Senate Bill 2502
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
By the Committee on Fiscal Policy
301-1776C-99
1 A bill to be entitled
2 An act implementing the 1999-2000 General
3 Appropriations Act; providing legislative
4 intent; amending s. 216.292, F.S.; authorizing
5 the Department of Children and Family Services
6 and the Agency for Health Care Administration
7 to transfer general revenue funds between them;
8 providing that specified funds are to be used
9 to increase the adult mental health equity
10 funding in specified districts of the
11 Department of Children and Family Services and
12 are not subject to the provisions of s.
13 394.908, F.S.; amending s. 409.9115, F.S.;
14 specifying how the Agency for Health Care
15 Administration shall make payments for the
16 Medicaid disproportionate share program for
17 mental health hospitals; requiring the Agency
18 for Health Care Administration to use a
19 specified disproportionate share formula,
20 specified audited financial data, and a
21 specified Medicaid per diem rate in fiscal year
22 1999-2000 for qualifying hospitals; amending s.
23 409.9116, F.S.; providing a formula for rural
24 hospital disproportionate share payments;
25 amending s. 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the
26 Department of Children and Family Services and
27 the Department of Health to advance certain
28 moneys for certain contract services; directing
29 the Agency for Health Care Administration to
30 include health maintenance organization
31 recipients in the county billing for a
1
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 specified purpose; authorizing the Departments
2 of Children and Family Services, Revenue, Labor
3 and Employment Security, and Health and the
4 Agency for Health Care Administration to
5 transfer positions and funds to comply with the
6 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act or the
7 WAGES Act; amending s. 216.181, F.S.;
8 authorizing the Department of Children and
9 Family Services to use certain funds for fixed
10 capital outlay expenditures to meet certain
11 federal standards; requiring the Agency for
12 Health Care Administration to take necessary
13 actions to ensure that expenditures for
14 Medicaid transportation do not exceed the
15 amount budgeted and to take certain steps if
16 that becomes impossible; amending s. 216.181,
17 F.S.; authorizing the Department of Law
18 Enforcement to transfer some positions and
19 associated budget and a certain percentage of
20 salary rate between budget entities and
21 providing requirements with respect thereto;
22 authorizing the Department of Law Enforcement
23 to participate in the model career service
24 classification and compensation system, subject
25 to certain conditions; authorizing the
26 Department of Law Enforcement to use certain
27 moneys to provide meritorious-performance
28 bonuses for employees, subject to approval;
29 authorizing the Correctional Privatization
30 Commission and the Department of Juvenile
31 Justice to make certain expenditures to defray
2
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 costs incurred by a municipality or county as a
2 result of opening a facility of the commission
3 or the department; amending s. 287.064, F.S.;
4 authorizing the Department of Law Enforcement
5 to finance, through the Comptroller's
6 consolidated major equipment financing program,
7 the purchase of certain equipment, software,
8 and services for the Florida Crime Information
9 Center; amending s. 212.20, F.S.; providing for
10 use of moneys allocated to the Solid Waste
11 Management Trust Fund; providing for certain
12 counties to use moneys received for aquatic
13 weed control for recycling purposes; amending
14 s. 403.7095, F.S.; revising the expiration date
15 of the solid waste management grant program;
16 requiring a specified level of funding for
17 counties receiving solid waste management and
18 recycling grants; providing for allocation of
19 funds for innovative programs to address
20 recycling practices and procedures; amending s.
21 110.1239, F.S.; providing requirements for the
22 funding of the state group health insurance
23 program; amending s. 373.59, F.S.; requiring
24 release of certain moneys by the Secretary of
25 Environmental Protection to water management
26 districts, upon request; amending s. 287.161,
27 F.S.; requiring the Department of Management
28 Services to charge all persons receiving
29 transportation from the executive aircraft pool
30 a specified rate; providing for deposit and use
31 of such fees; amending s. 15.09, F.S.;
3
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 authorizing the appropriation of funds from the
2 Public Access Data Systems Trust Fund for the
3 operations of the Department of State; amending
4 s. 253.034, F.S.; authorizing the Department of
5 Transportation to sell certain property used by
6 the Department of Highway Safety and Motor
7 Vehicles; amending s. 334.0445, F.S.; revising
8 the expiration date for the model career
9 service classification and compensation plan;
10 amending s. 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the
11 Department of Transportation to transfer salary
12 rate to the turnpike budget entity to
13 facilitate transferring personnel to the
14 turnpike headquarters facility in Orange
15 County; amending ss. 601.02, 601.15, F.S.;
16 providing for transfer of funds to the
17 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
18 for citrus canker eradication; prescribing
19 powers of the Commissioner of Education to
20 reorganize entities, duties, and functions
21 within the Department of Education; providing a
22 limitation; providing for a report; providing
23 for allocation of moneys provided for workforce
24 development and providing for budget amendment
25 when a program is moved; providing for future
26 repeal of various provisions; providing effect
27 of veto of specific appropriation or proviso to
28 which implementing language refers; providing
29 applicability to other legislation; providing
30 performance measures and standards for
31 individual programs within state agencies;
4
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 providing that the performance measures and
2 standards are directly linked to the
3 appropriations made in the 1999-2000 General
4 Appropriations Act, as required by the
5 Government Performance and Accountability Act
6 of 1994; providing severability; providing an
7 effective date.
8
9 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
10
11 Section 1. It is the intent of the Legislature that
12 the implementing and administering provisions of this act
13 apply to the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year
14 1999-2000.
15 Section 2. In order to implement Specific
16 Appropriations 212 through 425 of the 1999-2000 General
17 Appropriations Act, paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section
18 216.292, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to
19 read:
20 216.292 Appropriations nontransferable; exceptions.--
21 (1)
22 (b) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
23 Department of Children and Family Services and the Agency for
24 Health Care Administration may transfer general revenue funds
25 as necessary to comply with any provision of the General
26 Appropriations Act that requires or specifically authorizes
27 the transfer of general revenue funds between these two
28 agencies. This paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
29 Section 3. In order to implement Specific
30 Appropriation 348 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
31 general revenue funds in the amount of $11,665,879 are to be
5
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 used to increase the adult mental health equity funding in
2 districts 4, 7, and 11 of the Department of Children and
3 Family Services and shall not be subject to the provisions of
4 section 394.908, Florida Statutes, for the equity distribution
5 of these funds.
6 Section 4. In order to implement Specific
7 Appropriation 268 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
8 subsection (3) of section 409.9115, Florida Statutes, 1998
9 Supplement, is amended to read:
10 409.9115 Disproportionate share program for mental
11 health hospitals.--The Agency for Health Care Administration
12 shall design and implement a system of making mental health
13 disproportionate share payments to hospitals that qualify for
14 disproportionate share payments under s. 409.911. This system
15 of payments shall conform with federal requirements and shall
16 distribute funds in each fiscal year for which an
17 appropriation is made by making quarterly Medicaid payments.
18 Notwithstanding s. 409.915, counties are exempt from
19 contributing toward the cost of this special reimbursement for
20 patients.
21 (3) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
22 Agency for Health Care Administration shall make payments for
23 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
24 hospitals on a monthly basis. If the amounts appropriated for
25 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
26 hospitals are increased or decreased during the fiscal year
27 pursuant to the requirements of chapter 216, the required
28 adjustment shall be prorated over the remaining payment
29 periods. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
30 Section 5. During the 1999-2000 fiscal year, the
31 Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the 1992-1993
6
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 disproportionate share formula, the 1989 audited financial
2 data, and the Medicaid per diem rate as of January 1, 1992,
3 for those hospitals that qualify for the hospital
4 disproportionate share program funded in Specific
5 Appropriation 243 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act.
6 This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
7 Section 6. In order to implement Specific
8 Appropriation 236 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
9 subsection (6) of section 409.9116, Florida Statutes, 1998
10 Supplement, is amended to read:
11 409.9116 Disproportionate share/financial assistance
12 program for rural hospitals.--In addition to the payments made
13 under s. 409.911, the Agency for Health Care Administration
14 shall administer a federally matched disproportionate share
15 program and a state-funded financial assistance program for
16 statutory rural hospitals. The agency shall make
17 disproportionate share payments to statutory rural hospitals
18 that qualify for such payments and financial assistance
19 payments to statutory rural hospitals that do not qualify for
20 disproportionate share payments. The disproportionate share
21 program payments shall be limited by and conform with federal
22 requirements. In fiscal year 1993-1994, available funds shall
23 be distributed in one payment, as soon as practicable after
24 the effective date of this act. In subsequent fiscal years,
25 funds shall be distributed quarterly in each fiscal year for
26 which an appropriation is made. Notwithstanding the provisions
27 of s. 409.915, counties are exempt from contributing toward
28 the cost of this special reimbursement for hospitals serving a
29 disproportionate share of low-income patients.
30 (6) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
31 Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the following
7
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 formula for distribution of the funds in Specific
2 Appropriation 236 240 of the 1999-2000 1998-1999 General
3 Appropriations Act for the disproportionate share/financial
4 assistance program for rural hospitals.
5 (a) The agency shall first determine a preliminary
6 payment amount for each rural hospital by allocating all
7 available state funds using the following formula:
8
9 PDAER = (TAERH x TARH)/STAERH
10
11 Where:
12 PDAER = preliminary distribution amount for each rural
13 hospital.
14 TAERH = total amount earned by each rural hospital.
15 TARH = total amount appropriated or distributed under
16 this section.
17 STAERH = sum of total amount earned by each rural
18 hospital.
19 (b) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
20 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
21 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (a).
22 (c) The state-funds-only payment amount is then
23 calculated for each hospital using the formula:
24
25 SFOER = Maximum value of (1) SFOL - PDAER or (2) 0
26
27 Where:
28 SFOER = state-funds-only payment amount for each rural
29 hospital.
30 SFOL = state-funds-only payment level, which is set at
31 4 percent of TARH.
8
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (d) The adjusted total amount allocated to the rural
2 disproportionate share program shall then be calculated using
3 the following formula:
4
5 ATARH = (TARH - SSFOER)
6
7 Where:
8 ATARH = adjusted total amount appropriated or
9 distributed under this section.
10 SSFOER = sum of the state-funds-only payment amount
11 calculated under paragraph (c) for all rural hospitals.
12 (e) The determination of the amount of rural
13 disproportionate share hospital funds is calculated by the
14 following formula:
15
16 TDAERH = [(TAERH x ATARH)/STAERH]
17
18 Where:
19 TDAERH = total distribution amount for each rural
20 hospital.
21 (f) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
22 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
23 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (e).
24 (g) State-funds-only payment amounts calculated under
25 paragraph (c) are then added to the results of paragraph (f)
26 to determine the total distribution amount for each rural
27 hospital.
28 (h) This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
29 Section 7. In order to implement Specific
30 Appropriations 292 through 425 and 445 through 540 of the
31 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act, paragraph (c) of
9
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 subsection (15) of section 216.181, Florida Statutes, 1998
2 Supplement, is amended to read:
3 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
4 capital outlay.--
5 (15)
6 (c) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
7 funds appropriated to the Department of Children and Family
8 Services in Specific Appropriations 292 293 through 425 446A
9 and the Department of Health in Specific Appropriations 445
10 466 through 540 555 of the 1999-2000 1998-1999 General
11 Appropriations Act may be advanced, unless specifically
12 prohibited in such General Appropriations Act, for those
13 contracted services that were approved for advancement by the
14 Comptroller in fiscal year 1993-1994, including those services
15 contracted on a fixed-price or unit cost basis. This
16 paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
17 Section 8. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriation 243 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
19 and for the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the Agency for Health
20 Care Administration shall include health maintenance
21 organization recipients in the county billing for inpatient
22 hospital stays for the purpose of shared costs with counties
23 in accordance with the Florida Statutes. This section is
24 repealed on July 1, 2000.
25 Section 9. For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
26 Departments of Children and Family Services, Revenue, Labor
27 and Employment Security, and Health and the Agency for Health
28 Care Administration may transfer positions and general revenue
29 funds as necessary to comply with any provision of the
30 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act or WAGES Act which
31 requires or specifically authorizes the transfer of positions
10
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 and general revenue funds between these agencies. This section
2 is repealed on July 1, 2000.
3 Section 10. In order to implement Specific
4 Appropriations 420 through 425 of the 1999-2000 General
5 Appropriations Act, subsection (16) of section 216.181,
6 Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
7 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
8 capital outlay.--
9 (16) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to
10 the contrary and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
11 the Department of Children and Family Services is authorized
12 to use operating funds budgeted for Developmental Services
13 Institutions for fixed capital outlay expenditures as needed
14 to bring any currently unlicensed beds up to Federal
15 Intermediate Care Facility for the Developmentally Disabled
16 licensure standards. This subsection is repealed on July 1,
17 2000 1999.
18 Section 11. In order to implement Specific
19 Appropriation 255 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
20 the Agency for Health Care Administration shall take any
21 necessary lawfully authorized action to ensure that total
22 expenditures for Medicaid transportation remain within the
23 amount budgeted in the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act.
24 In the event that the agency finds that it is impossible to
25 constrain Medicaid transportation expenditures to within the
26 budgeted amount, it shall notify the Legislature of this and
27 provide suggestions for statutory revisions necessary to
28 alleviate future deficits as well as a description of all
29 action taken under its current authority. This section is
30 repealed on July 1, 2000.
31
11
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 Section 12. In order to implement Specific
2 Appropriations 973, 982, 987, and 993 of the 1999-2000 General
3 Appropriations Act, subsection (17) of section 216.181,
4 Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
5 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
6 capital outlay.--
7 (17) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
8 section to the contrary, and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999
9 fiscal year only, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement
10 may transfer up to 20 positions and associated budget between
11 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
12 throughout each transfer. The department may also transfer up
13 to 10 percent of the initial approved salary rate between
14 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
15 throughout each transfer. The department must provide notice
16 to the Executive Office of the Governor, the chair of the
17 Senate Budget Ways and Means Committee, and the chair of the
18 House Committee on Criminal Justice Appropriations for all
19 transfers of positions or salary rate. This subsection is
20 repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
21 Section 13. For the purpose of implementing Specific
22 Appropriations 973, 982, 987, and 993 of the 1999-2000 General
23 Appropriations Act, beginning July 1, 1999, the Florida
24 Department of Law Enforcement, with approval of the Executive
25 Office of the Governor and in consultation with the Department
26 of Management Services, legislative appropriation and
27 personnel committees, and the affected certified bargaining
28 units, is authorized to participate in the model career
29 service classification and compensation system as authorized
30 by section 334.0445, Florida Statutes, which is hereby
31
12
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 continued through June 30, 2000, for this purpose. This
2 section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
3 Section 14. Consistent with the provisions of section
4 216.163, Florida Statutes, in accordance with
5 performance-based program budgeting requirements, and
6 notwithstanding the provisions of section 216.181, Florida
7 Statutes, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement may
8 transfer up to one-half of 1 percent of the funds in Specific
9 Appropriations 973, 982, 987, and 993 of the 1999-2000 General
10 Appropriations Act for lump-sum salary bonuses for
11 departmental employees at the discretion of the executive
12 director, provided that such bonuses are given only to
13 selected employees for meritorious performance, instead of
14 being given as across-the-board bonuses for all employees. The
15 department, after consultation with the Executive Office of
16 the Governor, shall provide a plan to the chair of the House
17 Fiscal Responsibility Council and to the chair of the Senate
18 Budget Committee for approval before awarding such bonuses.
19 This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
20 Section 15. In order to implement Specific
21 Appropriation 573 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
22 the Correctional Privatization Commission and the Department
23 of Juvenile Justice may expend appropriated funds to assist in
24 defraying the costs of impacts that are incurred by a
25 municipality or county and associated with opening a facility
26 under the authority of the Correctional Privatization
27 Commission or a facility under the authority of the Department
28 of Juvenile Justice which is located within that municipality
29 or county. The amount that is to be paid under this section
30 for any facility may not exceed 1 percent of the facility
31 construction cost, less building impact fees imposed by the
13
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 municipality, or by the county if the facility is located in
2 the unincorporated portion of the county. This section is
3 repealed on July 1, 2000.
4 Section 16. In order to implement Specific
5 Appropriation 984A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
6 Act, subsection (9) of section 287.064, Florida Statutes, 1998
7 Supplement, is amended to read:
8 287.064 Consolidated financing of deferred-payment
9 purchases.--
10 (9) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
11 Department of Law Enforcement is authorized, upon approval of
12 the Comptroller, to finance through the Comptroller's
13 consolidated master equipment financing program the purchase
14 of equipment, software, application development services,
15 support services, project management services, and system
16 integration services for the Florida Crime Information Center.
17 This subsection expires is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
18 Section 17. In order to implement Specific
19 Appropriations 1185 and 1189 of the 1999-2000 General
20 Appropriations Act, subsection (7) of section 212.20, Florida
21 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
22 212.20 Funds collected, disposition; additional powers
23 of department; operational expense; refund of taxes
24 adjudicated unconstitutionally collected.--
25 (7) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
26 use of funds allocated to the Solid Waste Management Trust
27 Fund shall be as provided in the General Appropriations Act.
28 There is transferred $11.4 $11.2 million for surface water
29 improvement and management projects and $8 million for the
30 aquatic weed control program from revenues provided by this
31 section. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
14
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 Section 18. In order to implement Specific
2 Appropriations 1274 and 1276 of the 1999-2000 General
3 Appropriations Act, counties receiving funds for aquatic weed
4 control as provided by section 212.20(7), Florida Statutes,
5 may use these funds for recycling purposes. This authorization
6 expires June 30, 2000.
7 Section 19. In order to implement Specific
8 Appropriations 1274 and 1276 of the 1999-2000 General
9 Appropriations Act, subsections (8) and (9) of section
10 403.7095, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, are amended to
11 read:
12 403.7095 Solid waste management grant program.--
13 (8) For fiscal year 1999-2000 1998-1999, the
14 department shall provide counties with populations under
15 100,000 with at least 80 percent of the level of funding they
16 received in fiscal year 1997-1998 for solid waste management
17 and recycling grants.
18 (9) For fiscal year 1999-2000 1998-1999, the
19 department shall provide 10 percent of the total funds
20 available after the requirements of subsection (8) are met for
21 recycling grants available to all counties on a competitive
22 basis for innovative programs. The department may consider one
23 or more of the following criteria in determining whether a
24 grant proposal is innovative:
25 (a) Demonstrate advanced technologies or processes.
26 (b) Collect and recycle materials targeted by the
27 department.
28 (c) Demonstrate substantial improvement in program
29 cost-effectiveness and efficiency as measured against
30 statewide average costs for the same or similar programs.
31
15
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (d) Demonstrate transferability of technology and
2 processes used in program.
3 (e) Demonstrate and implement multicounty or regional
4 recycling programs.
5 Section 20. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriation 1535A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
7 Act, section 110.1239, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is
8 amended to read:
9 110.1239 State group health insurance program
10 funding.--For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, it is
11 the intent of the Legislature that the state group health
12 insurance program be managed, administered, operated, and
13 funded in such a manner as to maximize the protection of state
14 employee health insurance benefits. Inherent in this intent is
15 the recognition that the health insurance liabilities
16 attributable to the benefits offered state employees should be
17 fairly, orderly, and equitably funded. Accordingly:
18 (1) The division shall determine the level of premiums
19 necessary to fully fund the state group health insurance
20 program for the next fiscal year. Such determination shall be
21 made after each revenue estimating conference on health
22 insurance as provided in s. 216.136(1), but not later than
23 December 1 and April 1 of each fiscal year.
24 (2) The Governor, in the Governor's recommended
25 budget, shall provide premium rates necessary for full funding
26 of the state group health insurance program, and the
27 Legislature shall provide in the General Appropriations Act
28 for a premium level necessary for full funding of the state
29 group health insurance program.
30 (3) For purposes of funding, any additional
31 appropriation amounts allocated to the state group health
16
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 insurance program by the Legislature shall be considered as a
2 state contribution and thus an increase in the state premiums.
3 (4) This section is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
4 Section 21. In order to implement Specific
5 Appropriation 1205 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
6 Act, subsection (17) of section 373.59, Florida Statutes, 1998
7 Supplement, is amended to read:
8 373.59 Water Management Lands Trust Fund.--
9 (17) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to
10 the contrary and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
11 the governing board of a water management district may
12 request, and the Secretary of Environmental Protection shall
13 release upon such request, moneys allocated to the districts
14 pursuant to subsection (8) for the purpose of carrying out the
15 provisions of ss. 373.451-373.4595. No funds may be used
16 pursuant to this subsection until necessary debt service
17 obligations and requirements for payments in lieu of taxes
18 that may be required pursuant to this section are provided
19 for. This subsection expires is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
20 Section 22. In order to implement Specific
21 Appropriations 1928 through 1931 of the 1999-2000 General
22 Appropriations Act, subsection (4) of section 287.161, Florida
23 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
24 287.161 Executive aircraft pool; assignment of
25 aircraft; charge for transportation.--
26 (4) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections
27 (2) and (3) and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
28 the Department of Management Services shall charge all persons
29 receiving transportation from the executive aircraft pool a
30 rate not less than the mileage allowance fixed by the
31 Legislature for the use of privately owned vehicles. Fees
17
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 collected for persons traveling by aircraft in the executive
2 aircraft pool shall be deposited into the Bureau of Aircraft
3 Trust Fund and shall be expended for costs incurred to operate
4 the aircraft management activities of the department. It is
5 the intent of the Legislature that the executive aircraft pool
6 be operated on a full cost recovery basis, less available
7 funds. This subsection expires is repealed on July 1, 2000
8 1999.
9 Section 23. In order to implement Specific
10 Appropriations 2037 through 2095 of the 1999-2000 General
11 Appropriations Act, paragraph (b) of subsection (5) of section
12 15.09, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
13 15.09 Fees.--
14 (5)
15 (b) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
16 funds from the Public Access Data Systems Trust Fund may be
17 appropriated for the operations of the department. This
18 paragraph expires is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
19 Section 24. In order to implement Specific
20 Appropriations 1412-1529 of the 1999-2000 General
21 Appropriations Act, subsection (9) of section 253.034, Florida
22 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
23 253.034 State-owned lands; uses.--
24 (9) Notwithstanding any provision of this section or
25 s. 253.111 to the contrary, the Department of Transportation
26 may sell, at fair market value, the following described state
27 real property utilized by the Department of Highway Safety and
28 Motor Vehicles:
29
30 From the NW Corner of Section 28 Township 22
31 South, Range 30 East, run North 89 degrees 21
18
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 minutes 24 seconds East 1900 feet; thence run
2 South 0 degrees 38 minutes 36 seconds East
3 59.45 feet for a point of beginning, said point
4 being on the Southerly right-of-way line of
5 State Highway No. 50; thence South 0 degrees 38
6 minutes 36 seconds East 525.41 feet; thence
7 North 66 degrees 42 minutes 09 seconds East 390
8 feet more or less to the waters edge of Lake
9 Barton; thence run Northerly along the waters
10 edge of Lake Barton to the North line of said
11 Section 28; thence run South 89 degrees 21
12 minutes 24 seconds West along the North line of
13 said Section 28, to a 4-inch concrete monument
14 on the Southerly right-of-way line of State
15 Road No. 50, being North 89 degrees 21 minutes
16 24 seconds East 2315.27 feet from the NW Corner
17 of said Section 28; thence run Westerly 419.59
18 feet along the arc of a 0 degree 44 minutes 25
19 seconds curve concave to the Northwesterly,
20 (having a central angle of 3 degrees 6 minutes
21 22 seconds, the long chord bearing South 81
22 degrees 08 minutes 37 seconds West 419.50 feet)
23 to the point of beginning. All of the above
24 described land being in the NE 1/4 of the NW
25 1/4 of said Section 28, Orange County,
26 Florida.
27
28 Proceeds from the sale shall be deposited in the State
29 Transportation Trust Fund. The Board of Trustees of the
30 Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall execute and deliver a
31 deed of conveyance for the purpose of carrying into effect a
19
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 contract or agreement of sale. This subsection expires is
2 repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
3 Section 25. In order to implement Specific
4 Appropriations 1412 through 1529 of the 1999-2000 General
5 Appropriations Act, subsection (1) of section 334.0445,
6 Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
7 334.0445 Model career service classification and
8 compensation plan.--
9 (1) Effective July 1, 1994, the Legislature grants to
10 the Department of Transportation in consultation with the
11 Department of Management Services, the Executive Office of the
12 Governor, legislative appropriations committees, legislative
13 personnel committees, and the affected certified bargaining
14 unions, the authority on a pilot basis to develop and
15 implement a model career service classification and
16 compensation system. Such system shall be developed for use by
17 all state agencies. Authorization for this program will be
18 through June 30, 2000 for 3 fiscal years beginning July 1,
19 1994, and ending June 30, 1997; however, the department may
20 elect or be directed by the Legislature to return to the
21 current system at anytime during this period if the model
22 system does not meet the stated goals and objectives. This
23 subsection expires July 1, 2000.
24 Section 26. In order to implement Specific
25 Appropriations 1412 through 1529 of the 1999-2000 General
26 Appropriations Act, subsection (17) is added to section
27 216.181, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, to read:
28 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
29 capital outlay.--
30 (17) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
31 chapter to the contrary, the Florida Department of
20
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 Transportation, in order to facilitate the transfer of
2 personnel to the new turnpike headquarters location in Orange
3 County, may transfer salary rate to the turnpike budget entity
4 from other departmental budget entities. The department must
5 provide documentation of all transfers to the Executive Office
6 of the Governor, the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee,
7 and the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on
8 Transportation and Economic Development Appropriations. This
9 subsection expires July 1, 2000.
10 Section 27. In order to implement Specific
11 Appropriation 1653A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
12 Act, section 601.02, Florida Statutes, to read:
13 601.02 Purposes.--
14 (1) This chapter is passed:
15 (a)(1) In the exercise of the police power to protect
16 health and welfare and to stabilize and protect the citrus
17 industry of the state.
18 (b)(2) Because the planting, growing, cultivating,
19 spraying, pruning, and fertilizing of citrus groves and the
20 harvesting, hauling, processing, packing, canning, and
21 concentrating of the citrus crop produced thereon is the major
22 agricultural enterprise of Florida and, together with the sale
23 and distribution of said crop, affects the health, morals, and
24 general economy of a vast number of citizens of the state who
25 are either directly or indirectly dependent thereon for a
26 livelihood, and said business is therefore of vast public
27 interest.
28 (c)(3) Because it is wise, necessary, and expedient to
29 protect and enhance the quality and reputation of Florida
30 citrus fruit and the canned and concentrated products thereof
31 in domestic and foreign markets.
21
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (d)(4) To provide means whereby producers, packers,
2 canners, and concentrators of citrus fruit and the canned and
3 concentrated products thereof may secure prompt and efficient
4 inspection and classification of grades of citrus fruit and
5 the canned and concentrated products thereof at reasonable
6 costs, it being hereby recognized that the standardization of
7 the citrus fruit industry of Florida by the proper grading and
8 classification of citrus fruit and the canned and concentrated
9 products thereof by prompt and efficient inspection under
10 competent authority is beneficial alike to producer, packer,
11 shipper, canner, concentrator, carrier, receiver, and consumer
12 in that it furnishes them prima facie evidence of the quality
13 and condition of such products and informs the carrier and
14 receiver of the quality of the products carried and received
15 by them and assures the ultimate consumer of the quality of
16 the products purchased.
17 (e)(5) To enable citrus producers collectively to pay
18 assessments to fund marketing and research programs for the
19 direct benefit of the citrus industry of this state. It is
20 the intent of the Legislature that all funds collected under
21 this chapter and the interest accrued on such funds are
22 consideration for a social contract between the state and the
23 citrus growers of the state whereby the state must hold such
24 funds in trust and inviolate and use them only for the
25 purposes prescribed in this chapter.
26 (f)(6) To stabilize the Florida citrus industry and to
27 protect the public against fraud, deception, and financial
28 loss through unscrupulous practices and haphazard methods in
29 connection with the processing and marketing of citrus fruit
30 and the canned or concentrated products thereof.
31
22
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (g)(7) Because said act is designed to promote the
2 general welfare of the Florida citrus industry, which in turn
3 will promote the general welfare and social and political
4 economy of the state.
5
6 In the event any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or
7 section of this chapter is declared unconstitutional by any
8 court of competent jurisdiction, then such declaration of such
9 unconstitutionality shall not affect the remainder of this
10 chapter, and the unconstitutional portion shall be considered
11 severable, it being the intent of the Legislature that the
12 remainder of this chapter shall continue in full force and
13 effect.
14 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(e), for the
15 1999-2000 fiscal year only, funds may be transferred, as
16 reflected in the General Appropriations Act, from the Citrus
17 Advertising Trust Fund to the Department of Agriculture and
18 Consumer Services for the purpose of citrus canker
19 eradication. This subsection expires July 1, 2000.
20 Section 28. In order to implement Specific
21 Appropriation 1653A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
22 Act, subsection (11) is added to section 601.15, Florida
23 Statutes, to read:
24 601.15 Advertising campaign; methods of conducting;
25 excise tax; emergency reserve fund; citrus research.--
26 (11) Notwithstanding subsection (1), for the 1999-2000
27 fiscal year only, funds may be transferred, as reflected in
28 the General Appropriations Act, from the Citrus Advertising
29 Trust Fund to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer
30 Services for the purpose of citrus canker eradication. This
31 subsection expires July 1, 2000.
23
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 Section 29. The Commissioner of Education is
2 authorized to establish, abolish, or consolidate bureaus,
3 sections, and subsections and to reallocate duties and
4 functions within the Department of Education in order to
5 promote effective and efficient operation of the department.
6 Authorized positions and appropriations may be transferred
7 from one budget entity to another as required to implement the
8 reorganization. The provisions of this section are subject to
9 the requirements of section 216.181, Florida Statutes. The
10 commissioner may not establish, abolish, or consolidate
11 bureaus, sections, or subsections after January 31, 2000. The
12 commissioner shall provide a report on the reorganization to
13 the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of
14 Representatives, the Minority Leaders of the Senate and the
15 House of Representatives, and the chairmen of the education
16 and appropriations committees of the Legislature by January
17 31, 2001. This section expires July 1, 2000.
18 Section 30. The funds provided in the 1999-2000
19 General Appropriations Act for workforce development shall be
20 initially allocated to the school district or community
21 college as designated. If, for any reason, a program in whole
22 or in part is moved from a community college to a school
23 district or moved from a school district to a community
24 college, the Commissioner of Education or the executive
25 director of the Division of Community Colleges shall submit a
26 budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216, Florida Statutes, to
27 transfer the appropriate amount of the 1999-2000 appropriation
28 between the affected district and community college. The
29 amount transferred shall be as near as practicable to the
30 actual amount appropriated for the FTE funded for that
31 program. This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
24
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 Section 31. A section of this act that implements a
2 specific appropriation or specifically identified proviso
3 language in the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act is void
4 if the specific appropriation or specifically identified
5 proviso language is vetoed. A section of this act that
6 implements more than one specific appropriation or more than
7 one portion of specifically identified proviso language in the
8 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act is void if all the
9 specific appropriations or portions of specifically identified
10 proviso language are vetoed.
11 Section 32. If any other act passed during the 1999
12 Regular Session of the Legislature or any extension thereof
13 contains a provision that is substantively the same as a
14 provision in this act, but that removes or is otherwise not
15 subject to the future repeal applied to such provision by this
16 act, the Legislature intends that the provision in the other
17 act shall take precedence and shall continue to operate,
18 notwithstanding the future repeal provided by this act.
