CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.





                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    

                            CHAMBER ACTION
              Senate                               House
                                   .
                                   .
 1                                 .
                                   .
 2                                 .
                                   .
 3                                 .
                                   .
 4                                                                

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10                                                                

11  Senator Casas moved the following amendment:

12

13         Senate Amendment (with title amendment) 

14         Delete everything after the enacting clause

15

16  and insert:

17         Section 1.  It is the intent of the Legislature that

18  the implementing and administering provisions of this act

19  apply to the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year

20  2000-2001.

21         Section 2.  In order to implement Specific

22  Appropriation 367 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

23  and notwithstanding section 394.908, Florida Statutes, all

24  funds in excess of Fiscal Year 1998-1999 appropriations are to

25  be allocated based on equity except those programs and funds

26  specifically identified in clarifying language in the General

27  Appropriations Act. No district shall receive an allocation of

28  recurring funds that is less than its initial approved

29  operating budget plus any distributions of lump sums for the

30  state Fiscal Year 1998-1999.

31         Section 3.  In order to implement Specific

                                  1
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Appropriation 246 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

 2  subsection (3) of section 409.9115, Florida Statutes, is

 3  amended to read:

 4         409.9115  Disproportionate share program for mental

 5  health hospitals.--The Agency for Health Care Administration

 6  shall design and implement a system of making mental health

 7  disproportionate share payments to hospitals that qualify for

 8  disproportionate share payments under s. 409.911. This system

 9  of payments shall conform with federal requirements and shall

10  distribute funds in each fiscal year for which an

11  appropriation is made by making quarterly Medicaid payments.

12  Notwithstanding s. 409.915, counties are exempt from

13  contributing toward the cost of this special reimbursement for

14  patients.

15         (3)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

16  Agency for Health Care Administration shall make payments for

17  the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health

18  hospitals on a monthly basis. If the amounts appropriated for

19  the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health

20  hospitals are increased or decreased during the fiscal year

21  pursuant to the requirements of chapter 216, the required

22  adjustment shall be prorated over the remaining payment

23  periods. This subsection expires is repealed on July 1, 2001

24  2000.

25         Section 4.  During the 2000-2001 fiscal year, the

26  Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the 1992-1993

27  disproportionate share formula, the 1994 audited financial

28  data, and the Medicaid per diem rate as of January 1, 1999,

29  for those hospitals that qualify for the hospital

30  disproportionate share program funded in Specific

31  Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act.

                                  2
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  This section expires July 1, 2001.

 2         Section 5.  In order to implement Specific

 3  Appropriation 212 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

 4  subsection (6) of section 409.9116, Florida Statutes, is

 5  amended to read:

 6         409.9116  Disproportionate share/financial assistance

 7  program for rural hospitals.--In addition to the payments made

 8  under s. 409.911, the Agency for Health Care Administration

 9  shall administer a federally matched disproportionate share

10  program and a state-funded financial assistance program for

11  statutory rural hospitals. The agency shall make

12  disproportionate share payments to statutory rural hospitals

13  that qualify for such payments and financial assistance

14  payments to statutory rural hospitals that do not qualify for

15  disproportionate share payments. The disproportionate share

16  program payments shall be limited by and conform with federal

17  requirements. In fiscal year 1993-1994, available funds shall

18  be distributed in one payment, as soon as practicable after

19  the effective date of this act. In subsequent fiscal years,

20  funds shall be distributed quarterly in each fiscal year for

21  which an appropriation is made. Notwithstanding the provisions

22  of s. 409.915, counties are exempt from contributing toward

23  the cost of this special reimbursement for hospitals serving a

24  disproportionate share of low-income patients.

25         (6)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

26  Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the following

27  formula for distribution of the funds in Specific

28  Appropriation 212 236 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General

29  Appropriations Act for the disproportionate share/financial

30  assistance program for rural hospitals.

31         (a)  The agency shall first determine a preliminary

                                  3
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  payment amount for each rural hospital by allocating all

 2  available state funds using the following formula:

 3

 4                  PDAER = (TAERH x TARH)/STAERH

 5

 6  Where:

 7         PDAER = preliminary distribution amount for each rural

 8  hospital.

 9         TAERH = total amount earned by each rural hospital.

10         TARH = total amount appropriated or distributed under

11  this section.

12         STAERH = sum of total amount earned by each rural

13  hospital.

14         (b)  Federal matching funds for the disproportionate

15  share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals

16  that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (a).

17         (c)  The state-funds-only payment amount is then

18  calculated for each hospital using the formula:

19

20         SFOER = Maximum value of (1) SFOL - PDAER or (2) 0

21

22  Where:

23         SFOER = state-funds-only payment amount for each rural

24  hospital.

25         SFOL = state-funds-only payment level, which is set at

26  4 percent of TARH.

27         (d)  The adjusted total amount allocated to the rural

28  disproportionate share program shall then be calculated using

29  the following formula:

30

31                     ATARH = (TARH - SSFOER)

                                  4
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1

 2  Where:

 3         ATARH = adjusted total amount appropriated or

 4  distributed under this section.

 5         SSFOER = sum of the state-funds-only payment amount

 6  calculated under paragraph (c) for all rural hospitals.

 7         (e)  The determination of the amount of rural

 8  disproportionate share hospital funds is calculated by the

 9  following formula:

10

11                TDAERH = [(TAERH x ATARH)/STAERH]

12

13  Where:

14         TDAERH = total distribution amount for each rural

15  hospital.

16         (f)  Federal matching funds for the disproportionate

17  share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals

18  that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (e).

19         (g)  State-funds-only payment amounts calculated under

20  paragraph (c) are then added to the results of paragraph (f)

21  to determine the total distribution amount for each rural

22  hospital.

23         (h)  This subsection expires is repealed on July 1,

24  2001 2000.

25         Section 6.  In order to implement Specific

26  Appropriations 264-435 and 462-592C of the 2000-2001 General

27  Appropriations Act, paragraph (c) of subsection (15) of

28  section 216.181, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:

29         216.181  Approved budgets for operations and fixed

30  capital outlay.--

31         (15)

                                  5
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (c)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,

 2  funds appropriated to the Department of Children and Family

 3  Services in Specific Appropriations 264 292 through 435 425

 4  and the Department of Health in Specific Appropriations 462

 5  445 through 592C 540 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General

 6  Appropriations Act may be advanced, unless specifically

 7  prohibited in such General Appropriations Act, for those

 8  contracted services that were approved for advancement by the

 9  Comptroller in fiscal year 1993-1994, including those services

10  contracted on a fixed-price or unit cost basis.  This

11  paragraph expires is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.

12         Section 7.  In order to implement Specific

13  Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

14  and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the Agency for Health

15  Care Administration shall include health maintenance

16  organization recipients in the county billing for inpatient

17  hospital stays for the purpose of shared costs with counties

18  in accordance with the Florida Statutes. This section expires

19  July 1, 2001.

20         Section 8.  In order to implement Specific

21  Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

22  paragraph (c) is added to subsection (5) of section 409.905,

23  Florida Statutes, to read:

24         409.905  Mandatory Medicaid services.--The agency may

25  make payments for the following services, which are required

26  of the state by Title XIX of the Social Security Act,

27  furnished by Medicaid providers to recipients who are

28  determined to be eligible on the dates on which the services

29  were provided.  Any service under this section shall be

30  provided only when medically necessary and in accordance with

31  state and federal law. Nothing in this section shall be

                                  6
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  construed to prevent or limit the agency from adjusting fees,

 2  reimbursement rates, lengths of stay, number of visits, number

 3  of services, or any other adjustments necessary to comply with

 4  the availability of moneys and any limitations or directions

 5  provided for in the General Appropriations Act or chapter 216.

 6         (5)  HOSPITAL INPATIENT SERVICES.--The agency shall pay

 7  for all covered services provided for the medical care and

 8  treatment of a recipient who is admitted as an inpatient by a

 9  licensed physician or dentist to a hospital licensed under

10  part I of chapter 395.  However, the agency shall limit the

11  payment for inpatient hospital services for a Medicaid

12  recipient 21 years of age or older to 45 days or the number of

13  days necessary to comply with the General Appropriations Act.

14         (c)  The Agency for Health Care Administration shall

15  adjust a hospital's inpatient per diem rate to reflect the

16  cost of serving the Medicaid population at that institution

17  if:

18         1.  There is a change in the mix of patient services,

19  primarily resulting from the effects of a natural disaster

20  occurring after July 1, 2000, which has caused the hospital's

21  average annual Medicaid per-patient cost to increase by more

22  than 25 percent; or

23         2.  The hospital experiences an increase in Medicaid

24  caseload by more than 20 percent, primarily resulting from the

25  closure of a hospital in the same service area occurring after

26  July 1, 1995, which has caused the hospital's average annual

27  Medicaid per-patient cost to increase by more than 25 percent.

28

29  The agency must include the estimated costs for any adjustment

30  in a hospital inpatient per diem pursuant to this paragraph in

31  the estimates it provides to the Social Services Estimating

                                  7
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Conference for inclusion in the total estimates for the

 2  Medicaid program. Before the agency implements a change in a

 3  hospital's inpatient per diem rate pursuant to this paragraph,

 4  the Legislature must have specifically appropriated sufficient

 5  funds in the General Appropriations Act to support the

 6  increase in cost as estimated by the Social Services

 7  Estimating Conference. This subsection expires July 1, 2001.

 8         Section 9.  For the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the

 9  Departments of Children and Family Services, Management

10  Services, Labor and Employment Security, and Health and the

11  Agency for Health Care Administration may transfer positions

12  and general revenue funds as necessary to comply with any

13  provision of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act or

14  Workforce Innovation Act of 2000 which requires or

15  specifically authorizes the transfer of positions and general

16  revenue funds between these agencies. This section expires

17  July 1, 2001.

18         Section 10.  In order to implement Specific

19  Appropriations 307-310, 310B, and 312 of the 2000-2001 General

20  Appropriations Act, section 39.3065, Florida Statutes, is

21  amended to read:

22         39.3065  Sheriffs of Pasco, Manatee, and Pinellas

23  Counties to provide child protective investigative services;

24  procedures; funding.--

25         (1)  As described in this section, the Department of

26  Children and Family Services shall, by the end of fiscal year

27  1999-2000, transfer all responsibility for child protective

28  investigations for Pinellas County, Manatee County, and Pasco

29  County to the sheriff of that county in which the child abuse,

30  neglect, or abandonment is alleged to have occurred. Each

31  sheriff is responsible for the provision of all child

                                  8
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  protective investigations in his or her county. Each

 2  individual who provides these services must complete the

 3  training provided to and required of protective investigators

 4  employed by the Department of Children and Family Services.

 5         (2)  During fiscal year 1998-1999, the Department of

 6  Children and Family Services and each sheriff's office shall

 7  enter into a contract for the provision of these services.

 8  Funding for the services will be appropriated to the

 9  Department of Children and Family Services, and the department

10  shall transfer to the respective sheriffs for the duration of

11  fiscal year 1998-1999, funding for the investigative

12  responsibilities assumed by the sheriffs, including federal

13  funds that the provider is eligible for and agrees to earn and

14  that portion of general revenue funds which is currently

15  associated with the services that are being furnished under

16  contract, and including, but not limited to, funding for all

17  investigative, supervisory, and clerical positions; training;

18  all associated equipment; furnishings; and other fixed capital

19  items. The contract must specify whether the department will

20  continue to perform part or none of the child protective

21  investigations during the initial year. The sheriffs may

22  either conduct the investigations themselves or may, in turn,

23  subcontract with law enforcement officials or with properly

24  trained employees of private agencies to conduct

25  investigations related to neglect cases only. If such a

26  subcontract is awarded, the sheriff must take full

27  responsibility for any safety decision made by the

28  subcontractor and must immediately respond with law

29  enforcement staff to any situation that requires removal of a

30  child due to a condition that poses an immediate threat to the

31  child's life. The contract must specify whether the services

                                  9
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  are to be performed by departmental employees or by persons

 2  determined by the sheriff. During this initial year, the

 3  department is responsible for quality assurance, and the

 4  department retains the responsibility for the performance of

 5  all child protective investigations. The department must

 6  identify any barriers to transferring the entire

 7  responsibility for child protective services to the sheriffs'

 8  offices and must pursue avenues for removing any such barriers

 9  by means including, but not limited to, applying for federal

10  waivers. By January 15, 1999, the department shall submit to

11  the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of

12  Representatives, and the chairs of the Senate and House

13  committees that oversee departmental activities a report that

14  describes any remaining barriers, including any that pertain

15  to funding and related administrative issues. Unless the

16  Legislature, on the basis of that report or other pertinent

17  information, acts to block a transfer of the entire

18  responsibility for child protective investigations to the

19  sheriffs' offices, the sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee

20  County, and Pinellas County, beginning in fiscal year

21  1999-2000, shall assume the entire responsibility for such

22  services, as provided in subsection (3).

23         (3)(a)  Beginning in fiscal year 1999-2000, the

24  sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas County

25  have the responsibility to provide all child protective

26  investigations in their respective counties.

27         (b)  The sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and

28  Pinellas County shall operate, at a minimum, in accordance

29  with the performance standards established by the Legislature

30  for protective investigations conducted by the Department of

31  Children and Family Services.

                                  10
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (c)  Funds for providing child protective

 2  investigations in Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas

 3  County must be identified in the annual appropriation made to

 4  the Department of Children and Family Services, which shall

 5  award grants for the full amount identified to the respective

 6  sheriffs' offices.  Funds for the child protective

 7  investigations may not be integrated into the sheriffs'

 8  regular budgets. Budgetary data and other data relating to the

 9  performance of child protective investigations must be

10  maintained separately from all other records of the sheriffs'

11  offices.

12         (d)  Program performance evaluation shall be based on

13  criteria mutually agreed upon by the respective sheriffs and a

14  committee of seven persons appointed by the Governor and

15  selected from those persons serving on the Department of

16  Children and Family Services District 5 Health and Human

17  Services Board and District 6 Health and Human Services Board.

18  Two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of Pasco

19  County, two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of

20  Manatee County, and two of the Governor's appointees must be

21  residents of Pinellas County.  Such appointees shall serve at

22  the pleasure of the Governor.  The individuals appointed must

23  have demonstrated experience in outcome evaluation, social

24  service areas of protective investigation, or child welfare

25  supervision.  The committee shall submit an annual report

26  regarding quality performance, outcome-measure attainment, and

27  cost efficiency to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of

28  the House of Representatives, and to the Governor no later

29  than January 31 of each year the sheriffs are receiving

30  general appropriations to provide child protective

31  investigations.

                                  11
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (4)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

 2  Sheriffs Sheriff of Broward County and Seminole County shall

 3  perform the same child protective investigative services

 4  according to the same standards as are performed by the

 5  sheriffs of Pinellas County, Manatee County, and Pasco County

 6  under this section. This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.

 7         Section 11.  Subsection (1) of section 1 of chapter

 8  99-219, Laws of Florida, is amended to read:

 9         Section 1.  (1)  The following provisions of section

10  20.19, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, are waived until

11  July 1, 2001 2000, for the purpose of allowing the Department

12  of Children and Family Services to organize programs,

13  districts, and functions of the department to achieve more

14  effective and efficient service delivery and improve

15  accountability, notwithstanding the provisions of section

16  20.04, Florida Statutes:

17         (a)  Section 20.19(2)(b) and (f) Florida Statutes, 1998

18  Supplement, relating to the secretary and deputy secretary.

19         (b)  Section 20.19(3), Florida Statutes, 1998

20  Supplement, relating to the Office of Standards and

21  Evaluation.

22         (c)  Section 20.19(5)(a), Florida Statutes, 1998

23  Supplement, relating to program offices.

24         (d)  Section 20.19(6)(a), (c), and (d), Florida

25  Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to the Assistant Secretary

26  for Administration.

27         (e)  Section 20.19(8)(l), (m), (n), and (o), Florida

28  Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to health and human

29  services boards.

30         (f)  Section 20.19(9), Florida Statutes, 1998

31  Supplement, relating to district nominee qualifications review

                                  12
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  committees.

 2         (g)  Section 20.19(10), (a), (b), (c)1.-7., (d), (e),

 3  (f), and (g), Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to

 4  the district administrator.

 5         (h)  Section 20.19(12)(d), Florida Statutes, 1998

 6  Supplement, relating to the departmental budget.

 7

 8  Actions taken under the authority granted by this section must

 9  be taken in consultation with the Executive Office of the

10  Governor. The secretary shall submit a report describing

11  actions taken and additional plans for implementing the

12  provisions of this section to the Governor, the President of

13  the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by

14  30 thirty days after this act bill becomes a law. The

15  department shall submit status reports on a monthly basis

16  through December 2000 1999.

17         Section 12.  In order to implement Specific

18  Appropriations 1150, 1159A, 1161, 1165, 1171, 1175, 1178,

19  1183, 1186, and 1190A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

20  Act, subsection (17) of section 216.181, Florida Statutes, is

21  amended to read:

22         216.181  Approved budgets for operations and fixed

23  capital outlay.--

24         (17)  Notwithstanding any other provision of this

25  section to the contrary, and for the 2000-2001 1999-2000

26  fiscal year only, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement

27  may transfer up to 20 positions and associated budget between

28  budget entities, provided the same funding source is used

29  throughout each transfer. The department may also transfer up

30  to 10 percent of the initial approved salary rate between

31  budget entities, provided the same funding source is used

                                  13
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  throughout each transfer. The department must provide notice

 2  to the Executive Office of the Governor, the chair of the

 3  Senate Budget Committee, and the chair of the House Committee

 4  on Criminal Justice Appropriations for all transfers of

 5  positions or salary rate. This subsection expires is repealed

 6  on July 1, 2001 2000.

 7         Section 13.  Consistent with the provisions of section

 8  216.163, Florida Statutes, in accordance with

 9  performance-based program budgeting requirements, and

10  notwithstanding the provisions of section 216.181, Florida

11  Statutes, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement may

12  transfer up to one-half of 1 percent of the funds in Specific

13  Appropriations 1150, 1159A, 1161, 1165, 1171, 1175, 1178,

14  1183, 1186, and 1190A, of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

15  Act for lump-sum salary bonuses for departmental employees at

16  the discretion of the executive director, provided that such

17  bonuses are given only to selected employees for meritorious

18  performance, instead of being given as across-the-board

19  bonuses for all employees. The department, after consultation

20  with the Executive Office of the Governor, shall provide a

21  plan to the chair of the House Fiscal Responsibility Council

22  and to the chair of the Senate Budget Committee for approval

23  before awarding such bonuses. This section expires July 1,

24  2001.

25         Section 14.  In order to implement Specific

26  Appropriations 1591G and 1476 of the 2000-2001 General

27  Appropriations Act, subsection (7) of section 212.20, Florida

28  Statutes, is amended to read:

29         212.20  Funds collected, disposition; additional powers

30  of department; operational expense; refund of taxes

31  adjudicated unconstitutionally collected.--

                                  14
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (7)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

 2  use of funds allocated to the Solid Waste Management Trust

 3  Fund shall be as provided in the General Appropriations Act.

 4  There is appropriated $10.5 transferred $15.5 million for

 5  wastewater surface water improvement and management projects

 6  and $10 million for the aquatic weed control program from

 7  revenues provided by this section.  This subsection expires is

 8  repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.

 9         Section 15.  In order to implement Specific

10  Appropriation 1633A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

11  Act, subsections (8) and (9) of section 403.7095, Florida

12  Statutes, are amended to read:

13         403.7095  Solid waste management grant program.--

14         (8)  For fiscal year 2000-2001 1999-2000, the

15  department shall provide counties with populations under

16  100,000 with at least 80 percent of the level of funding they

17  received in fiscal year 1997-1998 for solid waste management

18  and recycling grants.

19         (9)  For fiscal year 2000-2001 1999-2000, the

20  department shall provide 10 percent of the total funds

21  available after the requirements of subsection (8) are met for

22  recycling grants available to all counties on a competitive

23  basis for innovative programs. The department may consider one

24  or more of the following criteria in determining whether a

25  grant proposal is innovative:

26         (a)  Demonstrate advanced technologies or processes.

27         (b)  Collect and recycle materials targeted by the

28  department.

29         (c)  Demonstrate substantial improvement in program

30  cost-effectiveness and efficiency as measured against

31  statewide average costs for the same or similar programs.

                                  15
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (d)  Demonstrate transferability of technology and

 2  processes used in program.

 3         (e)  Demonstrate and implement multicounty or regional

 4  recycling programs.

 5         Section 16.  In order to implement Specific

 6  Appropriations 2432, 2433, and 2434 of the 2000-2001 General

 7  Appropriations Act, section 110.1239, Florida Statutes, is

 8  amended to read:

 9         110.1239  State group health insurance program

10  funding.--For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, it is

11  the intent of the Legislature that the state group health

12  insurance program be managed, administered, operated, and

13  funded in such a manner as to maximize the protection of state

14  employee health insurance benefits. Inherent in this intent is

15  the recognition that the health insurance liabilities

16  attributable to the benefits offered state employees should be

17  fairly, orderly, and equitably funded. Accordingly:

18         (1)  The division shall determine the level of premiums

19  necessary to fully fund the state group health insurance

20  program for the next fiscal year. Such determination shall be

21  made after each revenue estimating conference on health

22  insurance as provided in s. 216.136(1), but not later than

23  December 1 and April 1 of each fiscal year.

24         (2)  The Governor, in the Governor's recommended

25  budget, shall provide premium rates necessary for full funding

26  of the state group health insurance program, and the

27  Legislature shall provide in the General Appropriations Act

28  for a premium level necessary for full funding of the state

29  group health insurance program.

30         (3)  For purposes of funding, any additional

31  appropriation amounts allocated to the state group health

                                  16
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  insurance program by the Legislature shall be considered as a

 2  state contribution and thus an increase in the state premiums.

 3         (3)(4)  This section expires is repealed on July 1,

 4  2001 2000.

 5         Section 17.  In order to implement Specific

 6  Appropriation 1582A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

 7  Act, section 86 of chapter 93-213, Laws of Florida, as amended

 8  by section 28 of chapter 98-46, Laws of Florida, and section

 9  29 of chapter 99-228, Laws of Florida, is amended to read:

10         Section 86.  The Department of Environmental Regulation

11  is authorized 54 career service positions for administering

12  the state NPDES program. Twenty-five career service positions

13  are authorized for startup of the program beginning July 1,

14  1993, and the remaining 29 career service positions beginning

15  January 1, 1994.  The state NPDES program staffing shall start

16  July 1, 1993, with completion targeted for 6 months following

17  United States Environmental Protection Agency authorization to

18  administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

19  program.  Implementation of positions is subject to review and

20  final approval by the secretary of the Department of

21  Environmental Regulation.  The sum of $3.2 million is hereby

22  appropriated from the Pollution Recovery Trust Fund to cover

23  program startup costs. For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year

24  only, such funds need not be repaid.

25         Section 18.  In order to implement Specific

26  Appropriations 2408, 2409, 2410, and 2411 of the 2000-2001

27  General Appropriations Act, subsection (4) of section 287.161,

28  Florida Statutes, is amended to read:

29         287.161  Executive aircraft pool; assignment of

30  aircraft; charge for transportation.--

31         (4)  Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections

                                  17
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  (2) and (3) and for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,

 2  the Department of Management Services shall charge all persons

 3  receiving transportation from the executive aircraft pool a

 4  rate not less than the mileage allowance fixed by the

 5  Legislature for the use of privately owned vehicles. Fees

 6  collected for persons traveling by aircraft in the executive

 7  aircraft pool shall be deposited into the Bureau of Aircraft

 8  Trust Fund and shall be expended for costs incurred to operate

 9  the aircraft management activities of the department. It is

10  the intent of the Legislature that the executive aircraft pool

11  be operated on a full cost recovery basis, less available

12  funds. This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.

13         Section 19.  In order to implement Specific

14  Appropriation 1596C of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

15  Act, subsection (6) of section 403.1826, Florida Statutes, is

16  amended to read:

17         403.1826  Grants, requirements for eligibility.--

18         (6)(a)  A grant may not be made unless the local

19  governmental agency assures the department of the proper and

20  efficient operation and maintenance of the project after

21  construction.  Revenue sufficient to ensure that the facility

22  will be self-supporting shall be generated from sources which

23  include, but are not limited to, service charges and

24  connection fees. The revenue generated shall provide for

25  financing future sanitary sewerage capital improvements.  The

26  grantee shall accumulate, during the design life of the

27  grant-funded project, moneys in an amount equivalent to the

28  grant amount adjusted for inflationary cost increases.

29         (b)  The department may waive this accumulation

30  requirement for up to 5 years for a grantee, in a county as

31  defined by s. 125.011(1), which certifies to the department's

                                  18
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  satisfaction that an equivalent amount of money will be used,

 2  above the required amounts, to pay outstanding obligations

 3  resulting from improvements to the system. This paragraph

 4  expires July 1, 2001 2000.

 5         Section 20.  In order to implement Specific

 6  Appropriations 1807, 1816, 1822, 1837, 1847, and 1859 of the

 7  2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, subsection (19) is added

 8  to section 216.181, Florida Statutes, read:

 9         216.181  Approved budgets for operations and fixed

10  capital outlay.--

11         (19)  Notwithstanding any other provision of this

12  chapter to the contrary, the Florida Department of

13  Transportation, in order to facilitate the transfer of

14  personnel to the new turnpike headquarters location in Orange

15  County, may transfer salary rate to the turnpike budget entity

16  from other departmental budget entities. The department must

17  provide documentation to the Executive Office of the Governor,

18  the chair of the Senate Budget Committee, and the chair of the

19  House Committee on Transportation and Economic Development

20  Appropriations for all transfers. This subsection expires July

21  1, 2001.

22         Section 21.  The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering of

23  the Department of Business and Professional Regulation shall

24  transfer all tangible personal property which is owned by the

25  department and currently in use by the College of Veterinary

26  Medicine at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida,

27  to the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of

28  Florida.

29         Section 22.  The Florida Legislature affirms that all

30  funds and related interest appropriated to the Instituto

31  Patriotico y Docente San Carlos, Inc., a Florida

                                  19
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  not-for-profit corporation d/b/a/ San Carlos Institute,

 2  including, but not limited to, Public Education Capital Outlay

 3  (PECO) funds, were spent in accordance with legislative

 4  intent; and the Florida Legislature affirms that all matching

 5  fund requirements have been fully met by the San Carlos

 6  Institute.  Therefore, the requirement that interest funds not

 7  otherwise specifically contracted for be repaid to the State

 8  of Florida is waived, and the Legislature directs that all

 9  funds appropriated for the San Carlos Institute for fiscal

10  years 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 be released to the San Carlos

11  Institute pursuant to legislative intent.

12         Section 23.  The funds provided in the 2000-2001

13  General Appropriations Act for workforce development shall be

14  initially allocated to the school district or community

15  college as designated. If, for any reason, a program in whole

16  or in part is moved from a community college to a school

17  district or moved from a school district to a community

18  college, the Commissioner of Education or the executive

19  director of the Division of Community Colleges shall submit a

20  budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216, Florida Statutes, to

21  transfer the appropriate amount of the 2000-2001 appropriation

22  between the affected district and community college. The

23  amount transferred shall be as near as practicable to the

24  actual amount appropriated for the FTE funded for that

25  program. This section expires July 1, 2001.

26         Section 24.  Prior to the release of funds in Specific

27  Appropriation 135 for Leon and St. Johns counties, the

28  Department of Education and the Division of Community Colleges

29  shall jointly conduct an audit to determine whether all FTE,

30  completions and placements and related funds and any other

31  funds from all state sources related to the Law Enforcement

                                  20
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Programs recently transferred to St. Johns River Community

 2  College and Tallahassee Community College have been correctly

 3  identified and transferred to the respective colleges.

