|
|
|
1
|
CHAMBER ACTION |
2
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
The Committee on Education K-20 recommends the following: |
7
|
|
8
|
Committee Substitute |
9
|
Remove the entire bill and insert: |
10
|
A bill to be entitled |
11
|
An act relating to K-20 education accountability; amending |
12
|
s. 1008.31, F.S.; expanding legislative intent for the |
13
|
K-20 education performance accountability system; |
14
|
providing requirements and an implementation schedule for |
15
|
performance-based funding; providing mission, goals, and |
16
|
measures; requiring collection of certain data; requiring |
17
|
the State Board of Education to conduct an assessment |
18
|
study; authorizing adoption of equivalent scores for |
19
|
purpose of graduation; providing an effective date. |
20
|
|
21
|
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
22
|
|
23
|
Section 1. Section 1008.31, Florida Statutes, is amended |
24
|
to read: |
25
|
1008.31 Florida's K-20 education performance |
26
|
accountability system; legislative intent; performance-based |
27
|
funding; mission, goals, and systemwide measures.-- |
28
|
(1) LEGISLATIVE INTENT.--It is the intent of the |
29
|
Legislature that: |
30
|
(a) The performance accountability system implemented to |
31
|
assess the effectiveness of Florida's seamless K-20 education |
32
|
delivery system provide answers to the following questions in |
33
|
relation to its mission and goals: |
34
|
1. What is the public receiving in return for funds it |
35
|
invests in education? |
36
|
2. How effectively is Florida's K-20 education system |
37
|
educating its students? |
38
|
3. How effectively are the major delivery sectors |
39
|
promoting student achievement? |
40
|
4. How are individual schools and postsecondary education |
41
|
institutions performing their responsibility to educate their |
42
|
students as measured by how students are performing and how much |
43
|
they are learning? |
44
|
(b) The K-20 education performance accountability system |
45
|
be established as a single, unified accountability system with |
46
|
multiple components, including, but not limited to, measures of |
47
|
adequate yearly progress, individual student learning gains in |
48
|
public schools, school grades, and return on investment.
|
49
|
(c) The K-20 education performance accountability system |
50
|
comply with the accountability requirements of the “No Child |
51
|
Left Behind Act of 2001,” PL 107-110.
|
52
|
(d)(b)The State Board of Education recommend to the |
53
|
Legislature systemwide performance standards; the Legislature |
54
|
establish systemwide performance measures and standards; and the |
55
|
systemwide measures and standards provide Floridians with |
56
|
information on what the public is receiving in return for the |
57
|
funds it invests in education and how well the K-20 system |
58
|
educates its students. |
59
|
(e)(c)The State Board of Education establish performance |
60
|
measures and set performance standards for individual components |
61
|
of the public education system, including individual schools and |
62
|
postsecondary educational institutions, with measures and |
63
|
standards based primarily on student achievement. |
64
|
(2) PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING.-- |
65
|
(a) The State Board of Education shall cooperate with the |
66
|
Commissioner of Education andeach delivery system to develop |
67
|
proposals for performance-based funding, using performance |
68
|
measures adopted pursuant to this sectionestablished by the |
69
|
Legislature. |
70
|
(b) The State Board of Educationproposals must provide |
71
|
that at least 10 percent of the state funds appropriated for the |
72
|
K-20 education system are conditional upon meeting or exceeding |
73
|
established performance standards. The State Board of Education |
74
|
must submit the recommendations to the Legislature in the |
75
|
following sequence: |
76
|
(a) By December 1, 2002, recommendations for state |
77
|
universities, for consideration by the 2003 Legislature and |
78
|
implementation in the 2003-2004 fiscal year.
|
79
|
(b) By December 1, 2003, recommendations for public |
80
|
schools and workforce education, for consideration by the 2004 |
81
|
Legislature and implementation in the 2004-2005 fiscal year.
|
82
|
(c) By December 1, 2004, recommendations for community |
83
|
colleges, for consideration by the 2005 Legislature and |
84
|
implementation in the 2005-2006 fiscal year.
|
85
|
(d) By December 1, 2005, recommendations for all other |
86
|
programs that receive state funds within the Department of |
87
|
Education.
|
88
|
(c) The State Board of Education shall adopt guidelines |
89
|
required to implement performance-based funding that allow 1 |
90
|
year to demonstrate achievement of specified performance |
91
|
standards prior to a reduction in appropriations pursuant to |
92
|
this section.
|
93
|
(d) By December 1, 2003, the State Board of Education |
94
|
shall adopt common definitions, measures, standards, and |
95
|
performance improvement targets required to:
|
96
|
1. Use the state core measures and the sector-specific |
97
|
measures to evaluate the progress of each sector of the |
98
|
educational delivery system toward meeting the systemwide goals |
99
|
for public education.
|
100
|
2. Notify the sectors of their progress in achieving the |
101
|
specified measures so that they may develop improvement plans |
102
|
that directly influence decisions about policy, program |
103
|
development, and management.
|
104
|
3. Implement the performance-based budgeting system |
105
|
described in this section.
|
106
|
(e) During the 2003-2004 fiscal year, the Department of |
107
|
Education shall collect data required to establish progress, |
108
|
rewards, and sanctions.
|
109
|
(f) By December 1, 2004, the Department of Education shall |
110
|
recommend to the Legislature a formula for performance-based |
111
|
funding that applies accountability standards for the individual |
112
|
components of the public education system at every level, |
113
|
kindergarten through graduate school. Effective for the 2004- |
114
|
2005 fiscal year and thereafter, subject to annual legislative |
115
|
approval in the General Appropriations Act, performance-based |
116
|
funds shall be allocated based on the progress, rewards, and |
117
|
sanctions established pursuant to this section.
|
118
|
(3) MISSION, GOALS, AND SYSTEMWIDE MEASURES.-- |
119
|
(a)The mission of Florida's K-20 education system shall |
120
|
be to increase the proficiency of all students within one |
121
|
seamless, efficient system, by allowing them the opportunity to |
122
|
expand their knowledge and skills through learning opportunities |
123
|
and research valued by students, parents, and communities.
|
124
|
(b The State Board of Education shall adopt guiding |
125
|
principles for establishing state and sector-specific standards |
126
|
and measures.
|
127
|
(c) The State Board of Education shall, and tomaintain an |
128
|
accountability system that measures student progress toward the |
129
|
following goals: |
130
|
1.(a)Highest student achievement, as measured by: student |
131
|
FCAT performance and annual learning gains; the number and |
132
|
percentage of schools that improve at least one school |
133
|
performance grade designation or maintain a school performance |
134
|
grade designation of "A" pursuant to s. 1008.34; graduation or |
135
|
completion rates at all learning levels; and other measures |
136
|
identified in law or rule. |
137
|
2.(b)Seamless articulation and maximum access, as |
138
|
measured by: the percentage of students who demonstrate |
139
|
readiness for the educational level they are entering, from |
140
|
kindergarten through postsecondary education and into the |
141
|
workforce; the number and percentage of students needing |
142
|
remediation; the percentage of Floridians who complete |
143
|
associate, baccalaureate, graduate,professional, and |
144
|
postgraduate degrees; the number and percentage of credits that |
145
|
articulate; the extent to which each set of exit-point |
146
|
requirements matches the next set of entrance-point |
147
|
requirements; the degree to which underserved populations access |
148
|
educational opportunity; the extent to which access is provided |
149
|
through innovative educational delivery strategies;and other |
150
|
measures identified in law or rule. |
151
|
3.(c)Skilled workforce and economic development, as |
152
|
measured by: the number and percentage of graduates employed in |
153
|
their areas of preparation; the percentage of Floridians with |
154
|
high school diplomas and postsecondary education credentials; |
155
|
the percentage of business and community members who find that |
156
|
Florida's graduates possess the skills they need; national |
157
|
rankings;and other measures identified in law or rule. |
158
|
4.(d)Quality efficient services, as measured by: cost per |
159
|
completer or graduate; average cost per noncompleter at each |
160
|
educational level; cost disparity across institutions offering |
161
|
the same degrees; the percentage of education customers at each |
162
|
educational level who are satisfied with the education provided; |
163
|
and other measures identified in law or rule. |
164
|
(4) SYSTEMWIDE DATA COLLECTION.--School districts and |
165
|
public postsecondary educational institutions shall maintain |
166
|
information systems that will provide the State Board of |
167
|
Education and the Legislature with information and reports |
168
|
necessary to address the specifications of the accountability |
169
|
system. The State Board of Education shall determine the |
170
|
standards for the required data. Theat alevel of |
171
|
comprehensiveness and quality shall beno less than that which |
172
|
was available as of June 30, 2001. |
173
|
Section 2. The State Board of Education shall conduct a |
174
|
concordance study to determine if crosswalk scores can be |
175
|
determined to be equivalent to those required on the Florida |
176
|
Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) for high school graduation. |
177
|
At a minimum, the state board shall analyze the PSAT, PLAN, SAT, |
178
|
ACT, and the College Placement Test to determine if equivalent |
179
|
scores can be determined. In cases where such equivalencies can |
180
|
be determined, the state board is authorized to adopt those |
181
|
scores as meeting the graduation requirement in lieu of the FCAT |
182
|
passing score. Each time the score is changed, new equivalencies |
183
|
must be determined. This provision shall take effect for |
184
|
students who are eligible to graduate in the 2003-2004 academic |
185
|
year and thereafter.
|
186
|
Section 3. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |
187
|
|