19 Section 33. The performance measures and standards
20 established in this section for individual programs in
21 Education shall be applied to those programs for the 1999-2000
22 fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are
23 directly linked to the appropriations made in the General
24 Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, as required by
25 the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
26 (1) PUBLIC SCHOOLS.--
27 (a) For the Pre-Kindergarten Program, the purpose of
28 which is to prepare children for success in school, the
29 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
30 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
31 Appropriations 5, 6, and 109 are as follows:
25
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 1. PRE-KINDERGARTEN OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Number and percentage of kindergarten and first
3 grade students meeting state expectations for readiness..(TBD)
4 b. For the Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade (K-12)
5 Program, the purpose of which is to provide children and youth
6 with the sound education needed to grow to a satisfying and
7 productive adulthood, the outcome measures, output measures,
8 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
9 provided in Specific Appropriations 3, 108-110, 112, 115, 117,
10 117A, 117B, and 118 are as follows:
11 2. K-12 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Number and percentage of a student cohort who
13 graduates from high school, as defined in statute....(110,027;
14 52.65%)
15 b. Number and percentage of students 16 years or older
16 who were reported as dropouts...................(34,818; 4.9%)
17 c. Number and percentage of recent graduates who meet
18 the state levels in reading, writing, and mathematics for
19 placement into college-level courses...(Reading 31,135, 76.2%;
20 Writing 31,992, 78%; Mathematics 28,890,
21 71.9%)
22 d. Number and percentage of graduates residing in
23 Florida who, within 6 months after graduation, are employed,
24 enrolled in postsecondary programs, or enlisted in the
25 military.................................................(TBD)
26 e. Median learning gains of students in grades 3-10,
27 as measured by FCAT......................................(TBD)
28 f. Median learning gains for students scoring at or
29 below the 25th percentile on FCAT........................(TBD)
30 g. Number and percent of students demonstrating 1
31 year's academic gain for 1 year spent in school..........(TBD)
26
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 h. Number and percentage of students absent 11 to 20
2 days...............................................(Elementary
3 272,402, 20.3%; Middle 135,672, 22.7%; High 135,729, 21.3%;
4 Alternative (TBD); Exceptional Education 2,652, 8.3%)
5 i. Number and percentage of students absent 21 or more
6 days each year.......(Elementary 116,811, 8.7%; Middle 93,417,
7 15.6%; High 122,359,
8 19.1%; Alternative (TBD); Exceptional Education 27.8%)
9 j. Number and percentage of incidents of violence,
10 weapons violations, vandalism, substance abuse, and harassment
11 on the bus, on campus, and at school-sponsored activities
12 .........................................................(TBD)
13 k. Number and percent of teachers teaching more than 1
14 class out-of-field during a school term..................(TBD)
15 l. Number and percent of teachers with a major or
16 minor in the subject area in which they are teaching.....(TBD)
17 m. Number and percent of teachers who have earned a
18 degree beyond the bachelor's level in the subject area in
19 which they are employed to teach.........................(TBD)
20 n. Number and percent of teachers receiving more than
21 2 days staff development training during the contract year
22 .........................................................(TBD)
23 o. Number and percent of teachers with National
24 Teacher's Certification............................(750, 0.5%)
25 p. Meeting attendance rate of school advisory council
26 members..................................................(TBD)
27 q. Number and percent of school advisory councils,
28 demonstrating by vote, participation in spending of the $10
29 per unweighted FTE in lottery funds appropriated by the
30 Legislature for use by the councils......................(TBD)
31
27
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 r. Number and percent of schools having an active PTO
2 or PTA...................................................(TBD)
3 3. K-12 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Average number of days teachers and administrators
5 were not in attendance at school for reasons classified as
6 personal leave, sick leave, and temporary duty elsewhere.(TBD)
7 (2) COMMUNITY COLLEGES.--
8 (a) For the Associate of Arts (AA) Program, the
9 purpose of which is to provide freshman and sophomore classes
10 that enable transfers to a university primarily, and
11 secondarily, improve job skills, the outcome measures, output
12 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
13 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 7, 153, and 154 are
14 as follows:
15 1. ASSOCIATE OF ARTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of AA degree graduates who transfer to a
17 state university within 2 years..........................(65%)
18 b. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
19 University System who earn a 2.5 or above in the SUS after a
20 year.....................................................(72%)
21 c. Percent of AA graduates who are employed and have
22 not transferred to a state university....................(21%)
23 d. Of the AA students completing 18 credit hours, the
24 percent of whom graduate in 4 years......................(29%)
25 2. ASSOCIATE OF ARTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of AA degrees granted...............(29,000)
27 b. Percentage of students graduating with total
28 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 120%
29 of the degree requirement................................(36%)
30 (b) For the College Preparatory Program, the purpose
31 of which is to provide underprepared students with
28
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 communication and computation skills so they are prepared to
2 enter college level courses, the outcome measures, output
3 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
4 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 7, 153, and 154 are
5 as follows:
6 1. COLLEGE PREPARATORY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percentage of students exiting the
8 college-preparatory program who enter college-level course
9 work associated with the AA, Associate of Science (AS),
10 Postsecondary Vocational Certificate, and Postsecondary Adult
11 Vocational programs......................................(TBD)
12 b. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
13 University System who started in College Prep and who earn a
14 2.5 in the SUS after 1 year..............................(71%)
15 (3) STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM.--
16 (a) For the Instruction Program, the purpose of which
17 is to transmit knowledge, skills, and competencies that allow
18 eligible individuals to become practicing professionals or to
19 pursue further academic endeavors, the outcome measures,
20 output measures, and associated performance standards with
21 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 8A-8D and
22 180 are as follows:
23 1. INSTRUCTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Graduation rate for First Time In College (FTIC)
25 students, using a 6-year rate............................(60%)
26 b. Retention rate for FTIC students, using a 6-year
27 rate.....................................................(71%)
28 c. Graduation rate for AA transfer students, using a
29 4-year rate..............................................(69%)
30 d. Retention rate for AA transfer students, using a
31 4-year rate..............................................(80%)
29
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Percentage of students graduating with total
2 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 115%
3 of the degree requirement................................(61%)
4 f. Pass rate on licensure/certification exams, for the
5 first sitting............................................(TBD)
6 g. Percentage of graduates remaining in Florida..(TBD)
7 h. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
8 percentage employed at $25,000 or more 1 year following
9 graduation...............................................(45%)
10 i. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
11 percentage employed at $25,000 or more 5 years following
12 graduation...............................................(76%)
13 j. Percentage of undergraduate students enrolled in
14 graduate school upon completion of the baccalaureate degree
15 .........................................................(16%)
16 2. INSTRUCTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of degrees granted, by level...........(TBD)
18 b. Percentage of classes taught by state-funded ranked
19 faculty members..........................................(TBD)
20 c. Percent of qualified Florida students, those
21 applicants meeting BOR admission standards, admitted as FTIC
22 students.................................................(93%)
23 d. Percent of FTICs admitted as alternative admits
24 .......................................................(11.4%)
25 e. Percent of alternative admits who are out-of-state
26 students...............................................(14.8%)
27 (b) For the Research Program, the purpose of which is
28 to direct research toward solving technical, social, and
29 economic problems facing the state and the nation, the outcome
30 measures, output measures, and associated performance
31
30
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 8A-8D and 180-183A are as follows:
3 1. RESEARCH OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Externally-generated research and training grant
5 funds (federal, state, local, business, and industry) per
6 state-funded ranked faculty full-time equivalent (FTE);
7 Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS); and the
8 Health Science Centers to be reflected separately........(TBD)
9 b. Ratio of externally-generated research and training
10 grant funds to state research funds; IFAS and Health Science
11 Centers to be reflected separately.......................(TBD)
12 2. RESEARCH OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Average number of articles in refereed journals per
14 ranked faculty; IFAS and Health Science Centers to be
15 reflected separately.....................................(TBD)
16 (c) For the Public Service Program, the purpose of
17 which is to apply the expertise of university personnel in
18 solving public problems, the outcome measures, output
19 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
20 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 8A-8D and 180-183
21 are as follows:
22 1. PUBLIC SERVICE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. For IFAS only, the percent of public service
24 projects where the beneficiary is satisfied or highly
25 satisfied with the extension assistance..................(98%)
26 2. PUBLIC SERVICE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. The number and percentage of Florida's public
28 schools assisted.........................................(TBD)
29 (4) WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT.--
30 (a) For the Workforce Development Education Program,
31 the purpose of which is to respond to emerging local and
31
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 statewide economic development needs by providing workforce
2 development programs, the outcome measures, output measures,
3 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
4 provided in Specific Appropriation 148 are as follows:
5 1. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Number and percent of vocational certificate
7 program completers who left the program and are found placed
8 according to the following definitions:
9 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
10 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
11 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter.........(12,227, 42.6%)
12 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
13 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
14 employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing
15 education in a college credit-level program.....(4,369, 15.2%)
16 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
17 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
18 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
19 level..........................................(10,801, 37.6%)
20 b. Number of targeted population vocational
21 certificate program completers who left the program and are
22 found placed and disaggregated by targeted population:
23 (I) WAGES clients................................(694)
24 (II) Economically disadvantaged................(4,193)
25 (III) Limited English proficient...............(1,491)
26 (IV) Dislocated worker...........................(760)
27 (V) Disabled individuals.........................(591)
28 c. Number and percent of applied technology diploma
29 program completers who left the program and are found placed
30 according to the following definitions:
31
32
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
2 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
3 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter...................(TBD)
4 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
5 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
6 employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing
7 education in a college credit-level program..............(TBD)
8 d. Number and percent of associate in science degree
9 and college-credit certificate program completers who left the
10 program and are found placed according to the following
11 definitions:
12 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
13 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
14 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter..........(6,891, 57.9%)
15 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
16 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
17 employed at $3,900 per quarter, or found continuing education
18 in a college credit-level program......................(1,351,
19 11.3%)
20 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
21 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
22 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
23 level...........................................(1,661, 13.9%)
24 e. Number of targeted population associate in science
25 program completers who left the program and are found
26 placed-disaggregated by targeted populations:
27 (I) Wages clients.................................(71)
28 (II) Economically disadvantaged..................(690)
29 (III) Limited English proficient.................(331)
30 (IV) Dislocated worker...........................(259)
31 (V) Disabled individuals.........................(274)
33
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Number and percent of completers who are retained
2 in employment 1 year after found placed:
3 (I) Vocational certificate.......................(TBD)
4 (II) Applied technology diploma..................(TBD)
5 (III) Associate in science degree................(TBD)
6 2. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of vocational certificate program completers
8 ......................................................(30,635)
9 b. Number of occupational completion points completed
10 in vocational certificate programs.......................(TBD)
11 c. Number of occupational completion points achieved
12 in apprenticeship programs.............................(4,031)
13 d. Number of program completers in associate in
14 science degree and college credit certificate programs
15 ......................................................(12,045)
16 e. Number of associate in science degrees granted
17 .......................................................(9,338)
18 f. Number of occupational completion points completed
19 in applied technology diploma programs...................(TBD)
20 (b) For the Adult General Education Program, the
21 purpose of which is to respond to emerging local and statewide
22 economic development needs by providing adult general
23 education courses, outcome measures, output measures, and
24 associated performance standards with respect to funds
25 provided in Specific Appropriation 148 are as follows:
26 1. ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Number and percent of adult basic education,
28 including English as a Second Language, literacy completion
29 point completers who left the program and are found according
30 to the following definitions:
31
34
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (I) Level II - Found employed at $3,900 or more per
2 quarter, or found continuing education at the adult secondary,
3 vocational certificate, or college-credit levels.........(TBD)
4 (II) Level I - Found in employment not included in
5 Level II or continuing education at the adult basic education
6 level....................................................(TBD)
7 b. Number of adult secondary education literacy
8 completion point completers who left the program and are found
9 placed according to the following definitions:
10 (I) Level II - Found employed at $3,900 or more per
11 quarter, or found continuing education at the adult secondary,
12 vocational certificate, or college-credit levels...(Adult High
13 School, 18,816; GED, 3,677)
14 (II) Level I - Found in employment not included in
15 Level II or continuing education at the adult basic education
16 level..............................................(Adult High
17 School, 54,410; GED, 7,474)
18 2. ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of literacy completion points completed in
20 Adult Basic Education and Adult Secondary Program........(TBD)
21 b. Number of literacy completion points completed
22 disaggregated by targeted population (WAGES Clients,
23 Economically Disadvantaged, Limited English Proficient,
24 Dislocated Worker, Disabled Individuals) for Adult Basic,
25 Adult High School, and GED...............................(TBD)
26 Section 34. The performance measures and standards
27 established in this section for individual programs in Human
28 Services agencies shall be applied to those programs for the
29 1999-2000 fiscal year. These performance measures and
30 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
31 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as
35
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
2 of 1994.
3 (1) AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION.--
4 (a) For the Medicaid Health Services Program, the
5 purpose of which is to provide timely primary medical care to
6 categorically eligible clients under the Supplemental Security
7 Income (SSI) program, the Temporary Assistance for Needy
8 Families (TANF) program, the Institutional Care Program (ICP),
9 and for those persons eligible under other provisions of
10 federal or state law, in order to prevent more critical health
11 care problems and to increase access to such care where access
12 is restricted, the outcome measures, output measures, and
13 associated performance standards with respect to funds
14 provided in Specific Appropriations 224-279 are as follows:
15 1. HEALTH SERVICES TO PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORNS, AND
16 WOMEN WHO WANT FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of women receiving adequate prenatal care
18 .........................................................(86%)
19 b. Neonatal mortality rate...........(per 1,000)(4.86)
20 c. Percent of vaginal deliveries with no complications
21 .......................................................(73.1%)
22 d. Average length of time between pregnancies for
23 those receiving family planning services (months).......(37.4)
24 2. HEALTH SERVICES TO PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORNS, AND
25 WOMEN WHO WANT FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of women receiving prenatal care...(137,130)
27 b. Number of vaginal deliveries...............(64,152)
28 c. Number of women receiving family planning services
29 .....................................................(136,197)
30 3. HEALTH SERVICES TO CHILDREN OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
36
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Percent of eligible children who received all
2 required components of EPSDT screen......................(64%)
3 b. Percent of hospitalizations for conditions
4 preventable with good ambulatory care..................(7.53%)
5 c. Ratio of children hospitalized for mental health
6 care to those receiving mental health services..........(6.8%)
7 4. HEALTH SERVICES TO CHILDREN OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of children ages 1-20 enrolled in Medicaid
9 ...................................................(1,119,745)
10 b. Number of children receiving mental health services
11 ......................................................(54,443)
12 c. Number of children receiving EPSDT services
13 .....................................................(127,967)
14 d. Number of services by major type of service:
15 (I) Hospital inpatient services...............(39,828)
16 (II) Physician services....................(3,475,670)
17 (III) Prescribed drugs.....................(2,875,949)
18 5. HEALTH SERVICES TO WORKING AGE ADULTS
19 (NON-DISABLED) OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of hospitalizations for conditions
21 preventable with good ambulatory care..................(13.3%)
22 6. HEALTH SERVICES TO WORKING AGE ADULTS
23 (NON-DISABLED) OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of non-disabled adults receiving a service
25 .........................................................(85%)
26 7. HEALTH SERVICES TO DISABLED WORKING AGE ADULTS
27 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of hospitalizations for conditions
29 preventable with good ambulatory care..................(13.9%)
30 8. HEALTH SERVICES TO DISABLED WORKING AGE ADULTS
31 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
37
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Percent of enrolled disabled adults receiving a
2 service................................................(88.6%)
3 9. HEALTH SERVICES TO ELDERS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of hospital stays for elder recipients
5 exceeding length of stay criteria........................(26%)
6 b. Percent of elder recipients in long-term care who
7 improve or maintain activities of daily living (ADL)
8 functioning to those receiving mental health services....(TBD)
9 10. HEALTH SERVICES TO ELDERS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Number enrolled in long term care waivers...(9,766)
11 b. Number of elders receiving mental health care
12 .......................................................(7,688)
13 c. Number of services by major type of service:
14 (I) Hospital inpatient services...............(89,048)
15 (II) Physician services....................(1,285,488)
16 (III) Prescribed drugs.....................(8,337,539)
17 11. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID POLICY OUTCOME
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of new recipients voluntarily selecting
20 managed care plan........................................(75%)
21 b. Percent of programs with cost effectiveness
22 determined annually.......................................(5%)
23 12. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID POLICY OUTPUT
24 MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of new provider applications........(10,600)
26 b. Number of new enrollees provided choice counseling
27 .....................................................(516,000)
28 c. Number of providers........................(68,276)
29 13. PROCESS MEDICAID PROVIDER CLAIMS OUTCOME
30 MEASURES.--
31
38
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Average length of time between receipt of clean
2 claim and payment (days)..................................(16)
3 b. Percent increase in dollars recovered annually.(5%)
4 c. Amount of recoveries..................($19,275,043)
5 d. Cost avoided because of identification of
6 third-party coverage:
7 (I) Commercial coverage.................($197,493,244)
8 (II) Medicare...........................($694,234,790)
9 14. PROCESS MEDICAID PROVIDER CLAIMS OUTPUT
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of claims received..............(96,398,352)
12 b. Number of claims processed.............(65,400,797)
13 c. Number of claims denied................(30,997,555)
14 d. Number of fraud and abuse cases opened......(3,776)
15 e. Number of fraud and abuse cases closed......(4,683)
16 f. Number of referrals to the Medicaid Fraud Control
17 Unit/Attorney General's Office...........................(175)
18 (b) For the Health Services Quality Assurance Program,
19 the purpose of which is to ensure that all Floridians have
20 access to quality health care and services through the
21 licensure and certification of facilities, and in responding
22 to consumer complaints about facilities, services, and
23 practitioners, the outcome measures, output measures, and
24 associated performance standards with respect to funds
25 provided in Specific Appropriations 280-291 are as follows:
26 1. STATE REGULATION OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS
27 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percentage of Priority I practitioner
29 investigations resulting in emergency action.............(39%)
30 b. Average length of time (in days) to take emergency
31 action on Priority I practitioner investigations..........(60)
39
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Percentage of cease and desist orders issued to
2 unlicensed practitioners in which another complaint of
3 unlicensed activity is subsequently filed against the same
4 practitioner..............................................(7%)
5 d. Percentage of licensed practitioners involved in:
6 (I) Serious incidents...........................(.33%)
7 (II) Peer review discipline reports.............(.02%)
8 2. STATE REGULATION OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS
9 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of complaints determined legally sufficient
11 .......................................................(7,112)
12 b. Number of legally sufficient complaints resolved
13 by:
14 (I) Findings of no probable cause, including:
15 (A) Nolle prosse.................................(680)
16 (B) Letters of guidance..........................(491)
17 (C) Notice of noncompliance.......................(35)
18 (II) Findings of probable cause, including:
19 (A) Issuance of citation for minor violations.....(34)
20 (B) Stipulations or informal hearings............(662)
21 (C) Formal hearings...............................(44)
22 c. Percentage of investigations completed by priority
23 within timeframe:
24 (I) Priority I - 45 days........................(100%)
25 (II) Priority II - 180 days.....................(100%)
26 (III) Other - 180 days..........................(100%)
27 d. Average number of practitioner complaint
28 investigations per FTE....................................(87)
29 e. Number of inquiries to the call center regarding
30 practitioner licensure and disciplinary information..(113,293)
31
40
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 3. STATE LICENSURE AND FEDERAL CERTIFICATION OF HEALTH
2 CARE FACILITIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Percentage of investigations of alleged unlicensed
4 facilities and programs that have been previously issued a
5 cease and desist order and that are confirmed as repeated
6 unlicensed activity.......................................(7%)
7 b. Percentage of Priority I consumer complaints about
8 licensed facilities and programs that are investigated within
9 48 hours................................................(100%)
10 c. Percentage of accredited hospitals and ambulatory
11 surgical centers cited for not complying with life safety,
12 licensure, or emergency access standards.................(TBD)
13 d. Percentage of accreditation validation surveys that
14 result in findings of licensure deficiencies.............(TBD)
15 e. Percentage of facilities in which deficiencies are
16 found that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or
17 welfare of the public by type:
18 (I) Nursing Homes.................................(5%)
19 (II) Assisted Living Facilities...................(5%)
20 (III) Home Health Agencies.......................(TBD)
21 (IV) Clinical Laboratories.......................(TBD)
22 (V) Ambulatory Surgical Centers..................(TBD)
23 (VI) Hospitals...................................(TBD)
24 f. Percentage of failures by hospitals to report:
25 (I) Serious incidents (agency identified)........(TBD)
26 (II) Peer review disciplinary actions (agency
27 identified)..............................................(TBD)
28 4. STATE LICENSURE AND FEDERAL CERTIFICATION OF HEALTH
29 CARE FACILITIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of facility emergency actions taken.....(51)
31
41
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Total number of full facility quality-of-care
2 surveys conducted and by type..........................(6,171)
3 (I) Nursing Homes................................(815)
4 (II) Home Health Agencies......................(1,600)
5 (III) Assisted Living Facilities...............(1,282)
6 (IV) Clinical Laboratories.....................(1,082)
7 (V) Hospitals.....................................(35)
8 (VI) Other.....................................(1,357)
9 c. Average processing time (in days) for statewide
10 panel cases..............................................(259)
11 d. Number of hospitals that the agency determine have
12 not reported:
13 (I) Serious incidents(agency identified).........(TBD)
14 (II) Peer review disciplinary actions (agency
15 identified)..............................................(TBD)
16 5. HEALTH FACILITY PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW
17 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of plans and construction review performed
19 by type:
20 (I) Nursing Homes..............................(1,200)
21 (II) Hospitals.................................(3,500)
22 (III) Ambulatory Surgical Centers................(400)
23 b. Average number of hours for plans and construction
24 survey and review:
25 (I) Nursing Homes.................................(35)
26 (II) Hospitals....................................(35)
27 (III) Ambulatory Surgical Centers.................(35)
28 (2) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.--
29 (a) For the Florida Abuse Hotline Program, the purpose
30 of which is to serve as a central receiving and referral point
31 for all cases of suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of
42
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 children, disabled adults, and the elderly, the outcome
2 measures, output measures, and associated performance
3 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
4 Appropriations 322-325 are as follows:
5 1. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
6 FAMILIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percentage of abandoned calls made to the Florida
8 Abuse Hotline.............................................(2%)
9 2. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
10 FAMILIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Calls answered............................(303,332)
12 b. Percent of calls answered within three minutes
13 .........................................................(98%)
14 (b) For the Aging and Adult Services Program, the
15 purpose of which is to protect adults and the elderly from
16 abuse, neglect, and exploitation, the outcome measures, output
17 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
18 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 334-341 are as
19 follows:
20 1. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES AND FRAIL ELDERLY WHO ARE
21 VICTIMS OF ABUSE, NEGLECT, OR EXPLOITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Percent of protective supervision cases in which no
23 report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received
24 while the case is open (from beginning of protective
25 supervision for a maximum of 1 year......................(96%)
26 b. Percent of clients satisfied..................(90%)
27 2. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES AND FRAIL ELDERLY WHO ARE
28 VICTIMS OF ABUSE, NEGLECT, OR EXPLOITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of protective supervision cases in which no
30 report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received
31
43
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 while the case is open (from beginning of protective
2 supervision for a maximum of 1 year).....................(648)
3 b. Number of investigations...................(34,500)
4 c. Number of persons referred to other agencies
5 .......................................................(1,700)
6 d. Number of persons receiving protective supervision
7 services.................................................(675)
8 e. Number of persons receiving placement and community
9 support services.......................................(7,237)
10 3. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
11 REMAIN IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percent of adults with disabilities receiving
13 services who are not placed in a nursing home............(99%)
14 b. Percent of clients satisfied..................(95%)
15 4. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
16 REMAIN IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of adults with disabilities to be served:
18 (I) Community Care for Disabled Adults.........(1,051)
19 (II) Home Care for Disabled Adults.............(1,428)
20 (III) Number of Medicaid waiver clients served.(3,760)
21 (c) For the People with Mental Health and Substance
22 Abuse Problems Program, the purpose of which is to enable
23 adults with mental health problems to function
24 self-sufficiently in the community, enable children with
25 mental health problems to function appropriately and succeed
26 in school, and enable children and adults with or at serious
27 risk of substance abuse problems to be self-sufficient and
28 addiction free, the outcome measures, output measures, and
29 associated performance standards with respect to funds
30 provided in Specific Appropriations 342-356 are as follows:
31
44
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 1. CHILDREN INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED IN JUVENILE JUSTICE
2 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Percent of children restored to competency and
4 recommended to proceed with a judicial hearing:
5 (I) With mental illness..........................(90%)
6 (II) With mental retardation.....................(54%)
7 b. Percent of community partners satisfied based upon
8 a survey.................................................(90%)
9 c. Percent of children with mental illness restored to
10 competency or determined unrestorable in less than 180 days
11 .........................................................(80%)
12 d. Percent of children with mental retardation
13 restored to competency or determined unrestorable in less than
14 365 days.................................................(80%)
15 e. Percent of children returned to court for a
16 competency hearing and the court concurs with the
17 recommendation of the provider...........................(95%)
18 2. CHILDREN INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED IN JUVENILE JUSTICE
19 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number served who are incompetent to proceed..(224)
21 b. Number of days following the determination by the
22 mental health service provider of restoration of competency or
23 unrestorability of competency to the date of the court hearing
24 on the determination of competency.......................(TBD)
25 3. CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE (SED)
26 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Projected annual days SED children (excluding those
28 in juvenile justice facilities) spend in the community...(338)
29 b. Average functional level score SED children will
30 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
31 functioning score.........................................(49)
45
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Percent of families satisfied with the services
2 received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior scale
3 .........................................................(83%)
4 d. Percent of available school days SED children
5 attended during the last 30 days.........................(85%)
6 e. Percent of commitments or recommitments to Juvenile
7 Justice..................................................(TBD)
8 f. Percent of community partners satisfied based on a
9 survey...................................................(90%)
10 g. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
11 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
12 the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional
13 disturbance recorded in the initial assessment...........(TBD)
14 4. CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE (SED)
15 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. SED children to be served..................(22,104)
17 b. Total average expenditures for services per client
18 (includes Medicaid services).............................(TBD)
19 5. CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES (ED) OUTCOME
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Projected annual days ED children (excluding those
22 in juvenile justice facilities) spent in the community...(350)
23 b. Average functional level score ED children will
24 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
25 Functioning scale.........................................(55)
26 c. Percent of available school days ED children attend
27 during the last 30 days..................................(87%)
28 d. Percent of commitments or recommitments to Juvenile
29 Justice..................................................(TBD)
30 e. Percent of community partners satisfied based on a
31 survey...................................................(90%)
46
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Percent of families satisfied with the services
2 received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior scale
3 .........................................................(85%)
4 g. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
5 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
6 the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional
7 disturbance recorded in the initial assessment...........(TBD)
8 6. CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES (ED) OUTPUT
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of ED children to be served.........(13,101)
11 b. Total average expenditures for services per client
12 (includes Medicaid services).............................(TBD)
13 7. CHILDREN AT RISK OF EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE OUTCOME
14 MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of families satisfied with the services
16 received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior scale
17 .........................................................(90%)
18 8. CHILDREN AT RISK OF EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE OUTPUT
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of at-risk children to be served....(10,390)
21 9. CHILDREN WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTCOME
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of children who complete treatment....(72%)
24 b. Percent of parents of children receiving services
25 reporting average or above average level of satisfaction on
26 Family Centered Behavior Scale...........................(95%)
27 c. Percent of children drug free at 6 months following
28 completion of treatment..................................(TBD)
29 d. Percent of children receiving services who are
30 satisfied based on survey................................(90%)
31
47
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Percent of parents of children receiving services
2 reporting average or above level of satisfaction on the Family
3 Centered Behavior scale..................................(95%)
4 f. Percent of children under the supervision of the
5 state receiving substance abuse treatment who are not
6 committed or recommitted to the Department of Juvenile Justice
7 during the 12 months following treatment completion......(85%)
8 g. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
9 survey...................................................(90%)
10 10. CHILDREN WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTPUT
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of children served..................(62,979)
13 b. Number of children completing treatment.....(4,500)
14 11. CHILDREN AT RISK OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE OUTCOME
15 MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of children in targeted prevention programs
17 who achieve expected level of improvement in reading.....(75%)
18 b. Percent of children in targeted prevention programs
19 who achieve expected level of improvement in math........(75%)
20 c. Percent of children who receive targeted prevention
21 services who are not admitted to substance abuse services
22 during the 12 months after completion of prevention services
23 .........................................................(96%)
24 d. Percent of children in targeted prevention programs
25 who perceive substance use to be harmful at the time of
26 discharge when compared to admission.....................(76%)
27 12. CHILDREN AT RISK OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE OUTPUT
28 MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of children served in targeted prevention
30 .......................................................(6,233)
31
48
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 13. ADULTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTCOME
2 MEASURES.--
3 a. Percent drug free at 6 months following completion
4 of treatment.............................................(TBD)
5 b. Percent of adults employed upon discharge from
6 treatment services.......................................(61%)
7 c. Percent of adult women pregnant during treatment
8 who give birth to substance-free newborns................(89%)
9 d. Average score on the Behavioral Healthcare Rating
10 of Satisfaction..........................................(138)
11 e. Percentage of individuals in protective supervision
12 who have case plans requiring substance abuse treatment who
13 are receiving treatment..................................(TBD)
14 f. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
15 surveys..................................................(90%)
16 14. ADULTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTPUT
17 MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of adults served...................(120,287)
19 b. Number of clients who complete treatment......(TBD)
20 c. Number of individuals in protective supervision who
21 have case plans requiring substance abuse treatment who are
22 receiving treatment......................................(TBD)
23 15. ADULTS WITH SERIOUS AND PERSISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS
24 IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Average annual number of days spent in the
26 community (not in institutions or other facilities)......(340)
27 b. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
28 of Functioning score......................................(49)
29 c. Average client satisfaction score on the Behavioral
30 Healthcare Rating Scale..................................(130)
31 d. Average annual days worked for pay.............(30)
49
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Total average monthly income in last 30 days.($530)
2 f. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
3 survey...................................................(90%)
4 g. Increase family satisfaction..................(TBD)
5 h. Percentage of clients who worked during the year
6 .........................................................(TBD)
7 16. ADULTS WITH SERIOUS AND PERSISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS
8 IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of adults with a serious and persistent
10 mental illness in the community served................(36,312)
11 17. ADULTS IN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Average Global Assessment of Functioning scale
13 change score..............................................(17)
14 b. Percent readmitted within 30 days..............(0%)
15 c. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
16 survey...................................................(90%)
17 d. Increase family satisfaction..................(TBD)
18 18. ADULTS IN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of adults in mental health crisis served
20 ......................................................(20,863)
21 19. ADULTS WITH FORENSIC INVOLVEMENT OUTCOME
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
24 of Functioning score......................................(47)
25 b. Percent of persons who violate their conditional
26 release under chapter 916, Florida Statutes, and are
27 recommitted...............................................(4%)
28 c. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
29 survey...................................................(90%)
30 d. Average annual number of days spent in the
31 community (not in institutions or other facilities)......(325)
50
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 20. ADULTS WITH FORENSIC INVOLVEMENT OUTPUT
2 MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of adults with forensic involvement served
4 .......................................................(5,845)
5 (d) For the Families in Need of Child Care Programs,
6 the purpose of which is to allow parents to prevent the
7 reoccurrence of abuse or neglect, to obtain and retain
8 employment, to prepare children to enter school ready to
9 learn, and to protect children and adults from abuse, the
10 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
11 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
12 Appropriations 357-375 are as follows:
13 1. FAMILIES IN NEED OF CHILD CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Percent of 4-year-old children placed with
15 contracted providers in care for 9 months who enter
16 Kindergarten ready to learn as determined by DOE or local
17 school systems' readiness assessment.....................(80%)
18 b. Percent of non-WAGES, working poor clients who need
19 child care that receive subsidized child care services:
20 (I) ages 0 - 5...................................(92%)
21 (II) school age................................(41.5%)
22 (III) all kids...................................(63%)
23 c. Percent of WAGES clients who need child care that
24 receive subsidized child care services..................(100%)
25 d. Percent of licensed child care providers who are
26 satisfied with the licensing process.....................(93%)
27 e. Percent of licensed child care facilities and homes
28 with no class 1 (serious) violations during their licensure
29 year.....................................................(97%)
30 f. Number of provisional licenses as a result of
31 noncompliance with child care standards..................(375)
51
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 g. Number of verified incidents of abuse and/or
2 neglect in licensed child care arrangements...............(62)
3 h. Percent of clients receiving subsidized child care
4 services who are satisfied...............................(95%)
5 2. FAMILIES IN NEED OF CHILD CARE OUTPUTS MEASURES.--
6 a. Total number served:......................(134,009)
7 (I) At Risk...................................(13,250)
8 (II) Working Poor.............................(53,739)
9 (III) Migrants.................................(2,880)
10 (IV) WAGES/Transitional Child Care............(64,140)
11 3. FAMILIES KNOWN TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH CHILDREN AT
12 RISK OF ABUSE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of children in families who complete
14 intensive child abuse prevention programs of 3 months or more
15 who are not abused or neglected within:
16 (I) 6 months of program completion...............(95%)
17 (II) 12 months of program completion.............(95%)
18 (III) 18 months of program completion............(95%)
19 b. Percent of families receiving parent education and
20 other parent skill building services, lasting 6 weeks or
21 longer, who show improved family skills and capacity to care
22 for their children.......................................(TBD)
23 c. Percent of clients satisfied..................(95%)
24 4. FAMILIES KNOWN TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH CHILDREN AT
25 RISK OF ABUSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of persons served..................(153,005)
27 b. Number receiving information and referral services
28 ......................................................(61,287)
29 5. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
30 FAMILIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
52
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Percent of children who have no findings of child
2 maltreatment within 1 year of case closure from services.(95%)
3 b. Percent of children reunified with family who
4 return to foster care within one year of case closure.....(3%)
5 c. Percent of children not abused or neglected during
6 services.................................................(97%)
7 d. Percent of clients satisfied..................(95%)
8 e. Percent of families receiving ongoing services who
9 show improved scores on the Child Well-Being Scales......(TBD)
10 f. Percent of children given exit interviews who were
11 satisfied with their foster care placement...............(TBD)
12 g. Percent of families under 18 years who have no
13 finding of maltreatment during each 12 month period......(TBD)
14 6. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
15 FAMILIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Reports of child abuse/neglect............(126,735)
17 b. Children identified as abused/neglected during year
18 ......................................................(75,000)
19 c. Number of families served by Intensive Crisis
20 Counseling Program, Family Builders....................(6,767)
21 d. Number of families served by Protective Supervision
22 ......................................................(26,436)
23 e. Number of children served in foster care...(16,313)
24 f. Number of children served in relative care..(8,126)
25 g. Percent of alleged victims seen within 24 hours
26 ........................................................(100%)
27 h. Percent of investigations completed within 30 days
28 ........................................................(100%)
29 i. Percent of children who exited out-of-home care by
30 the 15th month...........................................(TBD)
31
53
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 j. Percent of cases reviewed by supervisors in
2 accordance with department timeframes for early warning system
3 .........................................................(TBD)
4 k. Number of individuals under the department's
5 protective supervision who have case plans requiring substance
6 abuse treatment who are receiving treatment..............(TBD)
7 l. Percent of individuals under the department's
8 protective supervision who have case plans requiring substance
9 abuse treatment who are receiving treatment..............(TBD)
10 m. Ratio of certified workers to children........(TBD)
11 7. VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OUTCOME MEASURESS.--
12 a. Ratio of incidents reported resulting in injury or
13 harm to clients as a result of inadequate security procedures
14 per 1,000 shelter days.....................................(0)
15 b. Percent of clients satisfied..................(95%)
16 8. VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of individuals receiving case management
18 services..............................................(21,270)
19 b. Number of children counseled...............(20,340)
20 c. Number of adults counseled................(108,442)
21 d. Percent of adult and child victims in shelter more
22 than 72 hours having a plan for family safety and security
23 when they leave shelter.................................(100%)
24 e. Number of individuals served in emergency shelters
25 ......................................................(15,775)
26 9. CHILD VICTIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT WHO BECOME
27 ELIGIBLE FOR ADOPTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of children who are adopted of the number
29 of children legally available for adoption...............(90%)
30 b. Percent of clients satisfied..................(95%)
31
54
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 10. CHILD VICTIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT WHO BECOME
2 ELIGIBLE FOR ADOPTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Children receiving adoptive services........(4,454)
4 b. Children receiving subsidies...............(12,454)
5 c. Number of children placed in adoption.......(1,900)
6 (e) For the People with Developmental Disabilities
7 Program, the purpose of which is to enable individuals with
8 developmental disabilities to live everyday lives, as measured
9 by achievement of valued personal outcomes appropriate to life
10 stages from birth to death, the outcome measures, output
11 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
12 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 376-390 are as
13 follows:
14 1. PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of people at or above the national standard
16 on quality of life outcomes..............................(50%)
17 b. Percent of adults living in homes of their own
18 .......................................................(18.5%)
19 c. Percent of people who are employed in integrated
20 settings...............................................(27.5%)
21 d. Percent of clients satisfied with services....(95%)
22 2. PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Children and adults provided case management
24 ......................................................(28,664)
25 b. Children and adults provided residential care
26 .......................................................(4,907)
27 c. Children and adults provided individualized
28 supports and services.................................(28,664)
29 (f) For the Economic Self-Sufficiency Program, the
30 purpose of which is to help people become economically
31 self-sufficient through programs such as Food Assistance, Work
55
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 and Gain Economic Self-Sufficiency (WAGES), Refugee
2 Assistance, and Medicaid eligibility services, including
3 disability determination eligibility, the outcome measures,
4 output measures, and associated performance standards with
5 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 391-404
6 are as follows:
7 1. WAGES/ADULTS AND FAMILIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
8 BECOME EMPLOYED OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percentage of applications processed within time
10 standards (total).......................................(100%)
11 b. Percentage of Food Stamp applications processed
12 within 30 days..........................................(100%)
13 c. Percentage of cash assistance applications