 4  Notwithstanding any provisions of chapter 99-227, Laws of

 5  Florida, to the contrary, it is the intent of the Legislature

 6  that all funds, including but not limited to the entire FEPP

 7  categorical programs, Workforce Development funds, performance

 8  incentives, Incentive Grants for Expanded Programs, and all

 9  other state fund sources related to these programs be included

10  in this audit. Notwithstanding any provisions of chapter

11  99-227, Laws of Florida, to the contrary, all funds identified

12  in this audit shall be shifted to the base of the appropriate

13  community college before the provisions of Specific

14  Appropriation 135 are allocated.

15         Section 25.  In order to implement Specific

16  Appropriation 167 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

17  subsection (8) of 240.2605, Florida Statutes, is amended to

18  read:

19         240.2605  Trust Fund for Major Gifts.--

20         (8)  Notwithstanding other provisions of this section,

21  for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, for gifts

22  received during this period, the university presidents shall

23  provide a list of donations from private donors for challenge

24  grants, new donations, major gifts, and the eminent scholars

25  program to be matched for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year

26  to the Board of Regents. The listing shall contain an

27  explanation of the donation, a statement of the specific

28  benefits accrued to the university as a result of the

29  donation, and how the donation is consistent with the mission

30  of the institution, as defined by the Board of Regents in the

31  1998-2003 Strategic Plan. University presidents shall rank

                                  21
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  each private donation to their university, giving highest

 2  priority to private donations that provide additional library

 3  resources to universities; donations that provide student

 4  assistance through scholarships, fellowships, or

 5  assistantships; donations that provide funding for existing

 6  academic programs at universities; and donations that meet the

 7  matching requirement without encumbering pledges. The Board of

 8  Regents, using the same criteria, shall develop a systemwide

 9  priority list and may set restrictions on the annual amount of

10  matching funds provided for single donations that exceed $5

11  million. The Board of Regents shall submit a report to the

12  President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of

13  Representatives, and the Executive Office of the Governor by

14  January 15, 2001.

15         Section 26.  In order to implement Specific

16  Appropriation 167 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

17  the university presidents shall provide to the Board of

18  Regents a list of donations received in 2000-2001 from private

19  donors for the State University System Facility Enhancement

20  Challenge Grant Program. This listing shall contain an

21  explanation of the donation, a statement of the specific

22  benefits accrued to the university as a result of the

23  donation, and the projected cost to the state for the

24  operation and maintenance of the facility. The Board of

25  Regents shall review and rank each private donation, giving

26  highest priority to private donations that provide the

27  financial resources for major renovations to existing

28  facilities, particularly instructional facilities, and new

29  space requirements as identified by the space utilization

30  model. This section expires July 1, 2001.

31         Section 27.  A section of this act that implements a

                                  22
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  specific appropriation or specifically identified proviso

 2  language in the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void

 3  if the specific appropriation or specifically identified

 4  proviso language is vetoed. A section of this act that

 5  implements more than one specific appropriation or more than

 6  one portion of specifically identified proviso language in the

 7  2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void if all the

 8  specific appropriations or portions of specifically identified

 9  proviso language are vetoed.

10         Section 28.  If any other act passed during the 2000

11  Regular Session of the Legislature or any extension thereof

12  contains a provision that is substantively the same as a

13  provision in this act, but that removes or is otherwise not

14  subject to the future repeal applied to such provision by this

15  act, the Legislature intends that the provision in the other

16  act shall take precedence and shall continue to operate,

17  notwithstanding the future repeal provided by this act.

18         Section 29.  The performance measures and standards

19  established in this section for individual programs in

20  education shall be applied to those programs for the 2000-2001

21  fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are

22  directly linked to the appropriations made in the General

23  Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as required by

24  the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.

25         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.--

26         (a)  For the Private Colleges and Universities Program,

27  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

28  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

29  Specific Appropriations 11, 12, 16-21, 24-27, 29-32, and 35-41

30  are as follows:

31         1.  FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

                                  23
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Retention rate of First Time in College (FTIC)

 2  award recipients, using a 6-year rate.........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         b.  Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, using a

 4  6-year rate.................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         2.  FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Number of degrees granted by level for FRAG

 7  recipients and contract program recipients....FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         3.  ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Retention rate of award recipients.FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         b.  Graduation rate of award recipients....FY 2001-2002

11  LBR

12         c.  Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the

13  percent employed at $22,000 or more 1 year following

14  graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

15         d.  Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the

16  percent employed at $22,000 or more 5 years following

17  graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

18         e.  Licensure/certification rates of award recipients

19  (where applicable)............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         4.  ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of prior year's graduates...FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         b.  Number of prior year's graduates remaining in

23  Florida...........................................FY 2001-2002

24  LBR

25         5.  HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

26  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Retention rate of students, using a 6-year rate..FY

28  2001-2002 LBR

29         b.  Graduation rate of students, using a 6-year rate.FY

30  2001-2002 LBR

31         6.  HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OUTPUT

                                  24
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  MEASURE.--

 2         a.  Number of FTIC students, disaggregated by in-state

 3  and out-of-state..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 4         (b)  For the Financial Aid Programs, the outcome

 5  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 6  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 7  Appropriations 2 and 55 are as follows:

 8         1.  BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Percent of high school graduates who successfully

10  completed the 19 core credits..............................60%

11         b.  Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by

12  delivery system, using a 4-year rate for community colleges

13  and a 6-year rate for universities........... FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         c.  Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by

15  delivery system.............................. FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         d.  Percent of high school graduates eligible for

17  awards who enrolled in a Florida postsecondary institution.84%

18         e.  Percentage of high school graduates attending

19  Florida postsecondary institutions.........................51%

20         2.  BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of Bright Futures recipients..........73,406

22         3.  FLORIDA STUDENT ASSISTANCE GRANTS (FSAG) OUTCOME

23  MEASURES.--

24         a.  Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by

25  delivery system.............................. FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         b.  Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by

27  delivery system.............................. FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         4.  CRITICAL TEACHER SHORTAGE LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAM

29  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

30         a.  Percent of recipients who, upon completion of the

31  program, work in fields in which there are shortages........FY

                                  25
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  2001-2002 LBR

 2         (c)  For the Public Schools Program, the outcome

 3  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 4  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 5  Appropriations 3, 3A, 5, 5A, 59-113, 115, and 117 are as

 6  follows:

 7         1.  KINDERGARTEN - GRADE TWELVE (K-12) OUTCOME

 8  MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Number and percent of teachers with National

10  Teacher's Certification, reported by district.......1,046/0.8%

11         b.  Number and percent of "A" schools, reported by

12  district...............................................254/10%

13         c.  Number and percent of schools that receive a grade

14  of "D" or "F," reported by district....................494/20%

15         d.  Number and percent of schools declining one or more

16  letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         e.  Number and percent of schools improving one or more

18  letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

19         2.  STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS

20  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Percent of certificates issued within 30 days after

22  receipt of application.....................................84%

23         b.  Number of districts that have implemented a high

24  quality professional development system, as determined by the

25  Department of Education, based on its review of student

26  performance data and the success of districts in defining and

27  meeting the training needs of teachers......................12

28         c.  Percent of current fiscal year competitive grants

29  approved by August 1 of current fiscal year................90%

30         3.  STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS

31  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

                                  26
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Number of certification applications processed

 2  ........................................................56,000

 3         (d)  For the Workforce Development Program, the outcome

 4  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 5  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 6  Appropriations 123-127 and 128-136 are as follows:

 7         1.  WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Number and percent of vocational certificate

 9  program completers who are found placed according to the

10  following definitions:

11         (I)  Level III - Completed a program identified as high

12  wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

13  employed at $4,680 or more per quarter............12,227/42.6%

14         (II)  Level II - Completed a program identified for new

15  entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

16  employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing

17  education in a college credit-level program........4,369/15.2%

18         (III)  Level I - Completed any program not included in

19  Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,

20  or continuing their education at the vocational certificate

21  level.............................................10,801/37.6%

22         b.  Number and percent of associate in science degree

23  and college-credit certificate program completers who are

24  found placed according to the following definitions:

25         (I)  Level III - Completed a program identified as high

26  wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

27  employed at $4,680 or more per quarter.............6,897/57.9%

28         (II)  Level II - Completed a program identified for new

29  entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

30  employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing

31  education in a college credit-level program........1,351/11.3%

                                  27
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (III)  Level I - Completed any program not included in

 2  Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,

 3  or continuing their education at the vocational certificate

 4  level..............................................1,166/13.9%

 5         2.  WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Number of adult basic education, including English

 7  as a Second Language, and adult secondary education completion

 8  point completers who are found employed or continuing their

 9  education.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         (e)  For the Community Colleges program, the outcome

11  measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

13  Appropriations 8 and 137-152 are as follows:

14         1.  COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Percent of Associate in Arts (AA) degree graduates

16  who transfer to a state university within 2 years..........64%

17         b.  Percent of AA degree transfers to the State

18  University System who earn a 2.5 or above in the SUS after a

19  year.......................................................73%

20         c.  Of the AA graduates who are employed full-time

21  rather than continuing their education, the percent which are

22  in jobs earning at least $9 an hour........................59%

23         d.  Of the AA students who complete 18 credit hours,

24  the percent of whom graduate in 4 years, disaggregating the

25  data by the following groups: ethnic, disabled, limited

26  English speaking, and economically disadvantaged...........33%

27         e.  Percent of students graduating with total

28  accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 120

29  percent of the degree requirement..........................36%

30         f.  Percent of students exiting the college-preparatory

31  program who enter college-level course work associated with

                                  28
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  the AA, Associate in Science (AS), Postsecondary Vocational

 2  Certificate, and Postsecondary Adult Vocational programs...66%

 3         g.  Percent of AA degree transfers to the State

 4  University System who started in College Prep and who earn a

 5  2.5 in the SUS after 1 year................................72%

 6         2.  COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of AA degrees granted.................29,000

 8         b.  Number of students receiving college preparatory

 9  instruction.............................................94,000

10         c.  Number of students enrolled in baccalaureate

11  programs offered on community college campuses....FY 2001-2002

12  LBR

13         (f)  For the Postsecondary Education Planning

14  Commission (PEPC) program, the outcome measures and associated

15  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

16  Specific Appropriations 153-158 are as follows:

17         1.  PEPC OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Completed studies required by statute or the

19  General Appropriations Act................................100%

20         (g)  For the State University System program, the

21  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

22  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

23  Appropriations 9A-9D, 160-183A are as follows:

24         1.  STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURES.--

25         a.  Graduation rate for First Time in College (FTIC)

26  students, using a 6-year rate..............................61%

27         b.  Retention rate for FTIC students, using a 6-year

28  rate.......................................................71%

29         c.  Graduation rate for AA transfer students, using a

30  4-year rate................................................69%

31         d.  Retention rate for AA transfer students, using a

                                  29
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  4-year rate................................................80%

 2         e.  Percent of students graduating with total

 3  accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 115

 4  percent of the degree requirement, disaggregating the data by

 5  FTIC and AA transfers......................................61%

 6         f.  Pass rate on licensure/certification exams, for the

 7  first sitting.................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         g.  Of the prior year graduates remaining in Florida,

 9  the percent employed at $22,000 or more 1 year following

10  graduation.................................................60%

11         h.  Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the

12  percent employed at $22,000 or more 5 years following

13  graduation.................................................90%

14         i.  Percent of undergraduate students enrolled in

15  graduate school upon completion of the baccalaureate degree

16  ...........................................................16%

17         j.  Externally generated research and training grant

18  funds (federal, state, local, business, and industry) per

19  state-funded ranked faculty full-time equivalent..FY 2001-2002

20  LBR

21         k.  Average number of articles in Institute for

22  Scientific Information Publication Count per ranked faculty.FY

23  2001-2002 LBR

24         l.  For IFAS only, the percent of public service

25  projects where the beneficiary is satisfied or highly

26  satisfied with the extension assistance....................98%

27         m.  Of the total instructional effort by level, the

28  percent of effort provided by faculty:

29         (I)  Lower level....................................35%

30         (II)  Upper level...................................50%

31         (III)  Graduate.....................................55%

                                  30
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         n.  Number and percent of qualified Florida students,

 2  those applicants meeting BOR admission standards, admitted as

 3  FTIC students.....................................FY 2001-2002

 4  LBR/95%

 5         o.  Percent of FTIC students admitted as student

 6  profile assessments........................................10%

 7         p.  Percent of student profile assessments who are

 8  out-of-state students......................................10%

 9         q.  Of total faculty effort allocated for public

10  service, the percent devoted to public schools.............25%

11         2.  STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTPUT MEASURE.--

12         a.  Number of degrees granted, by level:

13         (I)  Baccalaureate...............................37,982

14         (II)  Masters....................................11,008

15         (III)  Professional...............................1,255

16         (IV)  Doctoral....................................1,170

17         Section 30.  The performance measures and standards

18  established in this section for individual programs in human

19  services agencies shall be applied to those programs for the

20  2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and

21  standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in

22  the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as

23  required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act

24  of 1994.

25         (1)  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION.--

26         (a)  For the Administration and Support Program, the

27  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

28  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

29  Appropriations 184-190 are as follows:

30         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

                                  31
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  costs.....................................................1.2%

 2         b.  Information technology costs as a percent of agency

 3  administrative costs......................................9.6%

 4         2.  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 5         a.  Number of information technology service hours

 6  .......................................................165,460

 7         (b)  For the Health Care Services Program, the outcome

 8  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 9  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

10  Appropriations 191-251 are as follows:

11         1.  CHILDREN SPECIAL HEALTH CARE (KIDCARE PROGRAM)

12  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent of eligible uninsured children who receive

14  health benefits coverage..................................100%

15         b.  Percent of children enrolled with up-to-date

16  immunizations..............................................80%

17         c.  Percent of compliance with the standards

18  established in the Guidelines for Health Supervision of

19  Children and Youth as developed by the American Academy of

20  Pediatrics for children eligible under the program.........80%

21         d.  Percent of families satisfied with the care

22  provided under the program.................................90%

23         2.  CHILDREN SPECIAL HEALTH CARE (KIDCARE PROGRAM)

24  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Total number of uninsured children enrolled in

26  KidCare................................................400,982

27         b.  Number of uninsured children enrolled in Florida

28  Healthy Kids...........................................261,927

29         c.  Number of uninsured children enrolled in Medikids

30  ........................................................30,994

31         d.  Number of uninsured children enrolled in Children's

                                  32
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Medical Services Network.................................6,326

 2         e.  Number of uninsured children enrolled in the

 3  Medicaid Expansion......................................16,735

 4         f.  Number of uninsured children enrolled in Medicaid

 5  as a result of outreach efforts.........................85,000

 6         3.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

 7  MEASURE.--

 8         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

 9  costs.....................................................1.2%

10         4.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

11  MEASURES.--

12         a.  Average number of days between receipt of clean

13  Medicaid claim and payment..................................16

14         b.  Number of Medicaid claims received......115,612,455

15         c.  Number of Medicaid claims paid...........75,319,381

16         5.  MEDICAID SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS OUTCOME

17  MEASURES.--

18         a.  Percent of women receiving adequate prenatal care

19  .........................................................85.0%

20         b.  Neonatal mortality rate per 1,000..............4.70

21         c.  Average number of months between pregnancies for

22  those receiving family planning services..................37.4

23         d.  Percent of eligible children who received all

24  required components of EPSDT screen........................72%

25         e.  Percent of child hospitalizations for conditions

26  preventable with good ambulatory care....................7.50%

27         f.  Percent of nondisabled working age adult

28  hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good

29  ambulatory care..........................................12.5%

30         g.  Percent of disabled working age adult

31  hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good

                                  33
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  ambulatory care..........................................13.5%

 2         h.  Percent of elder hospitalizations for conditions

 3  preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.0%

 4         6.  MEDICAID SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Number of women receiving prenatal care.....143,852

 6         b.  Number of vaginal deliveries.................58,225

 7         c.  Number of women receiving family planning services

 8  .......................................................256,496

 9         d.  Number of children ages 1-20 enrolled in Medicaid

10  .....................................................1,179,147

11         e.  Number of children receiving EPSDT services.193,031

12         f.  Number of hospital inpatient services provided to

13  children................................................44,353

14         g.  Number of physician services provided to children

15  .....................................................3,927,330

16         h.  Number of prescribed drugs provided to children

17  .....................................................3,101,827

18         i.  Percent of nondisabled adults receiving a service

19  ...........................................................76%

20         j.  Percent of enrolled disabled adults receiving a

21  service..................................................87.6%

22         k.  Percent of hospital stays for elder recipients

23  exceeding length of stay criteria.........................9.5%

24         l.  Number of elders enrolled in long term care waivers

25  ........................................................13,614

26         m.  Number of hospital inpatient services provided to

27  elders.................................................111,883

28         n.  Number of physician services provided to elders

29  .....................................................3,042,986

30         o.  Number of prescribed drugs provided to elders

31  ....................................................10,044,825

                                  34
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         7.  MEDICAID LONG TERM CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Percent of elder hospitalizations for conditions

 3  preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.0%

 4         b.  Percent of developmentally disabled

 5  hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good

 6  ambulatory care............................................15%

 7         8.  MEDICAID PREPAID HEALTH PLAN OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Percent of elder and disabled hospitalizations for

 9  conditions preventable with good ambulatory care...........15%

10         b.  Percent of women and child hospitalizations for

11  conditions preventable with good ambulatory care.........14.2%

12         (c)  For the Health Care Regulation Program, the

13  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

14  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

15  Appropriations 252-263 are as follows:

16         1.  HEALTH FACILITIES AND PRACTITIONER REGULATION

17  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Percent of Priority I practitioner investigations

19  resulting in emergency action..............................25%

20         b.  Average number of days to take emergency action on

21  Priority I practitioner investigations......................60

22         c.  Percent of cease and desist orders issued to

23  unlicensed practitioners in which another complaint of

24  unlicensed activity is subsequently filed against the same

25  practitioner................................................6%

26         d.  Percent of initial investigations and

27  recommendations as to the existence of probable cause

28  completed within 180 days after receipt of complaint.......85%

29         e.  Percent of investigations of alleged unlicensed

30  facilities and programs that have been previously issued a

31  cease and desist order, that are confirmed as repeated

                                  35
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  unlicensed activity.........................................8%

 2         f.  Percent of Priority I consumer complaints about

 3  licensed facilities and programs that are investigated within

 4  48 hours..................................................100%

 5         g.  Percent of accredited hospitals and ambulatory

 6  surgical centers cited for not complying with life safety,

 7  licensure, or emergency access standards....................9%

 8         h.  Percent of validation surveys that are consistent

 9  with findings noted during the accreditation survey .......98%

10         i.  Percent of nursing home facilities with

11  deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,

12  or welfare of the public....................................2%

13         j.  Percent of assisted living facilities with

14  deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,

15  or welfare of the public....................................2%

16         k.  Percent of home health facilities with deficiencies

17  that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare

18  of the public...............................................0%

19         l.  Percent of clinical laboratories with deficiencies

20  that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare

21  of the public...............................................0%

22         m.  Percent of ambulatory surgical centers with

23  deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,

24  or welfare of the public....................................2%

25         n.  Percent of hospitals with deficiencies that pose a

26  serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare of the public

27  ............................................................2%

28         o.  Percent of hospitals that fail to report serious

29  incidents (agency identified)...............................5%

30         p.  Percent of hospitals that fail to report peer

31  review disciplinary actions (agency identified).............2%

                                  36
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         q.  Percent of new recipients voluntarily selecting

 2  managed care plan..........................................71%

 3         r.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

 4  costs.....................................................6.4%

 5         2.  HEALTH FACILITIES AND PRACTITIONER REGULATION

 6  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of practitioner complaints determined

 8  legally sufficient.......................................6,836

 9         b.  Number of legally sufficient practitioner

10  complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (nolle

11  prosse)..................................................1,182

12         c.  Number of legally sufficient practitioner

13  complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (letters

14  of guidance).............................................1,095

15         d.  Number of legally sufficient practitioner

16  complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (notice

17  of noncompliance)............................................3

18         e.  Number of legally sufficient practitioner

19  complaints resolved by findings of probable cause - issuance

20  of citation for minor violations............................62

21         f.  Number of legally sufficient practitioner

22  complaints resolved by findings of stipulations or informal

23  hearings.................................................1,023

24         g.  Number of legally sufficient practitioner

25  complaints resolved by findings of formal hearings..........37

26         h.  Average number of practitioner complaint

27  investigations per FTE.....................................227

28         i.  Number of inquiries to the call center regarding

29  practitioner licensure and disciplinary information....115,230

30         j.  Number of facility emergency actions taken.......89

31         k.  Total number of full facility quality-of-care

                                  37
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  surveys conducted........................................4,980

 2         l.  Number of nursing home full facility

 3  quality-of-care surveys conducted..........................712

 4         m.  Number of assisted living facility full facility

 5  quality-of-care surveys conducted..........................762

 6         n.  Number of home health agency full facility

 7  quality-of-care surveys conducted........................1,221

 8         o.  Number of clinical laboratory full facility

 9  quality-of-care surveys conducted........................1,163

10         p.  Number of hospital full facility quality-of-care

11  surveys conducted...........................................37

12         q.  Number of other full facility quality-of-care

13  surveys conducted........................................1,084

14         r.  Average processing time (in days) for Statewide

15  Provider and Subscriber Assistance Panel cases.............165

16         s.  Number of nursing home plans and construction

17  reviews performed........................................1,100

18         t.  Number of hospital plan and construction reviews

19  performed................................................2,500

20         u.  Number of ambulatory surgical center plans and

21  construction reviewed......................................200

22         v.  Average number of hours for a nursing home plans

23  and construction review.....................................30

24         w.  Average number of hours for a hospital plans and

25  construction review.........................................35

26         x.  Average number of hours for an ambulatory surgical

27  center plans and construction review........................25

28         y.  Number of new enrollees provided choice counseling

29  .......................................................191,582

30         (2)  DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.--

31         (a)  For the Executive Leadership Program, the outcome

                                  38
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 2  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 3  Appropriations 264-268 are as follows:

 4         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

 5  MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

 7  costs.....................................................0.3%

 8         (b)  For the Support Services Program, the outcome

 9  measures, output measures, and associated performance

10  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

11  Appropriations 269-293 are as follows:

12         1.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

13         a.  Information technology costs as a percent of total

14  agency costs..............................................3.5%

15         2.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of computer programs supported........22,485

17         b.  Number of computer programs designed and developed

18  ........................................................22,485

19         3.  ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME

20  MEASURE.--

21         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

22  costs.......................................................1%

23         4.  DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

25  costs.....................................................1.6%

26         (c)  For the Family Safety Program, the outcome

27  measures, output measures, and associated performance

28  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

29  Appropriations 294-325 are as follows:

30         1.  CHILD CARE REGULATION AND INFORMATION OUTCOME

31  MEASURE.--

                                  39
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Percent of licensed child care facilities and homes

 2  with no class 1 (serious) violations during their licensure

 3  year.......................................................97%

 4         2.  CHILD CARE REGULATION AND INFORMATION OUTPUT

 5  MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Number of facilities and homes licensed.......5,692

 7         3.  ADULT PROTECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Percent of protective supervision cases in which no

 9  report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received

10  while the case is open (from beginning of protective

11  supervision for a maximum of 1 year).......................97%

12         b.  Ratio of domestic violence incidents reported

13  resulting in injury or harm to clients as a result of

14  inadequate security procedures per 1,000 shelter days

15  .................................................2001-2002 LBR

16         c.  Percent of adult and child victims in shelter more

17  than 72 hours having a plan for family safety and security

18  when they leave shelter....................................95%

19         4.  ADULT PROTECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of investigations.....................32,281

21         b.  Number of persons receiving protective supervision

22  services...................................................628

23         c.  Number of persons referred to other agencies..1,700

24         d.  Number of individuals served in emergency shelters

25  ........................................................13,578

26         e.  Number of individuals counseled..............97,343

27         5.  CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION OUTCOME

28  MEASURE.--

29         a.  Percent of children in families who complete

30  intensive child abuse prevention programs of 3 months or more

31  who are not abused or neglected within 12 months after program

                                  40
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  completion.................................................96%

 2         b.  Per capita child abuse rate................23/1,000

 3         c.  Number of families served....................53,500

 4         6.  CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Percent of children who have no findings of child

 6  maltreatment within 1 year after case closure from services

 7  ...........................................................95%

 8         b.  Percent of children reunified with family who

 9  return to foster care within 1 year after case closure......3%

10         c.  Percent of children not abused or neglected during

11  services...................................................97%

12         d.  Percent of children who exited out-of-home care by

13  the 12th month.............................................30%

14         e.  Percent of cases reviewed by supervisors in

15  accordance with department timeframes for early warning system

16  ..........................................................100%

17         f.  Percent of alleged victims seen within 24 hours

18  ..........................................................100%

19         g.  Percent of investigations completed within 30 days

20  ..........................................................100%

21         h.  Percent of children removed from a home who are

22  placed with a relative as a result of a child protective

23  investigation....................................2001-2002 LBR

24         i.  Percent of children removed from a home who are

25  placed in out-of-home care (excluding relative placements) as

26  a result of a child protective investigation.....2001-2002 LBR

27         j.  Percent of foster homes that exceed their licensed

28  capacity without a current waiver................2001-2002 LBR

29         k.  Percent of case plans completed within 60 days

30  after the child is removed from the home.........2001-2002 LBR

31         l.  Percent of children who are adopted of the number

                                  41
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  of children legally available for adoption.................97%

 2         7.  CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 3         a.  Reports of child abuse/neglect..............134,344

 4         b.  Children identified as abused/neglected during year

 5  ........................................................75,000

 6         c.  Children receiving adoptive services..........4,500

 7         d.  Children receiving adoption subsidies........13,209

 8         8.  FLORIDA ABUSE HOTLINE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Percent of abandoned calls made to the Florida

10  Abuse Hotline...............................................7%

11         9.  FLORIDA ABUSE HOTLINE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

12         a.  Calls answered..............................474,204

13         10.  PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME

14  MEASURE.--

15         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

16  costs....................................................6.40%

17         (d)  For the Persons with Disabilities Program, the

18  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

19  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

20  Appropriations 326-360 are as follows:

21         1.  DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES PUBLIC FACILITIES OUTCOME

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Annual number of significant reportable incidents

24  per 100 persons with developmental disabilities living in

25  developmental services institutions.........................24

26         b.  Percent of people with improved quality of life.40%

27         2.  DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES PUBLIC FACILITIES OUTPUT

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Adults incompetent to proceed provided competency

30  training and custodial care in the Mentally Retarded

31  Defendants Program.........................................141

                                  42
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  Adults receiving services in developmental services

 2  institutions.............................................1,419

 3         3.  HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Percent of people receiving home and community

 5  services with improved quality of life (waiver and nonwaiver)

 6  ...........................................................53%

 7         b.  Percent of people receiving private ICF/DD with

 8  improved quality of life...................................40%

 9         c.  Percent of people who have a quality-of-life score

10  of 19 out of 25 or greater on the Outcome Based Performance

11  Measures Assessment at annual reassessment.................18%

12         d.  Percent of people who are employed in integrated

13  settings...................................................26%

14         4.  HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Children and adults provided residential care.5,330

16         b.  Number of people served in the community (not in

17  private ICF/DDs)........................................27,891

18         c.  Number of people served in private facilities.2,084

19         5.  IN-HOME SERVICES FOR DISABLED ADULTS OUTCOME

20  MEASURE.--

21         a.  Percent of adults with disabilities receiving

22  services who are not placed in a nursing home..............99%

23         6.  IN-HOME SERVICES FOR DISABLED ADULTS OUTPUT

24  MEASURE.--

25         a.  Number of disabled adults provided in-home supports

26  .........................................................4,302

27         7.  PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME

28  MEASURE.--

29         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

30  costs....................................................0.12%

31         (e)  For the Mental Health Program, the outcome

                                  43
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 2  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 3  Appropriations 361-390 are as follows:

 4         1.  VIOLENT SEXUAL PREDATOR OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Number of sexual predators served.............4,750

 6         b.  Number of people served who are committed........89

 7         c.  Number of people served who are noncommitted.....60

 8         2.  ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME

 9  MEASURES.--

10         a.  Average annual number of days spent in the

11  community (not in institutions or other facilities) for adults

12  with a serious and persistent mental illness...............344

13         b.  Average functional level based on Global Assessment

14  of Functioning score for adults with a serious and persistent

15  mental illness..............................................50

16         c.  Average annual days worked for pay for adults with

17  a serious and persistent mental illness.....................40

18         d.  Percent of clients with a serious and persistent

19  mental illness who worked during the year........2001-2002 LBR

20         e.  Percent of community partners (serious and

21  persistent mental illness) satisfied based on survey.......90%

22         f.  Average Global Assessment of Functioning scale

23  change score for adults in mental health crisis..............8

24         g.  Percent of adults in mental health crisis not

25  readmitted within 30 days..................................97%

26         h.  Percent of community partners (adults in mental

27  health crisis) satisfied based on survey...................90%

28         i.  Average functional level based on Global Assessment

29  of Functioning score for adults with forensic involvement...45

30         j.  Percent of adults with forensic involvement who

31  violate their conditional release under chapter 916, Florida

                                  44
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Statutes, and are recommitted...............................4%

