House Bill 2147er
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1
2 An act implementing the 2000-2001 General
3 Appropriations Act; providing legislative
4 intent; providing for allocation of moneys
5 provided for workforce development and
6 providing for budget amendment when a program
7 is moved; making certain findings regarding
8 funds for the San Carlos Institute; amending s.
9 240.384, F.S.; requiring an analysis and the
10 transfer of certain funds relating to certain
11 transferred criminal justice training programs;
12 amending s. 236.025, F.S.; revising funding for
13 exceptional student education programs;
14 providing for future reversion to current text;
15 amending s. 236.081, F.S.; revising funding for
16 exceptional student education programs;
17 providing for future reversion to current text;
18 amending s. 237.34, F.S.; revising reporting
19 requirements for exceptional student education
20 programs; providing for future reversion to
21 current text; amending s. 236.081, F.S.;
22 revising the exclusion provisions of the
23 computation of district required local effort;
24 requiring plaintiffs to provide the district
25 school board and the Department of Education
26 certain documentation in litigation affecting
27 the assessed value of real property above a
28 specified amount; providing for future
29 reversion to current text; amending s.
30 409.9115, F.S.; specifying how the Agency for
31 Health Care Administration shall make payments
1
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 for the Medicaid disproportionate share program
2 for mental health hospitals; requiring the
3 Agency for Health Care Administration to use a
4 specified disproportionate share formula,
5 specified audited financial data, and a
6 specified Medicaid per diem rate in fiscal year
7 2000-2001 for qualifying hospitals; amending s.
8 409.9116, F.S.; providing a formula for rural
9 hospital disproportionate share payments;
10 creating s. 409.9119, F.S.; creating a
11 disproportionate share program for specialty
12 hospitals for children; providing formulas
13 governing payments made to hospitals under the
14 program; providing for withholding payments
15 from a hospital that is not complying with
16 agency rules; amending s. 216.181, F.S.;
17 authorizing the Department of Children and
18 Family Services and the Department of Health to
19 advance certain moneys for certain contract
20 services; directing the Agency for Health Care
21 Administration to include health maintenance
22 organization recipients in the county billing
23 for a specified purpose; authorizing the
24 Departments of Children and Family Services,
25 Education, Management Services, Labor and
26 Employment Security, and Health and the Agency
27 for Health Care Administration to transfer
28 positions and funds to comply with the General
29 Appropriations Act or the Workforce Innovation
30 Act of 2000; amending s. 39.3065, F.S.;
31 requiring the sheriffs of Broward County and
2
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Seminole County to perform child protective
2 investigative services according to the same
3 standards as are performed by the sheriffs of
4 Pinellas, Manatee, and Pasco Counties;
5 providing for conduct of program performance
6 evaluation by a team of peer reviewers from the
7 respective sheriffs' offices that perform child
8 protective investigations and representatives
9 from the Department of Children and Family
10 Services; requiring a report to the Governor
11 and Legislature; providing that specified funds
12 are to be allocated based on equity and are not
13 subject to the provisions of s. 394.908, F.S.,
14 relating to historical inequity in funding of
15 alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health
16 services; amending s. 409.905, F.S.;
17 prescribing conditions upon which an adjustment
18 in a hospital's inpatient per diem rate may be
19 based; amending s. 1, ch. 99-219, Laws of
20 Florida; extending flexibility to implement
21 reorganization of the Department of Children
22 and Family Services until July 1, 2001;
23 amending s. 216.177, F.S.; providing notice
24 requirements for the Department of Children and
25 Family Services with respect to transferring
26 portions of district budgets; providing that
27 income earned as a temporary federal census
28 worker shall be disregarded in determination of
29 eligibility for certain public assistance
30 programs; providing limitations; amending s.
31 409.915, F.S.; exempting counties from
3
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 contributing toward the increased cost of
2 hospital inpatient services due to elimination
3 of Medicaid ceilings on certain types of
4 hospitals and for special Medicaid
5 reimbursements to hospitals; prohibiting the
6 Agency for Health Care Administration from
7 adjusting premiums paid to health maintenance
8 organizations or prepaid health care plans due
9 to elimination of Medicaid ceilings on certain
10 types of hospitals and special Medicaid
11 payments to hospitals; providing for a facility
12 in DeSoto County to house and rehabilitate
13 sexually violent predators; authorizing the
14 Department of Children and Family Services to
15 continue to contract with existing providers of
16 treatment and detention services until
17 completion of such facility; amending s.
18 409.9122, F.S.; requiring assignment of
19 Medicaid recipients to a managed care plan in
20 certain counties; authorizing the Department of
21 Law Enforcement to use certain moneys to
22 provide meritorious-performance bonuses for
23 employees, subject to review; amending s.
24 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the Department of
25 Law Enforcement to transfer some positions and
26 associated budget and a certain percentage of
27 salary rate between budget entities and
28 providing requirements with respect thereto;
29 authorizing the Correctional Privatization
30 Commission to make certain expenditures to
31 defray costs incurred by a municipality or
4
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 county as a result of opening or operating a
2 facility of the commission or the department;
3 authorizing the Department of Legal Affairs to
4 transfer certain funds between trust funds;
5 providing for reimbursement for purchase of
6 retirement credit by employees of the public
7 defender; restricting releases of juvenile
8 justice prevention funds; amending s. 318.21,
9 F.S.; distributing a portion of the civil
10 penalties paid to the county courts to the
11 state courts system instead of the Department
12 of Children and Family Services for
13 administrative, training, and other costs
14 associated with the implementation and
15 maintenance of Florida foster care citizen
16 review panels; amending s. 925.037, F.S.;
17 providing that the state courts system shall
18 allocate conflict counsel funds among certain
19 counties; amending s. 216.262, F.S.; providing
20 for additional positions to operate additional
21 prison bed capacity under certain
22 circumstances; amending ss. 938.01 and 943.25,
23 F.S.; providing for deposit of certain funds
24 for use by the Department of Law Enforcement,
25 rather than the Department of Community
26 Affairs; providing for future reversion to
27 current text; transferring the Criminal Justice
28 Program from the Department of Community
29 Affairs to the Department of Law Enforcement;
30 transferring the Prevention of Domestic and
31 Sexual Violence Program from the Department of
5
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Community Affairs to the Department of Children
2 and Family Services; providing matching funds
3 for the administration of such program;
4 amending ss. 316.1951, 319.14, 320.02, and
5 320.58, F.S.; deleting references to license
6 inspectors; providing for appointment of
7 compliance examiners; including reference to
8 the agents of the Department of Highway Safety
9 and Motor Vehicles with respect to application
10 for a certificate of title under ch. 319, F.S.;
11 providing for future reversion to current text;
12 amending s. 216.181, F.S.; authorizing the
13 Department of Transportation to transfer salary
14 rate to the turnpike budget entity to
15 facilitate transferring personnel to the
16 turnpike headquarters facility in Orange
17 County; amending s. 257.17, F.S.; providing for
18 library grants to certain municipalities;
19 amending s. 252.373, F.S.; providing for use of
20 funds of the Emergency Management,
21 Preparedness, and Assistance Trust Fund to
22 improve, and increase the number of, disaster
23 shelters in the state and improve local
24 disaster preparedness; amending s. 287.161,
25 F.S.; requiring the Department of Management
26 Services to charge all persons receiving
27 transportation from the executive aircraft pool
28 a specified rate; providing for deposit and use
29 of such fees; amending s. 212.20, F.S.;
30 providing for use of moneys allocated to the
31 Solid Waste Management Trust Fund; amending s.
6
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 403.7095, F.S., relating to the solid waste
2 management grant program; requiring a specified
3 level of funding for counties receiving solid
4 waste management and recycling grants;
5 providing for allocation of funds for
6 innovative programs to address recycling and
7 waste reduction practices and procedures;
8 amending s. 373.59, F.S.; requiring release of
9 certain moneys by the Secretary of
10 Environmental Protection to water management
11 districts, upon request; requiring transfer of
12 certain property owned by the Department of
13 Business and Professional Regulation to the
14 University of Florida; authorizing the
15 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
16 to use certain funds for expenses associated
17 with its administrative and regulatory powers
18 and duties; amending s. 259.032, F.S.;
19 authorizing the appropriation of certain funds
20 in the Conservation and Recreation Lands Trust
21 Fund for outdoor recreation grants; amending s.
22 110.12315, F.S.; providing copayment
23 requirements for the state employees'
24 prescription drug program; providing for a
25 preferred brand name drug list to be used in
26 the administration of such program; amending s.
27 110.1239, F.S.; providing requirements for the
28 funding of the state group health insurance
29 program; providing for implementation of
30 conversion of certain systems for budget
31 restructuring purposes; providing for future
7
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 repeal of various provisions; providing effect
2 of veto of specific appropriation or proviso to
3 which implementing language refers; providing
4 applicability to other legislation; providing
5 performance measures and standards for
6 individual programs within state agencies;
7 providing that the performance measures and
8 standards are directly linked to the
9 appropriations made in the 2000-2001 General
10 Appropriations Act, as required by the
11 Government Performance and Accountability Act
12 of 1994; providing severability; providing an
13 effective date.
14
15 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
16
17 Section 1. It is the intent of the Legislature that
18 the implementing and administering provisions of this act
19 apply to the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year
20 2000-2001.
21 Section 2. In order to implement Specific
22 Appropriation 135 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
23 the funds provided for workforce development shall be
24 initially allocated to the school district or community
25 college as designated. If, for any reason, a program in whole
26 or in part is moved from a community college to a school
27 district or moved from a school district to a community
28 college, the Commissioner of Education or the Executive
29 Director of the Division of Community Colleges shall submit a
30 budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216, Florida Statutes, to
31 transfer the appropriate amount of the 2000-2001 appropriation
8
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 between the affected district and community college. The
2 amount transferred shall be as near as practicable to the
3 actual amount appropriated for the FTE funded for that
4 program. This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
5 Section 3. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriation 2645A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
7 Act, the Legislature affirms and confirms that all funds and
8 related interest appropriated to the Instituto Patriotico v
9 Docente San Carlos, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation
10 doing business as the San Carlos Institute between fiscal
11 years 1986-1987 and 1992-1993, including, but not limited to,
12 Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) funds, were spent in
13 accordance with legislative intent; and the Legislature
14 affirms and confirms that all matching fund requirements have
15 been fully met by the San Carlos Institute. Furthermore, the
16 Legislature affirms and confirms that the appropriations to
17 the San Carlos Institute in fiscal years 1998-1999, 1999-2000,
18 and 2000-2001 do not require matching funds. Therefore, the
19 requirement that interest funds be repaid to the State of
20 Florida is hereby waived, and the Legislature directs all
21 applicable state agencies to release to the San Carlos
22 Institute all funds appropriated for the San Carlos Institute
23 for fiscal years 1993-1994, 1998-1999, 1999-2000, and
24 2000-2001. This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
25 Section 4. In order to implement Specific
26 Appropriation 135 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
27 subsection (7) is added to section 240.384, Florida Statutes,
28 to read:
29 240.384 Training school consolidation pilot
30 projects.--
31
9
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (7) AUDITOR GENERAL ANALYSIS.--Notwithstanding any
2 provision of this section to the contrary, and for the
3 2000-2001 fiscal year only, prior to the release of funds in
4 Specific Appropriation 135 of the 2000-2001 General
5 Appropriations Act for Leon and St. Johns Counties, the
6 Auditor General shall determine, no later than August 1, 2000,
7 that all FTEs, completions, placements, and related funds and
8 any other funds from all state sources relating to the
9 criminal justice training programs transferred to St. Johns
10 River Community College and Tallahassee Community College have
11 been correctly identified and transferred to the respective
12 community colleges. All program funds and their sources,
13 including, but not limited to, the entire FEFP, categorical
14 programs, workforce development funds, performance incentives,
15 incentive grants for expanded programs, and all other state
16 fund sources relating to these programs shall be included in
17 this analysis. All funds identified in this analysis for a
18 given program under this section shall be shifted to the base
19 appropriation for the appropriate community college before the
20 funds in Specific Appropriation 135 are allocated. This
21 subsection is repealed on July 1, 2000.
22 Section 5. In order to implement Specific
23 Appropriation 78 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
24 section 236.025, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
25 236.025 Revised funding model for exceptional student
26 education programs.--
27 (1) The revised funding model for exceptional student
28 education programs is designed to: be better for students
29 than the existing funding system by encouraging school
30 districts and schools to identify and implement educationally
31 effective instructional delivery models; simplify funding by
10
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 utilizing two five weighted cost factors and a guaranteed
2 allocation; provide fiscal support for exceptional students in
3 general education classes; be outcome driven; and be revenue
4 neutral; and reduce the paperwork burden associated with state
5 funding. This funding model is designed to support both
6 traditional and new service delivery models along the
7 continuum of services required for exceptional students. It is
8 the intent of the Legislature, through the General
9 Appropriations Act, to minimize the fiscal impact on school
10 districts of the implementation of this funding model.
11 (2)(a) The revised funding model uses existing basic,
12 English for Speakers of Other Languages, and vocational five
13 Florida Education Finance Program cost factors, two
14 exceptional education cost factors, and a guaranteed
15 allocation for exceptional student education programs.
16 Exceptional education cost factors are determined by using a
17 matrix of services to document the services that each
18 exceptional student will receive. The nature and intensity of
19 the services indicated on the matrix shall be consistent with
20 the services described in each exceptional student's
21 individual education plan.
22 (b) In order to generate funds using one of the two
23 weighted cost factors, a matrix of services must be completed
24 at the time of the student's initial placement into an
25 exceptional student education program and at least once every
26 3 years least once each year by public school personnel who
27 have received approved training. Additionally, each time an
28 exceptional student's individual education plan, family
29 support plan, or education plan is reviewed, the matrix of
30 services must also be reviewed. Nothing listed in the matrix
31 shall be construed as limiting the services a school district
11
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 must provide in order to ensure that exceptional students are
2 provided a free, appropriate public education.
3 (c) Students identified as exceptional, in accordance
4 with chapter 6A-6, Florida Administrative Code, who do not
5 have a matrix of services as specified in paragraph (b) shall
6 generate funds on the basis of full-time-equivalent student
7 membership in the Florida Education Finance Program at the
8 same funding level per student as provided for basic students.
9 Additional funds for these exceptional students shall be
10 provided through the guaranteed allocation designated in
11 subsection (3).
12 (3) For students identified as exceptional who do not
13 have a matrix of services, there is created a guaranteed
14 allocation to provide these students with a free appropriate
15 public education, in accordance with s. 230.23(4)(m) and rules
16 of the state board, which shall be allocated annually to each
17 school district in the amount provided in the General
18 Appropriations Act. These funds shall be in addition to the
19 funds appropriated on the basis of full-time-equivalent
20 student membership in the Florida Education Finance Program,
21 and the amount allocated for each school district shall not be
22 recalculated during the year. These funds shall be used to
23 provide special education and related services for exceptional
24 students.
25 (4)(3) The Department of Education shall revise its
26 monitoring systems for exceptional student education programs
27 to include a review of delivery of services as indicated on
28 the matrix of services.
29 (5)(4) The Department of Education shall adopt
30 promulgate rules necessary to implement the revised funding
31 model.
12
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (5) The funding level in the 1997-1998 FEFP for
2 exceptional student education shall be guaranteed for 3 years
3 so that no district will have a financial uncertainty during
4 the initial implementation of the revised funding model.
5 Section 6. The amendment of section 236.025, Florida
6 Statutes, by this act shall expire on July 1, 2001, and the
7 text of said section shall revert to that in existence on June
8 30, 2000, except that any amendments to such text enacted
9 other than by this act shall be preserved and continue to
10 operate to the extent that such amendments are not dependent
11 upon the portions of said text which expire pursuant to the
12 provisions of this act. The Division of Statutory Revision of
13 the Office of Legislative Services shall include in an
14 appropriate reviser's bill any amendments to said section
15 which are necessary to give effect to the legislative intent
16 expressed in this section.
17 Section 7. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriation 78 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
19 paragraphs (c) and (d) of subsection (1) of section 236.081,
20 Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
21 236.081 Funds for operation of schools.--If the annual
22 allocation from the Florida Education Finance Program to each
23 district for operation of schools is not determined in the
24 annual appropriations act or the substantive bill implementing
25 the annual appropriations act, it shall be determined as
26 follows:
27 (1) COMPUTATION OF THE BASIC AMOUNT TO BE INCLUDED FOR
28 OPERATION.--The following procedure shall be followed in
29 determining the annual allocation to each district for
30 operation:
31
13
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (c) Determination of programs.--Cost factors based on
2 desired relative cost differences between the following
3 programs shall be established in the annual General
4 Appropriations Act. The Commissioner of Education shall
5 specify a matrix of services and intensity levels to be used
6 by districts in the determination of the two weighted cost
7 factors for exceptional students with the highest levels of
8 need. For these students, the funding support level shall fund
9 the exceptional student education program, with the exception
10 of extended school year services for students with
11 disabilities. funding support for each exceptional student.
12 The funding support level for each exceptional student shall
13 fund the exceptional student's total education program.
14 1. Basic programs.--
15 a. Kindergarten and grades 1, 2, and 3.
16 b. Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.
17 c. Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12.
18 2. Programs for exceptional students.--
19 a. Support Level I.
20 b. Support Level II.
21 c. Support Level III.
22 a.d. Support Level IV.
23 b.e. Support Level V.
24 3. Secondary career education programs.--
25 4. Students-at-risk programs.--
26 a. Dropout prevention and teenage parents.
27 4.b. English for Speakers of Other Languages.--
28 (d) Annual allocation calculation.--
29 1. The Department of Education is authorized and
30 directed to review all district programs and enrollment
31 projections and calculate a maximum total weighted full-time
14
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 equivalent student enrollment for each district for the K-12
2 FEFP.
3 2. Maximum enrollments calculated by the department
4 shall be derived from enrollment estimates used by the
5 Legislature to calculate the FEFP. If two or more districts
6 enter into an agreement under the provisions of s.
7 230.23(4)(d), after the final enrollment estimate is agreed
8 upon, the amount of FTE specified in the agreement, not to
9 exceed the estimate for the specific program as identified in
10 paragraph (c), may be transferred from the participating
11 districts to the district providing the program.
12 3. As part of its calculation of each district's
13 maximum total weighted full-time equivalent student
14 enrollment, the department shall establish separate enrollment
15 ceilings for each of two program groups. Group 1 shall be
16 composed of grades K-3, grades 4-8, and grades 9-12. Group 2
17 shall be composed of students in exceptional student education
18 programs, English for Speakers of Other Languages
19 students-at-risk programs, all basic programs other than the
20 programs in group 1, and all vocational programs in grades
21 7-12.
22 a. The weighted enrollment ceiling for group 2
23 programs shall be calculated by multiplying the final
24 enrollment conference estimate for each program by the
25 appropriate program weight. The weighted enrollment ceiling
26 for program group 2 shall be the sum of the weighted
27 enrollment ceilings for each program in the program group,
28 plus the increase in weighted full-time equivalent student
29 membership from the prior year for clients of the Department
30 of Children and Family Services and the Department of Juvenile
31 Justice.
15
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. If, for any calculation of the FEFP, the weighted
2 enrollment for program group 2, derived by multiplying actual
3 enrollments by appropriate program weights, exceeds the
4 enrollment ceiling for that group, the following procedure
5 shall be followed to reduce the weighted enrollment for that
6 group to equal the enrollment ceiling:
7 (I) The weighted enrollment ceiling for each program
8 in the program group shall be subtracted from the weighted
9 enrollment for that program derived from actual enrollments.
10 (II) If the difference calculated under
11 sub-sub-subparagraph (I) is greater than zero for any program,
12 a reduction proportion shall be computed for the program by
13 dividing the absolute value of the difference by the total
14 amount by which the weighted enrollment for the program group
15 exceeds the weighted enrollment ceiling for the program group.
16 (III) The reduction proportion calculated under
17 sub-sub-subparagraph (II) shall be multiplied by the total
18 amount of the program group's enrollment over the ceiling as
19 calculated under sub-sub-subparagraph (I).
20 (IV) The prorated reduction amount calculated under
21 sub-sub-subparagraph (III) shall be subtracted from the
22 program's weighted enrollment. For any calculation of the
23 FEFP, the enrollment ceiling for group 1 shall be calculated
24 by multiplying the actual enrollment for each program in the
25 program group by its appropriate program weight.
26 c. For program group 2, the weighted enrollment
27 ceiling shall be a number not less than the sum obtained by:
28 (I) Multiplying the sum of reported FTE for all
29 programs in the program group that have a cost factor of 1.0
30 or more by 1.0, and
31
16
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (II) By adding this number to the sum obtained by
2 multiplying the projected FTE for all programs with a cost
3 factor less than 1.0 by the actual cost factor.
4 4. Following completion of the weighted enrollment
5 ceiling calculation as provided in subparagraph 3., a
6 supplemental capping calculation shall be employed for those
7 districts that are over their weighted enrollment ceiling. For
8 each such district, the total reported unweighted FTE
9 enrollment for group 2 programs shall be compared with the
10 total appropriated unweighted FTE enrollment for group 2
11 programs. If the total reported unweighted FTE for group 2 is
12 greater than the appropriated unweighted FTE, then the excess
13 unweighted FTE up to the unweighted FTE transferred from group
14 2 to group 1 for each district by the Public School FTE
15 Estimating Conference shall be funded at a weight of 1.0 and
16 added to the funded weighted FTE computed in subparagraph 3.
17 This adjustment shall be calculated beginning with the third
18 calculation of the 1998-1999 FEFP.
19 Section 8. The amendment of paragraphs (c) and (d) of
20 subsection (1) of section 236.081, Florida Statutes, by this
21 act shall expire on July 1, 2001, and the text of said
22 paragraphs shall revert to that in existence on June 30, 2000,
23 except that any amendments to such text enacted other than by
24 this act shall be preserved and continue to operate to the
25 extent that such amendments are not dependent upon the
26 portions of said text which expire pursuant to the provisions
27 of this act. The Division of Statutory Revision of the Office
28 of Legislative Services shall include in an appropriate
29 reviser's bill any amendments to said paragraphs which are
30 necessary to give effect to the legislative intent expressed
31 in this section.
17
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Section 9. In order to implement Specific
2 Appropriation 78 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
3 paragraph (b) of subsection (2) and paragraph (a) of
4 subsection (3) of section 237.34, Florida Statutes, are
5 amended to read:
6 237.34 Cost accounting and reporting.--
7 (2) COST REPORTING.--
8 (b) Each district shall report on a school-by-school
9 and on an aggregate district basis expenditures for each
10 program funded in s. 236.081(1)(c), except that programs for
11 exceptional students shall be reported on an aggregate basis.
12 (3) PROGRAM EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS.--
13 (a) Each district shall expend at least the percent of
14 the funds generated by each of the programs listed herein on
15 the aggregate total school costs for such programs:
16 1. Kindergarten and grades 1, 2, and 3, 90 percent.
17 2. Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, 80 percent.
18 3. Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12, 80 percent.
19 4. Programs for exceptional students, on an aggregate
20 program basis, 90 80 percent.
21 5. Grades 7 through 12 vocational education programs,
22 on an aggregate program basis, 80 percent.
23 6. Students-at-risk programs, on an aggregate program
24 basis, 80 percent.
25 7. Juvenile justice programs, on an aggregate program
26 basis, 80 percent.
27 8. Any new program established and funded under s.
28 236.081(1)(c), that is not included under subparagraphs 1.
29 through 6., on an aggregate basis as appropriate, 80 percent.
30 Section 10. The amendment of paragraph (b) of
31 subsection (2) and paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of section
18
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 237.34, Florida Statutes, by this act shall expire on July 1,
2 2001, and the text of said paragraphs shall revert to that in
3 existence on June 30, 2000, except that any amendments to such
4 text enacted other than by this act shall be preserved and
5 continue to operate to the extent that such amendments are not
6 dependent upon the portions of said text which expire pursuant
7 to the provisions of this act. The Division of Statutory
8 Revision of the Office of Legislative Services shall include
9 in an appropriate reviser's bill any amendments to said
10 paragraphs which are necessary to give effect to the
11 legislative intent expressed in this section.
12 Section 11. In order to implement Specific
13 Appropriation 78 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
14 paragraph (d) of subsection (4) of section 236.081, Florida
15 Statutes, is amended to read:
16 236.081 Funds for operation of schools.--If the annual
17 allocation from the Florida Education Finance Program to each
18 district for operation of schools is not determined in the
19 annual appropriations act or the substantive bill implementing
20 the annual appropriations act, it shall be determined as
21 follows:
22 (4) COMPUTATION OF DISTRICT REQUIRED LOCAL
23 EFFORT.--The Legislature shall prescribe the aggregate
24 required local effort for all school districts collectively as
25 an item in the General Appropriations Act for each fiscal
26 year. The amount that each district shall provide annually
27 toward the cost of the Florida Education Finance Program for
28 kindergarten through grade 12 programs shall be calculated as
29 follows:
30 (d) Exclusion.--
31 1. In those instances in which:
19
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a.1. There is litigation either attacking the
2 authority of the property appraiser to include certain
3 property on the tax assessment roll as taxable property or
4 contesting the assessed value of certain property on the tax
5 assessment roll, and
6 b.2. The assessed value of the property in contest
7 involves more than 6 percent of the total nonexempt assessment
8 roll, the plaintiff shall provide to the district school board
9 of the county in which the property is located and to the
10 Department of Education a certified copy of the petition and
11 receipt for the good faith payment at the time they are filed
12 with the court.
13
14 the assessed value of the property in contest shall be
15 excluded from the taxable value for school purposes for
16 purposes of computing the district required local effort.
17 2. For purposes of computing the required local effort
18 for each district affected by such petition, the Department of
19 Education shall exclude from the district's total nonexempt
20 assessment roll the assessed value of the property in contest
21 and shall add the amount of the good faith payment to the
22 district's required local effort.
23 Section 12. The amendment of paragraph (d) of
24 subsection (4) of section 236.081, Florida Statutes, by this
25 act shall expire on July 1, 2001, and the text of said
26 paragraph shall revert to that in existence on June 30, 2000,
27 except that any amendments to such text enacted other than by
28 this act shall be preserved and continue to operate to the
29 extent that such amendments are not dependent upon the
30 portions of said text which expire pursuant to the provisions
31 of this act. The Division of Statutory Revision of the Office
20
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 of Legislative Services shall include in an appropriate
2 reviser's bill any amendments to said paragraph which are
3 necessary to give effect to the legislative intent expressed
4 in this section.
5 Section 13. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriation 246 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
7 subsection (3) of section 409.9115, Florida Statutes, is
8 amended to read:
9 409.9115 Disproportionate share program for mental
10 health hospitals.--The Agency for Health Care Administration
11 shall design and implement a system of making mental health
12 disproportionate share payments to hospitals that qualify for
13 disproportionate share payments under s. 409.911. This system
14 of payments shall conform with federal requirements and shall
15 distribute funds in each fiscal year for which an
16 appropriation is made by making quarterly Medicaid payments.
17 Notwithstanding s. 409.915, counties are exempt from
18 contributing toward the cost of this special reimbursement for
19 patients.
20 (3) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
21 Agency for Health Care Administration shall make payments for
22 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
23 hospitals on a monthly basis. If the amounts appropriated for
24 the Medicaid disproportionate share program for mental health
25 hospitals are increased or decreased during the fiscal year
26 pursuant to the requirements of chapter 216, the required
27 adjustment shall be prorated over the remaining payment
28 periods. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.
29 Section 14. In order to implement Specific
30 Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
31 and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the Agency for Health
21
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Care Administration shall use the 1992-1993 disproportionate
2 share formula, the 1994 audited financial data, and the
3 Medicaid per diem rate as of January 1, 1999, for those
4 hospitals that qualify for the hospital disproportionate share
5 program funded in that specific appropriation. This section is
6 repealed on July 1, 2001.
7 Section 15. In order to implement Specific
8 Appropriation 212 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
9 subsection (6) of section 409.9116, Florida Statutes, is
10 amended to read:
11 409.9116 Disproportionate share/financial assistance
12 program for rural hospitals.--In addition to the payments made
13 under s. 409.911, the Agency for Health Care Administration
14 shall administer a federally matched disproportionate share
15 program and a state-funded financial assistance program for
16 statutory rural hospitals. The agency shall make
17 disproportionate share payments to statutory rural hospitals
18 that qualify for such payments and financial assistance
19 payments to statutory rural hospitals that do not qualify for
20 disproportionate share payments. The disproportionate share
21 program payments shall be limited by and conform with federal
22 requirements. In fiscal year 1993-1994, available funds shall
23 be distributed in one payment, as soon as practicable after
24 the effective date of this act. In subsequent fiscal years,
25 funds shall be distributed quarterly in each fiscal year for
26 which an appropriation is made. Notwithstanding the provisions
27 of s. 409.915, counties are exempt from contributing toward
28 the cost of this special reimbursement for hospitals serving a
29 disproportionate share of low-income patients.
30 (6) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
31 Agency for Health Care Administration shall use the following
22
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 formula for distribution of the funds in Specific
2 Appropriation 212 236 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General
3 Appropriations Act for the disproportionate share/financial
4 assistance program for rural hospitals.
5 (a) The agency shall first determine a preliminary
6 payment amount for each rural hospital by allocating all
7 available state funds using the following formula:
8
9 PDAER = (TAERH x TARH)/STAERH
10
11 Where:
12 PDAER = preliminary distribution amount for each rural
13 hospital.
14 TAERH = total amount earned by each rural hospital.
15 TARH = total amount appropriated or distributed under
16 this section.
17 STAERH = sum of total amount earned by each rural
18 hospital.
19 (b) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
20 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
21 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (a).
22 (c) The state-funds-only payment amount is then
23 calculated for each hospital using the formula:
24
25 SFOER = Maximum value of (1) SFOL - PDAER or (2) 0
26
27 Where:
28 SFOER = state-funds-only payment amount for each rural
29 hospital.
30 SFOL = state-funds-only payment level, which is set at
31 4 percent of TARH.
23
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (d) The adjusted total amount allocated to the rural
2 disproportionate share program shall then be calculated using
3 the following formula:
4
5 ATARH = (TARH - SSFOER)
6
7 Where:
8 ATARH = adjusted total amount appropriated or
9 distributed under this section.
10 SSFOER = sum of the state-funds-only payment amount
11 calculated under paragraph (c) for all rural hospitals.
12 (e) The determination of the amount of rural
13 disproportionate share hospital funds is calculated by the
14 following formula:
15
16 TDAERH = [(TAERH x ATARH)/STAERH]
17
18 Where:
19 TDAERH = total distribution amount for each rural
20 hospital.
21 (f) Federal matching funds for the disproportionate
22 share program shall then be calculated for those hospitals
23 that qualify for disproportionate share in paragraph (e).
24 (g) State-funds-only payment amounts calculated under
25 paragraph (c) are then added to the results of paragraph (f)
26 to determine the total distribution amount for each rural
27 hospital.
28 (h) This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.
29 Section 16. In order to implement Specific
30 Appropriation 234A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
31 Act, section 409.9119, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
24
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 409.9119 Disproportionate share program for specialty
2 hospitals for children.--In addition to the payments made
3 under s. 409.911, the Agency for Health Care Administration
4 shall develop and implement a system under which
5 disproportionate share payments are made to those hospitals
6 that are licensed by the state as specialty hospitals for
7 children and were licensed on January 1, 2000, as specialty
8 hospitals for children. This system of payments must conform
9 to federal requirements and must distribute funds in each
10 fiscal year for which an appropriation is made by making
11 quarterly Medicaid payments. Notwithstanding s. 409.915,
12 counties are exempt from contributing toward the cost of this
13 special reimbursement for hospitals that serve a
14 disproportionate share of low-income patients.
15 (1) The agency shall use the following formula to
16 calculate the total amount earned for hospitals that
17 participate in the specialty hospital for children
18 disproportionate share program:
19 TAE = DSR x BMPD x MD
20 Where:
21 TAE = total amount earned by a specialty hospital for
22 children.
23 DSR = disproportionate share rate.
24 BMPD = base Medicaid per diem.
25 MD = Medicaid days.
26 (2) The agency shall calculate the total additional
27 payment for hospitals that participate in the specialty
28 hospital for children disproportionate share program as
29 follows:
30
31 TAP = (TAE x TA)
25
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1
2 STAE
3 Where:
4 TAP = total additional payment for a specialty hospital
5 for children.
6 TAE = total amount earned by a specialty hospital for
7 children.
8 TA = total appropriation for the specialty hospital for
9 children disproportionate share program.
10 STAE = sum of total amount earned by each hospital that
11 participates in the specialty hospital for children
12 disproportionate share program.
13
14 (3) A hospital may not receive any payments under this
15 section until it achieves full compliance with the applicable
16 rules of the agency. A hospital that is not in compliance for
17 two or more consecutive quarters may not receive its share of
18 the funds. Any forfeited funds must be distributed to the
19 remaining participating specialty hospitals for children that
20 are in compliance.
21 (4) This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
22 Section 17. In order to implement Specific
23 Appropriations 264-435 and 462-592E of the 2000-2001 General
24 Appropriations Act, paragraph (c) of subsection (15) of
25 section 216.181, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
26 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
27 capital outlay.--
28 (15)
29 (c) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,
30 funds appropriated to the Department of Children and Family
31 Services in Specific Appropriations 264-435 292 through 425
26
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 and the Department of Health in Specific Appropriations
2 462-592E 445 through 540 of the 2000-2001 1999-2000 General
3 Appropriations Act may be advanced, unless specifically
4 prohibited in such General Appropriations Act, for those
5 contracted services that were approved for advancement by the
6 Comptroller in fiscal year 1993-1994, including those services
7 contracted on a fixed-price or unit cost basis. This
8 paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.
9 Section 18. In order to implement Specific
10 Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
11 and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the Agency for Health
12 Care Administration shall include health maintenance
13 organization recipients in the county billing for inpatient
14 hospital stays for the purpose of shared costs with counties
15 in accordance with the Florida Statutes. This section is
16 repealed on July 1, 2001.
17 Section 19. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriations 1-182, 184-263, 264-435, 462-592E, 2248-2333,
19 and 2402-2407 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, and
20 for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the Department of Children
21 and Family Services, the Department of Education, the
22 Department of Management Services, the Department of Labor and
23 Employment Security, the Department of Health, and the Agency
24 for Health Care Administration may transfer positions and
25 general revenue funds as necessary to comply with any
26 provision of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act or
27 Workforce Innovation Act of 2000 which requires or
28 specifically authorizes the transfer of positions and general
29 revenue funds between these agencies. This section is repealed
30 on July 1, 2001.
31
27
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Section 20. In order to implement Specific
2 Appropriations 307-310 and 312 of the 2000-2001 General
3 Appropriations Act, section 39.3065, Florida Statutes, is
4 amended to read:
5 39.3065 Sheriffs of certain Pasco, Manatee, and
6 Pinellas counties to provide child protective investigative
7 services; procedures; funding.--
8 (1) As described in this section, the Department of
9 Children and Family Services shall, by the end of fiscal year
10 1999-2000, transfer all responsibility for child protective
11 investigations for Pinellas County, Manatee County, and Pasco
12 County to the sheriff of that county in which the child abuse,
13 neglect, or abandonment is alleged to have occurred. Each
14 sheriff is responsible for the provision of all child
15 protective investigations in his or her county. Each
16 individual who provides these services must complete the
17 training provided to and required of protective investigators
18 employed by the Department of Children and Family Services.
