Florida Senate - 2016                        COMMITTEE AMENDMENT
       Bill No. SB 1190
       
       
       
       
       
       
                                Ì787538TÎ787538                         
       
                              LEGISLATIVE ACTION                        
                    Senate             .             House              
                  Comm: RCS            .                                
                  01/26/2016           .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————




       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
       The Committee on Community Affairs (Diaz de la Portilla)
       recommended the following:
       
    1         Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
    2  
    3         Delete everything after the enacting clause
    4  and insert:
    5         Section 1. Paragraph (c) of subsection (2), paragraph (e)
    6  of subsection (5), and paragraph (d) of subsection (7) of
    7  section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
    8         163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan
    9  amendment.—
   10         (2) COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PLAN AMENDMENTS.—
   11         (c) Plan amendments that are in an area of critical state
   12  concern designated pursuant to s. 380.05; propose a rural land
   13  stewardship area pursuant to s. 163.3248; propose a sector plan
   14  pursuant to s. 163.3245 or an amendment to an adopted sector
   15  plan; update a comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and
   16  appraisal pursuant to s. 163.3191; propose a development that is
   17  subject to the state coordinated review process qualifies as a
   18  development of regional impact pursuant to s. 380.06; or are new
   19  plans for newly incorporated municipalities adopted pursuant to
   20  s. 163.3167 must shall follow the state coordinated review
   21  process in subsection (4).
   22         (5) ADMINISTRATIVE CHALLENGES TO PLANS AND PLAN
   23  AMENDMENTS.—
   24         (e) If the administrative law judge recommends that the
   25  amendment be found in compliance, the judge shall submit the
   26  recommended order to the state land planning agency.
   27         1. If the state land planning agency determines that the
   28  plan amendment should be found not in compliance, the agency
   29  shall make every effort to refer the recommended order and its
   30  determination expeditiously to the Administration Commission for
   31  final agency action, but at a minimum within the time period
   32  provided by s. 120.569.
   33         2. If the state land planning agency determines that the
   34  plan amendment should be found in compliance, the agency shall
   35  make every effort to enter its final order expeditiously, but at
   36  a minimum within the time period provided by s. 120.569.
   37         3.The recommended order submitted under this paragraph
   38  becomes a final order 90 days after issuance unless the state
   39  land planning agency acts as provided in subparagraph 1. or
   40  subparagraph 2., or all parties consent in writing to an
   41  extension of the 90-day period.
   42         (7) MEDIATION AND EXPEDITIOUS RESOLUTION.—
   43         (d) For a case following the procedures under this
   44  subsection, absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances or
   45  written consent of the parties, if the administrative law judge
   46  recommends that the amendment be found not in compliance, the
   47  Administration Commission shall issue a final order, in a case
   48  proceeding under subsection (5), within 45 days after the
   49  issuance of the recommended order, unless the parties agree in
   50  writing to a longer time. If the administrative law judge
   51  recommends that the amendment be found in compliance, the state
   52  land planning agency shall issue a final order within 45 days
   53  after the issuance of the recommended order. If the state land
   54  planning agency fails to timely issue a final order, the
   55  recommended order finding the amendment to be in compliance
   56  immediately becomes final.
   57         Section 2. Subsection (1) of section 163.3245, Florida
   58  Statutes, is amended to read:
   59         163.3245 Sector plans.—
   60         (1) In recognition of the benefits of long-range planning
   61  for specific areas, local governments or combinations of local
   62  governments may adopt into their comprehensive plans a sector
   63  plan in accordance with this section. This section is intended
   64  to promote and encourage long-term planning for conservation,
   65  development, and agriculture on a landscape scale; to further
   66  support innovative and flexible planning and development
   67  strategies, and the purposes of this part and part I of chapter
   68  380; to facilitate protection of regionally significant
   69  resources, including, but not limited to, regionally significant
   70  water courses and wildlife corridors; and to avoid duplication
   71  of effort in terms of the level of data and analysis required
   72  for a development of regional impact, while ensuring the
   73  adequate mitigation of impacts to applicable regional resources
   74  and facilities, including those within the jurisdiction of other
   75  local governments, as would otherwise be provided. Sector plans
   76  are intended for substantial geographic areas that include at
   77  least 5,000 15,000 acres of one or more local governmental
   78  jurisdictions and are to emphasize urban form and protection of
   79  regionally significant resources and public facilities. A sector
   80  plan may not be adopted in an area of critical state concern.
