Senate Bill 2502e2
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 A bill to be entitled
2 An act implementing the 1999-2000 General
3 Appropriations Act; providing legislative
4 intent; providing that specified funds are to
5 be allocated based on equity and are not
6 subject to the provisions of s. 394.908, F.S.;
7 amending s. 409.9115, F.S.; specifying how the
8 Agency for Health Care Administration shall
9 make payments for the Medicaid disproportionate
10 share program for mental health hospitals;
11 requiring the Agency for Health Care
12 Administration to use a specified
13 disproportionate share formula, specified
14 audited financial data, and a specified
15 Medicaid per diem rate in fiscal year 1999-2000
16 for qualifying hospitals; amending s. 409.9116,
17 F.S.; providing a formula for rural hospital
18 disproportionate share payments; amending s.
19 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the Department of
20 Children and Family Services and the Department
21 of Health to advance certain moneys for certain
22 contract services; directing the Agency for
23 Health Care Administration to include health
24 maintenance organization recipients in the
25 county billing for a specified purpose;
26 authorizing the Departments of Children and
27 Family Services, Revenue, Labor and Employment
28 Security, and Health and the Agency for Health
29 Care Administration to transfer positions and
30 funds to comply with the 1999-2000 General
31 Appropriations Act or the WAGES Act; amending
1
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 s. 402.3015, F.S.; providing eligibility
2 guidelines for subsidized child care; amending
3 s. 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the Department of
4 Children and Family Services to use certain
5 funds for fixed capital outlay expenditures to
6 meet certain federal standards; requiring the
7 Agency for Health Care Administration to take
8 necessary actions to ensure that expenditures
9 for Medicaid transportation do not exceed the
10 amount budgeted and to take certain steps if
11 that becomes impossible; amending s. 39.3065,
12 F.S.; providing for the Broward County Sheriff
13 to provide child protective investigative
14 services; requiring Healthy Families Florida
15 service providers to furnish participants with
16 certain disclaimers and documentation;
17 prohibiting disclosure of certain records by
18 such providers; providing for disposal of
19 records after a specified period; amending s.
20 409.912, F.S.; exempting health centers meeting
21 certain criteria from licensure requirements;
22 amending s. 409.912, F.S.; providing additional
23 responsibilities of the Agency for Health Care
24 Administration in fostering cost-effective
25 purchasing of health care; amending s. 287.084,
26 F.S.; allowing consideration of certain vendors
27 in a request for proposals relating to
28 telemedicine by the Glades School District;
29 declaring legislative intent to evaluate the
30 Medicaid county ceiling and reimbursement rate
31 caps for certain hospitals; requiring a report;
2
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 amending s. 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the
2 Department of Law Enforcement to transfer some
3 positions and associated budget and a certain
4 percentage of salary rate between budget
5 entities and providing requirements with
6 respect thereto; providing that billing agent
7 consulting services related to certain Medicaid
8 provider agreements not be considered billing
9 agent services; requiring the Agency for Health
10 Care Administration to develop a reimbursement
11 schedule; authorizing the Department of Law
12 Enforcement to use certain moneys to provide
13 meritorious-performance bonuses for employees,
14 subject to approval; authorizing the
15 Correctional Privatization Commission and the
16 Department of Juvenile Justice to make certain
17 expenditures to defray costs incurred by a
18 municipality or county as a result of opening a
19 facility of the commission or the department;
20 amending s. 212.20, F.S.; providing for use of
21 moneys allocated to the Solid Waste Management
22 Trust Fund; providing for certain counties to
23 use moneys received for aquatic weed control
24 for recycling purposes; amending s. 403.7095,
25 F.S.; revising the expiration date of the solid
26 waste management grant program; requiring a
27 specified level of funding for counties
28 receiving solid waste management and recycling
29 grants; providing for allocation of funds for
30 innovative programs to address recycling
31 practices and procedures; amending s. 110.1239,
3
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 F.S.; providing requirements for the funding of
2 the state group health insurance program;
3 amending s. 373.59, F.S.; requiring release of
4 certain moneys by the Secretary of
5 Environmental Protection to water management
6 districts, upon request; authorizing the
7 Administration Commission to approve exceptions
8 to state personnel, payroll, and benefit rules,
9 policies, and practices and exemptions from
10 certain statutory provisions relating to state
11 employees for a specified pilot project;
12 amending s. 259.032, F.S.; authorizing the
13 appropriation of certain funds in the
14 Conservation and Recreation Lands Trust Fund
15 for outdoor recreation grants; amending s. 86,
16 ch. 93-213, Laws of Florida, as amended;
17 deferring repayment requirements for certain
18 funding provided to the state NPDES program;
19 amending s. 110.205, F.S.; providing additional
20 exemptions from the Career Service System for
21 personnel in the Office of the Governor;
22 providing for employment rights and benefits of
23 pari-mutuel laboratory employees under certain
24 circumstances; amending s. 287.161, F.S.;
25 requiring the Department of Management Services
26 to charge all persons receiving transportation
27 from the executive aircraft pool a specified
28 rate; providing for deposit and use of such
29 fees; amending s. 259.032, F.S.; providing for
30 the use of Conservation and Recreation Lands
31 funds to manage additional lands; providing a
4
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 limitation on state agency land management
2 allocation; amending s. 403.1826, F.S.;
3 providing authority of the Department of
4 Environmental Protection to waive requirements
5 related to water pollution control and sewage
6 treatment grants; authorizing the Department of
7 Agriculture and Consumer Services to use
8 certain funds for expenses associated with its
9 administrative and regulatory powers and
10 duties; requiring the transfer of described
11 real property from the Board of Trustees of the
12 Internal Improvement Trust Fund to the
13 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
14 for sale by it; amending s. 110.12315, F.S.;
15 prescribing copayment amounts for prescriptions
16 for state employees; prescribing required
17 premiums and copayments for the state and
18 members of the state group insurance program;
19 amending s. 15.09, F.S.; authorizing the
20 appropriation of funds from the Public Access
21 Data Systems Trust Fund for the operations of
22 the Department of State; amending s. 253.034,
23 F.S.; authorizing the Department of
24 Transportation to sell certain property used by
25 the Department of Highway Safety and Motor
26 Vehicles; amending s. 334.0445, F.S.; revising
27 the expiration date for the model career
28 service classification and compensation plan;
29 relieving the City of Milton of certain
30 obligations with respect to designated road
31 construction projects; amending s. 216.181,
5
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 F.S.; authorizing the Department of
2 Transportation to transfer salary rate to the
3 turnpike budget entity to facilitate
4 transferring personnel to the turnpike
5 headquarters facility in Orange County;
6 providing for allocation of moneys provided for
7 workforce development and providing for budget
8 amendment when a program is moved; providing
9 for future repeal of various provisions;
10 authorizing the Governor to use certain funds
11 to complete infrastructure projects for job
12 retention; amending s. 240.3341, F.S.;
13 authorizing community colleges to lease their
14 incubator facilities for small business
15 concerns; amending s. 240.2605, F.S.; requiring
16 the Board of Regents to rank certain donations;
17 requiring presidents of universities in the
18 State University System to provide lists of
19 certain donations; requiring the Board of
20 Regents to rank such donations; authorizing use
21 of certain funds to match specified projects at
22 USF; authorizing the use of certain funds to
23 accomplish 5-year updates of campus master
24 plans; amending s. 235.014, F.S.; providing
25 guidance for the Commissioner of Education in
26 preparation of the fixed capital outlay budget
27 request; providing effect of veto of specific
28 appropriation or proviso to which implementing
29 language refers; providing applicability to
30 other legislation; providing performance
31 measures and standards for individual programs
6
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 within state agencies; providing that the
2 performance measures and standards are directly
3 linked to the appropriations made in the
4 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act, as
5 required by the Government Performance and
6 Accountability Act of 1994; providing
7 severability; providing an effective date.
8
9 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
10
11 Section 1. It is the intent of the Legislature that
12 the implementing and administering provisions of this act
13 apply to the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year
14 1999-2000.
15 Section 2. In order to implement Specific
16 Appropriations 345 through 356C of the 1999-2000 General
17 Appropriations Act, and notwithstanding section 394.908,
18 Florida Statutes, all funds in excess of Fiscal Year 1998-1999
19 appropriations are to be allocated based on equity except
20 those programs and funds specifically identified in clarifying
21 language in the General Appropriations Act. No district shall
22 receive an allocation of recurring funds that is less than its
23 initial approved operating budget plus any distributions of
24 lump sums for the state Fiscal Year 1998-1999.
25 Section 3. In order to implement Specific
26 Appropriation 268 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
27 subsection (3) of section 409.9115, Florida Statutes, 1998
28 Supplement, is amended to read:
29 409.9115 Disproportionate share program for mental
30 health hospitals.--The Agency for Health Care Administration
31 shall design and implement a system of making mental health
7
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 disproportionate share payments to hospitals that qualify for
2 disproportionate share payments under s. 409.911. This system
3 of payments shall conform with federal requirements and shall
4 distribute funds in each fiscal year for which an
5 appropriation is made by making quarterly Medicaid payments.
6 Notwithstanding s. 409.915, counties are exempt from
7 contributing toward the cost of this special reimbursement for
8 patients.
9 (3) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
10 Agency for Health Care Administration shall make payments for
11 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
12 hospitals on a monthly basis. If the amounts appropriated for
13 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
14 hospitals are increased or decreased during the fiscal year
15 pursuant to the requirements of chapter 216, the required
16 adjustment shall be prorated over the remaining payment
17 periods. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
18 Section 4. During the 1999-2000 fiscal year, the
19 Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the 1992-1993
20 disproportionate share formula, the 1989 audited financial
21 data, and the Medicaid per diem rate as of January 1, 1992,
22 for those hospitals that qualify for the hospital
23 disproportionate share program funded in Specific
24 Appropriation 243 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act.
25 This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
26 Section 5. In order to implement Specific
27 Appropriation 236 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
28 subsection (6) of section 409.9116, Florida Statutes, 1998
29 Supplement, is amended to read:
30 409.9116 Disproportionate share/financial assistance
31 program for rural hospitals.--In addition to the payments made
8
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 under s. 409.911, the Agency for Health Care Administration
2 shall administer a federally matched disproportionate share
3 program and a state-funded financial assistance program for
4 statutory rural hospitals. The agency shall make
5 disproportionate share payments to statutory rural hospitals
6 that qualify for such payments and financial assistance
7 payments to statutory rural hospitals that do not qualify for
8 disproportionate share payments. The disproportionate share
9 program payments shall be limited by and conform with federal
10 requirements. In fiscal year 1993-1994, available funds shall
11 be distributed in one payment, as soon as practicable after
12 the effective date of this act. In subsequent fiscal years,
13 funds shall be distributed quarterly in each fiscal year for
14 which an appropriation is made. Notwithstanding the provisions
15 of s. 409.915, counties are exempt from contributing toward
16 the cost of this special reimbursement for hospitals serving a
17 disproportionate share of low-income patients.
18 (6) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
19 Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the following
20 formula for distribution of the funds in Specific
21 Appropriation 236 240 of the 1999-2000 1998-1999 General
22 Appropriations Act for the disproportionate share/financial
23 assistance program for rural hospitals.
24 (a) The agency shall first determine a preliminary
25 payment amount for each rural hospital by allocating all
26 available state funds using the following formula:
27
28 PDAER = (TAERH x TARH)/STAERH
29
30 Where:
31
9
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 PDAER = preliminary distribution amount for each rural
2 hospital.
3 TAERH = total amount earned by each rural hospital.
4 TARH = total amount appropriated or distributed under
5 this section.
6 STAERH = sum of total amount earned by each rural
7 hospital.
8 (b) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
9 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
10 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (a).
11 (c) The state-funds-only payment amount is then
12 calculated for each hospital using the formula:
13
14 SFOER = Maximum value of (1) SFOL - PDAER or (2) 0
15
16 Where:
17 SFOER = state-funds-only payment amount for each rural
18 hospital.
19 SFOL = state-funds-only payment level, which is set at
20 4 percent of TARH.
21 (d) The adjusted total amount allocated to the rural
22 disproportionate share program shall then be calculated using
23 the following formula:
24
25 ATARH = (TARH - SSFOER)
26
27 Where:
28 ATARH = adjusted total amount appropriated or
29 distributed under this section.
30 SSFOER = sum of the state-funds-only payment amount
31 calculated under paragraph (c) for all rural hospitals.
10
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (e) The determination of the amount of rural
2 disproportionate share hospital funds is calculated by the
3 following formula:
4
5 TDAERH = [(TAERH x ATARH)/STAERH]
6
7 Where:
8 TDAERH = total distribution amount for each rural
9 hospital.
10 (f) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
11 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
12 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (e).
13 (g) State-funds-only payment amounts calculated under
14 paragraph (c) are then added to the results of paragraph (f)
15 to determine the total distribution amount for each rural
16 hospital.
17 (h) This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
18 Section 6. In order to implement Specific
19 Appropriations 292 through 425 and 445 through 540 of the
20 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act, paragraph (c) of
21 subsection (15) of section 216.181, Florida Statutes, 1998
22 Supplement, is amended to read:
23 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
24 capital outlay.--
25 (15)
26 (c) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
27 funds appropriated to the Department of Children and Family
28 Services in Specific Appropriations 292 293 through 425 446A
29 and the Department of Health in Specific Appropriations 445
30 466 through 540 555 of the 1999-2000 1998-1999 General
31 Appropriations Act may be advanced, unless specifically
11
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 prohibited in such General Appropriations Act, for those
2 contracted services that were approved for advancement by the
3 Comptroller in fiscal year 1993-1994, including those services
4 contracted on a fixed-price or unit cost basis. This
5 paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
6 Section 7. In order to implement Specific
7 Appropriation 243 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
8 and for the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the Agency for Health
9 Care Administration shall include health maintenance
10 organization recipients in the county billing for inpatient
11 hospital stays for the purpose of shared costs with counties
12 in accordance with the Florida Statutes. This section is
13 repealed on July 1, 2000.
14 Section 8. For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
15 Departments of Children and Family Services, Revenue, Labor
16 and Employment Security, and Health and the Agency for Health
17 Care Administration may transfer positions and general revenue
18 funds as necessary to comply with any provision of the
19 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act or WAGES Act which
20 requires or specifically authorizes the transfer of positions
21 and general revenue funds between these agencies. This section
22 is repealed on July 1, 2000.
23 Section 9. In order to implement Specific
24 Appropriation 372 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
25 subsection (1) of section 402.3015, Florida Statutes, is
26 amended to read:
27 402.3015 Subsidized child care program; purpose; fees;
28 contracts.--
29 (1) The purpose of the subsidized child care program
30 is to provide quality child care to enhance the development,
31 including language, cognitive, motor, social, and self-help
12
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 skills of children who are at risk of abuse or neglect and
2 children of low-income families, and to promote financial
3 self-sufficiency and life skills for the families of these
4 children, unless prohibited by federal law. Priority for
5 participation in the subsidized child care program shall be
6 accorded to children under 13 years of age who are:
7 (a) Determined to be at risk of abuse, neglect, or
8 exploitation and who are currently clients of the department's
9 Children and Families Services Program Office;
10 (b) Children at risk of welfare dependency, including
11 children of participants in the WAGES Program, children of
12 migrant farmworkers, children of teen parents, and children
13 from other families at risk of welfare dependency due to a
14 family income of less than 100 percent of the federal poverty
15 level; and
16 (c)1. Children of working families whose family income
17 is equal to or greater than 100 percent, but does not exceed
18 150 percent, of the federal poverty level.
19 2. For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, eligibility
20 under this paragraph may be expanded to children of working
21 families whose family income does not exceed 200 percent of
22 the federal poverty level and who are enrolled in the Child
23 Care Executive Partnership Program established in s. 409.178.
24 This subparagraph expires July 1, 2000.
25 Section 10. In order to implement Specific
26 Appropriations 420 through 425 of the 1999-2000 General
27 Appropriations Act, subsection (16) of section 216.181,
28 Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
29 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
30 capital outlay.--
31
13
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (16) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to
2 the contrary and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
3 the Department of Children and Family Services is authorized
4 to use operating funds budgeted for Developmental Services
5 Institutions for fixed capital outlay expenditures as needed
6 to bring any currently unlicensed beds up to Federal
7 Intermediate Care Facility for the Developmentally Disabled
8 licensure standards. This subsection is repealed on July 1,
9 2000 1999.
10 Section 11. In order to implement Specific
11 Appropriation 255 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
12 the Agency for Health Care Administration shall take any
13 necessary lawfully authorized action to ensure that total
14 expenditures for Medicaid transportation remain within the
15 amount budgeted in the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act.
16 In the event that the agency finds that it is impossible to
17 constrain Medicaid transportation expenditures to within the
18 budgeted amount, it shall notify the Legislature of this and
19 provide suggestions for statutory revisions necessary to
20 alleviate future deficits as well as a description of all
21 action taken under its current authority. This section is
22 repealed on July 1, 2000.
23 Section 12. In order to implement Specific
24 Appropriation 359E of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
25 Act, section 39.3065, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is
26 amended to read:
27 39.3065 Sheriffs of Pasco, Manatee, and Pinellas
28 Counties to provide child protective investigative services;
29 procedures; funding.--
30 (1) As described in this section, the Department of
31 Children and Family Services shall, by the end of fiscal year
14
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 1999-2000, transfer all responsibility for child protective
2 investigations for Pinellas County, Manatee County, and Pasco
3 County to the sheriff of that county in which the child abuse,
4 neglect, or abandonment is alleged to have occurred. Each
5 sheriff is responsible for the provision of all child
6 protective investigations in his or her county. Each
7 individual who provides these services must complete the
8 training provided to and required of protective investigators
9 employed by the Department of Children and Family Services.
10 (2) During fiscal year 1998-1999, the Department of
11 Children and Family Services and each sheriff's office shall
12 enter into a contract for the provision of these services.
13 Funding for the services will be appropriated to the
14 Department of Children and Family Services, and the department
15 shall transfer to the respective sheriffs for the duration of
16 fiscal year 1998-1999, funding for the investigative
17 responsibilities assumed by the sheriffs, including federal
18 funds that the provider is eligible for and agrees to earn and
19 that portion of general revenue funds which is currently
20 associated with the services that are being furnished under
21 contract, and including, but not limited to, funding for all
22 investigative, supervisory, and clerical positions; training;
23 all associated equipment; furnishings; and other fixed capital
24 items. The contract must specify whether the department will
25 continue to perform part or none of the child protective
26 investigations during the initial year. The sheriffs may
27 either conduct the investigations themselves or may, in turn,
28 subcontract with law enforcement officials or with properly
29 trained employees of private agencies to conduct
30 investigations related to neglect cases only. If such a
31 subcontract is awarded, the sheriff must take full
15
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 responsibility for any safety decision made by the
2 subcontractor and must immediately respond with law
3 enforcement staff to any situation that requires removal of a
4 child due to a condition that poses an immediate threat to the
5 child's life. The contract must specify whether the services
6 are to be performed by departmental employees or by persons
7 determined by the sheriff. During this initial year, the
8 department is responsible for quality assurance, and the
9 department retains the responsibility for the performance of
10 all child protective investigations. The department must
11 identify any barriers to transferring the entire
12 responsibility for child protective services to the sheriffs'
13 offices and must pursue avenues for removing any such barriers
14 by means including, but not limited to, applying for federal
15 waivers. By January 15, 1999, the department shall submit to
16 the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of
17 Representatives, and the chairs of the Senate and House
18 committees that oversee departmental activities a report that
19 describes any remaining barriers, including any that pertain
20 to funding and related administrative issues. Unless the
21 Legislature, on the basis of that report or other pertinent
22 information, acts to block a transfer of the entire
23 responsibility for child protective investigations to the
24 sheriffs' offices, the sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee
25 County, and Pinellas County, beginning in fiscal year
26 1999-2000, shall assume the entire responsibility for such
27 services, as provided in subsection (3).
28 (3)(a) Beginning in fiscal year 1999-2000, the
29 sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas County
30 have the responsibility to provide all child protective
31 investigations in their respective counties.
16
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (b) The sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and
2 Pinellas County shall operate, at a minimum, in accordance
3 with the performance standards established by the Legislature
4 for protective investigations conducted by the Department of
5 Children and Family Services.
6 (c) Funds for providing child protective
7 investigations in Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas
8 County must be identified in the annual appropriation made to
9 the Department of Children and Family Services, which shall
10 award grants for the full amount identified to the respective
11 sheriffs' offices. Funds for the child protective
12 investigations may not be integrated into the sheriffs'
13 regular budgets. Budgetary data and other data relating to the
14 performance of child protective investigations must be
15 maintained separately from all other records of the sheriffs'
16 offices.
17 (d) Program performance evaluation shall be based on
18 criteria mutually agreed upon by the respective sheriffs and a
19 committee of seven persons appointed by the Governor and
20 selected from those persons serving on the Department of
21 Children and Family Services District 5 Health and Human
22 Services Board and District 6 Health and Human Services Board.
23 Two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of Pasco
24 County, two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of
25 Manatee County, and two of the Governor's appointees must be
26 residents of Pinellas County. Such appointees shall serve at
27 the pleasure of the Governor. The individuals appointed must
28 have demonstrated experience in outcome evaluation, social
29 service areas of protective investigation, or child welfare
30 supervision. The committee shall submit an annual report
31 regarding quality performance, outcome-measure attainment and
17
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 cost efficiency, to the President of the Senate, the Speaker
2 of the House of Representatives, and to the Governor no later
3 than January 31 of each year the sheriffs are receiving
4 general appropriations to provide child protective
5 investigations.
6 (4) For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the Sheriff of
7 Broward County shall perform the same child protective
8 investigative services according to the same standards as are
9 performed by the sheriffs of Pinellas County, Manatee County,
10 and Pasco County under this section. This subsection expires
11 July 1, 2000.
12 Section 13. (1) In order to implement Specific
13 Appropriation 363B of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
14 Act, all Healthy Families Florida contracted service providers
15 shall:
16 (a) Present the following disclaimer both orally and
17 in writing at the initial contact with the
18 parent: "Participation in the Healthy Families Program is
19 voluntary. You are not required to answer any questions other
20 than those required for birth registration and you have the
21 right to decline participation in the program at any time."
22 (b) Furnish, at the participant's request, a copy of
23 all documentation concerning services provided to the
24 participant, including applications and assessments. The
25 private, nonprofit corporation and other applicable service
26 providers shall dispose of all records or documents relating
27 to that individual 5 years after termination from the program.
28 (2) No information other than the name, date of birth,
29 social security number, zip code, and county of residence of
30 participants and their children may be forwarded from the
31 private, nonprofit corporation or other service provider to
18
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 the Department of Children and Family Services. This
2 information is to be used for evaluation purposes only. No
3 individual participant data may be forwarded to the National
4 Committee to Prevent Child Abuse or any other organization
5 collecting and recording such information.
6 (3) This section expires July 1, 2000.
7 Section 14. For the purpose of implementing Specific
8 Appropriation 260 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
9 paragraph (c) of subsection (3) of section 409.912, Florida
10 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
11 409.912 Cost-effective purchasing of health care.--The
12 agency shall purchase goods and services for Medicaid
13 recipients in the most cost-effective manner consistent with
14 the delivery of quality medical care. The agency shall
15 maximize the use of prepaid per capita and prepaid aggregate
16 fixed-sum basis services when appropriate and other
17 alternative service delivery and reimbursement methodologies,
18 including competitive bidding pursuant to s. 287.057, designed
19 to facilitate the cost-effective purchase of a case-managed
20 continuum of care. The agency shall also require providers to
21 minimize the exposure of recipients to the need for acute
22 inpatient, custodial, and other institutional care and the
23 inappropriate or unnecessary use of high-cost services.
24 (3) The agency may contract with:
25 (c)1. A federally qualified health center or an entity
26 owned by one or more federally qualified health centers or an
27 entity owned by other migrant and community health centers
28 receiving non-Medicaid financial support from the Federal
29 Government to provide health care services on a prepaid or
30 fixed-sum basis to recipients. Such prepaid health care
31 services entity must be licensed under parts I and III of
19
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 chapter 641 by January 1, 1998, but shall be prohibited from
2 serving Medicaid recipients on a prepaid basis, until such
3 licensure has been obtained. However, such an entity is
4 exempt from s. 641.225 if the entity meets the requirements
5 specified in subsections (14) and (15).
6 2. Until March 1, 2000, only, the licensure
7 requirements under parts I and III of chapter 641 shall not
8 apply to a federally qualified health center, an entity owned
9 by one or more federally qualified health centers, or an
10 entity owned by other migrant and community health centers
11 receiving non-Medicaid financial support from the Federal
12 Government to provide health care services on a prepaid or
13 fixed-sum basis to recipients. These entities are not
14 prohibited from serving Medicaid recipients on a prepaid
15 basis. This subparagraph expires March 1, 2000.
16 Section 15. In order to implement Specific
17 Appropriation 261 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
18 subsection (13) of section 409.912, Florida Statutes, 1998
19 Supplement, is amended to read:
20 409.912 Cost-effective purchasing of health care.--The
21 agency shall purchase goods and services for Medicaid
22 recipients in the most cost-effective manner consistent with
23 the delivery of quality medical care. The agency shall
24 maximize the use of prepaid per capita and prepaid aggregate
25 fixed-sum basis services when appropriate and other
26 alternative service delivery and reimbursement methodologies,
27 including competitive bidding pursuant to s. 287.057, designed
28 to facilitate the cost-effective purchase of a case-managed
29 continuum of care. The agency shall also require providers to
30 minimize the exposure of recipients to the need for acute
31
20
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 inpatient, custodial, and other institutional care and the
2 inappropriate or unnecessary use of high-cost services.
3 (13)(a) The agency shall identify health care
4 utilization and price patterns within the Medicaid program
5 which are not cost-effective or medically appropriate and
6 assess the effectiveness of new or alternate methods of
7 providing and monitoring service, and may implement such
8 methods as it considers appropriate. Such methods may include
9 disease management initiatives, an integrated and systematic
10 approach for managing the health care needs of recipients who
11 are at risk of or diagnosed with a specific disease by using
12 best practices, prevention strategies, clinical-practice
13 improvement, clinical interventions and protocols, outcomes
14 research, information technology, and other tools and
15 resources to reduce overall costs and improve measurable
16 outcomes.
17 (b) The responsibility of the agency under this
18 subsection shall include the development of capabilities to
19 identify actual and optimal practice patterns; patient and
20 provider educational initiatives; methods for determining
21 patient compliance with prescribed treatments; fraud, waste,
22 and abuse prevention and detection programs; and beneficiary
23 case management programs.
24 1. The practice pattern identification program shall
25 evaluate practitioner prescribing patterns based on national
26 and regional practice guidelines, comparing practitioners to
27 their peer groups. The agency and its Drug Utilization Review
28 Board shall consult with a panel of practicing health care
29 professionals appointed by the director of the agency,
30 consisting of six physicians licensed under chapter 458 or
31 chapter 459, two pharmacists licensed under chapter 465, and
21
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 one dentist licensed under chapter 466 who is an oral surgeon.
2 The advisory panel shall be responsible for evaluating
3 treatment guidelines and recommending ways to incorporate
4 their use in the practice pattern identification program.
5 Practitioners who are prescribing specific drugs
6 inappropriately or inefficiently, according to the practice
7 guidelines, may have their prescribing of only those drugs
8 subject to prior authorization after an appropriate education
9 intervention and opportunity to correct inappropriate
10 prescribing by the practitioner.
11 2. The agency shall also develop educational
12 interventions designed to promote the proper use of
13 medications by providers and beneficiaries.
14 3. The agency shall implement a pharmacy fraud, waste,
15 and abuse initiative that may include a surety bond or letter
16 of credit requirement for participating pharmacies, enhanced
17 provider auditing practices, the use of additional fraud and
18 abuse software, recipient management programs for
19 beneficiaries inappropriately using their benefits, and other
20 steps that will eliminate provider and recipient fraud, waste,
21 and abuse. The initiative shall address enforcement efforts
22 to reduce the number and use of counterfeit prescriptions.
23 4. The agency may apply for any federal waivers needed
24 to implement this paragraph.
25 5. This paragraph expires July 1, 2000.
26 Section 16. In order to implement Specific
27 Appropriation 490 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
28 subsection (3) is added to section 287.084, Florida Statutes,
29 to read:
30 287.084 Preference to Florida businesses.--
31
22
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (3) For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only,
2 notwithstanding any statutory authority or adopted local
3 government policy under which the Glades School District
4 operates, the district is hereby authorized to give
5 consideration to Florida vendors in the issuance of a request
6 for proposal for a pilot program for telemedicine within the
7 district. This subsection expires July 1, 2000.
8 Section 17. In order to implement Specific
9 Appropriation 243 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
10 it is the intent of the Legislature to evaluate the
11 implications of removing the Medicaid county ceiling and
12 individual provider target reimbursement rate caps for the
13 state's teaching and specialty hospitals. The Senate Budget
14 Committee, the Senate Health, Aging and Long-term Care
15 Committee, the House of Representatives Fiscal Responsibility
16 Council, and the House of Representatives Health Care Services
17 Committee shall analyze the short-term and long-term public
18 policy and cost implications of implementing the removal of
19 such Medicaid caps. The report shall consider all direct and
20 ancillary costs associated with outpatient services provided
21 by teaching and specialty hospitals. Any potential increase in
22 Medicaid fee-for-service reimbursement resulting from the
23 removal of these rate limitations shall be excluded in the
24 calculation of rates paid to Medicaid HMOs and prepaid
25 clinics. The report shall be presented to the President of the
26 Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by
27 September 1, 1999. This section expires July 1, 2000.
28 Section 18. In order to implement Specific
29 Appropriation 276 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act:
30 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1)
31 of section 409.9071, Florida Statutes, billing agent
23
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 consulting services shall not be considered billing agent
2 services. This subsection expires February 14, 2000.
3 (2) Notwithstanding subsections (5) and (6) of section
4 409.9071, Florida Statutes, and subject to federal approval,
5 the agency shall develop a reimbursement schedule based on
6 actual costs specific to school-based services which is based
7 on the federal rehabilitative services option. Subject to
8 federal approval, retroactive reimbursements for services as
9 specified in section 236.0812, Florida Statutes, shall be in
10 accordance with federal laws. This subsection expires July 1,
11 2000.
12 Section 19. In order to implement Specific
13 Appropriations 973, 982, 987, and 993 of the 1999-2000 General
14 Appropriations Act, subsection (17) of section 216.181,
15 Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
16 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
17 capital outlay.--
18 (17) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
19 section to the contrary, and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999
20 fiscal year only, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement
21 may transfer up to 20 positions and associated budget between
22 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
23 throughout each transfer. The department may also transfer up
24 to 10 percent of the initial approved salary rate between
25 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
26 throughout each transfer. The department must provide notice
27 to the Executive Office of the Governor, the chair of the
28 Senate Budget Ways and Means Committee, and the chair of the
29 House Committee on Criminal Justice Appropriations for all
30 transfers of positions or salary rate. This subsection is
31 repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
24
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 Section 20. Consistent with the provisions of section
2 216.163, Florida Statutes, in accordance with
3 performance-based program budgeting requirements, and
4 notwithstanding the provisions of section 216.181, Florida
5 Statutes, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement may
6 transfer up to one-half of 1 percent of the funds in Specific
7 Appropriations 973, 982, 987, and 993 of the 1999-2000 General
8 Appropriations Act for lump-sum salary bonuses for
9 departmental employees at the discretion of the executive
10 director, provided that such bonuses are given only to
11 selected employees for meritorious performance, instead of
12 being given as across-the-board bonuses for all employees. The
13 department, after consultation with the Executive Office of
14 the Governor, shall provide a plan to the chair of the House
15 Fiscal Responsibility Council and to the chair of the Senate
16 Budget Committee for approval before awarding such bonuses.
17 This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
18 Section 21. In order to implement Specific
19 Appropriation 573 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
20 the Correctional Privatization Commission and the Department
21 of Juvenile Justice may expend appropriated funds to assist in
22 defraying the costs of impacts that are incurred by a
23 municipality or county and associated with opening a facility
24 under the authority of the Correctional Privatization
25 Commission or a facility under the authority of the Department
26 of Juvenile Justice which is located within that municipality
27 or county. The amount that is to be paid under this section
28 for any facility may not exceed 1 percent of the facility
29 construction cost, less building impact fees imposed by the
30 municipality, or by the county if the facility is located in
31
25
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 the unincorporated portion of the county. This section is
2 repealed on July 1, 2000.
3 Section 22. In order to implement Specific
4 Appropriations 1185 and 1189 of the 1999-2000 General
5 Appropriations Act, subsection (7) of section 212.20, Florida
6 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
7 212.20 Funds collected, disposition; additional powers
8 of department; operational expense; refund of taxes
9 adjudicated unconstitutionally collected.--
10 (7) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, the
11 use of funds allocated to the Solid Waste Management Trust
12 Fund shall be as provided in the General Appropriations Act.
13 There is transferred $15.5 $11.2 million for surface water
14 improvement and management projects and $10 $8 million for the
15 aquatic weed control program from revenues provided by this
16 section. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
17 Section 23. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriations 1274 and 1276 of the 1999-2000 General
19 Appropriations Act, counties receiving funds for aquatic weed
20 control as provided by section 212.20(7), Florida Statutes,
21 may use these funds for recycling purposes. This authorization
22 expires June 30, 2000.
