CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
CHAMBER ACTION
Senate House
.
.
1 .
.
2 .
.
3 .
.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 Senator Casas moved the following amendment:
12
13 Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
14 Delete everything after the enacting clause
15
16 and insert:
17 Section 1. It is the intent of the Legislature that
18 the implementing and administering provisions of this act
19 apply to the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year
20 2000-2001.
21 Section 2. In order to implement Specific
22 Appropriation 367 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
23 and notwithstanding section 394.908, Florida Statutes, all
24 funds in excess of Fiscal Year 1998-1999 appropriations are to
25 be allocated based on equity except those programs and funds
26 specifically identified in clarifying language in the General
27 Appropriations Act. No district shall receive an allocation of
28 recurring funds that is less than its initial approved
29 operating budget plus any distributions of lump sums for the
30 state Fiscal Year 1998-1999.
31 Section 3. In order to implement Specific
1
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Appropriation 246 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
2 subsection (3) of section 409.9115, Florida Statutes, is
3 amended to read:
4 409.9115 Disproportionate share program for mental
5 health hospitals.--The Agency for Health Care Administration
6 shall design and implement a system of making mental health
7 disproportionate share payments to hospitals that qualify for
8 disproportionate share payments under s. 409.911. This system
9 of payments shall conform with federal requirements and shall
10 distribute funds in each fiscal year for which an
11 appropriation is made by making quarterly Medicaid payments.
12 Notwithstanding s. 409.915, counties are exempt from
13 contributing toward the cost of this special reimbursement for
14 patients.
15 (3) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
16 Agency for Health Care Administration shall make payments for
17 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
18 hospitals on a monthly basis. If the amounts appropriated for
19 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
20 hospitals are increased or decreased during the fiscal year
21 pursuant to the requirements of chapter 216, the required
22 adjustment shall be prorated over the remaining payment
23 periods. This subsection expires is repealed on July 1, 2001
24 2000.
25 Section 4. During the 2000-2001 fiscal year, the
26 Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the 1992-1993
27 disproportionate share formula, the 1994 audited financial
28 data, and the Medicaid per diem rate as of January 1, 1999,
29 for those hospitals that qualify for the hospital
30 disproportionate share program funded in Specific
31 Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act.
2
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 This section expires July 1, 2001.
2 Section 5. In order to implement Specific
3 Appropriation 212 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
4 subsection (6) of section 409.9116, Florida Statutes, is
5 amended to read:
6 409.9116 Disproportionate share/financial assistance
7 program for rural hospitals.--In addition to the payments made
8 under s. 409.911, the Agency for Health Care Administration
9 shall administer a federally matched disproportionate share
10 program and a state-funded financial assistance program for
11 statutory rural hospitals. The agency shall make
12 disproportionate share payments to statutory rural hospitals
13 that qualify for such payments and financial assistance
14 payments to statutory rural hospitals that do not qualify for
15 disproportionate share payments. The disproportionate share
16 program payments shall be limited by and conform with federal
17 requirements. In fiscal year 1993-1994, available funds shall
18 be distributed in one payment, as soon as practicable after
19 the effective date of this act. In subsequent fiscal years,
20 funds shall be distributed quarterly in each fiscal year for
21 which an appropriation is made. Notwithstanding the provisions
22 of s. 409.915, counties are exempt from contributing toward
23 the cost of this special reimbursement for hospitals serving a
24 disproportionate share of low-income patients.
25 (6) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
26 Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the following
27 formula for distribution of the funds in Specific
28 Appropriation 212 236 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General
29 Appropriations Act for the disproportionate share/financial
30 assistance program for rural hospitals.
31 (a) The agency shall first determine a preliminary
3
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 payment amount for each rural hospital by allocating all
2 available state funds using the following formula:
3
4 PDAER = (TAERH x TARH)/STAERH
5
6 Where:
7 PDAER = preliminary distribution amount for each rural
8 hospital.
9 TAERH = total amount earned by each rural hospital.
10 TARH = total amount appropriated or distributed under
11 this section.
12 STAERH = sum of total amount earned by each rural
13 hospital.
14 (b) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
15 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
16 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (a).
17 (c) The state-funds-only payment amount is then
18 calculated for each hospital using the formula:
19
20 SFOER = Maximum value of (1) SFOL - PDAER or (2) 0
21
22 Where:
23 SFOER = state-funds-only payment amount for each rural
24 hospital.
25 SFOL = state-funds-only payment level, which is set at
26 4 percent of TARH.
27 (d) The adjusted total amount allocated to the rural
28 disproportionate share program shall then be calculated using
29 the following formula:
30
31 ATARH = (TARH - SSFOER)
4
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1
2 Where:
3 ATARH = adjusted total amount appropriated or
4 distributed under this section.
5 SSFOER = sum of the state-funds-only payment amount
6 calculated under paragraph (c) for all rural hospitals.
7 (e) The determination of the amount of rural
8 disproportionate share hospital funds is calculated by the
9 following formula:
10
11 TDAERH = [(TAERH x ATARH)/STAERH]
12
13 Where:
14 TDAERH = total distribution amount for each rural
15 hospital.
16 (f) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
17 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
18 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (e).
19 (g) State-funds-only payment amounts calculated under
20 paragraph (c) are then added to the results of paragraph (f)
21 to determine the total distribution amount for each rural
22 hospital.
23 (h) This subsection expires is repealed on July 1,
24 2001 2000.
25 Section 6. In order to implement Specific
26 Appropriations 264-435 and 462-592C of the 2000-2001 General
27 Appropriations Act, paragraph (c) of subsection (15) of
28 section 216.181, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
29 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
30 capital outlay.--
31 (15)
5
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (c) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,
2 funds appropriated to the Department of Children and Family
3 Services in Specific Appropriations 264 292 through 435 425
4 and the Department of Health in Specific Appropriations 462
5 445 through 592C 540 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General
6 Appropriations Act may be advanced, unless specifically
7 prohibited in such General Appropriations Act, for those
8 contracted services that were approved for advancement by the
9 Comptroller in fiscal year 1993-1994, including those services
10 contracted on a fixed-price or unit cost basis. This
11 paragraph expires is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.
12 Section 7. In order to implement Specific
13 Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
14 and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the Agency for Health
15 Care Administration shall include health maintenance
16 organization recipients in the county billing for inpatient
17 hospital stays for the purpose of shared costs with counties
18 in accordance with the Florida Statutes. This section expires
19 July 1, 2001.
20 Section 8. In order to implement Specific
21 Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
22 paragraph (c) is added to subsection (5) of section 409.905,
23 Florida Statutes, to read:
24 409.905 Mandatory Medicaid services.--The agency may
25 make payments for the following services, which are required
26 of the state by Title XIX of the Social Security Act,
27 furnished by Medicaid providers to recipients who are
28 determined to be eligible on the dates on which the services
29 were provided. Any service under this section shall be
30 provided only when medically necessary and in accordance with
31 state and federal law. Nothing in this section shall be
6
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 construed to prevent or limit the agency from adjusting fees,
2 reimbursement rates, lengths of stay, number of visits, number
3 of services, or any other adjustments necessary to comply with
4 the availability of moneys and any limitations or directions
5 provided for in the General Appropriations Act or chapter 216.
6 (5) HOSPITAL INPATIENT SERVICES.--The agency shall pay
7 for all covered services provided for the medical care and
8 treatment of a recipient who is admitted as an inpatient by a
9 licensed physician or dentist to a hospital licensed under
10 part I of chapter 395. However, the agency shall limit the
11 payment for inpatient hospital services for a Medicaid
12 recipient 21 years of age or older to 45 days or the number of
13 days necessary to comply with the General Appropriations Act.
14 (c) The Agency for Health Care Administration shall
15 adjust a hospital's inpatient per diem rate to reflect the
16 cost of serving the Medicaid population at that institution
17 if:
18 1. There is a change in the mix of patient services,
19 primarily resulting from the effects of a natural disaster
20 occurring after July 1, 2000, which has caused the hospital's
21 average annual Medicaid per-patient cost to increase by more
22 than 25 percent; or
23 2. The hospital experiences an increase in Medicaid
24 caseload by more than 20 percent, primarily resulting from the
25 closure of a hospital in the same service area occurring after
26 July 1, 1995, which has caused the hospital's average annual
27 Medicaid per-patient cost to increase by more than 25 percent.
28
29 The agency must include the estimated costs for any adjustment
30 in a hospital inpatient per diem pursuant to this paragraph in
31 the estimates it provides to the Social Services Estimating
7
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Conference for inclusion in the total estimates for the
2 Medicaid program. Before the agency implements a change in a
3 hospital's inpatient per diem rate pursuant to this paragraph,
4 the Legislature must have specifically appropriated sufficient
5 funds in the General Appropriations Act to support the
6 increase in cost as estimated by the Social Services
7 Estimating Conference. This subsection expires July 1, 2001.
8 Section 9. For the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the
9 Departments of Children and Family Services, Management
10 Services, Labor and Employment Security, and Health and the
11 Agency for Health Care Administration may transfer positions
12 and general revenue funds as necessary to comply with any
13 provision of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act or
14 Workforce Innovation Act of 2000 which requires or
15 specifically authorizes the transfer of positions and general
16 revenue funds between these agencies. This section expires
17 July 1, 2001.
18 Section 10. In order to implement Specific
19 Appropriations 307-310, 310B, and 312 of the 2000-2001 General
20 Appropriations Act, section 39.3065, Florida Statutes, is
21 amended to read:
22 39.3065 Sheriffs of Pasco, Manatee, and Pinellas
23 Counties to provide child protective investigative services;
24 procedures; funding.--
25 (1) As described in this section, the Department of
26 Children and Family Services shall, by the end of fiscal year
27 1999-2000, transfer all responsibility for child protective
28 investigations for Pinellas County, Manatee County, and Pasco
29 County to the sheriff of that county in which the child abuse,
30 neglect, or abandonment is alleged to have occurred. Each
31 sheriff is responsible for the provision of all child
8
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 protective investigations in his or her county. Each
2 individual who provides these services must complete the
3 training provided to and required of protective investigators
4 employed by the Department of Children and Family Services.
5 (2) During fiscal year 1998-1999, the Department of
6 Children and Family Services and each sheriff's office shall
7 enter into a contract for the provision of these services.
8 Funding for the services will be appropriated to the
9 Department of Children and Family Services, and the department
10 shall transfer to the respective sheriffs for the duration of
11 fiscal year 1998-1999, funding for the investigative
12 responsibilities assumed by the sheriffs, including federal
13 funds that the provider is eligible for and agrees to earn and
14 that portion of general revenue funds which is currently
15 associated with the services that are being furnished under
16 contract, and including, but not limited to, funding for all
17 investigative, supervisory, and clerical positions; training;
18 all associated equipment; furnishings; and other fixed capital
19 items. The contract must specify whether the department will
20 continue to perform part or none of the child protective
21 investigations during the initial year. The sheriffs may
22 either conduct the investigations themselves or may, in turn,
23 subcontract with law enforcement officials or with properly
24 trained employees of private agencies to conduct
25 investigations related to neglect cases only. If such a
26 subcontract is awarded, the sheriff must take full
27 responsibility for any safety decision made by the
28 subcontractor and must immediately respond with law
29 enforcement staff to any situation that requires removal of a
30 child due to a condition that poses an immediate threat to the
31 child's life. The contract must specify whether the services
9
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 are to be performed by departmental employees or by persons
2 determined by the sheriff. During this initial year, the
3 department is responsible for quality assurance, and the
4 department retains the responsibility for the performance of
5 all child protective investigations. The department must
6 identify any barriers to transferring the entire
7 responsibility for child protective services to the sheriffs'
8 offices and must pursue avenues for removing any such barriers
9 by means including, but not limited to, applying for federal
10 waivers. By January 15, 1999, the department shall submit to
11 the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of
12 Representatives, and the chairs of the Senate and House
13 committees that oversee departmental activities a report that
14 describes any remaining barriers, including any that pertain
15 to funding and related administrative issues. Unless the
16 Legislature, on the basis of that report or other pertinent
17 information, acts to block a transfer of the entire
18 responsibility for child protective investigations to the
19 sheriffs' offices, the sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee
20 County, and Pinellas County, beginning in fiscal year
21 1999-2000, shall assume the entire responsibility for such
22 services, as provided in subsection (3).
23 (3)(a) Beginning in fiscal year 1999-2000, the
24 sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas County
25 have the responsibility to provide all child protective
26 investigations in their respective counties.
27 (b) The sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and
28 Pinellas County shall operate, at a minimum, in accordance
29 with the performance standards established by the Legislature
30 for protective investigations conducted by the Department of
31 Children and Family Services.
10
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (c) Funds for providing child protective
2 investigations in Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas
3 County must be identified in the annual appropriation made to
4 the Department of Children and Family Services, which shall
5 award grants for the full amount identified to the respective
6 sheriffs' offices. Funds for the child protective
7 investigations may not be integrated into the sheriffs'
8 regular budgets. Budgetary data and other data relating to the
9 performance of child protective investigations must be
10 maintained separately from all other records of the sheriffs'
11 offices.
12 (d) Program performance evaluation shall be based on
13 criteria mutually agreed upon by the respective sheriffs and a
14 committee of seven persons appointed by the Governor and
15 selected from those persons serving on the Department of
16 Children and Family Services District 5 Health and Human
17 Services Board and District 6 Health and Human Services Board.
18 Two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of Pasco
19 County, two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of
20 Manatee County, and two of the Governor's appointees must be
21 residents of Pinellas County. Such appointees shall serve at
22 the pleasure of the Governor. The individuals appointed must
23 have demonstrated experience in outcome evaluation, social
24 service areas of protective investigation, or child welfare
25 supervision. The committee shall submit an annual report
26 regarding quality performance, outcome-measure attainment, and
27 cost efficiency to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of
28 the House of Representatives, and to the Governor no later
29 than January 31 of each year the sheriffs are receiving
30 general appropriations to provide child protective
31 investigations.
11
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (4) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
2 Sheriffs Sheriff of Broward County and Seminole County shall
3 perform the same child protective investigative services
4 according to the same standards as are performed by the
5 sheriffs of Pinellas County, Manatee County, and Pasco County
6 under this section. This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.
7 Section 11. Subsection (1) of section 1 of chapter
8 99-219, Laws of Florida, is amended to read:
9 Section 1. (1) The following provisions of section
10 20.19, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, are waived until
11 July 1, 2001 2000, for the purpose of allowing the Department
12 of Children and Family Services to organize programs,
13 districts, and functions of the department to achieve more
14 effective and efficient service delivery and improve
15 accountability, notwithstanding the provisions of section
16 20.04, Florida Statutes:
17 (a) Section 20.19(2)(b) and (f) Florida Statutes, 1998
18 Supplement, relating to the secretary and deputy secretary.
19 (b) Section 20.19(3), Florida Statutes, 1998
20 Supplement, relating to the Office of Standards and
21 Evaluation.
22 (c) Section 20.19(5)(a), Florida Statutes, 1998
23 Supplement, relating to program offices.
24 (d) Section 20.19(6)(a), (c), and (d), Florida
25 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to the Assistant Secretary
26 for Administration.
27 (e) Section 20.19(8)(l), (m), (n), and (o), Florida
28 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to health and human
29 services boards.
30 (f) Section 20.19(9), Florida Statutes, 1998
31 Supplement, relating to district nominee qualifications review
12
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 committees.
2 (g) Section 20.19(10), (a), (b), (c)1.-7., (d), (e),
3 (f), and (g), Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to
4 the district administrator.
5 (h) Section 20.19(12)(d), Florida Statutes, 1998
6 Supplement, relating to the departmental budget.
7
8 Actions taken under the authority granted by this section must
9 be taken in consultation with the Executive Office of the
10 Governor. The secretary shall submit a report describing
11 actions taken and additional plans for implementing the
12 provisions of this section to the Governor, the President of
13 the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by
14 30 thirty days after this act bill becomes a law. The
15 department shall submit status reports on a monthly basis
16 through December 2000 1999.
17 Section 12. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriations 1150, 1159A, 1161, 1165, 1171, 1175, 1178,
19 1183, 1186, and 1190A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
20 Act, subsection (17) of section 216.181, Florida Statutes, is
21 amended to read:
22 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
23 capital outlay.--
24 (17) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
25 section to the contrary, and for the 2000-2001 1999-2000
26 fiscal year only, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement
27 may transfer up to 20 positions and associated budget between
28 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
29 throughout each transfer. The department may also transfer up
30 to 10 percent of the initial approved salary rate between
31 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
13
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 throughout each transfer. The department must provide notice
2 to the Executive Office of the Governor, the chair of the
3 Senate Budget Committee, and the chair of the House Committee
4 on Criminal Justice Appropriations for all transfers of
5 positions or salary rate. This subsection expires is repealed
6 on July 1, 2001 2000.
7 Section 13. Consistent with the provisions of section
8 216.163, Florida Statutes, in accordance with
9 performance-based program budgeting requirements, and
10 notwithstanding the provisions of section 216.181, Florida
11 Statutes, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement may
12 transfer up to one-half of 1 percent of the funds in Specific
13 Appropriations 1150, 1159A, 1161, 1165, 1171, 1175, 1178,
14 1183, 1186, and 1190A, of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
15 Act for lump-sum salary bonuses for departmental employees at
16 the discretion of the executive director, provided that such
17 bonuses are given only to selected employees for meritorious
18 performance, instead of being given as across-the-board
19 bonuses for all employees. The department, after consultation
20 with the Executive Office of the Governor, shall provide a
21 plan to the chair of the House Fiscal Responsibility Council
22 and to the chair of the Senate Budget Committee for approval
23 before awarding such bonuses. This section expires July 1,
24 2001.
25 Section 14. In order to implement Specific
26 Appropriations 1591G and 1476 of the 2000-2001 General
27 Appropriations Act, subsection (7) of section 212.20, Florida
28 Statutes, is amended to read:
29 212.20 Funds collected, disposition; additional powers
30 of department; operational expense; refund of taxes
31 adjudicated unconstitutionally collected.--
14
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (7) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
2 use of funds allocated to the Solid Waste Management Trust
3 Fund shall be as provided in the General Appropriations Act.
4 There is appropriated $10.5 transferred $15.5 million for
5 wastewater surface water improvement and management projects
6 and $10 million for the aquatic weed control program from
7 revenues provided by this section. This subsection expires is
8 repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.
9 Section 15. In order to implement Specific
10 Appropriation 1633A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
11 Act, subsections (8) and (9) of section 403.7095, Florida
12 Statutes, are amended to read:
13 403.7095 Solid waste management grant program.--
14 (8) For fiscal year 2000-2001 1999-2000, the
15 department shall provide counties with populations under
16 100,000 with at least 80 percent of the level of funding they
17 received in fiscal year 1997-1998 for solid waste management
18 and recycling grants.
19 (9) For fiscal year 2000-2001 1999-2000, the
20 department shall provide 10 percent of the total funds
21 available after the requirements of subsection (8) are met for
22 recycling grants available to all counties on a competitive
23 basis for innovative programs. The department may consider one
24 or more of the following criteria in determining whether a
25 grant proposal is innovative:
26 (a) Demonstrate advanced technologies or processes.
27 (b) Collect and recycle materials targeted by the
28 department.
29 (c) Demonstrate substantial improvement in program
30 cost-effectiveness and efficiency as measured against
31 statewide average costs for the same or similar programs.
15
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (d) Demonstrate transferability of technology and
2 processes used in program.
3 (e) Demonstrate and implement multicounty or regional
4 recycling programs.
5 Section 16. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriations 2432, 2433, and 2434 of the 2000-2001 General
7 Appropriations Act, section 110.1239, Florida Statutes, is
8 amended to read:
9 110.1239 State group health insurance program
10 funding.--For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, it is
11 the intent of the Legislature that the state group health
12 insurance program be managed, administered, operated, and
13 funded in such a manner as to maximize the protection of state
14 employee health insurance benefits. Inherent in this intent is
15 the recognition that the health insurance liabilities
16 attributable to the benefits offered state employees should be
17 fairly, orderly, and equitably funded. Accordingly:
18 (1) The division shall determine the level of premiums
19 necessary to fully fund the state group health insurance
20 program for the next fiscal year. Such determination shall be
21 made after each revenue estimating conference on health
22 insurance as provided in s. 216.136(1), but not later than
23 December 1 and April 1 of each fiscal year.
24 (2) The Governor, in the Governor's recommended
25 budget, shall provide premium rates necessary for full funding
26 of the state group health insurance program, and the
27 Legislature shall provide in the General Appropriations Act
28 for a premium level necessary for full funding of the state
29 group health insurance program.
30 (3) For purposes of funding, any additional
31 appropriation amounts allocated to the state group health
16
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 insurance program by the Legislature shall be considered as a
2 state contribution and thus an increase in the state premiums.
3 (3)(4) This section expires is repealed on July 1,
4 2001 2000.
5 Section 17. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriation 1582A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
7 Act, section 86 of chapter 93-213, Laws of Florida, as amended
8 by section 28 of chapter 98-46, Laws of Florida, and section
9 29 of chapter 99-228, Laws of Florida, is amended to read:
10 Section 86. The Department of Environmental Regulation
11 is authorized 54 career service positions for administering
12 the state NPDES program. Twenty-five career service positions
13 are authorized for startup of the program beginning July 1,
14 1993, and the remaining 29 career service positions beginning
15 January 1, 1994. The state NPDES program staffing shall start
16 July 1, 1993, with completion targeted for 6 months following
17 United States Environmental Protection Agency authorization to
18 administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
19 program. Implementation of positions is subject to review and
20 final approval by the secretary of the Department of
21 Environmental Regulation. The sum of $3.2 million is hereby
22 appropriated from the Pollution Recovery Trust Fund to cover
23 program startup costs. For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year
24 only, such funds need not be repaid.
25 Section 18. In order to implement Specific
26 Appropriations 2408, 2409, 2410, and 2411 of the 2000-2001
27 General Appropriations Act, subsection (4) of section 287.161,
28 Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
29 287.161 Executive aircraft pool; assignment of
30 aircraft; charge for transportation.--
31 (4) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections
17
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (2) and (3) and for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,
2 the Department of Management Services shall charge all persons
3 receiving transportation from the executive aircraft pool a
4 rate not less than the mileage allowance fixed by the
5 Legislature for the use of privately owned vehicles. Fees
6 collected for persons traveling by aircraft in the executive
7 aircraft pool shall be deposited into the Bureau of Aircraft
8 Trust Fund and shall be expended for costs incurred to operate
9 the aircraft management activities of the department. It is
10 the intent of the Legislature that the executive aircraft pool
11 be operated on a full cost recovery basis, less available
12 funds. This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.
13 Section 19. In order to implement Specific
14 Appropriation 1596C of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
15 Act, subsection (6) of section 403.1826, Florida Statutes, is
16 amended to read:
17 403.1826 Grants, requirements for eligibility.--
18 (6)(a) A grant may not be made unless the local
19 governmental agency assures the department of the proper and
20 efficient operation and maintenance of the project after
21 construction. Revenue sufficient to ensure that the facility
22 will be self-supporting shall be generated from sources which
23 include, but are not limited to, service charges and
24 connection fees. The revenue generated shall provide for
25 financing future sanitary sewerage capital improvements. The
26 grantee shall accumulate, during the design life of the
27 grant-funded project, moneys in an amount equivalent to the
28 grant amount adjusted for inflationary cost increases.
29 (b) The department may waive this accumulation
30 requirement for up to 5 years for a grantee, in a county as
31 defined by s. 125.011(1), which certifies to the department's
18
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 satisfaction that an equivalent amount of money will be used,
2 above the required amounts, to pay outstanding obligations
3 resulting from improvements to the system. This paragraph
4 expires July 1, 2001 2000.
5 Section 20. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriations 1807, 1816, 1822, 1837, 1847, and 1859 of the
7 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, subsection (19) is added
8 to section 216.181, Florida Statutes, read:
9 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
10 capital outlay.--
11 (19) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
12 chapter to the contrary, the Florida Department of
13 Transportation, in order to facilitate the transfer of
14 personnel to the new turnpike headquarters location in Orange
15 County, may transfer salary rate to the turnpike budget entity
16 from other departmental budget entities. The department must
17 provide documentation to the Executive Office of the Governor,
18 the chair of the Senate Budget Committee, and the chair of the
19 House Committee on Transportation and Economic Development
20 Appropriations for all transfers. This subsection expires July
21 1, 2001.
22 Section 21. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering of
23 the Department of Business and Professional Regulation shall
24 transfer all tangible personal property which is owned by the
25 department and currently in use by the College of Veterinary
26 Medicine at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida,
27 to the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of
28 Florida.
29 Section 22. The Florida Legislature affirms that all
30 funds and related interest appropriated to the Instituto
31 Patriotico y Docente San Carlos, Inc., a Florida
19
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 not-for-profit corporation d/b/a/ San Carlos Institute,
2 including, but not limited to, Public Education Capital Outlay
3 (PECO) funds, were spent in accordance with legislative
4 intent; and the Florida Legislature affirms that all matching
5 fund requirements have been fully met by the San Carlos
6 Institute. Therefore, the requirement that interest funds not
7 otherwise specifically contracted for be repaid to the State
8 of Florida is waived, and the Legislature directs that all
9 funds appropriated for the San Carlos Institute for fiscal
10 years 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 be released to the San Carlos
11 Institute pursuant to legislative intent.
12 Section 23. The funds provided in the 2000-2001
13 General Appropriations Act for workforce development shall be
14 initially allocated to the school district or community
15 college as designated. If, for any reason, a program in whole
16 or in part is moved from a community college to a school
17 district or moved from a school district to a community
18 college, the Commissioner of Education or the executive
19 director of the Division of Community Colleges shall submit a
20 budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216, Florida Statutes, to
21 transfer the appropriate amount of the 2000-2001 appropriation
22 between the affected district and community college. The
23 amount transferred shall be as near as practicable to the
24 actual amount appropriated for the FTE funded for that
25 program. This section expires July 1, 2001.
26 Section 24. Prior to the release of funds in Specific
27 Appropriation 135 for Leon and St. Johns counties, the
28 Department of Education and the Division of Community Colleges
29 shall jointly conduct an audit to determine whether all FTE,
30 completions and placements and related funds and any other
31 funds from all state sources related to the Law Enforcement
20
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Programs recently transferred to St. Johns River Community
2 College and Tallahassee Community College have been correctly
3 identified and transferred to the respective colleges.
