HB 0023 2003
   
1 CHAMBER ACTION
2         
3         
4         
5         
6          The Committee on Appropriations recommends the following:
7         
8          Committee Substitute
9          Remove the entire bill and insert:
10 A bill to be entitled
11          An act relating to administrative procedures; amending s.
12    120.52, F.S.; revising the definition of “invalid exercise
13    of delegated legislative authority"; amending s. 120.54,
14    F.S.; revising language with respect to incorporation of
15    rules by reference and with respect to uniform rules;
16    providing requirements with respect to the application of
17    alleged facts to specific rules or statutes; amending s.
18    120.56, F.S.; providing that hearings on rule challenges
19    shall be de novo in nature; providing for burden and
20    standard of proof; changing the timeframe for publishing
21    proposed rules where agency statements are challenged to
22    moot such challenge; providing that challenges to agency
23    statements may be abated pending rulemaking; providing
24    that a determination that such rule is an invalid exercise
25    of delegated legislative authority shall prohibit the
26    agency from enforcing its statement or certain similar
27    statements; amending s. 120.569, F.S.; revising language
28    with respect to decisions which affect substantial
29    interests; providing for initial scheduling orders by the
30    administrative law judge; providing for a discovery
31    period; amending s. 120.57, F.S.; revising language with
32    respect to additional procedures applicable to hearings
33    involving disputed issues of material fact; providing that
34    an order relinquishing jurisdiction shall be rendered
35    under certain circumstances; providing circumstances which
36    excuse an agency from ruling on an exception to a
37    recommended order; limiting the authority of agencies to
38    reject or modify conclusions of law and interpretations of
39    administrative rules in recommended orders; amending s.
40    120.595, F.S.; redefining the term “improper purpose” and
41    conforming a cross reference; providing for the award of
42    reasonable attorney’s fees and costs under certain
43    circumstances; providing for nonexclusivity; amending s.
44    120.60, F.S.; revising language with respect to licensing;
45    providing that licenses considered approved as a condition
46    of time may still be subject to satisfactory completion of
47    an examination; requiring written notice of intent to rely
48    on a default license; amending s. 120.68, F.S.; revising
49    language with respect to judicial review; providing
50    additional grounds for certain petitions challenging an
51    agency rule as an invalid exercise of delegated
52    legislative authority; amending s. 57.105, F.S.; providing
53    administrative law judges authority to award attorney's
54    fees and damages in certain administrative proceedings;
55    providing for appeal; amending s. 57.111, F.S.; increasing
56    the cap on attorney’s fees in civil actions and
57    administrative proceedings initiated by state agencies;
58    providing an effective date.
59         
60          Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
61         
62          Section 1. Paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of subsection (8)
63    of section 120.52, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
64          120.52 Definitions.--As used in this act:
65          (8) "Invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority"
66    means action which goes beyond the powers, functions, and duties
67    delegated by the Legislature. A proposed or existing rule is an
68    invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority if any one
69    of the following applies:
70          (e) The rule is arbitrary or capricious. A rule is
71    arbitrary if it is not supported by logic or the necessary
72    facts; a rule is capricious if it is adopted without thought or
73    reason or is irrational; or
74          (f) The rule is not supported by competent substantial
75    evidence; or
76          (f)(g)The rule imposes regulatory costs on the regulated
77    person, county, or city which could be reduced by the adoption
78    of less costly alternatives that substantially accomplish the
79    statutory objectives.
80         
81          A grant of rulemaking authority is necessary but not sufficient
82    to allow an agency to adopt a rule; a specific law to be
83    implemented is also required. An agency may adopt only rules
84    that implement or interpret the specific powers and duties
85    granted by the enabling statute. No agency shall have authority
86    to adopt a rule only because it is reasonably related to the
87    purpose of the enabling legislation and is not arbitrary and
88    capricious or is within the agency's class of powers and duties,
89    nor shall an agency have the authority to implement statutory
90    provisions setting forth general legislative intent or policy.
