Florida Senate - 2009                             CS for SB 2016
       
       
       
       By the Committee on Community Affairs; and Senator Bennett
       
       
       
       
       578-04899A-09                                         20092016c1
    1                        A bill to be entitled                      
    2         An act relating to environmental permitting; amending
    3         s. 373.4144, F.S.; providing legislative intent;
    4         requiring the Department of Environmental Protection
    5         to pursue the issuance of a state programmatic permit
    6         or regional general permits from the United States
    7         Army Corps of Engineers; revising provisions requiring
    8         the Department of Environmental Protection to develop
    9         and use a mechanism consolidating federal and state
   10         wetland permitting programs; authorizing
   11         implementation of a state programmatic general permit
   12         or regional general permits by the department and
   13         water management districts for certain dredge and fill
   14         activities; specifying conditions applicable to such
   15         permits; amending s. 373.4211, F.S.; delaying the
   16         effective date of a rule adding slash pine and
   17         gallberry to the list of facultative plants; revising
   18         provisions concerning the methodologies used to
   19         delineate the landward extent of wetlands and surface
   20         waters; revising provisions concerning the vegetative
   21         index used to delineate the landward extent of
   22         wetlands and surface waters; providing for permit
   23         modification under certain circumstances; providing
   24         for certain declaratory statements or formal
   25         jurisdictional determinations from the department or a
   26         water management district; providing exemptions for
   27         certain permit petitions and applications relating to
   28         specified activities; creating ss. 125.0112, F.S.;
   29         providing that the construction and operation of a
   30         biofuel processing facility or a renewable energy
   31         generating facility and the cultivation and production
   32         of bioenergy may be considered a valid industrial,
   33         agricultural, and silvicultural use for purposes of
   34         any local comprehensive plan; providing for a local
   35         government to establish an expedited review process
   36         under certain circumstances; providing that local
   37         expedited review does not obligate a local government
   38         to approve proposed uses; providing for alternative
   39         state review of certain plan amendments; providing the
   40         construction and operation of certain facilities may
   41         not affect classification of property for ad valorem
   42         tax purposes; amending s. 373.236, F.S.; requiring
   43         that a permit for the use of water for cultivating
   44         agricultural products and renewable energy be granted
   45         for a specified number of years if certain conditions
   46         are met; providing requirements for permittees;
   47         providing an exemption; amending s. 403.973, F.S.;
   48         providing for the expedited review of permit
   49         applications for projects resulting in the production
   50         of biofuels or in the construction of a biofuel or
   51         biodiesel processing facility or renewable energy
   52         generating facility; clarifying provisions relating to
   53         memoranda of agreement which establish regional teams
   54         for the expedited review of such applications;
   55         providing an effective date.
   56  
   57  Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
   58  
   59         Section 1. Section 373.4144, Florida Statutes, is amended
   60  to read:
   61         373.4144 Federal environmental permitting.—
   62         (1) The Legislature intends to facilitate coordination and
   63  a more efficient process of implementing regulatory duties and
   64  functions between the Department of Environmental Protection,
   65  the water management districts, the United States Army Corps of
   66  Engineers, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the
   67  National Marine Fisheries Service, the United States
   68  Environmental Protection Agency, the Fish and Wildlife
   69  Conservation Commission, and other relevant federal and state
   70  agencies. The department is directed to develop, on or before
   71  October 1, 2005, a mechanism or plan to consolidate, to the
   72  maximum extent practicable, the federal and state wetland
   73  permitting programs. It is the intent of the Legislature that
   74  all dredge and fill activities impacting 10 acres or less of
   75  wetlands or waters, including navigable waters, be processed by
   76  the state as part of the environmental resource permitting
   77  program implemented by the department and the water management
   78  districts. The resulting mechanism or plan shall analyze and
   79  propose the development of an expanded state programmatic
   80  general permit program in conjunction with the United States
   81  Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to s. 404 of the Clean Water
   82  Act, Pub. L. No. 92-500, as amended, 33 U.S.C. ss. 1251 et seq.,
   83  and s. 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Alternatively,
   84  or in combination with an expanded state programmatic general
   85  permit, the mechanism or plan may propose the creation of a
   86  series of regional general permits issued by the United States
   87  Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to the referenced statutes. All
   88  of the regional general permits must be administered by the
   89  department or the water management districts or their designees.
