CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.

House Bill 3243

Florida House of Representatives - 1998 HB 3243 By Representatives Thrasher, Ritter, Bradley, Cosgrove, Flanagan, Byrd and Burroughs 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to evidence; amending s. 3 90.803, F.S.; revising an exception to the 4 prohibition against hearsay evidence; providing 5 an effective date. 6 7 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 8 9 Section 1. Subsection (22) of section 90.803, Florida 10 Statutes, is amended to read: 11 90.803 Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant 12 immaterial.--The provision of s. 90.802 to the contrary 13 notwithstanding, the following are not inadmissible as 14 evidence, even though the declarant is available as a witness: 15 (22) FORMER TESTIMONY.--Former testimony given by the 16 declarant which testimony was given as a witness at another 17 hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a 18 deposition taken in compliance with law in the course of the 19 same or another proceeding, if the party against whom the 20 testimony is now offered, or, in a civil action or proceeding, 21 a predecessor in interest, or a person with a similar 22 interest, had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the 23 testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination, provided 24 that the court finds that the testimony is not inadmissible 25 pursuant to s. 90.402 or s. 90.403. at a civil trial, when 26 used in a retrial of said trial involving identical parties 27 and the same facts. 28 Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 1998, 29 and shall apply to pending cases in which the final pretrial 30 conference occurs on or after that date. 31 1 CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. Florida House of Representatives - 1998 HB 3243 505-161-98 1 ***************************************** 2 HOUSE SUMMARY 3 Revises an exception to the prohibition against hearsay 4 evidence to provide that former testimony given by the declarant which testimony was given as a witness at 5 another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a disposition taken in compliance with law in the 6 course of the same or another proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony is now offered, or, in a civil 7 action or proceeding, a predecessor in interest or a person with a similar interest, had an opportunity and 8 similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination, is not inadmissable, provided 9 that the court finds that the testimony is not inadmissable pursuant to described provisions of law. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2