14 processed within 45 days................................(100%)
15 d. Percentage of Medicaid applications processed
16 within 45 days..........................................(100%)
17 e. Percentage of disabled adult payment applications
18 processed within 90 days................................(100%)
19 f. Percentage of Food Stamp benefits determined
20 accurately............................................(90.70%)
21 g. Percentage of WAGES cash assistance benefits
22 determined accurately.................................(93.89%)
23 h. Percentage of Medicaid benefits determined
24 accurately..............................................(100%)
25 i. Percentage of Benefit Recovery claims established
26 within 90 days..........................................(100%)
27 j. Percentage of dollars collected for established
28 Benefit Recovery claims..................................(50%)
29 k. Percentage of suspected fraud cases referred that
30 result in Front-end Fraud Prevention savings.............(70%)
31
56
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 l. Percentage of WAGES sanctions referred by the local
2 WAGES coalitions that are executed within 10 days.......(100%)
3 m. Percentage of work eligible WAGES participants
4 accurately referred to the local WAGES coalitions within 1
5 work day................................................(100%)
6 n. Percentage of Refugee Assistance cases accurately
7 closed at 8 months or less..............................(100%)
8 o. Percentage of clients satisfied with eligibility
9 services:
10 p. Percentage of WAGES coalitions clients employed
11 .........................................................(41%)
12 2. WAGES/ADULTS AND FAMILIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
13 BECOME EMPLOYED OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Total number of applications............(2,575,690)
15 b. Dollars collected through Benefit Recovery
16 .................................................($21,000,000)
17 c. Number of Front-end Fraud Prevention investigations
18 completed.............................................(25,200)
19 d. Dollars saved through Front-end Fraud Prevention
20 .................................................($17,900,000)
21 e. Number of WAGES participants referred to the local
22 WAGES coalitions.....................................(125,000)
23 f. Number of refugee cases closed..............(5,600)
24 g. Number of WAGES coalitions clients employed
25 ......................................................(51,000)
26 h. Cost per WAGES client employed.............($1,800)
27 (g) For the Mental Health Institutions Program, the
28 purpose of which is to prepare adults with mental health
29 problems to function self-sufficiently in the community, the
30 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
31
57
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 413-419 are as follows:
3 1. ADULTS IN CIVIL COMMITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of patients who improve mental health based
5 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale..............(59%)
6 b. Average scores on a community readiness/ability
7 survey...................................................(TBD)
8 c. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
9 in each mental health institution.........................(26)
10 d. Percent of patients satisfied based on survey.(90%)
11 e. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
12 survey...................................................(TBD)
13 f. Percent of people served who are discharged to the
14 community................................................(50%)
15 g. Percent of patients readmitted................(TBD)
16 h. Percent of residents who meet readiness for
17 discharge criteria between 6 months and 12 months after
18 admission................................................(TBD)
19 2. ADULTS IN CIVIL COMMITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of adult abuse reports confirmed or proposed
21 confirmed................................................(TBD)
22 b. Number of adults in civil commitment (institutions)
23 served.................................................(2,826)
24 c. Number of people served who are discharged to the
25 community................................................(TBD)
26 d. Number of adult abuse or neglect reports from
27 mental health hospitals..................................(TBD)
28 3. ADULTS IN FORENSIC COMMITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Percent of residents who improve mental health
30 based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale........(77%)
31 b. Average number of days to restore competency..(167)
58
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
2 in each mental health institution.........................(10)
3 d. Percent of residents satisfied based on survey
4 .........................................................(80%)
5 e. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
6 survey...................................................(TBD)
7 f. Percent of residents restored to competency and
8 ready for discharge within 6 months after admission......(TBD)
9 g. Percent of residents restored to competency and
10 ready for discharge between 6 and 12 months after admission
11 .........................................................(TBD)
12 4. ADULTS IN FORENSIC COMMITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number served...............................(1,691)
14 b. Number of adult abuse reports confirmed or proposed
15 confirmed................................................(TBD)
16 c. Number of adult abuse or neglect reports from
17 mental health hospitals..................................(TBD)
18 (h) For the Developmental Services Institutions
19 Program, the purpose of which is to enable individuals with
20 developmental disabilities to live everyday lives, as measured
21 by achievement of valued personal outcomes appropriate to life
22 stages from birth to death, the outcome measures, output
23 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
24 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 420-425 are as
25 follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Annual number of significant reportable incidents
28 per 100 persons with developmental disabilities living in
29 developmental services institutions.......................(26)
30
31
59
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Statewide average on Conroy Quality of Life
2 Protocol for residents in developmental services institutions
3 .........................................................(61%)
4 c. Percent of people discharged as planned......(100%)
5 d. Percent of clients satisfied with services....(95%)
6 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Adults receiving services in developmental services
8 institutions...........................................(1,419)
9 b. Adults incompetent to proceed provided competency
10 training and custodial care in the Mentally Retarded
11 Defendants Program.......................................(156)
12 (3) Department of Elderly Affairs.--
13 (a) For the program entitled, Service to Elders
14 Program, the purpose of which is to assist elders to live in
15 the least restrictive and most appropriate community settings
16 and maintain independence, the outcome measures, output
17 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
18 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 426-443 are as
19 follows:
20 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percentage of elders CARES determined to be
22 eligible for nursing home placement who are diverted...(15.1%)
23 b. Percentage of high-risk Adult Protective Services
24 referrals served.........................................(TBD)
25 c. Percentage of CARES imminent risk referrals served
26 .........................................................(95%)
27 d. Satisfaction with the quality and delivery of home
28 and community-based care for service recipients is equal or
29 greater than previous periods............................(TBD)
30
31
60
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Cost of home and community-based care (including
2 non-DOEA programs) is less than nursing home care for
3 comparable client groups.................................(TBD)
4 f. Percentage of Community Care for the Elderly
5 clients defined as "probable Medicaid eligibles" who remain in
6 state-funded programs.................................(13.50%)
7 g. Percentage of elders assessed with high or moderate
8 risk environments who improved their environment score...(83%)
9 h. Percentage of elders assessed with a high social
10 isolation score who have improved in receiving services..(53%)
11 i. Percentage of new service recipients with high-risk
12 nutrition scores whose nutritional status improved.......(TBD)
13 j. Percentage of new service recipients whose ADL
14 assessment score has been maintained or improved.........(TBD)
15 k. Percentage of new service recipients whose IADL
16 assessment score has been maintained or improved.........(TBD)
17 l. Percentage of caregivers assessed who self-report
18 very likely of continuing to provide care................(93%)
19 m. Percentage of caregivers assessed at risk who
20 self-report they are very likely of continuing to provide care
21 .........................................................(TBD)
22 n. Number of people placed in jobs after participating
23 in the Older Worker Program..............................(TBD)
24 o. Average wage at placement for people in the Older
25 Worker Program...........................................(TBD)
26 p. Percentage of new service recipients (congregate
27 meal sites) whose nutritional status has been maintained or
28 improved.................................................(TBD)
29 q. Percentage of Elder Helplines with an excellent
30 rating on the Elder Helpline evaluation assessment.......(TBD)
31
61
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 r. Percentage of people who rate the Memory Disorder
2 Clinic assessment conference as very helpful.............(TBD)
3 s. Percent of clients satisfied with the quality of
4 insurance counseling and information received............(TBD)
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Total number of CARES assessments..........(77,410)
7 b. Number and percentage of elders who enter DOEA
8 service programs each year with a risk score above the
9 1997-1998 average.................................(2,481; 45%)
10 c. Number and percentage of elders who enter DOEA
11 service programs each year with a frailty level above the
12 1997-1998 average.................................(8,954; 45%)
13 d. Percentage of copayment goal collected.......(100%)
14 e. Number of caregivers assessed..............(11,806)
15 f. Number of people trained in Older Workers Program
16 .........................................................(TBD)
17 g. Number of new congregate meal service recipients
18 (assessed)...............................................(TBD)
19 h. Number of people evaluated for memory loss by
20 Memory Disorder Clinics..................................(TBD)
21 i. Number of volunteer hours.....................(TBD)
22 j. Number of volunteers..........................(TBD)
23 k. Number of people served...................(127,589)
24 Section 35. The performance measures and standards
25 established in this section for individual programs in Public
26 Safety and Judiciary agencies shall be applied to those
27 programs for the 1999-2000 fiscal year. These performance
28 measures and standards are directly linked to the
29 appropriations made in the General Appropriations Act for
30 Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as required by the Government
31 Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
62
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (1) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.--
2 (a) For the Custody and Control Program, the purpose
3 of which is to protect the public and provide a safe secure
4 environment for incarcerated offenders and the staff
5 maintaining custody of them by applying effective physical
6 security methods and procedures and providing accurate risk
7 assessment and classification of inmates and adequate
8 nutrition and facility maintenance, the outcome measures,
9 output measures, and associated performance standards with
10 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 566-578B
11 are as follows:
12 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
14 major institutions.........................................(0)
15 b. Percentage of inmates who did not escape when
16 assigned outside a secure perimeter....................(99.9%)
17 c. Number of inmate-on-inmate physical assaults on one
18 or more persons........................................(1,540)
19 d. Number of inmate-on-staff physical assaults on one
20 or more persons..........................................(592)
21 e. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
22 inmates..................................................(900)
23 f. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
24 reports per 1,000 inmates................................(375)
25 g. Percentage of random inmate drug tests that are
26 negative...............................................(98.5%)
27 h. Total number and percentage of inmate random drug
28 tests that are positive...........................(1,381/1.5%)
29 i. Number of verbal assaults by inmates, including
30 written threats.................................(Data Pending)
31
63
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 j. Total number of major minor and total disciplinary
2 reports written for minimum custody inmates..(5,000/500/5,500)
3 k. Total number of major minor and total disciplinary
4 reports written for medium custody inmates.(7,500/1,000/8,500)
5 l. Total number of major minor and total disciplinary
6 reports written for close custody inmates
7 ........................................(40,000/10,000/50,000)
8 m. Total number of major minor and total disciplinary
9 reports written for maximum custody inmates.......(150/25/175)
10 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Percent of time served by inmates sentenced for
12 crimes committed prior to October 1, 1995..............(69.0%)
13 b. Percent of time served by inmates sentenced for
14 crimes committed on or after October 1, 1995...........(89.0%)
15 c. Average daily inmate population in adult male major
16 institutions..........................................(53,301)
17 d. Average daily inmate population in adult and youth
18 female major institutions..............................(3,441)
19 e. Average daily inmate population in adult and youth
20 male institutions......................................(2,555)
21 f. Average daily inmate population in adult male work
22 camps..................................................(7,333)
23 g. Average daily inmate population in youth male work
24 camps....................................................(543)
25 h. Average daily inmate population in adult male
26 forestry camps...........................................(307)
27 i. Average daily inmate population in adult female
28 forestry camps...........................................(282)
29 j. Average daily inmate population in adult male road
30 prisons..................................................(407)
31
64
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 k. Percentage of adult male inmates in minimum custody
2 .........................................................(19%)
3 l. Percentage of adult male inmates in medium custody
4 .........................................................(30%)
5 m. Percentage of adult male inmates in close custody
6 .........................................................(45%)
7 n. Percentage of adult male inmates in maximum custody
8 ................................................(less than 1%)
9 o. Percentage of adult female inmates in minimum
10 custody..................................................(50%)
11 p. Percentage of adult female inmates in medium
12 custody..................................................(25%)
13 q. Percentage of adult female inmates in close custody
14 .........................................................(15%)
15 r. Percentage of adult female inmates in maximum
16 custody.............................................(less than
17 1%)
18 s. Percentage of youth male inmates in minimum custody
19 .........................................................(20%)
20 t. Percentage of youth male inmates in medium custody
21 .........................................................(40%)
22 u. Percentage of youth male inmates in close custody
23 .........................................................(30%)
24 v. Percentage of youth male inmates in maximum custody
25 ................................................(less than 1%)
26 w. Percentage of youth female inmates in minimum
27 custody..................................................(30%)
28 x. Percentage of youth female inmates in medium
29 custody..................................................(35%)
30 y. Percentage of youth female inmates in close custody
31 ..........................................................20%)
65
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 z. Percentage of youth female inmates in maximum
2 custody...................................................(0%)
3 aa. Per diem rate for adult male major institutions
4 ......................................................($47.45)
5 bb. Per diem rate for adult and youthful female major
6 institutions..........................................($72.14)
7 cc. Per diem rate for youthful male major institutions
8 ......................................................($58.32)
9 dd. Total number of beds on-line and operational in
10 the system on June 30 annually........................(77,128)
11 ee. Total number of beds occupied by inmates on June
12 30 annually...........................................(75,538)
13 ff. Total number of beds constructed but not funded
14 for operation on June 30...............................(1,590)
15 gg. Total number of beds under construction on June 30
16 .......................................................(6,874)
17 hh. Percentage of entry level correctional officers
18 with less than 3 years experience...............(data pending)
19 ii. Percentage of entry level correctional officers in
20 training status..........................................(TBD)
21 jj. Number of verbal assaults by inmates, including
22 written threats..........................................(TBD)
23 kk. Percentage of shifts worked at critical complement
24 - Region I...............................................(TBD)
25 ll. Percentage of shifts worked at critical complement
26 - Region II..............................................(TBD)
27 mm. Percentage of shifts worked at critical complement
28 - Region III.............................................(TBD)
29 nn. Percentage of shifts worked at critical complement
30 - Region IV..............................................(TBD)
31
66
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 oo. Percentage of shifts worked at critical complement
2 - Region V...............................................(TBD)
3 pp. Average daily cost per inmate for food products
4 .......................................................($2.17)
5 qq. Total number of announced facility security audits
6 conducted by DOC..........................................(28)
7 rr. Total number of unannounced facility security
8 audits conducted by DOC...................................(26)
9 ss. Number of drug instructions conducted.........(55)
10 tt. Number of criminal investigations conducted..(390)
11 uu. Number of management reviews conducted - OSHA, air
12 quality, fire safety, investigations, etc.................(60)
13 vv. Total dollars in sales from canteens and vending
14 machines.........................................($37,500,000)
15 ww. Total net profits from sales in canteens and
16 vending machines.................................($15,043,500)
17 xx. Total dollars deposited in Inmate Welfare Trust
18 Fund from telephone commissions..................($13,500,000)
19 (b) For the Health Services Program, the purpose of
20 which is to protect the public and maintain a humane
21 environment in correctional institutions for incarcerated
22 offenders and the staff maintaining custody of them by
23 applying effective basic health care treatment to inmates, the
24 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
25 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
26 Appropriations 600-603 are as follows:
27 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Total number of health care grievances upheld.
29 b. Percentage of health care grievances upheld.
30
31
67
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Number of suicides per 1,000 inmates within DOC
2 compared to the national average for correctional
3 facilities/institutions.........................(.06%/National
4 average not available)
5 d. Average price per inmate per month for health care
6 .........................................................(305)
7 e. Total dollar amount of inmate medical co-payments
8 collected...........................................($425,000)
9 f. Comparison of average daily cost of hospital stays
10 within DOC compared to HMO average, statewide average, and
11 Medicaid..................................(2,190/3,279/HMO not
12 available/Medicaid not available)
13 g. Average length of community hospital stays for
14 emergency admissions.....................................(4.5)
15 h. Average length of community hospital stays for
16 nonemergency admissions..................................(4.2)
17 i. Annual percentage increase in expenditure rate per
18 inmate compared to the health-related component of the
19 Consumer Price Index...............................(2.9%/3.5%)
20 j. Total number of inpatient/inmate community hospital
21 days for emergency admissions..........................(6,200)
22 k. Total number of inpatient/inmate community hospital
23 days for nonemergency admissions.......................(2,500)
24 l. Number of Level One physical health related
25 deficiencies cited by Correctional Medical Authority that were
26 noted as corrected on follow-up correction action visits......
27 m. Number of Level One mental health related
28 deficiencies cited by Correctional Medical Authority that were
29 noted as corrected on follow-up correction action visits......
30
31
68
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 n. Number of Level Two physical health-related
2 deficiencies cited by Correctional Medical Authority that were
3 noted as corrected on follow-up correction action visits......
4 o. Number of Level Two mental health-related
5 deficiencies cited by Correctional Medical Authority that were
6 noted as corrected on follow-up correction action visits......
7 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Annual cost of HIV/AIDS treated in prisons
9 .................................................($20,815,460)
10 b. Annual cost of cardiac illnesses treated in prisons
11 ..................................................($5,204,636)
12 c. Annual cost of cancer treated in prisons
13 ..................................................($2,935,548)
14 d. Total number of inmates with HIV/AIDS treated in
15 prisons................................................(2,400)
16 e. Total number of inmates with cardiac illnesses
17 treated in prisons.....................................(1,050)
18 f. Total number of inmates with cancer treated in
19 prisons..................................................(810)
20 g. Number of inmates classified as Mental Health Level
21 S-III..................................................(6,500)
22 h. Number of inmates classified as Mental Health Level
23 S-IV.....................................................(230)
24 i. Number of inmates classified as Mental Health Level
25 S-V......................................................(200)
26 j. Number and percentage of inmates treated with
27 psychotropic drugs..................................(6,000/8%)
28 k. Average monthly cost of prescription drugs
29 dispensed.........................................($2,400,000)
30 l. Average monthly cost of nonprescription drugs
31 dispensed............................................($30,000)
69
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 m. Average monthly number of inmate/offender drug
2 prescriptions written................................(155,000)
3 n. Comparison of average daily cost of inmate health
4 care within DOC to Medicaid and commercial HMOs
5 ........................($10.40/Medicaid not available/HMO not
6 available)
7 o. Average daily cost of inmate health care within DOC
8 for inmates 65 years of age compared to Medicare population
9 .........................................................(TBD)
10 p. Average number of inpatient community hospital days
11 per 1,000 inmates........................................(150)
12 q. Average number of inpatient community hospital days
13 per 1,000 inmates of DOC population compared to Medicaid and
14 commercial HMO population..(150/Medicaid not available/HMO not
15 available)
16 r. Number of medical providers and visits per medical
17 provider per month...................................(640/130)
18 s. Number of dentists and dental procedures per day
19 per dental provider....................................(27/80)
20 t. Average daily number of inmate sick call visits
21 .........................................................(TBD)
22 u. Total number of community emergency room visits per
23 1,000 inmates.............................................(38)
24 v. Total number of inmate ambulatory surgeries in
25 community facilities per 1,000 inmates....................(23)
26 (c) For the Community Corrections Program the purpose
27 of which is to assist sentenced felony offenders to become
28 productive law abiding citizens by applying supervision in the
29 community to hold offenders accountable to the conditions of
30 their supervision and to detect violations of those conditions
31 and make apprehensions when violations or new crimes occur,
70
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
2 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
3 Appropriations 579-589 are as follows:
4 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded within
6 2 years...........................................(3,544/4.1%)
7 b. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
8 supervision revoked within 2 years..............(33,204/37.0%)
9 c. Number/percentage of offenders who did not
10 participate in or did not complete programs.......(3,392/4.4%)
11 d. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
12 supervision revoked who did not participate in or did not
13 complete programs...............................(31,363/40.3%)
14 e. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
15 completed a secure residential drug treatment program.(0/0.0%)
16 f. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
17 supervision revoked who completed a secure residential drug
18 treatment program...................................(41/19.0%)
19 (31,363/40.3%)
20 g. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
21 completed a nonsecure residential drug treatment program
22 .....................................................(43/2.6%)
23 h. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
24 supervision revoked who completed a nonsecure residential drug
25 treatment program..................................(513/30.6%)
26 i. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
27 completed a nonresidential drug treatment program....(97/1.5%)
28 j. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
29 supervision revoked who completed a nonresidential drug
30 treatment program................................(1,163/18.1%)
31
71
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 k. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
2 completed a program at a Probation and Restitution Center
3 .....................................................(12/2.8%)
4 l. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
5 supervision revoked who completed a program at a Probation and
6 Restitution Center.................................(124/28.7%)
7 m. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
8 completed supervision/work release, but are subsequently
9 recommitted to prison for committing a new crime within 2
10 years...............................................(497/1.2%)
11 n. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
12 completed supervision/work release, but are subsequently
13 recommitted to supervision for committing a new crime within 2
14 years.............................................(2,354/5.8%)
15 o. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
16 completed a secure residential drug treatment program, but are
17 subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new crime
18 within 2 years........................................(2/3.3%)
19 p. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
20 completed a secure residential drug treatment program, but are
21 subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a new
22 crime within 2 years.................................(8/13.3%)
23 q. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
24 completed a nonsecure residential drug treatment program, but
25 are subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new
26 crime within 2 years.................................(10/2.6%)
27 r. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
28 completed a nonsecure residential drug treatment program, but
29 are subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a
30 new crime within 2 years............................(41/10.6%)
31
72
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 t. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
2 completed a nonresidential drug treatment program, but are
3 subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new crime
4 within 2 years.......................................(27/0.9%)
5 u. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
6 completed a nonresidential drug treatment program, but are
7 subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a new
8 crime within 2 years................................(171/5.7%)
9 v. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
10 completed a probation and restitution center program, but are
11 subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new crime
12 within 2 years........................................(1/1.1%)
13 w. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
14 completed a probation and restitution center program, but are
15 subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a new
16 crime within 2 years..................................(8/8.6%)
17 x. Number/percentage of offenders supervised in the
18 community who are ordered by the court to participate in
19 programs and the percentage of those that participate in
20 educational and/or vocational programs...........(1,874/95.3%)
21 y. Number/percentage of offenders supervised in the
22 community who are ordered by the court to participate in
23 programs and the percentage of those that participate in drug
24 treatment programs..............................(34,142/81.7%)
25 z. Number and percentage of officers meeting their
26 obligation in the number of contacts required by the
27 department standard for administrative supervision.......(TBD)
28 aa. Number and percentage of officers meeting their
29 obligation in the number of contacts required by the
30 department standard for basic supervision................(TBD)
31
73
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 bb. Number and percentage of officers meeting their
2 obligation in the number of contacts required by the
3 department standard for enhanced risk supervision........(TBD)
4 cc. Number and percentage of officers meeting their
5 obligation in the number of contacts required by the
6 department standard for intensive risk supervision.......(TBD)
7 dd. Number and percentage of officers meeting their
8 obligation in the number of contacts required by the
9 department standard for close risk supervision...........(TBD)
10 ee. Number and percentage of officers meeting their
11 obligation in the number of contacts required by the
12 department standard for community control................(TBD)
13 ff. Number and percentage of offenders whose
14 supervision was terminated normally, by court order, or early
15 2 years after the period of supervision was imposed
16 ................................................(28,105/32.5%)
17 gg. Number and percentage of offenders whose
18 supervision is still active 2 years after the period of
19 supervision was imposed.........................(21,729/25.1%)
20 hh. Number and percentage of nonparticipating and
21 noncompleting offenders whose supervision was terminated
22 normally, by court order, or early 2 years after the period of
23 supervision was imposed.........................(24,563/31.6%)
24 ii. Number and percentage of nonparticipating and
25 noncompleting offenders whose supervision is still active 2
26 years after the period of supervision was imposed
27 ................................................(18,530/23.8%)
28 jj. Number and percentage of secure residential drug
29 treatment completers whose supervision was terminated
30 normally, by court order, or early 2 years after the period of
31 supervision was imposed.............................(52/24.1%)
74
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 kk. Number and percentage of secure residential drug
2 treatment completers whose supervision is still active 2 years
3 after the period of supervision was imposed........(123/56.9%)
4 ll. Number and percentage of nonsecure residential
5 drug treatment completers whose supervision was terminated
6 normally, by court order, or early 2 years after the period of
7 supervision was imposed............................(417/24.9%)
8 mm. Number and percentage of nonsecure residential
9 drug treatment completers whose supervision is still active 2
10 years after the period of supervision was imposed..(701/41.9%)
11 nn. Number and percentage of nonresidential drug
12 treatment completers whose supervision was terminated
13 normally, by court order, or early 2 years after the period of
14 supervision was imposed..........................(2,970/46.3%)
15 oo. Number and percentage of nonresidential drug
16 treatment completers whose supervision is still active 2 years
17 after the period of supervision was imposed......(2,185/34.1%)
18 pp. Number and percentage of probation and restitution
19 center program completers whose supervision was terminated
20 normally, by court order, or early 2 years after the period of
21 supervision was imposed............................(106/24.5%)
22 qq. Number and percentage of probation and restitution
23 center program completers whose supervision is still active 2
24 years after the period of supervision was imposed..(190/44.0%)
25 rr. Percentage of offenders supervised in the
26 community who are employable and the percentage of those who
27 are employed.............................................(TBD)
28 ss. Percentage of offenders supervised in the
29 community who are ordered by the court to participate in
30 educational and/or vocational programs and the percentage of
31 those who participate............................(1,874/95.3%)
75
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 tt. Percentage of offenders supervised in the
2 community who are ordered by the court to participate in drug
3 treatment programs and the percentage of those who participate
4 ................................................(34,142/81.7%)
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
7 in the community on administrative supervision compared to the
8 department standard..................................(0.1/0.0)
9 b. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
10 in the community on basic risk supervision compared to the
11 department standard..................................(1.1/1.0)
12 c. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
13 in the community on enhanced risk supervision compared to the
14 department standard..................................(1.5/1.5)
15 d. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
16 in the community on intensive risk supervision compared to the
17 department standard..................................(1.8/2.0)
18 e. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
19 in the community on close risk supervision compared to the
20 department standard..................................(2.4/3.0)
21 f. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
22 in the community on community control compared to the
23 department standard..................................(6.3/8.0)
24 g. Total annual dollar amount collected from offenders
25 on community supervision only by DOC for restitution
26 .................................................($27,432,748)
27 h. Total annual dollar amount collected from offenders
28 on community supervision only by DOC for other court-ordered
29 costs............................................($13,129,604)
30
31
76
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 i. Total annual dollar amount collected from offenders
2 on community supervision only by DOC for costs of supervision
3 .................................................($23,592,056)
4 j. Annual dollar amount collected for subsistence from
5 offenders/inmates in community correctional centers
6 ..................................................($7,835,742)
7 k. Annual dollar amount collected for subsistence from
8 offenders/inmates in probation and restitution centers
9 ....................................................($571,560)
10 l. Annual number of nondiscretionary pretrial
11 intervention preliminary investigations conducted.....(9,376 )
12 m. Annual number of nondiscretionary pretrial
13 intervention background investigations.................(9,949)
14 n. Annual number of nondiscretionary presentence
15 investigations.........................................(9,333)
16 o. Annual number of nondiscretionary sentencing
17 guidelines scoresheet investigations..................(39,696)
18 p. Annual number of nondiscretionary pre-plea
19 investigations...........................................(568)
20 q. Annual number of nondiscretionary prison
21 post-sentence investigations...........................(7,505)
22 r. Annual number of nondiscretionary security
23 investigations...........................................(256)
24 s. Average monthly active adult male population of
25 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on probation,
26 including Administrative..............................(54,604)
27 t. Average monthly active adult female population of
28 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on probation,
29 including Administrative, including Administrative....(16,797)
30
31
77
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 u. Average monthly active youth male population of
2 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on probation,
3 including Administrative..............................(16,866)
4 v. Average monthly active adult female population of
5 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on probation,
6 including Administrative...............................(3,695)
7 w. Average monthly active adult male population of
8 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on drug offender
9 probation..............................................(6,640)
10 x. Average monthly active adult female population of
11 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on drug offender
12 probation..............................................(1,948)
13 y. Average monthly active youth male population of
14 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on drug offender
15 probation..............................................(1,868)
16 z. Average monthly active youth female population of
17 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on drug offender
18 probation................................................(251)
19 aa. Average monthly active adult male population of
20 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on community
21 control................................................(6,790)
22 bb. Average monthly active adult female population of
23 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on community
24 control................................................(1,889)
25 cc. Average monthly active youth male population of
26 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on community
27 control................................................(2,826)
28 dd. Average monthly active youth female population of
29 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on community
30 control..................................................(434)
31
78
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 ee. Average monthly active adult male population of
2 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on pretrial
3 intervention...........................................(3,147)
4 ff. Average monthly active adult female population of
5 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on pretrial
6 intervention...........................................(2,111)
7 gg. Average monthly active youth male population of
8 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on pretrial
9 intervention...........................................(1,744)
10 hh. Average monthly active youth female population of
11 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on pretrial
12 intervention.............................................(859)
13 ii. Average monthly active adult male population of
14 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on parole
15 .......................................................(2,020)
16 jj. Average monthly active adult female population of
17 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on parole..(163)
18 kk. Average monthly active youth male population of
19 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on parole...(86)
20 ll. Average monthly active youth female population of
21 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on parole....(5)
22 mm. Average monthly active adult male population of
23 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on conditional
24 release................................................(2,858)
25 nn. Average monthly active adult female population of
26 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on conditional
27 release..................................................(146)
28 oo. Average monthly active youth male population of
29 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on conditional
30 release...................................................(44)
31
79
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 pp. Average monthly active youth female population of
2 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on conditional
3 release....................................................(0)
4 qq. Average monthly active adult male population of
5 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on other
6 post-prison release......................................(527)
7 rr. Average monthly active adult female population of
8 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on other
9 post-prison release.......................................(75)
10 ss. Average monthly active youth male population of
11 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on other
12 post-prison release........................................(9)
13 tt. Average monthly active youth female population of
14 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on other
15 post-prison release........................................(0)
16 uu. Average monthly active adult male population of
17 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on work release
18 .......................................................(1,506)
19 vv. Average monthly active adult female population of
20 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on work release
21 .........................................................(183)
22 ww. Average monthly active youth male population of
23 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on work release
24 .........................................................(135)
25 xx. Average monthly active youth female population of
26 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on work release
27 ...........................................................(7)
28 yy. Average monthly active adult male population of
29 offenders/inmates supervised in the community at other
30 community correctional centers...........................(525)
31
80
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 zz. Average monthly active adult female population of
2 offenders/inmates supervised in the community at other
3 community correctional centers............................(36)
4 aaa. Average monthly active youth male population of
5 offenders/inmates supervised in the community at other
6 community correctional centers............................(36)
7 bbb. Average monthly active youth female population of
8 offenders/inmates supervised in the community at other
9 community correctional centers.............................(1)
10 ccc. Average monthly active adult male population of
11 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on sex offender
12 probation................................................(TBD)
13 ddd. Average monthly active adult female population of
14 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on sex offender
15 probation................................................(TBD)
16 eee. Average monthly active youth male population of
17 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on sex offender
18 probation................................................(TBD)
19 fff. Average monthly active youth female population of
20 offenders/inmates supervised in the community on sex offender
21 probation................................................(TBD)
22 ggg. Average monthly active adult male population of
23 offenders/inmates placed on work release in community
24 correctional centers as a condition of confinement or
25 supervision............................................(2,031)
26 hhh. Average monthly active adult female population of
27 offenders/inmates placed on work release in community
28 correctional centers as a condition of confinement or
29 supervision..............................................(219)
30 iii. Average monthly active youth male population of
31 offenders/inmates placed on work release in community
81
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 correctional centers as a condition of confinement or
2 supervision..............................................(171)
3 jjj. Average monthly active youth female population of
4 offenders/inmates placed on work release in community
5 correctional centers as a condition of confinement or
6 supervision................................................(8)
7 kkk. Average monthly active adult male population of
8 offenders/inmates placed in probation and restitution centers
9 as a condition of confinement or supervision.............(199)
10 lll. Average monthly active adult female population of
11 offenders/inmates placed in probation and restitution centers
12 as a condition of confinement or supervision..............(73)
13 mmm. Average monthly active youth male population of
14 offenders/inmates placed in probation and restitution centers
15 as a condition of confinement or supervision.............(214)
16 nnn. Average monthly active youth female population of
17 offenders/inmates placed in probation and restitution centers
18 as a condition of confinement or supervision..............(28)
19 ooo. Average monthly active adult male population of
20 offenders/inmates placed in secure residential drug treatment
21 centers as a condition of confinement or supervision.....(291)
22 ppp. Average monthly active adult female population of
23 offenders/inmates placed in secure residential drug treatment
24 centers as a condition of confinement or supervision......(70)
25 qqq. Average monthly active youth male population of
26 offenders/inmates placed in secure residential drug treatment
27 centers as a condition of confinement or supervision.....(204)
28 rrr. Average monthly active youth female population of
29 offenders/inmates placed in secure residential drug treatment
30 centers as a condition of confinement or supervision.......(7)
31
82
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 sss. Average monthly active adult male population of
2 offenders/inmates placed in nonsecure residential drug
3 treatment centers as a condition of confinement or supervision
4 .........................................................(939)
5 ttt. Average monthly active adult female population of
6 offenders/inmates placed in nonsecure residential drug
7 treatment centers as a condition of confinement or supervision
8 .........................................................(290)
9 uuu. Average monthly active youth male population of
10 offenders/inmates placed in nonsecure residential drug
11 treatment centers as a condition of confinement or supervision
12 .........................................................(210)
13 vvv. Average monthly active youth female population of
14 offenders/inmates placed in nonsecure residential drug
15 treatment centers as a condition of confinement or supervision
16 ..........................................................(28)
17 www. Number and percentage of offenders participating
18 in a probation and restitution centers program and not
19 transferred or administratively terminated from the program
20 who have successful completions within 2 years of program
21 admission..........................................(961/46.3%)
22 xxx. Number and percentage of offenders participating
23 in a secure residential drug treatment center program and not
24 transferred or administratively terminated from the program
25 who have successful completions within 2 years of program
26 admission..........................................(718/36.6%)
27 yyy. Number and percentage of offenders participating
28 in a nonsecure residential drug treatment center program and
29 not transferred or administratively terminated from the
30 program who have successful completions within 2 years of
31 program admission................................(3,090/54.7%)
83
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 zzz. Number and percentage of offenders participating
2 in a nonresidential drug treatment center program and not
3 transferred or administratively terminated from the program
4 who have successful completions within 2 years of program
5 admission.......................................(15,178/48.0%)
6 aaaa. Number and percentage of offenders participating
7 in a work release program and not transferred or
8 administratively terminated from the program who have
9 successful completions within 2 years of program admission
10 .................................................(4,912/91.0%)
11 bbbb. Percentage of adult male offenders supervised in
12 the community on administrative supervision.............(1.6%)
13 cccc. Percentage of adult female offenders supervised
14 in the community on administrative supervision..........(1.3%)
15 dddd. Percentage of youth male offenders supervised in
16 the community on administrative supervision.............(0.7%)
17 eeee. Percentage of youth female offenders supervised
18 in the community on administrative supervision..........(0.7%)
19 ffff. Percentage of adult male offenders supervised in
20 the community on basic risk supervision................(33.6%)
21 gggg. Percentage of adult female offenders supervised
22 in the community on basic risk supervision.............(55.5%)
23 hhhh. Percentage of youth male offenders supervised in
24 the community on basic risk supervision................(12.2%)
25 iiii. Percentage of youth female offenders supervised
26 in the community on basic risk supervision.............(32.0%)
27 jjjj. Percentage of adult male offenders supervised in
28 the community on enhanced risk supervision.............(21.1%)
29 kkkk. Percentage of adult female offenders supervised
30 in the community on enhanced risk supervision..........(16.6%)
31
84
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 llll. Percentage of youth male offenders supervised in
2 the community on enhanced risk supervision.............(36.2%)
3 mmmm. Percentage of youth female offenders supervised
4 in the community on enhanced risk supervision..........(39.0%)
5 nnnn. Percentage of adult male offenders supervised in
6 the community on intensive risk supervision............(13.8%)
7 oooo. Percentage of adult female offenders supervised
8 in the community on intensive risk supervision.........(11.2%)
9 pppp. Percentage of youth male offenders supervised in
10 the community on intensive risk supervision............(25.0%)
11 qqqq. Percentage of youth female offenders supervised
12 in the community on intensive risk supervision.........(14.1%)
13 rrrr. Percentage of adult male offenders supervised in
14 the community on close risk supervision................(20.7%)
15 ssss. Percentage of adult female offenders supervised
16 in the community on close risk supervision..............(6.9%)
17 tttt. Percentage of youth male offenders supervised in
18 the community on close risk supervision................(13.7%)
19 uuuu. Percentage of youth female offenders supervised
20 in the community on close risk supervision..............(5.5%)
21 vvvv. Percentage of adult male offenders supervised in
22 the community on community control......................(8.9%)
23 wwww. Percentage of adult female offenders supervised
24 in the community on community control...................(8.2%)
25 xxxx. Percentage of youth male offenders supervised in
26 the community on community control.....................(12.0%)
27 yyyy. Percentage of youth female offenders supervised
28 in the community on community control...................(8.4%)
29 zzzz. Number of technical violation reports completed
30 on offenders who violate a condition of supervision...(50,558)
31
85
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 aaaaa. Number of new offenses committed while an
2 offender is on probation, including Administrative.......(TBD)
3 bbbbb. Number of new offenses committed while an
4 offender is on community control.........................(TBD)
5 ccccc. Number of new offenses committed while an
6 offender is on pretrial intervention.....................(TBD)
7 ddddd. Number of new offenses committed while an
8 offender is on parole....................................(TBD)
9 eeeee. Number of new offenses committed while an
10 offender is on conditional release.......................(TBD)
11 fffff. Number of new offenses committed while an
12 offender is on other post-prison release.................(TBD)
13 ggggg. Number of new offenses committed while an
14 offender is on work release..............................(TBD)
15 hhhhh. Number of new offenses committed while an
16 offender is on sex offender probation....................(TBD)
17 iiiii. Number of new offenses committed while an
18 offender is in community correctional centers............(TBD)
19 jjjjj. Number of new offenses committed while an
20 offender is in probation and restitution centers.........(TBD)
21 kkkkk. Number of new offenses committed while an
22 offender is in secure residential drug treatment centers.(TBD)
23 lllll. Number of new offenses committed while an
24 offender is in nonsecure residential drug treatment centers
25 .........................................................(TBD)
26 mmmmm. Number of new offenses committed while an
27 offender is nonresidential drug treatment centers........(TBD)
28 nnnnn. Average dollar amount in restitution collected
29 per offender required to pay..................................