91    Statutory language granting rulemaking authority or generally
92    describing the powers and functions of an agency shall be
93    construed to extend no further than implementing or interpreting
94    the specific powers and duties conferred by the same statute.
95          Section 2. Paragraph (i) of subsection (1) and paragraph
96    (b) of subsection (5) of section 120.54, Florida Statutes, are
97    amended to read:
98          120.54 Rulemaking.--
99          (1) GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL RULES OTHER THAN
100    EMERGENCY RULES.--
101          (i)1.A rule may incorporate material by reference but
102    only as the material exists on the date the rule is adopted. For
103    purposes of the rule, changes in the material are not effective
104    unless the rule is amended to incorporate the changes.
105          2. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in this section,
106    when an adopted rule of the Department of Environmental
107    Protection or a water management district is incorporated by
108    reference in the other agency’s rule to implement a provision of
109    chapter 373, subsequent amendments to the rule are not effective
110    as to the incorporating rule unless the agency incorporating by
111    reference notifies the committee and the Department of State of
112    its intent to adopt the subsequent amendment, publishes notice
113    of such intent in the Florida Administrative Weekly, and files
114    with the Department of State a copy of the amended rule
115    incorporated by reference. Changes in the rule incorporated by
116    reference are effective 20 days after the date of the published
117    notice and filing with the Department of State. The Department
118    of State shall amend the history note of the incorporating rule
119    to show the effective date of such change. Any substantially
120    affected person may, within 14 days after the date of
121    publication of the notice of intent in the Florida
122    Administrative Weekly, file an objection to rulemaking with the
123    agency. The objection shall specify the portions of the rule
124    incorporated by reference to which the person objects and the
125    reasons for the objection. The agency shall not have the
126    authority under this subparagraph to adopt those portions of the
127    rule specified in such objection. Objections which are frivolous
128    or which duplicate those previously filed during the initial
129    adoption of the rule incorporated by reference shall not be
130    considered sufficient to prohibit the agency from adopting rules
131    under this subparagraph. The agency shall publish notice of the
132    objection, and its action in response, in the next available
133    issue.
134          3.A rule may not be amended by reference only. Amendments
135    must set out the amended rule in full in the same manner as
136    required by the State Constitution for laws. The Department of
137    State may prescribe by rule requirements for incorporating
138    materials by reference pursuant to this paragraph.
139          (5) UNIFORM RULES.--
140          (b) The uniform rules of procedure adopted by the
141    commission pursuant to this subsection shall include, but are
142    not belimited to:
143          1. Uniform rules for the scheduling of public meetings,
144    hearings, and workshops.
145          2. Uniform rules for use by each state agency that provide
146    procedures for conducting public meetings, hearings, and
147    workshops, and for taking evidence, testimony, and argument at
148    such public meetings, hearings, and workshops, in person and by
149    means of communications media technology. The rules shall
150    provide that all evidence, testimony, and argument presented
151    shall be afforded equal consideration, regardless of the method
152    of communication. If a public meeting, hearing, or workshop is
153    to be conducted by means of communications media technology, or
154    if attendance may be provided by such means, the notice shall so
155    state. The notice for public meetings, hearings, and workshops
156    utilizing communications media technology shall state how
157    persons interested in attending may do so and shall name
158    locations, if any, where communications media technology
159    facilities will be available. Nothing in this paragraph shall be
160    construed to diminish the right to inspect public records under
161    chapter 119. Limiting points of access to public meetings,
162    hearings, and workshops subject to the provisions of s. 286.011
163    to places not normally open to the public shall be presumed to
164    violate the right of access of the public, and any official
165    action taken under such circumstances is void and of no effect.
166    Other laws relating to public meetings, hearings, and workshops,
167    including penal and remedial provisions, shall apply to public
168    meetings, hearings, and workshops conducted by means of
169    communications media technology, and shall be liberally
170    construed in their application to such public meetings,
171    hearings, and workshops. As used in this subparagraph,
172    "communications media technology" means the electronic
173    transmission of printed matter, audio, full-motion video,
174    freeze-frame video, compressed video, and digital video by any
175    method available.
