1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act for the relief of Eric Brody by the Broward County |
3 | Sheriff's Office; providing for an appropriation to |
4 | compensate Eric Brody for injuries sustained as a result |
5 | of the negligence of the Broward County Sheriff's Office; |
6 | authorizing the Sheriff of Broward County, in lieu of |
7 | payment, to execute to Eric Brody and his legal guardians |
8 | an assignment of all claims that the Broward County |
9 | Sheriff's Office has against its insurer arising out of |
10 | the insurer's handling of the claim against the sheriff's |
11 | office; clarifying that such assignment does not impair |
12 | the ability or right of the assignees to pursue the final |
13 | judgment and cost judgment against the insurer; providing |
14 | a limitation on the payment of fees and costs related to |
15 | the claim against the Broward County Sheriff's Office and |
16 | an exception to that limitation as to any assigned claims |
17 | brought against the insurer; providing an effective date. |
18 |
|
19 | WHEREAS, on the evening of March 3, 1998, 18-year-old Eric |
20 | Brody, a college-bound high school senior, was returning home |
21 | from his part-time job at the Sawgrass Mills Sports Authority. |
22 | Eric was driving his 1982 AMC Concord eastbound on Oakland Park |
23 | Boulevard in Sunrise, Florida, and |
24 | WHEREAS, that same evening, Broward County Sheriff's Deputy |
25 | Christopher Thieman, who had been visiting his girlfriend and |
26 | was running late for duty, was driving his Broward County |
27 | Sheriff's Office cruiser westbound on Oakland Park Boulevard. At |
28 | the time he left his girlfriend's house, Deputy Thieman had less |
29 | than 15 minutes to travel 11 miles to make roll call on time, |
30 | which was mandatory pursuant to sheriff's office policy and |
31 | procedure, and |
32 | WHEREAS, at approximately 10:36 p.m., Eric Brody began to |
33 | make a left-hand turn into his neighborhood at the intersection |
34 | of N.W. 117th Avenue and Oakland Park Boulevard. Deputy Thieman, |
35 | who was driving in excess of the 45-mile-per-hour posted speed |
36 | limit and traveling in the opposite direction, was not within |
37 | the intersection and was more than 430 feet away from Eric |
38 | Brody's car when Eric Brody began the turn. Eric Brody's car |
39 | cleared two of the three westbound lanes on Oakland Park |
40 | Boulevard, and |
41 | WHEREAS, Deputy Thieman, who was traveling in the inside |
42 | westbound lane closest to the median, suddenly and inexplicably |
43 | steered his vehicle to the right, across the center lane and |
44 | into the outside lane, where the front end of his car struck the |
45 | passenger side of Eric's car with great force, just behind the |
46 | right front wheel and near the passenger door, and |
47 | WHEREAS, Deputy Thieman testified at trial that he knew |
48 | that the posted speed limit was 45 miles per hour, but he |
49 | refused to provide an estimate as to how fast he was traveling |
50 | before the crash, and |
51 | WHEREAS, despite the appearance of a conflict of interest, |
52 | the Broward County Sheriff's Office chose to conduct the |
53 | official crash investigation instead of deferring to the City of |
54 | Sunrise Police Department, which also had jurisdiction, or the |
55 | Florida Highway Patrol (FHP), which often investigates motor |
56 | vehicle collisions involving non-FHP law enforcement officers so |
57 | as to avoid any possible conflict of interest, and |
58 | WHEREAS, in the course of the investigation, the Broward |
59 | County Sheriff's Office lost key evidence from the crashed |
60 | vehicles and did not report any witnesses even though the first |
61 | responders to the crash scene were police officers from the City |
62 | of Sunrise, and |
63 | WHEREAS, the Broward County detective who led the crash |
64 | investigation entered inaccurate data into a computerized |
65 | accident reconstruction program which skewed the speed at which |
66 | Deputy Thieman was driving, but, nevertheless, determined that |
67 | he was still traveling well over the speed limit, and |
68 | WHEREAS, accident reconstruction experts called by both |
69 | parties testified that Deputy Thieman was driving at least 60 to |
70 | more than 70 miles per hour when his vehicle slammed into the |
71 | passenger side of Eric Brody's car, and |
72 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody was found unconscious 6 minutes later |
73 | by paramedics, his head and upper torso leaning upright and |
74 | toward the passenger-side door. Although he was out of his |
75 | shoulder harness and seat belt by the time paramedics arrived, |
76 | the Brodys' attorney proved that Eric was wearing his seat belt |
77 | and that the 16-year-old seat belt buckle failed during the |
78 | crash. Photographs taken at the scene by the sheriff's office |