   81         Section 3. Subsection (2) of section 171.046, Florida
   82  Statutes, is amended to read:
   83         171.046 Annexation of enclaves.—
   84         (2) In order to expedite the annexation of enclaves of 110
   85  10 acres or less into the most appropriate incorporated
   86  jurisdiction, based upon existing or proposed service provision
   87  arrangements, a municipality may:
   88         (a) Annex an enclave by interlocal agreement with the
   89  county having jurisdiction of the enclave; or
   90         (b) Annex an enclave with fewer than 25 registered voters
   91  by municipal ordinance when the annexation is approved in a
   92  referendum by at least 60 percent of the registered voters who
   93  reside in the enclave.
   94         Section 4. Subsection (14), paragraph (g) of subsection
   95  (15), paragraphs (b) and (e) of subsection (19), and subsection
   96  (30) of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
   97         380.06 Developments of regional impact.—
   98         (14) CRITERIA OUTSIDE AREAS OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN.—If
   99  the development is not located in an area of critical state
  100  concern, in considering whether the development is shall be
  101  approved, denied, or approved subject to conditions,
  102  restrictions, or limitations, the local government shall
  103  consider whether, and the extent to which:
  104         (a) The development is consistent with the local
  105  comprehensive plan and local land development regulations.;
  106         (b) The development is consistent with the report and
  107  recommendations of the regional planning agency submitted
  108  pursuant to subsection (12).; and
  109         (c) The development is consistent with the State
  110  Comprehensive Plan. In consistency determinations, the plan
  111  shall be construed and applied in accordance with s. 187.101(3).
  112  
  113  However, a local government may approve a change to a
  114  development authorized as a development of regional impact if
  115  the change has the effect of reducing the originally approved
  116  height, density, or intensity of the development, and if the
  117  revised development would have been consistent with the
  118  comprehensive plan in effect when the development was originally
  119  approved. If the revised development is approved, the developer
  120  may proceed as provided in s. 163.3167(5).
  121         (15) LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT ORDER.—
  122         (g) A local government may shall not issue a permit permits
  123  for a development subsequent to the buildout date contained in
  124  the development order unless:
  125         1. The proposed development has been evaluated cumulatively
  126  with existing development under the substantial deviation
  127  provisions of subsection (19) after subsequent to the
  128  termination or expiration date;
  129         2. The proposed development is consistent with an
  130  abandonment of development order that has been issued in
  131  accordance with the provisions of subsection (26);
  132         3. The development of regional impact is essentially built
  133  out, in that all the mitigation requirements in the development
  134  order have been satisfied, all developers are in compliance with
  135  all applicable terms and conditions of the development order
  136  except the buildout date, and the amount of proposed development
  137  that remains to be built is less than 40 percent of any
  138  applicable development-of-regional-impact threshold; or
  139         4. The project has been determined to be an essentially
  140  built out built-out development of regional impact through an
  141  agreement executed by the developer, the state land planning
  142  agency, and the local government, in accordance with s. 380.032,
  143  which will establish the terms and conditions under which the
  144  development may be continued. If the project is determined to be
  145  essentially built out, development may proceed pursuant to the
  146  s. 380.032 agreement after the termination or expiration date
  147  contained in the development order without further development
  148  of-regional-impact review subject to the local government
  149  comprehensive plan and land development regulations or subject
  150  to a modified development-of-regional-impact analysis. The
  151  parties may amend the agreement without submission, review, or
  152  approval of a notification of proposed change pursuant to
  153  subsection (19). For the purposes of As used in this paragraph,
  154  a an “essentially built-out” development of regional impact is
  155  essentially built out, if means:
  156         a. The developers are in compliance with all applicable
  157  terms and conditions of the development order except the
  158  buildout date; and
  159         b.(I) The amount of development that remains to be built is
  160  less than the substantial deviation threshold specified in
  161  paragraph (19)(b) for each individual land use category, or, for
  162  a multiuse development, the sum total of all unbuilt land uses
  163  as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation
  164  threshold is equal to or less than 100 percent; or
  165         (II) The state land planning agency and the local
  166  government have agreed in writing that the amount of development
  167  to be built does not create the likelihood of any additional
  168  regional impact not previously reviewed.