 2         k.  Percent of community partners (adults in mental

 3  health crisis) satisfied based on survey...................90%

 4         l.  Average annual number of days spent in the

 5  community (not in institutions or other facilities) for adults

 6  with forensic involvement..................................310

 7         3.  ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT

 8  MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Number of adults with a serious and persistent

10  mental illness in the community served..................53,736

11         b.  Number of adults in mental health crisis served

12  ........................................................34,382

13         c.  Number of adults with forensic involvement served

14  ...........................................................896

15         4.  CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of children with mental illness restored to

18  competency and recommended to proceed with a judicial hearing

19  ...........................................................90%

20         b.  Percent of children with mental retardation

21  restored to competency and recommended to proceed with a

22  judicial hearing...........................................68%

23         c.  Percent of community partners satisfied with

24  program (children incompetent to proceed in Juvenile Justice)

25  based upon a survey........................................90%

26         d.  Projected annual days serious emotionally disturbed

27  (SED) children (excluding those in juvenile justice

28  facilities) spend in the community.........................333

29         e.  Percent of available school days SED children

30  attended during the last 30 days...........................86%

31         f.  Percent of SED community partners satisfied based

                                  45
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  on a survey................................................90%

 2         g.  Average functional level score SED children will

 3  have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of

 4  Functioning scale...........................................50

 5         h.  Percent of improvement of the emotional condition

 6  or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving

 7  the presented problem and symptoms of the serious disturbance

 8  recorded in the initial assessment.............. 2001-2002 LBR

 9         i.  Projected annual days emotionally disturbed (ED)

10  children (excluding those in juvenile justice facilities)

11  spend in the community.....................................349

12         j.  Percent of available days ED children attended

13  school during the last 30 days.............................89%

14         k.  Percent of ED community partners satisfied based on

15  a survey...................................................90%

16         l.  Percent of improvement of the emotional condition

17  or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving

18  the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional

19  disturbance recorded in the initial assessment...2001-2002 LBR

20         m.  Average functional level score ED children will

21  have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of

22  Functioning scale...........................................57

23         5.  CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT

24  MEASURES.--

25         a.  Number served who are incompetent to proceed....226

26         b.  Number of SED children to be served..........32,817

27         c.  Number of ED children to be served...........18,272

28         d.  Number of at-risk children to be served.......2,000

29         6.  ADULT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES OUTCOME

30  MEASURES.--

31         a.  Percent of civil commitment patients who improve

                                  46
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  mental health based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome

 2  Scale......................................................64%

 3         b.  Average civil commitment scores on community

 4  readiness/ability survey.........................2001-2002 LBR

 5         c.  Percent of civil commitment patients readmitted

 6  within 1 year....................................2001-2002 LBR

 7         d.  Percent of civil commitment community partners

 8  satisfied based on survey........................2001-2002 LBR

 9         e.  Percent of people in civil commitment served who

10  are discharged to the community............................40%

11         f.  Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents

12  in civil commitment in each mental health institution.......15

13         g.  Average number of days to restore competency for

14  adults in forensic commitment..............................174

15         h.  Percent of forensic residents restored to

16  competency.......................................2001-2002 LBR

17         i.  Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents

18  in forensic commitment in each mental health institution.....5

19         j.  Percent of forensic commitment community partners

20  satisfied based on survey..................................90%

21         7.  ADULT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES OUTPUT

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of people in civil commitment served...2,700

24         b.  Number of civil commitment adult abuse reports

25  confirmed or proposed confirmed..................2001-2002 LBR

26         c.  Number of forensic commitment adult abuse reports

27  confirmed or proposed confirmed..................2001-2002 LBR

28         d.  Number of adults in forensic commitment served

29  .........................................................1,605

30         8.  PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME

31  MEASURE.--

                                  47
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

 2  costs.....................................................1.6%

 3         (f)  For the Substance Abuse Program, the outcome

 4  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 5  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 6  Appropriations 391-398B are as follows:

 7         1.  PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME

 8  MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

10  costs.....................................................3.8%

11         2.  CHILD SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND

12  TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent of children with substance abuse who

14  complete treatment.........................................72%

15         b.  Percent of children with substance abuse who are

16  drug free during the 12 months following completion of

17  treatment..................................................52%

18         c.  Percent of children with substance abuse under the

19  supervision of the state receiving substance-abuse treatment

20  who are not committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice

21  during the 12 months following treatment completion........85%

22         d.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

23  survey.....................................................85%

24         e.  Percent of children at risk of substance abuse in

25  targeted prevention programs who achieve expected level of

26  improvement in reading.....................................75%

27         f.  Percent of children at risk of substance abuse in

28  targeted prevention programs who achieve expected level of

29  improvement in math........................................75%

30         g.  Percent of children at risk of substance abuse who

31  receive targeted prevention services who are not admitted to

                                  48
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  substance-abuse services during the 12 months after completion

 2  of prevention services.....................................95%

 3         3.  CHILD SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION SERVICES OUTPUT

 4  MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Number of children with substance-abuse problems

 6  served..................................................55,000

 7         b.  Number of children with substance abuse completing

 8  treatment................................................5,429

 9         c.  Number of children receiving aftercare/follow-up

10  .........................................................2,004

11         d.  Number of at-risk children served in targeted

12  prevention...............................................7,000

13         e.  Number of prevention services to children at risk

14  .........................................................7,483

15         4.  ADULT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND

16  TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of adults who are drug free during the 12

18  months following completion of treatment...................54%

19         b.  Percent of adults employed upon discharge from

20  treatment services.........................................65%

21         c.  Percent change in the number of clients with

22  arrests within 90 days following discharge compared to number

23  with arrests within 90 days prior to admission.............55%

24         d.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

25  survey.....................................................82%

26         e.  Percent of adults in child welfare protective

27  supervision who have case plans requiring substance-abuse

28  treatment who are receiving treatment......................53%

29         f.  Percent of clients who complete treatment.......68%

30         5.  ADULT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND

31  TREATMENT SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

                                  49
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Number of adults served.....................124,400

 2         b.  Number of adults in child welfare protective

 3  supervision who have case plans requiring substance-abuse

 4  treatment who are receiving treatment....................5,000

 5         c.  Number of adults provided detoxification and crisis

 6  supports................................................23,000

 7         d.  Number of at-risk adults provided prevention

 8  services................................................53,000

 9         e.  Number of adults provided treatment, as measured by

10  the number completing treatment.........................20,213

11         f.  Number of adults in need given aftercare/follow-up

12  ........................................................14,826

13         (g)  For the Economic Self-Sufficiency Program, the

14  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

15  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

16  Appropriations 399-435 are as follows:

17         1.  COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTCOME

18  MEASURE.--

19         a.  Percent of all applications processed within time

20  standards..................................................98%

21         2.  COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTPUT

22  MEASURE.--

23         a.  Total number of applications..............2,890,790

24         3.  PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME

25  MEASURE.--

26         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

27  costs.....................................................2.7%

28         4.  FRAUD PREVENTION AND BENEFIT RECOVERY OUTCOME

29  MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of Food Stamp benefits determined

31  accurately..............................................90.70%

                                  50
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  Percent of cash assistance benefits determined

 2  accurately..............................................93.89%

 3         c.  Percent of dollars collected for established

 4  benefit recovery claims.................................64.10%

 5         d.  Percent of suspected fraud cases referred that

 6  result in front-end fraud prevention savings...............70%

 7         5.  FRAUD PREVENTION AND BENEFIT RECOVERY OUTPUT

 8  MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Dollars collected through benefit recovery

10  ...................................................$14,725,000

11         b.  Number of front-end fraud prevention investigations

12  completed...............................................25,230

13         c.  Dollars saved through front-end fraud prevention

14  ...................................................$18,929,800

15         6.  SPECIAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

16         a.  Percent of applications processed within time

17  standards..................................................98%

18         7.  SPECIAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS OUTPUT MEASURE.--

19         a.  Number of applications processed for Optional State

20  Supplementation payments.................................5,640

21         8.  WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES) AND

22  EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

23         a.  Percent of 4-year-old children placed with

24  contracted providers in care for 9 months who enter

25  kindergarten ready to learn as determined by DOE or local

26  school systems' readiness assessment.......................83%

27         b.  Percent of cash and welfare-transition clients who

28  need child care who receive subsidized child care services

29  ..........................................................100%

30         c.  Percent of working poor clients

31  (nonwelfare-transition) who receive subsidized child care

                                  51
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  services...................................................71%

 2         9.  WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES) AND

 3  EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Number of cash assistance participants referred to

 5  the regional workforce development boards..............121,000

 6         b.  Number of children who received subsidized child

 7  care services..........................................147,085

 8         10.  REFUGEES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Percent of Refugee Assistance cases accurately

10  closed at 8 months or less.................................98%

11         11.  REFUGEES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

12         a.  Number of refugee cases closed................5,840

13         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF ELDERLY AFFAIRS.--

14         (a)  For the Services to Elders Program, the outcome

15  measures, output measures, and associated performance

16  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

17  Appropriations 436-461 are as follows:

18         1.  COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTCOME

19  MEASURES.--

20         a.  Percent of elders CARES determined to be eligible

21  for nursing home placement who are diverted..............16.8%

22         b.  Percent of CARES imminent-risk referrals served.90%

23         2.  COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTPUT

24  MEASURE.--

25         a.  Total number of CARES assessments............64,356

26         3.  HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Percent of Adult Protective Services (APS)

28  referrals who are in need of immediate services to prevent

29  further harm who are served within 72 hours................95%

30         b.  Costs of home and community-based care (including

31  non-DOEA programs) is less than nursing home care for

                                  52
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  comparable client groups......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 2         c.  Percent of elders assessed with high or

 3  moderate-risk environments who improved their environment

 4  score......................................................70%

 5         d.  Percent of new service recipients with high-risk

 6  nutrition scores whose nutritional status improved.......60.0%

 7         e.  Percent of new service recipients whose ADL

 8  assessment score has been maintained or improved.........60.6%

 9         f.  Percent of new service recipients whose IADL

10  assessment score has been maintained or improved.........60.0%

11         g.  Percent of family and family-assisted caregivers

12  who self-report they are very likely to provide care.......92%

13         h.  Percent of Community Care for the Elderly clients

14  defined as "probable Medicaid eligibles" who remain in

15  state-funded programs......................................15%

16         4.  HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of people served.....................139,331

18         b.  Number of congregate meals provided.......4,709,932

19         5.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

20  MEASURES.--

21         a.  Administrative and support cost as a percent of

22  total agency costs..........................................4%

23         b.  Increase the percent of participants passing the

24  competency test............................................80%

25         c.  Agency information technology cost as a percent of

26  total agency costs........................................0.6%

27         6.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

28  MEASURE.--

29         a.  Number of Assisted Living Facility and Adult Family

30  Care Home proprietors and staff trained..................7,000

31         7.  CONSUMER ADVOCATE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

                                  53
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Percent of complaint investigations initiated

 2  within 5 working days......................................90%

 3         8.  CONSUMER ADVOCATE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Number of judicially approved guardianship plans

 5  ...........................................................340

 6         b.  Number of complaint investigations completed..8,500

 7         (4)  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.--

 8         (a)  For the Executive Direction and Administration

 9  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

10  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

11  Specific Appropriations 462-474 are as follows:

12         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

13  MEASURES.--

14         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

15  costs.......................................................1%

16         b.  Percent of middle and high school students who

17  report using tobacco products in the last 30 days........25.5%

18         2.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

19  MEASURE.--

20         a.  Number of middle and high school students provided

21  comprehensive tobacco prevention education.............121,185

22         3.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Percent of hardware, software, and networks meeting

24  department standards.......................................98%

25         4.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of custom and in-house applications

27  supported...................................................42

28         b.  Number of personal computers, servers, and e-mail

29  users supported.........................................19,588

30         (b)  For the Community Public Health Program, the

31  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

                                  54
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 2  Appropriations 475-544 are as follows:

 3         1.  FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Total infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births

 5  ...........................................................6.9

 6         b.  Nonwhite infant mortality rate per 1,000 nonwhite

 7  births....................................................10.7

 8         c.  Percent of low-birth-weight births among prenatal

 9  Women, Infants, and Children program clients..............7.9%

10         d.  Live births to mothers age 15-19 per 1,000 females

11  15-19.....................................................55.4

12         e.  Percent of mothers 15-19 having a repeat birth..16%

13         f.  Percent of targeted low-income population receiving

14  dental health services from a county health department...10.5%

15         g.  Percent of students who visit the health clinic and

16  are able to return to class rather than leaving school.....90%

17         2.  FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

18         a.  Number of women and infants receiving Healthy Start

19  services...............................................145,000

20         b.  Average monthly participants in Women, Infants, and

21  Children program.......................................339,000

22         c.  Number of clients served in county health

23  department Family Planning programs....................162,000

24         d.  Number of teens age 15-19 served in county health

25  department Family Planning programs.....................43,725

26         e.  Number of adults and children receiving county

27  health department sponsored professional dental care....79,400

28         f.  Number of children served in the county health

29  department Child Health program........................168,000

30         g.  Number of School Health nursing assessments

31  provided...............................................885,000

                                  55
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         h.  Number of women, infants, and children provided

 2  food and nutrition services (WIC and Child Care Food)..443,100

 3         i.  Number of KidCare outreach services.......1,680,000

 4         3.  INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTCOME

 5  MEASURES.--

 6         a.  AIDS case rate per 100,000 population..........35.5

 7         b.  HIV/AIDS resident total deaths per 100,000

 8  population.................................................9.6

 9         c.  Chlamydia case rate per 100,000 population....195.0

10         d.  Tuberculosis case rate per 100,000 population...8.0

11         e.  Immunization rate among 2-year-olds.............90%

12         f.  Vaccine-preventable disease rate per 100,000

13  population................................................3.26

14         4.  INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTPUT

15  MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of HIV/AIDS counseling and testing services

17  provided annually......................................220,000

18         b.  Number of HIV partner notification services

19  provided annually........................................8,500

20         c.  Number of clients served in county health

21  department sexually transmitted disease programs........78,000

22         d.  Number of tuberculosis medical management services

23  provided................................................25,245

24         e.  Number of patients who complete tuberculosis

25  therapy at the A.G. Holley tuberculosis hospital............90

26         f.  Number of immunization services provided by county

27  public health departments............................1,629,815

28         g.  Number of HIV/AIDS patient care services provided

29  to individuals..........................................28,193

30         5.  ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31         a.  Food and waterborne disease cases per 1,000

                                  56
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  facilities regulated by the department.....................4.4

 2         b.  Overall sanitation and safety score in department

 3  regulated facilities.....................................97.2%

 4         c.  Septic tank failure rate per 1,000 within 2 years

 5  after system installation..................................2.4

 6         6.  ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of department regulated facilities inspected

 8  .......................................................122,527

 9         b.  Number of onsite sewage disposal system inspections

10  completed..............................................295,000

11         c.  Control of radiation threats as measured by the

12  number of x-ray machines inspected......................37,800

13         d.  Number of water systems and storage tanks inspected

14  .......................................................218,000

15         7.  STATEWIDE HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent saved on prescription drugs compared to

18  market price...............................................30%

19         b.  Percent of laboratory samples passing standardized

20  proficiency testing.......................................100%

21         c.  Percent of vital statistics records completed

22  within established timeframes..............................99%

23         (c)  For the Children's Medical Services (CMS) Program,

24  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

25  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

26  Specific Appropriations 545-571A are as follows:

27         1.  CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of families in Children's Medical Services

29  (CMS) Program Network indicating a positive perception of care

30  ...........................................................95%

31         b.  Percent of CMS Network enrollees in compliance with

                                  57
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  the periodicity schedule for well-child care...............90%

 2         c.  Percent of eligible infants/toddlers provided CMS

 3  program Early Intervention program services................90%

 4         d.  Percent of Child Protection Team (CPT) team

 5  assessments provided to Family Safety and Preservation program

 6  within established timeframes..............................90%

 7         2.  CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Number of children enrolled in CMS program Network

 9  (Medicaid and Non-Medicaid).............................37,500

10         b.  Number of clients receiving services in the CMS

11  program Early Intervention program......................29,000

12         c.  Number of children receiving Child Protection Team

13  (CPT) assessments.......................................27,500

14         (d)  For the Health Care Practitioner and Access

15  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

16  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

17  Specific Appropriations 572-592 are as follows:

18         1.  MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of unlicensed individuals identified and

20  referred to State Attorneys.................................36

21         b.  Percent of health care practitioners' applications

22  for licensure completed within 90 days....................100%

23         2.  MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Number of unlicensed individuals investigated...364

25         b.  Number of initial health care practitioner licenses

26  processed...............................................48,946

27         c.  Number of initial health care practitioner licenses

28  issued..................................................43,531

29         d.  Number of licenses issued and renewed by mail

30  .......................................................314,688

31         3.  COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

                                  58
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Percent of emergency medical service providers

 2  found to have a significant deficiency during licensure

 3  inspection................................................8.5%

 4         b.  Age-adjusted injury death rate per 100,000.......57

 5         c.  Number of emergency medical service providers

 6  licensed annually..........................................249

 7         d.  Number of medical students who do a rotation in a

 8  medically underserved area.................................715

 9         e.  Number of persons who receive continuing education

10  services through Work Force Development.................16,400

11         4.  COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of providers recruited for underserved areas

13  ............................................................46

14         b.  Number of brain and spinal cord injury victims

15  reintegrated to the community............................3,384

16         c.  Number of emergency medical services providers

17  licensed and emergency medical technicians and paramedics

18  certified...............................................31,930

19         (e)  For the Disability Determinations Program, the

20  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

21  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

22  Appropriations 592A-592C are as follows:

23         1.  DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTCOME

24  MEASURE.--

25         a.  Percent of Title II and XVI disability decisions

26  completed accurately as measured by the Social Security

27  Administration.............................................92%

28         2.  DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTPUT

29  MEASURE.--

30         a.  Number of Title II and XVI disability decisions

31  completed..............................................212,489

                                  59
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (5)  DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS.--

 2         (a)  For the Services to Veterans Program, the outcome

 3  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 4  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 5  Appropriations 593-611 are as follows:

 6         1.  VETERANS' HOMES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Occupancy rate for veterans homes in operation for

 8  2 years or longer..........................................75%

 9         b.  Percent of veterans' homes that received gold-star

10  certification by AHCA.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         2.  VETERANS' HOMES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

12         a.  Number of veterans' homes beds available........390

13         3.  VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

14         a.  Percent of "ready to rate" claims submitted to

15  USDVA compared to total claims submitted....................2%

16         4.  VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of veterans served...................195,000

18         b.  Number of claims processed...................15,500

19         5.  VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

20         a.  Value of cost avoidance because of issue resolution

21  ....................................................$4,680,000

22         6.  VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

23         a.  Number of veterans served (benefited) by issue

24  resolution.............................................240,000

25         7.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

26  MEASURES.--

27         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

28  costs.......................................................8%

29         b.  Percent of time computer network is available for

30  use or response time.......................................85%

31         c.  Number of veterans or eligible dependents enrolled

                                  60
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  in certified educational programs.......................27,000

 2         d.  Percent of veterans, families, and survivors aware

 3  of FDVA services...........................................43%

 4         e.  Percent of schools certified after submission of

 5  application...............................................100%

 6         8.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

 7  MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Number of constituents served...............559,000

 9         b.  Value of veterans' education benefits paid

10  ..................................................$110,000,000

11         c.  Number of Florida education institution programs

12  certified................................................3,000

13         d.  Number of staff supported by the information

14  technology service through networking, software, and hardware

15  support....................................................540

16         Section 31.  The performance measures and standards

17  established in this section for individual programs in public

18  safety and judiciary agencies shall be applied to those

19  programs for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance

20  measures and standards are directly linked to the

21  appropriations made in the General Appropriations Act for

22  Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as required by the Government

23  Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.

24         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.--

25         (a)  For the Administration Program, the outcome

26  measures, output measures, and associated performance

27  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

28  Appropriations 612-624 are as follows:

29         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

30  MEASURE.--

31         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

                                  61
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  costs....................................................11.0%

 2         2.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 3         a.  Percent of fully operational hours of Corrections

 4  Data Center..............................................97.0%

 5         (b)  For the Security and Institutional Operations

 6  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 7  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 8  Specific Appropriations 625-700 are as follows:

 9         1.  ADULT MALE CUSTODY OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of

11  major institutions...........................................0

12         b.  Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or

13  more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         c.  Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary

15  reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         d.  Percent of random inmate drug tests that are

17  negative.................................................98.5%

18         2.  ADULT FEMALE CUSTODY OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of

20  major institutions...........................................0

21         b.  Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or

22  more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         c.  Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary

24  reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         d.  Percent of random inmate drug tests that are

26  negative.................................................98.5%

27         3.  MALE YOUTHFUL OFFENDER OPERATIONS OUTCOME

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of

30  major institutions...........................................0

31         b.  Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or

                                  62
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 2         c.  Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary

 3  reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 4         d.  Percent of random inmate drug tests that are

 5  negative.................................................98.5%

 6         4.  SPECIALTY INSTITUTION OPERATIONS OUTCOME

 7  MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of

 9  major institutions...........................................0

10         b.  Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or

11  more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         c.  Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary

13  reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         d.  Percent of random inmate drug tests that are

15  negative.................................................98.5%

16         5.  RECEPTION CENTER OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of

18  major institutions...........................................0

19         b.  Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or

20  more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         c.  Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary

22  reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         d.  Percent of random inmate drug tests that are

24  negative.................................................98.5%

25         6.  PUBLIC SERVICE WORK SQUADS & WORK RELEASE

26  TRANSITION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of available work assignments.........35,203

28         b.  Number of inmates available for work assignments

29  ................................................. FY 2001-2002

30  LBR

31         c.  Percent of those available for work who are not

                                  63
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  assigned..................................................1.4%

 2         d.  Percent of available inmates working..........83.0%

 3         7.  ROAD PRISONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 4         a.  Annual cost savings to the state for using inmate

 5  labor for maintenance of state rights-of-way..FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         8.  OFFENDER MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Percent of inmates who did not escape when assigned

 8  outside a secure perimeter...............................99.9%

 9         b.  Percent of inmates placed in a facility that

10  provides at least one of inmate's primary program needs.....FY

11  2001-2002 LBR

12         9.  OFFENDER MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURE.--

13         a.  Number of new inmates received and oriented..26,831

14         10.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

15  MEASURE.--

16         a.  Percent of victim notifications that meet the

17  statutory time period requirements............FY 2001-2002 LBR

18         11.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

19  MEASURE.--

20         a.  Percent of reported criminal incidents investigated

21  by Inspector General's Office.................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         12.  CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES MAINTENANCE & REPAIR

23  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Square footage maintained in major institutions

25  ........................................................16.5 M

26         (c)  For the Community Corrections Program, the outcome

27  measures, output measures, and associated performance

28  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

29  Appropriations 701-736 are as follows:

30         1.  PROBATION SUPERVISION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31         a.  Percent of offenders that successfully complete

                                  64
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a

 2  2-year measurement period................................56.9%

 3         b.  Status of offenders 2 years after the period of

 4  supervision was imposed:

 5         (I)  Revoked:

 6         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 7         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         (II)  Absconded:

 9         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         c.  Percent of offenders who successfully complete

12  supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for

13  committing a new crime within 2 years:

14         (I)  To prison....................................98.9%

15         (II)  To supervision..............................94.4%

16         2.  PROBATION SUPERVISION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

18  supervised in the community compared to the department

19  standard:

20         (I)  Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         (II)  Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         (III)  Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         (IV)  Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         (V)  Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         3.  DRUG OFFENDER PROBATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

26         a.  Percent of offenders that successfully complete

27  their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a

28  2-year measurement period................................56.9%

29         b.  Status of offenders 2 years after the period of

30  supervision was imposed:

31         (I)  Revoked:

                                  65
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 2         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         (II)  Absconded:

 4         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         c.  Percent of offenders who successfully complete

 7  supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for

 8  committing a new crime within 2 years:

 9         (I)  To prison....................................98.9%

10         (II)  To supervision..............................94.4%

11         4.  DRUG OFFENDER PROBATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

13  supervised in the community compared to the department

14  standard:

15         (I)  Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         (II)  Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         (III)  Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

18         (IV)  Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

19         (V)  Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         5.  PRETRIAL INTERVENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Percent of offenders that successfully complete

22  their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a

23  2-year measurement period................................56.9%

24         b.  Status of offenders 2 years after the period of

25  supervision was imposed:

26         (I)  Revoked:

27         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         (II)  Absconded:

30         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

31         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

                                  66
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         c.  Percent of offenders who successfully complete

 2  supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for

 3  committing a new crime within 2 years:

 4         (I)  To prison....................................98.9%

 5         (II)  To supervision..............................94.4%

 6         6.  PRETRIAL INTERVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

 8  supervised in the community compared to the department

 9  standard:

10         (I)  Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         (II)  Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         (III)  Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         (IV)  Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         (V)  Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

15         7.  COMMUNITY CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Percent of offenders that successfully complete

17  their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a

18  2-year measurement period................................56.9%

19         b.  Status of offenders 2 years after the period of

20  supervision was imposed:

21         (I)  Revoked:

22         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         (II)  Absconded:

25         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         c.  Percent of offenders who successfully complete

28  supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for

29  committing a new crime within 2 years:

30         (I)  To prison....................................98.9%

31         (II)  To supervision..............................94.4%

                                  67
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         8.  COMMUNITY CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 2         a.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

 3  supervised in the community compared to the department

 4  standard......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         9.  POST-PRISON-RELEASE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 6         a.  Percent of offenders that successfully complete

 7  their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a

 8  2-year measurement period................................56.9%

 9         b.  Status of offenders 2 years after the period of

10  supervision was imposed:

11         (I)  Revoked:

12         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         (II)  Absconded:

15         (A)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         (B)  Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         c.  Percent of offenders who successfully complete

18  supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for

19  committing a new crime within 2 years:

20         (I)  To prison....................................98.9%

21         (II)  To supervision..............................94.4%

22         10.  POST-PRISON-RELEASE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

24  supervised in the community compared to the department

25  standard:

26         (I)  Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         (II)  Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         (III)  Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         (IV)  Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         (V)  Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

31         11.  ADULT SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

                                  68
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Substance abuse tests administered to offenders

 2  being supervised in the community.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         12.  OFFENDER MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 4         a.  Score sheets processed......................122,722

 5         (d)  For the Health Care Program, the outcome measures,

 6  output measures, and associated performance standards with

 7  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 737-750

 8  are as follows:

 9         1.  INMATE HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Health care grievances that are upheld:

11         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         (II)  Percent......................................3.0%

13         b.  Number of suicides per 100,000 inmates compared to

14  the national average for correctional facilities/institutions:

15         (I)  Within DOC........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         (II)  National average.................FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         c.  Comparison of per diems for General Medical

18  Services:

19         (I)  DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         (II)  HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         (III)  Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         d.  Comparison of per diems for Mental Health Services:

23         (I)  DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         (II)  HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         (III)  Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         e.  Comparison of per diems for hospitalization

27  contracts:

28         (I)  DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         (II)  HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         (III)  Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

31         (e)  For the Correctional Education and Programs

                                  69
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 2  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 3  Specific Appropriations 751-766 are as follows:

 4         1.  ADULT SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND

 5  TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 6         a.  Percent of community supervision offenders who have

 7  completed drug treatment without subsequent recommitment to

 8  community supervision or prison within 24 months after release

 9  .........................................................93.2%

10         b.  Percent of inmates who have completed drug

11  treatment without subsequent recommitment to community

12  supervision or prison within 24 months after release.....72.9%

13         c.  Percent of inmates who need programs and

14  successfully complete Drug Abuse Education/Treatment programs

15  .........................................................46.0%

16         2.  BASIC EDUCATION SKILLS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of inmates who successfully complete

18  Mandatory Literacy Programs..............................52.0%

19         b.  Percent of inmates who successfully complete GED

20  Education Programs.......................................14.0%

21         c.  Percent of inmates who successfully complete

22  Vocational Education Programs............................32.0%

23         d.  Percent of inmates who participate in Special

24  Education (Federal Law) Programs..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         e.  Percent of inmates completing mandatory literacy

26  programs who score at or above 9th grade level on next Test

27  for Adult Basic Education (TABE).........................16.0%

28         2.  ADULT OFFENDER TRANSITION, REHABILITATION, AND

29  SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of community supervision offenders who

31  successfully complete transition, rehabilitation, or support

                                  70
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  programs without subsequent recommitment to community

 2  supervision or prison for 24 months after release........85.5%

 3         b.  Percent of inmates who successfully complete

 4  transition, rehabilitation, or support programs without

 5  subsequent recommitment to community supervision or prison for

 6  24 months after release..................................72.9%

 7         3.  ADULT OFFENDER TRANSITION, REHABILITATION, AND

 8  SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Number of transition plans completed for inmates

10  released from prison..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         b.  Percent of transition plans completed for inmates