23 Section 24. In order to implement Specific
24 Appropriations 1274 and 1276 of the 1999-2000 General
25 Appropriations Act, subsections (8) and (9) of section
26 403.7095, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, are amended to
27 read:
28 403.7095 Solid waste management grant program.--
29 (8) For fiscal year 1999-2000 1998-1999, the
30 department shall provide counties with populations under
31 100,000 with at least 80 percent of the level of funding they
26
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 received in fiscal year 1997-1998 for solid waste management
2 and recycling grants.
3 (9) For fiscal year 1999-2000 1998-1999, the
4 department shall provide 10 percent of the total funds
5 available after the requirements of subsection (8) are met for
6 recycling grants available to all counties on a competitive
7 basis for innovative programs. The department may consider one
8 or more of the following criteria in determining whether a
9 grant proposal is innovative:
10 (a) Demonstrate advanced technologies or processes.
11 (b) Collect and recycle materials targeted by the
12 department.
13 (c) Demonstrate substantial improvement in program
14 cost-effectiveness and efficiency as measured against
15 statewide average costs for the same or similar programs.
16 (d) Demonstrate transferability of technology and
17 processes used in program.
18 (e) Demonstrate and implement multicounty or regional
19 recycling programs.
20 Section 25. In order to implement Specific
21 Appropriation 1535A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
22 Act, section 110.1239, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is
23 amended to read:
24 110.1239 State group health insurance program
25 funding.--For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only, it is
26 the intent of the Legislature that the state group health
27 insurance program be managed, administered, operated, and
28 funded in such a manner as to maximize the protection of state
29 employee health insurance benefits. Inherent in this intent is
30 the recognition that the health insurance liabilities
31
27
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 attributable to the benefits offered state employees should be
2 fairly, orderly, and equitably funded. Accordingly:
3 (1) The division shall determine the level of premiums
4 necessary to fully fund the state group health insurance
5 program for the next fiscal year. Such determination shall be
6 made after each revenue estimating conference on health
7 insurance as provided in s. 216.136(1), but not later than
8 December 1 and April 1 of each fiscal year.
9 (2) The Governor, in the Governor's recommended
10 budget, shall provide premium rates necessary for full funding
11 of the state group health insurance program, and the
12 Legislature shall provide in the General Appropriations Act
13 for a premium level necessary for full funding of the state
14 group health insurance program.
15 (3) For purposes of funding, any additional
16 appropriation amounts allocated to the state group health
17 insurance program by the Legislature shall be considered as a
18 state contribution and thus an increase in the state premiums.
19 (4) This section is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
20 Section 26. In order to implement Specific
21 Appropriation 1205 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
22 Act, subsection (17) of section 373.59, Florida Statutes, 1998
23 Supplement, is amended to read:
24 373.59 Water Management Lands Trust Fund.--
25 (17) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to
26 the contrary and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
27 the governing board of a water management district may
28 request, and the Secretary of Environmental Protection shall
29 release upon such request, moneys allocated to the districts
30 pursuant to subsection (8) for the purpose of carrying out the
31 provisions of ss. 373.451-373.4595. In addition, for the
28
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the governing boards of the
2 Northwest Florida Water Management District and Suwannee River
3 Water Management District may request, and the Secretary of
4 the Department of Environmental Protection shall release upon
5 such request, moneys allocated to the districts pursuant to
6 subsection (8) for the purpose of carrying out the provisions
7 of ss. 373.0361 and 373.0831. No funds may be used pursuant
8 to this subsection until necessary debt service obligations
9 and requirements for payments in lieu of taxes that may be
10 required pursuant to this section are provided for. This
11 subsection expires is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
12 Section 27. For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
13 Administration Commission may approve exceptions to the
14 state's personnel, payroll, and benefit rules, policies, and
15 practices and may approve exemptions from:
16 (1) Statutory provisions relating to state employment
17 in chapter 110, Florida Statutes;
18 (2) Statutory provisions relating to state employees
19 in parts I and II of chapter 112, Florida Statutes; and
20 (3) Salary rate and position control provisions in ss.
21 216.181, 216.251, and 216.262, Florida Statutes, 1998
22 Supplement.
23
24 Such exceptions and exemptions may only be approved in order
25 to take advantage of or to demonstrate the best practices
26 inherent in purchased commercial off-the-shelf software for
27 human resources, payroll, and benefits and shall be granted
28 only after review and approval by those agencies whose
29 statutory responsibilities or rule requirements are affected.
30 The Administration Commission shall follow the notice, review,
31 and exception procedures set forth in s. 216.177(2), Florida
29
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 Statutes, and public employee collective bargaining agreements
2 established pursuant to s. 447.309, Florida Statutes, prior to
3 granting an exception or exemption. Exceptions and exemptions
4 under this section are limited to only those organizations
5 selected by the Florida Financial Management Information
6 System Coordinating Council to serve as pilot sites in the
7 proof-of-concept pilot project authorized in Specific
8 Appropriation 1535 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
9 Act. This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
10 Section 28. In order to implement Specific
11 Appropriation 1326 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
12 Act, subsection (15) of section 259.032, Florida Statutes,
13 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
14 259.032 Conservation and Recreation Lands Trust Fund;
15 purpose.--
16 (15) For fiscal year 1999-2000 1998-1999 only, moneys
17 credited to the fund may be appropriated to provide grants to
18 qualified local governmental entities pursuant to the
19 provisions of s. 375.075. This subsection is repealed on July
20 1, 2000 1999.
21 Section 29. In order to implement Specific
22 Appropriations 1210, 1212, 1222, and 1223B of the 1999-2000
23 General Appropriations Act, section 86 of chapter 93-213, Laws
24 of Florida, as amended by section 28 of chapter 98-46, Laws of
25 Florida, is amended to read:
26 Section 86. The Department of Environmental Regulation
27 is authorized 54 career service positions for administering
28 the state NPDES program. Twenty-five career service positions
29 are authorized for startup of the program beginning July 1,
30 1993, and the remaining 29 career service positions beginning
31 January 1, 1994. The state NPDES program staffing shall start
30
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 July 1, 1993, with completion targeted for 6 months following
2 United States Environmental Protection Agency authorization to
3 administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
4 program. Implementation of positions is subject to review and
5 final approval by the secretary of the Department of
6 Environmental Regulation. The sum of $3.2 million is hereby
7 appropriated from the Pollution Recovery Trust Fund to cover
8 program startup costs. For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only,
9 such funds need not be repaid.
10 Section 30. For the purpose of implementing Specific
11 Appropriation 1656 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
12 Act, paragraph (k) of subsection (2) of section 110.205,
13 Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
14 110.205 Career service; exemptions.--
15 (2) EXEMPT POSITIONS.--The exempt positions which are
16 not covered by this part include the following, provided that
17 no position, except for positions established for a limited
18 period of time pursuant to paragraph (h), shall be exempted if
19 the position reports to a position in the career service:
20 (k)1. All officers and employees in the office of the
21 Governor, including all employees at the Governor's mansion,
22 and employees within each separate budget entity, as defined
23 in chapter 216, assigned to the Governor. Unless otherwise
24 fixed by law, the salary and benefits of these positions shall
25 be set by the department as follows:
26 a.1. The chief of staff, the assistant or deputy chief
27 of staff, general counsel, Director of Legislative Affairs,
28 inspector general, Director of Cabinet Affairs, Director of
29 Press Relations, Director of Planning and Budgeting, director
30 of administration, director of state-federal relations, and
31 chief prosecutor of the statewide grand jury, and the director
31
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 of each separate budget entity shall have their salaries and
2 benefits established by the department in accordance with the
3 rules of the Senior Management Service.
4 b.2. The salaries and benefits of positions not
5 established in sub-subparagraph a. subparagraph 1. shall be
6 set by the employing agency. Salaries and benefits of
7 employees whose professional training is comparable to that of
8 licensed professionals under paragraph (q), or whose
9 administrative responsibility is comparable to a bureau chief
10 shall be set by the Selected Exempt Service. The department
11 shall make the comparability determinations. Other employees
12 shall have benefits set as if career service employees.
13 2. For the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, all officers
14 and employees in the office of the Governor, including all
15 employees at the Governor's mansion, and employees within each
16 separate budget entity, as defined in chapter 216, assigned to
17 the Governor. Unless otherwise fixed by law, the salary and
18 benefits of these positions shall be set by the department as
19 follows:
20 a. The chief of staff, the assistant or deputy chief
21 of staff, general counsel, Director of Legislative Affairs,
22 chief inspector general, Director of Cabinet Affairs, Director
23 of Press Relations, Director of Planning and Budgeting,
24 director of administration, director of state-federal
25 relations, Director of Appointments, Director of External
26 Affairs, Deputy General Counsel, Governor's Liaison for
27 Community Development, Chief of Staff Lieutenant Governor,
28 Deputy Director of Planning and Budgeting, policy
29 coordinators, and the director of each separate budget entity
30 shall have their salaries and benefits established by the
31
32
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 department in accordance with the rules of the Senior
2 Management Service.
3 b. The salaries and benefits of positions not
4 established in sub-subparagraph a. shall be set by the
5 employing agency. Salaries and benefits of employees whose
6 professional training is comparable to that of licensed
7 professionals under paragraph (q), or whose administrative
8 responsibility is comparable to a bureau chief shall be set by
9 the Selected Exempt Service. The department shall make the
10 comparability determinations. Other employees shall have
11 benefits set comparable to legislative staff, except that
12 leave shall be comparable to career service.
13 c. This subparagraph expires July 1, 2000.
14 Section 31. In order to implement Specific
15 Appropriation 1617 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
16 Act:
17 (1) For purposes of this section, "eligible employee"
18 means any employee of the University of Florida College of
19 Veterinary Medicine Pari-mutuel Laboratory on June 30, 1999,
20 who had permanent status in the Career Service System on June
21 30, 1997, as an employee of the Department of Business and
22 Professional Regulation in the Pari-mutuel Laboratory and who
23 subsequently transferred to the State University System during
24 the 1997-1998 fiscal year.
25 (2) If the laboratory is relocated to Gainesville and
26 the eligible employee is no longer employed by the state, the
27 eligible employee may hold applicable sick and annual leave
28 balances inactive without automatic payout for a period of 1
29 year from the effective date of termination of state
30 employment, until the effective date of other state employment
31 or the effective date of private employment, whichever is
33
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 earlier. At that time, the leave balances shall be transferred
2 to the eligible employee's account or paid to the employee
3 pursuant to applicable law and rules.
4 (3) An eligible employee may elect to participate in
5 the new employer's sick leave pool immediately upon
6 commencement of employment if such employee participated in
7 the University of Florida's sick leave pool during the year
8 immediately preceding termination of employment. No eligible
9 employee shall be required to make an initial donation or
10 additional donation of sick leave as a condition of
11 participation in an agency sick leave pool for a period of 1
12 year.
13 (4) Eligible employees shall be given preference, if
14 qualified, for similar employment within the Career Service
15 System or the State University System. The Department of
16 Management Services shall assist eligible employees in
17 identifying similar employment opportunities and determining
18 position eligibility. The department shall also assist
19 eligible employees with resume writing preparation and career
20 counseling training.
21 (5) Eligible employees reemployed by the Department of
22 Business and Professional Regulation by June 30, 2000, shall
23 retain all retention points earned during prior employment
24 with the agency, plus the retention points the eligible
25 employee would have accrued had the operation of the
26 pari-mutuel laboratory not been transferred from the agency.
27 (6) This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
28 Section 32. In order to implement Specific
29 Appropriations 1928 through 1931 of the 1999-2000 General
30 Appropriations Act, subsection (4) of section 287.161, Florida
31 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
34
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 287.161 Executive aircraft pool; assignment of
2 aircraft; charge for transportation.--
3 (4) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections
4 (2) and (3) and for the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
5 the Department of Management Services shall charge all persons
6 receiving transportation from the executive aircraft pool a
7 rate not less than the mileage allowance fixed by the
8 Legislature for the use of privately owned vehicles. Fees
9 collected for persons traveling by aircraft in the executive
10 aircraft pool shall be deposited into the Bureau of Aircraft
11 Trust Fund and shall be expended for costs incurred to operate
12 the aircraft management activities of the department. It is
13 the intent of the Legislature that the executive aircraft pool
14 be operated on a full cost recovery basis, less available
15 funds. This subsection expires is repealed on July 1, 2000
16 1999.
17 Section 33. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriations 1038D, 1038E, 1038F, 1038K, 1038L, 1368A,
19 1368D, 1370, 1379, 1382B, 1382C, 1382D, 1382E, 1383, 1384, and
20 1397D of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act, paragraph
21 (b) of subsection (11) of section 259.032, Florida Statutes,
22 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
23 259.032 Conservation and Recreation Lands Trust Fund;
24 purpose.--
25 (11)
26 (b) An amount up to 1.5 percent of the cumulative
27 total of funds ever deposited into the Florida Preservation
28 2000 Trust Fund shall be made available for the purposes of
29 management, maintenance, and capital improvements, and for
30 associated contractual services, for lands acquired pursuant
31 to this section and s. 259.101 to which title is vested in the
35
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 board of trustees and other conservation and recreation lands
2 managed by a state agency. Each agency with management
3 responsibilities shall annually request from the Legislature
4 funds sufficient to fulfill such responsibilities. Capital
5 improvements shall include, but need not be limited to,
6 perimeter fencing, signs, firelanes, access roads and trails,
7 and minimal public accommodations, such as primitive
8 campsites, garbage receptacles, and toilets. Any equipment
9 purchased with funds provided pursuant to this paragraph may
10 be used for the purposes provided in this paragraph on any
11 conservation and recreation lands managed by a state agency.
12 Section 34. In order to implement Specific
13 Appropriation 1243 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
14 Act, subsection (6) of section 403.1826, Florida Statutes, is
15 amended to read:
16 403.1826 Grants, requirements for eligibility.--
17 (6)(a) A grant may not be made unless the local
18 governmental agency assures the department of the proper and
19 efficient operation and maintenance of the project after
20 construction. Revenue sufficient to ensure that the facility
21 will be self-supporting shall be generated from sources which
22 include, but are not limited to, service charges and
23 connection fees. The revenue generated shall provide for
24 financing future sanitary sewerage capital improvements. The
25 grantee shall accumulate, during the design life of the
26 grant-funded project, moneys in an amount equivalent to the
27 grant amount adjusted for inflationary cost increases.
28 (b) The department may waive this accumulation
29 requirement for up to 5 years for a grantee, in a county as
30 defined by s. 125.011(1), which certifies to the department's
31 satisfaction that an equivalent amount of money will be used,
36
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 above the required amounts, to pay outstanding obligations
2 resulting from improvements to the system. This paragraph
3 expires July 1, 2000.
4 Section 35. In order to implement Specific
5 Appropriation 1038A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
6 Act, and notwithstanding the provisions of sections
7 496.405(4)(c), 496.409(7), 496.410(15), and 496.419(9),
8 Florida Statutes, the moneys received and deposited into the
9 General Inspection Trust Fund may be used by the Department of
10 Agriculture and Consumer Services to defray the expenses of
11 the department in the discharge of any and all of its
12 administrative and regulatory powers and duties as prescribed
13 by law. This section expires July 1, 2000.
14 Section 36. In order to implement Specific
15 Appropriation 1038A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
16 Act, the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust
17 Fund's property described as: Lot 4, (less the east 12 feet
18 thereof) and all of Lots 5 and 6, Block M, TINKER HEIGHTS,
19 according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book M, page
20 93, Public Records of Orange County, Florida, shall be deeded,
21 by quitclaim deed, on or before September 1, 1999, to the
22 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
23 Notwithstanding the provisions of chapters 253 and 259,
24 Florida Statutes, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer
25 Services is directed to sell, in accordance with section
26 255.25001, Florida Statutes, such property for no less than
27 the property's appraised value. All proceeds from this sale
28 shall be deposited in the General Inspection Trust Fund of the
29 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and may be
30 appropriated for the acquisition of property for and
31 construction of an Agricultural Regional Office Center, to be
37
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 located in Polk County, Florida. The purchase of property by
2 the Department of Agriculture and consumer Services shall
3 follow the requirements of section 253.025, Florida Statutes.
4 This section expires July 1, 2000.
5 Section 37. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriation 1535A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
7 Act, subsection (4) is added to section 110.12315, Florida
8 Statutes, to read:
9 110.12315 Prescription drug program.--
10 (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (1)
11 and (2), under the state employees' prescription drug program,
12 effective October 1, 1999, copayments must be made as follows:
13 (a) Twenty-dollar copayment for brand name drug with
14 card;
15 (b) Seven-dollar copayment for generic drug with card;
16 (c) Seven-dollar copayment for generic mail order
17 drug;
18 (d) Twenty-dollar copayment for brand name mail order
19 drug.
20
21 This subsection expires July 1, 2000.
22 Section 38. In order to implement Specific
23 Appropriation 1535A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
24 Act, the following premium and copayments are required:
25 (1) Effective October 1, 1999, the state share of the
26 State Group Health Insurance Plan premiums and the state share
27 of the health maintenance organization premiums for the
28 Executive Branch, Legislative Branch, and Judicial Branch
29 agencies shall be $191.52 per month for individual coverage
30 and $391.60 per month for family coverage.
31
38
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (2) Effective October 1, 1999, the employee share of
2 health insurance premiums shall increase to $32.30 per month
3 for individual coverage and $116.20 per month for family
4 coverage.
5 (3) Under the State Health Insurance Program, the
6 copayments for physician office visits with health maintenance
7 organizations shall increase from $5 to $10, effective October
8 1, 1999. In addition, copayments for prescription drugs with
9 health maintenance organizations shall increase effective
10 October 1, 1999, as follows:
11 (a) Copayment for brand name drugs shall increase from
12 $10 to $20;
13 (b) Copayment for generic drugs shall increase from $5
14 to $7.
15 (4) This section expires July 1, 2000.
16 Section 39. In order to implement Specific
17 Appropriations 2037 through 2096A of the 1999-2000 General
18 Appropriations Act, paragraph (b) of subsection (5) of section
19 15.09, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
20 15.09 Fees.--
21 (5)
22 (b) For the 1999-2000 1998-1999 fiscal year only,
23 funds from the Public Access Data Systems Trust Fund may be
24 appropriated for the operations of the department. This
25 paragraph expires is repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
26 Section 40. In order to implement Specific
27 Appropriations 1412-1529 of the 1999-2000 General
28 Appropriations Act, subsection (9) of section 253.034, Florida
29 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
30 253.034 State-owned lands; uses.--
31
39
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (9) Notwithstanding any provision of this section or
2 s. 253.111 to the contrary, the Department of Transportation
3 may sell, at fair market value, the following described state
4 real property utilized by the Department of Highway Safety and
5 Motor Vehicles:
6
7 From the NW Corner of Section 28 Township 22
8 South, Range 30 East, run North 89 degrees 21
9 minutes 24 seconds East 1900 feet; thence run
10 South 0 degrees 38 minutes 36 seconds East
11 59.45 feet for a point of beginning, said point
12 being on the Southerly right-of-way line of
13 State Highway No. 50; thence South 0 degrees 38
14 minutes 36 seconds East 525.41 feet; thence
15 North 66 degrees 42 minutes 09 seconds East 390
16 feet more or less to the waters edge of Lake
17 Barton; thence run Northerly along the waters
18 edge of Lake Barton to the North line of said
19 Section 28; thence run South 89 degrees 21
20 minutes 24 seconds West along the North line of
21 said Section 28, to a 4-inch concrete monument
22 on the Southerly right-of-way line of State
23 Road No. 50, being North 89 degrees 21 minutes
24 24 seconds East 2315.27 feet from the NW Corner
25 of said Section 28; thence run Westerly 419.59
26 feet along the arc of a 0 degree 44 minutes 25
27 seconds curve concave to the Northwesterly,
28 (having a central angle of 3 degrees 6 minutes
29 22 seconds, the long chord bearing South 81
30 degrees 08 minutes 37 seconds West 419.50 feet)
31 to the point of beginning. All of the above
40
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 described land being in the NE 1/4 of the NW
2 1/4 of said Section 28, Orange County,
3 Florida.
4
5 Proceeds from the sale shall be deposited in the State
6 Transportation Trust Fund. The Board of Trustees of the
7 Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall execute and deliver a
8 deed of conveyance for the purpose of carrying into effect a
9 contract or agreement of sale. This subsection expires is
10 repealed on July 1, 2000 1999.
11 Section 41. In order to implement Specific
12 Appropriations 1412 through 1529 of the 1999-2000 General
13 Appropriations Act, subsection (1) of section 334.0445,
14 Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, is amended to read:
15 334.0445 Model career service classification and
16 compensation plan.--
17 (1) Effective July 1, 1994, the Legislature grants to
18 the Department of Transportation in consultation with the
19 Department of Management Services, the Executive Office of the
20 Governor, legislative appropriations committees, legislative
21 personnel committees, and the affected certified bargaining
22 unions, the authority on a pilot basis to develop and
23 implement a model career service classification and
24 compensation system. Such system shall be developed for use by
25 all state agencies. Authorization for this program will be
26 through June 30, 2000 for 3 fiscal years beginning July 1,
27 1994, and ending June 30, 1997; however, the department may
28 elect or be directed by the Legislature to return to the
29 current system at anytime during this period if the model
30 system does not meet the stated goals and objectives. This
31 subsection expires July 1, 2000.
41
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 Section 42. Notwithstanding section 337.403, Florida
2 Statutes, the City of Milton is relieved of its obligation to
3 repay the Department of Transportation for the relocation of
4 water, gas, and sewer utilities under the agreements between
5 the city and the department dated July 14, 1998, with respect
6 to construction projects on State Roads 87 and 89 which are
7 funded under Specific Appropriation 1509 of the 1999-2000
8 General Appropriations Act.
9 Section 43. In order to implement Specific
10 Appropriations 1412 through 1529 of the 1999-2000 General
11 Appropriations Act, subsection (17) is added to section
12 216.181, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, to read:
13 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
14 capital outlay.--
15 (17) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
16 chapter to the contrary, the Florida Department of
17 Transportation, in order to facilitate the transfer of
18 personnel to the new turnpike headquarters location in Orange
19 County, may transfer salary rate to the turnpike budget entity
20 from other departmental budget entities. The department must
21 provide documentation of all transfers to the Executive Office
22 of the Governor, the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee,
23 and the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on
24 Transportation and Economic Development Appropriations. This
25 subsection expires July 1, 2000.
26 Section 44. The funds provided in the 1999-2000
27 General Appropriations Act for workforce development shall be
28 initially allocated to the school district or community
29 college as designated. If, for any reason, a program in whole
30 or in part is moved from a community college to a school
31 district or moved from a school district to a community
42
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 college, the Commissioner of Education or the executive
2 director of the Division of Community Colleges shall submit a
3 budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216, Florida Statutes, to
4 transfer the appropriate amount of the 1999-2000 appropriation
5 between the affected district and community college. The
6 amount transferred shall be as near as practicable to the
7 actual amount appropriated for the FTE funded for that
8 program. This section is repealed on July 1, 2000.
9 Section 45. Notwithstanding section 288.063, Florida
10 Statutes, for 1999-2000, funds in Specific Appropriation 1673
11 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act may be used at the
12 discretion of the Governor for the completion of
13 infrastructure projects for the purpose of job retention
14 through making Florida military bases more efficient and
15 accessible.
16 Section 46. In order to implement Specific
17 Appropriation 154 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
18 subsection (3) of section 240.3341, Florida Statutes, is
19 amended to read:
20 240.3341 Incubator facilities for small business
21 concerns.--
22 (3)(a) The incubator facility and any improvements to
23 the facility shall be owned by the community college. The
24 community college may charge residents of the facility all or
25 part of the cost for facilities, utilities, and support
26 personnel and equipment. No small business concern shall
27 reside in the incubator facility for more than 5 calendar
28 years. The state shall not be liable for any act or failure
29 to act of any small business concern residing in an incubator
30 facility pursuant to this section or of any such concern
31 benefiting from the incubator facilities program.
43
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (b) Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (a) to
2 the contrary, and for the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
3 incubator facility may be leased by the community college.
4 This paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2000.
5 Section 47. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriations 8E, 193A, and 195 of the 1999-2000 General
7 Appropriations Act, subsection (8) is added to section
8 240.2605, Florida Statutes, to read:
9 240.2605 Trust Fund for Major Gifts.--
10 (8) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section,
11 for the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, for gifts received during
12 this period, the university presidents shall provide a list of
13 donations from private donors for challenge grants, new
14 donations, major gifts, and the eminent scholars program to be
15 matched for the 1999-2000 fiscal year to the Board of Regents.
16 The listing shall contain an explanation of the donation, a
17 statement of the specific benefits accrued to the university
18 as a result of the donation, and how the donation is
19 consistent with the mission of the institution, as defined by
20 the Board of Regents in the 1998-2003 Strategic Plan.
21 University presidents shall rank each private donation to
22 their university, giving highest priority to private donations
23 that provide additional library resources to universities;
24 donations that provide student assistance through
25 scholarships, fellowships, or assistantships; donations that
26 provide funding for existing academic programs at
27 universities; and donations that meet the matching requirement
28 without encumbering pledges. The Board of Regents, using the
29 same criteria, shall develop a systemwide priority list and
30 may set restrictions on the annual amount of matching funds
31 provided for single donations that exceed $5 million.
44
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 Section 48. In order to implement Specific
2 Appropriation 209A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations
3 Act, the university presidents shall provide to the Board of
4 Regents a list of donations received in 1999-2000 from private
5 donors for the State University System Facility Enhancement
6 Challenge Grant Program. This listing shall contain an
7 explanation of the donation, a statement of the specific
8 benefits accrued to the university as a result of the
9 donation, and the projected cost to the state for the
10 operation and maintenance of the facility. The Board of
11 Regents shall review and rank each private donation, giving
12 highest priority to private donations that provide the
13 financial resources for major renovations to existing
14 facilities, particularly instructional facilities, and new
15 space requirements as identified by the space utilization
16 model. This section expires July 1, 2000.
17 Section 49. Notwithstanding the provisions of section
18 240.2601, Florida Statutes, funds included in Specific
19 Appropriation 209A of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act
20 for the USF Engineering III project and the USF
21 Psychology/CSD/Lab Building project may be used to match
22 private funds or USF Foundation funds previously expended for
23 planning/design costs related to these projects. Additionally,
24 USF Foundation funds made available from foundation
25 investments or foundation revenue-generating activities may be
26 used as the private fund source for the USF Engineering III
27 project. This section expires July 1, 2000.
28 Section 50. Notwithstanding the provisions of section
29 240.156, Florida Statutes, up to $3 million may be used for
30 payment of professional fees to accomplish 5-year updates to
31
45
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 campus master plans pursuant to section 240.155(3), Florida
2 Statutes. This section expires July 1, 2000.
3 Section 51. In order to implement Specific
4 Appropriations 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 42A, and 43 of the
5 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act, subsection (13) is added
6 to section 235.014, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, to
7 read:
8 235.014 Functions of the department.--The functions of
9 the department shall include, but not be limited to, the
10 following; it shall:
11 (13) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection
12 (11), for purposes of preparing the commissioner's
13 comprehensive fixed capital outlay legislative budget request
14 for fiscal year 2000-2001 and providing the State Board of
15 Community Colleges and the Board of Regents an estimate of the
16 funds available to develop their required 3-year priority
17 list, the commissioner shall use the total amount of funds
18 appropriated in Specific Appropriations 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,
19 42, 42A, and 43 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act,
20 regardless of fund source, as the amount of funds appropriated
21 by the Legislature for fixed capital outlay for fiscal year
22 1999-2000. This subsection expires July 1, 2000.
23 Section 52. A section of this act that implements a
24 specific appropriation or specifically identified proviso
25 language in the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act is void
26 if the specific appropriation or specifically identified
27 proviso language is vetoed. A section of this act that
28 implements more than one specific appropriation or more than
29 one portion of specifically identified proviso language in the
30 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act is void if all the
31
46
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 specific appropriations or portions of specifically identified
2 proviso language are vetoed.
3 Section 53. If any other act passed during the 1999
4 Regular Session of the Legislature or any extension thereof
5 contains a provision that is substantively the same as a
6 provision in this act, but that removes or is otherwise not
7 subject to the future repeal applied to such provision by this
8 act, the Legislature intends that the provision in the other
9 act shall take precedence and shall continue to operate,
10 notwithstanding the future repeal provided by this act.
11 Section 54. The performance measures and standards
12 established in this section for individual programs in
13 Education shall be applied to those programs for the 1999-2000
14 fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are
15 directly linked to the appropriations made in the General
16 Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, as required by
17 the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
18 (1) PUBLIC SCHOOLS.--
19 (a) For the Pre-Kindergarten Program, the purpose of
20 which is to prepare children for success in school, the
21 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
22 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
23 Appropriations 5, 6, and 109 are as follows:
24 1. PRE-KINDERGARTEN OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Number and percentage of kindergarten and first
26 grade students meeting state expectations for readiness.....FY
27 2000-2001 LBR
28 b. For the Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade (K-12)
29 Program, the purpose of which is to provide children and youth
30 with the sound education needed to grow to a satisfying and
31 productive adulthood, the outcome measures, output measures,
47
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
2 provided in Specific Appropriations 3, 5, 109, 110, 110A, 112,
3 115, 117, 117B, and 118 are as follows:
4 2. K-12 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Number and percentage of a student cohort who
6 graduates from high school, as defined in statute.....110,027;
7 52.65%
8 b. Number and percentage of students 16 years or older
9 who were reported as dropouts.....................34,818; 4.9%
10 c. Number and percentage of recent graduates who meet
11 the state levels in reading, writing, and mathematics for
12 placement into college-level courses....Reading 31,135, 76.2%;
13 Writing 31,992, 78%; Mathematics 28,890,
14 71.9%
15 d. Number and percentage of graduates residing in
16 Florida who, within 6 months after graduation, are employed,
17 enrolled in postsecondary programs, or enlisted in the
18 military..................................... FY 2000-2001 LBR
19 e. Median learning gains of students in grades 3-10,
20 as measured by FCAT...........................FY 2000-2001 LBR
21 f. Median learning gains for students scoring at or
22 below the 25th percentile on FCAT.............FY 2000-2001 LBR
23 g. Number and percent of students demonstrating 1
24 year's academic gain for 1 year spent in school...FY 2000-2001
25 LBR
26 h. Student performance results on locally administered
27 norm-referenced tests at grades 4 and 8.......FY 2000-2001 LBR
28 i. For each of the following measures, the Department
29 of Education shall report disaggregated data for students in
30 Exceptional Education and English for Speakers of Other
31 Languages (ESOL) programs:
48
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (I) For Grade 4, percent of students scoring 3 or more
2 on Florida Writes!.........................................70%
3 (II) For Grade 4, percent of students who attain
4 proficiency in reading on the FCAT............FY 2000-2001 LBR
5 (III) For Grade 5, percent of students who attain
6 proficiency in mathematics on the FCAT........FY 2000-2001 LBR
7 (IV) For Grade 8, percent of students scoring 3 or
8 more on Florida Writes!....................................80%
9 (V) For Grade 8, percent of students who attain
10 proficiency in mathematics on the FCAT........FY 2000-2001 LBR
11 (VI) For Grade 8, percent of students who attain
12 proficiency in reading on the FCAT............FY 2000-2001 LBR
13 (VII) For Grade 10, percent of students scoring 3 or
14 more on Florida Writes!....................................85%
15 (VIII) For Grade 10, percent of students who attain
16 proficiency in mathematics on the FCAT........FY 2000-2001 LBR
17 (IX) For Grade 10, percent of students who attain
18 proficiency in reading on the FCAT............FY 2000-2001 LBR
19 j. Number and percentage of students absent 11 to 20
20 days...Elementary 272,402, 20.3%; Middle 135,672, 22.7%; High
21 135,729, 21.3%; Alternative FY 2000-2001 LBR; Exceptional
22 Education 2,652, 8.3%
23 k. Number and percentage of students absent 21 or more
24 days each year...Elementary 116,811, 8.7%; Middle 93,417,
25 15.6%; High 122,359, 19.1%; Alternative FY 2000-2001 LBR;
26 Exceptional Education 27.8%
27 l. Number and percentage of incidents of violence,
28 weapons violations, vandalism, substance abuse, and harassment
29 on the bus, on campus, and at school-sponsored activities...FY
30 2000-2001 LBR
31
49
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 m. Number and percent of teachers teaching more than 1
2 class out-of-field during a school term.......FY 2000-2001 LBR
3 n. Number and percent of teachers with a major or
4 minor in the subject area in which they are teaching........FY
5 2000-2001 LBR
6 o. Number and percent of teachers who have earned a
7 degree beyond the bachelor's level in the subject area in
8 which they are employed to teach..............FY 2000-2001 LBR
9 p. Number and percent of teachers receiving more than
10 2 days staff development training during the contract year..FY
11 2000-2001 LBR
12 q. Number and percent of teachers with National
13 Teacher's Certification..............................750, 0.5%
14 r. Meeting attendance rate of school advisory council
15 members.......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
16 s. Number and percent of school advisory councils,
17 demonstrating by vote, participation in spending of the $10
18 per unweighted FTE in lottery funds appropriated by the
19 Legislature for use by the councils...........FY 2000-2001 LBR
20 t. Number and percent of schools having an active PTO
21 or PTA........................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
22 3. K-12 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Average number of days teachers and administrators
24 were not in attendance at school for reasons classified as
25 personal leave, sick leave, and temporary duty elsewhere....FY
26 2000-2001 LBR
27 (2) COMMUNITY COLLEGES.--
28 (a) For the Associate of Arts (AA) Program, the
29 purpose of which is to provide freshman and sophomore classes
30 that enable transfers to a university primarily, and
31 secondarily, improve job skills, the outcome measures, output
50
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
2 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 7, 153, and 154 are
3 as follows:
4 1. ASSOCIATE OF ARTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Percent of AA degree graduates who transfer to a
6 state university within 2 years............................65%
7 b. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
8 University System who earn a 2.5 or above in the SUS after a
9 year.......................................................72%
10 c. Percent of AA graduates who are employed and have
11 not transferred to a state university......................21%
12 d. Of the AA students completing 18 credit hours, the
13 percent of whom graduate in 4 years........................29%
14 2. ASSOCIATE OF ARTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of AA degrees granted.................29,000
16 b. Percentage of students graduating with total
17 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 120%
18 of the degree requirement..................................36%
19 (b) For the College Preparatory Program, the purpose
20 of which is to provide underprepared students with
21 communication and computation skills so they are prepared to
22 enter college level courses, the outcome measures, output
23 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
24 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 7, 153, and 154 are
25 as follows:
26 1. COLLEGE PREPARATORY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percentage of students exiting the
28 college-preparatory program who enter college-level course
29 work associated with the AA, Associate of Science (AS),
30 Postsecondary Vocational Certificate, and Postsecondary Adult
31 Vocational programs...........................FY 2000-2001 LBR
51
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
2 University System who started in College Prep and who earn a
3 2.5 in the SUS after 1 year................................71%
4 (3) STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM.--
5 (a) For the Instruction Program, the purpose of which
6 is to transmit knowledge, skills, and competencies that allow
7 eligible individuals to become practicing professionals or to
8 pursue further academic endeavors, the outcome measures,
9 output measures, and associated performance standards with
10 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 8A-8D and
11 180-183 are as follows:
12 1. INSTRUCTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Graduation rate for First Time In College (FTIC)
14 students, using a 6-year rate..............................60%
15 b. Retention rate for FTIC students, using a 6-year
16 rate.......................................................71%
17 c. Graduation rate for AA transfer students, using a
18 4-year rate................................................69%
19 d. Retention rate for AA transfer students, using a
20 4-year rate................................................80%
21 e. Percentage of students graduating with total
22 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 115%
23 of the degree requirement..................................61%
24 f. Pass rate on licensure/certification exams, for the
25 first sitting.................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
26 g. Percentage of graduates remaining in Florida
27 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
28 h. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
29 percentage employed at $25,000 or more 1 year following
30 graduation.................................................45%
31
52
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 i. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
2 percentage employed at $25,000 or more 5 years following
3 graduation.................................................76%
4 j. Percentage of undergraduate students enrolled in
5 graduate school upon completion of the baccalaureate degree
6 ...........................................................16%
7 2. INSTRUCTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of degrees granted, by level....FY 2000-2001
9 LBR
10 b. Percentage of classes taught by state-funded ranked
11 faculty members...............................FY 2000-2001 LBR
12 c. Percent of qualified Florida students, those
13 applicants meeting BOR admission standards, admitted as FTIC
14 students...................................................93%
15 d. Percent of FTICs admitted as alternative admits
16 .........................................................11.4%
17 e. Percent of alternative admits who are out-of-state
18 students.................................................14.8%
19
20 The Board of Regents is directed to incorporate these measures
21 as program performance measures in the program reviews
22 conducted pursuant to section 240.209(5)(b), Florida Statutes,
23 1998 Supplement, and use this information in decisions
24 regarding degree program approval, termination, and
25 modification.
