|
|
|
1
|
CHAMBER ACTION |
2
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
The Committee on Commerce recommends the following: |
7
|
|
8
|
Committee Substitute |
9
|
Remove the entire bill and insert: |
10
|
A bill to be entitled |
11
|
An act relating to military readiness; creating s. |
12
|
163.3175, F.S.; providing legislative findings relating to |
13
|
the compatibility of development with military |
14
|
installations; providing for an exchange of information |
15
|
between certain local governments and military |
16
|
installations; requiring the local government to consider |
17
|
the comments of the commanding officer of a military |
18
|
installation relating to potential adverse effects on the |
19
|
installation which may result from rezonings or changes in |
20
|
land use; defining the term “military installation”; |
21
|
amending s. 163.3177, F.S.; providing that an element |
22
|
relating to military readiness is a mandatory element of |
23
|
the comprehensive plan for certain local governments; |
24
|
requiring the local governments to seek advice from |
25
|
individuals who may be affected by this element; providing |
26
|
factors that must be considered in connection with this |
27
|
element; requiring the local governments to submit the |
28
|
military readiness element by June 30, 2004; providing an |
29
|
exemption; amending s. 163.3187, F.S.; exempting from |
30
|
certain restrictions on the adoption of amendments to |
31
|
comprehensive plans an amendment relating to military |
32
|
readiness; providing an effective date. |
33
|
|
34
|
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
35
|
|
36
|
Section 1. Section 163.3175, Florida Statutes, is created |
37
|
to read: |
38
|
163.3175 Legislative findings on compatibility of |
39
|
development with military installations; exchange of information |
40
|
between local governments and military installations.--
|
41
|
(1) The Legislature finds that incompatible development of |
42
|
land close to a military installation can adversely affect the |
43
|
ability of such an installation to carry out its mission. The |
44
|
Legislature further finds that such development also threatens |
45
|
the public safety because of the possibility of accidents |
46
|
occurring within the areas surrounding a military installation. |
47
|
In addition, the economic health of a community is affected if |
48
|
military operations and missions must relocate because of urban |
49
|
encroachment. Therefore, the Legislature finds it desirable for |
50
|
the local governments in the state to cooperate with military |
51
|
installations to encourage compatible land use, help prevent |
52
|
encroachment, and facilitate the continued presence of major |
53
|
military installations in this state.
|
54
|
(2) In any county that has a military installation
|
55
|
located within or adjacent to its boundaries, each local
|
56
|
government, including the county government, must transmit to |
57
|
the commanding officer of the military installation information |
58
|
regarding proposed changes in land use or proposed rezonings |
59
|
that would, if approved, affect the intensity, density, or use |
60
|
of the property that is the subject of the application and is |
61
|
within an area of interest previously identified by the |
62
|
commanding officer. The commanding officer or his or her |
63
|
designee may submit to the local government written comments |
64
|
regarding any adverse effects that the proposed changes or |
65
|
rezonings may have on military installations, operating areas, |
66
|
or ranges, including, but not limited to, the commanding |
67
|
officer's opinion as to whether those proposed changes will |
68
|
violate the safety and noise standards contained in the Air |
69
|
Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) prepared for a military |
70
|
airfield or whether the changes are incompatible with the |
71
|
Installation Environmental Noise Management Program (IENMP) of |
72
|
the United States Army. The commanding officer may provide the |
73
|
state land planning agency with copies of any comments on |
74
|
proposed comprehensive plan changes. The commanding officer is |
75
|
encouraged to include information about any community planning |
76
|
assistance grants that may be available to the local government |
77
|
through the federal Office of Economic Adjustment, as an |
78
|
incentive for communities to participate in a joint planning |
79
|
process that would facilitate the compatibility of community |
80
|
planning and activities vital to the national defense. The local |
81
|
government should take the comments of the commanding officer or |
82
|
his or her designee into consideration when rezoning or making |
83
|
changes in land use.
|
84
|
(3) As used in this section, the term “military |
85
|
installation” means a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, |
86
|
homeport facility for any ship, or other location under the |
87
|
jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, including any leased |
88
|
facility. Such term does not include any facility used primarily |
89
|
for civil works, river and harbor projects, or flood control |
90
|
projects. |
91
|
Section 2. Paragraph (l) is added to subsection (6) of |
92
|
section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, to read: |
93
|
163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
94
|
plan; studies and surveys.-- |
95
|
(6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)- |
96
|
(5), the comprehensive plan shall include the following |
97
|
elements: |
98
|
(l) For each unit of local government impacted by a
|
99
|
military installation within or adjacent to its boundaries, a |
100
|
military readiness element. In preparing to adopt this element, |
101
|
the local government must seek advice from residents of the |
102
|
county and others who are likely to be affected by the |
103
|
provisions therein, including, but not limited to, builders and |
104
|
developers, conservation groups, representatives of the armed |
105
|
services, and neighborhood groups.
|
106
|
1. The military readiness element must take into |
107
|
consideration how the public health, safety, and welfare is |
108
|
likely to be affected by the proximity of development to |
109
|
military installations, operating areas, and ranges and must |
110
|
make reasonable provision for preserving open space and |
111
|
compatible land uses near a military installation.
|
112
|
2. The military readiness element must also take into |
113
|
consideration the findings of the Department of Defense Joint |
114
|
Land Use Study Program, which promotes incorporating the |
115
|
findings of the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) and |
116
|
the Installation Environmental Noise Management Program (IENMP).
|
117
|
3. In counties that contain or border on a military
|
118
|
airfield, the military readiness element must take into |
119
|
consideration the extent to which the use of land surrounding |
120
|
the airfield is consistent with the safety and noise standards |
121
|
contained in the AICUZ prepared for that military airfield.
|
122
|
4. A local government is required to submit to the state |
123
|
land planning agency the military readiness element by June 30, |
124
|
2004 and may update the element as provided for in s. |
125
|
163.3187(1)(m).
|
126
|
5. A local government which, prior to January 1, 2003, has |
127
|
entered into any memoranda of understanding with any military |
128
|
installation which address, at a minimum, employment, emergency |
129
|
preparedness, recreation, law enforcement, mutual aid, and |
130
|
housing and which, prior to September 1, 2003, amends its zoning |
131
|
code to include a representative of the military installation as |
132
|
a member of the local development review committee, shall be |
133
|
exempt from the requirement to prepare a military readiness |
134
|
element as a mandatory element of its comprehensive plan but may |
135
|
prepare such an element as an optional element. This exemption |
136
|
shall remain effective so long as a representative of the |
137
|
military installation remains a member of the local development |
138
|
review committee and such memoranda of understanding or |
139
|
extensions thereof or successor memoranda remain effective.
|
140
|
Section 3. Paragraph (m) is added to subsection (1) of |
141
|
section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, to read: |
142
|
163.3187 Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.-- |
143
|
(1) Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to |
144
|
this part may be made not more than two times during any |
145
|
calendar year, except: |
146
|
(m) A comprehensive plan amendment relating to military |
147
|
readiness may be made at any time and does not count toward the |
148
|
limitation on the frequency of plan amendments.
|
149
|
Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |