HB 0349CS

CHAMBER ACTION




1The State Administration Council recommends the following:
2
3     Council/Committee Substitute
4     Remove the entire bill and insert:
5
A bill to be entitled
6An act relating to auditor selection procedures; amending
7s. 218.391, F.S.; revising the auditor selection
8procedures that local governmental entities, district
9school boards, charter schools, and charter technical
10career centers must use in selecting auditors to conduct
11certain required financial audits; revising provisions
12relating to membership, purposes, and duties of audit
13committees required to be established to aid in such
14selection; providing for requests for proposals; providing
15review and ranking requirements; requiring written
16contracts and providing requirements therefor, including
17renewal requirements; providing an effective date.
18
19Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
20
21     Section 1.  Section 218.391, Florida Statutes, is amended
22to read:
23     218.391  Auditor selection procedures.--
24     (1)  Each local governmental entity, district school board,
25charter school, or charter technical career center, prior to
26entering into a written contract pursuant to subsection (7),
27except as provided in subsection (8), shall use auditor
28selection procedures when selecting an auditor to conduct the
29annual financial audit required in s. 218.39.
30     (2)  The governing body of a charter county, municipality,
31special district, district school board, charter school, or
32charter technical career center shall establish an audit auditor
33selection committee and auditor selection procedures or use the
34procedures outlined in subsection (3). Each noncharter county
35shall establish an audit committee that, at a minimum, shall
36consist of each of the county officers elected pursuant to s.
371(d), Art. VIII of the State Constitution, or a designee, and
38one member of the board of county commissioners or its designee.
39The primary purpose of the audit committee and the procedures is
40to assist the governing body in selecting contract with an
41auditor to conduct the annual financial audit required in s.
42218.39; however, the audit committee may serve other audit
43oversight purposes as determined by the entity's governing body.
44The public shall not be excluded from the proceedings under this
45section.
46     (3)  The audit governing body of a noncharter county or
47district school board that retains a certified public accountant
48shall establish an auditor selection committee shall and select
49an auditor according to the following procedure:
50     (a)  Establish factors to use for the evaluation of audit
51services to be provided by a certified public accounting firm
52duly licensed under chapter 473 and qualified to conduct audits
53in accordance with government auditing standards as adopted by
54the Florida Board of Accountancy. Such factors shall include,
55but are not limited to, ability of personnel, experience,
56ability to furnish the required services, and such other factors
57as may be determined by the committee to be applicable to its
58particular requirements For each noncharter county, the auditor
59selection committee shall consist of the county officers elected
60pursuant to s. 1(d), Art. VIII of the State Constitution, and
61one member of the board of county commissioners or its designee.
62     (b)  The committee shall Publicly announce requests for
63proposals, in a uniform and consistent manner, each occasion
64when auditing services are required to be purchased. Public
65announcements notice must include, at a minimum, a brief general
66description of the audit and must indicate how interested firms
67certified public accountants can apply for consideration.
68     (c)  Provide interested The committee shall encourage firms
69with a request for proposal. The request for proposal shall
70include information on how proposals are to be evaluated and
71such other information the committee determines is necessary for
72the firm to prepare a proposal engaged in the lawful practice of
73public accounting who desire to provide professional services to
74submit annually a statement of qualifications and performance
75data.
76     (d)  Any certified public accountant desiring to provide
77auditing services shall first be qualified pursuant to law. The
78committee shall make a finding that the firm or individual to be
79employed is fully qualified to render the required services.
80Among the factors to be considered in making this finding are
81the capabilities, adequacy of personnel, past record, and
82experience of the firm or individual.
83     (e)  The committee shall adopt procedures for the
84evaluation of professional services, including, but not limited
85to, capabilities, adequacy of personnel, past record,
86experience, results of recent external quality control reviews,
87and such other factors as may be determined by the committee to
88be applicable to its particular requirements.
89     (f)  The public shall not be excluded from the proceedings
90under this subsection.
91     (d)(g)  The committee shall Evaluate proposals provided
92current statements of qualifications and performance data on
93file with the committee, together with those that may be
94submitted by qualified other firms regarding the proposed audit,
95and shall conduct discussions with, and may require public
96presentations by, no fewer than three firms regarding their
97qualifications, approach to the audit, and ability to furnish
98the required services. If compensation is one of the factors
99established pursuant to paragraph (a), it shall not be the sole
100or predominant factor used to evaluate proposals.
101     (e)(h)  The committee shall select Rank and recommend in
102order of preference no fewer than three firms deemed to be the
103most highly qualified to perform the required services after
104considering the following factors established pursuant to
105paragraph (a): the ability of professional personnel; past
106performance; willingness to meet time requirements; location;
107and recent, current, and projected workloads of the firms.
108However, such distribution shall not violate the principle of
109selection of the most highly qualified firms. If fewer than
110three firms respond to the request for proposal desire to
111perform the services, the committee shall recommend such firms
112as it deems determines to be the most highly qualified.
113     (4)(i)  The governing body shall inquire of qualified firms
114as to the basis of compensation, select one of the firms
115recommended by the audit committee, and negotiate a contract,
116using one of the following methods:
117     (a)  If compensation is not one of the factors established
118pursuant to paragraph (3)(a) and not used to evaluate firms
119pursuant to paragraph (3)(e), the governing body shall negotiate
120a contract with The committee may request, accept, and consider
121proposals for the compensation to be paid only during
122competitive negotiations under paragraph (h). the firm ranked
123first may then negotiate a contract with the board giving, among
124other things, a basis of its fee for that engagement. If the
125governing body board is unable to negotiate a satisfactory
126contract with that firm, negotiations with that firm shall be
127formally terminated, and the governing body board shall then
128undertake negotiations with the second-ranked firm. Failing
129accord with the second-ranked firm, negotiations shall then be
130terminated with that firm and undertaken with the third-ranked
131firm. Negotiations with the other ranked firms shall be
132undertaken in the same manner. The governing body board, in
133negotiating with firms, may reopen formal negotiations with any
134one of the three top-ranked firms, but it may not negotiate with
135more than one firm at a time. The board shall also negotiate on
136the scope and quality of services. In making such determination,
137the board shall conduct a detailed analysis of the cost of the
138professional services required in addition to considering their
139scope and complexity. For contracts over $50,000, the board
140shall require the firm receiving the award to execute a truth-
141in-negotiations certificate stating that the rates of
142compensation and other factual unit costs supporting the
143compensation are accurate, complete, and current at the time of
144contracting. Such certificate shall also contain a description
145and disclosure of any understanding that places a limit on
146current or future years' audit contract fees, including any
147arrangements under which fixed limits on fees will not be
148subject to reconsideration if unexpected accounting or auditing
149issues are encountered. Such certificate shall also contain a
150description of any services rendered by the certified public
151accountant or firm of certified public accountants at rates or
152terms that are not customary. Any auditing service contract
153under which such a certificate is required must contain a
154provision that the original contract price and any additions
155thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by
156which the board determines the contract price was increased due
157to inaccurate or incomplete factual unit costs. All such
158contract adjustments shall be made within 1 year following the
159end of the contract.
160     (b)  If compensation is one of the factors established
161pursuant to paragraph (3)(a) and used in the evaluation of
162proposals pursuant to paragraph (3)(d), the governing body shall
163select the highest-ranked qualified firm or must document in its
164public records the reason for not selecting the highest-ranked
165qualified firm.
166     (c)  The governing body may select a firm recommended by
167the audit committee and negotiate a contract with one of the
168recommended firms using an appropriate alternative negotiation
169method for which compensation is not the sole or predominant
170factor used to select the firm.
171     (d)  In negotiations with firms under this section, the
172governing body may allow a designee to conduct negotiations on
173its behalf.
174     (5)  The method used by the governing body to select a firm
175recommended by the audit committee and negotiate a contract with
176such firm must ensure that the agreed-upon compensation is
177reasonable to satisfy the requirements of s. 218.39 and the
178needs of the governing body.
179     (6)(j)  If the governing body board is unable to negotiate
180a satisfactory contract with any of the recommended selected
181firms, the committee shall recommend select additional firms,
182and negotiations the board shall continue negotiations in
183accordance with this section subsection until an agreement is
184reached.
185     (7)  Every procurement of audit services shall be evidenced
186by a written contract embodying all provisions and conditions of
187the procurement of such services. For purposes of this section,
188an engagement letter signed and executed by both parties shall
189constitute a written contract. The written contract shall, at a
190minimum, include the following:
191     (a)  A provision specifying the services to be provided and
192fees or other compensation for such services.
193     (b)  A provision requiring that invoices for fees or other
194compensation be submitted in sufficient detail to demonstrate
195compliance with the terms of the contract.
196     (c)  A provision specifying the contract period, including
197renewals, and conditions under which the contract may be
198terminated or renewed.
199     (8)  Written contracts entered into pursuant to subsection
200(7) may be renewed. Such renewals may be done without the use of
201the auditor selection procedures provided in this section.
202Renewal of a contract shall be in writing.
203     Section 2.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2005.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.