19 (2) During fiscal year 1998-1999, the Department of
20 Children and Family Services and each sheriff's office shall
21 enter into a contract for the provision of these services.
22 Funding for the services will be appropriated to the
23 Department of Children and Family Services, and the department
24 shall transfer to the respective sheriffs for the duration of
25 fiscal year 1998-1999, funding for the investigative
26 responsibilities assumed by the sheriffs, including federal
27 funds that the provider is eligible for and agrees to earn and
28 that portion of general revenue funds which is currently
29 associated with the services that are being furnished under
30 contract, and including, but not limited to, funding for all
31 investigative, supervisory, and clerical positions; training;
28
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 all associated equipment; furnishings; and other fixed capital
2 items. The contract must specify whether the department will
3 continue to perform part or none of the child protective
4 investigations during the initial year. The sheriffs may
5 either conduct the investigations themselves or may, in turn,
6 subcontract with law enforcement officials or with properly
7 trained employees of private agencies to conduct
8 investigations related to neglect cases only. If such a
9 subcontract is awarded, the sheriff must take full
10 responsibility for any safety decision made by the
11 subcontractor and must immediately respond with law
12 enforcement staff to any situation that requires removal of a
13 child due to a condition that poses an immediate threat to the
14 child's life. The contract must specify whether the services
15 are to be performed by departmental employees or by persons
16 determined by the sheriff. During this initial year, the
17 department is responsible for quality assurance, and the
18 department retains the responsibility for the performance of
19 all child protective investigations. The department must
20 identify any barriers to transferring the entire
21 responsibility for child protective services to the sheriffs'
22 offices and must pursue avenues for removing any such barriers
23 by means including, but not limited to, applying for federal
24 waivers. By January 15, 1999, the department shall submit to
25 the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of
26 Representatives, and the chairs of the Senate and House
27 committees that oversee departmental activities a report that
28 describes any remaining barriers, including any that pertain
29 to funding and related administrative issues. Unless the
30 Legislature, on the basis of that report or other pertinent
31 information, acts to block a transfer of the entire
29
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 responsibility for child protective investigations to the
2 sheriffs' offices, the sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee
3 County, and Pinellas County, beginning in fiscal year
4 1999-2000, shall assume the entire responsibility for such
5 services, as provided in subsection (3).
6 (3)(a) Beginning in fiscal year 1999-2000, the
7 sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas County
8 have the responsibility to provide all child protective
9 investigations in their respective counties.
10 (b) The sheriffs of Pasco County, Manatee County, and
11 Pinellas County shall operate, at a minimum, in accordance
12 with the performance standards established by the Legislature
13 for protective investigations conducted by the Department of
14 Children and Family Services.
15 (c) Funds for providing child protective
16 investigations in Pasco County, Manatee County, and Pinellas
17 County must be identified in the annual appropriation made to
18 the Department of Children and Family Services, which shall
19 award grants for the full amount identified to the respective
20 sheriffs' offices. Funds for the child protective
21 investigations may not be integrated into the sheriffs'
22 regular budgets. Budgetary data and other data relating to the
23 performance of child protective investigations must be
24 maintained separately from all other records of the sheriffs'
25 offices.
26 (d) Program performance evaluation shall be based on
27 criteria mutually agreed upon by the respective sheriffs and a
28 committee of seven persons appointed by the Governor and
29 selected from those persons serving on the Department of
30 Children and Family Services District 5 Health and Human
31 Services Board and District 6 Health and Human Services Board.
30
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of Pasco
2 County, two of the Governor's appointees must be residents of
3 Manatee County, and two of the Governor's appointees must be
4 residents of Pinellas County. Such appointees shall serve at
5 the pleasure of the Governor. The individuals appointed must
6 have demonstrated experience in outcome evaluation, social
7 service areas of protective investigation, or child welfare
8 supervision. The committee shall submit an annual report
9 regarding quality performance, outcome-measure attainment, and
10 cost efficiency to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of
11 the House of Representatives, and to the Governor no later
12 than January 31 of each year the sheriffs are receiving
13 general appropriations to provide child protective
14 investigations.
15 (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (d),
16 and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, program performance
17 evaluation shall be based on criteria mutually agreed upon by
18 the respective sheriffs and the Department of Children and
19 Family Services. The program performance evaluation shall be
20 conducted by a team of peer reviewers from the respective
21 sheriffs' offices that perform child protective investigations
22 and representatives from the department. The department shall
23 submit a report regarding quality performance, outcome-measure
24 attainment, and cost efficiency to the President of the
25 Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the
26 Governor no later than January 31, 2001. This paragraph is
27 repealed on July 1, 2001.
28 (4) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
29 Sheriffs Sheriff of Broward County and Seminole County shall
30 perform the same child protective investigative services
31 according to the same standards as are performed by the
31
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 sheriffs of Pinellas County, Manatee County, and Pasco County
2 under this section. This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.
3 Section 21. In order to implement Specific
4 Appropriation 367 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
5 and notwithstanding s. 394.908, Florida Statutes, all funds in
6 excess of fiscal year 1998-1999 appropriations are to be
7 allocated based on equity except those programs and funds
8 specifically identified in clarifying language in the General
9 Appropriations Act. No district shall receive an allocation of
10 recurring funds that is less than its initial approved
11 operating budget plus any distributions of lump sums for the
12 state fiscal year 1998-1999. This section is repealed on July
13 1, 2001.
14 Section 22. In order to implement Specific
15 Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
16 paragraph (c) is added to subsection (5) of section 409.905,
17 Florida Statutes, to read:
18 409.905 Mandatory Medicaid services.--The agency may
19 make payments for the following services, which are required
20 of the state by Title XIX of the Social Security Act,
21 furnished by Medicaid providers to recipients who are
22 determined to be eligible on the dates on which the services
23 were provided. Any service under this section shall be
24 provided only when medically necessary and in accordance with
25 state and federal law. Nothing in this section shall be
26 construed to prevent or limit the agency from adjusting fees,
27 reimbursement rates, lengths of stay, number of visits, number
28 of services, or any other adjustments necessary to comply with
29 the availability of moneys and any limitations or directions
30 provided for in the General Appropriations Act or chapter 216.
31
32
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (5) HOSPITAL INPATIENT SERVICES.--The agency shall pay
2 for all covered services provided for the medical care and
3 treatment of a recipient who is admitted as an inpatient by a
4 licensed physician or dentist to a hospital licensed under
5 part I of chapter 395. However, the agency shall limit the
6 payment for inpatient hospital services for a Medicaid
7 recipient 21 years of age or older to 45 days or the number of
8 days necessary to comply with the General Appropriations Act.
9 (c) The Agency for Health Care Administration shall
10 adjust a hospital's current inpatient per diem rate to reflect
11 the cost of serving the Medicaid population at that
12 institution if:
13 1. The hospital experiences an increase in Medicaid
14 caseload by more than 25 percent in any year, primarily
15 resulting from the closure of a hospital in the same service
16 area occurring after July 1, 1995; or
17 2. The hospital's Medicaid per diem rate is at least
18 25 percent below the Medicaid per patient cost for that year.
19
20 No later than November 1, 2000, the agency must provide
21 estimated costs for any adjustment in a hospital inpatient per
22 diem pursuant to this paragraph to the Executive Office of the
23 Governor, the House of Representatives General Appropriations
24 Committee, and the Senate Budget Committee. Before the agency
25 implements a change in a hospital's inpatient per diem rate
26 pursuant to this paragraph, the Legislature must have
27 specifically appropriated sufficient funds in the 2001-2002
28 General Appropriations Act to support the increase in cost as
29 estimated by the agency. This paragraph is repealed on July 1,
30 2001.
31
33
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Section 23. In order to implement Specific
2 Appropriations 264-435 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
3 Act, subsection (1) of section 1 of chapter 99-219, Laws of
4 Florida, is amended to read:
5 Section 1. (1) The following provisions of section
6 20.19, Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, are waived until
7 July 1, 2001 2000, for the purpose of allowing the Department
8 of Children and Family Services to organize programs,
9 districts, and functions of the department to achieve more
10 effective and efficient service delivery and improve
11 accountability, notwithstanding the provisions of section
12 20.04, Florida Statutes:
13 (a) Section 20.19(2)(b) and (f), Florida Statutes,
14 1998 Supplement, relating to the secretary and deputy
15 secretary.
16 (b) Section 20.19(3), Florida Statutes, 1998
17 Supplement, relating to the Office of Standards and
18 Evaluation.
19 (c) Section 20.19(5)(a), Florida Statutes, 1998
20 Supplement, relating to program offices.
21 (d) Section 20.19(6)(a), (c), and (d), Florida
22 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to the Assistant Secretary
23 for Administration.
24 (e) Section 20.19(8)(l), (m), (n), and (o), Florida
25 Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to health and human
26 services boards.
27 (f) Section 20.19(9), Florida Statutes, 1998
28 Supplement, relating to district nominee qualifications review
29 committees.
30
31
34
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (g) Section 20.19(10), (a), (b), (c)1.-7., (d), (e),
2 (f), and (g), Florida Statutes, 1998 Supplement, relating to
3 the district administrator.
4 (h) Section 20.19(12)(d), Florida Statutes, 1998
5 Supplement, relating to the departmental budget.
6
7 Actions taken under the authority granted by this section must
8 be taken in consultation with the Executive Office of the
9 Governor. The secretary shall submit a report describing
10 actions taken and additional plans for implementing the
11 provisions of this section to the Governor, the President of
12 the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by
13 30 thirty days after this act bill becomes a law. The
14 department shall submit status reports on a monthly basis
15 through December 2000 1999.
16 Section 24. In order to implement Specific
17 Appropriations 264-435 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
18 Act, subsection (4) is added to section 216.177, Florida
19 Statutes, to read:
20 216.177 Appropriations acts, statement of intent,
21 violation, notice, review and objection procedures.--
22 (4) Notwithstanding the 14-day notice requirements of
23 this section, and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the
24 Department of Children and Family Services is required to
25 provide notice of proposed transfers submitted pursuant to s.
26 20.19(10)(c)8. to the Executive Office of the Governor and the
27 chairs of the legislative appropriations committees at least 3
28 working days prior to their implementation.
29 Section 25. In order to implement Specific
30 Appropriations 264-435 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
31 Act, notwithstanding any provision of state law to the
35
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 contrary, and within the procedures, requirements, and
2 limitations of federal law and regulation, income earned
3 through temporary decennial census employment shall be
4 disregarded when determining eligibility or continued
5 eligibility for participation in programs requiring a
6 financial determination for receipt of benefits, payments, or
7 services, including the WAGES Program under chapter 414,
8 Florida Statutes, subsidized child care under s. 402.3015,
9 Florida Statutes, and any other social or economic assistance
10 funded through the state share of Temporary Assistance for
11 Needy Families (TANF) block grant funds. For purposes of this
12 section, "temporary decennial census employment" means
13 employment for 120 days or less, within the period January 1,
14 2000, to December 31, 2000, with the United States Department
15 of Commerce as a census-taker or block canvasser. This section
16 is repealed on July 1, 2001.
17 Section 26. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriation 217 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
19 subsection (7) is added to section 409.915, Florida Statutes,
20 to read:
21 409.915 County contributions to Medicaid.--Although
22 the state is responsible for the full portion of the state
23 share of the matching funds required for the Medicaid program,
24 in order to acquire a certain portion of these funds, the
25 state shall charge the counties for certain items of care and
26 service as provided in this section.
27 (7) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to
28 the contrary, counties are exempt from contributing toward the
29 increased cost of hospital inpatient services due to the
30 elimination of ceilings on Medicaid inpatient reimbursement
31 rates paid to teaching hospitals, specialty hospitals, and
36
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 community health education program hospitals and for special
2 Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals for which the Legislature
3 has specifically appropriated funds. This subsection is
4 repealed on July 1, 2001.
5 Section 27. In order to implement Specific
6 Appropriations 217 and 220 of the 2000-2001 General
7 Appropriations Act, the Agency for Health Care Administration
8 shall not adjust a premium paid to a health maintenance
9 organization or a prepaid health care plan to reflect an
10 increase in such premium because of specifically appropriated
11 funds in the General Appropriations Act to eliminate ceilings
12 on Medicaid reimbursement rates paid to teaching hospitals,
13 specialty hospitals, and community health education program
14 hospitals and for making special Medicaid payments to
15 hospitals. This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
16 Section 28. (1) In order to implement Specific
17 Appropriations 361-364 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
18 Act, and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the Department of
19 Children and Family Services may continue to contract with
20 existing providers of treatment and detention services until
21 completion of the 600-bed facility near DeSoto County to house
22 and rehabilitate sexually violent predators.
23 (2)(a) The Correctional Privatization Commission
24 created under chapter 957, Florida Statutes, in consultation
25 with the Department of Children and Family Services, shall
26 develop and issue a request for proposals on or before
27 September 1, 2000, for the financing, design, construction,
28 acquisition, ownership, leasing, and operation of a secure
29 facility of at least 600 beds to house and rehabilitate sexual
30 predators committed under part V of chapter 394, Florida
31 Statutes, the Jimmy Ryce Act of 1998. The Secretary of
37
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Children and Family Services shall provide final approval of
2 the request for proposal, the successful bidder, and the
3 contract.
4 (b) This constitutes specific legislative
5 authorization for the Correctional Privatization Commission to
6 enter into a contract with a provider for the financing,
7 design, construction, acquisition, ownership, leasing, and
8 operation of a secure facility to house and rehabilitate
9 sexual predators to be constructed in Desoto County, Florida.
10 (c) The selected contractor is authorized to enter
11 into a lease arrangement or other private financing or to
12 sponsor the issuance of tax exempt bonds, certificates of
13 participation, or other public or private means to finance the
14 facility. The state is authorized to enter into all such
15 agreements as are necessary, including lease alternatives, to
16 bring the facility to an operational state and to commence
17 leasing of the facility.
18 (d) Upon completion of the sexual predator secure
19 treatment facility in Desoto County, the Martin Sexually
20 Violent Predator Treatment and Retaining Program shall be
21 phased out, to be terminated within 1 year after completion of
22 the facility.
23 (3) This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
24 Section 29. In order to implement Specific
25 Appropriations 204A-240, 250, and 251 of the 2000-2001 General
26 Appropriations Act, paragraph (k) is added to subsection (2)
27 of section 409.9122, Florida Statutes, to read:
28 409.9122 Mandatory Medicaid managed care enrollment;
29 programs and procedures.--
30 (2)
31
38
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (k)1. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (f),
2 and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, when a Medicaid
3 recipient does not choose a managed care plan or MediPass
4 provider, the agency shall assign the Medicaid recipient to a
5 managed care plan, except in those counties in which there are
6 fewer than two managed care plans accepting Medicaid
7 enrollees, in which case assignment shall be to a managed care
8 plan or a MediPass provider. Medicaid recipients in counties
9 with fewer than two managed care plans accepting Medicaid
10 enrollees who are subject to mandatory assignment but who fail
11 to make a choice shall be assigned to managed care plans until
12 an equal enrollment of 50 percent in MediPass and provider
13 service networks and 50 percent in managed care plans is
14 achieved. Once equal enrollment is achieved, the assignments
15 shall be divided in order to maintain an equal enrollment in
16 MediPass and managed care plans. When making assignments, the
17 agency shall take into account the following criteria:
18 a. A managed care plan has sufficient network capacity
19 to meet the need of members.
20 b. The managed care plan or MediPass has previously
21 enrolled the recipient as a member, or one of the managed care
22 plan's primary care providers or MediPass providers has
23 previously provided health care to the recipient.
24 c. The agency has knowledge that the member has
25 previously expressed a preference for a particular managed
26 care plan or MediPass provider as indicated by Medicaid
27 fee-for-service claims data, but has failed to make a choice.
28 d. The managed care plan's or MediPass primary care
29 providers are geographically accessible to the recipient's
30 residence.
31
39
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 e. The agency has authority to make mandatory
2 assignments based on quality of service and performance of
3 managed care plans.
4 2. This paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2001.
5 Section 30. Consistent with the provisions of s.
6 216.163, Florida Statutes, in accordance with
7 performance-based program budgeting requirements, and
8 notwithstanding the provisions of s. 216.181, Florida
9 Statutes, the Department of Law Enforcement may transfer up to
10 one-half of 1 percent of the funds in Specific Appropriations
11 1150, 1160A, 1161, 1165, 1171, 1175, 1178, 1183, 1186, and
12 1190C of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act for salary
13 bonuses for departmental employees at the discretion of the
14 executive director, provided that such bonuses are given only
15 to selected employees for meritorious performance, instead of
16 being given as across-the-board bonuses for all employees. The
17 department, after consultation with the Executive Office of
18 the Governor, shall provide a plan to the chairs of the
19 legislative appropriations committees responsible for
20 producing the General Appropriations Act for review before
21 awarding such bonuses. This section is repealed on July 1,
22 2001.
23 Section 31. In order to implement Specific
24 Appropriations 1150, 1160A, 1161, 1165, 1171, 1175, 1178,
25 1183, 1186, and 1190C of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
26 Act, subsection (17) of section 216.181, Florida Statutes, is
27 amended to read:
28 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
29 capital outlay.--
30 (17) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
31 section to the contrary, and for the 2000-2001 1999-2000
40
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 fiscal year only, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement
2 may transfer up to 20 positions and associated budget between
3 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
4 throughout each transfer. The department may also transfer up
5 to 10 percent of the initial approved salary rate between
6 budget entities, provided the same funding source is used
7 throughout each transfer. The department must provide notice
8 to the Executive Office of the Governor, the chair of the
9 Senate Budget Committee, and the chair of the House Committee
10 on Criminal Justice Appropriations for all transfers of
11 positions or salary rate. This subsection is repealed on July
12 1, 2001 2000.
13 Section 32. In order to implement Specific
14 Appropriation 1137 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
15 Act, the Correctional Privatization Commission may expend
16 appropriated funds to assist in defraying the costs of impacts
17 that are incurred by a municipality or county and associated
18 with opening or operating a facility under the authority of
19 the Correctional Privatization Commission or a facility under
20 the authority of the Department of Juvenile Justice which is
21 located within that municipality or county. The amount that is
22 to be paid under this section for any facility may not exceed
23 1 percent of the facility construction cost, less building
24 impact fees imposed by the municipality, or by the county if
25 the facility is located in the unincorporated portion of the
26 county. This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
27 Section 33. In order to implement Specific
28 Appropriation 1226 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
29 Act, the Department of Legal Affairs may transfer up to
30 $1,054,632 between trust funds. This section is repealed on
31 July 1, 2001.
41
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Section 34. In order to implement the proviso
2 immediately preceding Specific Appropriation 925 of the
3 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, the public defender of
4 any judicial circuit in this state may reimburse any employee
5 who purchased, at his or her own expense, additional
6 retirement credit in the Florida Retirement System Elected
7 Officers' Class, for time spent as an employee of the public
8 defender, up to the amounts actually spent by the employee.
9 This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
10 Section 35. In order to implement Specific
11 Appropriation 1144A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
12 Act, notwithstanding the provisions of s. 216.192, Florida
13 Statutes, and pursuant to s. 216.345, Florida Statutes, funds
14 in Specific Appropriation 1144A shall not be allocated or
15 released until the Department of Juvenile Justice develops a
16 plan to ensure that the use of funds is in accordance with
17 lawfully established priorities and conditions for the use of
18 juvenile justice prevention funds and the plan is approved by
19 the Juvenile Justice Review Panel established pursuant to
20 Executive Order 2000-7. This section is repealed on July 1,
21 2001.
22 Section 36. In order to implement Specific
23 Appropriation 2713B of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
24 Act, paragraph (i) is added to subsection (2) of section
25 318.21, Florida Statutes, as amended by subsection (1) of
26 section 4 of chapter 97-235, Laws of Florida, and section 135
27 of chapter 98-403, Laws of Florida, to read:
28 318.21 Disposition of civil penalties by county
29 courts.--All civil penalties received by a county court
30 pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be
31 distributed and paid monthly as follows:
42
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (2) Of the remainder:
2 (a) Five and six-tenths percent shall be paid to the
3 General Revenue Fund of the state, except that the first
4 $300,000 shall be deposited into the Grants and Donations
5 Trust Fund in the Department of Children and Family Services
6 for administrative costs, training costs, and costs associated
7 with the implementation and maintenance of Florida foster care
8 citizen review panels as provided for in s. 39.702.
9 (i) For fiscal year 2000-2001 only, and in lieu of the
10 provisions of paragraph (a), five and six-tenths percent shall
11 be paid to the General Revenue Fund of the state, except that
12 the first $300,000 shall be deposited into the Grants and
13 Donations Trust Fund in the state courts system for
14 administrative costs, training costs, and costs associated
15 with the implementation and maintenance of Florida foster care
16 citizen review panels as provided for in s. 39.702. This
17 paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2001.
18 Section 37. In order to implement Specific
19 Appropriation 2670B of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
20 Act, subsection (8) is added to section 925.037, Florida
21 Statutes, to read:
22 925.037 Reimbursement of counties for fees paid to
23 appointed counsel; circuit conflict committees.--
24 (8) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
25 section to the contrary, and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year
26 only, funds allocated pursuant to this section shall be
27 distributed to the counties in the designated circuits by the
28 state courts system. This subsection is repealed on July 1,
29 2001.
30 Section 38. In order to implement Specific
31 Appropriation 625 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act,
43
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 subsection (4) is added to section 216.262, Florida Statutes,
2 to read:
3 216.262 Authorized positions.--
4 (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter on
5 increasing the number of authorized positions, and for the
6 2000-2001 fiscal year only, if the actual inmate population of
7 the Department of Corrections exceeds by 2 percent for 2
8 consecutive months or more the inmate population projected by
9 the Criminal Justice Estimating Conference on March 2, 2000,
10 the Executive Office of the Governor may request positions in
11 excess of the number authorized by the Legislature and
12 sufficient funding from the Working Capital Fund to operate
13 the additional prison bed capacity necessary to accommodate
14 the actual inmate population. Such request is subject to the
15 budget amendment and consultation provisions of this chapter.
16 This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001.
17 Section 39. In order to implement Specific
18 Appropriations 297-301, 1149B-1149P, and 1160A-1160C of the
19 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, subsection (1) of
20 section 938.01, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
21 938.01 Additional Court Cost Clearing Trust Fund.--
22 (1) All courts created by Art. V of the State
23 Constitution shall, in addition to any fine or other penalty,
24 assess $3 as a court cost against every person convicted for
25 violation of a state penal or criminal statute or convicted
26 for violation of a municipal or county ordinance. Any person
27 whose adjudication is withheld pursuant to the provisions of
28 s. 318.14(9) or (10) shall also be assessed such cost. In
29 addition, $3 from every bond estreature or forfeited bail bond
30 related to such penal statutes or penal ordinances shall be
31 forwarded to the Treasurer as described in this subsection.
44
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 However, no such assessment may be made against any person
2 convicted for violation of any state statute, municipal
3 ordinance, or county ordinance relating to the parking of
4 vehicles.
5 (a) All such costs collected by the courts shall be
6 remitted to the Department of Revenue, in accordance with
7 administrative rules adopted by the executive director of the
8 Department of Revenue, for deposit in the Additional Court
9 Cost Clearing Trust Fund and shall be earmarked to the
10 Department of Law Enforcement and the Department of Community
11 Affairs for distribution as follows:
12 1. Two dollars and seventy-five cents of each $3
13 assessment shall be deposited in the Criminal Justice
14 Standards and Training Trust Fund, and the remaining 25 cents
15 of each such assessment shall be deposited into the Department
16 of Law Enforcement Operating Trust Fund and shall be disbursed
17 to the Bureau of Public Safety Management of the Department of
18 Law Enforcement Community Affairs.
19 2. Ninety-two percent of the money distributed to the
20 Additional Court Cost Clearing Trust Fund pursuant to s.
21 318.21 shall be earmarked to the Department of Law Enforcement
22 for deposit in the Criminal Justice Standards and Training
23 Trust Fund, and 8 percent of such money shall be deposited
24 into the Department of Law Enforcement Operating Trust Fund
25 and shall be disbursed to the Bureau of Public Safety
26 Management of the Department of Law Enforcement Community
27 Affairs.
28 (b) The funds deposited in the Criminal Justice
29 Standards and Training Trust Fund and the Department of Law
30 Enforcement Operating Trust Fund may be invested. Any interest
31 earned from investing such funds and any unencumbered funds
45
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 remaining at the end of the budget cycle shall remain in the
2 respective trust fund until the following year.
3 (c) All funds in the Criminal Justice Standards and
4 Training Trust Fund earmarked to the Department of Law
5 Enforcement shall be disbursed only in compliance with s.
6 943.25(9).
7 Section 40. The amendment of subsection (1) of section
8 938.01, Florida Statutes, by this act shall expire on July 1,
9 2001, and the text of said subsection shall revert to that in
10 existence on June 30, 2000, except that any amendments to such
11 text enacted other than by this act shall be preserved and
12 continue to operate to the extent that such amendments are not
13 dependent upon the portions of said text which expire pursuant
14 to the provisions of this act. The Division of Statutory
15 Revision of the Office of Legislative Services shall include
16 in an appropriate reviser's bill any amendments to said
17 subsection which are necessary to give effect to the
18 legislative intent expressed in this section.
19 Section 41. In order to implement Specific
20 Appropriations 297-301, 1149B-1149P, and 1160A-1160C of the
21 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, subsection (1) of
22 section 943.25, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
23 943.25 Criminal justice trust funds; source of funds;
24 use of funds.--
25 (1) The Department of Law Enforcement Community
26 Affairs may approve, for disbursement from the Department of
27 Law Enforcement Operating Trust Fund established pursuant to
28 s. 290.034, those appropriated sums necessary and required by
29 the state for grant matching, implementing, administering,
30 evaluating, and qualifying for such federal funds.
31 Disbursements from the trust fund for the purpose of
46
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 supplanting state general revenue funds may not be made
2 without specific legislative appropriation.
3 Section 42. The amendment of subsection (1) of section
4 943.25, Florida Statutes, by this act shall expire on July 1,
5 2001, and the text of said subsection shall revert to that in
6 existence on June 30, 2000, except that any amendments to such
7 text enacted other than by this act shall be preserved and
8 continue to operate to the extent that such amendments are not
9 dependent upon the portions of said text which expire pursuant
10 to the provisions of this act. The Division of Statutory
11 Revision of the Office of Legislative Services shall include
12 in an appropriate reviser's bill any amendments to said
13 subsection which are necessary to give effect to the
14 legislative intent expressed in this section.
15 Section 43. (1) In order to implement Specific
16 Appropriations 297-301, 1149B-1149P, and 1160A-1160C of the
17 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, and for the 2000-2001
18 fiscal year only, the Criminal Justice Program shall be
19 transferred from the Department of Community Affairs to the
20 Department of Law Enforcement by a type two transfer, pursuant
21 to s. 20.06(2), Florida Statutes. The Criminal Justice Program
22 so transferred is comprised of the Byrne State and Local Law
23 Enforcement Assistance Program, Local Law Enforcement Block
24 Grants, Drug-Free Communities Program, Residential Substance
25 Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners, the Bulletproof Vest
26 Program, the Guantanamo Bay Refugee and Entrant Assistance
27 Program, the National Criminal History Improvement Program,
28 and the Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-in-Sentencing
29 Program.
30 (2)(a) In order to implement Specific Appropriations
31 297-301, 1149B-1149P, and 1160A-1160C of the 2000-2001 General
47
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Appropriations Act, and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only,
2 the Prevention of Domestic and Sexual Violence Program is
3 transferred from the Department of Community Affairs to the
4 Department of Children and Family Services by a type two
5 transfer, pursuant to s. 20.06(2), Florida Statutes. The
6 Domestic and Sexual Violence Program so transferred is
7 comprised of the Governor's Task Force on Domestic and Sexual
8 Violence and the Violence Against Women Program.
9 (b) From the funds deposited into the Department of
10 Law Enforcement Operating Trust Fund pursuant to s.
11 938.01(1)(a)1. and 2., Florida Statutes, the Department of Law
12 Enforcement shall transfer funds to the Department of Children
13 and Family Services to be used as matching funds for the
14 administration of the Prevention of Domestic and Sexual
15 Violence Program transferred from the Department of Community
16 Affairs. The amount of the transfer for fiscal year 2000-2001
17 shall be determined by the Governor's Office of Planning and
18 Budgeting, in consultation with the Department of Community
19 Affairs, the Department of Law Enforcement, and the Department
20 of Children and Family Services, and shall be based on the
21 historic use of these funds and current needs of the
22 Prevention of Domestic and Sexual Violence Program.
23 (3) This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
24 Section 44. In order to implement Specific
25 Appropriations 2128-2132 of the 2000-2001 General
26 Appropriations Act, subsection (4) of section 316.1951,
27 Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
28 316.1951 Parking for certain purposes prohibited.--
29 (4) A law enforcement officer or license inspector or
30 supervisor, as authorized in s. 320.58(1)(a), may cause to be
31 removed at the owner's expense any motor vehicle found upon a
48
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 public street, public parking lot, other public property, or
2 private property, where the public has the right to travel by
3 motor vehicle, which is in violation of subsection (1). Every
4 written notice issued pursuant to this section shall be
5 affixed in a conspicuous place upon a vehicle by a law
6 enforcement officer or license inspector or supervisor. Any
7 vehicle found in violation of subsection (1) within 10 days
8 after a previous violation and written notice shall be subject
9 to immediate removal without an additional waiting period.
10 Section 45. The amendment of subsection (4) of section
11 316.1951, Florida Statutes, by this act shall expire on July
12 1, 2001, and the text of said subsection shall revert to that
13 in existence on June 30, 2000, except that any amendments to
14 such text enacted other than by this act shall be preserved
15 and continue to operate to the extent that such amendments are
16 not dependent upon the portions of said text which expire
17 pursuant to the provisions of this act. The Division of
18 Statutory Revision of the Office of Legislative Services shall
19 include in an appropriate reviser's bill any amendments to
20 said subsection which are necessary to give effect to the
21 legislative intent expressed in this section.
22 Section 46. In order to implement Specific
23 Appropriations 2128-2132 of the 2000-2001 General
24 Appropriations Act, paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section
25 319.14, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
26 319.14 Sale of motor vehicles registered or used as
27 taxicabs, police vehicles, lease vehicles, or rebuilt vehicles
28 and nonconforming vehicles.--
29 (1)
30 (b) No person shall knowingly offer for sale, sell, or
31 exchange a rebuilt vehicle until the department has stamped in
49
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a conspicuous place on the certificate of title for the
2 vehicle words stating that the vehicle has been rebuilt,
3 assembled from parts, or combined, or is a kit car, glider
4 kit, replica, or flood vehicle unless proper application for a
5 certificate of title for a vehicle that is rebuilt, assembled
6 from parts, or combined, or is a kit car, glider kit, replica,
7 or flood vehicle has been made to the department in accordance
8 with this chapter and the department or its agent has
9 conducted the physical examination of the vehicle to assure
10 the identity of the vehicle.
11 Section 47. The amendment of paragraph (b) of
12 subsection (1) of section 319.14, Florida Statutes, by this
13 act shall expire on July 1, 2001, and the text of said
14 paragraph shall revert to that in existence on June 30, 2000,
15 except that any amendments to such text enacted other than by
16 this act shall be preserved and continue to operate to the
17 extent that such amendments are not dependent upon the
18 portions of said text which expire pursuant to the provisions
19 of this act. The Division of Statutory Revision of the Office
20 of Legislative Services shall include in an appropriate
21 reviser's bill any amendments to said paragraph which are
22 necessary to give effect to the legislative intent expressed
23 in this section.
24 Section 48. In order to implement Specific
25 Appropriations 2128-2132 of the 2000-2001 General
26 Appropriations Act, subsection (14) of section 320.02, Florida
27 Statutes, is amended to read:
28 320.02 Registration required; application for
29 registration; forms.--
30 (14)(a) The license inspectors appointed by the
31 department pursuant to s. 320.58 are empowered to issue a
50
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 notice of violation on a form prescribed by the department to
2 unattended motor vehicles that reasonably appear to such
3 examiners to be required to be registered under this chapter
4 and that are not so registered. The notice of violation shall
5 include a summary of the provisions of this section and shall
6 contain such other information as the department in its
7 discretion shall determine.
8 (b) The owner or person in charge of any vehicle that
9 is issued a notice of violation pursuant to this section
10 shall, within 30 days of the date of issuance shown on the
11 notice, register the vehicle as required by this chapter or
12 provide proof satisfactory to the department that the vehicle
13 is exempt from such registration. If the vehicle is not
14 registered or the proof is not provided on or after the 31st
15 day following the date of issuance shown on the notice, the
16 department is authorized to immobilize the vehicle by use of
17 an immobilization device. Upon proof of registration of the
18 vehicle or proof satisfactory to the department that the
19 vehicle is exempt from such registration, the department shall
20 remove the immobilization device. The department shall
21 immediately remove, at no charge, any immobilization device
22 that has been placed on any vehicle in error.
23 (c) The license inspectors appointed by the department
24 pursuant to s. 320.58 are empowered to enter upon both
25 publicly owned and privately owned property in order to carry
26 out the provisions of this section.
27 (d) Any person who, without the authorization of the
28 department, disables, removes, tampers with, damages, or
29 unlocks an immobilization device placed on a vehicle pursuant
30 to this section, or who attempts to do so, is guilty of a
31
51
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s.
2 775.082 or s. 775.083.
3 Section 49. The amendment of subsection (14) of
4 section 320.02, Florida Statutes, by this act shall expire on
5 July 1, 2001, and the text of said subsection shall revert to
6 that in existence on June 30, 2000, except that any amendments
7 to such text enacted other than by this act shall be preserved
8 and continue to operate to the extent that such amendments are
9 not dependent upon the portions of said text which expire
10 pursuant to the provisions of this act. The Division of
11 Statutory Revision of the Office of Legislative Services shall
12 include in an appropriate reviser's bill any amendments to
13 said subsection which are necessary to give effect to the
14 legislative intent expressed in this section.
15 Section 50. In order to implement Specific
16 Appropriations 2128-2132 of the 2000-2001 General
17 Appropriations Act, section 320.58, Florida Statutes, is
18 amended to read:
19 320.58 Compliance examiners License inspectors;
20 powers, appointment.--
21 (1)(a) The department shall appoint as many compliance
22 examiners license inspectors and supervisors as it deems
23 necessary to enforce the provisions of this chapter and
24 chapters 319, 322, and 324. In order to enforce the
25 provisions of these laws, the inspectors are empowered to
26 enter on both publicly owned and privately owned property and
27 to issue uniform traffic citations to persons found in
28 violation thereof. The department is further empowered to
29 delegate the power to issue uniform traffic citations to
30 persons acting as its agents for the purpose of enforcing the
31 registration provisions of this chapter, which may include,
52
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 but not be limited to, personnel employed by district school
2 boards as agreed to by the school board and the county tax
3 collector.
4 (b) License inspectors appointed pursuant to this
5 section and agents delegated by the department are not to be
6 considered for membership in the state high-risk retirement
7 program.
8 (2) Any person who fails or refuses to surrender his
9 or her driver's license, registration certificate, and license
10 plate upon lawful demand of an inspector, supervisor, or
11 authorized agent of the department is guilty of a misdemeanor
12 of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or
13 s. 775.083.
