CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
H
Senator Laurent moved the following amendment:
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
CHAMBER ACTION
Senate House
.
.
1 .
.
2 .
.
3 .
.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 Senator Laurent moved the following amendment:
12
13 Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
14 Delete everything after the enacting clause
15
16 and insert:
17 Section 1. Section 73.0511, Florida Statutes, is
18 amended to read:
19 73.0511 Prelitigation notice and offer of full
20 compensation.--Before an eminent domain action is initiated
21 under chapter 73 or chapter 74 Prior to instituting
22 litigation, the condemning authority shall notify the fee
23 owners appearing of record on the date the offer is made of
24 their statutory rights under s. 73.091 and shall make a
25 written offer of full compensation for the property to be
26 acquired and any damages to the remainder caused by the
27 taking, naming the fee owners to whom it is made. The notice
28 and written offer must be sent to the fee owners' last known
29 address listed on the county ad valorem tax roll. Notice to
30 one fee owner constitutes notice to all fee owners on
31 multiple-ownership property. This section may not be
1
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 interpreted as shifting the burden of proof of either the
2 condemning authority or fee owners at a valuation trial under
3 chapter 73 or chapter 74, as otherwise provided by law. The
4 governmental condemning authority is not required to give
5 notice to a person who acquires title to the property
6 subsequent to the notice required by this section.
7 Section 2. Subsection (2) of section 337.27, section
8 337.271, subsection (2) of section 348.0008, subsection (2) of
9 section 348.759, and subsection (2) of section 348.957,
10 Florida Statutes, are repealed.
11 Section 3. Subsection (6) is added to section 253.82,
12 Florida Statutes, to read:
13 253.82 Title of state or private owners to Murphy Act
14 lands.--
15 (6)(a) All reservations of easements on deeds by the
16 Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund
17 conveying land acquired under chapter 18296, Laws of Florida,
18 1937, are hereby vested by operation of law, and without the
19 necessity of instruments of conveyance from the Board of
20 Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, in the
21 governmental entity having right and title to the road to
22 which the reservations are adjacent. All reservations adjacent
23 to a road that was designated as a state road at the time of
24 the reservation, which road is currently held by the state,
25 are conveyed to the Department of Transportation. All
26 reservations adjacent to a road that was designated as a state
27 road at the time of the reservation, which road is located in
28 an unincorporated area of a county or owned by the county
29 within any incorporated area, are conveyed to the respective
30 county. All other reservations within an incorporated area
31 adjacent to a road that was designated as a state road at the
2
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 time of the reservation, which reservations are not otherwise
2 conveyed to the state or the county, are conveyed to the
3 incorporated area. The conveyance includes all right, title,
4 and interest in the reservation held by the Board of Trustees
5 of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund.
6 (b) Every entity that holds title to Murphy Act
7 reservations must establish a procedure for reviewing any deed
8 that contains a reservation when a review is requested or a
9 road project is anticipated. The review process must provide
10 for:
11 1. A determination of whether the language of the deed
12 created a reservation at the time of the original conveyance.
13 2. A review of any release of the reservation provided
14 by the property owner.
15 3. The recording of a notice of the nonexistence of a
16 reservation if reservation language in the deed does not
17 impact the property.
18 4. A determination of whether any or all of the
19 reservation may be released, and a form for recording the
20 release.
21 5. A process to allow for review through mediation if
22 requested by the property owner or through binding arbitration
23 pursuant to chapter 44.
24
25 Any fee charged may not exceed the actual cost to review the
26 deed, perform an appeal, and pay any recording expenses. Any
27 such fee may not exceed $300.
28 (c)1. Any owner of property encumbered by a Murphy Act
29 road reservation who has been denied a release of all or part
30 of the reservation or who has received notice of a
31 governmental entity's intent to preserve the reservation under
3
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 s. 712.05 may appeal to the entity and show that the
2 reservation substantially denies the property owner the
3 current economic use of the property held by the owner. For
4 purposes of this determination, the term "current economic
5 use" means the use of the property on the date notice of the
6 easement is filed under s. 712.05.