176          3. Uniform rules of procedure for the filing of notice of
177    protests and formal written protests.
178          4. Uniform rules of procedure for the filing of petitions
179    for administrative hearings pursuant to s. 120.569 or s. 120.57.
180    Such rules shall require the petition toinclude:
181          a. The identification of the petitioner.
182          b. A statement of when and how the petitioner received
183    notice of the agency's action or proposed action.
184          c. An explanation of how the petitioner's substantial
185    interests are or will be affected by the action or proposed
186    action.
187          d. A statement of all material facts disputed by the
188    petitioner or a statement that there are no disputed facts.
189          e. A statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including a
190    statement of the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant
191    reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action.
192          f. A statement of the specific rules or statutes thatthe
193    petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the
194    agency's proposed action and an explanation of how the alleged
195    facts relate to the specific rules or statutes.
196          g. A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner,
197    stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the agency to
198    take with respect to the proposed action.
199          5. Uniform rules of procedure for the filing and prompt
200    disposition of petitions for declaratory statements.
201          6. Provision of a method by which each agency head shall
202    provide a description of the agency's organization and general
203    course of its operations.
204          7. Uniform rules establishing procedures for granting or
205    denying petitions for variances and waivers pursuant to s.
206    120.542.
207          Section 3. Paragraph (e) of subsection (1), paragraph (a)
208    of subsection (3), and paragraph (e) of subsection (4) of
209    section 120.56, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
210          120.56 Challenges to rules.--
211          (1) GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A
212    RULE OR A PROPOSED RULE.--
213          (e) Hearings held under this section shall be de novo in
214    nature. The standard of proof shall be the preponderance of the
215    evidence. Hearings shall beconducted in the same manner as
216    provided by ss. 120.569 and 120.57, except that the
217    administrative law judge's order shall be final agency action.
218    The petitioner and the agency whose rule is challenged shall be
219    adverse parties. Other substantially affected persons may join
220    the proceedings as intervenors on appropriate terms which shall
221    not unduly delay the proceedings. Failure to proceed under this
222    section shall not constitute failure to exhaust administrative
223    remedies.
224          (3) CHALLENGING EXISTING RULES; SPECIAL PROVISIONS.--
225          (a) A substantially affected person may seek an
226    administrative determination of the invalidity of an existing
227    rule at any time during the existence of the rule. The
228    petitioner has a burden of proving by a preponderance of the
229    evidence that the existing rule is an invalid exercise of
230    delegated legislative authority as to the objections raised.
231          (4) CHALLENGING AGENCY STATEMENTS DEFINED AS RULES;
232    SPECIAL PROVISIONS.--
233          (e)1. If, prior to a final hearing to determine whether
234    all or part of any agency statement violates s. 120.54(1)(a), an
235    agency publishes, pursuant to s. 120.54(3)(a), proposed rules
236    that address the statement, then, for purposes of this section,
237    a presumption is created that the agency is acting expeditiously
238    and in good faith to adopt rules that address the statement, and
239    the agency shall be permitted to rely upon the statement or a
240    substantially similar statement as a basis for agency action if
241    the statement meets the requirements of s. 120.57(1)(e).
242          2. If, prior to the final hearing to determine whether all
243    or part of an agency statement violates s. 120.54(1)(a), an
244    agency publishes a notice of rule development that addresses the
245    statement, pursuant to s. 120.54(2), or certifies that such a
246    notice has been transmitted to the Florida Administrative Weekly
247    for publication, then such publication shall constitute good
248    cause for the granting of a stay of the proceedings and a
249    continuance of the final hearing for 30 days. If the agency
250    publishes proposed rules within this 30-day period or any
251    extension of that period granted by an administrative law judge
252    upon showing of good cause, then the administrative law judge
253    shall place the case in abeyance pending the outcome of
254    rulemaking and any proceedings involving challenges to proposed
255    rules pursuant to subsection (2).