14 Section 51. The amendment of section 320.58, Florida
15 Statutes, by this act shall expire on July 1, 2001, and the
16 text of said section shall revert to that in existence on June
17 30, 2000, except that any amendments to such text enacted
18 other than by this act shall be preserved and continue to
19 operate to the extent that such amendments are not dependent
20 upon the portions of said text which expire pursuant to the
21 provisions of this act. The Division of Statutory Revision of
22 the Office of Legislative Services shall include in an
23 appropriate reviser's bill any amendments to said section
24 which are necessary to give effect to the legislative intent
25 expressed in this section.
26 Section 52. In order to implement Specific
27 Appropriations 1807-1864 of the 2000-2001 General
28 Appropriations Act, subsection (18) of section 216.181,
29 Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
30 216.181 Approved budgets for operations and fixed
31 capital outlay.--
53
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (18) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
2 chapter to the contrary, the Florida Department of
3 Transportation, in order to facilitate the transfer of
4 personnel to the new turnpike headquarters location in Orange
5 County, may transfer salary rate to the turnpike budget entity
6 from other departmental budget entities. The department must
7 provide documentation of all transfers to the Executive Office
8 of the Governor, the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee,
9 and the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on
10 Transportation and Economic Development Appropriations. This
11 subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.
12 Section 53. In order to implement Specific
13 Appropriation 2627 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
14 Act, subsection (4) is added to section 257.17, Florida
15 Statutes, to read:
16 257.17 Operating grants.--A political subdivision that
17 has been designated by a county as the single library
18 administrative unit is eligible to receive from the state an
19 annual operating grant of not more than 25 percent of all
20 local funds expended by that political subdivision during the
21 second preceding fiscal year for the operation and maintenance
22 of a library, under the following conditions:
23 (4)(a) A municipality with a population of 200,000 or
24 more that establishes or maintains a library is eligible to
25 receive from the state an annual operating grant of not more
26 than 25 percent of all local funds expended by that
27 municipality during the second preceding fiscal year for the
28 operation and maintenance of a library, under the following
29 conditions:
30 1. The municipal library is operated under a single
31 administrative head and expends its funds centrally;
54
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 2. The municipal library has an operating budget of at
2 least $20,000 per year from local sources; and
3 3. The municipal library provides free library service
4 to all residents of the municipality.
5 (b) This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001.
6 Section 54. In order to implement Specific
7 Appropriations 1406Q and 1406R of the 2000-2001 General
8 Appropriations Act, subsection (1) of section 252.373, Florida
9 Statutes, is amended to read:
10 252.373 Allocation of funds; rules.--
11 (1)(a) Funds appropriated from the Emergency
12 Management, Preparedness, and Assistance Trust Fund shall be
13 allocated by the Department of Community Affairs as follows:
14 1.(a) Sixty percent to implement and administer state
15 and local emergency management programs, including training,
16 of which 20 percent shall be used by the division and 80
17 percent shall be allocated to local emergency management
18 agencies and programs. Of this 80 percent, at least 80
19 percent shall be allocated to counties.
20 2.(b) Twenty percent to provide for state relief
21 assistance for nonfederally declared disasters, including but
22 not limited to grants and below-interest-rate loans to
23 businesses for uninsured losses resulting from a disaster.
24 3.(c) Twenty percent for grants and loans to state or
25 regional agencies, local governments, and private
26 organizations to implement projects that will further state
27 and local emergency management objectives. These projects
28 must include, but need not be limited to, projects that will
29 promote public education on disaster preparedness and recovery
30 issues, enhance coordination of relief efforts of statewide
31 private sector organizations, and improve the training and
55
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 operations capabilities of agencies assigned lead or support
2 responsibilities in the state comprehensive emergency
3 management plan, including the State Fire Marshal's Office for
4 coordinating the Florida fire services. The division shall
5 establish criteria and procedures for competitive allocation
6 of these funds by rule. No more than 5 percent of any award
7 made pursuant to this subparagraph paragraph may be used for
8 administrative expenses.
9 (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a),
10 and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, up to $4 million of
11 the unencumbered balance of the Emergency Management,
12 Preparedness, and Assistance Trust Fund shall be utilized to
13 improve, and increase the number of, disaster shelters within
14 the state and improve local disaster preparedness. This
15 paragraph is repealed on July 1, 2001.
16 Section 55. In order to implement Specific
17 Appropriations 2408-2411 of the 2000-2001 General
18 Appropriations Act, subsection (4) of section 287.161, Florida
19 Statutes, is amended to read:
20 287.161 Executive aircraft pool; assignment of
21 aircraft; charge for transportation.--
22 (4) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections
23 (2) and (3) and for the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only,
24 the Department of Management Services shall charge all persons
25 receiving transportation from the executive aircraft pool a
26 rate not less than the mileage allowance fixed by the
27 Legislature for the use of privately owned vehicles. Fees
28 collected for persons traveling by aircraft in the executive
29 aircraft pool shall be deposited into the Bureau of Aircraft
30 Trust Fund and shall be expended for costs incurred to operate
31 the aircraft management activities of the department. It is
56
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 the intent of the Legislature that the executive aircraft pool
2 be operated on a full cost recovery basis, less available
3 funds. This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.
4 Section 56. In order to implement Specific
5 Appropriations 1476, 1591G, 1591J, and 1591K of the 2000-2001
6 General Appropriations Act, subsection (7) of section 212.20,
7 Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
8 212.20 Funds collected, disposition; additional powers
9 of department; operational expense; refund of taxes
10 adjudicated unconstitutionally collected.--
11 (7) For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, the
12 use of funds allocated to the Solid Waste Management Trust
13 Fund shall be as provided in the General Appropriations Act.
14 There is transferred $15 $15.5 million for surface water
15 improvement and management projects and $6.5 $10 million for
16 the aquatic weed control program from revenues provided by
17 this section. This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001
18 2000.
19 Section 57. In order to implement Specific
20 Appropriation 1609D of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
21 Act, subsections (8) and (9) of section 403.7095, Florida
22 Statutes, are amended to read:
23 403.7095 Solid waste management grant program.--
24 (8) For fiscal year 2000-2001 only 1999-2000, the
25 department shall provide counties with populations under
26 100,000 with at least 80 percent of the level of funding they
27 received in fiscal year 1997-1998 for solid waste management
28 and recycling grants. This subsection is repealed on July 1,
29 2001.
30 (9) For fiscal year 2000-2001 only 1999-2000, the
31 department shall provide 25 10 percent of the total funds
57
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 available after the requirements of subsection (8) are met for
2 recycling and waste reduction grants available to all counties
3 on a competitive basis for innovative programs. Because the
4 Legislature recognizes that input from the recycling industry
5 is essential to the success of this funding program, the
6 department shall cooperate with affected organizations to
7 develop a process and define specific criteria for evaluating
8 proposals and selecting programs for funding that comply with
9 the following general guidelines. Programs selected for
10 funding shall The department may consider one or more of the
11 following criteria in determining whether a grant proposal is
12 innovative:
13 (a) Demonstrate advanced technologies or processes
14 that are not in common use in Florida, that represent a novel
15 application of an existing technology or process, or that
16 overcome obstacles to recycling in new or innovative ways.
17 (b) Collect and recycle or reduce materials targeted
18 by the department and the recycling industry.
19 (c) Demonstrate the potential economic and
20 environmental benefits of the proposed recycling program and
21 the cost-effectiveness of the program's approach substantial
22 improvement in program cost-effectiveness and efficiency as
23 measured against statewide average costs for the same or
24 similar programs.
25 (d) Demonstrate transferability of technology and
26 processes used in the program and specify how the program will
27 promote transferability.
28 (e) Demonstrate local support for the proposed program
29 by the commitment of cash or in-kind matching funds and
30 implement multicounty or regional recycling programs.
31 (f) This subsection is repealed on July 1, 2001.
58
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Section 58. In order to implement Specific
2 Appropriations 1490E and 1591G of the 2000-2001 General
3 Appropriations Act, subsection (11) of section 373.59, Florida
4 Statutes, is amended to read:
5 373.59 Water Management Lands Trust Fund.--
6 (11) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to
7 the contrary, and for the 2000-2001 fiscal year only, the
8 governing board of a water management district may request,
9 and the Secretary of Environmental Protection shall release
10 upon such request, moneys allocated to the districts pursuant
11 to subsection (8) for the purpose of carrying out the purposes
12 of s. 373.0361, s. 375.0831, s. 373.139, or ss.
13 373.451-373.4595 and for legislatively authorized land
14 acquisition and water restoration initiatives. No funds may be
15 used pursuant to this subsection until necessary debt service
16 obligations, requirements for payments in lieu of taxes, and
17 land management obligations that may be required by this
18 chapter are provided for. This subsection is repealed on July
19 1, 2001.
20 Section 59. In order to implement Specific
21 Appropriation 1983 of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
22 Act, the Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering of the Department of
23 Business and Professional Regulation shall transfer title to
24 all tangible personal property owned by the department that is
25 currently in use by the College of Veterinary Medicine at the
26 University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida, to the college.
27 This section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
28 Section 60. In order to implement Specific
29 Appropriation 1262C of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
30 Act, and notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 496.405(4)(c),
31 496.409(7), 496.410(15), and 496.419(9), Florida Statutes, the
59
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 moneys received and deposited into the General Inspection
2 Trust Fund may be used by the Department of Agriculture and
3 Consumer Services to defray the expenses of the department in
4 the discharge of any and all of its administrative and
5 regulatory powers and duties as prescribed by law. This
6 section is repealed on July 1, 2001.
7 Section 61. In order to implement Specific
8 Appropriation 1641A of the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
9 Act, subsection (15) of section 259.032, Florida Statutes, is
10 amended to read:
11 259.032 Conservation and Recreation Lands Trust Fund;
12 purpose.--
13 (15) For fiscal year 2000-2001 1999-2000 only, moneys
14 credited to the fund may be appropriated to provide grants to
15 qualified local governmental entities pursuant to the
16 provisions of s. 375.075. This subsection is repealed on July
17 1, 2001 2000.
18 Section 62. In order to implement section 8 of the
19 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, subsection (7) of
20 section 110.12315, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
21 110.12315 Prescription drug program.--The state
22 employees' prescription drug program is established. This
23 program shall be administered by the Department of Management
24 Services, according to the terms and conditions of the plan as
25 established by the relevant provisions of the annual General
26 Appropriations Act and implementing legislation, subject to
27 the following conditions:
28 (7) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (1)
29 and (2), under the state employees' prescription drug program,
30 effective October 1, 1999, copayments must be made as follows:
31
60
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (a) For the period July 1, 2000, through December 31,
2 2000:
3 1. For generic drug with card......................$7.
4 2. For brand name drug with card..................$20.
5 3. For generic mail order drug with card...........$7.
6 4. For brand name mail order drug with card.......$20.
7 (b) Effective January 1, 2001:
8 1. For generic drug with card......................$7.
9 2. For preferred brand name drug with card........$20.
10 3. For nonpreferred brand name drug with card.....$35.
11 4. For generic mail order drug with card.......$10.50.
12 5. For preferred brand name mail order drug with
13 card......................................................$30.
14 6. For nonpreferred brand name drug with
15 card...................................................$52.50.
16 (c) The Department of Management Services shall create
17 a preferred brand name drug list to be used in the
18 administration of the state employees' prescription drug
19 program.
20 (a) Twenty-dollar copayment for brand name drug with
21 card;
22 (b) Seven-dollar copayment for generic drug with card;
23 (c) Seven-dollar copayment for generic mail order
24 drug;
25 (d) Twenty-dollar copayment for brand name mail order
26 drug.
27
28 This subsection expires July 1, 2001 2000.
29 Section 63. In order to implement section 8 of the
30 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act, section 110.1239,
31 Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
61
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 110.1239 State group health insurance program
2 funding.--For the 2000-2001 1999-2000 fiscal year only, it is
3 the intent of the Legislature that the state group health
4 insurance program be managed, administered, operated, and
5 funded in such a manner as to maximize the protection of state
6 employee health insurance benefits. Inherent in this intent is
7 the recognition that the health insurance liabilities
8 attributable to the benefits offered state employees should be
9 fairly, orderly, and equitably funded. Accordingly:
10 (1) The division shall determine the level of premiums
11 necessary to fully fund the state group health insurance
12 program for the next fiscal year. Such determination shall be
13 made after each revenue estimating conference on health
14 insurance as provided in s. 216.136(1), but not later than
15 December 1 and April 1 of each fiscal year.
16 (2) The Governor, in the Governor's recommended
17 budget, shall provide premium rates necessary for full funding
18 of the state group health insurance program, and the
19 Legislature shall provide in the General Appropriations Act
20 for a premium level necessary for full funding of the state
21 group health insurance program.
22 (3) For purposes of funding, any additional
23 appropriation amounts allocated to the state group health
24 insurance program by the Legislature shall be considered as a
25 state contribution and thus an increase in the state premiums.
26 (4) This section is repealed on July 1, 2001 2000.
27 Section 64. In order to implement the revised budget
28 structure contained in the 2000-2001 General Appropriations
29 Act for reorganizations approved by the Legislature but not
30 appropriated in the General Appropriations Act, the effective
31 date for necessary budget restructuring and account code
62
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 conversion of financial, personnel, purchasing, and similar
2 system and data issues in systems, including, but not limited
3 to, FLAIR, LAS/PBS, COPES, and SPURS, associated with such
4 reorganizations may be extended to October 1, 2000, unless a
5 later date is specified in such legislation.
6 Section 65. A section of this act that implements a
7 specific appropriation or specifically identified proviso
8 language in the 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void
9 if the specific appropriation or specifically identified
10 proviso language is vetoed. A section of this act that
11 implements more than one specific appropriation or more than
12 one portion of specifically identified proviso language in the
13 2000-2001 General Appropriations Act is void if all the
14 specific appropriations or portions of specifically identified
15 proviso language are vetoed.
16 Section 66. If any other act passed during the 2000
17 Regular Session of the Legislature or any extension thereof
18 contains a provision that is substantively the same as a
19 provision in this act, but that removes or is otherwise not
20 subject to the future repeal applied to such provision by this
21 act, the Legislature intends that the provision in the other
22 act shall take precedence and shall continue to operate,
23 notwithstanding the future repeal provided by this act.
24 Section 67. The performance measures and standards
25 established in this section for individual programs in
26 education agencies shall be applied to those programs for the
27 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and
28 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
29 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as
30 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
31 of 1994.
63
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (1) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.--
2 (a) For the Private Colleges and Universities Program,
3 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
4 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
5 Specific Appropriations 11, 15-27, 29-32, and 35-41 are as
6 follows:
7 1. FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Retention rate of First Time in College (FTIC)
9 award recipients, using a 6-year rate.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 b. Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, using a
11 6-year rate...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 2. FLORIDA RESIDENT ACCESS GRANT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
13 a. Number of degrees granted by level for FRAG
14 recipients and contract program recipients....FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 3. ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Retention rate of award
17 recipients....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 b. Graduation rate of award
19 recipients....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 c. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
21 percent employed at $22,000 or more 1 year following
22 graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 d. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
24 percent employed at $22,000 or more 5 years following
25 graduation....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 e. Licensure/certification rates of award recipients
27 (where applicable)............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 4. ACADEMIC CONTRACTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of prior year's graduates...FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 b. Number of prior year's graduates remaining in
31 Florida.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
64
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 5. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
2 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Retention rate of students, using a 6-year
4 rate..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 b. Graduation rate of students, using a 6-year
6 rate..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 6. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OUTPUT
8 MEASURE.--
9 a. Number of FTIC students, disaggregated by in-state
10 and out-of-state..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 (b) For the Financial Aid Programs, the outcome
12 measures, output measures, and associated performance
13 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
14 Appropriations 2 and 55 are as follows:
15 1. BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of high school graduates who successfully
17 completed the 19 core credits..............................60%
18 b. Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by
19 delivery system, using a 4-year rate for community colleges
20 and a 6-year rate for universities............FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 c. Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by
22 delivery system...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 d. Percent of high school graduates eligible for
24 awards who enrolled in a Florida postsecondary
25 institution................................................84%
26 e. Percent of high school graduates attending Florida
27 postsecondary institutions.................................51%
28 2. BRIGHT FUTURES SCHOLARSHIP OUTPUT MEASURE.--
29 a. Number of Bright Futures recipients..........73,406
30 3. FLORIDA STUDENT ASSISTANCE GRANTS (FSAG) OUTCOME
31 MEASURES.--
65
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Retention rate of FTIC award recipients, by
2 delivery system...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 b. Graduation rate of FTIC award recipients, by
4 delivery system...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 4. CRITICAL TEACHER SHORTAGE LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAM
6 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
7 a. Percent of recipients who, upon completion of the
8 program, work in fields in which there are
9 shortages.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 (c) For the Public Schools Program, the outcome
11 measures, output measures, and associated performance
12 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
13 Appropriations 3-7 and 59-121 are as follows:
14 1. KINDERGARTEN - GRADE TWELVE (K-12) OUTCOME
15 MEASURES.--
16 a. Number and percent of teachers with National
17 Teacher's Certification, reported by district.......1,046/0.8%
18 b. Number/percent of "A" schools, reported by
19 district...............................................254/10%
20 c. Number/percent of "D" or "F" schools, reported by
21 district...............................................494/20%
22 d. Number/percent of schools declining one or more
23 letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 e. Number/percent of schools improving one or more
25 letter grades, reported by district...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 2. STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
27 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of teacher certificates issued within 30
29 days after receipt of application..........................84%
30 b. Number of districts that have implemented a
31 high-quality professional development system, as determined by
66
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 the Department of Education, based on its review of student
2 performance data and the success of districts in defining and
3 meeting the training needs of teachers......................12
4 c. Percent of current fiscal year competitive grants
5 initial disbursement made by December 1 of current
6 fiscal year...............................................100%
7 3. STATE OVERSIGHT AND ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
8 OUTPUT MEASURE.--
9 a. Number of certification applications
10 processed...............................................56,000
11 (d) For the Workforce Development Program, the outcome
12 measures, output measures, and associated performance
13 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
14 Appropriations 123-135 are as follows:
15 1. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Number/percent of vocational certificate program
17 completers who are found placed according to the following
18 definitions:
19 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
20 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting Conference
21 list and found employed at $4,680 or more per
22 quarter...........................................12,227/42.6%
23 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
24 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting Conference list and
25 found employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found
26 continuing education in a college-credit-level
27 program............................................4,369/15.2%
28 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
29 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
30 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
31 level.............................................10,801/37.6%
67
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number/percent of associate in science degree and
2 college-credit certificate program completers who are found
3 placed according to the following definitions:
4 (I) Level III - Completed a program identified as high
5 wage/high skill on the Occupational Forecasting Conference
6 list and found employed at $4,680 or more per
7 quarter............................................6,897/57.9%
8 (II) Level II - Completed a program identified for new
9 entrants on the Occupational Forecasting Conference list and
10 found employed at $3,900 or more per quarter, or found
11 continuing education in a college-credit-level
12 program............................................1,351/11.3%
13 (III) Level I - Completed any program not included in
14 Levels II or III and found employed, enlisted in the military,
15 or continuing their education at the vocational certificate
16 level..............................................1,661/13.9%
17 c. Number/percent of workforce development programs
18 which meet or exceed nationally recognized accrediting
19 standards for those programs which teach a subject matter for
20 which there is a nationally recognized accrediting
21 body..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 d. Number/percent of students attending workforce
23 development programs which meet or exceed nationally
24 recognized accrediting standards..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 e. Number/percent of students completing workforce
26 development programs which meet or exceed nationally
27 recognized accrediting standards..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 2. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
29 a. Number of adult basic education, including English
30 as a Second Language, and adult secondary education completion
31
68
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 point completers who are found employed or continuing their
2 education.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 (e) For the Community Colleges Program, the outcome
4 measures, output measures, and associated performance
5 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
6 Appropriations 8 and 137-152 are as follows:
7 1. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percent of Associate in Arts (AA) degree graduates
9 who transfer to a state university within 2 years..........67%
10 b. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
11 University System who earn a 2.5 or above in the SUS after
12 1 year.....................................................75%
13 c. Of the AA graduates who are employed full time
14 rather than continuing their education, the percent which are
15 in jobs earning at least $9 an hour........................59%
16 d. Of the AA students who complete 18 credit hours,
17 the percent of whom graduate in 4 years, disaggregating the
18 data by the following groups: ethnic, disabled, limited
19 English speaking, and economically disadvantaged...........30%
20 e. Percent of students graduating with total
21 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 120
22 percent of the degree requirement..........................36%
23 f. Percent of students exiting the college-preparatory
24 program who enter college-level course work associated with
25 the AA, Associate in Science (AS), Postsecondary Vocational
26 Certificate, and Postsecondary Adult Vocational programs...66%
27 g. Percent of AA degree transfers to the State
28 University System who started in College Prep and who earn a
29 2.5 in the SUS after 1 year................................75%
30
31
69
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 h. Number/percent of AA partial completers
2 transferring to the State University System with at least 40
3 credit hours..................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 i. Number/FTEs of AA students who do not complete 18
5 credit hours within 4 years...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 j. Of the economically disadvantaged AA students who
7 complete 18 credit hours, the number and percent who graduate
8 with an AA degree within 4 years..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 k. Of the disabled AA students who complete 18 credit
10 hours, the number and percent who graduate with an AA degree
11 within 4 years................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 l. Of the black male AA students who complete 18
13 credit hours, the number and percent who graduate with
14 an AA degree within 4 years...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 m. Of the English as Second Language (college prep) or
16 English for Non-Speaker (college credit) students who complete
17 18 credit hours, the number and percent who graduate with an
18 AA degree within 4 years......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 n. Of the AA graduates who have not transferred to the
20 State University System, the number and percent who are found
21 placed in an occupation identified as high wage/high skill on
22 the Occupational Forecasting Conference list and found
23 employed at $4,680 per quarter or more........FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 2. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of AA degrees granted.................29,000
26 b. Number of students receiving college preparatory
27 instruction.............................................94,000
28 c. Number of students enrolled in baccalaureate
29 programs offered on community college
30 campuses......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31
70
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (f) For the Postsecondary Education Planning
2 Commission (PEPC) Program, the outcome measures and associated
3 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
4 Specific Appropriations 153-158 are as follows:
5 1. PEPC OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Completed studies required by statute or the
7 General Appropriations Act................................100%
8 (g) For the State University System Program, the
9 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 9A-9D and 160-182 are as follows:
12 1. STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Graduation rate for First Time in College (FTIC)
14 students, using a 6-year rate..............................61%
15 b. Retention rate for FTIC students, using a 6-year
16 rate.......................................................71%
17 c. Graduation rate for AA transfer students, using a
18 4-year rate................................................69%
19 d. Retention rate for AA transfer students, using a
20 4-year rate................................................80%
21 e. Percent of students graduating with total
22 accumulated credit hours that are less than or equal to 115
23 percent of the degree requirement, disaggregating the data by
24 FTIC and AA transfers......................................61%
25 f. Pass rate on licensure/certification exams, for the
26 first sitting.................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 g. Of the prior year graduates remaining in Florida,
28 the percent employed at $22,000 or more 1 year following
29 graduation.................................................60%
30
31
71
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 h. Of those graduates remaining in Florida, the
2 percent employed at $22,000 or more 5 years following
3 graduation.................................................90%
4 i. Percent of undergraduate students enrolled in
5 graduate school upon completion of the baccalaureate
6 degree.....................................................16%
7 j. Externally generated research and training grant
8 funds (federal, state, local, business, and industry) per
9 state-funded ranked faculty full-time
10 equivalent....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 k. Average number of articles in Institute for
12 Scientific Information Publication Count per ranked
13 faculty.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 l. For IFAS only, the percent of public service
15 projects where the beneficiary is satisfied or highly
16 satisfied with the extension assistance....................98%
17 m. Of the total instructional effort by level, the
18 percent of effort provided by faculty:
19 (I) Lower level....................................35%
20 (II) Upper level...................................50%
21 (III) Graduate.....................................55%
22 n. Number and percent of qualified Florida students,
23 those applicants meeting BOR admission standards, admitted as
24 FTIC students.............................FY 2001-2002 LBR/95%
25 o. Percent of FTIC students admitted as student
26 profile assessments........................................10%
27 p. Percent of student profile assessments who are
28 out-of-state students......................................10%
29 q. Of total faculty effort allocated for public
30 service, the percent devoted to public schools.............25%
31 2. STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
72
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of degrees granted, baccalaureate.....37,982
2 b. Number of degrees granted, masters...........11,008
3 c. Number of degrees granted, doctoral...........1,255
4 d. Number of degrees granted, professional.......1,170
5 (h) For the Vocational Rehabilitation Program, the
6 purpose of which is to empower individuals with disabilities
7 to maximize their employment, economic self-sufficiency, and
8 independence, the outcome measures, output measures, and
9 associated performance standards with respect to funds in
10 Specific Appropriations 10E-10N are as follows:
11 1. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percent/number of customers gainfully employed
13 (rehabilitated) at least 90 days:...................63%/10,500
14 (I) Of VR severely disabled................63.5%/4,100
15 (II) Of VR most severely disabled..........56.5%/4,600
16 (III) Of all other VR disabled...............76%/1,600
17 b. Percent/number of VR customers placed in
18 competitive employment............................97.5%/10,237
19 c. Percent/number of VR customers retained in
20 employment after 1 year............................62.5%/5,500
21 d. Average annual earnings of VR customers at
22 placement..............................................$13,900
23 e. Average annual earnings of VR customers after
24 1 year.................................................$14,400
25 f. Percent of case costs covered by third-party
26 payers.....................................................20%
27 g. Average cost of case life (to division):
28 (I) For severely disabled VR customers..........$3,311
29 (II) For most severely disabled VR customers....$3,175
30 (III) For all other disabled VR customers.........$400
31
73
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 h. Maintain the annual rate and number of
2 rehabilitation customers gainfully employed at least 90 days
3 at 68.3% and 847 customers, or more..................68.3%/847
4 2. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of customers reviewed for
6 eligibility.............................................26,500
7 b. Number of individualized written plans for
8 services................................................22,500
9 c. Number of customers served...................72,000
10 d. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
11 team member................................................161
12 e. Percent of eligibility determinations completed in
13 compliance with federal law..............................92.5%
14 Section 68. The performance measures and standards
15 established in this section for individual programs in human
16 services agencies shall be applied to those programs for the
17 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and
18 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
19 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as
20 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
21 of 1994.