4 Notwithstanding any provisions of chapter 99-227, Laws of
5 Florida, to the contrary, it is the intent of the Legislature
6 that all funds, including but not limited to the entire FEPP
7 categorical programs, Workforce Development funds, performance
8 incentives, Incentive Grants for Expanded Programs, and all
9 other state fund sources related to these programs be included
10 in this audit. Notwithstanding any provisions of chapter
11 99-227, Laws of Florida, to the contrary, all funds identified
12 in this audit shall be shifted to the base of the appropriate
13 community college before the provisions of Specific
14 Appropriation 135 are allocated.
15 Section 25. In order to implement Specific
16 Appropriation 167 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
17 subsection (8) of 240.2605, Florida Statutes, is amended to
18 read:
19 240.2605 Trust Fund for Major Gifts.--
20 (8) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section,
21 for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, for gifts
22 received during this period, the university presidents shall
23 provide a list of donations from private donors for challenge
24 grants, new donations, major gifts, and the eminent scholars
25 program to be matched for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year
26 to the Board of Regents. The listing shall contain an
27 explanation of the donation, a statement of the specific
28 benefits accrued to the university as a result of the
29 donation, and how the donation is consistent with the mission
30 of the institution, as defined by the Board of Regents in the
31 1998-2003 Strategic Plan. University presidents shall rank
21
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 each private donation to their university, giving highest
2 priority to private donations that provide additional library
3 resources to universities; donations that provide student
4 assistance through scholarships, fellowships, or
5 assistantships; donations that provide funding for existing
6 academic programs at universities; and donations that meet the
7 matching requirement without encumbering pledges. The Board of
8 Regents, using the same criteria, shall develop a systemwide
9 priority list and may set restrictions on the annual amount of
10 matching funds provided for single donations that exceed $5
11 million. The Board of Regents shall submit a report to the
12 President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of
13 Representatives, and the Executive Office of the Governor by
14 January 15, 2001.
15 Section 26. In order to implement Specific
16 Appropriation 167 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
17 the university presidents shall provide to the Board of
18 Regents a list of donations received in 2000-2001 from private
19 donors for the State University System Facility Enhancement
20 Challenge Grant Program. This listing shall contain an
21 explanation of the donation, a statement of the specific
22 benefits accrued to the university as a result of the
23 donation, and the projected cost to the state for the
24 operation and maintenance of the facility. The Board of
25 Regents shall review and rank each private donation, giving
26 highest priority to private donations that provide the
27 financial resources for major renovations to existing
28 facilities, particularly instructional facilities, and new
29 space requirements as identified by the space utilization
30 model. This section expires July 1, 2001.
31 Section 27. A section of this act that implements a
22
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 specific appropriation or specifically identified proviso
2 language in the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void
3 if the specific appropriation or specifically identified
4 proviso language is vetoed. A section of this act that
5 implements more than one specific appropriation or more than
6 one portion of specifically identified proviso language in the
7 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void if all the
8 specific appropriations or portions of specifically identified
9 proviso language are vetoed.
10 Section 28. If any other act passed during the 2000
11 Regular Session of the Legislature or any extension thereof
12 contains a provision that is substantively the same as a
13 provision in this act, but that removes or is otherwise not
14 subject to the future repeal applied to such provision by this
15 act, the Legislature intends that the provision in the other
16 act shall take precedence and shall continue to operate,
17 notwithstanding the future repeal provided by this act.
18 Section 29. The performance measures and standards
19 established in this section for individual programs in
20 education shall be applied to those programs for the 2000-2001
21 fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are
22 directly linked to the appropriations made in the General
23 Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as required by
24 the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
25 (1) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.--
26 (a) For the Private Colleges and Universities Program,
27 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
28 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
29 Specific Appropriations 11, 12, 16-21, 24-27, 29-32, and 35-41
30 are as follows:
31 1. FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Retention rate of First Time in College (FTIC)
2 award recipients, using a 6-year rate.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 b. Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, using a
4 6-year rate.................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 2. FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of degrees granted by level for FRAG
7 recipients and contract program recipients....FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 3. ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Retention rate of award recipients.FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 b. Graduation rate of award recipients....FY 2001-2002
11 LBR
12 c. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
13 percent employed at $22,000 or more 1 year following
14 graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 d. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
16 percent employed at $22,000 or more 5 years following
17 graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 e. Licensure/certification rates of award recipients
19 (where applicable)............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 4. ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of prior year's graduates...FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 b. Number of prior year's graduates remaining in
23 Florida...........................................FY 2001-2002
24 LBR
25 5. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
26 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Retention rate of students, using a 6-year rate..FY
28 2001-2002 LBR
29 b. Graduation rate of students, using a 6-year rate.FY
30 2001-2002 LBR
31 6. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OUTPUT
24
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 MEASURE.--
2 a. Number of FTIC students, disaggregated by in-state
3 and out-of-state..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 (b) For the Financial Aid Programs, the outcome
5 measures, output measures, and associated performance
6 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
7 Appropriations 2 and 55 are as follows:
8 1. BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of high school graduates who successfully
10 completed the 19 core credits..............................60%
11 b. Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by
12 delivery system, using a 4-year rate for community colleges
13 and a 6-year rate for universities........... FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 c. Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by
15 delivery system.............................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 d. Percent of high school graduates eligible for
17 awards who enrolled in a Florida postsecondary institution.84%
18 e. Percentage of high school graduates attending
19 Florida postsecondary institutions.........................51%
20 2. BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of Bright Futures recipients..........73,406
22 3. FLORIDA STUDENT ASSISTANCE GRANTS (FSAG) OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by
25 delivery system.............................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 b. Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by
27 delivery system.............................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 4. CRITICAL TEACHER SHORTAGE LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAM
29 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
30 a. Percent of recipients who, upon completion of the
31 program, work in fields in which there are shortages........FY
25
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 2001-2002 LBR
2 (c) For the Public Schools Program, the outcome
3 measures, output measures, and associated performance
4 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
5 Appropriations 3, 3A, 5, 5A, 59-113, 115, and 117 are as
6 follows:
7 1. KINDERGARTEN - GRADE TWELVE (K-12) OUTCOME
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Number and percent of teachers with National
10 Teacher's Certification, reported by district.......1,046/0.8%
11 b. Number and percent of "A" schools, reported by
12 district...............................................254/10%
13 c. Number and percent of schools that receive a grade
14 of "D" or "F," reported by district....................494/20%
15 d. Number and percent of schools declining one or more
16 letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 e. Number and percent of schools improving one or more
18 letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 2. STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
20 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percent of certificates issued within 30 days after
22 receipt of application.....................................84%
23 b. Number of districts that have implemented a high
24 quality professional development system, as determined by the
25 Department of Education, based on its review of student
26 performance data and the success of districts in defining and
27 meeting the training needs of teachers......................12
28 c. Percent of current fiscal year competitive grants
29 approved by August 1 of current fiscal year................90%
30 3. STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
31 OUTPUT MEASURE.--
26
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Number of certification applications processed
2 ........................................................56,000
3 (d) For the Workforce Development Program, the outcome
4 measures, output measures, and associated performance
5 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
6 Appropriations 123-127 and 128-136 are as follows:
7 1. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Number and percent of vocational certificate
9 program completers who are found placed according to the
10 following definitions:
11 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
12 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
13 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter............12,227/42.6%
14 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
15 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
16 employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing
17 education in a college credit-level program........4,369/15.2%
18 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
19 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
20 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
21 level.............................................10,801/37.6%
22 b. Number and percent of associate in science degree
23 and college-credit certificate program completers who are
24 found placed according to the following definitions:
25 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
26 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
27 employed at $4,680 or more per quarter.............6,897/57.9%
28 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
29 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found
30 employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing
31 education in a college credit-level program........1,351/11.3%
27
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
2 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
3 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
4 level..............................................1,166/13.9%
5 2. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of adult basic education, including English
7 as a Second Language, and adult secondary education completion
8 point completers who are found employed or continuing their
9 education.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 (e) For the Community Colleges program, the outcome
11 measures, output measures, and associated performance
12 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
13 Appropriations 8 and 137-152 are as follows:
14 1. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of Associate in Arts (AA) degree graduates
16 who transfer to a state university within 2 years..........64%
17 b. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
18 University System who earn a 2.5 or above in the SUS after a
19 year.......................................................73%
20 c. Of the AA graduates who are employed full-time
21 rather than continuing their education, the percent which are
22 in jobs earning at least $9 an hour........................59%
23 d. Of the AA students who complete 18 credit hours,
24 the percent of whom graduate in 4 years, disaggregating the
25 data by the following groups: ethnic, disabled, limited
26 English speaking, and economically disadvantaged...........33%
27 e. Percent of students graduating with total
28 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 120
29 percent of the degree requirement..........................36%
30 f. Percent of students exiting the college-preparatory
31 program who enter college-level course work associated with
28
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 the AA, Associate in Science (AS), Postsecondary Vocational
2 Certificate, and Postsecondary Adult Vocational programs...66%
3 g. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
4 University System who started in College Prep and who earn a
5 2.5 in the SUS after 1 year................................72%
6 2. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of AA degrees granted.................29,000
8 b. Number of students receiving college preparatory
9 instruction.............................................94,000
10 c. Number of students enrolled in baccalaureate
11 programs offered on community college campuses....FY 2001-2002
12 LBR
13 (f) For the Postsecondary Education Planning
14 Commission (PEPC) program, the outcome measures and associated
15 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
16 Specific Appropriations 153-158 are as follows:
17 1. PEPC OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Completed studies required by statute or the
19 General Appropriations Act................................100%
20 (g) For the State University System program, the
21 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
22 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
23 Appropriations 9A-9D, 160-183A are as follows:
24 1. STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Graduation rate for First Time in College (FTIC)
26 students, using a 6-year rate..............................61%
27 b. Retention rate for FTIC students, using a 6-year
28 rate.......................................................71%
29 c. Graduation rate for AA transfer students, using a
30 4-year rate................................................69%
31 d. Retention rate for AA transfer students, using a
29
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 4-year rate................................................80%
2 e. Percent of students graduating with total
3 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 115
4 percent of the degree requirement, disaggregating the data by
5 FTIC and AA transfers......................................61%
6 f. Pass rate on licensure/certification exams, for the
7 first sitting.................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 g. Of the prior year graduates remaining in Florida,
9 the percent employed at $22,000 or more 1 year following
10 graduation.................................................60%
11 h. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
12 percent employed at $22,000 or more 5 years following
13 graduation.................................................90%
14 i. Percent of undergraduate students enrolled in
15 graduate school upon completion of the baccalaureate degree
16 ...........................................................16%
17 j. Externally generated research and training grant
18 funds (federal, state, local, business, and industry) per
19 state-funded ranked faculty full-time equivalent..FY 2001-2002
20 LBR
21 k. Average number of articles in Institute for
22 Scientific Information Publication Count per ranked faculty.FY
23 2001-2002 LBR
24 l. For IFAS only, the percent of public service
25 projects where the beneficiary is satisfied or highly
26 satisfied with the extension assistance....................98%
27 m. Of the total instructional effort by level, the
28 percent of effort provided by faculty:
29 (I) Lower level....................................35%
30 (II) Upper level...................................50%
31 (III) Graduate.....................................55%
30
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 n. Number and percent of qualified Florida students,
2 those applicants meeting BOR admission standards, admitted as
3 FTIC students.....................................FY 2001-2002
4 LBR/95%
5 o. Percent of FTIC students admitted as student
6 profile assessments........................................10%
7 p. Percent of student profile assessments who are
8 out-of-state students......................................10%
9 q. Of total faculty effort allocated for public
10 service, the percent devoted to public schools.............25%
11 2. STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Number of degrees granted, by level:
13 (I) Baccalaureate...............................37,982
14 (II) Masters....................................11,008
15 (III) Professional...............................1,255
16 (IV) Doctoral....................................1,170
17 Section 30. The performance measures and standards
18 established in this section for individual programs in human
19 services agencies shall be applied to those programs for the
20 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and
21 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
22 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as
23 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
24 of 1994.
25 (1) AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION.--
26 (a) For the Administration and Support Program, the
27 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 184-190 are as follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
31
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 costs.....................................................1.2%
2 b. Information technology costs as a percent of agency
3 administrative costs......................................9.6%
4 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
5 a. Number of information technology service hours
6 .......................................................165,460
7 (b) For the Health Care Services Program, the outcome
8 measures, output measures, and associated performance
9 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
10 Appropriations 191-251 are as follows:
11 1. CHILDREN SPECIAL HEALTH CARE (KIDCARE PROGRAM)
12 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of eligible uninsured children who receive
14 health benefits coverage..................................100%
15 b. Percent of children enrolled with up-to-date
16 immunizations..............................................80%
17 c. Percent of compliance with the standards
18 established in the Guidelines for Health Supervision of
19 Children and Youth as developed by the American Academy of
20 Pediatrics for children eligible under the program.........80%
21 d. Percent of families satisfied with the care
22 provided under the program.................................90%
23 2. CHILDREN SPECIAL HEALTH CARE (KIDCARE PROGRAM)
24 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Total number of uninsured children enrolled in
26 KidCare................................................400,982
27 b. Number of uninsured children enrolled in Florida
28 Healthy Kids...........................................261,927
29 c. Number of uninsured children enrolled in Medikids
30 ........................................................30,994
31 d. Number of uninsured children enrolled in Children's
32
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Medical Services Network.................................6,326
2 e. Number of uninsured children enrolled in the
3 Medicaid Expansion......................................16,735
4 f. Number of uninsured children enrolled in Medicaid
5 as a result of outreach efforts.........................85,000
6 3. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
7 MEASURE.--
8 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
9 costs.....................................................1.2%
10 4. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Average number of days between receipt of clean
13 Medicaid claim and payment..................................16
14 b. Number of Medicaid claims received......115,612,455
15 c. Number of Medicaid claims paid...........75,319,381
16 5. MEDICAID SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS OUTCOME
17 MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of women receiving adequate prenatal care
19 .........................................................85.0%
20 b. Neonatal mortality rate per 1,000..............4.70
21 c. Average number of months between pregnancies for
22 those receiving family planning services..................37.4
23 d. Percent of eligible children who received all
24 required components of EPSDT screen........................72%
25 e. Percent of child hospitalizations for conditions
26 preventable with good ambulatory care....................7.50%
27 f. Percent of nondisabled working age adult
28 hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good
29 ambulatory care..........................................12.5%
30 g. Percent of disabled working age adult
31 hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good
33
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 ambulatory care..........................................13.5%
2 h. Percent of elder hospitalizations for conditions
3 preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.0%
4 6. MEDICAID SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of women receiving prenatal care.....143,852
6 b. Number of vaginal deliveries.................58,225
7 c. Number of women receiving family planning services
8 .......................................................256,496
9 d. Number of children ages 1-20 enrolled in Medicaid
10 .....................................................1,179,147
11 e. Number of children receiving EPSDT services.193,031
12 f. Number of hospital inpatient services provided to
13 children................................................44,353
14 g. Number of physician services provided to children
15 .....................................................3,927,330
16 h. Number of prescribed drugs provided to children
17 .....................................................3,101,827
18 i. Percent of nondisabled adults receiving a service
19 ...........................................................76%
20 j. Percent of enrolled disabled adults receiving a
21 service..................................................87.6%
22 k. Percent of hospital stays for elder recipients
23 exceeding length of stay criteria.........................9.5%
24 l. Number of elders enrolled in long term care waivers
25 ........................................................13,614
26 m. Number of hospital inpatient services provided to
27 elders.................................................111,883
28 n. Number of physician services provided to elders
29 .....................................................3,042,986
30 o. Number of prescribed drugs provided to elders
31 ....................................................10,044,825
34
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 7. MEDICAID LONG TERM CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percent of elder hospitalizations for conditions
3 preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.0%
4 b. Percent of developmentally disabled
5 hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good
6 ambulatory care............................................15%
7 8. MEDICAID PREPAID HEALTH PLAN OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percent of elder and disabled hospitalizations for
9 conditions preventable with good ambulatory care...........15%
10 b. Percent of women and child hospitalizations for
11 conditions preventable with good ambulatory care.........14.2%
12 (c) For the Health Care Regulation Program, the
13 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
14 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
15 Appropriations 252-263 are as follows:
16 1. HEALTH FACILITIES AND PRACTITIONER REGULATION
17 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of Priority I practitioner investigations
19 resulting in emergency action..............................25%
20 b. Average number of days to take emergency action on
21 Priority I practitioner investigations......................60
22 c. Percent of cease and desist orders issued to
23 unlicensed practitioners in which another complaint of
24 unlicensed activity is subsequently filed against the same
25 practitioner................................................6%
26 d. Percent of initial investigations and
27 recommendations as to the existence of probable cause
28 completed within 180 days after receipt of complaint.......85%
29 e. Percent of investigations of alleged unlicensed
30 facilities and programs that have been previously issued a
31 cease and desist order, that are confirmed as repeated
35
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 unlicensed activity.........................................8%
2 f. Percent of Priority I consumer complaints about
3 licensed facilities and programs that are investigated within
4 48 hours..................................................100%
5 g. Percent of accredited hospitals and ambulatory
6 surgical centers cited for not complying with life safety,
7 licensure, or emergency access standards....................9%
8 h. Percent of validation surveys that are consistent
9 with findings noted during the accreditation survey .......98%
10 i. Percent of nursing home facilities with
11 deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,
12 or welfare of the public....................................2%
13 j. Percent of assisted living facilities with
14 deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,
15 or welfare of the public....................................2%
16 k. Percent of home health facilities with deficiencies
17 that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare
18 of the public...............................................0%
19 l. Percent of clinical laboratories with deficiencies
20 that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare
21 of the public...............................................0%
22 m. Percent of ambulatory surgical centers with
23 deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,
24 or welfare of the public....................................2%
25 n. Percent of hospitals with deficiencies that pose a
26 serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare of the public
27 ............................................................2%
28 o. Percent of hospitals that fail to report serious
29 incidents (agency identified)...............................5%
30 p. Percent of hospitals that fail to report peer
31 review disciplinary actions (agency identified).............2%
36
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 q. Percent of new recipients voluntarily selecting
2 managed care plan..........................................71%
3 r. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
4 costs.....................................................6.4%
5 2. HEALTH FACILITIES AND PRACTITIONER REGULATION
6 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of practitioner complaints determined
8 legally sufficient.......................................6,836
9 b. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
10 complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (nolle
11 prosse)..................................................1,182
12 c. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
13 complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (letters
14 of guidance).............................................1,095
15 d. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
16 complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (notice
17 of noncompliance)............................................3
18 e. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
19 complaints resolved by findings of probable cause - issuance
20 of citation for minor violations............................62
21 f. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
22 complaints resolved by findings of stipulations or informal
23 hearings.................................................1,023
24 g. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
25 complaints resolved by findings of formal hearings..........37
26 h. Average number of practitioner complaint
27 investigations per FTE.....................................227
28 i. Number of inquiries to the call center regarding
29 practitioner licensure and disciplinary information....115,230
30 j. Number of facility emergency actions taken.......89
31 k. Total number of full facility quality-of-care
37
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 surveys conducted........................................4,980
2 l. Number of nursing home full facility
3 quality-of-care surveys conducted..........................712
4 m. Number of assisted living facility full facility
5 quality-of-care surveys conducted..........................762
6 n. Number of home health agency full facility
7 quality-of-care surveys conducted........................1,221
8 o. Number of clinical laboratory full facility
9 quality-of-care surveys conducted........................1,163
10 p. Number of hospital full facility quality-of-care
11 surveys conducted...........................................37
12 q. Number of other full facility quality-of-care
13 surveys conducted........................................1,084
14 r. Average processing time (in days) for Statewide
15 Provider and Subscriber Assistance Panel cases.............165
16 s. Number of nursing home plans and construction
17 reviews performed........................................1,100
18 t. Number of hospital plan and construction reviews
19 performed................................................2,500
20 u. Number of ambulatory surgical center plans and
21 construction reviewed......................................200
22 v. Average number of hours for a nursing home plans
23 and construction review.....................................30
24 w. Average number of hours for a hospital plans and
25 construction review.........................................35
26 x. Average number of hours for an ambulatory surgical
27 center plans and construction review........................25
28 y. Number of new enrollees provided choice counseling
29 .......................................................191,582
30 (2) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.--
31 (a) For the Executive Leadership Program, the outcome
38
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 measures, output measures, and associated performance
2 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
3 Appropriations 264-268 are as follows:
4 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
5 MEASURE.--
6 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
7 costs.....................................................0.3%
8 (b) For the Support Services Program, the outcome
9 measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 269-293 are as follows:
12 1. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
13 a. Information technology costs as a percent of total
14 agency costs..............................................3.5%
15 2. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of computer programs supported........22,485
17 b. Number of computer programs designed and developed
18 ........................................................22,485
19 3. ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME
20 MEASURE.--
21 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
22 costs.......................................................1%
23 4. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
25 costs.....................................................1.6%
26 (c) For the Family Safety Program, the outcome
27 measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 294-325 are as follows:
30 1. CHILD CARE REGULATION AND INFORMATION OUTCOME
31 MEASURE.--
39
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Percent of licensed child care facilities and homes
2 with no class 1 (serious) violations during their licensure
3 year.......................................................97%
4 2. CHILD CARE REGULATION AND INFORMATION OUTPUT
5 MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of facilities and homes licensed.......5,692
7 3. ADULT PROTECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percent of protective supervision cases in which no
9 report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received
10 while the case is open (from beginning of protective
11 supervision for a maximum of 1 year).......................97%
12 b. Ratio of domestic violence incidents reported
13 resulting in injury or harm to clients as a result of
14 inadequate security procedures per 1,000 shelter days
15 .................................................2001-2002 LBR
16 c. Percent of adult and child victims in shelter more
17 than 72 hours having a plan for family safety and security
18 when they leave shelter....................................95%
19 4. ADULT PROTECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of investigations.....................32,281
21 b. Number of persons receiving protective supervision
22 services...................................................628
23 c. Number of persons referred to other agencies..1,700
24 d. Number of individuals served in emergency shelters
25 ........................................................13,578
26 e. Number of individuals counseled..............97,343
27 5. CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION OUTCOME
28 MEASURE.--
29 a. Percent of children in families who complete
30 intensive child abuse prevention programs of 3 months or more
31 who are not abused or neglected within 12 months after program
40
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 completion.................................................96%
2 b. Per capita child abuse rate................23/1,000
3 c. Number of families served....................53,500
4 6. CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Percent of children who have no findings of child
6 maltreatment within 1 year after case closure from services
7 ...........................................................95%
8 b. Percent of children reunified with family who
9 return to foster care within 1 year after case closure......3%
10 c. Percent of children not abused or neglected during
11 services...................................................97%
12 d. Percent of children who exited out-of-home care by
13 the 12th month.............................................30%
14 e. Percent of cases reviewed by supervisors in
15 accordance with department timeframes for early warning system
16 ..........................................................100%
17 f. Percent of alleged victims seen within 24 hours
18 ..........................................................100%
19 g. Percent of investigations completed within 30 days
20 ..........................................................100%
21 h. Percent of children removed from a home who are
22 placed with a relative as a result of a child protective
23 investigation....................................2001-2002 LBR
24 i. Percent of children removed from a home who are
25 placed in out-of-home care (excluding relative placements) as
26 a result of a child protective investigation.....2001-2002 LBR
27 j. Percent of foster homes that exceed their licensed
28 capacity without a current waiver................2001-2002 LBR
29 k. Percent of case plans completed within 60 days
30 after the child is removed from the home.........2001-2002 LBR
31 l. Percent of children who are adopted of the number
41
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 of children legally available for adoption.................97%
2 7. CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Reports of child abuse/neglect..............134,344
4 b. Children identified as abused/neglected during year
5 ........................................................75,000
6 c. Children receiving adoptive services..........4,500
7 d. Children receiving adoption subsidies........13,209
8 8. FLORIDA ABUSE HOTLINE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
9 a. Percent of abandoned calls made to the Florida
10 Abuse Hotline...............................................7%
11 9. FLORIDA ABUSE HOTLINE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Calls answered..............................474,204
13 10. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
14 MEASURE.--
15 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
16 costs....................................................6.40%
17 (d) For the Persons with Disabilities Program, the
18 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
19 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
20 Appropriations 326-360 are as follows:
21 1. DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES PUBLIC FACILITIES OUTCOME
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Annual number of significant reportable incidents
24 per 100 persons with developmental disabilities living in
25 developmental services institutions.........................24
26 b. Percent of people with improved quality of life.40%
27 2. DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES PUBLIC FACILITIES OUTPUT
28 MEASURES.--
29 a. Adults incompetent to proceed provided competency
30 training and custodial care in the Mentally Retarded
31 Defendants Program.........................................141
42
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. Adults receiving services in developmental services
2 institutions.............................................1,419
3 3. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of people receiving home and community
5 services with improved quality of life (waiver and nonwaiver)
6 ...........................................................53%
7 b. Percent of people receiving private ICF/DD with
8 improved quality of life...................................40%
9 c. Percent of people who have a quality-of-life score
10 of 19 out of 25 or greater on the Outcome Based Performance
11 Measures Assessment at annual reassessment.................18%
12 d. Percent of people who are employed in integrated
13 settings...................................................26%
14 4. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Children and adults provided residential care.5,330
16 b. Number of people served in the community (not in
17 private ICF/DDs)........................................27,891
18 c. Number of people served in private facilities.2,084
19 5. IN-HOME SERVICES FOR DISABLED ADULTS OUTCOME
20 MEASURE.--
21 a. Percent of adults with disabilities receiving
22 services who are not placed in a nursing home..............99%
23 6. IN-HOME SERVICES FOR DISABLED ADULTS OUTPUT
24 MEASURE.--
25 a. Number of disabled adults provided in-home supports
26 .........................................................4,302
27 7. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
28 MEASURE.--
29 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
30 costs....................................................0.12%
31 (e) For the Mental Health Program, the outcome
43
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 measures, output measures, and associated performance
2 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
3 Appropriations 361-390 are as follows:
4 1. VIOLENT SEXUAL PREDATOR OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of sexual predators served.............4,750
6 b. Number of people served who are committed........89
7 c. Number of people served who are noncommitted.....60
8 2. ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Average annual number of days spent in the
11 community (not in institutions or other facilities) for adults
12 with a serious and persistent mental illness...............344
13 b. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
14 of Functioning score for adults with a serious and persistent
15 mental illness..............................................50
16 c. Average annual days worked for pay for adults with
17 a serious and persistent mental illness.....................40
18 d. Percent of clients with a serious and persistent
19 mental illness who worked during the year........2001-2002 LBR
