HB 1931

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act relating to negligence; creating s. 768.0755, F.S.;
3providing that a person seeking damages for a slip and
4fall on a transitory foreign substance in a commercial
5establishment must prove that the commercial establishment
6had actual knowledge of the condition or constructive
7knowledge of the condition; defining "constructive
8knowledge"; providing that constructive knowledge may be
9proven by circumstantial evidence; amending s. 768.81,
10F.S.; redefining the term "negligence cases" as it relates
11to comparative fault to include claims for negligent
12security in which the defendant is sued for failing to
13prevent the commission of an intentional tort; providing
14that the apportionment of damages does not apply to any
15action in which an intentional tortfeasor is sued and
16seeks to apportion fault to a negligent tortfeasor;
17repealing s. 768.0710, F.S., relating to the duty to
18maintain premises in a reasonably safe condition for the
19safety of business invitees; reenacting s. 25.077, F.S.,
20relating to the duty of the clerk of court to report
21certain information concerning negligence cases, to
22incorporate the amendment made to s. 768.81, F.S., in a
23reference thereto; providing an effective date.
24
25Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
26
27     Section 1.  Section 768.0775, Florida Statutes, is created
28to read:
29     768.0775  Premises liability for transitory foreign
30substances in a commercial establishment.--If a person slips and
31falls on a transitory foreign substance in a commercial
32establishment, the injured person must prove that the commercial
33establishment had actual knowledge of the dangerous condition or
34had constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition in that
35the condition existed for a sufficient length of time that, in
36the exercise of ordinary care, the commercial establishment
37should have known of the dangerous condition and taken action to
38remedy it. Constructive knowledge may be proven by
39circumstantial evidence showing that:
40     (1)  The dangerous condition existed for such a length of
41time that in the exercise of ordinary care, the commercial
42establishment should have known of the condition; or
43     (2)  The condition occurred with regularity and was
44therefore foreseeable.
45     Section 2.  Subsection (4) of section 768.81, Florida
46Statutes, is amended to read:
47     768.81  Comparative fault.--
48     (4)  APPLICABILITY.--
49     (a)  This section applies to negligence cases. For purposes
50of this section, the term "negligence cases" includes, but is
51not limited to, civil actions for damages based upon theories of
52negligence, including negligent security resulting in the
53commission of an intentional tort or criminal act; strict
54liability;, products liability;, professional malpractice
55whether couched in terms of contract or tort;, or breach of
56warranty and like theories. In determining whether a case falls
57within the term "negligence cases," the court shall look to the
58substance of the action and not the conclusory terms used by the
59parties.
60     (b)  This section does not apply to any action brought by
61any person to recover actual economic damages resulting from
62pollution, to any action in which an intentional tortfeasor
63seeks to apportion fault to a negligent tortfeasor based upon an
64intentional tort, or to any cause of action as to which
65application of the doctrine of joint and several liability is
66specifically provided by chapter 403, chapter 498, chapter 517,
67chapter 542, or chapter 895.
68     Section 3.  Section 768.0710, Florida Statutes, is
69repealed.
70     Section 4.  For the purpose of incorporating the amendment
71to section 768.81, Florida Statutes, in a reference thereto,
72section 25.077, Florida Statutes, is reenacted to read:
73     25.077  Negligence case settlements and jury verdicts; case
74reporting.--Through the state's uniform case reporting system,
75the clerk of court shall report to the Office of the State
76Courts Administrator, beginning in 2003, information from each
77settlement or jury verdict and final judgment in negligence
78cases as defined in s. 768.81(4), as the President of the Senate
79and the Speaker of the House of Representatives deem necessary
80from time to time. The information shall include, but need not
81be limited to: the name of each plaintiff and defendant; the
82verdict; the percentage of fault of each; the amount of economic
83damages and noneconomic damages awarded to each plaintiff,
84identifying those damages that are to be paid jointly and
85severally and by which defendants; and the amount of any
86punitive damages to be paid by each defendant.
87     Section 5.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2005.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.