26 (b) For the Research Program, the purpose of which is
27 to direct research toward solving technical, social, and
28 economic problems facing the state and the nation, the outcome
29 measures, output measures, and associated performance
30 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
31 Appropriations 8A-8D and 180-183 are as follows:
53
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 1. RESEARCH OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Externally-generated research and training grant
3 funds (federal, state, local, business, and industry) per
4 state-funded ranked faculty full-time equivalent (FTE);
5 Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS); and the
6 Health Science Centers to be reflected separately
7 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
8 b. Ratio of externally-generated research and training
9 grant funds to state research funds; IFAS and Health Science
10 Centers to be reflected separately............FY 2000-2001 LBR
11 2. RESEARCH OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Average number of articles in refereed journals per
13 ranked faculty; IFAS and Health Science Centers to be
14 reflected separately........................................FY
15 2000-2001 LBR
16 (c) For the Public Service Program, the purpose of
17 which is to apply the expertise of university personnel in
18 solving public problems, the outcome measures, output
19 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
20 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 8A-8D and 180-183
21 are as follows:
22 1. PUBLIC SERVICE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. For IFAS only, the percent of public service
24 projects where the beneficiary is satisfied or highly
25 satisfied with the extension assistance....................98%
26 2. PUBLIC SERVICE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. The number and percentage of Florida's public
28 schools assisted..............................FY 2000-2001 LBR
29 (4) WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT.--
30 (a) For the Workforce Development Education Program,
31 the purpose of which is to respond to emerging local and
54
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 statewide economic development needs by providing workforce
2 development programs, the outcome measures, output measures,
3 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
4 provided in Specific Appropriation 148 are as follows:
5 1. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Number and percent of vocational certificate
7 program completers who left the program and are found placed
8 according to the following definitions:
9 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
10 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
11 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter...........12,227, 42.6%
12 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
13 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
14 employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing
15 education in a college credit-level program.......4,369, 15.2%
16 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
17 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
18 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
19 level............................................10,801, 37.6%
20 b. Number of targeted population vocational
21 certificate program completers who left the program and are
22 found placed and disaggregated by targeted population:
23 (I) WAGES clients..................................694
24 (II) Economically disadvantaged..................4,193
25 (III) Limited English proficient.................1,491
26 (IV) Dislocated worker.............................760
27 (V) Disabled individuals...........................591
28 c. Number and percent of applied technology diploma
29 program completers who left the program and are found placed
30 according to the following definitions:
31
55
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
2 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
3 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter........FY 2000-2001 LBR
4 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
5 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
6 employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing
7 education in a college credit-level program...FY 2000-2001 LBR
8 d. Number and percent of associate in science degree
9 and college-credit certificate program completers who left the
10 program and are found placed according to the following
11 definitions:
12 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
13 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
14 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter............6,891, 57.9%
15 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
16 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
17 employed at $3,900 per quarter, or found continuing education
18 in a college credit-level program.......................1,351,
19 11.3%
20 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
21 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
22 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
23 level.............................................1,661, 13.9%
24 e. Number of targeted population associate in science
25 program completers who left the program and are found
26 placed-disaggregated by targeted populations:
27 (I) Wages clients...................................71
28 (II) Economically disadvantaged....................690
29 (III) Limited English proficient...................331
30 (IV) Dislocated worker.............................259
31 (V) Disabled individuals...........................274
56
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Number and percent of completers who are retained
2 in employment 1 year after found placed:
3 (I) Vocational certificate............FY 2000-2001 LBR
4 (II) Applied technology diploma.......FY 2000-2001 LBR
5 (III) Associate in science degree.....FY 2000-2001 LBR
6 2. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of vocational certificate program completers
8 ........................................................30,635
9 b. Number of occupational completion points completed
10 in vocational certificate programs............FY 2000-2001 LBR
11 c. Number of occupational completion points achieved
12 in apprenticeship programs...............................4,031
13 d. Number of program completers in associate in
14 science degree and college credit certificate programs..12,045
15 e. Number of associate in science degrees granted
16 .........................................................9,338
17 f. Number of occupational completion points completed
18 in applied technology diploma programs........FY 2000-2001 LBR
19 (b) For the Adult General Education Program, the
20 purpose of which is to respond to emerging local and statewide
21 economic development needs by providing adult general
22 education courses, outcome measures, output measures, and
23 associated performance standards with respect to funds
24 provided in Specific Appropriation 148 are as follows:
25 1. ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Number and percent of adult basic education,
27 including English as a Second Language, literacy completion
28 point completers who left the program and are found according
29 to the following definitions:
30 (I) Level II - Found employed at $3,900 or more per
31 quarter, or found continuing education at the adult secondary,
57
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 vocational certificate, or college-credit levels..FY 2000-2001
2 LBR
3 (II) Level I - Found in employment not included in
4 Level II or continuing education at the adult basic education
5 level.........................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
6 b. Number of adult secondary education literacy
7 completion point completers who left the program and are found
8 placed according to the following definitions:
9 (I) Level II - Found employed at $3,900 or more per
10 quarter, or found continuing education at the adult secondary,
11 vocational certificate, or college-credit levels....Adult High
12 School, 18,816; GED, 3,677
13 (II) Level I - Found in employment not included in
14 Level II or continuing education at the adult basic education
15 level...............................................Adult High
16 School, 54,410; GED, 7,474
17 2. ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of literacy completion points completed in
19 Adult Basic Education and Adult Secondary Program.FY 2000-2001
20 LBR
21 b. Number of literacy completion points completed
22 disaggregated by targeted population (WAGES Clients,
23 Economically Disadvantaged, Limited English Proficient,
24 Dislocated Worker, Disabled Individuals) for Adult Basic,
25 Adult High School, and GED....................FY 2000-2001 LBR
26 Section 55. The performance measures and standards
27 established in this section for individual programs in Human
28 Services agencies shall be applied to those programs for the
29 1999-2000 fiscal year. These performance measures and
30 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
31 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as
58
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
2 of 1994.
3 (1) AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION.--
4 (a) For the Medicaid Health Services Program, the
5 purpose of which is to ensure that health services are
6 provided to Medicaid eligible pregnant women, children,
7 disabled adults, and the elderly, the outcome measures, output
8 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
9 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 224-279 are as
10 follows:
11 1. HEALTH SERVICES TO PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORNS, AND
12 WOMEN WHO WANT FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of women receiving adequate prenatal care
14 ...........................................................86%
15 b. Neonatal mortality rate per 1,000..............4.86
16 c. Percent of vaginal deliveries with no complications
17 .........................................................73.1%
18 d. Average length of time between pregnancies for
19 those receiving family planning services (months).........37.4
20 2. HEALTH SERVICES TO PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORNS, AND
21 WOMEN WHO WANT FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of women receiving prenatal care.....137,130
23 b. Number of vaginal deliveries.................64,152
24 c. Number of women receiving family planning services
25 .......................................................136,197
26 3. HEALTH SERVICES TO CHILDREN OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of eligible children who received all
28 required components of EPSDT screen........................64%
29 b. Percent of hospitalizations for conditions
30 preventable with good ambulatory care....................7.53%
31
59
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Ratio of children hospitalized for mental health
2 care to those receiving mental health services.............6.8
3 4. HEALTH SERVICES TO CHILDREN OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of children ages 1-20 enrolled in Medicaid
5 .....................................................1,119,745
6 b. Number of children receiving mental health services
7 ........................................................54,443
8 c. Number of children receiving EPSDT services.127,967
9 d. Number of services by major type of service:
10 (I) Hospital inpatient services.................39,828
11 (II) Physician services......................3,475,670
12 (III) Prescribed drugs.......................2,875,949
13 5. HEALTH SERVICES TO WORKING AGE ADULTS
14 (NON-DISABLED) OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of hospitalizations for conditions
16 preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.3%
17 6. HEALTH SERVICES TO WORKING AGE ADULTS
18 (NON-DISABLED) OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of non-disabled adults receiving a service
20 ...........................................................85%
21 7. HEALTH SERVICES TO DISABLED WORKING AGE ADULTS
22 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of hospitalizations for conditions
24 preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.9%
25 8. HEALTH SERVICES TO DISABLED WORKING AGE ADULTS
26 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of enrolled disabled adults receiving a
28 service..................................................88.6%
29 9. HEALTH SERVICES TO ELDERS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of hospital stays for elder recipients
31 exceeding length of stay criteria..........................26%
60
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent of elder recipients in long-term care who
2 improve or maintain activities of daily living (ADL)
3 functioning to those receiving mental health services.......FY
4 2000-2001 LBR
5 10. HEALTH SERVICES TO ELDERS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number enrolled in long term care waivers.....9,766
7 b. Number of elders receiving mental health care.7,688
8 c. Number of services by major type of service:
9 (I) Hospital inpatient services.................89,048
10 (II) Physician services......................1,285,488
11 (III) Prescribed drugs.......................8,337,539
12 11. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID POLICY OUTCOME
13 MEASURES.--
14 a. Percent of new recipients voluntarily selecting
15 managed care plan..........................................75%
16 b. Percent of programs with cost effectiveness
17 determined annually.........................................5%
18 12. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID POLICY OUTPUT
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of new provider applications..........10,600
21 b. Number of new enrollees provided choice counseling
22 .......................................................516,000
23 c. Number of providers..........................68,276
24 13. PROCESS MEDICAID PROVIDER CLAIMS OUTCOME
25 MEASURES.--
26 a. Average length of time between receipt of clean
27 claim and payment (days)....................................16
28 b. Percent increase in dollars recovered annually...5%
29 c. Amount of recoveries....................$19,275,043
30 d. Cost avoided because of identification of
31 third-party coverage:
61
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (I) Commercial coverage...................$197,493,244
2 (II) Medicare.............................$694,234,790
3 14. PROCESS MEDICAID PROVIDER CLAIMS OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of claims received................96,398,352
6 b. Number of claims processed...............65,400,797
7 c. Number of claims denied..................30,997,555
8 d. Number of fraud and abuse cases opened........3,776
9 e. Number of fraud and abuse cases closed........4,683
10 f. Number of referrals to the Medicaid Fraud Control
11 Unit/Attorney General's Office.............................175
12 (b) For the Health Services Quality Assurance Program,
13 the purpose of which is to ensure that all Floridians have
14 access to quality health care and services through the
15 licensure and certification of facilities, and in responding
16 to consumer complaints about facilities, services, and
17 practitioners, the outcome measures, output measures, and
18 associated performance standards with respect to funds
19 provided in Specific Appropriations 280-291 are as follows:
20 1. STATE REGULATION OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS
21 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Percentage of Priority I practitioner
23 investigations resulting in emergency action...............39%
24 b. Average length of time (in days) to take emergency
25 action on Priority I practitioner investigations............60
26 c. Percentage of cease and desist orders issued to
27 unlicensed practitioners in which another complaint of
28 unlicensed activity is subsequently filed against the same
29 practitioner................................................7%
30 d. Percentage of licensed practitioners involved in:
31 (I) Serious incidents............................0.33%
62
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (II) Peer review discipline reports..............0.02%
2 2. STATE REGULATION OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS
3 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of complaints determined legally sufficient
5 .........................................................7,112
6 b. Number of legally sufficient complaints resolved
7 by:
8 (I) Findings of no probable cause, including:
9 (A) Nolle prosse...................................680
10 (B) Letters of guidance............................491
11 (C) Notice of noncompliance.........................35
12 (II) Findings of probable cause, including:
13 (A) Issuance of citation for minor violations.......34
14 (B) Stipulations or informal hearings..............662
15 (C) Formal hearings.................................44
16 c. Percentage of investigations completed by priority
17 within timeframe:
18 (I) Priority I - 45 days..........................100%
19 (II) Priority II - 180 days.......................100%
20 (III) Other - 180 days............................100%
21 d. Average number of practitioner complaint
22 investigations per FTE......................................87
23 e. Number of inquiries to the call center regarding
24 practitioner licensure and disciplinary information....113,293
25 3. STATE LICENSURE AND FEDERAL CERTIFICATION OF HEALTH
26 CARE FACILITIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percentage of investigations of alleged unlicensed
28 facilities and programs that have been previously issued a
29 cease and desist order and that are confirmed as repeated
30 unlicensed activity.........................................7%
31
63
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percentage of Priority I consumer complaints about
2 licensed facilities and programs that are investigated within
3 48 hours..................................................100%
4 c. Percentage of accredited hospitals and ambulatory
5 surgical centers cited for not complying with life safety,
6 licensure, or emergency access standards......FY 2000-2001 LBR
7 d. Percentage of accreditation validation surveys that
8 result in findings of licensure deficiencies..FY 2000-2001 LBR
9 e. Percentage of facilities in which deficiencies are
10 found that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or
11 welfare of the public by type:
12 (I) Nursing Homes...................................5%
13 (II) Assisted Living Facilities.....................5%
14 (III) Home Health Agencies............FY 2000-2001 LBR
15 (IV) Clinical Laboratories............FY 2000-2001 LBR
16 (V) Ambulatory Surgical Centers.......FY 2000-2001 LBR
17 (VI) Hospitals........................FY 2000-2001 LBR
18 f. Percentage of failures by hospitals to report:
19 (I) Serious incidents (agency identified).FY 2000-2001
20 LBR
21 (II) Peer review disciplinary actions (agency
22 identified)...................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
23 4. STATE LICENSURE AND FEDERAL CERTIFICATION OF HEALTH
24 CARE FACILITIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of facility emergency actions taken.......51
26 b. Total number of full facility quality-of-care
27 surveys conducted and by type............................6,171
28 (I) Nursing Homes..................................815
29 (II) Home Health Agencies........................1,600
30 (III) Assisted Living Facilities.................1,282
31 (IV) Clinical Laboratories.......................1,082
64
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (V) Hospitals.......................................35
2 (VI) Other.......................................1,357
3 c. Average processing time (in days) for statewide
4 panel cases................................................259
5 d. Number of hospitals that the agency determine have
6 not reported:
7 (I) Serious incidents(agency identified)..FY 2000-2001
8 LBR
9 (II) Peer review disciplinary actions (agency
10 identified)...................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
11 5. HEALTH FACILITY PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW
12 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of plans and construction review performed
14 by type:
15 (I) Nursing Homes................................1,200
16 (II) Hospitals...................................3,500
17 (III) Ambulatory Surgical Centers..................400
18 b. Average number of hours for plans and construction
19 survey and review:
20 (I) Nursing Homes...................................35
21 (II) Hospitals......................................35
22 (III) Ambulatory Surgical Centers...................35
23 (2) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.--
24 (a) For the Florida Abuse Hotline Program, the purpose
25 of which is to serve as a central receiving and referral point
26 for all cases of suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of
27 children, disabled adults, and the elderly, the outcome
28 measures, output measures, and associated performance
29 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
30 Appropriations 322-325 are as follows:
31
65
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 1. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
2 FAMILIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Percentage of abandoned calls made to the Florida
4 Abuse Hotline...............................................2%
5 2. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
6 FAMILIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Calls answered..............................303,332
8 b. Percent of calls answered within three minutes..98%
9 (b) For the Aging and Adult Services Program, the
10 purpose of which is to protect frail elderly and disabled
11 adults who cannot manage their own affairs from abuse,
12 neglect, or exploitation, the outcome measures, output
13 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
14 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 334-341 are as
15 follows:
16 1. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES AND FRAIL ELDERLY WHO ARE
17 VICTIMS OF ABUSE, NEGLECT, OR EXPLOITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of protective supervision cases in which no
19 report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received
20 while the case is open (from beginning of protective
21 supervision for a maximum of 1 year........................96%
22 b. Percent of clients satisfied....................90%
23 c. Percent of case closures for proposed confirmed
24 within 60 days for each district...........................95%
25 2. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES AND FRAIL ELDERLY WHO ARE
26 VICTIMS OF ABUSE, NEGLECT, OR EXPLOITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of protective supervision cases in which no
28 report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received
29 while the case is open (from beginning of protective
30 supervision for a maximum of 1 year).......................490
31 b. Number of investigations.....................29,993
66
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Number of persons referred to other agencies..1,700
2 d. Number of persons receiving protective supervision
3 services...................................................516
4 3. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
5 REMAIN IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Percent of adults with disabilities receiving
7 services who are not placed in a nursing home..............99%
8 b. Percent of clients satisfied....................95%
9 4. ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
10 REMAIN IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of adults with disabilities to be served:
12 (I) Community Care for Disabled Adults...........1,051
13 (II) Home Care for Disabled Adults...............1,428
14 (III) Number of Medicaid waiver clients served...1,397
15 b. Number of persons receiving OSS case management
16 services (Elderly and Disabled) excluding mental health
17 eligible.................................................7,062
18 c. Number of persons placed in an Assisted Living
19 Facility, Adult Family-Care Home, or Nursing Home (Elderly and
20 Disabled).....................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
21 (c) For the People with Mental Health and Substance
22 Abuse Problems Program, the purpose of which is to enable
23 adults with mental health problems to function
24 self-sufficiently in the community, enable children with
25 mental health problems to function appropriately and succeed
26 in school, and enable children and adults with or at serious
27 risk of substance abuse problems to be self-sufficient and
28 addiction free, the outcome measures, output measures, and
29 associated performance standards with respect to funds
30 provided in Specific Appropriations 342-356 are as follows:
31
67
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 1. CHILDREN INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED IN JUVENILE JUSTICE
2 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Percent of children restored to competency and
4 recommended to proceed with a judicial hearing:
5 (I) With mental illness............................90%
6 (II) With mental retardation.......................54%
7 b. Percent of community partners satisfied based upon
8 a survey...................................................90%
9 c. Percent of children with mental illness restored to
10 competency or determined unrestorable in less than 180 days
11 ...........................................................80%
12 d. Percent of children with mental retardation
13 restored to competency or determined unrestorable in less than
14 365 days...................................................90%
15 e. Percent of children returned to court for a
16 competency hearing and the court concurs with the
17 recommendation of the provider.............................95%
18 2. CHILDREN INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED IN JUVENILE JUSTICE
19 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number served who are incompetent to proceed....224
21 b. Number of days following the determination by the
22 mental health service provider of restoration of competency or
23 unrestorability of competency to the date of the court hearing
24 on the determination of competency............FY 2000-2001 LBR
25 3. CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE (SED)
26 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Projected annual days SED children (excluding those
28 in juvenile justice facilities) spend in the community.....338
29 b. Average functional level score SED children will
30 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
31 functioning score...........................................49
68
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent of families satisfied with the services
2 received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior scale.83%
3 d. Percent of available school days SED children
4 attended during the last 30 days...........................85%
5 e. Percent of commitments or recommitments to Juvenile
6 Justice.......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
7 f. Percent of community partners satisfied based on a
8 survey.....................................................90%
9 g. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
10 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
11 the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional
12 disturbance recorded in the initial assessment....FY 2000-2001
13 LBR
14 4. CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE (SED)
15 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. SED children to be served....................22,104
17 b. Total average expenditures for services per client
18 (includes Medicaid services)..................FY 2000-2001 LBR
19 5. CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES (ED) OUTCOME
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Projected annual days ED children (excluding those
22 in juvenile justice facilities) spent in the community.....350
23 b. Average functional level score ED children will
24 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
25 Functioning scale...........................................55
26 c. Percent of available school days ED children attend
27 during the last 30 days....................................87%
28 d. Percent of commitments or recommitments to Juvenile
29 Justice.......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
30 e. Percent of community partners satisfied based on a
31 survey.....................................................90%
69
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Percent of families satisfied with the services
2 received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior scale.85%
3 g. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
4 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
5 the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional
6 disturbance recorded in the initial assessment....FY 2000-2001
7 LBR
8 6. CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES (ED) OUTPUT
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of ED children to be served...........13,101
11 b. Total average expenditures for services per client
12 (includes Medicaid services)..................FY 2000-2001 LBR
13 7. CHILDREN AT RISK OF EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE OUTCOME
14 MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of families satisfied with the services
16 received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior scale.90%
17 8. CHILDREN AT RISK OF EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE OUTPUT
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of at-risk children to be served......10,390
20 9. CHILDREN WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTCOME
21 MEASURES.--
22 a. Percent of children who complete treatment......72%
23 b. Percent of parents of children receiving services
24 reporting average or above average level of satisfaction on
25 Family Centered Behavior Scale.............................95%
26 c. Percent of children drug free at 6 months following
27 completion of treatment.......................FY 2000-2001 LBR
28 d. Percent of children receiving services who are
29 satisfied based on survey..................................90%
30 e. Percent of children under the supervision of the
31 state receiving substance abuse treatment who are not
70
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 committed or recommitted to the Department of Juvenile Justice
2 during the 12 months following treatment completion........85%
3 f. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
4 survey.....................................................90%
5 10. CHILDREN WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of children served....................62,979
8 b. Number of children completing treatment.......4,500
9 11. CHILDREN AT RISK OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE OUTCOME
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Percent of children in targeted prevention programs
12 who achieve expected level of improvement in reading.......75%
13 b. Percent of children in targeted prevention programs
14 who achieve expected level of improvement in math..........75%
15 c. Percent of children who receive targeted prevention
16 services who are not admitted to substance abuse services
17 during the 12 months after completion of prevention services
18 ...........................................................96%
19 d. Percent of children in targeted prevention programs
20 who perceive substance use to be harmful at the time of
21 discharge when compared to admission.......................76%
22 12. CHILDREN AT RISK OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE OUTPUT
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of children served in targeted prevention
25 .........................................................6,233
26 13. ADULTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent drug free at 6 months following completion
29 of treatment..................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
30
31
71
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent of clients completing treatment who are not
2 readmitted for substance abuse services during the 12 months
3 following discharge........................................96%
4 c. Percent of adults employed upon discharge from
5 treatment services.........................................61%
6 d. Percent of adult women pregnant during treatment
7 who give birth to substance-free newborns..................89%
8 e. Average score on the Behavioral Healthcare Rating
9 of Satisfaction............................................138
10 f. Percentage of adults in child welfare protective
11 supervision who have case plans requiring substance abuse
12 treatment who are receiving treatment.........FY 2000-2001 LBR
13 g. Percent change in the number of clients with
14 arrests within 90 days following discharge compared to number
15 with arrests within 90 days prior to admission.............57%
16 h. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
17 surveys....................................................90%
18 14. ADULTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTPUT
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of adults served.....................141,832
21 b. Number of clients who complete treatment
22 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
23 c. Number of adults in child welfare protective
24 supervision who have case plans requiring substance abuse
25 treatment who are receiving treatment.........FY 2000-2001 LBR
26 15. ADULTS WITH SERIOUS AND PERSISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS
27 IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Average annual number of days spent in the
29 community (not in institutions or other facilities)........340
30 b. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
31 of Functioning score........................................49
72
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Average client satisfaction score on the Behavioral
2 Healthcare Rating Scale....................................130
3 d. Average annual days worked for pay...............30
4 e. Percentage of clients who worked during the year
5 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
6 f. Total average monthly income in last 30 days...$530
7 g. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
8 survey.....................................................90%
9 h. Increase family satisfaction.......FY 2000-2001 LBR
10 16. ADULTS WITH SERIOUS AND PERSISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS
11 IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of adults with a serious and persistent
13 mental illness in the community served..................36,312
14 17. ADULTS IN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Average Global Assessment of Functioning scale
16 change score................................................17
17 b. Percent not readmitted within 30 days..........100%
18 c. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
19 survey.....................................................90%
20 d. Increase family satisfaction.......FY 2000-2001 LBR
21 18. ADULTS IN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of adults in mental health crisis served
23 ........................................................20,863
24 19. ADULTS WITH FORENSIC INVOLVEMENT OUTCOME
25 MEASURES.--
26 a. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
27 of Functioning score........................................47
28 b. Percent of persons who violate their conditional
29 release under chapter 916, Florida Statutes, and are
30 recommitted.................................................4%
31
73
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
2 survey.....................................................90%
3 d. Average annual number of days spent in the
4 community (not in institutions or other facilities)........325
5 20. ADULTS WITH FORENSIC INVOLVEMENT OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of adults with forensic involvement served
8 .........................................................5,845
9 (d) For the Families in Need of Child Care Program and
10 People in Need of Family Safety and Preservation Services
11 Program, the purpose of which is to prevent the reoccurrence
12 of abuse or neglect, to allow parents to obtain and retain
13 employment, to prepare children to enter school ready to
14 learn, and to protect children and adults from abuse, the
15 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
16 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
17 Appropriations 357-375 are as follows:
18 1. FAMILIES IN NEED OF CHILD CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of 4-year-old children placed with
20 contracted providers in care for 9 months who enter
21 Kindergarten ready to learn as determined by DOE or local
22 school systems' readiness assessment.......................80%
23 b. Percent of non-WAGES, working poor clients who need
24 child care that receive subsidized child care services:
25 (I) Ages 0 - 5.....................................92%
26 (II) School age..................................41.5%
27 (III) All kids.....................................63%
28 c. Percent of WAGES clients who need child care that
29 receive subsidized child care services....................100%
30 d. Percent of licensed child care providers who are
31 satisfied with the licensing process.......................93%
74
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Percent of licensed child care facilities and homes
2 with no class 1 (serious) violations during their licensure
3 year.......................................................97%
4 f. Number of provisional licenses as a result of
5 noncompliance with child care standards....................375
6 g. Number of verified incidents of abuse and/or
7 neglect in licensed child care arrangements.................62
8 h. Percent of clients receiving subsidized child care
9 services who are satisfied.................................95%
10 2. FAMILIES IN NEED OF CHILD CARE OUTPUTS MEASURES.--
11 a. Total number served:........................134,009
12 (I) At Risk.....................................13,250
13 (II) Working Poor...............................53,739
14 (III) Migrants...................................2,880
15 (IV) WAGES/Transitional Child Care..............64,140
16 3. FAMILIES KNOWN TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH CHILDREN AT
17 RISK OF ABUSE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of children in families who complete
19 intensive child abuse prevention programs of 3 months or more
20 who are not abused or neglected within:
21 (I) 6 months of program completion.................95%
22 (II) 12 months of program completion...............95%
23 (III) 18 months of program completion..............95%
24 b. Percent of families receiving parent education and
25 other parent skill building services, lasting 6 weeks or
26 longer, who show improved family skills and capacity to care
27 for their children............................FY 2000-2001 LBR
28 c. Percent of clients satisfied....................95%
29 4. FAMILIES KNOWN TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH CHILDREN AT
30 RISK OF ABUSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of persons served....................153,005
75
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number receiving information and referral services
2 ........................................................61,287
3 5. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
4 FAMILIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Percent of children who have no findings of child
6 maltreatment within 1 year of case closure from services...95%
7 b. Percent of children reunified with family who
8 return to foster care within one year of case closure.......3%
9 c. Percent of children not abused or neglected during
10 services...................................................97%
11 d. Percent of clients satisfied....................95%
12 e. Percent of families receiving ongoing services who
13 show improved scores on the Child Well-Being Scales.........FY
14 2000-2001 LBR
15 f. Percent of children given exit interviews who were
16 satisfied with their foster care placement....FY 2000-2001 LBR
17 6. CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR
18 FAMILIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Reports of child abuse/neglect..............126,735
20 b. Children identified as abused/neglected during year
21 ........................................................75,000
22 c. Number of families served by Intensive Crisis
23 Counseling Program, Family Builders......................6,767
24 d. Number of families served by Protective Supervision
25 ........................................................26,436
26 e. Number of children served in foster care.....16,313
27 f. Number of children served in relative care....8,126
28 g. Percent of alleged victims seen within 24 hours
29 ..........................................................100%
30 h. Percent of investigations completed within 30 days
31 ..........................................................100%
76
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 i. Percent of children who exited out-of-home care by
2 the 12th month................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
3 j. Percent of cases reviewed by supervisors in
4 accordance with department timeframes for early warning system
5 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
6 k. Number of individuals under the department's
7 protective supervision who have case plans requiring substance
8 abuse treatment who are receiving treatment...FY 2000-2001 LBR
9 l. Percent of individuals under the department's
10 protective supervision who have case plans requiring substance
11 abuse treatment who are receiving treatment...FY 2000-2001 LBR
12 m. Ratio of certified workers to children.FY 2000-2001
13 LBR
14 7. VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Ratio of incidents reported resulting in injury or
16 harm to clients as a result of inadequate security procedures
17 per 1,000 shelter days........................FY 2000-2001 LBR
18 b. Percent of clients satisfied....................95%
19 8. VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of individuals receiving case management
21 services................................................21,270
22 b. Number of children counseled.................20,340
23 c. Number of adults counseled..................108,442
24 d. Percent of adult and child victims in shelter more
25 than 72 hours having a plan for family safety and security
26 when they leave shelter...................................100%
27 e. Number of individuals served in emergency shelters
28 ........................................................15,775
29 9. CHILD VICTIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT WHO BECOME
30 ELIGIBLE FOR ADOPTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
77
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of children who are adopted of the number
2 of children legally available for adoption.................90%
3 b. Percent of clients satisfied....................95%
4 10. CHILD VICTIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT WHO BECOME
5 ELIGIBLE FOR ADOPTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Children receiving adoptive services..........4,454
7 b. Children receiving subsidies.................12,454
8 c. Number of children placed in adoption.........1,900
9 (e) For the People with Developmental Disabilities
10 Program, the purpose of which is to enable individuals with
11 developmental disabilities to live everyday lives, as measured
12 by achievement of valued personal outcomes appropriate to life
13 stages from birth to death, the outcome measures, output
14 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
15 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 376-390 are as
16 follows:
17 1. PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of people who have a quality of life score
19 of 19 out of 25 or greater on the Outcome Based Performance
20 Measures Assessment at annual reassessment.................76%
21 b. Percent of adults living in homes of their own
22 .........................................................18.5%
23 c. Percent of people who are employed in integrated
24 settings.................................................27.5%
25 d. Percent of clients satisfied with services......95%
26 2. PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Children and adults provided case management.28,664
28 b. Children and adults provided residential care.4,907
29 (f) For the Economic Self-Sufficiency Program, the
30 purpose of which is to help people become economically
31 self-sufficient through programs such as Food Assistance, Work
78
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 and Gain Economic Self-Sufficiency (WAGES), Refugee
2 Assistance, and Medicaid eligibility services, including
3 disability determination eligibility, the outcome measures,
4 output measures, and associated performance standards with
5 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 391-404
6 are as follows:
7 1. WAGES/ADULTS AND FAMILIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
8 BECOME EMPLOYED OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percentage of applications processed within time
10 standards (total).........................................100%
11 b. Percentage of Food Stamp applications processed
12 within 30 days............................................100%
13 c. Percentage of cash assistance applications
14 processed within 45 days..................................100%
15 d. Percentage of Medicaid applications processed
16 within 45 days............................................100%
17 e. Percentage of disabled adult payment applications
18 processed within 90 days..................................100%
19 f. Percentage of Food Stamp benefits determined