   90         (2)(a)The department shall pursue the issuance by the
   91  United States Army Corps of Engineers, pursuant to state and
   92  federal law and as set forth in this section, of an expanded
   93  state programmatic general permit or a series of regional
   94  general permits for categories of activities in waters of the
   95  United States governed by the Clean Water Act and in navigable
   96  waters under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, which are
   97  similar in nature, which will cause only minimal adverse
   98  environmental effects when performed separately, and which will
   99  have only minimal cumulative adverse effects on the environment.
  100         (b)The department is directed to:
  101         1.Use the mechanism of a state general permit or regional
  102  general permits to eliminate overlapping federal regulations and
  103  state rules that seek to protect the same resource and to avoid
  104  duplication of permitting between the United States Army Corps
  105  of Engineers and the department for minor work located in waters
  106  of the United States, including navigable waters, thus
  107  eliminating, in appropriate cases, the need for a separate
  108  individual approval from the United States Army Corps of
  109  Engineers while ensuring the most stringent protection of
  110  wetland resources; and
  111         2.Not seek issuance of or take any action pursuant to any
  112  such permits unless the conditions are at least as protective of
  113  the environment and natural resources as existing state law
  114  under this part and federal law under the Clean Water Act and
  115  the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
  116         (c)The department shall report to the Legislature by
  117  January 15 of each year on efforts to eliminate impediments to
  118  achieving greater efficiencies through expansion of a state
  119  programmatic general permit or regional general permits.
  120         (3)(2)To effectuate efficient wetland permitting and avoid
  121  duplication, the department and water management districts may
  122  implement a voluntary state programmatic general permit for all
  123  dredge and fill activities impacting 5 acres or less of wetlands
  124  or other surface waters, including navigable waters, subject to
  125  agreement with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, if the
  126  general permit is at least as protective of the environment and
  127  natural resources as existing state law under this part and
  128  federal law under the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors
  129  Act of 1899. This subsection does not prevent the department or
  130  water management districts from pursuing and implementing a
  131  state programmatic permit for projects impacting more than 5
  132  acres of wetlands or other surface waters. The department is
  133  directed to file with the Speaker of the House of
  134  Representatives and the President of the Senate a report
  135  proposing any required federal and state statutory changes that
  136  would be necessary to accomplish the directives listed in this
  137  section and to coordinate with the Florida Congressional
  138  Delegation on any necessary changes to federal law to implement
  139  the directives.
  140         (4)(3)Nothing in This section does not shall be construed
  141  to preclude the department from pursuing a series of regional
  142  general permits for construction activities in wetlands or
  143  surface waters or the complete assumption of federal permitting
  144  programs regulating the discharge of dredged or fill material
  145  pursuant to s. 404 of the Clean Water Act, Pub. L. No. 92-500,
  146  as amended, 33 U.S.C. ss. 1251 et seq., and s. 10 of the Rivers
  147  and Harbors Act of 1899, so long as the assumption encompasses
  148  all dredge and fill activities in, on, or over jurisdictional
  149  wetlands or waters, including navigable waters, within the
  150  state.
  151         (5)(a)In order to assist in facilitating the objectives of
  152  this section and to promote consistency between federal and
  153  state mitigation requirements, the department and water
  154  management districts shall compare their rules regarding
  155  mitigation for adverse impacts to the mitigation rules of the
  156  United States Army Corps of Engineers and the United States
  157  Environmental Protection Agency in 73 Federal Register, pages
  158  19594-19705 (2008). The comparison shall be done in consultation
  159  with appropriate representatives of the United States Army Corps
  160  of Engineers and the United States Environmental Protection
  161  Agency. After performing the comparison, the department and
  162  water management districts shall:
  163         1.Identify any inconsistent or contradictory provisions;
  164  and
  165         2.Recommend appropriate revisions to the rules of the
  166  department or water management districts to reduce inconsistent
  167  or contradictory requirements in such a manner that will not
  168  lessen environmental protection. The recommendations shall
  169  include a consideration for increasing the geographic size of
  170  drainage basins and regional watersheds to facilitate or reflect
  171  a watershed approach to mitigation.
