| 1 | Representative(s) Stargel offered the following: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 | Amendment |
| 4 | Remove line(s) 161-166 and insert: |
| 5 | (e) If the other parent and any other person entitled to |
| 6 | visitation with the child fails to timely file an objection, it |
| 7 | shall be presumed that the relocation is in the best interest of |
| 8 | the child, the relocation shall be allowed, and the court shall, |
| 9 | absent good cause, enter an order, attaching a copy of the |
| 10 | Notice of Intent to Relocate, reflecting that the order is |
| 11 | entered as a result of the failure to object to the Notice of |
| 12 | Intent to Relocate, and adopting the visitation schedule and |
| 13 | transportation arrangements contained in the Notice of Intent to |
| 14 | Relocate. The order may issue in an expedited manner without the |
| 15 | necessity of an evidentiary hearing. If an objection is timely |
| 16 | filed, the burden returns to the parent or person seeking to |
| 17 | relocate to initiate court proceedings to obtain court |
| 18 | permission to relocate prior to doing so. |