Florida Senate - 2012 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for CS for SB 1860 Barcode 230376 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House . . . Floor: 4/AD/2R . 03/06/2012 05:01 PM . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Senator Diaz de la Portilla moved the following: 1 Senate Substitute for Amendment (202446) (with title 2 amendment) 3 4 Delete lines 1236 - 1240 5 and insert: 6ATTORNEY’SFEES.— 7 (a) With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss. 8 627.730-627.7405 between the insured and the insurer, or between 9 an assignee of an insured’s rights and the insurer, the 10 provisions of ss.s.627.428 and 768.79shallapply, except as 11 provided in subsections (10) and (15), and except that any 12 attorney fees recovered must: 13 1. Comply with prevailing professional standards; 14 2. Ensure that the attorney fees for work performed by an 15 attorney does not duplicate work performed by a paralegal or 16 legal assistant; and 17 3. Not overstate or inflate the number of hours reasonably 18 necessary for a case of comparable skill or complexity. 19 (b) Notwithstanding s. 627.428 and this subsection, it 20 shall be presumed that any attorney fees awarded under ss. 21 627.730-627.7405 are calculated without regard to a contingency 22 risk multiplier. This presumption may be overcome only if the 23 court makes findings of fact based upon competent evidence in 24 the record which establishes that: 25 1. The party requesting the multiplier would have faced 26 substantial difficulties finding competent counsel to pursue the 27 case in the relevant market but for the consideration of a fee 28 multiplier; 29 2. Consideration of a fee multiplier was a necessary 30 incentive to obtain competent counsel to pursue the case; 31 3. The claim would not be economically feasible to hire an 32 attorney on a noncontingent, fixed-fee basis; 33 4. The attorney was unable to mitigate the risk of 34 nonpayment of attorney fees in any other way; and 35 5. The use of a multiplier is justified based on factors 36 such as the amount of risk undertaken by the attorney at the 37 outset of the case, the results obtained, and the type of fee 38 arrangement between the attorney and client. 39 (c) Paragraph (b) does not apply to a case where class 40 action status has been sought or granted, and a contingency risk 41 multiplier may be applied in such cases notwithstanding 42 paragraph (b). 43 (d) Upon the request of either party, a judge must make 44 written findings, substantiated by evidence presented at trial 45 or any hearings associated with the trial, that an award of 46 attorney fees complies with this subsection. 47 48 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 49 And the title is amended as follows: 50 Between lines 75 and 76 51 insert: 52 providing criteria for the award of attorney fees; 53 providing a presumption regarding the use of a 54 contingency risk multiplier;