|
|||
| 1 | CHAMBER ACTION | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | The Committee on Commerce recommends the following: | ||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | Committee Substitute | ||
| 9 | Remove the entire bill and insert: | ||
| 10 | A bill to be entitled | ||
| 11 | An act relating to military readiness; creating s. | ||
| 12 | 163.3175, F.S.; providing legislative findings relating to | ||
| 13 | the compatibility of development with military | ||
| 14 | installations; providing for an exchange of information | ||
| 15 | between certain local governments and military | ||
| 16 | installations; requiring the local government to consider | ||
| 17 | the comments of the commanding officer of a military | ||
| 18 | installation relating to potential adverse effects on the | ||
| 19 | installation which may result from rezonings or changes in | ||
| 20 | land use; defining the term “military installation”; | ||
| 21 | amending s. 163.3177, F.S.; providing that an element | ||
| 22 | relating to military readiness is a mandatory element of | ||
| 23 | the comprehensive plan for certain local governments; | ||
| 24 | requiring the local governments to seek advice from | ||
| 25 | individuals who may be affected by this element; providing | ||
| 26 | factors that must be considered in connection with this | ||
| 27 | element; requiring the local governments to submit the | ||
| 28 | military readiness element by June 30, 2004; providing an | ||
| 29 | exemption; amending s. 163.3187, F.S.; exempting from | ||
| 30 | certain restrictions on the adoption of amendments to | ||
| 31 | comprehensive plans an amendment relating to military | ||
| 32 | readiness; providing an effective date. | ||
| 33 | |||
| 34 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: | ||
| 35 | |||
| 36 | Section 1. Section 163.3175, Florida Statutes, is created | ||
| 37 | to read: | ||
| 38 | 163.3175 Legislative findings on compatibility of | ||
| 39 | development with military installations; exchange of information | ||
| 40 | between local governments and military installations.-- | ||
| 41 | (1) The Legislature finds that incompatible development of | ||
| 42 | land close to a military installation can adversely affect the | ||
| 43 | ability of such an installation to carry out its mission. The | ||
| 44 | Legislature further finds that such development also threatens | ||
| 45 | the public safety because of the possibility of accidents | ||
| 46 | occurring within the areas surrounding a military installation. | ||
| 47 | In addition, the economic health of a community is affected if | ||
| 48 | military operations and missions must relocate because of urban | ||
| 49 | encroachment. Therefore, the Legislature finds it desirable for | ||
| 50 | the local governments in the state to cooperate with military | ||
| 51 | installations to encourage compatible land use, help prevent | ||
| 52 | encroachment, and facilitate the continued presence of major | ||
| 53 | military installations in this state. | ||
| 54 | (2) In any county that has a military installation | ||
| 55 | located within or adjacent to its boundaries, each local | ||
| 56 | government, including the county government, must transmit to | ||
| 57 | the commanding officer of the military installation information | ||
| 58 | regarding proposed changes in land use or proposed rezonings | ||
| 59 | that would, if approved, affect the intensity, density, or use | ||
| 60 | of the property that is the subject of the application and is | ||
| 61 | within an area of interest previously identified by the | ||
| 62 | commanding officer. The commanding officer or his or her | ||
| 63 | designee may submit to the local government written comments | ||
| 64 | regarding any adverse effects that the proposed changes or | ||
| 65 | rezonings may have on military installations, operating areas, | ||
| 66 | or ranges, including, but not limited to, the commanding | ||
| 67 | officer's opinion as to whether those proposed changes will | ||
| 68 | violate the safety and noise standards contained in the Air | ||
| 69 | Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) prepared for a military | ||
| 70 | airfield or whether the changes are incompatible with the | ||
| 71 | Installation Environmental Noise Management Program (IENMP) of | ||
| 72 | the United States Army. The commanding officer may provide the | ||
| 73 | state land planning agency with copies of any comments on | ||
| 74 | proposed comprehensive plan changes. The commanding officer is | ||
| 75 | encouraged to include information about any community planning | ||
| 76 | assistance grants that may be available to the local government | ||
| 77 | through the federal Office of Economic Adjustment, as an | ||
| 78 | incentive for communities to participate in a joint planning | ||