79 | investigators showed the belt to be fully spooled out because |
80 | the retractor was jammed, with the belt dangling outside the |
81 | vehicle from the driver-side door, providing proof that Eric |
82 | Brody was wearing his seat belt and shoulder harness during the |
83 | crash, and |
84 | WHEREAS, accident reconstruction and human factor experts |
85 | called by both the plaintiff and the defendant agreed that if |
86 | Deputy Thieman had been driving at the speed limit, Eric Brody |
87 | would have easily completed his turn, and |
88 | WHEREAS, the experts also agreed that if Deputy Thieman |
89 | simply remained within his lane of travel, regardless of his |
90 | speed, there would not have been a collision, and |
91 | WHEREAS, in order to investigate the seat-belt defense, |
92 | experts for Eric Brody recreated the accident using an exact |
93 | car-to-car crash test that was conducted by a nationally |
94 | recognized crash test facility. The crash test involved vehicles |
95 | identical to the Brody and Thieman vehicles, a fully |
96 | instrumented hybrid III dummy, and high-speed action cameras, |
97 | and |
98 | WHEREAS, the crash test proved that Eric Brody was wearing |
99 | his restraint system during the crash because the seat-belted |
100 | test dummy struck its head on the passenger door within inches |
101 | of where Eric Brody's head actually struck the passenger door, |
102 | and |
103 | WHEREAS, when Eric Brody's head struck the passenger door |
104 | of his vehicle, the door crushed inward from the force of the |
105 | impact with the police cruiser while at the same time his upper |
106 | torso was moving toward the point of impact and the passenger |
107 | door. The impact resulted in skull fractures and massive brain |
108 | sheering, bleeding, bruising, and swelling, and |
109 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody was airlifted by helicopter to Broward |
110 | General Hospital where he was placed on a ventilator and |
111 | underwent an emergency craniotomy and neurosurgery. He began to |
112 | recover from a deep coma more than 7 months after his injury and |
113 | underwent extensive rehabilitation, having to relearn how to |
114 | walk, talk, feed himself, and perform other basic functions, and |
115 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody, who is now 30 years old, has been left |
116 | profoundly brain-injured, lives with his parents, and is mostly |
117 | isolated from his former friends and other young people his age. |
118 | His speech is barely intelligible and he has significant |
119 | cognitive dysfunction, judgment impairment, memory loss, and |
120 | neuro-visual disabilities. Eric Brody also has impaired fine and |
121 | gross motor skills and very poor balance. Although Eric is able |
122 | to use a walker for short distances, he mostly uses a wheelchair |
123 | to get around. The entire left side of his body is partially |
124 | paralyzed and spastic, and he needs help with many of his daily |
125 | functions. Eric Brody is permanently and totally disabled; |
126 | however, he has a normal life expectancy, and |
127 | WHEREAS, the cost of Eric Brody's life care plan is nearly |
128 | $10 million, and he has been left totally dependent on public |
129 | health programs and taxpayer assistance since 1998, and |
130 | WHEREAS, the Broward County Sheriff's Office was insured |
131 | for this claim through Ranger Insurance Company and paid more |
132 | than $400,000 for liability coverage that has a policy limit of |
133 | $3 million, and |
134 | WHEREAS, Ranger Insurance Company ignored seven demand |
135 | letters and other attempts by the Brodys to settle the case for |
136 | the policy limit, and instead chose to wait for more than 7 |
137 | years following the date of the accident until the day the trial |
138 | judge specially set the case for trial before offering to pay |
139 | the policy limit. By that time nearly $750,000 had been spent |
140 | preparing the case for trial, and Eric Brody had past due bills |
141 | and liens of nearly $1.5 million for health and rehabilitative |
142 | care services. Because of the considerable expenditure of money |
143 | in preparing the case for trial, the exorbitant costs of Eric |
144 | Brody's medical bills and liens, and the continually escalating |
145 | costs of future care, settlement for the policy limit was no |
146 | longer feasible, and |
147 | WHEREAS, on December 1, 2005, after a 2-month trial, a |
148 | Broward County jury consisting of three men and three women |
149 | found that that Deputy Thieman and the Broward County Sheriff's |
150 | Office were 100 percent negligent, and Eric Brody was not |
151 | comparatively negligent, and |
152 | WHEREAS, the jury found Eric Brody's damages to be |
153 | $30,690,000, including a determination that his past and future |
154 | care and other economic damages were $11,326,216, and |