12  released from prison..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         c.  Percent of inmates participating in religious

14  programming.................................................FY

15  2001-2002 LBR

16         (2)  JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION.--

17         (a)  For the Justice Administrative Commission Program,

18  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

19  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

20  Specific Appropriations 767-781 are as follows:

21         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Administrative costs as a percentage of total

24  agency costs..............................................4.0%

25         b.  Number of material/substantial audit findings

26  related to areas of direct JAC responsibility to its customers

27  ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         c.  Percent of invoices processed within statutory

29  timeframes..................................................FY

30  2001-2002 LBR

31         2.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

                                  71
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Number of budget amendments processed and agency

 3  transfers processed...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 4         b.  Number of accounting transactions (FLAIR) input..FY

 5  2001-2002 LBR

 6         c.  Number of financial reports produced...FY 2001-2002

 7  LBR

 8         d.  Number of reports prepared.........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 9         e.  Number of employee and position transactions

10  (COPES) processed by type.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         f.  Number of IRM reports provided to the State

12  Technology Office............................ FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         g.  Number of JAC Staff users directly supported.....FY

14  2001-2002 LBR

15         h.  Number of Public Records Requests..FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         (b)  For the Criminal Prosecutions and Civil Actions

17  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

18  performance standards with respect to funds provided to each

19  State Attorney Office in Specific Appropriations 782-924 are

20  as follows:

21         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number of dispositions by trial verdicts, pleas,

23  nontrial, and otherwise disposed of...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         b.  Percent of dispositions by trial verdicts, pleas,

25  nontrial, and otherwise disposed of...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         c.  Offenders who qualify for enhanced sentencing for

27  whom state attorneys requested enhanced sentencing and the

28  number for whom judges ordered enhanced sentencing "Enhanced

29  Sentencing" includes Habitual Offender, Violent Habitual,

30  Violent Career Criminal, Prison Releasee Reoffender,

31  10-20-Life, and Three-Strikes statutes:

                                  72
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 2         (II)  Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         d.  Number of Baker Act hearings in which the

 4  recommendation of the state attorney was supported by the

 5  court.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         e.  Cases in which restitution was recommended and

 7  ordered:

 8         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 9         (II)  Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         f.  Cases in which child support was requested and

11  ordered:

12         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         (II)  Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         g.  Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed

15  annually..................................................0.0%

16         h.  Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         i.  Average years of prosecution experience......... FY

18  2001-2002 LBR

19         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of criminal case referrals:

21         (I)  Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         (II)  Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         (III)  Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         b.  Number of filings:

25         (I)  Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         (II)  Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         (III)  Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         c.  Average number of referrals per attorney:

29         (I)  Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         (II)  Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

31         (III)  Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

                                  73
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         d.  Average number of filings per attorney:

 2         (I)  Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         (II)  Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 4         (III)  Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         e.  Number of cases investigated/reviewed..FY 2001-2002

 6  LBR

 7         f.  Number of victim contacts and notifications..... FY

 8  2001-2002 LBR

 9         g.  Number of witness contacts and notifications.... FY

10  2001-2002 LBR

11         h.  Number of truancy interventions....FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         i.  Number of citizen dispute mediations.. FY 2001-2002

13  LBR

14         j.  Number of worthless check diversions.. FY 2001-2002

15  LBR

16         k.  Number of domestic violence diversions.......... FY

17  2001-2002 LBR

18         l.  Number of statutory pretrial interventions...... FY

19  2001-2002 LBR

20         m.  Number of cases referred to drug court.FY 2001-2002

21  LBR

22         n.  Number of postconviction relief responses.....9,000

23         o.  Number of Habeas Corpus responses..FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         p.  Number of actions for the following:

25         (I)  Public records requests...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         (II)  Bond validations.................FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         (III)  Expungements....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         (IV)  Forfeiture.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         (V)  Baker Act hearings................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         (VI)  Bond estreatures.................FY 2001-2002 LBR

31         q.  Number of sexual predator civil commitment

                                  74
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  proceedings.................................................FY

 2  2001-2002 LBR

 3         r.  Number of child welfare referrals received.......FY

 4  2001-2002 LBR

 5         s.  Number of child support enforcement referrals....FY

 6  2001-2002 LBR

 7         (c)  For the Public Defender Trial Program, the outcome

 8  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 9  standards with respect to funds provided to each Trial Public

10  Defender Office in Specific Appropriations 925-1044 are as

11  follows:

12         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent of clients in custody contacted within 72

14  hours after appointment to a public defender.............90.0%

15         b.  Percent of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved

16  within speedy trial rule unless dismissed................90.0%

17         c.  Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed

18  annually..................................................0.0%

19         d.  Average years of defense experience....FY 2001-2002

20  LBR

21         e.  Annual attorney turnover rates.................9.0%

22         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of criminal cases closed.............571,418

24         b.  Number of civil cases closed.................18,650

25         c.  Number of pleas....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         d.  Number of trials...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         e.  Number of cases nolle prossed or dismissed.......FY

28  2001-2002 LBR

29         f.  Number of clients represented......FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         g.  Number of cases closed.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

31         h.  Number of violation of probation hearings........FY

                                  75
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  2001-2002 LBR

 2         i.  Number of initial interviews for assigned cases..FY

 3  2001-2002 LBR

 4         (d)  For the Public Defender Appellate Program, the

 5  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 6  standards with respect to funds provided to each Appellate

 7  Public Defender Office in Specific Appropriations 1045-1069

 8  are as follows:

 9         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Percent of appeals resolved...................91.0%

11         b.  Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed

12  annually..................................................0.0%

13         c.  Average years of defense experience....FY 2001-2002

14  LBR

15         d.  Annual attorney turnover rates.................9.0%

16         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of clients represented......FY 2001-2002 LBR

18         b.  Number of briefs filed.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

19         c.  Number of writs filed..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         d.  Number of cases closed........................4,739

21         (e)  For the Capital Collateral Regional Counsels

22  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

23  performance standards with respect to funds provided to each

24  Appellate Public Defender Office in Specific Appropriations

25  1070-1092 are as follows:

26         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Percent of cases in which postconviction motion,

28  postconviction appeal, federal habeas corpus motion, or

29  federal appeal is timely filed, without extension.......... FY

30  2001-2002 LBR

31         b.  Number of decisions by the court to release a death

                                  76
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  row inmate................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

 2         c.  Number of new trials granted to death row inmates

 3  ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 4         d.  Number of new sentencing hearings granted........FY

 5  2001-2002 LBR

 6         e.  Number of other appeals granted....FY 2001-2002 LBR

 7         f.  Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed

 8  annually..................................................0.0%

 9         g.  Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         h.  Average years of postconviction experience.......FY

11  2001-2002 LBR

12         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number of death row public records requests

14  processed, as measured by number of record analyses made...180

15         b.  Number of death row cases investigated/analyzed.139

16         c.  Number of death row case requests for public

17  records made............................................... FY

18  2001-2002 LBR

19         d.  Number of formal legal and background death row

20  case public record analyses made..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         e.  Average number of hours per public records analysis

22  ..................................................FY 2001-2002

23  LBR

24         f.  Number of death row cases investigated.FY 2001-2002

25  LBR

26         g.  Number of witnesses and experts interviewed......FY

27  2001-2002 LBR

28         h.  Number of death penalty inmate contacts made.....FY

29  2001-2002 LBR

30         i.  Number of postconviction and appellate actions...FY

31  2001-2002 LBR

                                  77
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         j.  Number of issues raised by CCRC that are formally

 2  considered by the courts......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         k.  Percent of issues raised by CCRC that are formally

 4  considered by the courts......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         l.  Requested extensions of time granted following

 6  court considerations:

 7         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         (II)  Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 9         m.  Number of CCRC court issues not ruled on by the

10  courts due to strength of at least one issue..FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.--

12         (a)  For the Juvenile Detention Program, the outcome

13  measures, output measures, and associated performance

14  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

15  Appropriations 1093-1101 are as follows:

16         1.  DETENTION CENTERS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of escapes from secure detention facilities

18  per 100,000 resident days....................................0

19         b.  Number of batteries per 100,000 resident days while

20  in secure detention:

21         (I)  Youth on youth..................................84

22         (II)  Youth on staff.................................20

23         c.  Percent of youth who remain crime free while in

24  secure detention.........................................97.0%

25         2.  DETENTION CENTERS OUTPUT MEASURE.--

26         a.  Number of admissions to secure detention facilities

27  ........................................................61,844

28         3.  HOME DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

29         a.  Percent of successful completions without

30  committing a new law or contract violation, failure to appear,

31  an abscond, or contempt of court.........................73.0%

                                  78
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         4.  HOME DETENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Number of admissions into home detention.....35,549

 3         b.  Average daily population for home detention......FY

 4  2001-2002 LBR

 5         (b)  For the Probation and Community Corrections

 6  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 7  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 8  Specific Appropriations 1102-1111 are as follows:

 9         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Percent of youth who remain crime free during

11  aftercare supervision....................................65.0%

12         b.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

13  release from nonresidential commitment...................65.0%

14         c.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

15  release from probation...................................79.0%

16         d.  Percent of juveniles who remain crime free within 1

17  year after release from aftercare.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

18         e.  Average time in days to make recommendations to the

19  State Attorney once the law enforcement report is received...9

20         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Youth received at intake...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         b.  Number of youth under aftercare supervision......FY

23  2001-2002 LBR

24         c.  Number of youth under probation supervision......FY

25  2001-2002 LBR

26         d.  Number of youth receiving nonresidential

27  delinquency rehabilitation services...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         e.  Average annual community control and intake

29  caseload (agency standard is 32:1)........................40:1

30         (c)  For the Office of the Secretary/Assistant

31  Secretary for Administrative Services Program, the outcome

                                  79
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 2  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 3  Appropriations 1112-1121A are as follows:

 4         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM

 5  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Administrative costs as a percentage of total

 7  agency costs..............................................7.5%

 8         2.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Response time for youthful offender face sheet

10  inquiries in seconds (current is 75 seconds)................38

11         3.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--

12         a.  Youth tracked by the Juvenile Justice Information

13  System.................................................488,387

14         (d)  For the Residential Corrections Program, the

15  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

16  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

17  Appropriations 1122-1139 are as follows:

18         1.  NONSECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

19         a.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

20  release..................................................53.0%

21         b.  Percent of escapes from nonsecure residential

22  commitment programs...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         c.  Number of youth-on-youth batteries per 100 youth.FY

24  2001-2002 LBR

25         d.  Number of youth-on-staff batteries per 100 youth.FY

26  2001-2002 LBR

27         e.  Nonexempt contracts awarded on a competitive basis:

28         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         (II)  Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         f.  Percent of residential commitment program reviews

31  conducted by Quality Assurance, which indicate satisfactory or

                                  80
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  higher ratings on overall quality (calendar year).FY 2001-2002

 2  LBR

 3         2.  NONSECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Youth served in nonsecure residential commitment:

 5         (I)  Total number of youth served.................9,660

 6         (II)  Average daily population of youth served.......FY

 7  2001-2002 LBR

 8         b.  Number of residential commitment beds on line....FY

 9  2001-2002 LBR

10         c.  Youth receiving substance abuse treatment.....2,386

11         3.  SECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

13  release..................................................53.0%

14         b.  Percent of escapes.............................0.0%

15         c.  Number of youth-on-youth batteries per 100 youth.FY

16  2001-2002 LBR

17         d.  Number of youth-on-staff batteries per 100 youth.FY

18  2001-2002 LBR

19         e.  Nonexempt contracts awarded on a competitive basis:

20         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         (II)  Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         f.  Percent of residential commitment program reviews

23  conducted by Quality Assurance, which indicate satisfactory or

24  higher ratings on overall quality (calendar year).FY 2001-2002

25  LBR

26         4.  SECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Youth served in secure residential commitment:

28         (I)  Total number of youth served.................2,501

29         (II)  Average daily population of youth served.......FY

30  2001-2002 LBR

31         b.  Number of residential commitment beds on line....FY

                                  81
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  2001-2002 LBR

 2         (e)  For the Prevention and Victim Services, the

 3  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 4  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 5  Appropriations 1140-1149A are as follows:

 6         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 7         a.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 6 months

 8  after receiving prevention services......................85.0%

 9         2.  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

10         a.  Number of youth served with prevention services

11  .......................................................121,264

12         (4)  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.--

13         (a)  For the Office of Executive Direction & Business

14  Support Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and

15  associated performance standards with respect to funds

16  provided in Specific Appropriations 1150-1160D are as follows:

17         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Administrative costs as a percentage of total

19  agency costs..............................................5.1%

20         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of internal investigations conducted.....100

22         b.  Number of Florida law enforcement agencies

23  accredited/reaccredited.....................................25

24         c.  Total number of accredited Florida law enforcement

25  agencies....................................................76

26         (b)  For the Criminal Justice Investigations and

27  Forensic Science Program, the outcome measures, output

28  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

29  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1161-1174 are as

30  follows:

31         1.  LABORATORY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

                                  82
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Lab service requests completed:

 2         (I)  Number......................................75,505

 3         (II)  Percent.....................................95.0%

 4         b.  Average number of days to complete lab service

 5  requests by lab discipline:

 6         (I)  Toxicology......................................30

 7         (II)  Chemistry........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         (III)  Crime Scene...................................39

 9         (IV)  Firearms.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         (V)  Documents.......................................50

11         (VI)  Automated Fingerprint Identification System

12  (AFIS)..................................................... FY

13  2001-2002 LBR

14         (VII)  Latents.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

15         (VIII)  Serology/DNA................................150

16         (IX)  Computer Evidence Recovery (CER).FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         (X)  Microanalysis...................................85

18         2.  LABORATORY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of crime scenes processed................600

20         b.  Number of DNA samples added to DNA database..24,000

21         c.  Number of expert witness appearances in court

22  proceedings..............................................1,815

23         3.  INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

24         a.  Percent of closed criminal investigations resolved

25  .........................................................87.0%

26         b.  Criminal investigations closed resulting in an

27  arrest:

28         (I)  Number.........................................826

29         (II)  Percent.....................................67.0%

30         4.  INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31         a.  Number of criminal investigations worked......2,878

                                  83
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  Number of criminal investigations commenced...1,549

 2         c.  Number of criminal investigations closed......1,314

 3         d.  Percent of criminal investigations closed.....47.5%

 4         e.  Number of short-term investigative assists worked

 5  .........................................................1,578

 6         5.  MUTUAL AID & PROTECTIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of background investigations performed.3,500

 8         b.  Number of dignitaries provided with FDLE protective

 9  services....................................................52

10         (c)  For the Criminal Justice Information Program, the

11  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

13  Appropriations 1175-1182 are as follows:

14         1.  INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Percent of responses from FCIC hot files that

16  contain substantive information within defined timeframes

17  .........................................................96.0%

18         b.  Percent of time FCIC is running and accessible

19  .........................................................99.5%

20         2.  INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of FCIC workstations networked........18,000

22         3.  PREVENTION AND CRIME INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME

23  MEASURES.--

24         a.  Percent response to criminal history record check

25  customers within defined timeframes......................92.0%

26         b.  Percent of criminal history information records

27  compiled accurately......................................83.0%

28         4.  PREVENTION AND CRIME INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT

29  MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of criminal arrest information received

31  electronically (through AFIS) for entry into the criminal

                                  84
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  history system...........................................80.0%

 2         b.  Number of responses to requests from criminal

 3  history record checks................................1,580,000

 4         c.  Number of registered sexual predators/offenders

 5  identified to the public................................16,603

 6         d.  Number of missing children cases worked through

 7  MCIC.......................................................625

 8         e.  Arrest/identification records created and

 9  maintained........................................FY 2001-2002

10  LBR

11         (d)  For the Criminal Justice Professionalism Program,

12  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

13  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

14  Specific Appropriations 1183-1190 are as follows:

15         1.  TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES OUTCOME

16  MEASURE.--

17         a.  Percent of individuals who pass the basic

18  professional certification examination for law enforcement

19  officers, corrections officers, and correctional probation

20  officers.................................................75.0%

21         2.  TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES OUTPUT

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of course curricula and examinations

24  developed or revised.......................................109

25         b.  Number of examinations administered...........7,000

26         c.  Number of individuals trained by the Florida

27  Criminal Justice Executive Institute.......................604

28         d.  Number of law enforcement officers trained by DARE

29  ...........................................................155

30         3.  COMPLIANCE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

31         a.  Percent of training schools in compliance with

                                  85
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  standards...............................................100.0%

 2         4.  COMPLIANCE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 3         a.  Number of discipline referrals processed for state

 4  & local LEOs and COs and CPOs pursuant to ch. 120, F.S...1,500

 5         b.  Number of program and financial compliance audits

 6  performed................................................3,155

 7         c.  Number of records audited to validate the accuracy

 8  and completeness of ATMS2 record information.............3,000

 9         d.  Breath-testing instruments tested...............648

10         (e)  For the Public Assistance Fraud Program, the

11  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

13  Appropriations 1190A-1190E are as follows:

14         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

15         a.  Amount of fraudulent benefits withheld as a result

16  of public assistance fraud investigations...............$27.8M

17         2.  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

18         a.  Public assistance fraud investigations conducted

19  ........................................................11,476

20         (5)  DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS.--

21         (a)  For the Office of Attorney General Program, the

22  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

23  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

24  Appropriations 1191-1231 are as follows:

25         1.  CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

26         a.  Percent of mediated open government cases resolved

27  in 3 weeks or less.......................................75.0%

28         b.  Percent of lemon law cases resolved in less than 1

29  year.....................................................99.0%

30         c.  Percent of clients expressing satisfaction with

31  civil enforcement legal services..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

                                  86
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         2.  CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Number of active antitrust cases...FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         b.  Number of active consumer fraud cases..FY 2001-2002

 4  LBR

 5         c.  Number of active Medicaid fraud cases..FY 2001-2002

 6  LBR

 7         d.  Number of active child support enforcement cases

 8  ................................................. FY 2001-2002

 9  LBR

10         e.  Number of active lemon law cases...FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         f.  Number of active children's legal services cases

12  ................................................. FY 2001-2002

13  LBR

14         g.  Number of active civil rights cases....FY 2001-2002

15  LBR

16         h.  Number of active eminent domain cases..FY 2001-2002

17  LBR

18         3.  CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

19         a.  Average number of days for opinion response......29

20         4.  CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Opinions issued.................................255

22         5.  CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LITIGATION DEFENSE OUTCOME

23  MEASURE.--

24         a.  Percent of clients expressing satisfaction with

25  criminal and civil litigation legal services.............90.0%

26         6.  CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LITIGATION DEFENSE OUTPUT

27  MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of active tax cases.........FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         b.  Number of active civil appellate cases.FY 2001-2002

30  LBR

31         c.  Number of active inmate cases......FY 2001-2002 LBR

                                  87
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         d.  Number of active state employment cases..........FY

 2  2001-2002 LBR

 3         e.  Number of active tort cases........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 4         f.  Number of active capital criminal cases..........FY

 5  2001-2002 LBR

 6         g.  Number of active noncapital cases..FY 2001-2002 LBR

 7         7.  VICTIM SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Average number of days from application to

 9  eligibility determination...................................51

10         b.  Percent of counties receiving motor vehicle theft

11  grant funds that experienced a reduction in motor vehicle

12  theft incidents below 1994 levels compared to the statewide

13  average..................................................70.0%

14         8.  VICTIM SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of victim compensation claims paid.....7,000

16         b.  Number of information and referral services

17  provided................................................25,000

18         c.  Number of VOCA grants funded....................250

19         d.  Number of victims served through contract grants

20  .......................................................175,000

21         e.  Number of motor vehicle theft grants funded......40

22         f.  Number of people attending training (crime

23  prevention)..............................................4,918

24         g.  Number of minority communities served with crime

25  prevention education and awareness programs..................8

26         9.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

27  MEASURE.--

28         a.  Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         (b)  For the Statewide Prosecution Program, the outcome

30  measures, output measures, and associated performance

31  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

                                  88
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Appropriations 1232-1234 are as follows:

 2         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 3         a.  Conviction rate for defendants who reached final

 4  adjudication.............................................90.0%

 5         b.  Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of law enforcement agencies assisted......88

 8         b.  Total number of active cases, excluding drug cases

 9  ..................................................FY 2001-2002

10  LBR

11         c.  Total number of drug related multi-circuit

12  organized criminal cases....................................50

13         (c)  For the Florida Elections Commission Program, the

14  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

15  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

16  Appropriations 1235-1237A are as follows:

17         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Percent of cases that are closed within 12 months

19  .........................................................75.0%

20         2.  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of election complaints and automatic fine

22  cases......................................................485

23         (6)  PAROLE COMMISSION.--

24         (a)  For the Post-Incarceration Enforcement and

25  Victims-Rights Program, the outcome measures, output measures,

26  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

27  provided in Specific Appropriations 1238-1244 are as follows:

28         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

29         a.  Parolees who have successfully completed their

30  supervision without revocation within the first 2 years:

31         (I)  Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

                                  89
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (II)  Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 2         b.  Percent of revocation cases completed within 90

 3  days after final hearing......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 4         c.  Percent of cases placed before the Parole

 5  Commission/Clemency Board containing no factual errors...80.0%

 6         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of conditional release cases handled...5,311

 8         b.  Number of supervision reviews...................468

 9         c.  Number of revocation determinations...........3,005

10         d.  Number of Clemency Board decisions supported..2,686

11         e.  Number of Parole Release Decisions.FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         f.  Number of Victims Contacted........FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         Section 32.  The performance measures and standards

14  established in this section for individual programs in natural

15  resources, environment, growth management, and transportation

16  agencies shall be applied to those programs for the 2000-2001

17  fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are

18  directly linked to the appropriations made in the General

19  Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as required by

20  the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.

21         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES.--

22         (a)  For the Office of the Commissioner and Division of

23  Administration, the outcome measures, output measures, and

24  associated performance standards with respect to funds

25  provided in Specific Appropriations 1245-1262D are as follows:

26         1.  AGRICULTURAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

27         a.  Criminal investigations closure rate............76%

28         2.  AGRICULTURAL WATER POLICY COORDINATION OUTPUT

29  MEASURE.--

30         a.  Number of water policy assists provided to

31  agricultural interests.....................................266

                                  90
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         3.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

 2  MEASURE.--

 3         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

 4  costs....................................................6.17%

 5         (b)  For the Forest and Resource Protection Program,

 6  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 7  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 8  Specific Appropriations 1263-1279 are as follows:

 9         1.  LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

10         a.  Percent of State Forest timber producing acres

11  adequately stocked and growing.............................32%

12         2.  LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number of forest acres and other lands managed by

14  the department and purchased by the state with approved

15  management plans.......................................907,860

16         b.  Number of forest-related technical assists provided

17  to nonindustrial private land owners....................39,800

18         c.  Number of person-hours spent responding to

19  emergency incidents other than wildfires.................8,000

20         d.  Number of youths who fulfill Juvenile Justice

21  Forestry Youth Academy training program.....................40

22         e.  Number of acres of cooperative forest lands managed

23  .......................................................600,000

24         f.  Number of hours of work provided by inmate work

25  camps..................................................315,000

26         3.  WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME

27  MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of acres of protected forest and wildlands

29  not burned by wildfires..................................98.1%

30         b.  Percent of threatened structures not burned by

31  wildfires................................................99.7%

                                  91
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         c.  Percent of wildfires caused by humans...........80%

 2         4.  WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT

 3  MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Number of wildfires detected and suppressed...3,800

 5         b.  Number of acres burned through prescribed burning

 6  .................................................... 2 million

 7         c.  Number of person-hours of firefighting training

 8  provided................................................50,000

 9         d.  Number of acres of forest land protected from

10  wildfires...........................................25,100,000

11         (c)  For the Food Safety and Quality Program, the

12  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

13  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

14  Appropriations 1285-1295 are as follows:

15         1.  DAIRY FACILITIES COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of dairy establishments meeting food safety

18  and sanitation requirements.............................80.77%

19         b.  Percent of milk and milk products analyzed that

20  meet standards...........................................90.7%

21         2.  DAIRY FACILITIES COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of milk and milk product analyses conducted

24  ........................................................70,000

25         b.  Number of dairy establishments inspections...16,500

26         3.  FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME

27  MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of food establishments meeting food safety

29  and sanitation requirements..............................91.2%

30         b.  Percent of food products analyzed that meet

31  standards................................................91.4%

                                  92
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         c.  Percent of produce or other food samples analyzed

 2  that meet pesticide residue standards....................97.7%

 3         4.  FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT

 4  MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Number of inspections of food establishments, dairy

 6  establishments, and water vending machines..............65,500

 7         b.  Number of food analyses conducted............43,000

 8         c.  Number of pesticide residue analyses conducted

 9  .......................................................265,000

10         d.  Number of food-related consumer assistance

11  investigations or actions................................3,500

12         e.  Tons of poultry and shell eggs graded.......430,000

13         (d)  For the Consumer Protection Program, the outcome

14  measures, output measures, and associated performance

15  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

16  Appropriations 1296-1313B are as follows:

17         1.  AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTCOME

18  MEASURES.--

19         a.  Percent of licensed pest control applicators

20  inspected that are in compliance with regulations..........78%

21         b.  Percent of feed, seed, and fertilizer inspected

22  products in compliance with performance/quality standards..83%

23         c.  Percent of licensed pesticide applicators inspected

24  that are in compliance.....................................76%

25         d.  Number of reported human/equine disease cases

26  caused by mosquitoes......................................2/40

27         2.  AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTPUT

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Number of pest control; feed, seed, and fertilizer;

30  and pesticide inspections...............................16,818

31         b.  Number of complaints investigated/processed

                                  93
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  relating to all entities regulated by the Division of

 2  Agricultural Environmental Services......................1,225

 3         c.  Number of laboratory analyses performed on seed and

 4  fertilizer and pesticide product and residue samples...217,591

 5         d.  Number of people served by mosquito control

 6  activities..........................................14,500,000

 7         3.  CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 8         a.  Percent of regulated entities (motor vehicle repair

 9  shops, health studio, telemarketer, business opportunity,

10  dance studio, solicitation of contribution, sellers of travel,

11  & pawn shops) found operating in compliance of the consumer

12  protection laws............................................91%

13         4.  CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of assists provided to consumers, not

15  including lemon law....................................780,600

16         b.  Number of lemon law assists made to consumers

17  ........................................................21,000

18         c.  Number of complaints investigated/processed

19  relating to all entities regulated by the Division of Consumer

20  Services in the Consumer Protection Program.............12,190

21         d.  Number of "no sales solicitation calls"

22  subscriptions processed................................103,000

23         e.  Number of registered entities licensed by the

24  division................................................35,607

25         5.  STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTCOME

26  MEASURES.--

27         a.  Percent of LP Gas facilities found in compliance

28  with safety requirements on first inspection...............20%

29         b.  Percent of amusement attractions found in full

30  compliance with safety requirements on first inspections...40%

31         c.  Percent of regulated weighing and measuring

                                  94
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  devices, packages, and businesses with scanners in compliance

 2  with accuracy standards during initial inspection/testing..95%

 3         d.  Percent of petroleum products meeting quality

 4  standards................................................99.2%

 5         6.  STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTPUT

 6  MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of LP Gas facility inspections and

 8  reinspections conducted..................................5,830

 9         b.  Number of petroleum field inspections conducted

10  .......................................................185,000

11         c.  Number of petroleum lab test analyses performed

12  .......................................................172,000

13         d.  Number of amusement ride safety inspections

14  conducted................................................9,205

15         e.  Number of weights and measures inspections

16  conducted...............................................64,000

17         (e)  For the Agricultural Economic Development Program,

18  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

19  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

20  Specific Appropriations 1314-1355E are as follows:

21         1.  FRUITS AND VEGETABLES INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

22  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Dollar value of fruit and vegetables that are

24  shipped to other states or countries that are subject to

25  mandatory inspection............................$1,443,648,000

26         2.  FRUITS AND VEGETABLES INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

27  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

28         a.  Number of tons of fruits and vegetables inspected

29  ....................................................13,781,717

30         3.  AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31         a.  Total sales of agricultural and seafood products

                                  95
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  generated by tenants of state farmers markets.....$202,206,000

 2         b.  Dollar value of federal commodities and recovered

 3  food distributed...................................$50,246,102

 4         c.  Florida agricultural products as a percent of the

 5  national market...........................................3.7%

 6         4.  AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of buyers reached with agricultural

 8  promotion campaign messages.......................1.73 billion

 9         b.  Number of marketing assists provided to producers

10  and businesses..........................................96,319

11         c.  Pounds of federal commodities and recovered food

12  distributed.........................................75,816,366

13         d.  Number of leased square feet at State Farmers'

14  Markets..............................................1,592,536

15         e.  Number of marketing assists provided to producers

16  and businesses..........................................16,500

17         5.  AQUACULTURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Shellfish illness reported from Florida shellfish

19  products per 100,000 meals served........................0.331

20         b.  Percent of shellfish and crab processing facilities

21  in significant compliance with permit and food safety

22  regulations................................................80%

23         6.  AQUACULTURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Number of shellfish processing plant inspections

25  ...........................................................700

26         b.  Number of available acres of harvestable shellfish

27  waters.................................................973,321

28         7.  AGRICULTURAL INSPECTION STATIONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

29         a.  Amount of revenue generated by Bills of Lading

30  transmitted to the Department of Revenue from Agricultural

31  Inspection stations................................$16,852,050

                                  96
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         8.  AGRICULTURAL INSPECTION STATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural

 3  inspection stations.................................12,973,040

 4         b.  Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural

 5  inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated

 6  commodities..........................................3,222,791

 7         c.  Number of Bills of Lading transmitted to the

 8  Department of Revenue from agricultural inspection stations

 9  ........................................................78,000

10         9.  ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURE.--

11         a.  Percent of livestock and poultry infected with

12  specific transmissible diseases for which monitoring,

13  controlling, and eradicating activities are established

14  ......................................................0.00043%

15         10.  ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of animal site inspections performed..16,650

17         b.  Number of animals tested or vaccinated......770,000

18         c.  Number of animal-related diagnostic laboratory

19  procedures performed...................................850,000

20         11.  PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Percent of newly introduced pests and diseases

22  prevented from infesting Florida plants to a level where

23  eradication is biologically or economically unfeasible...80.8%

24         b.  Percent of commercial citrus acres free of citrus

25  canker...................................................98.5%

26         12.  PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of plant, fruit fly trap and honeybee

28  inspections performed................................3,768,166

29         b.  Number of commercial citrus acres surveyed for

30  citrus canker..........................................560,000

31         c.  Millions of sterile med flies released........3,412

                                  97
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         d.  Number of acres where plant pest and disease

 2  eradication or control efforts were undertaken.........100,000

 3         e.  Number of plant, soil, insect, and other organism

 4  samples processed for identification or diagnosis......407,000

 5         f.  Number of cartons of citrus certified as fly-free

 6  for export..........................................10,014,270

 7         (2)  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.--

 8         (a)  For the Office of the Secretary Program, the

 9  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

10  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

11  Appropriations 1356-1372 are as follows:

12         1.  LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent of local government participation in land

14  acquisition programs..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

15         b.  Percent of local government participation in land

16  acquisition programs acquiring open space in urban cores....FY

17  2001-2002 LBR

18         2.  LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of project grant applications reviewed....FY

20  2001-2002 LBR

21         b.  Number of grants awarded...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         c.  Number of project applications receiving technical

23  assistance................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         d.  Number of active projects monitored....FY 2001-2002

25  LBR

26         e.  Number of parcels appraised, negotiated, and closed

27  ..................................................FY 2001-2002

28  LBR

29         3.  FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

30         a.  Number of local governments participating in

31  coastal management programs to protect, maintain, and develop

                                  98
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  coastal resources through a coordinated effort....FY 2001-2002

 2  LBR

 3         4.  FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Number of projects reviewed that do not require

 5  problem resolution............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         b.  Number of projects reviewed that do require some

 7  problem resolution............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         c.  Number of projects funded..........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 9         d.  Number of individuals trained......FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         5.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

11  MEASURE.--

12         a.  Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed

13  as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         (b)  For the Community Planning and Protection Program,

15  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

16  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

17  Specific Appropriation 1373-1378A are as follows:

18         1.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of plans reviewed...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         b.  Number of plan changes processed...FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         c.  Number of local government evaluation and appraisal

22  report reviews completed......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         d.  Number of grants administered......FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         e.  Number of technical assistance initiatives

25  completed.................................................. FY

26  2001-2002 LBR

27         f.  Number of plans adequately addressing disaster

28  mitigation................................................. FY

29  2001-2002 LBR

30         g.  Number of developments of regional impact managed

31  ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

                                  99
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         h.  Number of Area of Critical State Concern

 2  development orders reviewed and final orders issued.........FY

 3  2001-2002 LBR

 4         (c)  For the Emergency Response Management Program, the

 5  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 6  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 7  Appropriations 1379-1416 are as follows:

 8         1.  PREDISASTER MITIGATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Number of dollars saved by mitigating repetitive

10  losses due to flood damage....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         2.  PREDISASTER MITIGATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of predisaster mitigation grants awarded to

13  state and local governments...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         b.  Number of applicants provided technical assistance

15  ........................................................... FY

16  2001-2002 LBR

17         c.  Number of communities audited and receiving

18  technical assistance in accord with the National Flood

19  Insurance Program.............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         d.  Number of Flood Mitigation Assistance Program

21  grants awarded............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         3.  EMERGENCY PLANNING OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Percent of counties with above average ability to

24  respond to emergencies........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         4.  EMERGENCY PLANNING OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of technical assistance contacts to state

27  and local government regarding capability assessments for

28  readiness.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         b.  Number of personnel trained in emergency

30  preparedness............................................... FY

31  2001-2002 LBR

                                 100
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         c.  Number of plans, reports, and procedures maintained

 2  in coordinating with federal and state emergency management

 3  organizations.............................................. FY

 4  2001-2002 LBR

 5         d.  Number of signatories maintained regarding the

 6  Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 7         e.  Number of public hurricane shelters evaluated....FY

 8  2001-2002 LBR

 9         f.  Number of organizations awarded funds..FY 2001-2002

10  LBR

11         g.  Number of funding applications processed.........FY

12  2001-2002 LBR

13         5.  EMERGENCY RECOVERY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

14         a.  Number of months required for communities to

15  completely recover from a disaster............FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         6.  EMERGENCY RECOVERY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of financial assistance recovery grants to

18  eligible local entities.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

19         b.  Number of mitigation agreements with local entities

20  managed...................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         c.  Number of hurricane shelters created...FY 2001-2002

22  LBR

23         d.  Number of projects requiring National Environmental

24  Policy Act review.............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         e.  Number of postdisaster assessments conducted.....FY

26  2001-2002 LBR

27         f.  Number of outreach team members deployed.........FY

28  2001-2002 LBR

29         g.  Number of project inspections performed..........FY

30  2001-2002 LBR

31         7.  EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

                                 101
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Percent of events in which the affected population

 2  is warned within an appropriate timeframe in relation to the

 3  disaster/event................................... FY 2001-2002

 4  LBR

 5         8.  EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 6         a.  Operations Center is activated at Level 2 or above

 7  for local government emergency needs..........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         b.  Number of incidents reported to the State Warning

 9  Point...................................................... FY

10  2001-2002 LBR

11         c.  Number of requests from local governments and

12  allied agencies for assistance................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         d.  Number of predisaster mitigation grants awarded..FY

14  2001-2002 LBR

15         e.  Population covered in NOAA weather radio

16  transmission areas........................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         9.  HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMPLIANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Percent of facilities in compliance with hazardous

19  materials requirements........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         10.  HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMPLIANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of facility files researched for compliance

22  verification................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         b.  Number of Community Right to Know requests

24  fulfilled.................................................. FY

25  2001-2002 LBR

26         c.  Number of facility risk management audits conducted

27  ........................................................... FY

28  2001-2002 LBR

29         d.  Number of financial agreements maintained........FY

30  2001-2002 LBR

31         (d)  For the Housing and Community Revitalization

                                 102
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 2  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 3  Specific Appropriations 1417-1441A are as follows:

 4         1.  AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT

 5  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 6         a.  Number of neighborhoods improved and assisted

 7  through community development block grant programs,

 8  empowerment zone programs, urban infill programs, affordable

 9  housing programs, and long-term redevelopment programs......FY

10  2001-2002 LBR

11         b.  Number of jobs created/retained through community

12  development block grant programs..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         2.  AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT

14  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of grants administered for affordable

16  housing.................................................... FY

17  2001-2002 LBR

18         b.  Number of redevelopment plans developed..........FY

19  2001-2002 LBR

20         c.  Number of grant awards managed.....FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         d.  Number of people trained/served....FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         3.  BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION

23  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Percent of local governments that have a building

25  code program rated at or above a specified level of

26  effectiveness by a recognized rating organization.FY 2001-2002

27  LBR

28         4.  BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION

29  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

30         a.  Number of partners assisted........FY 2001-2002 LBR

31         b.  Number of code amendments promulgated..FY 2001-2002

                                 103
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  LBR

 2         c.  Number of permits issued for manufactured buildings

 3  ........................................................... FY

 4  2001-2002 LBR

 5         d.  Number of grants managed...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         5.  PUBLIC SERVICE AND ENERGY INITIATIVES OUTCOME

 7  MEASURE.--

 8         a.  Number of households benefiting from services

 9  provided by community development block grant programs,

10  community services, LIHEP, weatherization, and energy programs

11  ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         6.  PUBLIC SERVICE AND ENERGY INITIATIVES OUTPUT

13  MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of public service grants administered.....FY

15  2001-2002 LBR

16         b.  Number of energy efficient demonstration grants

17  administered................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR

18         (e)  For the Florida Housing Finance Corporation

19  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

20  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

21  Specific Appropriations 1458-1462 are as follows:

22         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

23         a.  Percent of dollars that are targeted to

24  farmworkers, elderly, and fishworkers.........FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         b.  Ratio of nonstate funding to state-appropriated

26  dollars.................................................... FY

27  2001-2002 LBR

28         c.  Percent of units exceeding statutory set-asides..FY

29  2001-2002 LBR

30         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31         a.  Number of applications processed...FY 2001-2002 LBR

                                 104
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  Number of local governments under compliance

 2  monitoring for the State Housing Initiatives Partnership

 3  (SHIP) program.............................................114

 4         c.  Number of local governments served.FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         d.  Executive direction and support services costs as a

 6  percent of total program costs................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 7         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.--

 8         (a)  For the Division of Administrative Services, the

 9  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

10  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

11  Appropriations 1463-1474 are as follows:

12         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

13  MEASURE.--

14         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

15  costs....................................................5.12%

16         (b)  For the State Lands Program, the outcome measures,

17  output measures, and associated performance standards with

18  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1475-1506

19  are as follows:

20         1.  INVASIVE PLANT CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of new acres of public land where invasive,

22  exotic, upland plants are controlled and maintained......7,000

23         b.  Number of acres of public water bodies treated

24  ........................................................40,165

25         c.  Number of acres of upland plants controlled...4,285

26         2.  LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Percent of parcels acquired within the agreed upon

28  time limit.................................................70%

29         b.  Appraised value as a percent of purchase price for

30  parcels....................................................92%

31         c.  Number of appraisals certified..................500

                                 105
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         d.  Number of maps certified.........................80

 2         e.  Number of appraisals completed on projects on

 3  current list (as amended)..................................500

 4         f.  Number of parcels (ownerships) negotiated.....4,397

 5         g.  Number of parcels (ownerships) closed.........1,281

 6         3.  LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Percent of easements, leases, and other requests

 8  completed by maximum time frames prescribed................75%

 9         b.  Percent of all land management plans completed

10  within statutory timeframes................................70%

11         4.  LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

12         a.  Number of leases developed by the department....500

13         (c)  For the Water Resource Management Program, the

14  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

15  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

16  Appropriations 1568-1596D are as follows:

17         1.  BEACH MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Percent of miles of critically eroding beaches

19  restored or maintained.....................................49%

20         2.  BEACH MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of coastal construction permits processed

22  .........................................................1,652

23         3.  WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OUTCOME

24  MEASURES.--

25         a.  Percent of rivers that meet designated uses.....92%

26         b.  Percent of lakes that meet designated uses......87%

27         c.  Percent of estuaries that meet designated uses..95%

28         d.  Percent of groundwater that meets designated uses

29  ...........................................................85%

30         e.  Percent of drinking water that meets designated

31  uses.......................................................90%

                                 106
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         f.  Percent of the state's water segments that meet

 2  designated uses............................................89%

 3         g.  Wetland acres authorized by permit to be

 4  impacted/acres required to be created, enhanced, restored, or

 5  preserved.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         h.  Percent of mines in significant compliance with

 7  restoration plan...........................................95%

 8         i.  Percent of public water systems with no significant

 9  public health drinking water quality problems............93.5%

10         4.  WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OUTPUT

11  MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of mining inspections....................400

13         b.  Number of water resource permits processed...18,500

14         c.  Number of regulatory inspections conducted...17,000

15         d.  Number of technical assistance, public education,

16  and outreach contacts made...............................4,250

17         e.  Number of water resource protection and restoration

18  projects funded.............................................50

19         f.  Percent reduction in phosphorus loadings to Lake

20  Okeechobee................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         g.  Number of Total Maximum Daily Loads adopted......FY

22  2001-2002 LBR

23         5.  WATER SUPPLY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Reclaimed water (reuse) capacity as percent of

25  total wastewater capacity..................................45%

26         6.  WATER SUPPLY OUTPUT MEASURE.--

27         a.  Number of alternative water supply projects funded

28  .............................................................9

29         (d)  For the Waste Management Program, the outcome

30  measures, output measures, and associated performance

31  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

                                 107
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Appropriations 1597-1633B are as follows:

 2         1.  WASTE CLEANUP OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 3         a.  Cumulative percent of petroleum contaminated

 4  program sites with cleanup completed.......................19%

 5         b.  Cumulative percent of dry-cleaning contaminated

 6  sites with cleanup completed................................1%

 7         c.  Cumulative percent of other contaminated sites with

 8  cleanup completed..........................................62%

 9         d.  Percent of hazardous waste sites cleaned up.....18%

10         2.  WASTE CLEANUP OUTPUT MEASURES.--

11         a.  Number of petroleum program contaminated sites

12  being cleaned up.........................................2,668

13         b.  Number of known contaminated hazardous waste sites

14  being cleaned up...........................................200

15         3.  WASTE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Percent of regulated petroleum storage tank

17  facilities in significant compliance with state regulations

18  ...........................................................89%

19         b.  Percent of inspected facilities that generate,

20  treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste in significant

21  compliance.................................................96%

22         c.  Cumulative percent of petroleum contaminated

23  non-program sites with cleanup completed...................65%

24         d.  Percent of inspected permitted solid waste

25  facilities in significant compliance.......................96%

26         e.  Percent of municipal solid waste managed by

27  recycling/waste-to-energy/landfilling..............38%/16%/46%

28         4.  WASTE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--

29         a.  Number of storage tank facilities inspected..16,123

30         b.  Percent of storage tank facilities inspected....85%

31         c.  Number of solid and hazardous waste permits,

                                 108
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  variances, exemptions, certifications, and registrations

 2  processed..................................................331

 3         d.  Number of solid and hazardous waste compliance

 4  assurance inspections conducted..........................2,800

 5         e.  Number of petroleum storage systems compliance

 6  inspections conducted...................................16,123

 7         f.  Number of pollution prevention assessments

 8  conducted at businesses and government facilities...........32

 9         g.  Number of pollution site technical reviews

10  conducted................................................1,045

11         h.  Number of known contaminated sites being cleaned up

12  by responsible parties...................................1,091

13         (e)  For the Recreation and Parks Program, the outcome

14  measures, output measures, and associated performance

15  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

16  Appropriations 1634-1666 are as follows:

17         1.  LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Acres designated as part of the Florida Greenways

19  and Trails system......................................102,970

20         2.  LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of technical assists provided to local

22  government to promote Greenways and Trails..................33

23         3.  RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OUTPUT

24  MEASURE.--

25         a.  Number of recreational grants to local governments

26  for recreational facilities and land acquisition............34

27         4.  STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

28         a.  Attendance at state parks................15,000,000

29         5.  STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

30         a.  Number of state park sites managed..............152

31         b.  Number of acres managed.....................515,111

                                 109
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         6.  COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 2         a.  Increase in the number of degraded acreage in state

 3  buffer enhanced or restored..............................7,778

 4         (f)  For the Air Resources Management Program, the

 5  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 6  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 7  Appropriations 1667-1685 are as follows:

 8         1.  AIR ASSESSMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Percent of time that monitored population breathes

10  good or moderate quality air.............................98.5%

11         b.  Percent of population living in areas monitored for

12  air quality................................................86%

13         2.  AIR ASSESSMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of monitors operated by the department and

15  local programs.............................................240

16         b.  Number of emission points reviewed and analyzed

17  .........................................................5,350

18         3.  AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

19         a.  Pounds of NOx air emissions per capita.......128.72

20         b.  Pounds of SO2 air emissions per capita.......100.49

21         c.  Pounds of CO air emissions per capita........542.51

22         d.  Pounds of VOC air emissions per capita.......108.05

23         e.  Percent of Title V facilities in significant

24  compliance with state regulations..........................95%

25         4.  AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of air permits issued..................1,292

27         b.  Number of facility inspections................6,477

28         5.  UTILITIES SITING AND COORDINATION OUTCOME

29  MEASURE.--

30         a.  Percent of energy facilities certified within

31  statutory timeframes.......................................85%

                                 110
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (g)  For the Law Enforcement Program, the outcome

 2  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 3  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 4  Appropriations 1686-1715B are as follows:

 5         1.  ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Number of investigations closed.................227

 7         2.  PATROL ON STATE LANDS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 8         a.  Criminal incidents per 100,000 state park visitors

 9  ............................................................30

10         3.  PATROL ON STATE LANDS OUTPUT MEASURE.--

11         a.  Number of patrol hours on state lands........71,936

12         4.  EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

13         a.  Gallons of pollutant discharge per capita...189,868

14         5.  EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of sites/spills remediated...............533

16         b.  Number of incidents reported..................2,700

17         (4)  FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION.--

18         (a)  For the Executive Director and Division of

19  Administration, the outcome measures, output measures, and

20  associated performance standards with respect to funds

21  provided in Specific Appropriations 1716-1749C are as follows:

22         1.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

23         a.  Percent change in licensed anglers...............3%

24         b.  Percent change in the number of licensed hunters.0%

25         2.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of licensed anglers................1,712,711

27         b.  Number of licensed hunters..................167,798

28         3.  OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION OUTCOME

29  MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of total students meeting minimum standards

31  for graduation.............................................88%

                                 111
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  Number of hunting accidents......................23

 2         4.  OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION OUTPUT

 3  MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Number of students graduating hunter education

 5  courses.................................................10,514

 6         b.  Number of written conservation education materials

 7  provided to citizens.................................6,538,965

 8         5.  MARINE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION OUTCOME

 9  MEASURE.--

10         a.  Percent of critical habitat (hot spots) protected

11  through land acquisition, lease, or management contract....38%

12         6.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

13  MEASURE.--

14         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

15  costs.....................................................5.7%

16         (b)  For the Law Enforcement Program, the outcome

17  measures, output measures, and associated performance

18  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

19  Appropriations 1750-1765 are as follows:

20         1.  WILDLIFE, MARINE, AND BOATING LAW ENFORCEMENT

21  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

22         a.  Overall conviction rate............FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         2.  WILDLIFE, MARINE, AND BOATING LAW ENFORCEMENT

24  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Total number of violations.........FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         b.  Number of felony violations........FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         c.  Total number of hours spent in preventative patrol

28  and investigations (not including Marine Patrol).......616,566

29         d.  Total number of hours spent on land (not including

30  Marine Patrol).........................................536,936

31         e.  Total number of hours spent on water (not including

                                 112
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Marine Patrol)..........................................71,056

 2         f.  Total number of hours spent in air (not including

 3  Marine Patrol)...........................................8,474

 4         g.  Total number of investigations closed (not

 5  including Marine Patrol)...................................750

 6         h.  Number of inspections of licensed and permitted

 7  captive wildlife facilities..............................4,446

 8         i.  Number of vessel safety inspections (not including

 9  Marine Patrol).........................................154,408

10         j.  Total number of boating accidents investigated...FY

11  2001-2002 LBR

12         k.  Total number of boating fatalities investigated..FY

13  2001-2002 LBR

14         l.  Number of flight hours provided...............3,650

15         (c)  For the Wildlife Management Program, the outcome

16  measures, output measures, and associated performance

17  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

18  Appropriations 1766-1781B are as follows:

19         1.  WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

20         a.  Percent of satisfied hunters....................75%

21         b.  Percent of wildlife species whose biological status

22  is stable or improving.....................................70%

23         2.  WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Number of acres managed for wildlife......4,750,000

25         b.  Number of wildlife technical assists provided...325

26         (d)  For the Freshwater Fisheries Management Program,

27  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

28  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

29  Specific Appropriations 1782-1789A are as follows:

30         1.  FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

31         a.  Percent angler satisfaction.....................75%

                                 113
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         2.  FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Number of acres of water bodies managed to improve

 3  fishing................................................770,955

 4         b.  Number of access points established or maintained

 5  ............................................................42

 6         c.  Number of participants in achievement programs..600

 7         d.  Number of fish stocked....................2,385,000

 8         e.  Number of acres of water bodies where habitat

 9  rehabilitation projects have been completed.............40,000

10         (e)  For the Marine Fisheries Program, the outcome

11  measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

13  Appropriations 1790-1798A are as follows:

14         1.  MARINE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

15         a.  Percent of fisheries stocks with sufficient data

16  that are increasing or stable..............................79%

17         2.  MARINE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

18         a.  Number of commercial and other marine fishing

19  licenses processed......................................32,600

20         b.  Number of artificial reefs created and/or monitored

21  ............................................................68

22         c.  Number of fishery stocks management plans reviewed

23  ............................................................15

24         (f)  For the Marine Research Program, the outcome

25  measures, output measures, and associated performance

26  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

27  Appropriations 1798B-1806C are as follows:

28         1.  MARINE ASSESSMENT, RESTORATION, AND TECHNICAL

29  SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of research projects that provide

31  management recommendations or support management actions..100%

                                 114
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  Manatee mortality rate........................7.72%

 2         2.  MARINE ASSESSMENT, RESTORATION, AND TECHNICAL

 3  SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Total number of sea turtle nests.............77,864

 5         b.  Manatee population............................2,399

 6         c.  Number of fish stocks assessments and data

 7  summaries conducted........................................170

 8         d.  Number of requests for status of endangered and

 9  threatened species completed.............................3,400

10         (5)  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.--

11         (a)  For the Transportation Systems Development

12  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

13  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

14  Specific Appropriations 1807-1821G are as follows:

15         1.  HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of motor vehicle fatalities per 100 million

17  miles traveled.......................................... <2.05

18         b.  Percent of state highway system pavement meeting

19  department standards.......................................78%

20         c.  Percent of FDOT maintained bridges which meet

21  department standards.......................................90%

22         d.  Percent increase in number of days required for

23  completed construction contracts over original contract days

24  (less weather days).......................................<30%

25         e.  Percent increase in final amount paid for completed

26  construction contracts over original contract amount......<10%

27         f.  Percent of vehicle crashes on state highway system

28  where road-related conditions were listed as a contributing

29  factor.....................................................<1%

30         g.  Construction Engineering as a percent of

31  construction...............................................15%

                                 115
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         h.  Average construction cost per lane mile of new

 2  capacity............................................$3,800,000

 3         2.  HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Number of lane miles let to contract for

 5  resurfacing..............................................2,800

 6         b.  Number of lane miles let to contract for highway

 7  capacity improvements......................................176

 8         c.  Percent of construction contracts planned for

 9  letting that were actually let.............................95%

10         d.  Number of bridges let to contract for repair.....81

11         e.  Number of bridges let to contract for replacement

12  ............................................................35

13         f.  Number of right-of-way parcels acquired.......2,230

14         g.  Number of projects certified ready for construction

15  ............................................................81

16         3.  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Transit ridership growth compared to population

18  growth...................................................2%/2%

19         b.  Tons of cargo shipped by air..............4,000,000

20         c.  Average cost per requested trip for transportation

21  disadvantaged............................................$4.32

22         4.  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of passenger enplanements.........56,000,000

24         b.  Number of public transit passenger trips

25  ...................................................175,000,000

26         c.  Number of cruise embarkations and disembarkations

27  at Florida ports.....................................9,300,000

28         d.  Number of transportation disadvantaged trips

29  provided.............................................5,768,000

30         (b)  For the Transportation Systems Operation Program,

31  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

                                 116
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 2  Specific Appropriations 1822-1864 are as follows:

 3         1.  HIGHWAY OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Maintenance condition rating of state highway

 5  system as measured against the department's maintenance manual

 6  standards...................................................80

 7         b.  Percent of commercial vehicles weighed by fixed

 8  scales that were overweight...............................0.4%

 9         c.  Percent of commercial vehicles weighed by portable

10  scales that were overweight..............................37.0%

11         2.  HIGHWAY OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of commercial vehicles weighed....11,000,000

13         b.  Number of commercial vehicle safety inspections

14  performed...............................................50,000

15         c.  Number of portable scale weighings performed.45,000

16         3.  TOLL OPERATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

17         a.  Operational cost per toll transaction........<$0.16

18         4.  TOLL OPERATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

19         a.  Number of toll transactions.............499,000,000

20         5.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

21  MEASURE.--

22         a.  Administration and support costs as a percent of

23  total agency costs........................................2.1%

24         6.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

25         a.  Percent of mainframe utilization................90%

26         7.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--

27         a.  Number of computer work stations supported....8,017

28         Section 33.  The performance measures and standards

29  established in this section for individual programs in general

30  government agencies shall be applied to those programs for the

31  2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and

                                 117
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in

 2  the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as

 3  required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act

 4  of 1994.

 5         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.--

 6         (a)  For the Office of the Comptroller and Division of

 7  Administration Program, the outcome measures, output measures,

 8  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

 9  provided in Specific Appropriations 1878-1880 are as follows:

10         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

11  MEASURE.--

12         a.  Cabinet and Clemency support administrative costs

13  as a percent of total agency costs............FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         (b)  For the Financial Accountability for Public Funds

15  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

16  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

17  Specific Appropriations 1881-1903 are as follows:

18         1.  RECOVERY AND RETURN OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY OUTCOME

19  MEASURES.--

20         a.  Percent of increase in the total number of holders

21  reporting...................................................3%

22         b.  Percent of previously filing holders who submit

23  problem reports.............................................3%

24         c.  Percent of total number (% of $) of claims paid to

25  the owner compared to the total number ($) of returnable

26  accounts reported/received.................................22%

27         d.  Percent of the total dollar amount of claims paid

28  to the owner compared to the total dollars in returnable

29  accounts reported/received.................................80%

30         2.  RECOVERY AND RETURN OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY OUTPUT

31  MEASURES.--

                                 118
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Number of holders reports processed..........16,000

 2         b.  Number of exams of holders who have not previously

 3  filed a holder report......................................213

 4         c.  Number of exams conducted/processed.............476

 5         d.  Dollar value collected as a result of exams

 6  ...................................................$15,500,000

 7         e.  Number/dollar value of owner accounts processed

 8  ..................................................... 255,000/

 9  $101,000,000

10         f.  Total cost of the program to the number of holder

11  reports/owner accounts processed.......................$9/$186

12         g.  Number/dollar value of claims paid to owners

13  .................................................... 55,000/FY

14  2001-2002 LBR

15         h.  Number of owner accounts advertised.........100,000

16         i.  Percent of claims approved/denied within 30/60/90

17  days from the date received (cumulative total)....50%/90%/100%

18         j.  Percent of claims paid within 30/60/90 days from

19  the date received (cumulative total)..............15%/50%/100%

20         3.  STATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATE AGENCY

21  ACCOUNTING OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Percent of program's customers who return an

23  overall customer service rating of good or excellent on

24  surveys....................................................95%

25         b.  Percent of vendor payments issued in less than the

26  Comptroller's statutory time limit of 10 days.............100%

27         c.  Accuracy rate of postaudited vendor payments.....FY

28  2001-2002 LBR

29         d.  Percent of those utilizing the program and

30  providing financial information who rate the overall

31  relevancy, usefulness, and timeliness of information as good

                                 119
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  or excellent...............................................95%

 2         e.  Number of qualifications in the Independent

 3  Auditor's Report on the State General Purpose Financial

 4  Statements which are related to the presentation of the

 5  financial statements.........................................0

 6         f.  Percent of vendor payments issued electronically

 7  ...........................................................16%

 8         g.  Percent of payroll payments issued electronically

 9  ...........................................................77%

10         h.  Percent of retirement payments issued

11  electronically.............................................76%

12         4.  STATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATE AGENCY

13  ACCOUNTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of vendor payment requests preaudited

15  .....................................................1,000,000

16         b.  Number of vendor payment requests postaudited....FY

17  2001-2002 LBR

18         c.  Percent of vendor payment requests postaudited...FY

19  2001-2002 LBR

20         d.  Number of vendor invoices paid............4,050,000

21         e.  Number of payroll payments issued.........5,639,780

22         f.  Number of payments issued electronically..6,450,000

23         g.  Number of instances during the year where, as a

24  result of inadequate cash management under this program,

25  general revenue had a negative cash balance..................0

26         h.  Number of fiscal integrity cases closed..........18

27         i.  Number of "get lean" hotline calls processed for

28  referral to the appropriate agency.........................250

29         j.  Number of fiscal integrity cases closed where

30  criminal, disciplinary, and/or administrative actions taken.FY

31  2001-2002 LBR

                                 120
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         5.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

 2  MEASURE.--

 3         a.  Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed

 4  as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         6.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Percent of user requests that are responded to

 7  timely and effectively........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         7.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Number of Florida Accounting Information Resource

10  (FLAIR) design, programming and education service requests

11  completed.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         b.  The number of hours the computer is available for

13  use........................................................ FY

14  2001-2002 LBR

15         (c)  For the Financial Institutions Regulatory and

16  Consumer Financial Protection Program, the outcome measures,

17  output measures, and associated performance standards with

18  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1904-1938

19  are as follows:

20         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Percent of licensees examined where department

22  action is taken against the licensee for cause -- based on

23  risk assessment profile, or internal/external information

24  which indicates a violation of statute..................33.05%

25         b.  Percent of licensees examined where department

26  action is taken against the licensee for cause --

27  routine-proactive exam conducted on randomly selected entities

28  or entities on an examination cycle.....................16.88%

29         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

30         a.  Number of "for cause" examinations completed....377

31         b.  Number of "routine" examinations completed....1,435

                                 121
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         c.  Percent of total licensees examined to determine

 2  compliance with applicable regulations......................5%

 3         4.  FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTCOME

 4  MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Percent of licensees sanctioned for violations..<1%

 6         b.  Percent of total applicants not licensed to conduct

 7  business in the state because they fail to meet substantive

 8  licensing requirements....................................4.3%

 9         c.  Percent of applicants prevented from entering the

10  securities industry in Florida who subsequently are the

11  subject of additional disciplinary action in other

12  jurisdictions within 3 years...............................60%

13         5.  FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTPUT

14  MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of final actions taken against licensees.370

16         b.  Number of applications denied or withdrawn....3,546

17         c.  Number of applications processed.............70,944

18         d.  Amount (dollars) of securities registration

19  applications denied or withdrawn..................$2.1 billion

20         e.  Number of applications licensed..............67,398

21         f.  Number of applicants licensed with restrictions..95

22         g.  Number/percent of filings or requests processed by

23  the department within a designated standard number of days, by

24  type..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         h.  Number of applicants denied or withdrawn with

26  additional disciplinary information reported on the Central

27  Registration Depository within 3 years.....................324

28         6.  SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS OF STATE BANKING SYSTEM

29  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

31  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

                                 122
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Florida on Return on Assets................................51%

 2         b.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

 3  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

 4  Florida on Return on Equity................................51%

 5         c.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

 6  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

 7  Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio..........................51%

 8         d.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

 9  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

10  Florida on Tier 1 Capital..................................51%

11         e.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

12  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

13  chartered in Florida on Return on Assets...................51%

14         f.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

15  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

16  chartered in Florida on Return on Equity...................51%

17         g.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

18  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

19  chartered in Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio.............51%

20         h.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

21  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

22  chartered in Florida on Tier 1 Capital.....................51%

23         i.  Percent of applications for new Florida financial

24  institutions that seek state charters......................67%

25         j.  Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by

26  state-chartered financial institutions compared to assessments

27  that would be paid if the bank was nationally or federally

28  chartered..............................................$10,000

29         k.  Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by

30  state-chartered financial institutions compared to assessments

31  that would be paid if the credit union was nationally or

                                 123
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  federally chartered.......................................$500

 2         l.  Percent of banks receiving an examination report

 3  within 45 days after the conclusion of their on-site state

 4  examination................................................75%

 5         m.  Percent of credit unions receiving an examination

 6  report within 30 days after the conclusion of their on-site

 7  state examination..........................................75%

 8         n.  Percent of international financial institutions

 9  receiving an examination report within 45 days after the

10  conclusion of their on-site state examination..............75%

11         o.  Percent of trust companies receiving an examination

12  report within 60 days after the conclusion of their on-site

13  state examination..........................................75%

14         p.  Percent of De Novo applications statutorily

15  complete that are processed within 90 days.................67%

16         q.  Percent of branch applications statutorily complete

17  that are processed within 50 days..........................67%

18         r.  Percent of merger/acquisition applications

19  statutorily complete that are processed within 60 days.....67%

20         s.  Percent of financial institutions under enforcement

21  action that are substantially in compliance with conditions

22  imposed....................................................90%

23         7.  SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS OF STATE BANKING SYSTEM OUTPUT

24  MEASURES.--

25         a.  Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on

26  Assets...................................................0.96%

27         b.  Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on

28  Equity..................................................10.50%

29         c.  Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on

30  Capital to Asset Ratio....................................9.0%

31         d.  Median Florida state-chartered banks Tier 1 Capital

                                 124
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  ..........................................................9.1%

 2         e.  Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return

 3  on Assets................................................0.93%

 4         f.  Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return

 5  on Equity.................................................7.1%

 6         g.  Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return

 7  on Capital to Asset Ratio................................12.5%

 8         h.  Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Tier 1

 9  Capital.................................................11.90%

10         i.  Number of new Florida state-chartered banks opened

11  ............................................................15

12         j.  Amount (dollars) annual assessments paid by banks

13  ....................................................$6,929,900

14         k.  Amount (dollars) annual assessments paid by credit

15  unions..............................................$1,463,000

16         l.  Number of banks examined by the Division of Banking

17  receiving an examination report within 45 days..............54

18         m.  Number of credit unions examined by the Division of

19  Banking receiving an examination report within 30 days......57

20         n.  Number of international financial institutions

21  examined by the Division of Banking receiving an examination

22  report within 45 days.......................................14

23         o.  Number of trust companies examined by the Division

24  of Banking receiving an examination report within 60 days....8

25         p.  Number of statutorily complete new DeNovo

26  applications received that are processed within 90 days......7

27         q.  Number of statutorily complete branch applications

28  received that are processed within 15 days..................14

29         r.  Number of statutorily complete merger/acquisition

30  applications received that are processed within 60 days......7

31         s.  Number of institutions in substantial compliance

                                 125
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  with enforcement actions....................................20

 2         t.  Percent/number of financial institutions examined

 3  within statutory timeframes by type of institution:

 4         (I)  Banks......................................66%/144

 5         (II)  Credit Unions..............................66%/76

 6         (III)  International.............................66%/41

 7         (IV)  Trust Companies............................66%/12

 8         u.  Percent/number of surveys returned that rate the

 9  Division's examination program as satisfactory or above

10  .......................................................75%/150

11         v.  Average change in total exam time from previous

12  state exam by type of institution:

13         (I)  Banks..........................................-5%

14         (II)  Credit Unions.................................-5%

15         (III)  International................................-5%

16         (IV)  Trust Companies...............................-5%

17         w.  Average percent of total exam hours conducted

18  off-site, by type of institution:

19         (I)  Banks..........................................25%

20         (II)  Credit Unions.................................25%

21         (III)  International................................25%

22         (IV)  Trust Companies...............................25%

23         8.  CONSUMER FINANCIAL FRAUD PREVENTION AND DETECTION

24  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

25         a.  Percent of investigations of licensed and

26  unlicensed entities referred to other agencies where

27  investigative assistance aided in obtaining

28  criminal/civil/administrative actions:

29         (I)  Licensed........................................6%

30         (II)  Unlicensed....................................59%

31         b.  Dollars returned (voluntarily or through court

                                 126
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  ordered restitution) to victims compared to total dollars of

 2  verified loss as a result of investigative efforts of licensed

 3  entities.............................................$0.001/$1

 4         c.  Dollars returned (voluntarily or through court

 5  ordered restitution) to victims compared to total dollars of

 6  verified loss as a result of investigative efforts of

 7  unlicensed entities...................................$0.46/$1

 8         d.  Percent of written complaints processed within

 9  applicable standards.......................................85%

10         e.  Percent of written complaints regarding licensed

11  entities referred for examination, investigation, or

12  legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal sanctions

13  within/outside statutory authority.......................18.6%

14         f.  Percent of written complaints regarding unlicensed

15  entities referred for examination, investigation, or

16  legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal sanctions

17  within/outside statutory authority.......................37.5%

18         9.  CONSUMER FINANCIAL FRAUD PREVENTION AND DETECTION

19  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of investigations closed.................450

21         b.  Number of background investigations completed...800

22         c.  Amount (dollars) of court ordered restitution to

23  victims of licensed/unlicensed entities:

24         (I)  Licensed.......................................$9K

25         (II)  Unlicensed.................................$20.8M

26         d.  Amount (dollars) of voluntary reimbursement

27  received from licensed/unlicensed entities:

28         (I)  Licensed.....................................$1.2K

29         (II)  Unlicensed................................$434.7K

30         e.  Amount (dollars) returned to victims of

31  licensed/unlicensed entities:

                                 127
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (I)  Licensed......................................$10K

 2         (II)  Unlicensed.................................$21.2M

 3         f.  Amount (dollars) of verified loss to victims of

 4  licensed/unlicensed entities:

 5         (I)  Licensed.....................................$9.2M

 6         (II)  Unlicensed................................$46.14M

 7         g.  Average number of days for initial written

 8  responses to consumers.......................................7

 9         h.  Average number of days to resolve, refer, or close

10  a written complaint.........................................68

11         i.  Number of complaints resolved, referred, or closed

12  during the year..........................................4,350

13         j.  Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 90 days

14  and less than 120 days.....................................10%

15         k.  Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 120

16  days.......................................................15%

17         l.  Number of written complaints where the department

18  identified statutory violations............................150

19         m.  Number of complaints referred for consideration of

20  legal or criminal action...................................275

21         n.  Number of public/consumer awareness contacts made

22  activities with personal, direct face-to-face contact......140

23         o.  Number of public/consumer awareness activities

24  conducted utilizing all types of media.....................540

25         p.  Number of participants at public/consumer awareness

26  activities with personal, direct, face-to-face contact...6,800

27         q.  Total number of hours spent conducting

28  public/consumer awareness activities.....................1,100

29         10.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

30  MEASURE.--

31         a.  Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed

                                 128
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 2         11.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 3         a.  Increase in the level of service requests that are

 4  responded to timely and effectively...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

 5         12.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Number of completed service requests for internal

 7  systems design and support....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 8         (2)  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL

 9  REGULATION.--

10         (a)  For the Office of the Secretary and Division of

11  Administration Program, the outcome measures, output measures,

12  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

13  provided in Specific Appropriations 1939-1957 are as follows:

14         1.  FLORIDA BOXING COMMISSION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

15         a.  Percent of licenses suspended or revoked (primarily

16  for medical purposes/approx 90%) in relation to fights

17  supervised...............................................28.8%

18         2.  FLORIDA BOXING COMMISSION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

19         a.  Number of scheduled boxing rounds.............2,472

20         3.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

21         a.  Percent agency administrative and support costs

22  compared to total agency costs................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         4.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Percent increase in public access to regulatory

25  information................................................10%

26         5.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--

27         a.  Number of clients served.................15,968,506

28         (b)  For the Professional Regulation Program, the

29  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

30  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

31  Appropriations 1958-1978 are as follows:

                                 129
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         1.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 2         a.  Percent of applications processed within 90 days

 3  ..........................................................100%

 4         2.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Number of applications processed.............59,263

 6         b.  Number of licensees.........................499,964

 7         3.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Percent of cases that are resolved through

 9  alternative means (notices of noncompliance, citations or

10  alternative dispute resolution)............................ FY

11  2001-2002 LBR

12         b.  Percent of establishments or licensees found in

13  violation of critical or multiple noncritical violations

14  resulting in discipline...................................0.9%

15         4.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Total number of cases..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         b.  Number of enforcement actions................35,558

18         (c)  For the Pari-Mutuel Wagering Program, the outcome

19  measures, output measures, and associated performance

20  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

21  Appropriations 1979-2001 are as follows:

22         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Percent of races and games that result in statutory

24  or rule infractions......................................0.85%

25         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

26         a.  Number of races and games monitored..........87,000

27         3.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

28         a.  Percent of applications processed within 90 days

29  ..........................................................100%

30         4.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

31         a.  Number of applications processed.............23,001

                                 130
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         5.  TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 2         a.  Total collections per dollar spent on pari-mutuel

 3  events..................................................$19.38

 4         6.  TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 5         a.  Number of audits conducted...................87,500

 6         (d)  For the Hotels and Restaurants Program, the

 7  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 8  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 9  Appropriations 2001A-2013 are as follows:

10         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

11         a.  Percent of licensees in compliance with applicable

12  laws and rules for food service and public lodging

13  establishments..........................................86.07%

14         b.  Percent of licensees in compliance with applicable

15  laws and rules for elevators, escalators, and other vertical

16  conveyance devices......................................95.29%

17         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

18         a.  Number of educational packets distributed and

19  education and training seminars/workshops conducted....283,407

20         b.  Number of inspections for food service and public

21  lodging establishments........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         c.  Number of inspections for elevators, escalators,

23  and other vertical conveyance devices.........FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         d.  Number of call-back inspections for food service

25  and public lodging establishments.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

26         3.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

27         a.  Percent of hotel and restaurant licenses and

28  elevator certificates of operation processed within 30 days

29  .........................................................90.6%

30         4.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31         a.  Number of licensees for public lodging and food

                                 131
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  service establishments..................................69,315

 2         b.  Number of licensees for elevators, escalators, and

 3  other vertical conveyance devices.......................43,897

 4         (e)  For the Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Program,

 5  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 6  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 7  Specific Appropriations 2014-2033 are as follows:

 8         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Percent repeated noncomplying wholesale/retail

10  licensees on yearly basis.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         b.  Percent noncomplying wholesale/retail licensees on

12  yearly basis................................................FY

13  2001-2002 LBR

14         c.  Percent of alcoholic beverages and tobacco

15  retailers tested found to be in compliance with underage

16  persons' access...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         d.  Percent of total retail alcohol and tobacco

18  licensees and permit holders inspected.....................30%

19         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

20         a.  Number of licensees..........................64,000

21         3.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

22         a.  Percent of license applications processed within 90

23  days.......................................................95%

24         4.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

25         a.  Number of applications processed.............12,307

26         5.  TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Total auditing expenditures compared to auditing

28  collections.................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         b.  Percent of retail and wholesale tax dollars

30  identified by audit that were collected....................85%

31         6.  TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

                                 132
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Number of audits conducted..................241,000

 2         (f)  For the Florida Land Sales, Condominiums, and

 3  Mobile Homes Program, the outcome measures, output measures,

 4  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

 5  provided in Specific Appropriations 2034-2045 are as follows:

 6         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Percent of administrative actions resulting in

 8  consent orders............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

 9         b.  Average number of days to resolve consumer

10  complaints not investigated...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         c.  Average number of days to resolve investigations.FY

12  2001-2002 LBR

13         d.  Average number of days to resolve cases submitted

14  for arbitration for condominiums..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

15         e.  Percent of parties surveyed that benefited from

16  education provided (condominiums).............FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

18         a.  Number of administrative actions resolved by

19  consent orders............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         b.  Number of days to close consumer complaints......FY

21  2001-2002 LBR

22         c.  Number of consumer complaints closed...FY 2001-2002

23  LBR

24         d.  Number of days to close investigations.FY 2001-2002

25  LBR

26         e.  Number of investigations closed....FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         f.  Number of days to close cases......FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         g.  Number of cases closed.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         h.  Number of seminars conducted.......FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         i.  Number of attendees at educational seminars

31  surveyed................................................... FY

                                 133
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  2001-2002 LBR

 2         j.  Number of topics covered at educational seminars.FY

 3  2001-2002 LBR

 4         k.  Number of unit owners represented at educational

 5  seminars................................................... FY

 6  2001-2002 LBR

 7         l.  Number of associations represented at educational

 8  seminars................................................... FY

 9  2001-2002 LBR

10         3.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

11         a.  Percent of permanent licenses issued and filings

12  reviewed as prescribed by laws.............................97%

13         4.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

14         a.  Permanent licenses and filings processed.....19,161

15         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS.--

16         (a)  For the Citrus Research Program, the outcome

17  measures, output measures, and associated performance

18  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

19  Appropriations 2046-2048 are as follows:

20         1.  CITRUS RESEARCH OUTCOME MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of new citrus product lines................2

22         2.  CITRUS RESEARCH OUTPUT MEASURE.--

23         a.  Number of sponsored research programs............17

24         (b)  For the Executive Direction and Support Services

25  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

26  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

27  Specific Appropriations 2049-2056 are as follows:

28         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

29  MEASURE.--

30         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

31  costs.....................................................7.8%

                                 134
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (c)  For the Agricultural Products and Marketing

 2  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 3  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 4  Specific Appropriations 2057-2059 are as follows:

 5         1.  AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Percent return on investment for Florida growers.9%

 7         2.  AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Number of TV Gross Rating Points..............4,000

 9         b.  Number of trade incentive programs administered

10  .........................................................2,400

11         (4)  EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR.--

12         (a)  For the Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development

13  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

14  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

15  Specific Appropriations 2084-2088D are as follows:

16         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

17  MEASURE.--

18         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total program

19  costs.......................................................1%

20         2.  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS OUTCOME

21  MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number/dollar amount of contracts and grants

23  administered................................. 283/$290 million

24         b.  Public expenditures per job created/retained under

25  QTI incentive program...................................$3,750

26         c.  Number of state agency proposed rules reviewed

27  which impact small businesses...............................70

28         d.  Number of business leaders' meetings coordinated..1

29         e.  Implement the revitalization of urban communities

30  (Front Porch Florida) as measured by the number of

31  applications and neighborhood plans reviewed; partnering

                                 135
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  activities, interactive community activities, and technical

 2  assistance activities facilitated.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

 3         f.  Market, promote, and provide services to the

 4  state's entertainment industry (Office of Film Commission) as

 5  measured by the number of marketing, promotion, and other

 6  services provided.............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 7         g.  Dollar amount and procurement opportunities

 8  generated for Black businesses....................$2.5 million

 9         h.  Economic contributions from Florida Sports

10  Foundation-sponsored regional and major sporting events grants

11  ..................................................$150 million

12         i.  Satisfaction of the area Sports Commissions with

13  the efforts of the foundation to promote and develop the

14  sports industry and related industries in the state........75%

15         j.  Economic contributions to communities as a result

16  of hosting Florida's Senior State Games Championship........FY

17  2001-2002 LBR

18         k.  Economic contributions to communities as a result

19  of hosting Florida's Sunshine State Spring Games Championship

20  ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         l.  Number of jobs created as a result of economic

22  factors on the community using the State of Florida Economic

23  Impact Model..................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         m.  Number of out-of-state travelers who come to and go

25  through Florida..................................$50.6 million

26         n.  Number of resident travelers who come to and go

27  through Florida...................................13.6 million

28         o.  Impact that travelers in Florida have on the

29  state's overall economy through rental car surcharge....$141.2

30  million

31         p.  Impact that travelers in Florida have on the

                                 136
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  state's overall economy through tourism-related employment

 2  .......................................................835,156

 3         q.  Impact that travelers in Florida have on the

 4  state's overall economy through taxable sales....$48.3 billion

 5         r.  Impact that travelers in Florida have on the

 6  state's overall economy through local option tax..$320 million

 7         s.  Growth in private sector contributions to VISIT

 8  FLORIDA................................................... $34

 9  million

10         t.  Satisfaction of Visit Florida's Partners and

11  representative members of the tourism industry with the

12  efforts of Visit Florida to promote Florida tourism........75%

13         u.  Facilitate the creation of an inventory of the

14  sites identified by the state's tourism regions as

15  nature-based and heritage tourism sites and implement

16  procedures to maintain the inventory..........FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         v.  Implement s. 288.1224(13), F.S., including the

18  incorporation of nature-based and heritage tourism components

19  into the Four-Year Marketing Plan.............FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         w.  Value of new investment in the Florida space

21  business and programs (cumulative)................$230 million

22         x.  Number of launches...............................30

23         y.  Number of visitors to space-related tourism

24  facilities.........................................2.9 million

25         z.  Tax revenue generated by space-related tourism

26  facilities..........................................$1,400,000

27         aa.  Number of direct full-time jobs facilitated as a

28  result of Enterprise Florida's recruitment, expansion, and

29  retention efforts in rural areas (2,000), in urban core areas

30  (2,000), in critical industries (10,000)................31,000

31         bb.  Documented export sales attributable to programs

                                 137
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  and activities....................................$275 million

 2         cc.  Total number of marketing leads generated through

 3  Enterprise Florida's comprehensive marketing programs: trade

 4  leads - 450, investment leads - 300........................750

 5         dd.  Satisfaction of economic development practitioners

 6  and other appropriate entities with efforts of Enterprise

 7  Florida in providing economic development leadership in the

 8  full range of services required for state and local economic

 9  growth, including critical industries and workforce

10  development................................................75%

11         ee.  Satisfaction of economic development practitioners

12  and other appropriate entities with efforts of EFI in

13  marketing the state, including marketing rural communities and

14  distressed urban communities, as a pro-business location for

15  potential new investment...................................75%

16         ff.  Percent of supplemental fund requests from

17  Regional Workforce Boards acted upon in a timely fashion for

18  requests less than or equal to established fund threshold

19  acted upon within 14 days of receipt of approvable

20  documentation, and for requests greater than the established

21  fund threshold within 90 days........................100%/100%

22         gg.  Number and percent of agency policies to be

23  reviewed, recommendations made, and actions taken to implement

24  recommendations........................................202/70%

25         hh.  Number and percent of on-site regional workforce

26  development board reviews completed in accordance with an

27  established schedule by June 30, 2000..................24/100%

28         ii.  For regions out of compliance, the percent of

29  reviews where board staff issued the report of deficiencies

30  and provided recommendations for corrective action within 14

31  days after exit...........................................100%

                                 138
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         jj.  Number and percent of individuals completing high

 2  skill/high wage programs found employed at an average hourly

 3  wage equal to or higher than $9/ahw for the last completed

 4  reporting period....................................49,500/50%

 5         kk.  Number and percent of WIA statewide standards met

 6  or exceeded...................................... 12 of 17/70%

 7         ll.  Number and percent of WIA regional standards met

 8  or exceeded................................................300

 9  of 408/73.5%

10         mm.  Percent of customers who found the State Board

11  fulfilling its oversight and coordinating responsibilities

12  determined through the use of a customer survey............75%

13         nn.  QRT Employee Retention Rates and Earnings in

14  quarter following completion of training....70% at $9 or above

15         oo.  QRT Employee satisfaction rates (per survey)...75%

16         pp.  IWT Employee Retention Rates and Earnings in

17  quarter following completion of training....70% at $9 or above

18         qq.  IWT Employer satisfaction rates (per survey)...75%

19         3.  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS OUTPUT

20  MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of missions/events coordinated/participated

22  in to develop business opportunities for Black Business

23  Investment Board.............................................4

24         b.  Number of Black Business Investment Boards created

25  or supported.................................................8

26         c.  Private dollars leveraged by Black Business

27  Investment Board................................. $1.6 million

28         d.  Number of Businesses provided Technical Assistance

29  through Statewide BBIC.....................................200

30         e.  Number/amount of major and regional sports event

31  grants awarded.....................................30/$700,000

                                 139
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         f.  Number of publications produced and distributed by

 2  the Florida Sports Foundation........................5/574,000

 3         g.  Number of statewide promotions conducted/supported

 4  by the Florida Sports Foundation.............................6

 5         h.  Number of national promotions conducted/supported

 6  by the Florida Sports Foundation.............................1

 7         i.  Number of trade/consumer shows facilitated or

 8  conducted by the Florida Sports Foundation..................10

 9         j.  Number of athletes competing in Florida's Senior

10  State Games Championship......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         k.  Number of athletes competing in Florida's Sunshine

12  State Spring Games Championship...............FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         l.  Number of amateur athletic sports leaders workshops

14  and seminars conducted........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

15         m.  Quality and effectiveness of paid advertising

16  messages reaching the target audience: impressions.550 million

17         n.  Number contacting VISIT FLORIDA in response to

18  advertising............................................620,146

19         o.  Value and number of consumer promotions facilitated

20  by VISIT FLORIDA...............................$13 million/155

21         p.  Number of leads and visitor inquiries generated by

22  the FTIMC events and media placements................1,229,780

23         q.  Number of private-sector partners.............3,462

24         r.  Level of private-sector partner financial

25  contribution through direct financial investment..$2.2 million

26         s.  Level of private-sector partner financial

27  contribution through strategic alliance program...$1.3 million

28         t.  Number of students in Spaceport Florida Authority

29  (SFA) sponsored space-related classroom or research at

30  accredited institutions of higher education................400

31         u.  Equity in SFA industrial/research facilities....$65

                                 140
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  million

 2         v.  Presentations to industry and governmental decision

 3  makers......................................................35

 4         w.  Equity in SFA space-related tourist facilities..$25

 5  million

 6         x.  Number of trade events...........................32

 7         y.  Number of companies assisted by Enterprise Florida

 8  in the area of international trade.......................2,660

 9         z.  Number of active recruitment, expansion, and

10  retention projects worked during the year..................295

11         aa.  Number of leads and projects referred to local

12  Economic Development Organizations.........................120

13         bb.  Number of successful incentive projects worked

14  with local Economic Development Organizations...............60

15         cc.  Number of times Enterprise Florida's information

16  services are accessed by local Economic Development

17  Organizations..............................................800

18         dd.  Market space and defense businesses as measured by

19  the number of leads generated...............................75

20         ee.  Rural and urban core businesses provided

21  assistance.................................................225

22         ff.  Total number of Quick Response Training new

23  full-time, high skill/high wage jobs created.............4,500

24         gg.  Number of Quick Response Training new full-time,

25  high skill/high wage jobs created in rural areas...........300

26         hh.  Number of Quick Response Training new full-time,

27  high skill/high wage jobs created in urban core areas......300

28         ii.  Number of Quick Response Training new full-time,

29  high skill/high wage jobs created in critical industries.2,700

30         jj.  QRT Ratio of private funds match to state funds..3

31  to 1

                                 141
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         kk.  Total number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot

 2  Project (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent

 3  worker training..........................................1,000

 4         ll.  Number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot Project

 5  (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent worker

 6  training in rural areas....................................100

 7         mm.  Number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot Project

 8  (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent worker

 9  training in urban core areas...............................200

10         nn.  Number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot Project

11  (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent worker

12  training in critical industries............................250

13         oo.  IWT Ratio of private funds match to federal WIA

14  funds...................................................2 to 1

15         (5)  DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES.--

16         (a)  For the Executive Director and Division of

17  Administrative Services, the outcome measures, output

18  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

19  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2089-2099 are as

20  follows:

21         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Administration and support costs/positions as a

23  percent of total agency costs and positions........5.02%/7.43%

24         b.  Cost per square foot spent on operational

25  maintenance of agency facilities.........................$4.76

26         (b)  For the Highway Patrol Program, the outcome

27  measures, output measures, and associated performance

28  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

29  Appropriations 2100-2123 are as follows:

30         1.  HIGHWAY SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31         a.  Florida death rate on patrolled highways per 100

                                 142
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  million vehicle miles of travel (For Information Only).....1.9

 2         b.  National average death rate on highways per 100

 3  million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7

 4         c.  Florida death rate on all roads per 100 million

 5  vehicle miles of travel....................................1.9

 6         d.  National average death rate on all roads per 100

 7  million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7

 8         e.  Alcohol-related death rate per 100 million vehicle

 9  miles of travel...........................................0.64

10         f.  Number of crashes investigated by FHP.......186,978

11         g.  Percent change in number of crashes investigated by

12  FHP........................................................+1%

13         h.  Annual crash rate per 100 million vehicle miles of

14  travel on all Florida roads................................177

15         2.  HIGHWAY SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Actual average response time (minutes) to calls for

17  crashes or assistance....................................26.00

18         b.  Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

19  on preventive patrol.................................1,014,491

20         c.  Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

21  on preventive patrol.......................................42%

22         d.  Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

23  on crash investigation.................................338,826

24         e.  Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

25  on crash investigation.....................................14%

26         f.  Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (long

27  form).....................................................2.17

28         g.  Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (short

29  form).....................................................1.35

30         h.  Average time (hours) to investigate crashes

31  (nonreportable)...........................................0.65

                                 143
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         i.  Duty hours spent on law enforcement officer

 2  assistance to motorist.................................102,387

 3         j.  Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

 4  on motorist assistance......................................5%

 5         k.  Number of motorists assisted by law enforcement

 6  officers...............................................299,924

 7         3.  CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS OUTCOME

 8  MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Percent of closed criminal investigation cases

10  which are resolved.........................................66%

11         4.  CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS OUTPUT

12  MEASURES.--

13         a.  Average time (hours) spent per criminal

14  investigation cases closed..............................37,901

15         b.  Actual number of criminal cases closed........1,233

16         c.  Average time (hours) spent per professional

17  compliance investigation cases closed....................7,884

18         d.  Actual number of professional compliance

19  investigation cases closed.................................122

20         e.  Number of hours spent on traffic homicide

21  investigations.........................................133,105

22         f.  Number of cases resolved as result of traffic

23  homicide investigations..................................1,647

24         g.  Average time (hours) spent per traffic homicide

25  investigation............................................80.82

26         h.  Percent of recruits retained by FHP for 3 years

27  after the completion of training...........................88%

28         i.  Number of hours spent on investigations......63,350

29         5.  PUBLIC INFORMATION AND SAFETY EDUCATION OUTCOME

30  MEASURES.--

31         a.  Percent increase in seat belt use................1%

                                 144
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  State seat belt compliance rate...............60.7%

 2         c.  National average seat belt compliance rate (for

 3  comparison)................................................68%

 4         6.  PUBLIC INFORMATION AND SAFETY EDUCATION OUTPUT

 5  MEASURES.--

 6         a.  Number of public traffic safety presentations made

 7  .........................................................1,563

 8         b.  Persons in attendance at public traffic safety

 9  presentations...........................................83,475

10         c.  Average size of audience per presentation........53

11         d.  Number of training courses offered to FHP recruits

12  and personnel...............................................41

13         e.  Number of students successfully completing training

14  courses....................................................967

15         7.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

16  MEASURE.--

17         a.  Program administration and support costs/positions

18  as a percent of total program costs and positions.....1.29%/1%

19         (c)  For the Licenses, Titles, and Regulations Program,

20  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

21  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

22  Specific Appropriations 2124-2175 are as follows:

23         1.  MOTOR VEHICLES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

24         a.  Percent of motor vehicle titles issued without

25  error......................................................98%

26         b.  Number of fraudulent motor vehicle titles

27  identified and submitted to law enforcement................930

28         c.  Percent change in number of fraudulent motor

29  vehicle titles identified and submitted to law enforcement..3%

30         d.  Ratio of warranty complaints to new mobile homes

31  titled....................................................1:61

                                 145
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         e.  Percent reduction in pollution tonnage per day in

 2  the six applicable (air quality) counties...............15.50%

 3         f.  Ratio of taxes collected from international

 4  registration plans (IRP) and international fuel tax agreements

 5  (IFTA) audits to cost of audits.......................$1.85/$1

 6         2.  MOTOR VEHICLES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of motor vehicle and mobile homes

 8  registrations issued................................13,923,922

 9         b.  Number of motor vehicle and mobile home titles

10  issued...............................................4,700,000

11         c.  Average cost to issue a motor vehicle title...$2.05

12         d.  Average number of days to issue a motor vehicle

13  title......................................................3.4

14         e.  Number of vessel registrations issued.......863,501

15         f.  Number of vessel titles issued..............224,171

16         g.  Average cost to issue a vessel title..........$5.08

17         h.  Number of motor carriers audited per auditor, with

18  number of auditors shown.................................22/14

19         3.  DRIVER'S LICENSES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

20         a.  Percent of customers waiting 15 minutes or less for

21  driver license service.....................................82%

22         b.  Percent of customers waiting 30 minutes or more for

23  driver license service.....................................11%

24         c.  Percent of DUI course graduates who do not

25  recidivate within 3 years after graduation.................86%

26         d.  Average number of corrections per 1,000 driver

27  records maintained.........................................4.0

28         e.  Percent of motorists complying with financial

29  responsibility.............................................83%

30         f.  Number of driver's licenses/identification cards

31  suspended, cancelled and invalidated as a result of fraudulent

                                 146
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  activity, with annual percent change shown............2,178/1%

 2         4.  DRIVER'S LICENSES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 3         a.  Number of driver's licenses issued........4,188,819

 4         b.  Number of identification cards issued.......821,349

 5         c.  Number of written driver's license examinations

 6  conducted............................................2,213,001

 7         d.  Number of road tests conducted..............525,855

 8         5.  KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Percent of customers who rate services as

10  satisfactory or better as measured by survey...............80%

11         6.  KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTPUT MEASURE.--

12         a.  Number of service programs maintained.........3,310

13         (6)  DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE.--

14         (a)  For the Office of the Treasurer and Division of

15  Administration Program the outcome measures, output measures,

16  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

17  provided in Specific Appropriations 2176-2194 are as follows:

18         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

19  MEASURE.--

20         a.  Administrative costs expressed as a percent of

21  total program costs...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         2.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

23  MEASURES.--

24         a.  Number of cabinet issues handled..............2,242

25         b.  Number of issues handled by Insurance Consumer

26  Advocate...................................................500

27         3.  LEGAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

28         a.  Percent of suspected code violations referred to

29  Legal Services resulting in discipline or corrective action

30  ...........................................................92%

31         4.  LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

                                 147
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Number of assignments handled by Legal Services

 2  .........................................................4,569

 3         5.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 4         a.  Minimum percent of scheduled services and service

 5  requests completed in a timely manner......................80%

 6         6.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 7         a.  Number of scheduled hours of technical resources

 8  available per position...................................2,900

 9         (b)  For the Division of Treasury Program the outcome

10  measures, output measures, and associated performance

11  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

12  Appropriations 2195-2204 are as follows:

13         1.  DEPOSIT SECURITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

14         a.  Maximum administrative unit cost per $100,000 of

15  securities placed for deposit security services purposes...$25

16         2.  DEPOSIT SECURITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of analysis performed on the financial

18  condition of qualified public depositories and custodians, and

19  securities held for deposit..............................3,880

20         b.  Number of account actions taken on trust deposit

21  and collateral accounts.................................34,545

22         3.  STATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT OUTCOME

23  MEASURES.--

24         a.  Ratio of net rates of return to established

25  national benchmarks for:

26         (I)  Internal liquidity investments................1.05

27         (II)  Internal bridge investments..................1.03

28         (III)  External investment program bridge portfolio

29  ..........................................................1.01

30         (IV)  Medium term portfolio........................1.02

31         (V)  Investment grade convertible bonds....FY 2001-2002

                                 148
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  LBR

 2         4.  STATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT OUTPUT

 3  MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Number of cash management consultation services..30

 5         b.  Number of financial management/accounting

 6  transactions processed and reports produced.........10,200,093

 7         5.  SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 8         a.  Minimum percent of state employees (excluding OPS)

 9  participating in the State Supplemental Retirement Plan

10  (Deferred Compensation)....................................24%

11         6.  SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of participant account actions processed by

13  the state deferred compensation office..................89,268

14         b.  Number of educational materials distributed by the

15  state deferred compensation office............FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         (c)  For the Fire Marshal Program, the outcome

17  measures, output measures, and associated performance

18  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

19  Appropriations 2205-2217D are as follows:

20         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of fire related deaths occurring in state

22  owned and leased properties required to be inspected.........0

23         b.  Percent of mandated regulatory inspections

24  completed.................................................100%

25         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of recurring inspections completed of fire

27  code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........7,200

28         b.  Number of high hazard inspections completed of fire

29  code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........6,536

30         c.  Number of construction inspections completed of

31  fire code compliance in state owned/leased buildings.......875

                                 149
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         d.  Percent of fire code inspections completed within

 2  statutory defined timeframe...............................100%

 3         e.  Percent of fire code plans reviews completed within

 4  statutory defined timeframe...............................100%

 5         f.  Number of boilers inspected by department

 6  inspectors...............................................5,500

 7         g.  Number of regulatory inspections completed......481

 8         3.  FIRE AND ARSON INVESTIGATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Percent of closed fire investigations successfully

10  concluded, including by cause determined, suspect identified

11  and/or arrested, or other reasons..........................85%

12         b.  Percent of closed arson investigations for which an

13  arrest was made Florida/National.........................29/18

14         4.  FIRE AND ARSON INVESTIGATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Total number of fire investigations opened....9,458

16         b.  Total number of fire investigations closed....6,242

17         5.  PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND STANDARDS OUTCOME

18  MEASURES.--

19         a.  Percent of challenges to examination results and

20  eligibility determination compared to those eligible to

21  challenge..................................................<1%

22         b.  Number/percent of students who rate training they

23  received at the Florida State Fire College as improving their

24  ability to perform assigned duties...................3,500/95%

25         c.  Percent of above satisfactory ratings by

26  supervisors of students' job performance from post-class

27  evaluations of skills gained through training at the Florida

28  State Fire College.........................................85%

29         6.  PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND STANDARDS OUTPUT

30  MEASURES.--

31         a.  Number of classes conducted by the Florida State

                                 150
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Fire College...............................................210

 2         b.  Number of students trained and classroom contact

 3  hours provided by the Florida State Fire College.4,200/220,000

 4         c.  Number/percent of customer requests for

 5  certification testing completed within defined timeframes

 6  .....................................................4,000/90%

 7         d.  Number of certified training centers inspected...29

 8         e.  Number of examinations administered...........4,400

 9         (d)  For the State Property and Casualty Claims

10  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

11  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

12  Specific Appropriations 2218-2224 are as follows:

13         1.  RISK REDUCTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of workers' compensation claims requiring

15  some payment per 100 FTE employees.........................5.7

16         b.  Number and percent of responses indicating the risk

17  services training they received was useful in developing and

18  implementing risk management plans in their agencies....80/90%

19         c.  Average cost of tort liability claims paid...$3,599

20         d.  Average cost of Federal Civil Rights liability

21  claims paid............................................$13,046

22         e.  Average cost of workers' compensation claims.$3,250

23         f.  Average cost of property claims paid.........$3,497

24         g.  Number/percent of liability claims closed in

25  relation to liability claims worked during the fiscal year

26  .....................................................4,226/51%

27         2.  RISK REDUCTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

28         a.  Risk services training and consultation as measured

29  by the number of training units (1 unit=8 hrs.) provided and

30  consultation contracts made................................265

31         3.  STATE SELF-INSURED CLAIMS ADJUSTMENTS OUTCOME

                                 151
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Percent of indemnity and medical payments made in a

 3  timely manner in compliance with DLES Security Rule

 4  38F-24.021, F.A.C..........................................95%

 5         b.  State employees' workers' compensation benefit cost

 6  rate, as defined by indemnity and medical benefits, per $100

 7  of state employees' payroll as compared to prior years..<$1.16

 8         c.  Percent of lawsuits, generated from a liability

 9  claim, evaluated with SEFES codes entered within prescribed

10  timeframes.................................................92%

11         d.  Number/percent of trainees who indicated the

12  training they received was useful in performing required

13  property program processes.............................123/95%

14         e.  Average operational cost of a claim worked..$140.28

15         4.  STATE SELF-INSURED CLAIMS ADJUSTMENTS OUTPUT

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of workers' compensation claims worked

18  ........................................................28,500

19         b.  Number of workers' compensation claims litigated

20  ...........................................................780

21         c.  Number of liability claims worked.............8,784

22         d.  Number of training units (1 unit=8 hrs.) provided

23  by the property program.....................................40

24         e.  Number of state property loss/damage claims worked

25  ...........................................................522

26         (e)  For the Insurance Regulation and Consumer

27  Protection Program the outcome measures, output measures, and

28  associated performance standards with respect to funds

29  provided in Specific Appropriations 2225-2247 are as follows:

30         1.  INSURANCE COMPANY LICENSURE AND OVERSIGHT OUTCOME

31  MEASURES.--

                                 152
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Percent of total premium of major lines

 2  (homeowner's, automobile, worker's compensation) written

 3  through the residual market..............................3.13%

 4         b.  Maximum number of insurance companies entering

 5  rehabilitation or liquidation during the year.FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         2.  INSURANCE COMPANY LICENSURE AND OVERSIGHT OUTPUT

 7  MEASURES.--

 8         a.  Current number of licensed insurance entities.3,420

 9         b.  Number of market conduct examinations completed.265

10         c.  Number of financial reviews and examinations

11  completed...............................................12,620

12         d.  Number of rate and form reviews completed....22,100

13         e.  Total number of insurance companies in

14  rehabilitation or liquidation during the year...............56

15         3.  INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE LICENSURE, SALES

16  APPOINTMENTS, AND OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

17         a.  Maximum percent of insurance representatives

18  requiring discipline or oversight..........................23%

19         4.  INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE LICENSURE, SALES

20  APPOINTMENTS, AND OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of applications for licensure processed

22  ........................................................71,222

23         b.  Number of appointment actions processed.....868,916

24         c.  Number of applicants and licensees required to

25  comply with education requirements.....................107,610

26         5.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Percent of arrests for insurance fraud resulting in

28  trial or nontrial conviction...............................82%

29         b.  Percent of investigative actions resulting in

30  administrative action against agents and agencies..........64%

31         6.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

                                 153
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Number of insurance fraud investigations completed

 2  .........................................................1,599

 3         b.  Number of agent and agency investigations completed

 4  .........................................................2,428

 5         7.  INSURANCE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Percent of service requests appropriately resolved

 7  ........................................................... FY

 8  2001-2002 LBR

 9         8.  INSURANCE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of consumer educational materials created

11  and distributed........................................223,664

12         b.  Number of telephone calls answered through the

13  consumer helpline......................................362,393

14         c.  Number of consumer requests and information

15  inquiries handled.......................................50,908

16         (7)  DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY.--

17         (a)  For the Workforce Assistance and Security Program,

18  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

19  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

20  Specific Appropriations 2248-2333 are as follows:

21         1.  WORKFORCE PLACEMENT AND ASSISTANCE OUTCOME

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Percent of injured workers returning to work at 80

24  percent or more of previous average (BRE) quarterly wage for

25  at least 1 quarter of the year following injury for accident 2

26  yrs prior................................................63.5%

27         b.  Percent of initial payments made on time by

28  insurance carriers.......................................91.8%

29         c.  Number of workers newly protected by workers'

30  compensation coverage per fiscal year as a result of

31  compliance efforts......................................14,015

                                 154
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         d.  Percent of investigated issues resolved by EAO..10%

 2         e.  Percent of noncomplying carriers in compliance upon

 3  reaudit....................................................78%

 4         f.  Percent of eligible workers receiving reemployment

 5  services sponsored by the division with closed cases during

 6  the fiscal year and returned to suitable work.FY 2001-2002 LBR

 7         g.  Average total cost per 4-year-old case......$17,597

 8         h.  Percent of lost time cases with no petition for

 9  benefits filed 18 months after the date of accident........77%

10         i.  Percent of compliance enforcement actions which

11  result in a successful outcome (payment in full of all

12  penalties assessed and compliance by the employer and/or

13  cessation of all business operations of the employer).......FY

14  2001-2002 LBR

15         j.  Percent of permanent total supplemental benefits

16  paid by the division to injured workers timely and accurately

17  ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

18         k.  Percent of timely held mediations (21 days)......FY

19  2001-2002 LBR

20         l.  Average days from petition filed to disposition

21  order...................................................... FY

22  2001-2002 LBR

23         m.  Cost per disposition order entered.FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         n.  Occupational injury and illness total case

25  incidence rate (per 100 workers)  (information only)......8.1%

26         o.  Percent change in total case incidence rate for

27  private sector job sites served............................-4%

28         p.  Percent change in total case incidence rate for

29  public sector job sites served.............................-4%

30         q.  Percent reduction in lost workday case incidence

31  rate for private sector job sites served...................-5%

                                 155
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         r.  Percent reduction in lost workday case incidence

 2  rate for public sector job sites served....................-5%

 3         s.  Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate

 4  for private employers served...............................-5%

 5         t.  Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate

 6  for public employers served................................-5%

 7         u.  Percent of employers surveyed who view services as

 8  adequately effective or above..............................90%

 9         v.  Percent of UC benefits paid timely..............90%

10         w.  Percent of UC benefits paid accurately..........95%

11         x.  Percent of UC appeal cases completed timely..87.01%

12         y.  Percent of new UC employer liability determinations

13  made timely.............................................84.20%

14         z.  Percent of current quarter UC taxes paid timely

15  .........................................................92.5%

16         aa.  Percent of job openings filled...............50.2%

17         bb.  Percent of individuals referred to jobs who are

18  placed.....................................................28%

19         cc.  Percent of food stamp clients employed.......11.8%

20         dd.  Percent increase in high skill/high wage

21  apprenticeship programs registered..........................5%

22         ee.  WIA adult & dislocated worker placement rate...78%

23         ff.  WIA youth positive outcome rate................80%

24         gg.  Rate and number of customers gainfully employed

25  (rehabilitated) at least 90 days (96-97 - at least 60 days)

26  .....................................................62%/9,500

27         hh.  Rate and number of VR severely disabled customers

28  gainfully employed (rehabilitated) at least 90 days (96-97 -

29  at least 60 days)....................................63%/3,800

30         ii.  Rate and number of VR most severely disabled

31  customers gainfully employed (rehabilitated) at least 90 days

                                 156
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  (96-97 - at least 60 days)...........................56%/4,275

 2         jj.  Rate and number of all other VR disabled customers

 3  gainfully employed (rehabilitated) at least 90 days (96-97 -

 4  at least 60 days)....................................75%/1,437

 5         kk.  Rate and number of VR customers placed in

 6  competitive employment.............................97.5%/9,262

 7         ll.  Rate and number of VR customers retained in

 8  employment after 1 year............................61.5%/5,200

 9         mm.  Average annual earnings of VR customers at

10  placement..............................................$13,633

11         nn.  Average annual earnings of VR customers after 1

12  year...................................................$14,384

13         oo.  Percent of case costs covered by third-party

14  payers.....................................................20%

15         pp.  Average cost of case life (to Division) for

16  severely disabled VR customers..........................$3,311

17         qq.  Average cost of case life (to Division) for most

18  severely disabled VR customers..........................$3,175

19         rr.  Average cost of case life (to Division) for all

20  other disabled VR customers...............................$450

21         ss.  Percent of unemployment compensation appeals

22  disposed within 45 days....................................50%

23         tt.  Percent of unemployment compensation appeals

24  disposed within 90 days....................................95%

25         uu.  Percent of cases appealed to DCA................7%

26         vv.  Average unit cost of cases appealed to

27  Unemployment Appeals Commission...........................$186

28         ww.  Average unit cost of cases appealed to DCA....$685

29         xx.  Percent of appealed decisions affirmed by the DCA

30  ...........................................................94%

31         2.  WORKFORCE PLACEMENT AND ASSISTANCE OUTPUT

                                 157
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Number of employer investigations conducted for

 3  compliance with workers' compensation law...............22,758

 4         b.  Number of applicants screened for reemployment

 5  services.................................................1,921

 6         c.  Number of carriers audited......................381

 7         d.  Number of investigated issues resolved by the

 8  Employee Assistance Office..............................25,000

 9         e.  Number of private-sector employers (and job sites)

10  provided OHSA 7(c)1 consultation services..................549

11         f.  Number of public-sector employers (and job sites)

12  provided consultation services...........................3,000

13         g.  Number of private-sector employers receiving

14  training and other technical services..............2,300/6,700

15         h.  Number of public-sector employers receiving

16  training and other technical services................330/5,600

17         i.  Number of UC claimant eligibility determinations

18  issued.................................................170,635

19         j.  Number of UC benefits weeks paid..........3,153,006

20         k.  Amount of UC benefits paid.............$683,477,111

21         l.  Number of appeal cases completed.............52,197

22         m.  Number of new UC employer liability determinations

23  made....................................................69,118

24         n.  Amount of UC taxes collected...........$651,471,000

25         o.  Number of UC employer tax/wage reports processed

26  .....................................................1,609,450

27         p.  Number individuals referred to job openings listed

28  with J&B...............................................540,000

29         q.  Number individuals placed by J&B............137,700

30         r.  Number individuals obtaining employment after

31  receiving specific J&B services.........................35,700

                                 158
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         s.  Cost per placement by J&B......................$230

 2         t.  Cost per individual placed or obtained employment

 3  ..........................................................$176

 4         u.  Number of food stamp recipients employed.....14,800

 5         v.  Cost per food stamp placement..................$302

 6         w.  Number Apprenticeship Program requests meeting high

 7  skill/high wage requirements...............................166

 8         x.  Number apprentices successfully completing terms of

 9  training as set by registered industry standards.........2,900

10         y.  Number WIA Adult Program completers...........8,600

11         z.  Number WIA Youth Program completers...........6,000

12         aa.  Employers in compliance or brought into compliance

13  with labor laws as a percent of total employers monitored..85%

14         bb.  Employers monitored for compliance with child

15  labor and migrant farmworker labor laws..................3,290

16         cc.  Number of customers reviewed for eligibility

17  ........................................................26,000

18         dd.  Number of individualized written plans for

19  services................................................19,750

20         ee.  Number of customers served..................72,000

21         ff.  Percent of eligibility determinations completed in

22  compliance with federal law................................85%

23         gg.  Customer caseload per counseling/case management

24  team member................................................161

25         hh.  Number of unemployment compensation appeals

26  disposed of..............................................9,000

27         3.  BLIND SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  Rate and number of rehabilitation customers

29  gainfully employed at least 90 days..................68.3%/847

30         b.  Rate and number of rehabilitation customers placed

31  in competitive employment............................64.3%/654

                                 159
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         c.  Projected average annual earnings of rehabilitation

 2  customers at placement.................................$13,500

 3         d.  Rate and number of successfully rehabilitated older

 4  persons, nonvocational rehabilitation..............55.2%/1,355

 5         e.  Ratio and number of customers (children)

 6  successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from pre-school to

 7  school................................................67.3%/36

 8         f.  Ratio and number of customers (children)

 9  successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from school to work

10  ......................................................26.5%/38

11         g.  Percent of eligible library customers served..19.8%

12         h.  Percent of library customers satisfied with the

13  timeliness of services...................................98.6%

14         i.  Percent of library customers satisfied with the

15  selection of reading materials available...................96%

16         4.  BLIND SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of written plans for services..........1,425

18         b.  Number of books available per library customer

19  .........................................................51.14

20         c.  Number of books loaned per library customer...12.39

21         d.  Number of periodicals loaned per library customer

22  ..........................................................3.62

23         e.  Net increase in registered customers for library

24  services...................................................822

25         f.  Cost per library customer....................$19.65

26         g.  Total number of food service managers...........162

27         h.  Number of existing food services facilities

28  renovated...................................................10

29         i.  Number of new food service facilities constructed.5

30         j.  Number of customers reviewed for eligibility..2,035

31         k.  Number of customers served...................13,100

                                 160
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         l.  Average time lapse between application and

 2  eligibility determination for rehabilitation customers......69

 3         m.  Customer caseload per counseling/case management

 4  team member................................................114

 5         5.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

 6  MEASURE.--

 7         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

 8  cost......................................................7.9%

 9         6.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Percent of data processing requests completed by

11  due date...................................................95%

12         b.  System design and programming hourly cost.......$52

13         c.  Percent of scheduled production jobs completed

14  .........................................................99.9%

15         d.  Percent of scheduled hours available data center

16  operations..............................................99.79%

17         e.  Cost per MIP (millions of instructions per second)

18  .......................................................$19,000

19         f.  Percent of Help Desk calls resolved within 3

20  working days............................................89.48%

21         g.  Cost per Help Desk call..........................$8

22         h.  Percent of scheduled hours available network.99.08%

23         i.  Cost for support per network device............$195

24         7.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Number of data processing requests completed by due

26  date.....................................................2,900

27         b.  Number of scheduled production jobs completed

28  .......................................................517,000

29         c.  Number of hours available data center operations

30  .........................................................2,876

31         d.  Number of Help Desk calls resolved within 3 working

                                 161
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  days....................................................18,175

 2         e.  Number of hours available network.............2,855

 3         (8)  DEPARTMENT OF THE LOTTERY.--

 4         (a)  For the Sale of Lottery Products Program, the

 5  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 6  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 7  Appropriations 2353-2366 are as follows:

 8         1.  SALE OF LOTTERY PRODUCTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Total revenue in dollars..................$2,287.3M

10         b.  Percent change in total revenue dollars from prior

11  year.....................................................2.87%

12         c.  Transfers to the state Educational Enhancement

13  Trust Fund.............................................$869.1M

14         d.  Percent of total revenue to the Educational

15  Enhancement Trust Fund.....................................38%

16         2.  SALE OF LOTTERY PRODUCTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of total revenue paid as prizes......49.64%

18         b.  Administrative expense paid for retailer commission

19  ......................................................$129.41M

20         c.  Operating expense (includes retailer commission)

21  .......................................................$282.7M

22         d.  Operating expense as percent of total revenue...12%

23         e.  Percent of respondents who are aware of the

24  Lottery's contribution to education........................65%

25         f.  Provide executive direction and support services

26  for all lottery operations as measured by percent of total

27  agency budget...............................................9%

28         (9)  DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES.--

29         (a)  For the Administration Program, the outcome

30  measures, output measures, and associated performance

31  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

                                 162
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Appropriations 2367-2378 are as follows:

 2         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

 3  MEASURE.--

 4         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

 5  costs....................................................2.62%

 6         2.  STATE TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 7         a.  Number of state entities served..................73

 8         3.  STATE EMPLOYEE LEASING OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Number of employees in the State Employee Leasing

10  service.....................................................19

11         (b)  For the SMART Schools Clearinghouse Program, the

12  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

13  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

14  Appropriations 2379-2384 are as follows:

15         1.  SMART SCHOOLS CLEARINGHOUSE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

16         a.  Number of schools receiving SMART awards.........25

17         (c)  For the Facilities Program, the outcome measures,

18  output measures, and associated performance standards with

19  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2385-2401

20  are as follows:

21         1.  FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Average DMS full service rent - composite cost per

23  net square foot (actual)................................$15.39

24         b.  Average private sector full service rent -

25  composite cost per net square foot in counties where DMS has

26  office facilities (for comparison)......................$16.95

27         c.  DMS average operations and maintenance cost per

28  square foot maintained...................................$5.20

29         d.  Private industry average operations and maintenance

30  cost per square foot maintained..........................$6.74

31         2.  FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

                                 163
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Net square feet of state-owned office space

 2  occupied by state agencies including non-DMS owned facilities

 3  .....................................................7,840,079

 4         b.  Net square feet of private office space occupied by

 5  state agencies......................................10,713,751

 6         c.  Number of maintained square feet (private contract

 7  and agency)..........................................7,412,150

 8         3.  BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Gross square foot construction cost of office

10  facilities for DMS......................................$84.94

11         b.  Gross square foot construction cost of office

12  facilities for private industry average (for comparison)

13  ........................................................$91.73

14         4.  BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

15         a.  Dollar volume of Fixed Capital Outlay project

16  starts managed....................................$280,000,000

17         5.  CAPITOL POLICE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Number of criminal incidents per 1,000 employees

19  .........................................................28.75

20         6.  CAPITOL POLICE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Total number of criminal incidents reported...5,686

22         b.  Total number of noncriminal calls for service

23  ........................................................32,000

24         c.  Number of patrol hours on-site at state facilities

25  ........................................................72,800

26         (d)  For the Support Program, the outcome measures,

27  output measures, and associated performance standards with

28  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2408-2425

29  are as follows:

30         1.  AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31         a.  Passenger load factor for DMS...................3.5

                                 164
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         b.  Cost per flight hour - DMS aircraft pool.....$1,200

 2         c.  Average percent DMS direct cost per flight hour

 3  below industry direct cost.................................32%

 4         2.  AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 5         a.  Number of flights by executive aircraft pool..1,500

 6         3.  FEDERAL PROPERTY ASSISTANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 7         a.  Federal property distribution rate..............85%

 8         4.  FEDERAL PROPERTY ASSISTANCE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 9         a.  Number of federal property orders processed...2,150

10         5.  MOTOR VEHICLE AND WATERCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTCOME

11  MEASURES.--

12         a.  Average percent below private sector fleet

13  maintenance - labor costs..................................10%

14         b.  Average percent below private sector fleet

15  maintenance - parts costs..................................26%

16         c.  Average percent state rental vehicles below state

17  rental contract rates......................................30%

18         6.  MOTOR VEHICLE AND WATERCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTPUT

19  MEASURE.--

20         a.  Miles of state rental vehicle service provided

21  .....................................................1,900,000

22         7.  PURCHASING OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Percent of state term contracts savings.........39%

24         8.  PURCHASING OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

25         a.  Number of contracts and agreements executed...1,103

26         9.  MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

27         a.  Average number of days to process minority

28  certification...............................................10

29         10.  MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

30         a.  Number of certified minority businesses.......5,600

31         (e)  For the Workforce Program, the outcome measures,

                                 165
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  output measures, and associated performance standards with

 2  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2426-2450

 3  are as follows:

 4         1.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Total program cost per authorized positions in the

 6  state personnel system..................................$78.76

 7         b.  Overall customer satisfaction rating............75%

 8         c.  Percent of agencies at or above EEO gender parity

 9  with available labor market..............................86.7%

10         d.  Percent of agencies at or above EEO minority parity

11  with available labor market................................70%

12         2.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

13         a.  Number of authorized positions supported by the

14  Cooperative Personnel Employment Subsystem (COPES).....125,600

15         3.  INSURANCE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of vendors meeting all contractual

18  performance provisions.....................................95%

19         b.  Administrative cost per enrollee............$230.06

20         4.  INSURANCE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of subscribers or contracts..........480,591

22         5.  RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME

23  MEASURES.--

24         a.  Percent of customers satisfied with retirement

25  information.............................................92.78%

26         b.  Percent of agency payroll transactions correctly

27  reported...................................................90%

28         c.  Percent of customers satisfied with retirement

29  services................................................92.53%

30         d.  Administrative cost per active and retired member

31  (excluding RIM project).................................$20.39

                                 166
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         e.  Percent of local retirement systems annually

 2  reviewed which are funded on a sound actuarial basis.......95%

 3         6.  RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT

 4  MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Number of local pension plan valuations and impact

 6  statements reviewed........................................400

 7         b.  Number of FRS members.......................810,349

 8         (f)  For the Information Technology Program, the

 9  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

10  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

11  Appropriations 2451-2472 are as follows:

12         1.  TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for

14  local access...............................................40%

15         b.  Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for

16  long distance..............................................40%

17         c.  Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for

18  data service...............................................25%

19         d.  Overall customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5)

20  ..........................................................3.79

21         2.  TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Total revenue for voice service.........$80,185,085

23         b.  Total revenue for data service..........$50,814,915

24         3.  WIRELESS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

25         a.  Percent wireless discount from commercially

26  available and similar type engineering services............35%

27         4.  WIRELESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

28         a.  Overall customer satisfaction ranking (scale of 1

29  to 5).....................................................4.15

30         b.  Number of engineering projects and approvals

31  handled for state and local governments....................616

                                 167
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         c.  Number of square miles covered by Joint Task Force

 2  Radio System............................................57,727

 3         5.  INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 4         a.  Overall customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5)

 5  ..........................................................3.94

 6         6.  INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

 7         a.  Number of ITP research, development, and consulting

 8  projects completed.........................................436

 9         (10)  DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS.--

10         (a)  For the Readiness and Response Program, the

11  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided to Specific

13  Appropriations 2488A-2507D are as follows:

14         1.  DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

15         a.  Percent of Law Enforcement officers trained that

16  rate the training as relevant and valuable...............87.5%

17         2.  DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

18         a.  Interagency counter-drug assistance provided as

19  measured by the number of man-days devoted to counter-drug

20  tasks...................................................61,950

21         b.  Presentations provided to improve drug awareness

22  among high school students..............................22,249

23         c.  Community anti-drug coalitions sponsored.........18

24         d.  Number of law enforcement personnel trained.....400

25         e.  Number of man-days devoted to providing

26  counter-drug training to law enforcement agents........125,000

27         3.  READINESS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

28         a.  Percent of authorized filled positions..........95%

29         4.  READINESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

30         a.  Number/percent of armories rated adequate....36/62%

31         b.  Percent of satisfaction with training facilities at

                                 168
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Camp Blanding..............................................82%

 2         c.  Number of annual training days at Camp Blanding

 3  .......................................................180,000

 4         d.  Number of new recruits using State Education

 5  Assistance Program.......................................1,300

 6         e.  Number of crisis response exercises conducted

 7  annually.....................................................4

 8         f.  Number of soldiers in the Florida National Guard

 9  recruited and retained..................................11,599

10         g.  Number of armories under maintenance and repair..55

11         h.  Number of people using the Camp Blanding training

12  area...................................................233,587

13         4.  RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

14         a.  Percent of supported agencies reporting

15  satisfaction with the department's support for specific

16  missions...................................................90%

17         5.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

18  MEASURE.--

19         a.  Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed

20  as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         6.  FEDERAL/STATE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS OUTCOME

22  MEASURE.--

23         a.  Number of Department of Defense contracts

24  administered in Florida.....................................21

25         (11)  PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.--

26         (a)  For the Utilities Regulation/Consumer Assistance

27  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

28  performance standards with respect to Specific Appropriations

29  2508-2515 are as follows:

30         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31         a.  Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida

                                 169
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  compared to average ROE in the USA:

 2         (I)  Electric:

 3         (A)  Florida.......................................+/-1

 4         (B)  USA..........................................12.20

 5         (II)  Gas:

 6         (A)  Florida.......................................+/-1

 7         (B)  USA..........................................11.60

 8         (III)  Water and wastewater:

 9         (A)  Florida.....................................+/-2.5

10         (B)  USA..........................................11.20

11         b.  Percent of utilities achieving within range, over

12  range, and under range of last authorized ROE:

13         (I)  Electric:

14         (A)  Within range..................................100%

15         (B)  Over range......................................0%

16         (II)  Gas:

17         (A)  Within range...................................25%

18         (B)  Over range......................................0%

19         (III)  Water and wastewater:

20         (A)  Within range....................................5%

21         (B)  Over range.....................................25%

22         c.  Limit in the percent increase in annual utility

23  bill for average residential usage compared to inflation as

24  measured by the Consumer Price Index within:

25         (I)  Electric (1,000 KWH)............................1%

26         (II)  Gas (30 Therms)................................1%

27         (III)  Water and wastewater (10,000 gal).............1%

28         d.  Percent of state access lines served by Alternative

29  Local Exchange Companies (ALECS)..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         e.  Percent of communications service variances per

31  inspection points examined:

                                 170
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (I)  Local exchange & alternate local exchange

 2  telephone companies........................................22%

 3         (II)  Interexchange.................................20%

 4         (III)  Pay telephone companies.......................4%

 5         f.  Percent of electric safety variances corrected on

 6  1st reinspection............................................3%

 7         g.  Percent of gas safety variances corrected on 1st

 8  reinspection...............................................25%

 9         h.  Consumer calls:

10         (I)  Percent of calls answered......................72%

11         (II)  Average waiting time.......................2 min.

12         i.  Percent of consumer complaints resolved:

13         (I)  Within 30 days.................................48%

14         (II)  Within 60 days................................62%

15         j.  Per capita annual KWH energy savings through

16  conservation programs..................................142 KWH

17         k.  Percent of combined conservation goals achieved by

18  7 FEECA utilities.........................................100%

19         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Proceedings, reviews, and audits examining rates,

21  rate structure, earnings, and expenditures:

22         (I)  Electric.......................................120

23         (II)  Gas...........................................110

24         (III)  Water and wastewater.........................873

25         b.  Number of proceedings establishing agreements

26  between local service providers............................687

27         c.  Number of proceedings granting certificates to

28  operate as a telecommunications company..................1,009

29         d.  Number of proceedings granting service authority,

30  resolving territorial disputes:

31         (I)  Electric.........................................3

                                 171
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (II)  Gas.............................................1

 2         (III)  Water and wastewater..........................71

 3         e.  Number of 10-year site plan reviews and need

 4  determinations for electric utilities.......................15

 5         f.  Number of consumer inquiries/complaints handled:

 6         (I)  Communications..............................17,356

 7         (II)  Electric....................................1,731

 8         (III)  Gas..........................................211

 9         (IV)  Water and wastewater..........................422

10         g.  Number of service evaluations/safety inspections

11  performed:

12         (I)  Communications (service evaluations).........9,100

13         (II)  Electric (safety inspections)...............3,670

14         (III)  Gas (safety inspections)......................77

15         h.  Number of enforcement proceedings relating to

16  service and safety:

17         (I)  Communications..................................58

18         (II)  Electric........................................0

19         (III)  Gas............................................0

20         i.  Number of conservation programs reviewed.........25

21         (12)  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.--

22         (a)  For the Administration Program, the outcome

23  measures, output measures, and associated performance

24  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

25  Appropriations 2516-2525 are as follows:

26         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

27  MEASURE.--

28         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

29  costs (excluding revenue sharing)........................5.79%

30         (b)  For the Property Tax Administration Program, the

31  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

                                 172
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 2  Appropriations 2526-2538 are as follows:

 3         1.  PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION OVERSIGHT OUTCOME

 4  MEASURES.--

 5         a.  Percent of refund and tax certificate applications

 6  processed within 30 days after receipt.....................95%

 7         b.  Number of refund requests per 100,000 parcels..31.6

 8         2.  PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION OVERSIGHT OUTPUT

 9  MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of property tax refund requests processed

11  .........................................................2,700

12         b.  Number of tax certificate cancellations/corrections

13  processed................................................2,000

14         3.  PROPERTY TAX ROLL OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Percent of classes studied found to have a level of

16  at least 90 percent......................................97.1%

17         b.  Taxroll uniformity - average for coefficient of

18  dispersion...............................................11.2%

19         4.  PROPERTY TAX ROLL OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of subclasses of property studied with

21  feedback to property appraisers..........................4,400

22         b.  Number of taxpayers audited on behalf of county

23  property appraisers (TPP)..................................260

24         c.  Number of county property tax rolls evaluated....67

25         5.  TRUTH-IN-MILLAGE COMPLIANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

26         a.  Percent of taxing authorities in total or

27  substantial truth-in-millage compliance on initial submission

28  .........................................................97.5%

29         6.  TRUTH-IN-MILLAGE COMPLIANCE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

30         a.  Number of TRIM compliance letters sent to taxing

31  authorities................................................605

                                 173
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (c)  For the Child-Support Enforcement Program, the

 2  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 3  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 4  Appropriations 2539-2561 are as follows:

 5         1.  CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT OUTCOME

 6  MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Percent of children with a court order for support

 8  ...........................................................52%

 9         b.  Percent of children with paternity established

10  .........................................................81.5%

11         2.  CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT OUTPUT

12  MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number of children with a newly established court

14  order...................................................60,000

15         b.  Number of cases prepared for judicial processing

16  .......................................................330,000

17         3.  CHILD-SUPPORT PAYMENTS DISTRIBUTION OUTCOME

18  MEASURES.--

19         a.  Total child-support dollars collected per $1 of

20  total expenditures.......................................$3.05

21         b.  Percent of State Disbursement Unit Collections

22  disbursed within 2 business days after receipt.............95%

23         4.  CHILD-SUPPORT PAYMENTS DISTRIBUTION OUTCOME

24  MEASURE.--

25         a.  Child-support collections distributed..$763 million

26         5.  CHILD-SUPPORT PAYMENTS COLLECTION OUTCOME

27  MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of cases with child support due in a month

29  which received a payment during the month..................54%

30         b.  Percent of child-support collected that was due

31  during the fiscal year.....................................57%

                                 174
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         (d)  For the General Tax Administration Program, the

 2  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 3  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 4  Appropriations 2562-2580 are as follows:

 5         1.  TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 6         a.  Average days from receipt of payment to final

 7  processing of deposit - sales, corporation, intangibles, fuel

 8  ..........................................................0.60

 9         b.  Number of days between initial distribution of

10  funds and final adjustments - sales, fuel...................60

11         c.  Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially

12  error free and on time.....................................76%

13         d.  Return on investment - total collections per dollar

14  spent..................................................$149.73

15         e.  Dollars collected as a percent of actual liability

16  of notices sent for apparent sales tax return filing errors or

17  late returns...............................................50%

18         f.  Average time, in days, between the processing of a

19  sales tax return and the first notification to the taxpayer of

20  an apparent filing error or late return.....................36

21         g.  Percent of delinquent sales tax return and filing

22  error or late return notices issued accurately to taxpayer.90%

23         h.  Percent of final audit assessment amounts collected

24  - tax only.................................................85%

25         i.  Final audit assessment amounts as a percent of

26  initial assessment amounts - tax only......................74%

27         j.  Dollars collected voluntarily as a percent of total

28  dollars collected..........................................97%

29         k.  Average number of days to resolve a dispute of an

30  audit assessment...........................................175

31         l.  Direct collections per enforcement related dollar

                                 175
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  spent....................................................$4.82

 2         2.  TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 3         a.  Number of delinquent tax return notices issued to

 4  taxpayers..............................................720,000

 5         b.  Number of notices sent to taxpayers for apparent

 6  tax return filing errors or late return................520,000

 7         c.  Number of tax returns processed...........8,330,000

 8         d.  Number of tax returns reconciled..........6,500,000

 9         e.  Number of identified potential liabilities resolved

10  .....................................................1,060,000

11         f.  Number of audits completed...................29,500

12         g.  Number of successful contacts with taxpayers.47,000

13         3.  TAX DISTRIBUTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

14         a.  Accuracy of initial revenue distributions to local

15  governments................................................93%

16         4.  TAX DISTRIBUTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

17         a.  Number of refund claims processed............64,000

18         (e)  For the Information Services Program, the outcome

19  measures, output measures, and associated performance

20  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

21  Appropriations 2581-2588 are as follows:

22         1.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Information program costs as a percent of total

24  agency costs.............................................4.18%

25         2.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Develop and maintain applications as measured by

27  completed work requests..................................1,100

28         b.  Number of computer operations by production

29  transaction/jobs executed...........................99,150,000

30         (13)  DEPARTMENT OF STATE.--

31         (a)  For the Secretary and Division of Administrative

                                 176
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  Services, the outcome measures, output measures, and

 2  associated performance standards with respect to funds

 3  provided in Specific Appropriations 2589-2596A are as follows:

 4         1.  ADVOCACY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS

 5  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 6         a.  Level of clients who indicate assistance is very

 7  responsive, as measured by survey..........................60%

 8         b.  Percent of overseas clients who indicate assistance

 9  is very responsive.........................................96%

10         c.  Percent of volunteer-consultants who would

11  volunteer again............................................97%

12         d.  Ratio of donated services and contributions as

13  compared to the amount of state funding..................1.5:1

14         2.  ADVOCACY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS

15  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of Trade/Cultural Missions.................3

17         b.  Number of Consular Corps Credentials issued......50

18         c.  Number of Sister Cities/Sister State Grants

19  approved....................................................20

20         d.  Number of Civil Law Notaries issued.............270

21         e.  Total number of notary applications processed per

22  year...................................................100,000

23         f.  Number of volunteer technical assistance missions

24  to Central America and the Caribbean........................96

25         g.  Number of international and domestic development

26  missions....................................................15

27         (b)  For the Elections Program, the outcome measures,

28  output measures, and associated performance standards with

29  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2597-2602

30  are as follows:

31         1.  ELECTION RECORDS, LAWS, AND CODES OUTCOME

                                 177
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Percent of campaign treasurer's reports detail

 3  information released on the Internet within 7 days.........94%

 4         b.  Percent survey respondents satisfied with services:

 5  Quality and Timeliness of Response.........................90%

 6         c.  Percent of training session/workshop attendees

 7  satisfied: Quality of content and Applicability of materials

 8  presented..................................................90%

 9         2.  ELECTION RECORDS, LAWS, AND CODES OUTPUT

10  MEASURES.--

11         a.  Number of campaign reports received/processed

12  ........................................................14,000

13         b.  Number of attendees at training, workshops, and

14  assistance events..........................................500

15         c.  Number of web hits..........................750,000

16         (c)  For the Historical Resources Program the outcome

17  measures, output measures, and associated performance

18  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

19  Appropriations 2603-2622B are as follows:

20         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

21  MEASURE.--

22         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total program

23  costs....................................................9.74%

24         2.  HISTORIC MUSEUMS CONSERVATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

25         a.  Percent of visitors who rank "quality of exhibits"

26  as excellent or good.......................................88%

27         3.  HISTORIC MUSEUMS CONSERVATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of museum exhibits........................84

29         b.  Number of visitors to state historic museums

30  educated about Florida history.........................233,046

31         c.  Educational opportunities provided to museum

                                 178
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  visitors.............................................3,600,000

 2         4.  HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESERVATION OUTCOME

 3  MEASURES.--

 4         a.  Total local funds leveraged by historical resources

 5  program.......................................... $105 million

 6         b.  Percent of customers satisfied with quality and

 7  timeliness of technical assistance provided................96%

 8         5.  HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESERVATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 9         a.  Number of grants awarded........................243

10         b.  Number of dollars awarded through grants

11  ...................................................$16,088,144

12         c.  Number of publications and multimedia products

13  available for the general public (historical and

14  archaeological items)......................................315

15         d.  Number of preservation services applications

16  reviewed.................................................8,000

17         e.  Number of attendees at produced and sponsored

18  events (historic and archaeological)..........FY 2001-2002 LBR

19         f.  Number of historic resources protected and

20  preserved................................................7,881

21         g.  Attendees educated at workshops on the preservation

22  of historic resources..................................163,975

23         6.  ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Number of historic and archaeological objects

25  maintained for public use and scientific research......150,000

26         7.  ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of sites in the Florida Master Site File

28  .......................................................133,000

29         b.  Number of historic and archaeological objects

30  maintained for public use..............................120,000

31         c.  Number of copies or viewings of publications,

                                 179
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  including web hits...................................1,750,000

 2         (d)  For the Commercial Recording and Registration

 3  Program the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

 4  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

 5  Specific Appropriations 2623-2625A are as follows:

 6         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

 7         a.  Percent client satisfaction with the division's

 8  services...................................................91%

 9         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

10         a.  Average Cost/Corporate Filing.................$5.38

11         b.  Average Cost/Uniform Commercial Code Filings..$1.81

12         c.  Average Cost/Inquiry.........................$0.075

13         d.  Proportion of total inquires handled by telephone

14  ...........................................................20%

15         e.  Proportion of total inquiries handled by

16  mail/walk-ins.............................................7.5%

17         f.  Proportion of total inquiries handled by electronic

18  means....................................................72.5%

19         (e)  For the Library and Information Services Program

20  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

21  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

22  Specific Appropriations 2626-2629B are as follows:

23         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

24         a.  Annual increase in the use of local public library

25  service.....................................................2%

26         b.  Annual increase in usage of research collections.6%

27         c.  Annual cost avoidance achieved by government

28  agencies through records storage/disposition/micrographics

29  ...................................................$58,000,000

30         d.  Customer Satisfaction with relevancy and timeliness

31  of research response.......................................90%

                                 180
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         e.  Customer Satisfaction with Records Management

 2  technical assistance, training, and Records Center Services

 3  ...........................................................90%

 4         f.  Customer Service with accuracy and timeliness of

 5  library consultant responses..................FY 2001-2002 LBR

 6         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

 7         a.  Number of items loaned by public libraries

 8  ....................................................71,361,232

 9         b.  Number of library customer visits........50,504,239

10         c.  Number of public library reference requests

11  ....................................................25,644,913

12         d.  Number of public library registered borrowers

13  .....................................................7,207,942

14         e.  Number of persons attending public library programs

15  .....................................................3,148,771

16         f.  Number of volumes in public library collections

17  ....................................................25,242,994

18         g.  Number of new users (State Library, State Archives)

19  .........................................................6,336

20         h.  Number of reference requests handled (State

21  Library, State Archives)...............................117,847

22         i.  Number of database searches conducted (State

23  Library, State Archives)...............................837,195

24         j.  Number of items loaned (State Library).......86,163

25         k.  Cubic feet of obsolete public records approved for

26  disposal...............................................510,000

27         l.  Cubic feet of noncurrent records stored at the

28  Records Center.........................................220,000

29         m.  Number of microfilm images created, processed,

30  and/or duplicated at the Records Center............160,000,000

31         (f)  For the Division of Cultural Affairs, the outcome

                                 181
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  measures, output measures, and associated performance

 2  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

 3  Appropriations 2630-2646B are as follows:

 4         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

 5  MEASURE.--

 6         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total program

 7  costs....................................................3.21%

 8         2.  CULTURAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT GRANTS OUTCOME

 9  MEASURES.--

10         a.  Attendance at supported cultural events..21,000,000

11         b.  Number of individuals served by professional

12  associations.........................................8,000,000

13         c.  Total local financial support leveraged by state

14  funding...........................................$360,000,000

15         3.  CULTURAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT GRANTS OUTPUT

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of capital grants awarded.................30

18         b.  Number of program grants awarded................750

19         c.  Dollars awarded through capital grants..$12,000,000

20         d.  Dollars awarded through program grants..$19,535,872

21         e.  Percent of counties funded by the program.....88.1%

22         f.  Percent of large counties (N=34; population

23  >75,000) funded by the program...........................97.0%

24         g.  Percent of small counties (N=33; population less

25  than 75,000) funded by the program.......................78.8%

26         h.  Number of state-supported performances and exhibits

27  ........................................................25,000

28         (g)  For the Licensing Program the outcome measures,

29  output measures, and associated performance standards with

30  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2647-2650

31  are as follows:

                                 182
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

 2         a.  Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery

 3  licenses issued within 90 days after receipt of an application

 4  ...........................................................83%

 5         b.  Percent/number Concealed Weapon/Firearm licenses

 6  issued within 90-day statutory timeframe without fingerprint

 7  results...............................................7%/1,978

 8         c.  Number of default Concealed Weapons/Firearms

 9  licensees with prior criminal histories....................339

10         d.  Percent License Revocations or Suspensions

11  Initiated within 20 days after receipt of disqualifying

12  information (all license types)............................60%

13         e.  Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery

14  investigations completed within 60 days....................94%

15         f.  Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery

16  inspections completed within 30 days.......................90%

17         g.  Percent of Concealed Weapon/Firearm Violators to

18  Licensed Population......................................0.15%

19         h.  Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery

20  Violators to Licensed Population.........................1.42%

21         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Average Cost/Concealed Weapon/Firearm Application

23  Processed..................................................$27

24         b.  Average Cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery

25  Application Processed......................................$59

26         c.  Average Cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery

27  Investigation...........................................$1,846

28         d.  Average Cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery

29  Compliance Inspection.....................................$377

30         e.  Average cost/Administrative Action (revocation,

31  fine, probation, & compliance letters)....................$491

                                 183
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         f.  Number investigations performed (Security,

 2  Investigative, and Recovery complaint and agency generated

 3  inspections).............................................1,541

 4         g.  Number compliance inspections performed (Security,

 5  Investigative, and Recovery licensees/new agency inspections

 6  and random inspections)..................................1,771

 7         (h)  For the Historic Pensacola Preservation Board the

 8  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

 9  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

10  Appropriations 2651-2654 are as follows:

11         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

12         a.  Number of visitors to Board-managed properties

13  .......................................................150,000

14         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of consultations to city and county

16  governments................................................550

17         b.  Total acreage of historic properties maintained

18  ..........................................................8.75

19         c.  Total square footage of historic properties

20  maintained.............................................108,600

21         (i)  For the Ringling Museum of Art, the outcome

22  measures, output measures, and associated performance

23  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

24  Appropriations 2655-2657A are as follows:

25         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

26         a.  Annual number of museum visitors............251,308

27         b.  Number of individual participants in scheduled

28  education programs.......................................3,200

29         c.  Percent of visitors rating visit better than

30  expected...................................................77%

31         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

                                 184
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         a.  Total number of objects maintained...........12,850

 2         b.  Number of institutions to which items are on loan

 3  ............................................................16

 4         c.  Net asset balance of the Museum and Foundation,

 5  including assets transferred to the state and excluding art

 6  and other collections...............................$8,300,000

 7         Section 34.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2000;

 8  and in the event that this act fails to become a law until

 9  after that date, it shall take effect upon becoming a law and

10  shall operate retroactively to July 1, 2000.

11

12

13  ================ T I T L E   A M E N D M E N T ===============

14  And the title is amended as follows:

15         Delete everything before the enacting clause

16

17  and insert:

18                      A bill to be entitled

19         An act implementing the 2000-2001 General

20         Appropriations Act; providing legislative

21         intent; providing that specified funds are to

22         be allocated based on equity and are not

23         subject to the provisions of s. 394.908, F.S.;

24         amending s. 409.9115, F.S.; specifying how the

25         Agency for Health Care Administration shall

26         make payments for the Medicaid disproportionate

27         share program for mental health hospitals;

28         requiring the Agency for Health Care

29         Administration to use a specified

30         disproportionate share formula, specified

31         audited financial data, and a specified

                                 185
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         Medicaid per diem rate in fiscal year 2000-2001

 2         for qualifying hospitals; amending s. 409.9116,

 3         F.S.; providing a formula for rural hospital

 4         disproportionate share payments; amending s.

 5         216.181, F.S.; authorizing the Department of

 6         Children and Family Services and the Department

 7         of Health to advance certain moneys for certain

 8         contract services; directing the Agency for

 9         Health Care Administration to include health

10         maintenance organization recipients in the

11         county billing for a specified purpose;

12         amending s. 409.905, F.S.; prescribing

13         conditions upon which an adjustment in a

14         hospital's inpatient per diem rate may be

15         based; authorizing the Departments of Children

16         and Family Services, Management Services, Labor

17         and Employment Security, and Health and the

18         Agency for Health Care Administration to

19         transfer positions and funds to comply with the

20         General Appropriations Act or the WAGES Act;

21         amending s. 39.3065, F.S.; providing for the

22         sheriffs of Broward County and Seminole County

23         to provide child protective investigative

24         services; amending s. 1, ch. 99-219, Laws of

25         Florida; extending flexibility to implement

26         reorganization of the Department of Children

27         and Family Services until July 1, 2001;

28         amending s. 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the

29         Department of Law Enforcement to transfer some

30         positions and associated budget and a certain

31         percentage of salary rate between budget

                                 186
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         entities and providing requirements with

 2         respect thereto; providing that billing agent

 3         consulting services related to certain Medicaid

 4         provider agreements not be considered billing

 5         agent services; requiring the Agency for Health

 6         Care Administration to develop a reimbursement

 7         schedule; authorizing the Department of Law

 8         Enforcement to use certain moneys to provide

 9         meritorious-performance bonuses for employees,

10         subject to approval; amending s. 212.20, F.S.;

11         providing for use of moneys allocated to the

12         Solid Waste Management Trust Fund; amending s.

13         403.7095, F.S.; revising the expiration date of

14         the solid waste management grant program;

15         requiring a specified level of funding for

16         counties receiving solid waste management and

17         recycling grants; providing for allocation of

18         funds for innovative programs to address

19         recycling practices and procedures; amending s.

20         110.1239, F.S.; providing requirements for the

21         funding of the state group health insurance

22         program; amending s. 86, ch. 93-213, Laws of

23         Florida, as amended; deferring repayment

24         requirements for certain funding provided to

25         the state NPDES program; amending s. 287.161,

26         F.S.; requiring the Department of Management

27         Services to charge all persons receiving

28         transportation from the executive aircraft pool

29         a specified rate; providing for deposit and use

30         of such fees; amending s. 403.1826, F.S.;

31         providing authority of the Department of

                                 187
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         Environmental Protection to waive requirements

 2         related to water pollution control and sewage

 3         treatment grants; amending s. 216.181, F.S.;

 4         providing authority to the Department of

 5         Transportation to facilitate the transfer of

 6         personnel to the turnpike headquarters facility

 7         in Orange County; providing for the transfer of

 8         tangible personal property from the Department

 9         of Business and Professional Regulation to the

10         College of Veterinary Medicine at the

11         University of Florida; providing legislative

12         intent concerning funds appropriated for the

13         San Carlos Institute; providing for allocation

14         of moneys provided for workforce development

15         and providing for budget amendment when a

16         program is moved; providing for future repeal

17         of various provisions; providing for audit and

18         transfer of specified funds relating to law

19         enforcement programs transferred to St. Johns

20         River and Tallahassee Community Colleges;

21         amending s. 240.2605, F.S.; requiring the Board

22         of Regents to rank certain donations; requiring

23         presidents of universities in the State

24         University System to provide lists of certain

25         donations; requiring the Board of Regents to

26         submit a report; requiring the Board of Regents

27         to rank such donations; providing effect of

28         veto of specific appropriation or proviso to

29         which implementing language refers; providing

30         applicability to other legislation; providing

31         performance measures and standards for programs

                                 188
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1         within state agencies; providing that the

 2         performance measures and standards are linked

 3         to appropriations in the General Appropriations

 4         Act; providing an effective date.

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

                                 189
    5:11 PM   04/03/00                                h2147c-39j01