  172         (b)The department and water management districts shall
  173  submit a consolidated report regarding the requirements of this
  174  subsection to the Governor, the Chair of the Senate
  175  Environmental Preservation and Conservation Committee, and the
  176  Chair of the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy
  177  Committee by January 15, 2010. If the department and water
  178  management districts believe any conflicting state law prevents
  179  them from amending their rules to achieve the objectives of this
  180  subsection, the report must identify such law and explain why it
  181  prevents a rule amendment to achieve the objectives of this
  182  subsection.
  183         Section 2. Subsection (19) of section 373.4211, Florida
  184  Statutes, is amended to read:
  185         373.4211 Ratification of chapter 17-340, Florida
  186  Administrative Code, on the delineation of the landward extent
  187  of wetlands and surface waters.—Pursuant to s. 373.421, the
  188  Legislature ratifies chapter 17-340, Florida Administrative
  189  Code, approved on January 13, 1994, by the Environmental
  190  Regulation Commission, with the following changes:
  191         (19)(a) Rule 17-340.450(3) is amended by adding, after the
  192  species list, the following language:
  193         “Within Monroe County and the Key Largo portion of Miami
  194  Dade County only, the following species shall be listed as
  195  facultative: Alternanthera paronychioides, Byrsonima lucida,
  196  Ernodea littoralis, Guapira discolor, Marnilkara bahamensis,
  197  Pisonis rotundata, Pithecellobium keyensis, Pithecellobium
  198  unquis-cati, Randia aculeata, Reynosia septentrionalis, and
  199  Thrinax radiata.”
  200         (b)Pursuant to s. 373.421 and subject to the conditions
  201  described in this paragraph, the Legislature ratifies the
  202  changes to rule 62-340.450(3), Florida Administrative Code,
  203  approved on February 23, 2006, by the Environmental Regulation
  204  Commission which added slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and
  205  gallberry (Ilex glabra) to the list of facultative plants.
  206  However, this ratification and the rule revision will not take
  207  effect until a voluntary state programmatic general permit for
  208  all dredge and fill activities affecting 5 acres or less of
  209  wetlands or other surface waters is implemented as provided in
  210  s. 373.4144(3).
  211         (c)Unless the holder of a valid permit elects to use the
  212  delineation line as amended to add slash pine (Pinus elliottii)
  213  and gallberry (Ilex glabra) to the list of facultative plants,
  214  the surface water and wetland delineations identified and
  215  approved by a permit issued under rules adopted under this part
  216  before July 1, 2009, remain valid until expiration of the
  217  permit, notwithstanding the changes to rule 62-340.450(3),
  218  Florida Administrative Code, as described in this subsection.
  219  For purposes of this paragraph, the term “identified and
  220  approved” means:
  221         1.The delineation was field-verified by the permitting
  222  agency and such verification was surveyed as part of the
  223  application review process for the permit; or
  224         2.The delineation was field-verified by the permitting
  225  agency and approved pursuant to the permit.
  226  
  227  Where surface water and wetland delineations were not identified
  228  and approved pursuant to the permit issued under rules adopted
  229  under this part, delineations within the geographical area to
  230  which the permit applies shall be determined pursuant to the
  231  rules applicable at the time the permit was issued,
  232  notwithstanding the changes to rule 62-340.450(3), Florida
  233  Administrative Code, as described in this subsection. This
  234  paragraph also applies to any modification of the permit issued
  235  under rules adopted pursuant to this part which does not
  236  constitute a substantial modification within the geographical
  237  area to which the permit applies.
  238         (d)Unless the petitioner elects to use the delineation
  239  line as amended to add slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and
  240  gallberry (Ilex glabra) to the list of facultative plants, any
  241  declaratory statement issued by the department under s. 403.914,
  242  1984 Supplement to the Florida Statutes 1983 as amended,
  243  pursuant to rules adopted thereunder, or formal determination
  244  issued by the department or a water management district under s.