20 e. Percent of community partners (serious and
21 persistent mental illness) satisfied based on survey.......90%
22 f. Average Global Assessment of Functioning scale
23 change score for adults in mental health crisis..............8
24 g. Percent of adults in mental health crisis not
25 readmitted within 30 days..................................97%
26 h. Percent of community partners (adults in mental
27 health crisis) satisfied based on survey...................90%
28 i. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
29 of Functioning score for adults with forensic involvement...45
30 j. Percent of adults with forensic involvement who
31 violate their conditional release under chapter 916, Florida
44
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Statutes, and are recommitted...............................4%
2 k. Percent of community partners (adults in mental
3 health crisis) satisfied based on survey...................90%
4 l. Average annual number of days spent in the
5 community (not in institutions or other facilities) for adults
6 with forensic involvement..................................310
7 3. ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of adults with a serious and persistent
10 mental illness in the community served..................53,736
11 b. Number of adults in mental health crisis served
12 ........................................................34,382
13 c. Number of adults with forensic involvement served
14 ...........................................................896
15 4. CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of children with mental illness restored to
18 competency and recommended to proceed with a judicial hearing
19 ...........................................................90%
20 b. Percent of children with mental retardation
21 restored to competency and recommended to proceed with a
22 judicial hearing...........................................68%
23 c. Percent of community partners satisfied with
24 program (children incompetent to proceed in Juvenile Justice)
25 based upon a survey........................................90%
26 d. Projected annual days serious emotionally disturbed
27 (SED) children (excluding those in juvenile justice
28 facilities) spend in the community.........................333
29 e. Percent of available school days SED children
30 attended during the last 30 days...........................86%
31 f. Percent of SED community partners satisfied based
45
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 on a survey................................................90%
2 g. Average functional level score SED children will
3 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
4 Functioning scale...........................................50
5 h. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
6 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
7 the presented problem and symptoms of the serious disturbance
8 recorded in the initial assessment.............. 2001-2002 LBR
9 i. Projected annual days emotionally disturbed (ED)
10 children (excluding those in juvenile justice facilities)
11 spend in the community.....................................349
12 j. Percent of available days ED children attended
13 school during the last 30 days.............................89%
14 k. Percent of ED community partners satisfied based on
15 a survey...................................................90%
16 l. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
17 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
18 the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional
19 disturbance recorded in the initial assessment...2001-2002 LBR
20 m. Average functional level score ED children will
21 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
22 Functioning scale...........................................57
23 5. CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT
24 MEASURES.--
25 a. Number served who are incompetent to proceed....226
26 b. Number of SED children to be served..........32,817
27 c. Number of ED children to be served...........18,272
28 d. Number of at-risk children to be served.......2,000
29 6. ADULT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES OUTCOME
30 MEASURES.--
31 a. Percent of civil commitment patients who improve
46
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 mental health based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome
2 Scale......................................................64%
3 b. Average civil commitment scores on community
4 readiness/ability survey.........................2001-2002 LBR
5 c. Percent of civil commitment patients readmitted
6 within 1 year....................................2001-2002 LBR
7 d. Percent of civil commitment community partners
8 satisfied based on survey........................2001-2002 LBR
9 e. Percent of people in civil commitment served who
10 are discharged to the community............................40%
11 f. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
12 in civil commitment in each mental health institution.......15
13 g. Average number of days to restore competency for
14 adults in forensic commitment..............................174
15 h. Percent of forensic residents restored to
16 competency.......................................2001-2002 LBR
17 i. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
18 in forensic commitment in each mental health institution.....5
19 j. Percent of forensic commitment community partners
20 satisfied based on survey..................................90%
21 7. ADULT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES OUTPUT
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of people in civil commitment served...2,700
24 b. Number of civil commitment adult abuse reports
25 confirmed or proposed confirmed..................2001-2002 LBR
26 c. Number of forensic commitment adult abuse reports
27 confirmed or proposed confirmed..................2001-2002 LBR
28 d. Number of adults in forensic commitment served
29 .........................................................1,605
30 8. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
31 MEASURE.--
47
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
2 costs.....................................................1.6%
3 (f) For the Substance Abuse Program, the outcome
4 measures, output measures, and associated performance
5 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
6 Appropriations 391-398B are as follows:
7 1. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
8 MEASURE.--
9 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
10 costs.....................................................3.8%
11 2. CHILD SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND
12 TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of children with substance abuse who
14 complete treatment.........................................72%
15 b. Percent of children with substance abuse who are
16 drug free during the 12 months following completion of
17 treatment..................................................52%
18 c. Percent of children with substance abuse under the
19 supervision of the state receiving substance-abuse treatment
20 who are not committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice
21 during the 12 months following treatment completion........85%
22 d. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
23 survey.....................................................85%
24 e. Percent of children at risk of substance abuse in
25 targeted prevention programs who achieve expected level of
26 improvement in reading.....................................75%
27 f. Percent of children at risk of substance abuse in
28 targeted prevention programs who achieve expected level of
29 improvement in math........................................75%
30 g. Percent of children at risk of substance abuse who
31 receive targeted prevention services who are not admitted to
48
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 substance-abuse services during the 12 months after completion
2 of prevention services.....................................95%
3 3. CHILD SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION SERVICES OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of children with substance-abuse problems
6 served..................................................55,000
7 b. Number of children with substance abuse completing
8 treatment................................................5,429
9 c. Number of children receiving aftercare/follow-up
10 .........................................................2,004
11 d. Number of at-risk children served in targeted
12 prevention...............................................7,000
13 e. Number of prevention services to children at risk
14 .........................................................7,483
15 4. ADULT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND
16 TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of adults who are drug free during the 12
18 months following completion of treatment...................54%
19 b. Percent of adults employed upon discharge from
20 treatment services.........................................65%
21 c. Percent change in the number of clients with
22 arrests within 90 days following discharge compared to number
23 with arrests within 90 days prior to admission.............55%
24 d. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
25 survey.....................................................82%
26 e. Percent of adults in child welfare protective
27 supervision who have case plans requiring substance-abuse
28 treatment who are receiving treatment......................53%
29 f. Percent of clients who complete treatment.......68%
30 5. ADULT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND
31 TREATMENT SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
49
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Number of adults served.....................124,400
2 b. Number of adults in child welfare protective
3 supervision who have case plans requiring substance-abuse
4 treatment who are receiving treatment....................5,000
5 c. Number of adults provided detoxification and crisis
6 supports................................................23,000
7 d. Number of at-risk adults provided prevention
8 services................................................53,000
9 e. Number of adults provided treatment, as measured by
10 the number completing treatment.........................20,213
11 f. Number of adults in need given aftercare/follow-up
12 ........................................................14,826
13 (g) For the Economic Self-Sufficiency Program, the
14 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 399-435 are as follows:
17 1. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTCOME
18 MEASURE.--
19 a. Percent of all applications processed within time
20 standards..................................................98%
21 2. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTPUT
22 MEASURE.--
23 a. Total number of applications..............2,890,790
24 3. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
25 MEASURE.--
26 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
27 costs.....................................................2.7%
28 4. FRAUD PREVENTION AND BENEFIT RECOVERY OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of Food Stamp benefits determined
31 accurately..............................................90.70%
50
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. Percent of cash assistance benefits determined
2 accurately..............................................93.89%
3 c. Percent of dollars collected for established
4 benefit recovery claims.................................64.10%
5 d. Percent of suspected fraud cases referred that
6 result in front-end fraud prevention savings...............70%
7 5. FRAUD PREVENTION AND BENEFIT RECOVERY OUTPUT
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Dollars collected through benefit recovery
10 ...................................................$14,725,000
11 b. Number of front-end fraud prevention investigations
12 completed...............................................25,230
13 c. Dollars saved through front-end fraud prevention
14 ...................................................$18,929,800
15 6. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
16 a. Percent of applications processed within time
17 standards..................................................98%
18 7. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
19 a. Number of applications processed for Optional State
20 Supplementation payments.................................5,640
21 8. WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES) AND
22 EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of 4-year-old children placed with
24 contracted providers in care for 9 months who enter
25 kindergarten ready to learn as determined by DOE or local
26 school systems' readiness assessment.......................83%
27 b. Percent of cash and welfare-transition clients who
28 need child care who receive subsidized child care services
29 ..........................................................100%
30 c. Percent of working poor clients
31 (nonwelfare-transition) who receive subsidized child care
51
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 services...................................................71%
2 9. WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES) AND
3 EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of cash assistance participants referred to
5 the regional workforce development boards..............121,000
6 b. Number of children who received subsidized child
7 care services..........................................147,085
8 10. REFUGEES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
9 a. Percent of Refugee Assistance cases accurately
10 closed at 8 months or less.................................98%
11 11. REFUGEES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Number of refugee cases closed................5,840
13 (3) DEPARTMENT OF ELDERLY AFFAIRS.--
14 (a) For the Services to Elders Program, the outcome
15 measures, output measures, and associated performance
16 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
17 Appropriations 436-461 are as follows:
18 1. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTCOME
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of elders CARES determined to be eligible
21 for nursing home placement who are diverted..............16.8%
22 b. Percent of CARES imminent-risk referrals served.90%
23 2. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTPUT
24 MEASURE.--
25 a. Total number of CARES assessments............64,356
26 3. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of Adult Protective Services (APS)
28 referrals who are in need of immediate services to prevent
29 further harm who are served within 72 hours................95%
30 b. Costs of home and community-based care (including
31 non-DOEA programs) is less than nursing home care for
52
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 comparable client groups......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 c. Percent of elders assessed with high or
3 moderate-risk environments who improved their environment
4 score......................................................70%
5 d. Percent of new service recipients with high-risk
6 nutrition scores whose nutritional status improved.......60.0%
7 e. Percent of new service recipients whose ADL
8 assessment score has been maintained or improved.........60.6%
9 f. Percent of new service recipients whose IADL
10 assessment score has been maintained or improved.........60.0%
11 g. Percent of family and family-assisted caregivers
12 who self-report they are very likely to provide care.......92%
13 h. Percent of Community Care for the Elderly clients
14 defined as "probable Medicaid eligibles" who remain in
15 state-funded programs......................................15%
16 4. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of people served.....................139,331
18 b. Number of congregate meals provided.......4,709,932
19 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Administrative and support cost as a percent of
22 total agency costs..........................................4%
23 b. Increase the percent of participants passing the
24 competency test............................................80%
25 c. Agency information technology cost as a percent of
26 total agency costs........................................0.6%
27 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
28 MEASURE.--
29 a. Number of Assisted Living Facility and Adult Family
30 Care Home proprietors and staff trained..................7,000
31 7. CONSUMER ADVOCATE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
53
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Percent of complaint investigations initiated
2 within 5 working days......................................90%
3 8. CONSUMER ADVOCATE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of judicially approved guardianship plans
5 ...........................................................340
6 b. Number of complaint investigations completed..8,500
7 (4) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.--
8 (a) For the Executive Direction and Administration
9 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
10 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
11 Specific Appropriations 462-474 are as follows:
12 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
13 MEASURES.--
14 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
15 costs.......................................................1%
16 b. Percent of middle and high school students who
17 report using tobacco products in the last 30 days........25.5%
18 2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
19 MEASURE.--
20 a. Number of middle and high school students provided
21 comprehensive tobacco prevention education.............121,185
22 3. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Percent of hardware, software, and networks meeting
24 department standards.......................................98%
25 4. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of custom and in-house applications
27 supported...................................................42
28 b. Number of personal computers, servers, and e-mail
29 users supported.........................................19,588
30 (b) For the Community Public Health Program, the
31 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
54
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 475-544 are as follows:
3 1. FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Total infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births
5 ...........................................................6.9
6 b. Nonwhite infant mortality rate per 1,000 nonwhite
7 births....................................................10.7
8 c. Percent of low-birth-weight births among prenatal
9 Women, Infants, and Children program clients..............7.9%
10 d. Live births to mothers age 15-19 per 1,000 females
11 15-19.....................................................55.4
12 e. Percent of mothers 15-19 having a repeat birth..16%
13 f. Percent of targeted low-income population receiving
14 dental health services from a county health department...10.5%
15 g. Percent of students who visit the health clinic and
16 are able to return to class rather than leaving school.....90%
17 2. FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of women and infants receiving Healthy Start
19 services...............................................145,000
20 b. Average monthly participants in Women, Infants, and
21 Children program.......................................339,000
22 c. Number of clients served in county health
23 department Family Planning programs....................162,000
24 d. Number of teens age 15-19 served in county health
25 department Family Planning programs.....................43,725
26 e. Number of adults and children receiving county
27 health department sponsored professional dental care....79,400
28 f. Number of children served in the county health
29 department Child Health program........................168,000
30 g. Number of School Health nursing assessments
31 provided...............................................885,000
55
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 h. Number of women, infants, and children provided
2 food and nutrition services (WIC and Child Care Food)..443,100
3 i. Number of KidCare outreach services.......1,680,000
4 3. INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTCOME
5 MEASURES.--
6 a. AIDS case rate per 100,000 population..........35.5
7 b. HIV/AIDS resident total deaths per 100,000
8 population.................................................9.6
9 c. Chlamydia case rate per 100,000 population....195.0
10 d. Tuberculosis case rate per 100,000 population...8.0
11 e. Immunization rate among 2-year-olds.............90%
12 f. Vaccine-preventable disease rate per 100,000
13 population................................................3.26
14 4. INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTPUT
15 MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of HIV/AIDS counseling and testing services
17 provided annually......................................220,000
18 b. Number of HIV partner notification services
19 provided annually........................................8,500
20 c. Number of clients served in county health
21 department sexually transmitted disease programs........78,000
22 d. Number of tuberculosis medical management services
23 provided................................................25,245
24 e. Number of patients who complete tuberculosis
25 therapy at the A.G. Holley tuberculosis hospital............90
26 f. Number of immunization services provided by county
27 public health departments............................1,629,815
28 g. Number of HIV/AIDS patient care services provided
29 to individuals..........................................28,193
30 5. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Food and waterborne disease cases per 1,000
56
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 facilities regulated by the department.....................4.4
2 b. Overall sanitation and safety score in department
3 regulated facilities.....................................97.2%
4 c. Septic tank failure rate per 1,000 within 2 years
5 after system installation..................................2.4
6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of department regulated facilities inspected
8 .......................................................122,527
9 b. Number of onsite sewage disposal system inspections
10 completed..............................................295,000
11 c. Control of radiation threats as measured by the
12 number of x-ray machines inspected......................37,800
13 d. Number of water systems and storage tanks inspected
14 .......................................................218,000
15 7. STATEWIDE HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent saved on prescription drugs compared to
18 market price...............................................30%
19 b. Percent of laboratory samples passing standardized
20 proficiency testing.......................................100%
21 c. Percent of vital statistics records completed
22 within established timeframes..............................99%
23 (c) For the Children's Medical Services (CMS) Program,
24 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
25 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
26 Specific Appropriations 545-571A are as follows:
27 1. CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of families in Children's Medical Services
29 (CMS) Program Network indicating a positive perception of care
30 ...........................................................95%
31 b. Percent of CMS Network enrollees in compliance with
57
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 the periodicity schedule for well-child care...............90%
2 c. Percent of eligible infants/toddlers provided CMS
3 program Early Intervention program services................90%
4 d. Percent of Child Protection Team (CPT) team
5 assessments provided to Family Safety and Preservation program
6 within established timeframes..............................90%
7 2. CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of children enrolled in CMS program Network
9 (Medicaid and Non-Medicaid).............................37,500
10 b. Number of clients receiving services in the CMS
11 program Early Intervention program......................29,000
12 c. Number of children receiving Child Protection Team
13 (CPT) assessments.......................................27,500
14 (d) For the Health Care Practitioner and Access
15 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
16 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
17 Specific Appropriations 572-592 are as follows:
18 1. MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of unlicensed individuals identified and
20 referred to State Attorneys.................................36
21 b. Percent of health care practitioners' applications
22 for licensure completed within 90 days....................100%
23 2. MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of unlicensed individuals investigated...364
25 b. Number of initial health care practitioner licenses
26 processed...............................................48,946
27 c. Number of initial health care practitioner licenses
28 issued..................................................43,531
29 d. Number of licenses issued and renewed by mail
30 .......................................................314,688
31 3. COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
58
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Percent of emergency medical service providers
2 found to have a significant deficiency during licensure
3 inspection................................................8.5%
4 b. Age-adjusted injury death rate per 100,000.......57
5 c. Number of emergency medical service providers
6 licensed annually..........................................249
7 d. Number of medical students who do a rotation in a
8 medically underserved area.................................715
9 e. Number of persons who receive continuing education
10 services through Work Force Development.................16,400
11 4. COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of providers recruited for underserved areas
13 ............................................................46
14 b. Number of brain and spinal cord injury victims
15 reintegrated to the community............................3,384
16 c. Number of emergency medical services providers
17 licensed and emergency medical technicians and paramedics
18 certified...............................................31,930
19 (e) For the Disability Determinations Program, the
20 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
21 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
22 Appropriations 592A-592C are as follows:
23 1. DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTCOME
24 MEASURE.--
25 a. Percent of Title II and XVI disability decisions
26 completed accurately as measured by the Social Security
27 Administration.............................................92%
28 2. DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTPUT
29 MEASURE.--
30 a. Number of Title II and XVI disability decisions
31 completed..............................................212,489
59
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (5) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS.--
2 (a) For the Services to Veterans Program, the outcome
3 measures, output measures, and associated performance
4 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
5 Appropriations 593-611 are as follows:
6 1. VETERANS' HOMES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Occupancy rate for veterans homes in operation for
8 2 years or longer..........................................75%
9 b. Percent of veterans' homes that received gold-star
10 certification by AHCA.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 2. VETERANS' HOMES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Number of veterans' homes beds available........390
13 3. VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Percent of "ready to rate" claims submitted to
15 USDVA compared to total claims submitted....................2%
16 4. VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of veterans served...................195,000
18 b. Number of claims processed...................15,500
19 5. VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
20 a. Value of cost avoidance because of issue resolution
21 ....................................................$4,680,000
22 6. VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
23 a. Number of veterans served (benefited) by issue
24 resolution.............................................240,000
25 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
26 MEASURES.--
27 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
28 costs.......................................................8%
29 b. Percent of time computer network is available for
30 use or response time.......................................85%
31 c. Number of veterans or eligible dependents enrolled
60
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 in certified educational programs.......................27,000
2 d. Percent of veterans, families, and survivors aware
3 of FDVA services...........................................43%
4 e. Percent of schools certified after submission of
5 application...............................................100%
6 8. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
7 MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of constituents served...............559,000
9 b. Value of veterans' education benefits paid
10 ..................................................$110,000,000
11 c. Number of Florida education institution programs
12 certified................................................3,000
13 d. Number of staff supported by the information
14 technology service through networking, software, and hardware
15 support....................................................540
16 Section 31. The performance measures and standards
17 established in this section for individual programs in public
18 safety and judiciary agencies shall be applied to those
19 programs for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance
20 measures and standards are directly linked to the
21 appropriations made in the General Appropriations Act for
22 Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as required by the Government
23 Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
24 (1) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.--
25 (a) For the Administration Program, the outcome
26 measures, output measures, and associated performance
27 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
28 Appropriations 612-624 are as follows:
29 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
30 MEASURE.--
31 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
61
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 costs....................................................11.0%
2 2. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
3 a. Percent of fully operational hours of Corrections
4 Data Center..............................................97.0%
5 (b) For the Security and Institutional Operations
6 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
7 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
8 Specific Appropriations 625-700 are as follows:
9 1. ADULT MALE CUSTODY OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
11 major institutions...........................................0
12 b. Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or
13 more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 c. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
15 reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 d. Percent of random inmate drug tests that are
17 negative.................................................98.5%
18 2. ADULT FEMALE CUSTODY OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
20 major institutions...........................................0
21 b. Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or
22 more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 c. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
24 reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 d. Percent of random inmate drug tests that are
26 negative.................................................98.5%
27 3. MALE YOUTHFUL OFFENDER OPERATIONS OUTCOME
28 MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
30 major institutions...........................................0
31 b. Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or
62
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 c. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
3 reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 d. Percent of random inmate drug tests that are
5 negative.................................................98.5%
6 4. SPECIALTY INSTITUTION OPERATIONS OUTCOME
7 MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
9 major institutions...........................................0
10 b. Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or
11 more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 c. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
13 reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 d. Percent of random inmate drug tests that are
15 negative.................................................98.5%
16 5. RECEPTION CENTER OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
18 major institutions...........................................0
19 b. Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or
20 more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 c. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
22 reports per 1,000 inmates.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 d. Percent of random inmate drug tests that are
24 negative.................................................98.5%
25 6. PUBLIC SERVICE WORK SQUADS & WORK RELEASE
26 TRANSITION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of available work assignments.........35,203
28 b. Number of inmates available for work assignments
29 ................................................. FY 2001-2002
30 LBR
31 c. Percent of those available for work who are not
63
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 assigned..................................................1.4%
2 d. Percent of available inmates working..........83.0%
3 7. ROAD PRISONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Annual cost savings to the state for using inmate
5 labor for maintenance of state rights-of-way..FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 8. OFFENDER MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of inmates who did not escape when assigned
8 outside a secure perimeter...............................99.9%
9 b. Percent of inmates placed in a facility that
10 provides at least one of inmate's primary program needs.....FY
11 2001-2002 LBR
12 9. OFFENDER MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURE.--
13 a. Number of new inmates received and oriented..26,831
14 10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
15 MEASURE.--
16 a. Percent of victim notifications that meet the
17 statutory time period requirements............FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 11. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
19 MEASURE.--
20 a. Percent of reported criminal incidents investigated
21 by Inspector General's Office.................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 12. CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
23 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Square footage maintained in major institutions
25 ........................................................16.5 M
26 (c) For the Community Corrections Program, the outcome
27 measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 701-736 are as follows:
30 1. PROBATION SUPERVISION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Percent of offenders that successfully complete
64
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a
2 2-year measurement period................................56.9%
3 b. Status of offenders 2 years after the period of
4 supervision was imposed:
5 (I) Revoked:
6 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 (II) Absconded:
9 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 c. Percent of offenders who successfully complete
12 supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for
13 committing a new crime within 2 years:
14 (I) To prison....................................98.9%
15 (II) To supervision..............................94.4%
16 2. PROBATION SUPERVISION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
18 supervised in the community compared to the department
19 standard:
20 (I) Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 (II) Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 (III) Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 (IV) Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 (V) Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 3. DRUG OFFENDER PROBATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Percent of offenders that successfully complete
27 their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a
28 2-year measurement period................................56.9%
29 b. Status of offenders 2 years after the period of
30 supervision was imposed:
31 (I) Revoked:
65
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 (II) Absconded:
4 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 c. Percent of offenders who successfully complete
7 supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for
8 committing a new crime within 2 years:
9 (I) To prison....................................98.9%
10 (II) To supervision..............................94.4%
11 4. DRUG OFFENDER PROBATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
13 supervised in the community compared to the department
14 standard:
15 (I) Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 (II) Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 (III) Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 (IV) Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 (V) Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 5. PRETRIAL INTERVENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percent of offenders that successfully complete
22 their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a
23 2-year measurement period................................56.9%
24 b. Status of offenders 2 years after the period of
25 supervision was imposed:
26 (I) Revoked:
27 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 (II) Absconded:
30 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
66
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 c. Percent of offenders who successfully complete
2 supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for
3 committing a new crime within 2 years:
4 (I) To prison....................................98.9%
5 (II) To supervision..............................94.4%
6 6. PRETRIAL INTERVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
8 supervised in the community compared to the department
9 standard:
10 (I) Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 (II) Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 (III) Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 (IV) Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 (V) Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 7. COMMUNITY CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of offenders that successfully complete
17 their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a
18 2-year measurement period................................56.9%
19 b. Status of offenders 2 years after the period of
20 supervision was imposed:
21 (I) Revoked:
22 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 (II) Absconded:
25 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 c. Percent of offenders who successfully complete
28 supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for
29 committing a new crime within 2 years:
30 (I) To prison....................................98.9%
31 (II) To supervision..............................94.4%
67
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 8. COMMUNITY CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURE.--
2 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
3 supervised in the community compared to the department
4 standard......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 9. POST-PRISON-RELEASE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Percent of offenders that successfully complete
7 their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a
8 2-year measurement period................................56.9%
9 b. Status of offenders 2 years after the period of
10 supervision was imposed:
11 (I) Revoked:
12 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 (II) Absconded:
15 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 c. Percent of offenders who successfully complete
18 supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for
19 committing a new crime within 2 years:
20 (I) To prison....................................98.9%
21 (II) To supervision..............................94.4%
22 10. POST-PRISON-RELEASE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
24 supervised in the community compared to the department
25 standard:
26 (I) Administrative....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 (II) Basic risk.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 (III) Enhanced risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 (IV) Intensive risk...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 (V) Close risk........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 11. ADULT SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
68
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Substance abuse tests administered to offenders