  169  
  170  The single-family residential portions of a development may be
  171  considered “essentially built out” if all of the workforce
  172  housing obligations and all of the infrastructure and horizontal
  173  development have been completed, at least 50 percent of the
  174  dwelling units have been completed, and more than 80 percent of
  175  the lots have been conveyed to third-party individual lot owners
  176  or to individual builders who own no more than 40 lots at the
  177  time of the determination. The mobile home park portions of a
  178  development may be considered “essentially built out” if all the
  179  infrastructure and horizontal development has been completed,
  180  and at least 50 percent of the lots are leased to individual
  181  mobile home owners. In order to accommodate changing market
  182  demands and achieve maximum land use efficiency in an
  183  essentially built out project, when a developer is building out
  184  a project, a local government, without the concurrence of the
  185  state land planning agency, may adopt a resolution authorizing
  186  the developer to exchange one approved land use for another
  187  approved land use specified in the agreement. Before issuance of
  188  a building permit pursuant to an exchange, the developer must
  189  demonstrate to the local government that the exchange ratio will
  190  not result in a net increase in impacts to public facilities and
  191  will meet all applicable requirements of the comprehensive plan
  192  and land development code.
  193         (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.—
  194         (b) Any proposed change to a previously approved
  195  development of regional impact or development order condition
  196  which, either individually or cumulatively with other changes,
  197  exceeds any of the following criteria in subparagraphs 1.-11.
  198  constitutes shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall
  199  cause the development to be subject to further development-of
  200  regional-impact review through the notice of proposed change
  201  process under this subsection. without the necessity for a
  202  finding of same by the local government:
  203         1. An increase in the number of parking spaces at an
  204  attraction or recreational facility by 15 percent or 500 spaces,
  205  whichever is greater, or an increase in the number of spectators
  206  that may be accommodated at such a facility by 15 percent or
  207  1,500 spectators, whichever is greater.
  208         2. A new runway, a new terminal facility, a 25 percent
  209  lengthening of an existing runway, or a 25 percent increase in
  210  the number of gates of an existing terminal, but only if the
  211  increase adds at least three additional gates.
  212         3. An increase in land area for office development by 15
  213  percent or an increase of gross floor area of office development
  214  by 15 percent or 100,000 gross square feet, whichever is
  215  greater.
  216         4. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 10
  217  percent or 55 dwelling units, whichever is greater.
  218         5. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 50
  219  percent or 200 units, whichever is greater, provided that 15
  220  percent of the proposed additional dwelling units are dedicated
  221  to affordable workforce housing, subject to a recorded land use
  222  restriction that shall be for a period of not less than 20 years
  223  and that includes resale provisions to ensure long-term
  224  affordability for income-eligible homeowners and renters and
  225  provisions for the workforce housing to be commenced before
  226  prior to the completion of 50 percent of the market rate
  227  dwelling. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term
  228  “affordable workforce housing” means housing that is affordable
  229  to a person who earns less than 120 percent of the area median
  230  income, or less than 140 percent of the area median income if
  231  located in a county in which the median purchase price for a
  232  single-family existing home exceeds the statewide median
  233  purchase price of a single-family existing home. For purposes of
  234  this subparagraph, the term “statewide median purchase price of
  235  a single-family existing home” means the statewide purchase
  236  price as determined in the Florida Sales Report, Single-Family
  237  Existing Homes, released each January by the Florida Association
  238  of Realtors and the University of Florida Real Estate Research
  239  Center.
  240         6. An increase in commercial development by 60,000 square
  241  feet of gross floor area or of parking spaces provided for
  242  customers for 425 cars or a 10 percent increase, whichever is
  243  greater.
  244         7. An increase in a recreational vehicle park area by 10
  245  percent or 110 vehicle spaces, whichever is less.
  246         8. A decrease in the area set aside for open space of 5
  247  percent or 20 acres, whichever is less.
  248         9. A proposed increase to an approved multiuse development
  249  of regional impact where the sum of the increases of each land
  250  use as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation
  251  criteria is equal to or exceeds 110 percent. The percentage of
  252  any decrease in the amount of open space shall be treated as an
  253  increase for purposes of determining when 110 percent has been
  254  reached or exceeded.
  255         10. A 15 percent increase in the number of external vehicle
  256  trips generated by the development above that which was
  257  projected during the original development-of-regional-impact
  258  review.
