HB 1181

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act relating to alimony; amending s. 61.14, F.S.;
3authorizing a court to reduce or terminate an award of
4alimony if there is proof by a preponderance of the
5evidence that the obligee is in a de facto marriage with a
6person of the opposite sex outside of the legal bond of
7matrimony; prescribing factors to be considered by the
8court; providing construction; providing an effective
9date.
10
11Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
12
13     Section 1.  Subsection (1) of section 61.14, Florida
14Statutes, is amended to read:
15     61.14  Enforcement and modification of support,
16maintenance, or alimony agreements or orders.--
17     (1)(a)  When the parties enter into an agreement for
18payments for, or instead of, support, maintenance, or alimony,
19whether in connection with a proceeding for dissolution or
20separate maintenance or with any voluntary property settlement,
21or when a party is required by court order to make any payments,
22and the circumstances or the financial ability of either party
23changes or the child who is a beneficiary of an agreement or
24court order as described herein reaches majority after the
25execution of the agreement or the rendition of the order, either
26party may apply to the circuit court of the circuit in which the
27parties, or either of them, resided at the date of the execution
28of the agreement or reside at the date of the application, or in
29which the agreement was executed or in which the order was
30rendered, for an order decreasing or increasing the amount of
31support, maintenance, or alimony, and the court has jurisdiction
32to make orders as equity requires, with due regard to the
33changed circumstances or the financial ability of the parties or
34the child, decreasing, increasing, or confirming the amount of
35separate support, maintenance, or alimony provided for in the
36agreement or order.  A finding that medical insurance is
37reasonably available or the child support guidelines in s. 61.30
38may constitute changed circumstances. Except as otherwise
39provided in s. 61.30(11)(c), the court may modify an order of
40support, maintenance, or alimony by increasing or decreasing the
41support, maintenance, or alimony retroactively to the date of
42the filing of the action or supplemental action for modification
43as equity requires, giving due regard to the changed
44circumstances or the financial ability of the parties or the
45child.
46     (b)1.  The court may reduce or terminate an award of
47alimony upon specific written findings by the court that since
48the granting of a divorce and the award of alimony a de facto
49marriage has existed between the obligee and a person of the
50opposite sex. On the issue of whether alimony should be reduced
51or terminated under this paragraph, the burden is on the obligor
52to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a de facto
53marriage exists.
54     2.  In determining whether an existing award of alimony
55should be reduced or terminated because of an alleged de facto
56marriage between an obligee and a person of the opposite sex,
57the court shall elicit the nature and extent of the relationship
58in question. The court shall give consideration, without
59limitation, to circumstances, including, but not limited to, the
60following, in determining the relationship of an obligee to
61another person:
62     a.  The extent to which the obligee and the other person
63have held themselves out as a married couple by engaging in
64conduct such as using the same last name, using a common mailing
65address, referring to each other in terms such as "my husband"
66or "my wife," or otherwise conducting themselves in a manner
67that evidences a stable marriage-like relationship.
68     b.  The period of time that the obligee has resided with
69another person not related by consanguinity or affinity in a
70permanent place of abode.
71     c.  The duration and circumstances under which the obligee
72has maintained a continuing conjugal relationship with the other
73person.
74     d.  The extent to which the obligee and the other person
75have pooled their assets or income or otherwise exhibited
76financial interdependence.
77     e.  The extent to which the obligee or the other person has
78supported the other, in whole or in part.
79     f.  The extent to which the obligee or the other person has
80performed valuable services for the other.
81     g.  The extent to which the obligee or the other person has
82performed valuable services for the other's company or employer.
83     h.  Whether the obligee and the other person have worked
84together to create or enhance anything of value.
85     i.  Whether the obligee and the other person have jointly
86contributed to the purchase of any real or personal property.
87     j.  Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the
88other person have an express agreement regarding property
89sharing or support.
90     k.  Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the
91other person have an implied agreement regarding property
92sharing or support.
93     3.  This paragraph does not abrogate the requirement that
94every marriage in this state be solemnized under a license and
95does not recognize a common law marriage as valid.
96     (c)(b)  For each support order reviewed by the department
97as required by s. 409.2564(12), if the amount of the child
98support award under the order differs by at least 10 percent but
99not less than $25 from the amount that would be awarded under s.
10061.30, the department shall seek to have the order modified and
101any modification shall be made without a requirement for proof
102or showing of a change in circumstances.
103     (d)(c)  The department shall have authority to adopt rules
104to implement this section.
105     Section 2.  This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.