HB 0929

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act for the relief of Cindy Haider, wife of Jeffrey
3Haider, deceased, Alan Haider, adult dependent child of
4Jeffrey Haider, deceased, Max Haider, adult child of
5Jeffrey Haider, deceased, Jonathan Haider, adult child of
6Jeffrey Haider, deceased, and Jessica Haider, adult child
7of Jeffrey Haider, deceased, by the South Broward Hospital
8District; providing for an appropriation to compensate
9them for injuries and damages sustained as a result of the
10negligence of the South Broward Hospital District;
11providing for the establishment of trusts and requirements
12with respect thereto; providing for attorney's fees and
13costs; providing an effective date.
14
15     WHEREAS, in May 2000, Jeffrey Haider, a 45-year-old man,
16began experiencing headaches, vomiting, fatigue, dizziness, and
17behavioral changes such as difficulty concentrating and
18confusion, and
19     WHEREAS, as a result of these symptoms, Jeffrey Haider saw
20several health care providers over a period of several weeks,
21and
22     WHEREAS, an MRI of Jeffrey Haider was taken on May 31,
232000, and
24     WHEREAS, a radiologist and a neurologist determined that
25Jeffrey Haider had a large mass within the right temporal lobe
26which was 7 x 5 centimeters in size, and
27     WHEREAS, the mass was diagnosed as a brain tumor and
28Jeffrey Haider was referred to a neurosurgeon, and
29     WHEREAS, the neurosurgeon who examined Jeffrey Haider
30agreed that the patient had a right temporal lobe tumor and
31recommended a craniotomy for resection of the tumor, and
32     WHEREAS, the procedure was performed on June 5, 2000, and
33once the incisions in the area of the middle cerebral artery
34were made, massive bleeding occurred, with blood gushing out of
35Jeffrey Haider's incisions under pulsating pressure, and
36     WHEREAS, at this point the neurosurgeon realized that the
37diagnosis of a tumor was incorrect and that Jeffrey Haider had
38an aneurysm, and
39     WHEREAS, in fact, the neurosurgeon notes in his operative
40report that "at this point, we felt that this probably was an
41aneurysm. I brought in the radiologist who felt that, in
42retrospect, this was a possibility," and
43     WHEREAS, an aneurysm is a permanent, abnormally blood-
44filled dilation of a blood vessel, usually resulting from the
45disease of a vessel wall, and it is common medical knowledge
46that puncturing an aneurysm is the incorrect treatment for a
47cerebral aneurysm, and
48     WHEREAS, the surgeon and the radiologist then summoned an
49interventional radiologist who performed an angiogram, a
50procedure that should have been ordered prior to the operation,
51and
52     WHEREAS, the intraoperative angiogram revealed a giant
53aneurysm filling from the right middle cerebral artery, and
54     WHEREAS, in an instance of further negligence on the part
55of the South Broward Hospital District, the neurosurgeon did not
56repair Jeffrey Haider's middle cerebral artery, but instead
57controlled the bleeding from the aneurysm for about 45 minutes
58and then closed the dura and the skull, and then sent Jeffrey
59Haider to the intensive care unit "with the idea of reoperating
60at a later time," and
61     WHEREAS, however, within hours, Jeffrey Haider was
62exhibiting dangerous neurological symptoms and was in need of
63immediate repair of the aneurysm, and
64     WHEREAS, on June 6, 2000, the repair surgery was commenced,
65and
66     WHEREAS, when Jeffrey Haider's skull was reopened the brain
67was noted to be "extremely swollen" and the "aneurysm was
68causing tremendous pressure on the brain and herniating through
69the craniotomy," and
70     WHEREAS, at that point the neurosurgeon compounded Jeffrey
71Haider's condition by tearing off the M1 artery from the
72junction of the aneurysm and the M2 artery so that he was unable
73to perform an anastomosis to repair and join the arteries, and
74     WHEREAS, Dr. Rodriquez, the neurosurgeon, states in his
75operative report that "the larger M2 (artery), and even the
76other one, were essentially on the aneurysm bulbous dilation and
77I could not bring them together to do an anastomosis," and
78     WHEREAS, Jeffrey Haider and his family suffered
79astronomical economic and noneconomic damages as a result of the
80treatment he received from the South Broward Hospital District,
81and
82     WHEREAS, Jeffrey Haider was in a chronic vegetative state
83and required 7-day-a-week, around-the-clock care until his death
84on January 1, 2004, NOW, THEREFORE,
85
86Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
87
88     Section 1.  The facts stated in the preamble to this act
89are found and declared to be true.
90     Section 2.  The South Broward Hospital District is
91authorized and directed to appropriate from funds of the
92district not otherwise appropriated and to draw a warrant in
93favor of Cindy Haider, wife of Jeffrey Haider, deceased; Alan
94Haider, adult dependent child of Jeffrey Haider, deceased; Max
95Haider, adult child of Jeffrey Haider, deceased; Jonathan
96Haider, adult child of Jeffrey Haider, deceased; and Jessica
97Haider, adult child of Jeffrey Haider, deceased, in the sum of
98$3,800,000 plus liquidated interest of $46,437 for a total of
99$3,846,437, as agreed to by the claimants and the district, as
100compensation for injuries and damages sustained as a result of
101the negligence of employees of the South Broward Hospital
102District. After payment of costs and attorney's fees as limited
103by section 768.28(8), Florida Statutes, payments shall be
104distributed as follows:
105     (1)  Sixty percent to be paid to Cindy Haider.
106     (2)  Ten percent to be paid to the trust account
107established for Alan Haider pursuant to section 3.
108     (3)  Ten percent to be paid to the trust account
109established for Max Haider pursuant to section 3.
110     (4)  Ten percent to be paid to the trust account
111established for Jonathan Haider pursuant to section 3.
112     (5)  Ten percent to be paid to the trust account
113established for Jessica Haider pursuant to section 3.
114     Section 3.  Alan Haider, Max Haider, Jonathan Haider,
115Jessica Haider, and their respective attorneys shall be
116required, as a condition of payment under section 2, to nominate
117either a financial institution doing business in Florida or an
118independent individual who is not related to the claimants by
119either blood, marriage, or contract and who possesses financial
120and trust management experience to act as a trustee for an
121irrevocable inter vivos trust established for the benefit of
122each respective claimant. The proceeds to be paid to Alan
123Haider, Max Haider, Jonathan Haider, and Jessica Haider pursuant
124to section 2 shall be placed in separate irrevocable inter vivos
125trusts, to be used solely for the health care, support,
126maintenance, and education of each respective claimant until the
127claimant is 30 years of age. The trustee must take into
128consideration any other resources and income of the beneficiary
129of a trust before disbursing any funds from the trust to the
130beneficiary.
131     Section 4.  This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.