|
|
|
|
|
1
|
CHAMBER ACTION |
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
The Committee on Future of Florida's Families recommends the |
|
7
|
following: |
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
Committee Substitute |
|
10
|
Remove the entire bill and insert: |
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
A bill to be entitled |
|
13
|
An act relating to community care for the elderly; |
|
14
|
amending s. 430.205, F.S.; providing guidelines for |
|
15
|
determining the priority of recipients of services; |
|
16
|
providing an effective date. |
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
Section 1. Subsection (5) of section 430.205, Florida |
|
21
|
Statutes, is amended to read: |
|
22
|
430.205 Community care service system.-- |
|
23
|
(5) Any person who has been classified as a functionally |
|
24
|
impaired elderly person is eligible to receive community-care- |
|
25
|
for-the-elderly core services. |
|
26
|
(a)Those elderly persons who are determined by protective |
|
27
|
investigations to be vulnerable adults in need of services, |
|
28
|
pursuant to s. 415.104(3)(b), or to be victims of abuse, |
|
29
|
neglect, or exploitation who are in need of immediate services |
|
30
|
to prevent further harm and are referred by the adult protective |
|
31
|
services program, shall be given primary consideration for |
|
32
|
receiving community-care-for-the-elderly services. As used in |
|
33
|
this paragraphsubsection, "primary consideration" means that an |
|
34
|
assessment and services must commence within 72 hours after |
|
35
|
referral to the department or as established in accordance with |
|
36
|
department contracts by local protocols developed between |
|
37
|
department service providers and the adult protective services |
|
38
|
program. |
|
39
|
(b) The department shall determine an order of |
|
40
|
prioritization for all other functionally impaired elderly |
|
41
|
persons seeking community-care-for-the-elderly services that is |
|
42
|
based upon the potential recipient’s frailty level and |
|
43
|
likelihood of institutional placement without such services. |
|
44
|
After determining such frailty level and likelihood of |
|
45
|
institutional placement, should the list of potential recipients |
|
46
|
require further prioritization, another factor that must be |
|
47
|
considered is the potential recipient’s ability to pay for such |
|
48
|
services. Those who are less able to pay for such services must |
|
49
|
receive higher priority than those who are better able to pay |
|
50
|
for such services. A potential recipient’s ability to pay may be |
|
51
|
determined by the department based on the potential recipient’s |
|
52
|
self-declared statement of income and expenses. |
|
53
|
Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2003. |