20 accurately..............................................90.70%
21 g. Percentage of WAGES cash assistance benefits
22 determined accurately...................................93.89%
23 h. Percentage of Medicaid benefits determined
24 accurately................................................100%
25 i. Percentage of Benefit Recovery claims established
26 within 90 days............................................100%
27 j. Percentage of dollars collected for established
28 Benefit Recovery claims....................................50%
29 k. Percentage of suspected fraud cases referred that
30 result in Front-end Fraud Prevention savings...............70%
31
79
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 l. Percentage of WAGES sanctions referred by the local
2 WAGES coalitions that are executed within 10 days.........100%
3 m. Percentage of work eligible WAGES participants
4 accurately referred to the local WAGES coalitions within 1
5 work day..................................................100%
6 n. Percentage of Refugee Assistance cases accurately
7 closed at 8 months or less................................100%
8 o. Percentage of clients satisfied with eligibility
9 services:
10 (I) WAGES..........................................95%
11 (II) All other programs............................95%
12 2. WAGES/ADULTS AND FAMILIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO
13 BECOME EMPLOYED OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Total number of applications..............2,575,690
15 b. Dollars collected through Benefit Recovery
16 ...................................................$21,000,000
17 c. Number of Front-end Fraud Prevention investigations
18 completed...............................................25,200
19 d. Dollars saved through Front-end Fraud Prevention
20 ...................................................$17,900,000
21 e. Number of WAGES participants referred to the local
22 WAGES coalitions.......................................125,000
23 f. Number of refugee cases closed................5,600
24 (g) For the Mental Health Institutions Program, the
25 purpose of which is to prepare adults with mental health
26 problems to function self-sufficiently in the community, the
27 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 413-419 are as follows:
30 1. ADULTS IN CIVIL COMMITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
80
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of patients who improve mental health based
2 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale................65%
3 b. Average scores on a community readiness/ability
4 survey........................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
5 c. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
6 in each mental health institution...........................20
7 d. Percent of patients satisfied based on survey...90%
8 e. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
9 survey........................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
10 f. Percent of people served who are discharged to the
11 community..................................................50%
12 g. Percent of patients readmitted within 1 year.....FY
13 2000-2001 LBR
14 h. Percent of residents who meet readiness for
15 discharge criteria between 6 months and 12 months after
16 admission.....................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
17 2. ADULTS IN CIVIL COMMITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of people served.......................3,000
19 3. ADULTS IN FORENSIC COMMITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of residents who improve mental health
21 based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale..........77%
22 b. Average number of days to restore competency....167
23 c. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
24 in each mental health institution...........................10
25 d. Percent of residents satisfied based on survey..80%
26 e. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
27 survey.....................................................90%
28 f. Percent of residents restored to competency and
29 ready for discharge within 6 months after admission.........FY
30 2000-2001 LBR
31
81
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 g. Percent of residents restored to competency and
2 ready for discharge between 6 and 12 months after admission.FY
3 2000-2001 LBR
4 4. ADULTS IN FORENSIC COMMITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number served.................................1,742
6 b. Number of adult abuse reports confirmed or proposed
7 confirmed.....................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
8 c. Number of adult abuse or neglect reports from
9 mental health hospitals.......................FY 2000-2001 LBR
10 (h) For the Developmental Services Institutions
11 Program, the purpose of which is to enable individuals with
12 developmental disabilities to live everyday lives, as measured
13 by achievement of valued personal outcomes appropriate to life
14 stages from birth to death, the outcome measures, output
15 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
16 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 420-425 are as
17 follows:
18 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Annual number of significant reportable incidents
20 per 100 persons with developmental disabilities living in
21 developmental services institutions.........................26
22 b. Percent of people discharged as planned........100%
23 c. Percent of clients satisfied with services......95%
24 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Adults receiving services in developmental services
26 institutions.............................................1,357
27 b. Adults incompetent to proceed provided competency
28 training and custodial care in the Mentally Retarded
29 Defendants Program.........................................156
30 (3) Department of Elderly Affairs.--
31
82
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (a) For the program entitled Service to Elders
2 Program, the purpose of which is to assist elders to live in
3 the least restrictive and most appropriate community settings
4 and maintain independence, the outcome measures, output
5 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
6 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 426-443 are as
7 follows:
8 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percentage of elders CARES determined to be
10 eligible for nursing home placement who are diverted.....15.1%
11 b. Percentage of Adult Protective Services referrals
12 served........................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
13 c. Percentage of CARES imminent risk referrals served
14 ...........................................................95%
15 d. Satisfaction with the quality and delivery of home
16 and community-based care for service recipients is equal or
17 greater than previous periods.................FY 2000-2001 LBR
18 e. Cost of home and community-based care (including
19 non-DOEA programs) is less than nursing home care for
20 comparable client groups......................FY 2000-2001 LBR
21 f. Percentage of elders assessed with high or moderate
22 risk environments who improved their environment score.....83%
23 g. Percentage of elders assessed with a high social
24 isolation score who have improved in receiving services....53%
25 h. Percentage of new service recipients with high-risk
26 nutrition scores whose nutritional status improved..........FY
27 2000-2001 LBR
28 i. Percentage of new service recipients whose ADL
29 assessment score has been maintained or improved..FY 2000-2001
30 LBR
31
83
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 j. Percentage of new service recipients whose IADL
2 assessment score has been maintained or improved..FY 2000-2001
3 LBR
4 k. Percentage of family and family-assisted caregivers
5 who self-report they are very likely to provide care.......95%
6 l. Percentage of caregivers assessed at risk who
7 self-report they are very likely of continuing to provide care
8 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
9 m. Percentage of people placed in jobs after
10 participating in the Older Worker Program..................77%
11 n. Average wage at placement for people in the Older
12 Worker Program...........................................$7.07
13 o. Percentage of new service recipients (congregate
14 meal sites) whose nutritional status has been maintained or
15 improved......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
16 p. Percentage of Elder Helplines with an excellent
17 rating on the Elder Helpline evaluation assessment..........FY
18 2000-2001 LBR
19 q. Percentage of people who rate the Memory Disorder
20 Clinic assessment conference as very helpful..FY 2000-2001 LBR
21 r. Percent of clients satisfied with the quality of
22 insurance counseling and information received.FY 2000-2001 LBR
23 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Total number of CARES assessments............77,410
25 b. Percentage of Community Care for the Elderly
26 clients defined as "probable Medicaid eligibles" who remain in
27 state-funded programs....................................13.5%
28 c. Number of elders who enter DOEA service programs
29 each year with a risk score above the 1997-1998 average..2,481
30
31
84
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of elders who enter DOEA service programs
2 each year with a frailty level above the 1997-1998 average
3 .........................................................8,954
4 e. Percentage of copayment goal collected.........100%
5 f. Number of caregivers assessed................11,806
6 g. Number of people trained in Older Workers Program
7 ...........................................................609
8 h. Number of new congregate meal service recipients
9 (assessed)....................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
10 i. Number of people evaluated for memory loss by
11 Memory Disorder Clinics.......................FY 2000-2001 LBR
12 j. Number of volunteer hours..........FY 2000-2001 LBR
13 k. Number of volunteers...............FY 2000-2001 LBR
14 l. Number of people served.....................127,589
15 Section 56. The performance measures and standards
16 established in this section for individual programs in Public
17 Safety and Judiciary agencies shall be applied to those
18 programs for the 1999-2000 fiscal year. These performance
19 measures and standards are directly linked to the
20 appropriations made in the General Appropriations Act for
21 Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as required by the Government
22 Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
23 (1) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.--
24 (a) For the Custody and Control Program, the purpose
25 of which is to protect the public and provide a safe secure
26 environment for incarcerated offenders and the staff
27 maintaining custody of them by applying effective physical
28 security methods and procedures and providing accurate risk
29 assessment and classification of inmates and adequate
30 nutrition and facility maintenance, the outcome measures,
31 output measures, and associated performance standards with
85
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 566-578A
2 are as follows:
3 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
5 major institutions...........................................0
6 b. Percentage of inmates who did not escape when
7 assigned outside a secure perimeter......................99.9%
8 c. Number of inmate-on-inmate physical assaults on one
9 or more persons..........................................1,540
10 d. Number of inmate-on-staff physical assaults on one
11 or more persons............................................592
12 e. Number of major disciplinary reports per 1,000
13 inmates....................................................900
14 f. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
15 reports per 1,000 inmates..................................375
16 g. Percentage of random inmate drug tests that are
17 negative.................................................98.5%
18 h. Total number and percentage of inmate random drug
19 tests that are positive.............................1,381/1.5%
20 (b) For the Health Services Program, the purpose of
21 which is to protect the public and maintain a humane
22 environment in correctional institutions for incarcerated
23 offenders and the staff maintaining custody of them by
24 applying effective basic health care treatment to inmates, the
25 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
26 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
27 Appropriations 600-603 are as follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Total number of health care grievances upheld....50
30 b. Percentage of health care grievances upheld....1.6%
31
86
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Number of suicides per 1,000 inmates within DOC
2 compared to the national average for correctional
3 facilities/institutions.........................0.06%/National
4 average not available
5 (c) For the Community Corrections Program the purpose
6 of which is to assist sentenced felony offenders to become
7 productive law abiding citizens by applying supervision in the
8 community to hold offenders accountable to the conditions of
9 their supervision and to detect violations of those conditions
10 and make apprehensions when violations or new crimes occur,
11 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
12 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
13 Appropriations 579-589 are as follows:
14 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded within
16 2 years.............................................3,544/4.1%
17 b. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
18 supervision revoked within 2 years................33,204/37.0%
19 c. Number/percentage of offenders who did not
20 participate in or did not complete programs.........3,392/4.4%
21 d. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
22 supervision revoked who did not participate in or did not
23 complete programs.................................31,363/40.3%
24 e. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
25 completed a secure residential drug treatment program...0/0.0%
26 f. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
27 supervision revoked who completed a secure residential drug
28 treatment program.....................................21/10.2%
29 g. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
30 completed a nonsecure residential drug treatment program
31 .......................................................36/2.3%
87
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 h. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
2 supervision revoked who completed a nonsecure residential drug
3 treatment program....................................455/29.6%
4 i. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
5 completed a nonresidential drug treatment program......61/1.3%
6 j. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
7 supervision revoked who completed a nonresidential drug
8 treatment program....................................866/18.4%
9 k. Number/percentage of offenders who absconded who
10 completed a program at a Probation and Restitution Center
11 .......................................................12/2.8%
12 l. Number/percentage of offenders who had their
13 supervision revoked who completed a program at a Probation and
14 Restitution Center...................................110/31.0%
15 m. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
16 completed supervision/work release, but are subsequently
17 recommitted to prison for committing a new crime within 2
18 years.................................................497/1.2%
19 n. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
20 completed supervision/work release, but are subsequently
21 recommitted to supervision for committing a new crime within 2
22 years...............................................2,211/5.7%
23 o. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
24 completed a secure residential drug treatment program, but are
25 subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new crime
26 within 2 years..........................................0/0.0%
27 p. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
28 completed a secure residential drug treatment program, but are
29 subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a new
30 crime within 2 years...................................3/13.3%
31
88
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 q. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
2 completed a nonsecure residential drug treatment program, but
3 are subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new
4 crime within 2 years....................................7/2.7%
5 r. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
6 completed a nonsecure residential drug treatment program, but
7 are subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a
8 new crime within 2 years..............................26/10.2%
9 s. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
10 completed a nonresidential drug treatment program, but are
11 subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new crime
12 within 2 years.........................................17/0.6%
13 t. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
14 completed a nonresidential drug treatment program, but are
15 subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a new
16 crime within 2 years..................................171/5.7%
17 u. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
18 completed a probation and restitution center program, but are
19 subsequently recommitted to prison for committing a new crime
20 within 2 years..........................................0/0.0%
21 v. Number/percentage of offenders who successfully
22 completed a probation and restitution center program, but are
23 subsequently recommitted to supervision for committing a new
24 crime within 2 years....................................8/8.6%
25 w. Number/percentage of offenders supervised in the
26 community who are ordered by the court to participate in
27 programs and the percentage of those that participate in
28 educational and/or vocational programs.............1,874/95.3%
29 x. Number/percentage of offenders supervised in the
30 community who are ordered by the court to participate in
31
89
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 programs and the percentage of those that participate in drug
2 treatment programs................................34,142/81.7%
3 y. Percentage of offenders supervised in the community
4 who are ordered by the court to participate in educational
5 and/or vocational programs and the percentage of those who
6 participate........................................1,874/95.3%
7 z. Percentage of offenders supervised in the community
8 who are ordered by the court to participate in drug treatment
9 programs and the percentage of those who participate
10 ..................................................34,142/81.7%
11 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
13 in the community on administrative supervision compared to the
14 department standard....................................0.1/0.0
15 b. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
16 in the community on basic risk supervision compared to the
17 department standard....................................1.1/1.0
18 c. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
19 in the community on enhanced risk supervision compared to the
20 department standard....................................1.5/1.5
21 d. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
22 in the community on intensive risk supervision compared to the
23 department standard....................................1.8/2.0
24 e. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
25 in the community on close risk supervision compared to the
26 department standard....................................2.4/3.0
27 f. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
28 in the community on community control compared to the
29 department standard....................................6.3/8.0
30 g. Total annual dollar amount collected from offenders
31 on community supervision only by DOC...............$65,061,512
90
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 h. Total annual dollar amount collected from offenders
2 on community supervision only by DOC for restitution
3 ...................................................$27,432,748
4 i. Total annual dollar amount collected from offenders
5 on community supervision only by DOC for other court-ordered
6 costs..............................................$13,129,604
7 j. Total annual dollar amount collected from offenders
8 on community supervision only by DOC for costs of supervision
9 ...................................................$23,592,056
10 k. Annual dollar amount collected for subsistence from
11 offenders/inmates in community correctional centers.$7,835,742
12 l. Annual dollar amount collected for subsistence from
13 offenders/inmates in probation and restitution centers
14 ......................................................$571,560
15 (d) For the Offender Work and Training Program, the
16 purpose of which is to use the labor of incarcerated adult and
17 youthful offenders to benefit the state local communities and
18 victims of crimes by providing educational vocational and life
19 management opportunities that reduce the costs of prison
20 construction provide projects to improve communities and
21 provide inmate work administered by other state agencies, the
22 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
23 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
24 Appropriations 590-598A are as follows:
25 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Number and percentage of inmates needing mandatory
27 literacy program who participate in mandatory literacy
28 programs.............................................8,364/64%
29 b. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
30 mandatory literacy programs who complete mandatory literacy
31 programs.............................................3,364/40%
91
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Number and percentage of inmates needing GED
2 education programs who participate in GED education programs
3 ....................................................18,464/84%
4 d. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
5 GED education programs who complete GED education programs
6 .....................................................2,348/18%
7 e. Number and percentage of inmates needing special
8 education programs who participate in special education
9 programs.............................................3,011/85%
10 f. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
11 special education programs who complete special education
12 programs......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
13 g. Number and percentage of inmates needing vocational
14 education programs who participate in vocational education
15 programs.............................................9,960/64%
16 h. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
17 vocational education programs who complete vocational
18 education programs...................................2,310/35%
19 i. Number and percentage of inmates needing drug abuse
20 education/treatment programs who participate in drug abuse
21 education/treatment programs........................18,668/45%
22 j. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
23 drug abuse education/treatment programs who complete drug
24 abuse education/treatment programs...................6,316/34%
25 k. Number and percentage of inmates needing life
26 skills programs who participate in life skills programs
27 .......................................................368/18%
28 l. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
29 life skills programs who complete life skills programs.160/43%
30 m. Number and percentage of inmates needing transition
31 programs who participate in transition programs.....4,486/100%
92
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 n. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
2 transition programs who complete transition programs.3,368/75%
3 o. Number and percentage of inmates needing wellness
4 programs who participate in wellness programs........2,396/90%
5 p. Number and percentage of inmates participating in
6 wellness programs who complete wellness programs.......672/28%
7 q. Percentage of inmates placed in a facility that
8 provides at least one of inmate's primary program needs....75%
9 r. Number of inmates available for work assignments
10 and the percentage of those available for work who are not
11 assigned...........................................50,971/2.3%
12 s. Number of available work assignments.........34,626
13 t. Average increase in grade level achieved by inmates
14 participating in educational programs per instructional period
15 ...........................................................0.6
16 u. Number of GED certificates earned by offenders per
17 teacher.................................15.03 for 156 teachers
18 v. Number of vocational certificates earned by
19 offenders per teachers..................17.39 for 139 teachers
20 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number and percent of transition plans completed
22 for inmates released from prison....................22,338/95%
23 b. Number of mandatory literacy programs completed by
24 offenders per teacher with number of GED/MLP teachers shown
25 ............................................21.27/156 teachers
26 c. Number of victims notified annually and the
27 percentage of victim notifications that meet the statutory
28 time period requirements...............15,586/FY 2000-2001 LBR
29 d. Number of annual volunteer hours in the chaplaincy
30 program with annual percentage change shown......250,000/2.8%
31
93
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
2 required by sections 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes,
3 shall be included in the agency Fiscal Year 2000-2001
4 Legislative Budget Request. Measures for which data are
5 unavailable should be included with an explanation as to the
6 utility of the measure.
7 (2) DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.--
8 (a) For the Juvenile Detention Program, the purpose of
9 which is to maintain, develop, and implement a comprehensive
10 range of detention services to protect the community, hold
11 youths accountable, and ensure the appearance of youths for
12 court proceedings, the outcome measures, output measures, and
13 associated performance standards with respect to funds
14 provided in Specific Appropriations 966-968A are as follows.
15 1. SECURE DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of escapes from secure detention facilities
17 per 100,000 resident days..................................3.3
18 b. Number of youth-on-youth batteries (assaults
19 requiring medical attention) per 100,000 resident days while
20 in secure detention.........................................98
21 c. Number of youth-on-staff batteries (assaults
22 requiring medical attention) per 100,000 resident days while
23 in secure detention.........................................22
24 2. SECURE DETENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of admissions to secure detention facilities
26 ........................................................68,403
27 b. Number of releases from secure detention facilities
28 ........................................................67,170
29 c. Average daily population for secure detention as
30 compared to fixed capacity beds in secure detention as of June
31 30.................................................2,571:2,222
94
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 3. HOME/NONSECURE DETENTION OUTCOMES.--
2 a. Number of absconds from home detention per 100,000
3 resident days..............................................121
4 b. Number of new law violations from home detention
5 per 100,000 resident days ..................................92
6 4. HOME/NONSECURE DETENTION OUTPUTS.--
7 a. Number of admissions into home detention/nonsecure
8 detention.............................................. 36,659
9 b. Average daily population for home detention...2,751
10 (b) For the Juvenile Offender Program the purpose of
11 which is to provide protection for the public from juvenile
12 crime by reducing juvenile delinquency through the development
13 and implementation of an effective continuum of services and
14 commitment programs including secure residential programs, the
15 outcome measures, and output measures, and associated
16 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
17 Specific Appropriations 969-972C are as follows:
18 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
20 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
21 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
22 a low-risk program.......................................46.6%
23 b. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
24 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
25 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
26 a moderate-risk program..................................46.8%
27 c. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
28 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
29 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
30 a high-risk program......................................47.4%
31
95
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
2 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
3 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
4 a maximum-risk program...................................38.5%
5 e. Percentage of juveniles who were adjudicated or had
6 adjudication withheld in juvenile court or convicted in adult
7 court for a crime which occurred within 1 year of release from
8 an aftercare program.....................................41.8%
9 f. Percentage of escapes from low-risk residential
10 commitment programs.......................................8.7%
11 g. Percentage of escapes from moderate-risk
12 residential commitment programs..........................3.42%
13 h. Percentage of escapes from high-risk residential
14 commitment programs......................................1.19%
15 i. Percentage of escapes from maximum residential
16 commitment programs.......................................0.0%
17 j. Percentage of residential commitment program
18 reviews conducted by Quality Assurance which indicate
19 satisfactory or higher ratings on all physical plant safety
20 and security standards.....................................80%
21 k. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
22 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs.........0.18
23 l. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
24 youth in moderate-risk residential commitment programs....0.23
25 m. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
26 youth in high-risk residential commitment programs.........0.4
27 n. Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100
28 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs............0
29 o. Number of youth-on-staff assaults/batteries per 100
30 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs..........1.0
31
96
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 p. Number of youth-on-staff assaults/batteries per 100
2 youth in moderate-risk residential commitment programs.....1.5
3 q. Number of youth-on-staff assaults/batteries per 100
4 youth in high-risk residential commitment programs.........2.0
5 r. Number of youth-on-staff assaults/batteries per 100
6 youth in low-risk residential commitment programs..........5.0
7 s. Percentage of residential commitment program
8 reviews conducted by Quality Assurance, which indicated
9 satisfactory or higher ratings on overall quality..........94%
10 t. Percentage of residential commitment program
11 reviews conducted by Quality Assurance which indicate
12 satisfactory or higher ratings on staff-to-youth ratios....80%
13 u. Percentage of youth who were adjudicated or had
14 adjudication withheld for a crime which occurred within one
15 year of exiting a nonresidential program.................34.7%
16 v. Percentage of cases processed within statutory time
17 frames..................................................71.80%
18 w. Average time in days to make recommendations to the
19 State Attorney once the law enforcement report is received...9
20 x. The number and percentage of contracts awarded on a
21 competitive basis.....................................50/74.6%
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Total number of youth served and average daily
24 population of youth served in low-risk residential commitment
25 programs.............................................2,204/477
26 b. Total number of youth served and average daily
27 population of youth served in moderate-risk residential
28 commitment programs................................9,115/2,681
29 c. Total number of youth served and average daily
30 population of youth served in high-risk residential commitment
31 programs...........................................4,030/1,969
97
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Total number of youth served and average daily
2 population of youth served in maximum-risk residential
3 commitment programs....................................259/217
4 e. Number of low-risk residential commitment beds
5 on-line....................................................530
6 f. Number of moderate-risk residential commitment beds
7 on-line..................................................3,852
8 g. Number of high-risk residential commitment beds
9 on-line..................................................2,562
10 h. Number of maximum-risk residential commitment beds
11 on-line....................................................297
12 i. Number of youth receiving supervision services,
13 either state or contracted, in community control........30,000
14 j. Number of youth receiving supervision services,
15 either state or contracted, in diversion programs.......17,824
16 k. Average annual community control and intake
17 caseload compared to agency standard for 1,080 FTE...42:1/32:1
18 l. Number of youth processed through intake....112,000
19
20 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
21 required by sections 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes,
22 shall be included in the agency Fiscal Year 2000-2001
23 Legislative Budget Request. Measures for which data are
24 unavailable should be included with an explanation as to the
25 utility of the measure.
26 (3) DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.--
27 (a) For the Criminal Justice Investigations and
28 Forensic Science Program the purpose of which is to manage,
29 coordinate and provide investigative, forensic, prevention and
30 protection services and through partnerships with local,
31 state, and federal criminal justice agencies to improve the
98
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 state's capacity to prevent crime and detect, capture and
2 prosecute criminal suspects, the outcome measures, output
3 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
4 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 982-986 are as
5 follows:
6 1. LABORATORY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Number/percentage of service requests by lab
8 discipline completed................................73,500/95%
9 b. Average number of days to complete lab service
10 requests, excluding serology and DNA........................30
11 c. Average number of days to complete lab service
12 requests for serology.......................................50
13 d. Average number of days to complete lab service
14 requests for DNA...........................................115
15 2. INVESTIGATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Number/percentage of closed criminal investigations
18 resolved.............................................1,008/85%
19 b. Number/percentage of criminal investigations closed
20 resulting in an arrest...........................826/65%/2,212
21 3. LABORATORY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of crime scenes processed................600
23 b. Number of DNA samples added to DNA database...7,000
24 c. Number of expert witness appearances in court
25 proceedings..............................................1,762
26 4. INVESTIGATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of criminal investigations worked......2,794
29 b. Number of criminal investigations commenced...1,504
30 c. Number/percentage of criminal investigations closed
31 .....................................................1,276/46%
99
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of short-term investigative assists worked
2 ...........................................................566
3 5. PROTECTIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of dignitaries provided with FDLE protective
5 services....................................................52
6 b. Number of background investigations performed.3,500
7 (b) For the Criminal Justice Information Program the
8 purpose of which is to provide criminal justice information
9 needed to prevent crime, solve cases, recover property and
10 identify and apprehend criminals; to provide screening to
11 identify persons with criminal warrants, arrests, and
12 convictions; and to provide statistical and analytical
13 information about crime to policymakers and the public, the
14 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 987-992 are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percentage of responses to simulated FCIC queries
19 within defined time frame..................................90%
20 b. Percent of time FCIC is running and accessible
21 .........................................................99.5%
22 c. Percentage response to criminal history record
23 check customers within defined time frame..................92%
24 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Percentage of criminal arrest information received
26 electronically (through AFIS) for entry into the criminal
27 history system.............................................70%
28 b. Number of agencies/FCIC work stations networked
29 ....................................................835/14,631
30 c. Number of agencies connected to the Criminal
31 Justice Network............................................757
100
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of responses to requests for crime
2 statistics..............................................30,000
3 e. Number of responses to requests for criminal
4 history record checks................................1,498,810
5 f. Number of registered sexual predators/ offenders
6 identified to the public................................15,350
7 g. Number of responses to requests for sexual
8 predator/offender information..........................279,000
9 h. Number of missing children cases worked through
10 MCIC.......................................................602
11 (c) For Criminal Justice Professionalism Program the
12 purpose of which is to promote and facilitate the competency
13 and professional conduct of criminal justice officers through
14 a partnership with criminal justice agencies in provide
15 entry-level and in-service officer training and maintain
16 disciplinary procedures the outcome measures, output measures,
17 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
18 provided in Specific Appropriations 993-996 are as follows:
19 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Number/percentage of individuals who pass the basic
21 professionalism certification examination for law enforcement
22 officers, correctional officers, and correctional probation
23 officers.............................................5,140/75%
24 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of course curricula and examinations
26 developed or revised.......................................109
27 b. Number of examinations administered...........7,000
28 c. Number of individuals trained by the Florida
29 Criminal Justice Executive Institute.......................549
30 d. Number of law enforcement officers trained by DARE
31 ...........................................................155
101
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Number of discipline referrals processed for state
2 and local LEOs and COs and CPOs pursuant to Ch. 120, F.S.
3 .........................................................2,100
4 f. Number of criminal justice officer disciplinary
5 actions....................................................452
6 g. Number of program and financial compliance audits
7 performed................................................3,155
8 h. Number of records audited to validate the accuracy
9 and completeness of ATMS2 record information.............2,138
10
11 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
12 required by sections 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes,
13 shall be included in the agency Fiscal Year 2000-2001
14 Legislative Budget Request. Measures for which data are
15 unavailable should be included with an explanation as to the
16 utility of the measure.
17 (4) DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS.--
18 (a) For the Office of the Attorney General Program,
19 the purpose of which is to provide civil representation and
20 legal services on behalf of the State of Florida, and to
21 assist crime victims and law enforcement agencies through
22 associated support services, the outcome measures, output
23 measures and associated performance standards with respect to
24 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 997-1013 are as
25 follows:
26 1. CIVIL REPRESENTATION AND LEGAL SERVICE OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Average number of days for opinion response......29
29 b. Percent of mediated cases resolved in 3 weeks or
30 less.......................................................75%
31
102
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent of lemon law cases resolved in less than
2 one year...................................................99%
3 2. CIVIL REPRESENTATION AND LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Cases opened..................................7,000
6 b. Cases closed..................................4,700
7 c. Number of capital briefs/state & federal
8 responses/oral arguments...................................270
9 d. Number of noncapital briefs/state & federal
10 responses/oral arguments................................11,289
11 e. Number of Antitrust cases closed.................20
12 f. Number of Economic Crime cases closed...........375
13 g. Number of Medicaid Fraud cases closed...........625
14 h. Number of Children's Legal Services (uncontested
15 disposition orders entered) cases closed ................1,400
16 i. Number of Ethics cases closed....................15
17 j. Opinions issued.................................255
18 k. Number/percent of disputes resolved through
19 mediation..............................................105/76%
20 l. Cost per mediation.............................$555
21 3. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND VICTIM SUPPORT SERVICE OUTCOME
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Average number of days from application to payment
24 ............................................................42
25 b. Percent of counties receiving motor vehicle theft
26 grant funds that experienced a reduction in motor vehicle
27 theft incidents below 1994 levels..........................85%
28 4. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND VICTIM SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of victim compensation claims eligibility
31 determinations...........................................7,950
103
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of victim compensation claims paid.....7,000
2 c. Number of victim compensation final orders issued
3 ...........................................................170
4 d. Number of sexual battery examination claims paid
5 .........................................................5,200
6 e. Number of appellate services provided...........800
7 f. Number of information and referral services
8 provided................................................25,000
9 g. Number of VOCA grants funded....................200
10 h. Number of victims served through contract...100,000
11 i. Number of motor vehicle theft grants funded......40
12 j. Number of people attending training (victims/crime
13 prevention)........................................1,368/3,550
14 k. Number of training sessions held (victims/crime
15 prevention)..............................................33/30
16 (b) For the Statewide Prosecution Program the purpose
17 of which is to investigate and prosecute criminal offenses
18 enumerated in section 16.56, Florida Statutes, when they have
19 been part of an organized crime conspiracy affecting two or
20 more judicial circuits, including assistance to federal state
21 attorneys and local law enforcement offices in their efforts
22 against organized crime, the outcome measures, output
23 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
24 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1014-1016 are as
25 follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Of the defendants who reached disposition, the
28 number of those convicted..................................625
29 b. Conviction rate per defendant...................96%
30 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of law enforcement agencies assisted......66
104
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Ratio of request to number of intake prosecutors
2 .........................................................297:5
3 c. Ratio of investigations to number of prosecutors
4 ..........................................................21:1
5 d. Ratio of total filed cases to total number of
6 prosecutors................................................8:1
7
8 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
9 required by sections 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes,
10 shall be included in the agency Fiscal Year 2000-2001
11 Legislative Budget Request. Measures for which data are
12 unavailable should be included with an explanation as to the
13 utility of the measure.