7 2. Upon a determination by the governmental entity
8 that the reservation substantially denies the property owner
9 the current economic use of the property held by the owner,
10 the governmental entity must purchase the real property and
11 improvements not retained by the property owner in fee simple
12 title or release all or part of the reservation as necessary
13 to allow for beneficial use of the property.
14 3. If the governmental entity and property owner are
15 unable to agree as to whether the reservation substantially
16 denies the current economic use of the property or as to the
17 purchase price, the property owner may request mediation or
18 binding arbitration under chapter 44 to resolve these issues.
19 4. Before the payment of any compensation, the
20 property owner must provide the governmental entity copies of
21 any title insurance policies and notice of any compensation
22 received from a title company related to the easement.
23 (7) The process for release of any road reservation
24 covered by this section or payment for property impacted by
25 the use of a reservation covered by this section must be
26 solely in accordance with this section. Any action for the
27 taking of property related to road construction is separate
28 and distinct from an action under this section.
29 (8) The governmental entity is not liable for
30 attorney's fees or costs incurred by the owner in establishing
31 the impact of the road reservation on the property.
4
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 Section 4. Section 712.04, Florida Statutes, is
2 amended to read:
3 712.04 Interests extinguished by marketable record
4 title.--Subject to the matters stated in s. 712.03, such
5 marketable record title shall be free and clear of all
6 estates, interests, claims, or charges whatsoever, the
7 existence of which depends upon any act, title transaction,
8 event or omission that occurred prior to the effective date of
9 the root of title. All such estates, interests, claims, or
10 charges, however denominated, whether such estates, interests,
11 claims, or charges are or appear to be held or asserted by a
12 person sui juris or under a disability, whether such person is
13 within or without the state, whether such person is natural or
14 corporate, or is private or governmental, are hereby declared
15 to be null and void, except that this chapter shall not be
16 deemed to affect any right, title, or interest of the United
17 States, Florida, or any of its officers, boards, commissions,
18 or other agencies reserved in the patent or deed by which the
19 United States, Florida, or any of its agencies parted with
20 title. However, all reservations of easements in deeds by the
21 Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund conveying land
22 acquired under chapter 18296, Laws of Florida, 1937, shall be
23 extinguished by the Marketable Record Title Act on July 1,
24 2001, subject to the provisions of s. 712.03, and further
25 subject to the right of any governmental entity that holds
26 title to the reservations to preserve such reservations as are
27 necessary for future transportation projects in adopted
28 transportation plans by filing notice under s. 712.05 before
29 July 1, 2001.
30 Section 5. Subsection (3) is added to section 712.05,
31 Florida Statutes, to read:
5
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 712.05 Effect of filing notice.--
2 (3) Any governmental entity that claims a road
3 reservation pursuant to a deed conveyed under the Murphy Act
4 may preserve the reservation or any portion thereof necessary
5 for future transportation projects in adopted transportation
6 plans and protect the reservation from extinguishment by the
7 operation of this chapter by filing for record, prior to July
8 1, 2001, a notice, in writing, in accordance with the
9 provisions of this chapter. The notice preserves the
10 reservation or portion thereof for 10 years following the date
11 of record if the reservation is used or identified by the
12 governmental entity in the final design plans of a road
13 project scheduled for construction to begin before the end of
14 the 10-year period. Any reservation used or identified in the
15 final design plans of a road project scheduled for
16 construction to begin before the end of the 10-year period is
17 not extinguished.
18 Section 6. Subsection (3) is added to section 479.15,
19 Florida Statutes, to read:
20 479.15 Harmony of regulations.--
21 (3) It is the express intent of the Legislature to
22 limit the state right-of-way acquisition costs in eminent
23 domain proceedings by preempting county and municipal
24 regulation of outdoor advertising signs located adjacent to
25 any part of the state highway system when the state is making
26 improvement to such highways, the provisions of s. 479.155
27 notwithstanding. Whenever land is acquired upon which is
28 situated a lawful nonconforming sign, the sign may, upon
29 receiving a waiver from federal regulations and at the
30 election of its owner, be relocated or reconstructed adjacent
31 to the new right-of-way at the same station along the roadway
6
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 and any local ordinance to the contrary is preempted.
2 Section 7. (1) The Legislature finds that balancing
3 the property and business interests of private citizens with
4 costs of advancing the public purposes of governmental
5 projects is an important function of the Legislature.
6 Therefore, the Legislature creates and establishes a study
7 panel on eminent domain to make an assessment of the current
8 administration of the exercise of the eminent domain power by
9 state and local governments, to identify issues of fairness
10 and justice in the protection of property and business rights
11 upon the acquisition for public good, to analyze the
12 feasibility of establishing procedures or programs to assist
13 property or business owners adversely affected by
14 transportation projects when demonstrating actual loss, and to
15 ascertain any potential increase or decrease in the costs of
16 right-of-way acquisition upon any proposed legislative
17 recommendation. In carrying forth its stated purpose, the
18 study panel will provide and address:
19 (a) A brief jurisprudential history of the basis of
20 the power of eminent domain vis a vis property and business
21 rights, constitutional or otherwise.
22 (b) A study of the frequency of acquisition by
23 voluntary purchase prior to the filing of an eminent domain
24 lawsuit rather than acquisition by lawsuit for transportation
25 projects in which acquisition of title took place between
26 January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1997, identifying whether
27 acquisition included any business interests in addition to
28 property interests and whether an initial offer was made by
29 the condemning authority.
30 (c) A study of right-of-way costs per parcel for
31 transportation projects in which acquisition of title took
7
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 place between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1997,
2 comparing the amount of any initial offer with the amount of
3 settlement; identifying whether settlement occurred prior to
4 lawsuit, in litigation prior to jury trial, or by jury trial;
5 identifying any stipulated allocations between the amounts
6 reimbursed to a property or business owner for property,
7 business damages, attorney's fees and costs, or expert costs;
8 and identifying any allocations between administrative costs
9 or expert costs expended by the condemning authority.
10 (d) A study of the appraisal methodology employed by
11 condemning authorities for the valuation of real estate with
12 the highest and best use in agriculture for acquisitions in
13 which title vested or purchase contracts were agreed to
14 between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1997.
15 (e) A study of the frequency with which the property
16 owner received compensation for a substantial diminution of
17 access to the exclusion of a business owner in transportation
18 projects in which acquisition of title took place between
19 January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1997.
20 (f) A study of the frequency of the number of whole
21 takings relative to the number of partial takings in
22 transportation projects in which acquisition of title took
23 place between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1997.
24 (g) A study of the feasibility of potential programs
25 for assisting businesses adversely affected by transportation
26 projects, including, but not limited to:
27 1. Business loan programs with low or no interest.
28 2. Business grant programs.
29 3. Credits for, and exemptions from, taxes or fees for
30 impacted businesses.
31 4. Use of state surcharges on local fuel tax revenues
8
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 to fund local business assistance programs.
2 5. Use of alternative dispute resolution approaches to
3 resolving business damage claims.
4 6. Provision by statute or constitutional amendment to
5 further protect business rights when affected by eminent
6 domain.
7 (h) A study of alternative approaches to business
8 damages which would make the business owner whole.
9 (i) A study of the costs of eminent domain actions in
10 this state, including property and business damage
11 compensation and attorney's fees, as compared to the costs
12 under the federal system and that of other states.
13 (j) Any other aspects of eminent domain deemed
14 appropriate by the study panel.
15 (2) When not otherwise specifically provided, the
16 study panel shall establish guidelines or parameters of the
17 studies in subsection (1) so that the studies are not
18 exhaustive, but maintain representative statistical accuracy.