2 being supervised in the community.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 12. OFFENDER MANAGEMENT & CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURE.--
4 a. Score sheets processed......................122,722
5 (d) For the Health Care Program, the outcome measures,
6 output measures, and associated performance standards with
7 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 737-750
8 are as follows:
9 1. INMATE HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Health care grievances that are upheld:
11 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 (II) Percent......................................3.0%
13 b. Number of suicides per 100,000 inmates compared to
14 the national average for correctional facilities/institutions:
15 (I) Within DOC........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 (II) National average.................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 c. Comparison of per diems for General Medical
18 Services:
19 (I) DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 (II) HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 (III) Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 d. Comparison of per diems for Mental Health Services:
23 (I) DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 (II) HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 (III) Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 e. Comparison of per diems for hospitalization
27 contracts:
28 (I) DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 (II) HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 (III) Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 (e) For the Correctional Education and Programs
69
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
2 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
3 Specific Appropriations 751-766 are as follows:
4 1. ADULT SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND
5 TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Percent of community supervision offenders who have
7 completed drug treatment without subsequent recommitment to
8 community supervision or prison within 24 months after release
9 .........................................................93.2%
10 b. Percent of inmates who have completed drug
11 treatment without subsequent recommitment to community
12 supervision or prison within 24 months after release.....72.9%
13 c. Percent of inmates who need programs and
14 successfully complete Drug Abuse Education/Treatment programs
15 .........................................................46.0%
16 2. BASIC EDUCATION SKILLS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of inmates who successfully complete
18 Mandatory Literacy Programs..............................52.0%
19 b. Percent of inmates who successfully complete GED
20 Education Programs.......................................14.0%
21 c. Percent of inmates who successfully complete
22 Vocational Education Programs............................32.0%
23 d. Percent of inmates who participate in Special
24 Education (Federal Law) Programs..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 e. Percent of inmates completing mandatory literacy
26 programs who score at or above 9th grade level on next Test
27 for Adult Basic Education (TABE).........................16.0%
28 2. ADULT OFFENDER TRANSITION, REHABILITATION, AND
29 SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of community supervision offenders who
31 successfully complete transition, rehabilitation, or support
70
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 programs without subsequent recommitment to community
2 supervision or prison for 24 months after release........85.5%
3 b. Percent of inmates who successfully complete
4 transition, rehabilitation, or support programs without
5 subsequent recommitment to community supervision or prison for
6 24 months after release..................................72.9%
7 3. ADULT OFFENDER TRANSITION, REHABILITATION, AND
8 SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of transition plans completed for inmates
10 released from prison..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 b. Percent of transition plans completed for inmates
12 released from prison..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 c. Percent of inmates participating in religious
14 programming.................................................FY
15 2001-2002 LBR
16 (2) JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION.--
17 (a) For the Justice Administrative Commission Program,
18 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
19 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
20 Specific Appropriations 767-781 are as follows:
21 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Administrative costs as a percentage of total
24 agency costs..............................................4.0%
25 b. Number of material/substantial audit findings
26 related to areas of direct JAC responsibility to its customers
27 ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 c. Percent of invoices processed within statutory
29 timeframes..................................................FY
30 2001-2002 LBR
31 2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
71
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of budget amendments processed and agency
3 transfers processed...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 b. Number of accounting transactions (FLAIR) input..FY
5 2001-2002 LBR
6 c. Number of financial reports produced...FY 2001-2002
7 LBR
8 d. Number of reports prepared.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 e. Number of employee and position transactions
10 (COPES) processed by type.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 f. Number of IRM reports provided to the State
12 Technology Office............................ FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 g. Number of JAC Staff users directly supported.....FY
14 2001-2002 LBR
15 h. Number of Public Records Requests..FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 (b) For the Criminal Prosecutions and Civil Actions
17 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
18 performance standards with respect to funds provided to each
19 State Attorney Office in Specific Appropriations 782-924 are
20 as follows:
21 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of dispositions by trial verdicts, pleas,
23 nontrial, and otherwise disposed of...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 b. Percent of dispositions by trial verdicts, pleas,
25 nontrial, and otherwise disposed of...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 c. Offenders who qualify for enhanced sentencing for
27 whom state attorneys requested enhanced sentencing and the
28 number for whom judges ordered enhanced sentencing "Enhanced
29 Sentencing" includes Habitual Offender, Violent Habitual,
30 Violent Career Criminal, Prison Releasee Reoffender,
31 10-20-Life, and Three-Strikes statutes:
72
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 d. Number of Baker Act hearings in which the
4 recommendation of the state attorney was supported by the
5 court.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 e. Cases in which restitution was recommended and
7 ordered:
8 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 f. Cases in which child support was requested and
11 ordered:
12 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 g. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
15 annually..................................................0.0%
16 h. Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 i. Average years of prosecution experience......... FY
18 2001-2002 LBR
19 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of criminal case referrals:
21 (I) Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 (II) Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 (III) Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 b. Number of filings:
25 (I) Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 (II) Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 (III) Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 c. Average number of referrals per attorney:
29 (I) Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 (II) Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 (III) Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
73
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 d. Average number of filings per attorney:
2 (I) Misdemeanor.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 (II) Felony...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 (III) Juvenile........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 e. Number of cases investigated/reviewed..FY 2001-2002
6 LBR
7 f. Number of victim contacts and notifications..... FY
8 2001-2002 LBR
9 g. Number of witness contacts and notifications.... FY
10 2001-2002 LBR
11 h. Number of truancy interventions....FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 i. Number of citizen dispute mediations.. FY 2001-2002
13 LBR
14 j. Number of worthless check diversions.. FY 2001-2002
15 LBR
16 k. Number of domestic violence diversions.......... FY
17 2001-2002 LBR
18 l. Number of statutory pretrial interventions...... FY
19 2001-2002 LBR
20 m. Number of cases referred to drug court.FY 2001-2002
21 LBR
22 n. Number of postconviction relief responses.....9,000
23 o. Number of Habeas Corpus responses..FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 p. Number of actions for the following:
25 (I) Public records requests...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 (II) Bond validations.................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 (III) Expungements....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 (IV) Forfeiture.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 (V) Baker Act hearings................FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 (VI) Bond estreatures.................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 q. Number of sexual predator civil commitment
74
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 proceedings.................................................FY
2 2001-2002 LBR
3 r. Number of child welfare referrals received.......FY
4 2001-2002 LBR
5 s. Number of child support enforcement referrals....FY
6 2001-2002 LBR
7 (c) For the Public Defender Trial Program, the outcome
8 measures, output measures, and associated performance
9 standards with respect to funds provided to each Trial Public
10 Defender Office in Specific Appropriations 925-1044 are as
11 follows:
12 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of clients in custody contacted within 72
14 hours after appointment to a public defender.............90.0%
15 b. Percent of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved
16 within speedy trial rule unless dismissed................90.0%
17 c. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
18 annually..................................................0.0%
19 d. Average years of defense experience....FY 2001-2002
20 LBR
21 e. Annual attorney turnover rates.................9.0%
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of criminal cases closed.............571,418
24 b. Number of civil cases closed.................18,650
25 c. Number of pleas....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 d. Number of trials...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 e. Number of cases nolle prossed or dismissed.......FY
28 2001-2002 LBR
29 f. Number of clients represented......FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 g. Number of cases closed.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 h. Number of violation of probation hearings........FY
75
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 2001-2002 LBR
2 i. Number of initial interviews for assigned cases..FY
3 2001-2002 LBR
4 (d) For the Public Defender Appellate Program, the
5 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
6 standards with respect to funds provided to each Appellate
7 Public Defender Office in Specific Appropriations 1045-1069
8 are as follows:
9 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of appeals resolved...................91.0%
11 b. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
12 annually..................................................0.0%
13 c. Average years of defense experience....FY 2001-2002
14 LBR
15 d. Annual attorney turnover rates.................9.0%
16 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of clients represented......FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 b. Number of briefs filed.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 c. Number of writs filed..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 d. Number of cases closed........................4,739
21 (e) For the Capital Collateral Regional Counsels
22 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
23 performance standards with respect to funds provided to each
24 Appellate Public Defender Office in Specific Appropriations
25 1070-1092 are as follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of cases in which postconviction motion,
28 postconviction appeal, federal habeas corpus motion, or
29 federal appeal is timely filed, without extension.......... FY
30 2001-2002 LBR
31 b. Number of decisions by the court to release a death
76
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 row inmate................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 c. Number of new trials granted to death row inmates
3 ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 d. Number of new sentencing hearings granted........FY
5 2001-2002 LBR
6 e. Number of other appeals granted....FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 f. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
8 annually..................................................0.0%
9 g. Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 h. Average years of postconviction experience.......FY
11 2001-2002 LBR
12 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of death row public records requests
14 processed, as measured by number of record analyses made...180
15 b. Number of death row cases investigated/analyzed.139
16 c. Number of death row case requests for public
17 records made............................................... FY
18 2001-2002 LBR
19 d. Number of formal legal and background death row
20 case public record analyses made..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 e. Average number of hours per public records analysis
22 ..................................................FY 2001-2002
23 LBR
24 f. Number of death row cases investigated.FY 2001-2002
25 LBR
26 g. Number of witnesses and experts interviewed......FY
27 2001-2002 LBR
28 h. Number of death penalty inmate contacts made.....FY
29 2001-2002 LBR
30 i. Number of postconviction and appellate actions...FY
31 2001-2002 LBR
77
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 j. Number of issues raised by CCRC that are formally
2 considered by the courts......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 k. Percent of issues raised by CCRC that are formally
4 considered by the courts......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 l. Requested extensions of time granted following
6 court considerations:
7 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 m. Number of CCRC court issues not ruled on by the
10 courts due to strength of at least one issue..FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 (3) DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.--
12 (a) For the Juvenile Detention Program, the outcome
13 measures, output measures, and associated performance
14 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
15 Appropriations 1093-1101 are as follows:
16 1. DETENTION CENTERS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of escapes from secure detention facilities
18 per 100,000 resident days....................................0
19 b. Number of batteries per 100,000 resident days while
20 in secure detention:
21 (I) Youth on youth..................................84
22 (II) Youth on staff.................................20
23 c. Percent of youth who remain crime free while in
24 secure detention.........................................97.0%
25 2. DETENTION CENTERS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
26 a. Number of admissions to secure detention facilities
27 ........................................................61,844
28 3. HOME DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
29 a. Percent of successful completions without
30 committing a new law or contract violation, failure to appear,
31 an abscond, or contempt of court.........................73.0%
78
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 4. HOME DETENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of admissions into home detention.....35,549
3 b. Average daily population for home detention......FY
4 2001-2002 LBR
5 (b) For the Probation and Community Corrections
6 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
7 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
8 Specific Appropriations 1102-1111 are as follows:
9 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of youth who remain crime free during
11 aftercare supervision....................................65.0%
12 b. Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after
13 release from nonresidential commitment...................65.0%
14 c. Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after
15 release from probation...................................79.0%
16 d. Percent of juveniles who remain crime free within 1
17 year after release from aftercare.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 e. Average time in days to make recommendations to the
19 State Attorney once the law enforcement report is received...9
20 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Youth received at intake...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 b. Number of youth under aftercare supervision......FY
23 2001-2002 LBR
24 c. Number of youth under probation supervision......FY
25 2001-2002 LBR
26 d. Number of youth receiving nonresidential
27 delinquency rehabilitation services...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 e. Average annual community control and intake
29 caseload (agency standard is 32:1)........................40:1
30 (c) For the Office of the Secretary/Assistant
31 Secretary for Administrative Services Program, the outcome
79
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 measures, output measures, and associated performance
2 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
3 Appropriations 1112-1121A are as follows:
4 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM
5 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Administrative costs as a percentage of total
7 agency costs..............................................7.5%
8 2. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
9 a. Response time for youthful offender face sheet
10 inquiries in seconds (current is 75 seconds)................38
11 3. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Youth tracked by the Juvenile Justice Information
13 System.................................................488,387
14 (d) For the Residential Corrections Program, the
15 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
16 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
17 Appropriations 1122-1139 are as follows:
18 1. NONSECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after
20 release..................................................53.0%
21 b. Percent of escapes from nonsecure residential
22 commitment programs...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 c. Number of youth-on-youth batteries per 100 youth.FY
24 2001-2002 LBR
25 d. Number of youth-on-staff batteries per 100 youth.FY
26 2001-2002 LBR
27 e. Nonexempt contracts awarded on a competitive basis:
28 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 f. Percent of residential commitment program reviews
31 conducted by Quality Assurance, which indicate satisfactory or
80
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 higher ratings on overall quality (calendar year).FY 2001-2002
2 LBR
3 2. NONSECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Youth served in nonsecure residential commitment:
5 (I) Total number of youth served.................9,660
6 (II) Average daily population of youth served.......FY
7 2001-2002 LBR
8 b. Number of residential commitment beds on line....FY
9 2001-2002 LBR
10 c. Youth receiving substance abuse treatment.....2,386
11 3. SECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after
13 release..................................................53.0%
14 b. Percent of escapes.............................0.0%
15 c. Number of youth-on-youth batteries per 100 youth.FY
16 2001-2002 LBR
17 d. Number of youth-on-staff batteries per 100 youth.FY
18 2001-2002 LBR
19 e. Nonexempt contracts awarded on a competitive basis:
20 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 f. Percent of residential commitment program reviews
23 conducted by Quality Assurance, which indicate satisfactory or
24 higher ratings on overall quality (calendar year).FY 2001-2002
25 LBR
26 4. SECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Youth served in secure residential commitment:
28 (I) Total number of youth served.................2,501
29 (II) Average daily population of youth served.......FY
30 2001-2002 LBR
31 b. Number of residential commitment beds on line....FY
81
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 2001-2002 LBR
2 (e) For the Prevention and Victim Services, the
3 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
4 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
5 Appropriations 1140-1149A are as follows:
6 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
7 a. Percent of youth who remain crime free 6 months
8 after receiving prevention services......................85.0%
9 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
10 a. Number of youth served with prevention services
11 .......................................................121,264
12 (4) DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.--
13 (a) For the Office of Executive Direction & Business
14 Support Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and
15 associated performance standards with respect to funds
16 provided in Specific Appropriations 1150-1160D are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Administrative costs as a percentage of total
19 agency costs..............................................5.1%
20 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of internal investigations conducted.....100
22 b. Number of Florida law enforcement agencies
23 accredited/reaccredited.....................................25
24 c. Total number of accredited Florida law enforcement
25 agencies....................................................76
26 (b) For the Criminal Justice Investigations and
27 Forensic Science Program, the outcome measures, output
28 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
29 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1161-1174 are as
30 follows:
31 1. LABORATORY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
82
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Lab service requests completed:
2 (I) Number......................................75,505
3 (II) Percent.....................................95.0%
4 b. Average number of days to complete lab service
5 requests by lab discipline:
6 (I) Toxicology......................................30
7 (II) Chemistry........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 (III) Crime Scene...................................39
9 (IV) Firearms.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 (V) Documents.......................................50
11 (VI) Automated Fingerprint Identification System
12 (AFIS)..................................................... FY
13 2001-2002 LBR
14 (VII) Latents.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 (VIII) Serology/DNA................................150
16 (IX) Computer Evidence Recovery (CER).FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 (X) Microanalysis...................................85
18 2. LABORATORY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of crime scenes processed................600
20 b. Number of DNA samples added to DNA database..24,000
21 c. Number of expert witness appearances in court
22 proceedings..............................................1,815
23 3. INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of closed criminal investigations resolved
25 .........................................................87.0%
26 b. Criminal investigations closed resulting in an
27 arrest:
28 (I) Number.........................................826
29 (II) Percent.....................................67.0%
30 4. INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of criminal investigations worked......2,878
83
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. Number of criminal investigations commenced...1,549
2 c. Number of criminal investigations closed......1,314
3 d. Percent of criminal investigations closed.....47.5%
4 e. Number of short-term investigative assists worked
5 .........................................................1,578
6 5. MUTUAL AID & PROTECTIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of background investigations performed.3,500
8 b. Number of dignitaries provided with FDLE protective
9 services....................................................52
10 (c) For the Criminal Justice Information Program, the
11 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
12 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
13 Appropriations 1175-1182 are as follows:
14 1. INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of responses from FCIC hot files that
16 contain substantive information within defined timeframes
17 .........................................................96.0%
18 b. Percent of time FCIC is running and accessible
19 .........................................................99.5%
20 2. INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of FCIC workstations networked........18,000
22 3. PREVENTION AND CRIME INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent response to criminal history record check
25 customers within defined timeframes......................92.0%
26 b. Percent of criminal history information records
27 compiled accurately......................................83.0%
28 4. PREVENTION AND CRIME INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of criminal arrest information received
31 electronically (through AFIS) for entry into the criminal
84
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 history system...........................................80.0%
2 b. Number of responses to requests from criminal
3 history record checks................................1,580,000
4 c. Number of registered sexual predators/offenders
5 identified to the public................................16,603
6 d. Number of missing children cases worked through
7 MCIC.......................................................625
8 e. Arrest/identification records created and
9 maintained........................................FY 2001-2002
10 LBR
11 (d) For the Criminal Justice Professionalism Program,
12 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
13 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
14 Specific Appropriations 1183-1190 are as follows:
15 1. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES OUTCOME
16 MEASURE.--
17 a. Percent of individuals who pass the basic
18 professional certification examination for law enforcement
19 officers, corrections officers, and correctional probation
20 officers.................................................75.0%
21 2. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES OUTPUT
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of course curricula and examinations
24 developed or revised.......................................109
25 b. Number of examinations administered...........7,000
26 c. Number of individuals trained by the Florida
27 Criminal Justice Executive Institute.......................604
28 d. Number of law enforcement officers trained by DARE
29 ...........................................................155
30 3. COMPLIANCE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
31 a. Percent of training schools in compliance with
85
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 standards...............................................100.0%
2 4. COMPLIANCE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of discipline referrals processed for state
4 & local LEOs and COs and CPOs pursuant to ch. 120, F.S...1,500
5 b. Number of program and financial compliance audits
6 performed................................................3,155
7 c. Number of records audited to validate the accuracy
8 and completeness of ATMS2 record information.............3,000
9 d. Breath-testing instruments tested...............648
10 (e) For the Public Assistance Fraud Program, the
11 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
12 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
13 Appropriations 1190A-1190E are as follows:
14 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
15 a. Amount of fraudulent benefits withheld as a result
16 of public assistance fraud investigations...............$27.8M
17 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
18 a. Public assistance fraud investigations conducted
19 ........................................................11,476
20 (5) DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS.--
21 (a) For the Office of Attorney General Program, the
22 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
23 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
24 Appropriations 1191-1231 are as follows:
25 1. CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Percent of mediated open government cases resolved
27 in 3 weeks or less.......................................75.0%
28 b. Percent of lemon law cases resolved in less than 1
29 year.....................................................99.0%
30 c. Percent of clients expressing satisfaction with
31 civil enforcement legal services..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
86
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 2. CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of active antitrust cases...FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 b. Number of active consumer fraud cases..FY 2001-2002
4 LBR
5 c. Number of active Medicaid fraud cases..FY 2001-2002
6 LBR
7 d. Number of active child support enforcement cases
8 ................................................. FY 2001-2002
9 LBR
10 e. Number of active lemon law cases...FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 f. Number of active children's legal services cases
12 ................................................. FY 2001-2002
13 LBR
14 g. Number of active civil rights cases....FY 2001-2002
15 LBR
16 h. Number of active eminent domain cases..FY 2001-2002
17 LBR
18 3. CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
19 a. Average number of days for opinion response......29
20 4. CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Opinions issued.................................255
22 5. CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LITIGATION DEFENSE OUTCOME
23 MEASURE.--
24 a. Percent of clients expressing satisfaction with
25 criminal and civil litigation legal services.............90.0%
26 6. CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LITIGATION DEFENSE OUTPUT
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of active tax cases.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 b. Number of active civil appellate cases.FY 2001-2002
30 LBR
31 c. Number of active inmate cases......FY 2001-2002 LBR
87
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 d. Number of active state employment cases..........FY
2 2001-2002 LBR
3 e. Number of active tort cases........FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 f. Number of active capital criminal cases..........FY
5 2001-2002 LBR
6 g. Number of active noncapital cases..FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 7. VICTIM SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Average number of days from application to
9 eligibility determination...................................51
10 b. Percent of counties receiving motor vehicle theft
11 grant funds that experienced a reduction in motor vehicle
12 theft incidents below 1994 levels compared to the statewide
13 average..................................................70.0%
14 8. VICTIM SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of victim compensation claims paid.....7,000
16 b. Number of information and referral services
17 provided................................................25,000
18 c. Number of VOCA grants funded....................250
19 d. Number of victims served through contract grants
20 .......................................................175,000
21 e. Number of motor vehicle theft grants funded......40
22 f. Number of people attending training (crime
23 prevention)..............................................4,918
24 g. Number of minority communities served with crime
25 prevention education and awareness programs..................8
26 9. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION & SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
27 MEASURE.--
28 a. Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 (b) For the Statewide Prosecution Program, the outcome
30 measures, output measures, and associated performance
31 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
88
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Appropriations 1232-1234 are as follows:
2 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Conviction rate for defendants who reached final
4 adjudication.............................................90.0%
5 b. Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of law enforcement agencies assisted......88
8 b. Total number of active cases, excluding drug cases
9 ..................................................FY 2001-2002
10 LBR
11 c. Total number of drug related multi-circuit
12 organized criminal cases....................................50
13 (c) For the Florida Elections Commission Program, the
14 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 1235-1237A are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Percent of cases that are closed within 12 months
19 .........................................................75.0%
20 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of election complaints and automatic fine
22 cases......................................................485
23 (6) PAROLE COMMISSION.--
24 (a) For the Post-Incarceration Enforcement and
25 Victims-Rights Program, the outcome measures, output measures,
26 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
27 provided in Specific Appropriations 1238-1244 are as follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Parolees who have successfully completed their
30 supervision without revocation within the first 2 years:
31 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
89
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 b. Percent of revocation cases completed within 90
3 days after final hearing......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 c. Percent of cases placed before the Parole
5 Commission/Clemency Board containing no factual errors...80.0%
6 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of conditional release cases handled...5,311
8 b. Number of supervision reviews...................468
9 c. Number of revocation determinations...........3,005
10 d. Number of Clemency Board decisions supported..2,686
11 e. Number of Parole Release Decisions.FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 f. Number of Victims Contacted........FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 Section 32. The performance measures and standards
14 established in this section for individual programs in natural
15 resources, environment, growth management, and transportation
16 agencies shall be applied to those programs for the 2000-2001
17 fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are
18 directly linked to the appropriations made in the General
19 Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as required by
20 the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
21 (1) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES.--
22 (a) For the Office of the Commissioner and Division of
23 Administration, the outcome measures, output measures, and
24 associated performance standards with respect to funds
25 provided in Specific Appropriations 1245-1262D are as follows:
26 1. AGRICULTURAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
27 a. Criminal investigations closure rate............76%
28 2. AGRICULTURAL WATER POLICY COORDINATION OUTPUT
29 MEASURE.--
30 a. Number of water policy assists provided to
31 agricultural interests.....................................266
90
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 3. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
2 MEASURE.--
3 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
4 costs....................................................6.17%
5 (b) For the Forest and Resource Protection Program,
6 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
7 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
8 Specific Appropriations 1263-1279 are as follows:
9 1. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
10 a. Percent of State Forest timber producing acres
11 adequately stocked and growing.............................32%
12 2. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of forest acres and other lands managed by
14 the department and purchased by the state with approved
15 management plans.......................................907,860
16 b. Number of forest-related technical assists provided
17 to nonindustrial private land owners....................39,800
18 c. Number of person-hours spent responding to
19 emergency incidents other than wildfires.................8,000
20 d. Number of youths who fulfill Juvenile Justice
21 Forestry Youth Academy training program.....................40
22 e. Number of acres of cooperative forest lands managed
23 .......................................................600,000
24 f. Number of hours of work provided by inmate work
25 camps..................................................315,000
26 3. WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of acres of protected forest and wildlands
29 not burned by wildfires..................................98.1%
30 b. Percent of threatened structures not burned by
31 wildfires................................................99.7%
91
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 c. Percent of wildfires caused by humans...........80%
2 4. WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of wildfires detected and suppressed...3,800
5 b. Number of acres burned through prescribed burning
6 .................................................... 2 million
7 c. Number of person-hours of firefighting training
8 provided................................................50,000
9 d. Number of acres of forest land protected from
10 wildfires...........................................25,100,000
11 (c) For the Food Safety and Quality Program, the
12 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
13 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
14 Appropriations 1285-1295 are as follows:
15 1. DAIRY FACILITIES COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of dairy establishments meeting food safety
18 and sanitation requirements.............................80.77%
19 b. Percent of milk and milk products analyzed that
20 meet standards...........................................90.7%
21 2. DAIRY FACILITIES COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of milk and milk product analyses conducted
24 ........................................................70,000
25 b. Number of dairy establishments inspections...16,500
26 3. FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of food establishments meeting food safety
29 and sanitation requirements..............................91.2%
30 b. Percent of food products analyzed that meet
31 standards................................................91.4%
92
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 c. Percent of produce or other food samples analyzed
2 that meet pesticide residue standards....................97.7%
3 4. FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of inspections of food establishments, dairy
6 establishments, and water vending machines..............65,500
7 b. Number of food analyses conducted............43,000
8 c. Number of pesticide residue analyses conducted
9 .......................................................265,000
10 d. Number of food-related consumer assistance
11 investigations or actions................................3,500
12 e. Tons of poultry and shell eggs graded.......430,000
13 (d) For the Consumer Protection Program, the outcome
14 measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 1296-1313B are as follows:
17 1. AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTCOME
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of licensed pest control applicators
20 inspected that are in compliance with regulations..........78%
21 b. Percent of feed, seed, and fertilizer inspected
22 products in compliance with performance/quality standards..83%
23 c. Percent of licensed pesticide applicators inspected
24 that are in compliance.....................................76%
25 d. Number of reported human/equine disease cases
26 caused by mosquitoes......................................2/40
27 2. AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTPUT
28 MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of pest control; feed, seed, and fertilizer;
30 and pesticide inspections...............................16,818
31 b. Number of complaints investigated/processed
93
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of
2 Agricultural Environmental Services......................1,225
3 c. Number of laboratory analyses performed on seed and
4 fertilizer and pesticide product and residue samples...217,591