22 (1) AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION.--
23 (a) For the Administration and Support Program, the
24 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
25 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
26 Appropriations 184-190 are as follows:
27 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
29 costs.....................................................1.2%
30 b. Information technology costs as a percent of agency
31 administrative costs......................................9.6%
74
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
2 a. Number of information technology service
3 hours..................................................165,460
4 (b) For the Health Care Services Program, the outcome
5 measures, output measures, and associated performance
6 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
7 Appropriations 191-251 are as follows:
8 1. CHILDREN SPECIAL HEALTH CARE (KIDCARE PROGRAM)
9 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of eligible uninsured children who receive
11 health benefits coverage..................................100%
12 b. Percent of children enrolled with up-to-date
13 immunizations..............................................80%
14 c. Percent of compliance with the standards
15 established in the Guidelines for Health Supervision of
16 Children and Youth as developed by the American Academy of
17 Pediatrics for children eligible under the program.........80%
18 d. Percent of families satisfied with the care
19 provided under the program.................................90%
20 2. CHILDREN SPECIAL HEALTH CARE (KIDCARE PROGRAM)
21 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Total number of uninsured children enrolled in
23 KidCare................................................400,982
24 b. Number of uninsured children enrolled in Florida
25 Healthy Kids...........................................261,927
26 c. Number of uninsured children enrolled in
27 Medikids................................................30,994
28 d. Number of uninsured children enrolled in Children's
29 Medical Services Network.................................6,326
30 e. Number of uninsured children enrolled in the
31 Medicaid Expansion......................................16,735
75
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Number of uninsured children enrolled in Medicaid
2 as a result of outreach efforts.........................85,000
3 3. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
4 MEASURE.--
5 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
6 costs.....................................................1.2%
7 4. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Average number of days between receipt of clean
10 Medicaid claim and payment..................................16
11 b. Number of Medicaid claims received......115,612,455
12 c. Number of Medicaid claims paid...........75,319,381
13 5. MEDICAID SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS OUTCOME
14 MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of women receiving adequate prenatal
16 care.......................................................85%
17 b. Neonatal mortality rate per 1,000...............4.7
18 c. Average number of months between pregnancies for
19 those receiving family planning services..................37.4
20 d. Percent of eligible children who received all
21 required components of EPSDT screen........................72%
22 e. Percent of child hospitalizations for conditions
23 preventable with good ambulatory care.....................7.5%
24 f. Percent of nondisabled working age adult
25 hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good
26 ambulatory care..........................................12.5%
27 g. Percent of disabled working age adult
28 hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good
29 ambulatory care..........................................13.5%
30 h. Percent of elder hospitalizations for conditions
31 preventable with good ambulatory care......................13%
76
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 6. MEDICAID SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of women receiving prenatal care.....143,852
3 b. Number of vaginal deliveries.................58,225
4 c. Number of women receiving family planning
5 services...............................................256,496
6 d. Number of children ages 1-20 enrolled in
7 Medicaid.............................................1,179,147
8 e. Number of children receiving EPSDT
9 services...............................................193,031
10 f. Number of hospital inpatient services provided to
11 children................................................44,353
12 g. Number of physician services provided to
13 children.............................................3,927,330
14 h. Number of prescribed drugs provided to
15 children.............................................3,101,827
16 i. Percent of nondisabled adults receiving a
17 service....................................................76%
18 j. Percent of enrolled disabled adults receiving a
19 service..................................................87.6%
20 k. Percent of hospital stays for elder recipients
21 exceeding length of stay criteria.........................9.5%
22 l. Number of elders enrolled in long-term care
23 waivers.................................................13,614
24 m. Number of hospital inpatient services provided to
25 elders.................................................111,883
26 n. Number of physician services provided to
27 elders...............................................3,042,986
28 o. Number of prescribed drugs provided to
29 elders..............................................10,044,825
30 7. MEDICAID LONG TERM CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
77
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of elder hospitalizations for conditions
2 preventable with good ambulatory care......................13%
3 b. Percent of developmentally disabled
4 hospitalizations for conditions preventable with good
5 ambulatory care............................................15%
6 8. MEDICAID PREPAID HEALTH PLAN OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of elder and disabled hospitalizations for
8 conditions preventable with good ambulatory care...........15%
9 b. Percent of women and child hospitalizations for
10 conditions preventable with good ambulatory care.........14.2%
11 (c) For the Health Care Regulation Program, the
12 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
13 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
14 Appropriations 252-263 are as follows:
15 1. HEALTH FACILITIES AND PRACTITIONER REGULATION
16 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of Priority I practitioner investigations
18 resulting in emergency action..............................25%
19 b. Average number of days to take emergency action on
20 Priority I practitioner investigations......................60
21 c. Percent of cease and desist orders issued to
22 unlicensed practitioners in which another complaint of
23 unlicensed activity is subsequently filed against the same
24 practitioner................................................6%
25 d. Percent of initial investigations and
26 recommendations as to the existence of probable cause
27 completed within 180 days after receipt of complaint.......85%
28 e. Percent of investigations of alleged unlicensed
29 facilities and programs that have been previously issued a
30 cease and desist order, that are confirmed as repeated
31 unlicensed activity.........................................8%
78
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Percent of Priority I consumer complaints about
2 licensed facilities and programs that are investigated within
3 48 hours..................................................100%
4 g. Percent of accredited hospitals and ambulatory
5 surgical centers cited for not complying with life safety,
6 licensure, or emergency access standards....................9%
7 h. Percent of validation surveys that are consistent
8 with findings noted during the accreditation survey .......98%
9 i. Percent of nursing home facilities with
10 deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,
11 or welfare of the public....................................2%
12 j. Percent of assisted living facilities with
13 deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,
14 or welfare of the public....................................2%
15 k. Percent of home health facilities with deficiencies
16 that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare
17 of the public...............................................0%
18 l. Percent of clinical laboratories with deficiencies
19 that pose a serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare
20 of the public...............................................0%
21 m. Percent of ambulatory surgical centers with
22 deficiencies that pose a serious threat to the health, safety,
23 or welfare of the public....................................2%
24 n. Percent of hospitals with deficiencies that pose a
25 serious threat to the health, safety, or welfare of the
26 public......................................................2%
27 o. Percent of hospitals that fail to report serious
28 incidents (agency identified)...............................5%
29 p. Percent of hospitals that fail to report peer
30 review disciplinary actions (agency identified).............2%
31
79
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 q. Percent of new recipients voluntarily selecting
2 managed care plan..........................................71%
3 r. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
4 costs.....................................................6.4%
5 2. HEALTH FACILITIES AND PRACTITIONER REGULATION
6 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of practitioner complaints determined
8 legally sufficient.......................................6,836
9 b. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
10 complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (nolle
11 prosse)..................................................1,182
12 c. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
13 complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (letters
14 of guidance).............................................1,095
15 d. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
16 complaints resolved by findings of no probable cause (notice
17 of noncompliance)............................................3
18 e. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
19 complaints resolved by findings of probable cause - issuance
20 of citation for minor violations............................62
21 f. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
22 complaints resolved by findings of stipulations or informal
23 hearings.................................................1,023
24 g. Number of legally sufficient practitioner
25 complaints resolved by findings of formal hearings..........37
26 h. Average number of practitioner complaint
27 investigations per FTE.....................................227
28 i. Number of inquiries to the call center regarding
29 practitioner licensure and disciplinary information....115,230
30 j. Number of facility emergency actions taken.......89
31
80
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 k. Total number of full facility quality-of-care
2 surveys conducted........................................4,980
3 l. Number of nursing home full facility
4 quality-of-care surveys conducted..........................712
5 m. Number of assisted living facility full facility
6 quality-of-care surveys conducted..........................762
7 n. Number of home health agency full facility
8 quality-of-care surveys conducted........................1,221
9 o. Number of clinical laboratory full facility
10 quality-of-care surveys conducted........................1,163
11 p. Number of hospital full facility quality-of-care
12 surveys conducted...........................................37
13 q. Number of other full facility quality-of-care
14 surveys conducted........................................1,084
15 r. Average processing time (in days) for Statewide
16 Provider and Subscriber Assistance Panel cases.............165
17 s. Number of nursing home plans and construction
18 reviews performed........................................1,100
19 t. Number of hospital plan and construction reviews
20 performed................................................2,500
21 u. Number of ambulatory surgical center plans and
22 construction reviewed......................................200
23 v. Average number of hours for a nursing home plans
24 and construction review.....................................30
25 w. Average number of hours for a hospital plans and
26 construction review.........................................35
27 x. Average number of hours for an ambulatory surgical
28 center plans and construction review........................25
29 y. Number of new enrollees provided choice
30 counseling.............................................191,582
31 (2) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.--
81
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (a) For the Executive Leadership Program, the outcome
2 measures, output measures, and associated performance
3 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
4 Appropriations 264-268 are as follows:
5 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
6 MEASURE.--
7 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
8 costs.....................................................0.3%
9 (b) For the Support Services Program, the outcome
10 measures, output measures, and associated performance
11 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
12 Appropriations 269-293 are as follows:
13 1. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Information technology costs as a percent of total
15 agency costs..............................................3.5%
16 2. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of computer programs supported........22,485
18 b. Number of computer programs designed and
19 developed...............................................22,485
20 3. ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME
21 MEASURE.--
22 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
23 costs.......................................................1%
24 4. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
25 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
26 costs.....................................................1.6%
27 (c) For the Family Safety Program, the outcome
28 measures, output measures, and associated performance
29 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
30 Appropriations 294-325B are as follows:
31
82
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 1. CHILD CARE REGULATION AND INFORMATION OUTCOME
2 MEASURE.--
3 a. Percent of licensed child care facilities and homes
4 with no class 1 (serious) violations during their licensure
5 year.......................................................97%
6 2. CHILD CARE REGULATION AND INFORMATION OUTPUT
7 MEASURE.--
8 a. Number of facilities and homes licensed.......5,692
9 3. ADULT PROTECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of protective supervision cases in which no
11 report alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation is received
12 while the case is open (from beginning of protective
13 supervision for a maximum of 1 year).......................97%
14 b. Ratio of domestic violence incidents reported
15 resulting in injury or harm to clients as a result of
16 inadequate security procedures per 1,000 shelter
17 days..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 c. Percent of adult and child victims in shelter more
19 than 72 hours having a plan for family safety and security
20 when they leave shelter....................................95%
21 4. ADULT PROTECTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of investigations.....................32,281
23 b. Number of persons receiving protective supervision
24 services...................................................628
25 c. Number of persons referred to other
26 agencies.................................................1,700
27 d. Number of individuals served in emergency
28 shelters................................................13,578
29 e. Number of individuals counseled..............97,343
30 5. CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION OUTCOME
31 MEASURE.--
83
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of children in families who complete
2 intensive child abuse prevention programs of 3 months or more
3 who are not abused or neglected within 12 months after program
4 completion.................................................96%
5 b. Per capita child abuse rate................23/1,000
6 c. Number of children in families served........53,500
7 6. CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Percent of children who have no findings of child
9 maltreatment within 1 year after case closure from
10 services...................................................95%
11 b. Percent of children reunified with family who
12 return to foster care within 1 year after case closure......3%
13 c. Percent of children not abused or neglected during
14 services...................................................97%
15 d. Percent of children who exited out-of-home care by
16 the 12th month.............................................30%
17 e. Percent of cases reviewed by supervisors in
18 accordance with department timeframes for early warning
19 system....................................................100%
20 f. Percent of alleged victims seen within 24
21 hours.....................................................100%
22 g. Percent of investigations completed within 30
23 days......................................................100%
24 h. Percent of children removed from a home who are
25 placed with a relative as a result of a child protective
26 investigation.................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 i. Percent of children removed from a home who are
28 placed in out-of-home care (excluding relative placements) as
29 a result of a child protective
30 investigation.................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31
84
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 j. Percent of foster homes that exceed their licensed
2 capacity without a current waiver.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 k. Percent of case plans completed within 60 days
4 after the child is removed from the home......FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 l. Percent of children who are adopted of the number
6 of children legally available for adoption.................90%
7 7. CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Reports of child abuse/neglect..............177,196
9 b. Children identified as abused/neglected during
10 year....................................................75,000
11 c. Children receiving adoptive services..........4,500
12 d. Children receiving adoption subsidies........13,209
13 8. FLORIDA ABUSE HOTLINE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Percent of calls made to the Florida Abuse Hotline
15 that were abandoned.........................................7%
16 9. FLORIDA ABUSE HOTLINE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
17 a. Calls answered..............................441,000
18 10. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
19 MEASURE.--
20 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
21 costs.....................................................6.4%
22 (d) For the Persons with Disabilities Program, the
23 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
24 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
25 Appropriations 326-360 are as follows:
26 1. DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES PUBLIC FACILITIES OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Annual number of significant reportable incidents
29 per 100 persons with developmental disabilities living in
30 developmental services institutions.........................24
31 b. Percent of people with improved quality of
85
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 life.......................................................40%
2 2. DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES PUBLIC FACILITIES OUTPUT
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Adults incompetent to proceed provided competency
5 training and custodial care in the Mentally Retarded
6 Defendants Program.........................................141
7 b. Adults receiving services in developmental services
8 institutions.............................................1,419
9 3. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of people receiving home and community
11 services with improved quality of life (waiver and
12 nonwaiver).................................................53%
13 b. Percent of people receiving private ICF/DD with
14 improved quality of life...................................40%
15 c. Percent of people who have a quality-of-life score
16 of 19 out of 25 or greater on the Outcome Based Performance
17 Measures Assessment at annual reassessment.................18%
18 d. Percent of people who are employed in integrated
19 settings...................................................26%
20 4. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Children and adults provided residential
22 care.....................................................5,330
23 b. Number of people served in the community (not in
24 private ICF/DDs)........................................27,891
25 c. Number of people served in private
26 facilities...............................................2,084
27 5. IN-HOME SERVICES FOR DISABLED ADULTS OUTCOME
28 MEASURE.--
29 a. Percent of adults with disabilities receiving
30 services who are not placed in a nursing home..............99%
31
86
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 6. IN-HOME SERVICES FOR DISABLED ADULTS OUTPUT
2 MEASURE.--
3 a. Number of disabled adults provided in-home
4 supports.................................................4,302
5 7. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
6 MEASURE.--
7 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
8 costs....................................................0.12%
9 (e) For the Mental Health Program, the outcome
10 measures, output measures, and associated performance
11 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
12 Appropriations 361-390 are as follows:
13 1. VIOLENT SEXUAL PREDATOR OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of sexual predators served.............4,750
15 b. Number of people served who are committed........89
16 c. Number of people served who are noncommitted.....60
17 2. ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Average annual number of days spent in the
20 community (not in institutions or other facilities) for adults
21 with a serious and persistent mental illness...............344
22 b. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
23 of Functioning score for adults with a serious and persistent
24 mental illness..............................................50
25 c. Average annual days worked for pay for adults with
26 a serious and persistent mental illness.....................40
27 d. Percent of clients with a serious and persistent
28 mental illness who worked during the year.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 e. Percent of community partners (serious and
30 persistent mental illness) satisfied based on survey.......90%
31
87
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Average Global Assessment of Functioning scale
2 change score for adults in mental health crisis..............8
3 g. Percent of adults in mental health crisis not
4 readmitted within 30 days..................................97%
5 h. Percent of community partners (adults in mental
6 health crisis) satisfied based on survey...................90%
7 i. Average functional level based on Global Assessment
8 of Functioning score for adults with forensic involvement...45
9 j. Percent of adults with forensic involvement who
10 violate their conditional release under chapter 916, Florida
11 Statutes, and are recommitted...............................4%
12 k. Percent of community partners (adults in mental
13 health crisis) satisfied based on survey...................90%
14 l. Average annual number of days spent in the
15 community (not in institutions or other facilities) for adults
16 with forensic involvement..................................310
17 3. ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of adults with a serious and persistent
20 mental illness in the community served..................53,736
21 b. Number of adults in mental health crisis
22 served..................................................34,382
23 c. Number of adults with forensic involvement
24 served.....................................................896
25 4. CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME
26 MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of children with mental illness restored to
28 competency and recommended to proceed with a judicial
29 hearing....................................................90%
30
31
88
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent of children with mental retardation
2 restored to competency and recommended to proceed with a
3 judicial hearing...........................................68%
4 c. Percent of community partners satisfied with
5 program (children incompetent to proceed in Juvenile Justice)
6 based upon a survey........................................90%
7 d. Projected annual days serious emotionally disturbed
8 (SED) children (excluding those in juvenile justice
9 facilities) spend in the community.........................333
10 e. Percent of available school days SED children
11 attended during the last 30 days...........................86%
12 f. Percent of SED community partners satisfied based
13 on a survey................................................90%
14 g. Average functional level score SED children will
15 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
16 Functioning scale...........................................50
17 h. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
18 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
19 the presented problem and symptoms of the serious emotional
20 disturbance recorded in the initial
21 assessment....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 i. Projected annual days emotionally disturbed (ED)
23 children (excluding those in juvenile justice facilities)
24 spend in the community.....................................349
25 j. Percent of available days ED children attended
26 school during the last 30 days.............................89%
27 k. Percent of ED community partners satisfied based on
28 a survey...................................................90%
29 l. Percent of improvement of the emotional condition
30 or behavior of the child or adolescent evidenced by resolving
31
89
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 the presented problem and symptoms of the emotional
2 disturbance recorded in the initial
3 assessment....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 m. Average functional level score ED children will
5 have achieved on the Children's Global Assessment of
6 Functioning scale...........................................57
7 5. CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Number served who are incompetent to proceed....226
10 b. Number of SED children to be served..........32,817
11 c. Number of ED children to be served...........18,272
12 d. Number of at-risk children to be served.......2,000
13 6. ADULT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES OUTCOME
14 MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of civil commitment patients who improve
16 mental health based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome
17 Scale......................................................64%
18 b. Average civil commitment scores on community
19 readiness/ability survey......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 c. Percent of civil commitment patients readmitted
21 within 1 year.................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 d. Percent of civil commitment community partners
23 satisfied based on survey.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 e. Percent of people in civil commitment served who
25 are discharged to the community............................40%
26 f. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
27 in civil commitment in each mental health institution.......15
28 g. Average number of days to restore competency for
29 adults in forensic commitment..............................174
30 h. Percent of forensic residents restored to
31 competency within 12 months...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
90
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 i. Annual number of harmful events per 100 residents
2 in forensic commitment in each mental health institution.....5
3 j. Percent of forensic commitment community partners
4 satisfied based on survey..................................90%
5 7. ADULT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITIES OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of people in civil commitment served...2,700
8 b. Number of civil commitment adult abuse reports
9 confirmed or proposed confirmed...............FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 c. Number of forensic commitment adult abuse reports
11 confirmed or proposed confirmed...............FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 d. Number of adults in forensic commitment
13 served...................................................1,605
14 8. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
15 MEASURE.--
16 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
17 costs.....................................................1.6%
18 (f) For the Substance Abuse Program, the outcome
19 measures, output measures, and associated performance
20 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
21 Appropriations 391-398A are as follows:
22 1. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
23 MEASURE.--
24 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
25 costs.....................................................3.8%
26 2. CHILD SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND
27 TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of children with substance abuse who
29 complete treatment.........................................72%
30
31
91
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent of children with substance abuse who are
2 drug free during the 12 months following completion of
3 treatment..................................................52%
4 c. Percent of children with substance abuse under the
5 supervision of the state receiving substance-abuse treatment
6 who are not committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice
7 during the 12 months following treatment completion........85%
8 d. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
9 survey.....................................................85%
10 e. Percent of children at risk of substance abuse in
11 targeted prevention programs who achieve expected level of
12 improvement in reading.....................................75%
13 f. Percent of children at risk of substance abuse in
14 targeted prevention programs who achieve expected level of
15 improvement in math........................................75%
16 g. Percent of children at risk of substance abuse who
17 receive targeted prevention services who are not admitted to
18 substance-abuse services during the 12 months after completion
19 of prevention services.....................................95%
20 3. CHILD SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION SERVICES OUTPUT
21 MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of children with substance-abuse problems
23 served..................................................55,000
24 b. Number of children with substance abuse completing
25 treatment................................................5,429
26 c. Number of children receiving
27 aftercare/follow-up......................................2,004
28 d. Number of at-risk children served in targeted
29 prevention...............................................7,000
30 e. Number of prevention services to children at
31 risk.....................................................7,483
92
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 4. ADULT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND
2 TREATMENT SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
3 a. Percent of adults who are drug free during the 12
4 months following completion of treatment...................54%
5 b. Percent of adults employed upon discharge from
6 treatment services.........................................65%
7 c. Percent change in the number of clients with
8 arrests within 90 days following discharge compared to number
9 with arrests within 90 days prior to admission.............55%
10 d. Percent of community partners satisfied based on
11 survey.....................................................82%
12 e. Percent of adults in child welfare protective
13 supervision who have case plans requiring substance-abuse
14 treatment who are receiving treatment......................53%
15 f. Percent of clients who complete treatment.......68%
16 5. ADULT SUBSTANCE-ABUSE-PREVENTION, EVALUATION, AND
17 TREATMENT SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of adults served.....................124,400
19 b. Number of adults in child welfare protective
20 supervision who have case plans requiring substance-abuse
21 treatment who are receiving treatment....................5,000
22 c. Number of adults provided detoxification and crisis
23 supports................................................23,000
24 d. Number of at-risk adults provided prevention
25 services................................................53,000
26 e. Number of adults provided treatment..........20,213
27 f. Number of adults in need given
28 aftercare/follow-up.....................................14,826
29 (g) For the Economic Self-Sufficiency Program, the
30 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
31
93
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 399-435 are as follows:
3 1. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTCOME
4 MEASURE.--
5 a. Percent of all applications processed within time
6 standards..................................................98%
7 2. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTPUT
8 MEASURE.--
9 a. Total number of applications..............2,890,790
10 3. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE OUTCOME
11 MEASURE.--
12 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total program
13 costs.....................................................2.7%
14 4. FRAUD PREVENTION AND BENEFIT RECOVERY OUTCOME
15 MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of Food Stamp benefits determined
17 accurately...............................................90.7%
18 b. Percent of cash assistance benefits determined
19 accurately..............................................93.89%
20 c. Percent of dollars collected for established
21 benefit recovery claims..................................64.1%
22 d. Percent of suspected fraud cases referred that
23 result in front-end fraud prevention savings...............70%
24 5. FRAUD PREVENTION AND BENEFIT RECOVERY OUTPUT
25 MEASURES.--
26 a. Dollars collected through benefit
27 recovery...........................................$14,725,000
28 b. Number of front-end fraud prevention investigations
29 completed...............................................25,230
30 c. Dollars saved through front-end fraud
31 prevention.........................................$18,929,800
94
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 6. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
2 a. Percent of Optional State Supplementation (OSS)
3 applications processed within time standards...............98%
4 7. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
5 a. Number of applications processed for Optional State
6 Supplementation payments.................................5,640
7 8. WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES) AND
8 EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of 4-year-old children placed with
10 contracted providers in care for 9 months who enter
11 kindergarten ready to learn as determined by the Florida
12 Partnership for School Readiness...........................83%
13 b. Percent of cash and welfare-transition clients who
14 need child care who receive subsidized child care
15 services..................................................100%
16 c. Percent of working poor clients
17 (nonwelfare-transition) who receive subsidized child care
18 services...................................................71%
19 9. WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES) AND
20 EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of cash assistance participants referred to
22 the regional workforce development boards..............121,000
23 b. Number of children who received subsidized child
24 care services..........................................147,085
25 10. REFUGEES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
26 a. Percent of Refugee Assistance cases accurately
27 closed at 8 months or less.................................98%
28 11. REFUGEES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
29 a. Number of refugee cases closed................5,840
30 (3) DEPARTMENT OF ELDERLY AFFAIRS.--
31
95
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (a) For the Services to Elders Program, the outcome
2 measures, output measures, and associated performance
3 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
4 Appropriations 436-461 are as follows:
5 1. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTCOME
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of elders CARES determined to be eligible
8 for nursing home placement who are diverted..............16.8%
9 b. Percent of CARES imminent-risk referrals
10 served.....................................................90%
11 2. COMPREHENSIVE ELIGIBILITY SERVICES OUTPUT
12 MEASURE.--
13 a. Total number of CARES assessments............64,356
14 3. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of Adult Protective Services (APS)
16 referrals who are in need of immediate services to prevent
17 further harm who are served within 72 hours................95%
18 b. Costs of home and community-based care (including
19 non-DOEA programs) is less than nursing home care for
20 comparable client groups......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 c. Percent of elders assessed with high or
22 moderate-risk environments who improved their environment
23 score......................................................70%
24 d. Percent of new service recipients with high-risk
25 nutrition scores whose nutritional status improved.........60%
26 e. Percent of new service recipients whose ADL
27 assessment score has been maintained or improved.........60.6%
28 f. Percent of new service recipients whose IADL
29 assessment score has been maintained or improved...........60%
30 g. Percent of family and family-assisted caregivers
31 who self-report they are very likely to provide care.......92%
96
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 h. Percent of Community Care for the Elderly clients
2 defined as "probable Medicaid eligibles" who remain in
3 state-funded programs......................................15%
4 4. HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of people served.....................139,331
6 b. Number of congregate meals provided.......4,709,932
7 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Administrative and support cost as a percent of
10 total agency costs..........................................4%
11 b. Increase the percent of participants passing the
12 competency test............................................80%
13 c. Agency information technology cost as a percent of
14 total agency costs........................................0.6%
15 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
16 MEASURE.--
17 a. Number of Assisted Living Facility and Adult Family
18 Care Home proprietors and staff trained..................7,000
19 7. CONSUMER ADVOCATE SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
20 a. Percent of complaint investigations initiated
21 within 5 working days......................................90%
22 8. CONSUMER ADVOCATE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of judicially approved guardianship
24 plans......................................................340
25 b. Number of complaint investigations
26 completed................................................8,500
27 (4) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.--
28 (a) For the Executive Direction and Administration
29 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
30 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
31 Specific Appropriations 462-474 are as follows:
97
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
2 MEASURES.--
3 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
4 costs.......................................................1%
5 b. Percent of middle and high school students who
6 report using tobacco products in the last 30 days........25.5%
7 2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
8 MEASURE.--
9 a. Number of middle and high school students provided
10 comprehensive tobacco prevention education.............121,185
11 3. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
12 a. Percent of hardware, software, and networks meeting
13 department standards.......................................98%
14 4. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of custom and in-house applications
16 supported...................................................42
17 b. Number of personal computers, servers, and e-mail
18 users supported.........................................19,588
19 (b) For the Community Public Health Program, the
20 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
21 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
22 Appropriations 475-544B are as follows:
23 1. FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Total infant mortality rate per 1,000 live
25 births.....................................................6.9
26 b. Nonwhite infant mortality rate per 1,000 nonwhite
27 births....................................................10.7
28 c. Percent of low-birth-weight births among prenatal
29 Women, Infants, and Children program clients..............7.9%
30 d. Live births to mothers age 15-19 per 1,000 females
31 15-19.....................................................55.4
98
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 e. Percent of mothers 15-19 having a repeat
2 birth......................................................16%
3 f. Percent of targeted low-income population receiving
4 dental health services from a county health department...10.5%
5 g. Percent of students who visit the health clinic and
6 are able to return to class rather than leaving school.....90%
7 2. FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of women and infants receiving Healthy Start
9 services...............................................145,000
10 b. Average monthly participants in Women, Infants, and
11 Children program.......................................339,000
12 c. Number of clients served in county health
13 department Family Planning programs....................162,000
14 d. Number of teens age 15-19 served in county health
15 department Family Planning programs.....................43,725
16 e. Number of adults and children receiving county
17 health department sponsored professional dental care....79,400
18 f. Number of children served in the county health
19 department Child Health program........................168,000
20 g. Number of School Health nursing assessments
21 provided...............................................885,000
22 h. Number of women, infants, and children provided
23 food and nutrition services (WIC and Child Care
24 Food)..................................................443,100
25 i. Number of KidCare outreach services.......1,680,000
26 3. INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. AIDS case rate per 100,000 population..........35.5
29 b. HIV/AIDS resident total deaths per 100,000
30 population.................................................9.6
31 c. Chlamydia case rate per 100,000 population......195
99
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Tuberculosis case rate per 100,000 population.....8
2 e. Immunization rate among 2-year-olds.............90%
3 f. Vaccine-preventable disease rate per 100,000
4 population................................................3.26
5 4. INFECTIOUS-DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of HIV/AIDS counseling and testing services
8 provided annually......................................220,000
9 b. Number of HIV partner notification services
10 provided annually........................................8,500
11 c. Number of clients served in county health
12 department sexually transmitted disease programs........78,000
13 d. Number of tuberculosis medical management services
14 provided................................................25,245
15 e. Number of patients who complete tuberculosis
16 therapy at the A.G. Holley tuberculosis hospital............90
17 f. Number of immunization services provided by county
18 public health departments............................1,629,815
19 g. Number of HIV/AIDS patient care services provided
20 to individuals..........................................28,193
21 5. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Food and waterborne disease cases per 1,000
23 facilities regulated by the department.....................4.4
24 b. Overall sanitation and safety score in department
25 regulated facilities.....................................97.2%
26 c. Septic tank failure rate per 1,000 within 2 years
27 after system installation..................................2.4
28 6. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of department regulated facilities
30 inspected..............................................122,527
31
100
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of onsite sewage disposal system inspections
2 completed..............................................295,000
3 c. Control of radiation threats as measured by the
4 number of x-ray machines inspected......................37,800
5 d. Number of water systems and storage tanks
6 inspected..............................................218,000
7 7. STATEWIDE HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent saved on prescription drugs compared to
10 market price...............................................30%
11 b. Percent of laboratory samples passing standardized
12 proficiency testing.......................................100%
13 c. Percent of vital statistics records completed
14 within established timeframes..............................99%
15 (c) For the Children's Medical Services (CMS) Program,
16 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
17 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
18 Specific Appropriations 545-571 are as follows:
19 1. CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Percent of families in Children's Medical Services
21 (CMS) Program Network indicating a positive perception of
22 care.......................................................95%
23 b. Percent of CMS Network enrollees in compliance with
24 the periodicity schedule for well-child care...............90%
25 c. Percent of eligible infants/toddlers provided CMS
26 program Early Intervention program services................90%
27 d. Percent of Child Protection Team (CPT) team
28 assessments provided to Family Safety and Preservation program
29 within established timeframes..............................90%
30 2. CHILDREN'S SPECIAL HEALTH CARE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31
101
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of children enrolled in CMS program Network
2 (Medicaid and Non-Medicaid).............................37,500
3 b. Number of clients receiving services in the CMS
4 program Early Intervention program......................29,000
5 c. Number of children receiving Child Protection Team
6 (CPT) assessments.......................................27,500
7 (d) For the Health Care Practitioner and Access
8 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
9 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
10 Specific Appropriations 572-592B are as follows:
11 1. MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of unlicensed individuals identified and
13 referred to State Attorneys.................................36
14 b. Percent of health care practitioners' applications
15 for licensure completed within 90 days....................100%
16 2. MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Number of unlicensed individuals investigated...364
18 b. Number of initial health care practitioner licenses
19 processed...............................................48,946
20 c. Number of initial health care practitioner licenses
21 issued..................................................43,531
22 d. Number of licenses issued and renewed by
23 mail...................................................314,688
24 3. COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Percent of emergency medical service providers
26 found to have a significant deficiency during licensure
27 inspection................................................8.5%
28 b. Age-adjusted injury death rate per 100,000.......57
29 c. Number of emergency medical service providers
30 licensed annually..........................................249
31
102
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of medical students who do a rotation in a
2 medically underserved area.................................715
3 e. Number of persons who receive continuing education
4 services through Work Force Development.................16,400
5 4. COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of providers recruited for underserved
7 areas.......................................................46
8 b. Number of brain and spinal cord injury victims
9 reintegrated to the community............................3,384
10 c. Number of emergency medical services providers
11 licensed and emergency medical technicians and paramedics
12 certified...............................................31,930
13 (e) For the Disability Determinations Program, the
14 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 592C-592E are as follows:
17 1. DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTCOME
18 MEASURE.--
19 a. Percent of Title II and XVI disability decisions
20 completed accurately as measured by the Social Security
21 Administration.............................................92%
22 2. DISABILITY BENEFITS DETERMINATIONS OUTPUT
23 MEASURE.--
24 a. Number of Title II and XVI disability decisions
25 completed..............................................212,489
26 (5) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS.--
27 (a) For the Services to Veterans Program, the outcome
28 measures, output measures, and associated performance
29 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
30 Appropriations 593-611 are as follows:
31 1. VETERANS' HOMES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
103
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Occupancy rate for veterans homes in operation for
2 2 years or longer..........................................75%
3 b. Percent of veterans' homes that received gold-star
4 certification by AHCA.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 2. VETERANS' HOMES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of veterans' homes beds available........390
7 3. VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
8 a. Percent of "ready to rate" claims submitted to
9 USDVA compared to total claims submitted....................2%
10 4. VETERANS' CLAIMS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of veterans served...................195,000
12 b. Number of claims processed...................15,500
13 5. VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
14 a. Value of cost avoidance because of issue
15 resolution..........................................$4,680,000
16 6. VETERANS' FIELD SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
17 a. Number of veterans served (benefited) by issue
18 resolution.............................................240,000
19 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
22 costs.......................................................8%
23 b. Percent of time computer network is available for
24 use or response time.......................................85%
25 c. Number of veterans or eligible dependents enrolled
26 in certified educational programs.......................27,000
27 d. Percent of veterans, families, and survivors aware
28 of FDVA services...........................................43%
29 e. Percent of schools certified after submission of
30 application...............................................100%
31
104
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 8. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTPUT
2 MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of constituents served...............559,000
4 b. Value of veterans' education benefits
5 paid..............................................$110 million
6 c. Number of Florida education institution programs
7 certified................................................3,000
8 d. Number of staff supported by the information
9 technology service through networking, software, and hardware
10 support....................................................540
11 Section 69. The performance measures and standards
12 established in this section for individual programs in public
13 safety and judiciary agencies shall be applied to those
14 programs for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance
15 measures and standards are directly linked to the
16 appropriations made in the General Appropriations Act for
17 Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as required by the Government
18 Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
19 (1) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.--
20 (a) For the Security and Institutional Operations
21 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
22 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
23 Specific Appropriations 625-700 are as follows:
24 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of escapes from the secure perimeter of
26 major institutions...........................................0
27 b. Percent of inmates who did not escape when assigned
28 outside a secure perimeter...............................99.9%
29 c. Number of batteries committed by inmates on one or
30 more persons per 1,000 inmates................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31
105
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of inmates receiving major disciplinary
2 reports per 1,000 inmates..................................375
3 e. Percent of random inmate drug tests that are
4 negative.................................................98.5%
5 f. Percent of reported criminal incidents
6 investigated by the Inspector General's Office............100%
7 g. Percent of victim notifications that meet the
8 statutory time period requirements........................100%
9 h. Percent of available inmates who work.........83.5%
10 i. Number of available work assignments.........35,203
11 j. Number of inmates available for work
12 assignments...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 k. Percent of those available for work who are not
14 assigned..................................................1.4%
15 l. Annual cost savings to the state for using inmate
16 labor for maintenance of state
17 rights-of-way.................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 m. Percent of inmates placed in a facility that
19 provides at least one of inmate's primary program
20 needs.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
22 a. Number of new inmates received and
23 oriented................................................26,831
24 (b) For the Health Care Program, the outcome measures,
25 output measures, and associated performance standards with
26 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 737-750
27 are as follows:
28 1. INMATE HEALTH SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Health care grievances that are upheld:
30 (I) Number..........................................60
31 (II) Percent........................................3%
106
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of suicides per 100,000 inmates compared to
2 the national average for correctional facilities/institutions:
3 (I) Within DOC........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 (II) National average.................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 c. Comparison of per diems for General Medical
6 Services:
7 (I) DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 (II) HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 (III) Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 d. Comparison of per diems for Mental Health Services:
11 (I) DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 (II) HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 (III) Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 e. Comparison of per diems for hospitalization
15 contracts:
16 (I) DOC...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 (II) HMO..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 (III) Medicaid HMO....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 f. Comparison of per diems for hospitalization
20 contracts:
21 (I) DOC.............(to be reported by the department)
22 (II) HMO............(to be reported by the department)
23 (III) Medicaid HMO..(to be reported by the department)
24 (c) For the Community Corrections Program, the outcome
25 measures, output measures, and associated performance
26 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
27 Appropriations 701-736 are as follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Status of offenders 2 years after the period of
30 supervision was imposed:
31 (I) Revoked:
107
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 (II) Absconded:
4 (A) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 (B) Percent...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 b. Percent of offenders that successfully complete
7 their sentence or are still under supervision at the end of a
8 2-year measurement period................................56.9%
9 c. Percent of offenders who successfully complete
10 supervision and are not subsequently recommitted to DOC for
11 committing a new crime within 2 years:
12 (I) To prison....................................98.9%
13 (II) To supervision..............................94.4%
14 d. Percent of court-ordered amounts collected from
15 offenders on community supervision only by DOC
16 for restitution...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 e. Percent of court-ordered amounts collected from
18 offenders on community supervision only by DOC for other
19 court-ordered costs...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 f. Percent of court-ordered amounts collected from
21 offenders on community supervision only by DOC for costs of
22 supervision...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 g. Percent of court-ordered amounts collected for
24 subsistence from offenders/inmates in community correctional
25 centers.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 h. Percent of court-ordered amounts collected for
27 subsistence from offenders/inmates in probation and
28 restitution centers...........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30
31
108
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of monthly personal contacts with offenders
2 supervised in the community compared to the department
3 standard:
4 (I) Administrative.................................0.2
5 (II) Basic risk....................................1.3
6 (III) Enhanced risk................................1.5
7 (IV) Intensive risk................................1.9
8 (V) Close risk.....................................2.5
9 (VI) Community Control.............................6.5
10 b. Substance abuse tests administered to offenders
11 being supervised in the community.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 c. Score sheets processed......................122,722
13 (d) For the Correctional Education and Rehabilitation
14 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
15 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
16 Specific Appropriations 751-766 are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of inmates completing mandatory literacy
19 programs who score at or above 9th grade level on next Test
20 for Adult Basic Education (TABE)...........................16%
21 b. Percent of inmates who successfully complete
22 mandatory literacy programs................................52%
23 c. Percent of inmates who successfully complete GED
24 education programs.........................................14%
25 d. Percent of inmates who need special education
26 programs who participate in special education (federal law)
27 programs......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 e. Percent of inmates who successfully complete
29 vocational education programs..............................32%
30
31
109
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Percent of community supervision offenders who have
2 completed drug treatment without subsequent recommitment to
3 community supervision or prison within 24 months after
4 release..................................................93.2%
5 g. Percent of inmates who have completed drug
6 treatment without subsequent recommitment to community
7 supervision or prison within 24 months after release.....72.9%
8 h. Percent of inmates who need programs and
9 successfully complete Drug Abuse Education/Treatment
10 programs...................................................46%
11 i. Average increase in grade level achieved by inmates
12 participating in educational programs per instructional
13 period.....................................................0.6
14 j. Percent of community supervision offenders who
15 successfully complete transition, rehabilitation, or support
16 programs without subsequent recommitment to community
17 supervision or prison for 24 months after release........85.5%
18 k. Percent of inmates who successfully complete
19 transition, rehabilitation, or support programs without
20 subsequent recommitment to community supervision or prison for
21 24 months after release..................................72.9%
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of transition plans completed for inmates
24 released from prison..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 b. Percent of transition plans completed for inmates
26 released from prison..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 c. Percent of inmates participating in religious
28 programming...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29
30 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
31 required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall
110
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative
2 budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should
3 be included with an explanation as to the utility of the
4 measure.
5 (2) JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION.--The Justice
6 Administrative Commission shall recommend standards for the
7 following outcomes and outputs for fiscal year 2000-2001 to
8 the appropriate legislative committees. For each outcome and
9 output, or for each group of integrally related outcomes and
10 outputs, the commission shall identify total associated costs
11 for producing that outcome or output, based on the fiscal year
12 1999-2000 budget, in order to improve the Legislature's
13 ability to appropriate funds, compare activities, and evaluate
14 commission activities for efficiency:
15 (a) For the Justice Administrative Commission Program,
16 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
17 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
18 Specific Appropriations 774-781B are as follows:
19 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
20 MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of material/substantial audit findings
22 related to areas of direct JAC responsibility to its
23 customers.
24 b. Percent of invoices processed within statutory
25 timeframes.
26 2. BUDGET SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
27 a. Number of budget amendments processed and agency
28 transfers processed.
29 3. ACCOUNTING SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of accounting transactions (FLAIR)
31 processed.
111
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of financial reports produced.
2 4. HUMAN RESOURCES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
3 a. Number of reports prepared.
4 5. PAYROLL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
5 a. Number of employee and position transactions
6 (COPES) processed by type.
7 6. TECHNOLOGY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of JAC staff users directly supported.
9 b. Number of JAC computer devices directly supported.
10 c. Number of IRM reports provided to the State
11 Technology Office.
12 7. ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
13 a. Number of public records requests.
14 (3) STATE ATTORNEYS.--Each state attorney shall
15 recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for
16 fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative
17 committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of
18 integrally related outcomes and outputs, the state attorney
19 shall identify total associated costs for producing that
20 outcome or output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget,
21 in order to improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate
22 funds, compare activities, and evaluate state attorney
23 activities for efficiency:
24 (a) For the Criminal Prosecutions and Civil Actions
25 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
26 performance standards with respect to funds provided to each
27 State Attorney Office in Specific Appropriations 782-924A are
28 as follows:
29 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Offenders who qualify for enhanced sentencing for
31 whom state attorneys requested enhanced sentencing and the
112
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 number for whom judges ordered enhanced sentencing. "Enhanced
2 sentencing" includes Habitual Offender, Violent Habitual
3 Offender, Violent Career Criminal, Prison Releasee Reoffender,
4 10-20-Life, and Three-Strikes statutes:
5 (I) Number.
6 (II) Percent.
7 b. Number of dispositions by trial verdicts, pleas,
8 nontrial, and otherwise disposed of.
9 c. Percent of dispositions by trial verdicts, pleas,
10 nontrial, and otherwise disposed of.
11 d. Number of Baker Act hearings in which the
12 recommendation of the state attorney was supported by the
13 court.
14 e. Cases in which restitution was recommended and
15 ordered:
16 (I) Number.
17 (II) Percent.
18 f. Number of substantiated Bar grievances filed
19 annually.
20 g. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
21 annually.
22 h. Cases in which child support was requested and
23 ordered:
24 (I) Number.
25 (II) Percent.
26 i. Annual attorney turnover rates.
27 2. CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of criminal case referrals:
29 (I) Misdemeanor.
30 (II) Felony.
31 (III) Juvenile.
113
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of filings:
2 (I) Misdemeanor.
3 (II) Felony.
4 (III) Juvenile.
5 c. Average number of referrals per attorney:
6 (I) Misdemeanor.
7 (II) Felony.
8 (III) Juvenile.
9 d. Average number of filings per attorney:
10 (I) Misdemeanor.
11 (II) Felony.
12 (III) Juvenile.
13 e. Average paid attorney hours worked in office per
14 case.
15 f. Average paid attorney hours worked in court per
16 case.
17 3. INVESTIGATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
18 a. Number of cases investigated and reviewed.
19 4. VICTIM/WITNESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of victim contacts and notifications.
21 b. Number of witness contacts and notifications.
22 c. Number of restitution actions for victims.
23 5. CHILD WELFARE LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of child welfare referrals received and
25 acted upon.
26 b. Percent of child welfare referrals received and
27 acted upon.
28 6. POSTCONVICTION RELIEF SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of postconviction relief responses.
30 b. Number of habeas corpus responses.
31 7. CIVIL ACTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
114
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of child support enforcement referrals
2 handled.
3 b. Number of sexual predator civil commitment
4 proceedings.
5 c. Number of truancy interventions.
6 d. Number of citizen dispute mediations.