30 (d) For the Offender Work and Training Program, the
31 purpose of which is to use the labor of incarcerated adult and
86
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 youthful offenders to benefit the state local communities and
2 victims of crimes by providing educational vocational and life
3 management opportunities that reduce the costs of prison
4 construction provide projects to improve communities and
5 provide inmate work administered by other state agencies, the
6 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
7 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
8 Appropriations 590-598A are as follows:
9 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Number and percentage of inmates needing mandatory
11 literacy programs.................................(13,148/20%)
12 b. Number and percentage of inmates needing mandatory
13 literacy program who participate in mandatory literacy
14 programs...........................................(8,364/64%)
15 c. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
16 mandatory literacy programs who complete mandatory literacy
17 programs...........................................(3,364/40%)
18 d. Number and percentage of inmates needing GED
19 education programs................................(21,946/33%)
20 e. Number and percentage of inmates needing GED
21 education programs who participate in GED education programs
22 ..................................................(18,464/84%)
23 f. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
24 GED education programs who complete GED education programs
25 ...................................................(1,796/10%)
26 g. Number and percentage of inmates needing special
27 education programs..................................(3,544/5%)
28 h. Number and percentage of inmates needing special
29 education programs who participate in special education
30 programs...........................................(3,011/85%)
31
87
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 i. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
2 special education programs who complete special education
3 programs.................................................(TBD)
4 j. Number and percentage of inmates needing vocational
5 education programs................................(15,486/23%)
6 k. Number and percentage of inmates needing vocational
7 education programs who participate in vocational education
8 programs...........................................(9,960/64%)
9 l. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
10 vocational education programs who complete vocational
11 education programs.................................(2,286/23%)
12 m. Number and percentage of inmates needing drug abuse
13 education/treatment programs......................(41,928/63%)
14 n. Number and percentage of inmates needing drug abuse
15 education/treatment programs who participate in drug abuse
16 education/treatment programs......................(18,668/45%)
17 o. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
18 drug abuse education/treatment programs who complete drug
19 abuse education/treatment programs.................(6,316/34%)
20 p. Number and percentage of inmates needing life
21 skills programs.....................................(2,090/3%)
22 q. Number and percentage of inmates needing life
23 skills programs who participate in life skills programs
24 .....................................................(368/18%)
25 r. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
26 life skills programs who complete life skills programs
27 .....................................................(160/43%)
28 s. Number and percentage of inmates needing transition
29 programs............................................(4,494/7%)
30 t. Number and percentage of inmates needing transition
31 programs who participate in transition programs...(4,486/100%)
88
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 u. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
2 transition programs who complete transition programs
3 ...................................................(3,368/75%)
4 v. Number and percentage of inmates needing wellness
5 programs............................................(2,672/4%)
6 w. Number and percentage of inmates needing wellness
7 programs who participate in wellness programs......(2,396/90%)
8 x. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
9 wellness programs who complete wellness programs.....(672/28%)
10 y. Percentage of inmates placed in a facility that
11 provides at least one of inmate's primary program needs..(75%)
12 z. Number of inmates available for work assignments
13 and the percentage of those available for work who are not
14 assigned.........................................(50,971/2.3%)
15 aa. Number of available work assignments and the
16 percentage of those work assignments that are 40 hour per week
17 assignments.........................................(34,626/%)
18 bb. Average increase in grade level achieved by
19 inmates participating in educational programs per
20 instructional period.....................................(0.6)
21 cc. Number of GED certificates earned by offenders per
22 teacher.................................................(15.03
23 for 156 teachers)
24 dd. Number of vocational certificates earned by
25 offenders per teachers................(17.39 for 139 teachers)
26 ee. Number of inmates assigned to work with community
27 work squads............................................(3,183)
28 ff. Number of available community work squad
29 assignments............................................(4,097)
30 gg. Number of institutional work assignments available
31 ......................................................(25,749)
89
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 hh. Annual cost avoidance realized by using inmate
2 labor to support institutional operations calculated at
3 minimum wage of $5.15 per hour................($206.9 million)
4 ii. Annual number of inmate hours spent working for
5 other state government agencies and communities....(5,316,844)
6 jj. Total dollar value of work performed by inmates
7 for government entities and communities..........($40,804,934)
8 kk. Annual dollar value of work performed for Florida
9 Department of Transportation.....................($12,265,668)
10 ll. Annual dollar value of work performed for other
11 state agencies....................................($8,918,520)
12 mm. Annual dollar value of work performed for
13 communities......................................($19,620,746)
14 nn. Net savings for state agencies and communities
15 that use inmate labor............................($21,101,772)
16 oo. Number of inmate work hours in gardening
17 operations...............................................(TBD)
18 pp. Annual dollar value of food produced by inmates in
19 gardening operations................................($493,400)
20 qq. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
21 PRIDE programs...........................................(TBD)
22 rr. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
23 PRIDE programs who reoffend within 2 years of release from
24 prison...................................................(TBD)
25 ss. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
26 PIE programs.............................................(TBD)
27 tt. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
28 PIE programs who reoffend within 2 years of release from
29 prison...................................................(TBD)
30 uu. Total dollar amount paid by all inmates on work
31 release for restitution and other court ordered payments.(TBD)
90
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 vv. Total dollar amount paid by inmates working in
2 PRIDE programs for restitution and other court ordered
3 payments............................................($277,597)
4 ww. Total dollar amount paid by inmates working in PIE
5 programs for restitution and other court ordered payments
6 .........................................................(TBD)
7 xx. Percentage and number of inmates completing
8 mandatory literacy programs who score at or above 9th grade
9 level on next Test for Adult Basic Education.........(16%/279)
10 yy. Average number of annual infirmary visits by
11 inmates who completed a wellness program.................(TBD)
12 zz. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
13 inmates for all inmates..................................(927)
14 aaa. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
15 inmates for inmates completing mandatory literacy programs
16 .......................................................(1,398)
17 bbb. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
18 inmates for inmates completing GED education programs....(634)
19 ccc. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
20 inmates for inmates completing special education programs
21 .......................................................(2,650)
22 ddd. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
23 inmates for inmates completing vocational education programs
24 .........................................................(524)
25 eee. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
26 inmates for inmates completing drug abuse education/treatment
27 programs.................................................(531)
28 fff. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
29 inmates for inmates completing life skills programs......(810)
30 ggg. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
31 inmates for inmates completing transition programs.......(483)
91
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 hhh. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
2 inmates for inmates completing wellness programs.........(641)
3 iii. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
4 inmates for inmates completing work release programs.....(364)
5 jjj. Number and percent of released inmates who commit
6 a new crime within 2 years of release and are subsequently
7 committed to prison or community supervision for all inmates
8 .........................................................(TBD)
9 kkk. Number and percent of released inmates who have
10 completed mandatory literacy programs and who commit a new
11 crime within 2 years of release and are subsequently committed
12 to prison or community supervision.......................(TBD)
13 lll. Number and percent of released inmates who have
14 completed GED education programs and who commit a new crime
15 within 2 years of release and are subsequently committed to
16 prison or community supervision..........................(TBD)
17 mmm. Number and percent of released inmates who have
18 completed special education programs and who commit a new
19 crime within 2 years of release and are subsequently committed
20 to prison or community supervision.......................(TBD)
21 nnn. Number and percent of released inmates who have
22 completed vocational education programs and who commit a new
23 crime within 2 years of release and are subsequently committed
24 to prison or community supervision.......................(TBD)
25 ooo. Number and percent of released inmates who have
26 completed drug abuse education/treatment programs and who
27 commit a new crime within 2 years of release and are
28 subsequently committed to prison or community supervision
29 .........................................................(TBD)
30 ppp. Number and percent of released inmates who have
31 completed life skills programs and who commit a new crime
92
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 within 2 years of release and are subsequently committed to
2 prison or community supervision..........................(TBD)
3 qqq. Number and percent of released inmates who have
4 completed transition programs and who commit a new crime
5 within 2 years of release and are subsequently committed to
6 prison or community supervision..........................(TBD)
7 rrr. Number and percent of released inmates who have
8 completed wellness programs and who commit a new crime within
9 2 years of release and are subsequently committed to prison or
10 community supervision....................................(TBD)
11 sss. Number and percent of released inmates who have
12 completed work release programs and who commit a new crime
13 within 2 years of release and are subsequently committed to
14 prison or community supervision..........................(TBD)
15 ttt. Number and percentage of released inmates who are
16 employed during two or more consecutive quarters of the
17 calendar year............................................(TBD)
18 uuu. Number and percentage of released inmates who
19 have completed mandatory literacy programs who are employed
20 during two or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year
21 .........................................................(TBD)
22 vvv. Number and percentage of released inmates who
23 have completed GED education programs who are employed during
24 two or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year....(TBD)
25 www. Number and percentage of released inmates who
26 have completed special education programs who are employed
27 during two or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year
28 .........................................................(TBD)
29 xxx. Number and percentage of released inmates who
30 have completed vocational education programs who are employed
31
93
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 during two or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year
2 .........................................................(TBD)
3 yyy. Number and percentage of released inmates who
4 have completed drug abuse education/treatment programs who are
5 employed during two or more consecutive quarters of the
6 calendar year............................................(TBD)
7 zzz. Number and percentage of released inmates who
8 have completed life skills programs who are employed during
9 two or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year....(TBD)
10 aaaa. Number and percentage of released inmates who
11 have completed transition programs who are employed during two
12 or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year........(TBD)
13 bbbb. Number and percentage of released inmates who
14 have completed wellness programs who are employed during two
15 or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year........(TBD)
16 cccc. Number and percentage of released inmates who
17 have completed work release programs who are employed during
18 two or more consecutive quarters of the calendar year....(TBD)
19 dddd. Number and percentage of released inmates who
20 are employed at or above a full quarter earning level....(TBD)
21 eeee. Number and percentage of released inmates who
22 have completed mandatory literacy programs and who are
23 employed at or above a full quarter earning level........(TBD)
24 ffff. Number and percentage of released inmates who
25 have completed GED education programs and who are employed at
26 or above a full quarter earning level....................(TBD)
27 gggg. Number and percentage of released inmates who
28 have completed special education programs and who are employed
29 at or above a full quarter earning level.................(TBD)
30
31
94
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 hhhh. Number and percentage of released inmates who
2 have completed vocational education programs and who are
3 employed at or above a full quarter earning level........(TBD)
4 iiii. Number and percentage of released inmates who
5 have completed drug abuse education/treatment programs and who
6 are employed at or above a full quarter earning level....(TBD)
7 jjjj. Number and percentage of released inmates who
8 have completed life skills programs and who are employed at or
9 above a full quarter earning level.......................(TBD)
10 kkkk. Number and percentage of released inmates who
11 have completed transition programs and who are employed at or
12 above a full quarter earning level.......................(TBD)
13 llll. Number and percentage of released inmates who
14 have completed wellness programs and who are employed at or
15 above a full quarter earning level.......................(TBD)
16 mmmm. Number and percentage of released inmates who
17 have completed work release programs and who are employed at
18 or above a full quarter earning level....................(TBD)
19 nnnn. Average weekly number and annual percentage of
20 inmates attending religious services...............(13,013/5%)
21 oooo. Number and percentage of inmates who are regular
22 attendants of religious services who reoffend within 2 years
23 .........................................................(TBD)
24 pppp. Number and percentage of inmates who are regular
25 attendants of religious services who return to the prison
26 system with 2 years......................................(TBD)
27 qqqq. Average monthly number of inmates using or
28 receiving general library print and audio-visual materials
29 .....................................................(219,183)
30
31
95
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 rrrr. Average monthly number of inmates using or
2 receiving general library reference and research assistance
3 ......................................................(12,835)
4 ssss. Average monthly number of inmates using or
5 receiving law library research materials..............(67,219)
6 tttt. Average monthly number of inmates using or
7 receiving law library reference and research assistance
8 ......................................................(40,405)
9 uuuu. Average monthly number of inmates who work as
10 law clerks in institutional law libraries................(368)
11 vvvv. Average monthly number of inmates who are
12 trained as law clerks....................................(135)
13 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number and percent of transition plans completed
15 for inmates released from prison..................(22,338/95%)
16 b. Number of mandatory literacy programs completed by
17 offenders per teacher with number of GED/MLP teachers shown
18 ..........................................(21.27/156 teachers)
19 c. Number of victims notified annually and the
20 percentage of victim notifications that meet the statutory
21 time period requirements.................................(TBD)
22 d. Number of annual volunteer hours in the chaplaincy
23 program with annual percentage change shown.....(250,000/2.8%)
24 (2) DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.--
25 (a) For the Juvenile Detention Program, the purpose of
26 which is to maintain, develop, and implement a comprehensive
27 range of detention services to protect the community, hold
28 youths accountable, and ensure the appearance of youths for
29 court proceedings, the outcome measures, output measures, and
30 associated performance standards with respect to funds
31 provided in Specific Appropriations 966-968A are as follows.
96
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 1. JUVENILE DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of escapes from secure detention facilities
3 per 100,000 resident days................................(3.3)
4 b. Number of youth-on-youth batteries (assaults
5 requiring medical attention) per 100,000 resident days while
6 in secure detention.......................................(98)
7 c. Number of youth-on-staff batteries (assaults
8 requiring medical attention) per 100,000 resident days while
9 in secure detention.......................................(32)
10 2. JUVENILE DETENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of admissions to secure detention facilities
12 ......................................................(68,403)
13 b. Number of releases from secure detention facilities
14 ......................................................(67,170)
15 c. Average daily population for secure detention as
16 compared to fixed capacity beds in secure detention as of June
17 30...............................................(2,571:2,222)
18 d. Actual number of escapes from secure detention
19 facilities per fiscal year................................(18)
20 e. Actual number of batteries requiring medical
21 attention per fiscal year for youth-on-youth and
22 youth-on-staff.........................................(1,016)
23 f. The actual number of absconds from home detention
24 per fiscal year .......................................(1,467)
25 g. The actual number of new law violations from home
26 detention per fiscal year................................(919)
27 3. HOME/NONSECURE DETENTION OUTCOMES.--
28 a. Number of absconds from home detention per 100,000
29 resident days............................................(166)
30 b. Number of new law violations from home detention
31 per 100,000 resident days ................................(92)
97
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 4. HOME/NONSECURE DETENTION OUTPUTS.--
2 a. Number of admissions into home detention/nonsecure
3 detention.....................................................
4 (36,659)
5 b. Average daily population for home detention.(2,751)
6 (b) For the Juvenile Offender Program the purpose of
7 which is to provide protection for the public from juvenile
8 crime by reducing juvenile delinquency through the development
9 and implementation of an effective continuum of services and
10 commitment programs including secure residential programs, the
11 outcome measures, and output measures, and associated
12 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
13 Specific Appropriations 969-972C are as follows:
14 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
16 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
17 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
18 a low-risk program.....................................(46.6%)
19 b. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
20 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
21 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
22 a moderate-risk program................................(46.8%)
23 c. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
24 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
25 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
26 a high-risk program....................................(47.4%)
27 d. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
28 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
29 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
30 a maximum-risk program.................................(38.5%)
31
98
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
2 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
3 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
4 an aftercare program...................................(41.8%)
5 f. Percentage of escapes from low-risk residential
6 commitment programs................................... (9.38%)
7 g. Percentage of escapes from moderate-risk
8 residential commitment programs........................(3.42%)
9 h. Percentage of escapes from high-risk residential
10 commitment programs................................... (1.19%)
11 i. Percentage of escapes from maximum residential
12 commitment programs................................... (0.43%)
13 j. Percentage of residential commitment program
14 reviews conducted by Quality Assurance which indicate
15 satisfactory or higher ratings on all physical plant safety
16 and security standards...................................(73%)
17 k. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
18 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs........(.18)
19 l. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
20 youth in moderate-risk residential commitment programs...(.23)
21 m. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
22 youth in high-risk residential commitment programs........(.4)
23 n. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
24 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs..........(0)
25 o. Number of youth-on- staff assaults/batteries per
26 100 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs....(1.5)
27 p. Number of youth-on-staff assaults/batteries per 100
28 youth in moderate-risk residential commitment programs...(2.3)
29 q. Number of youth-on- staff assaults/batteries per
30 100 youth in high-risk residential commitment programs...(3.1)
31
99
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 r. Number of youth-on- staff assaults/batteries per
2 100 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs....(6.6)
3 s. Total number of youth served and average daily
4 population of youth served in low-risk residential commitment
5 programs...........................................(2,204/477)
6 t. Total number of youth served and average daily
7 population of youth served in moderate-risk residential
8 commitment programs..............................(7,224/2,125)
9 u. Total number of youth served and average daily
10 population of youth served in high-risk residential commitment
11 programs.........................................(3,214/1,572)
12 v. Total number of youth served and average daily
13 population of youth served in maximum-risk residential
14 commitment programs..................................(240/125)
15 w. Number of low-risk residential commitment beds
16 on-line..................................................(530)
17 x. Number of moderate-risk residential commitment beds
18 on-line................................................(2,484)
19 y. Number of high-risk residential commitment beds
20 on-line................................................(1,674)
21 z. Number of maximum-risk residential commitment beds
22 on-line..................................................(172)
23 aa. The average length of stay (in months) in low-risk
24 residential commitment programs for youth released during the
25 fiscal year..............................................(2.9)
26 bb. The average length of stay (in months) in
27 moderate-risk residential commitment programs for youth
28 released during the fiscal year..........................(5.8)
29 cc. The average length of stay (in months) in
30 high-risk residential commitment programs for youth released
31 during the fiscal year...................................(8.8)
100
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 dd. The average length of stay (in months) in
2 maximum-risk residential commitment programs for youth
3 released during the fiscal year.........................(18.6)
4 ee. The number of contracts executed with private
5 providers for residential programs.......................(133)
6 ff. The number of contracts executed with government
7 providers for residential programs........................(21)
8 gg. The number and percent of contracts awarded on a
9 competitive basis.................................. (75/65.2%)
10 hh. Percentage of residential commitment program
11 reviews conducted by Quality Assurance, which indicated
12 satisfactory or higher ratings on overall quality........(94%)
13 ii. Percentage of residential commitment program
14 reviews conducted by Quality Assurance which indicate
15 satisfactory or higher ratings on staff-to-youth ratios..(80%)
16 jj. The ratio of direct care staff per shift to youth
17 in state-operated programs..........................(59.5/462)
18 kk. The ratio of nondirect care staff per shift to
19 youth in state-operated programs......................(38/462)
20 ll. The number of incidents of contraband possession
21 by youth in low-risk residential commitment programs.......(2)
22 mm. The number of incidents of contraband possession
23 by youth in moderate-risk residential commitment programs.(28)
24 nn. The number of incidents of contraband possession
25 by youth in high-risk residential commitment programs......(6)
26 oo. The number of incidents of contraband possession
27 by youth in low-risk residential commitment programs.......(0)
28 pp. Percentage of youth who were adjudicated or had
29 adjudication withheld for a crime which occurred within one
30 year of existing a nonresidential program...............(34.7)
31
101
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 qq. Percentage of cases processed within statutory
2 time frames...........................................(71.80%)
3 rr. Average time in days to make recommendations to
4 the State Attorney once the law enforcement repot is received
5 ...........................................................(9)
6 ss. Percentage of juvenile cases received that are
7 placed on community control............................(23.7%)
8 tt. The number of contracts executed with private
9 providers for nonresidential services....................(102)
10 uu. The number of contracts executed with government
11 providers for nonresidential services.....................(55)
12 vv. The number and percentage of contracts awarded on
13 a competitive basis.................................(50/74.6%)
14 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Total number of youth served and average daily
16 population of youth served in low-risk residential commitment
17 programs...........................................(2,204/477)
18 b. Total number of youth served and average daily
19 population of youth served in moderate-risk residential
20 commitment programs..............................(7,224/2,125)
21 c. Total number of youth served and average daily
22 population of youth served in high-risk residential commitment
23 programs.........................................(3,214/1,572)
24 d. Total number of youth served and average daily
25 population of youth served in maximum-risk residential
26 commitment programs..................................(240/125)
27 e. Number of low-risk residential commitment beds
28 on-line..................................................(530)
29 f. Number of moderate-risk residential commitment beds
30 on-line................................................(2,484)
31
102
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 g. Number of high-risk residential commitment beds
2 on-line................................................(1,674)
3 h. Number of maximum-risk residential commitment beds
4 on-line..................................................(172)
5 i. Number of youth receiving supervision services,
6 either state or contracted, in community control......(25,108)
7 j. Number of youth receiving supervision services,
8 either state or contracted, in diversion programs.....(17,824)
9 k. Average annual community control and intake
10 caseload compared to agency standard for 1,080 FTE.(42:1/32:1)
11 l. Number of youth processed through intake..(105,973)
12 (3) DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.--
13 (a) For the Criminal Justice Investigations and
14 Forensic Science Program the purpose of which is to manage,
15 coordinate and provide investigative, forensic, prevention and
16 protection services and through partnerships with local,
17 state, and federal criminal justice agencies to improve the
18 state's capacity to prevent crime and detect, capture and
19 prosecute criminal suspects, the outcome measures, output
20 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
21 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 982-986A are as
22 follows:
23 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Number/percentage of criminal investigations closed
25 resulting in an arrest......................(826 / 65% /2,212)
26 b. Number/percentage of closed criminal investigations
27 resolved...........................................(1,008/85%)
28 c. Number/ percentage of service requests by lab
29 discipline completed..............................(73,500/95%)
30 d. Average number of days to complete lab service
31 requests, excluding serology and DNA......................(30)
103
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Average number of days to complete lab service
2 requests for DNA.........................................(115)
3 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of criminal investigations worked....(2,794)
5 b. Number of criminal investigations commenced.(1,504)
6 c. Number/percentage of criminal investigations closed
7 ...................................................(1,276/46%)
8 d. Number of short-term investigative assists worked
9 .........................................................(566)
10 e. Number of crime scenes processed..............(600)
11 f. Number of DNA samples added to DNA database.(7,000)
12 g. Number of expert witness appearances in court
13 proceedings............................................(1,762)
14 h. Number of dignitaries provided with FDLE protective
15 services..................................................(52)
16 i. Number of background investigations performed
17 .......................................................(3,500)
18 (b) For the Criminal Justice Information Program the
19 purpose of which is to provide criminal justice information
20 needed to prevent crime, solve cases, recover property and
21 identify and apprehend criminals; to provide screening to
22 identify persons with criminal warrants, arrests, and
23 convictions; and to provide statistical and analytical
24 information about crime to policymakers and the public, the
25 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
26 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
27 Appropriations 987-992 are as follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Percentage of responses to simulated FCIC queries
30 within defined time frame................................(90%)
31
104
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Percent of time FCIC is running and accessible
2 .......................................................(99.5%)
3 c. Percentage response to criminal history record
4 check customers within defined time frame................(92%)
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Percentage of criminal arrest information received
7 electronically (through AFIS) for entry into the criminal
8 history system...........................................(70%)
9 b. Number of agencies/FCIC work stations networked
10 ..................................................(835/14,631)
11 c. Number of agencies connected to the Criminal
12 Justice Network..........................................(757)
13 d. Number of responses to requests for crime
14 statistics............................................(30,000)
15 e. Number of responses to requests for criminal
16 history record checks..............................(1,498,810)
17 f. Number of registered sexual predators/ offenders
18 identified to the public..............................(15,350)
19 g. Number of responses to requests for sexual
20 predator/offender information........................(279,000)
21 h. Number of missing children cases worked through
22 MCIC.....................................................(602)
23 (c) For Criminal Justice Professionalism Program the
24 purpose of which is to promote and facilitate the competency
25 and professional conduct of criminal justice officers through
26 a partnership with criminal justice agencies in provide
27 entry-level and in-service officer training and maintain
28 disciplinary procedures the outcome measures, output measures,
29 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
30 provided in Specific Appropriations 993-996 are as follows:
31 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
105
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number/percentage of individuals who pass the basic
2 professionalism certification examination for law enforcement
3 officers, correctional officers, and correctional probation
4 officers...........................................(5,140/75%)
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of course curricula and examinations
7 developed or revised.....................................(109)
8 b. Number of examinations administered.........(7,000)
9 c. Number of individuals trained by the Florida
10 Criminal Justice Executive Institute.....................(549)
11 d. Number of law enforcement officers trained by DARE
12 .........................................................(155)
13 e. Number of discipline referrals processed for state
14 and local LEOs and COs and CPOs pursuant to Ch. 120, F.S.