5 d. Number of people served by mosquito control
6 activities..........................................14,500,000
7 3. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
8 a. Percent of regulated entities (motor vehicle repair
9 shops, health studio, telemarketer, business opportunity,
10 dance studio, solicitation of contribution, sellers of travel,
11 & pawn shops) found operating in compliance of the consumer
12 protection laws............................................91%
13 4. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of assists provided to consumers, not
15 including lemon law....................................780,600
16 b. Number of lemon law assists made to consumers
17 ........................................................21,000
18 c. Number of complaints investigated/processed
19 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of Consumer
20 Services in the Consumer Protection Program.............12,190
21 d. Number of "no sales solicitation calls"
22 subscriptions processed................................103,000
23 e. Number of registered entities licensed by the
24 division................................................35,607
25 5. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTCOME
26 MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of LP Gas facilities found in compliance
28 with safety requirements on first inspection...............20%
29 b. Percent of amusement attractions found in full
30 compliance with safety requirements on first inspections...40%
31 c. Percent of regulated weighing and measuring
94
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 devices, packages, and businesses with scanners in compliance
2 with accuracy standards during initial inspection/testing..95%
3 d. Percent of petroleum products meeting quality
4 standards................................................99.2%
5 6. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of LP Gas facility inspections and
8 reinspections conducted..................................5,830
9 b. Number of petroleum field inspections conducted
10 .......................................................185,000
11 c. Number of petroleum lab test analyses performed
12 .......................................................172,000
13 d. Number of amusement ride safety inspections
14 conducted................................................9,205
15 e. Number of weights and measures inspections
16 conducted...............................................64,000
17 (e) For the Agricultural Economic Development Program,
18 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
19 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
20 Specific Appropriations 1314-1355E are as follows:
21 1. FRUITS AND VEGETABLES INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
22 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Dollar value of fruit and vegetables that are
24 shipped to other states or countries that are subject to
25 mandatory inspection............................$1,443,648,000
26 2. FRUITS AND VEGETABLES INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
27 OUTPUT MEASURE.--
28 a. Number of tons of fruits and vegetables inspected
29 ....................................................13,781,717
30 3. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Total sales of agricultural and seafood products
95
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 generated by tenants of state farmers markets.....$202,206,000
2 b. Dollar value of federal commodities and recovered
3 food distributed...................................$50,246,102
4 c. Florida agricultural products as a percent of the
5 national market...........................................3.7%
6 4. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of buyers reached with agricultural
8 promotion campaign messages.......................1.73 billion
9 b. Number of marketing assists provided to producers
10 and businesses..........................................96,319
11 c. Pounds of federal commodities and recovered food
12 distributed.........................................75,816,366
13 d. Number of leased square feet at State Farmers'
14 Markets..............................................1,592,536
15 e. Number of marketing assists provided to producers
16 and businesses..........................................16,500
17 5. AQUACULTURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Shellfish illness reported from Florida shellfish
19 products per 100,000 meals served........................0.331
20 b. Percent of shellfish and crab processing facilities
21 in significant compliance with permit and food safety
22 regulations................................................80%
23 6. AQUACULTURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of shellfish processing plant inspections
25 ...........................................................700
26 b. Number of available acres of harvestable shellfish
27 waters.................................................973,321
28 7. AGRICULTURAL INSPECTION STATIONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
29 a. Amount of revenue generated by Bills of Lading
30 transmitted to the Department of Revenue from Agricultural
31 Inspection stations................................$16,852,050
96
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 8. AGRICULTURAL INSPECTION STATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
3 inspection stations.................................12,973,040
4 b. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
5 inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated
6 commodities..........................................3,222,791
7 c. Number of Bills of Lading transmitted to the
8 Department of Revenue from agricultural inspection stations
9 ........................................................78,000
10 9. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURE.--
11 a. Percent of livestock and poultry infected with
12 specific transmissible diseases for which monitoring,
13 controlling, and eradicating activities are established
14 ......................................................0.00043%
15 10. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of animal site inspections performed..16,650
17 b. Number of animals tested or vaccinated......770,000
18 c. Number of animal-related diagnostic laboratory
19 procedures performed...................................850,000
20 11. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percent of newly introduced pests and diseases
22 prevented from infesting Florida plants to a level where
23 eradication is biologically or economically unfeasible...80.8%
24 b. Percent of commercial citrus acres free of citrus
25 canker...................................................98.5%
26 12. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of plant, fruit fly trap and honeybee
28 inspections performed................................3,768,166
29 b. Number of commercial citrus acres surveyed for
30 citrus canker..........................................560,000
31 c. Millions of sterile med flies released........3,412
97
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 d. Number of acres where plant pest and disease
2 eradication or control efforts were undertaken.........100,000
3 e. Number of plant, soil, insect, and other organism
4 samples processed for identification or diagnosis......407,000
5 f. Number of cartons of citrus certified as fly-free
6 for export..........................................10,014,270
7 (2) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.--
8 (a) For the Office of the Secretary Program, the
9 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 1356-1372 are as follows:
12 1. LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of local government participation in land
14 acquisition programs..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 b. Percent of local government participation in land
16 acquisition programs acquiring open space in urban cores....FY
17 2001-2002 LBR
18 2. LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of project grant applications reviewed....FY
20 2001-2002 LBR
21 b. Number of grants awarded...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 c. Number of project applications receiving technical
23 assistance................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 d. Number of active projects monitored....FY 2001-2002
25 LBR
26 e. Number of parcels appraised, negotiated, and closed
27 ..................................................FY 2001-2002
28 LBR
29 3. FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
30 a. Number of local governments participating in
31 coastal management programs to protect, maintain, and develop
98
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 coastal resources through a coordinated effort....FY 2001-2002
2 LBR
3 4. FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of projects reviewed that do not require
5 problem resolution............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 b. Number of projects reviewed that do require some
7 problem resolution............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 c. Number of projects funded..........FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 d. Number of individuals trained......FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
11 MEASURE.--
12 a. Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed
13 as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 (b) For the Community Planning and Protection Program,
15 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
16 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
17 Specific Appropriation 1373-1378A are as follows:
18 1. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of plans reviewed...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 b. Number of plan changes processed...FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 c. Number of local government evaluation and appraisal
22 report reviews completed......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 d. Number of grants administered......FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 e. Number of technical assistance initiatives
25 completed.................................................. FY
26 2001-2002 LBR
27 f. Number of plans adequately addressing disaster
28 mitigation................................................. FY
29 2001-2002 LBR
30 g. Number of developments of regional impact managed
31 ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
99
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 h. Number of Area of Critical State Concern
2 development orders reviewed and final orders issued.........FY
3 2001-2002 LBR
4 (c) For the Emergency Response Management Program, the
5 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
6 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
7 Appropriations 1379-1416 are as follows:
8 1. PREDISASTER MITIGATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
9 a. Number of dollars saved by mitigating repetitive
10 losses due to flood damage....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 2. PREDISASTER MITIGATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of predisaster mitigation grants awarded to
13 state and local governments...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 b. Number of applicants provided technical assistance
15 ........................................................... FY
16 2001-2002 LBR
17 c. Number of communities audited and receiving
18 technical assistance in accord with the National Flood
19 Insurance Program.............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 d. Number of Flood Mitigation Assistance Program
21 grants awarded............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 3. EMERGENCY PLANNING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Percent of counties with above average ability to
24 respond to emergencies........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 4. EMERGENCY PLANNING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of technical assistance contacts to state
27 and local government regarding capability assessments for
28 readiness.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 b. Number of personnel trained in emergency
30 preparedness............................................... FY
31 2001-2002 LBR
100
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 c. Number of plans, reports, and procedures maintained
2 in coordinating with federal and state emergency management
3 organizations.............................................. FY
4 2001-2002 LBR
5 d. Number of signatories maintained regarding the
6 Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 e. Number of public hurricane shelters evaluated....FY
8 2001-2002 LBR
9 f. Number of organizations awarded funds..FY 2001-2002
10 LBR
11 g. Number of funding applications processed.........FY
12 2001-2002 LBR
13 5. EMERGENCY RECOVERY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Number of months required for communities to
15 completely recover from a disaster............FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 6. EMERGENCY RECOVERY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of financial assistance recovery grants to
18 eligible local entities.......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 b. Number of mitigation agreements with local entities
20 managed...................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 c. Number of hurricane shelters created...FY 2001-2002
22 LBR
23 d. Number of projects requiring National Environmental
24 Policy Act review.............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 e. Number of postdisaster assessments conducted.....FY
26 2001-2002 LBR
27 f. Number of outreach team members deployed.........FY
28 2001-2002 LBR
29 g. Number of project inspections performed..........FY
30 2001-2002 LBR
31 7. EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
101
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Percent of events in which the affected population
2 is warned within an appropriate timeframe in relation to the
3 disaster/event................................... FY 2001-2002
4 LBR
5 8. EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Operations Center is activated at Level 2 or above
7 for local government emergency needs..........FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 b. Number of incidents reported to the State Warning
9 Point...................................................... FY
10 2001-2002 LBR
11 c. Number of requests from local governments and
12 allied agencies for assistance................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 d. Number of predisaster mitigation grants awarded..FY
14 2001-2002 LBR
15 e. Population covered in NOAA weather radio
16 transmission areas........................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 9. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMPLIANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Percent of facilities in compliance with hazardous
19 materials requirements........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 10. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMPLIANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of facility files researched for compliance
22 verification................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 b. Number of Community Right to Know requests
24 fulfilled.................................................. FY
25 2001-2002 LBR
26 c. Number of facility risk management audits conducted
27 ........................................................... FY
28 2001-2002 LBR
29 d. Number of financial agreements maintained........FY
30 2001-2002 LBR
31 (d) For the Housing and Community Revitalization
102
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
2 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
3 Specific Appropriations 1417-1441A are as follows:
4 1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT
5 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of neighborhoods improved and assisted
7 through community development block grant programs,
8 empowerment zone programs, urban infill programs, affordable
9 housing programs, and long-term redevelopment programs......FY
10 2001-2002 LBR
11 b. Number of jobs created/retained through community
12 development block grant programs..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT
14 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of grants administered for affordable
16 housing.................................................... FY
17 2001-2002 LBR
18 b. Number of redevelopment plans developed..........FY
19 2001-2002 LBR
20 c. Number of grant awards managed.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 d. Number of people trained/served....FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 3. BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION
23 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Percent of local governments that have a building
25 code program rated at or above a specified level of
26 effectiveness by a recognized rating organization.FY 2001-2002
27 LBR
28 4. BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION
29 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of partners assisted........FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 b. Number of code amendments promulgated..FY 2001-2002
103
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 LBR
2 c. Number of permits issued for manufactured buildings
3 ........................................................... FY
4 2001-2002 LBR
5 d. Number of grants managed...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 5. PUBLIC SERVICE AND ENERGY INITIATIVES OUTCOME
7 MEASURE.--
8 a. Number of households benefiting from services
9 provided by community development block grant programs,
10 community services, LIHEP, weatherization, and energy programs
11 ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 6. PUBLIC SERVICE AND ENERGY INITIATIVES OUTPUT
13 MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of public service grants administered.....FY
15 2001-2002 LBR
16 b. Number of energy efficient demonstration grants
17 administered................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 (e) For the Florida Housing Finance Corporation
19 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
20 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
21 Specific Appropriations 1458-1462 are as follows:
22 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of dollars that are targeted to
24 farmworkers, elderly, and fishworkers.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 b. Ratio of nonstate funding to state-appropriated
26 dollars.................................................... FY
27 2001-2002 LBR
28 c. Percent of units exceeding statutory set-asides..FY
29 2001-2002 LBR
30 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of applications processed...FY 2001-2002 LBR
104
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. Number of local governments under compliance
2 monitoring for the State Housing Initiatives Partnership
3 (SHIP) program.............................................114
4 c. Number of local governments served.FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 d. Executive direction and support services costs as a
6 percent of total program costs................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 (3) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.--
8 (a) For the Division of Administrative Services, the
9 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 1463-1474 are as follows:
12 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
13 MEASURE.--
14 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
15 costs....................................................5.12%
16 (b) For the State Lands Program, the outcome measures,
17 output measures, and associated performance standards with
18 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1475-1506
19 are as follows:
20 1. INVASIVE PLANT CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of new acres of public land where invasive,
22 exotic, upland plants are controlled and maintained......7,000
23 b. Number of acres of public water bodies treated
24 ........................................................40,165
25 c. Number of acres of upland plants controlled...4,285
26 2. LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of parcels acquired within the agreed upon
28 time limit.................................................70%
29 b. Appraised value as a percent of purchase price for
30 parcels....................................................92%
31 c. Number of appraisals certified..................500
105
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 d. Number of maps certified.........................80
2 e. Number of appraisals completed on projects on
3 current list (as amended)..................................500
4 f. Number of parcels (ownerships) negotiated.....4,397
5 g. Number of parcels (ownerships) closed.........1,281
6 3. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of easements, leases, and other requests
8 completed by maximum time frames prescribed................75%
9 b. Percent of all land management plans completed
10 within statutory timeframes................................70%
11 4. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Number of leases developed by the department....500
13 (c) For the Water Resource Management Program, the
14 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 1568-1596D are as follows:
17 1. BEACH MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Percent of miles of critically eroding beaches
19 restored or maintained.....................................49%
20 2. BEACH MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of coastal construction permits processed
22 .........................................................1,652
23 3. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OUTCOME
24 MEASURES.--
25 a. Percent of rivers that meet designated uses.....92%
26 b. Percent of lakes that meet designated uses......87%
27 c. Percent of estuaries that meet designated uses..95%
28 d. Percent of groundwater that meets designated uses
29 ...........................................................85%
30 e. Percent of drinking water that meets designated
31 uses.......................................................90%
106
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 f. Percent of the state's water segments that meet
2 designated uses............................................89%
3 g. Wetland acres authorized by permit to be
4 impacted/acres required to be created, enhanced, restored, or
5 preserved.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 h. Percent of mines in significant compliance with
7 restoration plan...........................................95%
8 i. Percent of public water systems with no significant
9 public health drinking water quality problems............93.5%
10 4. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OUTPUT
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of mining inspections....................400
13 b. Number of water resource permits processed...18,500
14 c. Number of regulatory inspections conducted...17,000
15 d. Number of technical assistance, public education,
16 and outreach contacts made...............................4,250
17 e. Number of water resource protection and restoration
18 projects funded.............................................50
19 f. Percent reduction in phosphorus loadings to Lake
20 Okeechobee................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 g. Number of Total Maximum Daily Loads adopted......FY
22 2001-2002 LBR
23 5. WATER SUPPLY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Reclaimed water (reuse) capacity as percent of
25 total wastewater capacity..................................45%
26 6. WATER SUPPLY OUTPUT MEASURE.--
27 a. Number of alternative water supply projects funded
28 .............................................................9
29 (d) For the Waste Management Program, the outcome
30 measures, output measures, and associated performance
31 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
107
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Appropriations 1597-1633B are as follows:
2 1. WASTE CLEANUP OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Cumulative percent of petroleum contaminated
4 program sites with cleanup completed.......................19%
5 b. Cumulative percent of dry-cleaning contaminated
6 sites with cleanup completed................................1%
7 c. Cumulative percent of other contaminated sites with
8 cleanup completed..........................................62%
9 d. Percent of hazardous waste sites cleaned up.....18%
10 2. WASTE CLEANUP OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of petroleum program contaminated sites
12 being cleaned up.........................................2,668
13 b. Number of known contaminated hazardous waste sites
14 being cleaned up...........................................200
15 3. WASTE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of regulated petroleum storage tank
17 facilities in significant compliance with state regulations
18 ...........................................................89%
19 b. Percent of inspected facilities that generate,
20 treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste in significant
21 compliance.................................................96%
22 c. Cumulative percent of petroleum contaminated
23 non-program sites with cleanup completed...................65%
24 d. Percent of inspected permitted solid waste
25 facilities in significant compliance.......................96%
26 e. Percent of municipal solid waste managed by
27 recycling/waste-to-energy/landfilling..............38%/16%/46%
28 4. WASTE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of storage tank facilities inspected..16,123
30 b. Percent of storage tank facilities inspected....85%
31 c. Number of solid and hazardous waste permits,
108
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 variances, exemptions, certifications, and registrations
2 processed..................................................331
3 d. Number of solid and hazardous waste compliance
4 assurance inspections conducted..........................2,800
5 e. Number of petroleum storage systems compliance
6 inspections conducted...................................16,123
7 f. Number of pollution prevention assessments
8 conducted at businesses and government facilities...........32
9 g. Number of pollution site technical reviews
10 conducted................................................1,045
11 h. Number of known contaminated sites being cleaned up
12 by responsible parties...................................1,091
13 (e) For the Recreation and Parks Program, the outcome
14 measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 1634-1666 are as follows:
17 1. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Acres designated as part of the Florida Greenways
19 and Trails system......................................102,970
20 2. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of technical assists provided to local
22 government to promote Greenways and Trails..................33
23 3. RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OUTPUT
24 MEASURE.--
25 a. Number of recreational grants to local governments
26 for recreational facilities and land acquisition............34
27 4. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
28 a. Attendance at state parks................15,000,000
29 5. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of state park sites managed..............152
31 b. Number of acres managed.....................515,111
109
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 6. COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
2 a. Increase in the number of degraded acreage in state
3 buffer enhanced or restored..............................7,778
4 (f) For the Air Resources Management Program, the
5 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
6 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
7 Appropriations 1667-1685 are as follows:
8 1. AIR ASSESSMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of time that monitored population breathes
10 good or moderate quality air.............................98.5%
11 b. Percent of population living in areas monitored for
12 air quality................................................86%
13 2. AIR ASSESSMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of monitors operated by the department and
15 local programs.............................................240
16 b. Number of emission points reviewed and analyzed
17 .........................................................5,350
18 3. AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Pounds of NOx air emissions per capita.......128.72
20 b. Pounds of SO2 air emissions per capita.......100.49
21 c. Pounds of CO air emissions per capita........542.51
22 d. Pounds of VOC air emissions per capita.......108.05
23 e. Percent of Title V facilities in significant
24 compliance with state regulations..........................95%
25 4. AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of air permits issued..................1,292
27 b. Number of facility inspections................6,477
28 5. UTILITIES SITING AND COORDINATION OUTCOME
29 MEASURE.--
30 a. Percent of energy facilities certified within
31 statutory timeframes.......................................85%
110
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (g) For the Law Enforcement Program, the outcome
2 measures, output measures, and associated performance
3 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
4 Appropriations 1686-1715B are as follows:
5 1. ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of investigations closed.................227
7 2. PATROL ON STATE LANDS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
8 a. Criminal incidents per 100,000 state park visitors
9 ............................................................30
10 3. PATROL ON STATE LANDS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
11 a. Number of patrol hours on state lands........71,936
12 4. EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
13 a. Gallons of pollutant discharge per capita...189,868
14 5. EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of sites/spills remediated...............533
16 b. Number of incidents reported..................2,700
17 (4) FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION.--
18 (a) For the Executive Director and Division of
19 Administration, the outcome measures, output measures, and
20 associated performance standards with respect to funds
21 provided in Specific Appropriations 1716-1749C are as follows:
22 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent change in licensed anglers...............3%
24 b. Percent change in the number of licensed hunters.0%
25 2. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of licensed anglers................1,712,711
27 b. Number of licensed hunters..................167,798
28 3. OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of total students meeting minimum standards
31 for graduation.............................................88%
111
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. Number of hunting accidents......................23
2 4. OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION OUTPUT
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of students graduating hunter education
5 courses.................................................10,514
6 b. Number of written conservation education materials
7 provided to citizens.................................6,538,965
8 5. MARINE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION OUTCOME
9 MEASURE.--
10 a. Percent of critical habitat (hot spots) protected
11 through land acquisition, lease, or management contract....38%
12 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
13 MEASURE.--
14 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
15 costs.....................................................5.7%
16 (b) For the Law Enforcement Program, the outcome
17 measures, output measures, and associated performance
18 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
19 Appropriations 1750-1765 are as follows:
20 1. WILDLIFE, MARINE, AND BOATING LAW ENFORCEMENT
21 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
22 a. Overall conviction rate............FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 2. WILDLIFE, MARINE, AND BOATING LAW ENFORCEMENT
24 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Total number of violations.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 b. Number of felony violations........FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 c. Total number of hours spent in preventative patrol
28 and investigations (not including Marine Patrol).......616,566
29 d. Total number of hours spent on land (not including
30 Marine Patrol).........................................536,936
31 e. Total number of hours spent on water (not including
112
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Marine Patrol)..........................................71,056
2 f. Total number of hours spent in air (not including
3 Marine Patrol)...........................................8,474
4 g. Total number of investigations closed (not
5 including Marine Patrol)...................................750
6 h. Number of inspections of licensed and permitted
7 captive wildlife facilities..............................4,446
8 i. Number of vessel safety inspections (not including
9 Marine Patrol).........................................154,408
10 j. Total number of boating accidents investigated...FY
11 2001-2002 LBR
12 k. Total number of boating fatalities investigated..FY
13 2001-2002 LBR
14 l. Number of flight hours provided...............3,650
15 (c) For the Wildlife Management Program, the outcome
16 measures, output measures, and associated performance
17 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
18 Appropriations 1766-1781B are as follows:
19 1. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of satisfied hunters....................75%
21 b. Percent of wildlife species whose biological status
22 is stable or improving.....................................70%
23 2. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of acres managed for wildlife......4,750,000
25 b. Number of wildlife technical assists provided...325
26 (d) For the Freshwater Fisheries Management Program,
27 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
28 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
29 Specific Appropriations 1782-1789A are as follows:
30 1. FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
31 a. Percent angler satisfaction.....................75%
113
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 2. FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of acres of water bodies managed to improve
3 fishing................................................770,955
4 b. Number of access points established or maintained
5 ............................................................42
6 c. Number of participants in achievement programs..600
7 d. Number of fish stocked....................2,385,000
8 e. Number of acres of water bodies where habitat
9 rehabilitation projects have been completed.............40,000
10 (e) For the Marine Fisheries Program, the outcome
11 measures, output measures, and associated performance
12 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
13 Appropriations 1790-1798A are as follows:
14 1. MARINE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
15 a. Percent of fisheries stocks with sufficient data
16 that are increasing or stable..............................79%
17 2. MARINE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of commercial and other marine fishing
19 licenses processed......................................32,600
20 b. Number of artificial reefs created and/or monitored
21 ............................................................68
22 c. Number of fishery stocks management plans reviewed
23 ............................................................15
24 (f) For the Marine Research Program, the outcome
25 measures, output measures, and associated performance
26 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
27 Appropriations 1798B-1806C are as follows:
28 1. MARINE ASSESSMENT, RESTORATION, AND TECHNICAL
29 SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of research projects that provide
31 management recommendations or support management actions..100%
114
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. Manatee mortality rate........................7.72%
2 2. MARINE ASSESSMENT, RESTORATION, AND TECHNICAL
3 SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Total number of sea turtle nests.............77,864
5 b. Manatee population............................2,399
6 c. Number of fish stocks assessments and data
7 summaries conducted........................................170
8 d. Number of requests for status of endangered and
9 threatened species completed.............................3,400
10 (5) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.--
11 (a) For the Transportation Systems Development
12 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
13 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
14 Specific Appropriations 1807-1821G are as follows:
15 1. HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of motor vehicle fatalities per 100 million
17 miles traveled.......................................... <2.05
18 b. Percent of state highway system pavement meeting
19 department standards.......................................78%
20 c. Percent of FDOT maintained bridges which meet
21 department standards.......................................90%
22 d. Percent increase in number of days required for
23 completed construction contracts over original contract days
24 (less weather days).......................................<30%
25 e. Percent increase in final amount paid for completed
26 construction contracts over original contract amount......<10%
27 f. Percent of vehicle crashes on state highway system
28 where road-related conditions were listed as a contributing
29 factor.....................................................<1%
30 g. Construction Engineering as a percent of
31 construction...............................................15%
115
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 h. Average construction cost per lane mile of new
2 capacity............................................$3,800,000
3 2. HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of lane miles let to contract for
5 resurfacing..............................................2,800
6 b. Number of lane miles let to contract for highway
7 capacity improvements......................................176
8 c. Percent of construction contracts planned for
9 letting that were actually let.............................95%
10 d. Number of bridges let to contract for repair.....81
11 e. Number of bridges let to contract for replacement
12 ............................................................35
13 f. Number of right-of-way parcels acquired.......2,230
14 g. Number of projects certified ready for construction
15 ............................................................81
16 3. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Transit ridership growth compared to population
18 growth...................................................2%/2%
19 b. Tons of cargo shipped by air..............4,000,000
20 c. Average cost per requested trip for transportation
21 disadvantaged............................................$4.32
22 4. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of passenger enplanements.........56,000,000
24 b. Number of public transit passenger trips
25 ...................................................175,000,000
26 c. Number of cruise embarkations and disembarkations
27 at Florida ports.....................................9,300,000
28 d. Number of transportation disadvantaged trips
29 provided.............................................5,768,000
30 (b) For the Transportation Systems Operation Program,
31 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
116
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
2 Specific Appropriations 1822-1864 are as follows:
3 1. HIGHWAY OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Maintenance condition rating of state highway
5 system as measured against the department's maintenance manual
6 standards...................................................80
7 b. Percent of commercial vehicles weighed by fixed
8 scales that were overweight...............................0.4%
9 c. Percent of commercial vehicles weighed by portable
10 scales that were overweight..............................37.0%
11 2. HIGHWAY OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of commercial vehicles weighed....11,000,000
13 b. Number of commercial vehicle safety inspections
14 performed...............................................50,000
15 c. Number of portable scale weighings performed.45,000
16 3. TOLL OPERATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
17 a. Operational cost per toll transaction........<$0.16
18 4. TOLL OPERATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
19 a. Number of toll transactions.............499,000,000
20 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
21 MEASURE.--
22 a. Administration and support costs as a percent of
23 total agency costs........................................2.1%
24 6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
25 a. Percent of mainframe utilization................90%
26 7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--
27 a. Number of computer work stations supported....8,017
28 Section 33. The performance measures and standards
29 established in this section for individual programs in general
30 government agencies shall be applied to those programs for the
31 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and
117
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
2 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 as
3 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
4 of 1994.