  259         11. Any change that would result in development of any area
  260  which was specifically set aside in the application for
  261  development approval or in the development order for
  262  preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened
  263  plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened, or
  264  species of special concern and their habitat, any species
  265  protected by 16 U.S.C. ss. 668a-668d, primary dunes, or
  266  archaeological and historical sites designated as significant by
  267  the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State.
  268  The refinement of the boundaries and configuration of such areas
  269  shall be considered under sub-subparagraph (e)2.j.
  270  
  271  The substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs
  272  3., 6., and 9., excluding residential uses, and in subparagraph
  273  10., are increased by 100 percent for a project certified under
  274  s. 403.973 which creates jobs and meets criteria established by
  275  the Department of Economic Opportunity as to its impact on an
  276  area’s economy, employment, and prevailing wage and skill
  277  levels. The substantial deviation numerical standards in
  278  subparagraphs 3., 4., 5., 6., 9., and 10. are increased by 50
  279  percent for a project located wholly within an urban infill and
  280  redevelopment area designated on the applicable adopted local
  281  comprehensive plan future land use map and not located within
  282  the coastal high hazard area.
  283         (e)1. Except for a development order rendered pursuant to
  284  subsection (22) or subsection (25), a proposed change to a
  285  development order which individually or cumulatively with any
  286  previous change is less than any numerical criterion contained
  287  in subparagraphs (b)1.-10. and does not exceed any other
  288  criterion, or which involves an extension of the buildout date
  289  of a development, or any phase thereof, of less than 5 years is
  290  not subject to the public hearing requirements of subparagraph
  291  (f)3., and is not subject to a determination pursuant to
  292  subparagraph (f)5. Notice of the proposed change shall be made
  293  to the regional planning council and the state land planning
  294  agency. Such notice must include a description of previous
  295  individual changes made to the development, including changes
  296  previously approved by the local government, and must include
  297  appropriate amendments to the development order.
  298         2. The following changes, individually or cumulatively with
  299  any previous changes, are not substantial deviations:
  300         a. Changes in the name of the project, developer, owner, or
  301  monitoring official.
  302         b. Changes to a setback which do not affect noise buffers,
  303  environmental protection or mitigation areas, or archaeological
  304  or historical resources.
  305         c. Changes to minimum lot sizes.
  306         d. Changes in the configuration of internal roads which do
  307  not affect external access points.
  308         e. Changes to the building design or orientation which stay
  309  approximately within the approved area designated for such
  310  building and parking lot, and which do not affect historical
  311  buildings designated as significant by the Division of
  312  Historical Resources of the Department of State.
  313         f. Changes to increase the acreage in the development, if
  314  no development is proposed on the acreage to be added.
  315         g. Changes to eliminate an approved land use, if there are
  316  no additional regional impacts.
  317         h. Changes required to conform to permits approved by any
  318  federal, state, or regional permitting agency, if these changes
  319  do not create additional regional impacts.
  320         i. Any renovation or redevelopment of development within a
  321  previously approved development of regional impact which does
  322  not change land use or increase density or intensity of use.
  323         j. Changes that modify boundaries and configuration of
  324  areas described in subparagraph (b)11. due to science-based
  325  refinement of such areas by survey, by habitat evaluation, by
  326  other recognized assessment methodology, or by an environmental
  327  assessment. In order for changes to qualify under this sub
  328  subparagraph, the survey, habitat evaluation, or assessment must
  329  occur before the time that a conservation easement protecting
  330  such lands is recorded and must not result in any net decrease
  331  in the total acreage of the lands specifically set aside for
  332  permanent preservation in the final development order.
  333         k. Changes that do not increase the number of external peak
  334  hour trips and do not reduce open space and conserved areas
  335  within the project except as otherwise permitted by sub
  336  subparagraph j.
  337         l. A phase date extension, if the state land planning
  338  agency, in consultation with the regional planning council and
  339  subject to the written concurrence of the Department of
  340  Transportation, agrees that the traffic impact is not
  341  significant and adverse under applicable state agency rules.
  342         m.l. Any other change that the state land planning agency,
  343  in consultation with the regional planning council, agrees in
  344  writing is similar in nature, impact, or character to the
  345  changes enumerated in sub-subparagraphs a.-l. a.-k. and that
  346  does not create the likelihood of any additional regional
  347  impact.