14 Section 57. The performance measures and standards
15 established in this section for individual programs in Natural
16 Resources shall be applied to those programs for the 1999-2000
17 fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are
18 directly linked to the appropriations made in the General
19 Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as required by
20 the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
21 (1) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES.--
22 (a) For the Food Safety and Quality Program, the
23 purpose of which is to ensure the safety, wholesomeness,
24 quality, and accurate labeling of food products through
25 inspections, laboratory analyses, consumer assistance, and
26 enforcement actions, the outcome measures, output measures,
27 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
28 provided in Specific Appropriations 1042-1046 are as follows:
29 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30
31
105
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Total outbreaks of food-borne illness in
2 Florida/total number of people who become ill in calendar year
3 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
4 b. Number/percentage of food and dairy establishments
5 which fail to meet food safety and sanitation requirements
6 ....................................................2,670/8.9%
7 c. Number of food or dairy products removed from sale
8 for failure to meet food safety requirements or standards
9 ........................................................15,500
10 d. Number/percentage of food products analyzed which
11 fail to meet standards................................775/8.5%
12 e. Number/percentage of milk and milk products
13 analyzed which fail to meet standards...............1,300/6.5%
14 f. Number/percentage of produce or other food samples
15 analyzed which fail to meet pesticide residue standards
16 .......................................................52/2.3%
17 g. Number/percentage of food and dairy enforcement
18 actions which result in compliance or other resolution within
19 60 days, excluding Field Notices of Violation.......13,000/99%
20 2. OUTPUT MEASURES
21 a. Number of inspections of food establishments, dairy
22 establishments, and water vending machines..............61,500
23 b. Number of enforcement actions taken, excluding
24 Field Notices of Violation..............................13,131
25 c. Number of food analyses/samples analyzed
26 ..................................................31,200/9,000
27 d. Number of milk and milk products analyses/samples
28 analyzed.........................................70,000/20,000
29 e. Number of pesticide residue analyses/samples
30 analyzed.........................................273,000/3,050
31
106
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Number of food-related consumer assistance
2 investigations or actions................................4,800
3 g. Tons of poultry and shell eggs graded.......430,000
4 (b) For the Consumer Protection Program, the purpose
5 of which is to protect Florida's consumers from deceptive and
6 unfair business and trade practices and from unsafe, harmful,
7 and inferior products and services, the outcome measures,
8 output measures, and associated performance standards with
9 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations
10 1047-1050A are as follows:
11 1. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTCOME
12 MEASURES.--
13 a. Number/percentage of LP Gas accidents due to
14 equipment failure or code violations at licensed LP Gas
15 storage, distribution, and handling facilities............2/3%
16 b. Number/percentage of LP Gas facilities found in
17 compliance with safety requirements on first inspection
18 .......................................................989/20%
19 c. Number of reportable accidents resulting from
20 amusement attraction mechanical or structural failure........1
21 d. Number/percentage of amusement attractions found in
22 full compliance with safety requirements on first inspection
23 .....................................................3,441/37%
24 e. Number/percentage of regulated weighing and
25 measuring devices, packages, and businesses with scanners in
26 compliance with accuracy standards during initial
27 inspection/testing.................................237,000/95%
28 f. Number/percentage of petroleum products meeting
29 quality standards.................................57,000/99.2%
30
31
107
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 g. Number/percentage of state and commercial weights
2 and volumetric standards found within specified tolerances
3 ....................................................11,760/98%
4 2. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTPUT
5 MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of LP Gas facility inspections/reinspections
7 conducted................................................4,200
8 b. Number of LP Gas-related accidents investigated..50
9 c. Number of amusement device safety/permit
10 inspections conducted..............................9,300/1,725
11 d. Number of weighing and measuring devices
12 inspected/tested.......................................249,000
13 e. Number of complaints investigated/processed
14 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of
15 Standards in the Consumer Protection Program.............3,180
16 f. Number of LP Gas professional certification
17 examinations administered................................1,500
18 g. Number of laboratory analyses performed on
19 regulated petroleum products...........................140,000
20 h. Number of enforcement actions taken against all
21 entities regulated by the Division of Standards in the
22 Consumer Protection Program.............................37,375
23 i. Number of physical measurement standards tests or
24 calibrations conducted..................................12,000
25 3. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Number/percentage regulated entities (motor vehicle
27 repair shops, health studio, telemarketer, business
28 opportunity, dance studio, solicitation of contribution,
29 sellers of travel, and pawn shops) found operating in
30 violation of the consumer protection laws............8,892/26%
31
108
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number/percentage of consumer hotline callers that
2 receive accurate information and are treated courteously by
3 call center staff.............................FY 2000-2001 LBR
4 c. Number/percentage of "no-sales solicitation"
5 complaints from subscribers.........................17,160/13%
6 d. Amount/percentage of money recovered for consumers
7 from regulated motor vehicle repair shops..........$165,000/FY
8 2000-2001 LBR
9 4. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of assists provided to consumers, not
11 including lemon law..................................1,003,195
12 b. Number of lemon law assists made to consumers
13 ........................................................30,450
14 c. Number of complaints investigated/processed
15 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of Consumer
16 Services in the Consumer Protection Program.............33,529
17 d. Number of enforcement actions taken against all
18 entities regulated by the Division of Consumer Services in the
19 Consumer Protection Program................................260
20 e. Number of "no sales solicitation calls"
21 subscriptions processed................................180,000
22 5. AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Number/percentage of licensed pest control
25 applicators inspected who misapply chemicals or otherwise
26 violate regulations....................................375/23%
27 b. Number/percentage of feed, seed, and fertilizer
28 inspected products in compliance with performance/quality
29 standards.........................................16,698/90.5%
30 c. Number/percentage of licensed pesticide applicators
31 who do not apply chemicals properly....................198/36%
109
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of reported human/equine disease cases
2 caused by mosquitoes......................................3/40
3 6. AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of pest control inspections conducted..1,630
6 b. Number of feed, seed, and fertilizer inspections
7 conducted...............................................12,146
8 c. Number of complaints investigated/processed
9 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of
10 Agricultural Environmental Services in the Consumer Protection
11 Program excluding pesticide-related actions................800
12 d. Number of pest control professional certification
13 examinations administered................................1,605
14 e. Number of laboratory analyses performed on seed and
15 fertilizer samples.....................................160,000
16 f. Number of enforcement actions taken against all
17 entities regulated by the Division of Agricultural
18 Environmental Services in the Consumer Protection Program
19 excluding pesticide-related actions......................2,470
20 g. Number of pesticide-related complaints investigated
21 ...........................................................352
22 h. Number of pesticide-related inspections conducted
23 .........................................................3,129
24 i. Number of pesticide-related enforcement actions
25 initiated/completed........................................500
26 j. Number of wells monitored for pesticide or nitrate
27 residues....................................................46
28 k. Number of pesticide product and residue analyses
29 performed in the pesticide laboratory...................63,500
30 l. Number of persons in Florida served by effective
31 mosquito control programs...........................14,000,000
110
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (c) For the Agricultural Economic Development Program,
2 the purpose of which is to maintain and enhance Florida
3 agriculture in the national and international marketplace, the
4 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
5 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
6 Appropriations 1051-1068M are as follows:
7 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percentage of national agricultural gate receipts
9 represented by Florida agricultural products..FY 2000-2001 LBR
10 b. Percentage of national agricultural exports
11 represented by Florida agricultural products..FY 2000-2001 LBR
12 c. Percentage/value of Florida's gross state product
13 represented by Florida agricultural products..FY 2000-2001 LBR
14 2. MARKET DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION, STATISTICS, AND
15 REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Gate receipts value of agriculture and seafood
17 products sold by Florida's agricultural industry, in dollars
18 in calendar year................................$7.075 billion
19 b. Total sales of agricultural and seafood products
20 generated by tenants of state farmers markets.....$194,189,444
21 c. Dollar value of federal commodities and recovered
22 food distributed...................................$52,142,213
23 3. MARKET DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION, STATISTICS, AND
24 REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of buyers reached with agricultural
26 promotion campaign messages.......................2.02 billion
27 b. Number of marketing assists provided to producers
28 and businesses..........................................96,319
29 c. Pounds of federal commodities and recovered food
30 distributed.........................................66,214,385
31 4. FRUIT AND VEGETABLE REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
111
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Dollar value of fruit and vegetables that are
2 shipped to other states or countries which are subject to
3 mandatory inspection............................$1,443,648,000
4 5. FRUIT AND VEGETABLE REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
5 a. Number of tons of fruits and vegetables inspected
6 ....................................................13,781,717
7 6. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Number/percentage of newly introduced pests and
9 diseases prevented from infesting Florida plants to a level
10 where eradication is biologically or economically unfeasible
11 .....................................................100/93.5%
12 b. Number/percentage of commercial citrus acres free
13 of citrus canker.................................832,581/98.5%
14 c. Number/percentage of acres of commercial citrus,
15 monitored by the department, at the request of the grower,
16 which are free of the Caribbean fruit fly..........186,000/98%
17 d. Number/percentage of exotic fruit fly
18 (Mediterranean, Oriental, Mexican, Queensland, West Indian)
19 outbreaks where eradication can occur without use of
20 aerial-treatments.......................................2/100%
21 7. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of plant, fruit fly trap, and honeybee
23 inspections performed................................2,280,000
24 b. Number of commercial citrus acres surveyed for
25 citrus canker..........................................245,000
26 c. Number of exotic fruit fly traps serviced....36,729
27 d. Millions of sterile med flies released........7,800
28 e. Number of acres where plant pest and disease
29 eradication or control efforts were undertake..........100,000
30 f. Number of shipments of plant products certified
31 pest-free for export....................................25,000
112
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 g. Number of plant, soil, insect, and other organism
2 samples processed for identification or diagnosis......650,000
3 8. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Number/percentage of livestock and poultry infected
5 with specific transmissible diseases for which monitoring,
6 controlling, and eradicating activities are established
7 ..................................................472/0.00083%
8 9. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of animal site inspections performed..14,904
10 b. Number of animals tested/vaccinated.650,000/120,000
11 c. Number of animal sites quarantined and monitored
12 ...........................................................315
13 d. Number of/unit cost per animal-related diagnostic
14 laboratory procedure(s) performed................850,000/$2.84
15 e. Number of animals covered by health certificates
16 .......................................................815,000
17 f. Number of animal permits processed............4,750
18 10. AGRICULTURE INSPECTION STATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
20 inspection stations.................................11,236,244
21 b. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
22 inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated
23 commodities..........................................2,505,682
24 c. Percentage of vehicles inspected at agricultural
25 inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated
26 commodities................................................22%
27 d. Amount of revenue generated by Bills of Lading
28 transmitted to the Department of Revenue from Agricultural
29 Inspection stations................................$12,658,800
30
31
113
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Number of Bills of Lading transmitted to the
2 Department of Revenue from Agricultural Inspection stations
3 ........................................................83,000
4 (d) For the Forest and Resource Protection Program,
5 the purpose of which is to promote and use sound management
6 practices for forestry and other agricultural activities, the
7 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
8 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
9 Appropriations 1038D-1038V are as follows:
10 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Number/percentage of acres of protected forest and
12 wildlands not burned by wildfires.............24,924,300/99.3%
13 b. Number/percentage of threatened structures not
14 burned by wildfires..................................1,000/98%
15 c. Number/percentage of wildfires caused by humans
16 .....................................................3,040/80%
17 d. Number/percentage of State Forest timber producing
18 acres adequately stocked and growing.............107,485/25.9%
19 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of wildfires detected and suppressed...3,800
21 b. Average elapsed time in minutes between wildfire
22 ignition and detection......................................55
23 c. Average elapsed time in minutes between wildfire
24 detection and arrival on scene..............................34
25 d. Number/percentage of forest acres and other lands
26 managed by the department and purchased by the state with
27 approved management plans..........................831,951/94%
28 e. Number of acres burned through prescribed burning
29 ...................................................2.1 million
30 f. Number of person-hours of firefighting training
31 provided................................................47,000
114
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 g. Number of forest-related technical assists provided
2 to nonindustrial private land owners....................37,000
3 h. Number of open burning authorizations processed for
4 land clearing, agriculture, and silviculture...........118,000
5 i. Number of fire prevention presentations made..1,350
6 j. Number of person-hours spent responding to
7 emergency incidents other than wildfires.................8,000
8 (2) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.--
9 (a) No later than 45 days after this act becomes law,
10 the Executive Office of the Governor may adjust measures
11 related to the Air Resources Management, Water Resources
12 Management, and Waste Management programs as necessary to
13 comply with statutory law and specific appropriations, subject
14 to the notification, review and objection procedures of
15 section 216.177, Florida Statutes. Nothing in these measures
16 and standards shall permit the agency to engage in regulatory
17 or enforcement activities, or to establish requirements, more
18 stringent than those specifically authorized in statutory law.
19 (b) For the State Lands Program, the purpose of which
20 is to acquire, administer, and dispose of state lands, the
21 title of which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the
22 Internal Improvement Trust Fund; administer, manage, and
23 maintain the records of all lands held by the Board of
24 Trustees; administer and maintain the geodetic survey
25 requirements for the State of Florida; identify and set
26 ordinary and mean high water boundaries for purposes of
27 sovereignty and land title; and control aquatic and invasive
28 plant species, the outcome measures, output measures, and
29 associated performance standards with respect to funds
30 provided in Specific Appropriations 1187-1209 are as follows:
31 1. LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
115
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent increase in the number of occurrences of
2 endangered/ threatened/special concern species on publicly
3 managed conservation areas.................................10%
4 2. LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of acres of critical habitat acquired by the
6 P2000 Program as listed in the CARL report.............311,601
7 b. Percentage of acres acquired by the P2000 Program
8 that have a critical habitat within the acquired tract.....38%
9 c. Number of acres of land acquired by the P2000
10 Program that had its highest resource values based on FNAI
11 elements...............................................218,808
12 d. Number and percent completion of projects on the
13 CARL list...............................................95/10%
14 e. Percentage of parcels at less than appraised value
15 - $100,000 or less..........................................6%
16 f. Percentage of parcels at less than appraised value
17 - greater than $100,000....................................63%
18 g. Percentage of appraised value to purchase price -
19 $100,000 or less...........................................93%
20 h. Percentage of appraised value to purchase price -
21 greater than $100,000......................................89%
22 i. Number of appraisals certified..................336
23 j. Number of surveys/maps certified for environmental
24 land acquisition.........................................98/49
25 k. Number of surveys/maps certified for
26 nonenvironmental land acquisition........................20/21
27 l. Percentage of parcels acquired within the "standard
28 time limit" - $100,000 or less.............................51%
29 m. Percentage of parcels acquired within the "standard
30 time limit" - greater than $100,000........................57%
31 3. LAND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
116
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of parcels evaluated and disposed of that
2 have been determined to have no further public use..........80
3 b. Percentage of easements, leases, and other requests
4 completed by maximum time frames prescribed................75%
5 c. Percentage of all leases of sovereign submerged
6 lands in compliance with lease conditions..................92%
7 d. Percentage of all land management plans completed
8 within statutory time frames...............................60%
9 4. LAND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Percentage of submerged land leases found in
11 compliance annually........................................92%
12 b. Ratio of parcels of lands surplused/parcels of land
13 evaluated for possible surplus.............................1:2
14 c. Number of verified records maintained.......237,265
15 d. Number of submerged land leases audited annually
16 ...........................................................313
17 5. AQUATIC/EXOTIC PLANT CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of new acres of public land that have
19 invasive, exotic, upland plants controlled and have existing
20 management personnel committed to maintaining these plants
21 under control after initial treatment....................3,500
22 b. Percentage of Florida's public waters where control
23 of hydrilla, water hyacinth, and water lettuce has been
24 achieved and sustained.....................................93%
25 6. AQUATIC/EXOTIC PLANT CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Percentage of public lakes and rivers that contain
27 invasive, nonnative aquatic plants and are under maintenance
28 control....................................................93%
29 b. Percentage of public lands where invasive,
30 nonnative upland plants, have been brought under control
31
117
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 through efforts of, or pass-through funding, by the Bureau of
2 Aquatic Plant Management......................FY 2000-2001 LBR
3 c. Average cost per acre to achieve maintenance
4 control of aquatic, nonnative plants......................$130
5 (c) For the Marine Resources Program, the purpose of
6 which is to preserve, enhance, and restore desired natural
7 functions and diversity of Florida's marine and estuarine
8 environments, the outcome measures, output measures, and
9 associated performance standards with respect to funds
10 provided in Specific Appropriations 1221A-1221AB are as
11 follows:
12 1. SHELLFISH REGULATION AND MARINE RESEARCH
13 OUTCOMES.--
14 a. Reduce the ratio of shellfish illnesses reported
15 from Florida shellfish products to the number of meals served
16 .................................................0.331/100,000
17 b. Increase in the number of marine fisheries stocks
18 reported as stable or increasing...........................113
19 2. SHELLFISH REGULATION AND MARINE RESEARCH OUTPUT
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Percent of research projects that provide
22 management recommendations or support management actions..100%
23 b. Percent of shellfish and crab processing facilities
24 in significant compliance with permit and food safety
25 regulations................................................80%
26 c. Limit in the number of reported cases of
27 sickness/deaths from shellfish consumption that can be
28 directly traced to seafood harvested from contaminated waters
29 or to actions by fishermen, packing houses, or seafood dealers
30 not in compliance with state regulations..................48/3
31
118
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Commercial and other fishing licenses processed
2 annually................................................25,951
3 e. Artificial reefs monitored and/or created annually
4 ............................................................65
5 f. Percentage of shellfish harvesting areas opened
6 .........................................................67.5%
7 g. Red tide/fish kill/disease investigations.........6
8 3. PROTECTION OF ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES
9 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
10 a. Reduction in the manatee mortality rate..........1%
11 4. PROTECTION OF ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES
12 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Limit in the number of manatee deaths as a result
14 of human activities.........................................57
15 b. Limit in the number of manatee deaths as a result
16 of nonhuman activities.....................................134
17 c. Manatee population............................2,275
18 d. Number of Sea turtle nests - NW region..........905
19 e. Number of Sea turtle nests - NE region........2,702
20 f. Number of Sea turtle nests - SE region.......68,022
21 g. Number of Sea turtle nests - SW region........6,235
22 h. Manatee federal recovery plans completed and tasks
23 implemented.................................................87
24 i. Miles of sea turtle index nesting beaches surveyed
25 ...........................................................201
26 j. Limit in the number/percent of stranded sea turtles
27 necropsied...........................................1,000/10%
28 (d) For the Water Resources Management Program, the
29 purpose of which is to regulate, manage, conserve, and protect
30 the state's drinking water, surface and groundwater resources,
31 wetlands, beaches, and lands reclaimed after mining
119
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 activities, the outcome measures, output measures, and
2 associated performance standards with respect to funds
3 provided in Specific Appropriations 1222-1243A are as follows:
4 1. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING OUTCOME
5 MEASURES.--
6 a. Percentage of rivers that meet designated uses..92%
7 b. Percentage of lakes that meet designated uses...87%
8 c. Percentage of estuaries that meet designated uses
9 ...........................................................95%
10 d. Percentage of groundwater that meets designated
11 uses ......................................................85%
12 e. Percentage of reclaimed water (reuse) capacity
13 relative to total domestic wastewater capacity.............40%
14 f. Percentage of public water systems with no
15 significant (public health-based) drinking water quality
16 problems...................................................90%
17 g. Number of wetland acres within agency jurisdiction
18 successfully preserved, created, restored, and enhanced to
19 offset the number of wetland acres impacted; and functional
20 wetland acres - net gain/loss ratio..........................0
21 2. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING OUTPUT
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of wastewater inspections, site visits,
24 technical assistance contacts, and other compliance activities
25 .........................................................1,260
26 b. Number of wastewater permits and other
27 authorizations processed....................................30
28 c. Number of water quality stations monitored in the
29 statewide monitoring networks..............................980
30
31
120
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of drinking water inspections, site visits,
2 technical assistance contacts, and other compliance activities
3 .........................................................2,520
4 3. BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND
5 PERMITTING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Linear miles of beaches which provide upland
7 protection, wildlife habitat, or recreation according to
8 statutory and rule requirements............................825
9 4. BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND
10 PERMITTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Beach renourishment and dune restoration funds
12 awarded...........................................$7.7 million
13 b. Number of beach renourishment and dune restoration
14 projects funded..............................................7
15 c. Number of other compliance activities...........168
16 d. Number of coastal construction permits, including
17 field permits, processed.................................1,580
18 e. Miles of shoreline surveyed and monitored.......752
19 5. MINE RECLAMATION AND PERMITTING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
20 a. Percentage of mined lands qualifying for
21 reclamation which have been reclaimed according to statutory
22 and rule requirements......................................95%
23 6. MINE RECLAMATION AND PERMITTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Funds awarded annually for mine reclamation
25 projects...........................................$10 million
26 b. Number of mining permits processed/number of
27 inspections.............................................20/550
28 c. Number of applications/acreage processed for mine
29 reclamation projects..................................60/6,500
30 7. WATER FACILITIES FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OUTCOME
31 MEASURE.--
121
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percentage of wastewater, drinking water, and
2 stormwater projects on State Revolving Fund loan priority
3 lists and the construction grant priority list that are funded
4 annually..................................................3.5%
5 8. WATER FACILITIES FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Loan grant funds awarded................$80 million
8 b. Number of local governments, including
9 systems/utilities funded....................................12
10 (e) For the Waste Management Program, the purpose of
11 which is to protect the public and the environment through
12 promotion of sound waste management practices, the outcome
13 measures, output measures, and associated performance
14 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
15 Appropriations 1244-1277D are as follows:
16 1. PETROLEUM TANK REGULATION AND CONTAMINATED SITE
17 REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percentage of regulated petroleum storage tank
19 facilities in compliance with state regulations............89%
20 b. Percentage/number of contaminated petroleum sites
21 with rehabilitation underway..........................9%/1,544
22 c. Percentage/number of contaminated petroleum sites
23 with rehabilitation completed..........................0.3%/57
24 2. PETROLEUM TANK REGULATION AND CONTAMINATED SITE
25 REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Percentage of reimbursement claims processed...100%
27 b. Number and percentage of petroleum sites eligible
28 for state financial assistance......................17,100/99%
29 3. DRYCLEANING SITE REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percentage and number of contaminated drycleaning
31 sites with rehabilitation underway.......................9%/82
122
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percentage and number of contaminated drycleaning
2 sites with rehabilitation completed.......................0%/0
3 4. DRYCLEANING SITE REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
4 a. Number of drycleaning site cleanup applications
5 eligible for state financial assistance..................1,200
6 5. HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION, MANAGEMENT, AND SITE
7 REHABILITATION OUTCOMES.--
8 a. Percentage of all hazardous waste generators in
9 significant compliance with state and federal regulations..88%
10 b. Percentage of permitted transfer, storage, and
11 disposal facilities in significant compliance with state and
12 federal regulations........................................95%
13 c. Number of facilities or sources of pollution that
14 modified their industrial processes to reduce generation of
15 pollutants as a result of department activities.............10
16 d. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (Federal
17 superfund sites) with rehabilitation underway..........100%/49
18 e. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (Federal
19 superfund sites) with rehabilitation completed............0%/0
20 f. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (known
21 state program sites) with rehabilitation underway.......95%/19
22 g. Percentage/number of contaminated sites (known
23 state program sites) with rehabilitation completed........5%/1
24 6. HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION, MANAGEMENT, AND SITE
25 REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
26 a. Number of tons of hazardous waste generated in
27 Florida................................................185,221
28 7. SOLID WASTE REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Percentage of permitted solid waste facilities in
31 compliance with state requirements.........................96%
123
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percentage of municipal solid waste recycled
2 statewide..................................................40%
3 c. Number of tons/percentage of municipal solid waste
4 collected that is recycled.......................9,423,784/40%
5 d. Number of tons/percentage of municipal solid waste
6 burned annually..................................4,096,035/17%
7 e. Number of tons/percentage of municipal solid waste
8 disposed in landfills...........................10,266,086/43%
9 8. SOLID WASTE REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of solid waste permits and registrations
12 processed..................................................685
13 b. Number and dollar amount of solid waste management
14 and recycling grants issued....................252/$35 million
15 c. Number of waste-to-energy facilities located in
16 Florida.....................................................13
17 (f) For the Recreation and Parks Program, the purpose
18 of which is to anticipate and meet the outdoor recreation
19 demands of Florida's residents and visitors and to ensure that
20 an adequate natural resource base is maintained to accommodate
21 future demands and preserve a quality environment, the outcome
22 measures, output measures, and associated performance
23 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
24 Appropriations 1278-1327C are as follows:
25 1. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Increase in attendance at state parks over prior
27 year......................................................1.3%
28 b. Increase the acreage available for public
29 recreation over prior year..................................2%
30 2. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of parks sites managed...................151
124
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of recreational facilities built, repaired,
2 or restored by type compared to plan development needs.....174
3 c. Number of cultural/historical sites restored or
4 maintained compared to need..................................1
5 d. Number of acres managed for secondary use/multiple
6 use........................................................500
7 e. Acres of native habitat successfully maintained as
8 natural areas in state parks compared to need...57,176/532,217
9 f. Percentage of management plans completed in
10 compliance with Florida Statutes..........................100%
11 g. Percentage of lands acquired by P2000 that meet at
12 least 3 criteria of the program...........................100%
13 h. Number of parks/acres/trail miles supported by
14 general administration, maintenance/minor repairs, protection,
15 and all variations of visitor service activities
16 ...............................................152/534,387/380
17 i. Number of private/public partnerships utilized to
18 assist operations of state parks...........................900
19 j. Number of state parks additions/inholding land
20 acquisitions................................................10
21 k. Number of recreational and natural/cultural
22 additions and inholding acquisitions for existing parks by
23 type as related to available funding.........................1
24 3. GREENWAYS AND TRAILS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
25 a. Number of additional greenways, recreational
26 trails, or trail systems acquired to provide or enhance access
27 to public lands while ensuring that the ecological integrity
28 of the land is not compromised..............................18
29 4. GREENWAYS AND TRAILS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of state greenways and trails managed......4
31
125
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of miles of recreational facilities built,
2 repaired, or restored by type compared to plan development
3 needs.......................................................35
4 c. Number of trailheads developed to provide public
5 access points on greenways and trails.......................10
6 5. RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
7 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
8 a. Increase in technical assistance and grant related
9 services to local governments over prior year...............2%
10 6. RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OUTPUT
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of recreational grants/funding to local
13 governments for recreational facilities and land acquisition
14 .............................................330/$34.6 million
15 b. Number of technical assistance consultations,
16 meetings, calls, and publications..........................350
17 7. COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTCOME
18 MEASURE.--
19 a. Percentage of degraded acreage identified in state
20 buffer enhanced or restored..............................11.6%
21 8. COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTPUT
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of acres managed.....................129,493
24 b. Number of acres where invasive or undesirable plant
25 species have been controlled.............................2,255
26 (g) For the Air Resources Management Program, the
27 purpose of which is to maintain and improve the state's air
28 quality through air-pollution mitigation and prevention, the
29 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
30 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
31 Appropriations 1328-1335 are as follows:
126
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 1. AIR QUALITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percentage of population living in areas monitored
3 for air quality............................................90%
4 b. Annual average percentage of time monitored
5 population breathes good quality air.......................80%
6 c. Annual average percentage of time monitored
7 population breathes moderate quality air...................20%
8 d. Percentage of the population which breathes air
9 that violates the standard for ozone as determined by the data
10 generated by the state air quality monitoring network.......4%
11 2. AIR QUALITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of monitors operated by the department and
13 local programs.............................................163
14 b. Number of quality assurance audits conducted to
15 ensure accurate and reliable ambient air quality data......301
16 3. AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT OR PREVENTION OUTCOME
17 MEASURES.--
18 a. Annual 0.5% reduction of NOX air emissions per
19 capita..................................................129.24
20 b. Annual 0.5% reduction of SO2 air emissions per
21 capita...................................................99.67
22 c. Annual 0.5% reduction of CO air emissions per
23 capita..................................................544.33
24 d. Annual 0.5% reduction of VOC air emissions per
25 capita..................................................108.49
26 4. AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT OR PREVENTION OUTPUT
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of Title V permits issued/denied.......315/0
29 b. Number of Title V modifications issued/denied..10/0
30 c. Number of non-Title V permits issued/denied...350/3
31
127
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of non-Title V modifications issued/denied
2 ..........................................................97/0
3 e. Number of Title V facilities inspected..........850
4 f. Number of asbestos projects reviewed and evaluated
5 .........................................................2,260
6 (h) For the Law Enforcement Program, the purpose of
7 which is to protect the people, the environment, and the
8 natural resources through law enforcement, education, and
9 public service, the outcome measures, output measures, and
10 associated performance standards with respect to funds
11 provided in Specific Appropriations 1336-1345 are as follows:
12 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
13 a. Number/percentage of known hazardous substance dump
14 sites and petroleum spills whereby action, other than criminal
15 investigation, was taken to reduce, control, or eliminate risk
16 to public health and the environment.................1,430/48%
17 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of investigations opened/closed......227/182
19 b. Number of environmental dump sites responded to.673
20 c. Number of petroleum spills responded to.........757
21 d. Number of arrests for speed zone violations or
22 manatee molestation......................................1,631
23 e. Funds spent/recovered on spill remediation
24 ..............................................$928,153/$86,638
25 f. Number of sites/spills remediated...............561
26 (3) GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION.--
27 (a) For the Law Enforcement Program, the purpose of
28 which is to provide patrol and protection activities to
29 safeguard the opportunities for boating, camping, fishing,
30 hunting, wildlife viewing, and other natural resource related
31 activities in a safe and healthy environment, the outcome
128
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 measures, output measures, and associated performance
2 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
3 Appropriations 1361-1375 are as follows:
4 1. UNIFORM PATROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Total number of violations...................29,130
6 b. Number of felony violations........FY 2000-2001 LBR
7 c. Number of misdemeanor violations...FY 2000-2001 LBR
8 d. Number of infractions violations...FY 2000-2001 LBR
9 e. Total number of hours spent in preventative land
10 patrol.................................................516,259
11 f. Total number of hours spent in preventative water
12 patrol..................................................68,320
13 g. Total number of hours spent in preventative air
14 patrol...................................................8,244
15 2. INVESTIGATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of hours spent on investigations.....297,167
17 b. Number of violations encountered by all staff
18 ........................................................14,050
19 c. Total number of investigations opened...........806
20 d. Number of felony investigations opened.FY 2000-2001
21 LBR
22 e. Number of misdemeanor investigations opened......FY
23 2000-2001 LBR
24 f. Number of infractions investigations opened......FY
25 2000-2001 LBR
26 g. Total number of investigations closed...........725
27 h. Number of felony investigations closed.FY 2000-2001
28 LBR
29 i. Number of misdemeanor investigations closed......FY
30 2000-2001 LBR
31
129
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 j. Number of infractions investigations closed......FY
2 2000-2001 LBR
3 k. Total violations by investigative staff.......1,368
4 l. Total conviction rate..............FY 2000-2001 LBR
5 m. Felony conviction rate.............FY 2000-2001 LBR
6 n. Misdemeanor conviction rate........FY 2000-2001 LBR
7 o. Infraction conviction rate.........FY 2000-2001 LBR
8 3. INSPECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of inspections.........................4,890
10 b. Number of violations............................587
11 4. AVIATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of air contacts resulting in detection and
13 apprehension...............................................445
14 b. Number of hours of biological flight time
15 requested/provided.................................1,666/1,220
16 5. BOATING SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of vessel safety inspections.........154,408
18 b. Number of accident investigated.................210
19 c. Number of fatalities investigated................26
20 d. Number of injuries investigated.................136
21 e. Number of vessel safety inspection hours on St.
22 Johns River..............................................9,318
23 f. Number of accidents on St. Johns River...........21
24 g. Number of vessel safety inspection hours on Lake
25 Okeechobee...............................................5,861
26 h. Number of accidents on Lake Okeechobee...........15
27 6. HUNTER EDUCATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of hunter education classes offered......350
29 b. Number of graduates of hunter education classes
30 ........................................................12,125
31
130
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent of total students graduating hunter
2 education classes..........................................87%
3 d. Number of hunting accidents......................23
4 e. Number of attendees or graduates of hunter
5 education classes involved in hunting accidents..............7
6 (b) For the Wildlife Management Program, the purpose
7 of which is to maintain or enhance Florida's diverse wildlife
8 and to provide for responsible use of this resource, the
9 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 1379-1394 are as follows:
12 1. WILDLIFE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES OUTCOME
13 MEASURES.--
14 a. Percent change in the number of licensed resident
15 hunters..................................................-2.3%
16 b. Percent change in the number of licensed
17 nonresident hunters.......................................4.6%
18 c. Economic impact of wildlife-related outdoor
19 recreation......................................$3,675,935,000
20 d. Percent of satisfied hunters....................73%
21 e. Percent of satisfied wildlife viewers...........92%
22 f. Percent of the acreage under management control
23 which is open to the public for wildlife-related outdoor
24 recreation...............................................99.9%
25 2. WILDLIFE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES OUTPUT
26 MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of publicly-owned acres managed for
28 wildlife-related outdoor recreation..................3,700,000
29 b. Number of privately-owned acres managed for
30 wildlife-related outdoor recreation....................830,780
31 c. Number of licensed resident hunters.........164,626
131
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of licensed nonresident hunters........4,760
2 e. Number of participants enrolled in wildlife
3 achievement programs.....................................3,750
4 f. Number of wildlife viewers................3,630,000
5 3. WILDLIFE POPULATION AND HABITAT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. The mean biological vulnerability score of 63 game
7 species - score is from 0 to 70 and lower is better......16.44
8 b. The mean biological vulnerability score of 389
9 nongame species - score is from 0 to 70 and lower is better
10 .........................................................13.21
11 c. The mean biological vulnerability score of 80
12 wildlife species listed as endangered, threatened or as a
13 species of special concern - score is from 0 to 70 and lower
14 is better................................................29.62
15 4. WILDLIFE POPULATION AND HABITAT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of acres managed for wildlife......4,530,780
17 b. Number of habitat management plans requested by and
18 prepared for private landowners........................121/121
19 c. Number of requests for wildlife habitat technical
20 assistance received from and provided to other agency or local
21 governments............................................299/299
22 d. Number of survey and monitoring projects for game
23 species.....................................................16
24 e. Number of survey and monitoring projects for
25 nongame wildlife species....................................11
26 f. Number of survey and monitoring projects for
27 wildlife species listed as endangered, threatened or species
28 of special concern...........................................4
29 g. Number of wildlife species for which sufficient
30 data have been obtained to refine the biological vulnerability
31 score.......................................................78
132
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 5. COMMERCIAL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Wholesale price value of the commercial adult
3 alligators, hatchlings, and eggs....................$5,228,826
4 b. Percent change in the number of alligator licenses
5 sold........................................................0%
6 c. Percent change in the number of alligator tags sold
7 - adult, hatchlings, and eggs...............................0%
8 6. COMMERCIAL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of properties enrolled in the private-lands
10 alligator management program...............................124
11 b. Number of alligators available for harvest under
12 the public-waters harvest programs.......................3,370
13 c. Number of alligator nest eggs available to
14 alligator ranches........................................1,118
15 d. Number of alligator hatchlings available to
16 alligator ranches.......................................10,200
17 (c) For the Fisheries Management Program, the purpose
18 of which is to maintain, enhance, and provide for responsible
19 use of Florida's freshwater fisheries, the outcome measures,
20 output measures, and associated performance standards with
21 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations
22 1395-1401B are as follows:
23 1. RECREATIONAL FISHING OPPORTUNITIES OUTCOME MEASURES
24 a. Percent change in licensed resident anglers...-3.6%
25 b. Percent change in licensed nonresident anglers.-17%
26 c. Percent angler satisfaction.....................75%
27 d. Percent change in licensed freshwater commercial
28 fishermen...................................................0%
29 2. RECREATIONAL FISHING OPPORTUNITIES OUTPUT
30 MEASURES.--
31
133
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of water bodies and acres in fish management
2 areas, urban areas, and other lakes or rivers managed to
3 improve fishing....................................113/770,955
4 b. Number of access points established or maintained
5 ............................................................42
6 c. Number of participants in achievement programs..600
7 d. Number of licensed resident anglers.........426,000
8 e. Number of licensed nonresident anglers......117,000
9 f. Number of fish stocked....................2,385,000
10 g. Number of outreach participants in clinics and
11 derbies.................................................25,000
12 h. Number of private and volunteer-staffed events...15
13 i. Number of information and technical assistance
14 requests provided to sports fishermen....................9,468
15 j. Number of licensed freshwater commercial fishermen
16 .........................................................1,500
17 k. Number of commercial fishing permits reviewed and
18 issued including fishing gear and grass carp.............1,145
19 l. Number of information and technical assistance
20 requests received and provided to commercial fishermen......25
21 3. FISHERIES HABITAT REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION
22 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of water bodies and acres where habitat
24 rehabilitation projects have been completed...........6/40,000
25 b. Percentage change in degraded lakes rehabilitated
26 ..........................................................1.7%
27 4. FISHERIES HABITAT REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION
28 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of water bodies and acres with approved
30 habitat rehabilitation plans in progress.............12/90,000
31
134
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of water bodies and acres surveyed for
2 habitat rehabilitation plans........................15/150,000
3 c. Number of water bodies and acres with developed
4 habitat rehabilitation plans........................20/110,000
5 d. Number of habitat rehabilitation technical
6 assistance requests received and provided, including other
7 agencies and local governments...............................4
8 (4) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.--
9 (a) For the District Operations Program, the purpose
10 of which is to develop and implement the State Highway System;
11 to acquire rights of way necessary to support the DOT's work
12 program; to promote all forms of public transportation
13 including transit, aviation, intermodal/rail, and seaport
14 development; and to provide routine and uniform maintenance of
15 the State Highway System, operate vehicle repair shops and
16 warehouses, manage highway beautification, and operate welcome
17 centers, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
18 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
19 Specific Appropriations 1434-1458, 1467-1483, and 1492-1529
20 are as follows:
21 1. HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION/ENGINEERING PROGRAM OUTCOME
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of motor vehicle fatalities per 100 million
24 miles traveled..................................less than 2.05
25 b. Percentage of state highway system pavement in good
26 condition..................................................80%
27 c. Percentage of state-maintained bridges in good
28 condition..................................................95%
29 d. Percentage increase in number of days required for
30 completed construction contracts over original contract days
31 (less weather days)..............................less than 30%
135
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Percentage increase in final amount paid for
2 completed construction contracts over original contract amount
3 .................................................less than 10%
4 f. Percentage of vehicle crashes on state highway
5 system where road-related conditions were listed as a
6 contributing factor.............................less than 1.0%
7 g. Construction Engineering as a percentage of
8 construction...............................................15%
9 2. HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION/ENGINEERING PROGRAM OUTPUT
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of lane miles let to contract for
12 resurfacing..............................................1,752
13 b. Number of lane miles let to contract for highway
14 capacity improvements......................................235
15 c. Percentage of construction contracts planned for
16 letting that were actually let.............................95%
17 d. Number of bridges let to contract for repair.....63
18 e. Number of bridges let to contract for replacement
19 ............................................................67
20 3. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of right-of-way parcels acquired.......2,170
22 b. Number of projects certified ready for construction
23 ...........................................................108
24 4. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Transit ridership growth compared to population
26 growth...................................................2%/2%
27 b. Tons of cargo shipped by air..............4,500,000
28 5. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of passenger enplanements.........59,000,000
30 b. Number of public transit passenger trips
31 ...................................................173,000,000
136
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Number of cruise embarkations and disembarkations
2 at Florida ports....................................11,000,000
3 6. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OUTCOME
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Maintenance condition rating of state highway
6 system as measured against the department's maintenance manual
7 standards...................................................80
8 (b) For the Planning and Engineering Program, the
9 purpose of which is to reduce occurrences of overweight
10 commercial motor vehicles on the State Highway System and
11 eliminate hazards caused by defective or unsafe commercial
12 motor vehicles, the outcome measures, output measures, and
13 associated performance standards with respect to funds
14 provided in Specific Appropriations 1434-1442A are as follows:
15 1. MOTOR CARRIER COMPLIANCE PROGRAM OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of commercial vehicles weighed that were
18 over weight:
19 (I) Fixed scale weighings........................0.4%
20 (II) Portable scale weighings....................37.0%
21 2. MOTOR CARRIER COMPLIANCE PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of commercial vehicles weighed....10,400,000
23 b. Number of commercial vehicles safety inspections
24 performed...............................................75,000
25 c. Number of portable scale weighings performed.50,000
26 (c) For the Finance and Administration Program, the
27 purpose of which is the efficiently operate and maintain state
28 toll facilities, the outcome measures, the output measures,
29 and associated performance standard with respect to funds
30 provided in Specific Appropriations 1412-1427A are as follows:
31 1. TOLL OPERATION PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
137
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Operational cost per toll...................<$0.160
2 2. TOLL OPERATION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of toll transactions.............472,000,000
4
5 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
6 required by sections 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes,
7 shall be included in the agency Fiscal Year 2000-2001
8 Legislative Budget Request. Measures for which data are
9 unavailable should be included with an explanation as to the
10 utility of the measure.
11 Section 58. The performance measures and standards
12 established in this section for individual programs in the
13 General Government agencies shall be applied to those programs
14 for the 1999-2000 fiscal year. These performance measures and
15 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
16 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as
17 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
18 of 1994.
19 (1) DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.--
20 (a) For the Financial Accountability for Public Funds
21 Program, the purpose of which is to provide for and promote
22 financial accountability for public funds throughout state
23 government, provide the citizens of Florida with timely,
24 factual, and comprehensive information on the financial status
25 of the state and how state funds are expended, and receive and
26 investigate complaints of government fraud, waste and abuse,
27 the outcome measures, output measures and associated
28 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
29 Specific Appropriations 1554-1560 are as follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
138
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percentage of program's customers who return an
2 overall customer service rating of good or excellent on
3 surveys....................................................94%
4 b. Percentage of payment requests rejected during the
5 preaudit process for inconsistencies with legal and/or other
6 applicable requirements.....................................1%
7 c. Percentage of vendor payments issues in less than
8 the Comptroller's statutory time limit of ten days........100%
9 d. Accuracy rate of postaudited vendor payments.....FY
10 2000-2001 LBR
11 e. Dollars recovered from erroneous payments compared
12 to total dollars of erroneous payment detected....FY 2000-2001
13 LBR
14 f. Percentage of federal wage and information returns
15 prepared and filed where no penalties or interest were paid
16 ..........................................................100%
17 g. Percentage of federal tax deposits where no
18 penalties or interest were paid...........................100%
19 h. Percentage of payroll payments made accurately
20 based on information submitted............................100%
21 i. Percentage of those utilizing program provided
22 financial information who rate the overall relevancy,
23 usefulness, and timeliness of information as good or excellent
24 ...........................................................95%
25 j. Number of qualifications in the Independent
26 Auditor's Report on the State General Purpose Financial
27 Statements which are related to the presentation of the
28 financial statements.........................................0
29 k. Percentage of vendor payments issued electronically
30 ...........................................................22%
31
139
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 l. Percentage of payroll payments issued
2 electronically.............................................77%
3 m. Percentage of retirement payments issued
4 electronically.............................................79%
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of vendor payment requests preaudited
7 .......................................................800,000
8 b. Percentage of vendor payment requests preaudited
9 ...........................................................19%
10 c. Dollar amount of vendor payment requests preaudited
11 .................................................$14.1 billion
12 d. Number of vendor payment requests postaudited....FY
13 2000-2001 LBR
14 e. Percentage of vendor payment requests postaudited
15 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
16 f. Dollar amount of vendor payment requests
17 postaudited...................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
18 g. Number of vendor invoices paid..........4.2 million
19 h. Dollar amount of vendor invoices paid.$34.7 billion
20 i. Number of federal wage and information returns
21 prepared and filed.....................................289,000
22 j. Number of federal tax deposits made..............88
23 k. Number of IRS penalties paid......................0
24 l. Dollar amount of IRS penalties paid...............0
25 m. Number of payroll payments issued.........5,416,880
26 n. Dollar amount of payroll payments issued.......$5.8
27 billion
28 o. Number of payroll payments issued according to
29 published schedules................................5.4 million
30 p. Percentage of payroll payments issued according to
31 published schedules.......................................100%
140
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 q. Number of instances during the year where as a
2 result of inadequate cash management under this program,
3 general revenue had a negative cash balance..................0
4 r. Percentage of atypical balances corrected at
5 year-end.....................................................0
6 s. Average number of days from month's end to complete
7 reconciliations.............................................30
8 t. Number of payments issued electronically........7.1
9 million
10 u. Dollar amount of payments issued electronically
11 .................................................$23.7 billion
12 v. Hours of training/education conducted on accounting
13 issues.....................................................425
14 w. Hours of training/education conducted on payroll
15 issues......................................................50
16 x. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed..........FY
17 2000-2001 LBR
18 y. Number of "get lean" hotline calls processed for
19 referral to the appropriate agency.........................500
20 z. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed where
21 criminal, disciplinary, and/or administrative actions taken.FY
22 2000-2001 LBR
23 (b) For the Financial Institutions Regulatory Program,
24 the purpose of which is to ensure the safety and soundness of
25 state financial institutions and to enhance the dual banking
26 system, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
27 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
28 Specific Appropriations 1566-1569 are as follows:
29 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30
31
141
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
2 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
3 Florida on Return on Assets................................51%
4 b. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
5 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
6 Florida on Return on Equity................................51%
7 c. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
8 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
9 Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio..........................51%
10 d. Percentage of Florida state-chartered banks that
11 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
12 Florida on Tier 1 Capital..................................51%
13 e. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
14 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
15 chartered in Florida on Return on Assets...................51%
16 f. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
17 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
18 chartered in Florida on Return on Equity...................51%
19 g. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
20 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
21 chartered in Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio.............51%
22 h. Percentage of Florida state-chartered credit unions
23 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
24 chartered in Florida on Tier 1 Capital.....................51%
25 i. Percentage of applications for new Florida
26 financial institutions that seek state charters............67%
27 j. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
28 state chartered banks compared to assessments that would be
29 paid if the bank was nationally or federally chartered.$15,300
30 k. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
31 state chartered credit unions compared to assessments that
142
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 would be paid if the credit unions was nationally or federally
2 chartered.................................................$350
3 l. Percentage of banks receiving an examination report
4 within 45 days after the conclusion of their on-site state
5 examination................................................75%
6 m. Percentage of credit unions receiving an
7 examination report within 30 days after the conclusion of
8 their on-site state examination............................75%
9 n. Percentage of international financial institutions
10 receiving an examination report within 45 days after the
11 conclusion of their on-site state examination..............75%
12 o. Percentage of trust companies receiving an
13 examination report within 60 days after the conclusion of
14 their on-site state examination............................75%
15 p. Percentage of De Novo applications statutorily
16 complete that are processed within a standard number of 90
17 days.......................................................67%
18 q. Percentage of branch applications statutorily
19 complete that are processed within 50 days.................67%
20 r. Percentage of expedited branch applications that
21 are processed within 10 days..............................100%
22 s. Percentage of merger/acquisition applications
23 statutorily complete that are processed within 60 days.....67%
24 t. Percentage of financial institutions under
25 enforcement action that are substantially in compliance with
26 conditions imposed.........................................90%
27 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on
29 Assets...................................................1.06%
30 b. Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on
31 Equity..................................................11.01%
143
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Median Florida state-chartered banks Capital to
2 Asset Ratio..............................................9.15%
3 d. Median Florida state-chartered banks Tier 1 Capital
4 .........................................................9.18%
5 e. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return
6 on Assets................................................1.04%
7 f. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return
8 on Equity................................................8.06%
9 g. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions
10 Capital to Asset Ratio..................................12.94%
11 h. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Tier 1
12 Capital.................................................12.18%
13 i. Number of new Florida state-chartered banks opened
14 ............................................................20
15 j. Amount of annual assessments paid by banks
16 ....................................................$6,756,100
17 k. Amount of annual assessments paid by credit unions
18 ....................................................$1,237,200
19 l. Number of banks examined by the Division of Banking
20 receiving an examination report within 45 days..............45
21 m. Number of credit unions examined by the Division of
22 Banking receiving an examination report within 30 days......57
23 n. Number of International financial institutions
24 examined by the Division of Banking receiving an examination
25 report within 45 days.......................................16
26 o. Number of Trust Companies examined by the Division
27 of Banking receiving an examination report within 60 days....8
28 p. Number of statutorily complete new De Novo
29 applications received that are processed within 90 days......5
30 q. Number of statutorily complete branch applications
31 received that are processed within 50 days..................27
144
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 r. Number of statutorily complete expedited branch
2 applications received that are processed within 10 days.....45
3 s. Number of statutorily complete merger/acquisition
4 applications received that are processed within 60 days.....17
5 t. Number of institutions under enforcement actions.23
6 u. Percentage/number of financial institutions
7 examined within statutory time frames by type of institution
8 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
9 v. Percentage/number of surveys returned that rate the
10 Division's examination program as satisfactory or above
11 .......................................................75%/150
12 w. Percentage/number of state examinations where total
13 examination time was reduced by a standard percentage compared
14 to the hours required during the base examination.FY 2000-2001
15 LBR
16 x. Percentage/number of state examinations where
17 on-site hours were reduced by a standard percentage compared
18 to the on-site hours required during the base examination...FY
19 2000-2001 LBR
20 (c) For the Unclaimed Property Program, the purpose of
21 which is to increase efforts in finding, locating, collecting
22 in a manner to allow for better identification of owners, and
23 returning unclaimed property to the owners, the outcome
24 measures, output measures, and associated performance
25 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
26 Appropriations 1570-1573 are as follows:
27 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percentage increase in the total number of holders
29 reporting...................................................5%
30 b. Percentage of previously filing holders who submit
31 problem reports.............................................3%
145
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percentage of the total number of claims paid to
2 the owner compared to the total number of returnable accounts
3 reported/received..........................................22%
4 d. Percentage of the total dollar amount of claims
5 paid to the owner compared to the total dollars in returnable
6 accounts reported/received.................................80%
7 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of holders reports processed..........16,000
9 b. Number of seminars conducted......................3
10 c. Number of in-state exams of holders who have not
11 previously filed a holder report............................13
12 d. Number of out-of-state exams of holders who have
13 not previously filed a holder report.......................200
14 e. Number of in-state exams conducted...............26
15 f. Dollar value collected as a result of in-state
16 exams.................................................$500,000
17 g. Number of out-of-state exams processed..........450
18 h. Dollar value collected as a result of out-of-state
19 exams..............................................$15 million
20 i. Number/dollar value of owner accounts processed
21 ..........................................255,000/$101 million
22 j. Total cost of the program to the number of holder
23 reports/owner accounts processed...........................$30
24 k. Number/dollar value of claims paid to owners
25 .......................................56,400/FY 2000-2001 LBR
26 l. Number of owner accounts advertised.........100,000
27 m. Number of claims processed...................60,000
28 n. Percentage of claims approved/denied within
29 30/60/90 days from the date received..........FY 2000-2001 LBR
30 o. Percentage of claims paid within 30/60/90 days from
31 date received......................................10%/40%/50%
146
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 p. Percentage of customer telephone calls answered
2 within 20 seconds.............................FY 2000-2001 LBR
3 (d) For the Consumer Financial Protection and Industry
4 Authorization Program, the purpose of which is to protect
5 consumers of the securities and finance industries and the
6 public from illegal financial activities, and provide
7 consumers and the public with authoritative and expedient
8 information, the outcome measures, output measures, and
9 associated performance standards with respect to funds
10 provided in Specific Appropriations 1574-1578 are as follows:
11 1. CONSUMER PROTECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percentage of licensees examined where department
13 action is taken for violations for cause due to receipt of
14 information which indicates a potential violation of the
15 statute.......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
16 b. Percentage of licensees examined where department
17 action is taken for violations found in routine randomly
18 selected licenses examined based on a risk assessment profile
19 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
20 c. Percentage of investigations of licensed and
21 unlicensed entities referred to other agencies where
22 investigative assistance aided in obtaining
23 criminal/civil/administrative actions.........FY 2000-2001 LBR
24 d. Dollars returned (voluntarily or through court
25 ordered restitution) to victims compared to total dollars of
26 verified loss as a result of investigative efforts of licensed
27 entities......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
28 e. Dollars returned to victims compared to total
29 dollars of verified loss as a result of investigative efforts
30 of unlicensed entities........................FY 2000-2001 LBR
31
147
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Percentage of written complaints processed within
2 applicable standards.......................................85%
3 g. Percentage of telephone complaints resolved without
4 written documentation from the consumer.......FY 2000-2001 LBR
5 h. Percentage of written complaints regarding licensed
6 and unlicensed entities referred for examination,
7 investigation, or legal/criminal action resulting in
8 formal/informal sanctions within/outside statutory authority
9 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
10 i. Percentage of participants at public/consumer
11 awareness activities who completed a questionnaire and
12 responded that the subject presented was informative,
13 understandable, important, and timely.........FY 2000-2001 LBR
14 2. CONSUMER PROTECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of for-cause examinations completed.......FY
16 2000-2001 LBR
17 b. Number of routine examinations completed.........FY
18 2000-2001 LBR
19 c. Percent of total licensees examined to determine
20 compliance with applicable regulations....................7.1%
21 d. Number of investigations closed.................550
22 e. Number of background investigations completed...768
23 f. Amount of court ordered restitution to victims of
24 licensed/unlicensed entities..................FY 2000-2001 LBR
25 g. Amount of voluntary reimbursement received from
26 licensed/unlicensed entities..................FY 2000-2001 LBR
27 h. Amount returned to victims of licensed/unlicensed
28 entities......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
29 i. Amount of verified loss to victims of
30 licensed/unlicensed entities..................FY 2000-2001 LBR
31
148
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 j. Average number of days for initial written
2 responses to consumers.......................................7
3 k. Average number of days to resolve, refer, or close
4 a written complaint.........................................68
5 l. Number of complaints resolved, referred, or closed
6 during the year..........................................4,350
7 m. Percentage of complaints remaining open beyond 90
8 days.......................................................21%
9 n. Percentage of complaints remaining open beyond 120
10 days.......................................................15%
11 o. Number of hotline/complaint line calls processed as
12 complaints..................................................FY
13 2000-2001 LBR
14 p. Number of written complaints where the department
15 identified statutory violations............................150
16 q. Number of complaints referred for consideration of
17 legal or criminal action....................................40
18 r. Number of public/consumer awareness contacts made
19 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
20 s. Number of public/consumer awareness activities
21 conducted.....................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
22 t. Number of participants at public/awareness
23 activities....................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
24 3. INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Percentage of licensees sanctioned for violations
26 ........................................................0.009%
27 b. Percentage of total applicants not licensed to
28 conduct business in the state because they fail to meet
29 substantive licensing requirements..........................5%
30 c. Percentage of applicants prevented from entering
31 the securities industry in Florida who subsequently are the
149
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 subject of additional disciplinary action in other
2 jurisdictions within 3 years...............................60%
3 4. INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of final actions taken against licensees.370
5 b. Number of applications denied or withdrawn....3,546
6 c. Number of applications licensed..............67,398
7 d. Number of applications processed.............70,944
8 e. Amount of securities registration applications
9 denied or withdrawn...............................$4.2 billion
10 f. Number of applicants licensed with restrictions.280
11 g. Number of applications denied or withdrawn with
12 additional disciplinary information reported on the CRD within
13 three years................................................324
14 h. Number/percentage of filing or requests processed
15 within a designated standard number of days by type.........FY
16 2000-2001 LBR
17 (2) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR.--
18 (a) For the Economic Improvement Program, the purpose
19 of which is to maintain and improve the economic health of
20 Florida by increasing jobs, income, and investments through
21 promoting targeted businesses, tourism, professional and
22 amateur sports and entertainment, and by assisting
23 communities, residents, and businesses, and the outcome
24 measures, output measures, and associated performance
25 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
26 Appropriations 1668-1673 are as follows:
27 1. OFFICE OF TOURISM TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
28 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number/dollar amount of contracts and grants
30 administered..................................283/$290 million
31
150
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Public expenditures per job created/retained under
2 QTI incentive program...................................$3,750
3 c. Number of state agency proposed rules reviewed
4 which impact small businesses...............................85
5 d. Number of business leaders' meetings coordinated..3
6 2. BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of businesses/jobs retained or created as a
8 result of the venture capital funds.......................4/25
9 b. Dollar amount/number of bid and performance bonds
10 to contractors in bonding program...............$10 million/35
11 c. Dollar amount and procurement opportunities
12 generated for Black businesses....................$2.5 million
13 3. BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Amount of venture capital funds provided...$250,000
15 b. Number of participants enrolled in Contractor
16 Assistance and Bonding Program..............................74
17 c. Number of missions/events coordinated/participated
18 in to develop business opportunities.........................5
19 d. BBICs created or supported........................7
20 e. Private dollars leveraged................$2 million
21 4. FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Economic contributions from Florida Sports
23 Foundation-sponsored regional and major sporting events grants
24 ..................................................$150 million
25 5. FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number/amount of major sports event grants awarded
27 ...................................................30/$700,000
28 b. Number of publications produced/distributed
29 .....................................................7/574,000
30 c. Number of promotions conducted/supported:
31 (I) Statewide........................................6
151
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (II) National........................................1
2 d. Number of trade/consumer shows facilitated or
3 conducted...................................................10
4 6. GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON PHYSICAL FITNESS AND AMATEUR
5 SPORTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of participants - Youth, Seniors, and Adults
7 ........................................................32,300
8 b. Number of participants - Bike Florida...........750
9 c. Number of surveys conducted/satisfaction rating
10 .....................................................1,000/98%
11 7. GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON PHYSICAL FITNESS AND AMATEUR
12 SPORTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Education symposiums conducted...................10
14 b. Host festival events in accordance with section
15 14.22, Florida Statutes.....................................14
16 c. Publications, magazines, brochures, pamphlets -
17 distribution...........................................350,000
18 8. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Sustained growth in the number of travelers who
20 come to and go through Florida:
21 (I) Out-of-state..........................49.9 million
22 (II) Residents............................12.6 million
23 b. Sustained growth in the beneficial impacts that
24 travelers in Florida have on the state's overall economy:
25 (I) Rental car surcharge................$141.7 million
26 (II) Tourism-related employment................815,267
27 (III) Taxable sales......................$45.5 billion
28 (IV) Local option tax.....................$293 million
29 c. Growth in private sector contributions to VISIT
30 FLORIDA..........................................$26.7 million
31 9. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
152
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Quality and effectiveness of paid advertising
2 messages reaching the target audience:
3 (I) Impressions............................505 million
4 (II) Leads (number contacting VISIT FLORIDA in
5 response to advertising)...............................552,500
6 b. Value and number of consumer promotions facilitated
7 by VISIT FLORIDA...............................$11 million/150
8 c. Number of leads and visitor inquiries generated by
9 VISIT FLORIDA events and media placements..............650,000
10 d. Number of private sector partners.............1,500
11 e. Level of private sector partner financial
12 contributions through:
13 (I) Direct financial investment.............$2 million
14 (II) Strategic alliance program...............$300,000
15 10. SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Value of new investment in the Florida space
17 business and programs (cumulative)................$200 million
18 b. Number of launches...............................30
19 c. Number of visitors to space-related tourism
20 facilities........................................2.75 million
21 d. Tax revenue generated by space-related tourism
22 facilities..........................................$1,206,600
23 11. SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of students in Spaceport Florida Authority
25 (SFA) sponsored space-related classroom or research at
26 accredited institutions of higher education................300
27 b. Equity in SFA industrial/research facilities..$54.2
28 million
29 c. Presentations to industry and governmental decision
30 makers......................................................15
31
153
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Equity in SFA space-related tourist facilities..$20
2 million
3 12. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA International Trade and
4 Economic Development OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of permanent jobs directly created as a
6 result of ITED programs.................................27,000
7 b. Number of permanent jobs retained as a direct
8 result of ITED programs..................................2,600
9 c. Documented export sales attributable to programs
10 and activities.....................................$40 million
11 d. Documented sales as a result of foreign office
12 activities.........................................$18 million
13 e. Signed Representation Agreements.................72
14 13. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA International Trade and
15 Economic Development OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Total number of qualified trade leads...........440
17 b. Number of trade events...........................33
18 c. Number of Florida companies in field office
19 portfolio (counseled)....................................1,085
20 d. Number of investment projects identified or
21 referred by foreign offices................................159
22 e. Number of Florida companies assisted by foreign
23 offices..................................................1,625
24 f. Number of active retention/expansion projects
25 worked during the year......................................70
26 g. Number of active recruitment projects worked during
27 the year...................................................225
28 h. Number of leads and projects referred to local
29 Economic Development Organizations.........................120
30 14. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Technology Development OUTCOME
31 MEASURES.--
154
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Jobs created/retained as a result of assistance to
2 manufacturing firms........................................650
3 b. Lowered inventory costs as a result of assistance
4 to manufacturing firms...........................$7.72 million
5 c. Lowered labor and materials costs as a result of
6 assistance to manufacturing firms................$6.06 million
7 d. Increased sales as a result of assistance to
8 manufacturing firms (Florida Manufacturing Technology Centers)
9 ...................................................$46 million
10 e. Commercialized technologies (Innovation and
11 Commercialization Corporations).............................30
12 f. Assistance in formation of new companies/joint
13 ventures (Innovation and Commercialization Corporations)....10
14 g. Capital raised by assisted companies (Innovation
15 and Commercialization Corporations)................$20 million
16 h. Assist companies in creating new and retaining
17 existing jobs (Innovation and Commercialization Corporations)
18 ...........................................................421
19 15. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Technology Development OUTPUT
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of companies assisted by Manufacturing
22 Technology Centers:........................................960
23 (I) Small companies................................719
24 (II) Medium companies..............................190
25 (III) Women/Minority companies......................95
26 (IV) Rural companies................................75
27 b. Number of new companies/joint ventures created by
28 Innovation and Commercialization Corporations...............10
29 c. Review technology assistance applications.......500
30 d. Sign contracts (Innovation and Commercialization
31 Corporations)...............................................47
155
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Assist technology-based companies/entrepreneurs.700
2 f. Number of activities assisting manufacturing
3 companies..................................................900
4 16. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Workforce Development OUTCOME
5 MEASURES.--
6 a. Individuals completing Performance-Based Incentive
7 Fund programs and placed in targeted occupations........23,264
8 b. Individuals exiting Performance-Based Incentive
9 Fund programs and placed in targeted occupations........18,964
10 c. Disadvantaged individuals and WAGES participants
11 completing training and placed in targeted occupations...7,966
12 d. Disadvantaged individuals and WAGES participants
13 exiting and placed in targeted occupations...............4,826
14 e. WAGES participants completing training and placed
15 in expanded "career path" occupations as defined by JEP/WAGES
16 .........................................................3,183
17 f. Trained and placed WAGES participants retaining
18 employment at least six months...........................2,652
19 g. Individuals receiving customized training and being
20 placed in new companies in Enterprise Zones and companies
21 located in rural areas...................................1,270
22 h. Individuals receiving customized training and
23 placed in high skill/high wage jobs......................8,450
24 17. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Workforce Development OUTPUT
25 MEASURES.--
26 a. Incentives paid for individuals in
27 Performance-Based Incentive Fund programs completing and
28 placed in targeted occupations..................$8.863 million
29 b. Incentives paid for individuals in
30 Performance-Based Incentive Fund programs exiting and placed
31 in targeted occupations.........................$7.25 million
156
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Incentives paid for WAGES participants and other
2 disadvantaged individuals completing and placed in targeted
3 occupations.......................................$5.9 million
4 d. Incentives paid for WAGES participants and other
5 disadvantaged individuals exiting and placed in targeted
6 occupations......................................$4.86 million
7 e. Number of Quick Response Training grants executed
8 with new and expanding businesses in rural areas.............6
9 f. Number of Quick Response Training grants executed
10 with new and expanding businesses in Enterprise Zones........4
11 g. Number of Quick Response Training Grants executed
12 with new and expanded businesses............................33
13 18. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Capital Development OUTCOME
14 MEASURES.--
15 a. Jobs created as a result of Capital Development,
16 nonexport loans............................................120
17 b. Jobs created as a result of Capital Development,
18 venture capital activity....................................55
19 c. Venture Capital raised by presenters at venture
20 forums..............................................$7 million
21 d. Investments received by Florida businesses from
22 Cypress Fund sponsored firms and co-investors......$12 million
23 e. Florida businesses cumulatively receiving venture
24 capital investments from Cypress Fund venture firms..........5
25 19. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA Capital Development OUTPUT
26 MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of nonexport low-cost business loans funded
28 at sub-prime rates...........................................8
29 b. Dollar value of nonexport low-cost business loans
30 funded at sub-prime rates..........................$12 million
31
157
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Number of Venture Finance Directories and primers
2 distributed................................................882
3 d. Venture capital conferences/forums and
4 investor/entrepreneur networking seminars....................7
5 e. Investors, entrepreneurs, and service providers
6 attending venture capital forums...........................330
7 f. Venture capital invested by Florida institutions in
8 Cypress Fund......................................$2.8 million
9 (3) DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES.--
10 (a) For the Highway Patrol Program, the purpose of
11 which is to increase highway safety in Florida through law
12 enforcement, preventive patrol, and public education, the
13 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
14 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
15 Appropriations 1682-1689A are as follows:
16 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of seat belt use (for information only):
18 (I) Annual percent change...........................1%
19 (II) State compliance rate.........................62%
20 (III) National average compliance rate.............68%
21 b. Annual mileage death rate on all Florida roads per
22 100 million vehicle miles of travel:
23 (I) Florida.......................................2.05
24 (II) National average..............................1.7
25 c. Annual alcohol-related death rate per 100 million
26 vehicle miles of travel...................................0.67
27 d. Annual crashes investigated by FHP:
28 (I) Number of crashes investigated by FHP (for
29 information only)......................................197,405
30 (II) Percent change.................................1%
31
158
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Annual crash rate per 100 million vehicle miles of
2 travel on all Florida roads..............................186.2
3 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Average time (hours) spent per criminal
5 investigation cases closed...............................40.93
6 b. Actual number of criminal cases closed........1,350
7 c. Average time (hours) spent per professional
8 compliance investigation cases closed....................85.26
9 d. Actual number of professional compliance
10 investigation cases closed..................................95
11 e. Number of hours spent on traffic homicide
12 investigations (for information only)..................135,607
13 f. Number of cases resolved as result of traffic
14 homicide investigations..................................1,602
15 g. Public traffic safety presentations:
16 (I) Number of presentations made...................630
17 (II) Persons in attendance......................72,000
18 h. Number of training courses offered to FHP recruits
19 and personnel...............................................67
20 i. Number of students successfully completing the
21 course...................................................1,209
22 j. Actual average response time (in minutes) to calls
23 for crashes or assistance................................24.50
24 k. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
25 on preventive patrol (for information only)..........1,014,971
26 l. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
27 on preventive patrol.......................................42%
28 m. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
29 on crash investigation (for information only)..........338,826
30 n. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
31 on crash investigation.....................................14%
159
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 o. Law enforcement officer assistance rendered:
2 (I) Duty hours spent (for information only)....111,355
3 (II) Percent of duty hours..........................5%
4 (III) Number of motorists assisted.............308,500
5 p. Average size of audience per traffic safety
6 presentation given by public information officers..........114
7 q. Average time (in hours) to investigate crashes:
8 (I) Long-form.....................................2.30
9 (II) Short-form...................................1.50
10 (III) Nonreportable...............................0.70
11 r. Average time spent (in hours) per traffic homicide
12 investigation............................................84.65
13 s. Percentage of recruits retained by FHP for 1 year
14 after the completion of training...........................93%
15 (b) For the Driver Licenses Program, the purpose of
16 which is to maintain an efficient driver licensing program
17 assuring that only drivers demonstrating the necessary
18 knowledge, skills, and abilities are licensed to operate motor
19 vehicles on Florida roads; to remove drivers from the highways
20 who abuse their driving privilege or require further driver
21 education; to ensure that drivers are financially responsible
22 for their actions; and to maintain adequate records for driver
23 education and administrative control, the outcome measures,
24 output measures, and associated performance standards with
25 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations
26 1690-1695A are as follows:
27 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of customers waiting 15 minutes or less for
29 driver license service.....................................79%
30 b. Percent of customers waiting 30 minutes or more for
31 driver license service......................................8%
160
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent of DUI course graduates who do not
2 recidivate within three years of graduation................86%
3 d. Average number of corrections per 1,000 driver
4 records maintained.........................................4.3
5 e. Percent of motorists complying with financial
6 responsibility.............................................83%
7 f. Number of driver licenses/identification cards
8 suspended, cancelled, and invalidated as a result of
9 fraudulent activity, with annual percent change shown.2,046/1%
10 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of driver licenses issued..........3,609,500
12 b. Number of identification cards issued.......729,854
13 c. Number of (written) driver license examinations
14 conducted............................................1,029,731
15 d. Number of road tests conducted..............393,744
16 (c) For the Motor Vehicles Program, the purpose of
17 which is to increase consumer protection, health, and public
18 safety through efficient license systems that register and
19 title motor vehicles, vessels, and mobile homes, regulate
20 vehicle and motor home dealers, manufacturers, and central
21 emission inspection stations, and to collect revenue in the
22 most efficient and effective manner, the outcome measures,
23 output measures, and associated performance standards with
24 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1696-1705
25 are as follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURERS.--
27 a. Percent of motor vehicle titles issued without
28 error......................................................99%
29 b. Fraudulent motor vehicle titles:
30 (I) Number identified and submitted to law enforcement
31 .........................................................1,042
161
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (II) Percent change.................................5%
2 c. Ratio of warranty complaints to new mobile homes
3 titled...................................................1:890
4 d. Percent reduction in pollution tonnage per day in
5 the six applicable (air quality) counties...............15.63%
6 e. Ratio of taxes collected from international
7 registration plans (IRP) and international fuel tax agreements
8 (IFTA) audits to cost of audits..........................$2:$1
9 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of motor vehicle and mobile homes
11 registrations issued................................13,642,317
12 b. Number of motor vehicle and mobile home titles
13 issued...............................................4,794,000
14 c. Average cost to issue a motor vehicle title...$2.05
15 d. Average time to issue a motor vehicle title.....3.4
16 days
17 e. Number of vessel registrations issued.......841,849
18 f. Number of vessel titles issued..............206,375
19 g. Average cost to issue a vessel title..........$5.50
20 h. Number of motor carriers audited per auditor, with
21 number of auditors shown.................................20/14
22
23 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
24 required by sections 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes,
25 shall be included in the agency Fiscal Year 2000-2001
26 Legislative Budget Request. Measures for which data are
27 unavailable should be included with an explanation as to the
28 utility of the measure.
29 (4) DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
30 (a) For the Fire Marshal Program, the purpose of which
31 is to enhance public safety through investigation and forensic
162
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 services, increasing the solvability of criminal cases, by
2 ensuring that emergency responders and service providers are
3 qualified, competent, and ethical through quality training,
4 education, and establishing professional standards; and
5 maintaining the safest possible environment through the
6 regulation, product testing, and inspection of fire
7 suppression and protection equipment, explosives, and
8 fireworks, the outcome measures, output measures, and
9 associated performance standards with respect to funds
10 provided in Specific Appropriations 1745-1753 are as follows:
11 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Number/percentage of closed fire investigations
13 successfully concluded, including by cause determined, suspect
14 identified and/or arrested, or other reasons.........5,443/87%
15 b. Number/percentage of closed arson investigations
16 for which an arrest was made.........................1,031/29%
17 c. Number/percentage of inspected state owned and
18 leased properties that experience a fire......FY 2000-2001 LBR
19 d. Number/percentage of licensed entities found in
20 violation of statutes.........................FY 2000-2001 LBR
21 e. Number of unlicensed entities found in violation of
22 statutes......................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
23 f. Number/percentage of students who rate training
24 they received at the Florida State Fire College as improving
25 their ability to perform assigned duties.............5,901/95%
26 g. Percent of above satisfactory ratings by
27 supervisors of students job performance from post-class
28 evaluations of skills gained through training at the Florida
29 State Fire College.........................................85%
30
31
163
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 h. Number/percentage of favorable rulings by hearing
2 officers on challenges to examination results and eligibility
3 determinations..........................................12/92%
4 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Total number of fire investigations commenced.7,968
6 b. Number of criminal investigations commenced...3,558
7 c. Number of accidental investigations commenced.2,696
8 d. Number of other investigations commenced......1,714
9 e. Total number of fire investigations closed....8,567
10 f. Total number of fire code compliance inspections in
11 state owned/leased buildings............................14,611
12 g. Number of recurring inspections completed of fire
13 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........7,200
14 h. Number of high hazard inspections completed of fire
15 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........6,536
16 i. Number of construction inspections completed of
17 fire code compliance in state owned/leased buildings.......875
18 j. Percent of fire code inspections completed within
19 statutory defined time-frame...............................91%
20 k. Number of plans reviewed to assure compliance with
21 fire codes in state owned/leased buildings...............1,157
22 l. Percent of fire code plans reviews completed within
23 statutory defined time-frame...............................98%
24 m. Total number of boilers inspected............12,500
25 n. Number of boilers inspected by department
26 inspectors...............................................4,200
27 o. Number of boilers inspected by other inspectors
28 .........................................................8,300
29 p. Number of complaint investigations completed..1,497
30 q. Number of regulatory inspections completed......850
31
164
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 r. Number of licensed applications reviewed for
2 qualification............................................8,750
3 s. Number of classes conducted by the Florida State
4 Fire College...............................................210
5 t. Number of students trained and classroom contact
6 hours provided by the Florida State Fire College.6,212/215,677
7 u. Number of curricula developed for Florida State
8 Fire College and certified training center delivery..........5
9 v. Percentage of satisfactory student evaluations of
10 Florida State Fire College facilities and services.........95%
11 w. Number/percentage of customer requests for
12 certification testing completed within defined time frames
13 .....................................................3,384/98%
14 x. Number/percentage of certified training centers
15 inspected that meet certification requirements.........27/100%
16 y. Number of examinations administered...........5,500
17 (b) For the State Property and Casualty Claims
18 Program, the purpose of which is to ensure that participating
19 state agencies are provided quality workers' compensation,
20 liability, federal civil rights, auto liability, and property
21 insurance coverage at reasonable rates by provided
22 self-insurance, purchase of insurance, claims handling, and
23 technical assistance in managing risk, the outcome measures,
24 output measures, and associated performance standards with
25 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1754-1757
26 are as follows:
27 1. WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME
28 MEASURES.--
29 a. Number/percentage of indemnity and medical payments
30 made in a timely manner in compliance with DLES Security Rule
31 38F-24.021, F.A.C..................................121,672/97%
165
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. State Employees' Workers Compensation Benefit Cost
2 Rate, as defined by indemnity and medical costs per $100 of
3 state employees' payroll.................................$1.16
4 2. WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT
5 MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of workers' compensation claims worked
7 ........................................................28,520
8 b. Number of workers compensation claims litigated.780
9 c. Number of workers' compensation claims referred to
10 the Special Investigative Unit or the Department's Bureau of
11 Workers' Compensation Fraud.................................96
12 3. RISK SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Number/percentage of workers' compensation claims
14 requiring some payment per 100 full-time-equivalent employees
15 ..............................................FY 2000-2001 LBR
16 b. Number and percent of agencies who indicated the
17 risk services training they received was useful in developing
18 and implementing risk management plans in their agencies
19 ........................................................26/90%
20 c. Average cost of tort liability claims paid..$12,905
21 d. Average cost of Federal Civil Rights liability
22 claims paid............................................$29,067
23 e. Average cost of workers' compensation claims.$3,250
24 f. Average cost of property claims paid.........$7,547
25 4. RISK SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of risk services training units provided to
27 state agency personnel......................................70
28 b. Number of risk services surveys, follow-ups, and
29 visits made.................................................50
30 c. Number of risk services consultative contacts made
31 ...........................................................195
166
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 5. LIABILITY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Number/percentage of claims closed in relation to
3 claims closed during the fiscal year.................4,226/51%
4 b. Number/percentage of lawsuits, generated from a
5 liability claim, evaluated with SEFES codes entered within
6 prescribed timeframes..................................902/92%
7 6. LIABILITY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
8 a. Number of liability claims worked.............8,287
9 7. PROPERTY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Number/percentage of trainees who indicated the
11 training they received was useful in performing required
12 property program processes....................FY 2000-2001 LBR
13 b. Number and percent of property claims closed within
14 prescribed time periods from the date complete documentation
15 is received.............................................70/93%
16 8. PROPERTY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of training units/assists provided by the
18 property program........................................50/253
19 b. Number of state property loss/damage claims worked
20 ...........................................................306
21 (5) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY.--
22 (a) For the Disability Determination Program, the
23 purpose of which is to make timely and accurate disability
24 decisions for Florida citizens applying for benefits under the
25 federal Social Security Act or the Medically Needy program
26 administered by the Department of Children and Families, the
27 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 1847-1849 are as follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
167
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Average number of days required to complete initial
2 disability determinations:
3 (I) Under Title II..................................80
4 (II) Under Title XVI................................80
5 b. Average number of days required to complete initial
6 Medically Needy decisions...................................70
7 c. Percentage of Title II and XVI disability decisions
8 completed accurately as measured by the Social Security
9 Administration.............................................92%
10 d. Percentage of Medically Needy decisions completed
11 accurately, as measured by the internal ODD Quality Assurance
12 section....................................................94%
13 e. Cost per case (Titles II and XVI)..............$281
14 f. Cost per case (Medically Needy)................$181
15 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of Title II and XVI disability decisions
17 completed..............................................229,593
18 b. Number of Medically Needy decisions completed
19 ........................................................18,365
20 c. Title II/XVI production per work year...........275
21 d. Medically Needy production per work year........334
22 (b) For the Rehabilitation Program, the purpose of
23 which is to oversee programs that provide vocational and
24 rehabilitative services to individuals with mental or physical
25 disabilities in an effort to enable them to live and work as
26 independently as possible, the outcome measures, output
27 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
28 funds in Specific Appropriations 1830-1846 are as follows:
29 1. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Rate and number of customers gainfully employed
31 (rehabilitated) at least 90 days:....................62%/9,500
168
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (I) Of VR severely disabled..................63%/3,800
2 (II) Of VR most severely disabled............56%/4,275
3 (III) Of BSCI customers referred to VR..........55%/89
4 (IV) Of all other VR disabled................75%/1,437
5 b. Rate and number of VR customers placed in
6 competitive employment.............................97.5%/9,262
7 c. Rate and number of VR customers retained in
8 employment after one year..........................61.5%/5,200
9 d. Average annual earnings of VR customers at
10 placement..............................................$13,633
11 e. Average annual earnings of VR customers after one
12 year...................................................$14,384
13 f. Rate and number of BSCI customers returned
14 (reintegrated) to their communities at an appropriate level of
15 functioning for their injuries.........................82%/800
16 g. Percentage of case costs covered by third-party
17 payers.....................................................25%
18 h. Average cost of case life (to Division):
19 (I) For severely disabled VR customers..........$3,311
20 (II) For most severely disabled VR customers....$3,611
21 (III) For all other disabled VR customers.........$450
22 (IV) For brain injured BSCI customers...........$3,500
23 (V) For spinal cord injured BSCI customers......$9,500
24 2. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of customers reviewed for eligibility.24,000
26 b. Number of individualized written plans for services
27 ........................................................19,750
28 c. Number of customers served...................72,000
29 d. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
30 team member................................................165
31
169
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Percent of eligibility determinations completed in
2 compliance with federal law................................85%
3 3. BLIND SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Rate and number of rehabilitation customers
5 gainfully employed at least 90 days..................68.3%/847
6 b. Rate and number of rehabilitation customers placed
7 in competitive employment............................64.3%/654
8 c. Projected average annual earnings of rehabilitation
9 customers at placement.................................$13,500
10 d. Rate and number of successfully rehabilitated older
11 persons, nonvocational rehabilitation..............55.2%/1,355
12 e. Ratio and number of customers (children)
13 successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from preschool to
14 school................................................67.3%/62
15 f. Ratio and number of customers (children)
16 successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from school to work
17 ......................................................26.5%/52
18 g. Percentage of eligible library customers served
19 .........................................................19.8%
20 h. Percentage of library customers satisfied with the
21 timeliness of services...................................98.6%
22 i. Percentage of library customers satisfied with the
23 selection of reading materials available.................96.0%
24 4. BLIND SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of customers reviewed for eligibility..2,035
26 b. Number of written plans for services..........1,425
27 c. Number of customers served...................14,500
28 d. Average time lapse between application and
29 eligibility determination for rehabilitation customers......69
30 e. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
31 team member................................................114
170
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Number of books available per library customer
2 .........................................................51.14
3 g. Number of books loaned per library customer...12.39
4 h. Number of periodicals loaned per library customer
5 ..........................................................3.62
6 i. Net increase in registered customers for library
7 services...................................................822
8 j. Cost per library customer....................$19.65
9 k. Total number of food service managers...........162
10 l. Number of existing food services facilities
11 renovated...................................................10
12 m. Number of new food service facilities constructed.5
13 (c) For the Safety/Workers' Compensation Program, the
14 purpose of which is to keep the workplace safe and return
15 injured employees to work at a reasonable cost to employers,
16 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
17 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
18 Appropriations 1799-1807 are as follows:
19 1. WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Percentage of injured workers returning to work at
21 80 percent or more of previous average (BRE) quarterly wage
22 for at least 1 quarter of the year following injury for
23 accident 2 years prior...................................63.5%
24 b. Percentage of initial payments made on time by
25 insurance carriers.......................................91.8%
26 c. Number of workers newly protected by workers'
27 compensation coverage per fiscal year as a result of
28 compliance efforts......................................14,105
29 d. Percent of investigated issues resolved by EAO..10%
30 e. Average closure time for disputed issues through
31 efforts of EAO (in days)....................................30
171
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Percent of noncomplying carriers in compliance upon
2 reaudit....................................................78%
3 g. Percent of cases closed during fiscal year in which
4 a worker returns to work...................................63%
5 h. Number of employers brought into compliance through
6 investigations...........................................2,995
7 i. Estimated amount of insurance premium dollars newly
8 generated due to compliance........................$12,562,847
9 j. Average total cost per 4-year-old case (information
10 only)..................................................$17,597
11 k. Percentage of lost time cases with no petition for
12 benefits filed 18 months after the date of accident........77%
13 2. WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of employer coverage documents processed,
15 including exemptions from coverage filed by construction
16 employers..............................................621,694
17 b. Number of stop-work orders served to employers
18 failing to comply with requirements......................1,368
19 c. Number of employer investigations conducted for
20 compliance with workers' compensation law...............22,758
21 d. Number of applicants screened for reemployment
22 services.................................................1,921
23 e. Number of program applicants provided reemployment
24 services.................................................1,750
25 f. Number of carriers audited......................381
26 g. Number of investigated issues resolved by the
27 Employee Assistance Office..............................25,000
28 h. Number of days between the filing of the petition
29 for benefits with the division and the referral of the
30 petition to the Judges of Compensation Claims.FY 2000-2001 LBR
31 3. SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
172
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Occupational injury and illness total case
2 incidence rate (per 100 workers) (information only).......8.1%
3 b. Percentage change in total case incidence rate for
4 private sector job sites served..........................-4.0%
5 c. Percentage change in total case incidence rate for
6 public sector job sites served...........................-4.0%
7 d. Percentage reduction in lost workday case incidence
8 rate for private sector job sites served.................-5.0%
9 e. Percentage change in lost workday case incidence
10 rate for public sector job sites served..................-5.0%
11 f. Percentage change in disabling compensable claims
12 rate for private employers served........................-5.0%
13 g. Percentage change in disabling compensable claims
14 rate for public employers served.........................-5.0%
15 h. Percent of employers surveyed who view services as
16 adequately effective or above..............................90%
17 4. SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of private sector employers (and job sites)
19 provided OHSA 7 (c)1 consultation services.................549
20 b. Number of public sector employers (and job sites)
21 provided consultation services...........................3,000
22 c. Number of private sector employers receiving
23 training and other technical services.........FY 2000-2001 LBR
24 d. Number of public sector employers receiving
25 training and other technical services.........FY 2000-2001 LBR
26 (d) For the Employment Security Program, the purpose
27 of which is to increase Floridians' ability to lead
28 independent lives, secure safe and gainful employment, and
29 provide employers with skilled workers, thereby enabling
30 Florida to compete successfully in the global economy, the
31 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
173
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 1808-1826 are as follows:
3 1. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of UC benefits paid timely............90.0%
5 b. Percent of UC benefits paid accurately..........95%
6 c. Percent of UC appeal cases completed timely..87.01%
7 d. Percent of new UC employer liability determinations
8 made timely.............................................84.20%
9 e. Percent of current quarter UC taxes paid timely
10 .........................................................95.5%
11 2. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of UC claimant eligibility determinations
13 issued.................................................184,324
14 b. Number of UC benefits weeks paid..........3,266,221
15 c. Amount of UC benefits paid.............$741,304,302
16 d. Number of appeal cases completed.............52,197
17 e. Number of new UC employer liability determinations
18 made....................................................69,118
19 f. Amount of UC taxes collected...........$523,054,615
20 g. Number of UC employer tax/wage reports processed
21 .....................................................1,531,803
22 3. JOBS AND BENEFITS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of job openings filled................50.2%
24 b. Percent individuals referred to jobs who are placed
25 ...........................................................27%
26 c. Percent food stamp clients employed...........11.8%
27 d. Percent increase in high skill/high wage
28 apprenticeship programs registered.......................5.00%
29 4. JOBS AND BENEFITS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number individuals referred to job openings listed
31 with J&B...............................................540,000
174
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number individuals placed by J&B............137,700
2 c. Number individuals obtaining employment after
3 receiving specific J&B services.........................35,700
4 d. Cost per placement by J&B......................$231
5 e. Cost per individual placed or obtained employment
6 ..........................................................$176
7 f. Number recipients employed:
8 (I) Food stamps.................................14,800
9 (II) Cost per food stamp placement................$302
10 g. Number Apprenticeship Program requests meeting high
11 skill/high wage requirements...............................166
12 h. Number apprentices successfully completing terms of
13 training as set by registered industry standards.........2,900
14 5. WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. WIA adult and dislocated worker placement rate
16 (Information only)......................................76.50%
17 b. WIA youth positive outcome rate (Information only)
18 ...........................................................79%
19 6. WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number WIA Adult Program completers...........8,568
21 b. Number WIA Youth Program completers...........5,809
22 7. WAGES OUTCOMES.--
23 a. Percentage of WAGES Coalitions clients employed.41%
24 8. WAGES OUTPUTS.--
25 a. Number of WAGES Coalitions clients employed..51,000
26 b. Cost per WAGES client employed...............$1,800
27 (e) For the Public Employees Relations Commission, the
28 purpose of which is to promote harmonious employer/employee
29 relations at the state and local levels by resolving and
30 mediating workplace disputes, the following measures and
31
175
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 standards shall be applied to the funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 1791-1794:
3 1. PERC OUTCOMES.--
4 a. Percentage of timely labor dispositions.......95.2%
5 b. Percentage of timely employment dispositions..94.9%
6 c. Percentage of dispositions not appealed.........96%
7 d. Percentage of appealed dispositions affirmed....86%
8 2. PERC OUTPUTS.--
9 a. Number of labor dispositions....................738
10 b. Number of employment dispositions...............744
11 (f) For the Workers' Compensation Hearings Program,
12 the purpose of which is to resolve disputed compensation
13 claims in conformity with pertinent statutory, rule, and
14 caseload requirements through the maintenance of a statewide
15 mediation, hearing, and order adjudicatory system, the outcome
16 measures, output measures, and associated performance
17 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
18 Appropriations 1795-1798 are as follows:
19 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Percentage of concluded mediations resulting in
21 resolution.................................................56%
22 b. Percentage of appealed, decided orders affirmed.80%
23 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of petitions received by presiding judge
25 ........................................................79,000
26 b. Number of mediations held....................17,600
27 c. Number of final hearings held.................3,800
28 d. Number of other hearings held................38,500
29 (I) Number of final merit orders.................2,850
30 (II) Number of lump sum settlements orders......29,190
31
176
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (g) For the Unemployment Appeals Commission, the
2 purpose of which is to provide rapid cost-effective review and
3 decisions for appealed unemployment compensation claims, the
4 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
5 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
6 Appropriations 1850-1852 are as follows:
7 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percentage of unemployment compensation appeals
9 disposed within 45 days....................................50%
10 b. Percentage of unemployment compensation appeals
11 disposed within 90 days....................................95%
12 c. Percentage of cases appealed to DCA..............7%
13 d. Average unit cost of cases appealed to Unemployment
14 Appeals Commission........................................$186
15 e. Average unit cost of cases appealed to DCA.....$685
16 f. Percentage of appealed decisions affirmed by the
17 DCA........................................................94%
18 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of unemployment compensation appeals
20 disposed of.............................................10,500
21 (h) For the Information Management Center, the purpose
22 of which is to provide application development and support,
23 processing applications error-free, through a computer network
24 that is responsive and available, the outcome measures, output
25 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
26 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1827-1829 are as
27 follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Percentage of data processing requests completed by
30 due date...................................................95%
31 b. System design and programming hourly cost....$52.00
177
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percentage of scheduled production jobs completed
2 .........................................................99.9%
3 d. Percentage scheduled hours available data center
4 operations..............................................99.79%
5 e. Cost per MIP (millions of instructions per second)
6 ....................................................$19,000.00
7 f. Percentage of Help Desk calls resolved within 3
8 working days............................................89.48%
9 g. Cost per Help Desk call.......................$8.00
10 h. Percentage scheduled hours available network.99.08%
11 i. Cost for support per network device.........$195.00
12 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of data processing requests completed by due
14 date.....................................................2,900
15 b. Number of scheduled production jobs completed
16 .......................................................517,000
17 c. Number of hours available data center operations
18 .........................................................2,876
19 d. Number of Help Desk calls resolved within 3 working
20 days....................................................18,175
21 e. Number of hours available network.............2,855
22
23 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
24 required by sections 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes,
25 shall be included in the agency Fiscal Year 2000-2001
26 Legislative Budget Request. Measures for which data are
27 unavailable should be included with an explanation as to the
28 utility of the measure.
29 (6) DEPARTMENT OF THE LOTTERY.--
30 (a) For the Sale of Lottery Products Program, the
31 purpose purpose of which is to maximize revenues for public
178
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 education in a manner consistent with the dignity of the state
2 and the welfare of its citizens, the outcome measures, output
3 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
4 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1871-1882 are as
5 follows:
6 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Total revenue in dollars.............$2,047 million
8 b. Percent change from prior year................0.56%
9 c. Transfers to the state Educational Enhancement
10 Trust Fund..............................................$784.7
11 million
12 d. Percent of total revenue to the Educational
13 Enhancement Trust Fund.....................................38%
14 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of total revenue paid as prizes......49.65%
16 b. Administrative expense paid for retailer commission
17 ................................................$112.6 million
18 c. Operating expense....................$252.8 million
19 d. Operating expense as percent of total revenue...12%
20 e. Survey results of public awareness of the
21 contribution to education by the Lottery - percent of
22 respondents who are aware of the Lottery's contribution to
23 education..................................................65%
24 (7) DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES.--
25 (a) For the State Group Insurance Program, the purpose
26 of which is to contribute to a productive workforce
27 representative of the labor market by providing cost effective
28 employee health insurance, the outcome measures, output
29 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
30 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1897-1903 are as
31 follows:
179
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 1. STATE GROUP INSURANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Customer feedback ranking for Division out of
3 possible 10 points........................................6.57
4 b. Percentage of claims reaching final action within
5 30 days of receipt.........................................98%
6 c. Overall payment and procedural error rate........5%
7 d. Telephone queue time in seconds..................45
8 e. Unprocessed original claims inventory........30,000
9 f. Average annual cost per contract to administer
10 insurance programs......................................$14.84
11 (b) For the Facilities Program, the purpose of which
12 is to provide best value office facilities considering the
13 total cost of constructing, managing, and maintaining office
14 facilities, and compared to comparable industry standards, the
15 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
16 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
17 Appropriations 1904-1927A are as follows:
18 1. FACILITIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Gross square foot construction cost of office
20 facilities for DMS......................................$80.02
21 b. Gross square foot construction cost of office
22 facilities for private industry average.................$87.55
23 c. Average full service rent - composite cost per net
24 square foot in counties where DMS has office facilities for
25 DMS actual..............................................$15.13
26 d. Average full service rent - composite cost per net
27 square foot in counties where DMS has office facilities for
28 private industry........................................$16.42
29 e. New office space efficiency per net square
30 foot/gross square foot.....................................87%
31
180
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Average operations and maintenance cost per net
2 square foot maintained by DMS............................$5.04
3 g. Average operations and maintenance cost per net
4 square foot maintained by private industry...............$5.92
5 h. Number of criminal incidents per 100,000 gross
6 square feet................................................4.7
7 i. Number of criminal incidents per 1,000 employees
8 .........................................................20.33
9 2. FACILITIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Gross square feet of office facilities completed
11 .......................................................337,320
12 b. Net square feet of state-owned office space
13 occupied by state agencies including non-DMS owned facilities
14 .....................................................7,820,113
15 c. Net square feet of private office space occupied by
16 state agencies......................................11,057,443
17 d. Number of square feet maintained by DMS...4,893,921
18 e. Number of square feet maintained by private
19 contractor...........................................1,912,009
20 f. Gross square feet monitored for security purposes
21 .....................................................7,313,643
22 g. Number of investigations conducted..............210
23 (c) For the Support Program, the purpose of which is
24 to provide government entities access to best value
25 commodities and services through centralized procurement,
26 federal property assistance, and fleet management, the outcome
27 measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 1928-1931 are as follows:
30 1. SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Percentage of state term contracts savings......35%
181
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. State term contracts cost avoidance....$205,000,000
2 c. Average percentage below private sector fleet
3 maintenance for labor costs................................13%
4 d. Average percentage below private sector fleet
5 maintenance for parts costs................................26%
6 e. Average percentage state rental vehicles below
7 state rental contract rates................................30%
8 f. Passenger load factor for DMS...................3.5
9 g. Passenger load factor for large corporation.....3.4
10 h. Cost per flight hour - DMS aircraft pool.....$1,166
11 i. Average percentage DMS direct cost per flight hour
12 below industry direct cost.................................44%
13 j. Number of government and nonprofit organizations
14 visiting a surplus property distribution center..........3,400
15 k. Federal property distribution rate..............85%
16 2. SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of commodities/services on state term
18 contracts..............................................233,000
19 b. Number of agencies using SPURS...................30
20 c. Percentage of agencies using SPURS..............75%
21 d. Number of federal property orders processed...2,150
22 e. Number of vehicle maintenance service hours...8,600
23 f. Days of state rental vehicle service provided
24 ........................................................41,000
25 g. Miles of state rental vehicle service provided
26 .....................................................1,700,000
27 h. Number of flights by executive aircraft pool..2,500
28 (d) For the Workforce Program, the purpose of which is
29 to manage the State Personnel System to help state agencies
30 achieve an effective workforce; perform a variety of
31 activities to assist state agencies in human resource
182
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 management; and provide administrative support for the
2 Cooperative Personnel Employment Subsystem (COPES), the
3 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
4 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
5 Appropriations 1932-1936 are as follows:
6 1. STATE PERSONNEL SYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Administrative cost per FTE for Cooperative
8 Personnel Employee System...............................$40.20
9 b. Administrative cost per FTE for administrative cost
10 net of COPES............................................$35.38
11 c. Administrative cost per FTE total administrative
12 cost per FTE............................................$75.58
13 d. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
14 information provided resulted in more effective and efficient
15 HR-related decisionmaking..................................83%
16 e. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
17 technical assistance provided resulted in more effective and
18 efficient HR-related decision-making.......................83%
19 f. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
20 information provided was timely............................83%
21 g. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
22 information provided was accurate..........................83%
23 h. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
24 information provided was consistent with past practices....83%
25 i. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
26 technical assistance provided was timely...................87%
27 j. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
28 technical assistance provided was accurate.................87%
29 k. Percentage of customers satisfied that the
30 technical assistance provided was consistent with past
31 practices..................................................74%
183
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 l. Percentage of agencies at or above EEO gender
2 parity with available labor market.......................86.7%
3 m. Percentage of agencies at or above EEO minority
4 parity with the available labor market...................56.7%
5 2. STATE PERSONNEL SYSTEM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of informational materials provided....1,820
7 b. Number of responses to technical assistance
8 requests................................................15,343
9 (e) For the Retirement Benefits Program, the purpose
10 of which is to provide quality and cost-effective retirement
11 services, the outcome measures, output measures, and
12 associated performance standards with respect to funds
13 provided in Specific Appropriations 1937-1947 are as follows:
14 1. RETIREMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percentage of participating agencies satisfied with
16 retirement information...................................94.9%
17 b. Percentage of participating active members
18 satisfied with retirement information....................86.5%
19 c. Percentage of participating recent retirees
20 satisfied with retirement information....................96.5%
21 d. Percentage of participating other retirees
22 satisfied with retirement information....................96.3%
23 e. Percentage of agency payroll transactions correctly
24 reported.................................................97.9%
25 f. Percentage of standard retirement services offered
26 by FRS compared to comparable programs.....................82%
27 g. Percentage of participating agencies satisfied with
28 retirement services......................................94.9%
29 h. Percentage of participating active members
30 satisfied with retirement services.......................87.7%
31
184
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 i. Percentage of participating recent retirees
2 satisfied with retirement services.........................97%
3 j. Percentage of participating other retirees
4 satisfied with retirement services.......................95.8%
5 k. Administrative cost per active and retired member
6 ........................................................$20.60
7 l. Ratio of active and retired members to division FTE
8 .......................................................3,325:1
9 m. Funding ratio of FRS assets to liabilities......93%
10 n. Percentage of local retirement systems annually
11 reviewed which are funded on a sound actuarial basis.......92%
12 2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of annuitants added to retired payroll
14 ........................................................13,200
15 b. Number of retirement account audits..........83,000
16 c. Number of changes processed..................54,445
17 d. Number of benefit payments issued.........2,158,346
18 e. Number of local pension plan valuations and impact
19 statements reviewed........................................850
20 (f) For the Information Technology Program, the
21 purpose of which is to effectively and efficiently satisfy
22 customer needs for using, sharing, and managing information
23 technology resources, the outcome measures, output measures,
24 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
25 provided in Specific Appropriations 1948-1959 are as follows:
26 1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percentage SUNCOM discount from commercial rates
28 for local access...........................................40%
29 b. Percentage SUNCOM discount from commercial rates
30 for long distance..........................................40%
31
185
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percentage SUNCOM discount from commercial rates
2 for data service...........................................25%
3 d. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for
4 service features..........................................2.23
5 e. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for
6 service delivery..........................................2.16
7 f. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for
8 timely problem resolution.................................2.33
9 g. Customer Survey Ranking (Scale of 1 to 5) for best
10 value services............................................2.15
11 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of SUNCOM long distance billable minutes
13 ...................................................226,535,921
14 b. Number of SUNCOM local service main stations
15 .....................................................1,729,785
16 c. Number of SUNCOM data locations served.......10,747
17 d. Percentage SUNCOM service growth for local access
18 ............................................................9%
19 e. Percentage SUNCOM service growth for long distance
20 ............................................................1%
21 f. Percentage SUNCOM service growth for data service
22 ............................................................9%
23 3. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
25 accessible information services...........................2.67
26 b. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
27 desirable technology services.............................2.40
28 c. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
29 timely problem resolution.................................2.33
30 d. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
31 projects within schedule..................................2.56
186
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for best
2 value services............................................2.15
3 f. Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for
4 reliable information services.............................2.11
5 4. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of Technology Resource Center research
7 projects completed..........................................15
8 b. Number of Technology Resource Center consulting
9 projects completed...........................................7
10 c. Number of Technology Resource Center development
11 projects completed.........................................425
12 d. Percentage utilization by the Unisys System as used
13 for capacity planning & technology refresh, employing 80%
14 maximum utilization standard...............................60%
15 e. Percentage utilization by the IBM System as used
16 for capacity planning & technology refresh, employing 80%
17 maximum utilization standard.............................59.5%
18 5. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
19 a. Percentage wireless discount from commercially
20 available and similar type engineering services............35%
21 6. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of engineering projects and approvals
23 handled for state government...............................110
24 b. Number of engineering projects and approvals
25 handled for local governments..............................550
26 c. Number of Joint Task Force Radio Systems fixed
27 sites operated and maintained...............................81
28 d. Percentage of state covered by the Joint Task Force
29 Radio System...............................................34%
30 e. Percentage of Joint Task Force Radio System current
31 phase(s) under development completed.......................34%
187
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (8) DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS.--
2 (a) For the Readiness and Response Program, the
3 purpose of which is to provide military units and personnel
4 (at the Governor's request) that are ready to protect life and
5 property; preserve peace, order, and public safety; and
6 contribute to such state and local programs that add value to
7 the State of Florida, the outcome measures, output measures,
8 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
9 provided in Specific Appropriations 1975-1979A are as follows:
10 1. READINESS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Percentage of Area Commands assigned Military
12 Support Missions that are prepared to execute those missions
13 ...........................................................85%
14 b. Percentage of units with a Green readiness rating
15 ...........................................................88%
16 2. READINESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number/percentage of armories rated adequate.57/97%
18 b. Percentage of satisfaction with training facilities
19 at Camp Blanding...........................................80%
20 c. Number of annual training days at Camp Blanding
21 .......................................................120,000
22 d. Percentage of available training days at Camp
23 Blanding.................................................15.7%
24 e. Percentage of assigned soldiers to authorized
25 staffing levels............................................99%
26 f. Number of new recruits using State Education
27 Assistance Program.........................................625
28 g. Number of crisis response exercises conducted
29 annually.....................................................3
30 3. RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
188
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percentage of supported agencies reporting
2 satisfaction with the department's support for specific
3 missions...................................................88%
4 4. RESPONSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Percentage of State Active Duty (SAD) purchase
6 orders processed in 24 hours...............................96%
7 b. Percentage of SAD vouchers purchased and paid in 40
8 days.......................................................98%
9 c. Percentage of SAD payrolls paid on time.........98%
10 d. Percentage of Area Command Plans rated satisfactory
11 as a result of operations.................................100%
12 e. Percentage of missions accomplished on or before
13 time.......................................................90%
14 (9) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.--
15 (a) For the Property Tax Administration Program, the
16 purpose of which is to enhance the equity in property
17 assessments and taxation through the state and to facilitate
18 equalization of the distribution of the required local effort
19 millage, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
20 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
21 Specific Appropriations 2000-2003 are as follows:
22 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of classes studied found to have a level of