| 79 | process that would facilitate the compatibility of community | ||
| 80 | planning and activities vital to the national defense. The local | ||
| 81 | government should take the comments of the commanding officer or | ||
| 82 | his or her designee into consideration when rezoning or making | ||
| 83 | changes in land use. | ||
| 84 | (3) As used in this section, the term “military | ||
| 85 | installation” means a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, | ||
| 86 | homeport facility for any ship, or other location under the | ||
| 87 | jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, including any leased | ||
| 88 | facility. Such term does not include any facility used primarily | ||
| 89 | for civil works, river and harbor projects, or flood control | ||
| 90 | projects. | ||
| 91 | Section 2. Paragraph (l) is added to subsection (6) of | ||
| 92 | section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, to read: | ||
| 93 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive | ||
| 94 | plan; studies and surveys.-- | ||
| 95 | (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)- | ||
| 96 | (5), the comprehensive plan shall include the following | ||
| 97 | elements: | ||
| 98 | (l) For each unit of local government impacted by a | ||
| 99 | military installation within or adjacent to its boundaries, a | ||
| 100 | military readiness element. In preparing to adopt this element, | ||
| 101 | the local government must seek advice from residents of the | ||
| 102 | county and others who are likely to be affected by the | ||
| 103 | provisions therein, including, but not limited to, builders and | ||
| 104 | developers, conservation groups, representatives of the armed | ||
| 105 | services, and neighborhood groups. | ||
| 106 | 1. The military readiness element must take into | ||
| 107 | consideration how the public health, safety, and welfare is | ||
| 108 | likely to be affected by the proximity of development to | ||
| 109 | military installations, operating areas, and ranges and must | ||
| 110 | make reasonable provision for preserving open space and | ||
| 111 | compatible land uses near a military installation. | ||
| 112 | 2. The military readiness element must also take into | ||
| 113 | consideration the findings of the Department of Defense Joint | ||
| 114 | Land Use Study Program, which promotes incorporating the | ||
| 115 | findings of the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) and | ||
| 116 | the Installation Environmental Noise Management Program (IENMP). | ||
| 117 | 3. In counties that contain or border on a military | ||
| 118 | airfield, the military readiness element must take into | ||
| 119 | consideration the extent to which the use of land surrounding | ||
| 120 | the airfield is consistent with the safety and noise standards | ||
| 121 | contained in the AICUZ prepared for that military airfield. | ||
| 122 | 4. A local government is required to submit to the state | ||
| 123 | land planning agency the military readiness element by June 30, | ||
| 124 | 2004 and may update the element as provided for in s. | ||
| 125 | 163.3187(1)(m). | ||
| 126 | 5. A local government which, prior to January 1, 2003, has | ||
| 127 | entered into any memoranda of understanding with any military | ||
| 128 | installation which address, at a minimum, employment, emergency | ||
| 129 | preparedness, recreation, law enforcement, mutual aid, and | ||
| 130 | housing and which, prior to September 1, 2003, amends its zoning | ||
| 131 | code to include a representative of the military installation as | ||
| 132 | a member of the local development review committee, shall be | ||
| 133 | exempt from the requirement to prepare a military readiness | ||
| 134 | element as a mandatory element of its comprehensive plan but may | ||
| 135 | prepare such an element as an optional element. This exemption | ||
| 136 | shall remain effective so long as a representative of the | ||
| 137 | military installation remains a member of the local development | ||
| 138 | review committee and such memoranda of understanding or | ||
| 139 | extensions thereof or successor memoranda remain effective. | ||
| 140 | Section 3. Paragraph (m) is added to subsection (1) of | ||
| 141 | section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, to read: | ||
| 142 | 163.3187 Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.-- | ||
| 143 | (1) Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to | ||
| 144 | this part may be made not more than two times during any | ||
| 145 | calendar year, except: | ||
| 146 | (m) A comprehensive plan amendment relating to military | ||
| 147 | readiness may be made at any time and does not count toward the | ||
| 148 | limitation on the frequency of plan amendments. | ||
| 149 | Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. | ||