1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to public school student progression; |
3 | amending s. 1008.25, F.S.; revising provisions relating to |
4 | mandatory retention; providing for mandatory retention at |
5 | the end of grade 4 based on reading deficiency |
6 | demonstrated by statewide assessment testing and teacher |
7 | observation; conforming provisions relating to intensive |
8 | interventions in reading for retained students; providing |
9 | an effective date. |
10 |
|
11 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
12 |
|
13 | Section 1. Subsections (5), (6), and (7) of section |
14 | 1008.25, Florida Statutes, are amended to read: |
15 | 1008.25 Public school student progression; remedial |
16 | instruction; reporting requirements.-- |
17 | (5) READING DEFICIENCY AND PARENTAL NOTIFICATION.-- |
18 | (a) It is the ultimate goal of the Legislature that every |
19 | student read at or above grade level. Any student who exhibits a |
20 | substantial deficiency in reading, based upon locally determined |
21 | or statewide assessments conducted in kindergarten or grade 1, |
22 | grade 2, or grade 3, or grade 4, or through teacher |
23 | observations, must be given intensive reading instruction |
24 | immediately following the identification of the reading |
25 | deficiency. The student's reading proficiency must be reassessed |
26 | by locally determined assessments or through teacher |
27 | observations at the beginning of the grade following the |
28 | intensive reading instruction. The student must continue to be |
29 | provided with intensive reading instruction until the reading |
30 | deficiency is remedied. |
31 | (b) Beginning with the 2005-2006 2002-2003 school year, if |
32 | the student's reading deficiency, as identified in paragraph |
33 | (a), is not remedied by the end of grade 4 3, as demonstrated by |
34 | statewide assessment testing in reading and by teacher |
35 | observation of a deficiency in reading scoring at Level 2 or |
36 | higher on the statewide assessment test in reading for grade 3, |
37 | the student must be retained. |
38 | (c) The parent of any student who exhibits a substantial |
39 | deficiency in reading, as described in paragraph (a), must be |
40 | notified in writing of the following: |
41 | 1. That his or her child has been identified as having a |
42 | substantial deficiency in reading. |
43 | 2. A description of the current services that are provided |
44 | to the child. |
45 | 3. A description of the proposed supplemental |
46 | instructional services and supports that will be provided to the |
47 | child that are designed to remediate the identified area of |
48 | reading deficiency. |
49 | 4. That if the child's reading deficiency is not |
50 | remediated by the end of grade 4 3, the child must be retained |
51 | unless he or she is exempt from mandatory retention for good |
52 | cause. |
53 | 5. Strategies for parents to use in helping their child |
54 | succeed in reading proficiency. |
55 | 6. That the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) |
56 | is not the sole determiner of promotion and that additional |
57 | evaluations, portfolio reviews, and assessments are available to |
58 | the child to assist parents and the school district in knowing |
59 | when a child is reading at or above grade level and ready for |
60 | grade promotion. |
61 | 7. The district's specific criteria and policies for |
62 | midyear promotion. Midyear promotion means promotion of a |
63 | retained student at any time during the year of retention once |
64 | the student has demonstrated ability to read at grade level. |
65 | (6) ELIMINATION OF SOCIAL PROMOTION.-- |
66 | (a) No student may be assigned to a grade level based |
67 | solely on age or other factors that constitute social promotion. |
68 | (b) The district school board may only exempt students |
69 | from mandatory retention, as provided in paragraph (5)(b), for |
70 | good cause. Good cause exemptions shall be limited to the |
71 | following: |
72 | 1. Limited English proficient students who have had less |
73 | than 2 years of instruction in an English for Speakers of Other |
74 | Languages program. |
75 | 2. Students with disabilities whose individual education |
76 | plan indicates that participation in the statewide assessment |
77 | program is not appropriate, consistent with the requirements of |
78 | State Board of Education rule. |
79 | 3. Students who demonstrate an acceptable level of |
80 | performance on an alternative standardized reading assessment |
81 | approved by the State Board of Education. |
82 | 4. Students who demonstrate, through a student portfolio, |
83 | that the student is reading on grade level as evidenced by |
84 | demonstration of mastery of the Sunshine State Standards in |
85 | reading equal to at least a Level 2 performance on the FCAT. |
86 | 5. Students with disabilities who participate in the FCAT |
87 | and who have an individual education plan or a Section 504 plan |
88 | that reflects that the student has received the intensive |
89 | remediation in reading, as required by paragraph (4)(b), for |
90 | more than 2 years but still demonstrates a deficiency in reading |
91 | and was previously retained in kindergarten, grade 1, grade 2, |
92 | or grade 3, or grade 4. |
93 | 6. Students who have received the intensive remediation in |
94 | reading as required by paragraph (4)(b) for 2 or more years but |
95 | still demonstrate a deficiency in reading and who were |
96 | previously retained in kindergarten, grade 1, grade 2, or grade |
97 | 3, or grade 4 for a total of 2 years. Intensive reading |
98 | instruction for students so promoted must include an altered |
99 | instructional day based upon an academic improvement plan that |
100 | includes specialized diagnostic information and specific reading |
101 | strategies for each student. The district school board shall |
102 | assist schools and teachers to implement reading strategies that |
103 | research has shown to be successful in improving reading among |
104 | low-performing readers. |
105 | (c) Requests for good cause exemptions for students from |
106 | the mandatory retention requirement as described in |
107 | subparagraphs (b)3. and 4. shall be made consistent with the |
108 | following: |
109 | 1. Documentation shall be submitted from the student's |
110 | teacher to the school principal that indicates that the |
111 | promotion of the student is appropriate and is based upon the |
112 | student's academic record. In order to minimize paperwork |
113 | requirements, such documentation shall consist only of the |
114 | existing academic improvement plan, individual educational plan, |
115 | if applicable, report card, or student portfolio. |
116 | 2. The school principal shall review and discuss such |
117 | recommendation with the teacher and make the determination as to |
118 | whether the student should be promoted or retained. If the |
119 | school principal determines that the student should be promoted, |
120 | the school principal shall make such recommendation in writing |
121 | to the district school superintendent. The district school |
122 | superintendent shall accept or reject the school principal's |
123 | recommendation in writing. |
124 | (7) SUCCESSFUL PROGRESSION FOR RETAINED READERS.-- |
125 | (a) Students retained under the provisions of paragraph |
126 | (5)(b) must be provided intensive interventions in reading to |
127 | ameliorate the student's specific reading deficiency, as |
128 | identified by a valid and reliable diagnostic assessment. This |
129 | intensive intervention must include effective instructional |
130 | strategies, participation in the school district's summer |
131 | reading camp, and appropriate teaching methodologies necessary |
132 | to assist those students in becoming successful readers, able to |
133 | read at or above grade level, and ready for promotion to the |
134 | next grade. |
135 | (b) Beginning with the 2005-2006 2004-2005 school year, |
136 | each school district shall: |
137 | 1. Conduct a review of student academic improvement plans |
138 | for all students who did not score above Level 1 on the reading |
139 | portion of the FCAT and did not meet the criteria for one of the |
140 | good cause exemptions in paragraph (6)(b). The review shall |
141 | address additional supports and services, as described in this |
142 | subsection, needed to remediate the identified areas of reading |
143 | deficiency. The school district shall require a student |
144 | portfolio to be completed for each such student. |
145 | 2. Provide students who are retained under the provisions |
146 | of paragraph (5)(b) with intensive instructional services and |
147 | supports to remediate the identified areas of reading |
148 | deficiency, including a minimum of 90 minutes of daily, |
149 | uninterrupted, scientifically research-based reading instruction |
150 | and other strategies prescribed by the school district, which |
151 | may include, but are not limited to: |
152 | a. Small group instruction. |
153 | b. Reduced teacher-student ratios. |
154 | c. More frequent progress monitoring. |
155 | d. Tutoring or mentoring. |
156 | e. Transition classes containing 4th and 5th 3rd and 4th |
157 | grade students. |
158 | f. Extended school day, week, or year. |
159 | g. Summer reading camps. |
160 | 3. Provide written notification to the parent of any |
161 | student who is retained under the provisions of paragraph (5)(b) |
162 | that his or her child has not met the proficiency level required |
163 | for promotion and the reasons the child is not eligible for a |
164 | good cause exemption as provided in paragraph (6)(b). The |
165 | notification must comply with the provisions of s. 1002.20(14) |
166 | and must include a description of proposed interventions and |
167 | supports that will be provided to the child to remediate the |
168 | identified areas of reading deficiency. |
169 | 4. Implement a policy for the midyear promotion of any |
170 | student retained under the provisions of paragraph (5)(b) who |
171 | can demonstrate that he or she is a successful and independent |
172 | reader, reading at or above grade level, and ready to be |
173 | promoted to grade 5 4. Tools that school districts may use in |
174 | reevaluating any student retained may include subsequent |
175 | assessments, alternative assessments, and portfolio reviews, in |
176 | accordance with rules of the State Board of Education. Students |
177 | promoted during the school year after November 1 must |
178 | demonstrate proficiency above that required to score at Level 2 |
179 | on the grade 3 FCAT, as determined by the State Board of |
180 | Education. The State Board of Education shall adopt standards |
181 | that provide a reasonable expectation that the student's |
182 | progress is sufficient to master appropriate 5th 4th grade level |
183 | reading skills. |
184 | 5. Provide students who are retained under the provisions |
185 | of paragraph (5)(b) with a high-performing teacher as determined |
186 | by student performance data and above-satisfactory performance |
187 | appraisals. |
188 | 6. In addition to required reading enhancement and |
189 | acceleration strategies, provide parents of students to be |
190 | retained with at least one of the following instructional |
191 | options: |
192 | a. Supplemental tutoring in scientifically research-based |
193 | reading services in addition to the regular reading block, |
194 | including tutoring before and/or after school. |
195 | b. A "Read at Home" plan outlined in a parental contract, |
196 | including participation in "Families Building Better Readers |
197 | Workshops" and regular parent-guided home reading. |
198 | c. A mentor or tutor with specialized reading training. |
199 | 7. Establish a Reading Enhancement and Acceleration |
200 | Development (READ) Initiative. The focus of the READ Initiative |
201 | shall be to prevent the retention of grade 4 3 students and to |
202 | offer intensive accelerated reading instruction to grade 4 3 |
203 | students who failed to meet standards for promotion to grade 5 4 |
204 | and to each K-4 K-3 student who is assessed as exhibiting a |
205 | reading deficiency. The READ Initiative shall: |
206 | a. Be provided to all K-4 K-3 students at risk of |
207 | retention as identified by the statewide assessment system used |
208 | in Reading First schools. The assessment must measure phonemic |
209 | awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. |
210 | b. Be provided during regular school hours in addition to |
211 | the regular reading instruction. |
212 | c. Provide a state-identified reading curriculum that has |
213 | been reviewed by the Florida Center for Reading Research at |
214 | Florida State University and meets, at a minimum, the following |
215 | specifications: |
216 | (I) Assists students assessed as exhibiting a reading |
217 | deficiency in developing the ability to read at grade level. |
218 | (II) Provides skill development in phonemic awareness, |
219 | phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. |
220 | (III) Provides scientifically based and reliable |
221 | assessment. |
222 | (IV) Provides initial and ongoing analysis of each |
223 | student's reading progress. |
224 | (V) Is implemented during regular school hours. |
225 | (VI) Provides a curriculum in core academic subjects to |
226 | assist the student in maintaining or meeting proficiency levels |
227 | for the appropriate grade in all academic subjects. |
228 | 8. Establish at each school, where applicable, an |
229 | Intensive Acceleration Class for retained grade 4 3 students who |
230 | subsequently score at Level 1 on the reading portion of the |
231 | FCAT. The focus of the Intensive Acceleration Class shall be to |
232 | increase a child's reading level at least two grade levels in 1 |
233 | school year. The Intensive Acceleration Class shall: |
234 | a. Be provided to any student in grade 4 3 who scores at |
235 | Level 1 on the reading portion of the FCAT and who was retained |
236 | in grade 4 3 the prior year because of scoring at Level 1 on the |
237 | reading portion of the FCAT. |
238 | b. Have a reduced teacher-student ratio. |
239 | c. Provide uninterrupted reading instruction for the |
240 | majority of student contact time each day and incorporate |
241 | opportunities to master the grade 5 4 Sunshine State Standards |
242 | in other core subject areas. |
243 | d. Use a reading program that is scientifically research- |
244 | based and has proven results in accelerating student reading |
245 | achievement within the same school year. |
246 | e. Provide intensive language and vocabulary instruction |
247 | using a scientifically research-based program, including use of |
248 | a speech-language therapist. |
249 | f. Include weekly progress monitoring measures to ensure |
250 | progress is being made. |
251 | g. Report to the Department of Education, in the manner |
252 | described by the department, the progress of students in the |
253 | class at the end of the first semester. |
254 | 9. Report to the State Board of Education, as requested, |
255 | on the specific intensive reading interventions and supports |
256 | implemented at the school district level. The Commissioner of |
257 | Education shall annually prescribe the required components of |
258 | requested reports. |
259 | 10. Provide a student who has been retained in grade 4 3 |
260 | and has received intensive instructional services but is still |
261 | not ready for grade promotion, as determined by the school |
262 | district, the option of being placed in a transitional |
263 | instructional setting. Such setting shall specifically be |
264 | designed to produce learning gains sufficient to meet grade 5 4 |
265 | performance standards while continuing to remediate the areas of |
266 | reading deficiency. |
267 | Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2005. |