5 (1) DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.--
6 (a) For the Office of the Comptroller and Division of
7 Administration Program, the outcome measures, output measures,
8 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
9 provided in Specific Appropriations 1878-1880 are as follows:
10 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
11 MEASURE.--
12 a. Cabinet and Clemency support administrative costs
13 as a percent of total agency costs............FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 (b) For the Financial Accountability for Public Funds
15 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
16 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
17 Specific Appropriations 1881-1903 are as follows:
18 1. RECOVERY AND RETURN OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY OUTCOME
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of increase in the total number of holders
21 reporting...................................................3%
22 b. Percent of previously filing holders who submit
23 problem reports.............................................3%
24 c. Percent of total number (% of $) of claims paid to
25 the owner compared to the total number ($) of returnable
26 accounts reported/received.................................22%
27 d. Percent of the total dollar amount of claims paid
28 to the owner compared to the total dollars in returnable
29 accounts reported/received.................................80%
30 2. RECOVERY AND RETURN OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY OUTPUT
31 MEASURES.--
118
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Number of holders reports processed..........16,000
2 b. Number of exams of holders who have not previously
3 filed a holder report......................................213
4 c. Number of exams conducted/processed.............476
5 d. Dollar value collected as a result of exams
6 ...................................................$15,500,000
7 e. Number/dollar value of owner accounts processed
8 ..................................................... 255,000/
9 $101,000,000
10 f. Total cost of the program to the number of holder
11 reports/owner accounts processed.......................$9/$186
12 g. Number/dollar value of claims paid to owners
13 .................................................... 55,000/FY
14 2001-2002 LBR
15 h. Number of owner accounts advertised.........100,000
16 i. Percent of claims approved/denied within 30/60/90
17 days from the date received (cumulative total)....50%/90%/100%
18 j. Percent of claims paid within 30/60/90 days from
19 the date received (cumulative total)..............15%/50%/100%
20 3. STATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATE AGENCY
21 ACCOUNTING OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Percent of program's customers who return an
23 overall customer service rating of good or excellent on
24 surveys....................................................95%
25 b. Percent of vendor payments issued in less than the
26 Comptroller's statutory time limit of 10 days.............100%
27 c. Accuracy rate of postaudited vendor payments.....FY
28 2001-2002 LBR
29 d. Percent of those utilizing the program and
30 providing financial information who rate the overall
31 relevancy, usefulness, and timeliness of information as good
119
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 or excellent...............................................95%
2 e. Number of qualifications in the Independent
3 Auditor's Report on the State General Purpose Financial
4 Statements which are related to the presentation of the
5 financial statements.........................................0
6 f. Percent of vendor payments issued electronically
7 ...........................................................16%
8 g. Percent of payroll payments issued electronically
9 ...........................................................77%
10 h. Percent of retirement payments issued
11 electronically.............................................76%
12 4. STATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATE AGENCY
13 ACCOUNTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of vendor payment requests preaudited
15 .....................................................1,000,000
16 b. Number of vendor payment requests postaudited....FY
17 2001-2002 LBR
18 c. Percent of vendor payment requests postaudited...FY
19 2001-2002 LBR
20 d. Number of vendor invoices paid............4,050,000
21 e. Number of payroll payments issued.........5,639,780
22 f. Number of payments issued electronically..6,450,000
23 g. Number of instances during the year where, as a
24 result of inadequate cash management under this program,
25 general revenue had a negative cash balance..................0
26 h. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed..........18
27 i. Number of "get lean" hotline calls processed for
28 referral to the appropriate agency.........................250
29 j. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed where
30 criminal, disciplinary, and/or administrative actions taken.FY
31 2001-2002 LBR
120
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
2 MEASURE.--
3 a. Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed
4 as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Percent of user requests that are responded to
7 timely and effectively........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of Florida Accounting Information Resource
10 (FLAIR) design, programming and education service requests
11 completed.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 b. The number of hours the computer is available for
13 use........................................................ FY
14 2001-2002 LBR
15 (c) For the Financial Institutions Regulatory and
16 Consumer Financial Protection Program, the outcome measures,
17 output measures, and associated performance standards with
18 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1904-1938
19 are as follows:
20 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percent of licensees examined where department
22 action is taken against the licensee for cause -- based on
23 risk assessment profile, or internal/external information
24 which indicates a violation of statute..................33.05%
25 b. Percent of licensees examined where department
26 action is taken against the licensee for cause --
27 routine-proactive exam conducted on randomly selected entities
28 or entities on an examination cycle.....................16.88%
29 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of "for cause" examinations completed....377
31 b. Number of "routine" examinations completed....1,435
121
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 c. Percent of total licensees examined to determine
2 compliance with applicable regulations......................5%
3 4. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTCOME
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Percent of licensees sanctioned for violations..<1%
6 b. Percent of total applicants not licensed to conduct
7 business in the state because they fail to meet substantive
8 licensing requirements....................................4.3%
9 c. Percent of applicants prevented from entering the
10 securities industry in Florida who subsequently are the
11 subject of additional disciplinary action in other
12 jurisdictions within 3 years...............................60%
13 5. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTPUT
14 MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of final actions taken against licensees.370
16 b. Number of applications denied or withdrawn....3,546
17 c. Number of applications processed.............70,944
18 d. Amount (dollars) of securities registration
19 applications denied or withdrawn..................$2.1 billion
20 e. Number of applications licensed..............67,398
21 f. Number of applicants licensed with restrictions..95
22 g. Number/percent of filings or requests processed by
23 the department within a designated standard number of days, by
24 type..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 h. Number of applicants denied or withdrawn with
26 additional disciplinary information reported on the Central
27 Registration Depository within 3 years.....................324
28 6. SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS OF STATE BANKING SYSTEM
29 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
31 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
122
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Florida on Return on Assets................................51%
2 b. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
3 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
4 Florida on Return on Equity................................51%
5 c. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
6 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
7 Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio..........................51%
8 d. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
9 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
10 Florida on Tier 1 Capital..................................51%
11 e. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
12 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
13 chartered in Florida on Return on Assets...................51%
14 f. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
15 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
16 chartered in Florida on Return on Equity...................51%
17 g. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
18 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
19 chartered in Florida on Capital to Asset Ratio.............51%
20 h. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
21 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
22 chartered in Florida on Tier 1 Capital.....................51%
23 i. Percent of applications for new Florida financial
24 institutions that seek state charters......................67%
25 j. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
26 state-chartered financial institutions compared to assessments
27 that would be paid if the bank was nationally or federally
28 chartered..............................................$10,000
29 k. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
30 state-chartered financial institutions compared to assessments
31 that would be paid if the credit union was nationally or
123
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 federally chartered.......................................$500
2 l. Percent of banks receiving an examination report
3 within 45 days after the conclusion of their on-site state
4 examination................................................75%
5 m. Percent of credit unions receiving an examination
6 report within 30 days after the conclusion of their on-site
7 state examination..........................................75%
8 n. Percent of international financial institutions
9 receiving an examination report within 45 days after the
10 conclusion of their on-site state examination..............75%
11 o. Percent of trust companies receiving an examination
12 report within 60 days after the conclusion of their on-site
13 state examination..........................................75%
14 p. Percent of De Novo applications statutorily
15 complete that are processed within 90 days.................67%
16 q. Percent of branch applications statutorily complete
17 that are processed within 50 days..........................67%
18 r. Percent of merger/acquisition applications
19 statutorily complete that are processed within 60 days.....67%
20 s. Percent of financial institutions under enforcement
21 action that are substantially in compliance with conditions
22 imposed....................................................90%
23 7. SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS OF STATE BANKING SYSTEM OUTPUT
24 MEASURES.--
25 a. Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on
26 Assets...................................................0.96%
27 b. Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on
28 Equity..................................................10.50%
29 c. Median Florida state-chartered banks Return on
30 Capital to Asset Ratio....................................9.0%
31 d. Median Florida state-chartered banks Tier 1 Capital
124
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 ..........................................................9.1%
2 e. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return
3 on Assets................................................0.93%
4 f. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return
5 on Equity.................................................7.1%
6 g. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Return
7 on Capital to Asset Ratio................................12.5%
8 h. Median Florida state-chartered credit unions Tier 1
9 Capital.................................................11.90%
10 i. Number of new Florida state-chartered banks opened
11 ............................................................15
12 j. Amount (dollars) annual assessments paid by banks
13 ....................................................$6,929,900
14 k. Amount (dollars) annual assessments paid by credit
15 unions..............................................$1,463,000
16 l. Number of banks examined by the Division of Banking
17 receiving an examination report within 45 days..............54
18 m. Number of credit unions examined by the Division of
19 Banking receiving an examination report within 30 days......57
20 n. Number of international financial institutions
21 examined by the Division of Banking receiving an examination
22 report within 45 days.......................................14
23 o. Number of trust companies examined by the Division
24 of Banking receiving an examination report within 60 days....8
25 p. Number of statutorily complete new DeNovo
26 applications received that are processed within 90 days......7
27 q. Number of statutorily complete branch applications
28 received that are processed within 15 days..................14
29 r. Number of statutorily complete merger/acquisition
30 applications received that are processed within 60 days......7
31 s. Number of institutions in substantial compliance
125
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 with enforcement actions....................................20
2 t. Percent/number of financial institutions examined
3 within statutory timeframes by type of institution:
4 (I) Banks......................................66%/144
5 (II) Credit Unions..............................66%/76
6 (III) International.............................66%/41
7 (IV) Trust Companies............................66%/12
8 u. Percent/number of surveys returned that rate the
9 Division's examination program as satisfactory or above
10 .......................................................75%/150
11 v. Average change in total exam time from previous
12 state exam by type of institution:
13 (I) Banks..........................................-5%
14 (II) Credit Unions.................................-5%
15 (III) International................................-5%
16 (IV) Trust Companies...............................-5%
17 w. Average percent of total exam hours conducted
18 off-site, by type of institution:
19 (I) Banks..........................................25%
20 (II) Credit Unions.................................25%
21 (III) International................................25%
22 (IV) Trust Companies...............................25%
23 8. CONSUMER FINANCIAL FRAUD PREVENTION AND DETECTION
24 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Percent of investigations of licensed and
26 unlicensed entities referred to other agencies where
27 investigative assistance aided in obtaining
28 criminal/civil/administrative actions:
29 (I) Licensed........................................6%
30 (II) Unlicensed....................................59%
31 b. Dollars returned (voluntarily or through court
126
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 ordered restitution) to victims compared to total dollars of
2 verified loss as a result of investigative efforts of licensed
3 entities.............................................$0.001/$1
4 c. Dollars returned (voluntarily or through court
5 ordered restitution) to victims compared to total dollars of
6 verified loss as a result of investigative efforts of
7 unlicensed entities...................................$0.46/$1
8 d. Percent of written complaints processed within
9 applicable standards.......................................85%
10 e. Percent of written complaints regarding licensed
11 entities referred for examination, investigation, or
12 legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal sanctions
13 within/outside statutory authority.......................18.6%
14 f. Percent of written complaints regarding unlicensed
15 entities referred for examination, investigation, or
16 legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal sanctions
17 within/outside statutory authority.......................37.5%
18 9. CONSUMER FINANCIAL FRAUD PREVENTION AND DETECTION
19 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of investigations closed.................450
21 b. Number of background investigations completed...800
22 c. Amount (dollars) of court ordered restitution to
23 victims of licensed/unlicensed entities:
24 (I) Licensed.......................................$9K
25 (II) Unlicensed.................................$20.8M
26 d. Amount (dollars) of voluntary reimbursement
27 received from licensed/unlicensed entities:
28 (I) Licensed.....................................$1.2K
29 (II) Unlicensed................................$434.7K
30 e. Amount (dollars) returned to victims of
31 licensed/unlicensed entities:
127
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (I) Licensed......................................$10K
2 (II) Unlicensed.................................$21.2M
3 f. Amount (dollars) of verified loss to victims of
4 licensed/unlicensed entities:
5 (I) Licensed.....................................$9.2M
6 (II) Unlicensed................................$46.14M
7 g. Average number of days for initial written
8 responses to consumers.......................................7
9 h. Average number of days to resolve, refer, or close
10 a written complaint.........................................68
11 i. Number of complaints resolved, referred, or closed
12 during the year..........................................4,350
13 j. Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 90 days
14 and less than 120 days.....................................10%
15 k. Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 120
16 days.......................................................15%
17 l. Number of written complaints where the department
18 identified statutory violations............................150
19 m. Number of complaints referred for consideration of
20 legal or criminal action...................................275
21 n. Number of public/consumer awareness contacts made
22 activities with personal, direct face-to-face contact......140
23 o. Number of public/consumer awareness activities
24 conducted utilizing all types of media.....................540
25 p. Number of participants at public/consumer awareness
26 activities with personal, direct, face-to-face contact...6,800
27 q. Total number of hours spent conducting
28 public/consumer awareness activities.....................1,100
29 10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
30 MEASURE.--
31 a. Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed
128
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 11. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
3 a. Increase in the level of service requests that are
4 responded to timely and effectively...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 12. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of completed service requests for internal
7 systems design and support....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 (2) DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
9 REGULATION.--
10 (a) For the Office of the Secretary and Division of
11 Administration Program, the outcome measures, output measures,
12 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
13 provided in Specific Appropriations 1939-1957 are as follows:
14 1. FLORIDA BOXING COMMISSION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
15 a. Percent of licenses suspended or revoked (primarily
16 for medical purposes/approx 90%) in relation to fights
17 supervised...............................................28.8%
18 2. FLORIDA BOXING COMMISSION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
19 a. Number of scheduled boxing rounds.............2,472
20 3. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
21 a. Percent agency administrative and support costs
22 compared to total agency costs................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 4. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Percent increase in public access to regulatory
25 information................................................10%
26 5. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--
27 a. Number of clients served.................15,968,506
28 (b) For the Professional Regulation Program, the
29 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
30 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
31 Appropriations 1958-1978 are as follows:
129
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
2 a. Percent of applications processed within 90 days
3 ..........................................................100%
4 2. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of applications processed.............59,263
6 b. Number of licensees.........................499,964
7 3. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percent of cases that are resolved through
9 alternative means (notices of noncompliance, citations or
10 alternative dispute resolution)............................ FY
11 2001-2002 LBR
12 b. Percent of establishments or licensees found in
13 violation of critical or multiple noncritical violations
14 resulting in discipline...................................0.9%
15 4. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Total number of cases..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 b. Number of enforcement actions................35,558
18 (c) For the Pari-Mutuel Wagering Program, the outcome
19 measures, output measures, and associated performance
20 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
21 Appropriations 1979-2001 are as follows:
22 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Percent of races and games that result in statutory
24 or rule infractions......................................0.85%
25 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
26 a. Number of races and games monitored..........87,000
27 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
28 a. Percent of applications processed within 90 days
29 ..........................................................100%
30 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
31 a. Number of applications processed.............23,001
130
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 5. TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
2 a. Total collections per dollar spent on pari-mutuel
3 events..................................................$19.38
4 6. TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
5 a. Number of audits conducted...................87,500
6 (d) For the Hotels and Restaurants Program, the
7 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
8 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
9 Appropriations 2001A-2013 are as follows:
10 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Percent of licensees in compliance with applicable
12 laws and rules for food service and public lodging
13 establishments..........................................86.07%
14 b. Percent of licensees in compliance with applicable
15 laws and rules for elevators, escalators, and other vertical
16 conveyance devices......................................95.29%
17 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of educational packets distributed and
19 education and training seminars/workshops conducted....283,407
20 b. Number of inspections for food service and public
21 lodging establishments........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 c. Number of inspections for elevators, escalators,
23 and other vertical conveyance devices.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 d. Number of call-back inspections for food service
25 and public lodging establishments.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
27 a. Percent of hotel and restaurant licenses and
28 elevator certificates of operation processed within 30 days
29 .........................................................90.6%
30 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of licensees for public lodging and food
131
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 service establishments..................................69,315
2 b. Number of licensees for elevators, escalators, and
3 other vertical conveyance devices.......................43,897
4 (e) For the Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Program,
5 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
6 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
7 Specific Appropriations 2014-2033 are as follows:
8 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent repeated noncomplying wholesale/retail
10 licensees on yearly basis.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 b. Percent noncomplying wholesale/retail licensees on
12 yearly basis................................................FY
13 2001-2002 LBR
14 c. Percent of alcoholic beverages and tobacco
15 retailers tested found to be in compliance with underage
16 persons' access...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 d. Percent of total retail alcohol and tobacco
18 licensees and permit holders inspected.....................30%
19 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
20 a. Number of licensees..........................64,000
21 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
22 a. Percent of license applications processed within 90
23 days.......................................................95%
24 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
25 a. Number of applications processed.............12,307
26 5. TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Total auditing expenditures compared to auditing
28 collections.................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 b. Percent of retail and wholesale tax dollars
30 identified by audit that were collected....................85%
31 6. TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
132
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Number of audits conducted..................241,000
2 (f) For the Florida Land Sales, Condominiums, and
3 Mobile Homes Program, the outcome measures, output measures,
4 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
5 provided in Specific Appropriations 2034-2045 are as follows:
6 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of administrative actions resulting in
8 consent orders............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 b. Average number of days to resolve consumer
10 complaints not investigated...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 c. Average number of days to resolve investigations.FY
12 2001-2002 LBR
13 d. Average number of days to resolve cases submitted
14 for arbitration for condominiums..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 e. Percent of parties surveyed that benefited from
16 education provided (condominiums).............FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of administrative actions resolved by
19 consent orders............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 b. Number of days to close consumer complaints......FY
21 2001-2002 LBR
22 c. Number of consumer complaints closed...FY 2001-2002
23 LBR
24 d. Number of days to close investigations.FY 2001-2002
25 LBR
26 e. Number of investigations closed....FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 f. Number of days to close cases......FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 g. Number of cases closed.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 h. Number of seminars conducted.......FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 i. Number of attendees at educational seminars
31 surveyed................................................... FY
133
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 2001-2002 LBR
2 j. Number of topics covered at educational seminars.FY
3 2001-2002 LBR
4 k. Number of unit owners represented at educational
5 seminars................................................... FY
6 2001-2002 LBR
7 l. Number of associations represented at educational
8 seminars................................................... FY
9 2001-2002 LBR
10 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
11 a. Percent of permanent licenses issued and filings
12 reviewed as prescribed by laws.............................97%
13 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
14 a. Permanent licenses and filings processed.....19,161
15 (3) DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS.--
16 (a) For the Citrus Research Program, the outcome
17 measures, output measures, and associated performance
18 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
19 Appropriations 2046-2048 are as follows:
20 1. CITRUS RESEARCH OUTCOME MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of new citrus product lines................2
22 2. CITRUS RESEARCH OUTPUT MEASURE.--
23 a. Number of sponsored research programs............17
24 (b) For the Executive Direction and Support Services
25 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
26 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
27 Specific Appropriations 2049-2056 are as follows:
28 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
29 MEASURE.--
30 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
31 costs.....................................................7.8%
134
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (c) For the Agricultural Products and Marketing
2 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
3 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
4 Specific Appropriations 2057-2059 are as follows:
5 1. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Percent return on investment for Florida growers.9%
7 2. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of TV Gross Rating Points..............4,000
9 b. Number of trade incentive programs administered
10 .........................................................2,400
11 (4) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR.--
12 (a) For the Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development
13 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
14 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
15 Specific Appropriations 2084-2088D are as follows:
16 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
17 MEASURE.--
18 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total program
19 costs.......................................................1%
20 2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS OUTCOME
21 MEASURES.--
22 a. Number/dollar amount of contracts and grants
23 administered................................. 283/$290 million
24 b. Public expenditures per job created/retained under
25 QTI incentive program...................................$3,750
26 c. Number of state agency proposed rules reviewed
27 which impact small businesses...............................70
28 d. Number of business leaders' meetings coordinated..1
29 e. Implement the revitalization of urban communities
30 (Front Porch Florida) as measured by the number of
31 applications and neighborhood plans reviewed; partnering
135
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 activities, interactive community activities, and technical
2 assistance activities facilitated.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 f. Market, promote, and provide services to the
4 state's entertainment industry (Office of Film Commission) as
5 measured by the number of marketing, promotion, and other
6 services provided.............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 g. Dollar amount and procurement opportunities
8 generated for Black businesses....................$2.5 million
9 h. Economic contributions from Florida Sports
10 Foundation-sponsored regional and major sporting events grants
11 ..................................................$150 million
12 i. Satisfaction of the area Sports Commissions with
13 the efforts of the foundation to promote and develop the
14 sports industry and related industries in the state........75%
15 j. Economic contributions to communities as a result
16 of hosting Florida's Senior State Games Championship........FY
17 2001-2002 LBR
18 k. Economic contributions to communities as a result
19 of hosting Florida's Sunshine State Spring Games Championship
20 ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 l. Number of jobs created as a result of economic
22 factors on the community using the State of Florida Economic
23 Impact Model..................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 m. Number of out-of-state travelers who come to and go
25 through Florida..................................$50.6 million
26 n. Number of resident travelers who come to and go
27 through Florida...................................13.6 million
28 o. Impact that travelers in Florida have on the
29 state's overall economy through rental car surcharge....$141.2
30 million
31 p. Impact that travelers in Florida have on the
136
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 state's overall economy through tourism-related employment
2 .......................................................835,156
3 q. Impact that travelers in Florida have on the
4 state's overall economy through taxable sales....$48.3 billion
5 r. Impact that travelers in Florida have on the
6 state's overall economy through local option tax..$320 million
7 s. Growth in private sector contributions to VISIT
8 FLORIDA................................................... $34
9 million
10 t. Satisfaction of Visit Florida's Partners and
11 representative members of the tourism industry with the
12 efforts of Visit Florida to promote Florida tourism........75%
13 u. Facilitate the creation of an inventory of the
14 sites identified by the state's tourism regions as
15 nature-based and heritage tourism sites and implement
16 procedures to maintain the inventory..........FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 v. Implement s. 288.1224(13), F.S., including the
18 incorporation of nature-based and heritage tourism components
19 into the Four-Year Marketing Plan.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 w. Value of new investment in the Florida space
21 business and programs (cumulative)................$230 million
22 x. Number of launches...............................30
23 y. Number of visitors to space-related tourism
24 facilities.........................................2.9 million
25 z. Tax revenue generated by space-related tourism
26 facilities..........................................$1,400,000
27 aa. Number of direct full-time jobs facilitated as a
28 result of Enterprise Florida's recruitment, expansion, and
29 retention efforts in rural areas (2,000), in urban core areas
30 (2,000), in critical industries (10,000)................31,000
31 bb. Documented export sales attributable to programs
137
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 and activities....................................$275 million
2 cc. Total number of marketing leads generated through
3 Enterprise Florida's comprehensive marketing programs: trade
4 leads - 450, investment leads - 300........................750
5 dd. Satisfaction of economic development practitioners
6 and other appropriate entities with efforts of Enterprise
7 Florida in providing economic development leadership in the
8 full range of services required for state and local economic
9 growth, including critical industries and workforce
10 development................................................75%
11 ee. Satisfaction of economic development practitioners
12 and other appropriate entities with efforts of EFI in
13 marketing the state, including marketing rural communities and
14 distressed urban communities, as a pro-business location for
15 potential new investment...................................75%
16 ff. Percent of supplemental fund requests from
17 Regional Workforce Boards acted upon in a timely fashion for
18 requests less than or equal to established fund threshold
19 acted upon within 14 days of receipt of approvable
20 documentation, and for requests greater than the established
21 fund threshold within 90 days........................100%/100%
22 gg. Number and percent of agency policies to be
23 reviewed, recommendations made, and actions taken to implement
24 recommendations........................................202/70%
25 hh. Number and percent of on-site regional workforce
26 development board reviews completed in accordance with an
27 established schedule by June 30, 2000..................24/100%
28 ii. For regions out of compliance, the percent of
29 reviews where board staff issued the report of deficiencies
30 and provided recommendations for corrective action within 14
31 days after exit...........................................100%
138
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 jj. Number and percent of individuals completing high
2 skill/high wage programs found employed at an average hourly
3 wage equal to or higher than $9/ahw for the last completed
4 reporting period....................................49,500/50%
5 kk. Number and percent of WIA statewide standards met
6 or exceeded...................................... 12 of 17/70%
7 ll. Number and percent of WIA regional standards met
8 or exceeded................................................300
9 of 408/73.5%
10 mm. Percent of customers who found the State Board
11 fulfilling its oversight and coordinating responsibilities
12 determined through the use of a customer survey............75%
13 nn. QRT Employee Retention Rates and Earnings in
14 quarter following completion of training....70% at $9 or above
15 oo. QRT Employee satisfaction rates (per survey)...75%
16 pp. IWT Employee Retention Rates and Earnings in
17 quarter following completion of training....70% at $9 or above
18 qq. IWT Employer satisfaction rates (per survey)...75%
19 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS OUTPUT
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of missions/events coordinated/participated
22 in to develop business opportunities for Black Business
23 Investment Board.............................................4
24 b. Number of Black Business Investment Boards created
25 or supported.................................................8
26 c. Private dollars leveraged by Black Business
27 Investment Board................................. $1.6 million
28 d. Number of Businesses provided Technical Assistance
29 through Statewide BBIC.....................................200
30 e. Number/amount of major and regional sports event
31 grants awarded.....................................30/$700,000
139
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 f. Number of publications produced and distributed by
2 the Florida Sports Foundation........................5/574,000
3 g. Number of statewide promotions conducted/supported
4 by the Florida Sports Foundation.............................6
5 h. Number of national promotions conducted/supported
6 by the Florida Sports Foundation.............................1
7 i. Number of trade/consumer shows facilitated or
8 conducted by the Florida Sports Foundation..................10
9 j. Number of athletes competing in Florida's Senior
10 State Games Championship......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 k. Number of athletes competing in Florida's Sunshine
12 State Spring Games Championship...............FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 l. Number of amateur athletic sports leaders workshops
14 and seminars conducted........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 m. Quality and effectiveness of paid advertising
16 messages reaching the target audience: impressions.550 million
17 n. Number contacting VISIT FLORIDA in response to
18 advertising............................................620,146
19 o. Value and number of consumer promotions facilitated
20 by VISIT FLORIDA...............................$13 million/155
21 p. Number of leads and visitor inquiries generated by
22 the FTIMC events and media placements................1,229,780
23 q. Number of private-sector partners.............3,462
24 r. Level of private-sector partner financial
25 contribution through direct financial investment..$2.2 million
26 s. Level of private-sector partner financial
27 contribution through strategic alliance program...$1.3 million
28 t. Number of students in Spaceport Florida Authority
29 (SFA) sponsored space-related classroom or research at
30 accredited institutions of higher education................400
31 u. Equity in SFA industrial/research facilities....$65
140
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 million
2 v. Presentations to industry and governmental decision
3 makers......................................................35
4 w. Equity in SFA space-related tourist facilities..$25
5 million
6 x. Number of trade events...........................32
7 y. Number of companies assisted by Enterprise Florida
8 in the area of international trade.......................2,660
9 z. Number of active recruitment, expansion, and
10 retention projects worked during the year..................295
11 aa. Number of leads and projects referred to local
12 Economic Development Organizations.........................120
13 bb. Number of successful incentive projects worked
14 with local Economic Development Organizations...............60
15 cc. Number of times Enterprise Florida's information
16 services are accessed by local Economic Development
17 Organizations..............................................800
18 dd. Market space and defense businesses as measured by
19 the number of leads generated...............................75
20 ee. Rural and urban core businesses provided
21 assistance.................................................225
22 ff. Total number of Quick Response Training new
23 full-time, high skill/high wage jobs created.............4,500
24 gg. Number of Quick Response Training new full-time,
25 high skill/high wage jobs created in rural areas...........300
26 hh. Number of Quick Response Training new full-time,
27 high skill/high wage jobs created in urban core areas......300
28 ii. Number of Quick Response Training new full-time,
29 high skill/high wage jobs created in critical industries.2,700
30 jj. QRT Ratio of private funds match to state funds..3
31 to 1
141
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 kk. Total number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot
2 Project (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent
3 worker training..........................................1,000
4 ll. Number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot Project
5 (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent worker
6 training in rural areas....................................100
7 mm. Number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot Project
8 (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent worker
9 training in urban core areas...............................200
10 nn. Number of Incumbent Worker Training Pilot Project
11 (WIA) permanent jobs retained as a result of incumbent worker
12 training in critical industries............................250
13 oo. IWT Ratio of private funds match to federal WIA
14 funds...................................................2 to 1
15 (5) DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES.--
16 (a) For the Executive Director and Division of
17 Administrative Services, the outcome measures, output
18 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
19 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2089-2099 are as
20 follows:
21 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Administration and support costs/positions as a
23 percent of total agency costs and positions........5.02%/7.43%
24 b. Cost per square foot spent on operational
25 maintenance of agency facilities.........................$4.76
26 (b) For the Highway Patrol Program, the outcome
27 measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 2100-2123 are as follows:
30 1. HIGHWAY SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Florida death rate on patrolled highways per 100
142
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 million vehicle miles of travel (For Information Only).....1.9
2 b. National average death rate on highways per 100
3 million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7
4 c. Florida death rate on all roads per 100 million
5 vehicle miles of travel....................................1.9
6 d. National average death rate on all roads per 100
7 million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7
8 e. Alcohol-related death rate per 100 million vehicle
9 miles of travel...........................................0.64
10 f. Number of crashes investigated by FHP.......186,978
11 g. Percent change in number of crashes investigated by
12 FHP........................................................+1%
13 h. Annual crash rate per 100 million vehicle miles of
14 travel on all Florida roads................................177
15 2. HIGHWAY SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Actual average response time (minutes) to calls for
17 crashes or assistance....................................26.00
18 b. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
19 on preventive patrol.................................1,014,491
20 c. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
21 on preventive patrol.......................................42%
22 d. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
23 on crash investigation.................................338,826
24 e. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
25 on crash investigation.....................................14%
26 f. Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (long
27 form).....................................................2.17
28 g. Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (short
29 form).....................................................1.35
30 h. Average time (hours) to investigate crashes
31 (nonreportable)...........................................0.65
143
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 i. Duty hours spent on law enforcement officer
2 assistance to motorist.................................102,387
3 j. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
4 on motorist assistance......................................5%
5 k. Number of motorists assisted by law enforcement
6 officers...............................................299,924
7 3. CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS OUTCOME
8 MEASURE.--
9 a. Percent of closed criminal investigation cases
10 which are resolved.........................................66%
11 4. CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS OUTPUT
12 MEASURES.--
13 a. Average time (hours) spent per criminal
14 investigation cases closed..............................37,901
15 b. Actual number of criminal cases closed........1,233
16 c. Average time (hours) spent per professional
17 compliance investigation cases closed....................7,884
18 d. Actual number of professional compliance
19 investigation cases closed.................................122
20 e. Number of hours spent on traffic homicide
21 investigations.........................................133,105
22 f. Number of cases resolved as result of traffic
23 homicide investigations..................................1,647
24 g. Average time (hours) spent per traffic homicide
25 investigation............................................80.82
26 h. Percent of recruits retained by FHP for 3 years
27 after the completion of training...........................88%
28 i. Number of hours spent on investigations......63,350
29 5. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND SAFETY EDUCATION OUTCOME
30 MEASURES.--
31 a. Percent increase in seat belt use................1%
144
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. State seat belt compliance rate...............60.7%
2 c. National average seat belt compliance rate (for
3 comparison)................................................68%
4 6. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND SAFETY EDUCATION OUTPUT
5 MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of public traffic safety presentations made
7 .........................................................1,563
8 b. Persons in attendance at public traffic safety
9 presentations...........................................83,475
10 c. Average size of audience per presentation........53
11 d. Number of training courses offered to FHP recruits
12 and personnel...............................................41
13 e. Number of students successfully completing training
14 courses....................................................967
15 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
16 MEASURE.--
17 a. Program administration and support costs/positions
18 as a percent of total program costs and positions.....1.29%/1%
19 (c) For the Licenses, Titles, and Regulations Program,
20 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
21 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
22 Specific Appropriations 2124-2175 are as follows:
23 1. MOTOR VEHICLES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of motor vehicle titles issued without
25 error......................................................98%
26 b. Number of fraudulent motor vehicle titles
27 identified and submitted to law enforcement................930
28 c. Percent change in number of fraudulent motor
29 vehicle titles identified and submitted to law enforcement..3%
30 d. Ratio of warranty complaints to new mobile homes
31 titled....................................................1:61
145
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 e. Percent reduction in pollution tonnage per day in
2 the six applicable (air quality) counties...............15.50%
3 f. Ratio of taxes collected from international
4 registration plans (IRP) and international fuel tax agreements
5 (IFTA) audits to cost of audits.......................$1.85/$1
6 2. MOTOR VEHICLES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of motor vehicle and mobile homes
8 registrations issued................................13,923,922
9 b. Number of motor vehicle and mobile home titles
10 issued...............................................4,700,000
11 c. Average cost to issue a motor vehicle title...$2.05
12 d. Average number of days to issue a motor vehicle
13 title......................................................3.4
14 e. Number of vessel registrations issued.......863,501
15 f. Number of vessel titles issued..............224,171
16 g. Average cost to issue a vessel title..........$5.08
17 h. Number of motor carriers audited per auditor, with
18 number of auditors shown.................................22/14
19 3. DRIVER'S LICENSES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of customers waiting 15 minutes or less for
21 driver license service.....................................82%
22 b. Percent of customers waiting 30 minutes or more for
23 driver license service.....................................11%
24 c. Percent of DUI course graduates who do not
25 recidivate within 3 years after graduation.................86%
26 d. Average number of corrections per 1,000 driver
27 records maintained.........................................4.0
28 e. Percent of motorists complying with financial
29 responsibility.............................................83%
30 f. Number of driver's licenses/identification cards
31 suspended, cancelled and invalidated as a result of fraudulent
146
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 activity, with annual percent change shown............2,178/1%
2 4. DRIVER'S LICENSES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of driver's licenses issued........4,188,819
4 b. Number of identification cards issued.......821,349
5 c. Number of written driver's license examinations
6 conducted............................................2,213,001
7 d. Number of road tests conducted..............525,855
8 5. KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTCOME MEASURE.--
9 a. Percent of customers who rate services as
10 satisfactory or better as measured by survey...............80%
11 6. KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Number of service programs maintained.........3,310
13 (6) DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE.--
14 (a) For the Office of the Treasurer and Division of
15 Administration Program the outcome measures, output measures,
16 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
17 provided in Specific Appropriations 2176-2194 are as follows:
18 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
19 MEASURE.--
20 a. Administrative costs expressed as a percent of
21 total program costs...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of cabinet issues handled..............2,242
25 b. Number of issues handled by Insurance Consumer
26 Advocate...................................................500
27 3. LEGAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
28 a. Percent of suspected code violations referred to
29 Legal Services resulting in discipline or corrective action
30 ...........................................................92%
31 4. LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
147
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Number of assignments handled by Legal Services
2 .........................................................4,569
3 5. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Minimum percent of scheduled services and service
5 requests completed in a timely manner......................80%
6 6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURE.--
7 a. Number of scheduled hours of technical resources
8 available per position...................................2,900
9 (b) For the Division of Treasury Program the outcome
10 measures, output measures, and associated performance
11 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
12 Appropriations 2195-2204 are as follows:
13 1. DEPOSIT SECURITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Maximum administrative unit cost per $100,000 of
15 securities placed for deposit security services purposes...$25
16 2. DEPOSIT SECURITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of analysis performed on the financial
18 condition of qualified public depositories and custodians, and
19 securities held for deposit..............................3,880
20 b. Number of account actions taken on trust deposit
21 and collateral accounts.................................34,545
22 3. STATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Ratio of net rates of return to established
25 national benchmarks for:
26 (I) Internal liquidity investments................1.05
27 (II) Internal bridge investments..................1.03
28 (III) External investment program bridge portfolio
29 ..........................................................1.01
30 (IV) Medium term portfolio........................1.02
31 (V) Investment grade convertible bonds....FY 2001-2002
148
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 LBR
2 4. STATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT OUTPUT
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of cash management consultation services..30
5 b. Number of financial management/accounting
6 transactions processed and reports produced.........10,200,093
7 5. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN OUTCOME MEASURE.--
8 a. Minimum percent of state employees (excluding OPS)
9 participating in the State Supplemental Retirement Plan
10 (Deferred Compensation)....................................24%
11 6. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of participant account actions processed by
13 the state deferred compensation office..................89,268
14 b. Number of educational materials distributed by the
15 state deferred compensation office............FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 (c) For the Fire Marshal Program, the outcome
17 measures, output measures, and associated performance
18 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
19 Appropriations 2205-2217D are as follows:
20 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of fire related deaths occurring in state
22 owned and leased properties required to be inspected.........0
23 b. Percent of mandated regulatory inspections
24 completed.................................................100%
25 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of recurring inspections completed of fire
27 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........7,200
28 b. Number of high hazard inspections completed of fire
29 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........6,536
30 c. Number of construction inspections completed of
31 fire code compliance in state owned/leased buildings.......875
149
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 d. Percent of fire code inspections completed within
2 statutory defined timeframe...............................100%
3 e. Percent of fire code plans reviews completed within
4 statutory defined timeframe...............................100%
5 f. Number of boilers inspected by department
6 inspectors...............................................5,500
7 g. Number of regulatory inspections completed......481
8 3. FIRE AND ARSON INVESTIGATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of closed fire investigations successfully
10 concluded, including by cause determined, suspect identified
11 and/or arrested, or other reasons..........................85%
12 b. Percent of closed arson investigations for which an
13 arrest was made Florida/National.........................29/18
14 4. FIRE AND ARSON INVESTIGATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Total number of fire investigations opened....9,458
16 b. Total number of fire investigations closed....6,242
17 5. PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND STANDARDS OUTCOME
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of challenges to examination results and
20 eligibility determination compared to those eligible to
21 challenge..................................................<1%
22 b. Number/percent of students who rate training they
23 received at the Florida State Fire College as improving their
24 ability to perform assigned duties...................3,500/95%
25 c. Percent of above satisfactory ratings by
26 supervisors of students' job performance from post-class
27 evaluations of skills gained through training at the Florida
28 State Fire College.........................................85%
29 6. PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND STANDARDS OUTPUT
30 MEASURES.--
31 a. Number of classes conducted by the Florida State
150
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Fire College...............................................210
2 b. Number of students trained and classroom contact
3 hours provided by the Florida State Fire College.4,200/220,000
4 c. Number/percent of customer requests for
5 certification testing completed within defined timeframes
6 .....................................................4,000/90%
7 d. Number of certified training centers inspected...29
8 e. Number of examinations administered...........4,400
9 (d) For the State Property and Casualty Claims
10 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
11 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
12 Specific Appropriations 2218-2224 are as follows:
13 1. RISK REDUCTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of workers' compensation claims requiring
15 some payment per 100 FTE employees.........................5.7
16 b. Number and percent of responses indicating the risk
17 services training they received was useful in developing and
18 implementing risk management plans in their agencies....80/90%
19 c. Average cost of tort liability claims paid...$3,599
20 d. Average cost of Federal Civil Rights liability
21 claims paid............................................$13,046
22 e. Average cost of workers' compensation claims.$3,250
23 f. Average cost of property claims paid.........$3,497
24 g. Number/percent of liability claims closed in
25 relation to liability claims worked during the fiscal year
26 .....................................................4,226/51%
27 2. RISK REDUCTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
28 a. Risk services training and consultation as measured
29 by the number of training units (1 unit=8 hrs.) provided and
30 consultation contracts made................................265
31 3. STATE SELF-INSURED CLAIMS ADJUSTMENTS OUTCOME
151
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 MEASURES.--
2 a. Percent of indemnity and medical payments made in a
3 timely manner in compliance with DLES Security Rule
4 38F-24.021, F.A.C..........................................95%
5 b. State employees' workers' compensation benefit cost
6 rate, as defined by indemnity and medical benefits, per $100
7 of state employees' payroll as compared to prior years..<$1.16
8 c. Percent of lawsuits, generated from a liability
9 claim, evaluated with SEFES codes entered within prescribed
10 timeframes.................................................92%
11 d. Number/percent of trainees who indicated the
12 training they received was useful in performing required
13 property program processes.............................123/95%
14 e. Average operational cost of a claim worked..$140.28
15 4. STATE SELF-INSURED CLAIMS ADJUSTMENTS OUTPUT
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of workers' compensation claims worked
18 ........................................................28,500
19 b. Number of workers' compensation claims litigated
20 ...........................................................780
21 c. Number of liability claims worked.............8,784
22 d. Number of training units (1 unit=8 hrs.) provided
23 by the property program.....................................40
24 e. Number of state property loss/damage claims worked
25 ...........................................................522
26 (e) For the Insurance Regulation and Consumer
27 Protection Program the outcome measures, output measures, and
28 associated performance standards with respect to funds
29 provided in Specific Appropriations 2225-2247 are as follows:
30 1. INSURANCE COMPANY LICENSURE AND OVERSIGHT OUTCOME
31 MEASURES.--
152
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Percent of total premium of major lines
2 (homeowner's, automobile, worker's compensation) written
3 through the residual market..............................3.13%
4 b. Maximum number of insurance companies entering
5 rehabilitation or liquidation during the year.FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 2. INSURANCE COMPANY LICENSURE AND OVERSIGHT OUTPUT
7 MEASURES.--
8 a. Current number of licensed insurance entities.3,420
9 b. Number of market conduct examinations completed.265
10 c. Number of financial reviews and examinations
11 completed...............................................12,620
12 d. Number of rate and form reviews completed....22,100
13 e. Total number of insurance companies in
14 rehabilitation or liquidation during the year...............56
15 3. INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE LICENSURE, SALES
16 APPOINTMENTS, AND OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
17 a. Maximum percent of insurance representatives
18 requiring discipline or oversight..........................23%
19 4. INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE LICENSURE, SALES
20 APPOINTMENTS, AND OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of applications for licensure processed
22 ........................................................71,222
23 b. Number of appointment actions processed.....868,916
24 c. Number of applicants and licensees required to
25 comply with education requirements.....................107,610
26 5. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of arrests for insurance fraud resulting in
28 trial or nontrial conviction...............................82%
29 b. Percent of investigative actions resulting in
30 administrative action against agents and agencies..........64%
31 6. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
153
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Number of insurance fraud investigations completed
2 .........................................................1,599
3 b. Number of agent and agency investigations completed
4 .........................................................2,428
5 7. INSURANCE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Percent of service requests appropriately resolved
7 ........................................................... FY
8 2001-2002 LBR
9 8. INSURANCE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of consumer educational materials created
11 and distributed........................................223,664
12 b. Number of telephone calls answered through the
13 consumer helpline......................................362,393
14 c. Number of consumer requests and information
15 inquiries handled.......................................50,908
16 (7) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY.--
17 (a) For the Workforce Assistance and Security Program,
18 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
19 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
20 Specific Appropriations 2248-2333 are as follows:
21 1. WORKFORCE PLACEMENT AND ASSISTANCE OUTCOME
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of injured workers returning to work at 80
24 percent or more of previous average (BRE) quarterly wage for
25 at least 1 quarter of the year following injury for accident 2
26 yrs prior................................................63.5%
27 b. Percent of initial payments made on time by
28 insurance carriers.......................................91.8%
29 c. Number of workers newly protected by workers'
30 compensation coverage per fiscal year as a result of
31 compliance efforts......................................14,015
154
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 d. Percent of investigated issues resolved by EAO..10%
2 e. Percent of noncomplying carriers in compliance upon
3 reaudit....................................................78%
4 f. Percent of eligible workers receiving reemployment
5 services sponsored by the division with closed cases during
6 the fiscal year and returned to suitable work.FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 g. Average total cost per 4-year-old case......$17,597
8 h. Percent of lost time cases with no petition for
9 benefits filed 18 months after the date of accident........77%
10 i. Percent of compliance enforcement actions which
11 result in a successful outcome (payment in full of all
12 penalties assessed and compliance by the employer and/or
13 cessation of all business operations of the employer).......FY
14 2001-2002 LBR
15 j. Percent of permanent total supplemental benefits
16 paid by the division to injured workers timely and accurately
17 ..............................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 k. Percent of timely held mediations (21 days)......FY
19 2001-2002 LBR
20 l. Average days from petition filed to disposition
21 order...................................................... FY
22 2001-2002 LBR
23 m. Cost per disposition order entered.FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 n. Occupational injury and illness total case
25 incidence rate (per 100 workers) (information only)......8.1%
26 o. Percent change in total case incidence rate for
27 private sector job sites served............................-4%
28 p. Percent change in total case incidence rate for
29 public sector job sites served.............................-4%
30 q. Percent reduction in lost workday case incidence
31 rate for private sector job sites served...................-5%
155
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 r. Percent reduction in lost workday case incidence
2 rate for public sector job sites served....................-5%
3 s. Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate
4 for private employers served...............................-5%
5 t. Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate
6 for public employers served................................-5%
7 u. Percent of employers surveyed who view services as
8 adequately effective or above..............................90%
9 v. Percent of UC benefits paid timely..............90%
10 w. Percent of UC benefits paid accurately..........95%
11 x. Percent of UC appeal cases completed timely..87.01%
12 y. Percent of new UC employer liability determinations
13 made timely.............................................84.20%
14 z. Percent of current quarter UC taxes paid timely
15 .........................................................92.5%
16 aa. Percent of job openings filled...............50.2%
17 bb. Percent of individuals referred to jobs who are
18 placed.....................................................28%
19 cc. Percent of food stamp clients employed.......11.8%
20 dd. Percent increase in high skill/high wage
21 apprenticeship programs registered..........................5%
22 ee. WIA adult & dislocated worker placement rate...78%
23 ff. WIA youth positive outcome rate................80%
24 gg. Rate and number of customers gainfully employed
25 (rehabilitated) at least 90 days (96-97 - at least 60 days)
26 .....................................................62%/9,500
27 hh. Rate and number of VR severely disabled customers
28 gainfully employed (rehabilitated) at least 90 days (96-97 -
29 at least 60 days)....................................63%/3,800
30 ii. Rate and number of VR most severely disabled
31 customers gainfully employed (rehabilitated) at least 90 days
156
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (96-97 - at least 60 days)...........................56%/4,275
2 jj. Rate and number of all other VR disabled customers
3 gainfully employed (rehabilitated) at least 90 days (96-97 -
4 at least 60 days)....................................75%/1,437
5 kk. Rate and number of VR customers placed in
6 competitive employment.............................97.5%/9,262
7 ll. Rate and number of VR customers retained in
8 employment after 1 year............................61.5%/5,200
9 mm. Average annual earnings of VR customers at
10 placement..............................................$13,633
11 nn. Average annual earnings of VR customers after 1
12 year...................................................$14,384
13 oo. Percent of case costs covered by third-party
14 payers.....................................................20%
15 pp. Average cost of case life (to Division) for
16 severely disabled VR customers..........................$3,311
17 qq. Average cost of case life (to Division) for most
18 severely disabled VR customers..........................$3,175
19 rr. Average cost of case life (to Division) for all
20 other disabled VR customers...............................$450
21 ss. Percent of unemployment compensation appeals
22 disposed within 45 days....................................50%
23 tt. Percent of unemployment compensation appeals
24 disposed within 90 days....................................95%
25 uu. Percent of cases appealed to DCA................7%
26 vv. Average unit cost of cases appealed to
27 Unemployment Appeals Commission...........................$186
28 ww. Average unit cost of cases appealed to DCA....$685
29 xx. Percent of appealed decisions affirmed by the DCA
30 ...........................................................94%
31 2. WORKFORCE PLACEMENT AND ASSISTANCE OUTPUT
157
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of employer investigations conducted for
3 compliance with workers' compensation law...............22,758
4 b. Number of applicants screened for reemployment
5 services.................................................1,921
6 c. Number of carriers audited......................381
7 d. Number of investigated issues resolved by the
8 Employee Assistance Office..............................25,000
9 e. Number of private-sector employers (and job sites)
10 provided OHSA 7(c)1 consultation services..................549
11 f. Number of public-sector employers (and job sites)
12 provided consultation services...........................3,000
13 g. Number of private-sector employers receiving
14 training and other technical services..............2,300/6,700
15 h. Number of public-sector employers receiving
16 training and other technical services................330/5,600
17 i. Number of UC claimant eligibility determinations
18 issued.................................................170,635
19 j. Number of UC benefits weeks paid..........3,153,006
20 k. Amount of UC benefits paid.............$683,477,111
21 l. Number of appeal cases completed.............52,197
22 m. Number of new UC employer liability determinations
23 made....................................................69,118
24 n. Amount of UC taxes collected...........$651,471,000
25 o. Number of UC employer tax/wage reports processed
26 .....................................................1,609,450
27 p. Number individuals referred to job openings listed
28 with J&B...............................................540,000
29 q. Number individuals placed by J&B............137,700
30 r. Number individuals obtaining employment after
31 receiving specific J&B services.........................35,700
158
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 s. Cost per placement by J&B......................$230
2 t. Cost per individual placed or obtained employment
3 ..........................................................$176
4 u. Number of food stamp recipients employed.....14,800
5 v. Cost per food stamp placement..................$302
6 w. Number Apprenticeship Program requests meeting high
7 skill/high wage requirements...............................166
8 x. Number apprentices successfully completing terms of
9 training as set by registered industry standards.........2,900
10 y. Number WIA Adult Program completers...........8,600
11 z. Number WIA Youth Program completers...........6,000
12 aa. Employers in compliance or brought into compliance
13 with labor laws as a percent of total employers monitored..85%
14 bb. Employers monitored for compliance with child
15 labor and migrant farmworker labor laws..................3,290
16 cc. Number of customers reviewed for eligibility
17 ........................................................26,000
18 dd. Number of individualized written plans for
19 services................................................19,750
20 ee. Number of customers served..................72,000
21 ff. Percent of eligibility determinations completed in
22 compliance with federal law................................85%
23 gg. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
24 team member................................................161
25 hh. Number of unemployment compensation appeals
26 disposed of..............................................9,000
27 3. BLIND SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Rate and number of rehabilitation customers
29 gainfully employed at least 90 days..................68.3%/847
30 b. Rate and number of rehabilitation customers placed
31 in competitive employment............................64.3%/654
159
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 c. Projected average annual earnings of rehabilitation
2 customers at placement.................................$13,500
3 d. Rate and number of successfully rehabilitated older
4 persons, nonvocational rehabilitation..............55.2%/1,355
5 e. Ratio and number of customers (children)
6 successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from pre-school to
7 school................................................67.3%/36
8 f. Ratio and number of customers (children)
9 successfully rehabilitated/transitioned from school to work
10 ......................................................26.5%/38
11 g. Percent of eligible library customers served..19.8%
12 h. Percent of library customers satisfied with the
13 timeliness of services...................................98.6%
14 i. Percent of library customers satisfied with the
15 selection of reading materials available...................96%
16 4. BLIND SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of written plans for services..........1,425
18 b. Number of books available per library customer
19 .........................................................51.14
20 c. Number of books loaned per library customer...12.39
21 d. Number of periodicals loaned per library customer
22 ..........................................................3.62
23 e. Net increase in registered customers for library
24 services...................................................822
25 f. Cost per library customer....................$19.65
26 g. Total number of food service managers...........162
27 h. Number of existing food services facilities
28 renovated...................................................10
29 i. Number of new food service facilities constructed.5
30 j. Number of customers reviewed for eligibility..2,035
31 k. Number of customers served...................13,100
160
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 l. Average time lapse between application and
2 eligibility determination for rehabilitation customers......69
3 m. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
4 team member................................................114
5 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
6 MEASURE.--
7 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
8 cost......................................................7.9%
9 6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of data processing requests completed by
11 due date...................................................95%
12 b. System design and programming hourly cost.......$52
13 c. Percent of scheduled production jobs completed
14 .........................................................99.9%
15 d. Percent of scheduled hours available data center
16 operations..............................................99.79%
17 e. Cost per MIP (millions of instructions per second)
18 .......................................................$19,000
19 f. Percent of Help Desk calls resolved within 3
20 working days............................................89.48%
21 g. Cost per Help Desk call..........................$8
22 h. Percent of scheduled hours available network.99.08%
23 i. Cost for support per network device............$195
24 7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of data processing requests completed by due
26 date.....................................................2,900
27 b. Number of scheduled production jobs completed
28 .......................................................517,000
29 c. Number of hours available data center operations
30 .........................................................2,876
31 d. Number of Help Desk calls resolved within 3 working
161
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 days....................................................18,175
2 e. Number of hours available network.............2,855
3 (8) DEPARTMENT OF THE LOTTERY.--
4 (a) For the Sale of Lottery Products Program, the
5 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
6 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
7 Appropriations 2353-2366 are as follows:
8 1. SALE OF LOTTERY PRODUCTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Total revenue in dollars..................$2,287.3M
10 b. Percent change in total revenue dollars from prior
11 year.....................................................2.87%
12 c. Transfers to the state Educational Enhancement
13 Trust Fund.............................................$869.1M
14 d. Percent of total revenue to the Educational
15 Enhancement Trust Fund.....................................38%
16 2. SALE OF LOTTERY PRODUCTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of total revenue paid as prizes......49.64%
18 b. Administrative expense paid for retailer commission
19 ......................................................$129.41M
20 c. Operating expense (includes retailer commission)
21 .......................................................$282.7M
22 d. Operating expense as percent of total revenue...12%
23 e. Percent of respondents who are aware of the
24 Lottery's contribution to education........................65%
25 f. Provide executive direction and support services
26 for all lottery operations as measured by percent of total
27 agency budget...............................................9%
28 (9) DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES.--
29 (a) For the Administration Program, the outcome
30 measures, output measures, and associated performance
31 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
162
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Appropriations 2367-2378 are as follows:
2 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
3 MEASURE.--
4 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
5 costs....................................................2.62%
6 2. STATE TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
7 a. Number of state entities served..................73
8 3. STATE EMPLOYEE LEASING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
9 a. Number of employees in the State Employee Leasing
10 service.....................................................19
11 (b) For the SMART Schools Clearinghouse Program, the
12 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
13 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
14 Appropriations 2379-2384 are as follows:
15 1. SMART SCHOOLS CLEARINGHOUSE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
16 a. Number of schools receiving SMART awards.........25
17 (c) For the Facilities Program, the outcome measures,
18 output measures, and associated performance standards with
19 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2385-2401
20 are as follows:
21 1. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Average DMS full service rent - composite cost per
23 net square foot (actual)................................$15.39
24 b. Average private sector full service rent -
25 composite cost per net square foot in counties where DMS has
26 office facilities (for comparison)......................$16.95
27 c. DMS average operations and maintenance cost per
28 square foot maintained...................................$5.20
29 d. Private industry average operations and maintenance
30 cost per square foot maintained..........................$6.74
31 2. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
163
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Net square feet of state-owned office space
2 occupied by state agencies including non-DMS owned facilities
3 .....................................................7,840,079
4 b. Net square feet of private office space occupied by
5 state agencies......................................10,713,751
6 c. Number of maintained square feet (private contract
7 and agency)..........................................7,412,150
8 3. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Gross square foot construction cost of office
10 facilities for DMS......................................$84.94
11 b. Gross square foot construction cost of office
12 facilities for private industry average (for comparison)
13 ........................................................$91.73
14 4. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
15 a. Dollar volume of Fixed Capital Outlay project
16 starts managed....................................$280,000,000
17 5. CAPITOL POLICE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Number of criminal incidents per 1,000 employees
19 .........................................................28.75
20 6. CAPITOL POLICE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Total number of criminal incidents reported...5,686
22 b. Total number of noncriminal calls for service
23 ........................................................32,000
24 c. Number of patrol hours on-site at state facilities
25 ........................................................72,800
26 (d) For the Support Program, the outcome measures,
27 output measures, and associated performance standards with
28 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2408-2425
29 are as follows:
30 1. AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Passenger load factor for DMS...................3.5
164
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 b. Cost per flight hour - DMS aircraft pool.....$1,200
2 c. Average percent DMS direct cost per flight hour
3 below industry direct cost.................................32%
4 2. AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
5 a. Number of flights by executive aircraft pool..1,500
6 3. FEDERAL PROPERTY ASSISTANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
7 a. Federal property distribution rate..............85%
8 4. FEDERAL PROPERTY ASSISTANCE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
9 a. Number of federal property orders processed...2,150
10 5. MOTOR VEHICLE AND WATERCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTCOME
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Average percent below private sector fleet
13 maintenance - labor costs..................................10%
14 b. Average percent below private sector fleet
15 maintenance - parts costs..................................26%
16 c. Average percent state rental vehicles below state
17 rental contract rates......................................30%
18 6. MOTOR VEHICLE AND WATERCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTPUT
19 MEASURE.--
20 a. Miles of state rental vehicle service provided
21 .....................................................1,900,000
22 7. PURCHASING OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Percent of state term contracts savings.........39%
24 8. PURCHASING OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
25 a. Number of contracts and agreements executed...1,103
26 9. MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
27 a. Average number of days to process minority
28 certification...............................................10
29 10. MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
30 a. Number of certified minority businesses.......5,600
31 (e) For the Workforce Program, the outcome measures,
165
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 output measures, and associated performance standards with
2 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2426-2450
3 are as follows:
4 1. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Total program cost per authorized positions in the
6 state personnel system..................................$78.76
7 b. Overall customer satisfaction rating............75%
8 c. Percent of agencies at or above EEO gender parity
9 with available labor market..............................86.7%
10 d. Percent of agencies at or above EEO minority parity
11 with available labor market................................70%
12 2. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
13 a. Number of authorized positions supported by the
14 Cooperative Personnel Employment Subsystem (COPES).....125,600
15 3. INSURANCE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of vendors meeting all contractual
18 performance provisions.....................................95%
19 b. Administrative cost per enrollee............$230.06
20 4. INSURANCE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of subscribers or contracts..........480,591
22 5. RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of customers satisfied with retirement
25 information.............................................92.78%
26 b. Percent of agency payroll transactions correctly
27 reported...................................................90%
28 c. Percent of customers satisfied with retirement
29 services................................................92.53%
30 d. Administrative cost per active and retired member
31 (excluding RIM project).................................$20.39
166
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 e. Percent of local retirement systems annually
2 reviewed which are funded on a sound actuarial basis.......95%
3 6. RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of local pension plan valuations and impact
6 statements reviewed........................................400
7 b. Number of FRS members.......................810,349
8 (f) For the Information Technology Program, the
9 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 2451-2472 are as follows:
12 1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for
14 local access...............................................40%
15 b. Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for
16 long distance..............................................40%
17 c. Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for
18 data service...............................................25%
19 d. Overall customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5)
20 ..........................................................3.79
21 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Total revenue for voice service.........$80,185,085
23 b. Total revenue for data service..........$50,814,915
24 3. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
25 a. Percent wireless discount from commercially
26 available and similar type engineering services............35%
27 4. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Overall customer satisfaction ranking (scale of 1
29 to 5).....................................................4.15
30 b. Number of engineering projects and approvals
31 handled for state and local governments....................616
167
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 c. Number of square miles covered by Joint Task Force
2 Radio System............................................57,727
3 5. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Overall customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5)
5 ..........................................................3.94
6 6. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
7 a. Number of ITP research, development, and consulting
8 projects completed.........................................436
9 (10) DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS.--
10 (a) For the Readiness and Response Program, the
11 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
12 standards with respect to funds provided to Specific
13 Appropriations 2488A-2507D are as follows:
14 1. DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
15 a. Percent of Law Enforcement officers trained that
16 rate the training as relevant and valuable...............87.5%
17 2. DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Interagency counter-drug assistance provided as
19 measured by the number of man-days devoted to counter-drug
20 tasks...................................................61,950
21 b. Presentations provided to improve drug awareness
22 among high school students..............................22,249
23 c. Community anti-drug coalitions sponsored.........18
24 d. Number of law enforcement personnel trained.....400
25 e. Number of man-days devoted to providing
26 counter-drug training to law enforcement agents........125,000
27 3. READINESS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
28 a. Percent of authorized filled positions..........95%
29 4. READINESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number/percent of armories rated adequate....36/62%
31 b. Percent of satisfaction with training facilities at
168
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Camp Blanding..............................................82%
2 c. Number of annual training days at Camp Blanding
3 .......................................................180,000
4 d. Number of new recruits using State Education
5 Assistance Program.......................................1,300
6 e. Number of crisis response exercises conducted
7 annually.....................................................4
8 f. Number of soldiers in the Florida National Guard
9 recruited and retained..................................11,599
10 g. Number of armories under maintenance and repair..55
11 h. Number of people using the Camp Blanding training
12 area...................................................233,587
13 4. RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Percent of supported agencies reporting
15 satisfaction with the department's support for specific
16 missions...................................................90%
17 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
18 MEASURE.--
19 a. Maximum threshold of administrative costs expressed
20 as a percent of total program costs...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 6. FEDERAL/STATE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS OUTCOME
22 MEASURE.--
23 a. Number of Department of Defense contracts
24 administered in Florida.....................................21
25 (11) PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.--
26 (a) For the Utilities Regulation/Consumer Assistance
27 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
28 performance standards with respect to Specific Appropriations
29 2508-2515 are as follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31 a. Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida
169
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 compared to average ROE in the USA:
2 (I) Electric:
3 (A) Florida.......................................+/-1
4 (B) USA..........................................12.20
5 (II) Gas:
6 (A) Florida.......................................+/-1
7 (B) USA..........................................11.60
8 (III) Water and wastewater:
9 (A) Florida.....................................+/-2.5
10 (B) USA..........................................11.20
11 b. Percent of utilities achieving within range, over
12 range, and under range of last authorized ROE:
13 (I) Electric:
14 (A) Within range..................................100%
15 (B) Over range......................................0%
16 (II) Gas:
17 (A) Within range...................................25%
18 (B) Over range......................................0%
19 (III) Water and wastewater:
20 (A) Within range....................................5%
21 (B) Over range.....................................25%
22 c. Limit in the percent increase in annual utility
23 bill for average residential usage compared to inflation as
24 measured by the Consumer Price Index within:
25 (I) Electric (1,000 KWH)............................1%
26 (II) Gas (30 Therms)................................1%
27 (III) Water and wastewater (10,000 gal).............1%
28 d. Percent of state access lines served by Alternative
29 Local Exchange Companies (ALECS)..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 e. Percent of communications service variances per
31 inspection points examined:
170
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (I) Local exchange & alternate local exchange
2 telephone companies........................................22%
3 (II) Interexchange.................................20%
4 (III) Pay telephone companies.......................4%
5 f. Percent of electric safety variances corrected on
6 1st reinspection............................................3%
7 g. Percent of gas safety variances corrected on 1st
8 reinspection...............................................25%
9 h. Consumer calls:
10 (I) Percent of calls answered......................72%
11 (II) Average waiting time.......................2 min.