  348  
  349  This subsection does not require the filing of a notice of
  350  proposed change but requires an application to the local
  351  government to amend the development order in accordance with the
  352  local government’s procedures for amendment of a development
  353  order. In accordance with the local government’s procedures,
  354  including requirements for notice to the applicant and the
  355  public, the local government shall either deny the application
  356  for amendment or adopt an amendment to the development order
  357  which approves the application with or without conditions.
  358  Following adoption, the local government shall render to the
  359  state land planning agency the amendment to the development
  360  order. The state land planning agency may appeal, pursuant to s.
  361  380.07(3), the amendment to the development order if the
  362  amendment involves sub-subparagraph g., sub-subparagraph h.,
  363  sub-subparagraph j., sub-subparagraph k., or sub-subparagraph m.
  364  l. and if the agency believes that the change creates a
  365  reasonable likelihood of new or additional regional impacts.
  366         3. Except for the change authorized by sub-subparagraph
  367  2.f., any addition of land not previously reviewed or any change
  368  not specified in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) shall be
  369  presumed to create a substantial deviation. This presumption may
  370  be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.
  371         4. Any submittal of a proposed change to a previously
  372  approved development must include a description of individual
  373  changes previously made to the development, including changes
  374  previously approved by the local government. The local
  375  government shall consider the previous and current proposed
  376  changes in deciding whether such changes cumulatively constitute
  377  a substantial deviation requiring further development-of
  378  regional-impact review.
  379         5. The following changes to an approved development of
  380  regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial
  381  deviation. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and
  382  convincing evidence:.
  383         a. A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the acreage
  384  to a land use not previously approved in the development order.
  385  Changes of less than 15 percent shall be presumed not to create
  386  a substantial deviation.
  387         b. Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the
  388  contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases
  389  and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized
  390  multiuse development of regional impact which was originally
  391  approved with three or more uses specified in s. 380.0651(3)(c)
  392  and (d) and residential use.
  393         6. If a local government agrees to a proposed change, a
  394  change in the transportation proportionate share calculation and
  395  mitigation plan in an adopted development order as a result of
  396  recalculation of the proportionate share contribution meeting
  397  the requirements of s. 163.3180(5)(h) in effect as of the date
  398  of such change shall be presumed not to create a substantial
  399  deviation. For purposes of this subsection, the proposed change
  400  in the proportionate share calculation or mitigation plan may
  401  not be considered an additional regional transportation impact.
  402         (30) NEW PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS.—A new proposed development
  403  otherwise subject to the review requirements of this section
  404  shall be approved by a local government pursuant to s.
  405  163.3184(4) in lieu of proceeding in accordance with this
  406  section. However, if the proposed development is consistent with
  407  the comprehensive plan as provided in s. 163.3194(3)(b), the
  408  development is not required to undergo review pursuant to s.
  409  163.3184(4) or this section. This subsection does not apply to
  410  amendments to a development order governing an existing
  411  development of regional impact.
  412         Section 5. Paragraph (c) of subsection (4) of section
  413  380.0651, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
  414         380.0651 Statewide guidelines and standards.—
  415         (4) Two or more developments, represented by their owners
  416  or developers to be separate developments, shall be aggregated
  417  and treated as a single development under this chapter when they
  418  are determined to be part of a unified plan of development and
  419  are physically proximate to one other.
  420         (c) Aggregation is not applicable when the following
  421  circumstances and provisions of this chapter apply are
  422  applicable:
  423         1. Developments that which are otherwise subject to
  424  aggregation with a development of regional impact which has
  425  received approval through the issuance of a final development
  426  order may shall not be aggregated with the approved development
  427  of regional impact. However, nothing contained in this
  428  subparagraph does not shall preclude the state land planning
  429  agency from evaluating an allegedly separate development as a
  430  substantial deviation pursuant to s. 380.06(19) or as an
  431  independent development of regional impact.
  432         2. Two or more developments, each of which is independently
  433  a development of regional impact that has or will obtain a
  434  development order pursuant to s. 380.06.
  435         3. Completion of any development that has been vested
  436  pursuant to s. 380.05 or s. 380.06, including vested rights
  437  arising out of agreements entered into with the state land
  438  planning agency for purposes of resolving vested rights issues.
  439  Development-of-regional-impact review of additions to vested
  440  developments of regional impact shall not include review of the
  441  impacts resulting from the vested portions of the development.