15 .......................................................(2,100)
16 f. Number of criminal justice officer disciplinary
17 actions..................................................(452)
18 g. Number of program and financial compliance audits
19 performed..............................................(3,155)
20 h. Number of records audited to validate the accuracy
21 and completeness of ATMS2 record information...........(2,138)
22 (4) DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS.--
23 (a) For the Office of the Attorney General Program,
24 the purpose of which is to provide civil representation and
25 legal services on behalf of the State of Florida, and to
26 assist crime victims and law enforcement agencies through
27 associated support services, the outcome measures, output
28 measures and associated performance standards with respect to
29 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 997-1013 are as
30 follows:
31
106
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 1. CIVIL REPRESENTATION AND LEGAL SERVICE OUTCOME
2 MEASURES.--
3 a. Actual cost per legal hour for state agency
4 representation...........................................($46)
5 b. Percent of client agencies expressing satisfaction
6 with civil defense services..............................(95%)
7 c. Cost per capital brief/state & federal
8 responses/oral arguments: ($5,100)
9 d. Cost per noncapital brief/state & federal
10 responses/oral arguments:...............................($820)
11 e. Percent of prosecutorial agencies expressing
12 satisfaction with criminal appellate services ...........(95%)
13 f. Children's Legal Services dependency petitions
14 filed..................................................(1,600)
15 g. Termination of parental rights final judgments
16 .........................................................(100)
17 h. Child Support Enforcement - Court Orders...(12,000)
18 i. Child Support Enforcement - Cases referred from
19 Department of Revenue.................................(13,000)
20 j. Average number of days for opinion response....(29)
21 k. Percent of mediated cases resolved in 3 weeks or
22 less.....................................................(75%)
23 l. Percent of lemon law cases resolved in less than
24 one year.................................................(99%)
25 m. Number/percent disputes in which litigation was
26 filed by one of parties.................................(2/1%)
27 2. CIVIL REPRESENTATION AND LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT
28 MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of state agencies represented...........(50)
30 b. Cases opened................................(7,000)
31 c. Cases closed................................(4,700)
107
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Number of capital cases opened................(210)
2 e. Number of noncapital cases opened..........(14,000)
3 f. Number of capital briefs/state & federal
4 responses/oral arguments.................................(250)
5 g. Number of noncapital briefs/state & federal
6 responses/oral arguments..............................(10,500)
7 h. Number of Antitrust cases closed...............(20)
8 i. Number of Economic Crime cases closed.........(300)
9 j. Number of Medicaid Fraud cases closed.........(400)
10 k. Number of Children's Legal Services (uncontested
11 disposition orders entered) cases closed ..............(1,400)
12 l. Number of Ethics cases closed..................(15)
13 m. Lemon Law cases approved for state-run arbitration
14 .......................................................(1,500)
15 n. Opinions issued...............................(255)
16 o. Cost per opinion...........................($1,350)
17 p. Number/percent of disputes resolved through
18 mediation............................................(105/76%)
19 q. Cost per mediation...........................($555)
20 3. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND VICTIM SUPPORT SERVICE OUTCOME
21 MEASURES.--
22 a. Average number of days from application to payment
23 ..........................................................(42)
24 b. Number of appeals filed with district courts of
25 appeal.....................................................(5)
26 c. Percent of counties receiving motor vehicle theft
27 grant funds that experienced a reduction in motor vehicle
28 theft incidents below 1994 levels........................(65%)
29 d. Percent of training participants who rated the
30 training as good or excellent (victims/crime prevention).(65%)
31
108
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Number of convenience store complaints resolved
2 ..........................................................(25)
3 4. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND VICTIM SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of victim compensation claims eligibility
6 determinations.........................................(6,500)
7 b. Number of victim compensation claims paid...(5,500)
8 c. Amount paid on behalf of victims......($20 million)
9 d. Number of victim compensation final orders issues
10 .........................................................(170)
11 e. Number of sexual battery examination claims paid
12 .......................................................(5,200)
13 f. Number of appellate services provided.........(700)
14 g. Number of information and referral services
15 provided..............................................(25,000)
16 h. Number of VOCA grants funded..................(200)
17 I. Amount of funds awarded in VOCA grants.($21million)
18 j. Number of victims served through contract
19 .....................................................(100,000)
20 k. Number of motor vehicle theft grants funded....(40)
21 l. Amount of funds awarded in motor vehicle theft
22 grants...................................................($2.4
23 million)
24 m. Number of applications received............(12,000)
25 n. Number of eligible applications received....(7,000)
26 o. Number of victim compensation appeals received
27 .........................................................(175)
28 p. Number of sexual battery examination claims
29 received...............................................(5,800)
30 q. Number of persons seeking appellate services..(825)
31
109
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 r. Number of calls received on the toll-free
2 information and referral line.........................(30,000)
3 s. Number of VOCA grant applications received....(200)
4 t. Number of motor vehicle theft grant applications
5 received..................................................(40)
6 u. Number of robberies occurring in convenience stores
7 .......................................................(2,575)
8 v. Number of convenience store security
9 violations/complaints received............................(60)
10 w. Number of people attending training (victims/crime
11 prevention)......................................(1,368/3,550)
12 x. Number of training sessions held (victims/crime
13 prevention)............................................(33/30)
14 y. Cost per attendee for training (victims/crime
15 prevention).............................................($161)
16 z. Number of convenience store complaints/violations
17 processed.................................................(25)
18 aa. Number of convenience store technical assistance
19 responses provided........................................(60)
20 (b) For the Statewide Prosecution Program the purpose
21 of which is to investigate and prosecute criminal offenses
22 enumerated in section 16.56, Florida Statutes, when they have
23 been part of an organized crime conspiracy affecting two or
24 more judicial circuits, including assistance to federal state
25 attorneys and local law enforcement offices in their efforts
26 against organized crime, the outcome measures, output
27 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
28 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1014-1016 are as
29 follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
110
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Of the defendants who reached disposition, the
2 number of those convicted................................(288)
3 b. Of the defendants who reached disposition, the
4 number of those convicted by plea....................... (271)
5 c. Of the defendants who reached disposition, the
6 number of those convicted by trial....................... (17)
7 d. Conviction rate per defendant.................(94%)
8 e. Dispositions - total years prison/probation..(626 &
9 2 life/1,310)
10 f. Dispositions - total monetary penalties assessed
11 .................................................($27,544,524)
12 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. New requests for investigative and prosecutorial
14 assistance from law enforcement .........................(653)
15 b. Number of law enforcement agencies assisted....(66)
16 c. Ratio of request to number of intake prosecutors
17 .......................................................(297:5)
18 d. Investigations handled (total volume inclusive of
19 previous years)..........................................(702)
20 e. Number of subjects/targets..................(1,459)
21 f. Ratio of investigations to number of prosecutors
22 ........................................................(21:1)
23 g. New criminal cases filed......................(107)
24 h. Number of defendants charged..................(157)
25 i. Counts filed................................(2,036)
26 j. Total volume of final criminal cases handled
27 (inclusive of prior years)...............................(261)
28 k. Number of defendants charged..................(681)
29 l. Number of counts............................(4,136)
30 m. Ratio of total filed cases to total number of
31 prosecutors..............................................(8:1)
111
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 Section 36. The performance measures and standards
2 established in this section for individual programs in Natural
3 Resources shall be applied to those programs for the 1999-2000
4 fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are
5 directly linked to the appropriations made in the General
6 Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as required by
7 the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
8 (1) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.--
9 (a) For the Food Safety and Quality Program, the
10 purpose of which is to ensure the safety, wholesomeness,
11 quality, and accurate labeling of food products through
12 inspections, laboratory analyses, consumer assistance, and
13 enforcement actions, the outcome measures, output measures,
14 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
15 provided in Specific Appropriations 1042-1046 are as follows:
16 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Total outbreaks of food-borne illness in
18 Florida/total number of people who become ill in calendar year
19 .........................................................(TBD)
20 b. Number/percentage of food and dairy establishments
21 which fail to meet food safety and sanitation requirements
22 ..................................................(2,670/8.9%)
23 c. Number of food or dairy products removed from sale
24 for failure to meet food safety requirements or standards
25 ......................................................(15,500)
26 d. Number/percentage of food products analyzed which
27 fail to meet standards..............................(775/8.5%)
28 e. Number/percentage of milk and milk products
29 analyzed which fail to meet standards.............(1,300/8.8%)
30
31
112
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Number/percentage of produce or other food samples
2 analyzed which fail to meet pesticide residue standards
3 .....................................................(52/2.3%)
4 g. Number/percentage of food and dairy enforcement
5 actions which result in compliance or other resolution within
6 60 days, excluding Field Notices of Violation.....(13,000/99%)
7 2. OUTPUT MEASURES
8 a. Number of inspections of food establishments, dairy
9 establishments, and water vending machines............(61,500)
10 b. Number of enforcement actions taken, excluding
11 Field Notices of Violation............................(13,131)
12 c. Number of food analyses/samples analyzed
13 ................................................(31,200/9,000)
14 d. Number of milk and milk products analyses/samples
15 analyzed........................................(70,000/20,000
16 e. Number of pesticide residue analyses/samples
17 analyzed.......................................(273,000/3,050)
18 f. Number of food-related consumer assistance
19 investigations or actions..............................(4,800)
20 g. Tons of poultry and shell eggs graded.....(430,000)
21 (b) For the Consumer Protection Program, the purpose
22 of which is to protect Florida's consumers from deceptive and
23 unfair business and trade practices and from unsafe, harmful,
24 and inferior products and services, the outcome measures,
25 output measures, and associated performance standards with
26 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1047-1050
27 are as follows:
28 1. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30
31
113
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number/percentage of LP Gas accidents due to
2 equipment failure or code violations at licensed LP Gas
3 storage, distribution, and handling facilities..........(2/3%)
4 b. Number/percentage of LP Gas facilities found in
5 compliance with safety requirements on first inspection
6 .....................................................(989/20%)
7 c. Number of reportable accidents resulting from
8 amusement attraction mechanical or structural failure......(1)
9 d. Number/percentage of amusement attractions found in
10 full compliance with safety requirements on first inspection
11 ...................................................(3,441/37%)
12 e. Number/percentage of regulated weighing and
13 measuring devices, packages, and businesses with scanners in
14 compliance with accuracy standards during initial
15 inspection/testing...............................(237,000/95%)
16 f. Number/percentage of petroleum products meeting
17 quality standards...............................(57,000/99.2%)
18 g. Number/percentage of state and commercial weights
19 and volumetric standards found within specified tolerances
20 ..................................................(11,760/98%)
21 2. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTPUT
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of LP Gas facility inspections/reinspections
24 conducted..............................................(4,200)
25 b. Number of LP Gas-related accidents investigated
26 ..........................................................(50)
27 c. Number of amusement device safety/permit
28 inspections conducted............................(9,300/1,725)
29 d. Number of weighing and measuring devices
30 inspected/tested.....................................(249,000)
31
114
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Number of complaints investigated/processed
2 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of
3 Standards in the Consumer Protection Program...........(3,180)
4 f. Number of LP Gas professional certification
5 examinations administered..............................(1,500)
6 g. Number of laboratory analyses performed on
7 regulated petroleum products.........................(140,000)
8 h. Number of enforcement actions taken against all
9 entities regulated by the Division of Standards in the
10 Consumer Protection Program...........................(37,375)
11 i. Number of physical measurement standards tests or
12 calibrations conducted................................(12,000)
13 3. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Number/percentage regulated entities (motor vehicle
15 repair shops, health studio, telemarketer, business
16 opportunity, dance studio, solicitation of contribution,
17 sellers of travel, and pawn shops) found operating in
18 violation of the consumer protection laws..........(8,892/26%)
19 b. Number/percentage of consumer hotline callers that
20 receive accurate information and are treated courteously by
21 call center staff........................................(TBD)
22 c. Number/percentage of "no-sales solicitation"
23 complaints from subscribers.......................(17,160/13%)
24 d. Amount/percentage of money recovered for consumers
25 from regulated motor vehicle repair shops.......($165,000/TBD)
26 4. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of assists provided to consumers, not
28 including lemon law................................(1,003,195)
29 b. Number of lemon law assists made to consumers
30 ......................................................(30,450)
31
115
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Number of complaints investigated/processed
2 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of Consumer
3 Services in the Consumer Protection Program...........(33,529)
4 d. Number of enforcement actions taken against all
5 entities regulated by the Division of Consumer Services in the
6 Consumer Protection Program..............................(260)
7 e. Number of "no sales solicitation calls"
8 subscriptions processed..............................(180,000)
9 5. PEST CONTROL AND FEED, SEED AND FERTILIZER
10 COMPLIANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Number/percentage of licensed pest control
12 applicators inspected who misapply chemicals or otherwise
13 violate regulations..................................(375/23%)
14 b. Number/percentage of feed, seed, and fertilizer
15 inspected products in compliance with performance/quality
16 standards.......................................(16,698/90.5%)
17 6. PEST CONTROL AND FEED, SEED, AND FERTILIZER
18 COMPLIANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of pest control inspections conducted
20 .......................................................(1,630)
21 b. Number of feed, seed, and fertilizer inspections
22 conducted.............................................(12,146)
23 c. Number of complaints investigated/processed
24 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of
25 Agricultural Environmental Services in the Consumer Protection
26 Program..................................................(800)
27 d. Number of pest control professional certification
28 examinations administered..............................(1,605)
29 e. Number of laboratory analyses performed on seed and
30 fertilizer samples...................................(160,000)
31
116
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Number of enforcement actions taken against all
2 entities regulated by the Division of Agricultural
3 Environmental Services in the Consumer Protection Program
4 .......................................................(2,470)
5 7. CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Number/percentage of licensed pesticide applicators
7 inspected who do not apply chemicals properly........(198/36%)
8 b. Number of reported human/equine disease cases
9 caused by mosquitos.....................................(3/40)
10 8. CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of pesticide-related complaints investigated
12 .........................................................(352)
13 b. Number of pesticide-related inspections conducted
14 .......................................................(3,129)
15 c. Number of pesticide-related enforcement actions
16 initiated/completed......................................(500)
17 d. Number of wells monitored for pesticide or nitrate
18 residues..................................................(46)
19 e. Number of pesticide product and residue analyses
20 performed in the pesticide laboratory.................(63,500)
21 f. Number of persons in Florida served by effective
22 mosquito control programs.........................(14,000,000)
23 (c) For the Agricultural Economic Development Program,
24 the purpose of which is to maintain and enhance Florida
25 agriculture in the national and international marketplace, the
26 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
27 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
28 Appropriations 1051-1067 are as follows:
29 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percentage of national agricultural gate receipts
31 represented by Florida agricultural products.............(TBD)
117
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Percentage of national agricultural exports
2 represented by Florida agricultural products.............(TBD)
3 c. Percentage/value of Florida's gross state product
4 represented by Florida agricultural products.............(TBD)
5 2. MARKET DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION, STATISTICS, AND
6 REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Gate receipts value of agriculture and seafood
8 products sold by Florida's agricultural industry, in dollars
9 in calendar year.......................................($7.075
10 billion)
11 b. Total sales of agricultural and seafood products
12 generated by tenants of state farmers markets...($194,189,444)
13 c. Dollar value of federal commodities and recovered
14 food distributed.................................($52,142,213)
15 3. MARKET DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION, STATISTICS, AND
16 REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of buyers reached with agricultural
18 promotion campaign messages.....................(2.02 billion)
19 b. Number of marketing assists provided to producers
20 and businesses........................................(94,569)
21 c. Pounds of federal commodities and recovered food
22 distributed.......................................(66,214,385)
23 4. FRUIT AND VEGETABLE REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Dollar value of fruit and vegetables that are
25 shipped to other states or countries which are subject to
26 mandatory inspection..........................($1,443,648,000)
27 5. FRUIT AND VEGETABLE REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
28 a. Number of tons of fruits and vegetables inspected
29 ..................................................(13,781,717)
30 6. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
118
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number/percentage of newly introduced pests and
2 diseases prevented from infesting Florida plants to a level
3 where eradication is biologically or economically unfeasible
4 ...................................................(100/93.5%)
5 b. Number/percentage of commercial citrus acres free
6 of citrus canker...............................(832,581/98.5%)
7 c. Number/percentage of acres of commercial citrus,
8 monitored by the department, at the request of the grower,
9 which are free of the Caribbean fruit fly........(186,000/98%)
10 d. Number/percentage of exotic fruit fly
11 (Mediterranean, Oriental, Mexican, Queensland, West Indian)
12 outbreaks where eradication can occur without use of
13 aerial-treatments.....................................(2/100%)
14 7. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of plant, fruit fly trap, and honeybee
16 inspections performed..............................(2,280,000)
17 b. Number of commercial citrus acres surveyed for
18 citrus canker........................................(245,000)
19 c. Number of exotic fruit fly traps serviced..(36,729)
20 d. Millions of sterile med flies released......(7,800)
21 e. Number of acres where plant pest and disease
22 eradication or control efforts were undertake........(100,000)
23 f. Number of shipments of plant products certified
24 pest-free for export..................................(25,000)
25 g. Number of plant, soil, insect, and other organism
26 samples processed for identification or diagnosis....(650,000)
27 8. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURE.--
28 a. Number/percentage of livestock and poultry infected
29 with specific transmissible diseases for which monitoring,
30 controlling, and eradicating activities are established
31 .................................................(472/.00083%)
119
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 9. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of animal site inspections performed
3 ......................................................(14,904)
4 b. Number of animals tested/vaccinated
5 .............................................(650,000/120,000)
6 c. Number of animal sites quarantined and monitored
7 .........................................................(315)
8 d. Number of/unit cost per animal-related diagnostic
9 laboratory procedure(s) performed..............(850,000/$2.84)
10 e. Number of animals covered by health certificates
11 .....................................................(815,000)
12 f. Number of animal permits processed..........(4,750)
13 10. AGRICULTURE INSPECTION STATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
15 inspection stations...............................(11,236,244)
16 b. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
17 inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated
18 commodities........................................(2,505,682)
19 c. Percentage of vehicles inspected at agricultural
20 inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated
21 commodities..............................................(22%)
22 d. Amount of revenue generated by Bills of Lading
23 transmitted to the Department of Revenue from Agricultural
24 Inspection stations..............................($12,658,800)
25 e. Number of Bills of Lading transmitted to the
26 Department of Revenue from Agricultural Inspection stations
27 ......................................................(83,000)
28 (d) For the Forestry Program, the purpose of which is
29 to promote and use sound management practices for forestry and
30 other agricultural activities, the outcome measures, output
31 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
120
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1069-1082 are as
2 follows:
3 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Number/percentage of acres of protected forest and
5 wildlands not burned by wildfires...........(24,924,300/99.3%)
6 b. Number/percentage of threatened structures not
7 burned by wildfires................................(1,000/98%)
8 c. Number/percentage of wildfires caused by humans
9 ...................................................(3,040/80%)
10 d. Number/percentage of State Forest timber producing
11 acres adequately stocked and growing...........(107,485/25.9%)
12 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of wildfires detected and suppressed.(3,800)
14 b. Average elapsed time in minutes between wildfire
15 ignition and detection....................................(55)
16 c. Average elapsed time in minutes between wildfire
17 detection and arrival on scene............................(34)
18 d. Number/percentage of forest acres and other lands
19 managed by the department and purchased by the state with
20 approved management plans........................(831,951/94%)
21 e. Number of acres burned through prescribed burning
22 .................................................(2.1 million)
23 f. Number of person-hours of firefighting training
24 provided..............................................(47,000)
25 g. Number of forest-related technical assists provided
26 to nonindustrial private land owners..................(37,000)
27 h. Number of open burning authorizations processed for
28 land clearing, agriculture, and silviculture.........(118,000)
29 i. Number of fire prevention presentations made
30 .......................................................(1,350)
31
121
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 j. Number of person-hours spent responding to
2 emergency incidents other than wildfires...............(8,000)
3 (2) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.--
4 (a) For the State Lands Program, the purpose of which
5 is to acquire, administer, and dispose of state lands, the
6 title of which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the
7 Internal Improvement Trust Fund; administer, manage, and
8 maintain the records of all lands held by the Board of
9 Trustees; administer and maintain the geodetic survey
10 requirements for the State of Florida; identify and set
11 ordinary and mean high water boundaries for purposes of
12 sovereignty and land title; and control aquatic and invasive
13 plant species, the outcome measures, output measures, and
14 associated performance standards with respect to funds
15 provided in Specific Appropriations 1187-1209 are as follows:
16 1. LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
17 a. Percent increase in the number of occurrences of
18 endangered/ threatened/special concern species on publicly
19 managed conservation areas...............................(10%)
20 2. LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of acres of critical habitat acquired by the
22 P2000 Program as listed in the CARL report...........(311,601)
23 b. Percentage of acres acquired by the P2000 Program
24 that have a critical habitat within the acquired tract...(38%)
25 c. Number of acres of land acquired by the P2000
26 Program that had its highest resource values based on FNAI
27 elements.............................................(218,808)
28 d. Number and percent completion of projects on the
29 CARL list.............................................(95/10%)
30 e. Percentage of parcels at less than appraised value
31 - less than $100,000......................................(6%)
122
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Percentage of parcels at less than appraised value
2 - greater than $100,000..................................(63%)
3 g. Percentage of parcels at less than appraised value
4 - less than $100,000.....................................(93%)
5 h. Percentage of parcels at less than appraised value
6 - greater than $100,000..................................(89%)
7 i. Number of appraisals certified................(336)
8 j. Number of surveys/maps certified for environmental
9 land acquisition.......................................(98/49)
10 k. Number of surveys/maps certified for
11 nonenvironmental land acquisition......................(20/21)
12 l. Percentage of parcels acquired within the "standard
13 time limit" - less than $100,000.........................(51%)
14 m. Percentage of parcels acquired within the "standard
15 time limit" - greater than $100,000......................(57%)
16 3. LAND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of parcels evaluated and disposed of that
18 have been determined to have no further public use........(80)
19 b. Percentage of easements, leases, and other requests
20 completed by maximum time frames prescribed..............(75%)
21 c. Percentage of all leases of sovereign submerged
22 lands in compliance with lease conditions................(92%)
23 d. Percentage of all land management plans completed
24 within statutory time frames.............................(60%)
25 4. LAND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Percentage of submerged land leases found in
27 compliance annually......................................(92%)
28 b. Ratio of parcels of lands surplused/parcels of land
29 evaluated for possible surplus...........................(1:2)
30 c. Number of verified records maintained.....(237,265)
31
123
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Number of submerged land leases audited annually
2 .........................................................(313)
3 5. AQUATIC/EXOTIC PLANT CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of new acres of public land that have
5 invasive, exotic, upland plants controlled and have existing
6 management personnel committed to maintaining these plants
7 under control after initial treatment..................(3,500)
8 b. Percentage of Florida's public waters where
9 control of hydrilla, water hyacinth, and water lettuce has
10 been achieved and sustained..............................(93%)
11 6. AQUATIC/EXOTIC PLANT CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Percentage of public lakes and rivers that contain
13 invasive, nonnative aquatic plants and are under maintenance
14 control..................................................(93%)
15 b. Percentage of public lands where invasive,
16 nonnative upland plants, have been brought under control
17 through efforts of, or pass-through funding, by the Bureau of
18 Aquatic Plant Management.................................(TBD)
19 c. Average cost per acre to achieve maintenance
20 control of aquatic, nonnative plants....................($130)
21 (b) For the Water Resources Management Program, the
22 purpose of which is to regulate, manage, conserve, and protect
23 the state's drinking water, surface and groundwater resources,
24 wetlands, beaches, and lands reclaimed after mining
25 activities, the outcome measures, output measures, and
26 associated performance standards with respect to funds
27 provided in Specific Appropriations 1222-1243 are as follows:
28 1. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Percentage of rivers that meet designated uses
31 .........................................................(92%)
124
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Percentage of lakes that meet designated uses.(87%)
2 c. Percentage of estuaries that meet designated uses
3 .........................................................(95%)
4 d. Percentage of groundwater that meets designated
5 uses ....................................................(85%)
6 e. Percentage of reclaimed water (reuse) capacity
7 relative to total domestic wastewater capacity...........(40%)
8 f. Percentage of public water systems with no
9 significant (public health-based) drinking water quality
10 problems.................................................(90%)
11 g. Number of wetland acres within agency jurisdiction
12 successfully preserved, created, restored, and enhanced to
13 offset the number of wetland acres impacted; and functional
14 wetland acres - net gain/loss ratio........................(0)
15 2. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING OUTPUT
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of wastewater inspections, site visits,
18 technical assistance contacts, and other compliance activities
19 .......................................................(1,260)
20 b. Number of wastewater permits and other
21 authorizations processed..................................(30)
22 c. Number of water quality stations monitored in the
23 statewide monitoring networks............................(980)
24 d. Number of drinking water inspections, site visits,
25 technical assistance contacts, and other compliance activities
26 .......................................................(2,520)
27 3. BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND
28 PERMITTING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
29 a. Linear miles of beaches which provide upland
30 protection, wildlife habitat, or recreation according to
31 statutory and rule requirements..........................(825)
125
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 4. BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND
2 PERMITTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Beach renourishment and dune restoration funds
4 awarded..................................................($7.7
5 million)
6 b. Number of beach renourishment and dune restoration
7 projects funded............................................(7)
8 c. Number of other compliance activities.........(168)
9 d. Number of coastal construction permits, including
10 field permits, processed...............................(1,580)
11 e. Miles of shoreline surveyed and monitored.....(752)
12 5. MINE RECLAMATION AND PERMITTING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
13 a. Percentage of mined lands qualifying for
14 reclamation which have been reclaimed according to statutory
15 and rule requirements....................................(95%)
16 6. MINE RECLAMATION AND PERMITTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Funds awarded annually for mine reclamation
18 projects.........................................($10 million)
19 b. Number of mining permits processed/number of
20 inspections...........................................(20/550)
21 c. Number of applications/acreage processed for mine
22 reclamation projects................................(60/6,500)
23 7. WATER FACILITIES FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OUTCOME
24 MEASURE.--
25 a. Percentage of wastewater, drinking water, and
26 stormwater projects on State Revolving Fund loan priority
27 lists and the construction grant priority list that are funded
28 annually................................................(3.5%)
29 8. WATER FACILITIES FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OUTPUT
30 MEASURES.--
31 a. Loan grant funds awarded..............($80 million)
126
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Number of local governments, including
2 systems/utilities funded..................................(12)
3 (c) For the Waste Management Program, the purpose of
4 which is to protect the public and the environment through
5 promotion of sound waste management practices, the outcome
6 measures, output measures, and associated performance
7 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
8 Appropriations 1244-1277D are as follows:
9 1. PETROLEUM TANK REGULATION AND CONTAMINATED SITE
10 REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Percentage of regulated petroleum storage tank
12 facilities in compliance with state regulations..........(89%)
13 b. Percentage/number of contaminated petroleum sites
14 with rehabilitation underway........................(9%/1,544)
15 c. Percentage/number of contaminated petroleum sites
16 with rehabilitation completed........................(0.3%/57)
17 2. PETROLEUM TANK REGULATION AND CONTAMINATED SITE
18 REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Percentage of reimbursement claims processed(100%)
20 b. Number and percentage of petroleum sites eligible
21 for state financial assistance....................(17,100/99%)
22 3. DRYCLEANING SITE REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percentage and number of contaminated drycleaning
24 sites with rehabilitation underway.....................(9%/82)
25 b. Percentage and number of contaminated drycleaning
26 sites with rehabilitation completed.....................(0%/0)
27 4. DRYCLEANING SITE REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
28 a. Number of drycleaning site cleanup applications
29 eligible for state financial assistance................(1,200)
30 5. HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION, MANAGEMENT, AND SITE
31 REHABILITATION OUTCOMES.--
127
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Percentage of all hazardous waste generators in
2 significant compliance with state and federal regulations
3 .........................................................(88%)
4 b. Percentage of permitted transfer, storage, and
5 disposal facilities in significant compliance with state and
6 federal regulations......................................(95%)
7 c. Number of facilities or sources of pollution that
8 modified their industrial processes to reduce generation of
9 pollutants as a result of department activities...........(10)
10 d. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (Federal
11 superfund sites) with rehabilitation underway........(100%/49)
12 e. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (Federal
13 superfund sites) with rehabilitation completed..........(0%/0)
14 f. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (known
15 state program sites) with rehabilitation underway.....(95%/19)
16 g. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (known
17 state program sites) with rehabilitation completed......(5%/1)
18 6. HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION, MANAGEMENT, AND SITE
19 REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
20 a. Number of tons of hazardous waste generated in
21 Florida..............................................(185,221)
22 7. SOLID WASTE REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Percentage of permitted solid waste facilities in
25 compliance with state requirements.......................(96%)
26 b. Percentage of municipal solid waste recycled
27 statewide................................................(40%)
28 c. Number of tons/percentage of municipal solid waste
29 collected that is recycled.....................(9,423,784/40%)
30 d. Number of tons/percentage of municipal solid waste
31 burned annually................................(4,096,035/17%)
128
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Number of tons/percentage of municipal solid waste
2 disposed in landfills.........................(10,266,086/43%)
3 8. SOLID WASTE REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of solid waste permits and registrations
6 processed................................................(685)
7 b. Number and dollar amount of solid waste management
8 and recycling grants issued..................(252/$35 million)
9 c. Number of waste-to-energy facilities located in
10 Florida...................................................(13)
11 (d) For the Recreation and Parks Program, the purpose
12 of which is to anticipate and meet the outdoor recreation
13 demands of Florida's residents and visitors and to ensure that
14 an adequate natural resource base is maintained to accommodate
15 future demands and preserve a quality environment, the outcome
16 measures, output measures, and associated performance
17 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
18 Appropriations 1278-1327B are as follows:
19 1. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Increase in attendance at state parks over prior
21 year....................................................(1.3%)
22 b. Increase the acreage available for public
23 recreation over prior year................................(2%)
24 2. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of parks sites managed.................(151)
26 b. Number of recreational facilities built, repaired,
27 or restored by type compared to plan development needs...(TBD)
28 c. Number of cultural/historical sites restored or
29 maintained compared to need..............................(TBD)
30 d. Number of acres managed for secondary use/multiple
31 use......................................................(500)
129
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Acres of native habitat successfully maintained as
2 natural areas in state parks compared to need.(58,000/545,075)
3 f. Percentage of management plans completed in
4 compliance with Florida Statutes........................(100%)
5 g. Percentage of lands acquired by P2000 that meet at
6 least 3 criteria of the program.........................(100%)
7 h. Number of parks/acres/trail miles supported by
8 general administration, maintenance/minor repairs, protection,
9 and all variations of visitor service activities
10 .............................................(152/534,387/380)
11 i. Number of private/public partnerships utilized to
12 assist operations of state parks.........................(900)
13 j. Number of state parks additions/inholding land
14 acquisitions..............................................(10)
15 k. Number of recreational and natural/cultural
16 additions and inholding acquisitions for existing parks by
17 type as related to available funding.......................(1)
18 3. GREENWAYS AND TRAILS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
19 a. Number of additional greenways, recreational
20 trails, or trail systems acquired to provide or enhance access
21 to public lands while ensuring that the ecological integrity
22 of the land is not compromised............................(18)
23 4. GREENWAYS AND TRAILS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of state greenways and trails managed....(4)
25 b. Number of miles of recreational facilities built,
26 repaired, or restored by type compared to plan development
27 needs.....................................................(35)
28 c. Number of trailheads developed to provide public
29 access points on greenways and trails.....................(10)
30 5. RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
31 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
130
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Increase in technical assistance and grant related
2 services to local governments over prior year.............(2%)
3 6. RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of recreational grants/funding to local
6 governments for recreational facilities and land acquisition
7 ...........................................(202/$23.1 million)
8 b. Number of technical assistance consultations,
9 meetings, calls, and publications........................(350)
10 7. COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTCOME
11 MEASURE.--
12 a. Percentage of degraded acreage identified in state
13 buffer enhanced or restored............................(11.6%)
14 8. COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTPUT
15 MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of acres managed...................(129,493)
17 b. Number of acres where invasive or undesirable plant
18 species have been controlled...........................(2,255)
19 (e) For the Air Resources Management Program, the
20 purpose of which is to maintain and improve the state's air
21 quality through air-pollution mitigation and prevention, the
22 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
23 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
24 Appropriations 1328-1335 are as follows:
25 1. AIR QUALITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Percentage of population living in areas monitored
27 for air quality..........................................(90%)
28 b. Annual average percentage of time monitored
29 population breathes good quality air.....................(80%)
30 c. Annual average percentage of time monitored
31 population breathes moderate quality air.................(20%)
131
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Percentage of the population which breathes air
2 that violates the standard for ozone as determined by the data
3 generated by the state air quality monitoring network.....(4%)
4 2. AIR QUALITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of monitors operated by the department and
6 local programs...........................................(163)
7 b. Number of quality assurance audits conducted to
8 ensure accurate and reliable ambient air quality data....(301)
9 3. AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT OR PREVENTION OUTCOME
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Annual 0.5% reduction of NOX air emissions per
12 capita................................................(129.24)
13 b. Annual 0.5% reduction of SO2 air emissions per
14 capita.................................................(99.67)
15 c. Annual 0.5% reduction of CO air emissions per
16 capita................................................(544.33)
17 d. Annual 0.5% reduction of VOC air emissions per
18 capita................................................(108.49)
19 4. AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT OR PREVENTION OUTPUT
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of Title V permits issued/denied.....(315/0)
22 b. Number of Title V modifications issued/denied
23 ........................................................(10/0)
24 c. Number of non-Title V permits issued/denied.(350/3)
25 d. Number of non-Title V modifications issued/denied
26 ........................................................(97/0)
27 e. Number of Title V facilities inspected........(850)
28 f. Number of asbestos projects reviewed and evaluated
29 .......................................................(2,260)
30 (f) For the Law Enforcement Program, the purpose of
31 which is to protect the people, the environment, and the
132
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 natural resources through law enforcement, education, and
2 public service, the outcome measures, output measures, and
3 associated performance standards with respect to funds
4 provided in Specific Appropriation 1247B are as follows:
5 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Number/percentage of known hazardous substance dump
7 sites and petroleum spills whereby action, other than criminal
8 investigation, was taken to reduce, control, or eliminate risk
9 to public health and the environment...............(1,430/48%)
10 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of investigations opened/closed....(227/182)
12 b. Number of environmental dump sites responded to
13 .........................................................(673)
14 c. Number of petroleum spills responded to.......(757)
15 d. Funds spent/recovered on spill remediation
16 ............................................($928,153/$86,638)
17 e. Number of sites/spills remediated.............(561)
18 (3) FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION.--
19 (a) For the Law Enforcement Program, the purpose of
20 which is to provide patrol and protection activities to
21 safeguard the opportunities for boating, camping, fishing,
22 hunting, wildlife viewing, and other natural resource related
23 activities in a safe and healthy environment, the outcome
24 measures, output measures, and associated performance
25 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
26 Appropriations 1361-1378 are as follows:
27 1. UNIFORM PATROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Total number of violations.................(29,130)
29 b. Number of felony violations...................(TBD)
30 c. Number of misdemeanor violations..............(TBD)
31 d. Number of infractions violations..............(TBD)
133
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Total number of hours spent in preventative land
2 patrol...............................................(516,259)
3 f. Total number of hours spent in preventative water
4 patrol................................................(68,320)
5 g. Total number of hours spent in preventative air
6 patrol.................................................(8,244)
7 2. INVESTIGATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of hours spent on investigations...(297,167)
9 b. Number of violations encountered by all staff
10 ......................................................(14,050)
11 c. Total number of investigations opened.........(806)
12 d. Number of felony investigations opened........(TBD)
13 e. Number of misdemeanor investigations opened...(TBD)
14 f. Number of infractions investigations opened...(TBD)
15 g. Total number of investigations closed.........(725)
16 h. Number of felony investigations closed........(TBD)
17 i. Number of misdemeanor investigations closed...(TBD)
18 j. Number of infractions investigations closed...(TBD)
19 k. Total violations by investigative staff.....(1,368)
20 l. Total conviction rate.........................(TBD)
21 m. Felony conviction rate........................(TBD)
22 n. Misdemeanor conviction rate...................(TBD)
23 o. Infraction conviction rate....................(TBD)
24 3. INSPECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of inspections.......................(4,890)
26 b. Number of violations..........................(587)
27 4. AVIATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of air contacts resulting in detection and
29 apprehension.............................................(445)
30 b. Number of hours of biological flight time
31 requested/provided...............................(1,666/1,220)
134
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 5. BOATING SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of vessel safety inspections.......(154,408)
3 b. Number of accident investigated...............(210)
4 c. Number of fatalities investigated..............(26)
5 d. Number of injuries investigated...............(136)
6 e. Number of vessel safety inspection hours on St.