  245  373.421, in response to a petition filed on or before July 1,
  246  2009, shall continue to be valid for the duration of such
  247  declaratory statement or formal determination. Any petition
  248  pending on or before July 1, 2009, is exempt from the changes to
  249  rule 62-340.450(3), Florida Administrative Code, as described in
  250  this subsection, and is subject to the provisions of chapter 62
  251  340, Florida Administrative Code, in effect prior to such
  252  change. Activities proposed within the boundaries of a valid
  253  declaratory statement or formal determination issued pursuant to
  254  a petition submitted to the department or the relevant water
  255  management district on or before July 1, 2009, or within the
  256  boundaries of a revalidated jurisdictional determination prior
  257  to its expiration, shall continue to be exempt after July 1,
  258  2009 from the changes to rule 62-340.450(3), Florida
  259  Administrative Code, as described in this subsection.
  260         Section 3. Section 125.0112, Florida Statutes, is created
  261  to read:
  262         125.0112Biofuels and renewable energy.—The construction
  263  and operation of a biofuel processing facility or a renewable
  264  energy generating facility, as defined in s. 366.91(2)(d), and
  265  the cultivation and production of bioenergy, as defined in s.
  266  570.957(1)(a), may be considered by a local government to be a
  267  valid industrial, agricultural, and silvicultural use permitted
  268  within those land use categories in the local comprehensive land
  269  use plan. If the local comprehensive plan does not specifically
  270  allow for the construction of a biofuel processing facility or
  271  renewable energy facility, the local government shall establish
  272  a specific review process that may include expediting local
  273  review of any necessary comprehensive plan amendment, zoning
  274  change, use permit, waiver, variance, or special exemption.
  275  Local expedited review of a proposed biofuel processing facility
  276  or a renewable energy facility does not obligate a local
  277  government to approved such proposed use. A comprehensive plan
  278  amendment necessary to accommodate a biofuel processing facility
  279  or renewable energy facility shall, if approved by the local
  280  government, be eligible for the alternative state review process
  281  in s. 163.32465. The construction and operation of a facility
  282  and related improvements on a portion of a property under this
  283  section may not affect the remainder of the property’s
  284  classification as agricultural under s. 193.461.
  285         Section 4. Subsection (6) is added to section 373.236,
  286  Florida Statutes, to read:
  287         373.236 Duration of permits; compliance reports.—
  288         (6)A permit that is approved for the use of water for a
  289  renewable energy operating facility or for cultivating
  290  agricultural products on lands consisting of 1,000 acres or more
  291  for renewable energy, as defined in s. 366.91(2)(d), shall, upon
  292  the applicant’s request, be granted for a term of at least 25
  293  years based on the anticipated life of the facility if there is
  294  sufficient data to provide reasonable assurance that the
  295  conditions for issuing a permit will be met for the duration of
  296  the permit. However, a permit may be issued for a shorter
  297  duration that reflects the longest period for which such
  298  reasonable assurances are provided. The permittee shall provide
  299  a compliance report every 5 years during the term of the permit
  300  as required under subsection (4).
  301         Section 5. Subsection (4) of section 373.243, Florida
  302  Statutes, is amended to read:
  303         373.243 Revocation of permits.—The governing board or the
  304  department may revoke a permit as follows:
  305         (4) For nonuse of the water supply allowed by the permit
  306  for a period of 2 years or more, the governing board or the
  307  department may revoke the permit permanently and in whole unless
  308  the user can prove that his or her nonuse was due to extreme
  309  hardship caused by factors beyond the user’s control. However,
  310  for a permit with a duration determined under s. 373.236(6), the
  311  governing board or the department may revoke the permit only if
  312  the nonuse of the water supply allowed by the permit is for a
  313  period of 4 years or more.