  442         4. The developments sought to be aggregated were authorized
  443  to commence development before prior to September 1, 1988, and
  444  could not have been required to be aggregated under the law
  445  existing before prior to that date.
  446         5. Any development that qualifies for an exemption under s.
  447  380.06(29).
  448         6. Newly acquired lands intended for development in
  449  coordination with developed and existing development of regional
  450  impact are not subject to aggregation if such newly acquired
  451  lands comprise an area equal to, or less than, 10 percent of the
  452  total acreage subject to an existing development-of-regional
  453  impact development order.
  454         Section 6. Subsection (1) of section 380.115, Florida
  455  Statutes, is amended to read:
  456         380.115 Vested rights and duties; effect of size reduction,
  457  changes in guidelines and standards.—
  458         (1) A change in a development-of-regional-impact guideline
  459  and standard does not abridge or modify any vested or other
  460  right or any duty or obligation pursuant to any development
  461  order or agreement that is applicable to a development of
  462  regional impact. A development that has received a development
  463  of-regional-impact development order pursuant to s. 380.06, but
  464  is no longer required to undergo development-of-regional-impact
  465  review by operation of a change in the guidelines and standards,
  466  a development that or has reduced its size below the thresholds
  467  specified in s. 380.0651, or a development that is exempt
  468  pursuant to s. 380.06(24) or (29), or a development that elects
  469  to rescind the development order are shall be governed by the
  470  following procedures:
  471         (a) The development shall continue to be governed by the
  472  development-of-regional-impact development order and may be
  473  completed in reliance upon and pursuant to the development order
  474  unless the developer or landowner has followed the procedures
  475  for rescission in paragraph (b). Any proposed changes to those
  476  developments which continue to be governed by a development
  477  order must shall be approved pursuant to s. 380.06(19) as it
  478  existed before a change in the development-of-regional-impact
  479  guidelines and standards, except that all percentage criteria
  480  are shall be doubled and all other criteria are shall be
  481  increased by 10 percent. The development-of-regional-impact
  482  development order may be enforced by the local government as
  483  provided in by ss. 380.06(17) and 380.11.
  484         (b) If requested by the developer or landowner, the
  485  development-of-regional-impact development order shall be
  486  rescinded by the local government having jurisdiction upon a
  487  showing that all required mitigation related to the amount of
  488  development that existed on the date of rescission has been
  489  completed or will be completed under an existing permit or
  490  equivalent authorization issued by a governmental agency as
  491  defined in s. 380.031(6), if provided such permit or
  492  authorization is subject to enforcement through administrative
  493  or judicial remedies.
  494         Section 7. This act shall take effect July 1, 2016.
  495  
  496  ================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ================
  497  And the title is amended as follows:
  498         Delete everything before the enacting clause
  499  and insert:
  500                        A bill to be entitled                      
  501         An act relating to growth management; amending s.
  502         163.3184, F.S.; specifying that certain developments
  503         must follow the state coordinated review process;
  504         providing timeframes within which the Division of
  505         Administrative Hearings must transmit certain
  506         recommended orders to the Administration Commission;
  507         establishing deadlines for the state land planning
  508         agency to take action on recommended orders relating
  509         to certain plan amendments; providing a procedure for
  510         issuing a final order if the state land planning
  511         agency fails to take action; amending s. 163.3245,
  512         F.S.; revising the acreage thresholds for sector
  513         plans; amending s. 171.046, F.S.; revising the size of
  514         an enclave that a municipality may annex on an
  515         expedited basis; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; authorizing
  516         certain changes to approved developments of regional
  517         impact; authorizing parties to amend certain
  518         development agreements without submittal, review, or
  519         approval of a notification of proposed change;
  520         providing criteria under which one approved land use
  521         may be submitted for another approved land use in
  522         certain land development agreements under certain
  523         circumstances; specifying that certain proposed
  524         changes to certain developments are a substantial
  525         deviation; specifying that such developments must
  526         undergo further development-of-regional-impact review;
  527         providing that certain phase date extensions to amend
  528         a development order are not substantial deviations
  529         under certain circumstances; specifying conditions
  530         under which certain proposed developments are not
  531         required to undergo the state-coordinated review
  532         process; amending s. 380.0651, F.S.; providing that
  533         lands acquired for development are not subject to
  534         aggregation under certain circumstances; amending s.
  535         380.115, F.S.; providing the procedures to be used by
  536         a development that elects to rescind a development
  537         order; providing an effective date.