7 John River.............................................(9,318)
8 f. Number of accidents on St. John River..........(21)
9 g. Number of vessel safety inspection hours on Lake
10 Okeechobee.............................................(5,861)
11 h. Number of accidents on Lake Okeechobee.........(15)
12 6. HUNTER EDUCATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of hunter education classes offered....(350)
14 b. Number of graduates of hunter education classes
15 ......................................................(12,125)
16 c. Percent of total students graduating hunter
17 education classes........................................(87%)
18 d. Number of hunting accidents....................(23)
19 e. Number of attendees or graduates of hunter
20 education classes involved in hunting accidents............(7)
21 (b) For the Wildlife Management Program, the purpose
22 of which is to maintain or enhance Florida's diverse wildlife
23 and to provide for responsible use of this resource, the
24 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
25 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
26 Appropriations 1379-1394 are as follows:
27 1. WILDLIFE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES OUTCOME
28 MEASURES.--
29 a. Percent change in the number of licensed resident
30 hunters................................................(-2.3%)
31
135
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Percent change in the number of licensed
2 nonresident hunters.....................................(4.6%)
3 c. Economic impact of wildlife-related outdoor
4 recreation....................................($3,675,935,000)
5 d. Percent of satisfied hunters..................(73%)
6 e. Percent of satisfied wildlife viewers.........(92%)
7 f. Percent of the acreage under management control
8 which is open to the public for wildlife-related outdoor
9 recreation.............................................(99.9%)
10 2. WILDLIFE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES OUTPUT
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of publicly-owned acres managed for
13 wildlife-related outdoor recreation................(3,700,000)
14 b. Number of privately-owned acres managed for
15 wildlife-related outdoor recreation..................(830,780)
16 c. Number of licensed resident hunters.......(164,626)
17 d. Number of licensed nonresident hunters......(4,760)
18 e. Number of participants enrolled in wildlife
19 achievement programs...................................(3,750)
20 f. Number of wildlife viewers..............(3,630,000)
21 3. WILDLIFE POPULATION AND HABITAT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. The mean biological vulnerability score of 63 game
23 species - score is from 0 to 70 and lower is better....(16.44)
24 b. The mean biological vulnerability score of 389
25 nongame species - score is from 0 to 70 and lower is better
26 .......................................................(13.21)
27 c. The mean biological vulnerability score of 80
28 wildlife species listed as endangered, threatened or as a
29 species of special concern - score is from 0 to 70 and lower
30 is better..............................................(29.62)
31 4. WILDLIFE POPULATION AND HABITAT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
136
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number of acres managed for wildlife....(4,530,780)
2 b. Number of habitat management plans requested by and
3 prepared for private landowners......................(121/121)
4 c. Number of requests for wildlife habitat technical
5 assistance received from and provided to other agency or local
6 governments..........................................(299/299)
7 d. Number of survey and monitoring projects for game
8 species...................................................(16)
9 e. Number of survey and monitoring projects for
10 nongame wildlife species..................................(11)
11 f. Number of survey and monitoring projects for
12 wildlife species listed as endangered, threatened or species
13 of special concern.........................................(4)
14 g. Number of wildlife species for which sufficient
15 data have been obtained to refine the biological vulnerability
16 score.....................................................(78)
17 5. COMMERCIAL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Wholesale price value of the commercial adult
19 alligators, hatchlings, and eggs..................($5,228,826)
20 b. Percent change in the number of alligator licenses
21 sold......................................................(0%)
22 c. Percent change in the number of alligator tags sold
23 - adult, hatchlings, and eggs.............................(0%)
24 6. COMMERCIAL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of properties enrolled in the private-lands
26 alligator management program.............................(124)
27 b. Number of alligators available for harvest under
28 the public-waters harvest programs.....................(3,370)
29 c. Number of alligator nest eggs available to
30 alligator ranches......................................(1,118)
31
137
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Number of alligator hatchlings available to
2 alligator ranches.....................................(10,200)
3 (c) For the Fisheries Management Program, the purpose
4 of which is to maintain, enhance, and provide for responsible
5 use of Florida's freshwater fisheries, the outcome measures,
6 output measures, and associated performance standards with
7 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations
8 1395-1401A are as follows:
9 1. RECREATIONAL FISHING OPPORTUNITIES OUTCOME MEASURES
10 a. Percent change in licensed resident anglers.(-3.6%)
11 b. Percent change in licensed nonresident anglers
12 ........................................................(-17%)
13 c. Percent angler satisfaction...................(75%)
14 d. Percent change in licensed freshwater commercial
15 fishermen.................................................(0%)
16 2. RECREATIONAL FISHING OPPORTUNITIES OUTPUT
17 MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of water bodies and acres in fish management
19 areas, urban areas, and other lakes or rivers managed to
20 improve fishing..................................(113/770,955)
21 b. Number of access points established or maintained
22 ..........................................................(42)
23 c. Number of participants in achievement programs
24 .........................................................(600)
25 d. Number of licensed resident anglers.......(426,000)
26 e. Number of licensed nonresident anglers....(117,000)
27 f. Number of fish stocked..................(2,385,000)
28 g. Number of outreach participants in clinics and
29 derbies...............................................(25,000)
30 h. Number of private and volunteer-staffed events.(15)
31
138
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 i. Number of information and technical assistance
2 requests provided to sports fishermen..................(9,468)
3 j. Number of licensed freshwater commercial fishermen
4 .......................................................(1,500)
5 k. Number of commercial fishing permits reviewed and
6 issued including fishing gear and grass carp...........(1,145)
7 l. Number of information and technical assistance
8 requests received and provided to commercial fishermen....(25)
9 3. FISHERIES HABITAT REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION
10 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of water bodies and acres where habitat
12 rehabilitation projects have been completed.........(6/40,000)
13 b. Percentage change in degraded lakes rehabilitated
14 ........................................................(1.7%)
15 4. FISHERIES HABITAT REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION
16 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of water bodies and acres with approved
18 habitat rehabilitation plans in progress...........(12/90,000)
19 b. Number of water bodies and acres surveyed for
20 habitat rehabilitation plans......................(15/150,000)
21 c. Number of water bodies and acres with developed
22 habitat rehabilitation plans......................(20/110,000)
23 d. Number of habitat rehabilitation technical
24 assistance requests received and provided, including other
25 agencies and local governments.............................(4)
26 (d) For the Marine Resources Program, the purpose of
27 which is to preserve, enhance, and restore desired natural
28 functions and diversity of Florida's marine and estuarine
29 environments, the outcome measures, output measures, and
30 associated performance standards with respect to funds
31 provided in Specific Appropriations 1402-1411C are as follows:
139
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 1. SHELLFISH REGULATION AND MARINE RESEARCH
2 OUTCOMES.--
3 a. Reduce by 1% annually the ratio of shellfish
4 illnesses reported from Florida shellfish products to the
5 number of meals served.........................(0.331/100,000)
6 b. Improve the number of marine fisheries stocks
7 reported as stable or increasing by 1% annually..........(113)
8 2. SHELLFISH REGULATION AND MARINE RESEARCH OUTPUT
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of research projects that provide
11 management recommendations or support management actions
12 ........................................................(100%)
13 b. Percent of shellfish and crab processing facilities
14 in significant compliance with permit and food safety
15 regulations..............................................(80%)
16 c. Number of reported cases of sickness/deaths from
17 shellfish consumption that can be directly traced to seafood
18 harvested from contaminated waters or to actions by fishermen,
19 packing houses, or seafood dealers not in compliance with
20 state regulations.......................................(48/3)
21 d. Commercial and other fishing licenses processed
22 annually..............................................(25,951)
23 e. Artificial reefs monitored and/or created annually
24 ..........................................................(65)
25 f. Percentage of shellfish harvesting areas opened
26 .......................................................(67.5%)
27 g. Red tide/fish kill/disease investigations.......(6)
28 3. PROTECTION OF ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES
29 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
30 a. Reduce the manatee mortality rate by 1% annually
31 .......................................................(7.88%)
140
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 4. PROTECTION OF ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES
2 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Manatee deaths as a result of human activities.(57)
4 b. Manatee deaths as a result of nonhuman activities
5 .........................................................(134)
6 c. Manatee population..........................(2,275)
7 d. Number of Sea turtle nests - NW region........(905)
8 e. Number of Sea turtle nests - NE region......(2,702)
9 f. Number of Sea turtle nests - SE region.....(68,022)
10 g. Number of Sea turtle nests - SW region......(6,235)
11 h. Manatee federal recovery plans completed and tasks
12 implemented...............................................(87)
13 i. Miles of sea turtle index nesting beaches surveyed
14 .........................................................(201)
15 j. Number/percent of stranded sea turtles necropsied
16 ...................................................(1,000/10%)
17 (4) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.--
18 (a) For the District Operations Program, the purpose
19 of which is to develop and implement the State Highway System;
20 to acquire rights of way necessary to support the DOT's work
21 program; to promote all forms of public transportation
22 including transit, aviation, intermodal/rail, and seaport
23 development; and to provide routine and uniform maintenance of
24 the State Highway System, operate vehicle repair shops and
25 warehouses, manage highway beautification, and operate welcome
26 centers, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
27 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
28 Specific Appropriations 1434-1483 and 1492-1529 are as
29 follows:
30 1. HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION/ENGINEERING PROGRAM OUTCOME
31 MEASURES.--
141
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number of motor vehicle fatalities per 100 million
2 miles traveled................................(less than 2.05)
3 b. Percentage of state highway system pavement in good
4 condition................................................(80%)
5 c. Percentage of state-maintained bridges in good
6 condition................................................(95%)
7 d. Percentage increase in number of days required for
8 completed construction contracts over original contract days
9 (less weather days)............................(less than 30%)
10 e. Percentage increase in final amount paid for
11 completed construction contracts over original contract amount
12 ...............................................(less than 10%)
13 f. Percentage of vehicle crashes on state highway
14 system where road-related conditions were listed as a
15 contributing factor.................................(less than
16 1.0%)
17 g. Number of motor vehicle fatalities per 100 million
18 miles traveled on the state highway system...............(TBD)
19 h. Number of bicycle deaths per 100,000 population on
20 the state highway system.................................(TBD)
21 i. Number of pedestrian deaths per 100,000 population
22 on the state highway system..............................(TBD)
23 2. HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION/ENGINEERING PROGRAM OUTPUT
24 MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of lane miles let to contract for
26 resurfacing............................................(1,752)
27 b. Number of lane miles let to contract for highway
28 capacity improvements....................................(235)
29 c. Percentage of construction contracts planned for
30 letting that were actually let...........................(95%)
31 d. Number of bridges let to contract for repair...(63)
142
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Number of bridges let to contract for replacement
2 ..........................................................(67)
3 3. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of right-of-way parcels acquired.....(2,170)
5 b. Number of projects certified ready for construction
6 .........................................................(108)
7 c. Percentage of planned parcels actually acquired
8 .........................................................(TBD)
9 d. Percentage of planned projects actually certified
10 .........................................................(TBD)
11 e. Number of planned construction contract lettings
12 delayed beyond the fiscal year because of failure to certify a
13 project ready for construction...........................(TBD)
14 f. Total purchase price of all FDOT negotiated parcels
15 compared to the total spread or difference between the FDOT
16 appraisal and the landowner's counter-offer to that appraisal
17 for the same negotiated parcels..........................(TBD)
18 g. Number and percentage of parcels acquired by
19 negotiation vs. condemnation.............................(TBD)
20 4. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Transit ridership growth compared to population
22 growth.................................................(2%/2%)
23 b. Percentage of runways (at licensed public use
24 airports) in compliance with minimum safety standards....(TBD)
25 c. Tons of cargo shipped by air............(4,500,000)
26 5. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of passenger enplanements.......(59,000,000)
28 b. Total passenger miles per gallon for fixed
29 route/demand response transit............................(TBD)
30 c. Number of public transit passenger trips
31 .................................................(173,000,000)
143
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Number of cruise embarkations and disembarkations
2 at Florida ports..................................(11,000,000)
3 e. Percentage of people requesting special need
4 transportation who did not receive it....................(TBE)
5 f. Number of containers moved at seaports........(TBD)
6 6. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OUTCOME
7 MEASURES.--
8 a. Maintenance condition rating of state highway
9 system as measured against the department's maintenance manual
10 standards.................................................(80)
11 (b) For the Planning and Engineering Program, the
12 purpose of which is to reduce occurrences of overweight
13 commercial motor vehicles on the State Highway System and
14 eliminate hazards caused by defective or unsafe commercial
15 motor vehicles, the outcome measures, output measures, and
16 associated performance standards with respect to funds
17 provided in Specific Appropriations 1434-1458 are as follows:
18 1. MOTOR CARRIER COMPLIANCE PROGRAM OUTCOME
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of commercial vehicles weighed that were
21 over weight:
22 (I) Fixed scale weighings.......................(0.4%)
23 (II) Portable scale weighings..................(37.0%)
24 2. MOTOR CARRIER COMPLIANCE PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of commercial vehicles weighed..(10,400,000)
26 b. Number of commercial vehicles safety inspections
27 performed.............................................(75,000)
28 c. Number of portable scale weighings performed
29 ......................................................(50,000)
30
31
144
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Percentage of safety inspections resulting in
2 placing the vehicle and/or driver out of service; random
3 inspections, targeted inspections........................(TBD)
4 e. Number of traffic stops.......................(TBD)
5 (c) For the Finance and Administration Program, the
6 purpose of which is the efficiently operate and maintain state
7 toll facilities, the outcome measures, the output measures,
8 and associated performance standard with respect to funds
9 provided in Specific Appropriations 1412-1427A are as follows:
10 1. TOLL OPERATION PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Operational cost per toll.................(<$0.160)
12 2. TOLL OPERATION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of toll transactions...........(472,000,000)
14 Section 37. The performance measures and standards
15 established in this section for individual programs in the
16 General Government agencies shall be applied to those programs
17 for the 1999-2000 fiscal year. These performance measures and
18 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
19 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as
20 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
21 of 1994.
22 (1) DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.--
23 (a) For the Financial Accountability for Public Funds
24 Program, the purpose of which is to provide for and promote
25 financial accountability for public funds throughout state
26 government, provide the citizens of Florida with timely,
27 factual, and comprehensive information on the financial status
28 of the state and how state funds are expended, and receive and
29 investigate complaints of government fraud, waste and abuse,
30 the outcome measures, output measures and associated
31
145
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
2 Specific Appropriations 1554-1560 are as follows:
3 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percentage of program's customers who return an
5 overall customer service rating of good or excellent on
6 surveys..................................................(94%)
7 b. Percentage of payment requests rejected during the
8 preaudit process for inconsistencies with legal and/or other
9 applicable requirements...................................(1%)
10 c. Percentage of vendor payments issues in less than
11 the Comptroller's statutory time limit of ten days......(100%)
12 d. Accuracy rate of postaudited vendor payments..(TBD)
13 e. Dollars recovered from erroneous payments compared
14 to total dollars of erroneous payment detected...........(TBD)
15 f. Percentage of federal wage and information returns
16 prepared and filed where no penalties or interest were paid
17 ........................................................(100%)
18 g. Percentage of federal tax deposits where no
19 penalties or interest were paid.........................(100%)
20 h. Percentage of payroll payments made accurately
21 based on information submitted..........................(100%)
22 i. Percentage of those utilizing program provided
23 financial information who rate the overall relevancy,
24 usefulness, and timeliness of information as good or excellent
25 .........................................................(95%)
26 j. Number of qualifications in the Independent
27 Auditor's Report on the State General Purpose Financial
28 Statements which are related to the presentation of the
29 financial statements.......................................(0)
30 k. Percentage of vendor payments issued electronically
31 .........................................................(22%)
146
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 l. Percentage of payroll payments issued
2 electronically...........................................(77%)
3 m. Percentage of retirement payments issued
4 electronically...........................................(79%)
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of vendor payment requests preaudited
7 .....................................................(800,000)
8 b. Percentage of vendor payment requests preaudited
9 .........................................................(19%)
10 c. Dollar amount of vendor payment requests preaudited
11 ........................................................($14.1
12 billion)
13 d. Number of vendor payment requests postaudited.(TBD)
14 e. Percentage of vendor payment requests postaudited
15 .........................................................(TBD)
16 f. Dollar amount of vendor payment requests
17 postaudited..............................................(TBD)
18 g. Number of vendor invoices paid........(4.2 million)
19 h. Dollar amount of vendor invoices paid........($34.7
20 billion)
21 i. Number of federal wage and information returns
22 prepared and filed...................................(289,000)
23 j. Number of federal tax deposits made............(88)
24 k. Number of IRS penalties paid....................(0)
25 l. Dollar amount of IRS penalties paid.............(0)
26 m. Number of payroll payments issued.......(5,416,880)
27 n. Dollar amount of payroll payments issued......($5.8
28 billion)
29 o. Number of payroll payments issued according to
30 published schedules..............................(5.4 million)
31
147
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 p. Percentage of payroll payments issued according to
2 published schedules.....................................(100%)
3 q. Number of instances during the year where as a
4 result of inadequate cash management under this program,
5 general revenue had a negative cash balance................(0)
6 r. Percentage of atypical balances corrected at
7 year-end...................................................(0)
8 s. Average number of days from month's end to complete
9 reconciliations...........................................(30)
10 t. Number of payments issued electronically.......(7.1
11 million)
12 u. Dollar amount of payments issued electronically
13 ...............................................($23.7 billion)
14 v. Hours of training/education conducted on accounting
15 issues...................................................(425)
16 w. Hours of training/education conducted on payroll
17 issues....................................................(50)
18 x. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed.......(TBD)
19 y. Number of "get lean" hotline calls processed for
20 referral to the appropriate agency.......................(500)
21 z. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed where
22 criminal, disciplinary, and/or administrative actions taken
23 .........................................................(TBD)
24 (b) For the Financial Institutions Regulatory Program,
25 the purpose of which is to ensure the safety and soundness of
26 state financial institutions and to enhance the dual banking
27 system, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
28 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
29 Specific Appropriations 1566-1569 are as follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
148
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
2 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
3 Florida on Return on Assets..............................(51%)
4 b. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
5 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
6 Florida on Return on Equity..............................(51%)
7 c. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
8 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
9 Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio........................(51%)
10 d. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
11 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
12 Florida on Tier 1 Capital................................(51%)
13 e. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
14 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
15 chartered in Florida on Return on Assets.................(51%)
16 f. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
17 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
18 chartered in Florida on Return on Equity.................(51%)
19 g. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
20 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
21 chartered in Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio...........(51%)
22 h. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
23 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
24 chartered in Florida on Tier 1 Capital...................(51%)
25 i. Percentage of applications for new Florida
26 financial institutions that seek state charters..........(67%)
27 j. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
28 state chartered banks compared to assessments that would be
29 paid if the bank was nationally or federally chartered
30 .....................................................($15,300)
31
149
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 k. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
2 state chartered credit unions compared to assessments that
3 would be paid if the credit unions was nationally or federally
4 chartered...............................................($350)
5 l. Percentage of banks receiving an examination report
6 within 45 days after the conclusion of their on-site state
7 examination..............................................(75%)
8 m. Percentage of credit unions receiving an
9 examination report within 30 days after the conclusion of
10 their on-site state examination..........................(75%)
11 n. Percentage of international financial institutions
12 receiving an examination report within 45 days after the
13 conclusion of their on-site state examination............(75%)
14 o. Percentage of trust companies receiving an
15 examination report within 60 days after the conclusion of
16 their on-site state examination..........................(75%)
17 p. Percentage of De Novo applications statutorily
18 complete that are processed within a standard number of 90
19 days.....................................................(67%)
20 q. Percentage of branch applications statutorily
21 complete that are processed within 50 days...............(67%)
22 r. Percentage of expedited branch applications that
23 are processed within 10 days............................(100%)
24 s. Percentage of merger/acquisition applications
25 statutorily complete that are processed within 60 days...(67%)
26 t. Percentage of financial institutions under
27 enforcement action that are substantially in compliance with
28 conditions imposed.......................................(90%)
29 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on
31 Assets.................................................(1.06%)
150
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on
2 Equity................................................(11.01%)
3 c. Median Florida state-chartered banks Capital to
4 Asset Ratio............................................(9.15%)
5 d. Median Florida state-chartered banks Tier 1 Capital
6 .......................................................(9.18%)
7 e. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return
8 on Assets..............................................(1.04%)
9 f. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return
10 on Equity..............................................(8.06%)
11 g. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions
12 Capital to Asset Ratio................................(12.94%)
13 h. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Tier 1
14 Capital...............................................(12.18%)
15 i. Number of new Florida state-chartered banks opened
16 ..........................................................(20)
17 j. Amount of annual assessments paid by banks
18 ..................................................($6,756,100)
19 k. Amount of annual assessments paid by credit unions
20 ..................................................($1,237,200)
21 l. Number of banks examined by the Division of Banking
22 receiving an examination report within 45 days............(45)
23 m. Number of credit unions examined by the Division of
24 Banking receiving an examination report within 30 days....(57)
25 n. Number of International financial institutions
26 examined by the Division of Banking receiving an examination
27 report within 45 days.....................................(16)
28 o. Number of Trust Companies examined by the Division
29 of Banking receiving an examination report within 60 days..(8)
30 p. Number of statutorily complete new De Novo
31 applications received that are processed within 90 days....(5)
151
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 q. Number of statutorily complete branch applications
2 received that are processed within 50 days................(27)
3 r. Number of statutorily complete expedited branch
4 applications received that are processed within 10 days...(45)
5 s. Number of statutorily complete merger/acquisition
6 applications received that are processed within 60 days...(17)
7 t. Number of institutions under enforcement actions
8 ..........................................................(23)
9 u. Percentage/number of financial institutions
10 examined within statutory time frames by type of institution
11 .........................................................(TBD)
12 v. Percentage/number of surveys returned that rate the
13 Division's examination program as satisfactory or above
14 .....................................................(75%/150)
15 w. Percentage/number of examinations conducted within
16 3 months and 6 months of a prior state or federal examination
17 .........................................................(TBD)
18 x. Percentage/number of state examinations where total
19 examination time was reduced by a standard percentage compared
20 to the hours required during the base examination........(TBD)
21 y. Percentage/number of state examinations where
22 on-site hours were reduced by a standard percentage compared
23 to the on-site hours required during the base examination
24 .........................................................(TBD)
25 (c) For the Unclaimed Property Program, the purpose of
26 which is to increase efforts in finding, locating, collecting
27 in a manner to allow for better identification of owners, and
28 returning unclaimed property to the owners, the outcome
29 measures, output measures, and associated performance
30 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
31 Appropriations 1570-1573 are as follows:
152
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percentage increase in the total number of holders
3 reporting.................................................(5%)
4 b. Percentage of previously filing holders who submit
5 problem reports...........................................(3%)
6 c. Percentage of the total number of claims paid to
7 the owner compared to the total number of returnable accounts
8 reported/received........................................(22%)
9 d. Percentage of the total dollar amount of claims
10 paid to the owner compared to the total dollars in returnable
11 accounts reported/received...............................(80%)
12 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of holders reports processed........(16,000)
14 b. Number of first time holders reports processed
15 .........................................................(800)
16 c. Number of seminars conducted....................(3)
17 d. Number of in-state exams of holders who have not
18 previously filed a holder report..........................(13)
19 e. Number of out-of-state exams of holders who have
20 not previously filed a holder report.....................(200)
21 f. Number of in-state exams conducted.............(26)
22 g. Dollar value collected as a result of in-state
23 exams...............................................($500,000)
24 h. Number of out-of-state exams processed........(450)
25 i. Dollar value collected as a result of out-of-state
26 exams.....................................................($15
27 million)
28 j. Number/dollar value of owner accounts processed
29 .................................................(255,000/$101
30 million)
31
153
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 k. Total cost of the program to the number of holder
2 reports/owner accounts processed.........................($30)
3 l. Number of holder reports categorized as problem
4 reports...................................................(3%)
5 m. Number of problem reports from holders who are
6 identified as filing previous holder reports.............(200)
7 n. Number of responses to holders who submitted
8 problem reports with instructions on how to correct the
9 problems.................................................(450)
10 o. Number/dollar value of claims paid to owners
11 ..................................................(56,400/TBD)
12 p. Number/dollar of returnable accounts entered on the
13 database from the annual reports.........................(TBD)
14 q. Number of owner accounts advertised.......(100,000)
15 r. Number of claims processed.................(60,000)
16 s. Percentage of claims approved/denied within
17 30/60/90 days from the date received.....................(TBD)
18 t. Number of claims approved/denied within 30/60/90
19 days from the date received...........................(10,800)
20 u. Percentage of claims paid within 30/60/90 days from
21 date received....................................(10%/40%/50%)
22 v. Number of claims paid within 30/60/90 days from
23 date received............................(5,640/22,560/28,200)
24 w. Percentage of customer telephone calls answered
25 within 20 seconds........................................(TBD)
26 x. Number of customer telephone calls answered within
27 20 seconds...............................................(TBD)
28 y. Number of customer telephone calls hung up before
29 answered.................................................(TBD)
30 (d) For the Consumer Financial Protection and Industry
31 Authorization Program, the purpose of which is to protect
154
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 consumers of the securities and finance industries and the
2 public from illegal financial activities, and provide
3 consumers and the public with authoritative and expedient
4 information, the outcome measures, output measures, and
5 associated performance standards with respect to funds
6 provided in Specific Appropriations 1574-1578 are as follows:
7 1. CONSUMER PROTECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percentage of licensees examined where department
9 action is taken for violations for cause due to receipt of
10 information which indicates a potential violation of the
11 statute..................................................(TBD)
12 b. Percentage of licensees examined where department
13 action is taken for violations found in routine randomly
14 selected licenses examined based on a risk assessment profile
15 .........................................................(TBD)
16 c. Percentage of investigations of licensed entities
17 referred to other agencies where investigative assistance
18 aided in obtaining criminal/civil/administrative actions.(TBD)
19 d. Percentage of investigations of unlicensed entities
20 referred to other agencies where investigative assistance
21 aided in obtaining criminal/civil/administrative actions.(TBD)
22 e. Percentage of investigations of licensed entities
23 referred to department legal staff where investigative
24 assistance aided in obtaining administrative or civil actions
25 .........................................................(TBD)
26 f. Percentage of investigations of unlicensed entities
27 referred to department legal staff where investigative
28 assistance aided in obtaining administrative or civil actions
29 .........................................................(TBD)
30 g. Dollars returned (voluntarily or through court
31 ordered restitution) to victims compared to total dollars of
155
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 verified loss as a result of investigative efforts of licensed
2 entities.................................................(TBD)
3 h. Dollars returned to victims compared to total
4 dollars of verified loss as a result of investigative efforts
5 of unlicensed entities...................................(TBD)
6 i. Percentage of written complaints processed within
7 applicable standards.....................................(85%)
8 j. Percentage of telephone complaints resolved without
9 written documentation from the consumer..................(TBD)
10 k. Percentage of written complaints regarding licensed
11 entities referred for examination, investigation, or
12 legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal sanctions
13 within/outside statutory authority.......................(TBD)
14 l. Percentage of written complaints regarding
15 unlicensed entities referred for examination, investigation,
16 or legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal
17 sanctions within/outside statutory authority.............(TBD)
18 m. Percentage of participants at public/consumer
19 awareness activities who completed a questionnaire and
20 responded that the subject presented was informative,