  314         Section 6. Subsections (3), (4), (7), and (11), paragraph
  315  (b) of subsection (13), paragraph (b) of subsection (14),
  316  subsection (15), and paragraph (b) of subsection (19) of section
  317  403.973, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
  318         403.973 Expedited permitting; comprehensive plan
  319  amendments.—
  320         (3)(a) The Governor, through the office, shall direct the
  321  creation of regional permit action teams, for the purpose of
  322  expediting review of permit applications and local comprehensive
  323  plan amendments submitted by:
  324         1. Businesses creating at least 100 jobs, or
  325         2. Businesses creating at least 50 jobs if the project is
  326  located in an enterprise zone, or in a county having a
  327  population of less than 75,000 or in a county having a
  328  population of less than 100,000 which is contiguous to a county
  329  having a population of less than 75,000, as determined by the
  330  most recent decennial census, residing in incorporated and
  331  unincorporated areas of the county., or
  332         (b) On a case-by-case basis and at the request of a county
  333  or municipal government, the office may certify as eligible for
  334  expedited review a project not meeting the minimum job creation
  335  thresholds but creating a minimum of 10 jobs. The recommendation
  336  from the governing body of the county or municipality in which
  337  the project may be located is required in order for the office
  338  to certify that any project is eligible for expedited review
  339  under this paragraph. When considering projects that do not meet
  340  the minimum job creation thresholds but that are recommended by
  341  the governing body in which the project may be located, the
  342  office shall consider economic impact factors that include, but
  343  are not limited to:
  344         1. The proposed wage and skill levels relative to those
  345  existing in the area in which the project may be located;
  346         2. The project’s potential to diversify and strengthen the
  347  area’s economy;
  348         3. The amount of capital investment; and
  349         4. The number of jobs that will be made available for
  350  persons served by the welfare transition program.
  351         (c) At the request of a county or municipal government, the
  352  office or a Quick Permitting County may certify projects located
  353  in counties where the ratio of new jobs per participant in the
  354  welfare transition program, as determined by Workforce Florida,
  355  Inc., is less than one or otherwise critical, as eligible for
  356  the expedited permitting process. Such projects must meet the
  357  numerical job creation criteria of this subsection, but the jobs
  358  created by the project do not have to be high-wage jobs that
  359  diversify the state’s economy.
  360         (d) Projects located in a designated brownfield area are
  361  eligible for the expedited permitting process.
  362         (e) Projects that are part of the state-of-the-art
  363  biomedical research institution and campus to be established in
  364  this state by the grantee under s. 288.955 are eligible for the
  365  expedited permitting process, if the projects are designated as
  366  part of the institution or campus by the board of county
  367  commissioners of the county in which the institution and campus
  368  are established.
  369         (f)Projects that result in the production of biofuels
  370  cultivated on lands consisting of 1,000 acres or more, or in the
  371  construction of a biofuel or biodiesel processing facility or
  372  renewable energy generating facility as defined in s.
  373  366.91(2)(d), are eligible for the expedited permitting process.
  374         (4) The regional teams shall be established through the
  375  execution of memoranda of agreement developed by the applicant
  376  and between the office with input solicited from and the
  377  respective heads of the Department of Environmental Protection,
  378  the Department of Community Affairs, the Department of
  379  Transportation and its district offices, the Department of
  380  Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Fish and Wildlife
  381  Conservation Commission, appropriate regional planning councils,
  382  appropriate water management districts, and voluntarily
  383  participating municipalities and counties. The memoranda of
  384  agreement must should also accommodate participation in the this
  385  expedited process by other local governments and federal
  386  agencies as circumstances warrant.
  387         (7) An appeal At the option of the participating local
  388  government, appeals of a local government’s its final approval
  389  for a project must may be conducted pursuant to the summary
  390  hearing provisions in of s. 120.574, pursuant to subsection
  391  (14), and consolidated with the challenge of applicable state
  392  agency actions, if any or pursuant to other appellate processes
  393  available to the local government. The local government’s
  394  decision to enter into a summary hearing must be made as
  395  provided in s. 120.574 or in the memorandum of agreement.