7 e. Number of worthless check diversions.
8 f. Number of domestic violence diversions.
9 g. Number of statutory pretrial interventions.
10 h. Number of cases referred to drug court.
11 i. Number of actions for the following:
12 (I) Public records requests.
13 (II) Bond validations.
14 (III) Expungements.
15 (IV) Forfeiture.
16 (V) Baker Act hearings.
17 (VI) Bond estreatures.
18 (4) PUBLIC DEFENDERS.--Each public defender shall
19 recommend standards for the following outcomes and outputs for
20 fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative
21 committees. For each outcome and output, or for each group of
22 integrally related outcomes and outputs, the public defender
23 shall identify total associated costs for producing that
24 outcome or output, based on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget,
25 in order to improve the Legislature's ability to appropriate
26 funds, compare activities, and evaluate public defender
27 activities for efficiency:
28 (a) For the Public Defender Trial Program, the outcome
29 measures, output measures, and associated performance
30 standards with respect to funds provided to each Trial Public
31
115
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Defender Office in Specific Appropriations 925-1044A are as
2 follows:
3 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of public defender clients in custody
5 contacted within 72 hours after appointment.
6 b. Number of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved
7 within speedy rule limit, unless dismissed.
8 c. Percent of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved
9 within speedy rule limit, unless dismissed.
10 d. Number of substantiated Bar grievances filed
11 annually.
12 e. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
13 annually.
14 f. Annual attorney turnover rates.
15 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of criminal cases closed.
17 b. Number of civil cases closed.
18 c. Number of pleas.
19 d. Number of trials.
20 e. Number of cases nolle prossed or dismissed.
21 f. Number of clients represented.
22 g. Number of cases closed.
23 h. Number of contested violation-of-probation
24 hearings.
25 i. Number of conflict hearings.
26 j. Number of initial interviews for assigned cases.
27 (5) APPELLATE PUBLIC DEFENDERS.--Each appellate public
28 defender shall recommend standards for the following outcomes
29 and outputs for fiscal year 2000-2001 to the appropriate
30 legislative committees. For each outcome and output, or for
31 each group of integrally related outcomes and outputs, the
116
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 appellate public defender shall identify total associated
2 costs for producing that outcome or output, based on the
3 fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to improve the
4 Legislature's ability to appropriate funds, compare
5 activities, and evaluate appellate public defender activities
6 for efficiency:
7 (a) For the Public Defender Appellate Program, the
8 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
9 standards with respect to funds provided to each Appellate
10 Public Defender Office in Specific Appropriations 1045-1069A
11 are as follows:
12 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of appeals resolved.
14 b. Number of substantiated Bar grievances filed
15 annually.
16 c. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
17 annually.
18 d. Annual attorney turnover rates.
19 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of clients represented.
21 b. Number of briefs filed.
22 c. Number of writs filed.
23 d. Number of cases closed.
24 (6) CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSELS.--Each
25 capital collateral regional counsel shall recommend standards
26 for the following outcomes and outputs for fiscal year
27 2000-2001 to the appropriate legislative committees. For each
28 outcome and output, or for each group of integrally related
29 outcomes and outputs, the counsel shall identify total
30 associated costs for producing that outcome or output, based
31 on the fiscal year 1999-2000 budget, in order to improve the
117
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Legislature's ability to appropriate funds, compare
2 activities, and evaluate counsel activities for efficiency:
3 (a) For the Capital Collateral Regional Counsels
4 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
5 performance standards with respect to funds provided to each
6 Capital Collateral Regional Counsel office in Specific
7 Appropriations 1070-1092 are as follows:
8 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of cases in which postconviction motion,
10 postconviction appeal, federal habeas corpus motion, or
11 federal appeal is timely filed, without extension.
12 b. Number of decisions by the court to release a death
13 row inmate.
14 c. Number of new trials granted to death row inmates.
15 d. Number of new sentencing hearings granted.
16 e. Number of other appeals granted.
17 f. Percent of substantiated Bar grievances filed
18 annually.
19 g. Annual attorney turnover rates.
20 h. Number/percent of final decisions from the courts:
21 (I) Number of decisions by the court to release death
22 row inmates.
23 (II) Number of new trials granted to death row
24 inmates.
25 (III) Number of new sentencing hearings granted.
26 (IV) Number of other appeals granted.
27 2. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS AND ANALYSIS SERVICES
28 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of death row case requests for public
30 records made.
31
118
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of formal legal and background death row
2 case record analyses made.
3 c. Average number of hours per public records
4 analysis.
5 3. DEATH ROW CASE INVESTIGATION SERVICES OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of death row cases investigated.
8 b. Average number of hours per death row case
9 investigated.
10 c. Number of witnesses and experts interviewed.
11 4. DEATH PENALTY LEGAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of death penalty inmate contacts made.
13 b. Average number of hours per inmate contact made.
14 c. Number of evidentiary hearings on actions which are
15 authorized by statute.
16 d. Number of appellate actions which are authorized by
17 statute.
18 e. Average number of hours per evidentiary hearing.
19 f. Average number of hours per appellate action.
20 g. Number of issues raised by CCRC that are formally
21 considered by the courts which were not ruled procedurally
22 barred or without merit.
23 h. Percent of issues raised by CCRC that are formally
24 considered by the courts which were not ruled procedurally
25 barred or without merit.
26 i. Number of requested extensions of time granted
27 following court considerations.
28 j. Percent of requested extensions of time granted
29 following court considerations.
30 k. Number of CCRC court issues not ruled on by the
31 courts due to merit of at least one issue.
119
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 l. Number of issues raised by CCRC that are summarily
2 dismissed by the courts or, if formally considered by the
3 courts, ruled to be procedurally barred or without merit.
4 m. Percent of issues raised by CCRC that are summarily
5 dismissed by the courts or, if formally considered by the
6 courts, ruled to be procedurally barred or without merit.
7 n. Number of postconviction actions which contain a
8 request by the CCRC for the court to grant leave to amend a
9 postconviction action.
10 5. ADDITIONAL MEASURES.--Additional measures and
11 standards as contained in reviews required by ss. 11.513 and
12 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall be included in the agency
13 fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative budget request. Measures for
14 which data are unavailable should be included with an
15 explanation as to the utility of the measure. Specifically,
16 the following data should be reported:
17 a. Number of CCRC active state court cases in total
18 and number/percent by procedural stage:
19 (I) Number/percent in Stage One (cases where the
20 capital defendant's fully pled postconviction action is filed
21 in the trial court).
22 (II) Number/percent in Stage Two (cases where there is
23 a final order granting or denying the capital defendant's
24 motion for postconviction relief).
25 (III) Number/percent in Stage Three (cases where the
26 capital defendant's brief or briefs that address the trial
27 court's final order granting or denying the motion for
28 postconviction relief has been filed with the Supreme Court).
29 (IV) Number/percent in Stage Four (cases where the
30 appeal of the trial court's denial of the capital defendant's
31 motion for postconviction relief is completed).
120
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (V) Number/percent in Stage Five (cases where a
2 petition has been filed for writ of certiorari in the Supreme
3 Court of the United States).
4 b. Number of CCRC active federal court system cases in
5 total and percent of the cases by procedural stage:
6 (I) Number/percent in Stage One (cases where the
7 capital defendant's complete original motion for habeas corpus
8 is filed in federal court).
9 (II) Number/percent in Stage Two (cases where there is
10 a final order granting or denying the capital defendant's
11 motion for post-habeas corpus relief).
12 (III) Number/percent in Stage Three (cases where the
13 capital defendant's brief or briefs that address the federal
14 court's final order granting or denying the capital
15 defendant's motion for habeas corpus postconviction relief has
16 been filed with the Circuit Court of Appeals).
17 (IV) Number/percent in Stage Four (cases where the
18 appeal of the federal court's denial of the capital
19 defendant's motion for habeas corpus relief is completed).
20 (V) Number/percent in Stage Five (cases where a
21 petition has been filed for writ of certiorari in the Supreme
22 Court of the United States).
23 (7) DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE.--
24 (a) For the Juvenile Detention Program, the outcome
25 measures, output measures, and associated performance
26 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
27 Appropriations 1093-1101 are as follows:
28 1. SECURE DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Number of escapes from secure detention
30 facilities...................................................0
31
121
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of batteries per 1,000 youth based on
2 average daily population in secure detention:
3 (I) Youth on youth..................................84
4 (II) Youth on staff.................................20
5 c. Percent of youth who remain crime free while in
6 secure detention...........................................97%
7 2. SECURE DETENTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
8 a. Number of admissions to secure detention
9 facilities..............................................61,844
10 3. HOME/NONSECURE DETENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
11 a. Percent of successful completions without
12 committing a new law or contract violation, failure to appear,
13 an abscond, or contempt of court...........................73%
14 4. HOME DETENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of admissions into home detention.....35,549
16 b. Average daily population for home
17 detention.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 (b) For the Residential Corrections Program, the
19 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
20 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
21 Appropriations 1122-1139 are as follows:
22 1. RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
23 a. Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after
24 release....................................................53%
25 b. Number of escapes from residential commitment
26 programs......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 c. Number of youth-on-youth batteries per
28 1000 youth....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 d. Number of youth-on-staff batteries per
30 1000 youth....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31
122
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 e. Percent of residential commitment program reviews
2 conducted by Quality Assurance, which indicate satisfactory or
3 higher ratings on overall quality
4 (calendar year)...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 f. Total collections of statutorily mandated
6 maintenance fees..............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 2. RESIDENTIAL SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Youth served in residential commitment:
9 (I) Total number of youth served......FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 (II) Average daily population of youth
11 served........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 b. Number of residential commitment beds
13 on line.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 c. Number of youth receiving substance abuse
15 treatment.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
16 (c) For the Probation and Community Corrections
17 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
18 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
19 Specific Appropriations 1102-1111 are as follows:
20 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percent of youth who remain crime free during
22 aftercare supervision.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 b. Percent of juveniles who remain crime free 1 year
24 after release from aftercare..................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 c. Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after
26 release from nonresidential commitment........FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 d. Percent of youth who remain crime free 1 year after
28 release from probation........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 e. Average time in days to make recommendations to the
30 State Attorney once the law enforcement report is received...9
31 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
123
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Youth received at intake...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 b. Number of youth under aftercare
3 supervision...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 c. Number of youth under probation
5 supervision...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 d. Number of youth receiving nonresidential
7 delinquency rehabilitation services...........FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 e. Average annual community supervision
9 caseload..................................................40:1
10 f. Average annual intake and assessment
11 caseload......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 (d) For the Prevention and Victim Services Program,
13 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
14 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
15 Specific Appropriations 1140-1149A are as follows:
16 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
17 a. Percent of youth who remain crime free 6 months
18 after receiving prevention services........................85%
19 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
20 a. Number of youth served with prevention
21 services...............................................121,264
22
23 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
24 required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall
25 be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative
26 budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should
27 be included with an explanation as to the utility of the
28 measure.
29 (8) DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.--
30 (a) For the Criminal Justice Investigations and
31 Forensic Science Program, the outcome measures, output
124
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
2 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1161-1174 are as
3 follows:
4 1. LABORATORY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Lab service requests completed:
6 (I) Number......................................75,505
7 (II) Percent.......................................95%
8 b. Average number of days to complete lab service
9 requests by lab discipline:
10 (I) Toxicology......................................30
11 (II) Chemistry........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 (III) Crime Scene...................................39
13 (IV) Firearms.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 (V) Documents.......................................50
15 (VI) Automated Fingerprint Identification System
16 (AFIS)........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 (VII) Latents.........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 (VIII) Serology/DNA................................150
19 (IX) Computer Evidence Recovery
20 (CER).........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 (X) Microanalysis...................................85
22 2. LABORATORY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of crime scenes processed................600
24 b. Number of DNA samples added to DNA
25 database................................................24,000
26 c. Number of expert witness appearances in court
27 proceedings..............................................1,815
28 3. INVESTIGATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of closed criminal investigations
31 resolved...................................................87%
125
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of closed criminal investigations
2 resolved.................................................1,038
3 c. Criminal investigations closed resulting in an
4 arrest:
5 (I) Number.........................................826
6 (II) Percent.......................................67%
7 4. INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of criminal investigations worked......2,878
9 b. Number of criminal investigations commenced...1,549
10 c. Number of criminal investigations closed......1,314
11 d. Percent of criminal investigations closed.....47.5%
12 e. Number of short-term investigative assists
13 worked...................................................1,578
14 5. MUTUAL AID & PROTECTIVE SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of background investigations
16 performed................................................3,500
17 b. Number of dignitaries provided with FDLE protective
18 services....................................................52
19 (b) For the Criminal Justice Information Program, the
20 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
21 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
22 Appropriations 1175-1182 are as follows:
23 1. INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of responses from FCIC hot files that
25 contain substantive information within defined
26 timeframes.................................................96%
27 b. Percent of time FCIC is running and
28 accessible...............................................99.5%
29 c. Percent response to criminal history record check
30 customers within defined timeframes........................92%
31
126
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Percent of criminal history information records
2 compiled accurately........................................83%
3 2. INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
4 a. Percent of criminal arrest information received
5 electronically (through AFIS) for entry into the criminal
6 history system.............................................80%
7 b. Number of FCIC work stations networked.......18,000
8 c. Number of agencies networked....................855
9 d. Number of agencies connected to the Criminal
10 Justice Network............................................853
11 e. Number of responses to requests from criminal
12 history record checks................................1,580,000
13 f. Number of registered sexual predators/offenders
14 identified to the public................................16,603
15 g. Number of missing children cases worked through
16 MCIC.......................................................625
17 h. Arrest/identification records created and
18 maintained....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 (c) For the Criminal Justice Professionalism Program,
20 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
21 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
22 Specific Appropriations 1183-1190B are as follows:
23 1. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES OUTCOME
24 MEASURE.--
25 a. Percent of individuals who pass the basic
26 professional certification examination for law enforcement
27 officers, corrections officers, and correctional probation
28 officers...................................................75%
29 b. Number of individuals who pass the basic
30 professional certification examination for law enforcement
31
127
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 officers, corrections officers, and correctional probation
2 officers.................................................5,140
3 c. Percent of training schools in compliance with
4 standards.................................................100%
5 2. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of course curricula and examinations
8 developed or revised.......................................109
9 b. Number of examinations administered...........7,000
10 c. Number of individuals trained by the Florida
11 Criminal Justice Executive Institute.......................604
12 d. Number of law enforcement officers trained by
13 DARE.......................................................155
14 e. Number of discipline referrals processed for state
15 and local LEOs, COs, and CPOs pursuant to chapter 120,
16 Florida Statutes.........................................1,500
17 f. Number of criminal justice officer disciplinary
18 actions....................................................452
19 g. Number of program and financial compliance audits
20 performed................................................3,155
21 h. Number of records audited to validate the accuracy
22 and completeness of ATMS2 record information.............3,000
23 i. Breath-testing instruments tested...............648
24 (d) For the Public Assistance Fraud Program, the
25 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
26 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
27 Appropriations 1190C-1190G are as follows:
28 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
29 a. Amount of fraudulent benefits withheld as a result
30 of public assistance fraud investigations...............$27.8M
31 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
128
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Public assistance fraud investigations
2 conducted...............................................11,476
3
4 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
5 required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall
6 be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative
7 budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should
8 be included with an explanation as to the utility of the
9 measure.
10 (9) DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS.--
11 (a) For the Office of Attorney General Program, the
12 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
13 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
14 Appropriations 1191-1231 are as follows:
15 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Average number of days for opinion response......29
17 b. Percent of mediated open government cases resolved
18 in 3 weeks or less.........................................75%
19 c. Percent of lemon law cases resolved in less
20 than 1 year................................................99%
21 d. Average number of days from application to
22 eligibility determination (victim services).................51
23 e. Percent of counties receiving motor vehicle theft
24 grant funds that experienced a reduction in motor vehicle
25 theft incidents below 1994 levels compared to the statewide
26 average....................................................70%
27 f. Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
29 a. Cases opened..................................7,000
30 b. Cases closed..................................4,700
31
129
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Number of capital briefs/state and federal
2 responses/oral arguments...................................270
3 d. Number of active capital criminal
4 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 e. Number of noncapital briefs/state and federal
6 responses/oral arguments................................11,289
7 f. Number of active noncapital
8 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 g. Number of active antitrust cases...FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 h. Number of antitrust cases closed.................20
11 i. Number of economic crime cases closed...........400
12 j. Number of active Medicaid fraud
13 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 k. Number of active Children's Legal Services
15 (uncontested disposition orders entered)
16 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 l. Number of active ethics cases......FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 m. Number of opinions issued.......................255
19 n. Number of disputes resolved through mediation...105
20 o. Percent of disputes resolved through
21 mediation..................................................76%
22 p. Number of active lemon law cases...FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 q. Number of active consumer fraud
24 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 r. Number of active child support enforcement
26 cases........................................ FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 s. Number of active civil rights
28 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 t. Number of active eminent domain
30 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 u. Number of active tax cases.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
130
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 v. Number of active civil appellate
2 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 w. Number of active inmate cases......FY 2001-2002 LBR
4 x. Number of active state employment
5 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 y. Number of active tort cases........FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 z. Number of victim compensation claims paid.....7,000
8 aa. Number of victim compensation final orders
9 issued.....................................................170
10 bb. Number of sexual battery examination claims
11 paid.....................................................5,200
12 cc. Number of appellate services provided..........800
13 dd. Number of VOCA grants funded...................250
14 ee. Number of victims served through contract
15 grants.................................................175,000
16 ff. Number of motor vehicle theft grants funded.....40
17 gg. Number of people attending training (crime
18 prevention)..............................................4,918
19 hh. Number of minority communities served with crime
20 prevention education and awareness programs..................8
21 (b) For the Statewide Prosecution Program, the outcome
22 measures, output measures, and associated performance
23 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
24 Appropriations 1232-1234 are as follows:
25 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Of the defendants who reached disposition, the
27 number of those convicted..................................325
28 b. Conviction rate for defendants who reached final
29 adjudication................................................FY
30 2001-2002 LBR
31 c. Annual attorney turnover rates.....FY 2001-2002 LBR
131
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of law enforcement agencies assisted......88
3 b. Ratio of request to number of intake
4 prosecutors...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 c. Ratio of investigations to number of
6 prosecutors...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 d. Ratio of total filed cases to total number of
8 prosecutors...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 e. Total number of active cases, excluding drug
10 cases.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 f. Total number of drug related multi-circuit
12 organized criminal cases....................................50
13 (c) For the Florida Elections Commission Program, the
14 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 1235-1237A are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Percent of cases that are closed within
19 12 months..................................................75%
20 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of election complaints and automatic fine
22 cases......................................................485
23
24 Additional measures and standards as contained in reviews
25 required by ss. 11.513 and 216.0166, Florida Statutes, shall
26 be included in the agency fiscal year 2001-2002 legislative
27 budget request. Measures for which data are unavailable should
28 be included with an explanation as to the utility of the
29 measure.
30 (10) PAROLE COMMISSION.--
31
132
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (a) For the Post-Incarceration Enforcement and
2 Victims-Rights Program, the outcome measures, output measures,
3 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
4 provided in Specific Appropriations 1238-1244 are as follows:
5 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Parolees who have successfully completed their
7 supervision without revocation within the first 2 years:
8 (I) Number............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 (II) Percent..........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
10 b. Percent of revocation cases completed within 90
11 days after final hearing......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 c. Percent of cases placed before the Parole
13 Commission/Clemency Board containing no factual errors.....80%
14 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of conditional release cases handled...5,311
16 b. Number of supervision reviews...................468
17 c. Number of revocation determinations...........3,005
18 d. Number of Clemency Board decisions
19 supported................................................2,686
20 e. Number of parole release
21 decisions...................(to be reported by the commission)
22 f. Number of victims
23 contacted...................(to be reported by the commission)
24 Section 70. The performance measures and standards
25 established in this section for individual programs in natural
26 resources, environment, growth management, and transportation
27 agencies shall be applied to those programs for the 2000-2001
28 fiscal year. These performance measures and standards are
29 directly linked to the appropriations made in the General
30 Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as required by
31 the Government Performance and Accountability Act of 1994.
133
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (1) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES.--
2 (a) For the Office of the Commissioner and Division of
3 Administration, the outcome measures, output measures, and
4 associated performance standards with respect to funds
5 provided in Specific Appropriations 1245-1262C are as follows:
6 1. AGRICULTURAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
7 a. Criminal investigations closure rate............76%
8 2. AGRICULTURAL WATER POLICY COORDINATION OUTPUT
9 MEASURE.--
10 a. Number of water policy assists provided to
11 agricultural interests.....................................266
12 3. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
13 MEASURE.--
14 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
15 costs....................................................6.17%
16 (b) For the Forest and Resource Protection Program,
17 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
18 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
19 Specific Appropriations 1263-1279 are as follows:
20 1. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
21 a. Percent of State Forest timber producing acres
22 adequately stocked and growing.............................32%
23 2. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of forest acres and other lands managed by
25 the department and purchased by the state with approved
26 management plans.......................................907,860
27 b. Number of forest-related technical assists provided
28 to nonindustrial private land owners....................39,800
29 c. Number of person-hours spent responding to
30 emergency incidents other than wildfires.................8,000
31 d. Number of acres of cooperative forest lands
134
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 managed................................................600,000
2 3. WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of acres of protected forest and wildlands
5 not burned by wildfires..................................98.1%
6 b. Percent of threatened structures not burned by
7 wildfires................................................99.7%
8 c. Percent of wildfires caused by humans...........80%
9 4. WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Number of wildfires detected and suppressed...3,800
12 b. Number of acres burned through prescribed
13 burning..............................................2 million
14 c. Number of person-hours of firefighting training
15 provided................................................50,000
16 d. Number of acres of forest land protected from
17 wildfires...........................................25,100,000
18 (c) For the Food Safety and Quality Program, the
19 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
20 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
21 Appropriations 1285-1295 are as follows:
22 1. DAIRY FACILITIES COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of dairy establishments meeting food safety
25 and sanitation requirements.............................80.77%
26 b. Percent of milk and milk products analyzed that
27 meet standards...........................................90.7%
28 2. DAIRY FACILITIES COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of milk and milk product analyses
31 conducted...............................................70,000
135
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of dairy establishments inspections...16,500
2 3. FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of food establishments meeting food safety
5 and sanitation requirements..............................91.2%
6 b. Percent of food products analyzed that meet
7 standards................................................91.4%
8 c. Percent of produce or other food samples analyzed
9 that meet pesticide residue standards....................97.7%
10 4. FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of inspections of food establishments, dairy
13 establishments, and water vending machines..............65,500
14 b. Number of food analyses conducted............43,000
15 c. Number of pesticide residue analyses
16 conducted..............................................265,000
17 d. Number of food-related consumer assistance
18 investigations or actions................................3,500
19 e. Tons of poultry and shell eggs graded.......430,000
20 (d) For the Consumer Protection Program, the outcome
21 measures, output measures, and associated performance
22 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
23 Appropriations 1296-1313B are as follows:
24 1. AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTCOME
25 MEASURES.--
26 a. Percent of licensed pest control applicators
27 inspected that are in compliance with regulations..........78%
28 b. Percent of feed, seed, and fertilizer inspected
29 products in compliance with performance/quality
30 standards..................................................83%
31
136
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent of licensed pesticide applicators inspected
2 that are in compliance.....................................76%
3 d. Number of reported human/equine disease cases
4 caused by mosquitoes......................................2/40
5 2. AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of feed, seed, and fertilizer
8 inspections.............................................12,500
9 b. Number of pest control inspections............1,818
10 c. Number of pesticide inspections...............2,500
11 d. Number of complaints investigated/processed
12 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of
13 Agricultural Environmental Services (excluding
14 pesticide).................................................875
15 e. Number of pesticide complaints investigated.....350
16 f. Number of laboratory analyses performed on seed and
17 fertilizer and pesticide product and residue samples...217,591
18 g. Number of people served by mosquito control
19 activities..........................................14,500,000
20 3. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
21 a. Percent of regulated entities found operating in
22 compliance with the consumer protection laws...............91%
23 4. CONSUMER PROTECTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of assists provided to consumers, not
25 including lemon law....................................780,600
26 b. Number of lemon law assists made to
27 consumers...............................................21,000
28 c. Number of complaints investigated/processed
29 relating to all entities regulated by the Division of Consumer
30 Services in the Consumer Protection Program.............12,190
31
137
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of "no sales solicitation calls"
2 subscriptions processed................................103,000
3 e. Number of registered entities licensed by the
4 division................................................35,607
5 5. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTCOME
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of LP Gas facilities found in compliance
8 with safety requirements on first inspection...............20%
9 b. Percent of amusement attractions found in full
10 compliance with safety requirements on first inspection....40%
11 c. Percent of regulated weighing and measuring
12 devices, packages, and businesses with scanners in compliance
13 with accuracy standards during initial
14 inspection/testing.........................................95%
15 d. Percent of petroleum products meeting quality
16 standards................................................99.2%
17 6. STANDARDS AND PETROLEUM QUALITY INSPECTION OUTPUT
18 MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of LP Gas facility inspections and
20 reinspections conducted..................................5,830
21 b. Number of petroleum field inspections
22 conducted..............................................185,000
23 c. Number of petroleum lab test analyses
24 performed..............................................172,000
25 d. Number of amusement ride safety inspections
26 conducted................................................9,205
27 e. Number of weights and measures inspections
28 conducted...............................................64,000
29 (e) For the Agricultural Economic Development Program,
30 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
31
138
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
2 Specific Appropriations 1314-1355C are as follows:
3 1. FRUITS AND VEGETABLES INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
4 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
5 a. Dollar value of fruit and vegetables that are
6 shipped to other states or countries that are subject to
7 mandatory inspection............................$1,443,648,000
8 2. FRUITS AND VEGETABLES INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
9 OUTPUT MEASURE.--
10 a. Number of tons of fruits and vegetables
11 inspected...........................................13,781,717
12 3. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Total sales of agricultural and seafood products
14 generated by tenants of state farmers markets.....$202,206,000
15 b. Dollar value of federal commodities and recovered
16 food distributed...................................$50,246,102
17 c. Florida agricultural products as a percent of the
18 national market...........................................3.7%
19 4. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of buyers reached with agricultural
21 promotion campaign messages.......................1.73 billion
22 b. Number of marketing assists provided to producers
23 and businesses..........................................96,319
24 c. Pounds of federal commodities and recovered food
25 distributed.........................................75,816,366
26 d. Number of leased square feet at State Farmers'
27 Markets..............................................1,592,536
28 e. Number of market pricing information assists
29 provided to producers and businesses....................16,500
30 5. AQUACULTURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
139
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Shellfish illness reported from Florida shellfish
2 products per 100,000 meals served........................0.331
3 b. Percent of shellfish and crab processing facilities
4 in significant compliance with permit and food safety
5 regulations................................................80%
6 6. AQUACULTURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of shellfish processing plant
8 inspections................................................700
9 b. Number of available acres of harvestable shellfish
10 waters.................................................973,321
11 7. AGRICULTURAL INSPECTION STATIONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
12 a. Amount of revenue generated by Bills of Lading
13 transmitted to the Department of Revenue from Agricultural
14 Inspection stations................................$16,852,050
15 8. AGRICULTURAL INSPECTION STATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
17 inspection stations.................................12,973,040
18 b. Number of vehicles inspected at agricultural
19 inspection stations transporting agricultural or regulated
20 commodities..........................................3,222,791
21 c. Number of Bills of Lading transmitted to the
22 Department of Revenue from agricultural inspection
23 stations................................................78,000
24 9. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURE.--
25 a. Percent of livestock and poultry infected with
26 specific transmissible diseases for which monitoring,
27 controlling, and eradicating activities are
28 established...........................................0.00043%
29 10. ANIMAL PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of animal site inspections
31 performed...............................................16,650
140
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of animals tested or vaccinated......770,000
2 c. Number of animal-related diagnostic laboratory
3 procedures performed...................................850,000
4 d. Number of animals covered by health
5 certificates...........................................930,000
6 11. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of newly introduced pests and diseases
8 prevented from infesting Florida plants to a level where
9 eradication is biologically or economically unfeasible...80.8%
10 b. Percent of commercial citrus acres free of citrus
11 canker...................................................98.5%
12 12. PLANT PEST AND DISEASE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of plant, fruit fly trap and honeybee
14 inspections performed................................3,768,166
15 b. Number of commercial citrus acres surveyed for
16 citrus canker..........................................560,000
17 c. Millions of sterile med flies released........3,412
18 d. Number of acres where plant pest and disease
19 eradication or control efforts were undertaken.........100,000
20 e. Number of plant, soil, insect, and other organism
21 samples processed for identification or diagnosis......407,000
22 f. Number of cartons of citrus certified as fly-free
23 for export..........................................10,014,270
24 (2) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.--The department
25 shall recommend standards for the following outcomes and
26 outputs for fiscal year 2001-2002 to the appropriate
27 legislative committees. For each outcome and output, or for
28 each group of integrally related outcomes and outputs, the
29 department shall identify total associated costs for producing
30 that outcome or output, based on the fiscal year 2000-2001
31 budget, in order to improve the Legislature's ability to
141
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 appropriate funds, compare activities, and evaluate department
2 activities for efficiency:
3 (a) For the Office of the Secretary Program, the
4 purpose of which is to provide the overall planning,
5 coordinating, administrative, and executive direction for the
6 Department of Community Affairs and to administer the Florida
7 Communities Trust and Florida Coastal Management Programs, the
8 outcome measures and output measures are as follows:
9 1. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Maximum administrative costs as compared to total
11 agency costs.
12 b. Number of local governments participating in
13 coastal management programs to protect, maintain, and develop
14 coastal resources through coordinated management.
15 c. Number of improved coastal access sites.
16 d. Percent of local government participation in land
17 acquisition programs.
18 e. Percent of local government participation in land
19 acquisition programs that acquire open space in urban cores.
20 2. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of federal projects reviewed by Florida
22 Coastal Management (FCM) that do not require problem
23 resolution.
24 b. Number of federal projects reviewed by FCM that
25 require some problem resolution.
26 c. Number of FCM projects funded.
27 d. Number of individuals trained at coastal management
28 forums.
29 e. Number of land acquisition project applications
30 reviewed.
31
142
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Number of land acquisition project applications
2 receiving technical assistance.
3 g. Number of land acquisition grants awarded.
4 h. Number of land acquisition active projects
5 monitored.
6 i. Number of land acquisition parcels appraised,
7 negotiated, and closed.
8 (b) For the Community Planning Program, the purpose of
9 which is to help Florida's communities envision and plan their
10 future to meet the challenges of growth; to assist them in the
11 development and implementation of their comprehensive planning
12 efforts aimed at ensuring the availability of public
13 infrastructure necessary to support sound growth, preserving
14 and conserving valuable natural, human, economic, and physical
15 resources vital to quality of life, and mitigating or avoiding
16 the impacts of disasters; and to help communities plan and
17 build residential and commercial structures that are safe,
18 affordable, accessible, and energy efficient, the outcome and
19 output measures are as follows:
20 1. COMMUNITY PLANNING OUTCOME MEASURES.--
21 a. Percent of local governments receiving technical
22 assistance to implement a community planning component or
23 process impacting a community or included in a comprehensive
24 plan that exceeds minimum requirements of chapter 163, Florida
25 Statutes, and Administrative Rule 9J-5.
26 b. Number of local governments that have implemented a
27 community planning component or process impacting its
28 community or included in its comprehensive plan that exceeds
29 minimum requirements of chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and
30 Administrative Rule 9J-5.
31 2. COMMUNITY PLANNING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
143
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of new plans reviewed.
2 b. Number of plan amendments reviewed.
3 c. Number of local government evaluation and appraisal
4 reports (EARs) reviewed.
5 d. Number of planning grants administered.
6 e. Number of technical assistance initiatives
7 undertaken.
8 f. Number of plans that adequately address disaster
9 mitigation.
10 g. Number of developments of regional impact managed.
11 h. Number of area of critical state concern
12 development orders reviewed and final orders issued.
13 (c) For the Emergency Management Program, the purpose
14 of which is to help Florida's communities reduce the effects
15 of disasters and to coordinate the state's operational duties
16 and responsibilities prior to, during, and immediately after
17 disasters, the outcome and output measures are as follows:
18 1. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of counties with an above average
20 capability rating to respond to emergencies.
21 b. Average number of months required for communities
22 to completely recover from a disaster.
23 c. Percent of events in which the affected population
24 is warned within an appropriate timeframe in relation to the
25 disaster/event.
26 d. Percent of events in which the affected population
27 is evacuated within an appropriate timeframe in relation to
28 the disaster/event.
29 e. Statewide shelter deficit.
30 f. Percent of facilities in compliance with hazardous
31 materials planning programs.
144
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 g. Number of dollars saved by mitigating repetitive
2 losses.
3 2. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of applicants provided technical assistance.
5 b. Number of personnel trained in emergency
6 preparedness.
7 c. Number of plans, reports, and procedures
8 maintained.
9 d. Number of mutual aid signatories maintained.
10 e. Number of public hurricane shelters evaluated.
11 f. Number of organizations awarded funds.
12 g. Number of planning funding applications processed.
13 h. Number of financial agreements managed (recovery
14 and mitigation).
15 i. Number of hurricane shelter spaces created.
16 j. Number of projects requiring National Environmental
17 Policy Act review.
18 k. Number of post-disaster assessments conducted.
19 l. Number of outreach team members deployed.
20 m. Number of project inspections performed.
21 n. Number of days activated at Level 2 or above.
22 o. Number of incidents reported to the State Warning
23 Point.
24 p. Number of requests for state assistance.
25 q. Population covered in NOAA weather radio
26 transmission areas.
27 r. Number of facility files researched for compliance
28 verification (hazardous materials).
29 s. Number of community right-to-know requests
30 fulfilled (hazardous materials).
31
145
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 t. Number of hazardous materials facility audits
2 completed.
3 u. Number of hazardous materials planning financial
4 agreements maintained.
5 v. Number of applicants provided technical assistance
6 (predisaster mitigation).
7 w. Number of communities audited and technical
8 assistance provided (National Flood Insurance Program).
9 x. Number of Flood Mitigation Assistance Program
10 grants awarded.
11 y. Number of counties that have operationalized their
12 portion of the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Studies.
13 (d) The Housing and Community Development Program, the
14 purpose of which is to help revitalize Florida's communities
15 and neighborhoods by assisting local governments and nonprofit
16 community organizations in their efforts to rehabilitate
17 housing, create jobs, develop public infrastructure, and
18 provide basic community services, the outcome and output
19 measures are as follows:
20 1. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME
21 MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of neighborhoods assisted and improved
23 through community development block grant programs,
24 empowerment zone programs, urban infill programs, affordable
25 housing programs, and long-term redevelopment programs.
26 b. Percent of local governments that have a building
27 code program rated at or above a specified level of
28 effectiveness by a recognized rating organization.
29 c. Number of households benefiting from services
30 provided by community services block grant, LIHEP,
31 weatherization, and energy programs.
146
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of jobs created/retained through community
2 development block grant programs.
3 2. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of grant awards managed.
6 b. Number of redevelopment plans developed.
7 c. Number of people trained/served.
8 d. Number of code amendments promulgated.
9 e. Number of permits issued for manufactured
10 buildings.
