1 | Representative Clarke offered the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Amendment (with title amendment) |
4 | Between lines 4488 and 4489, insert: |
5 | Section 76. Study of exposure risks and potential adverse |
6 | effects of hurricane wind and storm surge on field-erected |
7 | aboveground storage tank systems at bulk product facilities.-- |
8 | (1) The Department of Environmental Protection shall |
9 | contract for a study to evaluate the exposure risks and |
10 | potential adverse effects of hurricane wind and storm surge on |
11 | field-erected aboveground storage tank systems, including tanks, |
12 | piping, pumps, and related components, at bulk product |
13 | facilities as defined in s. 376.031(3), Florida Statutes. The |
14 | study's scope shall include, but need not be limited to: |
15 | (a) Evaluating the frequency, strength, and probability |
16 | estimates for hurricane winds and storm surge on the coastal |
17 | areas of the state where existing bulk product facilities are |
18 | located and where new bulk product facilities are likely to be |
19 | constructed. |
20 | (b) Evaluating the need and timing for requirements for |
21 | the establishment of minimum ballast levels for field-erected |
22 | aboveground storage tanks at bulk product facilities based on |
23 | the frequency, strength, and probability estimates for hurricane |
24 | winds and storm surge, and based on levels calculated by a |
25 | professional engineer specific to each individual field-erected |
26 | aboveground storage tank, taking into account the type of tank, |
27 | the type of product stored, tank diameter, tank height, and |
28 | other relevant factors. |
29 | (c) Evaluating the need and feasibility for requirements |
30 | for: |
31 | 1. Professionally engineered permanent anchoring systems |
32 | for field-erected aboveground storage tanks in high-risk surge |
33 | zones. |
34 | 2. Professionally engineered temporary cable tie-down |
35 | systems, which could be preconstructed or prefabricated and |
36 | retained in storage until needed, that would not interfere with |
37 | normal daily operations and that could be set up in advance of |
38 | an approaching storm. |
39 | (d) Evaluating the need for potential siting |
40 | considerations or engineering mitigation that would prevent or |
41 | limit the installation of new field-erected aboveground storage |
42 | tank systems at bulk product facilities in areas that are |
43 | potentially high-risk areas for hurricane winds and storm surge |
44 | unless the systems are designed and engineered to withstand |
45 | hurricane winds and storm surge. |
46 | (e) Identifying all current and proposed industry |
47 | standards for professionally engineered dike fields surrounding |
48 | field-erected aboveground storage tanks at bulk product |
49 | facilities, including standards for materials and designs that |
50 | will withstand hurricane winds and storm surges yet allow access |
51 | for emergency firefighting vehicles in accordance with industry |
52 | reference standards contained in National Fire Protection |
53 | Association publication NFPA No. 30. |
54 | (2) The study shall include recommendations for changes, |
55 | if needed, to aboveground storage tank system laws and agency |
56 | rules in order to decrease damage from hurricanes and improve |
57 | recovery of field-erected aboveground storage tank systems after |
58 | storm damage. All recommendations shall be accompanied by a |
59 | cost-benefit analysis, which shall include an analysis of: |
60 | (a) The costs for modifying existing field-erected |
61 | aboveground storage tank systems and dike fields, and the costs |
62 | associated with new construction of field-erected aboveground |
63 | storage tank systems and dike fields, to meet any proposed new |
64 | requirements. |
65 | (b) The potential adverse effect on petroleum inventory |
66 | capacity in the state resulting from any proposed new |
67 | requirements. All industry segments with field-erected |
68 | aboveground storage tanks, including, but not limited to, those |
69 | used for petroleum and electric utility, shall be included in |
70 | the petroleum inventory capacity analysis. |
71 | (3) The department shall report the findings and |
72 | recommendations of the study to the Governor, the President of |
73 | the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by |
74 | March 1, 2008. |
75 | (4) The Department of Environmental Protection is |
76 | authorized to use up to $250,000 from the Inland Protection |
77 | Trust Fund for the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 fiscal years for the |
78 | cost of the study set forth in this section. |
79 | Section 77. Compilation and review of existing data and |
80 | information relating to environmental risks associated with oil |
81 | and natural gas exploration and production in the eastern Gulf |
82 | of Mexico.-- |
83 | (1) The Department of Environmental Protection shall |
84 | compile and review existing data and information to evaluate the |
85 | environmental risks from all activities associated with the |
86 | possible future exploration for and production of oil and |
87 | natural gas in the eastern Gulf of Mexico currently subject to |
88 | federal moratoria. The department shall immediately request from |
89 | the appropriate state agencies and private research institutes |
90 | all available data and information necessary to complete this |
91 | task. The appropriate state agencies must submit the data and |
92 | information to the department at the earliest possible date, and |
93 | private research institutes are encouraged to submit relevant |
94 | data and information to the maximum extent practicable. The |
95 | department's effort shall include data and information available |
96 | through appropriate federal executive branch agencies. To the |
97 | maximum extent practicable, the department's efforts shall take |
98 | into consideration current technologies for controlling |
99 | discharges from oil and gas exploration rigs and production |
100 | platforms and shall include, but need not be limited to: |
101 | (a) Evaluating the probability of a discharge from oil and |
102 | gas exploration rigs and production platforms. |
103 | (b) Evaluating the magnitude of any probable discharge |
104 | from oil and gas exploration rigs and production platforms. |
105 | (c) Evaluating the Gulf of Mexico currents and circulation |
106 | patterns and the likelihood of any probable discharge's reaching |
107 | the coastal waters and shorelines of the state. |
108 | (d) Evaluating the environmental impacts of any probable |
109 | discharge on the fish and wildlife resources in the coastal |
110 | waters of the state. |
111 | (2) The department shall report the findings of the |
112 | evaluation to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the |
113 | Speaker of the House of Representatives within 120 days after |
114 | the effective date of this act. |
115 |
|
116 |
|
117 | ======= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ======= |
118 | Remove lines 313 and insert: |
119 | grants program; providing appropriations; directing the |
120 | Department of Environmental Protection to contract for a |
121 | study of exposure risks and potential adverse effects of |
122 | hurricane wind and storm surge on field-erected |
123 | aboveground storage tank systems at bulk product |
124 | facilities; providing requirements for the scope of the |
125 | study; providing an appropriation from the Inland |
126 | Protection Trust Fund for the cost of the study; directing |
127 | the department to compile and review existing data and |
128 | information relating to environmental risks associated |
129 | with oil and natural gas exploration and production in the |
130 | eastern Gulf of Mexico; providing requirements and |
131 | criteria for the evaluation of such risks; requiring the |
132 | department to submit a report to the Governor and the |
133 | Legislature; providing an |