12 i. Percent of consumer complaints resolved:
13 (I) Within 30 days.................................48%
14 (II) Within 60 days................................62%
15 j. Per capita annual KWH energy savings through
16 conservation programs..................................142 KWH
17 k. Percent of combined conservation goals achieved by
18 7 FEECA utilities.........................................100%
19 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Proceedings, reviews, and audits examining rates,
21 rate structure, earnings, and expenditures:
22 (I) Electric.......................................120
23 (II) Gas...........................................110
24 (III) Water and wastewater.........................873
25 b. Number of proceedings establishing agreements
26 between local service providers............................687
27 c. Number of proceedings granting certificates to
28 operate as a telecommunications company..................1,009
29 d. Number of proceedings granting service authority,
30 resolving territorial disputes:
31 (I) Electric.........................................3
171
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (II) Gas.............................................1
2 (III) Water and wastewater..........................71
3 e. Number of 10-year site plan reviews and need
4 determinations for electric utilities.......................15
5 f. Number of consumer inquiries/complaints handled:
6 (I) Communications..............................17,356
7 (II) Electric....................................1,731
8 (III) Gas..........................................211
9 (IV) Water and wastewater..........................422
10 g. Number of service evaluations/safety inspections
11 performed:
12 (I) Communications (service evaluations).........9,100
13 (II) Electric (safety inspections)...............3,670
14 (III) Gas (safety inspections)......................77
15 h. Number of enforcement proceedings relating to
16 service and safety:
17 (I) Communications..................................58
18 (II) Electric........................................0
19 (III) Gas............................................0
20 i. Number of conservation programs reviewed.........25
21 (12) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.--
22 (a) For the Administration Program, the outcome
23 measures, output measures, and associated performance
24 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
25 Appropriations 2516-2525 are as follows:
26 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
27 MEASURE.--
28 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
29 costs (excluding revenue sharing)........................5.79%
30 (b) For the Property Tax Administration Program, the
31 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
172
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 2526-2538 are as follows:
3 1. PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION OVERSIGHT OUTCOME
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Percent of refund and tax certificate applications
6 processed within 30 days after receipt.....................95%
7 b. Number of refund requests per 100,000 parcels..31.6
8 2. PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION OVERSIGHT OUTPUT
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of property tax refund requests processed
11 .........................................................2,700
12 b. Number of tax certificate cancellations/corrections
13 processed................................................2,000
14 3. PROPERTY TAX ROLL OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of classes studied found to have a level of
16 at least 90 percent......................................97.1%
17 b. Taxroll uniformity - average for coefficient of
18 dispersion...............................................11.2%
19 4. PROPERTY TAX ROLL OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of subclasses of property studied with
21 feedback to property appraisers..........................4,400
22 b. Number of taxpayers audited on behalf of county
23 property appraisers (TPP)..................................260
24 c. Number of county property tax rolls evaluated....67
25 5. TRUTH-IN-MILLAGE COMPLIANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
26 a. Percent of taxing authorities in total or
27 substantial truth-in-millage compliance on initial submission
28 .........................................................97.5%
29 6. TRUTH-IN-MILLAGE COMPLIANCE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
30 a. Number of TRIM compliance letters sent to taxing
31 authorities................................................605
173
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (c) For the Child-Support Enforcement Program, the
2 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
3 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
4 Appropriations 2539-2561 are as follows:
5 1. CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT OUTCOME
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of children with a court order for support
8 ...........................................................52%
9 b. Percent of children with paternity established
10 .........................................................81.5%
11 2. CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT OUTPUT
12 MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of children with a newly established court
14 order...................................................60,000
15 b. Number of cases prepared for judicial processing
16 .......................................................330,000
17 3. CHILD-SUPPORT PAYMENTS DISTRIBUTION OUTCOME
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Total child-support dollars collected per $1 of
20 total expenditures.......................................$3.05
21 b. Percent of State Disbursement Unit Collections
22 disbursed within 2 business days after receipt.............95%
23 4. CHILD-SUPPORT PAYMENTS DISTRIBUTION OUTCOME
24 MEASURE.--
25 a. Child-support collections distributed..$763 million
26 5. CHILD-SUPPORT PAYMENTS COLLECTION OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of cases with child support due in a month
29 which received a payment during the month..................54%
30 b. Percent of child-support collected that was due
31 during the fiscal year.....................................57%
174
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 (d) For the General Tax Administration Program, the
2 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
3 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
4 Appropriations 2562-2580 are as follows:
5 1. TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Average days from receipt of payment to final
7 processing of deposit - sales, corporation, intangibles, fuel
8 ..........................................................0.60
9 b. Number of days between initial distribution of
10 funds and final adjustments - sales, fuel...................60
11 c. Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially
12 error free and on time.....................................76%
13 d. Return on investment - total collections per dollar
14 spent..................................................$149.73
15 e. Dollars collected as a percent of actual liability
16 of notices sent for apparent sales tax return filing errors or
17 late returns...............................................50%
18 f. Average time, in days, between the processing of a
19 sales tax return and the first notification to the taxpayer of
20 an apparent filing error or late return.....................36
21 g. Percent of delinquent sales tax return and filing
22 error or late return notices issued accurately to taxpayer.90%
23 h. Percent of final audit assessment amounts collected
24 - tax only.................................................85%
25 i. Final audit assessment amounts as a percent of
26 initial assessment amounts - tax only......................74%
27 j. Dollars collected voluntarily as a percent of total
28 dollars collected..........................................97%
29 k. Average number of days to resolve a dispute of an
30 audit assessment...........................................175
31 l. Direct collections per enforcement related dollar
175
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 spent....................................................$4.82
2 2. TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of delinquent tax return notices issued to
4 taxpayers..............................................720,000
5 b. Number of notices sent to taxpayers for apparent
6 tax return filing errors or late return................520,000
7 c. Number of tax returns processed...........8,330,000
8 d. Number of tax returns reconciled..........6,500,000
9 e. Number of identified potential liabilities resolved
10 .....................................................1,060,000
11 f. Number of audits completed...................29,500
12 g. Number of successful contacts with taxpayers.47,000
13 3. TAX DISTRIBUTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Accuracy of initial revenue distributions to local
15 governments................................................93%
16 4. TAX DISTRIBUTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
17 a. Number of refund claims processed............64,000
18 (e) For the Information Services Program, the outcome
19 measures, output measures, and associated performance
20 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
21 Appropriations 2581-2588 are as follows:
22 1. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Information program costs as a percent of total
24 agency costs.............................................4.18%
25 2. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Develop and maintain applications as measured by
27 completed work requests..................................1,100
28 b. Number of computer operations by production
29 transaction/jobs executed...........................99,150,000
30 (13) DEPARTMENT OF STATE.--
31 (a) For the Secretary and Division of Administrative
176
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Services, the outcome measures, output measures, and
2 associated performance standards with respect to funds
3 provided in Specific Appropriations 2589-2596A are as follows:
4 1. ADVOCACY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS
5 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Level of clients who indicate assistance is very
7 responsive, as measured by survey..........................60%
8 b. Percent of overseas clients who indicate assistance
9 is very responsive.........................................96%
10 c. Percent of volunteer-consultants who would
11 volunteer again............................................97%
12 d. Ratio of donated services and contributions as
13 compared to the amount of state funding..................1.5:1
14 2. ADVOCACY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS
15 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of Trade/Cultural Missions.................3
17 b. Number of Consular Corps Credentials issued......50
18 c. Number of Sister Cities/Sister State Grants
19 approved....................................................20
20 d. Number of Civil Law Notaries issued.............270
21 e. Total number of notary applications processed per
22 year...................................................100,000
23 f. Number of volunteer technical assistance missions
24 to Central America and the Caribbean........................96
25 g. Number of international and domestic development
26 missions....................................................15
27 (b) For the Elections Program, the outcome measures,
28 output measures, and associated performance standards with
29 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2597-2602
30 are as follows:
31 1. ELECTION RECORDS, LAWS, AND CODES OUTCOME
177
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 MEASURES.--
2 a. Percent of campaign treasurer's reports detail
3 information released on the Internet within 7 days.........94%
4 b. Percent survey respondents satisfied with services:
5 Quality and Timeliness of Response.........................90%
6 c. Percent of training session/workshop attendees
7 satisfied: Quality of content and Applicability of materials
8 presented..................................................90%
9 2. ELECTION RECORDS, LAWS, AND CODES OUTPUT
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of campaign reports received/processed
12 ........................................................14,000
13 b. Number of attendees at training, workshops, and
14 assistance events..........................................500
15 c. Number of web hits..........................750,000
16 (c) For the Historical Resources Program the outcome
17 measures, output measures, and associated performance
18 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
19 Appropriations 2603-2622B are as follows:
20 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
21 MEASURE.--
22 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total program
23 costs....................................................9.74%
24 2. HISTORIC MUSEUMS CONSERVATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
25 a. Percent of visitors who rank "quality of exhibits"
26 as excellent or good.......................................88%
27 3. HISTORIC MUSEUMS CONSERVATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of museum exhibits........................84
29 b. Number of visitors to state historic museums
30 educated about Florida history.........................233,046
31 c. Educational opportunities provided to museum
178
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 visitors.............................................3,600,000
2 4. HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESERVATION OUTCOME
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Total local funds leveraged by historical resources
5 program.......................................... $105 million
6 b. Percent of customers satisfied with quality and
7 timeliness of technical assistance provided................96%
8 5. HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESERVATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of grants awarded........................243
10 b. Number of dollars awarded through grants
11 ...................................................$16,088,144
12 c. Number of publications and multimedia products
13 available for the general public (historical and
14 archaeological items)......................................315
15 d. Number of preservation services applications
16 reviewed.................................................8,000
17 e. Number of attendees at produced and sponsored
18 events (historic and archaeological)..........FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 f. Number of historic resources protected and
20 preserved................................................7,881
21 g. Attendees educated at workshops on the preservation
22 of historic resources..................................163,975
23 6. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Number of historic and archaeological objects
25 maintained for public use and scientific research......150,000
26 7. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Number of sites in the Florida Master Site File
28 .......................................................133,000
29 b. Number of historic and archaeological objects
30 maintained for public use..............................120,000
31 c. Number of copies or viewings of publications,
179
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 including web hits...................................1,750,000
2 (d) For the Commercial Recording and Registration
3 Program the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
4 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
5 Specific Appropriations 2623-2625A are as follows:
6 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
7 a. Percent client satisfaction with the division's
8 services...................................................91%
9 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Average Cost/Corporate Filing.................$5.38
11 b. Average Cost/Uniform Commercial Code Filings..$1.81
12 c. Average Cost/Inquiry.........................$0.075
13 d. Proportion of total inquires handled by telephone
14 ...........................................................20%
15 e. Proportion of total inquiries handled by
16 mail/walk-ins.............................................7.5%
17 f. Proportion of total inquiries handled by electronic
18 means....................................................72.5%
19 (e) For the Library and Information Services Program
20 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
21 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
22 Specific Appropriations 2626-2629B are as follows:
23 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Annual increase in the use of local public library
25 service.....................................................2%
26 b. Annual increase in usage of research collections.6%
27 c. Annual cost avoidance achieved by government
28 agencies through records storage/disposition/micrographics
29 ...................................................$58,000,000
30 d. Customer Satisfaction with relevancy and timeliness
31 of research response.......................................90%
180
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 e. Customer Satisfaction with Records Management
2 technical assistance, training, and Records Center Services
3 ...........................................................90%
4 f. Customer Service with accuracy and timeliness of
5 library consultant responses..................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of items loaned by public libraries
8 ....................................................71,361,232
9 b. Number of library customer visits........50,504,239
10 c. Number of public library reference requests
11 ....................................................25,644,913
12 d. Number of public library registered borrowers
13 .....................................................7,207,942
14 e. Number of persons attending public library programs
15 .....................................................3,148,771
16 f. Number of volumes in public library collections
17 ....................................................25,242,994
18 g. Number of new users (State Library, State Archives)
19 .........................................................6,336
20 h. Number of reference requests handled (State
21 Library, State Archives)...............................117,847
22 i. Number of database searches conducted (State
23 Library, State Archives)...............................837,195
24 j. Number of items loaned (State Library).......86,163
25 k. Cubic feet of obsolete public records approved for
26 disposal...............................................510,000
27 l. Cubic feet of noncurrent records stored at the
28 Records Center.........................................220,000
29 m. Number of microfilm images created, processed,
30 and/or duplicated at the Records Center............160,000,000
31 (f) For the Division of Cultural Affairs, the outcome
181
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 measures, output measures, and associated performance
2 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
3 Appropriations 2630-2646B are as follows:
4 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
5 MEASURE.--
6 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
7 costs....................................................3.21%
8 2. CULTURAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT GRANTS OUTCOME
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Attendance at supported cultural events..21,000,000
11 b. Number of individuals served by professional
12 associations.........................................8,000,000
13 c. Total local financial support leveraged by state
14 funding...........................................$360,000,000
15 3. CULTURAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT GRANTS OUTPUT
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of capital grants awarded.................30
18 b. Number of program grants awarded................750
19 c. Dollars awarded through capital grants..$12,000,000
20 d. Dollars awarded through program grants..$19,535,872
21 e. Percent of counties funded by the program.....88.1%
22 f. Percent of large counties (N=34; population
23 >75,000) funded by the program...........................97.0%
24 g. Percent of small counties (N=33; population less
25 than 75,000) funded by the program.......................78.8%
26 h. Number of state-supported performances and exhibits
27 ........................................................25,000
28 (g) For the Licensing Program the outcome measures,
29 output measures, and associated performance standards with
30 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2647-2650
31 are as follows:
182
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
3 licenses issued within 90 days after receipt of an application
4 ...........................................................83%
5 b. Percent/number Concealed Weapon/Firearm licenses
6 issued within 90-day statutory timeframe without fingerprint
7 results...............................................7%/1,978
8 c. Number of default Concealed Weapons/Firearms
9 licensees with prior criminal histories....................339
10 d. Percent License Revocations or Suspensions
11 Initiated within 20 days after receipt of disqualifying
12 information (all license types)............................60%
13 e. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
14 investigations completed within 60 days....................94%
15 f. Percent Security, Investigative, and Recovery
16 inspections completed within 30 days.......................90%
17 g. Percent of Concealed Weapon/Firearm Violators to
18 Licensed Population......................................0.15%
19 h. Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery
20 Violators to Licensed Population.........................1.42%
21 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Average Cost/Concealed Weapon/Firearm Application
23 Processed..................................................$27
24 b. Average Cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
25 Application Processed......................................$59
26 c. Average Cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
27 Investigation...........................................$1,846
28 d. Average Cost/Security, Investigative, and Recovery
29 Compliance Inspection.....................................$377
30 e. Average cost/Administrative Action (revocation,
31 fine, probation, & compliance letters)....................$491
183
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 f. Number investigations performed (Security,
2 Investigative, and Recovery complaint and agency generated
3 inspections).............................................1,541
4 g. Number compliance inspections performed (Security,
5 Investigative, and Recovery licensees/new agency inspections
6 and random inspections)..................................1,771
7 (h) For the Historic Pensacola Preservation Board the
8 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
9 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
10 Appropriations 2651-2654 are as follows:
11 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
12 a. Number of visitors to Board-managed properties
13 .......................................................150,000
14 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of consultations to city and county
16 governments................................................550
17 b. Total acreage of historic properties maintained
18 ..........................................................8.75
19 c. Total square footage of historic properties
20 maintained.............................................108,600
21 (i) For the Ringling Museum of Art, the outcome
22 measures, output measures, and associated performance
23 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
24 Appropriations 2655-2657A are as follows:
25 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Annual number of museum visitors............251,308
27 b. Number of individual participants in scheduled
28 education programs.......................................3,200
29 c. Percent of visitors rating visit better than
30 expected...................................................77%
31 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
184
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 a. Total number of objects maintained...........12,850
2 b. Number of institutions to which items are on loan
3 ............................................................16
4 c. Net asset balance of the Museum and Foundation,
5 including assets transferred to the state and excluding art
6 and other collections...............................$8,300,000
7 Section 34. This act shall take effect July 1, 2000;
8 and in the event that this act fails to become a law until
9 after that date, it shall take effect upon becoming a law and
10 shall operate retroactively to July 1, 2000.
11
12
13 ================ T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ===============
14 And the title is amended as follows:
15 Delete everything before the enacting clause
16
17 and insert:
18 A bill to be entitled
19 An act implementing the 2000-2001 General
20 Appropriations Act; providing legislative
21 intent; providing that specified funds are to
22 be allocated based on equity and are not
23 subject to the provisions of s. 394.908, F.S.;
24 amending s. 409.9115, F.S.; specifying how the
25 Agency for Health Care Administration shall
26 make payments for the Medicaid disproportionate
27 share program for mental health hospitals;
28 requiring the Agency for Health Care
29 Administration to use a specified
30 disproportionate share formula, specified
31 audited financial data, and a specified
185
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Medicaid per diem rate in fiscal year 2000-2001
2 for qualifying hospitals; amending s. 409.9116,
3 F.S.; providing a formula for rural hospital
4 disproportionate share payments; amending s.
5 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the Department of
6 Children and Family Services and the Department
7 of Health to advance certain moneys for certain
8 contract services; directing the Agency for
9 Health Care Administration to include health
10 maintenance organization recipients in the
11 county billing for a specified purpose;
12 amending s. 409.905, F.S.; prescribing
13 conditions upon which an adjustment in a
14 hospital's inpatient per diem rate may be
15 based; authorizing the Departments of Children
16 and Family Services, Management Services, Labor
17 and Employment Security, and Health and the
18 Agency for Health Care Administration to
19 transfer positions and funds to comply with the
20 General Appropriations Act or the WAGES Act;
21 amending s. 39.3065, F.S.; providing for the
22 sheriffs of Broward County and Seminole County
23 to provide child protective investigative
24 services; amending s. 1, ch. 99-219, Laws of
25 Florida; extending flexibility to implement
26 reorganization of the Department of Children
27 and Family Services until July 1, 2001;
28 amending s. 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the
29 Department of Law Enforcement to transfer some
30 positions and associated budget and a certain
31 percentage of salary rate between budget
186
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 entities and providing requirements with
2 respect thereto; providing that billing agent
3 consulting services related to certain Medicaid
4 provider agreements not be considered billing
5 agent services; requiring the Agency for Health
6 Care Administration to develop a reimbursement
7 schedule; authorizing the Department of Law
8 Enforcement to use certain moneys to provide
9 meritorious-performance bonuses for employees,
10 subject to approval; amending s. 212.20, F.S.;
11 providing for use of moneys allocated to the
12 Solid Waste Management Trust Fund; amending s.
13 403.7095, F.S.; revising the expiration date of
14 the solid waste management grant program;
15 requiring a specified level of funding for
16 counties receiving solid waste management and
17 recycling grants; providing for allocation of
18 funds for innovative programs to address
19 recycling practices and procedures; amending s.
20 110.1239, F.S.; providing requirements for the
21 funding of the state group health insurance
22 program; amending s. 86, ch. 93-213, Laws of
23 Florida, as amended; deferring repayment
24 requirements for certain funding provided to
25 the state NPDES program; amending s. 287.161,
26 F.S.; requiring the Department of Management
27 Services to charge all persons receiving
28 transportation from the executive aircraft pool
29 a specified rate; providing for deposit and use
30 of such fees; amending s. 403.1826, F.S.;
31 providing authority of the Department of
187
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 Environmental Protection to waive requirements
2 related to water pollution control and sewage
3 treatment grants; amending s. 216.181, F.S.;
4 providing authority to the Department of
5 Transportation to facilitate the transfer of
6 personnel to the turnpike headquarters facility
7 in Orange County; providing for the transfer of
8 tangible personal property from the Department
9 of Business and Professional Regulation to the
10 College of Veterinary Medicine at the
11 University of Florida; providing legislative
12 intent concerning funds appropriated for the
13 San Carlos Institute; providing for allocation
14 of moneys provided for workforce development
15 and providing for budget amendment when a
16 program is moved; providing for future repeal
17 of various provisions; providing for audit and
18 transfer of specified funds relating to law
19 enforcement programs transferred to St. Johns
20 River and Tallahassee Community Colleges;
21 amending s. 240.2605, F.S.; requiring the Board
22 of Regents to rank certain donations; requiring
23 presidents of universities in the State
24 University System to provide lists of certain
25 donations; requiring the Board of Regents to
26 submit a report; requiring the Board of Regents
27 to rank such donations; providing effect of
28 veto of specific appropriation or proviso to
29 which implementing language refers; providing
30 applicability to other legislation; providing
31 performance measures and standards for programs
188
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01
SENATE AMENDMENT
Bill No. HB 2147, 1st Eng.
Amendment No.
1 within state agencies; providing that the
2 performance measures and standards are linked
3 to appropriations in the General Appropriations
4 Act; providing an effective date.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
189
5:11 PM 04/03/00 h2147c-39j01