19 In order for the study panel to receive input, and to assist
20 it in its evaluations and its formulation of recommendations,
21 the study panel may establish one or more technical or other
22 special advisory committees. The advisory committees may
23 include study panel or non-study panel members, including
24 representatives of those industries that may be affected by
25 the study panel's recommendations. Study panel and non-study
26 panel members of any technical or other special advisory
27 committees may not receive remuneration for their services.
28 Study panel members shall be reimbursed for travel and
29 expenses in accordance with chapter 112, Florida Statutes, to
30 the extent that funds are available for this purpose. Public
31 officers and employees shall be reimbursed by their respective
9
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 agencies in accordance with chapter 112, Florida Statutes.
2 Costs for the study panel shall be funded in the Department of
3 Transportation's adopted 5-year work program. The department
4 may contract with the Florida Conflict Resolution Consortium
5 and Florida State University. All state agencies are requested
6 to provide assistance to the study panel as necessary to
7 accomplish the purposes set forth for the study panel in this
8 act.
9 (3) The study panel shall consist of the following
10 members:
11 (a) A representative of the Department of
12 Transportation, a representative of the Department of Banking
13 and Finance, a representative of the Association of Counties,
14 a representative of the League of Cities, a representative of
15 the Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization, a
16 representative of the Office of the Attorney General, a
17 representative of either the St. Johns River Water Management
18 District or the South Florida Water Management District, and a
19 representative of the Florida Transportation Commission, all
20 to be appointed by the Governor.
21 (b) A member of the Florida Senate, a representative
22 of the Florida Transportation Builders Association, a
23 representative of the Florida Petroleum Council, a
24 representative of the Florida Retail Federation, a
25 representative of the Florida Division of the National
26 Federation of Independent Businesses, a representative of the
27 Florida Restaurant Association, and a representative of the
28 Eminent Domain Committee of the Academy of Florida Trial
29 Lawyers, all to be appointed by the President of the Senate.
30 (c) A member of the Florida House of Representatives,
31 a representative of the Florida Petroleum Marketers
10
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 Association, a representative of the Florida United Businesses
2 Association, a representative of the Florida Farm Bureau
3 Federation, a representative of the Florida Property Rights
4 Coalition, a representative of the Florida Chamber of
5 Commerce, and a representative of the Florida Bar Eminent
6 Domain Committee, all to be appointed by the Speaker of the
7 House of Representatives.
8 (4) The study panel shall hold at least two public
9 hearings, one of which shall be outside Tallahassee, and shall
10 seek public comment and input. The study panel shall submit a
11 written report to the Governor, the President of the Senate,
12 and the Speaker of the House of Representatives on its
13 findings and any recommendations for proposed legislation no
14 later than December 31, 1999.
15 Section 8. The Legislature finds that balancing
16 property and business interests of private citizens and
17 governmental entities is an important function of the
18 Legislature. Likewise, the Legislature finds that, in the
19 balancing of those interests, prelitigation offers of
20 compensation assist in reducing the costs of acquisition; that
21 an entire lot, block, or tract of land should be acquired only
22 when the public purpose and necessity are related to the
23 engineering needs of a project and not the saving of
24 acquisition costs to the detriment of business owners; that
25 orderly procedures for the transference of deeds under the
26 Murphy Act should be established to save administrative costs;
27 that provision should be made for the underlying fee owner to
28 be eligible for compensation for the denial of economic use
29 caused by the exercise of a reservation pursuant to deeds
30 under the Murphy Act; and that local ordinances regulating
31 outdoor advertising signs should be preempted upon relocation
11
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 of an outdoor advertising sign resulting from the acquisition
2 of right-of-way. Therefore, the Legislature finds that this
3 act fulfills an important state interest.
4 Section 9. Subsection (1) of section 337.19, Florida
5 Statutes, is amended to read:
6 337.19 Suits by and against department; limitation of
7 actions; forum.--
8 (1) Suits at law and in equity may be brought and
9 maintained by and against the department on any contract claim
10 arising from the breach of an express provision or an implied
11 covenant of a written agreement or a written directive issued
12 by the department pursuant to the written agreement. In any
13 such suit, the department and the contractor shall have all of
14 the same rights, obligations, remedies, and defenses as a
15 private person under a like contract, except that no liability
16 may be based on an oral modification of the written contract
17 or written directive. However, this section shall not be
18 construed to in any way prohibit the department from limiting
19 its liability or damages through provisions in its contracts.
20 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no
21 employee or agent of the department may be held personally
22 liable to an extent greater than that provided under s. 768.28
23 under contract for work done; provided, that no suit sounding
24 in tort shall be maintained against the department.
25 Section 10. Section 704.01, Florida Statutes, is
26 amended to read:
27 (Substantial rewording of section. See
28 s. 704.01, F.S., for present text.)
29 704.01 Common-law and statutory easements of
30 necessity.--
31 (1) IMPLIED GRANT OF WAY OF NECESSITY.--The common-law
12
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 rule of an implied grant of necessity is recognized, adopted,
2 and modified as follows: An implied grant exists when a
3 grantor has conveyed or hereafter conveys lands to which there
4 is not reasonable legal access except over lands retained by
5 the grantor, or when the grantor has retained or hereafter
6 retains lands to which there is no reasonable legal access
7 except over lands that the grantor has conveyed. An implied
8 grant arises only when a unity of title exists from a common
9 source other than the original grant from the state or the
10 United States. An implied grant is unaffected by subsequent
11 transfer of either the dominant or servient estate, include
12 involuntary transfers, such as tax deeds, foreclosures, or
13 reversions.
14 (2) STATUTORY WAY OF NECESSITY.--Based on public
15 policy, convenience, and necessity, a statutory way of
16 necessity exists when any land does not have reasonable legal
17 access and no common-law implied grant of way of necessity
18 exists.
19 (3) EXTENT OF WAY OF NECESSITY.--
20 (a) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), the
21 way of necessity shall be by the shortest route that provides
22 reasonable legal access between the portion of the dominant
23 estate most in need of the way and the public road nearest
24 thereto; provided, however, that the route of an implied way
25 of necessity to be created pursuant to subsection (1) shall
26 take into consideration any increase in the burden upon the
27 servient estate since the severance of unity of title arising
28 as a result of the creation thereof, and the route of a
29 statutory way of necessity to be created under subsection (2)
30 shall take into consideration the new burden upon the servient
31 estate arising as a result of the creation thereof.
13
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 (b) As used in this section, the term "reasonable
2 legal access:"
3 1. If the dominant estate is within a municipality,
4 means legal access over land which reasonably satisfies all of
5 the requirements for the beneficial use and enjoyment of the
6 dominant estate; and
7 2. If the dominant estate is not within a
8 municipality, means legal access over land other than by way
9 of a bridge, turnpike road, embankment, or substantial fill.
10
11 For the purposes of subparagraph 1., the fact that there
12 exists some form of legal access to the dominant estate does
13 not preclude the establishment of a way of necessity if that
14 existing access is of such a nature that it does not
15 constitute reasonable legal access by satisfying all of the
16 reasonable requirements for the beneficial use and enjoyment
17 of the dominant estate.
18 (c) The way of necessity under either subsection (1)
19 of subsection (2) may also be used for franchised cable
20 television service and necessary utility services, including,
21 but not limited to, water, wastewater, reclaimed water,
22 natural gas, electricity, or telephone service.
23 Section 11. Section 704.03, Florida Statutes, is
24 repealed.
25 Section 12. Section 704.04, Florida Statutes, is
26 amended to read:
27 704.04 Judicial remedy and compensation to servient
28 owner.--When the owner or owners of such lands across which a
29 statutory way of necessity under s. 704.01(2) is claimed,
30 exclusive of the common-law right, objects or refuses to
31 permit the use of such way under the conditions set forth
14
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 herein or until she or he receives compensation therefor,
2 either party or the board of county commissioners of such
3 county may file suit in the circuit court of the county
4 wherein the land is located in order to determine if the claim
5 for said easement exists, and the amount of compensation to
6 which said party is entitled for use of such easement. Where
7 said easement is awarded to the owner of the dominant
8 tenement, it shall be in compliance with s. 704.01(2) and
9 shall exist so long as such easement is reasonably necessary
10 for the purposes stated herein. The court, in its discretion,
11 shall determine all questions, including the type, duration,
12 extent, and location of the easement, the amount of
13 compensation, and the attorney's fees and costs to be awarded
14 to either party for unreasonable refusal to comply with the
15 provisions of s. 704.01(2) provided that if either of said
16 parties so requests in her or his original pleadings, the
17 amount of compensation may be determined by a jury trial. The
18 easement shall date from the time the award is paid. A way of
19 necessity created pursuant to this section shall be evidenced
20 by a written instrument, which may be the final judgment,
21 which is placed of record and contains a legally sufficient
22 description of the easement, the dominant estate, and the
23 servient estate.
24 Section 13. Section 1 of this act shall take effect
25 January 1, 1999; section 2 of this act shall take effect July
26 1, 1998, for eminent domain actions filed after July 1, 1998;
27 and all other sections of this act, unless otherwise provided,
28 shall take effect upon this act becoming a law.
29
30
31
15
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 ================ T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ===============
2 And the title is amended as follows:
3 Delete everything before the enacting clause
4
5 and insert:
6 A bill to be entitled
7 An act relating to the acquisition of interests
8 in land; amending s. 73.0511, F.S.; providing
9 requirements with respect to prelitigation;
10 providing prelitigation notice to fee owners;
11 providing for prelitigation offer to fee
12 owners; repealing s. 337.27(2), F.S., which
13 provides for the acquisition of lands and
14 property; repealing s. 337.271, F.S., which
15 provides for negotiations for acquisitions by
16 the Department of Transportation; repealing s.
17 348.0008, F.S., which provides for the
18 acquisition of lands and property in the
19 Florida Expressway Authority Act; repealing s.
20 348.759(2), F.S., which provides for the
21 acquisition of lands or property by the
22 Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority;
23 repealing s. 348.957(2), F.S., which provides
24 for the acquisition of lands or property by the
25 Seminole County Expressway Authority; amending
26 s. 253.82, F.S.; providing for all
27 transportation easements acquired under the
28 Murphy Act to be conveyed to the Department of
29 Transportation or the governmental entity
30 currently having title to the adjacent roadway;
31 requiring the establishment of a procedure for
16
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 92
Amendment No.
1 review of deeds containing transportation
2 reservations acquired under the Murphy Act;
3 setting requirements for the review process;
4 providing compensation for certain property
5 owners where the reservation denies current
6 economic use of the property; providing for
7 mediation or arbitration; amending ss. 712.04,
8 712.05, F.S.; providing for the release of
9 certain easements held by governmental
10 entities; providing for preservation of certain
11 road easement reservations scheduled to begin
12 within a specified period; amending s. 479.15,
13 F.S.; providing for the preemption of local
14 ordinances regulating outdoor advertising signs
15 upon relocation after acquisition of
16 right-of-way; creating an eminent domain study
17 panel; providing for the membership of the
18 study panel; requiring a report to the Governor
19 and Legislature; amending s. 337.19, F.S.;
20 authorizing suits to be brought against the
21 department for the breach of an expressed
22 provision or an implied covenant; providing
23 that liability may not be based on an oral
24 modification of a written contract; amending
25 ss. 704.01 and 704.04, F.S.; providing for an
26 implied grant of way of necessity and a
27 statutory way of necessity for cable television
28 and other utility services; repealing s.
29 704.03, F.S., which defines the term
30 "practicable" for purposes of laws relating to
31 easements; providing effective dates.
17
1:32 PM 04/28/98 s0092c3c-17c9u