|
|||
| 1 | CHAMBER ACTION | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | The Committee on Local Government & Veterans' Affairs recommends | ||
| 7 | the following: | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | Committee Substitute | ||
| 10 | Remove the entire bill and insert: | ||
| 11 | A bill to be entitled | ||
| 12 | An act relating to military readiness; amending s. | ||
| 13 | 163.3164, F.S.; defining the term “military | ||
| 14 | installations”; creating s. 163.3175, F.S.; providing | ||
| 15 | legislative findings relating to the compatibility of | ||
| 16 | development with military installations; providing for an | ||
| 17 | exchange of information between certain local governments | ||
| 18 | and military installations; requiring the local government | ||
| 19 | to consider the comments of the commanding officer of a | ||
| 20 | military installation relating to potential adverse | ||
| 21 | effects on the installation which may result from | ||
| 22 | rezonings or changes in land use; amending s. 163.3177, | ||
| 23 | F.S.; providing that an element relating to military | ||
| 24 | readiness is a mandatory element of the comprehensive | ||
| 25 | plans for certain local governments; requiring the local | ||
| 26 | governments to seek advice from individuals who may be | ||
| 27 | affected by this element; providing factors that must be | ||
| 28 | considered in connection with this element; requiring | ||
| 29 | certain local governments to update the military readiness | ||
| 30 | element by June 30, 2004; providing an exemption; amending | ||
| 31 | s. 163.3187, F.S.; exempting from certain restrictions on | ||
| 32 | the adoption of amendments to comprehensive plans an | ||
| 33 | amendment relating to military readiness; providing an | ||
| 34 | effective date. | ||
| 35 | |||
| 36 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: | ||
| 37 | |||
| 38 | Section 1. Subsection (32) is added to section 163.3164, | ||
| 39 | Florida Statutes, to read: | ||
| 40 | 163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land | ||
| 41 | Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act: | ||
| 42 | (32) “Military installation” means a base, camp, post, | ||
| 43 | station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other | ||
| 44 | location under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, | ||
| 45 | including any leased facility. Such term does not include any | ||
| 46 | facility used primarily for civil works, river and harbor | ||
| 47 | projects, or flood control projects. | ||
| 48 | Section 2. Section 163.3175, Florida Statutes, is created | ||
| 49 | to read: | ||
| 50 | 163.3175 Legislative findings on compatibility of | ||
| 51 | development with military installations; exchange of information | ||
| 52 | between local governments and military installations.-- | ||
| 53 | (1) The Legislature finds that incompatible development of | ||
| 54 | land close to a military installation can adversely affect the | ||
| 55 | ability of such an installation to carry out its mission. The | ||
| 56 | Legislature further finds that such development also threatens | ||
| 57 | the public safety because of the possibility of accidents | ||
| 58 | occurring within the areas surrounding a military installation. | ||
| 59 | In addition, the economic health of a community is affected if | ||
| 60 | military operations and missions must relocate because of urban | ||
| 61 | encroachment. Therefore, the Legislature finds it desirable for | ||
| 62 | the local governments in this state to cooperate with military | ||
| 63 | installations to encourage compatible land use, help prevent | ||
| 64 | encroachment, and facilitate the continued presence of major | ||
| 65 | military installations in this state. | ||
| 66 | (2) A county or counties in which a military installation | ||
| 67 | is either wholly or partially located, and those municipalities | ||
| 68 | as determined by the governing bodies of the affected counties | ||
| 69 | and municipalities and the commanding officer whose primary | ||
| 70 | concern is the operation of the military installation, shall | ||
| 71 | transmit to the commanding officer of the military installation | ||
| 72 | information regarding proposed changes in land use or proposed | ||
| 73 | rezonings that would, if approved, affect the density or use of | ||
| 74 | the property that is the subject of the application and is | ||
| 75 | within an area of interest previously identified by the | ||
| 76 | commanding officer. The commanding officer or his or her | ||
| 77 | designee may submit to the local government written comments | ||
| 78 | regarding any adverse effects that the proposed changes or | ||
| 79 | rezonings may have on military installations, operating areas, | ||
| 80 | or ranges, including, but not limited to, the commanding | ||
| 81 | officer's opinion as to whether those proposed changes will | ||
| 82 | violate the safety and noise standards contained in the Air | ||
| 83 | Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) prepared for a military | ||
| 84 | airfield or whether the changes are incompatible with the | ||
| 85 | Installation Environmental Noise Management Program (IENMP) of | ||
| 86 | the United States Army. The commanding officer may provide the | ||
| 87 | state land planning agency with copies of any comments on | ||
| 88 | proposed comprehensive plan changes. The commanding officer is | ||
| 89 | encouraged to include information about any community planning | ||
| 90 | assistance grants that may be available to the local government | ||
| 91 | through the federal Office of Economic Adjustment, as an | ||
| 92 | incentive for communities to participate in a joint planning | ||
| 93 | process that would facilitate the compatibility of community | ||
| 94 | planning and activities vital to the national defense. The local | ||
| 95 | government should take the comments of the commanding officer or | ||
| 96 | his or her designee into consideration when rezoning or making | ||
| 97 | changes in land use. | ||
| 98 | Section 3. Paragraph (l) is added to subsection (6) of | ||
| 99 | section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, to read: | ||
| 100 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive | ||
| 101 | plan; studies and surveys.-- | ||
| 102 | (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)- | ||
| 103 | (5), the comprehensive plan shall include the following | ||
| 104 | elements: | ||
| 105 | (l) For any county or counties in which a military | ||
| 106 | installation is either wholly or partially located and those | ||
| 107 | municipalities as determined by the governing bodies of the | ||
| 108 | affected counties and municipalities and the commanding officer | ||
| 109 | whose primary concern is the operation of the military | ||
| 110 | installation , a military readiness element. In preparing to | ||
| 111 | adopt this element, the local government must seek advice from | ||
| 112 | residents of the county and others who are likely to be affected | ||
| 113 | by the provisions therein, including, but not limited to, | ||
| 114 | builders and developers, conservation groups, representatives of | ||
| 115 | the armed services, and neighborhood groups. | ||
| 116 | 1. The military readiness element must take into | ||
| 117 | consideration how the public health, safety, and welfare is | ||
| 118 | likely to be affected by the proximity of development to | ||
| 119 | military installations, operating areas, and ranges and must | ||
| 120 | make reasonable provision for preserving open space and | ||
| 121 | compatible land uses near a military installation. | ||
| 122 | 2. The military readiness element must also take into | ||
| 123 | consideration the findings of the Department of Defense Joint | ||
| 124 | Land Use Study Program, which promotes incorporating the | ||
| 125 | findings of the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) and | ||
| 126 | of the Installation Environmental Noise Management Program | ||
| 127 | (IENMP, which was formerly the Installation Compatible Use Zone, | ||
| 128 | or ICUZ, program). | ||
| 129 | 3. For each unit of local government as defined in this | ||
| 130 | paragraph, the military readiness element must take into | ||
| 131 | consideration the extent to which the use of land surrounding | ||
| 132 | the airfield is consistent with the safety and noise standards | ||
| 133 | contained in the AICUZ prepared for that military airfield. | ||
| 134 | 4. Each unit of local government as defined in this | ||
| 135 | paragraph is required to update the military readiness element | ||
| 136 | pursuant to this act shall transmit the updated element by June | ||
| 137 | 30, 2004. | ||
| 138 | 5. A local government which, prior to January 1, 2003, has | ||
| 139 | entered into memoranda of understanding with a military | ||
| 140 | installation within the geographic boundaries of the local | ||
| 141 | government which address, at a minimum, employment, emergency | ||
| 142 | preparedness, recreation, law enforcement, mutual aid, and | ||
| 143 | housing and which, prior to September 1, 2003, amends its zoning | ||
| 144 | code to include a representative of the military installation as | ||
| 145 | a member of the local development review committee shall be | ||
| 146 | exempt from the requirement to prepare a military readiness | ||
| 147 | element as a mandatory element of its comprehensive plan but may | ||
| 148 | prepare such an element as an optional element. | ||
| 149 | Section 4. Paragraph (m) is added to subsection (1) of | ||
| 150 | section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, to read: | ||
| 151 | 163.3187 Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.-- | ||
| 152 | (1) Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to | ||
| 153 | this part may be made not more than two times during any | ||
| 154 | calendar year, except: | ||
| 155 | (m) A comprehensive plan amendment relating to military | ||
| 156 | readiness may be made at any time and does not count toward the | ||
| 157 | limitation on the frequency of plan amendments. | ||
| 158 | Section 5. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. | ||