21 understandable, important, and timely....................(TBD)
22 2. CONSUMER PROTECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of for cause examinations completed with
24 informal or formal action taken..........................(TBD)
25 b. Number of for cause examinations completed....(TBD)
26 c. Number of routine examinations completed with
27 informal or formal action taken..........................(TBD)
28 d. Number of routine examinations completed......(TBD)
29 e. Percent of total licensees examined to determine
30 compliance with applicable regulations..................(7.1%)
31 f. Number of investigations closed...............(550)
156
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 g. Number of investigations of licensed/unlicensed
2 entities closed..........................................(TBD)
3 h. Number of investigations of licensed entities
4 referred to other agencies for criminal/civil/administrative
5 action...................................................(TBD)
6 i. Number of investigations of unlicensed entities
7 referred to other agencies for criminal/civil/administrative
8 action...................................................(TBD)
9 j. Number of investigations of licensed entities
10 referred to other agencies where investigative assistance
11 aided in obtaining criminal/civil/administrative action..(TBD)
12 k. Number of investigations of unlicensed entities
13 referred to other agencies where investigative assistance
14 aided in obtaining criminal/civil/administrative action..(TBD)
15 l. Number of investigations referred to department
16 legal staff for administrative or civil action............(91)
17 m. Number of investigations of licensed/unlicensed
18 entities referred to department legal staff for administrative
19 or civil action......................................(TBD/TBD)
20 n. Number of investigations referred to department
21 legal staff where investigative assistance aided in obtaining
22 administrative or civil action............................(53)
23 o. Number of investigations of licensed/unlicensed
24 entities referred to department legal staff where
25 investigative assistance aided in obtaining administrative or
26 civil action.........................................(TBD/TBD)
27 p. Number of background investigations completed.(768)
28 q. Number of background investigations completed of
29 licensed/unlicensed entities.........................(TBD/TBD)
30 r. Amount of court ordered restitution to victims of
31 licensed/unlicensed entities.........................(TBD/TBD)
157
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 s. Amount of voluntary reimbursement received from
2 licensed/unlicensed entities.........................(TBD/TBD)
3 t. Amount returned to victims of licensed/unlicensed
4 entities.............................................(TBD/TBD)
5 u. Amount of verified loss to victims of
6 licensed/unlicensed entities.........................(TBD/TBD)
7 v. Number of department assisted investigations that
8 resulted in monetary awards to victims of licensed
9 entities/unlicensed entities.........................(TBD/TBD)
10 w. Average number of days for initial written
11 responses to consumers.....................................(7)
12 x. Average number of days to resolve, refer, or close
13 a written complaint.......................................(68)
14 y. Number of complaints resolved, referred, or closed
15 during the year........................................(4,350)
16 z. Percentage of complaints remaining open beyond 90
17 days.....................................................(21%)
18 aa. Percentage of complaints remaining open beyond 120
19 days.....................................................(15%)
20 bb. Number of hotline/complaint line calls processed
21 as complaints............................................(TBD)
22 cc. Number of hotline/complaint line calls resolved
23 without written documentation............................(TBD)
24 dd. Number of written complaints where the department
25 identified statutory violations..........................(150)
26 ee. Number of written complaints where the department
27 identified statutory violations by licensed/unlicensed
28 entities.............................................(TBD/TBD)
29 ff. Number of complaints referred for consideration of
30 legal or criminal action..................................(40)
31
158
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 gg. Number of complaints on licensed/unlicensed
2 entities referred for consideration of legal or criminal
3 action...............................................(TBD/TBD)
4 hh. Number of complaints referred for consideration of
5 legal or criminal action resulting in formal/informal
6 sanctions............................................(TBD/TBD)
7 ii. Number of public/consumer awareness contacts made
8 .........................................................(TBD)
9 jj. Number of public/consumer awareness activities
10 conducted................................................(TBD)
11 kk. Number of participants at public/awareness
12 activities...............................................(TBD)
13 3. INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Percentage of licensees sanctioned for violations
15 ......................................................(0.009%)
16 b. Percentage of total applicants not licensed to
17 conduct business in the state because they fail to meet
18 substantive licensing requirements........................(5%)
19 c. Percentage of applicants prevented from entering
20 the securities industry in Florida who subsequently are the
21 subject of additional disciplinary action in other
22 jurisdictions within three years.........................(60%)
23 4. INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of final actions taken against licensees
25 .........................................................(370)
26 b. Number of applications denied or withdrawn..(3,546)
27 c. Number of applications licensed............(67,398)
28 d. Number of applications processed...........(70,944)
29 e. Amount of securities registration applications
30 denied or withdrawn.............................($4.2 billion)
31
159
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Number of applicants licensed with restrictions
2 .........................................................(280)
3 g. Number of applications denied or withdrawn with
4 additional disciplinary information reported on the CRD within
5 three years..............................................(324)
6 h. Number/percentage of filing or requests processed
7 within a designated standard number of days by type......(TBD)
8 (2) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR.--
9 (a) For the Economic Improvement Program, the purpose
10 of which is to maintain and improve the economic health of
11 Florida by increasing jobs, income, and investments through
12 promoting targeted businesses, tourism, professional and
13 amateur sports and entertainment, and by assisting
14 communities, residents, and businesses, and the outcome
15 measures, output measures, and associated performance
16 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
17 Appropriations 1668-1673A are as follows:
18 1. OFFICE OF TOURISM TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
19 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number/dollar amount of contracts and grants
21 administered................................(283/$290 million)
22 b. Public expenditures per job created/retained under
23 QTI incentive program.................................($3,750)
24 c. Number of state agency proposed rules reviewed
25 which impact small businesses.............................(85)
26 d. Number of business leaders' meetings coordinated
27 ...........................................................(3)
28 2. BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of businesses/jobs retained or created as a
30 result of the venture capital funds.....................(4/25)
31
160
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Dollar amount/number of bid and performance bonds
2 to contractors in bonding program.............($10 million/35)
3 c. Dollar amount and procurement opportunities
4 generated for Black businesses..................($2.5 million)
5 3. BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Amount of venture capital funds provided.($250,000)
7 b. Number of participants enrolled in Contractor
8 Assistance and Bonding Program............................(74)
9 c. Number of missions/events coordinated/participated
10 in to develop business opportunities.......................(5)
11 d. BBICs created or supported......................(7)
12 e. Private dollars leveraged..............($2 million)
13 4. FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Economic contributions from Florida Sports
15 Foundation-sponsored regional and major sporting events grants
16 ................................................($150 million)
17 5. FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number/amount of major sports event grants awarded
19 .................................................(30/$700,000)
20 b. Number of publications produced/distributed
21 ...................................................(7/574,000)
22 c. Number of promotions conducted/supported:
23 (I) Statewide......................................(6)
24 (II) National......................................(1)
25 d. Number of trade/consumer shows facilitated or
26 conducted.................................................(10)
27 6. GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON PHYSICAL FITNESS AND AMATEUR
28 SPORTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of participants - Youth, Seniors, and Adults
30 ......................................................(32,300)
31 b. Number of participants - Bike Florida.........(750)
161
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Number of surveys conducted/satisfaction rating
2 ...................................................(1,000/98%)
3 7. GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON PHYSICAL FITNESS AND AMATEUR
4 SPORTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Education symposiums conducted.................(10)
6 b. Host festival events in accordance with section
7 14.22, Florida Statutes...................................(14)
8 c. Publications, magazines, brochures,
9 pamphlets-distribution...............................(350,000)
10 8. FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR
11 CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percent of overseas clients who indicate assistance
13 is very responsive.......................................(96%)
14 b. Percent of volunteer-consultants who would
15 volunteer again..........................................(97%)
16 c. Ratio of donated services and contributions as
17 compared to the amount of state funding................(1.5:1)
18 9. FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR
19 CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of volunteer technical assistance missions
21 to Central America and the Caribbean......................(96)
22 b. Number of international and domestic development
23 missions..................................................(15)
24 10. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Sustained growth in the number of travelers who
26 come to and go through Florida:
27 (I) Out-of-state........................(49.9 million)
28 (II) Residents..........................(12.6 million)
29 b. Sustained growth in the beneficial impacts that
30 travelers in Florida have on the state's overall economy:
31 (I) Rental car surcharge..............($141.7 million)
162
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (II) Tourism-related employment..............(815,267)
2 (III) Taxable sales....................($45.5 billion)
3 (IV) Local option tax...................($293 million)
4 c. Growth in private sector contributions to VISIT
5 FLORIDA.................................................($26.7
6 million)
7 11. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Quality and effectiveness of paid advertising
9 messages reaching the target audience:
10 (I) Impressions..........................(505 million)
11 (II) Leads (number contacting VISIT FLORIDA in
12 response to advertising).............................(552,500)
13 b. Value and number of consumer promotions facilitated
14 by VISIT FLORIDA.............................($11 million/150)
15 c. Number of leads and visitor inquiries generated by
16 VISIT FLORIDA events and media placements............(650,000)
17 d. Number of private sector partners...........(1,500)
18 e. Level of private sector partner financial
19 contributions through:
20 (I) Direct financial investment...........($2 million)
21 (II) Strategic alliance program.............($300,000)
22 12. SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Value of new investment in the Florida space
24 business and programs (cumulative)..............($200 million)
25 b. Number of launches.............................(30)
26 c. Number of visitors to space-related tourism
27 facilities...............................................(2.75
28 million)
29 d. Tax revenue generated by space-related tourism
30 facilities........................................($1,206,600)
31 13. SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTPUT MEASURES.--
163
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number of students in Spaceport Florida Authority
2 (SFA) sponsored space-related classroom or research at
3 accredited institutions of higher education..............(300)
4 b. Equity in SFA industrial/research facilities.($54.2
5 million)
6 c. Presentations to industry and governmental decision
7 makers....................................................(15)
8 d. Equity in SFA space-related tourist facilities.($20
9 million)
10 14. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA International Trade and
11 Economic Development OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of permanent jobs directly created as a
13 result of ITED programs...............................(27,000)
14 b. Number of permanent jobs retained as a direct
15 result of ITED programs................................(2,600)
16 c. Documented export sales attributable to programs
17 and activities...................................($40 million)
18 d. Documented sales as a result of foreign office
19 activities................................................($18
20 million)
21 e. Signed Representation Agreements - Florida Office
22 ..........................................................(48)
23 f. Signed Representation Agreements - International
24 Offices...................................................(24)
25 15. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA International Trade and
26 Economic Development OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Total number of qualified trade leads.........(440)
28 b. Number of trade events.........................(33)
29 c. Number of Florida companies in field office
30 portfolio (counseled)..................................(1,085)
31
164
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Number of investment projects identified or
2 referred by foreign offices..............................(159)
3 e. Number of Florida companies assisted by foreign
4 offices................................................(1,625)
5 f. Number of active retention/expansion projects
6 worked during the year....................................(70)
7 g. Number of active recruitment projects worked during
8 the year.................................................(225)
9 h. Number of leads and projects referred to local
10 Economic Development Organizations.......................(120)
11 16. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Technology Development OUTCOME
12 MEASURES.--
13 a. Jobs created/retained as a result of assistance to
14 manufacturing firms......................................(650)
15 b. Lowered inventory costs as a result of assistance
16 to manufacturing firms.........................($7.72 million)
17 c. Lowered labor and materials costs as a result of
18 assistance to manufacturing firms..............($6.06 million)
19 d. Increased sales as a result of assistance to
20 manufacturing firms (Florida Manufacturing Technology Centers)
21 .................................................($46 million)
22 e. Commercialized technologies (Innovation and
23 Commercialization Corporations)...........................(30)
24 f. Assistance in formation of new companies/joint
25 ventures (Innovation and Commercialization Corporations)..(10)
26 g. Capital raised by assisted companies (Innovation
27 and Commercialization Corporations).............($20 million)
28 h. Assist companies in creating new and retaining
29 existing jobs (Innovation and Commercialization Corporations)
30 .........................................................(421)
31
165
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 17. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Technology Development OUTPUT
2 MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of companies assisted by Manufacturing
4 Technology Centers:......................................(960)
5 (I) Small companies..............................(719)
6 (II) Medium companies............................(190)
7 (III) Women/Minority companies....................(95)
8 (IV) Rural companies..............................(75)
9 b. Number of new companies/joint ventures created by
10 Innovation and Commercialization Corporations.............(10)
11 c. Review technology assistance applications.....(500)
12 d. Sign contracts (Innovation and Commercialization
13 Corporations).............................................(47)
14 e. Assist technology-based companies/entrepreneurs
15 .........................................................(700)
16 f. Number of activities assisting manufacturing
17 companies................................................(900)
18 18. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Workforce Development OUTCOME
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Individuals completing Performance-Based Incentive
21 Fund programs and placed in targeted occupations......(23,264)
22 b. Individuals exiting Performance-Based Incentive
23 Fund programs and placed in targeted occupations......(18,964)
24 c. Disadvantaged individuals and WAGES participants
25 completing training and placed in targeted occupations.(7,966)
26 d. Disadvantaged individuals and WAGES participants
27 exiting and placed in targeted occupations.............(4,826)
28 e. WAGES participants completing training and placed
29 in expanded "career path" occupations as defined by JEP/WAGES
30 .......................................................(3,183)
31
166
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Trained and placed WAGES participants retaining
2 employment at least six months.........................(2,652)
3 g. Individuals receiving customized training and being
4 placed in new companies in Enterprise Zones and companies
5 located in rural areas.................................(1,270)
6 h. Individuals receiving customized training and
7 placed in high skill/high wage jobs....................(8,450)
8 19. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Workforce Development OUTPUT
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Incentives paid for individuals in
11 Performance-Based Incentive Fund programs completing and
12 placed in targeted occupations................($8.863 million)
13 b. Incentives paid for individuals in
14 Performance-Based Incentive Fund programs exiting and placed
15 in targeted occupations.......................($7.25 million)
16 c. Incentives paid for WAGES participants and other
17 disadvantaged individuals completing and placed in targeted
18 occupations.....................................($5.9 million)
19 d. Incentives paid for WAGES participants and other
20 disadvantaged individuals exiting and placed in targeted
21 occupations....................................($4.89 million)
22 e. Number of Quick Response Training grants executed
23 with new and expanding businesses in rural areas...........(6)
24 f. Number of Quick Response Training grants executed
25 with new and expanding businesses in Enterprise Zones......(4)
26 g. Number of Quick Response Training Grants executed
27 with new and expanded businesses..........................(33)
28 20. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Capital Development OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Jobs created as a result of Capital Development,
31 nonexport loans..........................................(120)
167
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Jobs created as a result of Capital Development,
2 venture capital activity..................................(55)
3 c. Venture Capital raised by presenters at venture
4 forums.....................................................($7
5 million)
6 d. Investments received by Florida businesses from
7 Cypress Fund sponsored firms and co-investors....($12 million)
8 e. Florida businesses cumulatively receiving venture
9 capital investments from Cypress Fund venture firms........(5)
10 21. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Capital Development OUTPUT
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of nonexport low-cost business loans funded
13 at sub-prime rates.........................................(8)
14 b. Dollar value of nonexport low-cost business loans
15 funded at sub-prime rates........................($12 million)
16 c. Number of Venture Finance Directories and primers
17 distributed..............................................(882)
18 d. Venture capital conferences/forums and
19 investor/entrepreneur networking seminars..................(7)
20 e. Investors, entrepreneurs, and service providers
21 attending venture capital forums.........................(330)
22 f. Venture capital invested by Florida institutions in
23 Cypress Fund....................................($2.8 million)
24 (3) DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES.--
25 (a) For the Highway Patrol Program, the purpose of
26 which is to increase highway safety in Florida through law
27 enforcement, preventive patrol, and public education, the
28 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
29 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
30 Appropriations 1682-1689A are as follows:
31 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
168
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Percent of seat belt use (for information only):
2 (I) Annual percent change.........................(1%)
3 (II) State compliance rate.......................(62%)
4 (III) National average compliance rate...........(68%)
5 b. Annual mileage death rate on all Florida roads per
6 100 million vehicle miles of travel:
7 (I) Florida.....................................(2.05)
8 (II) National average............................(1.7)
9 c. Annual alcohol-related death rate per 100 million
10 vehicle miles of travel..................................(.67)
11 d. Annual crashes investigated by FHP:
12 (I) Number of crashes investigated by FHP (for
13 information only)....................................(197,405)
14 (II) Percent change...............................(1%)
15 e. Number of closed criminal investigation cases
16 resolved (for information only)..........................(TBD)
17 f. Percent of closed criminal investigation cases
18 resolved.................................................(TBD)
19 g. Percent of closed professional compliance
20 investigation cases against FHP personnel, which are resolved
21 .........................................................(TBD)
22 h. Percent of closed professional compliance
23 investigation cases for other divisions..................(TBD)
24 i. Percent of attendees at traffic safety
25 presentations planning to implement improved driving habits
26 .........................................................(TBD)
27 j. Annual crash rate per 100 million vehicle miles of
28 travel on all Florida roads............................(186.2)
29 k. Annual crash rate per 100 million vehicle miles of
30 travel on FDOT roads (interstates, turnpikes, toll roads, and
31 U.S. and state highways) (for information only)..........(TBD)
169
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 l. Annual mileage death rate on FDOT roads per 100
2 million vehicle miles of travel (for information only)...(TBD)
3 m. Annual alcohol-related death rate per 100 million
4 vehicle miles of travel on FDOT roads....................(TBD)
5 n. Injury rate per 100 million vehicle miles of travel
6 on all Florida roads...................................(182.6)
7 o. Injury rate per 100 million vehicle miles of travel
8 on FDOT roads............................................(TBD)
9 p. Percent of Class 1 traffic homicide investigations
10 recommended for prosecution presented to the state attorney
11 which have charges filed.................................(TBD)
12 q. Percent of all traffic homicide investigations
13 resolved.................................................(TBD)
14 r. Percent of FHP recruits trained at the Academy that
15 successfully pass all phases of the State Law Enforcement
16 Certification exam on the first attempt..................(TBD)
17 s. Percent of FHP recruits reporting to the Academy
18 that successfully complete all phases of training........(TBD)
19 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Average time (hours) spent per criminal
21 investigation cases closed.............................(40.93)
22 b. Actual number of criminal cases closed......(1,350)
23 c. Average time (hours) spent per professional
24 compliance investigation cases closed..................(85.26)
25 d. Actual number of professional compliance
26 investigation cases closed................................(95)
27 e. Number of hours spent on traffic homicide
28 investigations (for information only)................(135,607)
29 f. Number of cases resolved as result of traffic
30 homicide investigations................................(1,602)
31 g. Public traffic safety presentations:
170
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (I) Number of presentations made.................(630)
2 (II) Persons in attendance....................(72,000)
3 h. Number of training courses offered to FHP recruits
4 and personnel.............................................(67)
5 i. Number of students successfully completing the
6 course.................................................(1,209)
7 j. Actual average response time (in minutes) to calls
8 for crashes or assistance..............................(24.50)
9 k. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
10 on preventive patrol (for information only)........(1,014,971)
11 l. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
12 on preventive patrol.....................................(42%)
13 m. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
14 on crash investigation (for information only)........(338,826)
15 n. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
16 on crash investigation...................................(14%)
17 o. Law enforcement officer assistance rendered:
18 (I) Duty hours spent (for information only)..(111,355)
19 (II) Percent of duty hours........................(5%)
20 (III) Number of motorists assisted...........(308,500)
21 p. Average size of audience per traffic safety
22 presentation given by public information officers........(114)
23 q. Average time (in hours) to investigate crashes:
24 (I) Long-form...................................(2.30)
25 (II) Short-form.................................(1.50)
26 (III) Nonreportable..............................(.70)
27 r. Average time spent (in minutes) on each motorist
28 assisted.................................................(TBD)
29 s. Average time spent (in hours) per traffic homicide
30 investigation..........................................(84.65)
31
171
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 t. Percentage of recruits retained by FHP for five
2 years after the completion of training...................(TBD)
3 u. Percentage of recruits retained by FHO for 1 year
4 after the completion of training.........................(93%)
5 (b) For the Driver Licenses Program, the purpose of
6 which is to maintain an efficient driver licensing program
7 assuring that only drivers demonstrating the necessary
8 knowledge, skills, and abilities are licensed to operate motor
9 vehicles on Florida roads; to remove drivers from the highways
10 who abuse their driving privilege or require further driver
11 education; to ensure that drivers are financially responsible
12 for their actions; and to maintain adequate records for driver
13 education and administrative control, the outcome measures,
14 output measures, and associated performance standards with
15 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations
16 1690-1695A are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of customers waiting 15 minutes or less for
19 driver license service...................................(79%)
20 b. Percent of customers waiting 30 minutes or more for
21 driver license service....................................(8%)
22 c. Percent of DUI course graduates who do not
23 recidivate within three years of graduation..............(86%)
24 d. Average number of corrections per 1,000 driver
25 records maintained.......................................(4.3)
26 e. Percent of motorists complying with financial
27 responsibility...........................................(83%)
28 f. Number of driver licenses/identification cards
29 suspended, cancelled, and invalidated as a result of
30 fraudulent activity, with annual percent change shown
31 ....................................................(2,046/1%)
172
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of driver licenses issued........(3,609,500)
3 b. Number of identification cards issued.....(729,854)
4 c. Number of (written) driver license examinations
5 conducted..........................................(1,029,731)
6 d. Number of road tests conducted............(393,744)
7 (c) For the Motor Vehicles Program, the purpose of
8 which is to increase consumer protection, health, and public
9 safety through efficient license systems that register and
10 title motor vehicles, vessels, and mobile homes, regulate
11 vehicle and motor home dealers, manufacturers, and central
12 emission inspection stations, and to collect revenue in the
13 most efficient and effective manner, the outcome measures,
14 output measures, and associated performance standards with
15 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1696-1705
16 are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURERS.--
18 a. Percent of motor vehicle titles issued without
19 error....................................................(99%)
20 b. Fraudulent motor vehicle titles:
21 (I) Number identified and submitted to law enforcement
22 .......................................................(1,042)
23 (II) Percent change...............................(5%)
24 c. Ratio of warranty complaints to new mobile homes
25 titled.................................................(1:890)
26 d. Percent reduction in pollution tonnage per day in
27 the six applicable (air quality) counties.............(15.63%)
28 e. Ratio of taxes collected from international
29 registration plans (IRP) and international fuel tax agreements
30 (IFTA) audits to cost of audits........................($2:$1)
31 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
173
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number of motor vehicle and mobile homes
2 registrations issued..............................(13,642,317)
3 b. Number of motor vehicle and mobile home titles
4 issued.............................................(4,794,000)
5 c. Average cost to issue a motor vehicle title.($2.05)
6 d. Average time to issue a motor vehicle title....(3.4
7 days)
8 e. Number of vessels registrations issued....(841,849)
9 f. Number of vessel titles issued............(206,375)
10 g. Average cost to issue a vessel title........($5.50)
11 h. Number of motor carriers audited per auditor, with
12 number of auditors shown...............................(20/14)
13 (4) DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
14 (a) For the Fire Marshal Program, the purpose of which
15 is to enhance public safety through investigation and forensic
16 services, increasing the solvability of criminal cases, by
17 ensuring that emergency responders and service providers are
18 qualified, competent, and ethical through quality training,
19 education, and establishing professional standards; and
20 maintaining the safest possible environment through the
21 regulation, product testing, and inspection of fire
22 suppression and protection equipment, explosives, and
23 fireworks, the outcome measures, output measures, and
24 associated performance standards with respect to funds
25 provided in Specific Appropriations 1745-1753 are as follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Number/percentage of closed fire investigations
28 successfully concluded, including by cause determined, suspect
29 identified and/or arrested, or other reasons.......(5,443/87%)
30 b. Number/percentage of closed arson investigations
31 for which an arrest was made.......................(1,031/29%)
174
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Number/percentage of inspected state owned and
2 leased properties that experience a fire.................(TBD)
3 d. Number/percentage of licensed entities found in
4 violation of statutes....................................(TBD)
5 e. Number/percentage of unlicensed entities found in
6 violation of statutes....................................(TBD)
7 f. Number/percentage of students who rate training
8 they received at the Florida State Fire College as improving
9 their ability to perform assigned duties...........(5,901/95%)
10 g. Percent of above satisfactory ratings by
11 supervisors of students job performance from post-class
12 evaluations of skills gained through training at the Florida
13 State Fire College.......................................(85%)
14 h. Number/percentage of favorable rulings by hearing
15 officers on challenges to examination results and eligibility
16 determinations........................................(12/92%)
17 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Total number of criminal fire investigations
19 commenced..............................................(7,968)
20 b. Number of criminal investigations commenced.(3,558)
21 c. Number of accidental investigations commenced
22 .......................................................(2,696)
23 d. Number of other investigations commenced....(1,714)
24 e. Total number of fire investigations closed..(8,567)
25 f. Total number of fire code compliance inspections in
26 state owned/leased buildings..........................(14,611)
27 g. Number of recurring inspections completed of fire
28 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings........(7,200)
29 h. Number of high hazard inspections completed of fire
30 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings........(6,536)
31
175
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 i. Number of construction inspections completed of
2 fire code compliance in state owned/leased buildings.....(875)
3 j. Percent of fire code inspections completed within
4 statutory defined time-frame.............................(91%)
5 k. Number of plans reviewed to assure compliance with
6 fire codes in state owned/leased buildings.............(1,157)
7 l. Percent of fire code plans reviews completed within
8 statutory defined time-frame.............................(98%)
9 m. Total number of boilers inspected..........(12,500)
10 n. Number of boilers inspected by department
11 inspectors.............................................(4,200)
12 o. Number of boilers inspected by other inspectors
13 .......................................................(8,300)
14 p. Number of complaint investigations completed
15 .......................................................(1,497)
16 q. Number of regulatory inspections completed....(850)
17 r. Number of licensed applications reviewed for
18 qualification..........................................(8,750)
19 s. Number of classes conducted by the Florida State
20 Fire College.............................................(210)
21 t. Number of students trained and classroom contact
22 hours provided by the Florida State Fire College
23 ...............................................(6,212/215,677)
24 u. Number of curricula developed for Florida State
25 Fire College and certified training center delivery........(5)
26 v. Percentage of satisfactory student evaluations of
27 Florida State Fire College facilities and services.......(95%)
28 w. Number/percentage of customer requests for
29 certification testing completed within defined time frames
30 ...................................................(3,384/98%)
31
176
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 x. Number/percentage of certified training centers
2 inspected that meet certification requirements.......(27/100%)
3 y. Number of examinations administered.........(5,500)
4 (b) For the State Property and Casualty Claims
5 Program, the purpose of which is to ensure that participating
6 state agencies are provided quality workers' compensation,
7 liability, federal civil rights, auto liability, and property
8 insurance coverage at reasonable rates by provided
9 self-insurance, purchase of insurance, claims handling, and
10 technical assistance in managing risk, the outcome measures,
11 output measures, and associated performance standards with
12 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1754-1757
13 are as follows:
14 1. WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME
15 MEASURES.--
16 a. Number/percentage of indemnity and medical payments
17 made in a timely manner in compliance with DLES Security Rule
18 38F-24.021, F.A.C................................(121,672/97%)
19 b. State Employees' Workers Compensation Benefit Cost
20 Rate, as defined by indemnity and medical costs per $100 of
21 state employees' payroll...............................($1.16)
22 2. WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of workers' compensation claims worked
25 ......................................................(28,520)
26 b. Number of workers compensation claims litigated
27 .........................................................(780)
28 c. Number of workers' compensation claims referred to
29 the Special Investigative Unit or the Department's Bureau of
30 Workers' Compensation Fraud...............................(96)
31 3. RISK SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
177
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number/percentage of workers' compensation claims
2 requiring some payment per 100 full-time-equivalent employees
3 ........................................................(TBD).