  396         (11) The standard form memorandum memoranda of agreement
  397  must shall include guidelines to be used in working with state,
  398  regional, and local permitting authorities. Guidelines may
  399  include, but are not limited to, the following:
  400         (a) A central contact point for filing permit applications
  401  and local comprehensive plan amendments and for obtaining
  402  information on permit and local comprehensive plan amendment
  403  requirements;
  404         (b) Identification of the individual or individuals within
  405  each respective agency who will be responsible for processing
  406  the expedited permit application or local comprehensive plan
  407  amendment for the that agency;
  408         (c) A mandatory preapplication review process to reduce
  409  permitting conflicts by providing guidance to applicants
  410  regarding the permits needed from each agency and governmental
  411  entity, site planning and development, site suitability and
  412  limitations, facility design, and steps the applicant can take
  413  to ensure expeditious permit application and local comprehensive
  414  plan amendment review. As a part of the this process, the first
  415  interagency meeting to discuss a project shall be held within 14
  416  days after the office’s determination that the project is
  417  eligible for expedited review. Subsequent interagency meetings
  418  may be scheduled to accommodate the needs of participating local
  419  governments that are unable to meet public notice requirements
  420  for executing a memorandum of agreement within the this
  421  timeframe. Such This accommodation may not exceed 45 days from
  422  the office’s determination that the project is eligible for
  423  expedited review;
  424         (d) The preparation of a single coordinated project
  425  description form and checklist and an agreement by state and
  426  regional agencies to reduce the burden on an applicant to
  427  provide duplicate information to multiple agencies;
  428         (e) Establishment of A process for the adoption and review
  429  of any comprehensive plan amendment needed by any certified
  430  project within 90 days after the submission of an application
  431  for a comprehensive plan amendment. However, the memorandum of
  432  agreement may not prevent affected persons as defined in s.
  433  163.3184 from appealing or participating in the this expedited
  434  plan amendment process and any review or appeals of decisions
  435  made under this paragraph; and
  436         (f) Additional incentives for an applicant who proposes a
  437  project that provides a net ecosystem benefit.
  438         (13) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law:
  439         (b) Projects that are qualified under this section are not
  440  subject to interstate highway level-of-service standards adopted
  441  by the Department of Transportation for concurrency purposes.
  442  The memorandum of agreement specified in subsection (5) must
  443  include a process by which the applicant will be assessed a fair
  444  share of the cost of mitigating the project’s significant
  445  traffic impacts, as defined in chapter 380 and related rules.
  446  The agreement must also specify whether the significant traffic
  447  impacts on the interstate system will be mitigated through the
  448  implementation of a project or payment of funds to the
  449  Department of Transportation. If Where funds are paid, the
  450  Department of Transportation must include in the 5-year work
  451  program transportation projects or project phases, in an amount
  452  equal to the funds received, to mitigate the traffic impacts
  453  associated with the proposed project.
  454         (14)
  455         (b) Challenges to state agency action in the expedited
  456  permitting process for establishment of a state-of-the-art
  457  biomedical research institution and campus in the this state by
  458  the grantee under s. 288.955 or a project identified in
  459  paragraph (3)(f) are subject to the same requirements as
  460  challenges brought under paragraph (a), except that,
  461  notwithstanding s. 120.574, summary proceedings must be
  462  conducted within 30 days after a party files the motion for
  463  summary hearing, regardless of whether the parties agree to the
  464  summary proceeding.
  465         (15) The office, working with the agencies that provide
  466  input to participating in the memoranda of agreement, shall
  467  review sites proposed for the location of facilities eligible
  468  for the Innovation Incentive Program under s. 288.1089. Within
  469  20 days after the request for the review by the office, the
  470  agencies shall provide to the office a statement as to each
  471  site’s necessary permits under local, state, and federal law and
  472  an identification of significant permitting issues, which if
  473  unresolved, may result in the denial of an agency permit or
  474  approval or any significant delay caused by the permitting
  475  process.
  476         (19) The following projects are ineligible for review under
  477  this part:
  478         (b) A project, the primary purpose of which is to:
  479         1. Effect the final disposal of solid waste, biomedical
  480  waste, or hazardous waste in this state.
  481         2. Produce electrical power, unless the production of
  482  electricity is incidental and not the primary function of the
  483  project or the electrical power is derived from a renewable
  484  energy fuel source as defined in s. 366.91(2)(d).
  485         3. Extract natural resources.
  486         4. Produce oil.
  487         5. Construct, maintain, or operate an oil, petroleum,
  488  natural gas, or sewage pipeline.
  489         Section 7. This act shall take effect July 1, 2009.