House Bill 2147e1

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1                      A bill to be entitled

  2         An act implementing the 2000-2001 General

  3         Appropriations Act; providing legislative

  4         intent; providing for allocation of moneys

  5         provided for workforce development and

  6         providing for budget amendment when a program

  7         is moved; making certain findings regarding

  8         funds for the San Carlos Institute; amending s.

  9         240.384, F.S.; requiring an audit and the

10         transfer of certain funds relating to certain

11         transferred criminal justice training programs;

12         amending s. 240.2605, F.S.; requiring the Board

13         of Regents to rank certain donations; requiring

14         presidents of universities in the State

15         University System to provide lists of certain

16         donations; amending s. 11.13, F.S.; limiting

17         compensation paid by a Florida governmental

18         entity to a legislator during any legislative

19         session; amending s. 409.9115, F.S.; specifying

20         how the Agency for Health Care Administration

21         shall make payments for the Medicaid

22         disproportionate share program for mental

23         health hospitals; requiring the Agency for

24         Health Care Administration to use a specified

25         disproportionate share formula, specified

26         audited financial data, and a specified

27         Medicaid per diem rate in fiscal year 2000-2001

28         for qualifying hospitals; amending s. 409.9116,

29         F.S.; providing a formula for rural hospital

30         disproportionate share payments; creating s.

31         409.9119, F.S.; creating a disproportionate


                                  1

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         share program for children's hospitals;

  2         providing formulas governing payments made to

  3         hospitals under the program; providing for

  4         withholding payments from a hospital that is

  5         not complying with agency rules; amending s.

  6         216.181, F.S.; authorizing the Department of

  7         Children and Family Services and the Department

  8         of Health to advance certain moneys for certain

  9         contract services; directing the Agency for

10         Health Care Administration to include health

11         maintenance organization recipients in the

12         county billing for a specified purpose;

13         authorizing the Departments of Children and

14         Family Services, Revenue, Management Services,

15         and Health and the Agency for Health Care

16         Administration to transfer positions and funds

17         to comply with the 2000-2001 General

18         Appropriations Act or the WAGES Act; amending

19         s. 402.3015, F.S.; providing eligibility

20         guidelines for subsidized child care; amending

21         s. 39.3065, F.S.; providing for the Broward

22         County Sheriff to provide child protective

23         investigative services; requiring Healthy

24         Families Florida service providers to furnish

25         participants with certain disclaimers and

26         documentation; prohibiting disclosure of

27         certain records by such providers; providing

28         for disposal of records after a specified

29         period; amending s. 409.912, F.S.; extending

30         additional responsibilities of the Agency for

31         Health Care Administration in fostering


                                  2

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         cost-effective purchasing of health care;

  2         amending s. 287.084, F.S.; allowing

  3         consideration of certain vendors in a request

  4         for proposals relating to telemedicine by the

  5         Glades School District; authorizing the

  6         Department of Law Enforcement to use certain

  7         moneys to provide meritorious-performance

  8         bonuses for employees, subject to approval;

  9         authorizing the Correctional Privatization

10         Commission to make certain expenditures to

11         defray costs incurred by a municipality or

12         county as a result of opening a facility of the

13         commission or the department; authorizing the

14         Department of Legal Affairs to transfer certain

15         funds between trust funds; providing for

16         reimbursement for purchase of retirement credit

17         by employees of the public defender;

18         restricting releases of juvenile justice

19         prevention funds; amending s. 216.181, F.S.;

20         authorizing the Department of Transportation to

21         transfer salary rate to the turnpike budget

22         entity to facilitate transferring personnel to

23         the turnpike headquarters facility in Orange

24         County; amending s. 252.373, F.S.; providing

25         for use of funds of the Emergency Management,

26         Preparedness, and Assistance Trust Fund to

27         improve, and increase the number of, disaster

28         shelters in the state and improve local

29         disaster preparedness; restricting release of

30         economic development tools funds and requiring

31         reversion at end of fiscal year; amending s.


                                  3

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         212.20, F.S.; providing for use of moneys

  2         allocated to the Solid Waste Management Trust

  3         Fund; amending s. 403.7095, F.S., relating to

  4         the solid waste management grant program;

  5         requiring a specified level of funding for

  6         counties receiving solid waste management and

  7         recycling grants; providing for allocation of

  8         funds for innovative programs to address

  9         recycling practices and procedures; amending s.

10         373.59, F.S.; requiring release of certain

11         moneys by the Secretary of Environmental

12         Protection to water management districts, upon

13         request; authorizing the Department of

14         Agriculture and Consumer Services to use

15         certain funds for expenses associated with its

16         administrative and regulatory powers and

17         duties; requiring transfer of certain property

18         by the Department of Business and Professional

19         Regulation to the University of Florida;

20         providing for future repeal of various

21         provisions; providing effect of veto of

22         specific appropriation or proviso to which

23         implementing language refers; providing

24         applicability to other legislation; providing

25         performance measures and standards for

26         individual programs within state agencies;

27         providing that the performance measures and

28         standards are directly linked to the

29         appropriations made in the 2000-2001 General

30         Appropriations Act, as required by the

31         Government Performance and Accountability Act


                                  4

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         of 1994; providing severability; providing an

  2         effective date.

  3

  4  Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

  5

  6         Section 1.  It is the intent of the Legislature that

  7  the implementing and administering provisions of this act

  8  apply to the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year

  9  2000-2001.

10         Section 2.  The funds provided in the 2000-2001 General

11  Appropriations Act for workforce development shall be

12  initially allocated to the school district or community

13  college as designated. If, for any reason, a program in whole

14  or in part is moved from a community college to a school

15  district or moved from a school district to a community

16  college, the Commissioner of Education or the executive

17  director of the Division of Community Colleges shall submit a

18  budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216, Florida Statutes, to

19  transfer the appropriate amount of the 2000-2001 appropriation

20  between the affected district and community college. The

21  amount transferred shall be as near as practicable to the

22  actual amount appropriated for the FTE funded for that

23  program. This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

24         Section 3.  In order to implement Specific

25  Appropriation 2645A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

26  Act, the Legislature affirms and confirms that all funds and

27  related interest appropriated to the Instituto Patriotico v

28  Docente San Carlos, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation

29  doing business as the San Carlos Institute between fiscal

30  years 1986-1987 and 1992-1993, including, but not limited to,

31  Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) funds, were spent in


                                  5

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  accordance with legislative intent; and the Legislature

  2  affirms and confirms that all matching fund requirements have

  3  been fully met by the San Carlos Institute. Furthermore, the

  4  Legislature affirms and confirms that the appropriations to

  5  the San Carlos Institute in fiscal years 1998-1999, 1999-2000,

  6  and 2000-2001 do not require matching funds. Therefore, the

  7  requirement that interest funds be repaid to the State of

  8  Florida is hereby waived, and the Legislature directs all

  9  applicable state agencies to release to the San Carlos

10  Institute all funds appropriated for the San Carlos Institute

11  for fiscal years 1993-1994, 1998-1999, 1999-2000, and

12  2000-2001. This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

13         Section 4.  In order to implement Specific

14  Appropriation 135 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

15  subsection (7) is added to section 240.384, Florida Statutes,

16  to read:

17         240.384  Training school consolidation pilot

18  projects.--

19         (7)  AUDIT.--Notwithstanding any provision of this

20  section to the contrary, for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only,

21  prior to the release of funds in Specific Appropriation 135 of

22  the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act for Leon and St.

23  Johns Counties, the Auditor General shall conduct an audit to

24  determine that all FTEs, completions, placements, and related

25  funds and any other funds from all state sources relating to

26  the criminal justice training programs transferred to St.

27  Johns River Community College and Tallahassee Community

28  College have been correctly identified and transferred to the

29  respective community colleges. All program funds and their

30  sources, including, but not limited to, the entire FEFP,

31  categorical programs, Workforce Development funds, performance


                                  6

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  incentives, incentive grants for expanded programs, and all

  2  other state fund sources relating to these programs shall be

  3  included in this audit. All funds identified in this audit for

  4  a given program under this section shall be shifted to the

  5  base appropriation for the appropriate community college

  6  before the funds in Specific Appropriation 135 are allocated.

  7  This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000.

  8         Section 5.  In order to implement Specific

  9  Appropriation 167 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

10  subsection (8) of 240.2605, Florida Statutes, is amended to

11  read:

12         240.2605  Trust Fund for Major Gifts.--

13         (8)  Notwithstanding other provisions of this section,

14  for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, for gifts

15  received during this period, the university presidents shall

16  provide a list of donations from private donors for challenge

17  grants, new donations, major gifts, and the eminent scholars

18  program to be matched for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year

19  to the Board of Regents. The listing shall contain an

20  explanation of the donation, a statement of the specific

21  benefits accrued to the university as a result of the

22  donation, and how the donation is consistent with the mission

23  of the institution, as defined by the Board of Regents in the

24  1998-2003 Strategic Plan. University presidents shall rank

25  each private donation to their university, giving highest

26  priority to private donations that provide additional library

27  resources to universities; donations that provide student

28  assistance through scholarships, fellowships, or

29  assistantships; donations that provide funding for existing

30  academic programs at universities; and donations that meet the

31  matching requirement without encumbering pledges. The Board of


                                  7

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  Regents, using the same criteria, shall develop a systemwide

  2  priority list and may set restrictions on the annual amount of

  3  matching funds provided for single donations that exceed $5

  4  million. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001.

  5         Section 6.  In order to implement Specific

  6  Appropriations 2334 and 2335 of the 2000-2001 General

  7  Appropriations Act, subsection (7) is added to section 11.13,

  8  Florida Statutes, to read:

  9         11.13  Compensation of members--

10         (7) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to

11  the contrary, for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, no member of

12  the Senate or House of Representatives shall receive

13  compensation from any Florida governmental entity, other than

14  the Legislature, for time during which legislative duties are

15  being performed.  This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001.

16         Section 7.  In order to implement Specific

17  Appropriation 246 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

18  subsection (3) of section 409.9115, Florida Statutes, is

19  amended to read:

20         409.9115  Disproportionate share program for mental

21  health hospitals.--The Agency for Health Care Administration

22  shall design and implement a system of making mental health

23  disproportionate share payments to hospitals that qualify for

24  disproportionate share payments under s. 409.911. This system

25  of payments shall conform with federal requirements and shall

26  distribute funds in each fiscal year for which an

27  appropriation is made by making quarterly Medicaid payments.

28  Notwithstanding s. 409.915, counties are exempt from

29  contributing toward the cost of this special reimbursement for

30  patients.

31


                                  8

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (3)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

  2  Agency for Health Care Administration shall make payments for

  3  the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health

  4  hospitals on a monthly basis. If the amounts appropriated for

  5  the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health

  6  hospitals are increased or decreased during the fiscal year

  7  pursuant to the requirements of chapter 216, the required

  8  adjustment shall be prorated over the remaining payment

  9  periods. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.

10         Section 8.  During the 2000-2001 fiscal year, the

11  Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the 1992-1993

12  disproportionate share formula, the 1994 audited financial

13  data, and the Medicaid per diem rate as of January 1, 1999,

14  for those hospitals that qualify for the hospital

15  disproportionate share program funded in Specific

16  Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act.

17  This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

18         Section 9.  In order to implement Specific

19  Appropriation 212 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

20  subsection (6) of section 409.9116, Florida Statutes, is

21  amended to read:

22         409.9116  Disproportionate share/financial assistance

23  program for rural hospitals.--In addition to the payments made

24  under s. 409.911, the Agency for Health Care Administration

25  shall administer a federally matched disproportionate share

26  program and a state-funded financial assistance program for

27  statutory rural hospitals. The agency shall make

28  disproportionate share payments to statutory rural hospitals

29  that qualify for such payments and financial assistance

30  payments to statutory rural hospitals that do not qualify for

31  disproportionate share payments. The disproportionate share


                                  9

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  program payments shall be limited by and conform with federal

  2  requirements. In fiscal year 1993-1994, available funds shall

  3  be distributed in one payment, as soon as practicable after

  4  the effective date of this act. In subsequent fiscal years,

  5  Funds shall be distributed quarterly in each fiscal year for

  6  which an appropriation is made. Notwithstanding the provisions

  7  of s. 409.915, counties are exempt from contributing toward

  8  the cost of this special reimbursement for hospitals serving a

  9  disproportionate share of low-income patients.

10         (6)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

11  Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the following

12  formula for distribution of the funds in Specific

13  Appropriation 212 236 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General

14  Appropriations Act for the disproportionate share/financial

15  assistance program for rural hospitals.

16         (a)  The agency shall first determine a preliminary

17  payment amount for each rural hospital by allocating all

18  available state funds using the following formula:

19

20                  PDAER = (TAERH x TARH)/STAERH

21

22  Where:

23         PDAER = preliminary distribution amount for each rural

24  hospital.

25         TAERH = total amount earned by each rural hospital.

26         TARH = total amount appropriated or distributed under

27  this section.

28         STAERH = sum of total amount earned by each rural

29  hospital.

30

31


                                  10

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (b)  Federal matching funds for the disproportionate

  2  share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals

  3  that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (a).

  4         (c)  The state-funds-only payment amount is then

  5  calculated for each hospital using the formula:

  6

  7         SFOER = Maximum value of (1) SFOL - PDAER or (2) 0

  8

  9  Where:

10         SFOER = state-funds-only payment amount for each rural

11  hospital.

12         SFOL = state-funds-only payment level, which is set at

13  4 percent of TARH.

14         (d)  The adjusted total amount allocated to the rural

15  disproportionate share program shall then be calculated using

16  the following formula:

17

18                     ATARH = (TARH - SSFOER)

19

20  Where:

21         ATARH = adjusted total amount appropriated or

22  distributed under this section.

23         SSFOER = sum of the state-funds-only payment amount

24  calculated under paragraph (c) for all rural hospitals.

25         (e)  The determination of the amount of rural

26  disproportionate share hospital funds is calculated by the

27  following formula:

28

29                TDAERH = [(TAERH x ATARH)/STAERH]

30

31  Where:


                                  11

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         TDAERH = total distribution amount for each rural

  2  hospital.

  3         (f)  Federal matching funds for the disproportionate

  4  share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals

  5  that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (e).

  6         (g)  State-funds-only payment amounts calculated under

  7  paragraph (c) are then added to the results of paragraph (f)

  8  to determine the total distribution amount for each rural

  9  hospital.

10         (h)  This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.

11         Section 10.  In order to implement Specific

12  Appropriation 234A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

13  Act, section 409.9119, Florida Statutes, is created to read:

14         409.9119  Disproportionate share program for children's

15  hospitals.--In addition to the payments made under s. 409.911,

16  the Agency for Health Care Administration shall develop and

17  implement a system under which disproportionate share payments

18  are made to those hospitals that are licensed by the state as

19  children's hospitals and were licensed on January 1, 2000, as

20  children's hospitals. This system of payments must conform to

21  federal requirements and must distribute funds in each fiscal

22  year for which an appropriation is made by making quarterly

23  Medicaid payments. Notwithstanding s. 409.915, counties are

24  exempt from contributing toward the cost of this special

25  reimbursement for hospitals that serve a disproportionate

26  share of low-income patients.

27         (1)  The agency shall use the following formula to

28  calculate the total amount earned for hospitals that

29  participate in the children's hospital disproportionate share

30  program:

31                      TAE = DSR x BMPD x MD


                                  12

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  Where:

  2         TAE = total amount earned by a children's hospital.

  3         DSR = disproportionate share rate.

  4         BMPD = base Medicaid per diem.

  5         MD = Medicaid days.

  6         (2)  The agency shall calculate the total additional

  7  payment for hospitals that participate in the children's

  8  hospital disproportionate share program as follows:

  9

10                         TAP = (TAE x TA)

11                                         

12                               STAE

13  Where:

14         TAP = total additional payment for a children's

15  hospital.

16         TAE = total amount earned by a children's hospital.

17         TA = total appropriation for the children's hospital

18  disproportionate share program.

19         STAE = sum of total amount earned by each hospital that

20  participates in the children's hospital disproportionate share

21  program.

22

23         (3)  A hospital may not receive any payments under this

24  section until it achieves full compliance with the applicable

25  rules of the agency. A hospital that is not in compliance for

26  two or more consecutive quarters may not receive its share of

27  the funds. Any forfeited funds must be distributed to the

28  remaining participating children's hospitals that are in

29  compliance.

30         (4)  This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

31


                                  13

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         Section 11.  In order to implement Specific

  2  Appropriations 264 through 435 and 462 through 592A of the

  3  2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, paragraph (c) of

  4  subsection (15) of section 216.181, Florida Statutes, is

  5  amended to read:

  6         216.181  Approved budgets for operations and fixed

  7  capital outlay.--

  8         (15)

  9         (c)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,

10  funds appropriated to the Department of Children and Family

11  Services in Specific Appropriations 264 292 through 435 425

12  and the Department of Health in Specific Appropriations 462

13  445 through 592A 540 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General

14  Appropriations Act may be advanced, unless specifically

15  prohibited in such General Appropriations Act, for those

16  contracted services that were approved for advancement by the

17  Comptroller in fiscal year 1993-1994, including those services

18  contracted on a fixed-price or unit cost basis.  This

19  paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.

20         Section 12.  In order to implement Specific

21  Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

22  and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the Agency for Health

23  Care Administration shall include health maintenance

24  organization recipients in the county billing for inpatient

25  hospital stays for the purpose of shared costs with counties

26  in accordance with the Florida Statutes. This section is

27  repealed on July 1, 2001.

28         Section 13.  For the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the

29  Departments of Children and Family Services, Revenue,

30  Management Services, and Health and the Agency for Health Care

31  Administration may transfer positions and general revenue


                                  14

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  funds as necessary to comply with any provision of the

  2  2000-2001 General Appropriations Act or WAGES Act which

  3  requires or specifically authorizes the transfer of positions

  4  and general revenue funds between these agencies. This section

  5  is repealed on July 1, 2001.

  6         Section 14.  In order to implement Specific

  7  Appropriation 428 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

  8  paragraph (d) of subsection (1) of section 402.3015, Florida

  9  Statutes, is amended to read:

10         402.3015  Subsidized child care program; purpose; fees;

11  contracts.--

12         (1)  The purpose of the subsidized child care program

13  is to provide quality child care to enhance the development,

14  including language, cognitive, motor, social, and self-help

15  skills of children who are at risk of abuse or neglect and

16  children of low-income families, and to promote financial

17  self-sufficiency and life skills for the families of these

18  children, unless prohibited by federal law. Priority for

19  participation in the subsidized child care program shall be

20  accorded to children under 13 years of age who are:

21         (d)  For the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, children of

22  working families enrolled in the Child Care Executive

23  Partnership Program whose family income does not exceed 200

24  percent of the federal poverty level. This paragraph is

25  repealed on July 1, 2001.

26         Section 15.  In order to implement Specific

27  Appropriations 307 through 310 and 312 of the 2000-2001

28  General Appropriations Act, subsection (4) of section 39.3065,

29  Florida Statutes, is amended to read:

30

31


                                  15

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         39.3065  Sheriffs of Pasco, Manatee, and Pinellas

  2  Counties to provide child protective investigative services;

  3  procedures; funding.--

  4         (4)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

  5  Sheriff of Broward County shall perform the same child

  6  protective investigative services according to the same

  7  standards as are performed by the sheriffs of Pinellas County,

  8  Manatee County, and Pasco County under this section. This

  9  subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.

10         Section 16.  (1)  In order to implement Specific

11  Appropriations 306 and 311A of the 2000-2001 General

12  Appropriations Act, all Healthy Families Florida contracted

13  service providers shall:

14         (a)  Present the following disclaimer both orally and

15  in writing at the initial contact with the parent:

16  "Participation in the Healthy Families Florida program is

17  voluntary. You are not required to answer any questions other

18  than those required for birth registration and you have the

19  right to decline participation in the program at any time."

20         (b)  Furnish, at the participant's request, a copy of

21  all documentation concerning services provided to the

22  participant, including applications and assessments. The

23  private, nonprofit corporation and other applicable service

24  providers shall dispose of all records or documents relating

25  to that individual 5 years after the individual's termination

26  from the program.

27         (2)  No information other than the name, date of birth,

28  social security number, zip code, and county of residence of

29  participants and their children may be forwarded from the

30  private, nonprofit corporation or other service provider to

31  the Department of Children and Family Services. This


                                  16

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  information is to be used for evaluation purposes only. No

  2  individual participant data may be forwarded to the National

  3  Committee to Prevent Child Abuse or any other organization

  4  collecting and recording such information.

  5         (3)  This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

  6         Section 17.  In order to implement Specific

  7  Appropriation 230 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

  8  subsection (13) of section 409.912, Florida Statutes, is

  9  amended to read:

10         409.912  Cost-effective purchasing of health care.--The

11  agency shall purchase goods and services for Medicaid

12  recipients in the most cost-effective manner consistent with

13  the delivery of quality medical care.  The agency shall

14  maximize the use of prepaid per capita and prepaid aggregate

15  fixed-sum basis services when appropriate and other

16  alternative service delivery and reimbursement methodologies,

17  including competitive bidding pursuant to s. 287.057, designed

18  to facilitate the cost-effective purchase of a case-managed

19  continuum of care. The agency shall also require providers to

20  minimize the exposure of recipients to the need for acute

21  inpatient, custodial, and other institutional care and the

22  inappropriate or unnecessary use of high-cost services.

23         (13)(a)  The agency shall identify health care

24  utilization and price patterns within the Medicaid program

25  which are not cost-effective or medically appropriate and

26  assess the effectiveness of new or alternate methods of

27  providing and monitoring service, and may implement such

28  methods as it considers appropriate. Such methods may include

29  disease management initiatives, an integrated and systematic

30  approach for managing the health care needs of recipients who

31  are at risk of or diagnosed with a specific disease by using


                                  17

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  best practices, prevention strategies, clinical-practice

  2  improvement, clinical interventions and protocols, outcomes

  3  research, information technology, and other tools and

  4  resources to reduce overall costs and improve measurable

  5  outcomes.

  6         (b)  The responsibility of the agency under this

  7  subsection shall include the development of capabilities to

  8  identify actual and optimal practice patterns; patient and

  9  provider educational initiatives; methods for determining

10  patient compliance with prescribed treatments; fraud, waste,

11  and abuse prevention and detection programs; and beneficiary

12  case management programs.

13         1.  The practice pattern identification program shall

14  evaluate practitioner prescribing patterns based on national

15  and regional practice guidelines, comparing practitioners to

16  their peer groups. The agency and its Drug Utilization Review

17  Board shall consult with a panel of practicing health care

18  professionals consisting of the following: the Speaker of the

19  House of Representatives and the President of the Senate shall

20  each appoint three physicians licensed under chapter 458 or

21  chapter 459; and the Governor shall appoint two pharmacists

22  licensed under chapter 465 and one dentist licensed under

23  chapter 466 who is an oral surgeon. Terms of the panel members

24  shall expire at the discretion of the appointing official. The

25  panel shall begin its work by August 1, 1999, regardless of

26  the number of appointments made by that date. The advisory

27  panel shall be responsible for evaluating treatment guidelines

28  and recommending ways to incorporate their use in the practice

29  pattern identification program. Practitioners who are

30  prescribing inappropriately or inefficiently, as determined by

31


                                  18

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  the agency, may have their prescribing of certain drugs

  2  subject to prior authorization.

  3         2.  The agency shall also develop educational

  4  interventions designed to promote the proper use of

  5  medications by providers and beneficiaries.

  6         3.  The agency shall implement a pharmacy fraud, waste,

  7  and abuse initiative that may include a surety bond or letter

  8  of credit requirement for participating pharmacies, enhanced

  9  provider auditing practices, the use of additional fraud and

10  abuse software, recipient management programs for

11  beneficiaries inappropriately using their benefits, and other

12  steps that will eliminate provider and recipient fraud, waste,

13  and abuse. The initiative shall address enforcement efforts to

14  reduce the number and use of counterfeit prescriptions.

15         4.  The agency may apply for any federal waivers needed

16  to implement this paragraph.

17         5.  This paragraph is repealed July 1, 2001.

18         Section 18.  In order to implement Specific

19  Appropriation 487 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

20  subsection (3) of section 287.084, Florida Statutes, is

21  amended to read:

22         287.084  Preference to Florida businesses.--

23         (3)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,

24  notwithstanding any statutory authority or adopted local

25  government policy under which the Glades School District

26  operates, the district is hereby authorized to give

27  consideration to Florida vendors in the issuance of a request

28  for proposal for a pilot program for telemedicine within the

29  district. This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.

30         Section 19.  Consistent with the provisions of s.

31  216.163, Florida Statutes, in accordance with


                                  19

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  performance-based program budgeting requirements, and

  2  notwithstanding the provisions of s. 216.181, Florida

  3  Statutes, the Department of Law Enforcement may transfer up to

  4  one-half of 1 percent of the funds in Specific Appropriations

  5  1149C through 1190G of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

  6  Act for salary bonuses for departmental employees at the

  7  discretion of the executive director, provided that such

  8  bonuses are given only to selected employees for meritorious

  9  performance, instead of being given as across-the-board

10  bonuses for all employees. The department, after consultation

11  with the Executive Office of the Governor, shall provide a

12  plan to the chairs of the Senate and House committees

13  responsible for producing the General Appropriations Act for

14  approval before awarding such bonuses. This section is

15  repealed on July 1, 2001.

16         Section 20.  In order to implement Specific

17  Appropriation 636 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,

18  the Correctional Privatization Commission may expend

19  appropriated funds to assist in defraying the costs of impacts

20  that are incurred by a municipality or county and associated

21  with opening a facility under the authority of the

22  Correctional Privatization Commission or a facility under the

23  authority of the Department of Juvenile Justice which is

24  located within that municipality or county. The amount that is

25  to be paid under this section for any facility may not exceed

26  1 percent of the facility construction cost, less building

27  impact fees imposed by the municipality, or by the county if

28  the facility is located in the unincorporated portion of the

29  county. This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

30         Section 21.  In order to implement Specific

31  Appropriation 1226 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations


                                  20

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  Act, the Department of Legal Affairs may transfer up to

  2  $1,054,632 between trust funds. This section is repealed on

  3  July 1, 2001.

  4         Section 22.  In order to implement the proviso

  5  immediately following Specific Appropriation 925 of the

  6  2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, the public defender of

  7  any judicial circuit in this state may reimburse any employee

  8  who purchased, at his or her own expense, additional

  9  retirement credit in the Florida Retirement System Elected

10  Officers' Class, for time spent as an employee of the public

11  defender, up to the amounts actually spent by the employee.

12  This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

13         Section 23.  In order to implement Specific

14  Appropriation 1144A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

15  Act, notwithstanding the provisions of s. 216.192, Florida

16  Statutes, and pursuant to s. 216.345, Florida Statutes, funds

17  in Specific Appropriation 1144A shall not be allocated or

18  released until the Department of Juvenile Justice develops a

19  plan to ensure that the use of funds is in accordance with

20  lawfully established priorities and conditions for the use of

21  juvenile justice prevention funds and the plan is approved by

22  the Juvenile Justice Review Panel established pursuant to

23  Executive Order 2000-7. This section is repealed on July 1,

24  2001.

25         Section 24.  In order to implement Specific

26  Appropriations 1807 through 1864 of the 2000-2001 General

27  Appropriations Act, subsection (18) of section 216.181,

28  Florida Statutes, is amended to read:

29         216.181  Approved budgets for operations and fixed

30  capital outlay.--

31


                                  21

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (18)  Notwithstanding any other provision of this

  2  chapter to the contrary, the Florida Department of

  3  Transportation, in order to facilitate the transfer of

  4  personnel to the new turnpike headquarters location in Orange

  5  County, may transfer salary rate to the turnpike budget entity

  6  from other departmental budget entities. The department must

  7  provide documentation of all transfers to the Executive Office

  8  of the Governor, the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee,

  9  and the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on

10  Transportation and Economic Development Appropriations. This

11  subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.

12         Section 25.  In order to implement Specific

13  Appropriations 1406Q and 1406R of the 2000-2001 General

14  Appropriations Act, subsection (1) of section 252.373, Florida

15  Statutes, is amended to read:

16         252.373  Allocation of funds; rules.--

17         (1)(a)  Funds appropriated from the Emergency

18  Management, Preparedness, and Assistance Trust Fund shall be

19  allocated by the Department of Community Affairs as follows:

20         1.(a)  Sixty percent to implement and administer state

21  and local emergency management programs, including training,

22  of which 20 percent shall be used by the division and 80

23  percent shall be allocated to local emergency management

24  agencies and programs.  Of this 80 percent, at least 80

25  percent shall be allocated to counties.

26         2.(b)  Twenty percent to provide for state relief

27  assistance for nonfederally declared disasters, including but

28  not limited to grants and below-interest-rate loans to

29  businesses for uninsured losses resulting from a disaster.

30         3.(c)  Twenty percent for grants and loans to state or

31  regional agencies, local governments, and private


                                  22

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  organizations to implement projects that will further state

  2  and local emergency management objectives.  These projects

  3  must include, but need not be limited to, projects that will

  4  promote public education on disaster preparedness and recovery

  5  issues, enhance coordination of relief efforts of statewide

  6  private sector organizations, and improve the training and

  7  operations capabilities of agencies assigned lead or support

  8  responsibilities in the state comprehensive emergency

  9  management plan, including the State Fire Marshal's Office for

10  coordinating the Florida fire services.  The division shall

11  establish criteria and procedures for competitive allocation

12  of these funds by rule.  No more than 5 percent of any award

13  made pursuant to this subparagraph paragraph may be used for

14  administrative expenses.

15         (b)  Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a),

16  for the 2000-2001 fiscal year, up to $4 million of the

17  unencumbered balance of the Emergency Management,

18  Preparedness, and Assistance Trust Fund shall be utilized to

19  improve, and increase the number of, disaster shelters within

20  the state and improve local disaster preparedness. This

21  paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2001.

22         Section 26.  In order to implement Specific

23  Appropriation 2088B of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

24  Act, notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 216.192 and

25  288.980(2)(a), Florida Statutes, and pursuant to s. 216.345,

26  Florida Statutes, funds in Specific Appropriation 2088B shall

27  not be released for any other purpose and shall be released

28  only when the projects meet the contracted performance

29  requirements. Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 216.301,

30  Florida Statues, and pursuant to s. 216.345, Florida Statutes,

31  all unexpended general revenue provided in Specific


                                  23

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  Appropriation 2088B shall revert to the General Revenue Fund

  2  unallocated on June 30, 2001. This section is repealed on July

  3  1, 2001.

  4         Section 27.  In order to implement Specific

  5  Appropriations 1476, 1591F, 1591H, and 1591I of the 2000-2001

  6  General Appropriations Act, subsection (7) of section 212.20,

  7  Florida Statutes, is amended to read:

  8         212.20  Funds collected, disposition; additional powers

  9  of department; operational expense; refund of taxes

10  adjudicated unconstitutionally collected.--

11         (7)  For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the

12  use of funds allocated to the Solid Waste Management Trust

13  Fund shall be as provided in the General Appropriations Act.

14  There is transferred $13 $15.5 million for surface water

15  improvement and management projects and $6.5 $10 million for

16  the aquatic weed control program from revenues provided by

17  this section.  This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001

18  2000.

19         Section 28.  In order to implement Specific

20  Appropriation 1609D of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

21  Act, subsections (8) and (9) of section 403.7095, Florida

22  Statutes, are amended to read:

23         403.7095  Solid waste management grant program.--

24         (8)  For fiscal year 2000-2001 1999-2000, the

25  department shall provide counties with populations under

26  100,000 with at least 80 percent of the level of funding they

27  received in fiscal year 1997-1998 for solid waste management

28  and recycling grants. This subsection is repealed on July 1,

29  2001.

30         (9)  For fiscal year 2000-2001 1999-2000, the

31  department shall provide 25 10 percent of the total funds


                                  24

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  available after the requirements of subsection (8) are met for

  2  recycling and waste reduction grants available to all counties

  3  on a competitive basis for innovative programs. Because the

  4  Legislature recognizes that input from the recycling industry

  5  is essential to the success of this funding program, the

  6  department shall cooperate with affected organizations to

  7  develop a process and define specific criteria for evaluating

  8  proposals and selecting programs for funding that comply with

  9  the following general guidelines. Programs selected for

10  funding shall The department may consider one or more of the

11  following criteria in determining whether a grant proposal is

12  innovative:

13         (a)  Demonstrate advanced technologies or processes

14  that are not in common use in Florida, that represent a novel

15  application of an existing technology or process, or that

16  overcome obstacles to recycling in new or innovative ways.