11 (e) The Florida Housing Finance Corporation Program,
12 the purpose of which is to administer programs to make
13 low-cost housing available to low-income and moderate-income
14 Florida families, the outcome and output measures are as
15 follows:
16 1. FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION OUTCOME
17 MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of targeted dollars that are allocated to
19 farmworkers, elderly, and fishworkers.
20 b. Ratio of nonstate funding to state-appropriated
21 dollars.
22 c. Percent of units exceeding statutory set-asides.
23 2. FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION OUTPUT
24 MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of applications processed.
26 b. Number of affordable housing loans funded.
27 c. Number of local governments under compliance
28 monitoring for the State Housing Initiatives Partnership
29 (SHIP) program.
30 d. Number of local governments served.
31
147
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 e. Provide executive direction and support services as
2 measured by percent of total program budget.
3 (3) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.--
4 (a) For the Division of Administrative Services, the
5 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
6 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
7 Appropriations 1463-1474 are as follows:
8 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
9 MEASURE.--
10 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
11 costs....................................................5.12%
12 (b) For the State Lands Program, the outcome measures,
13 output measures, and associated performance standards with
14 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1475-1505
15 are as follows:
16 1. INVASIVE PLANT CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURE.--
17 a. Percent of Florida's public waters where control of
18 hydrilla, water hyacinth, and water lettuce has been achieved
19 and sustained..............................................95%
20 2. INVASIVE PLANT CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Number of new acres of public land where invasive,
22 exotic, upland plants are controlled and maintained......7,000
23 b. Number of acres of public water bodies
24 treated.................................................40,165
25 c. Number of acres of upland plants controlled...4,285
26 3. LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
27 a. Percent increase in the number of occurrences of
28 endangered/threatened/special concern species on publicly
29 managed conservation areas................................3.6%
30 4. LAND ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31
148
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of parcels acquired within the agreed upon
2 time limit.................................................70%
3 b. Appraised value as a percent of purchase price for
4 parcels....................................................92%
5 c. Number of appraisals certified..................500
6 d. Number of maps certified.........................80
7 e. Number of appraisals completed on projects on
8 current list (as amended)..................................500
9 f. Number of parcels (ownerships) negotiated.....4,397
10 g. Number of parcels (ownerships) closed.........1,281
11 5. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percent of easements, leases, and other requests
13 completed by maximum time frames prescribed................75%
14 b. Percent of all land management plans completed
15 within statutory timeframes................................70%
16 6. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
17 a. Number of leases developed by the department....500
18 (c) For the Water Resource Management Program, the
19 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
20 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
21 Appropriations 1568-1596 are as follows:
22 1. BEACH MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Percent of miles of critically eroding beaches
24 restored or maintained.....................................49%
25 2. BEACH MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number of coastal construction permits
27 processed................................................1,725
28 b. Miles of shoreline surveyed and monitored.......207
29 c. Number of beach management plans developed and
30 maintained..................................................40
31
149
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 3. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OUTCOME
2 MEASURES.--
3 a. Percent of rivers that meet designated uses.....92%
4 b. Percent of lakes that meet designated uses......87%
5 c. Percent of estuaries that meet designated
6 uses.......................................................95%
7 d. Percent of groundwater that meets designated
8 uses.......................................................85%
9 e. Percent of the state's water segments that meet
10 designated uses............................................89%
11 f. Wetland acres authorized by permit to be
12 impacted/acres required to be created, enhanced, restored, or
13 preserved.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 g. Percent of mines in significant compliance with
15 restoration plan...........................................95%
16 h. Percent of public water systems with no significant
17 public health drinking water quality problems............93.5%
18 4. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OUTPUT
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Number of mining inspections....................400
21 b. Number of water resource permits processed...18,500
22 c. Number of regulatory inspections conducted...17,000
23 d. Number of technical assistance, public education,
24 and outreach contacts made...............................4,250
25 e. Number of water resource protection and restoration
26 projects funded.............................................50
27 f. Percent reduction in phosphorus loadings to Lake
28 Okeechobee................................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 g. Number of total maximum daily loads
30 adopted.......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 5. WATER SUPPLY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
150
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Reclaimed water (reuse) capacity as percent of
2 total wastewater capacity..................................45%
3 6. WATER SUPPLY OUTPUT MEASURE.--
4 a. Number of alternative water supply projects
5 funded.......................................................9
6 (d) For the Waste Management Program, the outcome
7 measures, output measures, and associated performance
8 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
9 Appropriations 1597-1633D are as follows:
10 1. WASTE CLEANUP OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Cumulative percent of petroleum contaminated
12 program sites with cleanup completed.......................19%
13 b. Cumulative percent of dry-cleaning contaminated
14 sites with cleanup completed................................1%
15 c. Cumulative percent of other contaminated sites with
16 cleanup completed..........................................62%
17 d. Percent of hazardous waste sites cleaned up.....18%
18 2. WASTE CLEANUP OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of petroleum program contaminated sites
20 being cleaned up.........................................2,668
21 b. Number of known contaminated hazardous waste sites
22 being cleaned up...........................................200
23 3. WASTE CONTROL OUTCOME MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of regulated petroleum storage tank
25 facilities in significant compliance with state
26 regulations................................................89%
27 b. Percent of inspected facilities that generate,
28 treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste in significant
29 compliance.................................................96%
30 c. Cumulative percent of petroleum contaminated
31 non-program sites with cleanup completed...................65%
151
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Percent of inspected permitted solid waste
2 facilities in significant compliance.......................96%
3 e. Percent of municipal solid waste managed by
4 recycling/waste-to-energy/landfilling..............38%/16%/46%
5 4. WASTE CONTROL OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Number of storage tank facilities
7 inspected...............................................16,123
8 b. Percent of storage tank facilities inspected....85%
9 c. Number of solid and hazardous waste permits,
10 variances, exemptions, certifications, and registrations
11 processed..................................................331
12 d. Number of solid and hazardous waste compliance
13 assurance inspections conducted..........................2,800
14 e. Number of petroleum storage systems compliance
15 inspections conducted...................................16,123
16 f. Number of pollution prevention assessments
17 conducted at businesses and government facilities...........32
18 g. Number of pollution site technical reviews
19 conducted................................................1,045
20 h. Number of known contaminated sites being cleaned up
21 by responsible parties...................................1,091
22 (e) For the Recreation and Parks Program, the outcome
23 measures, output measures, and associated performance
24 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
25 Appropriations 1634-1666D are as follows:
26 1. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
27 a. Acres designated as part of the Florida Greenways
28 and Trails system......................................102,970
29 2. LAND MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
30 a. Number of technical assists provided to local
31 government to promote Greenways and Trails..................33
152
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 3. RECREATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS OUTPUT
2 MEASURE.--
3 a. Number of recreational grants and funding provided
4 to local governments for recreational facilities and land
5 acquisition....................................325/$33,800,045
6 4. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
7 a. Attendance at state parks................15,000,000
8 5. STATE PARK OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of state park sites managed..............152
10 b. Number of acres managed.....................515,111
11 6. COASTAL AND AQUATIC MANAGED AREAS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
12 a. Increase in the number of degraded acreage in state
13 buffer enhanced or restored..............................7,778
14 (f) For the Air Resources Management Program, the
15 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
16 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
17 Appropriations 1667-1685 are as follows:
18 1. AIR ASSESSMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of time that monitored population breathes
20 good or moderate quality air.............................98.5%
21 b. Percent of population living in areas monitored for
22 air quality................................................86%
23 2. AIR ASSESSMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of monitors operated by the department and
25 local programs.............................................240
26 b. Number of emission points reviewed and
27 analyzed.................................................5,350
28 3. AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Pounds of NOx air emissions per capita.......128.72
30 b. Pounds of SO2 air emissions per capita.......100.49
31 c. Pounds of CO air emissions per capita........542.51
153
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Pounds of VOC air emissions per capita.......108.05
2 e. Percent of Title V facilities in significant
3 compliance with state regulations..........................95%
4 4. AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of air permits issued..................1,292
6 b. Number of facility inspections................6,477
7 5. UTILITIES SITING AND COORDINATION OUTCOME
8 MEASURE.--
9 a. Percent of energy facilities certified within
10 statutory timeframes.......................................85%
11 (g) For the Law Enforcement Program, the outcome
12 measures, output measures, and associated performance
13 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
14 Appropriations 1686-1715 are as follows:
15 1. ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
16 a. Number of investigations closed.................227
17 2. PATROL ON STATE LANDS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Criminal incidents per 100,000 state park
19 visitors....................................................30
20 3. PATROL ON STATE LANDS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
21 a. Number of patrol hours on state lands........71,936
22 4. EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Gallons of pollutant discharge per capita...189,868
24 5. EMERGENCY RESPONSE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of sites/spills remediated...............533
26 b. Number of incidents reported..................2,700
27 (4) FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION.--
28 (a) For the Executive Director and Division of
29 Administration, the outcome measures, output measures, and
30 associated performance standards with respect to funds
31 provided in Specific Appropriations 1716-1749C are as follows:
154
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Percent change in licensed anglers...............3%
3 b. Percent change in the number of licensed hunters.0%
4 2. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of licensed anglers................1,712,711
6 b. Number of licensed hunters..................167,798
7 3. OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION OUTCOME
8 MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of total students meeting minimum standards
10 for graduation.............................................88%
11 b. Number of hunting accidents......................23
12 4. OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND INFORMATION OUTPUT
13 MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of students graduating hunter education
15 courses.................................................10,514
16 b. Number of written conservation education materials
17 provided to citizens.................................6,538,965
18 5. MARINE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION OUTCOME
19 MEASURE.--
20 a. Percent of critical habitat (hot spots) protected
21 through land acquisition, lease, or management contract....38%
22 (b) For the Law Enforcement Program, the purpose of
23 which is to provide patrol and protection activities to
24 safeguard the opportunities for boating, camping, fishing,
25 hunting, wildlife viewing, and other natural-resource-related
26 activities in a safe and healthy environment, the outcome
27 measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
29 Appropriations 1750-1765 are as follows:
30 1. WILDLIFE, MARINE, AND BOATING LAWS ENFORCEMENT
31 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
155
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Total number of violations...................29,130
2 b. Total number of hours spent in preventive patrol
3 and investigations (not including Marine Patrol).......616,566
4 c. Number of air contacts resulting in detection and
5 apprehension (includes inland and marine)................3,550
6 d. Total number of hours spent on land (not including
7 Marine Patrol).........................................536,936
8 e. Total number of hours spent on water (not including
9 Marine Patrol)..........................................71,056
10 f. Total number of hours spent in air (not including
11 Marine Patrol)...........................................8,474
12 g. Total number of investigations closed (not
13 including Marine Patrol)...................................750
14 h. Number of inspections of licensed and permitted
15 captive wildlife facilities..............................4,446
16 i. Number of vessel safety inspections (not including
17 Marine Patrol).........................................154,408
18 j. Total number of boating accidents
19 investigated..................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 k. Total number of boating fatalities
21 investigated..................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 l. Number of flight hours provided...............3,650
23 (c) For the Wildlife Management Program, the purpose
24 of which is to maintain and enhance Florida's diverse wildlife
25 and to provide for responsible use of this resource, the
26 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
27 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
28 Appropriations 1766-1781D are as follows:
29 1. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Economic impact of wildlife-related outdoor
31 recreation......................................$3,675,935,000
156
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Percent of satisfied hunters....................75%
2 c. Percent of the acreage under management control
3 which is open to the public for wildlife-related outdoor
4 recreation...............................................99.9%
5 d. Percent of wildlife species whose biological status
6 is stable or improving.....................................70%
7 2. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of acres managed for wildlife......4,750,000
9 b. Number of wildlife technical assists provided...325
10 (d) For the Fisheries Management Program, the purpose
11 of which is to maintain, enhance, and provide for responsible
12 use of Florida's freshwater fisheries, the outcome measures,
13 output measures, and associated performance standards with
14 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1782-1789
15 are as follows:
16 1. FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent angler satisfaction.....................75%
18 b. Number of water bodies and acres where habitat
19 rehabilitation projects have been completed.........21/177,064
20 c. Percent change in degraded lakes
21 rehabilitated............................................+5.7%
22 2. FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of water bodies managed to improve
24 fishing................................................770,955
25 b. Number of access points established or
26 maintained..................................................42
27 c. Number of fish stocked....................2,385,000
28 (e) For the Marine Fisheries Program, the outcome
29 measures, output measures, and associated performance
30 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
31 Appropriations 1790-1798C are as follows:
157
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 1. MARINE FISHERIES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
2 a. Artificial reefs monitored and/or created
3 annually....................................................65
4 b. Percent of fisheries stocks that are increasing or
5 stable.....................................................79%
6 2. MARINE FISHERIES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
7 a. Number of commercial and other marine fishing
8 licenses processed......................................32,600
9 (f) For the Marine Research Program, the outcome
10 measures, output measures, and associated performance
11 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
12 Appropriations 1798B-1806C are as follows:
13 1. MARINE ASSESSMENT, RESTORATION, AND TECHNICAL
14 SUPPORT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Percent of research projects that provide
16 management recommendations or support management
17 actions...................................................100%
18 b. Manatee mortality rate........................7.72%
19 2. MARINE ASSESSMENT, RESTORATION, AND TECHNICAL
20 SUPPORT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
21 a. Total number of sea turtle nests.............77,864
22 b. Manatee population............................2,399
23 c. Number of fish stocks assessments and data
24 summaries conducted........................................170
25 d. Number of requests for status of endangered and
26 threatened species completed.............................3,400
27 (5) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.--
28 (a) For the Highway and Bridge Construction Program,
29 the purpose of which is to develop and implement the state
30 highway system, the outcome measures, output measures, and
31
158
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 associated performance standards with respect to funds
2 provided in Specific Appropriations 1807-1815 are as follows:
3 1. HIGHWAY BRIDGE AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM OUTCOME
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of motor vehicle fatalities per 100 million
6 miles traveled..................................less than 2.05
7 b. Percent of state highway system pavement meeting
8 department standards.......................................78%
9 c. Percent of department-maintained bridges meeting
10 department standards.......................................90%
11 d. Percent increase in number of days required for
12 completed construction contracts over original contract days
13 (less weather days)..............................less than 30%
14 e. Percent increase in final amount paid for completed
15 construction contracts over original contract
16 amount...........................................less than 10%
17 f. Percent of vehicle crashes on state highway system
18 where road-related conditions were listed as a contributing
19 factor............................................less than 1%
20 g. Average construction cost per lane mile of new
21 capacity..........................................$3.8 million
22 2. HIGHWAY BRIDGE AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM OUTPUT
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of lane miles let to contract for
25 resurfacing..............................................2,800
26 b. Number of lane miles let to contract for highway
27 capacity improvements......................................176
28 c. Percent of construction contracts planned for
29 letting that were actually let.............................95%
30 d. Number of bridges let to contract for repair.....81
31 e. Number of bridges let to contract for
159
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 replacement.................................................35
2 f. Number of right-of-way parcels acquired.......2,230
3 g. Number of projects certified ready for
4 construction................................................81
5 (b) For the Public Transportation Program, the purpose
6 of which is to develop and provide for all forms of public
7 transportation, including transit, aviation, intermodal rail,
8 and seaport development, the outcome measures, output
9 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
10 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 1816-1821G are as
11 follows:
12 1. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Transit ridership growth compared to population
14 growth...................................................2%/2%
15 b. Tons of cargo shipped by air..............4 million
16 c. Average cost per requested trip for transportation
17 disadvantaged............................................$4.32
18 2. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of passenger enplanements.........56 million
20 b. Number of public transit passenger
21 trips..............................................175 million
22 c. Number of cruise embarkations and disembarkations
23 at Florida ports...................................9.3 million
24 d. Number of trips provided (transportation
25 disadvantaged).......................................5,768,000
26 (c) For the Highway Operations Program, the purpose of
27 which is to provide routine and uniform maintenance of the
28 state highway system, the outcome measures, output measures,
29 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
30 provided in Specific Appropriations 1822-1836L are as follows:
31 1. HIGHWAY OPERATIONS PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
160
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Maintenance condition rating of state highway
2 system as measured against the department's maintenance manual
3 standards...................................................80
4 b. Percent of commercial vehicles weighed that were
5 over weight:
6 (I) Fixed scale weighings.........................0.4%
7 (II) Portable scale weighings......................37%
8 2. HIGHWAY OPERATIONS PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of commercial vehicles weighed....11 million
10 b. Number of commercial vehicle safety inspections
11 performed...............................................50,000
12 c. Number of portable scale weighings
13 performed...............................................45,000
14 (d) For the Toll Operations Program, the purpose of
15 which is to efficiently operate and maintain state toll
16 facilities, the outcome measures, output measures, and
17 associated performance standards with respect to funds
18 provided in Specific Appropriations 1837-1846E are as follows:
19 1. TOLL OPERATIONS PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Operational cost per toll...........less than $0.16
21 b. Operational cost per dollar
22 collected......................................less than $0.19
23 2. TOLL OPERATIONS PROGRAM OUTPUT MEASURE.--
24 a. Number of toll transactions.............499 million
25 Section 71. The performance measures and standards
26 established in this section for individual programs in general
27 government agencies shall be applied to those programs for the
28 2000-2001 fiscal year. These performance measures and
29 standards are directly linked to the appropriations made in
30 the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, as
31
161
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 required by the Government Performance and Accountability Act
2 of 1994.
3 (1) DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.--
4 (a) For the Financial Accountability for Public Funds
5 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
6 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
7 Specific Appropriations 1881-1903 are as follows:
8 1. RECOVERY AND RETURN OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY OUTCOME
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent increase in the total number of holders
11 reporting...................................................3%
12 b. Percent of previously filing holders who submit
13 problem reports.............................................3%
14 c. Percent of the total number of claims paid to the
15 owner compared to the total number of returnable accounts
16 reported/received..........................................22%
17 d. Percent of the total dollar amount of claims paid
18 to the owner compared to the total dollars in returnable
19 accounts reported/received.................................80%
20 2. RECOVERY AND RETURN OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY OUTPUT
21 MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of holders reports processed..........16,000
23 b. Number of exams of holders who have not previously
24 filed a holder report......................................213
25 c. Number of exams conducted/processed.............476
26 d. Dollar value collected as a result of exams...$15.5
27 million
28 e. Number/dollar value of owner accounts
29 processed.................................255,000/$101 million
30 f. Total cost of the program to the number of holder
31 reports/owner accounts processed.......................$9/$186
162
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 g. Number/dollar value of claims paid to
2 owners.................................55,000/FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 h. Number of owner accounts advertised.........100,000
4 i. Percent of claims approved/denied within 30/60/90
5 days from the date received (cumulative total)....50%/90%/100%
6 j. Percent of claims paid within 30/60/90 days from
7 date received (cumulative total)..................15%/50%/100%
8 3. STATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATE AGENCY
9 ACCOUNTING OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of program's customers who return an
11 overall customer service rating of good or excellent on
12 surveys....................................................95%
13 b. Percent of vendor payments issued in less than the
14 Comptroller's statutory time limit of 10 days.............100%
15 c. Accuracy rate of postaudited vendor
16 payments......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 d. Percent of those utilizing program provided
18 financial information who rate the overall relevancy,
19 usefulness, and timeliness of information as good or
20 excellent..................................................95%
21 e. Number of qualifications in the Independent
22 Auditor's Report on the State General Purpose Financial
23 Statements which are related to the presentation of the
24 financial statements.........................................0
25 f. Percent of vendor payments issued
26 electronically.............................................16%
27 g. Percent of payroll payments issued
28 electronically.............................................77%
29 h. Percent of retirement payments issued
30 electronically.............................................76%
31
163
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 4. STATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATE AGENCY
2 ACCOUNTING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of vendor payment requests
4 preaudited...........................................1 million
5 b. Number of vendor payment requests
6 postaudited...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 c. Percent of vendor payment requests
8 postaudited...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 d. Dollar amount of vendor payment requests
10 postaudited...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 e. Number of vendor invoices paid............4,050,000
12 f. Number of payroll payments issued.........5,639,780
13 g. Number of instances during the year where as a
14 result of inadequate cash management under this program,
15 general revenue had a negative cash balance..................0
16 h. Number of payments issued
17 electronically.......................................6,450,000
18 i. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed..........18
19 j. Number of "get lean" hotline calls processed for
20 referral to the appropriate agency.........................250
21 k. Number of fiscal integrity cases closed where
22 criminal disciplinary and/or administrative actions were
23 taken.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 (b) For the Financial Institutions Regulatory Program,
25 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
26 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
27 Specific Appropriations 1904-1926 are as follows:
28 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
29 a. Percent of licensees examined where department
30 action is taken against the licensee for violations:
31
164
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (I) For-cause violations based on risk assessment
2 profile or on internal/external information which indicates a
3 violation of statute....................................33.05%
4 (II) Routine proactive exam conducted on randomly
5 selected entities or entities on an examination cycle...16.88%
6 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of for-cause examinations completed......377
8 b. Number of routine examinations completed......1,435
9 c. Percent of total licensees examined to determine
10 compliance with applicable regulations......................5%
11 3. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTCOME
12 MEASURES.--
13 a. Percent of licensees sanctioned for
14 violations........................................less than 1%
15 b. Percent of total applicants not licensed to conduct
16 business in the state because they fail to meet substantive
17 licensing requirements....................................4.3%
18 c. Percent of applicants not granted registration in
19 the securities industry in Florida who subsequently are the
20 subject of regulatory action...............................60%
21 4. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY REGULATION OUTPUT
22 MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of final actions taken against
24 licensees..................................................370
25 b. Number of applications denied or withdrawn....3,546
26 c. Number of applications processed.............70,944
27 d. Amount of securities registration applications
28 denied or withdrawn...............................$2.1 billion
29 e. Number of applicants licensed................67,398
30 f. Number of applicants licensed with
31 restrictions................................................95
165
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 g. Number of applications denied or withdrawn with
2 additional disciplinary information reported on the Central
3 Registration Depository....................................324
4 h. Number/percent of filing or requests processed
5 within a designated standard number of days by
6 type..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 5. SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS OF STATE BANKING SYSTEM
8 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
10 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
11 Florida on return on assets................................51%
12 b. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
13 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
14 Florida on return on equity................................51%
15 c. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
16 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
17 Florida on capital to asset ratio..........................51%
18 d. Percent of Florida state-chartered banks that
19 exceed the median of all national/federal banks chartered in
20 Florida on tier 1 capital..................................51%
21 e. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
22 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
23 chartered in Florida on return on assets...................51%
24 f. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
25 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
26 chartered in Florida on return on equity...................51%
27 g. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
28 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
29 chartered in Florida on capital to asset ratio.............51%
30
31
166
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 h. Percent of Florida state-chartered credit unions
2 that exceed the median of all national/federal credit unions
3 chartered in Florida on tier 1 capital.....................51%
4 i. Percent of applications for new Florida financial
5 institutions that seek state charters......................67%
6 j. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
7 state-chartered banks compared to assessments that would be
8 paid if the bank was nationally or federally
9 chartered..............................................$10,000
10 k. Unit average dollar savings in assessments paid by
11 state-chartered credit unions compared to assessments that
12 would be paid if the credit unions were nationally or
13 federally chartered.......................................$500
14 l. Percent of banks receiving an examination report
15 within 45 days after the conclusion of their onsite state
16 examination................................................75%
17 m. Percent of credit unions receiving an examination
18 report within 30 days after the conclusion of their onsite
19 state examination..........................................75%
20 n. Percent of international financial institutions
21 receiving an examination report within 45 days after the
22 conclusion of their onsite state examination...............75%
23 o. Percent of trust companies receiving an examination
24 report within 60 days after the conclusion of their onsite
25 state examination..........................................75%
26 p. Percent of de novo applications statutorily
27 complete that are processed within a standard number of 90
28 days.......................................................67%
29 q. Percent of branch applications statutorily complete
30 that are processed within 50 days..........................67%
31
167
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 r. Percent of merger/acquisition applications
2 statutorily complete that are processed within 60 days.....67%
3 s. Percent of financial institutions under enforcement
4 action that are substantially in compliance with conditions
5 imposed....................................................90%
6 6. SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS OF STATE BANKING SYSTEM OUTPUT
7 MEASURES.--
8 a. Median Florida state-chartered bank return on
9 assets...................................................0.96%
10 b. Median Florida state-chartered bank return on
11 equity...................................................10.5%
12 c. Median Florida state-chartered bank capital to
13 asset ratio.................................................9%
14 d. Median Florida state-chartered bank tier 1
15 capital...................................................9.1%
16 e. Median Florida state-chartered credit union return
17 on assets................................................0.93%
18 f. Median Florida state-chartered credit union return
19 on equity.................................................7.1%
20 g. Median Florida state-chartered credit union capital
21 to asset ratio...........................................12.5%
22 h. Median Florida state-chartered credit union tier 1
23 capital..................................................11.9%
24 i. Number of new Florida state-chartered banks
25 opened......................................................15
26 j. Amount of annual assessments paid by
27 banks...............................................$6,929,900
28 k. Amount of annual assessments paid by
29 credit unions.......................................$1,463,000
30 l. Number of banks examined by the Division of Banking
31 receiving an examination report within 45 days..............54
168
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 m. Number of credit unions examined by the Division of
2 Banking receiving an examination report within 30 days......57
3 n. Number of international financial institutions
4 examined by the Division of Banking receiving an examination
5 report within 45 days.......................................14
6 o. Number of trust companies examined by the Division
7 of Banking receiving an examination report within 60 days....8
8 p. Number of statutorily complete new De Novo
9 applications received that are processed within 90 days......7
10 q. Number of statutorily complete branch applications
11 received that are processed within 15 days..................14
12 r. Number of statutorily complete merger/acquisition
13 applications received that are processed within 60 days......7
14 s. Number of institutions in substantial compliance
15 with enforcement actions....................................20
16 t. Percent/number of financial institutions examined
17 within statutory timeframes by type of institution:
18 (I) Banks......................................66%/144
19 (II) Credit Unions..............................66%/76
20 (III) International.............................66%/41
21 (IV) Trust Companies............................66%/12
22 u. Percent/number of surveys returned that rate the
23 Division's examination program as satisfactory or
24 above..................................................75%/150
25 v. Average change in total exam time from previous
26 state exam by type of institution:
27 (I) Banks..........................................-5%
28 (II) Credit Unions.................................-5%
29 (III) International................................-5%
30 (IV) Trust Companies...............................-5%
31
169
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 w. Average percent of total exam hours conducted
2 off-site, by type of institution:
3 (I) Banks..........................................25%
4 (II) Credit Unions.................................25%
5 (III) International................................25%
6 (IV) Trust Companies...............................25%
7 7. CONSUMER FINANCIAL FRAUD PREVENTION AND DETECTION
8 OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent of investigations of licensed and
10 unlicensed entities referred to other agencies where
11 investigative assistance aided in obtaining
12 criminal/civil/administrative actions:
13 (I) Licensed........................................6%
14 (II) Unlicensed....................................59%
15 b. Dollars returned (voluntarily or through
16 court-ordered restitution) to victims compared to total
17 dollars of verified loss as a result of investigative efforts
18 of licensed and unlicensed entities...................$.001/$1
19 c. Dollars returned (voluntarily or through court
20 ordered restitution) to victims compared to total dollars of
21 verified loss as a result of investigative efforts of
22 unlicensed entities...................................$0.46/$1
23 d. Percent of written complaints processed within
24 applicable standards.......................................85%
25 e. Percent of written complaints regarding licensed
26 entities referred for examination, investigation, or
27 legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal sanctions
28 within/outside statutory authority.......................18.6%
29 f. Percent of written complaints regarding unlicensed
30 entities referred for examination, investigation, or
31
170
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 legal/criminal action resulting in formal/informal sanctions
2 within/outside statutory authority.......................37.5%
3 8. CONSUMER FINANCIAL FRAUD PREVENTION AND DETECTION
4 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of investigations closed.................450
6 b. Number of background investigations completed...800
7 c. Amount of court-ordered restitution to victims of
8 licensed/unlicensed entities:
9 (I) Licensed....................................$9,000
10 (II) Unlicensed..........................$20.8 million
11 d. Amount of voluntary reimbursement received from
12 licensed/unlicensed entities:
13 (I) Licensed....................................$1,200
14 (II) Unlicensed...............................$434,700
15 e. Amount returned to victims of licensed/unlicensed
16 entities:
17 (I) Licensed...................................$10,000
18 (II) Unlicensed..........................$21.2 million
19 f. Amount of verified loss to victims of
20 licensed/unlicensed entities:
21 (I) Licensed..............................$9.2 million
22 (II) Unlicensed.........................$46.14 million
23 g. Average number of days for initial written
24 responses to consumers.......................................7
25 h. Average number of days to resolve, refer, or close
26 a written complaint.........................................68
27 i. Number of complaints resolved, referred, or closed
28 during the year..........................................4,350
29 j. Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 90 days
30 and less than 120 days.....................................10%
31
171
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 k. Percent of complaints remaining open beyond 120
2 days.......................................................15%
3 l. Number of written complaints where the department
4 identified statutory violations............................150
5 m. Number of complaints referred for consideration of
6 legal/criminal action (licensed and unlicensed entities)...275
7 n. Number of public/consumer awareness contacts made
8 activities with personal, direct face-to-face contact......140
9 o. Number of public/consumer awareness activities
10 conducted utilizing all types of media.....................540
11 p. Number of participants at personal, direct,
12 face-to-face public/consumer awareness activities........6,800
13 q. Total number of hours spent conducting
14 public/consumer awareness activities.....................1,100
15 (2) DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
16 REGULATION.--
17 (a) For the Florida Boxing Commission, the outcome
18 measures, output measures, and associated performance
19 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
20 Appropriations 1939-1957 are as follows:
21 1. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OUTCOME MEASURE.--
22 a. Percent increase in public access to regulatory
23 information................................................10%
24 2. FLORIDA BOXING COMMISSION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
25 a. Percent of licenses suspended or revoked (primarily
26 for medical purposes/approx 90%) in relation to fights
27 supervised...............................................28.8%
28 3. FLORIDA BOXING COMMISSION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
29 a. Number of scheduled boxing rounds.............2,472
30 (b) For the Professional Regulation Program, the
31 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
172
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 1958-1978 are as follows:
3 1. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Percent of applications processed within
5 90 days...................................................100%
6 2. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of applications processed.............59,263
8 b. Number of licensees.........................499,964
9 3. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent of cases that are resolved through
11 alternative means (notices of noncompliance, citations or
12 alternative dispute resolution)...............FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 b. Percent of establishments or licensees found in
14 violation of critical or multiple noncritical violations
15 resulting in discipline...................................0.9%
16 4. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
17 a. Total number of cases..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 b. Number of enforcement actions................35,558
19 (c) For the Pari-Mutuel Wagering Program, the outcome
20 measures, output measures, and associated performance
21 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
22 Appropriations 1979-2001 are as follows:
23 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Percent of races and games that result in statutory
25 or rule infractions......................................0.85%
26 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
27 a. Number of races and games monitored..........87,000
28 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
29 a. Percent of applications processed within
30 90 days...................................................100%
31 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
173
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of applications processed.............23,001
2 5. TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
3 a. Total collections per dollar spent on pari-mutuel
4 events..................................................$19.38
5 6. TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of audits conducted...................87,500
7 (d) For the Hotels and Restaurants Program, the
8 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
9 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
10 Appropriations 2002-2013 are as follows:
11 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
12 a. Percent of licensees in compliance with applicable
13 laws and rules for food service and public lodging
14 establishments..........................................86.07%
15 b. Percent of licensees in compliance with applicable
16 laws and rules for elevators, escalators, and other vertical
17 conveyance devices......................................95.29%
18 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of educational packets distributed and
20 education and training seminars/workshops conducted....283,407
21 b. Number of inspections for food service and public
22 lodging establishments........................FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 c. Number of inspections for elevators, escalators,
24 and other vertical conveyance devices.........FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 d. Number of call-back inspections for food service
26 and public lodging establishments.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
28 a. Percent of hotel and restaurant licenses and
29 elevator certificates of operation processed within
30 30 days..................................................90.6%
31 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
174
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of licensees for public lodging and food
2 service establishments..................................69,315
3 b. Number of licensees for elevators, escalators, and
4 other vertical conveyance devices.......................43,897
5 (e) For the Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Program,
6 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
7 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
8 Specific Appropriations 2014-2033 are as follows:
9 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
10 a. Percent repeated noncomplying wholesale/retail
11 licensees on yearly basis.....................FY 2001-2002 LBR
12 b. Percent noncomplying wholesale/retail licensees on
13 yearly basis..................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
14 c. Percent of alcoholic beverages and tobacco
15 retailers tested found to be in compliance with underage
16 persons' access...............................FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 d. Percent of total retail alcohol and tobacco
18 licensees and permit holders inspected.....................30%
19 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
20 a. Number of licensees..........................64,000
21 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
22 a. Percent of license applications processed within 90
23 days.......................................................95%
24 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
25 a. Number of applications processed.............12,307
26 5. TAX COLLECTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Total auditing expenditures compared to auditing
28 collections.................................. FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 b. Percent of retail and wholesale tax dollars
30 identified by audit that were collected....................85%
31 6. TAX COLLECTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
175
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of audits conducted..................241,000
2 (f) For the Florida Land Sales, Condominiums, and
3 Mobile Homes Program, the outcome measures, output measures,
4 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
5 provided in Specific Appropriations 2034-2045 are as follows:
6 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of administrative actions resulting in
8 consent orders............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
9 b. Average number of days to resolve consumer
10 complaints not investigated...................FY 2001-2002 LBR
11 c. Average number of days to resolve
12 investigations................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
13 d. Average number of days to resolve cases submitted
14 for arbitration for condominiums..............FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 e. Percent of parties surveyed that benefited from
16 education provided (condominiums).............FY 2001-2002 LBR
17 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of administrative actions resolved by
19 consent orders............................... FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 b. Number of days to close consumer
21 complaints....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
22 c. Number of consumer complaints
23 closed........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
24 d. Number of days to close
25 investigations................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 e. Number of investigations closed....FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 f. Number of days to close cases......FY 2001-2002 LBR
28 g. Number of cases closed.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
29 h. Number of seminars conducted.......FY 2001-2002 LBR
30 i. Number of attendees at educational seminars
31 surveyed......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
176
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 j. Number of topics covered at educational