4 b. Number and percent of agencies who indicated the
5 risk services training they received was useful in developing
6 and implementing risk management plans in their agencies
7 ......................................................(26/90%)
8 c. Average cost of tort liability claims paid
9 .....................................................($12,905)
10 d. Average cost of Federal Civil Rights liability
11 claims paid..........................................($29,067)
12 e. Average cost of workers' compensation claims
13 ......................................................($3,250)
14 f. Average cost of property claims paid.......($7,547)
15 4. RISK SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of risk services training units provided to
17 state agency personnel....................................(70)
18 b. Number of risk services surveys, follow-ups, and
19 visits made...............................................(50)
20 c. Number of risk services consultative contacts made
21 .........................................................(195)
22 5. LIABILITY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Number/percentage of claims closed in relation to
24 claims closed during the fiscal year...............(4,226/51%)
25 b. Number/percentage of lawsuits, generated from a
26 liability claim, evaluated with SEFES codes entered within
27 prescribed timeframes................................(902/92%)
28 6. LIABILITY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
29 a. Number of liability claims worked...........(8,287)
30 7. PROPERTY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
178
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Number/percentage of trainees who indicated the
2 training they received was useful in performing required
3 property program processes...............................(TBD)
4 b. Number and percent of property claims closed within
5 prescribed time periods from the date complete documentation
6 is received...........................................(70/93%)
7 8. PROPERTY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of training units/assists provided by the
9 property program......................................(50/253)
10 b. Number of state property loss/damage claims worked
11 .........................................................(306)
12 (5) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY.--
13 (a) For the Disability Determination Program, the
14 purpose of which is to make timely and accurate disability
15 decisions for Florida citizens applying for benefits under the
16 federal Social Security Act or the Medically Needy program
17 administered by the Department of Children and Families, the
18 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
19 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
20 Appropriations 1847-1849 are as follows:
21 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Average number of days required to complete initial
23 disability determinations:
24 (I) Under Title II................................(80)
25 (II) Under Title XVI..............................(80)
26 b. Average number of days required to complete initial
27 Medically Needy decisions.................................(70)
28 c. Percentage of Title II and XVI disability decisions
29 completed accurately as measured by the Social Security
30 Administration...........................................(92%)
31
179
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Percentage of Medically Needy decisions completed
2 accurately, as measured by the internal ODD Quality Assurance
3 section..................................................(94%)
4 e. Cost per case (Titles II and XVI)............($281)
5 f. Cost per case (Medically Needy)..............($181)
6 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of Title II and XVI disability decisions
8 completed............................................(229,593)
9 b. Number of Medically Needy decisions completed
10 ......................................................(18,365)
11 c. Title II/XVI production per work year.........(275)
12 d. Medically Needy production per work year......(334)
13 (b) For the Rehabilitation Program, the purpose of
14 which is to oversee programs that provide vocational and
15 rehabilitative services to individuals with mental or physical
16 disabilities in an effort to enable them to live and work as
17 independently as possible, the outcome measures, output
18 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
19 funds in Specific Appropriations 1830-1846 are as follows:
20 1. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Rate and number of customers gainfully employed
22 (rehabilitated) at least 90 days:..................(62%/9,500)
23 (I) Of VR severely disabled................(63%/3,800)
24 (II) Of VR most severely disabled..........(56%/4,275)
25 (III) Of BSCI customers referred to VR........(55%/89)
26 (IV) Of all other VR disabled..............(75%/1,437)
27 b. Rate and number of VR customers placed in
28 competitive employment...........................(97.5%/9,262)
29 c. Rate and number of VR customers retained in
30 employment after one year........................(61.5%/5,200)
31
180
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Average annual earnings of VR customers at
2 placement............................................($13,633)
3 e. Average annual earnings of VR customers after one
4 year.................................................($14,384)
5 f. Rate and number of BSCI customers returned
6 (reintegrated) to their communities at an appropriate level of
7 functioning for their injuries.......................(82%/800)
8 g. Percentage of case costs covered by third-party
9 payers...................................................(25%)
10 h. Average cost of case life (to Division):
11 (I) For severely disabled VR customers........($3,311)
12 (II) For most severely disabled VR customers..($3,611)
13 (III) For all other disabled VR customers.......($450)
14 (IV) For brain injured BSCI customers.........($3,500)
15 (V) For spinal cord injured BSCI customers....($9,500)
16 2. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of customers reviewed for eligibility
18 ......................................................(24,000)
19 b. Number of individualized written plans for services
20 ......................................................(19,750)
21 c. Number of customers served.................(72,000)
22 d. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
23 team member..............................................(165)
24 e. Percentage of eligibility determinations for VR
25 customers within 60 dyas after application...............(85%)
26 3. BLIND SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Rate and number of rehabilitation customers
28 gainfully employed at least 90 days................(68.3%/847)
29 b. Rate and number of rehabilitation customers placed
30 in competitive employment..........................(64.3%/654)
31
181
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Rate and number of rehabilitation customers
2 retained in employment after 1 year......................(TBD)
3 d. Projected average annual earnings of rehabilitation
4 customers at placement...............................($13,500)
5 e. Ration and number of successfully rehabilitated
6 older persons, nonvocational rehabilitation......(55.2%/1,355)
7 f. Ratio and number of customers (children)
8 successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from preschool to
9 school..............................................(67.3%/62)
10 g. Ratio and number of customers (children)
11 successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from school to work
12 ....................................................(26.5%/52)
13 h. Percentage of eligible library customers served
14 .......................................................(19.8%)
15 i. Percentage of library customers satisfied with the
16 timeliness of services.................................(98.6%)
17 j. Percentage of library customers satisfied with the
18 selection of reading materials available...............(96.0%)
19 k. Percentage of food service facilities meeting
20 assigned profit levels...................................(90%)
21 l. Average net income for food service facility
22 ....................................................($35,200 )
23 4. BLIND SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of customers reviewed for eligibility
25 .......................................................(2,035)
26 b. Number of written plans for services........(1,425)
27 c. Number of customers served.................(14,500)
28 d. Average time lapse between application and
29 eligibility determination for rehabilitation customers....(69)
30 e. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
31 team member..............................................(114)
182
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Number of books available per library customer
2 .......................................................(51.14)
3 g. Number of books loaned per library customer.(12.39)
4 h. Number of periodicals loaned per library customer
5 ........................................................(3.62)
6 i. Net increase in registered customers for library
7 services.................................................(822)
8 j. Cost per library customer..................($19.65)
9 k. Total number of food service managers.........(162)
10 l. Number of existing food services facilities
11 renovated.................................................(10)
12 m. Number of new food service facilities constructed
13 ...........................................................(5)
14 (c) For the Safety/Workers' Compensation Program, the
15 purpose of which is to keep the workplace safe and return
16 injured employees to work at a reasonable cost to employers,
17 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
18 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
19 Appropriations 1799-1807 are as follows:
20 1. WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percentage of injured workers returning to work at
22 80 percent or more of previous average (BRE) quarterly wage
23 for at least 1 quarter of the year following injury for
24 accident 2 years prior.................................(63.5%)
25 b. Percentage of initial payments made on time by
26 insurance carriers.....................................(91.8%)
27 c. Number of workers newly protected by workers'
28 compensation coverage per fiscal year as a result of
29 compliance efforts....................................(14,105)
30 d. Percent of investigated issues resolved by EAO
31 .........................................................(10%)
183
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Average closure time for disputed issues through
2 efforts of EAO (in days)..................................(30)
3 f. Percent of noncomplying carriers in compliance upon
4 reaudit..................................................(78%)
5 g. Percent of cases closed during fiscal year in which
6 a worker returns to work.................................(63%)
7 h. Number of employers brought into compliance through
8 investigations.........................................(2,995)
9 i. Estimated amount of insurance premium dollars newly
10 generated due to compliance......................($12,562,847)
11 j. Average total cost per 4-year-old case (information
12 only)....................................................($17,
13 597)
14 k. Percentage of lost time cases with no petition for
15 benefits filed 18 months after the date of accident......(77%)
16 2. WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of employer coverage documents processed,
18 including exemptions from coverage filed by construction
19 employers............................................(621,694)
20 b. Number of stop-work orders served to employers
21 failing to comply with requirements....................(1,368)
22 c. Number of employer investigations conducted for
23 compliance with workers' compensation law.............(22,758)
24 d. Number of applicants screened for reemployment
25 services...............................................(1,921)
26 e. Number of program applicants provided reemployment
27 services...............................................(1,750)
28 f. Number of carriers audited/reaudited annually
29 .....................................................(381/TBD)
30 g. Number of investigated issues resolved by the
31 Employee Assistance Office............................(25,000)
184
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 h. Number of days between the filing of the petition
2 for benefits with the division and the referral of the
3 petition to the Judges of Compensation Claims............(TBD)
4 i. Unit cost per audit/reaudit...................(TBD)
5 3. SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Occupational injury and illness total case
7 incidence rate (per 100 workers) (information only).....(8.1%)
8 b. Percentage change in total case incidence rate for
9 private sector job sites served........................(-4.0%)
10 c. Percentage change in total case incidence rate for
11 public sector job sites served.........................(-4.0%)
12 d. Percentage reduction in lost workday case incidence
13 rate for private sector job sites served...............(-5.0%)
14 e. Percentage change in lost workday case incidence
15 rate for public sector job sites served................(-5.0%)
16 f. Percentage change in disabling compensable claims
17 rate for private employers served......................(-5.0%)
18 g. Percentage change in disabling compensable claims
19 rate for public employers served.......................(-5.0%)
20 h. Percent of employers surveyed who view services as
21 adequately effective or above............................(90%)
22 4. SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of private sector employers (and job sites)
24 provided OHSA 7 (c)1 consultation services...............(549)
25 b. Number of public sector employers (and job sites)
26 provided consultation services.........................(3,000)
27 c. Number of private sector employers receiving
28 training and other technical services....................(TBD)
29 d. Number of public sector employers receiving
30 training and other technical services....................(TBD)
31
185
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Unit cost per private sector (OSHA 7(c)1)
2 consultation.............................................(TBD)
3 f. Unit cost per public sector consultation......(TBD)
4 (d) For the Employment Security Program, the purpose
5 of which is to increase Floridians' ability to lead
6 independent lives, secure safe and gainful employment, and
7 provide employers with skilled workers, thereby enabling
8 Florida to compete successfully in the global economy, the
9 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 1808-1826 are as follows:
12 1. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of UC benefits paid timely..........(90.0%)
14 b. Percent of UC benefits paid accurately........(95%)
15 c. Percent of UC appeal cases completed timely
16 ......................................................(87.01%)
17 d. Percent of new UC employer liability determinations
18 made timely...........................................(84.20%)
19 e. Percent of current quarter UC taxes paid timely
20 .......................................................(95.5%)
21 2. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of UC claimant eligibility determinations
23 issued...............................................(184,324)
24 b. Number of UC benefits weeks paid........(3,266,221)
25 c. Amount of UC benefits paid...........($741,304,302)
26 d. Number of appeal cases completed...........(52,197)
27 e. Number of new UC employer liability determinations
28 made..................................................(69,118)
29 f. Amount of UC taxes collected.........($523,054,615)
30 g. Number of UC employer tax/wage reports processed
31 ...................................................(1,531,803)
186
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 3. JOBS AND BENEFITS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percent of job openings filled..............(50.2%)
3 b. Percent individuals referred to jobs who are placed
4 .........................................................(27%)
5 c. Percent food stamp clients employed.........(11.8%)
6 d. Percent increase in high skill/high wage
7 apprenticeship programs registered.....................(5.00%)
8 4. JOBS AND BENEFITS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number individuals referred to job openings listed
10 with J&B.............................................(540,000)
11 b. Number individuals placed by J&B..........(137,700)
12 c. Number individuals obtaining employment after
13 receiving specific J&B services.......................(35,700)
14 d. Cost per placement by J&B....................($231)
15 e. Cost per individual placed or obtained employment
16 ........................................................($176)
17 f. Number recipients employed:
18 (I) Food stamps...............................(14,800)
19 (II) Cost per food stamp placement..............($302)
20 g. Number Apprenticeship Program requests meeting high
21 skill/high wage requirements.............................(150)
22 h. Number apprentices successfully completing terms of
23 training as set by registered industry standards.......(2,900)
24 5. JTPA OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. JTPA adult and dislocated worker placement rate
26 (Information only)....................................(76.50%)
27 b. JTPA youth positive outcome rate (Information only)
28 .........................................................(79%)
29 6. JTPA OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number JTPA Adult Program completers........(8,568)
31 b. Number JTPA Youth Program completers........(5,809)
187
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Number JTPA Dislocated Worker Program completers
2 .......................................................(6,365)
3 d. JTPA cost per participant served...........($2,323)
4 (e) For the Workers' Compensation Hearings Program,
5 the purpose of which is to resolve disputed compensation
6 claims in conformity with pertinent statutory, rule, and
7 caseload requirements through the maintenance of a statewide
8 mediation, hearing, and order adjudicatory system, the outcome
9 measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 1795-1798 are as follows:
12 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percentage of concluded mediations resulting in
14 resolution...............................................(56%)
15 b. Percentage of appealed, decided orders affirmed
16 .........................................................(80%)
17 c. Average days from petition filed to disposition
18 order....................................................(TBD)
19 d. Cost per disposition order entered............(TBD)
20 e. Average number of days from the date the petition
21 is filed to the scheduled mediation date.................(TBD)
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of petitions received by presiding judge
24 ......................................................(79,000)
25 b. Number of mediations held..................(17,600)
26 c. Number of final hearings held...............(3,800)
27 d. Number of other hearings held..............(38,500)
28 e. Number of Disposition Orders Entered..........(TBD)
29 (I) Number of final merit orders...............(2,850)
30 (II) Number of lump sum settlements orders....(29,190)
31 (III) Number of stipulation orders...............(TBD)
188
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Number of other orders (other than disposition
2 orders)..................................................(TBD)
3 (f) For the Unemployment Appeals Commission, the
4 purpose of which is to provide prompt, accurate benefits for
5 unemployed workers in order to expedite their reemployment
6 while providing an equitable and cost-effective unemployment
7 compensation system for the employers of Florida, the outcome
8 measures, output measures, and associated performance
9 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
10 Appropriations 1850-1852 are as follows:
11 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percentage of unemployment compensation appeals
13 disposed within 45 days..................................(50%)
14 b. Percentage of unemployment compensation appeals
15 disposed within 90 days..................................(95%)
16 c. Percentage of cases appealed to DCA............(7%)
17 d. Average unit cost of cases appealed to Unemployment
18 Appeals Commission......................................($186)
19 e. Average unit cost of cases appealed to DCA...($685)
20 f. Percentage of appealed decisions affirmed by the
21 DCA......................................................(94%)
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of unemployment compensation appeals
24 disposed of...........................................(10,500)
25 (g) For the Information Management Center, the purpose
26 of which is to provide application development and support,
27 processing applications error-free, through a computer network
28 that is responsive and available, the outcome measures, output
29 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
30 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1827-1829 are as
31 follows:
189
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percentage of data processing requests completed by
3 due date.................................................(95%)
4 b. System design and programming hourly cost..($52.00)
5 c. Percentage of scheduled production jobs completed
6 .......................................................(99.9%)
7 d. Percentage scheduled hours available data center
8 operations............................................(99.79%)
9 e. Cost per MIP (millions of instructions per second)
10 ..................................................($19,000.00)
11 f. Percentage of Help Desk calls resolved within 3
12 working days..........................................(89.48%)
13 g. Cost per Help Desk call.....................($8.00)
14 h. Percentage scheduled hours available network
15 ......................................................(99.08%)
16 i. Cost for support per network device.......($195.00)
17 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of data processing requests completed by due
19 date...................................................(2,900)
20 b. Number of scheduled production jobs completed
21 .....................................................(517,000)
22 c. Number of hours available data center operations
23 .......................................................(2,876)
24 d. Number of Help Desk calls resolved within 3 working
25 days..................................................(18,175)
26 e. Number of hours available network...........(2,855)
27 (6) DEPARTMENT OF THE LOTTERY.--
28 (a) For the Sale of Lottery Products Program, the
29 purpose purpose of which is to maximize revenues for public
30 education in a manner consistent with the dignity of the state
31 and the welfare of its citizens, the outcome measures, output
190
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
2 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1871-1882 are as
3 follows:
4 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Total revenue in dollars...........($2,047 million)
6 b. Percent change from prior year..............(0.56%)
7 c. Transfers to the state Educational Enhancement
8 Trust Fund.............................................($777.8
9 million)
10 d. Percent of total revenue to the Educational
11 Enhancement Trust Fund...................................(38%)
12 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of total revenue paid as prizes....(49.65%)
14 b. Administrative expense paid for retailer commission
15 .......................................................($111.8
16 million)
17 c. Operating expense..................($252.8 million)
18 d. Operating expense as percent of total revenue.(12%)
19 e. Survey results of public awareness of the
20 contribution to education by the Lottery - percent of
21 respondents who are aware of the Lottery's contribution to
22 education................................................(65%)
23 (7) DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES.--
24 (a) For the State Group Insurance Program, the purpose
25 of which is to contribute to a productive workforce
26 representative of the labor market by providing cost effective
27 employee health insurance, the outcome measures, output
28 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
29 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1897-1903 are as
30 follows:
31 1. STATE GROUP INSURANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
191
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 a. Customer feedback ranking for Division out of
2 possible 10 points......................................(6.57)
3 b. Percentage of claims reaching final action within
4 30 days of receipt.......................................(98%)
5 c. Overall payment and procedural error rate......(5%)
6 d. Telephone queue time in seconds................(45)
7 e. Unprocessed original claims inventory......(30,000)
8 f. Average annual cost per contract to administer
9 insurance programs....................................($14.84)
10 (b) For the Facilities Program, the purpose of which
11 is to provide best value office facilities considering the
12 total cost of constructing, managing, and maintaining office
13 facilities, and compared to comparable industry standards, the
14 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 1904-1927 are as follows:
17 1. FACILITIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Gross square foot construction cost of office
19 facilities for DMS....................................($80.02)
20 b. Gross square foot construction cost of office
21 facilities for private industry average...............($87.55)
22 c. Average full service rent - composite cost per net
23 square foot in counties where DMS has office facilities for
24 DMS actual............................................($15.13)
25 d. Average full service rent - composite cost per net
26 square foot in counties where DMS has office facilities for
27 private industry......................................($16.42)
28 e. New office space efficiency per net square
29 foot/gross square foot...................................(87%)
30 f. Average operations and maintenance cost per net
31 square foot maintained by DMS..........................($5.04)
192
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 g. Average operations and maintenance cost per net
2 square foot maintained by private industry.............($5.92)
3 h. Number of criminal incidents per 100,000 gross
4 square feet..............................................(4.7)
5 i. Number of criminal incidents per 1,000 employees
6 .......................................................(20.33)
7 2. FACILITIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Gross square feet of office facilities completed
9 .....................................................(337,320)
10 b. Net square feet of state-owned office space
11 occupied by state agencies including non-DMS owned facilities
12 ...................................................(7,820,113)
13 c. Net square feet of private office space occupied by
14 state agencies....................................(11,057,443)
15 d. Number of square feet maintained by DMS.(4,893,921)
16 e. Number of square feet maintained by private
17 contractor.........................................(1,912,009)
18 f. Gross square feet monitored for security purposes
19 ...................................................(7,313,643)
20 g. Number of investigations conducted............(210)
21 (c) For the Support Program, the purpose of which is
22 to provide government entities access to best value
23 commodities and services through centralized procurement,
24 federal property assistance, and fleet management, the outcome
25 measures, output measures, and associated performance
26 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
27 Appropriations 1928-1931 are as follows:
28 1. SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Percentage of state term contracts savings....(35%)
30 b. State term contracts cost avoidance..($205,000,000)
31
193
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Average percentage below private sector fleet
2 maintenance for labor costs..............................(13%)
3 d. Average percentage below private sector fleet
4 maintenance for parts costs..............................(26%)
5 e. Average percentage state rental vehicles below
6 state rental contract rates..............................(30%)
7 f. Passenger load factor for DMS.................(3.5)
8 g. Passenger load factor for large corporation...(3.4)
9 h. Cost per flight hour - DMS aircraft pool...($1,166)
10 i. Average percentage DMS direct cost per flight hour
11 below industry direct cost...............................(44%)
12 j. Number of government and nonprofit organizations
13 visiting a surplus property distribution center........(3,400)
14 k. Federal property distribution rate............(85%)
15 2. SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of commodities/services on state term
17 contracts............................................(233,000)
18 b. Number of agencies using SPURS.................(30)
19 c. Percentage of agencies using SPURS............(75%)
20 d. Number of federal property orders processed.(2,150)
21 e. Number of vehicle maintenance service hours.(8,600)
22 f. Days of state rental vehicle service provided
23 ......................................................(41,000)
24 g. Miles of state rental vehicle service provided
25 ...................................................(1,700,000)
26 h. Number of flights by executive aircraft pool
27 .......................................................(2,500)
28 (d) For the Workforce Program, the purpose of which is
29 to manage the State Personnel System to help state agencies
30 achieve an effective workforce; perform a variety of
31 activities to assist state agencies in human resource
194
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 management; and provide administrative support for the
2 Cooperative Personnel Employment Subsystem (COPES), the
3 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
4 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
5 Appropriations 1932-1936 are as follows:
6 1. STATE PERSONNEL SYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Administrative cost per FTE for Cooperative
8 Personnel Employee System.............................($40.20)
9 b. Administrative cost per FTE for administrative cost
10 net of COPES..........................................($35.38)
11 c. Administrative cost per FTE total administrative
12 cost per FTE..........................................($75.58)
13 d. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
14 information provided resulted in more effective and efficient
15 HR-related decisionmaking................................(83%)
16 e. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
17 technical assistance provided resulted in more effective and
18 efficient HR-related decision-making.....................(83%)
19 f. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
20 information provided was timely..........................(83%)
21 g. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
22 information provided was accurate........................(83%)
23 h. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
24 information provided was consistent with past practices..(83%)
25 i. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
26 technical assistance provided was timely.................(87%)
27 j. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
28 technical assistance provided was accurate...............(87%)
29 k. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
30 technical assistance provided was consistent with past
31 practices................................................(74%)
195
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 l. Percentage of agencies at or above EEO gender
2 parity with available labor market.....................(86.7%)
3 m. Percentage of agencies at or above EEO minority
4 parity with the available labor market.................(56.7%)
5 2. STATE PERSONNEL SYSTEM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of informational materials provided..(1,820)
7 b. Number of responses to technical assistance
8 requests..............................................(15,343)
9 (e) For the Retirement Benefits Program, the purpose
10 of which is to provide quality and cost-effective retirement
11 services, the outcome measures, output measures, and
12 associated performance standards with respect to funds
13 provided in Specific Appropriations 1937-1947 are as follows:
14 1. RETIREMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percentage of participating agencies satisfied with
16 retirement information...................................(99%)
17 b. Percentage of participating active members
18 satisfied with retirement information....................(78%)
19 c. Percentage of participating recent retirees
20 satisfied with retirement information....................(97%)
21 d. Percentage of participating other retirees
22 satisfied with retirement information....................(98%)
23 e. Percentage of agency payroll transactions correctly
24 reported...............................................(98.5%)
25 f. Percentage of standard retirement services offered
26 by FRS compared to comparable programs...................(82%)
27 g. Percentage of participating agencies satisfied with
28 retirement services......................................(98%)
29 h. Percentage of participating active members
30 satisfied with retirement services.......................(82%)
31
196
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 i. Percentage of participating recent retirees
2 satisfied with retirement services.......................(97%)
3 j. Percentage of participating other retirees
4 satisfied with retirement services.......................(98%)
5 k. Administrative cost per active and retired member
6 ......................................................($19.69)
7 l. Ratio of active and retired members to division FTE
8 .....................................................(3,303:1)
9 m. Funding ratio of FRS assets to liabilities....(93%)
10 n. Percentage of local retirement systems annually
11 reviewed which are funded on a sound actuarial basis(92%)
12 2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of annuitants added to retired payroll
14 ......................................................(13,200)
15 b. Number of retirement account audits........(83,000)
16 c. Number of changes processed................(49,119)
17 d. Number of benefit payments issued.......(2,075,333)
18 e. Number of local pension plan valuations and impact
19 statements reviewed......................................(850)
20 (f) For the Information Technology Program, the
21 purpose of which is to effectively and efficiently satisfy
22 customer needs for using, sharing, and managing information
23 technology resources, the outcome measures, output measures,
24 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
25 provided in Specific Appropriations 1948-1959 are as follows:
26 1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percentage SUNCOM discount from commercial rates
28 for local access.........................................(40%)
29 b. Percentage SUNCOM discount from commercial rates
30 for long distance........................................(40%)
31
197
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Percentage SUNCOM discount from commercial rates
2 for data service.........................................(25%)
3 d. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for
4 service features........................................(2.23)
5 e. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for
6 service delivery........................................(2.16)
7 f. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for
8 timely problem resolution...............................(2.33)
9 g. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for best
10 value services..........................................(2.15)
11 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of SUNCOM long distance billable minutes
13 .................................................(226,535,921)
14 b. Number of SUNCOM local service main stations
15 ...................................................(1,729,785)
16 c. Number of SUNCOM data locations served.....(10,747)
17 d. Percentage SUNCOM service growth for local access
18 ..........................................................(9%)
19 e. Percentage SUNCOM service growth for long distance
20 ..........................................................(1%)
21 f. Percentage SUNCOM service growth for data service
22 ..........................................................(9%)
23 3. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
25 accessible information services.........................(2.67)
26 b. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
27 desirable technology services...........................(2.40)
28 c. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
29 timely problem resolution...............................(2.33)
30 d. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
31 projects within schedule................................(2.56)
198
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 e. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for best
2 value services..........................................(2.15)
3 f. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
4 reliable information services...........................(2.11)
5 4. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of Technology Resource Center research
7 projects completed........................................(15)
8 b. Number of Technology Resource Center consulting
9 projects completed.........................................(7)
10 c. Number of Technology Resource Center development
11 projects completed.......................................(425)
12 d. Percentage utilization by the Unisys System as used
13 for capacity planning & technology refresh, employing 80%
14 maximum utilization standard.............................(60%)
15 e. Percentage utilization by the IBM System as used
16 for capacity planning & technology refresh, employing 80%
17 maximum utilization standard...........................(59.5%)
18 5. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
19 a. Percentage wireless discount from commercially
20 available and similar type engineering services..........(35%)
21 6. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of engineering projects and approvals
23 handled for state government.............................(110)
24 b. Number of engineering projects and approvals
25 handled for local governments............................(550)
26 c. Number of Joint Task Force Radio Systems fixed
27 sites operated and maintained.............................(81)
28 d. Percentage of state covered by the Joint Task Force
29 Radio System.............................................(34%)
30 e. Percentage of Joint Task Force Radio System current
31 phase(s) under development completed.....................(34%)
199
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (8) DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS.--
2 (a) For the Readiness and Response Program, the
3 purpose of which is to provide military units and personnel
4 (at the Governor's request) that are ready to protect life and
5 property; preserve peace, order, and public safety; and
6 contribute to such state and local programs that add value to
7 the State of Florida, the outcome measures, output measures,
8 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
9 provided in Specific Appropriations 1974A-1981G are as
10 follows:
11 1. READINESS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percentage of Area Commands assigned Military
13 Support Missions that are prepared to execute those missions
14 .........................................................(85%)
15 b. Percentage of units with a Green readiness rating
16 .........................................................(88%)
17 2. READINESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number/percentage of armories rated adequate
19 ......................................................(57/97%)
20 b. Percentage of satisfaction with training facilities
21 at Camp Blanding.........................................(80%)
22 c. Number of annual training days at Camp Blanding
23 .....................................................(120,000)
24 d. Percentage of available training days at Camp
25 Blanding...............................................(15.7%)
26 e. Percentage of assigned soldiers to authorized
27 staffing levels..........................................(99%)
28 f. Number of new recruits using State Education
29 Assistance Program.......................................(625)
30 g. Number of crisis response exercises conducted
31 annually...................................................(3)
200
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 3. RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percentage of supported agencies reporting
3 satisfaction with the department's support for specific
4 missions.................................................(88%)
5 4. RESPONSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Percentage of State Active Duty (SAD) purchase
7 orders processed in 24 hours.............................(96%)
8 b. Percentage of SAD vouchers purchased and paid in 40
9 days.....................................................(98%)
10 c. Percentage of SAD payrolls paid on time.......(98%)
11 d. Percentage of Area Command Plans rated satisfactory
12 as a result of operations...............................(100%)
13 e. Percentage of missions accomplished on or before
14 time.....................................................(90%)
15 (9) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.--
16 (a) For the Property Tax Administration Program, the
17 purpose of which is to enhance the equity in property
18 assessments and taxation through the state and to facilitate
19 equalization of the distribution of the required local effort
20 millage, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
21 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
22 Specific Appropriations 2000-2002 are as follows:
23 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of classes studied found to have a level of
25 at least 90 percent....................................(97.2%)
26 b. Tax roll uniformity - the average for coefficient
27 of dispersion..........................................(11.5%)
28 c. Percent of taxing authorities in total or
29 substantial truth in millage compliance on initial submission
30 .......................................................(92.5%)
31
201
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Percent of refund and tax certificate applications
2 processed within 30 days of receipt....................(92.5%)
3 e. Refund request per 100,000 parcels...........(31.8)
4 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of subclasses of property studied with
6 feedback to property appraisers........................(5,250)
7 b. Number of tax roll review notices issued........(3)
8 c. Total number of tax roll defects found..........(4)
9 d. Number of truth in millage compliance letters sent
10 to taxing authorities....................................(485)
11 e. Number of truth in millage compliance letters sent
12 to taxing authorities with minor infractions.............(118)
13 f. Number of property tax refund requests processed
14 .......................................................(2,500)
15 g. Number of tax certificates cancellations and
16 corrections processed..................................(1,500)
17 h. Number of taxpayers audited on behalf of county
18 property appraisers -Tangible Personal Property..........(250)
19 i. Student training hours provided to property
20 appraisers and their staff - Tangible Personal Property
21 .......................................................(3,500)
22 (b) For the Child Support Enforcement Program, the
23 purpose of which is to establish paternity and child support
24 orders, enforce those orders to collect child support, and
25 distribute child support collections in a timely manner, the
26 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
27 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
28 Appropriations 2004-2012 are as follows:
29 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percentage of children with a court order for
31 support..................................................(47%)
202
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 b. Percentage of children with paternity established
2 .........................................................(81%)
3 c. Total child support dollars collected per $1 of
4 total expenditures.....................................($2.77)
5 d. Percent of child support collected that was due
6 during the fiscal year...................................(51%)
7 e. Percent of cases with child support due in a month
8 that received a payment during the month.................(53%)
9 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
10 a. Number of children with a newly established court
11 order.................................................(58,800)
12 (c) For the General Tax Administration Program, the
13 purpose of which is to administer the revenue laws of the
14 state in a fair and equitable manner and to collect all money
15 owed, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
16 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
17 Specific Appropriations 2013-2023 are as follows:
18 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Average days from receipt of payment to final
20 processing of deposit - sales, corporation, intangibles, fuel
21 ........................................................(0.68)
22 b. Number of days between initial distribution of
23 funds and final adjustments - sales, fuel.................(70)
24 c. Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially
25 error free and on time...................................(80%)
26 d. Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially
27 error free and on time by first time filers..............(64%)
28 e. Return on investment - total collections per dollar
29 spent................................................($146.72)
30
31
203
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Dollars collected as a percentage of actual
2 liability of notices sent for apparent sales tax return filing
3 errors or late returns...................................(61%)
4 g. Percentage of tax returns that did not result in a
5 notice of apparent filing error or late return...........(89%)
6 h. Average time in days between the processing of a
7 sales tax return and the first notification to the taxpayer of
8 an apparent filing error or late return...................(40)
9 i. Percentage of delinquent sales tax return and
10 filing error or late return notices issued accurately to
11 taxpayer.................................................(90%)
12 j. Percentage of delinquent tax return and filing
13 error or late return notices sent to taxpayers that had to be
14 revised due to department or taxpayer error..............(21%)
15 k. Percentage of final audit assessment amounts
16 collected - tax only.....................................(84%)
17 l. Final audit assessment amounts as a percentage of
18 initial assessment amounts - tax only....................(72%)
19 m. Dollars collected voluntarily as a percentage of
20 total dollars collected..................................(97%)
21 n. Average number of days to resolve a dispute of an
22 audit assessment.........................................(175)
23 o. Direct collections per enforcement related dollar
24 spent..................................................($4.89)
25 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of delinquent tax return notices issued to
27 taxpayers............................................(744,000)
28 b. Number of notices sent to taxpayers for apparent
29 tax return filing errors or late return..............(567,000)
30 (10) DEPARTMENT OF STATE.--
31
204
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 (a) For the Historical, Archaeological, and Folklife
2 Appreciation Program, the purpose of which is to encourage
3 identification, evaluation, protection, preservation,
4 collection, conservation, interpretation, and public access to
5 information about Florida's historic sites, properties, and
6 objects related to Florida history and to archaeological and
7 folk cultural heritage, the outcome measures, output measures,
8 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
9 provided in Specific Appropriations 2051-2056A are as follows:
10 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Number/percentage increase of general public
12 utilizing historic information...................(200,000/21%)
13 b. Number of historic and archaeological objects
14 maintained for public use and scientific research.....(99,000)
15 c. Increase in number/percentage of historic and
16 archaeological properties:
17 (I) Recorded................................(9,650/8%)
18 (II) Protected or preserved for public use...(154/26%)
19 d. Total local funds leveraged by historical resources
20 program.................................................($61.5
21 million)
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of grants awarded......................(243)
24 b. Number of dollars awarded through grants
25 .................................................($16,088,144)
26 c. Number of museum exhibits......................(82)
27 d. Number of publications and multimedia products
28 available for the general public.........................(315)
29 e. Number of institutions to which items are on loan
30 ..........................................................(53)
31
205
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 f. Average cost to collect historical and
2 archaeological objects................................($75.62)
3 g. Average cost to maintain historical and
4 archaeological objects.................................($1.16)
5 h. Number of sites maintained in the Florida Master
6 Site File............................................(133,000)
7 i. Number of preservation services applications
8 reviewed...............................................(8,000)
9 j. Number of produced and sponsored events:
10 (I) K-12 targeted activities...................(1,350)
11 (II) Other sponsored events......................(720)
12 (b) For the Commercial Recording and Registration
13 Program, the purpose of which is to promote financial and
14 economic stability through public notice of clients' interest
15 in business organizations, trademarks, financial transactions,
16 and liens as well as identification of those doing business
17 under names other than their own, output measures, and
18 associated performance standards with respect to funds
19 provided in Specific Appropriations 2057-2059 are as follows:
20 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percentage public reporting satisfaction with the
22 division's services......................................(91%)
23 b. Percentage business reporting satisfaction with the
24 division's services......................................(91%)
25 c. Percentage law enforcement reporting satisfaction
26 with the division's services.............................(91%)
27 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Average Cost/Corporate Filing...............($5.38)
29 b. Average Cost/Uniform Commercial Code Filings
30 .......................................................($1.81)
31 c. Average Cost/Inquiry.......................($0.075)
206
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Proportion of total inquires handled by telephone
2 .........................................................(25%)
3 e. Proportion of total inquiries handled by
4 mail/walk-ins............................................(10%)
5 f. Proportion of total inquiries handled by electronic
6 means....................................................(65%)
7 (c) For the Libraries, Archives, and Information
8 Services Program, the purpose of which is to ensure access to
9 information of past, present, and future value for the
10 educational and cultural benefit of the people of Florida, the
11 Library, Archives, and Information program works in
12 partnership with citizens, information providers, and
13 government for efficient and effective management and
14 development of information services, the outcome measures,
15 output measures, and associated performance standards with
16 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2060-2067
17 are as follows:
18 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Annual increase in the use of local public library
20 service...................................................(2%)
21 b. Annual increase in accessibility by library patrons
22 to materials not owned by their local public library......(4%)
23 c. Annual increase in usage of research collections
24 ..........................................................(6%)
25 d. Annual cost avoidance achieved by government
26 agencies through records storage/disposition/micrographics
27 .................................................($58,000,000)
28 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of items loaned by public libraries
30 ..................................................(69,961,992)
31 b. Number of library customer visits......(49,513,960)
207
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 c. Number of public library reference requests
2 ..................................................(25,142,072)
3 d. Number of public library registered borrowers
4 ...................................................(7,066,610)
5 e. Number of persons attending public library programs
6 ...................................................(3,087,030)
7 f. Number of volumes in public library collections
8 ..................................................(24,748,033)
9 g. Number of records added to the statewide library
10 holdings database annually.........................(1,826,191)
11 h. Number of new users (State Library, State Archives)
12 .......................................................(5,977)
13 i. Number of reference requests handled (State
14 Library, State Archives).............................(117,847)
15 j. Number of items used on site (State Library)
16 ......................................................(39,822)
17 k. Number of database searches conducted (State
18 Library, State Archives).............................(789,807)
19 l. Number of items loaned (State Library).....(81,286)
20 m. Cubic feet of obsolete public records approved for
21 disposal.............................................(510,000)
22 n. Cubic feet of noncurrent records stored at the
23 Records Center.......................................(220,000)
24 o. Number of microfilm images created, processed,
25 and/or duplicated at the Records Center..........(160,000,000)
26 (d) For the Cultural Grants Program, the purpose of
27 which is foster development of a receptive climate for
28 cultural programs, to enrich culturally and benefit the
29 citizens of this state in their daily lives, to increase the
30 appeal of Florida visits and vacations, and to attract to
31 Florida residency outstanding creators through the promotion
208
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 of cultural programs, the outcome measures, output measures,
2 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
3 provided in Specific Appropriations 2068-2083A are as follows:
4 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Attendance at supported cultural events
6 ..................................................(25,000,000)
7 b. Number of individuals served by professional
8 associations.......................................(8,000,000)
9 c. Total local financial support leveraged by state
10 funding.........................................($343,832,378)
11 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of grants awarded:
13 (I) Capital.......................................(16)
14 (II) Program.....................................(705)
15 b. Dollars awarded through grants:
16 (I) Capital...............................($7,616,189)
17 (II) Program.............................($14,687,872)
18 c. Percentage of counties funded by the program:
19 .......................................................(85.1%)
20 (I) Large counties (N=34; population >75,000)..(94.0%)
21 (II) Small counties (N=33; population less than
22 75,000)................................................(75.8%)
23 d. Number of state supported performances and exhibits
24 ......................................................(23,000)
25 (e) For the Licensing Program, the purpose of which is
26 to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare through
27 the licensing, regulation, and enforcement of the private
28 security, private investigative, and recovery industries; the
29 regulation of game promotions conducted in Florida; and the
30 issuance of licenses to citizens wishing to carry concealed
31 weapons or firearms for lawful defense, the outcome measures,
209
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 output measures, and associated performance standards with
2 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2084-2087
3 are as follows:
4 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
6 licenses issued within 90 days of receipt of an application
7 .........................................................(83%)
8 b. Percent/number Concealed Weapon/Firearm licenses
9 issued within 90 day statutory timeframe without fingerprint
10 results............................................(19%/8,509)
11 c. Number of default Concealed Weapons/Firearms
12 licensees with prior criminal histories................(2,387)
13 d. Percent of license revocations or suspensions
14 initiated within 20 days of receipt of disqualifying
15 information (all license types)..........................(60%)
16 e. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
17 investigations completed within 60 days..................(94%)
18 f. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
19 inspections completed within 30 days.....................(80%)
20 g. Percent of Concealed Weapons/Firearm violators to
21 licensed population....................................(0.06%)
22 h. Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery
23 violators to the licensed population...................(1.25%)
24 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Average cost/Concealed Weapon/Firearm application
26 processed................................................($30)
27 b. Average cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
28 application processed....................................($35)
29 c. Average cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
30 investigation.........................................($1,596)
31
210
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 1999 SB 2502
301-1776C-99
1 d. Average cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
2 compliance inspection...................................($325)
3 e. Average cost/Administrative Action (revocation,
4 fine, probation & compliance letters)...................($500)
5 f. Number investigations performed (Security,
6 Investigative, and Recovery complaint and agency generated
7 inspections)...........................................(1,475)
8 g. Number compliance inspections performed (Security,
9 Investigative, and Recovery licensees/new agency inspections
10 and random inspections)................................(1,697)
11 3. POLICY ANALYSIS.--
12 a. Percent of fingerprint cards processed by FBI and
13 FDLE in excess of 90 days (all licenses).................(12%)
14 Section 38. If any provision of this act or the
15 application thereof to any person or circumstance is held
16 invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
17 applications of the act which can be given effect without the
18 invalid provision or application, and to this end the
19 provisions of this act are declared severable.
20 Section 39. This act shall take effect July 1, 1999;
21 or, in the event this act fails to become a law until after
22 that date, it shall take effect upon becoming a law and shall
23 operate retroactively to July 1, 1999.
24
25 *****************************************
26 SENATE SUMMARY
27 Provides guidelines for implementing the 1999-2000
General Appropriations Act and provides performance
28 measures and standards for programs within state
agencies.
29
30
31
211