17         (b)  Collect and recycle or reduce materials targeted

18  by the department and the recycling industry.

19         (c)  Demonstrate the potential economic and

20  environmental benefits of the proposed recycling program and

21  the cost-effectiveness of the program's approach substantial

22  improvement in program cost-effectiveness and efficiency as

23  measured against statewide average costs for the same or

24  similar programs.

25         (d)  Demonstrate transferability of technology and

26  processes used in the program and specify how the program will

27  promote transferability.

28         (e)  Demonstrate local support for the proposed program

29  by the commitment of cash or in-kind matching funds and

30  implement multicounty or regional recycling programs.

31         (f)  This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001.


                                  25

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         Section 29.  In order to implement Specific

  2  Appropriations 1490E and 1591F of the 2000-2001 General

  3  Appropriations Act, subsection (11) of section 373.59, Florida

  4  Statutes, is amended to read:

  5         373.59  Water Management Lands Trust Fund.--

  6         (11)  Notwithstanding any provision of this section to

  7  the contrary and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the

  8  governing board of a water management district may request,

  9  and the Secretary of Environmental Protection shall release

10  upon such request, moneys allocated to the districts pursuant

11  to subsection (8) for the purpose of carrying out the purposes

12  of s. 373.0361, s. 375.0831, s. 373.139, or ss.

13  373.451-373.4595 and for legislatively authorized land

14  acquisition and water restoration initiatives. No funds may be

15  used pursuant to this subsection until necessary debt service

16  obligations, requirements for payments in lieu of taxes, and

17  land management obligations that may be required by this

18  chapter are provided for. This subsection is repealed on July

19  1, 2001.

20         Section 30.  In order to implement Specific

21  Appropriation 1262C of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations

22  Act, and notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 496.405(4)(c),

23  496.409(7), 496.410(15), and 496.419(9), Florida Statutes, the

24  moneys received and deposited into the General Inspection

25  Trust Fund may be used by the Department of Agriculture and

26  Consumer Services to defray the expenses of the department in

27  the discharge of any and all of its administrative and

28  regulatory powers and duties as prescribed by law. This

29  section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

30         Section 31.  In order to implement Specific

31  Appropriation 1983 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations


                                  26

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  Act, the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering of the Department of

  2  Business and Professional Regulation shall transfer title to

  3  all tangible personal property that is owned by the Department

  4  and is currently in use by the College of Veterinary Medicine

  5  at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida to the

  6  College.  This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.

  7         Section 32.  A section of this act that implements a

  8  specific appropriation or specifically identified proviso

  9  language in the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void

10  if the specific appropriation or specifically identified

11  proviso language is vetoed. A section of this act that

12  implements more than one specific appropriation or more than

13  one portion of specifically identified proviso language in the

14  2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void if all the

15  specific appropriations or portions of specifically identified

16  proviso language are vetoed.

17         Section 33.  If any other act passed during the 2000

18  Regular Session of the Legislature or any extension thereof

19  contains a provision that is substantively the same as a

20  provision in this act, but that removes or is otherwise not

21  subject to the future repeal applied to such provision by this

22  act, the Legislature intends that the provision in the other

23  act shall take precedence and shall continue to operate,

24  notwithstanding the future repeal provided by this act.

25         Section 34.  The performance measures and standards

26  established in this section for individual programs in the

27  area of education shall be applied to those programs for the

28  2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and

29  standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in

30  the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as

31


                                  27

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act

  2  of 1994.

  3         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.--

  4         (a)  For the Private Colleges and Universities Program,

  5  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  6  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

  7  Specific Appropriations 11, 12, 16-21, 23, 27, 29-32, and

  8  36-41 are as follows:

  9         1.  FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Retention rate of First Time in College (FTIC)

11  award recipients, using a 6-year rate.........FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         b.  Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, using a

13  6-year rate...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         2.  FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

15         a.  Number of degrees granted by level for FRAG

16  recipients and contract program recipients....FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         3.  ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Retention rate of award

19  recipients....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         b.  Graduation rate of award

21  recipients....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         c.  Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the

23  percent employed at $22,000 or more 1 year following

24  graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         d.  Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the

26  percent employed at $22,000 or more 5 years following

27  graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         e.  Licensure/certification rates of award recipients

29  (where applicable)............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         4.  ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31         a.  Number of prior year's graduates...FY 2001-2002 LBR


                                  28

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number of prior year's graduates remaining in

  2  Florida.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  3         5.  HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

  4  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Retention rate of students, using a 6-year

  6  rate..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  7         b.  Graduation rate of students, using a 6-year

  8  rate..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  9         6.  HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OUTPUT

10  MEASURE.--

11         a.  Number of FTIC students, disaggregated by in-state

12  and out-of-state..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         (b)  For the Financial Aid Programs, the outcome

14  measures, output measures, and associated performance

15  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

16  Appropriations 2 and 55 are as follows:

17         1.  BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Percent of high school graduates who successfully

19  completed the 19 core credits..............................60%

20         b.  Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by

21  delivery system, using a 4-year rate for community colleges

22  and a 6-year rate for universities............FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         c.  Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by

24  delivery system...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         d.  Percent of high school graduates eligible for

26  awards who enrolled in a Florida postsecondary

27  institution................................................84%

28         e.  Increase in percent of high school graduates

29  attending Florida postsecondary institutions...............51%

30         2.  FLORIDA STUDENT ASSISTANCE GRANTS (FSAG) OUTCOME

31  MEASURES.--


                                  29

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by

  2  delivery system...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  3         b.  Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by

  4  delivery system...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  5         3.  CRITICAL TEACHER SHORTAGE LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAM

  6  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Percent of recipients who, upon completion of the

  8  program, work in fields in which there are

  9  shortages.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

10         b.  Percent of recipients who, upon completion of the

11  program, work in counties and in fields in which there are

12  shortages.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         c.  Within each designated shortage area, the percent

14  of the shortage that could be satisfied by the graduation and

15  employment of current students served by the

16  program.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         (c)  For the Public Schools Program, the outcome

18  measures, output measures, and associated performance

19  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

20  Appropriations 3, 3A, 3B, 68-71, 78, 80, 82, and 83 are as

21  follows:

22         1.  KINDERGARTEN - GRADE TWELVE (K-12) OUTCOME

23  MEASURES.--

24         a.  Number/percent of "A" schools, reported by

25  district...............................................254/10%

26         b.  Number/percent of "D" or "F" schools, reported by

27  district...............................................494/20%

28         c.  Number/percent of schools declining one or more

29  letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         d.  Number/percent of schools improving one or more

31  letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR


                                  30

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         2.  STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS

  2  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  3         a.  Percent of teacher certificates issued within 30

  4  days after receipt of application..........................84%

  5         b.  Percent of current fiscal year competitive grants

  6  initial disbursement made by September 1 of current fiscal

  7  year......................................................100%

  8         3.  STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS

  9  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

10         a.  Number of certification applications

11  processed...............................................56,000

12         (d)  For the Workforce Development Program, the outcome

13  measures, output measures, and associated performance

14  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

15  Appropriation 135 are as follows:

16         1.  WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number/percent of vocational certificate program

18  completers who are found placed according to the following

19  definitions:

20         (I)  Level III - Completed a program identified as high

21  wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

22  employed at $4,680 or more per quarter............12,227/42.6%

23         (II)  Level II - Completed a program identified for new

24  entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

25  employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing

26  education in a college-credit-level program........4,369/15.2%

27         (III)  Level I - Completed any program not included in

28  Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,

29  or continuing their education at the vocational certificate

30  level.............................................10,801/37.6%

31


                                  31

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number/percent of associate in science degree and

  2  college-credit certificate program completers who left the

  3  program and are found placed according to the following

  4  definitions:

  5         (I)  Level III - Completed a program identified as high

  6  wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

  7  employed at $4,680 or more per quarter.............6,897/57.9%

  8         (II)  Level II - Completed a program identified for new

  9  entrants on the Occupational Forecasting List and found

10  employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found continuing

11  education in a college-credit-level program........1,351/11.3%

12         (III)  Level I - Completed any program not included in

13  Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,

14  or continuing their education at the vocational certificate

15  level..............................................1,661/13.9%

16         c.  Number/percent of workforce development programs

17  which meet or exceed nationally recognized accrediting

18  standards for those programs which teach a subject matter for

19  which there is a nationally recognized accrediting

20  body..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         d.  Number/percent of students attending workforce

22  development programs which meet or exceed nationally

23  recognized accrediting standards..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

24         e.  Number/percent of students completing workforce

25  development programs which meet or exceed nationally

26  recognized accrediting standards..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         2.  WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

28         a.  Number of adult basic education, including English

29  as a Second Language, and adult secondary education completion

30  point completers who are found employed or continuing their

31  education.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR


                                  32

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (e)  For the Community Colleges Program, the outcome

  2  measures, output measures, and associated performance

  3  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  4  Appropriations 8, 146, and 147 are as follows:

  5         1.  COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Percent of Associate in Arts (AA) degree graduates

  7  who transfer to a state university within 2 years..........67%

  8         b.  Percent of AA degree transfers to the State

  9  University System who earn a 2.5 or above in the SUS after 1

10  year.......................................................75%

11         c.  Of the AA graduates who are employed full time

12  rather than continuing their education, the percent which are

13  in jobs earning at least $9 an hour........................59%

14         d.  Of the AA students who complete 18 credit hours,

15  the percent of whom graduate in 4 years, disaggregating the

16  data by the following groups: ethnic, disabled, limited

17  English speaking, and economically disadvantaged...........30%

18         e.  Percent of students graduating with total

19  accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 120

20  percent of the degree requirement..........................36%

21         f.  Percent of students exiting the college-preparatory

22  program who enter college-level course work associated with

23  the AA, Associate in Science (AS), Postsecondary Vocational

24  Certificate, and Postsecondary Adult Vocational programs...66%

25         g.  Percent of AA degree transfers to the State

26  University System who started in College Prep and who earn a

27  2.5 in the SUS after 1 year................................75%

28         h.  Number/percent of AA partial completers

29  transferring to the State University System with at least 40

30  credit hours..................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

31


                                  33

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         i.  Number/FTEs of AA students who do not complete 18

  2  credit hours within 4 years...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  3         j.  Of the economically disadvantaged AA students who

  4  complete 18 credit hours, the number and percent who graduate

  5  with an AA degree within 4 years..............FY 2001-2002 LBR

  6         k.  Of the disabled AA students who complete 18 credit

  7  hours, the number and percent who graduate with an AA degree

  8  within 4 years................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  9         l.  Of the black male AA students who complete 18

10  credit hours, the number and percent who graduate with

11  an AA degree within 4 years...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         m.  Of the English as Second Language (college prep) or

13  English for Non-Speaker (college credit) students who complete

14  18 credit hours, the number and percent who graduate with an

15  AA degree within 4 years......................FY 2001-2002 LBR

16         n.  Of the AA graduates who have not transferred to the

17  State University System, the number and percent who are found

18  placed in an occupation identified as high wage/high skill on

19  the Occupational Forecasting Conference list and found

20  employed at $4,680 per quarter or more........FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         2.  COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number of AA degrees granted.................29,000

23         b.  Number of students receiving college preparatory

24  instruction.............................................94,000

25         c.  Number of students enrolled in baccalaureate

26  programs offered on community college

27  campuses......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

28         (f)  For the Postsecondary Education Planning

29  Commission (PEPC) Program, the outcome measures and associated

30  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

31  Specific Appropriations 153-158 are as follows:


                                  34

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  PEPC OUTCOME MEASURE.--

  2         a.  Completed studies required by statute or the

  3  General Appropriations Act................................100%

  4         (g)  For the State University System Program, the

  5  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

  6  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  7  Appropriations 9A-D and 161-164 are as follows:

  8         1.  STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Graduation rate for First Time in College (FTIC)

10  students, using a 6-year rate..............................60%

11         b.  Retention rate for FTIC students, using a 6-year

12  rate.......................................................71%

13         c.  Graduation rate for AA transfer students, using a

14  4-year rate................................................69%

15         d.  Retention rate for AA transfer students, using a

16  4-year rate................................................80%

17         e.  Total sponsored research and development

18  expenditures per state-funded research expenditures.......3.52

19         2.  STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of degrees granted, baccalaureate.....35,000

21         b.  Number of degrees granted, masters...........10,200

22         c.  Number of degrees granted, doctoral...........1,138

23         d.  Number of degrees granted, professional.......1,137

24         Section 35.  The performance measures and standards

25  established in this section for individual programs in the

26  area of health and human services shall be applied to those

27  programs for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance

28  measures and standards are directly linked to the

29  appropriations made in the General Appropriations Act for

30  Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as required by the Government

31  Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.


                                  35

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (1)  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION.--

  2         (a)  For the Medicaid Health Services Program, the

  3  purpose of which is to provide timely primary medical care to

  4  categorically eligible clients under the Supplemental Security

  5  Income (SSI) program, the Temporary Assistance for Needy

  6  Families (TANF) program, and the Institutional Care Program

  7  (ICP), and to those persons eligible under other provisions of

  8  federal or state law, in order to prevent more critical health

  9  care problems and to increase access to such care where access

10  is restricted, the outcome measures, output measures, and

11  associated performance standards with respect to funds

12  provided in Specific Appropriations 196 through 251 are as

13  follows:

14         1.  HEALTH SERVICES TO PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORNS, AND

15  WOMEN WHO WANT FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Percent of women receiving adequate prenatal

17  care.......................................................86%

18         b.  Neonatal mortality rate (per 1,000)............4.86

19         c.  Percent of vaginal deliveries with no

20  complications............................................73.1%

21         d.  Average length of time between pregnancies for

22  those receiving family planning services (months).........37.4

23         2.  HEALTH SERVICES TO PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORNS, AND

24  WOMEN WHO WANT FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Number of women receiving prenatal care.....137,130

26         b.  Number of vaginal deliveries.................64,152

27         c.  Number of women receiving family planning

28  services...............................................136,197

29         3.  HEALTH SERVICES TO CHILDREN OUTCOME MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of eligible children who received all

31  required components of EPSDT screen........................64%


                                  36

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Percent of hospitalizations for conditions

  2  preventable with good ambulatory care....................7.53%

  3         c.  Percent of children receiving mental health

  4  services who are hospitalized for mental health care......6.8%

  5         4.  HEALTH SERVICES TO CHILDREN OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number of children ages 1-20 enrolled in

  7  Medicaid.............................................1,119,745

  8         b.  Number of children receiving mental health

  9  services................................................54,443

10         c.  Number of children receiving EPSDT

11  services...............................................127,967

12         d.  Number of services by major type of service:

13         (I)  Hospital inpatient services.................39,828

14         (II)  Physician services......................3,475,670

15         (III)  Prescribed drugs.......................2,875,949

16         5.  HEALTH SERVICES TO WORKING AGE ADULTS

17  (NON-DISABLED) OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Percent of hospitalizations for conditions

19  preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.3%

20         6.  HEALTH SERVICES TO WORKING AGE ADULTS

21  (NON-DISABLED) OUTPUT MEASURE.--

22         a.  Percent of non-disabled adults receiving a

23  service....................................................85%

24         7.  HEALTH SERVICES TO DISABLED WORKING AGE ADULTS

25  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

26         a.  Percent of hospitalizations for conditions

27  preventable with good ambulatory care....................13.9%

28         8.  HEALTH SERVICES TO DISABLED WORKING AGE ADULTS

29  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

30         a.  Percent of enrolled disabled adults receiving a

31  service..................................................88.6%


                                  37

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         9.  HEALTH SERVICES TO ELDERS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  2         a.  Percent of hospital stays for elder recipients

  3  exceeding length-of-stay criteria..........................26%

  4         b.  Percent of elder recipients in long-term care who

  5  improve or maintain activities of daily living (ADL)

  6  functioning to those receiving mental health services......TBD

  7         10.  HEALTH SERVICES TO ELDERS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number enrolled in long-term care waivers.....9,766

  9         b.  Number of elders receiving mental health

10  care.....................................................7,688

11         c.  Number of services by major type of service:

12         (I)  Hospital inpatient services.................89,048

13         (II)  Physician services......................1,285,488

14         (III)  Prescribed drugs.......................8,337,539

15         11.  ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID POLICY OUTCOME

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of new recipients voluntarily selecting

18  managed care plan..........................................75%

19         b.  Percent of programs with cost-effectiveness

20  determined annually.........................................5%

21         12.  ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID POLICY OUTPUT

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of new provider applications..........10,600

24         b.  Number of new enrollees provided choice

25  counseling.............................................516,000

26         c.  Number of providers..........................68,276

27         13.  PROCESS MEDICAID PROVIDER CLAIMS OUTCOME

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Average length of time between receipt of clean

30  claim and payment (days)....................................16

31         b.  Percent increase in dollars recovered annually...5%


                                  38

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Amount of recoveries....................$19,275,043

  2         d.  Cost avoided because of identification of

  3  third-party coverage:

  4         (I)  Commercial coverage...................$197,493,244

  5         (II)  Medicare.............................$694,234,790

  6         14.  PROCESS MEDICAID PROVIDER CLAIMS OUTPUT

  7  MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of claims received................96,398,352

  9         b.  Number of claims processed...............65,400,797

10         c.  Number of claims denied..................30,997,555

11         d.  Number of fraud and abuse cases opened........3,776

12         e.  Number of fraud and abuse cases closed........4,683

13         f.  Number of referrals to the Medicaid Fraud Control

14  Unit/Attorney General's Office.............................175

15         (b)  For the Health Services Quality Assurance Program,

16  the purpose of which is to ensure that all Floridians have

17  access to quality health care and services through the

18  licensure and certification of facilities, and in responding

19  to consumer complaints about facilities, services, and

20  practitioners, the outcome measures, output measures, and

21  associated performance standards with respect to funds

22  provided in Specific Appropriations 252 through 263 are as

23  follows:

24         1.  STATE REGULATION OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS

25  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

26         a.  Percent of Priority I practitioner investigations

27  resulting in emergency action..............................39%

28         b.  Average length of time (in days) to take emergency

29  action on Priority I practitioner investigations............60

30         c.  Percent of cease and desist orders issued to

31  unlicensed practitioners in which another complaint of


                                  39

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  unlicensed activity is subsequently filed against the same

  2  practitioner................................................7%

  3         d.  Percent of licensed practitioners involved in:

  4         (I)  Serious incidents............................0.33%

  5         (II)  Peer review discipline reports..............0.02%

  6         2.  STATE REGULATION OF HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS

  7  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of complaints determined legally

  9  sufficient...............................................7,112

10         b.  Number of legally sufficient complaints resolved

11  by:

12         (I)  Findings of no probable cause, including:

13         (A)  Nolle prosse...................................680

14         (B)  Letters of guidance............................491

15         (C)  Notice of noncompliance.........................35

16         (II)  Findings of probable cause, including:

17         (A)  Issuance of citation for minor violations.......34

18         (B)  Stipulations or informal hearings..............662

19         (C)  Formal hearings.................................44

20         c.  Percent of investigations completed by priority

21  within timeframe:

22         (I)  Priority I - 45 days..........................100%

23         (II)  Priority II - 180 days.......................100%

24         (III)  Other - 180 days............................100%

25         d.  Average number of practitioner complaint

26  investigations per FTE......................................87

27         e.  Number of inquiries to the call center regarding

28  practitioner licensure and disciplinary information....113,293

29         3.  STATE LICENSURE AND FEDERAL CERTIFICATION OF HEALTH

30  CARE FACILITIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

31


                                  40

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Percent of investigations of alleged unlicensed

  2  facilities and programs that have been previously issued a

  3  cease and desist order and that are confirmed as repeated

  4  unlicensed activity.........................................7%

  5         b.  Percent of Priority I consumer complaints about

  6  licensed facilities and programs that are investigated within

  7  48 hours..................................................100%

  8         c.  Percent of accredited hospitals and ambulatory

  9  surgical centers cited for not complying with life safety,

10  licensure, or emergency access standards...................TBD

11         d.  Percent of accreditation validation surveys that

12  result in findings of licensure deficiencies...............TBD

13         e.  Percent of facilities in which deficiencies are

14  found that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or

15  welfare of the public by type:

16         (I)  Nursing Homes...................................5%

17         (II)  Assisted Living Facilities.....................5%

18         (III)  Home Health Agencies.........................TBD

19         (IV)  Clinical Laboratories.........................TBD

20         (V)  Ambulatory Surgical Centers....................TBD

21         (VI)  Hospitals.....................................TBD

22         f.  Percent of failures by hospitals to report:

23         (I)  Serious incidents (agency identified)..........TBD

24         (II)  Peer review disciplinary actions (agency

25  identified)................................................TBD

26         4.  STATE LICENSURE AND FEDERAL CERTIFICATION OF HEALTH

27  CARE FACILITIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of facility emergency actions taken.......51

29         b.  Total number of full facility quality-of-care

30  surveys conducted and by type............................6,171

31         (I)  Nursing Homes..................................815


                                  41

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (II)  Home Health Agencies........................1,600

  2         (III)  Assisted Living Facilities.................1,282

  3         (IV)  Clinical Laboratories.......................1,082

  4         (V)  Hospitals.......................................35

  5         (VI)  Other.......................................1,357

  6         c.  Average processing time (in days) for statewide

  7  panel cases................................................259

  8         d.  Number of hospitals that the agency determines have

  9  not reported:

10         (I)  Serious incidents (agency identified)..........TBD

11         (II)  Peer review disciplinary actions (agency

12  identified)................................................TBD

13         5.  HEALTH FACILITY PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW

14  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of plans and construction reviews performed

16  by type:

17         (I)  Nursing Homes................................1,200

18         (II)  Hospitals...................................3,500

19         (III)  Ambulatory Surgical Centers..................400

20         b.  Average number of hours for plans and construction

21  surveys and reviews:

22         (I)  Nursing Homes...................................35

23         (II)  Hospitals......................................35

24         (III)  Ambulatory Surgical Centers...................35

25         (2)  DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.--

26         (a)  For the Florida Abuse Hotline Program, the purpose

27  of which is to serve as a central receiving and referral point

28  for all cases of suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of

29  children, disabled adults, and the elderly, the outcome

30  measures, output measures, and associated performance

31


                                  42

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  2  Appropriations 315 through 319 are as follows:

  3         1.  ABUSE HOTLINE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

  4         a.  Percent of abandoned calls made to the Florida

  5  Abuse Hotline...............................................7%

  6         2.  ABUSE HOTLINE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Calls answered..............................474,204

  8         b.  Percent of calls answered within 3 minutes......98%

  9         (b)  For the Adult Protection Program, the purpose of

10  which is to protect adults and the elderly from abuse,

11  neglect, and exploitation, the outcome measures, output

12  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

13  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 297 through 302 are

14  as follows:

15         1.  ADULT PROTECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Percent of protective supervision cases in which no

17  report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received

18  while the case is open (from beginning of protective

19  supervision for a maximum of 1 year).......................97%

20         b.  Percent of clients satisfied....................90%

21         2.  ADULT PROTECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number of investigations.....................34,500

23         b.  Number of persons referred to other

24  agencies.................................................1,700

25         3.  ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO

26  REMAIN IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Percent of adults with disabilities receiving

28  services who are not placed in a nursing home..............99%

29         b.  Percent of clients satisfied....................95%

30         4.  ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO

31  REMAIN IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                  43

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of adults with disabilities to be served:

  2         (I)  Community Care for Disabled Adults...........1,051

  3         (II)  Home Care for Disabled Adults...............1,428

  4         (III)  Number of Medicaid waiver clients served...3,760

  5         (IV)  Number of persons receiving placement and

  6  community support services...............................7,237

  7         (V)  Number of persons receiving protective supervision

  8  services...................................................675

  9         (c)  For the Mental Health and Substance Abuse Program,

10  the purpose of which is to enable adults with mental health

11  problems to function self-sufficiently in the community,

12  enable children with mental health problems to function

13  appropriately and succeed in school, and enable children and

14  adults with or at serious risk of substance abuse problems to

15  be self-sufficient and addiction free, the outcome measures,

16  output measures, and associated performance standards with

17  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 365

18  through 374 and 397 through 398 are as follows:

19         1.  CHILDREN INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED IN JUVENILE JUSTICE

20  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Percent of children restored to competency and

22  recommended to proceed with a judicial hearing:

23         (I)  With mental illness............................90%

24         (II)  With mental retardation.......................54%

25         b.  Percent of community partners satisfied based upon

26  a survey...................................................90%

27         c.  Percent of children with mental illness restored to

28  competency or determined unrestorable in less than

29  180 days...................................................80%

30

31


                                  44

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Percent of children with mental retardation

  2  restored to competency or determined unrestorable in less than

  3  365 days...................................................80%

  4         e.  Percent of children returned to court for a

  5  competency hearing and the court concurs in the recommendation

  6  of the provider............................................95%

  7         2.  CHILDREN INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED IN JUVENILE JUSTICE

  8  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Number served who are incompetent to proceed....224

10         b.  Number of days following the determination by the

11  mental health service provider of restoration of competency or

12  unrestorability of competency to the date of the court hearing

13  on the determination of competency.........................TBD

14         3.  CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE (SED)

15  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Projected annual days SED children (excluding those

17  in juvenile justice facilities) spend in the community.....338

18         b.  Average functional level score SED children will

19  have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of

20  Functioning Scale...........................................49

21         c.  Percent of families satisfied with the services

22  received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior

23  Scale......................................................83%

24         d.  Percent of available school days SED children

25  attended during the last 30 days...........................85%

26         e.  Percent of commitments or recommitments to

27  Department of Juvenile Justice.............................TBD

28         f.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on a

29  survey.....................................................90%

30         g.  Percent of improvement of the emotional condition

31  or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving


                                  45

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional

  2  disturbance recorded in the initial assessment.............TBD

  3         4.  CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE (SED)

  4  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  5         a.  SED children to be served....................22,104

  6         b.  Total average expenditures for services per client

  7  (includes Medicaid services)...............................TBD

  8         c.  Percent of improvement of the emotional condition

  9  or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving

10  the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional

11  disturbance recorded in the initial assessment.............TBD

12         5.  CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES (ED) OUTCOME

13  MEASURES.--

14         a.  Projected annual days ED children (excluding those

15  in juvenile justice facilities) spent in the community.....350

16         b.  Average functional level score ED children will

17  have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of

18  Functioning Scale...........................................55

19         c.  Percent of available school days ED children

20  attended during the last 30 days...........................87%

21         d.  Percent of commitments or recommitments to

22  Department of Juvenile Justice.............................TBD

23         e.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on a

24  survey.....................................................90%

25         f.  Percent of families satisfied with the services

26  received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior

27  Scale......................................................85%

28         6.  CHILDREN WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES (ED) OUTPUT

29  MEASURES.--

30         a.  Number of ED children to be served...........13,101

31


                                  46

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Total average expenditures for services per client

  2  (includes Medicaid services)...............................TBD

  3         7.  CHILDREN AT RISK OF EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE OUTCOME

  4  MEASURE.--

  5         a.  Percent of families satisfied with the services

  6  received as measured by the Family Centered Behavior

  7  Scale......................................................90%

  8         8.  CHILDREN AT RISK OF EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE OUTPUT

  9  MEASURE.--

10         a.  Number of at-risk children to be served......10,390

11         9.  CHILDREN WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTCOME

12  MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent of children who complete treatment......72%

14         b.  Percent of parents of children receiving services

15  reporting average or above average level of satisfaction on

16  Family Centered Behavior Scale.............................95%

17         c.  Percent of children drug free at 12 months

18  following completion of treatment..........................54%

19         d.  Percent of children receiving services who are

20  satisfied based on survey..................................90%

21         e.  Percent of parents of children receiving services

22  reporting average or above level of satisfaction on the Family

23  Centered Behavior Scale....................................95%

24         f.  Percent of children under the supervision of the

25  state receiving substance abuse treatment who are not

26  committed or recommitted to the Department of Juvenile Justice

27  during the 12 months following treatment completion........85%

28         g.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

29  survey.....................................................90%

30         10.  CHILDREN WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTPUT

31  MEASURES.--


                                  47

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of children served....................62,979

  2         b.  Number of children completing treatment.......4,500

  3         11.  CHILDREN AT RISK OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE OUTCOME

  4  MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Percent of children in targeted prevention programs

  6  who achieve expected level of improvement in reading.......75%

  7         b.  Percent of children in targeted prevention programs

  8  who achieve expected level of improvement in math..........75%

  9         c.  Percent of children who receive targeted prevention

10  services who are not admitted to substance abuse services

11  during the 12 months after completion of prevention

12  services...................................................96%

13         d.  Percent of children in targeted prevention programs

14  who perceive substance use to be harmful at the time of

15  discharge when compared to admission.......................76%

16         12.  CHILDREN AT RISK OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE OUTPUT

17  MEASURE.--

18         a.  Number of children served in targeted

19  prevention...............................................6,233

20         13.  ADULTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTCOME

21  MEASURES.--

22         a.  Percent drug free at 6 months following completion

23  of treatment...............................................TBD

24         b.  Percent of adults employed upon discharge from

25  treatment services.........................................61%

26         c.  Percent of adult women pregnant during treatment

27  who give birth to substance-free newborns..................89%

28         d.  Average score on the Behavioral Healthcare Rating

29  of Satisfaction............................................138

30

31


                                  48

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Percent of individuals in protective supervision

  2  who have case plans requiring substance abuse treatment who

  3  are receiving treatment....................................TBD

  4         f.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

  5  survey.....................................................90%

  6         14.  ADULTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS OUTPUT

  7  MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of adults served.....................120,287

  9         b.  Number of clients who complete treatment........TBD

10         c.  Number of individuals in protective supervision who

11  have case plans requiring substance abuse treatment who are

12  receiving treatment........................................TBD

13         15.  ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH OUTCOME MEASURES.--

14         a.  Average annual number of days spent in the

15  community (not in institutions or other facilities)........344

16         b.  Average functional level based on Children's Global

17  Assessment of Functioning Scale.............................50

18         c.  Average client satisfaction score on the Behavioral

19  Healthcare Rating Scale....................................130

20         d.  Average annual days worked for pay...............30

21         e.  Total average monthly income in last 30

22  days......................................................$530

23         f.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

24  survey.....................................................90%

25         g.  Percent of clients who worked during the

26  year.......................................................TBD

27         16.  ADULTS WITH SERIOUS AND PERSISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS

28  IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURE.--

29         a.  Number of adults with a serious and persistent

30  mental illness in the community served..................36,312

31         17.  ADULTS IN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                  49

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Average Global Assessment of Functioning Scale

  2  change score................................................17

  3         b.  Percent readmitted within 30 days................0%

  4         c.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

  5  survey.....................................................90%

  6         18.  ADULTS IN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS OUTPUT MEASURE.--

  7         a.  Number of adults in mental health crisis

  8  served..................................................20,863

  9         19.  ADULTS WITH FORENSIC INVOLVEMENT OUTCOME

10  MEASURES.--

11         a.  Average functional level based on Global Assessment

12  of Functioning score........................................47

13         b.  Percent of persons who violate their conditional

14  release under chapter 916, Florida Statutes, and are

15  recommitted.................................................4%

16         c.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

17  survey.....................................................90%

18         d.  Average annual number of days spent in the

19  community (not in institutions or other facilities)........325

20         20.  ADULTS WITH FORENSIC INVOLVEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of adults with forensic involvement

22  served...................................................5,845

23         (d)  For the Families in Need of Child Care Program,

24  the purpose of which is to allow parents to prevent the

25  recurrence of abuse or neglect, to obtain and retain

26  employment, to prepare children to enter school ready to

27  learn, and to protect children and adults from abuse, the

28  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

29  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

30  Appropriations 294 through 296, 301, 303 through 313, and 426

31  through 429 are as follows:


                                  50

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  FAMILIES IN NEED OF CHILD CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  2         a.  Percent of 4-year-old children placed with

  3  contracted providers in care for 9 months who enter

  4  kindergarten ready to learn as determined by DOE or local

  5  school systems' readiness assessment.......................80%

  6         b.  Percent of non-WAGES, working poor clients who need

  7  child care that receive subsidized child care services:

  8         (I)  Ages 0-5.......................................92%

  9         (II)  School age..................................41.5%

10         (III)  All children.................................63%

11         c.  Percent of WAGES clients needing child care who

12  receive subsidized child care services....................100%

13         d.  Percent of licensed child care providers who are

14  satisfied with the licensing process.......................93%

15         e.  Percent of licensed child care facilities and homes

16  with no class 1 (serious) violations during their licensure

17  year.......................................................97%

18         f.  Number of provisional licenses as a result of

19  noncompliance with child care standards....................375

20         g.  Number of verified incidents of abuse and/or

21  neglect in licensed child care arrangements.................62

22         h.  Percent of clients receiving subsidized child care

23  services who are satisfied.................................95%

24         2.  FAMILIES IN NEED OF CHILD CARE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Total number served.........................134,009

26         (I)  At Risk.....................................13,250

27         (II)  Working Poor...............................53,739

28         (III)  Migrants...................................2,880

29         (IV)  WAGES/Transitional Child Care..............64,140

30         3.  FAMILIES KNOWN TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH CHILDREN AT

31  RISK OF ABUSE OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                  51

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Percent of children in families who complete

  2  intensive child abuse prevention programs of 3 months or more

  3  who are not abused or neglected within:

  4         (I)  6 months after program completion..............95%

  5         (II)  12 months after program completion............95%

  6         (III)  18 months after program completion...........95%

  7         b.  Percent of families receiving parent education and

  8  other parent skill-building services, lasting 6 weeks or

  9  longer, who show improved family skills and capacity to care

10  for their children.........................................TBD

11         c.  Percent of clients satisfied....................95%

12         4.  FAMILIES KNOWN TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH CHILDREN AT

13  RISK OF ABUSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of persons served....................153,005

15         b.  Number receiving information and referral

16  services................................................61,287

17         5.  CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR

18  FAMILIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

19         a.  Percent of children who have no findings of child

20  maltreatment within 1 year after case closure from

21  services...................................................95%

22         b.  Percent of children reunified with family who

23  return to foster care within 1 year after case closure......3%

24         c.  Percent of children not abused or neglected during

25  services...................................................97%

26         d.  Percent of clients satisfied....................95%

27         e.  Percent of families receiving ongoing services who

28  show improved scores on the Child Well-Being Scale.........TBD

29         f.  Percent of children given exit interviews who were

30  satisfied with their foster care placement.................TBD

31


                                  52

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         g.  Percent of families with children under 18 years

  2  who have no finding of maltreatment during each 12-month

  3  period.....................................................TBD

  4         6.  CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED BY THEIR

  5  FAMILIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Reports of child abuse/neglect..............126,735

  7         b.  Children identified as abused/neglected

  8  during year.............................................75,000

  9         c.  Number of families served by Intensive Crisis

10  Counseling Program, Family Builders......................6,767

11         d.  Number of families served by Protective

12  Supervision.............................................26,436

13         e.  Number of children served in foster care.....16,313

14         f.  Number of children served in relative care....8,126

15         g.  Percent of alleged victims seen within

16  24 hours..................................................100%

17         h.  Percent of investigations completed within

18  30 days...................................................100%

19         i.  Percent of children who exited out-of-home care by

20  the 15th month.............................................TBD

21         j.  Percent of cases reviewed by supervisors in

22  accordance with department timeframes for early

23  warning system.............................................TBD

24         k.  Number of individuals under the department's

25  protective supervision who have case plans requiring substance

26  abuse treatment who are receiving treatment................TBD

27         l.  Percent of individuals under the department's

28  protective supervision who have case plans requiring substance

29  abuse treatment who are receiving treatment................TBD

30         m.  Ratio of certified workers to children..........TBD

31         7.  VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                  53

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Ratio of incidents reported resulting in injury or

  2  harm to clients as a result of inadequate security procedures

  3  per 1,000 shelter days........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  4         b.  Percent of clients satisfied....................95%

  5         8.  VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number of individuals receiving case management

  7  services................................................21,270

  8         b.  Number of children counseled.................20,340

  9         c.  Number of adults counseled..................108,442

10         d.  Percent of adult and child victims in shelter more

11  than 72 hours having a plan for family safety and security

12  when they leave shelter...................................100%

13         e.  Number of individuals served in emergency

14  shelters................................................15,775

15         9.  CHILD VICTIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT WHO BECOME

16  ELIGIBLE FOR ADOPTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of children who are adopted of the number

18  of children legally available for adoption.................90%

19         b.  Percent of clients satisfied....................95%

20         10.  CHILD VICTIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT WHO BECOME

21  ELIGIBLE FOR ADOPTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Children receiving adoptive services..........4,454

23         b.  Children receiving subsidies.................12,454

24         c.  Number of children placed in adoption.........1,900

25         (e)  For the People with Developmental Disabilities

26  Program, the purpose of which is to enable individuals with

27  developmental disabilities to live everyday lives, as measured

28  by achievement of valued personal outcomes appropriate to life

29  stages from birth to death, the outcome measures, output

30  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

31


                                  54

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 334 through 356 are

  2  as follows:

  3         1.  PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Percent of people at or above the national standard

  5  on quality of life outcomes................................50%

  6         b.  Percent of adults living in homes of their

  7  own......................................................18.5%

  8         c.  Percent of people who are employed in integrated

  9  settings.................................................27.5%

10         d.  Percent of clients satisfied with services......95%

11         2.  PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of children and adults provided case

13  management services.....................................28,664

14         b.  Number of children and adults provided residential

15  care.....................................................4,907

16         c.  Number of children and adults provided

17  individualized support and services.....................28,664

18         (f)  For the Economic Self-Sufficiency Program, the

19  purpose of which is to help people become economically

20  self-sufficient through programs such as Food Assistance, Work

21  and Gain Economic Self-sufficiency (WAGES), Refugee

22  Assistance, and Medicaid eligibility services, including

23  disability determination eligibility, the outcome measures,

24  output measures, and associated performance standards with

25  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 399

26  through 425 and 429 through 435 are as follows:

27         1.  WAGES/ADULTS AND FAMILIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO

28  BECOME EMPLOYED OUTCOME MEASURES.--

29         a.  Percent of applications processed within time

30  standards (total).........................................100%

31


                                  55

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Percent of Food Stamp applications processed within

  2  30 days...................................................100%

  3         c.  Percent of cash assistance applications processed

  4  within 45 days............................................100%

  5         d.  Percent of Medicaid applications processed within

  6  45 days...................................................100%

  7         e.  Percent of disabled adult payment applications

  8  processed within 90 days..................................100%

  9         f.  Percent of Food Stamp benefits determined

10  accurately...............................................90.7%

11         g.  Percent of WAGES cash assistance benefits

12  determined accurately...................................93.89%

13         h.  Percent of Medicaid benefits determined

14  accurately................................................100%

15         i.  Percent of Benefit Recovery claims established

16  within 90 days............................................100%

17         j.  Percent of dollars collected for established

18  Benefit Recovery claims....................................50%

19         k.  Percent of suspected fraud cases referred that

20  result in Front-end Fraud Prevention savings...............70%

21         l.  Percent of WAGES sanctions referred by the local

22  WAGES coalitions that are executed within 10 days.........100%

23         m.  Percent of work eligible WAGES participants

24  accurately referred to the local WAGES coalitions within 1

25  work day..................................................100%

26         n.  Percent of Refugee Assistance cases accurately

27  closed at 8 months or less................................100%

28         o.  Percent of clients satisfied with eligibility

29  services...................................................TBD

30         p.  Percent of WAGES coalitions clients

31  employed...................................................41%


                                  56

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         2.  WAGES/ADULTS AND FAMILIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO

  2  BECOME EMPLOYED OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  3         a.  Total number of applications..............2,575,690

  4         b.  Dollars collected through Benefit

  5  Recovery...........................................$21 million

  6         c.  Number of Front-end Fraud Prevention investigations

  7  completed...............................................25,200

  8         d.  Dollars saved through Front-end Fraud

  9  Prevention.......................................$17.9 million

10         e.  Number of WAGES participants referred to the local

11  WAGES coalitions.......................................125,000

12         f.  Number of refugee cases closed................5,600

13         g.  Number of WAGES coalitions clients

14  employed................................................51,000

15         h.  Cost per WAGES client employed...............$1,800

16         (g)  For the Mental Health Institutions Program, the

17  purpose of which is to prepare adults with mental health

18  problems to function self-sufficiently in the community, the

19  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

20  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

21  Appropriations 375 through 385 are as follows:

22         1.  ADULTS IN CIVIL COMMITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

23         a.  Percent of patients who improve mental health based

24  on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale................59%

25         b.  Average scores on a community readiness/ability

26  survey.....................................................TBD

27         c.  Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents

28  in each mental health institution...........................26

29         d.  Percent of patients satisfied based on survey...90%

30         e.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

31  survey.....................................................TBD


                                  57

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         f.  Percent of people served who are discharged to the

  2  community..................................................50%

  3         g.  Percent of patients readmitted..................TBD

  4         h.  Percent of residents who meet readiness for

  5  discharge criteria between 6 months and 12 months after

  6  admission..................................................TBD

  7         2.  ADULTS IN CIVIL COMMITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of adult abuse reports confirmed or

  9  proposed confirmed.........................................TBD

10         b.  Number of adults in civil commitment (institutions)

11  served...................................................2,826

12         c.  Number of adults served who are discharged to the

13  community..................................................TBD

14         d.  Number of adult abuse or neglect reports from

15  mental health hospitals....................................TBD

16         3.  ADULTS IN FORENSIC COMMITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of residents who improve mental health

18  based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale..........77%

19         b.  Average number of days to restore competency....167

20         c.  Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents

21  in each mental health institution...........................10

22         d.  Percent of residents satisfied based on

23  survey.....................................................80%

24         e.  Percent of community partners satisfied based on

25  survey.....................................................TBD

26         f.  Percent of residents restored to competency and

27  ready for discharge within 6 months after admission........TBD

28         g.  Percent of residents restored to competency and

29  ready for discharge between 6 and 12 months after

30  admission..................................................TBD

31         4.  ADULTS IN FORENSIC COMMITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                  58

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number served.................................1,691

  2         b.  Number of adult abuse reports confirmed or proposed

  3  confirmed..................................................TBD

  4         c.  Number of adult abuse or neglect reports from

  5  mental health hospitals....................................TBD

  6         (h)  For the Developmental Services Institutions

  7  Program, the purpose of which is to enable individuals with

  8  developmental disabilities to live everyday lives, as measured

  9  by achievement of valued personal outcomes appropriate to life

10  stages from birth to death, the outcome measures, output

11  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

12  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 326 through 333 are

13  as follows:

14         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Annual number of significant reportable incidents

16  per 100 persons with developmental disabilities living in

17  developmental services institutions.........................26

18         b.  Statewide average on Conroy Quality of Life

19  Protocol for residents in developmental services

20  institutions...............................................61%

21         c.  Percent of people discharged as planned........100%

22         d.  Percent of clients satisfied with services......95%

23         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Adults receiving services in developmental services

25  institutions.............................................1,419

26         b.  Adults incompetent to proceed provided competency

27  training and custodial care in the Mentally Retarded

28  Defendants Program.........................................156

29         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF ELDERLY AFFAIRS.--

30         (a)  For the Service to Elders Program, the purpose of

31  which is to assist elders to live in the least restrictive and


                                  59

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  most appropriate community settings and maintain independence,

  2  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  3  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

  4  Specific Appropriations 436 through 461 are as follows:

  5         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Percent of elders CARES determined to be eligible

  7  for nursing home placement who are diverted..............16.8%

  8         b.  Percent of high-risk Adult Protective Services

  9  referrals served...........................................TBD

10         c.  Percent of CARES imminent risk referrals

11  served.....................................................90%

12         d.  Satisfaction with the quality and delivery of home

13  and community-based care for service recipients equal to or

14  greater than previous periods..............................TBD

15         e.  Cost of home and community-based care (including

16  non-DOEA programs) less than nursing home care for comparable

17  client groups..............................................TBD

18         f.  Percent of Community Care for the Elderly clients

19  defined as "probable Medicaid eligibles" who remain in

20  state-funded programs......................................15%

21         g.  Percent of elders assessed with high or moderate

22  risk environments who improved their environment score.....83%

23         h.  Percent of elders assessed with a high social

24  isolation score who have improved in receiving services....53%

25         i.  Percent of new service recipients with high-risk

26  nutrition scores whose nutritional status improved.........60%

27         j.  Percent of new service recipients whose ADL

28  assessment score has been maintained or improved.........60.6%

29         k.  Percent of new service recipients whose IADL

30  assessment score has been maintained or improved...........60%

31


                                  60

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         l.  Percent of caregivers assessed who self-report they

  2  are very likely to continue to provide care................92%

  3         m.  Percent of caregivers assessed at risk who

  4  self-report they are very likely to continue to provide

  5  care.......................................................TBD

  6         n.  Number of people placed in jobs after participating

  7  in the Older Worker Program................................TBD

  8         o.  Average wage at placement for people in the Older

  9  Worker Program.............................................TBD

10         p.  Percent of new service recipients (congregate meal

11  sites) whose nutritional status has been maintained or

12  improved...................................................TBD

13         q.  Percent of Elder Helplines with an excellent rating

14  on the Elder Helpline evaluation assessment................TBD

15         r.  Percent of people who rate the Memory Disorder

16  Clinic assessment conference as very helpful...............TBD

17         s.  Percent of clients satisfied with the quality of

18  insurance counseling and information received..............TBD

19         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Total number of CARES assessments............64,356

21         b.  Number/percent of elders who enter DOEA service

22  programs each year with a risk score above the 1997-1998

23  average..............................................2,481/45%

24         c.  Number/percent of elders who enter DOEA service

25  programs each year with a frailty level above the 1997-1998

26  average..............................................8,954/45%

27         d.  Percent of copayment goal collected............100%

28         e.  Number of caregivers assessed................11,806

29         f.  Number of people trained in Older Worker

30  Program....................................................TBD

31


                                  61

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         g.  Number of new congregate meal service recipients

  2  (assessed).................................................TBD

  3         h.  Number of people evaluated for memory loss by

  4  Memory Disorder Clinics....................................TBD

  5         i.  Number of volunteer hours.......................TBD

  6         j.  Number of volunteers............................TBD

  7         k.  Number of people served.....................139,331

  8         (4)  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.--

  9         (a)  For the Executive Direction and Administration

10  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

11  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

12  Specific Appropriations 462 through 474 are as follows:

13         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

14  MEASURES.--

15         a.  Administrative costs as a percent of total agency

16  costs.......................................................1%

17         b.  Percent of middle and high school students who

18  report using tobacco products in the last 30 days........25.5%

19         2.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

20  MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of middle and high school students provided

22  comprehensive tobacco prevention education.............121,185

23         3.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Percent of hardware, software, and networks meeting

25  department standards.......................................98%

26         4.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of custom and in-house applications

28  supported...................................................42

29         b.  Number of personal computers, servers, and e-mail

30  users supported.........................................19,588

31


                                  62

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (b)  For the Community Public Health Program, the

  2  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

  3  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  4  Appropriations 475 through 544 are as follows:

  5         1.  FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Total infant mortality rate per 1,000 live

  7  births.....................................................6.9

  8         b.  Nonwhite infant mortality rate per 1,000 nonwhite

  9  births....................................................10.7

10         c.  Percent of low-birth-weight births among prenatal

11  Women, Infants, and Children program clients..............7.9%

12         d.  Live births to mothers age 15-19 per 1,000 females

13  15-19.....................................................55.4

14         e.  Percent of mothers 15-19 having a repeat

15  birth......................................................16%

16         f.  Percent of targeted low-income population receiving

17  dental health services from a county health department...10.5%

18         g.  Percent of students who visit the health clinic and

19  are able to return to class rather than leaving school.....90%

20         2.  FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of women and infants receiving Healthy Start

22  services...............................................145,000

23         b.  Average monthly participants in Women, Infants, and

24  Children program.......................................339,000

25         c.  Number of clients served in county health

26  department Family Planning programs....................162,000

27         d.  Number of teens age 15-19 served in county health

28  department Family Planning programs.....................43,725

29         e.  Number of adults and children receiving county

30  health department sponsored professional dental care....79,400

31


                                  63

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         f.  Number of children served in the county health

  2  department Child Health program........................168,000

  3         g.  Number of School Health nursing assessments

  4  provided...............................................885,000

  5         h.  Number of women, infants, and children provided

  6  food and nutrition services (WIC and Child Care

  7  Food)..................................................443,100

  8         i.  Number of family planning services provided to

  9  clients................................................162,000

10         j.  Number of KidCare outreach services.......1,680,000

11         3.  INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTCOME

12  MEASURES.--

13         a.  AIDS case rate per 100,000 population..........35.5

14         b.  HIV/AIDS resident total deaths per 100,000

15  population.................................................9.6

16         c.  Chlamydia case rate per 100,000 population......195

17         d.  Tuberculosis case rate per 100,000 population.....8

18         e.  Immunization rate among 2-year-olds.............90%

19         f.  Vaccine-preventable disease rate per 100,000

20  population................................................3.26

21         4.  INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTPUT

22  MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of HIV/AIDS counseling and testing services

24  provided annually......................................220,000

25         b.  Number of HIV partner notification services

26  provided annually........................................8,500

27         c.  Number of clients served in county health

28  department sexually transmitted disease programs........78,000

29         d.  Number of tuberculosis medical management services

30  provided................................................25,245

31


                                  64

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Number of patients who complete tuberculosis

  2  therapy at the A.G. Holley tuberculosis hospital............90

  3         f.  Number of immunization services provided by county

  4  public health departments............................1,629,815

  5         g.  Number of HIV/AIDS patient care services provided

  6  to individuals..........................................28,193

  7         5.  ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Food and waterborne disease cases per 1,000

  9  facilities regulated by the department.....................4.4

10         b.  Overall sanitation and safety score in

11  department-regulated facilities..........................97.2%

12         c.  Septic tank failure rate per 1,000 within 2 years

13  after system installation..................................2.4

14         6.  ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of department-regulated facilities

16  inspected..............................................122,527

17         b.  Number of onsite sewage disposal system inspections

18  completed..............................................295,000

19         c.  Control of radiation threats as measured by the

20  number of x-ray machines inspected......................37,800

21         d.  Number of water systems and storage tanks

22  inspected..............................................218,000

23         7.  STATEWIDE HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

24  MEASURES.--

25         a.  Percent saved on prescription drugs compared to

26  market price...............................................30%

27         b.  Percent of laboratory samples passing standardized

28  proficiency testing.......................................100%

29         c.  Percent of vital statistics records completed

30  within established timeframes..............................99%

31


                                  65

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (c)  For the Children's Medical Services (CMS) Program,

  2  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  3  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

  4  Specific Appropriations 545 through 571 are as follows:

  5         1.  CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Percent of families in Children's Medical Services

  7  (CMS) Program Network indicating a positive perception

  8  of care....................................................95%

  9         b.  Percent of CMS Network enrollees in compliance with

10  the periodicity schedule for well-child care...............90%

11         c.  Percent of eligible infants/toddlers provided CMS

12  Early Intervention Program services........................90%

13         d.  Percent of Child Protection Team (CPT) assessments

14  provided to Family Safety and Preservation Program within

15  established timeframes.....................................90%

16         2.  CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of children enrolled in CMS Program Network

18  (Medicaid and Non-Medicaid).............................37,500

19         b.  Number of clients receiving services in the CMS

20  Early Intervention Program..............................29,000

21         c.  Number of children receiving Child Protection Team

22  (CPT) assessments.......................................27,500

23         (d)  For the Health Care Practitioner and Access

24  Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

25  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

26  Specific Appropriations 572 through 592A are as follows:

27         1.  MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of unlicensed individuals identified and

29  referred to state attorneys.................................36

30         b.  Percent of health care practitioners' applications

31  for licensure completed within 90 days....................100%


                                  66

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         2.  MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  2         a.  Number of unlicensed individuals investigated...364

  3         b.  Number of initial health care practitioner licenses

  4  processed...............................................48,946

  5         c.  Number of initial health care practitioner licenses

  6  issued..................................................43,531

  7         d.  Number of licenses issued and renewed by

  8  mail...................................................314,688

  9         3.  COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Percent of emergency medical service providers

11  found to have a significant deficiency during licensure

12  inspection................................................8.5%

13         b.  Age-adjusted injury death rate per 100,000.......57

14         c.  Number of emergency medical service providers

15  licensed annually..........................................249

16         d.  Number of medical students who do a rotation in a

17  medically underserved area.................................715

18         e.  Number of persons who receive continuing education

19  services through Workforce Development..................16,400

20         4.  COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of providers recruited for underserved

22  areas.......................................................46

23         b.  Number of brain and spinal cord injury victims

24  reintegrated into the community..........................3,384

25         c.  Number of emergency medical service providers

26  licensed and emergency medical technicians and paramedics

27  certified...............................................31,930

28         (e)  For the Disability Determinations Program, the

29  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

30  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

31  Appropriations 592C through 592E are as follows:


                                  67

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTCOME

  2  MEASURE.--

  3         a.  Percent of Title II and XVI disability decisions

  4  completed accurately as measured by the Social Security

  5  Administration.............................................92%

  6         2.  DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTPUT

  7  MEASURE.--

  8         a.  Number of Title II and XVI disability decisions

  9  completed..............................................212,489

10         (5)  DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.--

11         (a)  For the Services to Veterans Program, the outcome

12  measures, output measures, and associated performance

13  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

14  Appropriations 593 through 599 are as follows:

15         1.  VETERANS' HOMES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Occupancy rate for veterans' homes in operation for

17  2 years or longer..........................................75%

18         b.  Percent of veterans' homes that received gold-star

19  certification by AHCA.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

20         2.  VETERANS' HOMES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

21         a.  Number of veterans' homes beds available........390

22         3.  VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Percent of "ready to rate" claims submitted to

24  USDVA compared to total claims submitted....................2%

25         4.  VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of veterans served...................195,000

27         b.  Number of claims processed...................15,500

28         5.  VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

29         a.  Value of cost avoidance because of issue

30  resolution..........................................$4,680,000

31         6.  VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--


                                  68

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of veterans served (benefited) by issue

  2  resolution.............................................240,000

  3         7.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

  4  MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Administrative cost as a percent of total agency

  6  costs.......................................................8%

  7         b.  Percent of time computer network is available for

  8  use or response time.......................................85%

  9         c.  Number of veterans or eligible dependents enrolled

10  in certified educational programs.......................27,000

11         d.  Percent of veterans, families, and survivors aware

12  of FDVA services...........................................43%

13         e.  Percent of schools certified after submission of

14  application...............................................100%

15         8.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of constituents served...............559,000

18         b.  Value of veterans' education benefits

19  paid..............................................$110 million

20         c.  Number of Florida education institution programs

21  certified................................................3,000

22         d.  Number of staff supported by the information

23  technology service through networking, software, and hardware

24  support....................................................540

25         Section 36.  The performance measures and standards

26  established in this section for individual programs in the

27  area of criminal justice shall be applied to those programs

28  for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and

29  standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in

30  the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as

31


                                  69

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act

  2  of 1994.

  3         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.--

  4         (a)  For the Security and Institutional Operations

  5  Program, the purpose of which is to protect the public and

  6  provide a safe, secure environment for incarcerated offenders

  7  and the staff maintaining custody of them by applying

  8  effective physical security methods and procedures and

  9  providing accurate risk assessment and classification of

10  inmates and adequate nutrition and facility maintenance, the

11  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

13  Appropriations 625 through 700 are as follows:

14         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of

16  major institutions...........................................0

17         b.  Number of inmates who escaped when assigned outside

18  a secure perimeter..........(to be reported by the department)

19         c.  Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or

20  more persons per 1,000

21  inmates.....................(to be reported by the department)

22         d.  Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary

23  reports per 1,000 inmates..................................375

24         e.  Percent of random inmate drug tests that are

25  negative.................................................98.5%

26         f.  Percent of available inmates who work.........83.5%

27         g.  Percent of reported criminal incidents

28  investigated..............................................100%

29         h.  Percent of victim notifications that meet the

30  statutory time period requirements........................100%

31


                                  70

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (b)  For the Health Services Program, the purpose of

  2  which is to protect the public and maintain a humane

  3  environment in correctional institutions for incarcerated

  4  offenders and the staff maintaining custody of them by

  5  applying effective basic health care treatment to inmates, the

  6  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

  7  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  8  Appropriations 737 through 750 are as follows:

  9         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of health care grievances upheld..........50

11         b.  Percent of health care grievances upheld.......1.6%

12         c.  Number of inmate suicides.........................6

13         d.  Comparison of per diems for General Medical

14  Services:

15         (I)  DOC.............(to be reported by the department)

16         (II)  HMO............(to be reported by the department)

17         (III)  Medicaid HMO..(to be reported by the department)

18         e.  Comparison of per diems for Mental Health Services:

19         (I)  DOC.............(to be reported by the department)

20         (II)  HMO............(to be reported by the department)

21         (III)  Medicaid HMO..(to be reported by the department)

22         f.  Comparison of per diems for hospitalization

23  contracts:

24         (I)  DOC.............(to be reported by the department)

25         (II)  HMO............(to be reported by the department)

26         (III)  Medicaid HMO..(to be reported by the department)

27         (c)  For the Community Corrections Program, the purpose

28  of which is to assist sentenced felony offenders to become

29  productive law-abiding citizens by applying supervision in the

30  community to hold offenders accountable to the conditions of

31  their supervision and to detect violations of those conditions


                                  71

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  and make apprehensions when violations or new crimes occur,

  2  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  3  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

  4  Specific Appropriations 701 through 736 are as follows:

  5         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number/percent of offenders who absconded within 2

  7  years...............................................3,544/4.1%

  8         b.  Number/percent of offenders who had their

  9  supervision revoked within 2 years..................33,204/37%

10         c.  Percent of offenders who successfully complete

11  their sentence or are still under supervision after

12  2 years..................................................56.9%

13         d.  Annual dollar amount collected from offenders on

14  community supervision only by DOC..................$70 million

15         e.  Annual dollar amount collected from offenders on

16  community supervision only by DOC for

17  restitution........................................$31 million

18         f.  Annual dollar amount collected from offenders on

19  community supervision only by DOC for other court-ordered

20  costs..............................................$14 million

21         g.  Annual dollar amount collected from offenders on

22  community supervision only by DOC for costs of

23  supervision........................................$26 million

24         h.  Annual dollar amount collected for subsistence from

25  offenders/inmates in community correctional

26  centers.............................................$8 million

27         i.  Annual dollar amount collected for subsistence from

28  offenders/inmates in probation and restitution

29  centers...............................................$600,000

30         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31


                                  72

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

  2  in the community on administrative supervision.............0.2

  3         b.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

  4  in the community on basic risk supervision.................1.3

  5         c.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

  6  in the community on enhanced risk supervision..............1.5

  7         d.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

  8  in the community on intensive risk supervision.............1.9

  9         e.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

10  in the community on close risk supervision.................2.5

11         f.  Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders

12  in the community on community control......................6.5

13         (d)  For the Correctional Education and Rehabilitation

14  Program, the purpose of which is to provide substance abuse

15  treatment and educational, vocational, and life management

16  opportunities that reduce the likelihood that offenders will

17  reoffend, the outcome measures, output measures, and

18  associated performance standards with respect to funds

19  provided in Specific Appropriations 751 through 766 are as

20  follows:

21         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number/percent of inmates needing mandatory

23  literacy programs who learn to read and write at or above 9th

24  grade level.............(to be reported by the department)/20%

25         b.  Number/percent of inmates participating in GED

26  education programs who obtain their

27  GED.........................(to be reported by the department)

28         c.  Number/percent of inmates needing special education

29  programs who participate in special education

30  programs.............................................3,011/85%

31


                                  73

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Number/percent of inmates participating in

  2  vocational education programs who obtain vocational

  3  certificates................(to be reported by the department)

  4         e.  Number/percent of inmates participating in drug

  5  abuse education/treatment programs who complete drug abuse

  6  education/treatment programs and remain drug free for at least

  7  6 months following program

  8  completion..................(to be reported by the department)

  9         f.  Average increase in grade level achieved by inmates

10  participating in educational programs per instructional

11  period.....................................................0.6

12         g.  Percent of community supervision offenders who

13  successfully complete transition, rehabilitation, or support

14  programs without subsequent recommitment to community

15  supervision or prison for 24 months after release........85.5%

16         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number/percent of transition plans completed for

18  inmates released from

19  prison......................(to be reported by the department)

20         b.  Number of annual volunteer hours in the chaplaincy

21  program with annual percent change shown..........250,000/2.8%

22

23  Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews

24  required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall

25  be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative

26  budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should

27  be included with an explanation as to the utility of the

28  measure.

29         (2)  DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.--

30         (a)  For the Juvenile Detention Program, the purpose of

31  which is to maintain, develop, and implement a comprehensive


                                  74

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  range of detention services to protect the community, hold

  2  youths accountable, and ensure the appearance of youths for

  3  court proceedings, the outcome measures, output measures, and

  4  associated performance standards with respect to funds

  5  provided in Specific Appropriations 1093 through 1101 are as

  6  follows:

  7         1.  SECURE DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of escapes from secure detention facilities

  9  per 100,000 resident days....................................1

10         b.  Number of youth-on-youth batteries (assaults

11  requiring medical attention) per 100,000 resident days while

12  in secure detention.........................................84

13         c.  Number of youth-on-staff batteries (assaults

14  requiring medical attention) per 100,000 resident days while

15  in secure detention.........................................20

16         2.  HOME/NONSECURE DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

17         a.  Percent of successful completions without

18  committing a new law or contract violation, failure to appear,

19  an abscond, or contempt of court...........................73%

20         (b)  For the Juvenile Offender Program, the purpose of

21  which is to provide protection for the public from juvenile

22  crime by reducing juvenile delinquency through the development

23  and implementation of an effective continuum of services and

24  commitment programs, including secure residential programs,

25  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

26  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

27  Specific Appropriations 1102 through 1111 are as follows:

28         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

29         a.  Percent of juveniles who were adjudicated or had

30  adjudication withheld in juvenile court or were convicted in

31


                                  75

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  adult court for a crime which occurred within 1 year after

  2  release from a:

  3         (I)  Low-risk program.............................46.6%

  4         (II)  Moderate-risk program.......................46.8%

  5         (III)  High-risk program..........................47.4%

  6         (IV)  Maximum-risk program........................38.5%

  7         (c)  For the Residential Corrections Program, the

  8  purpose of which is to provide protection for the public from

  9  juvenile crime by reducing juvenile delinquency through the

10  development and implementation of an effective continuum of

11  services and commitment programs, including secure residential

12  programs, the outcome measures, output measures, and

13  associated performance standards with respect to funds

14  provided in Specific Appropriations 1122 through 1139A are as

15  follows:

16         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

18  release....................................................53%

19         b.  Percent of escapes from residential commitment

20  programs..................................................0.3%

21         c.  Number of youth-on-youth assaults/batteries per 100

22  youth in residential commitment

23  programs....................(to be reported by the department)

24         d.  Number of youth-on-staff assaults/batteries per 100

25  youth in residential commitment

26  programs....................(to be reported by the department)

27         e.  Percent of residential commitment program reviews

28  conducted by Quality Assurance which indicate satisfactory or

29  higher ratings on staff-to-youth ratios....................80%

30         f.  Percent of cases processed within statutory time

31  frames...................................................71.8%


                                  76

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         g.  Average time (in days) to make recommendations to

  2  the state attorney once the law enforcement report is

  3  received.....................................................9

  4         h.  Total collections of statutorily mandated

  5  maintenance fees....................................$1 million

  6         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Total number of youth served and average daily

  8  population of youth served in low-risk residential commitment

  9  programs.............................................2,204/477

10         b.  Total number of youth served and average daily

11  population of youth served in moderate-risk residential

12  commitment programs................................9,115/2,681

13         c.  Number of residential commitment beds

14  on line.....................(to be reported by the department)

15         d.  Number of youth receiving substance abuse

16  treatment................................................2,386

17

18  Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews

19  required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall

20  be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative

21  budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should

22  be included with an explanation as to the utility of the

23  measure.

