Senate Bill sb1844
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2003 SB 1844
By Senator Margolis
35-892-03 See HB 25
1 A bill to be entitled
2 An act relating to prevention of discrimination
3 in prescription plans; requiring certain
4 employers to ensure that prescription plans
5 include certain coverage, are comprehensive,
6 and do not discriminate on the basis of gender;
7 providing for penalties; providing an effective
8 date.
9
10 WHEREAS, Title VII of the United States Civil Rights
11 Act makes it unlawful for an employer "to fail or refuse to
12 hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to
13 discriminate against any individual with respect to his or her
14 compensation, terms, conditions, and privileges of employment
15 because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or
16 national origin.", and
17 WHEREAS, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978
18 amended section 701 of the Civil Rights Act to provide that
19 "The terms 'because of sex' or 'on the basis of sex' include,
20 but are not limited to, because of or on the basis of
21 pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; and
22 women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical
23 conditions shall be treated the same for all employment
24 related purposes, including receipt of benefits under fringe
25 benefit programs, as other persons not so affected but similar
26 in their ability or inability to work....", and
27 WHEREAS, the United States Equal Employment Commission
28 found that two employers' exclusions of prescription
29 contraceptive drugs and devices in their respective health
30 plans were discriminatory on the basis of sex and pregnancy in
31
1
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2003 SB 1844
35-892-03 See HB 25
1 direct violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as
2 amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, and
3 WHEREAS, the United States District Court Western
4 District of Washington at Seattle found in Jennifer Erickson
5 v. The Bartell Drug Company, 141 F. Supp. 2d 1266, that the
6 employer's exclusion of prescription contraception from its
7 prescription plan is inconsistent with the requirements of
8 Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, and
9 WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States has
10 held in Shaw v. Delta Airlines, 463 US 85 (1983), that the
11 states play a significant role in the enforcement of Title VII
12 and therefore, under Shaw, state fair employment laws
13 governing employment benefits are not preempted by ERISA
14 insofar as such laws prevent conduct that is also unlawful
15 under Title VII, NOW, THEREFORE,
16
17 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
18
19 Section 1. Any employer that offers employees a
20 comprehensive prescription benefit plan in connection with
21 providing health care coverage shall ensure that the
22 prescription benefit plan includes coverage for contraceptive
23 drugs and devices, provides comprehensive coverage for
24 employees of both genders, and does not discriminate based
25 upon sex-based characteristics of the employees. Any employer
26 who fails to comply with the requirements of this section
27 shall be subject to the administrative and civil remedies
28 provided in section 760.11, Florida Statutes.
29 Section 2. This act shall take effect upon becoming a
30 law.
31
2
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.