24 at least 90 percent......................................97.2%
25 b. Tax roll uniformity - the average for coefficient
26 of dispersion............................................11.5%
27 c. Percent of taxing authorities in total or
28 substantial truth in millage compliance on initial submission
29 .........................................................97.3%
30 d. Percent of refund and tax certificate applications
31 processed within 30 days of receipt......................92.5%
189
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Refund request per 100,000 parcels.............31.8
2 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of subclasses of property studied with
4 feedback to property appraisers..........................5,250
5 b. Number of tax roll review notices issued..........3
6 c. Total number of tax roll defects found............4
7 d. Number of truth in millage compliance letters sent
8 to taxing authorities......................................485
9 e. Number of truth in millage compliance letters sent
10 to taxing authorities with minor infractions...............118
11 f. Number of property tax refund requests processed
12 .........................................................2,500
13 g. Number of tax certificates cancellations and
14 corrections processed....................................2,500
15 h. Number of taxpayers audited on behalf of county
16 property appraisers - Tangible Personal Property...........250
17 i. Student training hours provided to property
18 appraisers and their staff - Tangible Personal Property..3,500
19 (b) For the Child Support Enforcement Program, the
20 purpose of which is to establish paternity and child support
21 orders, enforce those orders to collect child support, and
22 distribute child support collections in a timely manner, the
23 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
24 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
25 Appropriations 2004-2012 are as follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percentage of children with a court order for
28 support....................................................47%
29 b. Percentage of children with paternity established
30 ...........................................................81%
31
190
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Total child support dollars collected per $1 of
2 total expenditures.......................................$2.77
3 d. Percent of child support collected that was due
4 during the fiscal year.....................................51%
5 e. Percent of cases with child support due in a month
6 that received a payment during the month...................53%
7 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
8 a. Number of children with a newly established court
9 order...................................................58,800
10 (c) For the General Tax Administration Program, the
11 purpose of which is to administer the revenue laws of the
12 state in a fair and equitable manner and to collect all money
13 owed, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
14 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
15 Specific Appropriations 2013-2023 are as follows:
16 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Average days from receipt of payment to final
18 processing of deposit - sales, corporation, intangibles, fuel
19 ..........................................................0.64
20 b. Number of days between initial distribution of
21 funds and final adjustments - sales, fuel...................66
22 c. Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially
23 error free and on time.....................................76%
24 d. Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially
25 error free and on time by first time filers................65%
26 e. Return on investment - total collections per dollar
27 spent..................................................$147.73
28 f. Dollars collected as a percentage of actual
29 liability of notices sent for apparent sales tax return filing
30 errors or late returns.....................................55%
31
191
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 g. Percentage of tax returns that did not result in a
2 notice of apparent filing error or late return.............90%
3 h. Average time in days between the processing of a
4 sales tax return and the first notification to the taxpayer of
5 an apparent filing error or late return.....................38
6 i. Percentage of delinquent sales tax return and
7 filing error or late return notices issued accurately to
8 taxpayer...................................................90%
9 j. Percentage of delinquent tax return and filing
10 error or late return notices sent to taxpayers that had to be
11 revised due to department or taxpayer error................20%
12 k. Percentage of final audit assessment amounts
13 collected - tax only.......................................85%
14 l. Final audit assessment amounts as a percentage of
15 initial assessment amounts - tax only......................74%
16 m. Dollars collected voluntarily as a percentage of
17 total dollars collected....................................97%
18 n. Average number of days to resolve a dispute of an
19 audit assessment...........................................175
20 o. Direct collections per enforcement related dollar
21 spent....................................................$4.92
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of delinquent tax return notices issued to
24 taxpayers..............................................732,000
25 b. Number of notices sent to taxpayers for apparent
26 tax return filing errors or late return................528,000
27 (10) DEPARTMENT OF STATE.--
28 (a) For the Historical, Archaeological, and Folklife
29 Appreciation Program, the purpose of which is to encourage
30 identification, evaluation, protection, preservation,
31 collection, conservation, interpretation, and public access to
192
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 information about Florida's historic sites, properties, and
2 objects related to Florida history and to archaeological and
3 folk cultural heritage, the outcome measures, output measures,
4 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
5 provided in Specific Appropriations 2051-2056A are as follows:
6 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Number/percentage increase of general public
8 utilizing historic information.....................200,000/21%
9 b. Number of historic and archaeological objects
10 maintained for public use and scientific research.......99,000
11 c. Increase in number/percentage of historic and
12 archaeological properties:
13 (I) Recorded..................................9,650/8%
14 (II) Protected or preserved for public use.....154/26%
15 d. Total local funds leveraged by historical resources
16 program..................................................$61.5
17 million
18 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of grants awarded........................243
20 b. Number of dollars awarded through grants
21 ...................................................$16,088,144
22 c. Number of museum exhibits........................82
23 d. Number of publications and multimedia products
24 available for the general public...........................315
25 e. Number of institutions to which items are on loan
26 ............................................................53
27 f. Average cost to collect historical and
28 archaeological objects..................................$75.62
29 g. Average cost to maintain historical and
30 archaeological objects...................................$1.16
31
193
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 h. Number of sites maintained in the Florida Master
2 Site File..............................................133,000
3 i. Number of preservation services applications
4 reviewed.................................................8,000
5 j. Number of produced and sponsored events:
6 (I) K-12 targeted activities.....................1,350
7 (II) Other sponsored events........................720
8 (b) For the Commercial Recording and Registration
9 Program, the purpose of which is to promote financial and
10 economic stability through public notice of clients' interest
11 in business organizations, trademarks, financial transactions,
12 and liens as well as identification of those doing business
13 under names other than their own, output measures, and
14 associated performance standards with respect to funds
15 provided in Specific Appropriations 2057-2059 are as follows:
16 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percentage public reporting satisfaction with the
18 division's services........................................91%
19 b. Percentage business reporting satisfaction with the
20 division's services........................................91%
21 c. Percentage law enforcement reporting satisfaction
22 with the division's services...............................91%
23 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Average Cost/Corporate Filing.................$5.38
25 b. Average Cost/Uniform Commercial Code Filings..$1.81
26 c. Average Cost/Inquiry.........................$0.075
27 d. Proportion of total inquires handled by telephone
28 ...........................................................25%
29 e. Proportion of total inquiries handled by
30 mail/walk-ins..............................................10%
31
194
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Proportion of total inquiries handled by electronic
2 means......................................................65%
3 (c) For the Libraries, Archives, and Information
4 Services Program, the purpose of which is to ensure access to
5 information of past, present, and future value for the
6 educational and cultural benefit of the people of Florida, the
7 Library, Archives, and Information program works in
8 partnership with citizens, information providers, and
9 government for efficient and effective management and
10 development of information services, the outcome measures,
11 output measures, and associated performance standards with
12 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2060-2067
13 are as follows:
14 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Annual increase in the use of local public library
16 service.....................................................2%
17 b. Annual increase in accessibility by library patrons
18 to materials not owned by their local public library........4%
19 c. Annual increase in usage of research collections.6%
20 d. Annual cost avoidance achieved by government
21 agencies through records storage/disposition/micrographics
22 ...................................................$58,000,000
23 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of items loaned by public libraries
25 ....................................................69,961,992
26 b. Number of library customer visits........49,513,960
27 c. Number of public library reference requests
28 ....................................................25,142,072
29 d. Number of public library registered borrowers
30 .....................................................7,066,610
31
195
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Number of persons attending public library programs
2 .....................................................3,087,030
3 f. Number of volumes in public library collections
4 ....................................................24,748,033
5 g. Number of records added to the statewide library
6 holdings database annually...........................1,826,191
7 h. Number of new users (State Library, State Archives)
8 .........................................................5,977
9 i. Number of reference requests handled (State
10 Library, State Archives)...............................117,847
11 j. Number of items used on site (State Library).39,822
12 k. Number of database searches conducted (State
13 Library, State Archives)...............................789,807
14 l. Number of items loaned (State Library).......81,286
15 m. Cubic feet of obsolete public records approved for
16 disposal...............................................510,000
17 n. Cubic feet of noncurrent records stored at the
18 Records Center.........................................220,000
19 o. Number of microfilm images created, processed,
20 and/or duplicated at the Records Center............160,000,000
21 (d) For the Cultural Grants Program, the purpose of
22 which is foster development of a receptive climate for
23 cultural programs, to enrich culturally and benefit the
24 citizens of this state in their daily lives, to increase the
25 appeal of Florida visits and vacations, and to attract to
26 Florida residency outstanding creators through the promotion
27 of cultural programs, the outcome measures, output measures,
28 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
29 provided in Specific Appropriations 2068-2083A are as follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Attendance at supported cultural events..25,000,000
196
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of individuals served by professional
2 associations.........................................8,000,000
3 c. Total local financial support leveraged by state
4 funding...........................................$343,832,378
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of grants awarded:
7 (I) Capital.........................................16
8 (II) Program.......................................705
9 b. Dollars awarded through grants:
10 (I) Capital.................................$7,616,189
11 (II) Program...............................$14,687,872
12 c. Percentage of counties funded by the program:.85.1%
13 (I) Large counties (N=34; population >75,000)....94.0%
14 (II) Small counties (N=33; population less than
15 75,000)..................................................75.8%
16 d. Number of state supported performances and exhibits
17 ........................................................23,000
18 (e) For the Licensing Program, the purpose of which is
19 to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare through
20 the licensing, regulation, and enforcement of the private
21 security, private investigative, and recovery industries; the
22 regulation of game promotions conducted in Florida; and the
23 issuance of licenses to citizens wishing to carry concealed
24 weapons or firearms for lawful defense, the outcome measures,
25 output measures, and associated performance standards with
26 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2084-2087
27 are as follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
30 licenses issued within 90 days of receipt of an application
31 ...........................................................83%
197
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent/number Concealed Weapon/Firearm licenses
2 issued within 90 day statutory timeframe without fingerprint
3 results..............................................19%/8,509
4 c. Number of default Concealed Weapons/Firearms
5 licensees with prior criminal histories..................2,387
6 d. Percent of license revocations or suspensions
7 initiated within 20 days of receipt of disqualifying
8 information (all license types)............................60%
9 e. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
10 investigations completed within 60 days....................94%
11 f. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
12 inspections completed within 30 days.......................80%
13 g. Percent of Concealed Weapons/Firearm violators to
14 licensed population......................................0.06%
15 h. Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery
16 violators to the licensed population.....................1.25%
17 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Average cost/Concealed Weapon/Firearm application
19 processed..................................................$30
20 b. Average cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
21 application processed......................................$35
22 c. Average cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
23 investigation...........................................$1,596
24 d. Average cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
25 compliance inspection.....................................$325
26 e. Average cost/Administrative Action (revocation,
27 fine, probation & compliance letters).....................$500
28 f. Number investigations performed (Security,
29 Investigative, and Recovery complaint and agency generated
30 inspections).............................................1,475
31
198
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 g. Number compliance inspections performed (Security,
2 Investigative, and Recovery licensees/new agency inspections
3 and random inspections)..................................1,697
4 (f) For the Florida Association of Voluntary Agencies
5 for Caribbean Action, the outcome measures, output measures,
6 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
7 provided in Specific Appropriation 2039A are as follows:
8 1. FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR
9 CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of overseas clients who indicate assistance
11 is very responsive.........................................96%
12 b. Percent of volunteer-consultants who would
13 volunteer again............................................97%
14 c. Ratio of donated services and contributions as
15 compared to the amount of state funding..................1.5:1
16 2. FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR
17 CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of volunteer technical assistance missions
19 to Central America and the Caribbean........................96
20 b. Number of international and domestic development
21 missions....................................................15
22 Section 59. The Legislature adopts the following
23 programs and performance measures for the entities indicated
24 for use in preparation of FY 2000-2001 legislative budget
25 request.
26 (1) DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
27 REGULATION.--The department shall recommend standards for the
28 following outcomes and outputs for fiscal year 2000-2001 to
29 the appropriate legislative committees. For each outcome and
30 output, or for each group of integrally related outcomes and
31 outputs, the department shall identify total associated costs
199
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 for producing that outcome or output, based on the fiscal year
2 1999-2000 budget, in order to improve the Legislature's
3 ability to appropriate funds, compare activities, and evaluate
4 department activities for efficiency:
5 (a) For the Professional Regulation Program, the
6 purpose of which is to license nonmedical professions within
7 the state and the individual practice acts that govern each of
8 the professions; serve as a liaison between the public and
9 professional boards, as well as between the licensees and
10 their respective boards; process applications, monitor
11 continuing education, renewal and reactivation requirements;
12 approve educational courses; develop, prepare, administer and
13 score to ensure validity and reliability of exams; and receive
14 and investigate complaints and prosecute violators, the
15 outcome measures and output measures are as follows:
16 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of application denials appealed which were
18 upheld
19 b. Percent of licensees in compliance with licensure
20 requirement/category as determined by random audit
21 c. Percent of applications processed timely
22 d. Customer Satisfaction Ranking with resolutions of
23 inquiries, requests and disputes
24 e. Percent of examinations satisfying reliability
25 requirements
26 f. Percent of state developed examinations that
27 satisfy validity requirements
28 g. Percent of examinations challenged and upheld
29 h. Percent of examination results timely released
30 2. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of completed applications denied
200
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of application denials appealed
2 c. Number of application denials appealed which were
3 upheld
4 d. Number of applicants who receive licenses - all
5 categories
6 e. Number of licensees audited
7 f. Number of audited licensees in compliance by
8 licensure requirement/category
9 g. Number of examinations
10 h. Number of examinations challenged
11 i. Number of examinations challenged which are upheld
12 3. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of complaints processed timely
14 b. Percent of cases involving repeat offenders
15 c. Percent of disciplined licensees in compliance with
16 terms of discipline imposed
17 d. Percent of inspections/audits that result in
18 disciplinary action being taken
19 e. Percent of unlicensed activity cases which involve
20 repeat offenders
21 f. Percent of cases that are resolved through
22 alternative means such as Notices of Noncompliance, Citations,
23 or Alternative Dispute Resolution
24 4. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of total offenders
26 b. Number of repeat offenders
27 c. Number of licensees disciplined
28 d. Number of disciplined licensees in compliance with
29 terms of discipline imposed
30 e. Number of alternative dispute resolutions
31
201
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 f. Number of Notices of Noncompliance that have been
2 issued pursuant to rules of the various boards or by direction
3 of the department
4 (b) For the Pari-mutuel Wagering Program, the purpose
5 of which is to license and regulate the state's pari-mutuel
6 industries, including cardrooms, and to collect all
7 pari-mutuel taxes and fees in a timely manner, the outcome
8 measures and output measures are as follows:
9 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Average number of days to issue a permanent license
11 b. Percent of licenses correctly issued as determined
12 by audit
13 2. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of days to issue a license that required
15 fingerprints
16 b. Number of days to issue a license that does not
17 require fingerprints
18 c. Number of occupational licenses reviewed
19 d. Number of occupational licenses determined by
20 review to be issued correctly
21 3. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Percent of races and games that result in statutory
23 or rule infractions
24 b. Percent of compliance audits timely completed
25 c. Percent of compliance audits with recurring
26 violations
27 d. Percent of urine/blood samples resulting in drug
28 positives
29 4. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of races and games officiated
31 b. Number of races and game violations
202
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Number of compliance audits with violations
2 d. Number of compliance audits with recurring
3 violations
4 e. Number of administrative actions taken as a result
5 of drug positives
6 f. Number of urine/blood samples tested
7 g. Number of urine/blood samples that tested positive
8 5. AUDITING AND FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT OUTCOME
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of taxes and fees accurately collected
11 b. Percent of purse audits resulting in recurring
12 financial violations
13 6. AUDITING AND FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Total dollars of tax revenue collected
15 b. Number of purse audits conducted
16 c. Number of purse audits with financial violations
17 d. Number of purse audits with recurring financial
18 violations
19 (c) For the Hotels and Restaurants Program, the
20 purpose of which is to license and regulate public lodging and
21 food service establishments, elevators, escalators, and other
22 vertical conveyance devices, the outcome measures and output
23 measures are as follows:
24 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Percent of hotel and restaurant licenses and
26 elevator certificates of operation processed timely
27 b. Customer satisfaction ranking with resolution of
28 inquiries, requests and disputes
29 c. Percent of Hospitality Education Program workshop
30 participants that found the training useful
31 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
203
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of food service and lodging establishments
2 with repeat critical enforcement actions
3 b. Percent of licensed food service establishments
4 with confirmed food borne illness outbreaks directly related
5 to food storage, preparation, or handling
6 c. Percent of repeat critical violations cited during
7 food service and lodging inspections resulting in compliance
8 d. Percent of hotel and restaurant administrative
9 complaints resolved in favor of the agency
10 e. Number of elevator equipment malfunction accidents
11 reported compared to number of active elevators
12 f. Percent of Hospitality Education Program workshop
13 participants that pass the Food Manager Certification
14 Examination
15 3. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of food service and lodging establishment
17 cases initiated with critical violations
18 b. Number of food service and lodging establishment
19 cases involving repeat offenders with critical violations
20 c. Number of food service establishments with
21 confirmed food-borne illness directly related to food storage,
22 preparation, or handling which have had prior enforcement
23 action
24 d. Number of food service and lodging establishment
25 cases where a fine is imposed against repeat offenders
26 e. Number of licensed public food service
27 establishments
28 f. Number of confirmed food-borne illness outbreaks
29 directly related to food storage, preparation or handling
30 g. Number of repeat critical violations during food
31 service and lodging inspections resulting in compliance
204
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 h. Number of critical violations cited as a result of
2 food service and lodging inspections
3 i. Number of hotel and restaurant administrative
4 complaints resolved in favor of the agency
5 j. Number of hotel and restaurant administrative
6 complaints initiated
7 k. Number of violations recorded for elevator
8 inspections
9 l. Number of elevator enforcement actions initiated
10 m. Number of participants in Hospitality Education
11 Program workshop
12 n. Number of Hospitality Education Program workshop
13 participants receiving passing grade
14 (d) For the Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Program,
15 the purpose of which is to supervise the conduct, management,
16 and operation of the manufacturing, packaging, distribution,
17 and sale of all alcoholic beverages; to enforce the provisions
18 of the beverage and tobacco laws, as well as the rules and
19 regulations adopted by the program; and to collect and
20 distribute all taxes, surcharges and licensing fees from
21 alcohol and tobacco sources, the outcome measures and output
22 measures are as follows:
23 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Customer satisfaction ranking with alcoholic
25 beverages and tobacco licensure standards uniformly and
26 equitably applied
27 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of disputed administrative cases resolved
29 in favor of the agency
30 b. Percent of complaints/cases settled by warning
31 notice or stipulation
205
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent repeated noncomplying wholesale licensees
2 on yearly basis
3 d. Percent of excise tax penalties collected compared
4 to final assessments in dollars
5 e. Percent of repeated noncomplying retail licensees
6 on yearly basis
7 f. Percent of surcharge penalties collected compared
8 to final assessments in dollars
9 g. Percent of alcoholic beverages and tobacco
10 retailers tested found to be in compliance with underage
11 persons' access
12 h. Percent of underage alcoholic beverages and tobacco
13 cases involving repeat retail offenders
14 3. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of complaints resulting in a warning notice
16 b. Number of administrative cases settled by
17 stipulation
18 c. Total amount of penalties assessed in dollars for
19 excise tax
20 d. Total amount of penalties collected in dollars for
21 excise tax
22 e. Total amount of penalties assessed in dollars for
23 surcharge
24 f. Total amount of penalties collected in dollars for
25 surcharge
26 g. Number of alcoholic beverages and tobacco retailers
27 randomly tested for underage persons' access
28 h. Number of alcoholic beverages and tobacco retailers
29 tested because of a complaint for underage persons' access
30 i. Number of underage alcoholic beverages and tobacco
31 arrests
206
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 j. Number underage alcohol/tobacco administrative
2 cases
3 k. Number of underage alcohol/tobacco administrative
4 cases involving repeat retail offenders
5 4. AUDITING AND FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT OUTCOMES
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of wholesale audit findings collected
8 b. Percent of retail audit findings collected
9 c. Average return on investment
10 d. Customer satisfaction ranking with alcoholic
11 beverages and tobacco taxation standards uniformly and
12 equitably applied
13 5. AUDITING AND FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Total dollar amount of wholesale audit findings
15 b. Total dollar amount of wholesale audit findings
16 collected
17 c. Total dollar amount of retail audit findings
18 d. Total dollar amount of retail audit findings
19 collected
20 (e) For the Florida Land Sales, Condominiums, and
21 Mobile Homes Program, the purpose of which is to regulate the
22 sale of subdivided lands in the state and out-of-state
23 subdivided lands offered for sale in the state; residential
24 condominiums and cooperatives; real estate timesharing; mobile
25 home parks; and yacht, ship brokers and salesmen, the outcome
26 measures and output measures are as follows:
27 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Average number of days to approve filings for
29 timeshare, condominiums, and mobile homes
30 b. Average number of days to issue permanent licenses
31 for land sales
207
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 2. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of deficiency letters issued for approved
3 filings
4 b. Number of permanent licenses issued
5 3. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.
6 a. Percent of administrative actions resulting in
7 consent orders
8 b. Average number of days to resolve consumer
9 complaints not investigated
10 c. Average number of days to resolve investigations
11 d. Average number of days to resolve cases submitted
12 for arbitration for condominiums
13 e. Percent of parties surveyed that benefited from
14 education provided for condominiums
15 4. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.
16 a. Number of administrative actions resolved by
17 consent orders
18 b. Number of days to close consumer complaints
19 c. Number of consumer complaints closed
20 d. Number of days to close investigations
21 e. Number of investigations closed
22 f. Number of days to close cases
23 g. Number of cases closed
24 h. Number of seminars conducted
25 i. Number of attendees at educational seminars
26 surveyed
27 j. Number of topics covered at educational seminars
28 k. Number of unit owners represented at educational
29 seminars
30 l. Number of associations represented at educational
31 seminars
208
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 (2) THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES/DIVISION OF
2 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS.--The division shall recommend
3 standards for the following outcomes and outputs for fiscal
4 year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative committees. For
5 each outcome and output, or for each group of integrally
6 related outcomes and outputs, the division shall identify
7 total associated costs for producing that outcome or output,
8 based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to improve
9 the Legislature's ability to appropriate funds, compare
10 activities, and evaluate division activities for efficiency
11 (a) For the Administrative Hearings Program, the
12 purpose of which is to resolve conflicts between citizens and
13 agencies of the state, the outcome measures and output
14 measures are as follows:
15 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Percentage of cases scheduled for hearing within 90
17 days of filing
18 b. Percentage of professional licensure cases
19 scheduled for hearing within 90 days of filing
20 c. Percentage of professional licensure cases closed
21 within 120 days of filing
22 d. Percentage of cases closed within 120 days of
23 filing
24 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of cases opened
26 b. Number of cases closed
27 c. Number of cases carried forward
28 d. Staffing ratio based on the average number of cases
29 closed per administrative law judge
30 e. Number of cases opened
31 f. Number of cases closed
209
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 g. Number of cases carried forward
2 (3) PAROLE COMMISSION.--The commission shall
3 recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for
4 fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative
5 committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of
6 integrally related outcomes and outputs, the commission shall
7 identify total associated costs for producing that outcome or
8 output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to
9 improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate funds,
10 compare activities, and evaluate commission activities for
11 efficiency:
12 (a) For the Parole Commission, the purpose of which is
13 to provide public safety and protect the rights of victims by
14 administering effective post-incarceration services including
15 offender release, offender revocation, clemency, and victim
16 assistance, the outcome measures and output measures are as
17 follows:
18 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Number and percentage of releasees who have
20 successfully completed their supervision without revocation
21 within the first 2 years
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of conditional release cases handled
24 b. Number of conditional medical release
25 determinations
26 c. Number of supervision reviews
27 d. Number of revocation determinations
28 e. Number of Clemency Board decisions supported
29 f. Number of clemency cases monitored
30 (4) PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.--The commission shall
31 recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for
210
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative
2 committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of
3 integrally related outcomes and outputs, the commission shall
4 identify total associated costs for producing that outcome or
5 output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to
6 improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate funds,
7 compare activities, and evaluate commission activities for
8 efficiency:
9 (a) For the Utilities Regulation and Competitive
10 Market Oversight Program, to provide a regulatory environment
11 that facilitates the provision of desired utility services of
12 acceptable quality at fair prices, the outcome and output
13 measures are as follows:
14 1. RATEMAKING OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida
16 compared to average ROE in the USA for electric
17 b. Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida
18 compared to average ROE in the USA for gas
19 c. Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida
20 compared to average ROE in the USA for water and wastewater
21 d. Percentage of utilities achieving within range,
22 over range, and under range of last authorized ROE for
23 electric
24 e. Percentage of utilities achieving within range,
25 over range, and under range of last authorized ROE for gas
26 f. Percentage of utilities achieving within range,
27 over range, and under range of last authorized ROE for water
28 and wastewater
29 g. Percentage of annual utility bill increases for
30 average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by
31 the Consumer Price Index for communications
211
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 h. Percentage of annual utility bill increases for
2 average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by
3 the Consumer Price Index for electric
4 i. Percentage of annual utility bill increases for
5 average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by
6 the Consumer Price Index for gas
7 j. Percentage of annual utility bill increases for
8 average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by
9 the Consumer Price Index for water and wastewater
10 k. Average basic residential utility bill as a
11 percentage of average Florida household income for composite
12 l. Average basic residential utility bill as a
13 percentage of average Florida household income for
14 communications
15 m. Average basic residential utility bill as a
16 percentage of average Florida household income for electric
17 n. Average basic residential utility bill as a
18 percentage of average Florida household income for gas
19 o. Average basic residential utility bill as a
20 percentage of average Florida household income for water and
21 wastewater
22 2. RATEMAKING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Proceedings, reviews and audits examining rates,
24 rate structure, earnings and expenditures for electric
25 b. Proceedings, reviews and audits examining rates,
26 rate structure, earnings and expenditures for gas
27 c. Proceedings, reviews and audits examining rates,
28 rate structure, earnings and expenditures for water and
29 wastewater
30 3. COMPETITIVE MARKET OVERSIGHT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS
31 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
212
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 a. Market share of largest service provider compared
2 to the composite market share of the next three largest
3 providers for Interexchange
4 b. Market share of largest service provider compared
5 to the composite market share of the next three largest
6 providers for alternate access vendors
7 c. Market share of largest service provider compared
8 to the composite market share of the next three largest
9 providers for pay telephone companies
10 d. Market share of local exchange telephone companies
11 compared to market share of alternate local exchange telephone
12 companies for local exchange telephone companies
13 e. Market share of local exchange telephone companies
14 compared to market share of alternate local exchange telephone
15 companies for alternate local exchange telephone companies
16 4. COMPETITIVE MARKET OVERSIGHT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS
17 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Proceedings establishing agreements between local
19 service providers
20 b. Proceedings granting certificates to operate as a
21 telecommunications company
22 c. Communications tariffs reviewed
23 5. SERVICE AND SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Percentage of communications service variances per
25 inspection points examined for local exchange and alternate
26 local exchange telephone companies
27 b. Percentage of communications service variances per
28 inspection points examined for Interexchange
29 c. Percentage of communications service variances per
30 inspection points examined for pay telephone companies
31
213
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 d. Percentage of electric safety variances per
2 inspection points examined
3 e. Percentage of gas safety variances per inspection
4 systems inspected
5 f. Percentage of consumer calls answered
6 g. Average waiting time for consumer calls
7 h. Percentage of consumer complaints resolved within
8 30 days
9 i. Percentage of consumer complaints resolved within
10 60 days
11 6. SERVICE AND SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Proceedings granting service authority, resolving
13 territorial disputes for electric
14 b. Proceedings granting service authority, resolving
15 territorial disputes for gas
16 c. Proceedings granting service authority, resolving
17 territorial disputes for water and wastewater
18 d. Ten-year site plan reviews and need determinations
19 for electric utilities
20 e. Consumer inquiries/complaints handled for
21 communications
22 f. Consumer inquiries/complaints handled for electric
23 g. Consumer inquiries/complaints handled for gas
24 h. Consumer inquiries/complaints handled for water and
25 wastewater
26 i. Consumer information activities relating to
27 service/safety
28 j. Service evaluations performed for communications
29 k. Safety inspections performed for electric
30 l. Safety inspections performed for gas
31
214
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 m. Enforcement proceedings relating to service and
2 safety for communications
3 n. Enforcement proceedings relating to service and
4 safety for electric
5 o. Enforcement proceedings relating to service and
6 safety for gas
7 7. CONSERVATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Per capita annual KWH energy savings through
9 conservation programs
10 b. Percentage of combined conservation goals achieved
11 by 7 FEECA utilities
12 8. CONSERVATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Conservation programs reviewed
14 b. Consumer information activities relating to
15 conservation
16 (5) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.--The department shall
17 recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for
18 fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative
19 committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of
20 integrally related outcomes and outputs, the department shall
21 identify total associated costs for producing that outcome or
22 output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to
23 improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate funds,
24 compare activities, and evaluate department activities for
25 efficiency:
26 (a) For the Children's Medical Services (CMS) Program,
27 the purpose of which is to provide a comprehensive system of
28 appropriate care for children with special health care needs
29 and high risk pregnant women through a statewide network of
30 physicians, health providers, hospitals, medical schools, and
31
215
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 regional health clinics, the outcome and output measures are
2 as follows:
3 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of families in Children's Medical Services
5 (CMS) program Network indicating a positive perception of care
6 b. Percent of CMS program Network enrollees in
7 compliance with the periodicity schedule for well child care
8 c. Percent of eligible infants/toddlers provided CMS
9 program Early Intervention program services
10 d. Percent of Child Protection Team (CPT) team
11 assessments provided to Family Safety and Preservation program
12 within established time frames
13 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of children enrolled in CMS program Network
15 (Medicaid and Non-Medicaid)
16 b. Number of clients receiving services in the CMS
17 program Early Intervention program
18 c. Number of children receiving Child Protection Team
19 (CPT) assessments
20 (b) For the Health Care Practitioner and Access
21 Program, the purpose of which is to protect the health of
22 residents and visitors by improving access to health care
23 practitioners and ensuring those practitioners including
24 Emergency Management Services personnel and providers meet
25 credentialing requirements and practice according to accepted
26 standards of care, the outcome and output measures are as
27 follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of unlicensed individuals identified and
30 referred to the state's attorneys
31
216
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent of health care practitioners' applications
2 for licensure completed within 90 days
3 c. Percent of emergency medical service providers
4 found to have a significant deficiency during licensure
5 inspection
6 d. Age-adjusted injury death rate per 100,000
7 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of unlicensed individuals investigated
9 b. Number of initial health care practitioner licenses
10 (I) Processed
11 (II) Issued
12 c. Number of initial health care practitioner licenses
13 issued
14 d. Number of emergency medical service providers
15 licensed annually
16 e. Number of medical students who do a rotation in a
17 medically underserved area
18 f. Number of persons who receive continuing education
19 services through Work Force Development
20 (c) For the Community Public Health Program, the
21 purpose of which is to maintain and improve the health of the
22 public via the provision of personal health, disease control
23 and environmental sanitation services, including statewide
24 support services, the outcome and output measures are as
25 follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. AIDS case rate per 100,000 population
28 b. HIV/AIDS resident total deaths per 100,000
29 population
30 c. Chlamydia case rate per 100,000 population
31 d. Tuberculosis case rate per 100,000 population
217
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Immunization rate among 2-year-olds
2 f. Total infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births
3 g. Nonwhite infant mortality rate per 1,000 nonwhite
4 births
5 h. Percent of low birth weight births among prenatal
6 Women, Infants and Children program clients
7 i. Live births to mothers age 15-19 per 1,000 females
8 15-19
9 j. Percent of mothers 15-19 having a repeat birth
10 k. Percent of targeted low income population receiving
11 dental health services from a county health department
12 l. Percent of middle and high school students who
13 report using tobacco products in the last 30 days
14 m. Percent of students who visit the health clinic and
15 are able to return to class rather than leaving school
16 n. Food and waterborne disease cases per 1,000
17 facilities regulated by the department
18 o. Overall sanitation and safety score in department
19 regulated facilities on a scale of 0% to 100%
20 p. Septic tank failure rate per 1,000 within 2 years
21 of system installation
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of HIV/AIDS counseling and testing services
24 provided annually
25 b. Number of HIV partner notification services
26 provided annually
27 c. Number of clients served in county health
28 department sexually transmitted disease programs
29 d. Number of tuberculosis medical management services
30 provided
31
218
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 e. Number of patients who complete tuberculosis
2 therapy at the A.G. Holley tuberculosis hospital
3 f. Number of immunization services provided by county
4 public health departments
5 g. Number of women and infants receiving Healthy Start
6 services
7 h. Average monthly participants in Women, Infants, and
8 Children program
9 i. Number of clients served in county health
10 department Family Planning programs
11 j. Number of teens age 15-19 served in county health
12 department Family Planning programs
13 k. Number of adults and children receiving county
14 health department sponsored professional dental care
15 l. Number of children served in the county health
16 department Child Health program
17 m. Number of adults served in the county health
18 department Adult Health and Chronic Disease programs
19 n. Number of School Health nursing assessments
20 provided
21 o. Number of department regulated facilities inspected
22 p. Number of onsite sewage disposal system inspections
23 completed
24 Section 60. If any provision of this act or the
25 application thereof to any person or circumstance is held
26 invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
27 applications of the act which can be given effect without the
28 invalid provision or application, and to this end the
29 provisions of this act are declared severable.
30 Section 61. This act shall take effect July 1, 1999;
31 or, in the event this act fails to become a law until after
219
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SB 2502 Second Engrossed
1 that date, it shall take effect upon becoming a law and shall
2 operate retroactively to July 1, 1999.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
220