256          3. If, following the commencement of the final hearing and
257    prior to entry of a final order that all or part of an agency
258    statement violates s. 120.54(1)(a), ifan agency publishes,
259    pursuant to s. 120.54(3)(a), proposed rules thatwhichaddress
260    the statement and proceeds expeditiously and in good faith to
261    adopt rules thatwhichaddress the statement, the agency shall
262    be permitted to rely upon the statement or a substantially
263    similar statement as a basis for agency action if the statement
264    meets the requirements of s. 120.57(1)(e).
265          4. If an agency fails to adopt rules thatwhichaddress
266    the statement within 180 days after publishing proposed rules,
267    for purposes of this subsection, a presumption is created that
268    the agency is not acting expeditiously and in good faith to
269    adopt rules. If the agency's proposed rules are challenged
270    pursuant to subsection (2), the 180-day period for adoption of
271    rules is tolled until a final order is entered in that
272    proceeding.
273          5. If the proposed rules addressing the challenged
274    statement are determined to be an invalid exercise of delegated
275    legislative authority as defined in s. 120.52(8)(b)-(g), the
276    agency must immediately discontinue reliance on the statement
277    and any substantially similar statement until the rules
278    addressing the subject are properly adopted.
279          Section 4. Paragraph (o) is added to subsection (2) of
280    section 120.569, Florida Statutes, to read:
281          120.569 Decisions which affect substantial interests.--
282          (2)
283          (o) On the request of any party, the administrative law
284    judge shall enter an initial scheduling order to facilitate the
285    just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of the proceeding.
286    The initial scheduling order shall establish a discovery period,
287    including a deadline by which all discovery shall be completed,
288    and the date by which the parties shall identify expert
289    witnesses and their opinions. The initial scheduling order also
290    may require the parties to meet and file a joint report by a
291    date certain.
292          Section 5. Paragraphs (e), (i), and (k) of subsection (1)
293    of section 120.57, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
294          120.57 Additional procedures for particular cases.--
295          (1) ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO HEARINGS INVOLVING
296    DISPUTED ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT.--
297          (e)1. Any agency action that determines the substantial
298    interests of a party and that is based on an unadopted rule is
299    subject to de novo review by an administrative law judge.
300          2. The agency action shall not be presumed valid or
301    invalid. The agency must demonstrate that the unadopted rule:
302          a. Is within the powers, functions, and duties delegated
303    by the Legislature or, if the agency is operating pursuant to
304    authority derived from the State Constitution, is within that
305    authority;
306          b. Does not enlarge, modify, or contravene the specific
307    provisions of law implemented;
308          c. Is not vague, establishes adequate standards for agency
309    decisions, or does not vest unbridled discretion in the agency;
310          d. Is not arbitrary or capricious. A rule is arbitrary if
311    it is not supported by logic or the necessary facts; a rule is
312    capricious if it is adopted without thought or reason or is
313    irrational;
314          e. Is not being applied to the substantially affected
315    party without due notice; and
316          f. Is supported by competent and substantial evidence; and
317          f.g.Does not impose excessive regulatory costs on the
318    regulated person, county, or city.
319          3. The recommended and final orders in any proceeding
320    shall be governed by the provisions of paragraphs (k) and (l),
321    except that the administrative law judge's determination
322    regarding the unadopted rule shall not be rejected by the agency
323    unless the agency first determines from a review of the complete
324    record, and states with particularity in the order, that such
325    determination is clearly erroneous or does not comply with
326    essential requirements of law. In any proceeding for review
327    under s. 120.68, if the court finds that the agency's rejection
328    of the determination regarding the unadopted rule does not
329    comport with the provisions of this subparagraph, the agency
330    action shall be set aside and the court shall award to the
331    prevailing party the reasonable costs and a reasonable
332    attorney's fee for the initial proceeding and the proceeding for
333    review.
334          (i) When, in any proceeding conducted pursuant to this
335    subsection, a dispute of material fact no longer exists, any
336    party may move the administrative law judge to relinquish
337    jurisdiction to the agency. An order relinquishing jurisdiction
338    shall be rendered if the administrative law judge determines
339    fromIn ruling on such a motion, the administrative law judge
340    may considerthe pleadings, depositions, answers to
341    interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with
342    supporting and opposing affidavits, if any, that no genuine
343    issue as to any material fact exists. If the administrative law
344    judge enters an order relinquishing jurisdiction, the agency may
345    promptly conduct a proceeding pursuant to subsection (2), if
346    appropriate, but the parties may not raise any issues of
347    disputed fact that could have been raised before the
348    administrative law judge. An order entered by an administrative
349    law judge relinquishing jurisdiction to the agency based upon a
350    determination that no genuine dispute of material fact exists,
351    need not contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, or a
352    recommended disposition or penalty.
353          (k) The presiding officer shall complete and submit to the
354    agency and all parties a recommended order consisting of
355    findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended
356    disposition or penalty, if applicable, and any other information
357    required by law to be contained in the final order. All
358    proceedings conducted pursuant to this subsection shall be de
359    novo. The agency shall allow each party 15 days in which to
360    submit written exceptions to the recommended order. An agency
361    need not rule on an exception that does not clearly identify the
362    disputed portion of the recommended order by page number or
363    paragraph, that does not identify the legal basis for the
364    exception, or that does not include appropriate and specific
365    citations to the record.
366          Section 6. Paragraphs (c) and (e) of subsection (1) of
367    section 120.595, Florida Statutes, are amended, and subsection
368    (6) is added to said section, to read:
369          120.595 Attorney's fees.--
370          (1) CHALLENGES TO AGENCY ACTION PURSUANT TO SECTION
371    120.57(1).--
372          (c) In proceedings pursuant to s. 120.57(1), and upon
373    motion, the administrative law judge shall determine whether any
374    party participated in the proceeding for an improper purpose as
375    defined by this subsection and s. 120.569(2)(e). In making such
376    determination, the administrative law judge shall consider
377    whether the nonprevailing adverse party has participated in two
378    or more other such proceedings involving the same prevailing
379    party and the same project as an adverse party and in which such
380    two or more proceedings the nonprevailing adverse party did not
381    establish either the factual or legal merits of its position,
382    and shall consider whether the factual or legal position
383    asserted in the instant proceeding would have been cognizable in
384    the previous proceedings. In such event, it shall be rebuttably
385    presumed that the nonprevailing adverse party participated in
386    the pending proceeding for an improper purpose.
387          (e) For the purpose of this subsection:
388          1. "Improper purpose" means participation in a proceeding
389    pursuant to s. 120.57(1) primarily to harass or to cause
390    unnecessary delay or for frivolous purpose or to needlessly
391    increase the cost of litigation, licensing,or securing the
392    approval of an activity.
393          2. "Costs" has the same meaning as the costs allowed in
394    civil actions in this state as provided in chapter 57.
395          3. "Nonprevailing adverse party" means a party that has
396    failed to have substantially changed the outcome of the proposed
397    or final agency action which is the subject of a proceeding. In
398    the event that a proceeding results in any substantial
399    modification or condition intended to resolve the matters raised
400    in a party's petition, it shall be determined that the party
401    having raised the issue addressed is not a nonprevailing adverse
402    party. The recommended order shall state whether the change is
403    substantial for purposes of this subsection. In no event shall
404    the term "nonprevailing party" or "prevailing party" be deemed
405    to include any party that has intervened in a previously
406    existing proceeding to support the position of an agency.
407          (6) OTHER SECTIONS NOT AFFECTED.--Other provisions,
408    including ss. 57.105 and 57.111, authorize the award of
409    attorney’s fees and costs in administrative proceedings. Nothing
410    in this section shall affect the availability of attorney’s fees
411    and costs as provided in those sections.
412          Section 7. Subsection (1) of section 120.60, Florida
413    Statutes, is amended to read:
414          120.60 Licensing.--
415          (1) Upon receipt of an application for a license, an
416    agency shall examine the application and, within 30 days after
417    such receipt, notify the applicant of any apparent errors or
418    omissions and request any additional information the agency is
419    permitted by law to require. An agency shall not deny a license
420    for failure to correct an error or omission or to supply
421    additional information unless the agency timely notified the
422    applicant within this 30-day period. An application shall be
423    considered complete upon receipt of all requested information
424    and correction of any error or omission for which the applicant
425    was timely notified or when the time for such notification has
426    expired. Every application for a license shall be approved or
427    denied within 90 days after receipt of a completed application
428    unless a shorter period of time for agency action is provided by
429    law. The 90-day time period shall be tolled by the initiation of
430    a proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57. AnyAnapplication
431    for a license that is notmust beapproved or denied within the
432    90-day or shorter time period, within 15 days after the
433    conclusion of a public hearing held on the application, or
434    within 45 days after a recommended order is submitted to the
435    agency and the parties, whichever action or timeframe is latest
436    and applicable, is considered approved unless the recommended
437    order recommends that the agency deny the license. Subject to
438    the satisfactory completion of an examination if required as a
439    prerequisite to licensure, any license that is considered
440    approved shall be issued and may include such reasonable
441    conditions as are authorized by law. Any applicant for licensure
442    seeking to claim licensure by default under this subsection
443    shall notify the agency clerk of the licensing agency, in
444    writing, of the intent to rely upon the default license
445    provision of this subsection, and shall not take any action
446    based upon the default license until after receipt of such
447    notice by the agency clerklater. The agency must approve any
448    application for a license or for an examination required for
449    licensure if the agency has not approved or denied the
450    application within the time periods prescribed by this
451    subsection.
452          Section 8. Subsection (9) of section 120.68, Florida
453    Statutes, is amended to read:
454          120.68 Judicial review.--
455          (9) No petition challenging an agency rule as an invalid
456    exercise of delegated legislative authority shall be instituted
457    pursuant to this section, except to review an order entered
458    pursuant to a proceeding under s. 120.56 or an agency’s findings
459    of immediate danger, necessity, and procedural fairness
460    prerequisite to the adoption of an emergency rule pursuant to s.
461    120.54(4), unless the sole issue presented by the petition is
462    the constitutionality of a rule and there are no disputed issues
463    of fact.
464          Section 9. Subsections (5) and (6) of section 57.105,
465    Florida Statutes, are renumbered as subsections (6) and (7),
466    respectively, and a new subsection (5) is added to said section
467    to read:
468          57.105 Attorney's fee; sanctions for raising unsupported
469    claims or defenses; service of motions; damages for delay of
470    litigation.--
471          (5) In administrative proceedings under chapter 120, an
472    administrative law judge shall award a reasonable attorney’s fee
473    and damages to the prevailing party to be paid to the prevailing
474    party in equal amounts by the losing party and the losing
475    party’s attorney or qualified representative in the same manner
476    and upon the same basis as provided in subsections (1)-(4). Such
477    award shall be a final order subject to judicial review pursuant
478    to s. 120.68. If the losing party is an agency as defined in s.
479    120.52(1), the award to the prevailing party shall be against
480    and paid by the agency. A voluntary dismissal by a nonprevailing
481    party does not divest the administrative law judge of
482    jurisdiction to make the award described in this subsection.
483          Section 10. Paragraph (d) of subsection (4) of section
484    57.111, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
485          57.111 Civil actions and administrative proceedings
486    initiated by state agencies; attorneys' fees and costs.--
487          (4)
488          (d) The court, or the administrative law judge in the case
489    of a proceeding under chapter 120, shall promptly conduct an
490    evidentiary hearing on the application for an award of
491    attorney's fees and shall issue a judgment, or a final order in
492    the case of an administrative law judge. The final order of an
493    administrative law judge is reviewable in accordance with the
494    provisions of s. 120.68. If the court affirms the award of
495    attorney's fees and costs in whole or in part, it may, in its
496    discretion, award additional attorney's fees and costs for the
497    appeal.
498          1. No award of attorney's fees and costs shall be made in
499    any case in which the state agency was a nominal party.
500          2. No award of attorney's fees and costs for an action
501    initiated by a state agency shall exceed $50,000$15,000.
502          Section 11. This act shall take effect upon becoming a
503    law.