2 seminars......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
3 k. Number of unit owners represented at educational
4 seminars......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
5 l. Number of associations represented at educational
6 seminars......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
7 3. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
8 a. Percent of permanent licenses issued and filings
9 reviewed as prescribed by laws.............................97%
10 4. STANDARDS AND LICENSURE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
11 a. Permanent licenses and filings processed.....19,161
12 (3) DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS.--
13 (a) For the Citrus Research Program, the outcome
14 measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 2046-2048 are as follows:
17 1. CITRUS RESEARCH OUTCOME MEASURE.--
18 a. Number of new citrus product lines................2
19 2. CITRUS RESEARCH OUTPUT MEASURE.--
20 a. Number of sponsored research programs............17
21 (b) For the Executive Direction and Support Services
22 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
23 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
24 Specific Appropriations 2049-2056 are as follows:
25 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
26 MEASURE.--
27 a. Administrative cost as a percent of total agency
28 costs.....................................................7.8%
29 (c) For the Agricultural Products and Marketing
30 Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
31
177
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
2 Specific Appropriations 2057-2059 are as follows:
3 1. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Percent return on investment for Florida
5 growers.....................................................9%
6 2. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of TV Gross Rating Points..............4,000
8 b. Number of trade incentive programs
9 administered.............................................2,400
10 (4) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR.--
11 (a) For the General Office Program, the purpose of
12 which is to assist the Governor in the performance of his or
13 her duties and responsibilities, helping to communicate and
14 implement the Governor's goals, priorities, programs, and
15 views to the citizens of Florida, the outcome measures, output
16 measures, and associated performance standards with respect to
17 funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2060-2083 are as
18 follows:
19 1. DRUG CONTROL COORDINATION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
20 a. Decrease the use of illegal drugs in Florida from
21 8% to 7%....................................................7%
22 2. LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS SYSTEM/PLANNING AND
23 BUDGETING SUBSYSTEM OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Decrease the ratio of Legislative Appropriations
25 System/Planning and Budgeting Subsystem costs to the number of
26 users supported from $5,316,331:585 to
27 $5,309,322:585..................................$5,309,322:585
28 3. SCHOOL READINESS OUTCOME MEASURE.--
29 a. Increase the percent of kindergarten students
30 meeting state expectations for readiness from 80% to 83%...83%
31 4. SCHOOL READINESS OUTPUT MEASURE.--
178
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Coordinate the state's School Readiness services as
2 measured by the number of students meeting state expectations
3 for readiness..........................................633,168
4 5. WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES)
5 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Maintain the level of Work and Gain Economic
7 Self-sufficiency (WAGES) clients who successfully leave the
8 program at 41% or more.....................................41%
9 6. WORK AND GAIN ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY (WAGES)
10 OUTPUT MEASURE.--
11 a. Oversee Work and Gain Economic Self-sufficiency
12 State Board as measured by the number of Work and Gain
13 Economic Self-sufficiency clients who successfully complete
14 the program.............................................52,966
15 (b) For the Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic
16 Development Program, the purpose of which is to maintain and
17 improve the economic health of Florida by increasing jobs,
18 income, and investments through promoting targeted businesses,
19 tourism, and professional and amateur sports and entertainment
20 and by assisting communities, residents, and businesses, the
21 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
22 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
23 Appropriations 2084-2088E are as follows:
24 1. OFFICE OF TOURISM, TRADE, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
25 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Number/dollar amount of contracts and grants
27 administered..................................283/$290 million
28 b. Public expenditures per job created/retained under
29 QTI incentive program...................................$3,750
30 c. Number of state agency proposed rules reviewed
31 which impact small businesses...............................70
179
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Number of business leaders' meetings
2 coordinated..................................................1
3 e. Implement the revitalization of urban communities
4 (Front Porch Florida) as measured by the number of
5 applications and neighborhood plans reviewed; partnering
6 activities, interactive community activities, and technical
7 assistance activities facilitated..........................TBD
8 f. Market, promote, and provide services to the
9 state's entertainment industry (Office of Film Commission) as
10 measured by the number of marketing, promotion, and other
11 services provided..........................................TBD
12 2. BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTCOME MEASURES.--
13 a. Number of jobs supported by financing black
14 business:
15 (I) Regional BBICs...............................2,000
16 (II) Statewide BBICs...............................120
17 b. Dollar amount and procurement opportunities
18 generated for Black businesses....................$2.5 million
19 3. BLACK BUSINESS INVESTMENT BOARD OUTPUT MEASURES.--
20 a. Matching dollars leveraged by the Black Business
21 Investment Board..................................$1.6 million
22 b. Number of businesses provided technical assistance
23 through Statewide BBIC.....................................200
24 4. FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Economic contributions from Florida Sports
26 Foundation-sponsored regional and major sporting
27 events grants.....................................$150 million
28 b. Satisfaction of the area sports commissions with
29 the efforts of the foundation to promote and develop the
30 sports industry and related industries in the state........75%
31
180
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Economic contributions to communities as a result
2 of hosting Florida's Senior State Games and Sunshine State
3 Games Championships........................................TBD
4 5. FLORIDA SPORTS FOUNDATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Number/amount of major and regional sports event
6 grants awarded.....................................30/$700,000
7 b. Number of athletes competing in Florida's Senior
8 State Games and Sunshine State Games Championships.........TBD
9 c. Number of amateur athletic events...............TBD
10 6. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Sustained growth in the number of travelers who
12 come to and go through Florida:
13 (I) Out-of-state..........................50.6 million
14 (II) Residents............................13.6 million
15 b. Sustained growth in the beneficial impacts that
16 travelers in Florida have on the state's overall economy:
17 (I) Rental car surcharge................$141.2 million
18 (II) Tourism-related employment................835,156
19 (III) Taxable sales......................$48.3 billion
20 (IV) Local option tax.....................$320 million
21 c. Growth in private sector contributions to VISIT
22 Florida............................................$34 million
23 d. Satisfaction of VISIT Florida's partners and
24 representative members of the tourism industry with the
25 efforts of VISIT Florida to promote Florida tourism........75%
26 e. Facilitate the creation of an inventory of the
27 sites identified by the state's tourism regions as
28 nature-based and heritage tourism sites and implement
29 procedures to maintain the inventory.......................TBD
30
31
181
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Implement s. 288.1224(13), Florida Statutes,
2 including the incorporation of nature-based and heritage
3 tourism components into the Four-Year Marketing Plan.......TBD
4 7. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON TOURISM OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Quality and effectiveness of paid advertising
6 messages reaching the target audience
7 (impressions)......................................550 million
8 b. Number contacting VISIT Florida in response to
9 advertising............................................620,146
10 c. Value and number of consumer promotions facilitated
11 by VISIT Florida...............................$13 million/155
12 d. Number of leads and visitor inquiries generated by
13 VISIT Florida events and media placements............1,229,780
14 e. Number of private sector partners.............3,462
15 f. Private sector partner financial contributions
16 through direct financial investment...............$2.2 million
17 g. Private sector partner financial contributions
18 through strategic alliance program................$1.3 million
19 8. SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTCOME MEASURES.--
20 a. Value of new investment in the Florida space
21 business and programs (cumulative)................$230 million
22 b. Number of launches...............................30
23 c. Number of visitors to space-related tourism
24 facilities.........................................2.9 million
25 d. Tax revenue generated by space-related tourism
26 facilities..........................................$1,400,000
27 9. SPACEPORT FLORIDA OUTPUT MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of students in Spaceport Florida Authority
29 (SFA) sponsored space-related classroom or research at
30 accredited institutions of higher education................400
31 b. Equity in SFA industrial/research
182
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 facilities.........................................$65 million
2 c. Number of presentations to industry and
3 governmental decisionmakers.................................35
4 d. Equity in SFA space-related tourist
5 facilities.........................................$25 million
6 10. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA BUSINESS EXPANSION, RETENTION,
7 AND RECRUITMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of direct full-time jobs facilitated as a
9 result of Enterprise Florida's recruitment, expansion, and
10 retention efforts.......................................31,000
11 (I) Rural areas (subset).........................2,000
12 (II) Urban core areas (subset)...................2,000
13 (III) Critical industries (subset)..............10,000
14 b. Documented export sales attributable to programs
15 and activities....................................$275 million
16 c. Number of qualified marketing leads generated
17 through Enterprise Florida's comprehensive marketing
18 programs...................................................750
19 (I) Trade leads (subset)...........................450
20 (II) Investment leads (subset).....................300
21 d. Satisfaction of economic development practitioners
22 and other appropriate entities with efforts of Enterprise
23 Florida in providing economic development leadership in the
24 full range of services required for state and local economic
25 growth, including critical industries and workforce
26 development................................................75%
27 e. Satisfaction of economic development practitioners
28 and other appropriate entities with efforts of EFI in
29 marketing the state, including rural communities and
30 distressed urban communities, as a probusiness location for
31 potential new investment...................................75%
183
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 11. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA BUSINESS EXPANSION, RETENTION,
2 AND RECRUITMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of trade events...........................32
4 b. Number of companies assisted by Enterprise Florida
5 in the area of international trade.......................2,660
6 c. Number of active recruitment, expansion, and
7 retention projects worked during the year..................295
8 d. Number of leads and projects referred to local
9 economic development organizations.........................120
10 e. Number of successful incentive projects worked with
11 local economic development organizations....................60
12 f. Number of times Enterprise Florida's information
13 services are accessed by local economic development
14 organizations..............................................800
15 12. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of supplemental fund requests from Regional
18 Workforce Boards acted upon in a timely fashion:
19 (I) Less than or equal to established fund threshold
20 acted upon within 14 days after receipt of approvable
21 documentation.............................................100%
22 (II) Greater than the established fund threshold
23 within 90 days............................................100%
24 b. Number/percent of agency policies to be reviewed,
25 recommendations made, and actions taken to implement
26 recommendations........................................202/70%
27 c. Number/percent of onsite regional workforce
28 development board reviews completed in accordance with an
29 established schedule by June 30, 2000..................24/100%
30 d. For regions out of compliance, the percent of
31 reviews where board staff issued the report of deficiencies
184
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 and provided recommendations for corrective action within 14
2 days after exit...........................................100%
3 e. Number/percent of individuals completing high
4 skill/high wage programs found employed at an average hourly
5 wage equal to or higher than $9 for the last completed
6 reporting period....................................49,500/50%
7 f. Number/percent of WIA statewide standards met or
8 exceeded..........................................12 of 17/70%
9 g. Number/percent of WIA regional standards met or
10 exceeded......................................300 of 408/73.5%
11 h. Percent of customers who found the State Board
12 fulfilling its oversight and coordinating responsibilities
13 determined through the use of a customer survey............75%
14 13. ENTERPRISE FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT
15 MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of new full-time, high skill/high wage jobs
17 created as a result of Quick Response Training...........4,500
18 (I) In rural areas.................................300
19 (II) In urban core areas...........................300
20 (III) In critical industries.....................2,700
21 b. QRT ratio of private funds match to state
22 funds......................................................3:1
23 c. QRT employee retention rates and earnings (at $9 or
24 above) in quarter following completion of training.........70%
25 d. QRT employee satisfaction rates (per survey)....75%
26 e. Number of permanent jobs retained as a result of
27 Incumbent Worker Training pilot project (WIA)............1,000
28 (I) In rural areas.................................100
29 (II) In urban core areas...........................200
30 (III) In critical industries.......................250
31
185
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. IWT ratio of private funds match to federal WIA
2 funds......................................................2:1
3 g. IWT employee retention rates and earnings (at $9 or
4 above) in quarter following completion of training.........70%
5 h. IWT employer satisfaction rates (per survey)....75%
6 (5) DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES.--
7 (a) For the Florida Highway Patrol Program, the
8 purpose of which is to increase highway safety in Florida
9 through law enforcement, preventive patrol, and public
10 education, the outcome measures, output measures, and
11 associated performance standards with respect to funds
12 provided in Specific Appropriations 2100-2123 are as follows:
13 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Percent of closed criminal investigation cases
15 which are resolved.........................................66%
16 b. Florida death rate on patrolled highways per 100
17 million vehicle miles of travel............................1.9
18 c. National average death rate on highways per 100
19 million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7
20 d. Florida death rate on all roads per 100 million
21 vehicle miles of travel....................................1.9
22 e. National average death rate on all roads per 100
23 million vehicle miles of travel............................1.7
24 f. Alcohol-related death rate per 100 million vehicle
25 miles of travel...........................................0.64
26 g. Number of crashes investigated by FHP.......186,978
27 h. Percent change in number of crashes investigated by
28 FHP...............................................more than 1%
29 i. Annual crash rate per 100 million vehicle miles of
30 travel on all Florida roads................................177
31 j. Percent change in seat belt use........more than 1%
186
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 k. State seat belt compliance rate...............60.7%
2 l. National average seat belt compliance rate (for
3 comparison)................................................68%
4 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Hours spent on criminal investigation cases
6 closed..................................................37,901
7 b. Actual number of criminal cases closed........1,233
8 c. Hours spent on professional compliance
9 investigation cases closed...............................7,884
10 d. Actual number of professional compliance
11 investigation cases closed.................................122
12 e. Number of hours spent on traffic homicide
13 investigations.........................................133,105
14 f. Number of cases resolved as result of traffic
15 homicide investigations..................................1,647
16 g. Average time (hours) spent per traffic homicide
17 investigation............................................80.82
18 h. Percent of recruits retained by FHP for 3 years
19 after the completion of training...........................88%
20 i. Number of hours spent on investigations......63,350
21 j. Actual average response time (minutes) to calls for
22 crashes or assistance.......................................26
23 k. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
24 on preventive patrol.................................1,014,491
25 l. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
26 on preventive patrol.......................................42%
27 m. Number of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
28 on crash investigation.................................337,801
29 n. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
30 on crash investigation.....................................14%
31
187
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 o. Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (long
2 form).....................................................2.17
3 p. Average time (hours) to investigate crashes (short
4 form).....................................................1.35
5 q. Average time (hours) to investigate crashes
6 (nonreportable)...........................................0.65
7 r. Duty hours spent on law enforcement officer
8 assistance to motorists................................102,387
9 s. Percent of law enforcement officer duty hours spent
10 on motorist assistance......................................5%
11 t. Number of motorists assisted by law enforcement
12 officers...............................................299,924
13 u. Number of public traffic safety presentations
14 made.....................................................1,563
15 v. Number of persons in attendance at public traffic
16 safety presentations....................................83,475
17 w. Average size of audience per presentation........53
18 x. Number of training courses offered to FHP recruits
19 and personnel...............................................41
20 y. Number of students successfully completing training
21 course.....................................................967
22 (b) For the Licenses, Titles, and Regulations Program,
23 the purpose of which is to maintain an efficient and effective
24 driver licensing program, ensuring that only drivers
25 demonstrating the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities
26 are licensed to operate motor vehicles on Florida roads; to
27 remove drivers from the highways who abuse their driving
28 privilege or require further driver education; to ensure that
29 drivers are financially responsible for their actions; and to
30 maintain adequate records for driver education and
31 administrative control, the outcome measures, output measures,
188
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
2 provided in Specific Appropriations 2124-2169 are as follows:
3 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
4 a. Percent of customers waiting 15 minutes or less for
5 driver license service.....................................82%
6 b. Percent of customers waiting 30 minutes or more for
7 driver license service.....................................11%
8 c. Percent of DUI course graduates who do not
9 recidivate within three years of graduation................86%
10 d. Average number of corrections per 1,000 driver
11 records maintained...........................................4
12 e. Percent of motorists complying with financial
13 responsibility.............................................83%
14 f. Number of driver licenses/identification cards
15 suspended, cancelled, and invalidated as a result of
16 fraudulent activity, with annual percent change
17 shown.................................................2,178/1%
18 g. Percent of motor vehicle titles issued without
19 error......................................................98%
20 h. Number of fraudulent motor vehicle titles
21 identified and submitted to law enforcement................930
22 i. Percent change in number of fraudulent motor
23 vehicle titles identified and submitted to law
24 enforcement.................................................3%
25 j. Ratio of warranty complaints to new mobile homes
26 titled....................................................1:61
27 k. Percent reduction in pollution tonnage per day in
28 the six applicable (air quality) counties................15.5%
29 l. Ratio of taxes collected from international
30 registration plans (IRP) and international fuel tax agreements
31 (IFTA) audits to cost of audits.......................$1.85:$1
189
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of driver licenses issued..........4,188,819
3 b. Number of identification cards issued.......821,349
4 c. Number of written driver license examinations
5 conducted............................................2,213,001
6 d. Number of road tests conducted..............525,855
7 e. Number of motor vehicle and mobile home
8 registrations issued................................13,923,922
9 f. Number of motor vehicle and mobile home titles
10 issued.............................................4.7 million
11 g. Average cost to issue a motor vehicle title...$2.05
12 h. Average number of days to issue a motor vehicle
13 title......................................................3.4
14 i. Number of vessel registrations issued.......863,501
15 j. Number of vessel titles issued..............224,171
16 k. Average cost to issue a vessel title..........$5.08
17 l. Number of motor carriers audited per auditor, with
18 number of auditors shown.................................22/14
19 (c) For the Kirkman Data Center Program, the purpose
20 of which is to encourage greater efficiency in all
21 governmental programs through implementation of effective
22 information technology initiatives, the outcome measures,
23 output measures, and associated performance standards with
24 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2170-2175
25 are as follows:
26 1. KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTCOME MEASURE.--
27 a. Percent of customers who rate services as
28 satisfactory or better as measured by survey...............80%
29 2. KIRKMAN DATA CENTER OUTPUT MEASURE.--
30 a. Number of service programs maintained.........3,310
31
190
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (d) For the Administrative Services Program, the
2 purpose of which is to provide policy determination and
3 administrative support for agency operations, the outcome
4 measures, output measures, and associated performance
5 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
6 Appropriations 2089-2099A, 2119-2123, and 2165-2169 are as
7 follows:
8 1. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROGRAM OUTCOME MEASURES.--
9 a. Percent agency administration and support costs and
10 positions compared to total agency costs and
11 positions..........................................5.02%:7.43%
12 b. Cost per square foot for operational maintenance of
13 agency facilities........................................$4.76
14 (6) DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE.--
15 (a) For the Division of Treasury Program, the outcome
16 measures, output measures, and associated performance
17 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
18 Appropriations 2195-2204 are as follows:
19 1. DEPOSIT SECURITY SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
20 a. Maximum administrative unit cost per $100,000 of
21 securities placed for deposit security services purposes...$25
22 2. DEPOSIT SECURITY SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of analyses performed on the financial
24 condition of qualified public depositories and custodians, and
25 securities held for deposit..............................3,880
26 b. Number of account actions taken on trust deposit
27 and collateral accounts.................................34,545
28 3. STATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT OUTCOME
29 MEASURES.--
30 a. Ratio of net rates of return to established
31 national benchmarks for:
191
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (I) Internal liquidity investments................1.05
2 (II) Internal bridge investments..................1.03
3 (III) External investment program bridge
4 portfolio.................................................1.01
5 (IV) Medium term portfolio........................1.02
6 (V) Investment grade convertible
7 bonds.........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
8 4. STATE FUNDS MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT OUTPUT
9 MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of cash management consultation
11 services....................................................30
12 b. Number of financial management/accounting
13 transactions processed and reports produced.........10,200,093
14 5. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN OUTCOME MEASURE.--
15 a. Minimum percent of state employees (excluding OPS)
16 participating in the State Supplemental Retirement Plan
17 (Deferred Compensation)....................................24%
18 6. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN OUTPUT MEASURES.--
19 a. Number of participant account actions processed by
20 the state deferred compensation office..................89,268
21 b. Number of educational materials distributed by the
22 state deferred compensation office............FY 2001-2002 LBR
23 (b) For the Fire Marshal Program, the outcome
24 measures, output measures, and associated performance
25 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
26 Appropriations 2205-2217N are as follows:
27 1. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of fire related deaths occurring in state
29 owned and leased properties required to be inspected.........0
30 b. Percent of mandated regulatory inspections
31 completed.................................................100%
192
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 2. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Number of recurring inspections completed of fire
3 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........7,200
4 b. Number of high hazard inspections completed of fire
5 code compliance in state owned/leased buildings..........6,536
6 c. Number of construction inspections completed of
7 fire code compliance in state owned/leased buildings.......875
8 d. Percent of fire code inspections completed within
9 statutory defined timeframe...............................100%
10 e. Percent of fire code plans reviews completed within
11 statutory defined timeframe...............................100%
12 f. Number of boilers inspected by department
13 inspectors...............................................5,500
14 g. Number of regulatory inspections completed......481
15 3. FIRE AND ARSON INVESTIGATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of closed fire investigations successfully
17 concluded, including by cause determined, suspect identified
18 and/or arrested, or other reasons..........................85%
19 b. Percent of closed arson investigations for which an
20 arrest was made Florida/National.......................29%/18%
21 4. FIRE AND ARSON INVESTIGATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
22 a. Total number of fire investigations opened....9,458
23 b. Total number of fire investigations closed....6,242
24 5. PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND STANDARDS OUTCOME
25 MEASURES.--
26 a. Percent of challenges to examination results and
27 eligibility determination compared to those eligible to
28 challenge.........................................less than 1%
29 b. Number/percent of students who rate training they
30 received at the Florida State Fire College as improving their
31 ability to perform assigned duties...................3,500/95%
193
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Percent of above satisfactory ratings by
2 supervisors of students' job performance from post-class
3 evaluations of skills gained through training at the Florida
4 State Fire College.........................................85%
5 6. PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND STANDARDS OUTPUT
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of classes conducted by the Florida State
8 Fire College...............................................210
9 b. Number of students trained and classroom contact
10 hours provided by the Florida State Fire
11 College..........................................4,200/220,000
12 c. Number/percent of customer requests for
13 certification testing completed within defined
14 timeframes...........................................4,000/90%
15 d. Number of certified training centers inspected...29
16 e. Number of examinations administered...........4,400
17 (c) For the Risk Management Program, the outcome
18 measures, output measures, and associated performance
19 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
20 Appropriations 2220-2224 are as follows:
21 1. RISK REDUCTION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Number of workers' compensation claims requiring
23 some payment per 100 FTE employees.........................5.7
24 b. Number and percent of responses indicating the risk
25 services training they received was useful in developing and
26 implementing risk management plans in their agencies....80/90%
27 c. Average cost of tort liability claims paid...$3,599
28 d. Average cost of Federal Civil Rights liability
29 claims paid............................................$13,046
30 e. Average cost of workers' compensation
31 claims..................................................$3,250
194
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Average cost of property claims paid.........$3,497
2 g. Number/percent of liability claims closed in
3 relation to liability claims worked during the fiscal
4 year.................................................4,226/51%
5 2. RISK REDUCTION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURE.--
6 a. Risk services training and consultation as measured
7 by the number of training units (1 unit=8 hrs.) provided and
8 consultation contracts made................................265
9 3. STATE SELF-INSURED CLAIMS ADJUSTMENTS OUTCOME
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Percent of indemnity and medical payments made in a
12 timely manner in compliance with DLES Security Rule
13 38F-24.021, F.A.C..........................................95%
14 b. State employees' workers' compensation benefit cost
15 rate, as defined by indemnity and medical benefits, per $100
16 of state employees' payroll as compared to prior
17 years..........................................less than $1.16
18 c. Percent of lawsuits, generated from a liability
19 claim, evaluated with SEFES codes entered within prescribed
20 timeframes.................................................92%
21 d. Number/percent of trainees who indicated the
22 training they received was useful in performing required
23 property program processes.............................123/95%
24 e. Average operational cost of a claim
25 worked.................................................$140.28
26 4. STATE SELF-INSURED CLAIMS ADJUSTMENTS OUTPUT
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Number of workers' compensation claims
29 worked..................................................28,500
30 b. Number of workers' compensation claims
31 litigated..................................................780
195
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Number of liability claims worked.............8,784
2 d. Number of training units (1 unit=8 hrs.) provided
3 by the property program.....................................40
4 e. Number of state property loss/damage claims
5 worked.....................................................522
6 (d) For the Insurance Regulation and Consumer
7 Protection Program, the outcome measures, output measures, and
8 associated performance standards with respect to funds
9 provided in Specific Appropriations 2225-2247 are as follows:
10 1. INSURANCE COMPANY LICENSURE AND OVERSIGHT OUTCOME
11 MEASURES.--
12 a. Maximum number of insurance companies entering
13 rehabilitation or liquidation during the
14 year..........................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
15 b. A. M. Best rating for authorized domestic insurers,
16 weighted average based on premium written:
17 (I) Homeowner's insurance.............FY 2001-2002 LBR
18 (II) Workers' compensation insurance..FY 2001-2002 LBR
19 (III) Automobile insurance............FY 2001-2002 LBR
20 (IV) Life and health insurance........FY 2001-2002 LBR
21 c. Residual market premium written as a percentage of
22 total premium, increase or decrease:
23 (I) Homeowner's (total), mobile home, dwelling fire
24 insurance.....................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
25 (II) Workers' compensation insurance..FY 2001-2002 LBR
26 (III) Automobile insurance............FY 2001-2002 LBR
27 d. Unfunded liability per residual market entity,
28 based on 100-year probable maximum loss:
29 (I) Florida Residential Property and Casualty Joint
30 Underwriting Association......................FY 2001-2002 LBR
31 (II) Florida Windstorm Underwriting
196
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 Association...................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
2 2. INSURANCE COMPANY LICENSURE AND OVERSIGHT OUTPUT
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Current number of licensed insurance
5 entities.................................................3,420
6 b. Number of market conduct examinations
7 completed..................................................265
8 c. Number of financial reviews and examinations
9 completed...............................................12,620
10 d. Number of rate and form reviews completed....22,100
11 e. Total number of insurance companies in
12 rehabilitation or liquidation during the year...............56
13 3. INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE LICENSURE, SALES
14 APPOINTMENTS, AND OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
15 a. Maximum percent of insurance representatives
16 requiring discipline or oversight..........................23%
17 4. INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE LICENSURE, SALES
18 APPOINTMENTS, AND OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
19 a. Number of applications for licensure
20 processed...............................................71,222
21 b. Number of appointment actions processed.....868,916
22 c. Number of applicants and licensees required to
23 comply with education requirements.....................107,610
24 5. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Percent of arrests for insurance fraud resulting in
26 trial or nontrial conviction...............................82%
27 b. Percent of investigative actions resulting in
28 administrative action against agents and agencies..........64%
29 6. COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of insurance fraud investigations
31 completed................................................1,599
197
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of agent and agency investigations
2 completed................................................2,428
3 7. INSURANCE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Percent of consumer service requests appropriately
5 resolved......................................FY 2001-2002 LBR
6 8. INSURANCE CONSUMER ASSISTANCE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Number of consumer educational materials created
8 and distributed........................................223,664
9 b. Number of telephone calls answered through the
10 consumer helpline......................................362,393
11 c. Number of consumer requests and information
12 inquiries handled.......................................50,908
13 (7) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY.--
14 (a) For the Blind Services Program, the purpose of
15 which is to obtain employment outcome and maximize
16 independence and integration into the community for Floridians
17 who are blind or visually impaired, the outcome measures,
18 output measures, and associated performance standards with
19 respect to funds in Specific Appropriations 2299-2311A are as
20 follows:
21 1. BLIND SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. Percent/number of rehabilitation customers
23 gainfully employed at least 90 days..................68.3%/847
24 b. Percent/number of rehabilitation customers placed
25 in competitive employment............................64.3%/654
26 c. Projected average annual earnings of rehabilitation
27 customers at placement.................................$13,500
28 d. Percent/number of successfully rehabilitated older
29 persons, nonvocational rehabilitation..............55.2%/1,355
30 e. Percent/number of customers (children) successfully
31 rehabilitated/transitioned from preschool to school...67.3%/36
198
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Percent/number of customers (children) successfully
2 rehabilitated/transitioned from school to work........26.5%/47
3 2. BLIND SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of customers reviewed for
5 eligibility..............................................2,035
6 b. Number of written plans for services..........1,425
7 c. Number of customers served...................13,100
8 d. Average time lapse (in days) between application
9 and eligibility determination for rehabilitation
10 customers...................................................69
11 e. Customer caseload per counseling/case management
12 team member................................................114
13 f. Cost per library customer....................$19.65
14 g. Total number of food service managers...........162
15 h. Number of existing food service facilities
16 renovated...................................................10
17 i. Number of new food service facilities
18 constructed..................................................5
19 j. Facilitate the provision of developmental services
20 to blind and visually impaired children....................890
21 k. Provide Braille and recorded publications to
22 customers...............................................45,000
23 (b) For the Safety/Workers' Compensation Program, the
24 purpose of which is to keep the workplace safe and return
25 injured employees to work at a reasonable cost to employers,
26 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
27 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
28 Specific Appropriations 2257-2271 are as follows:
29 1. WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of injured workers returning to work at 80
31 percent or more of previous average quarterly wage during the
199
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 four-quarter period following injury for accident 2 years
2 prior....................................................63.5%
3 b. Percent of initial payments made on time by
4 insurance carriers.........................................91%
5 c. Number of workers newly protected by workers'
6 compensation coverage per fiscal year as a result of
7 compliance efforts......................................11,145
8 d. Percent of investigated issues resolved by the
9 Employee Assistance Office..................................7%
10 e. Percent of noncomplying carriers in
11 compliance upon reaudit....................................78%
12 f. Average total cost per 4-year-old case (information
13 only)..................................................$20,000
14 g. Percent of lost time cases with no petition for
15 benefits filed 18 months after the date of accident........77%
16 h. Percent change in total case incidence rate for
17 private sector job sites served............................-4%
18 i. Percent change in total case incidence rate for
19 public sector job sites served.............................-4%
20 j. Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate
21 for private employers served..............................-25%
22 k. Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate
23 for public employers served...............................-25%
24 l. Percent of employers surveyed who view services as
25 adequately effective or above.......................85% to 90%
26 m. Percent of permanent total supplemental benefits
27 paid by the division to injured workers timely and
28 accurately................................................100%
29 n. Percent of compliance enforcement actions which
30 result in a successful outcome (positive disposition of any
31 formal or informal review; payment in full of all penalties
200
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 assessed and compliance by the employer; and/or cessation of
2 all business operations of the employer)...................New
3 o. Percent of requests for assistance filed by
4 attorneys..................................................New
5 p. Number of investigated issues resolved by the
6 Employee Assistance Office..............................25,000
7 2. WORKERS' COMPENSATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of employer investigations conducted for
9 compliance with workers' compensation law...............22,758
10 b. Number of program applicants provided reemployment
11 services.................................................2,100
12 c. Number of carriers audited......................381
13 d. Number of investigated issues resolved by the
14 Employee Assistance Office..............................25,000
15 e. Number of private sector employers (and job sites)
16 provided OSHA 7(c)1 consultation services..................549
17 f. Number of public sector employers (and job sites)
18 provided consultation services...........................3,000
19 g. Number of private sector employers receiving
20 training/other technical services..................2,300/6,700
21 h. Number of public sector employers receiving
22 training/other technical services....................330/5,600
23 i. Number of requests for assistance processed by the
24 Employee Assistance Office.................................New
25 3. SAFETY OUTCOME MEASURES.--
26 a. Occupational injury and illness total case
27 incidence rate (per 100 workers) (information only).......8.1%
28 b. Percent change in total case incidence rate for
29 private sector job sites served............................-4%
30 c. Percent change in total case incidence rate for
31 public sector job sites served.............................-4%
201
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 d. Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate
2 for private employers served..............................-25%
3 e. Percent change in disabling compensable claims rate
4 for public employers served...............................-25%
5 f. Percent of employers surveyed who view services as
6 adequately effective or above.......................85% to 90%
7 4. SAFETY OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of private sector employers (and job sites)
9 provided OSHA 7(c)1 consultation services..................549
10 b. Number of public sector employers (and job sites)
11 provided consultation services...........................3,000
12 c. Number of private sector employers receiving
13 training/other technical services..................2,300/6,700
14 d. Number of public sector employers receiving
15 training/other technical services....................330/5,600
16 (c) For the Unemployment Compensation Program, the
17 purpose of which is to provide prompt, accurate benefits for
18 unemployed workers in order to expedite their reemployment
19 while providing an equitable and cost-effective unemployment
20 compensation system for the employers of Florida, the outcome
21 measures, output measures, and associated performance
22 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
23 Appropriations 2272-2276 are as follows:
24 1. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
25 a. Percent of UC benefits paid timely..............90%
26 b. Percent of UC benefits paid accurately..........95%
27 c. Percent of UC appeal cases completed
28 timely.....................................................89%
29 d. Percent of new UC employer liability
30 determinations made timely...............................84.6%
31 e. Percent of current quarter UC taxes paid
202
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 timely...................................................92.5%
2 2. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
3 a. Number of UC claimant eligibility determinations
4 issued.................................................170,635
5 b. Number of UC benefits weeks paid..........3,153,006
6 c. Amount of UC benefits paid.............$683,477,111
7 d. Number of appeal cases completed.............52,197
8 e. Number of new UC employer liability determinations
9 made....................................................69,118
10 f. Amount of UC taxes collected...........$651,471,000
11 g. Number of UC employer tax/wage reports
12 processed............................................1,609,450
13 h. Number of process claims filed by unemployed
14 workers................................................481,270
15 (d) For the Workforce Employment Opportunities
16 Program, the purpose of which is to provide employment
17 services and training opportunities that promote a strong
18 Florida economy, the outcome measures, output measures, and
19 associated performance standards with respect to funds
20 provided in Specific Appropriations 2248-2250 and 2286-2298A
21 are as follows:
22 1. WORKFORCE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES OUTCOME
23 MEASURES.--
24 a. Percent of job openings filled................50.2%
25 b. Percent of individuals referred to jobs who are
26 placed.....................................................28%
27 c. Percent of food stamp clients employed........11.8%
28 d. Percent increase in high skill/high wage
29 apprenticeship programs registered..........................5%
30 e. Increase the percent of customers directly placed
31 in jobs or obtaining employment within 90 days after receiving
203
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 services from Workforce and Employment Opportunities from 22%
2 to 23%.....................................................23%
3 2. WORKFORCE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES OUTPUT
4 MEASURES.--
5 a. Number of individuals referred to job openings
6 listed with J&B........................................540,000
7 b. Number of individuals placed by J&B.........137,700
8 c. Refer customers to job training..............16,964
9 d. Number of individuals obtaining employment after
10 receiving specific J&B services.........................35,700
11 e. Cost per placement by J&B......................$230
12 f. Cost per individual placed in or having obtained
13 employment................................................$176
14 g. Number of recipients employed:
15 (I) Food stamps.................................14,800
16 (II) Cost per food stamp placement................$302
17 h. Number of Apprenticeship Program requests meeting
18 high skill/high wage requirements..........................166
19 i. Number of apprentices successfully completing terms
20 of training as set by registered industry standards......2,900
21 3. WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) OUTCOME MEASURES.--
22 a. WIA adult and dislocated worker placement rate
23 (information only).........................................78%
24 b. WIA youth positive outcome rate (information
25 only)......................................................80%
26 c. Increase the number of employers in compliance or
27 brought into compliance with labor laws as a percent of total
28 employers monitored annually from 83% to 85%...............85%
29 4. WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) OUTPUT MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of WIA Adult Program completers........8,600
31 b. Number of WIA Youth Program completers........6,000
204
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Monitor employers for compliance with child labor
2 and migrant farmworker labor laws........................3,290
3 (e) For the Public Employees Relations Commission
4 Program, the purpose of which is to promote harmonious
5 employer/employee relations at the state and local levels by
6 resolving and mediating workplace disputes, the outcome
7 measures, output measures, and associated performance
8 standards with respect to the funds provided in Specific
9 Appropriations 2326-2333 are as follows:
10 1. PERC OUTCOME MEASURES.--
11 a. Percent of timely labor dispositions............96%
12 b. Percent of timely employment dispositions.......98%
13 c. Percent of dispositions not appealed............96%
14 d. Percent of appealed dispositions affirmed.......98%
15 2. PERC OUTPUT MEASURES.--
16 a. Number of labor dispositions....................801
17 b. Number of employment dispositions...............691
18 (f) For the Workers' Compensation Appeals Program, the
19 purpose of which is to resolve disputed workers' compensation
20 claims in conformity with pertinent statutory, rule, and
21 caseload requirements through the maintenance of a statewide
22 mediation, hearing, and order adjudicatory system, the outcome
23 measures, output measures, and associated performance
24 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
25 Appropriations 2251-2256 are as follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Percent of concluded mediations resulting in
28 resolution.................................................56%
29 b. Percent of appealed, decided orders
30 affirmed...................................................80%
31 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
205
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Number of petitions received by presiding
2 judge..................................................112,000
3 b. Number of mediations held....................23,100
4 c. Number of final hearings held.................4,100
5 d. Number of other hearings held................42,300
6 (I) Number of final merit orders.................3,100
7 (II) Number of lump sum settlements orders......39,500
8 e. Number/percent of final orders entered
9 within 14 days....................................No data yet.
10 (g) For the Unemployment Appeals Commission Program,
11 the purpose of which is to provide rapid cost-effective review
12 and decisions for appealed unemployment compensation claims,
13 the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
14 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
15 Specific Appropriations 2282-2285 are as follows:
16 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of unemployment compensation appeals
18 disposed of within 45 days.................................50%
19 b. Percent of unemployment compensation appeals
20 disposed of within 90 days.................................95%
21 c. Percent of cases appealed to DCA.................7%
22 d. Average unit cost of cases appealed to Unemployment
23 Appeals Commission........................................$186
24 e. Average unit cost of cases appealed to DCA.....$685
25 f. Percent of appealed decisions affirmed by DCA...94%
26 2. OUTPUT MEASURE.--
27 a. Number of unemployment compensation appeals
28 disposed of..............................................9,000
29 (h) For the Information Technology Program, the
30 purpose of which is to support agency functions through the
31 management of information resources, the outcome measures,
206
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 output measures, and associated performance standards with
2 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2321-2325
3 are as follows:
4 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
5 a. Maintain the percent of scheduled information
6 technology production jobs completed at 99.9% or more....99.9%
7 b. Percent of data processing requests
8 completed by due date......................................95%
9 c. System design and programming hourly cost.......$52
10 d. Percent of scheduled production jobs
11 completed................................................99.9%
12 e. Percent of scheduled hours available (data center
13 operations).............................................99.79%
14 f. Cost per MIP (millions of instructions per
15 second)................................................$19,000
16 g. Percent of Help Desk calls resolved within
17 3 working days..........................................89.48%
18 h. Cost per Help Desk call..........................$8
19 i. Percent of scheduled hours available
20 (network)...............................................99.08%
21 j. Cost for support per network device............$195
22 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Number of data processing requests completed
24 by due date..............................................2,900
25 b. Number of scheduled production jobs
26 completed..............................................517,000
27 c. Number of hours available (data center
28 operations)..............................................2,876
29 d. Number of Help Desk calls resolved within 3 working
30 days....................................................18,175
31 e. Number of hours available (network)...........2,855
207
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Maintain and develop information technology as
2 measured by the number of production jobs completed....514,000
3 (i) For the Executive Direction and Support Services
4 Program, the purpose of which is to provide policy
5 determination and administrative support for agency
6 operations, the outcome measures, output measures, and
7 associated performance standards with respect to funds
8 provided in Specific Appropriations 2312-2320 are as follows:
9 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
10 a. Reduce the administrative costs to less than 7.9%
11 of total agency cost......................................7.9%
12 (8) DEPARTMENT OF THE LOTTERY.--
13 (a) For the Lottery Operations Program, the outcome
14 measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 2353-2366 are as follows:
17 1. LOTTERY OPERATIONS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Total revenue in dollars...........$2,287.3 million
19 b. Percent change in total revenue dollars from prior
20 year.....................................................2.87%
21 c. Transfers to the state Educational Enhancement
22 Trust Fund......................................$886.7 million
23 d. Percent of total revenue to the Educational
24 Enhancement Trust Fund..................................38.77%
25 2. LOTTERY OPERATIONS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
26 a. Percent of total revenue paid as prizes......49.79%
27 b. Administrative expense paid for retailer
28 commission.....................................$129.41 million
29 c. Operating expense (includes retailer
30 commission).....................................$261.8 million
31 d. Operating expense as percent of total
208
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 revenue.................................................11.44%
2 e. Percent of respondents who are aware of the
3 Lottery's contribution to education........................65%
4 f. Provide executive direction and support services
5 for all lottery operations as measured by percent of total
6 agency budget...............................................9%
7 (9) DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES.--
8 (a) For the Administration Program, the outcome
9 measures, output measures, and associated performance
10 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
11 Appropriations 2367-2378 are as follows:
12 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES OUTCOME
13 MEASURE.--
14 a. Administrative costs as a percent of total agency
15 costs....................................................2.62%
16 2. STATE TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
17 a. Number of state entities served..................73
18 3. STATE EMPLOYEE LEASING OUTCOME MEASURE.--
19 a. Number of employees in the State Employee Leasing
20 service.....................................................19
21 (b) For the SMART Schools Clearinghouse Program, the
22 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
23 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
24 Appropriations 2379-2384 are as follows:
25 1. SMART SCHOOLS CLEARINGHOUSE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
26 a. Number of schools receiving SMART awards.........25
27 (c) For the Facilities Program, the outcome measures,
28 output measures, and associated performance standards with
29 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2385-2401
30 are as follows:
31 1. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
209
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Average DMS full service rent - composite cost per
2 net square foot (actual)................................$15.39
3 b. Average private sector full service rent -
4 composite cost per net square foot in counties where DMS has
5 office facilities (for comparison)......................$16.95
6 c. DMS average operations and maintenance cost per
7 square foot maintained...................................$5.20
8 d. Private industry average operations and maintenance
9 cost per square foot maintained..........................$6.74
10 2. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
11 a. Net square feet of state-owned office space
12 occupied by state agencies including non-DMS owned
13 facilities...........................................7,840,079
14 b. Net square feet of private office space occupied by
15 state agencies......................................10,713,751
16 c. Number of maintained square feet (private contract
17 and agency)..........................................7,412,150
18 3. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Gross square foot construction cost of office
20 facilities for DMS......................................$84.94
21 b. Gross square foot construction cost of office
22 facilities for private industry average
23 (for comparison)........................................$91.73
24 4. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
25 a. Dollar volume of Fixed Capital Outlay project
26 starts managed....................................$280,000,000
27 5. CAPITOL POLICE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
28 a. Number of criminal incidents per 1,000
29 employees................................................28.75
30 6. CAPITOL POLICE OUTPUT MEASURES.--
31 a. Total number of criminal incidents reported...5,686
210
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Total number of noncriminal calls for
2 service.................................................32,000
3 c. Number of patrol hours on-site at state
4 facilities..............................................72,800
5 d. Gross square feet monitored for security
6 purposes.............................................7,825,023
7 e. Number of investigations conducted..............210
8 f. Number of state employees receiving crime
9 prevention and safety training...........................3,000
10 (d) For the Support Program, the outcome measures,
11 output measures, and associated performance standards with
12 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2408-2425
13 are as follows:
14 1. AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Passenger load factor for DMS...................3.5
16 b. Cost per flight hour - DMS aircraft pool.....$1,200
17 c. Average percent DMS direct cost per flight hour
18 below industry direct cost.................................34%
19 2. AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
20 a. Number of flights by executive aircraft
21 pool.....................................................1,500
22 3. FEDERAL PROPERTY ASSISTANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
23 a. Federal property distribution rate..............85%
24 4. FEDERAL PROPERTY ASSISTANCE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
25 a. Number of federal property orders processed...2,150
26 5. MOTOR VEHICLE AND WATERCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTCOME
27 MEASURES.--
28 a. Average percent below private sector fleet
29 maintenance - labor costs..................................13%
30 b. Average percent below private sector fleet
31 maintenance - parts costs..................................26%
211
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Average percent state rental vehicles below state
2 rental contract rates......................................30%
3 6. MOTOR VEHICLE AND WATERCRAFT MANAGEMENT OUTPUT
4 MEASURE.--
5 a. Miles of state rental vehicle service
6 provided.............................................1,900,000
7 7. PURCHASING OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURE.--
8 a. Percent of state term contracts savings.........39%
9 8. PURCHASING OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
10 a. Number of state contracts and agreements
11 executed.................................................1,103
12 (e) For the Workforce Program, the outcome measures,
13 output measures, and associated performance standards with
14 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations 2426-2450
15 are as follows:
16 1. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
17 a. Total program cost per authorized positions in the
18 state personnel system..................................$78.76
19 b. Overall customer satisfaction rating............85%
20 c. Percent of agencies at or above EEO gender parity
21 with available labor market..............................86.7%
22 d. Percent of agencies at or above EEO minority parity
23 with available labor market................................70%
24 2. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
25 a. Number of authorized positions supported by the
26 Cooperative Personnel Employment Subsystem (COPES).....125,600
27 b. Number of responses to technical assistance
28 requests................................................20,722
29 3. INSURANCE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME
30 MEASURES.--
31
212
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of vendors meeting all contractual
2 performance provisions.....................................95%
3 b. Administrative cost per health insurance
4 enrollee...............................................$230.06
5 c. Customer feedback ranking for Division (scale of 1
6 to 5)......................................................3.5
7 d. Percent of claims reaching final action within 30
8 days after receipt.........................................98%
9 e. Percent of dollars paid correctly...............99%
10 f. Telephone response time within 45 seconds.......90%
11 g. Percent of claims pended, paid, or rejected within
12 14 days....................................................90%
13 4. INSURANCE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT MEASURE.--
14 a. Number of enrollees.........................480,591
15 5. RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTCOME
16 MEASURES.--
17 a. Percent of members satisfied with retirement
18 information.............................................92.78%
19 b. Percent of participating agencies satisfied with
20 retirement information...................................94.9%
21 c. Percent of members satisfied with retirement
22 services................................................92.53%
23 d. Percent of participating agencies satisfied with
24 retirement services......................................94.9%
25 e. Percent of agency payroll transactions correctly
26 reported...................................................90%
27 f. Administrative cost per active and retired member
28 (excluding RIM project).................................$20.39
29 g. Percent of local retirement systems annually
30 reviewed which are funded on a sound actuarial basis.......95%
31 h. Ratio of active and retired members to division
213
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 FTE....................................................3,391:1
2 6. RETIREMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OUTPUT
3 MEASURES.--
4 a. Number of local pension plan valuations and impact
5 statements reviewed........................................400
6 b. Number of FRS members.......................810,349
7 c. Number of retirement account audits..........83,000
8 d. Number of benefit payments issued.........2,244,680
9 (f) For the Information Technology Program, the
10 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
11 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
12 Appropriations 2451-2472 are as follows:
13 1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for
15 local access...............................................40%
16 b. Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for
17 long distance..............................................40%
18 c. Percent SUNCOM discount from commercial rates for
19 data service...............................................25%
20 d. Overall customer survey ranking (scale of 1
21 to 5).....................................................3.79
22 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
23 a. Total revenue for voice service.........$80,185,085
24 b. Total revenue for data service..........$50,814,915
25 c. Number of SUNCOM long distance billable
26 minutes............................................262,126,091
27 d. Number of SUNCOM local service main
28 stations.............................................2,081,566
29 e. Number of SUNCOM data locations served.......10,747
30 3. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
214
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent wireless discount from commercially
2 available and similar type engineering services............35%
3 b. Overall customer satisfaction ranking (scale of 1
4 to 5).....................................................4.15
5 c. Percent of state covered by the Joint Task Force
6 Radio System...............................................58%
7 4. WIRELESS SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Number of engineering projects and approvals
9 handled for state and local governments....................616
10 b. Number of square miles covered by Joint Task Force
11 Radio System............................................57,727
12 c. Number of Joint Task Force Radio Systems fixed
13 sites operated and maintained...............................92
14 5. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTCOME MEASURE.--
15 a. Overall customer survey ranking (scale of 1
16 to 5).....................................................3.94
17 6. INFORMATION SERVICES OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of ITP research, development, and consulting
19 projects completed.........................................436
20 b. Percent utilization by the Unisys System as used
21 for capacity planning and technology refresh, employing 80%
22 maximum utilization standard...............................60%
23 c. Percent utilization by the IBM System as used for
24 capacity planning and technology refresh, employing 80%
25 maximum utilization standard.............................59.5%
26 (g) For the Administrative Hearings Program, the
27 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
28 standards with respect to funds in Specific Appropriations
29 2484-2488 are as follows:
30 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
31
215
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Percent of cases scheduled for hearing within 90
2 days after filing.......................................53.22%
3 b. Percent of cases closed within 120 days after
4 filing..................................................73.09%
5 c. Percent of professional licensure cases scheduled
6 for hearing within 90 days after filing.................21.61%
7 d. Percent of professional licensure cases closed
8 within 120 days after filing............................42.21%
9 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of cases opened........................5,877
11 b. Number of cases closed........................6,921
12 c. Number of cases carried forward...............2,354
13 d. Staffing ratio based on the average number of cases
14 closed per administrative law judge........................188
15 e. Number of professional licensure cases opened...487
16 f. Number of professional licensure cases closed...569
17 g. Number of professional licensure cases carried
18 forward....................................................292
19 (10) DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS.--
20 (a) For the Readiness and Response Program, the
21 purpose of which is to provide military units and personnel
22 (at the Governor's request) that are ready to protect life and
23 property; preserve peace, order, and public safety; and
24 contribute to such state and local programs that add value to
25 the State of Florida, the outcome measures, output measures,
26 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
27 provided in Specific Appropriations 2488A-2507E are as
28 follows:
29 1. READINESS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Percent of authorized filled positions..........95%
31 b. Number/percent of armories rated
216
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 adequate................................................36/62%
2 c. Percent of assigned soldiers to authorized staffing
3 levels.....................................................99%
4 2. READINESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
5 a. Percent of satisfaction with training facilities at
6 Camp Blanding..............................................82%
7 b. Number of annual training days at Camp
8 Blanding...............................................180,000
9 c. Number of new recruits using State Education
10 Assistance Program.......................................1,300
11 d. Number of crisis response exercises conducted
12 annually.....................................................4
13 e. Recruit, retain, and provide administration for
14 soldiers in the Florida National Guard..................11,599
15 f. Number of armories under maintenance and
16 repair......................................................55
17 g. Number of people using Camp Blanding training
18 area...................................................233,587
19 3. RESPONSE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
20 a. Percent of supported agencies reporting
21 satisfaction with the department's support for specific
22 missions...................................................90%
23 4. DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTCOME MEASURE.--
24 a. Percent of Law Enforcement officers trained that
25 rate the training as relevant and valuable...............87.5%
26 5. DRUG INTERDICTION AND PREVENTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
27 a. Provide interagency counter-drug assistance as
28 measured by the number of mandays devoted to counter-drug
29 tasks...................................................61,950
30 b. Provide presentations to improve drug awareness
31 among high school students..............................22,249
217
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Sponsor community anti-drug coalitions...........18
2 d. Number of law enforcement personnel trained.....400
3 e. Number of drug-training hours provided to law
4 enforcement agents.....................................125,000
5 6. FEDERAL/STATE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS OUTPUT
6 MEASURE.--
7 a. Administer Department of Defense contracts in
8 Florida.....................................................21
9 (11) PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.--
10 (a) For the Utilities Regulation/Consumer Assistance
11 Program, the purpose of which is to provide a regulatory
12 environment that facilitates the provision of desired utility
13 services of acceptable quality at fair prices, the outcome
14 measures, output measures, and associated performance
15 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
16 Appropriations 2508-2515 are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Average allowed Return on Equity (ROE) in Florida
19 compared to average ROE in the USA:
20 (I) Electric:
21 (A) Florida.......................................+/-1
22 (B) USA...........................................12.2
23 (II) Gas:
24 (A) Florida.......................................+/-1
25 (B) USA...........................................11.6
26 (III) Water and wastewater:
27 (A) Florida.....................................+/-2.5
28 (B) USA...........................................11.2
29 b. Percent of utilities achieving within range and
30 over range of last authorized ROE:
31 (I) Electric:
218
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (A) Within range..................................100%
2 (B) Over range......................................0%
3 (II) Gas:
4 (A) Within range...................................25%
5 (B) Over range......................................0%
6 (III) Water and wastewater:
7 (A) Within range....................................5%
8 (B) Over range.....................................25%
9 c. Limit in the percent increase in annual utility
10 bill for average residential usage compared to inflation as
11 measured by the Consumer Price Index within:
12 (I) Electric (1,000 KWH)............................1%
13 (II) Gas (30 Therms)................................1%
14 (III) Water and wastewater (10,000 gal).............1%
15 (IV) Communication..................................1%
16 d. Percent of communications service variances per
17 inspection points examined:
18 (I) Local exchange & alternate local exchange
19 telephone companies........................................22%
20 (II) Interexchange.................................20%
21 (III) Pay telephone companies.......................4%
22 e. Percent of electric safety variances corrected on
23 first reinspection..........................................3%
24 f. Percent of gas safety variances corrected on first
25 reinspection...............................................25%
26 g. Consumer calls:
27 (I) Percent of calls answered......................72%
28 (II) Average waiting time (in minutes)...............2
29 h. Percent of consumer complaints resolved:
30 (I) Within 30 days.................................48%
31 (II) Within 60 days................................62%
219
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 i. Per capita annual KWH energy savings through
2 conservation programs..................................142 KWH
3 j. Percent of combined conservation goals achieved by
4 7 FEECA utilities.........................................100%
5 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
6 a. Proceedings, reviews, and audits examining rates,
7 rate structure, earnings, and expenditures:
8 (I) Electric.......................................120
9 (II) Gas...........................................110
10 (III) Water and wastewater.........................873
11 b. Number of proceedings establishing agreements
12 between local service providers............................687
13 c. Number of proceedings granting certificates to
14 operate as a telecommunications company..................1,009
15 d. Number of proceedings granting service authority,
16 resolving territorial disputes:
17 (I) Electric.........................................3
18 (II) Gas.............................................1
19 (III) Water and wastewater..........................71
20 e. Number of 10-year site plan reviews and need
21 determinations for electric utilities.......................15
22 f. Number of consumer inquiries/complaints handled:
23 (I) Communications..............................17,356
24 (II) Electric....................................1,731
25 (III) Gas..........................................211
26 (IV) Water and wastewater..........................422
27 g. Number of service evaluations/safety inspections
28 performed:
29 (I) Communications (service evaluations).........9,100
30 (II) Electric (safety inspections)...............3,670
31 (III) Gas (safety inspections)......................77
220
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (12) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.--
2 (a) For the Property Tax Administration Program, the
3 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
4 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
5 Appropriations 2526-2538 are as follows:
6 1. PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION OVERSIGHT OUTCOME
7 MEASURES.--
8 a. Percent of refund and tax certificate applications
9 processed within 30 days after receipt.....................95%
10 b. Number of refund requests per 100,000
11 parcels...................................................31.6
12 2. PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION OVERSIGHT OUTPUT
13 MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of property tax refund requests
15 processed................................................2,700
16 b. Number of tax certificate cancellations/corrections
17 processed................................................2,000
18 3. PROPERTY TAX ROLL OVERSIGHT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
19 a. Percent of classes studied found to have a level of
20 assessment of at least 90 percent........................97.1%
21 b. Tax roll uniformity - average for coefficient of
22 dispersion...............................................11.2%
23 4. PROPERTY TAX ROLL OVERSIGHT OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of subclasses of property studied with
25 feedback to property appraisers..........................4,400
26 b. Number of taxpayers audited on behalf of county
27 property appraisers (TPP)..................................260
28 c. Number of county property tax rolls evaluated....67
29 5. TRUTH-IN-MILLAGE COMPLIANCE OUTCOME MEASURE.--
30 a. Percent of taxing authorities in total or
31 substantial truth-in-millage compliance on initial
221
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 submission...............................................97.5%
2 6. TRUTH-IN-MILLAGE COMPLIANCE OUTPUT MEASURE.--
3 a. Number of TRIM compliance letters sent to taxing
4 authorities................................................605
5 (b) For the Child-Support Enforcement Program, the
6 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
7 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
8 Appropriations 2539-2561G are as follows:
9 1. CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT OUTCOME
10 MEASURES.--
11 a. Percent of children with a court order for
12 support....................................................52%
13 b. Percent of children with paternity
14 established..............................................81.5%
15 2. CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT OUTPUT MEASURE.--
16 a. Number of children with a newly established court
17 order...................................................60,000
18 3. CHILD-SUPPORT COLLECTIONS AND DISTRIBUTION OUTCOME
19 MEASURES.--
20 a. Total child-support dollars collected per $1 of
21 total expenditures.......................................$3.05
22 b. Percent of State Disbursement Unit Collections
23 disbursed within 2 business days after receipt.............95%
24 4. CHILD-SUPPORT COLLECTIONS AND DISTRIBUTION OUTPUT
25 MEASURE.--
26 a. Child-support collections distributed..$763 million
27 5. CHILD-SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Percent of cases with child support due in a month
29 that received a payment during the month...................54%
30 b. Percent of child-support collected that was due
31 during the fiscal year.....................................57%
222
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 (c) For the General Tax Administration Program, the
2 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
3 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
4 Appropriations 2580A-2580AH are as follows:
5 1. TAXPAYER REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION OUTCOME
6 MEASURES.--
7 a. Return on investment - total collections per dollar
8 spent..................................................$149.73
9 b. Percent of sales tax returns filed substantially
10 error free and on time.....................................76%
11 c. Dollars collected voluntarily as a percentage of
12 total dollars collected....................................97%
13 2. FILING COMPLIANCE PROCESS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
14 a. Average number of days from receipt of payment to
15 final processing of deposit - sales, corporation, intangibles,
16 fuel......................................................0.60
17 b. Average number of days between the processing of a
18 sales tax return and the first notification to the taxpayer of
19 an apparent filing error or late return.....................36
20 c. Percent of delinquent sales tax return and filing
21 error or late return notices issued accurately to
22 taxpayers..................................................90%
23 3. FILING COMPLIANCE PROCESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of tax returns processed...........8,330,000
25 b. Number of tax returns reconciled..........6,500,000
26 c. Number of delinquent tax return notices issued to
27 taxpayers..............................................720,000
28 d. Number of notices sent to taxpayers for apparent
29 tax return filing errors or late returns...............520,000
30 e. Number of refund claims processed............64,000
31 4. REMITTANCE ACCOUNTING PROCESS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
223
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 a. Average number of days between initial distribution
2 of funds and final adjustments - sales, fuel................60
3 b. Accuracy of initial revenue distributions to local
4 governments................................................93%
5 5. ENFORCED COMPLIANCE PROCESS OUTCOME MEASURES.--
6 a. Dollars collected as a percentage of actual
7 liability of notices sent for apparent sales tax return filing
8 errors or late returns.....................................50%
9 b. Percent of final audit assessment amounts collected
10 - tax only.................................................85%
11 c. Final audit assessment amounts as a percentage of
12 initial assessment amounts - tax only......................74%
13 d. Average number of days to resolve a dispute of an
14 audit assessment...........................................175
15 e. Direct collections per enforcement-related dollar
16 spent....................................................$4.82
17 6. ENFORCED COMPLIANCE PROCESS OUTPUT MEASURES.--
18 a. Number of identified potential liabilities
19 resolved.............................................1,060,000
20 b. Number of audits completed...................29,500
21 (13) DEPARTMENT OF STATE.--
22 (a) For the Office of the Secretary and Administrative
23 Services Program, the purposes of which are to administer the
24 statutory responsibilities of the Secretary of State in regard
25 to international affairs, to administer the notary commissions
26 and apostilles certifications while providing enhanced public
27 access, and to help people reach their goals for improved
28 social and economic conditions in Central America and the
29 Caribbean through training and technical assistance, the
30 outcome measures, output measures, and associated performance
31
224
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
2 Appropriations 2589-2596 are as follows:
3 1. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS AND NOTARIES
4 OUTCOME MEASURE.--
5 a. Maintain the current level of clients who indicate
6 assistance is very responsive, as measured by survey, at 60
7 percent or more............................................60%
8 2. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS AND NOTARIES
9 OUTPUT MEASURES.--
10 a. Number of trade/cultural missions.................3
11 b. Number of Consular Corps credentials issued......50
12 c. Number of sister cities/sister state grants
13 approved....................................................20
14 3. FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR
15 CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTCOME MEASURES.--
16 a. Percent of overseas clients who indicate assistance
17 is very responsive.........................................96%
18 b. Percent of volunteer-consultants who would
19 volunteer again............................................97%
20 c. Ratio of donated services and contributions to the
21 amount of state funding..................................1.6:1
22 4. FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY AGENCIES FOR
23 CARIBBEAN ACTION OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of volunteer technical assistance missions
25 to Central America and the Caribbean.......................108
26 b. Number of international and domestic development
27 missions....................................................18
28 (b) For the Elections Program, the purpose of which is
29 to protect the integrity of elections and to promote public
30 awareness and participation in the electoral process through
31 open and accurate public access and in the development of
225
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 governmental procedures through the dissemination of Florida's
2 administrative records, laws, acts, and rules, the outcome
3 measures, output measures, and associated performance
4 standards with respect to funds provided in Specific
5 Appropriations 2597-2602 are as follows:
6 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
7 a. Percent of campaign treasurer report detail
8 information released on the Internet within 7 days.........94%
9 b. Percent of survey respondents satisfied with
10 services (quality and timeliness of response)..............90%
11 c. Percent of training session/workshop attendees
12 satisfied (quality of content and applicability of materials
13 presented).................................................90%
14 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
15 a. Number of campaign reports
16 received/processed......................................14,000
17 b. Number of attendees at training, workshops, and
18 assistance events..........................................500
19 c. Number of Internet website hits.............750,000
20 (c) For the Historical Resources Program, the purpose
21 of which is to encourage identification, evaluation,
22 protection, preservation, collection, conservation,
23 interpretation, and public access to information about
24 Florida's historic sites and properties and objects related to
25 Florida history and to archaeological and folk cultural
26 heritage, the outcome measures, output measures, and
27 associated performance standards with respect to funds
28 provided in Specific Appropriations 2603-2622 are as follows:
29 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
30 a. Number of copies or viewings of publications,
31 including Internet website hits......................1,750,000
226
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 b. Number of historic and archaeological objects
2 maintained for public use..............................120,000
3 c. Total number of historic and archaeological sites
4 recorded in the master site file.......................133,000
5 d. Total number of properties protected or
6 preserved................................................7,881
7 e. Total local funds leveraged by historical resources
8 program...........................................$105 million
9 f. Percent of Museum of Florida History visitors
10 rating the experience good or excellent....................88%
11 g. Percent of customers satisfied with the
12 quality/timeliness of technical assistance provided........96%
13 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
14 a. Number of grants awarded........................256
15 b. Number of dollars awarded through
16 grants.............................................$19,294,807
17 c. Number of museum exhibits........................84
18 d. Number of publications and multimedia products
19 available for the general public...........................259
20 e. Number of preservation services applications
21 reviewed.................................................8,256
22 f. Number of attendees at produced and sponsored
23 events.................................................127,784
24 g. Number of visitors to state historic
25 museums................................................233,046
26 (d) For the Corporations Program, the purpose of which
27 is to promote financial and economic stability through public
28 notice of clients' interest in business organizations,
29 trademarks, financial transactions, and liens as well as
30 identification of those doing business under names other than
31 their own, the outcome measures, output measures, and
227
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 associated performance standards with respect to funds
2 provided in Specific Appropriations 2623-2625A are as follows:
3 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
4 a. Percent of client satisfaction with the division's
5 services...................................................91%
6 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
7 a. Average cost/corporate filing.................$5.38
8 b. Average cost/Uniform Commercial Code
9 filing...................................................$1.81
10 c. Average cost/inquiry.........................$0.075
11 d. Percent of total inquires handled by
12 telephone..................................................20%
13 e. Percent of total inquiries handled by
14 mail/walk-ins.............................................7.5%
15 f. Percent of total inquiries handled by electronic
16 means....................................................72.5%
17 (e) For the Libraries and Information Services
18 Program, the purpose of which is to ensure access to
19 information of past, present, and future value for the
20 educational and cultural benefit of the people of Florida and
21 to work in partnership with citizens, information providers,
22 and government for efficient and effective management and
23 development of information services, the outcome measures,
24 output measures, and associated performance standards with
25 respect to funds provided in Specific Appropriations
26 2626-2629B are as follows:
27 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
28 a. Annual increase in the use of local public library
29 service.....................................................2%
30 b. Annual increase in usage of research
31 collections.................................................6%
228
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 c. Annual cost avoidance achieved by government
2 agencies through records storage/disposition
3 /micrographics.....................................$58 million
4 d. Customer satisfaction with relevancy and timeliness
5 of research response.......................................90%
6 e. Customer satisfaction with Records Management
7 technical assistance, training, and Records Center
8 Services...................................................90%
9 f. Customer satisfaction with accuracy and timeliness
10 of library consultant responses............................TBD
11 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
12 a. Number of items loaned by public
13 libraries...........................................71,361,232
14 b. Number of library customer visits........50,504,239
15 c. Number of public library reference
16 requests............................................25,644,913
17 d. Number of public library registered
18 borrowers............................................7,207,942
19 e. Number of persons attending public
20 library programs.....................................3,148,771
21 f. Number of volumes in public library
22 collections.........................................25,242,994
23 g. Number of new users (State Library, State
24 Archives)................................................6,336
25 h. Number of reference requests handled (State
26 Library, State Archives)...............................117,847
27 i. Number of database searches conducted (State
28 Library, State Archives)...............................837,195
29 j. Number of items loaned (State Library).......86,163
30 k. Cubic feet of obsolete public records approved for
31 disposal...............................................510,000
229
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 l. Cubic feet of noncurrent records stored at
2 the Records Center.....................................220,000
3 m. Number of microfilm images created, processed,
4 and/or duplicated at the Records Center............160 million
5 (f) For the Cultural Affairs Program, the purpose of
6 which is to foster development of a receptive climate for
7 cultural programs, to enrich culturally and benefit the
8 citizens of this state in their daily lives, to increase the
9 appeal of Florida visits and vacations, and to attract to
10 Florida residency outstanding creators through the promotion
11 of cultural programs, the outcome measures, output measures,
12 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
13 provided in Specific Appropriations 2630-2646C are as follows:
14 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
15 a. Attendance at supported cultural
16 events..............................................21 million
17 b. Number of individuals served by professional
18 associations.........................................8 million
19 c. Total local financial support leveraged by state
20 funding...........................................$360 million
21 d. Number of children attending school-based,
22 organized cultural events..........................3.9 million
23 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
24 a. Number of capital grants awarded.................30
25 b. Number of program grants awarded................750
26 c. Dollars awarded through capital
27 grants.............................................$12 million
28 d. Dollars awarded through program
29 grants.............................................$19,535,872
30 e. Percent of counties funded by the program.....88.1%
31
230
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Percent of large counties (N=34; population greater
2 than 75,000) funded by the program.......................97.1%
3 g. Percent of small counties (N=33; population less
4 than 75,000) funded by the program.......................78.8%
5 h. Number of state-supported performances and
6 exhibits................................................25,000
7 (g) For the Licensing Program, the purpose of which is
8 to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare through
9 the licensing, regulation, and enforcement of the private
10 security, private investigative, and recovery industries;
11 through the regulation of game promotions conducted in
12 Florida; and through the issuance of licenses to citizens
13 wishing to carry concealed weapons or firearms for lawful
14 defense, the outcome measures, output measures, and associated
15 performance standards with respect to funds provided in
16 Specific Appropriations 2647-2650 are as follows:
17 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
18 a. Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery
19 licenses issued within 90 days after receipt of an
20 application................................................83%
21 b. Percent/number of Concealed Weapon/Firearm licenses
22 issued within 90-day statutory timeframe without fingerprint
23 results...............................................7%/1,978
24 c. Number of default Concealed Weapon/Firearm
25 licensees with prior criminal histories....................339
26 d. Percent of license revocations or suspensions
27 initiated within 20 days after receipt of disqualifying
28 information (all license types)............................60%
29 e. Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery
30 investigations completed within 60 days....................94%
31
231
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 f. Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery
2 inspections completed within 30 days.......................90%
3 g. Percent of Concealed Weapon/Firearm violators to
4 licensed population......................................0.15%
5 h. Percent of Security, Investigative, and Recovery
6 violators to licensed population.........................1.42%
7 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
8 a. Average cost of Concealed Weapon/Firearm
9 application processed......................................$27
10 b. Average cost of Security, Investigative, and
11 Recovery application processed.............................$59
12 c. Average cost of Security, Investigative, and
13 Recovery investigation..................................$1,846
14 d. Average cost of Security, Investigative, and
15 Recovery compliance inspection............................$377
16 e. Average cost of Administrative Action (revocation,
17 fine, probation, and compliance letters)..................$491
18 f. Number of investigations performed (Security,
19 Investigative, and Recovery complaint and agency-generated
20 inspections).............................................1,541
21 g. Number of compliance inspections performed
22 (Security, Investigative, and Recovery licensees/new agency
23 inspections and random inspections)......................1,771
24 (h) For the Historic Pensacola Preservation Program,
25 the purpose of which is to develop, implement, and maintain a
26 variety of public programs through research, through
27 historical, archaeological, and architectural surveys, and
28 through administrative support and to provide special and
29 permanent exhibitions of local and regional history,
30 maintenance and operation of historic and other public
31 buildings, and education programs to effectively aid citizens
232
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 in the preservation of the cultural heritage and natural
2 resources of Florida, the outcome measures, output measures,
3 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
4 provided in Specific Appropriations 2651-2654 are as follows:
5 1. OUTCOME MEASURE.--
6 a. Number of visitors to board-managed
7 properties.............................................150,000
8 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
9 a. Number of consultations to city and county
10 governments................................................550
11 b. Total acreage of historic properties
12 maintained................................................8.75
13 c. Total square footage of historic properties
14 maintained.............................................108,600
15 (i) For the Ringling Museum of Art Program, the
16 purpose of which is to carry out its duties as the official
17 art museum of the State of Florida, including the preservation
18 and maintenance of collections, furnishings, objects,
19 artifacts, and objects of art and other property willed to the
20 State of Florida by John Ringling, to provide access to and
21 education about its holdings, and to acquire and preserve
22 additional objects of art and artifacts of historical or
23 cultural significance, the outcome measures, output measures,
24 and associated performance standards with respect to funds
25 provided in Specific Appropriations 2655-2657A are as follows:
26 1. OUTCOME MEASURES.--
27 a. Annual number of museum visitors............251,308
28 b. Number of individual participants in scheduled
29 education programs.......................................3,200
30 c. Percent of visitors rating visit better than
31 expected...................................................77%
233
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
ENROLLED
2000 Legislature HB 2147, Second Engrossed
1 2. OUTPUT MEASURES.--
2 a. Total number of objects maintained...........12,850
3 b. Number of institutions to which items are on
4 loan........................................................16
5 c. Net asset balance of the Museum and Foundation,
6 including assets transferred to the state and excluding art
7 and other collections...............................$8,300,000
8 Section 72. If any provision of this act or the
9 application thereof to any person or circumstance is held
10 invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
11 applications of the act which can be given effect without the
12 invalid provision or application, and to this end the
13 provisions of this act are declared severable.
14 Section 73. This act shall take effect July 1, 2000;
15 or, in the event this act fails to become a law until after
16 that date, it shall take effect upon becoming a law and shall
17 operate retroactively to July 1, 2000.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
234