24         (d)  For the Probation and Community Corrections

25  Program, the purpose of which is to provide protection for the

26  public from juvenile crime by reducing juvenile delinquency

27  through the development and implementation of an effective

28  continuum of services and commitment programs, including

29  nonresidential and community supervision programs, the outcome

30  measures, output measures, and associated performance

31


                                  77

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  2  Appropriations 1102 through 1111 are as follows:

  3         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Percent of youth who remain crime free during

  5  aftercare supervision......................................65%

  6         b.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

  7  release from aftercare...................................58.2%

  8         c.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

  9  release from nonresidential commitment.....................65%

10         d.  Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after

11  release from probation.....................................79%

12         (e)  For the Office of the Secretary/Assistant

13  Secretary for Administrative Services Program, the purpose of

14  which is to carry out executive direction and administrative

15  activities for the agency, including information technology

16  services, which provide computer network support to agency

17  staff to improve productivity and track juvenile offender

18  participation and progress in various juvenile justice

19  programs and are utilized by other agencies for law

20  enforcement, background screening, and research purposes, the

21  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

22  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

23  Appropriations 1112 through 1121A are as follows:

24         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

25         a.  Reduce administrative costs as a percent of total

26  agency costs................................................5%

27         b.  Response time (seconds) for youthful offender face

28  sheet inquiries (current is 75).............................38

29         2.  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

30         a.  Youth tracked by the Juvenile Justice Information

31  System.................................................488,387


                                  78

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.--

  2         (a)  For the Criminal Justice Investigations and

  3  Forensic Science Program, the purpose of which is to manage,

  4  coordinate, and provide investigative, forensic, prevention,

  5  and protection services and through partnerships with local,

  6  state, and federal criminal justice agencies to improve the

  7  state's capacity to prevent crime and detect, capture, and

  8  prosecute criminal suspects, the outcome measures, output

  9  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

10  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1161 through 1174

11  are as follows:

12         1.  LABORATORY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number/percent of service requests by lab

14  discipline completed................................75,705/95%

15         b.  Average number of days to complete lab service

16  requests, excluding serology and DNA........................30

17         c.  Average number of days to complete lab service

18  requests for serology.......................................50

19         d.  Average number of days to complete lab service

20  requests for DNA...........................................115

21         2.  LABORATORY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number of crime scenes processed................600

23         b.  Number of DNA samples added to DNA

24  database................................................24,000

25         c.  Number of expert witness appearances in court

26  proceedings..............................................1,815

27         3.  INVESTIGATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Number/percent of closed criminal investigations

30  resolved.............................................1,038/87%

31


                                  79

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number/percent of criminal investigations closed

  2  resulting in an arrest.................................851/67%

  3         4.  INVESTIGATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

  4  MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Number of criminal investigations worked......2,878

  6         b.  Number of criminal investigations

  7  commenced................................................1,549

  8         c.  Number/percent of criminal investigations

  9  closed...............................................1,314/47%

10         d.  Number of short-term investigative assists

11  worked...................................................1,578

12         5.  PROTECTIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number of dignitaries provided with FDLE protective

14  services....................................................52

15         b.  Number of background investigations

16  performed................................................3,500

17         (b)  For the Criminal Justice Information Program, the

18  purpose of which is to provide criminal justice information

19  needed to prevent crime, solve cases, recover property, and

20  identify and apprehend criminals; to provide screening to

21  identify persons with criminal warrants, arrests, and

22  convictions; and to provide statistical and analytical

23  information about crime to policymakers and the public, the

24  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

25  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

26  Appropriations 1175 through 1182 are as follows:

27         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of responses from FCIC hot files that

29  contain substantive information within defined

30  timeframe..................................................96%

31         b.  Percent of time FCIC is running and


                                  80

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  accessible...............................................99.5%

  2         c.  Percent response to criminal history record check

  3  customers within defined timeframe.........................92%

  4         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Percent of criminal arrest information received

  6  electronically (through AFIS) for entry into the criminal

  7  history system.............................................80%

  8         b.  Number of agencies/FCIC work stations

  9  networked...........................................855/18,000

10         c.  Number of agencies connected to the Criminal

11  Justice Network............................................853

12         d.  Number of responses to requests for crime

13  statistics..............................................50,000

14         e.  Number of responses to requests for criminal

15  history record checks................................1,578,175

16         f.  Number of registered sexual predators/offenders

17  identified to the public................................15,350

18         g.  Number of responses to requests for sexual

19  predator/offender information..........................279,000

20         h.  Number of missing children cases worked through

21  MCIC.......................................................625

22         (c)  For the Criminal Justice Professionalism Program,

23  the purpose of which is to promote and facilitate the

24  competency and professional conduct of criminal justice

25  officers through a partnership with criminal justice agencies

26  to provide entry-level and inservice officer training and

27  maintain disciplinary procedures, the outcome measures, output

28  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

29  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1183 through 1190B

30  are as follows:

31         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--


                                  81

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number/percent of individuals who pass the basic

  2  professionalism certification examination for law enforcement

  3  officers, correctional officers, and correctional probation

  4  officers.............................................5,140/75%

  5         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number of course curricula and examinations

  7  developed or revised.......................................109

  8         b.  Number of examinations administered...........7,000

  9         c.  Number of individuals trained by the Florida

10  Criminal Justice Executive Institute.......................604

11         d.  Number of law enforcement officers trained by

12  DARE.......................................................155

13         e.  Number of discipline referrals processed for state

14  and local LEOs, COs, and CPOs pursuant to chapter 120,

15  Florida Statutes.........................................1,500

16         f.  Number of criminal justice officer disciplinary

17  actions....................................................452

18         g.  Number of program and financial compliance audits

19  performed................................................2,500

20         h.  Number of records audited to validate the accuracy

21  and completeness of ATMS2 record information.............3,000

22

23  Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews

24  required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall

25  be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative

26  budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should

27  be included with an explanation as to the utility of the

28  measure.

29         (4)  DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS.--

30         (a)  For the Office of the Attorney General Program,

31  the purpose of which is to provide civil representation and


                                  82

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  legal services on behalf of the State of Florida and to assist

  2  crime victims and law enforcement agencies through associated

  3  support services, the outcome measures, output measures, and

  4  associated performance standards with respect to funds

  5  provided in Specific Appropriations 1191 through 1231 are as

  6  follows:

  7         1.  CIVIL REPRESENTATION AND LEGAL SERVICES OUTCOME

  8  MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Average number of days for opinion response......29

10         b.  Percent of mediated cases resolved in 3 weeks or

11  less.......................................................75%

12         c.  Percent of lemon law cases resolved in less

13  than 1 year................................................99%

14         2.  CIVIL REPRESENTATION AND LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT

15  MEASURES.--

16         a.  Cases opened..................................7,000

17         b.  Cases closed..................................4,700

18         c.  Number of capital briefs/state and federal

19  responses/oral arguments...................................270

20         d.  Number of noncapital briefs/state and federal

21  responses/oral arguments................................11,289

22         e.  Number of antitrust cases closed.................20

23         f.  Number of economic crime cases closed...........400

24         g.  Number of Medicaid fraud cases closed...........375

25         h.  Number of Children's Legal Services (uncontested

26  disposition orders entered) cases closed.................1,400

27         i.  Number of ethics cases closed....................15

28         j.  Number of opinions issued.......................255

29         k.  Number/percent of disputes resolved through

30  mediation..............................................105/76%

31         l.  Cost per mediation.............................$555


                                  83

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         3.  CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND VICTIM SUPPORT SERVICES

  2  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  3         a.  Average number of days from application to

  4  payment.....................................................42

  5         b.  Percent of counties receiving motor vehicle theft

  6  grant funds that experienced a reduction in motor vehicle

  7  theft incidents below 1994 levels..........................85%

  8         4.  CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND VICTIM SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT

  9  MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of victim compensation claims eligibility

11  determinations...........................................7,950

12         b.  Number of victim compensation claims paid.....7,000

13         c.  Number of victim compensation final orders

14  issued.....................................................170

15         d.  Number of sexual battery examination claims

16  paid.....................................................5,200

17         e.  Number of appellate services provided...........800

18         f.  Number of information and referral services

19  provided................................................25,000

20         g.  Number of VOCA grants funded....................200

21         h.  Number of victims served through contract...100,000

22         i.  Number of motor vehicle theft grants funded......40

23         j.  Number of people attending training (victims/crime

24  prevention)........................................1,368/3,550

25         k.  Number of training sessions held (victims/crime

26  prevention)..............................................33/30

27         (b)  For the Statewide Prosecution Program, the purpose

28  of which is to investigate and prosecute criminal offenses

29  enumerated in s. 16.56, Florida Statutes, when they have been

30  part of an organized crime conspiracy affecting two or more

31  judicial circuits, including assistance to federal


                                  84

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  prosecutors, state attorneys, and local law enforcement

  2  officers in their efforts against organized crime, the outcome

  3  measures, output measures, and associated performance

  4  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  5  Appropriations 1232 through 1234 are as follows:

  6         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Of the defendants who reached disposition, the

  8  number of those convicted..................................325

  9         b.  Conviction rate per defendant...................96%

10         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

11         a.  Number of law enforcement agencies assisted......88

12         b.  Ratio of request to number of intake

13  prosecutors..............................................342:6

14         c.  Ratio of investigations to number of

15  prosecutors...............................................21:1

16         d.  Ratio of total filed cases to total number of

17  prosecutors................................................8:1

18

19  Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews

20  required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall

21  be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative

22  budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should

23  be included with an explanation as to the utility of the

24  measure.

25         (5)  PUBLIC DEFENDERS.--Each public defender shall

26  recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for

27  fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative

28  committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of

29  integrally related outcomes and outputs, the public defender

30  shall identify total associated costs for producing that

31  outcome or output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget,


                                  85

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  in order to improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate

  2  funds, compare activities, and evaluate public defender

  3  activities for efficiency:

  4         (a)  For the Indigent Defense Program, the purpose of

  5  which is to represent appointed clients arrested for or

  6  charged with a felony, a violation of probation or community

  7  control, a misdemeanor, a criminal traffic offense, criminal

  8  contempt, or a violation of a municipal or county ordinance

  9  and juveniles alleged to be delinquent; to represent appointed

10  clients subject to Baker Act proceedings regarding involuntary

11  commitment pursuant to chapter 394 or chapter 916, Florida

12  Statutes, clients subject to commitment under the Jimmy Ryce

13  Act pursuant to chapter 916, Florida Statutes, and

14  appointments pursuant to civil contempt; and to provide

15  representation in other proceedings as appointed by the court,

16  the outcome measures and output measures are as follows:

17         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Number/percent of clients in custody contacted

19  within 48 hours after appointment of Public Defender,

20  excluding holidays and weekends.

21         b.  Number/percent of felony and misdemeanor cases

22  resolved within speedy rule limit, unless dismissed.

23         c.  Number/percent of substantiated Bar grievances

24  filed annually.

25         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Defend indigents in criminal trials as measured by

27  number of cases closed standard.

28         b.  Defend indigents in civil trials as measured by

29  number of cases closed standard.

30         c.  Number of pleas.

31         d.  Number of trials.


                                  86

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Number of cases nolle prossed or dismissed.

  2         f.  Number of clients represented.

  3         g.  Number of cases closed.

  4         h.  Number of violations of parole hearings.

  5         i.  Number of conflict hearings.

  6         j.  Number of initial interviews for assigned cases.

  7         (b)  For the Indigent Appellate Defense Program, the

  8  purpose of which is to represent appointed indigent clients on

  9  appeal, the outcome measures and output measures are as

10  follows:

11         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

12         a.  Number/percent of substantiated Bar grievances

13  filed annually.

14         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Increase percent of appeals resolved.

16         b.  Number of clients represented.

17         c.  Number of briefs filed.

18         d.  Number of writs filed.

19         e.  Number of cases closed.

20         (6)  STATE ATTORNEYS.--Each state attorney shall

21  recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for

22  fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative

23  committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of

24  integrally related outcomes and outputs, the state attorney

25  shall identify total associated costs for producing that

26  outcome or output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget,

27  in order to improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate

28  funds, compare activities, and evaluate state attorney

29  activities for efficiency:

30         (a)  For the Criminal Prosecution/Civil Action Program,

31  the purpose of which, in compliance with s. 17, Art. V of the


                                  87

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  State Constitution and chapters 27, 39, 61, 119, 394, 832,

  2  943, 948, 960, and 984, Florida Statutes, is to prosecute or

  3  defend on behalf of the state all actions in which the state

  4  is a party, the outcome measures and output measures are as

  5  follows:

  6         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Number/percent of offenders who qualify for

  8  enhanced sentencing and state attorney requests enhanced

  9  sentencing and for whom judge orders enhanced sentence.

10         b.  Number/percent of dispositions by trial verdict,

11  plea, and nontrial and other disposition.

12         c.  Number/percent of Jimmy Ryce commitments and

13  number/percent released from treatment who commit sex crimes.

14         d.  Number of Baker Act hearings in which the

15  recommendation of the state attorney was supported by the

16  court.

17         e.  Number/percent of cases in which restitution was

18  recommended and ordered.

19         f.  Number/percent of substantiated Bar grievances

20  filed annually.

21         2.  CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number of criminal case referrals.

23         b.  Number of filings by type (misdemeanor, felony,

24  juvenile).

25         c.  Number/percent of cases per attorney (misdemeanor,

26  felony, juvenile).

27         d.  Average paid attorney hours worked in office per

28  case.

29         e.  Average paid attorney hours worked in court per

30  case.

31         3.  INVESTIGATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                  88

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of cases investigated and reviewed.

  2         b.  Number of attempts to serve subpoenas.

  3         4.  VICTIM/WITNESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Number of victim contacts and notifications.

  5         b.  Number of witness contacts and notifications.

  6         c.  Number of restitution actions for victims.

  7         5.  CHILD WELFARE LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

  8         a.  Number/percent of child welfare referrals received

  9  and acted upon.

10         6.  POSTCONVICTION RELIEF SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

11         a.  Number of postconviction relief responses.

12         b.  Number of habeas corpus responses.

13         7.  CIVIL ACTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of actions for the following:  public

15  records requests, bond validations, expungements, forfeitures,

16  bond estreatures, Baker Act hearings, other civil actions.

17         b.  Number of child support enforcement referrals

18  handled.

19         c.  Number of sexual predator civil commitment

20  proceedings.

21         (7)  JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION.--The Justice

22  Administration Commission shall recommend standards for the

23  following outcomes and outputs for fiscal year 2000-2001 to

24  the appropriate legislative committees. For each outcome and

25  output, or for each group of integrally related outcomes and

26  outputs, the commission shall identify total associated costs

27  for producing that outcome or output, based on the fiscal year

28  1999-2000 budget, in order to improve the Legislature's

29  ability to appropriate funds, compare activities, and evaluate

30  commission activities for efficiency:

31


                                  89

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (a)  For the Justice Administrative Services Program,

  2  the purpose of which is to provide centralized administrative

  3  services for major state justice agencies (budget, accounting,

  4  human resources, technology resources, and administration,

  5  pursuant to s. 43.16, Florida Statutes), the outcome measures

  6  and output measures are as follows:

  7         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of material/substantial audit findings

  9  related to areas of direct JAC responsibility to its

10  customers.

11         b.  Percent of invoices processed within statutory

12  timeframes.

13         c.  Number of technical audit findings related to areas

14  of direct JAC responsibility to its customers.

15         2.  BUDGET SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

16         a.  Number of budget amendments processed correctly and

17  submitted per OPB guidelines.

18         3.  ACCOUNTING SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of accounting transactions (FLAIR)

20  processed.

21         b.  Number of invoices processed.

22         c.  Number of financial reports produced.

23         4.  HUMAN RESOURCES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Number of reports prepared.

25         b.  Number of requests for information/assistance

26  provided.

27         5.  PAYROLL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--

28         a.  Number of employee and position transactions

29  (COPES) processed by type.

30         6.  TECHNOLOGY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31         a.  Number of JAC staff users directly supported.


                                  90

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number of JAC computer devices directly supported.

  2         7.  ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  3         a.  Number of agency telephone calls handled.

  4         b.  Number of pieces of agency mail processed.

  5         c.  Number of checks processed.

  6         (8)  CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSELS.--Each

  7  capital collateral regional counsel shall recommend standards

  8  for the following outcomes and outputs for fiscal year

  9  2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative committees. For each

10  outcome and output, or for each group of integrally related

11  outcomes and outputs, the counsel shall identify total

12  associated costs for producing that outcome or output, based

13  on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to improve the

14  Legislature's ability to appropriate funds, compare

15  activities, and evaluate counsel activities for efficiency:

16         (a)  For the Capital Justice Representation Program,

17  the purpose of which is to represent each person convicted and

18  sentenced to death in the State of Florida for the sole

19  purpose of instituting and prosecuting collateral actions, as

20  authorized by statute, challenging the legality of the

21  judgment and sentence imposed against such person in the state

22  courts, federal courts in this state, the United States Court

23  of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, and the United States

24  Supreme Court, the outcome measures and output measures are as

25  follows:

26         1.  REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS AND ANALYSIS SERVICES

27  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of death row case requests for public

29  records made.

30         b.  Number of formal legal and background death row

31  case record analyses made.


                                  91

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Average number of hours per public records

  2  analysis.

  3         2.  DEATH ROW CASE INVESTIGATION SERVICES OUTPUT

  4  MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Number of death row cases investigated.

  6         b.  Average number of hours per death row case

  7  investigated.

  8         c.  Number of witnesses and experts interviewed.

  9         3.  DEATH PENALTY LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of death penalty inmate contacts made.

11         b.  Average number of hours per inmate contact made.

12         c.  Number of evidentiary hearings.

13         d.  Number of evidentiary hearings on actions which are

14  authorized by statute.

15         e.  Number of appellate actions.

16         f.  Number of appellate actions which are authorized by

17  statute.

18         g.  Average number of hours per evidentiary hearing.

19         h.  Average number of hours per appellate action.

20         i.  Number/percent of issues raised by CCRC that are

21  formally considered by the courts which were not ruled

22  procedurally barred or without merit.

23         j.  Number/percent of requested extensions of time

24  granted following court considerations.

25         k.  Number of CCRC court issues not ruled on by the

26  courts due to merit of at least one issue.

27         l.  Number/percent of issues raised by CCRC that are

28  summarily dismissed by the courts or, if formally considered

29  by the courts, ruled to be procedurally barred or without

30  merit.

31


                                  92

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         m.  Number of death row inmates represented in actions

  2  not authorized by statute.

  3         n.  Number of employee hours spent preparing and

  4  pursuing actions not authorized by statute.

  5         o.  Number of actions filed or prosecuted which are not

  6  authorized by statute.

  7         p.  Number of postconviction actions which contain a

  8  request by the CCRC for the court to grant leave to amend a

  9  postconviction action.

10         4.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

11         a.  Number/percent of final decisions from the courts:

12         (I)  Number of decisions by the court to release death

13  row inmate.

14         (II)  Number of new trials granted to death row

15  inmates.

16         (III)  Number of new sentencing hearings granted.

17         (IV)  Number of other appeals granted.

18         b.  Number of CCRC active state court cases in total

19  and number/percent by procedural stage:

20         (I)  Number/percent in Stage One (cases where the

21  capital defendant's fully pled postconviction action is filed

22  in the trial court).

23         (II)  Number/percent in Stage Two (cases where there is

24  a final order granting or denying the capital defendant's

25  motion for postconviction relief).

26         (III)  Number/percent in Stage Three (cases where the

27  capital defendant's brief or briefs that address the trial

28  court's final order granting or denying the motion for

29  postconviction relief has been filed with the Supreme Court).

30

31


                                  93

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (IV)  Number/percent in Stage Four (cases where the

  2  appeal of the trial court's denial of the capital defendant's

  3  motion for postconviction relief is completed).

  4         (V)  Number/percent in Stage Five (cases where a

  5  petition has been filed for writ of certiorari in the Supreme

  6  Court of the United States).

  7         c.  Number of CCRC active federal court system cases in

  8  total and percent of the cases by procedural stage:

  9         (I)  Number/percent in Stage One (cases where the

10  capital defendant's complete original motion for habeas corpus

11  is filed in federal court).

12         (II)  Number/percent in Stage Two (cases where there is

13  a final order granting or denying the capital defendant's

14  motion for post-habeas corpus relief).

15         (III)  Number/percent in Stage Three (cases where the

16  capital defendant's brief or briefs that address the federal

17  court's final order granting or denying the capital

18  defendant's motion for habeas corpus postconviction relief has

19  been filed with the Circuit Court of Appeals).

20         (IV)  Number/percent in Stage Four (cases where the

21  appeal of the federal court's denial of the capital

22  defendant's motion for habeas corpus relief is completed).

23         (V)  Number/percent in Stage Five (cases where a

24  petition has been filed for writ of certiorari in the Supreme

25  Court of the United States).

26         (9)  PAROLE COMMISSION.--The Parole Commission shall

27  recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for

28  fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative

29  committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of

30  integrally related outcomes and outputs, the commission shall

31  identify total associated costs for producing that outcome or


                                  94

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to

  2  improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate funds,

  3  compare activities, and evaluate commission activities for

  4  efficiency:

  5         (a)  For the Parole Commission, the purpose of which is

  6  to provide public safety and protect the rights of victims by

  7  administering effective postincarceration services, including

  8  offender release, offender revocation, clemency, and victim

  9  assistance, the outcome measures and output measures are as

10  follows:

11         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number/percent of parolees who have successfully

13  completed their supervision without revocation within the

14  first 2 years...............(to be reported by the commission)

15         b.  Percent of revocation cases completed within 90

16  days after final hearing....(to be reported by the commission)

17         c.  Percent of cases placed before the Parole

18  Commission/Clemency Board containing no factual errors.....80%

19         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of conditional release cases handled...5,311

21         b.  Number of supervision reviews...................468

22         c.  Number of revocation determinations...........3,005

23         d.  Number of Clemency Board decisions

24  supported................................................2,686

25         e.  Number of parole release

26  decisions...................(to be reported by the commission)

27         f.  Number of victims

28  contacted...................(to be reported by the commission)

29         Section 37.  The performance measures and standards

30  established in this section for individual programs in the

31  area of transportation and economic development shall be


                                  95

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  applied to those programs for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. These

  2  performance measures and standards are directly linked to the

  3  appropriations made in the General Appropriations Act for

  4  Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as required by the Government

  5  Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.

  6         (1)  EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR.--

  7         (a)  For the General Office Program, the purpose of

  8  which is to assist the Governor in the performance of his or

  9  her duties and responsibilities, helping to communicate and

10  implement the Governor's goals, priorities, programs, and

11  views to the citizens of Florida, the outcome measures, output

12  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

13  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2060 through 2083

14  are as follows:

15         1.  DRUG CONTROL COORDINATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

16         a.  Decrease the use of illegal drugs in Florida from

17  8% to 7%....................................................7%

18         2.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

19  MEASURE.--

20         a.  Increase the percent of the Governor's goals

21  achieved from 25% to 50%...................................50%

22         3.  LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS SYSTEM/PLANNING AND

23  BUDGETING SUBSYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Decrease the ratio of Legislative Appropriations

25  System/Planning and Budgeting Subsystem costs to the number of

26  users supported from $5,316,331:585 to

27  $5,309,322:585..................................$5,309,322:585

28         4.  SCHOOL READINESS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

29         a.  Increase the percent of kindergarten students

30  meeting state expectations for readiness from 80% to 83%...83%

31         5.  SCHOOL READINESS OUTPUT MEASURE.--


                                  96

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Coordinate the state's School Readiness services as

  2  measured by the number of students meeting state expectations

  3  for readiness..........................................633,168

  4         6.  WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES)

  5  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

  6         a.  Maintain the level of Work and Gain Economic

  7  Self-sufficiency (WAGES) clients who successfully leave the

  8  program at 41% or more.....................................41%

  9         7.  WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES)

10  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

11         a.  Oversee Work and Gain Economic Self-sufficiency

12  State Board as measured by the number of Work and Gain

13  Economic Self-sufficiency clients who successfully complete

14  the program.............................................52,966

15         (b)  For the Economic Improvement Program, the purpose

16  of which is to maintain and improve the economic health of

17  Florida by increasing jobs, income, and investments through

18  promoting targeted businesses, tourism, and professional and

19  amateur sports and entertainment and by assisting communities,

20  residents, and businesses, the outcome measures, output

21  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

22  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2084 through 2088D

23  are as follows:

24         1.  OFFICE OF TOURISM, TRADE, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

25  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number/dollar amount of contracts and grants

27  administered..................................283/$290 million

28         b.  Public expenditures per job created/retained under

29  QTI incentive program...................................$3,750

30         c.  Number of state agency proposed rules reviewed

31  which impact small businesses...............................70


                                  97

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Number of business leaders' meetings

  2  coordinated..................................................1

  3         2.  BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Number of jobs supported by financing black

  5  business:

  6         (I)  Regional BBICs...............................2,000

  7         (II)  Statewide BBICs...............................120

  8         b.  Dollar amount and procurement opportunities

  9  generated for Black businesses....................$2.5 million

10         3.  BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTPUT MEASURES.--

11         a.  Matching dollars leveraged by the Black Business

12  Investment Board..................................$1.6 million

13         b.  Number of businesses provided technical assistance

14  through Statewide BBIC.....................................200

15         4.  FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Economic contributions from Florida Sports

17  Foundation-sponsored regional and major sporting

18  events grants.....................................$150 million

19         b.  Satisfaction of the area sports commissions with

20  the efforts of the foundation to promote and develop the

21  sports industry and related industries in the state........75%

22         c.  Economic contributions to communities as a result

23  of hosting Florida's Senior State Games and Sunshine State

24  Games Championships........................................TBD

25         5.  FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number/amount of major and regional sports event

27  grants awarded.....................................30/$700,000

28         b.  Number of athletes competing in Florida's Senior

29  State Games and Sunshine State Games Championships.........TBD

30         c.  Number of amateur athletic events...............TBD

31         6.  FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                  98

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Sustained growth in the number of travelers who

  2  come to and go through Florida:

  3         (I)  Out-of-state..........................50.6 million

  4         (II)  Residents............................13.6 million

  5         b.  Sustained growth in the beneficial impacts that

  6  travelers in Florida have on the state's overall economy:

  7         (I)  Rental car surcharge................$141.2 million

  8         (II)  Tourism-related employment................835,156

  9         (III)  Taxable sales......................$48.3 billion

10         (IV)  Local option tax.....................$320 million

11         c.  Growth in private sector contributions to VISIT

12  Florida............................................$34 million

13         d.  Satisfaction of VISIT Florida's partners and

14  representative members of the tourism industry with the

15  efforts of VISIT Florida to promote Florida tourism........75%

16         e.  Facilitate the creation of an inventory of the

17  sites identified by the state's tourism regions as

18  nature-based and heritage tourism sites and implement

19  procedures to maintain the inventory.......................TBD

20         f.  Implement s. 288.1224(13), Florida Statutes,

21  including the incorporation of nature-based and heritage

22  tourism components into the Four-Year Marketing Plan.......TBD

23         7.  FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Quality and effectiveness of paid advertising

25  messages reaching the target audience

26  (impressions)......................................550 million

27         b.  Number contacting VISIT Florida in response to

28  advertising............................................620,146

29         c.  Value and number of consumer promotions facilitated

30  by VISIT Florida...............................$13 million/155

31


                                  99

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Number of leads and visitor inquiries generated by

  2  VISIT Florida events and media placements............1,229,780

  3         e.  Number of private sector partners.............3,462

  4         f.  Private sector partner financial contributions

  5  through direct financial investment...............$2.2 million

  6         g.  Private sector partner financial contributions

  7  through strategic alliance program................$1.3 million

  8         8.  SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Value of new investment in the Florida space

10  business and programs (cumulative)................$230 million

11         b.  Number of launches...............................30

12         c.  Number of visitors to space-related tourism

13  facilities.........................................2.9 million

14         d.  Tax revenue generated by space-related tourism

15  facilities..........................................$1,400,000

16         9.  SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of students in Spaceport Florida Authority

18  (SFA) sponsored space-related classroom or research at

19  accredited institutions of higher education................400

20         b.  Equity in SFA industrial/research

21  facilities.........................................$65 million

22         c.  Number of presentations to industry and

23  governmental decisionmakers.................................35

24         d.  Equity in SFA space-related tourist

25  facilities.........................................$25 million

26         10.  ENTERPRISE FLORIDA BUSINESS EXPANSION, RETENTION,

27  AND RECRUITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of direct full-time jobs facilitated as a

29  result of Enterprise Florida's recruitment, expansion, and

30  retention efforts.......................................31,000

31         (I)  Rural areas (subset).........................2,000


                                 100

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (II)  Urban core areas (subset)...................2,000

  2         (III)  Critical industries (subset)..............10,000

  3         b.  Documented export sales attributable to programs

  4  and activities....................................$275 million

  5         c.  Number of qualified marketing leads generated

  6  through Enterprise Florida's comprehensive marketing

  7  programs...................................................750

  8         (I)  Trade leads (subset)...........................450

  9         (II)  Investment leads (subset).....................300

10         d.  Satisfaction of economic development practitioners

11  and other appropriate entities with efforts of Enterprise

12  Florida in providing economic development leadership in the

13  full range of services required for state and local economic

14  growth, including critical industries and workforce

15  development................................................75%

16         e.  Satisfaction of economic development practitioners

17  and other appropriate entities with efforts of EFI in

18  marketing the state, including rural communities and

19  distressed urban communities, as a probusiness location for

20  potential new investment...................................75%

21         11.  ENTERPRISE FLORIDA BUSINESS EXPANSION, RETENTION,

22  AND RECRUITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of trade events...........................32

24         b.  Number of companies assisted by Enterprise Florida

25  in the area of international trade.......................2,660

26         c.  Number of active recruitment, expansion, and

27  retention projects worked during the year..................295

28         d.  Number of leads and projects referred to local

29  economic development organizations.........................120

30         e.  Number of successful incentive projects worked with

31  local economic development organizations....................60


                                 101

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         f.  Number of times Enterprise Florida's information

  2  services are accessed by local economic development

  3  organizations..............................................800

  4         12.  ENTERPRISE FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME

  5  MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Percent of supplemental fund requests from Regional

  7  Workforce Boards acted upon in a timely fashion:

  8         (I)  Less than or equal to established fund threshold

  9  acted upon within 14 days after receipt of approvable

10  documentation.............................................100%

11         (II)  Greater than the established fund threshold

12  within 90 days............................................100%

13         b.  Number/percent of agency policies to be reviewed,

14  recommendations made, and actions taken to implement

15  recommendations........................................202/70%

16         c.  Number/percent of onsite regional workforce

17  development board reviews completed in accordance with an

18  established schedule by June 30, 2000..................24/100%

19         d.  For regions out of compliance, the percent of

20  reviews where board staff issued the report of deficiencies

21  and provided recommendations for corrective action within 14

22  days after exit...........................................100%

23         e.  Number/percent of individuals completing high

24  skill/high wage programs found employed at an average hourly

25  wage equal to or higher than $9 for the last completed

26  reporting period....................................49,500/50%

27         f.  Number/percent of WIA statewide standards met or

28  exceeded..........................................12 of 17/70%

29         g.  Number/percent of WIA regional standards met or

30  exceeded......................................300 of 408/73.5%

31


                                 102

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         h.  Percent of customers who found the State Board

  2  fulfilling its oversight and coordinating responsibilities

  3  determined through the use of a customer survey............75%

  4         13.  ENTERPRISE FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT

  5  MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number of new full-time, high skill/high wage jobs

  7  created as a result of Quick Response Training...........4,500

  8         (I)  In rural areas.................................300

  9         (II)  In urban core areas...........................300

10         (III)  In critical industries.....................2,700

11         b.  QRT ratio of private funds match to state

12  funds......................................................3:1

13         c.  QRT employee retention rates and earnings (at $9 or

14  above) in quarter following completion of training.........70%

15         d.  QRT employee satisfaction rates (per survey)....75%

16         e.  Number of permanent jobs retained as a result of

17  Incumbent Worker Training pilot project (WIA)............1,000

18         (I)  In rural areas.................................100

19         (II)  In urban core areas...........................200

20         (III)  In critical industries.......................250

21         f.  IWT ratio of private funds match to federal WIA

22  funds......................................................2:1

23         g.  IWT employee retention rates and earnings (at $9 or

24  above) in quarter following completion of training.........70%

25         h.  IWT employer satisfaction rates (per survey)....75%

26         (2)  DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES.--

27         (a)  For the Highway Patrol Program, the purpose of

28  which is to increase highway safety in Florida through law

29  enforcement, preventive patrol, and public education, the

30  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

31


                                 103

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

  2  Appropriations 2100 through 2118 are as follows:

  3         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Percent of closed criminal investigation cases

  5  which are resolved.........................................66%

  6         b.  Florida death rate on patrolled highways per 100

  7  million vehicle miles of travel............................1.9

  8         c.  National average death rate on highways per 100

  9  million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7

10         d.  Florida death rate on all roads per 100 million

11  vehicle miles of travel....................................1.9

12         e.  National average death rate on all roads per 100

13  million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7

14         f.  Alcohol-related death rate per 100 million vehicle

15  miles of travel...........................................0.64

16         g.  Number of crashes investigated by FHP.......186,978

17         h.  Percent change in number of crashes investigated by

18  FHP........................................................+1%

19         i.  Annual crash rate per 100 million vehicle miles of

20  travel on all Florida roads................................177

21         j.  Percent change in seat belt use.................+1%

22         k.  State seat belt compliance rate...............60.7%

23         l.  National average seat belt compliance rate (for

24  comparison)................................................68%

25         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Hours spent on criminal investigation cases

27  closed..................................................37,901

28         b.  Actual number of criminal cases closed........1,233

29         c.  Hours spent on professional compliance

30  investigation cases closed...............................7,884

31         d.  Actual number of professional compliance


                                 104

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  investigation cases closed.................................122

  2         e.  Number of hours spent on traffic homicide

  3  investigations.........................................133,105

  4         f.  Number of cases resolved as result of traffic

  5  homicide investigations..................................1,647

  6         g.  Average time (hours) spent per traffic homicide

  7  investigation............................................80.82

  8         h.  Percent of recruits retained by FHP for 3 years

  9  after the completion of training...........................88%

10         i.  Number of hours spent on investigations......63,350

11         j.  Actual average response time (minutes) to calls for

12  crashes or assistance.......................................26

13         k.  Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

14  on preventive patrol.................................1,014,491

15         l.  Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

16  on preventive patrol.......................................42%

17         m.  Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

18  on crash investigation.................................337,801

19         n.  Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

20  on crash investigation.....................................14%

21         o.  Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (long

22  form).....................................................2.17

23         p.  Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (short

24  form).....................................................1.35

25         q.  Average time (hours) to investigate crashes

26  (nonreportable)...........................................0.65

27         r.  Duty hours spent on law enforcement officer

28  assistance to motorists................................102,387

29         s.  Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent

30  on motorist assistance......................................5%

31


                                 105

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         t.  Number of motorists assisted by law enforcement

  2  officers...............................................299,924

  3         u.  Number of public traffic safety presentations

  4  made.....................................................1,563

  5         v.  Number of persons in attendance at public traffic

  6  safety presentations....................................83,475

  7         w.  Average size of audience per presentation........53

  8         x.  Number of training courses offered to FHP recruits

  9  and personnel...............................................41

10         y.  Number of students successfully completing training

11  course.....................................................967

12         (b)  For the Driver Licenses Program, the purpose of

13  which is to maintain an efficient and effective driver

14  licensing program, ensuring that only drivers demonstrating

15  the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities are licensed to

16  operate motor vehicles on Florida roads; to remove drivers

17  from the highways who abuse their driving privilege or require

18  further driver education; to ensure that drivers are

19  financially responsible for their actions; and to maintain

20  adequate records for driver education and administrative

21  control, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

22  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

23  Specific Appropriations 2124 through 2164B are as follows:

24         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

25         a.  Percent of customers waiting 15 minutes or less for

26  driver license service.....................................82%

27         b.  Percent of customers waiting 30 minutes or more for

28  driver license service.....................................11%

29         c.  Percent of DUI course graduates who do not

30  recidivate within three years of graduation................86%

31         d.  Average number of corrections per 1,000 driver


                                 106

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  records maintained...........................................4

  2         e.  Percent of motorists complying with financial

  3  responsibility.............................................83%

  4         f.  Number of driver licenses/identification cards

  5  suspended, cancelled, and invalidated as a result of

  6  fraudulent activity, with annual percent change

  7  shown.................................................2,178/1%

  8         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Number of driver licenses issued..........4,188,819

10         b.  Number of identification cards issued.......821,349

11         c.  Number of written driver license examinations

12  conducted............................................2,213,001

13         d.  Number of road tests conducted..............525,855

14         (c)  For the Motor Vehicles Program, the purpose of

15  which is to increase consumer protection, health, and public

16  safety through efficient license systems that register and

17  title motor vehicles, vessels, and mobile homes, regulate

18  vehicle and motor home dealers, manufacturers, and central

19  emission inspection stations, and collect revenue in the most

20  efficient and effective manner, the outcome measures, output

21  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

22  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2124 through 2164B

23  are as follows:

24         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

25         a.  Percent of motor vehicle titles issued without

26  error......................................................98%

27         b.  Number of fraudulent motor vehicle titles

28  identified and submitted to law enforcement................930

29         c.  Percent change in number of fraudulent motor

30  vehicle titles identified and submitted to law

31  enforcement.................................................3%


                                 107

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Ratio of warranty complaints to new mobile homes

  2  titled....................................................1:61

  3         e.  Percent reduction in pollution tonnage per day in

  4  the six applicable (air quality) counties................15.5%

  5         f.  Ratio of taxes collected from international

  6  registration plans (IRP) and international fuel tax agreements

  7  (IFTA) audits to cost of audits.......................$1.85:$1

  8         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Number of motor vehicle and mobile home

10  registrations issued................................13,923,922

11         b.  Number of motor vehicle and mobile home titles

12  issued.............................................4.7 million

13         c.  Average cost to issue a motor vehicle title...$2.05

14         d.  Average number of days to issue a motor vehicle

15  title......................................................3.4

16         e.  Number of vessel registrations issued.......863,501

17         f.  Number of vessel titles issued..............224,171

18         g.  Average cost to issue a vessel title..........$5.08

19         h.  Number of motor carriers audited per auditor, with

20  number of auditors shown.................................22/14

21         (d)  For the Kirkman Data Center Program, the purpose

22  of which is to encourage greater efficiency in all

23  governmental programs through implementation of effective

24  information technology initiatives, the outcome measures,

25  output measures, and associated performance standards with

26  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2170

27  through 2175 are as follows:

28         1.  KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTCOME MEASURE.--

29         a.  Percent of customers who rate services as

30  satisfactory or better as measured by survey...............80%

31         2.  KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTPUT MEASURE.--


                                 108

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of service programs maintained.........3,310

  2         (e)  For the Office of Executive Director and Division

  3  of Administrative Services Program, the purpose of which is to

  4  provide policy determination and administrative support for

  5  agency operations, the outcome measures, output measures, and

  6  associated performance standards with respect to funds

  7  provided in Specific Appropriations 2089 through 2099, 2119

  8  through 2123A, and 2165 through 2169 are as follows:

  9         1.  OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND DIVISION OF

10  ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

11         a.  Percent agency administration and support costs and

12  positions compared to total agency costs and

13  positions..........................................5.02%:7.43%

14         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY.--

15         (a)  For the Rehabilitation Program, the purpose of

16  which is to empower individuals with disabilities to maximize

17  their employment, economic self-sufficiency, and independence;

18  to ensure the referral of persons with moderate to severe

19  brain injuries to a coordinated rehabilitation program for

20  services that will enable them to return to an appropriate

21  level of functioning in their communities; and to obtain

22  employment outcomes and maximize independence and integration

23  into the community for Floridians who are blind or visually

24  impaired, the outcome measures, output measures, and

25  associated performance standards with respect to funds in

26  Specific Appropriations 10I through 10O and 2299 through 2311A

27  are as follows:

28         1.  VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

29         a.  Percent/number of customers gainfully employed

30  (rehabilitated) at least 90 days (96-97 - at least 60

31  days):..............................................63%/10,500


                                 109

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (I)  Of VR severely disabled (96-97 - at least 60

  2  days)..............................................63.5%/4,100

  3         (II)  Of VR most severely disabled (96-97 - at least 60

  4  days)..............................................56.5%/4,600

  5         (III)  Of all other VR disabled (96-97 - at least 60

  6  days)................................................76%/1,600

  7         b.  Percent/number of VR customers placed in

  8  competitive employment............................97.5%/10,237

  9         c.  Percent/number of VR customers retained in

10  employment after 1 year............................62.5%/5,500

11         d.  Average annual earnings of VR customers at

12  placement..............................................$13,900

13         e.  Average annual earnings of VR customers after

14  1 year.................................................$14,400

15         f.  Percent of case costs covered by third-party

16  payers.....................................................20%

17         g.  Average cost of case life (to division):

18         (I)  For severely disabled VR customers..........$3,311

19         (II)  For most severely disabled VR customers....$3,175

20         (III)  For all other disabled VR customers.........$400

21         h.  Maintain the annual rate and number of

22  rehabilitation customers gainfully employed at least 90 days

23  at 68.3% and 847 customers, or more..................68.3%/847

24         2.  VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Number of customers reviewed for

26  eligibility.............................................26,500

27         b.  Number of individualized written plans for

28  services................................................22,500

29         c.  Number of customers served...................72,000

30         d.  Customer caseload per counseling/case management

31  team member................................................161


                                 110

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Percent of eligibility determinations completed in

  2  compliance with federal law..............................92.5%

  3         3.  BLIND SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Percent/number of rehabilitation customers

  5  gainfully employed at least 90 days..................68.3%/847

  6         b.  Percent/number of rehabilitation customers placed

  7  in competitive employment............................64.3%/654

  8         c.  Projected average annual earnings of rehabilitation

  9  customers at placement.................................$13,500

10         d.  Percent/number of successfully rehabilitated older

11  persons, nonvocational rehabilitation..............55.2%/1,355

12         e.  Percent/number of customers (children) successfully

13  rehabilitated/transitioned from preschool to school...67.3%/36

14         f.  Percent/number of customers (children) successfully

15  rehabilitated/transitioned from school to work........26.5%/47

16         4.  BLIND SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of customers reviewed for

18  eligibility..............................................2,035

19         b.  Number of written plans for services..........1,425

20         c.  Number of customers served...................13,100

21         d.  Average time lapse (in days) between application

22  and eligibility determination for rehabilitation

23  customers...................................................69

24         e.  Customer caseload per counseling/case management

25  team member................................................114

26         f.  Cost per library customer....................$19.65

27         g.  Total number of food service managers...........162

28         h.  Number of existing food service facilities

29  renovated...................................................10

30         i.  Number of new food service facilities

31  constructed..................................................5


                                 111

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         j.  Facilitate the provision of developmental services

  2  to blind and visually impaired children....................890

  3         k.  Provide Braille and recorded publications to

  4  customers...............................................45,000

  5         (b)  For the Safety/Workers' Compensation Program, the

  6  purpose of which is to keep the workplace safe and return

  7  injured employees to work at a reasonable cost to employers,

  8  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  9  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

10  Specific Appropriations 2257 through 2271 are as follows:

11         1.  WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Percent of injured workers returning to work at 80

13  percent or more of previous average quarterly wage during the

14  four-quarter period following injury for accident 2 years

15  prior....................................................63.5%

16         b.  Percent of initial payments made on time by

17  insurance carriers.........................................91%

18         c.  Number of workers newly protected by workers'

19  compensation coverage per fiscal year as a result of

20  compliance efforts......................................11,145

21         d.  Percent of investigated issues resolved by the

22  Employee Assistance Office..................................7%

23         e.  Percent of noncomplying carriers in

24  compliance upon reaudit....................................78%

25         f.  Average total cost per 4-year-old case (information

26  only)..................................................$20,000

27         g.  Percent of lost time cases with no petition for

28  benefits filed 18 months after the date of accident........77%

29         h.  Percent change in total case incidence rate for

30  private sector job sites served............................-4%

31


                                 112

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         i.  Percent change in total case incidence rate for

  2  public sector job sites served.............................-4%

  3         j.  Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate

  4  for private employers served..............................-25%

  5         k.  Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate

  6  for public employers served...............................-25%

  7         l.  Percent of employers surveyed who view services as

  8  adequately effective or above.......................85% to 90%

  9         m.  Percent of permanent total supplemental benefits

10  paid by the division to injured workers timely and

11  accurately................................................100%

12         n.  Percent of compliance enforcement actions which

13  result in a successful outcome (positive disposition of any

14  formal or informal review; payment in full of all penalties

15  assessed and compliance by the employer; and/or cessation of

16  all business operations of the employer)...................New

17         o.  Percent of requests for assistance filed by

18  attorneys..................................................New

19         p.  Number of investigated issues resolved by the

20  Employee Assistance Office..............................25,000

21         2.  WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number of employer investigations conducted for

23  compliance with workers' compensation law...............22,758

24         b.  Number of program applicants provided reemployment

25  services.................................................2,100

26         c.  Number of carriers audited......................381

27         d.  Number of investigated issues resolved by the

28  Employee Assistance Office..............................25,000

29         e.  Number of private sector employers (and job sites)

30  provided OSHA 7(c)1 consultation services..................549

31


                                 113

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         f.  Number of public sector employers (and job sites)

  2  provided consultation services...........................3,000

  3         g.  Number of private sector employers receiving

  4  training/other technical services..................2,300/6,700

  5         h.  Number of public sector employers receiving

  6  training/other technical services....................330/5,600

  7         i.  Number of requests for assistance processed by the

  8  Employee Assistance Office.................................New

  9         3.  SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

10         a.  Occupational injury and illness total case

11  incidence rate (per 100 workers) (information only).......8.1%

12         b.  Percent change in total case incidence rate for

13  private sector job sites served............................-4%

14         c.  Percent change in total case incidence rate for

15  public sector job sites served.............................-4%

16         d.  Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate

17  for private employers served..............................-25%

18         e.  Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate

19  for public employers served...............................-25%

20         f.  Percent of employers surveyed who view services as

21  adequately effective or above.......................85% to 90%

22         4.  SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of private sector employers (and job sites)

24  provided OSHA 7(c)1 consultation services..................549

25         b.  Number of public sector employers (and job sites)

26  provided consultation services...........................3,000

27         c.  Number of private sector employers receiving

28  training/other technical services..................2,300/6,700

29         d.  Number of public sector employers receiving

30  training/other technical services....................330/5,600

31


                                 114

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (c)  For the Employment Security Program, the purpose

  2  of which is to provide prompt, accurate benefits for

  3  unemployed workers in order to expedite their reemployment

  4  while providing an equitable and cost-effective unemployment

  5  compensation system for the employers of Florida and to

  6  provide employment services and training opportunities that

  7  promote a strong Florida economy, the outcome measures, output

  8  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

  9  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2248 through 2250,

10  2272 through 2276, and 2286 through 2298A are as follows:

11         1.  UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Percent of UC benefits paid timely..............90%

13         b.  Percent of UC benefits paid accurately..........95%

14         c.  Percent of UC appeal cases completed

15  timely.....................................................89%

16         d.  Percent of new UC employer liability

17  determinations made timely...............................84.6%

18         e.  Percent of current quarter UC taxes paid

19  timely...................................................92.5%

20         2.  UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of UC claimant eligibility determinations

22  issued.................................................170,635

23         b.  Number of UC benefits weeks paid..........3,153,006

24         c.  Amount of UC benefits paid.............$683,477,111

25         d.  Number of appeal cases completed.............52,197

26         e.  Number of new UC employer liability determinations

27  made....................................................69,118

28         f.  Amount of UC taxes collected...........$651,471,000

29         g.  Number of UC employer tax/wage reports

30  processed............................................1,609,450

31         h.  Number of process claims filed by unemployed


                                 115

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  workers................................................481,270

  2         3.  WORKFORCE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES OUTCOME

  3  MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Percent of job openings filled................50.2%

  5         b.  Percent of individuals referred to jobs who are

  6  placed.....................................................28%

  7         c.  Percent of food stamp clients employed........11.8%

  8         d.  Percent increase in high skill/high wage

  9  apprenticeship programs registered..........................5%

10         e.  Increase the percent of customers directly placed

11  in jobs or obtaining employment within 90 days after receiving

12  services from Workforce and Employment Opportunities from 22%

13  to 23%.....................................................23%

14         4.  WORKFORCE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES OUTPUT

15  MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of individuals referred to job openings

17  listed with J&B........................................540,000

18         b.  Number of individuals placed by J&B.........137,700

19         c.  Refer customers to job training..............16,964

20         d.  Number of individuals obtaining employment after

21  receiving specific J&B services.........................35,700

22         e.  Cost per placement by J&B......................$230

23         f.  Cost per individual placed in or having obtained

24  employment................................................$176

25         g.  Number of recipients employed:

26         (I)  Food stamps.................................14,800

27         (II)  Cost per food stamp placement................$302

28         h.  Number of Apprenticeship Program requests meeting

29  high skill/high wage requirements..........................166

30         i.  Number of apprentices successfully completing terms

31  of training as set by registered industry standards......2,900


                                 116

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         5.  WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  2         a.  WIA adult and dislocated worker placement rate

  3  (information only).........................................78%

  4         b.  WIA youth positive outcome rate (information

  5  only)......................................................80%

  6         c.  Increase the number of employers in compliance or

  7  brought into compliance with labor laws as a percent of total

  8  employers monitored annually from 83% to 85%...............85%

  9         6.  WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) OUTPUT MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of WIA Adult Program completers........8,600

11         b.  Number of WIA Youth Program completers........6,000

12         c.  Monitor employers for compliance with child labor

13  and migrant farmworker labor laws........................3,290

14         (d)  For the Public Employees Relations Commission, the

15  purpose of which is to promote harmonious employer/employee

16  relations at the state and local levels by resolving and

17  mediating workplace disputes, the outcome measures, output

18  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

19  the funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2326 through

20  2333 are as follows:

21         1.  PERC OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Percent of timely labor dispositions............96%

23         b.  Percent of timely employment dispositions.......98%

24         c.  Percent of dispositions not appealed............96%

25         d.  Percent of appealed dispositions affirmed.......98%

26         2.  PERC OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of labor dispositions....................801

28         b.  Number of employment dispositions...............691

29         (e)  For the Workers' Compensation Hearings Program,

30  the purpose of which is to resolve disputed workers'

31  compensation claims in conformity with pertinent statutory,


                                 117

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  rule, and caseload requirements through the maintenance of a

  2  statewide mediation, hearing, and order adjudicatory system,

  3  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  4  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

  5  Specific Appropriations 2251 through 2256 are as follows:

  6         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Percent of concluded mediations resulting in

  8  resolution.................................................56%

  9         b.  Percent of appealed, decided orders

10  affirmed...................................................80%

11         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of petitions received by presiding

13  judge..................................................112,000

14         b.  Number of mediations held....................23,100

15         c.  Number of final hearings held.................4,100

16         d.  Number of other hearings held................42,300

17         (I)  Number of final merit orders.................3,100

18         (II)  Number of lump sum settlements orders......39,500

19         e.  Number/percent of final orders entered

20  within 14 days....................................No data yet.

21         (f)  For the Unemployment Appeals Commission, the

22  purpose of which is to provide rapid cost-effective review and

23  decisions for appealed unemployment compensation claims, the

24  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

25  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

26  Appropriations 2282 through 2285 are as follows:

27         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of unemployment compensation appeals

29  disposed of within 45 days.................................50%

30         b.  Percent of unemployment compensation appeals

31  disposed of within 90 days.................................95%


                                 118

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Percent of cases appealed to DCA.................7%

  2         d.  Average unit cost of cases appealed to Unemployment

  3  Appeals Commission........................................$186

  4         e.  Average unit cost of cases appealed to DCA.....$685

  5         f.  Percent of appealed decisions affirmed by DCA...94%

  6         2.  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

  7         a.  Number of unemployment compensation appeals

  8  disposed of..............................................9,000

  9         (g)  For the Information Management Center, the purpose

10  of which is to support agency functions through the management

11  of information resources, the outcome measures, output

12  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

13  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2321 through 2325

14  are as follows:

15         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

16         a.  Maintain the percent of scheduled information

17  technology production jobs completed at 99.9% or more....99.9%

18         b.  Percent of data processing requests

19  completed by due date......................................95%

20         c.  System design and programming hourly cost.......$52

21         d.  Percent of scheduled production jobs

22  completed................................................99.9%

23         e.  Percent of scheduled hours available (data center

24  operations).............................................99.79%

25         f.  Cost per MIP (millions of instructions per

26  second)................................................$19,000

27         g.  Percent of Help Desk calls resolved within

28  3 working days..........................................89.48%

29         h.  Cost per Help Desk call..........................$8

30         i.  Percent of scheduled hours available

31  (network)...............................................99.08%


                                 119

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         j.  Cost for support per network device............$195

  2         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  3         a.  Number of data processing requests completed

  4  by due date..............................................2,900

  5         b.  Number of scheduled production jobs

  6  completed..............................................517,000

  7         c.  Number of hours available (data center

  8  operations)..............................................2,876

  9         d.  Number of Help Desk calls resolved within 3 working

10  days....................................................18,175

11         e.  Number of hours available (network)...........2,855

12         f.  Maintain and develop information technology as

13  measured by the number of production jobs completed....514,000

14         (h)  For the Executive Direction and Support Services

15  Program, the purpose of which is to provide policy

16  determination and administrative support for agency

17  operations, the outcome measures, output measures, and

18  associated performance standards with respect to funds

19  provided in Specific Appropriations 2312 through 2320 are as

20  follows:

21         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

22         a.  Reduce the administrative costs to less than 7.9%

23  of total agency cost......................................7.9%

24         (4)  DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS.--

25         (a)  For the Readiness and Response Program, the

26  purpose of which is to provide military units and personnel

27  (at the Governor's request) that are ready to protect life and

28  property; preserve peace, order, and public safety; and

29  contribute to such state and local programs that add value to

30  the State of Florida, the outcome measures, output measures,

31  and associated performance standards with respect to funds


                                 120

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  provided in Specific Appropriations 2489 through 2507D are as

  2  follows:

  3         1.  READINESS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Percent fill of federally authorized strength

  5  assigned to the Florida National Guard.....................95%

  6         b.  Number/percent of armories rated

  7  adequate................................................36/62%

  8         c.  Percent of assigned soldiers to authorized staffing

  9  levels.....................................................99%

10         2.  READINESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

11         a.  Percent of satisfaction with training facilities at

12  Camp Blanding..............................................82%

13         b.  Number of annual training days at Camp

14  Blanding...............................................180,000

15         c.  Number of new recruits using State Education

16  Assistance Program.......................................1,600

17         d.  Number of crisis response exercises conducted

18  annually.....................................................4

19         e.  Recruit, retain, and provide administration for

20  soldiers in the Florida National Guard..................11,599

21         f.  Maintain armories................................55

22         g.  Manage the Camp Blanding training area as measured

23  by the number of people using the facility.............233,587

24         3.  RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

25         a.  Percent of supported agencies reporting

26  satisfaction with the department's support for specific

27  missions...................................................90%

28         4.  DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

29         a.  Percent of Law Enforcement officers trained that

30  rate the training as relevant and valuable...............87.5%

31         5.  DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                 121

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Provide interagency counter-drug assistance as

  2  measured by the number of mandays devoted to counter-drug

  3  tasks...................................................61,950

  4         b.  Provide presentations to improve drug awareness

  5  among high school students..............................22,249

  6         c.  Sponsor community anti-drug coalitions...........18

  7         d.  Number of law enforcement personnel trained.....400

  8         e.  Number of drug-training hours provided to law

  9  enforcement agents.....................................125,000

10         6.  FEDERAL/STATE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS OUTPUT

11  MEASURE.--

12         a.  Administer Department of Defense contracts in

13  Florida.....................................................21

14         (5)  PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.--

15         (a)  For the Utilities Regulation and Competitive

16  Market Oversight Program, the purpose of which is to provide a

17  regulatory environment that facilitates the provision of

18  desired utility services of acceptable quality at fair prices,

19  the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

20  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

21  Specific Appropriations 2508 through 2515 are as follows:

22         1.  RATEMAKING OUTCOME MEASURES.--

23         a.  Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida

24  compared to national average ROE for electricity..........+/-1

25         b.  Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida

26  compared to national average ROE for gas..................+/-1

27         c.  Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida

28  compared to national average ROE for water and

29  wastewater..............................................+/-2.5

30         d.  Percent of utilities achieving within range, over

31  range, and under range of last authorized ROE for electricity:


                                 122

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (I)  Within range..................................100%

  2         (II)  Over range.....................................0%

  3         (III)  Under range...................................0%

  4         e.  Percent of utilities achieving within range, over

  5  range, and under range of last authorized ROE for gas:

  6         (I)  Within range...................................25%

  7         (II)  Over range.....................................0%

  8         (III)  Under range..................................75%

  9         f.  Percent of utilities achieving within range, over

10  range, and under range of last authorized ROE for water and

11  wastewater:

12         (I)  Within range....................................5%

13         (II)  Over range....................................25%

14         (III)  Under range..................................70%

15         g.  Percent of annual utility bill increases for

16  average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by

17  the Consumer Price Index for communications..............+/-1%

18         h.  Percent of annual utility bill increases for

19  average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by

20  the Consumer Price Index for electricity.................+/-1%

21         i.  Percent of annual utility bill increases for

22  average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by

23  the Consumer Price Index for gas.........................+/-1%

24         j.  Percent of annual utility bill increases for

25  average residential usage compared to inflation as measured by

26  the Consumer Price Index for water and wastewater........+/-1%

27         k.  Average basic residential utility bill as a percent

28  of average Florida household income for composite.........3.4%

29         l.  Average basic residential utility bill as a percent

30  of average Florida household income for communications....0.2%

31


                                 123

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         m.  Average basic residential utility bill as a percent

  2  of average Florida household income for electricity.......1.4%

  3         n.  Average basic residential utility bill as a percent

  4  of average Florida household income for gas..............0.65%

  5         o.  Average basic residential utility bill as a percent

  6  of average Florida household income for water and

  7  wastewater...............................................1.25%

  8         2.  RATEMAKING OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Number of proceedings, reviews, and audits

10  examining rates, rate structure, earnings, and expenditures

11  for electricity............................................120

12         b.  Number of proceedings, reviews, and audits

13  examining rates, rate structure, earnings, and expenditures

14  for gas....................................................110

15         c.  Number of proceedings, reviews, and audits

16  examining rates, rate structure, earnings, and expenditures

17  for water and wastewater...................................873

18         3.  COMPETITIVE MARKET OVERSIGHT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS

19  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

20         a.  Market share of largest service provider compared

21  to the composite market share of the next three largest

22  providers for Interexchange............................28%/35%

23         b.  Market share of largest service provider compared

24  to the composite market share of the next three largest

25  providers for alternate access vendors.................55%/40%

26         c.  Market share of largest service provider compared

27  to the composite market share of the next three largest

28  providers for pay telephone companies..................36%/34%

29         d.  Market share of local exchange telephone companies

30  compared to market share of alternate local exchange telephone

31  companies for local exchange telephone companies...........99%


                                 124

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Market share of local exchange telephone companies

  2  compared to market share of alternate local exchange telephone

  3  companies for alternate local exchange telephone

  4  companies...................................................1%

  5         4.  COMPETITIVE MARKET OVERSIGHT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS

  6  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Number of proceedings establishing agreements

  8  between local service providers............................687

  9         b.  Number of proceedings granting certificates to

10  operate as a telecommunications company..................1,009

11         c.  Number of communications tariffs reviewed.....2,198

12         5.  SERVICE AND SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent of communications service variances per

14  inspection points examined for local exchange and alternate

15  local exchange telephone companies.........................22%

16         b.  Percent of communications service variances per

17  inspection points examined for Interexchange...............20%

18         c.  Percent of communications service variances per

19  inspection points examined for pay telephone companies......4%

20         d.  Percent of electricity safety variances per

21  inspection points examined..................................3%

22         e.  Percent of gas safety variances per inspection

23  systems inspected..........................................25%

24         f.  Percent of consumer calls answered..............72%

25         g.  Average waiting time (minutes) for consumer

26  calls........................................................2

27         h.  Percent of consumer complaints resolved within 30

28  days.......................................................48%

29         i.  Percent of consumer complaints resolved within 60

30  days.......................................................62%

31         6.  SERVICE AND SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                 125

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of proceedings granting service authority,

  2  resolving territorial disputes for electricity...............3

  3         b.  Number of proceedings granting service authority,

  4  resolving territorial disputes for gas.......................1

  5         c.  Number of proceedings granting service authority,

  6  resolving territorial disputes for water and wastewater.....71

  7         d.  Number of 10-year site plan reviews and need

  8  determinations for electric utilities.......................15

  9         e.  Number of consumer inquiries/complaints handled for

10  communications..........................................17,356

11         f.  Number of consumer inquiries/complaints handled for

12  electricity..............................................1,731

13         g.  Number of consumer inquiries/complaints handled for

14  gas........................................................211

15         h.  Number of consumer inquiries/complaints handled for

16  water and wastewater.......................................422

17         i.  Number of consumer information activities relating

18  to service/safety...........................................13

19         j.  Number of service evaluations/safety inspections

20  performed for communications.............................9,100

21         k.  Number of service evaluations/safety inspections

22  performed for electricity................................3,670

23         l.  Number of service evaluations/safety inspections

24  performed for gas...........................................77

25         m.  Number of enforcement proceedings relating to

26  service and safety for communications.......................58

27         n.  Number of enforcement proceedings relating to

28  service and safety for electricity...........................0

29         o.  Number of enforcement proceedings relating to

30  service and safety for gas...................................0

31         (6)  DEPARTMENT OF STATE.--


                                 126

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (a)  For the International Affairs, Notaries, and

  2  Florida Association of Voluntary Agencies for Caribbean Action

  3  Programs, the purposes of which are to administer the

  4  statutory responsibilities of the Secretary of State in regard

  5  to international affairs, to administer the notary commissions

  6  and apostilles certifications while providing enhanced public

  7  access, and to help people reach their goals for improved

  8  social and economic conditions in Central America and the

  9  Caribbean through training and technical assistance, the

10  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

11  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

12  Appropriations 2589 through 2591D are as follows:

13         1.  INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS AND NOTARIES

14  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

15         a.  Maintain the current level of clients who indicate

16  assistance is very responsive, as measured by survey, at 60

17  percent or more............................................60%

18         2.  INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS AND NOTARIES

19  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of trade/cultural missions.................3

21         b.  Number of Consular Corps credentials issued......50

22         c.  Number of sister cities/sister state grants

23  approved....................................................20

24         d.  Number of Civil Law Notaries issued.............270

25         e.  Number of notary applications processed per

26  year...................................................100,000

27         3.  FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR

28  CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

29         a.  Percent of overseas clients who indicate assistance

30  is very responsive.........................................96%

31


                                 127

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Percent of volunteer-consultants who would

  2  volunteer again............................................97%

  3         c.  Ratio of donated services and contributions to the

  4  amount of state funding..................................1.6:1

  5         4.  FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR

  6  CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Number of volunteer technical assistance missions

  8  to Central America and the Caribbean.......................120

  9         b.  Number of international and domestic development

10  missions....................................................20

11         (b)  For the Historical, Archaeological, and Folklife

12  Appreciation Program, the purpose of which is to encourage

13  identification, evaluation, protection, preservation,

14  collection, conservation, interpretation, and public access to

15  information about Florida's historic sites and properties and

16  objects related to Florida history and to archaeological and

17  folk cultural heritage, the outcome measures, output measures,

18  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

19  provided in Specific Appropriations 2603 through 2622 are as

20  follows:

21         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Number of copies or viewings of publications,

23  including Internet website hits......................1,750,000

24         b.  Number of historic and archaeological objects

25  maintained for public use..............................120,000

26         c.  Total number of historic and archaeological sites

27  recorded in the master site file.......................133,000

28         d.  Total number of properties protected or

29  preserved................................................7,881

30         e.  Total local funds leveraged by historical resources

31  program...........................................$105 million


                                 128

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         f.  Percent of Museum of Florida History visitors

  2  rating the experience good or excellent....................88%

  3         g.  Percent of customers satisfied with the

  4  quality/timeliness of technical assistance provided........96%

  5         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number of grants awarded........................256

  7         b.  Number of dollars awarded through

  8  grants.............................................$19,294,807

  9         c.  Number of museum exhibits........................84

10         d.  Number of publications and multimedia products

11  available for the general public...........................259

12         e.  Number of preservation services applications

13  reviewed.................................................8,256

14         f.  Number of attendees at produced and sponsored

15  events.................................................127,784

16         g.  Number of visitors to state historic

17  museums................................................233,046

18         (c)  For the Commercial Recording and Registration

19  Program, the purpose of which is to promote financial and

20  economic stability through public notice of clients' interest

21  in business organizations, trademarks, financial transactions,

22  and liens as well as identification of those doing business

23  under names other than their own, the outcome measures, output

24  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

25  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2623 through 2625A

26  are as follows:

27         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

28         a.  Percent of client satisfaction with the division's

29  services...................................................91%

30         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31         a.  Average cost/corporate filing.................$5.38


                                 129

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Average cost/Uniform Commercial Code

  2  filing...................................................$1.81

  3         c.  Average cost/inquiry.........................$0.075

  4         d.  Percent of total inquires handled by

  5  telephone..................................................20%

  6         e.  Percent of total inquiries handled by

  7  mail/walk-ins.............................................7.5%

  8         f.  Percent of total inquiries handled by electronic

  9  means....................................................72.5%

10         (d)  For the Libraries, Archives, and Information

11  Services Program, the purpose of which is to ensure access to

12  information of past, present, and future value for the

13  educational and cultural benefit of the people of Florida and

14  to work in partnership with citizens, information providers,

15  and government for efficient and effective management and

16  development of information services, the outcome measures,

17  output measures, and associated performance standards with

18  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2626

19  through 2629A are as follows:

20         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Annual increase in the use of local public library

22  service.....................................................2%

23         b.  Annual increase in usage of research

24  collections.................................................6%

25         c.  Annual cost avoidance achieved by government

26  agencies through records storage/disposition

27  /micrographics.....................................$58 million

28         d.  Customer satisfaction with relevancy and timeliness

29  of research response.......................................90%

30         e.  Customer satisfaction with Records Management

31  technical assistance, training, and Records Center


                                 130

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  Services...................................................90%

  2         f.  Customer satisfaction with accuracy and timeliness

  3  of library consultant responses............................TBD

  4         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Number of items loaned by public

  6  libraries...........................................71,361,232

  7         b.  Number of library customer visits........50,504,239

  8         c.  Number of public library reference

  9  requests............................................25,644,913

10         d.  Number of public library registered

11  borrowers............................................7,207,942

12         e.  Number of persons attending public

13  library programs.....................................3,148,771

14         f.  Number of volumes in public library

15  collections.........................................25,242,994

16         g.  Number of new users (State Library, State

17  Archives)................................................6,336

18         h.  Number of reference requests handled (State

19  Library, State Archives)...............................117,847

20         i.  Number of database searches conducted (State

21  Library, State Archives)...............................837,195

22         j.  Number of items loaned (State Library).......86,163

23         k.  Cubic feet of obsolete public records approved for

24  disposal...............................................510,000

25         l.  Cubic feet of noncurrent records stored at

26  the Records Center.....................................220,000

27         m.  Number of microfilm images created, processed,

28  and/or duplicated at the Records Center............160 million

29         (e)  For the Cultural Grants Program, the purpose of

30  which is to foster development of a receptive climate for

31  cultural programs, to enrich culturally and benefit the


                                 131

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  citizens of this state in their daily lives, to increase the

  2  appeal of Florida visits and vacations, and to attract to

  3  Florida residency outstanding creators through the promotion

  4  of cultural programs, the outcome measures, output measures,

  5  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

  6  provided in Specific Appropriations 2630 through 2646B are as

  7  follows:

  8         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Attendance at supported cultural

10  events..............................................21 million

11         b.  Number of individuals served by professional

12  associations.........................................8 million

13         c.  Total local financial support leveraged by state

14  funding...........................................$360 million

15         d.  Number of children attending school-based,

16  organized cultural events..........................3.9 million

17         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

18         a.  Number of capital grants awarded.................30

19         b.  Number of program grants awarded................750

20         c.  Dollars awarded through capital

21  grants.............................................$12 million

22         d.  Dollars awarded through program

23  grants.............................................$19,535,872

24         e.  Percent of counties funded by the program.....88.1%

25         f.  Percent of large counties (N=34; population greater

26  than 75,000) funded by the program.......................97.1%

27         g.  Percent of small counties (N=33; population less

28  than 75,000) funded by the program.......................78.8%

29         h.  Number of state-supported performances and

30  exhibits................................................25,000

31


                                 132

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (f)  For the Licensing Program, the purpose of which is

  2  to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare through

  3  the licensing, regulation, and enforcement of the private

  4  security, private investigative, and recovery industries;

  5  through the regulation of game promotions conducted in

  6  Florida; and through the issuance of licenses to citizens

  7  wishing to carry concealed weapons or firearms for lawful

  8  defense, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  9  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

10  Specific Appropriations 2647 through 2650 are as follows:

11         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery

13  licenses issued within 90 days after receipt of an

14  application................................................83%

15         b.  Percent/number of Concealed Weapon/Firearm licenses

16  issued within 90-day statutory timeframe without fingerprint

17  results...............................................7%/1,978

18         c.  Number of default Concealed Weapon/Firearm

19  licensees with prior criminal histories....................339

20         d.  Percent of license revocations or suspensions

21  initiated within 20 days after receipt of disqualifying

22  information (all license types)............................60%

23         e.  Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery

24  investigations completed within 60 days....................94%

25         f.  Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery

26  inspections completed within 30 days.......................90%

27         g.  Percent of Concealed Weapon/Firearm violators to

28  licensed population......................................0.15%

29         h.  Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery

30  violators to licensed population.........................1.42%

31         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                 133

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Average cost of Concealed Weapon/Firearm

  2  application processed......................................$27

  3         b.  Average cost of Security, Investigative, and

  4  Recovery application processed.............................$59

  5         c.  Average cost of Security, Investigative, and

  6  Recovery investigation..................................$1,846

  7         d.  Average cost of Security, Investigative, and

  8  Recovery compliance inspection............................$377

  9         e.  Average cost of Administrative Action (revocation,

10  fine, probation, and compliance letters)..................$491

11         f.  Number of investigations performed (Security,

12  Investigative, and Recovery complaint and agency-generated

13  inspections).............................................1,541

14         g.  Number of compliance inspections performed

15  (Security, Investigative, and Recovery licensees/new agency

16  inspections and random inspections)......................1,771

17         (g)  For the Election Records, Laws, and Codes Program,

18  the purpose of which is to protect the integrity of elections

19  and to promote public awareness and participation in the

20  electoral process through open and accurate public access and

21  in the development of governmental procedures through the

22  dissemination of Florida's administrative records, laws, acts,

23  and rules, the outcome measures, output measures, and

24  associated performance standards with respect to funds

25  provided in Specific Appropriations 2597 through 2602 are as

26  follows:

27         1.  ELECTION RECORDS, LAWS, AND CODES OUTCOME

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Percent of campaign treasurer report detail

30  information released on the Internet within 7 days.........94%

31


                                 134

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Percent of survey respondents satisfied with

  2  services (quality and timeliness of response)..............90%

  3         c.  Percent of training session/workshop attendees

  4  satisfied (quality of content and applicability of materials

  5  presented).................................................90%

  6         2.  ELECTION RECORDS, LAWS, AND CODES OUTPUT

  7  MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of campaign reports

  9  received/processed......................................14,000

10         b.  Number of attendees at training, workshops, and

11  assistance events..........................................500

12         c.  Number of Internet website hits.............750,000

13         (h)  For the Historic Pensacola Preservation Program,

14  the purpose of which is to develop, implement, and maintain a

15  variety of public programs through research, through

16  historical, archaeological, and architectural surveys, and

17  through administrative support and to provide special and

18  permanent exhibitions of local and regional history,

19  maintenance and operation of historic and other public

20  buildings, and education programs to effectively aid citizens

21  in the preservation of the cultural heritage and natural

22  resources of Florida, the outcome measures, output measures,

23  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

24  provided in Specific Appropriations 2651 through 2654 are as

25  follows:

26         1.  HISTORIC PENSACOLA PRESERVATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

27         a.  Number of visitors to board-managed

28  properties.............................................150,000

29         2.  HISTORIC PENSACOLA PRESERVATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

30         a.  Number of consultations to city and county

31  governments................................................550


                                 135

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Total acreage of historic properties

  2  maintained................................................8.75

  3         c.  Total square footage of historic properties

  4  maintained.............................................108,600

  5         (i)  For the Ringling Museum of Art Program, the

  6  purpose of which is to carry out its duties as the official

  7  art museum of the State of Florida, including the preservation

  8  and maintenance of collections, furnishings, objects,

  9  artifacts, and objects of art and other property willed to the

10  State of Florida by John Ringling, to provide access to and

11  education about its holdings, and to acquire and preserve

12  additional objects of art and artifacts of historical or

13  cultural significance, the outcome measures, output measures,

14  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

15  provided in Specific Appropriations 2655 through 2657A are as

16  follows:

17         1.  RINGLING MUSEUM OF ART OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Annual number of museum visitors............251,308

19         b.  Number of individual participants in scheduled

20  education programs.......................................3,200

21         c.  Percent of visitors rating visit better than

22  expected...................................................77%

23         2.  RINGLING MUSEUM OF ART OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Total number of objects maintained...........12,850

25         b.  Number of institutions to which items are on

26  loan........................................................16

27         c.  Net asset balance of the Museum and Foundation,

28  including assets transferred to the state and excluding art

29  and other collections...............................$8,300,000

30         (7)  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.--

31


                                 136

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (a)  For the Highway and Bridge Construction Program,

  2  the purpose of which is to develop and implement the state

  3  highway system, the outcome measures, output measures, and

  4  associated performance standards with respect to funds

  5  provided in Specific Appropriations 1807 through 1814G, 1814I

  6  through 1814M, and 1814O through 1814T are as follows:

  7         1.  HIGHWAY BRIDGE AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM OUTCOME

  8  MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Number of motor vehicle fatalities per 100 million

10  miles traveled..................................less than 2.05

11         b.  Percent of state highway system pavement meeting

12  department standards.......................................78%

13         c.  Percent of department-maintained bridges meeting

14  department standards.......................................90%

15         d.  Percent increase in number of days required for

16  completed construction contracts over original contract days

17  (less weather days)..............................less than 30%

18         e.  Percent increase in final amount paid for completed

19  construction contracts over original

20  contract amount..................................less than 10%

21         f.  Percent of vehicle crashes on state highway system

22  where road-related conditions were listed as a contributing

23  factor............................................less than 1%

24         g.  Construction Engineering as a percent of

25  construction...............................................15%

26         h.  Average construction cost per lane mile of

27  new capacity......................................$3.8 million

28         2.  HIGHWAY BRIDGE AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM OUTPUT

29  MEASURES.--

30         a.  Number of lane miles let to contract for

31  resurfacing..............................................2,800


                                 137

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number of lane miles let to contract for highway

  2  capacity improvements......................................176

  3         c.  Percent of construction contracts planned for

  4  letting that were actually let.............................95%

  5         d.  Number of bridges let to contract for repair.....81

  6         e.  Number of bridges let to contract for

  7  replacement.................................................35

  8         (b)  For the Right-of-Way Acquisition Program, the

  9  purpose of which is to acquire rights-of-way necessary to

10  support the work program, the outcome measures, output

11  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

12  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1807 through 1813,

13  1814H, 1814N, and 1815 are as follows:

14         1.  RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of right-of-way parcels acquired.......2,230

16         b.  Number of projects certified ready for

17  construction................................................81

18         (c)  For the Public Transportation Program, the purpose

19  of which is to develop and provide for all forms of public

20  transportation, including transit, aviation, intermodal rail,

21  and seaport development, the outcome measures, output

22  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

23  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1816 through 1821G

24  are as follows:

25         1.  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--

26         a.  Transit ridership growth compared to population

27  growth...................................................2%/2%

28         b.  Tons of cargo shipped by air..............4 million

29         c.  Average cost per requested trip for transportation

30  disadvantaged............................................$4.32

31         2.  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                 138

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of passenger enplanements.........56 million

  2         b.  Number of public transit passenger

  3  trips..............................................175 million

  4         c.  Number of cruise embarkations and disembarkations

  5  at Florida ports...................................9.3 million

  6         d.  Number of trips provided (transportation

  7  disadvantaged).......................................5,768,000

  8         (d)  For the Highway Operations and Maintenance

  9  Program, the purpose of which is to provide routine and

10  uniform maintenance of the state highway system, the outcome

11  measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

13  Appropriations 1822 through 1833, 1835, 1836A through 1836G,

14  and 1836I through 1836L are as follows:

15         1.  HIGHWAY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OUTCOME

16  MEASURE.--

17         a.  Maintenance condition rating of state highway

18  system as measured against the department's maintenance manual

19  standards...................................................80

20         (e)  For the Motor Carrier Compliance Program, the

21  purpose of which is to enforce weight and safety requirements

22  on commercial vehicles, the outcome measures, output measures,

23  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

24  provided in Specific Appropriations 1826, 1832 through 1834,

25  1836, and 1836H are as follows:

26         1.  MOTOR CARRIER COMPLIANCE PROGRAM OUTCOME

27  MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of commercial vehicles weighed that were

29  over weight:

30         (I)  Fixed scale weighings.........................0.4%

31         (II)  Portable scale weighings......................37%


                                 139

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         2.  MOTOR CARRIER COMPLIANCE PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  2         a.  Number of commercial vehicles weighed....11 million

  3         b.  Number of commercial vehicle safety inspections

  4  performed...............................................50,000

  5         c.  Number of portable scale weighings

  6  performed...............................................45,000

  7         (f)  For the Toll Operations Program, the purpose of

  8  which is to efficiently operate and maintain state toll

  9  facilities, the outcome measures, output measures, and

10  associated performance standards with respect to funds

11  provided in Specific Appropriations 1837 through 1846E are as

12  follows:

13         1.  TOLL OPERATIONS PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--

14         a.  Operational cost per toll...........less than $0.16

15         b.  Operational cost per dollar

16  collected......................................less than $0.19

17         2.  TOLL OPERATIONS PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURE.--

18         a.  Number of toll transactions.............499 million

19         (g)  For Executive Direction and Support Services, the

20  purpose of which is to provide overall management and

21  administrative support for the department's programs, the

22  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

23  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

24  Appropriations 1847 through 1858A are as follows:

25         1.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME

26  MEASURE.--

27         a.  Percent of agency administration and support costs

28  and positions compared to total agency costs and

29  positions.................................................2.1%

30

31


                                 140

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         (8)  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.--The department

  2  shall recommend standards for the following outcomes and

  3  outputs for fiscal year 2001-2002 to the appropriate

  4  legislative committees.  For each outcome and output, or for

  5  each group of integrally related outcomes and outputs, the

  6  department shall identify total associated costs for producing

  7  that outcome or output, based on the fiscal year 2000-2001

  8  budget, in order to improve the Legislature's ability to

  9  appropriate funds, compare activities, and evaluate department

10  activities for efficiency:

11         (a)  For the Office of the Secretary Program, the

12  purpose of which is to provide the overall planning,

13  coordinating, administrative, and executive direction for the

14  Department of Community Affairs and to administer the Florida

15  Communities Trust and Florida Coastal Management Programs, the

16  outcome measures and output measures are as follows:

17         1.  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Administrative costs as compared to total agency

19  costs.

20         b.  Number of local governments participating in

21  coastal management programs to protect, maintain, and develop

22  coastal resources through coordinated management.

23         c.  Number of improved coastal access sites.

24         d.  Percent of local government participation in land

25  acquisition programs.

26         e.  Percent of local government participation in land

27  acquisition programs that acquire open space in urban cores.

28         2.  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

29         a.  Number of federal projects reviewed by Florida

30  Coastal Management (FCM) that do not require problem

31  resolution.


                                 141

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number of federal projects reviewed by FCM that

  2  require some problem resolution.

  3         c.  Number of FCM projects funded.

  4         d.  Number of individuals trained at coastal management

  5  forums.

  6         e.  Number of land acquisition project applications

  7  reviewed.

  8         f.  Number of land acquisition project applications

  9  receiving technical assistance.

10         g.  Number of land acquisition grants awarded.

11         h.  Number of land acquisition active projects

12  monitored.

13         i.  Number of land acquisition parcels appraised,

14  negotiated, and closed.

15         (b)  For the Community Planning and Protection Program,

16  the purpose of which is to help Florida's communities envision

17  and plan their future to meet the challenges of growth; to

18  assist them in the development and implementation of their

19  comprehensive planning efforts aimed at ensuring the

20  availability of public infrastructure necessary to support

21  sound growth, preserving and conserving valuable natural,

22  human, economic, and physical resources vital to quality of

23  life, and mitigating or avoiding the impacts of disasters; and

24  to help communities plan and build residential and commercial

25  structures that are safe, affordable, accessible, and energy

26  efficient, the outcome and output measures are as follows:

27         1.  COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PROTECTION OUTCOME

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Percent of local governments receiving technical

30  assistance to implement a community planning component or

31  process impacting a community or included in a comprehensive


                                 142

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  plan that exceeds minimum requirements of chapter 163, Florida

  2  Statutes, and Administrative Rule 9J-5.

  3         b.  Number of local governments that have implemented a

  4  community planning component or process impacting its

  5  community or included in its comprehensive plan that exceeds

  6  minimum requirements of chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and

  7  Administrative Rule 9J-5.

  8         c.  Average commute time.

  9         2.  COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PROTECTION OUTPUT

10  MEASURES.--

11         a.  Number of new plans reviewed.

12         b.  Number of plan amendments reviewed.

13         c.  Number of evaluation and appraisal reports (EARs)

14  reviewed.

15         d.  Number of planning grants administered.

16         e.  Number of technical assistance initiatives

17  undertaken.

18         f.  Number of plans that adequately address disaster

19  mitigation.

20         g.  Number of developments of regional impact managed.

21         h.  Number of area of critical state concern

22  development orders reviewed and final orders issued.

23         (c)  For the Emergency Response Management Program, the

24  purpose of which is to help Florida's communities reduce the

25  effects of disasters and to coordinate the state's operational

26  duties and responsibilities prior to, during, and immediately

27  after disasters, the outcome and output measures are as

28  follows:

29         1.  EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of counties with an above average

31  capability rating to respond to emergencies.


                                 143

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Amount of time required for communities to

  2  completely recover from a disaster.

  3         c.  Percent of events in which the affected population

  4  is warned within an appropriate timeframe in relation to the

  5  disaster/event.

  6         d.  Percent of events in which the affected population

  7  is evacuated within an appropriate timeframe in relation to

  8  the disaster/event.

  9         e.  Statewide shelter deficit.

10         f.  Percent of facilities in compliance with hazardous

11  materials planning programs.

12         g.  Dollars saved from foregoing repetitive losses.

13         2.  EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

14         a.  Number of planning contacts receiving technical

15  assistance (nonactivation).

16         b.  Number of emergency management personnel receiving

17  training and participating in exercises.

18         c.  Number of plans, reports, and procedures

19  maintained.

20         d.  Number of mutual aid signatories maintained.

21         e.  Number of public hurricane shelters evaluated.

22         f.  Number of organizations awarded funds.

23         g.  Number of planning funding applications processed.

24         h.  Number of financial agreements managed (recovery

25  and mitigation).

26         i.  Number of hurricane shelter spaces created.

27         j.  Number of projects requiring National Environmental

28  Policy Act review.

29         k.  Number of postdisaster damage and needs assessments

30  conducted.

31         l.  Number of outreach team members deployed.


                                 144

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         m.  Number of project inspections performed.

  2         n.  Number of days activated at Level 2 or above.

  3         o.  Number of incidents reported to the State Warning

  4  Point.

  5         p.  Number of requests for state assistance.

  6         q.  Population covered in NOAA weather radio

  7  transmission areas.

  8         r.  Number of facility files researched for compliance

  9  verification (hazardous materials).

10         s.  Number of community right-to-know requests

11  fulfilled (hazardous materials).

12         t.  Number of hazardous materials facility audits

13  completed.

14         u.  Number of hazardous materials planning financial

15  agreements maintained.

16         v.  Number of applicants provided technical assistance

17  (predisaster mitigation).

18         w.  Number of communities audited and technical

19  assistance provided (National Flood Insurance Program).

20         x.  Number of Flood Mitigation Assistance Program

21  grants awarded.

22         y.  Number of counties that have operationalized their

23  portion of the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Studies.

24         (d)  The Housing and Community Revitalization Program,

25  the purpose of which is to help revitalize Florida's

26  communities and neighborhoods by assisting local governments

27  and nonprofit community organizations in their efforts to

28  rehabilitate housing, create jobs, develop public

29  infrastructure, and provide basic community services, the

30  outcome and output measures are as follows:

31


                                 145

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  HOUSING AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION OUTCOME

  2  MEASURES.--

  3         a.  Number of neighborhoods assisted and improved

  4  through community development block grant programs,

  5  empowerment zone programs, urban infill programs, affordable

  6  housing programs, and long-term redevelopment programs.

  7         b.  Percent of local governments that have a building

  8  code program rated at or above a specified level of

  9  effectiveness by a recognized rating organization.

10         c.  Number of households benefiting from services

11  provided by community services block grant, LIHEP,

12  weatherization, and energy programs.

13         d.  Number of jobs created/retained through community

14  development block grant programs.

15         2.  HOUSING AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION OUTPUT

16  MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of grant awards managed.

18         b.  Number of redevelopment plans developed.

19         c.  Number of people trained/served.

20         d.  Number of code amendments promulgated.

21         e.  Number of permits issued for manufactured

22  buildings.

23         (e)  The Florida Housing Finance Corporation Program,

24  the purpose of which is to administer programs to make

25  low-cost housing available to low-income and moderate-income

26  Florida families, the outcome and output measures are as

27  follows:

28         1.  FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION OUTCOME

29  MEASURES.--

30         a.  Percent of targeted dollars that are allocated to

31  farmworkers, elderly, and fishworkers.


                                 146

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Ratio of nonstate funding to state-appropriated

  2  dollars.

  3         c.  Percent of units exceeding statutory set-asides.

  4         2.  FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION OUTPUT

  5  MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number of applications processed.

  7         b.  Number of affordable housing loans funded.

  8         c.  Number of local governments under compliance

  9  monitoring for the State Housing Initiatives Partnership

10  (SHIP) program.

11         d.  Number of local governments served.

12         e.  Provide executive direction and support services as

13  measured by percent of total program budget.

14         Section 38.  The performance measures and standards

15  established in this section for individual programs in the

16  area of general government shall be applied to those programs

17  for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and

18  standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in

19  the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as

20  required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act

21  of 1994. Nothing in these measures and standards shall permit

22  the agency to engage in regulatory or enforcement activities,

23  or to establish requirements, more stringent than those

24  specifically authorized in statutory law.

25         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES.--

26         (a)  For the Food Safety and Quality Program, the

27  purpose of which is to ensure the safety, wholesomeness,

28  quality, and accurate labeling of food products through

29  inspections, laboratory analyses, consumer assistance, and

30  enforcement actions, the outcome measures, output measures,

31  and associated performance standards with respect to funds


                                 147

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  provided in Specific Appropriations 1285 through 1295 are as

  2  follows:

  3         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Number/percent of food and dairy establishments

  5  which fail to meet food safety and sanitation

  6  requirements........................................2,870/8.9%

  7         b.  Number of food or dairy products removed from sale

  8  for failure to meet food safety requirements or

  9  standards...............................................17,300

10         c.  Number/percent of food products analyzed which fail

11  to meet standards.....................................822/8.5%

12         d.  Number/percent of milk and milk products analyzed

13  which fail to meet standards........................1,300/6.5%

14         e.  Number/percent of produce or other food samples

15  analyzed which fail to meet pesticide residue

16  standards..............................................52/2.3%

17         f.  Number/percent of food and dairy enforcement

18  actions which result in compliance or other resolution within

19  60 days, excluding Field Notices of Violation.......18,800/99%

20         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of inspections of food establishments, dairy

22  establishments, and water vending machines..............65,500

23         b.  Number of enforcement actions taken, excluding

24  Field Notices of Violation..............................19,400

25         c.  Number of food analyses/samples

26  analyzed..........................................43,000/9,600

27         d.  Number of milk and milk products analyses/samples

28  analyzed.........................................70,000/20,000

29         e.  Number of pesticide residue analyses/samples

30  analyzed.........................................273,000/3,050

31


                                 148

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         f.  Number of food-related consumer assistance

  2  investigations or actions................................4,800

  3         g.  Tons of poultry and shell eggs graded.......430,000

  4         (b)  For the Consumer Protection Program, the purpose

  5  of which is to protect Florida's consumers from deceptive and

  6  unfair business and trade practices and from unsafe, harmful,

  7  and inferior products and services, the outcome measures,

  8  output measures, and associated performance standards with

  9  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1296

10  through 1313B are as follows:

11         1.  STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTCOME

12  MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number/percent of LP Gas accidents due to equipment

14  failure or code violations at licensed LP Gas storage,

15  distribution, and handling facilities.....................2/3%

16         b.  Number/percent of LP Gas facilities found in

17  compliance with safety requirements on first

18  inspection.............................................989/20%

19         c.  Number of reportable accidents resulting from

20  amusement attraction mechanical or structural failure........1

21         d.  Number/percent of amusement attractions found in

22  full compliance with safety requirements on first

23  inspection...........................................3,497/38%

24         e.  Number/percent of regulated weighing and measuring

25  devices, packages, and businesses with scanners in compliance

26  with accuracy standards during initial

27  inspection/testing.................................237,000/95%

28         f.  Number/percent of petroleum products meeting

29  quality standards.................................57,000/99.2%

30         g.  Number/percent of state and commercial weights and

31  volumetric standards found within specified


                                 149

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  tolerances..........................................11,760/98%

  2         2.  STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTPUT

  3  MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Number of LP Gas facility inspections/reinspections

  5  conducted................................................4,200

  6         b.  Number of LP Gas-related accidents

  7  investigated................................................50

  8         c.  Number of amusement device safety/permit

  9  inspections conducted..............................9,300/1,725

10         d.  Number of weighing and measuring devices

11  inspected/tested.......................................249,000

12         e.  Number of complaints investigated/processed

13  relating to all entities regulated by the Division of

14  Standards in the Consumer Protection Program.............3,180

15         f.  Number of LP Gas professional certification

16  examinations administered................................1,700

17         g.  Number of laboratory analyses performed on

18  regulated petroleum products...........................140,000

19         h.  Number of enforcement actions taken against all

20  entities regulated by the Division of Standards in the

21  Consumer Protection Program.............................41,706

22         i.  Number of physical measurement standards tests or

23  calibrations conducted..................................12,000

24         3.  CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

25         a.  Number/percent regulated entities found operating

26  in violation of the consumer protection laws..........3,262/9%

27         b.  Number/percent of "no sales solicitation"

28  complaints from subscribers...........................6,000/6%

29         c.  Amount/percent of money recovered for consumers

30  from regulated motor vehicle repair shops..........$85,000/35%

31         4.  CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                 150

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of assists provided to consumers, not

  2  including lemon law..................................1,003,195

  3         b.  Number of lemon law assists made to

  4  consumers...............................................30,450

  5         c.  Number of complaints investigated/processed

  6  relating to all entities regulated by the Division of Consumer

  7  Services in the Consumer Protection Program.............33,529

  8         d.  Number of enforcement actions taken against all

  9  entities regulated by the Division of Consumer Services in the

10  Consumer Protection Program................................260

11         e.  Number of "no sales solicitation calls"

12  subscriptions processed................................180,000

13         5.  AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTCOME

14  MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number/percent of licensed pest control applicators

16  inspected who misapply chemicals or otherwise violate

17  regulations............................................375/23%

18         b.  Number/percent of feed, seed, and fertilizer

19  inspected products in compliance with performance/quality

20  standards.........................................16,698/90.5%

21         c.  Number/percent of licensed pesticide applicators

22  who do not apply chemicals properly....................132/24%

23         d.  Number of reported human/equine disease cases

24  caused by mosquitoes......................................3/40

25         6.  AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTPUT

26  MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of pest control inspections

28  conducted................................................1,818

29         b.  Number of feed, seed, and fertilizer inspections

30  conducted...............................................12,500

31


                                 151

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Number of complaints investigated/processed

  2  relating to all entities regulated by the Division of

  3  Agricultural Environmental Services in the Consumer Protection

  4  Program excluding pesticide-related actions................875

  5         d.  Number of pest control professional certification

  6  examinations administered................................1,605

  7         e.  Number of laboratory analyses performed on seed and

  8  fertilizer samples.....................................181,500

  9         f.  Number of enforcement actions taken against all

10  entities regulated by the Division of Agricultural

11  Environmental Services in the Consumer Protection Program

12  excluding pesticide-related actions......................2,470

13         g.  Number of pesticide-related complaints

14  investigated...............................................352

15         h.  Number of pesticide-related inspections

16  conducted................................................3,129

17         i.  Number of pesticide-related enforcement actions

18  initiated/completed........................................500

19         j.  Number of wells monitored for pesticide or nitrate

20  residues....................................................97

21         k.  Number of pesticide product and residue analyses

22  performed in the pesticide laboratory...................63,500

23         l.  Number of persons in Florida served by effective

24  mosquito control programs...........................14 million

25         (c)  For the Agricultural Economic Development Program,

26  the purpose of which is to maintain and enhance Florida

27  agriculture in the national and international marketplace, the

28  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

29  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

30  Appropriations 1314 through 1355C are as follows:

31


                                 152

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  MARKET DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION, STATISTICS, AND

  2  REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  3         a.  Gate receipts value of agriculture and seafood

  4  products sold by Florida's agricultural industry, in dollars

  5  in calendar year.................................$7.25 billion

  6         b.  Total sales of agricultural and seafood products

  7  generated by tenants of state farmers' markets....$194,189,444

  8         c.  Dollar value of federal commodities and recovered

  9  food distributed...................................$52,142,213

10         2.  MARKET DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION, STATISTICS, AND

11  REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of buyers reached with agricultural

13  promotion campaign messages.......................2.02 billion

14         b.  Number of marketing assists provided to producers

15  and businesses..........................................96,319

16         c.  Pounds of federal commodities and recovered food

17  distributed.........................................75,816,366

18         3.  FRUIT AND VEGETABLE REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--

19         a.  Dollar value of fruit and vegetables that are

20  shipped to other states or countries which are subject to

21  mandatory inspection............................$1,443,648,000

22         4.  FRUIT AND VEGETABLE REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

23         a.  Number of tons of fruits and vegetables

24  inspected...........................................13,781,717

25         5.  PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number/percent of newly introduced pests and

27  diseases prevented from infesting Florida plants to a level

28  where eradication is biologically or economically

29  unfeasible...........................................100/93.5%

30         b.  Number/percent of commercial citrus acres free of

31  citrus canker....................................832,581/98.5%


                                 153

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Number/percent of acres of commercial citrus,

  2  monitored by the department, at the request of the grower,

  3  which are free of the Caribbean fruit fly..........186,000/98%

  4         d.  Number/percent of exotic fruit fly (Mediterranean,

  5  Oriental, Mexican, Queensland, West Indian) outbreaks where

  6  eradication can occur without use of aerial

  7  treatments..............................................2/100%

  8         6.  PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Number of plant, fruit fly trap, and honeybee

10  inspections performed................................2,280,000

11         b.  Number of commercial citrus acres surveyed for

12  citrus canker..........................................245,000

13         c.  Number of exotic fruit fly traps serviced....36,729

14         d.  Millions of sterile med flies released........3,400

15         e.  Number of acres where plant pest and disease

16  eradication or control efforts were undertaken.........100,000

17         f.  Number of shipments of plant products certified

18  pest-free for export....................................25,000

19         g.  Number of plant, soil, insect, and other organism

20  samples processed for identification or diagnosis......650,000

21         7.  ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURE.--

22         a.  Number/percent of livestock and poultry infected

23  with specific transmissible diseases for which monitoring,

24  controlling, and eradicating activities are

25  established.......................................472/0.00083%

26         8.  ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of animal site inspections

28  performed...............................................14,904

29         b.  Number of animals

30  tested/vaccinated..............................650,000/120,000

31         c.  Number of animal sites quarantined and


                                 154

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  monitored..................................................315

  2         d.  Number of/unit cost per animal-related diagnostic

  3  laboratory procedure(s) performed................850,000/$2.84

  4         e.  Number of animals covered by health

  5  certificates...........................................930,000

  6         f.  Number of animal permits processed............5,100

  7         9.  AGRICULTURE INSPECTION STATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural

  9  inspection stations.................................11,236,244

10         b.  Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural

11  inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated

12  commodities..........................................2,505,682

13         c.  Percent of vehicles inspected at agricultural

14  inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated

15  commodities................................................22%

16         d.  Amount of revenue generated by bills of lading

17  transmitted to the Department of Revenue from agricultural

18  inspection stations................................$12,658,800

19         e.  Number of bills of lading transmitted to the

20  Department of Revenue from agricultural inspection

21  stations................................................83,000

22         10.  AQUACULTURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Ratio of shellfish illness reported from Florida

24  shellfish products to the the number of meals

25  served...........................................0.331/100,000

26         11.  AQUACULTURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Percent of shellfish and crab processing facilities

28  in significant compliance with permit and food safety

29  regulations................................................80%

30         b.  Number of reported cases of sickness/death from

31  shellfish consumption that can be directly traced to seafood


                                 155

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  harvested from contaminated houses, or seafood dealers not in

  2  compliance with state regulations..........................3/0

  3         c.  Percent of available harvestable waters

  4  opened.....................................................76%

  5         (d)  For the Forest and Resource Protection Program,

  6  the purpose of which is to promote and use sound management

  7  practices for forestry and other agricultural activities, the

  8  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

  9  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

10  Appropriations 1263 through 1279 are as follows:

11         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number/percent of acres of protected forest and

13  wildlands not burned by wildfires.............24,924,300/99.3%

14         b.  Number/percent of threatened structures not burned

15  by wildfires.......................................2,000/99.7%

16         c.  Number/percent of wildfires caused

17  by humans............................................3,040/80%

18         d.  Number/percent of State Forest timber producing

19  acres adequately stocked and growing.............107,485/25.9%

20         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

21         a.  Number of wildfires detected and suppressed...3,800

22         b.  Average elapsed time (in minutes) between wildfire

23  ignition and detection......................................55

24         c.  Average elapsed time (in minutes) between wildfire

25  detection and arrival on scene..............................34

26         d.  Number/percent of forest acres and other lands

27  managed by the department and purchased by the state with

28  approved management plans.........................907,860/100%

29         e.  Number of acres burned through prescribed

30  burning............................................2.1 million

31


                                 156

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         f.  Number of person-hours of firefighting training

  2  provided................................................47,000

  3         g.  Number of forest-related technical assists provided

  4  to nonindustrial private land owners....................37,000

  5         h.  Number of open burning authorizations processed for

  6  land clearing, agriculture, and silviculture...........118,000

  7         i.  Number of fire prevention presentations

  8  made.....................................................1,350

  9         j.  Number of person-hours spent responding to

10  emergency incidents other than wildfires.................8,000

11         (2)  DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.--

12         (a)  For the State Financial Information and State

13  Agency Accounting Program, the purpose of which is to provide

14  for and promote financial accountability for public funds

15  throughout state government, provide the citizens of Florida

16  with timely, factual, and comprehensive information on the

17  financial status of the state and how state funds are

18  expended, and receive and investigate complaints of government

19  fraud, waste, and abuse, the outcome measures, output

20  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

21  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1886 through 1892

22  are as follows:

23         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

24         a.  Percent of program's customers who return an

25  overall customer service rating of good or excellent on

26  surveys....................................................94%

27         b.  Percent of payment requests rejected during the

28  preaudit process for inconsistencies with legal and/or other

29  applicable requirements.....................................1%

30         c.  Percent of vendor payments issues in less than the

31  Comptroller's statutory time limit of 10 days.............100%


                                 157

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Accuracy rate of postaudited vendor

  2  payments......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  3         e.  Dollars recovered from erroneous payments compared

  4  to total dollars of erroneous payment

  5  detected......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  6         f.  Percent of federal wage and information returns

  7  prepared and filed where no penalties or interest were

  8  paid......................................................100%

  9         g.  Percent of federal tax deposits where no penalties

10  or interest were paid.....................................100%

11         h.  Percent of payroll payments made accurately based

12  on information submitted..................................100%

13         i.  Percent of those utilizing program provided

14  financial information who rate the overall relevancy,

15  usefulness, and timeliness of information as good or

16  excellent..................................................95%

17         j.  Number of qualifications in the Independent

18  Auditor's Report on the State General Purpose Financial

19  Statements which are related to the presentation of the

20  financial statements.........................................0

21         k.  Percent of vendor payments issued

22  electronically.............................................16%

23         l.  Percent of payroll payments issued

24  electronically.............................................77%

25         m.  Percent of retirement payments issued

26  electronically.............................................76%

27         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of vendor payment requests

29  preaudited...........................................1 million

30         b.  Percent of vendor payment requests

31  preaudited.................................................25%


                                 158

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Dollar amount of vendor payment requests

  2  preaudited.........................................$21 billion

  3         d.  Number of vendor payment requests

  4  postaudited...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  5         e.  Percent of vendor payment requests

  6  postaudited...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  7         f.  Dollar amount of vendor payment requests

  8  postaudited...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  9         g.  Number of vendor invoices paid..........4.2 million

10         h.  Dollar amount of vendor invoices paid...$37 billion

11         i.  Number of federal wage and information returns

12  prepared and filed.....................................297,000

13         j.  Number of federal tax deposits made..............88

14         k.  Number of IRS penalties paid......................0

15         l.  Dollar amount of IRS penalties paid...............0

16         m.  Number of payroll payments issued.........5,639,780

17         n.  Dollar amount of payroll payments

18  issued..........................................$6,055,154,053

19         o.  Number of payroll payments issued according to

20  published schedules..................................5,639,780

21         p.  Percent of payroll payments issued according to

22  published schedules.......................................100%

23         q.  Number of instances during the year where as a

24  result of inadequate cash management under this program,

25  general revenue had a negative cash balance..................0

26         r.  Percent of atypical balances corrected at

27  year end.....................................................0

28         s.  Average number of days from month's end to complete

29  reconciliations.............................................20

30         t.  Number of payments issued

31  electronically.......................................6,450,000


                                 159

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         u.  Dollar amount of payments issued

  2  electronically.....................................$22 billion

  3         v.  Hours of training/education conducted on accounting

  4  issues......................................................50

  5         w.  Hours of training/education conducted on payroll

  6  issues......................................................50

  7         x.  Number of fiscal integrity cases

  8  closed........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  9         y.  Percent of "get lean" hotline calls processed for

10  referral to the appropriate agency.......................20.4%

11         z.  Number of fiscal integrity cases closed that

12  resulted in administrative/civic/criminal

13  action........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         (b)  For the Financial Institutions Regulatory Program,

15  the purpose of which is to ensure the safety and soundness of

16  state financial institutions and to enhance the dual banking

17  system, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

18  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

19  Specific Appropriations 1904 through 1921 are as follows:

20         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

22  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

23  Florida on return on assets................................51%

24         b.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

25  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

26  Florida on return on equity................................51%

27         c.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

28  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

29  Florida on capital to asset ratio..........................51%

30

31


                                 160

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that

  2  exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in

  3  Florida on Tier 1 capital..................................51%

  4         e.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

  5  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

  6  chartered in Florida on return on assets...................51%

  7         f.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

  8  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

  9  chartered in Florida on return on equity...................51%

10         g.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

11  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

12  chartered in Florida on capital to asset ratio.............51%

13         h.  Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions

14  that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions

15  chartered in Florida on Tier 1 capital.....................51%

16         i.  Percent of applications for new Florida financial

17  institutions that seek state charters......................67%

18         j.  Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by

19  state-chartered banks compared to assessments that would be

20  paid if the bank was nationally or federally

21  chartered..............................................$15,300

22         k.  Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by

23  state-chartered credit unions compared to assessments that

24  would be paid if the credit unions were nationally or

25  federally chartered.......................................$350

26         l.  Percent of banks receiving an examination report

27  within 45 days after the conclusion of their onsite state

28  examination................................................75%

29         m.  Percent of credit unions receiving an examination

30  report within 30 days after the conclusion of their onsite

31  state examination..........................................75%


                                 161

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         n.  Percent of international financial institutions

  2  receiving an examination report within 45 days after the

  3  conclusion of their onsite state examination...............75%

  4         o.  Percent of trust companies receiving an examination

  5  report within 60 days after the conclusion of their onsite

  6  state examination..........................................75%

  7         p.  Percent of de novo applications statutorily

  8  complete that are processed within a standard number of 90

  9  days.......................................................67%

10         q.  Percent of branch applications statutorily complete

11  that are processed within 50 days..........................67%

12         r.  Percent of expedited branch applications that are

13  processed within 10 days..................................100%

14         s.  Percent of merger/acquisition applications

15  statutorily complete that are processed within 60 days.....67%

16         t.  Percent of financial institutions under enforcement

17  action that are substantially in compliance with conditions

18  imposed....................................................90%

19         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Median Florida state-chartered bank return on

21  assets...................................................1.06%

22         b.  Median Florida state-chartered bank return on

23  equity..................................................11.01%

24         c.  Median Florida state-chartered bank capital to

25  asset ratio..............................................9.15%

26         d.  Median Florida state-chartered bank Tier 1

27  capital..................................................9.18%

28         e.  Median Florida state-chartered credit union return

29  on assets................................................1.04%

30         f.  Median Florida state-chartered credit union return

31  on equity................................................8.06%


                                 162

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         g.  Median Florida state-chartered credit union capital

  2  to asset ratio..........................................12.94%

  3         h.  Median Florida state-chartered credit union Tier 1

  4  capital.................................................12.18%

  5         i.  Number of new Florida state-chartered banks

  6  opened......................................................20

  7         j.  Amount of annual assessments paid by

  8  banks...............................................$6,756,100

  9         k.  Amount of annual assessments paid by

10  credit unions.......................................$1,237,200

11         l.  Number of banks examined by the Division of Banking

12  receiving an examination report within 45 days..............45

13         m.  Number of credit unions examined by the Division of

14  Banking receiving an examination report within 30 days......57

15         n.  Number of international financial institutions

16  examined by the Division of Banking receiving an examination

17  report within 45 days.......................................16

18         o.  Number of trust companies examined by the Division

19  of Banking receiving an examination report within 60 days....8

20         p.  Number of statutorily complete new de novo

21  applications received that are processed within 90 days......5

22         q.  Number of statutorily complete branch applications

23  received that are processed within 50 days..................27

24         r.  Number of statutorily complete expedited branch

25  applications received that are processed within 10 days.....45

26         s.  Number of statutorily complete merger/acquisition

27  applications received that are processed within 60 days.....17

28         t.  Number of institutions under enforcement

29  actions.....................................................23

30         u.  Percent/number of financial institutions examined

31  within statutory timeframes by type of


                                 163

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  institution...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  2         v.  Percent/number of surveys returned that rate the

  3  Division's examination program as satisfactory or

  4  above..................................................75%/150

  5         w.  Percent/number of state examinations where total

  6  examination time was reduced by a standard percent compared to

  7  the hours required during the base

  8  examination...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  9         x.  Percent/number of state examinations where onsite

10  hours were reduced by a standard percent compared to the

11  onsite hours required during the base

12  examination...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         (c)  For the Unclaimed Property Program, the purpose of

14  which is to increase efforts in finding, locating, collecting

15  in a manner to allow for better identification of owners, and

16  returning unclaimed property to the owners, the outcome

17  measures, output measures, and associated performance

18  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

19  Appropriations 1881 through 1885 are as follows:

20         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

21         a.  Percent increase in the total number of holders

22  reporting...................................................3%

23         b.  Percent of previously filing holders who submit

24  problem reports.............................................3%

25         c.  Percent of the total number of claims paid to the

26  owner compared to the total number of returnable accounts

27  reported/received..........................................22%

28         d.  Percent of the total dollar amount of claims paid

29  to the owner compared to the total dollars in returnable

30  accounts reported/received.................................80%

31         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                 164

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of holders reports processed..........16,000

  2         b.  Number of seminars conducted......................3

  3         c.  Number of in-state exams of holders who have not

  4  previously filed a holder report............................13

  5         d.  Number of out-of-state exams of holders who have

  6  not previously filed a holder report.......................200

  7         e.  Number of in-state exams conducted...............26

  8         f.  Dollar value collected as a result of in-state

  9  exams.................................................$500,000

10         g.  Number of out-of-state exams processed..........450

11         h.  Dollar value collected as a result of out-of-state

12  exams..............................................$15 million

13         i.  Number/dollar value of owner accounts

14  processed.................................255,000/$101 million

15         j.  Total cost of the program to the number of holder

16  reports/owner accounts processed...........................$30

17         k.  Number/dollar value of claims paid to

18  owners.................................55,000/FY 2001-2002 LBR

19         l.  Number of owner accounts advertised.........100,000

20         m.  Number of claims processed...................55,000

21         n.  Percent of claims approved/denied within 30/60/90

22  days from the date received...................FY 2001-2002 LBR

23         o.  Percent of claims paid within 30/60/90 days from

24  date received......................................15%/35%/10%

25         p.  Percent of customer telephone calls answered within

26  20 seconds....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

27         (d)  For the Consumer Financial Protection and Industry

28  Authorization Program, the purpose of which is to protect

29  consumers of the securities and finance industries and the

30  public from illegal financial activities, and provide

31  consumers and the public with authoritative and expedient


                                 165

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  information, the outcome measures, output measures, and

  2  associated performance standards with respect to funds

  3  provided in Specific Appropriations 1922 through 1926 are as

  4  follows:

  5         1.  CONSUMER PROTECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Percent of licensees examined where department

  7  action is taken against the licensee for violations:

  8         (I)  For-cause violations based on risk assessment

  9  profile or on internal/external information which indicates a

10  violation of statute....................................33.05%

11         (II)  Routine proactive exam conducted on randomly

12  selected entities or entities on an examination cycle...16.88%

13         b.  Percent of investigations of licensed and

14  unlicensed entities referred to department legal staff and to

15  other agencies that resulted in criminal/civil/administrative

16  actions.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         c.  Dollars returned (voluntarily or through

18  court-ordered restitution) to victims compared to total

19  dollars of verified loss as a result of investigative efforts

20  of licensed and unlicensed entities...........FY 2001-2002 LBR

21         d.  Percent of written complaints processed within

22  applicable standards.......................................85%

23         e.  Percent of telephone complaints resolved without

24  written documentation from the consumer.......FY 2001-2002 LBR

25         f.  Percent of written complaints regarding licensed

26  and unlicensed entities referred for examination,

27  investigation, or legal/criminal action resulting in

28  formal/informal sanctions within/outside

29  statutory authority...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30         2.  CONSUMER PROTECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

31


                                 166

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of for-cause examinations completed with

  2  action taken (formal or informal).............FY 2001-2002 LBR

  3         b.  Number of routine examinations completed with

  4  action taken (formal or informal).............FY 2001-2002 LBR

  5         c.  Percent of total licensees examined to determine

  6  compliance with applicable regulations......................5%

  7         d.  Number of investigations closed.................450

  8         e.  Number of background investigations completed...800

  9         f.  Amount of court-ordered restitution to victims of

10  licensed/unlicensed entities..................FY 2001-2002 LBR

11         g.  Amount of voluntary reimbursement received from

12  licensed/unlicensed entities..................FY 2001-2002 LBR

13         h.  Amount returned to victims of licensed/unlicensed

14  entities......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

15         i.  Amount of verified loss to victims of

16  licensed/unlicensed entities..................FY 2001-2002 LBR

17         j.  Average number of days for initial written

18  responses to consumers.......................................7

19         k.  Average number of days to resolve, refer, or close

20  a written complaint.........................................68

21         l.  Number of complaints resolved, referred, or closed

22  during the year..........................................4,350

23         m.  Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 90 days

24  and less than 120 days.....................................10%

25         n.  Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 120

26  days.......................................................15%

27         o.  Number of hotline/complaint line calls processed as

28  complaints....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

29         p.  Number of written complaints where the department

30  identified statutory violations............................150

31


                                 167

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         q.  Number of complaints referred for examination,

  2  investigation, or legal/criminal action (licensed and

  3  unlicensed entities).......................................275

  4         r.  Number of public/consumer awareness activities

  5  conducted utilizing all types of media........FY 2001-2002 LBR

  6         s.  Number of participants at personal, direct,

  7  face-to-face public/consumer awareness

  8  activities....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  9         t.  Number of public/consumer awareness activities

10  conducted with personal, direct, face-to-face contact with

11  consumers.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

12         u.  Total number of hours spent conducting

13  public/consumer awareness activities..........FY 2001-2002 LBR

14         3.  INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Percent of licensees sanctioned for

16  violations................................................0.9%

17         b.  Percent of total applicants not licensed to conduct

18  business in the state because they fail to meet substantive

19  licensing requirements....................................4.3%

20         c.  Percent of applicants not granted registration in

21  the securities industry in Florida who subsequently are the

22  subject of regulatory action...............................60%

23         4.  INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

24         a.  Number of final actions taken against

25  licensees..................................................370

26         b.  Number of applications denied or withdrawn....3,546

27         c.  Number of applications licensed..............67,398

28         d.  Number of applications processed.............70,944

29         e.  Amount of securities registration applications

30  denied or withdrawn...............................$4.2 billion

31         f.  Number of applicants licensed with


                                 168

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  restrictions...............................................280

  2         g.  Number of applications denied or withdrawn with

  3  additional disciplinary information reported on the Central

  4  Registration Depository....................................324

  5         h.  Number/percent of filing or requests processed

  6  within a designated standard number of days by

  7  type..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

  8         (3)  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL

  9  REGULATION.--

10         (a)  For the Professional Regulation Program, the

11  purpose of which is to license nonmedical professions within

12  the state and the individual practice acts that govern each of

13  the professions; serve as a liaison between the public and

14  professional boards, as well as between the licensees and

15  their respective boards; process applications and monitor

16  continuing education, renewal, and reactivation requirements;

17  approve educational courses; develop, prepare, administer, and

18  score to ensure validity and reliability of exams; and receive

19  and investigate complaints and prosecute violators, the

20  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

21  standards with respect to funds in Specific Appropriations

22  1958 through 1978 are as follows:

23         1.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Percent of applications processed within

25  90 days...................................................100%

26         (b)  For the Pari-mutuel Wagering Program, the purpose

27  of which is to license and regulate the state's pari-mutuel

28  industries, including cardrooms, and to collect all

29  pari-mutuel taxes and fees in a timely manner, the outcome

30  measures, output measures, and associated performance

31


                                 169

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  standards with respect to funds in Specific Appropriations

  2  1979 through 2001 are as follows:

  3         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

  4         a.  Percent of races and games that result in statutory

  5  or rule infractions......................................0.85%

  6         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

  7         a.  Number of races and games monitored..........87,000

  8         3.  AUDITING AND FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURE.--

  9         a.  Number of audits conducted...................87,000

10         (c)  For the Hotels and Restaurants Program, the

11  purpose of which is to license and regulate public lodging and

12  food service establishments, elevators, escalators, and other

13  vertical conveyance devices, the outcome measures, output

14  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

15  funds in Specific Appropriations 2002 through 2013 are as

16  follows:

17         1.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--

18         a.  Percent of hotel and restaurant licenses and

19  elevator certificates of operation processed within

20  30 days..................................................90.6%

21         (d)  For the Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Program,

22  the purpose of which is to supervise the conduct, management,

23  and operation of the manufacturing, packaging, distribution,

24  and sale of all alcoholic beverages; to enforce the provisions

25  of the beverage and tobacco laws, as well as the rules and

26  regulations adopted by the program; and to collect and

27  distribute all taxes, surcharges, and licensing fees from

28  alcohol and tobacco sources, the outcome measures, output

29  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

30  funds in Specific Appropriations 2014 through 2033 are as

31  follows:


                                 170

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  2         a.  Percent of complaints/cases settled by warning

  3  notice or stipulation................................88%/55.2%

  4         b.  Percent of alcoholic beverages and tobacco

  5  retailers tested found to be in compliance with underage

  6  persons' access..........................................90.3%

  7         c.  Percent of underage alcoholic beverages and tobacco

  8  cases involving repeat retail offenders...................6.9%

  9         2.  COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of administrative cases settled by

11  stipulation................................................795

12         b.  Number of alcoholic beverages and tobacco retailers

13  randomly tested for underage persons' access.............6,887

14         c.  Number of alcoholic beverages and tobacco retailers

15  tested because of a complaint for underage persons'

16  access...................................................1,258

17         d.  Number of underage alcoholic beverages and tobacco

18  arrests..................................................2,670

19         e.  Number underage alcohol/tobacco administrative

20  cases......................................................262

21         f.  Number of underage alcohol/tobacco administrative

22  cases involving repeat retail offenders.....................19

23         (e)  For the Florida Land Sales, Condominiums, and

24  Mobile Homes Program, the purpose of which is to regulate the

25  sale of subdivided lands in the state and out-of-state

26  subdivided lands offered for sale in the state; residential

27  condominiums and cooperatives; real estate timesharing; mobile

28  home parks; and yacht and ship brokers and salesmen, the

29  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

30  standards with respect to funds in Specific Appropriations

31  2034 through 2045 are as follows:


                                 171

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

  2         a.  Percent of licenses issued and filings received as

  3  prescribed by law..........................................97%

  4         (4)  DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.--

  5         (a)  For the State Lands Program, the purpose of which

  6  is to acquire, administer, and dispose of state lands, the

  7  title of which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the

  8  Internal Improvement Trust Fund; administer, manage, and

  9  maintain the records of all lands held by the Board of

10  Trustees; administer and maintain the geodetic survey

11  requirements for the State of Florida; identify and set

12  ordinary and mean high water boundaries for purposes of

13  sovereignty and land title; and control aquatic and invasive

14  plant species, the outcome measures, output measures, and

15  associated performance standards with respect to funds

16  provided in Specific Appropriations 1475 through 1505 are as

17  follows:

18         1.  LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

19         a.  Percent increase in the number of occurrences of

20  endangered/threatened/special concern species on publicly

21  managed conservation areas................................3.6%

22         2.  LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of acres of underrepresented natural

24  communities............................................311,601

25         b.  Percent of acres acquired by the P2000 Program that

26  have a critical habitat within the acquired tract..........38%

27         c.  Number of acres of land acquired by the P2000

28  Program that had its highest resource values based on FNAI

29  elements.............................................1,097,334

30         d.  Number/percent completion of projects on the CARL

31  list....................................................95/10%


                                 172

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Percent of parcels at less than appraised value -

  2  $100,000 or less............................................6%

  3         f.  Percent of parcels at less than appraised value -

  4  greater than $100,000......................................63%

  5         g.  Percent of appraised value to purchase price -

  6  $100,000 or less...........................................93%

  7         h.  Percent of appraised value to purchase price -

  8  greater than $100,000......................................89%

  9         i.  Number of appraisals certified..................336

10         j.  Number of surveys/maps certified for environmental

11  land acquisition.........................................98/49

12         k.  Number of surveys/maps certified for

13  nonenvironmental land acquisition........................20/21

14         l.  Percent of parcels acquired within the "standard

15  time limit" - $100,000 or less.............................51%

16         m.  Percent of parcels acquired within the "standard

17  time limit" - greater than $100,000........................57%

18         3.  LAND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of parcels evaluated and disposed of that

20  have been determined to have no further public use..........80

21         b.  Percent of easements, leases, and other requests

22  completed by maximum timeframes prescribed.................75%

23         c.  Percent of all leases of sovereign submerged lands

24  in compliance with lease conditions........................92%

25         d.  Percent of all land management plans completed

26  within statutory timeframes................................60%

27         4.  LAND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

28         a.  Percent of submerged land leases found in

29  compliance annually........................................92%

30         b.  Ratio of parcels of lands surplused to parcels of

31  land evaluated for possible surplus........................1:2


                                 173

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Number of parcels mapped....................237,265

  2         d.  Number of submerged land leases audited

  3  annually...................................................301

  4         5.  AQUATIC/EXOTIC PLANT CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Number of new acres of public land that have

  6  invasive, exotic, upland plants controlled and have existing

  7  management personnel committed to maintaining these plants

  8  under control after initial treatment....................3,500

  9         b.  Percent of Florida's public waters where control of

10  hydrilla, water hyacinth, and water lettuce has been achieved

11  and sustained..............................................95%

12         6.  AQUATIC/EXOTIC PLANT CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURE.--

13         a.  Percent of public lakes and rivers that contain

14  invasive, nonnative aquatic plants and are under maintenance

15  control....................................................93%

16         (b)  For the Water Resources Management Program, the

17  purpose of which is to regulate, manage, conserve, and protect

18  the state's drinking water, surface and groundwater resources,

19  wetlands, beaches, and lands reclaimed after mining

20  activities, the outcome measures, output measures, and

21  associated performance standards with respect to funds

22  provided in Specific Appropriations 1568 through 1596 are as

23  follows:

24         1.  WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING OUTCOME

25  MEASURES.--

26         a.  Percent of rivers that meet designated

27  uses.......................................................92%

28         b.  Percent of lakes that meet designated uses......87%

29         c.  Percent of estuaries that meet designated

30  uses.......................................................95%

31         d.  Percent of groundwater that meets designated


                                 174

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  uses.......................................................85%

  2         e.  Percent of reclaimed water (reuse) capacity

  3  relative to total domestic wastewater capacity.............45%

  4         f.  Percent of public water systems with no significant

  5  (public health-based) drinking water quality problems......90%

  6         2.  WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING OUTPUT

  7  MEASURES.--

  8         a.  Number of wastewater inspections, site visits,

  9  technical assistance contacts, and other compliance

10  activities...............................................8,000

11         b.  Number of wastewater permits and other

12  authorizations processed.................................5,250

13         c.  Number of water quality stations monitored in the

14  statewide monitoring networks............................1,160

15         d.  Number of drinking water inspections, site visits,

16  technical assistance contacts, and other compliance

17  activities...............................................8,000

18         3.  BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND

19  PERMITTING OUTCOME MEASURE.--

20         a.  Linear miles of beaches which provide upland

21  protection, wildlife habitat, or recreation restored or

22  maintained according to statutory and rule requirements....825

23         4.  BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND

24  PERMITTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Beach renourishment and dune restoration funds

26  awarded............................................$30 million

27         b.  Number of beach renourishment and dune restoration

28  projects funded.............................................19

29         c.  Number of other compliance activities.........3,000

30         d.  Number of coastal construction permits, including

31  field permits, processed.................................1,650


                                 175

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Miles of shoreline surveyed and monitored.......752

  2         5.  MINE RECLAMATION AND PERMITTING OUTCOME MEASURE.--

  3         a.  Percent of mined lands qualifying for reclamation

  4  which have been reclaimed according to statutory and rule

  5  requirements...............................................95%

  6         6.  MINE RECLAMATION AND PERMITTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Funds awarded annually for mine reclamation

  8  projects...........................................$10 million

  9         b.  Number of mining permits processed/number of

10  inspections.............................................15/550

11         c.  Number of applications/acreage processed for mine

12  reclamation projects..................................60/6,500

13         7.  WATER FACILITIES FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OUTCOME

14  MEASURE.--

15         a.  Percent of wastewater, drinking water, and

16  stormwater projects on State Revolving Fund loan priority

17  lists and the construction grant priority list that are funded

18  annually..................................................3.5%

19         8.  WATER FACILITIES FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OUTPUT

20  MEASURES.--

21         a.  Loan grant funds awarded................$95 million

22         b.  Number of local governments, including

23  systems/utilities funded....................................25

24         (c)  For the Waste Management Program, the purpose of

25  which is to protect the public and the environment through

26  promotion of sound waste management practices, the outcome

27  measures, output measures, and associated performance

28  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

29  Appropriations 1597 through 1633C are as follows:

30         1.  PETROLEUM TANK REGULATION AND CONTAMINATED SITE

31  REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                 176

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Percent of regulated petroleum storage tank

  2  facilities in compliance with state regulations............89%

  3         b.  Percent/number of contaminated petroleum sites with

  4  rehabilitation underway...............................9%/1,544

  5         c.  Percent/number of contaminated petroleum sites with

  6  rehabilitation completed...............................0.3%/57

  7         2.  PETROLEUM TANK REGULATION AND CONTAMINATED SITE

  8  REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Percent of reimbursement claims processed......100%

10         b.  Number/percent of petroleum sites eligible for

11  state financial assistance..........................17,100/99%

12         3.  DRYCLEANING SITE REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number/percent of contaminated drycleaning sites

14  with rehabilitation underway.............................82/9%

15         b.  Number/percent of contaminated drycleaning sites

16  with rehabilitation completed.............................0/0%

17         4.  DRYCLEANING SITE REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

18         a.  Number of drycleaning site cleanup applications

19  eligible for state financial assistance..................1,200

20         5.  HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION, MANAGEMENT, AND SITE

21  REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--

22         a.  Percent of all hazardous waste generators in

23  significant compliance with state and federal

24  regulations................................................88%

25         b.  Percent of permitted transfer, storage, and

26  disposal facilities in significant compliance with state and

27  federal regulations........................................95%

28         c.  Number of facilities or sources of pollution that

29  modified their industrial processes to reduce generation of

30  pollutants as a result of department activities.............10

31


                                 177

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Percent/number of contaminated sites (federal

  2  superfund sites) with rehabilitation underway..........100%/49

  3         e.  Percent/number of contaminated sites (federal

  4  superfund sites) with rehabilitation completed............0%/0

  5         f.  Percent/number of contaminated sites (known state

  6  program sites) with rehabilitation underway.............95%/19

  7         g.  Percent/number of contaminated sites (known state

  8  program sites) with rehabilitation completed..............5%/1

  9         6.  HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION, MANAGEMENT, AND SITE

10  REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

11         a.  Number of tons of hazardous waste generated in

12  Florida................................................185,221

13         7.  SOLID WASTE REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME

14  MEASURES.--

15         a.  Percent of permitted solid waste facilities in

16  compliance with state requirements.........................96%

17         b.  Percent of municipal solid waste recycled

18  statewide..................................................40%

19         c.  Number of tons/percent of municipal solid waste

20  collected that is recycled.......................9,423,784/40%

21         d.  Number of tons/percent of municipal solid waste

22  burned annually..................................4,096,035/17%

23         e.  Number of tons/percent of municipal solid waste

24  disposed in landfills...........................10,266,086/43%

25         8.  SOLID WASTE REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT

26  MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of solid waste permits and registrations

28  processed..................................................685

29         b.  Number and dollar amount of solid waste management

30  and recycling grants issued....................252/$23 million

31


                                 178

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Number of waste-to-energy facilities located in

  2  Florida.....................................................13

  3         (d)  For the Recreation and Parks Program, the purpose

  4  of which is to anticipate and meet the outdoor recreation

  5  demands of Florida's residents and visitors and to ensure that

  6  an adequate natural resource base is maintained to accommodate

  7  future demands and preserve a quality environment, the outcome

  8  measures, output measures, and associated performance

  9  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

10  Appropriations 1634 through 1666D are as follows:

11         1.  STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Increase in attendance at state parks over prior

13  year......................................................1.3%

14         b.  Increase in acreage available for public recreation

15  over prior year.............................................2%

16         2.  STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

17         a.  Number of park sites managed....................152

18         b.  Number of development and improvement projects at

19  existing state parks........................................24

20         c.  Number of cultural/historical sites restored or

21  maintained compared to need..................................1

22         d.  Number of acres managed for secondary or multiple

23  use........................................................580

24         e.  Acres of native habitat successfully maintained as

25  natural areas in state parks............................65,000

26         f.  Percent of management plans completed in compliance

27  with Florida Statutes.....................................100%

28         g.  Percent of lands acquired by P2000 that meet at

29  least 3 criteria of the program...........................100%

30

31


                                 179

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         h.  Number of parks/acres/trail miles supported by

  2  general administration, maintenance/minor repairs, protection,

  3  and all variations of visitor service

  4  activities.....................................152/534,387/380

  5         i.  Number of private/public partnerships utilized to

  6  assist operations of state parks.........................2,000

  7         j.  Number of state park additions/inholding land

  8  acquisitions................................................10

  9         k.  Number of recreational and natural/cultural

10  additions and inholding acquisitions for existing parks by

11  type as related to available funding.........................1

12         3.  GREENWAYS AND TRAILS OUTCOME MEASURE.--

13         a.  Number of additional acres designated as part of

14  the Florida Greenways and Trails System.................10,970

15         4.  GREENWAYS AND TRAILS OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of acres of state greenways and trails

17  managed.................................................82,261

18         b.  Number of miles of recreational facilities built,

19  repaired, or restored........................................4

20         c.  Number of trailheads developed to provide public

21  access points on greenways and trails........................6

22         5.  RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

23  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Increase in technical assistance and grant-related

25  services to local governments over prior year...............2%

26         6.  RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OUTPUT

27  MEASURE.--

28         a.  Number of technical assistance consultations,

29  meetings, calls, and publications..........................760

30         7.  COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTCOME

31  MEASURE.--


                                 180

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Percent increase in degraded acreage in state

  2  buffer enhanced or restored...............................6.2%

  3         8.  COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTPUT

  4  MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Number of acres managed...................4,888,406

  6         b.  Number of acres where invasive or undesirable plant

  7  species have been controlled.............................2,255

  8         (e)  For the Air Resources Management Program, the

  9  purpose of which is to maintain and improve the state's air

10  quality through air pollution mitigation and prevention, the

11  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

12  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

13  Appropriations 1667 through 1685 are as follows:

14         1.  AIR QUALITY OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Percent of population living in areas monitored for

16  air quality................................................88%

17         b.  Annual average percent of time monitored population

18  breathes good or moderate quality air......................99%

19         c.  Percent of the population which breathes air that

20  violates the standard for ozone as determined by the data

21  generated by the state air quality monitoring network.......1%

22         2.  AIR QUALITY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number of monitors operated by the department and

24  local programs.............................................240

25         b.  Number of quality assurance audits conducted to

26  ensure accurate and reliable ambient air quality data......450

27         3.  AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT OR PREVENTION OUTCOME

28  MEASURES.--

29         a.  Annual 0.5% reduction of NOX air emissions per

30  capita..................................................128.72

31


                                 181

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Annual 0.5% reduction of SO2 air emissions per

  2  capita.....................................................123

  3         c.  Annual 0.5% reduction of CO air emissions per

  4  capita..................................................542.51

  5         d.  Annual 0.5% reduction of VOC air emissions per

  6  capita..................................................108.05

  7         4.  AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT OR PREVENTION OUTPUT

  8  MEASURES.--

  9         a.  Number of Title V permits processed..............92

10         b.  Number of Title V modifications processed........50

11         c.  Number of non-Title V permits processed.........700

12         d.  Number of non-Title V modifications processed...125

13         e.  Number of Title V facilities inspected..........750

14         f.  Number of asbestos projects reviewed and

15  evaluated................................................2,000

16         (f)  For the Law Enforcement Program, the purpose of

17  which is to protect the people, the environment, and the

18  natural resources through law enforcement, education, and

19  public service, the outcome measures, output measures, and

20  associated performance standards with respect to funds

21  provided in Specific Appropriations 1686 through 1715 are as

22  follows:

23         1.  OUTCOME MEASURE.--

24         a.  Percent decrease (in gallons) of pollutant

25  discharge per capita........................................5%

26         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number of criminal investigations

28  opened/closed..........................................337/227

29         b.  Number of incidents reported..................2,700

30         c.  Number of petroleum spills responded to.........757

31


                                 182

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Number of arrests for speed zone violations or

  2  manatee molestation......................................1,631

  3         e.  Funds spent/recovered on spill

  4  remediation...................................$928,153/$86,638

  5         f.  Number of sites/spills remediated...............533

  6         (5)  FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION.--

  7         (a)  For the Law Enforcement Program, the purpose of

  8  which is to provide patrol and protection activities to

  9  safeguard the opportunities for boating, camping, fishing,

10  hunting, wildlife viewing, and other natural-resource-related

11  activities in a safe and healthy environment, the outcome

12  measures, output measures, and associated performance

13  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

14  Appropriations 1750 through 1765 are as follows:

15         1.  UNIFORM PATROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Total number of violations...................29,130

17         b.  Total number of hours spent in preventive patrol

18  (land, water, and air).................................616,566

19         2.  INVESTIGATIONS OUTPUT MEASURE.--

20         a.  Number of hours spent on

21  investigations................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

22         3.  INSPECTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

23         a.  Number of inspections.........................4,446

24         4.  AVIATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--

25         a.  Number of air contacts resulting in detection and

26  apprehension (includes inland and marine)................3,550

27         5.  BOATING SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--

28         a.  Number of vessel safety inspections.........154,408

29         b.  Number of accidents investigated................210

30         c.  Number of fatalities investigated................26

31         d.  Number of injuries investigated.................136


                                 183

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Number of vessel safety inspection hours on St.

  2  Johns River..............................................9,318

  3         6.  OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION OUTPUT

  4  MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Number of graduates of hunter education

  6  classes.................................................12,125

  7         b.  Number of hunting accidents......................23

  8         c.  Number of attendees or graduates of hunter

  9  education classes involved in hunting accidents..............7

10         (b)  For the Wildlife Management Program, the purpose

11  of which is to maintain and enhance Florida's diverse wildlife

12  and to provide for responsible use of this resource, the

13  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

14  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

15  Appropriations 1766 through 1781D are as follows:

16         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

17         a.  Percent change in the number of licensed

18  hunters..................................................-1.7%

19         b.  Economic impact of wildlife-related outdoor

20  recreation......................................$3,675,935,000

21         c.  Percent of satisfied wildlife viewers...........92%

22         d.  Percent of the acreage under management control

23  which is open to the public for wildlife-related outdoor

24  recreation...............................................99.9%

25         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of licensed hunters..................164,945

27         b.  Number of wildlife viewers................3,630,000

28         3.  WILDLIFE POPULATION AND HABITAT OUTCOME MEASURE.--

29         a.  Percent of wildlife species whose biological status

30  is stable or improving.....................................69%

31         4.  WILDLIFE POPULATION AND HABITAT OUTPUT MEASURES.--


                                 184

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Number of acres managed for wildlife......4,700,000

  2         b.  Number of requests for technical assistance

  3  received and provided......................................325

  4         c.  Number of survey and monitoring projects for game,

  5  nongame, and listed species.................................31

  6         (c)  For the Fisheries Management Program, the purpose

  7  of which is to maintain, enhance, and provide for responsible

  8  use of Florida's freshwater fisheries, the outcome measures,

  9  output measures, and associated performance standards with

10  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1782

11  through 1789 are as follows:

12         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

13         a.  Percent change in licensed anglers..............+5%

14         b.  Percent angler satisfaction.....................75%

15         c.  Number of water bodies and acres where habitat

16  rehabilitation projects have been completed.........21/177,064

17         d.  Percent change in degraded lakes

18  rehabilitated............................................+5.7%

19         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of water bodies and acres in fish management

21  areas, urban areas, and other lakes or rivers managed to

22  improve fishing....................................169/800,050

23         b.  Number of access points established or

24  maintained..................................................60

25         c.  Number of licensed anglers................1,745,967

26         d.  Number of fish stocked....................2,385,000

27         e.  Number of outreach participants in clinics and

28  derbies.................................................25,000

29         3.  MARINE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

30         a.  Artificial reefs monitored and/or created

31  annually....................................................65


                                 185

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Percent of fisheries stocks that are increasing or

  2  stable...................................................78.5%

  3         4.  FLORIDA MARINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OUTCOME

  4  MEASURE.--

  5         a.  Percent of research projects that provide

  6  management recommendations or support management

  7  actions...................................................100%

  8         (6)  DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE.--

  9         (a)  For the Fire Marshal Program, the purpose of which

10  is to enhance public safety through investigation and forensic

11  services, increasing the solvability of criminal cases, by

12  ensuring that emergency responders and service providers are

13  qualified, competent, and ethical through quality training,

14  education, and establishing professional standards; and

15  maintaining the safest possible environment through the

16  regulation, product testing, and inspection of fire

17  suppression and protection equipment, explosives, and

18  fireworks, the outcome measures, output measures, and

19  associated performance standards with respect to funds

20  provided in Specific Appropriations 2205 through 2217L are as

21  follows:

22         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

23         a.  Number/percent of closed fire investigations

24  successfully concluded, including by cause determined, suspect

25  identified and/or arrested, or other reasons.........5,305/85%

26         b.  Number/percent of closed arson investigations for

27  which an arrest was made.............................1,078/30%

28         c.  Number/percent of inspected state owned and leased

29  properties that experience a fire.....................92/0.59%

30         d.  Number/percent of licensed entities found in

31  violation of statutes................................209/2.39%


                                 186

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Number of unlicensed entities found in violation of

  2  statutes....................................................15

  3         f.  Number/percent of students who rate training they

  4  received at the Florida State Fire College as improving their

  5  ability to perform assigned duties...................3,500/95%

  6         g.  Percent of above satisfactory ratings by

  7  supervisors of students job performance from post-class

  8  evaluations of skills gained through training at the Florida

  9  State Fire College.........................................85%

10         h.  Number/percent of favorable rulings by hearing

11  officers on challenges to examination results and eligibility

12  determinations..........................................12/92%

13         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

14         a.  Total number of fire investigations

15  commenced................................................9,438

16         b.  Number of criminal investigations commenced...3,594

17         c.  Number of accidental investigations

18  commenced................................................3,972

19         d.  Number of other investigations commenced......1,892

20         e.  Total number of fire investigations closed....6,242

21         f.  Total number of fire code compliance inspections in

22  state owned/leased buildings............................14,611

23         g.  Number of recurring inspections completed of fire

24  code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........7,200

25         h.  Number of high hazard inspections completed of fire

26  code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........6,536

27         i.  Number of construction inspections completed of

28  fire code compliance in state owned/leased buildings.......875

29         j.  Percent of fire code inspections completed within

30  statutorily defined timeframe..............................91%

31


                                 187

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         k.  Number of plans reviewed to assure compliance with

  2  fire codes in state owned/leased buildings...............1,157

  3         l.  Percent of fire code plans reviews completed within

  4  statutorily defined timeframe..............................98%

  5         m.  Total number of boilers inspected............12,500

  6         n.  Number of boilers inspected by department

  7  inspectors...............................................4,200

  8         o.  Number of boilers inspected by other

  9  inspectors...............................................8,300

10         p.  Number of complaint investigations

11  completed................................................1,497

12         q.  Number of regulatory inspections completed......850

13         r.  Number of licensed applications reviewed for

14  qualification............................................8,750

15         s.  Number of classes conducted by the Florida State

16  Fire College...............................................220

17         t.  Number of students trained and classroom contact

18  hours provided by the Florida State Fire

19  College..........................................6,212/215,677

20         u.  Number of curricula developed for Florida State

21  Fire College and certified training center delivery..........5

22         v.  Percent of satisfactory student evaluations of

23  Florida State Fire College facilities and services.........80%

24         w.  Number/percent of customer requests for

25  certification testing completed within defined

26  timeframes...........................................3,500/90%

27         x.  Number/percent of certified training centers

28  inspected that meet certification requirements..........15/95%

29         y.  Number of examinations administered...........4,400

30         (b)  For the State Property and Casualty Claims

31  Program, the purpose of which is to ensure that participating


                                 188

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  state agencies are provided quality workers' compensation,

  2  liability, federal civil rights, auto liability, and property

  3  insurance coverage at reasonable rates by provided

  4  self-insurance, purchase of insurance, claims handling, and

  5  technical assistance in managing risk, the outcome measures,

  6  output measures, and associated performance standards with

  7  respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2220

  8  through 2224 are as follows:

  9         1.  WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME

10  MEASURES.--

11         a.  Number/percent of indemnity and medical payments

12  made in a timely manner in compliance with DLES Security Rule

13  38F-24.021, F.A.C...................................59,220/95%

14         b.  State Employees' Workers Compensation Benefit Cost

15  Rate, as defined by indemnity and medical costs per $100 of

16  state employees' payroll.................................$1.17

17         2.  WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT

18  MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number of workers' compensation claims

20  worked..................................................28,500

21         b.  Number of workers' compensation claims

22  litigated..................................................779

23         c.  Number of workers' compensation claims referred to

24  the Special Investigative Unit or the Bureau of Workers'

25  Compensation Fraud..........................................80

26         3.  RISK SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number/percent of workers' compensation claims

28  requiring some payment per 100 full-time equivalent

29  employees.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30

31


                                 189

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number/percent of agencies who indicated the risk

  2  services training they received was useful in developing and

  3  implementing risk management plans in their

  4  agencies................................................99/90%

  5         c.  Average cost of tort liability claims paid...$3,419

  6         d.  Average cost of Federal Civil Rights liability

  7  claims paid............................................$29,067

  8         e.  Average cost of workers' compensation

  9  claims paid.............................................$3,700

10         f.  Average cost of property claims paid.........$7,547

11         4.  RISK SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

12         a.  Number of risk services training units provided to

13  state agency personnel......................................70

14         b.  Number of risk services surveys, follow-ups, and

15  visits made.................................................50

16         c.  Number of risk services consultative contacts

17  made.......................................................195

18         5.  LIABILITY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

19         a.  Number/percent of claims closed in relation to

20  claims closed during the fiscal year.................4,480/51%

21         b.  Number/percent of lawsuits, generated from a

22  liability claim, evaluated with SEFES codes entered within

23  prescribed timeframes..................................745/92%

24         6.  LIABILITY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT MEASURE.--

25         a.  Number of liability claims worked.............8,287

26         7.  PROPERTY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

27         a.  Number/percent of trainees who indicated the

28  training they received was useful in performing required

29  property program processes....................FY 2001-2002 LBR

30

31


                                 190

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         b.  Number/percent of property claims closed within

  2  prescribed time periods from the date complete documentation

  3  is received.............................................70/93%

  4         8.  PROPERTY CLAIMS COVERAGE OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  5         a.  Number of training units/assists provided by the

  6  property program........................................35/211

  7         b.  Number of state property loss/damage claims

  8  worked.....................................................522

  9         (7)  DEPARTMENT OF THE LOTTERY.--

10         (a)  For the Sale of Lottery Products Program, the

11  purpose of which is to maximize revenues for public education

12  in a manner consistent with the dignity of the state and the

13  welfare of its citizens, the outcome measures, output

14  measures, and associated performance standards with respect to

15  funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2353 through 2366

16  are as follows:

17         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

18         a.  Total revenue in dollars...........$2,287.3 million

19         b.  Percent change from prior year...............+0.56%

20         c.  Transfers to the state Educational Enhancement

21  Trust Fund......................................$887.7 million

22         d.  Percent of total revenue to the Educational

23  Enhancement Trust Fund..................................38.81%

24         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

25         a.  Percent of total revenue paid as prizes......49.64%

26         b.  Administrative expense paid for retailer

27  commission......................................$124.9 million

28         c.  Operating expense....................$264.1 million

29         d.  Operating expense as percent of total revenue...12%

30         e.  Survey results of public awareness of the

31  contribution to education by the Lottery - percent of


                                 191

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  respondents who are aware of the Lottery's contribution to

  2  education..................................................65%

  3         (8)  DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES.--

  4         (a)  For the Facilities Program, the purpose of which

  5  is to provide best value office facilities considering the

  6  total cost of constructing, managing, and maintaining office

  7  facilities, and compared to comparable industry standards, the

  8  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

  9  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

10  Appropriations 2385 through 2401 are as follows:

11         1.  FACILITIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Gross square foot construction cost of office

13  facilities for DMS......................................$78.04

14         b.  Gross square foot construction cost of office

15  facilities for private industry average.................$91.73

16         c.  Average full service rent - composite cost per net

17  square foot in counties where DMS has office facilities for

18  DMS actual..............................................$15.31

19         d.  Average full service rent - composite cost per net

20  square foot in counties where DMS has office facilities for

21  private industry........................................$16.95

22         e.  New office space efficiency per net square

23  foot/gross square foot.....................................87%

24         f.  Average operations and maintenance cost per net

25  square foot maintained by DMS............................$4.87

26         g.  Average operations and maintenance cost per net

27  square foot maintained by private industry...............$6.55

28         h.  Number of criminal incidents per 100,000 gross

29  square feet...............................................5.35

30         i.  Number of criminal incidents per 1,000

31  employees................................................21.64


                                 192

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         j.  Percent below change in statewide index reported

  2  crimes - Florida Capitol Police.............................5%

  3         2.  FACILITIES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  4         a.  Gross square feet of office facilities

  5  completed..............................................474,251

  6         b.  Net square feet of state-owned office space

  7  occupied by state agencies including non-DMS owned

  8  facilities...........................................7,412,150

  9         c.  Net square feet of private office space occupied by

10  state agencies......................................10,713,751

11         d.  Number of square feet maintained by DMS...3,627,036

12         e.  Number of square feet maintained by private

13  contractor...........................................3,785,114

14         f.  Gross square feet monitored for security

15  purposes.............................................7,825,023

16         g.  Number of investigations conducted..............210

17         h.  Total number of criminal incidents reported...5,686

18         i.  Total number of noncriminal calls for

19  service.................................................31,362

20         j.  Number of crime prevention and safety programs

21  presented to employees.....................................120

22         k.  Number of state employees receiving crime

23  prevention and safety training...........................3,000

24         (b)  For the Support Program, the purpose of which is

25  to provide government entities access to best value

26  commodities and services through centralized procurement,

27  federal property assistance, and fleet management, the outcome

28  measures, output measures, and associated performance

29  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

30  Appropriations 2412 through 2425 are as follows:

31         1.  SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                 193

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Percent of state term contracts savings.........35%

  2         b.  State term contracts cost avoidance....$215,000,000

  3         c.  Average percent below private sector fleet

  4  maintenance for labor costs................................13%

  5         d.  Average percent below private sector fleet

  6  maintenance for parts costs................................26%

  7         e.  Average percent of state rental vehicles below

  8  state rental contract rates................................35%

  9         f.  Number of government and nonprofit organizations

10  visiting a surplus property distribution center..........3,400

11         g.  Federal property distribution rate..............85%

12         2.  SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

13         a.  Number of commodities/services on state term

14  contracts..............................................233,000

15         b.  Number of agencies using SPURS...................35

16         c.  Percent of agencies using SPURS................100%

17         d.  Number of federal property orders processed...2,150

18         e.  Number of vehicle maintenance service hours...8,600

19         f.  Days of state rental vehicle service

20  provided................................................42,000

21         g.  Miles of state rental vehicle service

22  provided.............................................1,800,000

23         (c)  For the Workforce Program, the purpose of which is

24  to help state agencies achieve an effective workforce; perform

25  a variety of activities to assist state agencies in human

26  resource management; administer retirement and insurance

27  benefits; and provide administrative support for the

28  Cooperative Personnel Employment Subsystem (COPES), the

29  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

30  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

31  Appropriations 2426 through 2450 are as follows:


                                 194

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         1.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  2         a.  Program cost per authorized position in the State

  3  Personnel System: COPES cost............................$39.97

  4         b.  Program cost per authorized position in the State

  5  Personnel System: cost net of COPES.....................$33.84

  6         c.  Program cost per authorized position in the State

  7  Personnel System: Total.................................$73.81

  8         d.  Percent of customers satisfied that the information

  9  provided resulted in more effective and efficient HR-related

10  decisions..................................................85%

11         e.  Percent of customers satisfied that the technical

12  assistance provided resulted in more effective and efficient

13  HR-related decisions.......................................85%

14         f.  Percent of customers satisfied that the information

15  provided was timely........................................85%

16         g.  Percent of customers satisfied that the information

17  provided was accurate......................................85%

18         h.  Percent of customers satisfied that the information

19  provided was consistent with statutes, rules, policies, and/or

20  procedures.................................................85%

21         i.  Percent of customers satisfied that the technical

22  assistance provided was timely.............................88%

23         j.  Percent of customers satisfied that the technical

24  assistance provided was accurate...........................88%

25         k.  Percent of customers satisfied that the technical

26  assistance provided was consistent with statutes, rules,

27  policies, and/or procedures................................78%

28         l.  Percent of agencies at or above EEO gender parity

29  with available labor market..............................86.7%

30         m.  Percent of agencies at or above EEO minority parity

31  with the available labor market............................70%


                                 195

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         2.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  2         a.  Number of informational materials available...1,917

  3         b.  Number of responses to technical assistance

  4  requests................................................20,722

  5         3.  RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME

  6  MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Percent of participating agencies satisfied with

  8  retirement information...................................94.9%

  9         b.  Percent of participating active members satisfied

10  with retirement information..............................86.5%

11         c.  Percent of participating recent retirees satisfied

12  with retirement information..............................96.5%

13         d.  Percent of participating other retirees satisfied

14  with retirement information..............................96.3%

15         e.  Percent of agency payroll transactions correctly

16  reported.................................................97.9%

17         f.  Percent of standard retirement services offered by

18  FRS compared to comparable programs........................82%

19         g.  Percent of participating agencies satisfied with

20  retirement services......................................94.9%

21         h.  Percent of participating active members satisfied

22  with retirement services.................................87.7%

23         i.  Percent of participating recent retirees satisfied

24  with retirement services...................................97%

25         j.  Percent of participating other retirees satisfied

26  with retirement services.................................95.8%

27         k.  Administrative cost per active and retired member

28  (excluding RIM Project).................................$20.39

29         l.  Administrative cost per active and retired member

30  (including RIM Project).................................$32.99

31         m.  Ratio of active and retired members to


                                 196

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  division FTE...........................................3,391:1

  2         n.  Percent of FRS assets to liabilities...........112%

  3         o.  Percent of local retirement systems annually

  4  reviewed which are funded on a sound actuarial basis.......95%

  5         4.  RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT

  6  MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Number of annuitants added to retired

  8  payroll.................................................13,200

  9         b.  Number of retirement account audits..........83,000

10         c.  Number of changes processed..................56,078

11         d.  Number of benefit payments issued.........2,244,680

12         e.  Number of local pension plan valuations and impact

13  statements reviewed........................................400

14         5.  STATE GROUP INSURANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--

15         a.  Customer feedback ranking for Division out of

16  possible 10 points........................................6.57

17         b.  Percent of claims reaching final action within 30

18  days after receipt.........................................98%

19         c.  Overall payment and procedural error rate........5%

20         d.  Telephone queue time (in seconds)................45

21         e.  Unprocessed original claims inventory........30,000

22         f.  Average annual cost per contract to administer

23  insurance programs......................................$14.84

24         (d)  For the Information Technology Program, the

25  purpose of which is to effectively and efficiently satisfy

26  customer needs for using, sharing, and managing information

27  technology resources, the outcome measures, output measures,

28  and associated performance standards with respect to funds

29  provided in Specific Appropriations 2451 through 2472 are as

30  follows:

31         1.  TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                 197

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Percent of SUNCOM discount from commercial rates

  2  for local access...........................................40%

  3         b.  Percent of SUNCOM discount from commercial rates

  4  for long distance..........................................40%

  5         c.  Percent of SUNCOM discount from commercial rates

  6  for data service...........................................25%

  7         d.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

  8  service features..........................................3.87

  9         e.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

10  service delivery..........................................3.79

11         f.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

12  timely problem resolution.................................3.74

13         g.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for best

14  value services............................................3.65

15         2.  TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

16         a.  Number of SUNCOM long distance billable

17  minutes............................................262,126,091

18         b.  Number of SUNCOM local service main

19  stations.............................................2,081,566

20         c.  Number of SUNCOM data locations served.......10,747

21         d.  Percent of SUNCOM service growth for local

22  access......................................................3%

23         e.  Percent of SUNCOM service growth for long

24  distance....................................................1%

25         f.  Percent of SUNCOM service growth for data

26  service.....................................................0%

27         3.  INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

29  accessible information services...........................3.99

30         b.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

31  desirable technology services.............................4.00


                                 198

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         c.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

  2  timely problem resolution.................................3.80

  3         d.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

  4  projects within schedule..................................3.91

  5         e.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for best

  6  value services............................................3.91

  7         f.  Customer survey ranking (scale of 1 to 5) for

  8  reliable information services.............................3.92

  9         4.  INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

10         a.  Number of Technology Resource Center research

11  projects completed..........................................15

12         b.  Number of Technology Resource Center consulting

13  projects completed...........................................7

14         c.  Number of Technology Resource Center development

15  projects completed.........................................425

16         d.  Percent utilization by the Unisys System as used

17  for capacity planning and technology refresh, employing 80%

18  maximum utilization standard...............................60%

19         e.  Percent utilization by the IBM System as used for

20  capacity planning and technology refresh, employing 80%

21  maximum utilization standard.............................59.5%

22         5.  WIRELESS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--

23         a.  Percent wireless discount from commercially

24  available and similar type engineering services............35%

25         6.  WIRELESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--

26         a.  Number of engineering projects and approvals

27  handled for state government...............................110

28         b.  Number of engineering projects and approvals

29  handled for local governments..............................550

30         c.  Number of Joint Task Force Radio Systems fixed

31  sites operated and maintained...............................92


                                 199

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         d.  Percent of state covered by the Joint Task Force

  2  Radio System...............................................58%

  3         e.  Percent of Joint Task Force Radio System current

  4  phases under development completed.......................48.2%

  5         (e)  For the Administrative Hearings Program, the

  6  purpose of which is to resolve conflicts between citizens and

  7  agencies of the state, the outcome measures, output measures,

  8  and associated performance standards with respect to funds in

  9  Specific Appropriations 2484 through 2488 are as follows:

10         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

11         a.  Percent of cases scheduled for hearing within 90

12  days after filing.......................................53.22%

13         b.  Percent of professional licensure cases scheduled

14  for hearing within 90 days after filing.................21.61%

15         c.  Percent of professional licensure cases closed

16  within 120 days after filing............................42.21%

17         d.  Percent of cases closed within 120 days after

18  filing..................................................73.09%

19         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

20         a.  Number of cases opened........................5,877

21         b.  Number of cases closed........................6,921

22         c.  Number of cases carried forward...............2,354

23         d.  Staffing ratio based on the average number of cases

24  closed per administrative law judge........................188

25         e.  Number of professional licensure cases opened...487

26         f.  Number of professional licensure cases closed...569

27         g.  Number of professional licensure cases carried

28  forward....................................................292

29         (9)  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.--

30         (a)  For the Property Tax Administration Program, the

31  purpose of which is to enhance the equity in property


                                 200

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1  assessments and taxation through the state and to facilitate

  2  equalization of the distribution of the required local effort

  3  millage, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

  4  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

  5  Specific Appropriations 2526 through 2538 are as follows:

  6         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

  7         a.  Percent of classes studied found to have a level of

  8  at least 90 percent......................................97.2%

  9         b.  Tax roll uniformity (average for coefficient

10  of dispersion)...........................................11.5%

11         c.  Percent of taxing authorities in total or

12  substantial truth in millage compliance on initial

13  submission...............................................97.3%

14         d.  Percent of refund and tax certificate applications

15  processed within 30 days after receipt...................92.5%

16         e.  Refund request per 100,000 parcels.............31.8

17         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

18         a.  Number of subclasses of property studied with

19  feedback to property appraisers..........................5,250

20         b.  Number of tax roll review notices issued..........3

21         c.  Total number of tax roll defects found............4

22         d.  Number of truth in millage compliance letters sent

23  to taxing authorities......................................485

24         e.  Number of truth in millage compliance letters sent

25  to taxing authorities with minor infractions...............118

26         f.  Number of property tax refund requests

27  processed................................................2,500

28         g.  Number of tax certificates cancellations and

29  corrections processed....................................2,500

30         h.  Number of taxpayers audited on behalf of county

31  property appraisers (tangible personal property)...........250


                                 201

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         i.  Number of student training hours provided to

  2  property appraisers and their staff (tangible personal

  3  property)................................................3,500

  4         (b)  For the Child Support Enforcement Program, the

  5  purpose of which is to establish paternity and child support

  6  orders, enforce those orders to collect child support, and

  7  distribute child support collections in a timely manner, the

  8  outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance

  9  standards with respect to funds provided in Specific

10  Appropriations 2539 through 2561 are as follows:

11         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

12         a.  Percent of children with a court order for

13  support....................................................47%

14         b.  Percent of children with paternity

15  established................................................81%

16         c.  Total child support dollars collected per $1 of

17  total expenditures.......................................$2.77

18         d.  Percent of child support collected that was due

19  during the fiscal year.....................................51%

20         e.  Percent of cases with child support due in a month

21  that received a payment during the month...................53%

22         2.  OUTPUT MEASURE.--

23         a.  Number of children with a newly established court

24  order...................................................58,800

25         (c)  For the General Tax Administration Program, the

26  purpose of which is to administer the revenue laws of the

27  state in a fair and equitable manner and to collect all money

28  owed, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated

29  performance standards with respect to funds provided in

30  Specific Appropriations 2562 through 2580 are as follows:

31         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--


                                 202

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         a.  Average days from receipt of payment to final

  2  processing of deposit (sales, corporation, intangibles,

  3  fuel).....................................................0.64

  4         b.  Number of days between initial distribution of

  5  funds and final adjustments (sales, fuel)...................66

  6         c.  Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially

  7  error free and on time.....................................76%

  8         d.  Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially

  9  error free and on time by first time filers................65%

10         e.  Return on investment (total collections per dollar

11  spent).................................................$147.73

12         f.  Dollars collected as a percent of actual liability

13  of notices sent for apparent sales tax return filing errors or

14  late returns...............................................55%

15         g.  Percent of tax returns that did not result in a

16  notice of apparent filing error or late return.............90%

17         h.  Average time (in days) between the processing of a

18  sales tax return and the first notification to the taxpayer of

19  an apparent filing error or late return.....................38

20         i.  Percent of delinquent sales tax return and filing

21  error or late return notices issued accurately to taxpayer.90%

22         j.  Percent of delinquent tax return and filing error

23  or late return notices sent to taxpayers that had to be

24  revised due to department or taxpayer error................20%

25         k.  Percent of final audit assessment amounts

26  collected (tax only).......................................85%

27         l.  Final audit assessment amounts as a percent of

28  initial assessment amounts (tax only)......................74%

29         m.  Dollars collected voluntarily as a percent of total

30  dollars collected..........................................97%

31


                                 203

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         n.  Average number of days to resolve a dispute of an

  2  audit assessment...........................................175

  3         o.  Direct collections per enforcement-related dollar

  4  spent....................................................$4.92

  5         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

  6         a.  Number of delinquent tax return notices issued to

  7  taxpayers..............................................732,000

  8         b.  Number of notices sent to taxpayers for apparent

  9  tax return filing errors or late return................528,000

10         Section 39.  The Legislature adopts the following

11  programs and performance measures for the entities indicated

12  for use in preparation of the fiscal year 2001-2002

13  legislative budget request:

14         (1)  DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS.--The department shall

15  recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for

16  fiscal year 2001-2002 to the appropriate legislative

17  committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of

18  integrally related outcomes and outputs, the department shall

19  identify total associated costs for producing that outcome or

20  output, based on the fiscal year 2000-2001 budget, in order to

21  improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate funds,

22  compare activities, and evaluate department activities for

23  efficiency:

24         (a)  For the Department of Citrus, the purpose of which

25  is to market and regulate Florida citrus, the outcome measures

26  and output measures are as follows:

27         1.  OUTCOME MEASURES.--

28         a.  On-tree value of Florida citrus/ROI-grower.

29         b.  Consumer intent to purchase.

30         c.  Consumer recall of health and wellness benefits.

31         d.  Consumer recall of taste and quality.


                                 204

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.






                                          HB 2147, First Engrossed



  1         e.  Consumer awareness of grower's symbol.

  2         f.  Percent of food service sales bearing Florida

  3  sunshine tree.

  4         g.  Percent of top 100 school districts buying Florida

  5  sunshine tree products.

  6         h.  Number of boxes moving through fresh channels.

  7         i.  Number of boxes moving through processed channels.

  8         j.  Number of acres mechanically harvested.

  9         k.  Improvement of fresh juice quality and safety.

10         l.  Reduction of post-harvest losses.

11         m.  Fresh pre-peeled Florida citrus volume.

12         n.  Creation of revenue streams for the Florida grower.

13         o.  New health messages related to Florida citrus.

14         2.  OUTPUT MEASURES.--

15         a.  Number of television gross rating points.

16         b.  Number of radio gross rating points.

17         c.  Number of trade incentive programs.

18         d.  Number of mechanical harvesters under development.

19         e.  Number of sponsored research programs conducted.

20         f.  Number of medical research programs.

21         g.  Development of fresh-cut citrus line.

22         Section 40.  If any provision of this act or the

23  application thereof to any person or circumstance is held

24  invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or

25  applications of the act which can be given effect without the

26  invalid provision or application, and to this end the

27  provisions of this act are declared severable.

28         Section 41.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2000;

29  or, in the event this act fails to become a law until after

30  that date, it shall take effect upon becoming a law and shall

31  operate retroactively to July 1, 2000.


                                 205