155 | WHEREAS, final judgment was entered for $30,690,000, and |
156 | the court entered a cost judgment for $270,372.30, for a total |
157 | of $30,960,372.30, and |
158 | WHEREAS, the court denied the Broward County Sheriff's |
159 | Office posttrial motions for judgment notwithstanding the |
160 | verdict, new trial, or remittitur, and |
161 | WHEREAS, the insurer of the Broward County Sheriff's Office |
162 | retained appellate counsel and elected to appeal the final |
163 | judgment but not the cost judgment, and |
164 | WHEREAS, the Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld the |
165 | verdict in the fall of 2007, and |
166 | WHEREAS, the insurer of the Broward County Sheriff's Office |
167 | subsequently petitioned the Florida Supreme Court to seek |
168 | another appeal, but the petition was denied in April of 2008, |
169 | and |
170 | WHEREAS, all legal remedies for all parties involved have |
171 | been exhausted and this case is ripe for a claim bill, and |
172 | WHEREAS, upon the passage of a claim bill for any amount in |
173 | excess of the insurance policy limit of $3 million, the Broward |
174 | County Sheriff's Office may have a cause of action pursuant to |
175 | state law against its insurer for bad-faith claims practices, |
176 | breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and other possible |
177 | legal remedies which may result in a recovery from the insurer |
178 | to pay all outstanding sums owed to the guardianship of Eric |
179 | Brody, and |
180 | WHEREAS, the Broward County Sheriff's Office has paid |
181 | $200,000 pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the final |
182 | judgment and cost judgment remainder in the amount of |
183 | $30,760,372.30 is sought through the submission of a claim bill |
184 | to the Legislature, and |
185 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody is willing to accept an assignment of |
186 | all claims the Broward County Sheriff's Office may have against |
187 | its insurer in lieu of the sheriff's office making any payment |
188 | on this claim, and |
189 | WHEREAS, if the Broward County Sheriff's Office assigns all |
190 | of its claims against its insurer to Eric Brody, he will not |
191 | hold the sheriff's office responsible for any payment, NOW, |
192 | THEREFORE, |
193 |
|
194 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
195 |
|
196 | Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act |
197 | are found and declared to be true. |
198 | Section 2. The Sheriff of Broward County is authorized and |
199 | directed to appropriate from funds of the Broward County |
200 | Sheriff's Office not otherwise appropriated and to draw a |
201 | warrant payable to Eric Brody in the sum of $30,760,372.30, or |
202 | all amounts that remain unpaid in accordance with the final |
203 | judgment and cost judgment as provided for in the preamble of |
204 | this act. In lieu of payment, the Sheriff of Broward County may |
205 | assign to Eric Brody and his legal guardians all rights it may |
206 | have against its liability insurance carrier for breach of |
207 | contract, breach of fiduciary duty, bad faith, and any similar |
208 | or related claims that may exist pursuant to state law. If the |
209 | Sheriff of Broward County makes an assignment to the claimant as |
210 | provided for in this section, the Broward County Sheriff's |
211 | Office is not responsible for any further payment to the |
212 | claimant. |
213 | Section 3. If the Sheriff of Broward County makes the |
214 | assignment permitted under section 2 of this act, the protection |
215 | given to the Broward County Sheriff's Office does not impair in |
216 | any respect the ability or right of the assignees to pursue the |
217 | final judgment and cost judgment against the insurer of the |
218 | Broward County Sheriff's Office, less the $200,000 already paid, |
219 | pursuant to state law. |
220 | Section 4. The amount paid by the Broward County Sheriff's |
221 | Office pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the amount |
222 | awarded under this act are intended to provide the sole |
223 | compensation for all claims against the Broward County Sheriff's |
224 | Office arising out of the facts described in this act which |
225 | resulted in the injuries to Eric Brody. The total amount of |
226 | attorney's fees, lobbying fees, costs, and other similar |
227 | expenses relating to the claim against the Broward County |
228 | Sheriff's Office may not exceed 25 percent of the total amount |
229 | awarded under sections 2 and 3 of this act. Any attorney's fees, |
230 | costs, and related expenses awarded by a court or earned |
231 | pursuant to the prosecution of an assigned claim are not limited |
232 | by this section and shall be earned in accordance with state |
233 | law. |
234 | Section 5. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |