1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to voting systems; amending s. 20.10, |
3 | F.S., relating to the organizational structure of the |
4 | Department of State; specifying that the Bureau of Voting |
5 | Systems Certification and the Bureau of Voting Systems |
6 | Security are located within the Division of Elections; |
7 | creating s. 101.018, F.S.; creating the Bureau of Voting |
8 | Systems Security for the purpose of ensuring the security |
9 | of voting systems used in the state; specifying the duties |
10 | of the bureau; requiring that the bureau provide a monthly |
11 | report to the director of the Division of Elections and |
12 | the Secretary of State; requiring that any identified |
13 | security problem be remedied within a specified period; |
14 | providing that a manufacturer that fails to remedy a |
15 | security problem is subject to a fine for each day of such |
16 | failure; authorizing the division to adopt emergency rules |
17 | following the failure of a manufacturer to remedy a |
18 | medium-level or high-level security problem which occurs |
19 | proximate to a primary or general election; amending s. |
20 | 101.5606, F.S.; requiring that voting systems approved by |
21 | the Department of State allow the voter to correct an |
22 | error in voting; requiring that such systems produce a |
23 | paper record, be furnished with illumination, be equipped |
24 | with an audio-stimulus voting feature, and include a sip- |
25 | and-puff switch attachment; amending s. 101.5612, F.S.; |
26 | revising the testing requirements for electronic or |
27 | electromechanical voting systems that are configured to |
28 | include electronic or electromechanical tabulation |
29 | devices; requiring that each device be tested; providing |
30 | effective dates. |
31 |
|
32 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
33 |
|
34 | Section 1. Subsection (2) of section 20.10, Florida |
35 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
36 | 20.10 Department of State.--There is created a Department |
37 | of State. |
38 | (2) The following divisions of the Department of State are |
39 | established: |
40 | (a) Division of Elections. |
41 | 1. Bureau of Voting Systems Certification. |
42 | 2. Bureau of Voting Systems Security. |
43 | (b) Division of Historical Resources. |
44 | (c) Division of Corporations. |
45 | (d) Division of Library and Information Services. |
46 | (e) Division of Cultural Affairs. |
47 | (f) Division of Administration. |
48 | Section 2. Section 101.018, Florida Statutes, is created |
49 | to read: |
50 | 101.018 Bureau of Voting Systems Security.-- |
51 | (1) There is created a Bureau of Voting Systems Security |
52 | within the Division of Elections of the Department of State |
53 | which shall be responsible for ensuring the security of the |
54 | voting systems that are certified for use in this state. |
55 | (2) The bureau shall: |
56 | (a) Continuously test the hardware and software of the |
57 | voting systems for the purpose of identifying security problems. |
58 | (b) Test any voting system in response to a credible |
59 | published report of security problems. |
60 | (c) Notify the manufacturer of the voting system if a |
61 | security problem is identified. |
62 | (d) Work with the manufacturer of the voting system to |
63 | develop a remedy for the identified security problem. |
64 | (3) The bureau shall provide a monthly written report to |
65 | the director of the Division of Elections and the Secretary of |
66 | State for each certified voting system which must, at a minimum: |
67 | (a) Identify each security problem; |
68 | (b) Identify the source of any potential security breach |
69 | resulting from the problem as "external," such as a security |
70 | breach involving voters, or "internal," such as a security |
71 | breach involving employees of the supervisor of elections, poll |
72 | workers, or manufacturer's field representatives; |
73 | (c) Detail the scenarios in which the potential threat |
74 | could be realized; |
75 | (d) Discuss the likelihood of success for each of the |
76 | scenarios; |
77 | (e) Identify the scope of the potential threat, detailing |
78 | factors such as the number of machines that might be impacted, |
79 | the number of votes that could be affected in a statewide |
80 | election, and the number of counties that could be affected; and |
81 | (f) Based on paragraphs (a)-(e) and any other relevant |
82 | factors, classify the security threat posed by the problem as |
83 | "high," "medium," or "low." |
84 | (4)(a) A security problem that is identified in the |
85 | bureau's report must be remedied within 60 days after the |
86 | manufacturer receives notice of the problem or 14 days before |
87 | the next regularly scheduled primary or general election, |
88 | whichever occurs first. A problem shall be considered remedied |
89 | when the bureau so certifies in writing to the division director |
90 | and, in the case of a high threat, to the Secretary of State. |
91 | (b) Any manufacturer who fails to remedy a security |
92 | problem shall be fined $25,000 per day for each day following |
93 | the period specified in paragraph (a). In addition, if the |
94 | failure to remedy a medium-level or high-level security problem |
95 | is proximate to a scheduled primary or general election, the |
96 | division shall adopt emergency rules to protect the integrity of |
97 | the voting process. |
98 | Section 3. Effective January 1, 2008, section 101.5606, |
99 | Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
100 | 101.5606 Requirements for approval of systems.--No |
101 | electronic or electromechanical voting system shall be approved |
102 | by the Department of State unless it is so constructed that: |
103 | (1) It permits and requires voting in secrecy. |
104 | (2) It permits each elector to vote at any election for |
105 | all persons and offices for whom and for which the elector is |
106 | lawfully entitled to vote, and no others; to vote for as many |
107 | persons for an office as the elector is entitled to vote for; |
108 | and to vote for or against any question upon which the elector |
109 | is entitled to vote. |
110 | (3) It immediately rejects a ballot where the number of |
111 | votes for an office or measure exceeds the number which the |
112 | voter is entitled to cast or where the tabulating equipment |
113 | reads the ballot as a ballot with no votes cast. |
114 | (4) For systems using marksense ballots, it accepts a |
115 | rejected ballot pursuant to subsection (3) if a voter chooses to |
116 | cast the ballot, but records no vote for any office that has |
117 | been overvoted or undervoted. |
118 | (5) It is capable of correctly counting votes. |
119 | (6) It permits each voter at a primary election to vote |
120 | only for the candidates seeking nomination by the political |
121 | party in which such voter is registered, for any candidate for |
122 | nonpartisan office, and for any question upon which the voter is |
123 | entitled to vote. |
124 | (7) At presidential elections it permits each elector, by |
125 | one operation, to vote for all presidential electors of a party |
126 | or for all presidential electors of candidates for President and |
127 | Vice President with no party affiliation. |
128 | (8) It provides a method for write-in voting. |
129 | (9) It is capable of accumulating a count of the specific |
130 | number of ballots tallied for a precinct, accumulating total |
131 | votes by candidate for each office, and accumulating total votes |
132 | for and against each question and issue of the ballots tallied |
133 | for a precinct. |
134 | (10) It is capable of tallying votes from ballots of |
135 | different political parties from the same precinct, in the case |
136 | of a primary election. |
137 | (11) It is capable of automatically producing precinct |
138 | totals in printed, marked, or punched form, or a combination |
139 | thereof. |
140 | (12) If it is of a type that which registers votes |
141 | electronically, it will permit each voter to privately and |
142 | independently change his or her vote for any candidate or upon |
143 | any question appearing on the official ballot, or correct any |
144 | error, up to the time that the voter takes the final step to |
145 | register his or her vote and to have the vote computed. |
146 | (13) It is capable of providing records from which the |
147 | operation of the voting system may be audited. |
148 | (14) It uses a precinct-count tabulation system. |
149 | (15) It does not use an apparatus or device for the |
150 | piercing of ballots by the voter. |
151 | (16) It produces and retains a voter-verified permanent |
152 | paper record having a manual audit capacity that records each |
153 | vote to be cast and that is viewed by the voter from behind a |
154 | window or other device before the ballot is cast. |
155 | (17) It is furnished with illumination sufficient to |
156 | enable the voter to read the ballot while in the booth. |
157 | (18) It is equipped with an audio-stimulus voting feature |
158 | that communicates the complete content of the ballot in a human |
159 | voice and permits a voter who is blind or visually impaired to |
160 | cast a secret ballot using, at the option of the voter, voice- |
161 | only or tactile-discernible controls. |
162 | (19) It includes a sip-and-puff switch voting attachment. |
163 | Section 4. Paragraph (a) of subsection (4) of section |
164 | 101.5612, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
165 | 101.5612 Testing of tabulating equipment.-- |
166 | (4)(a)1. For electronic or electromechanical voting |
167 | systems configured to include electronic or electromechanical |
168 | tabulation devices that which are distributed to the precincts, |
169 | all or a sample of the devices to be used in the election shall |
170 | be publicly tested. If a sample is to be tested, the sample |
171 | shall consist of a random selection of at least 5 percent of the |
172 | devices for an optical scan system or 2 percent of the devices |
173 | for a touchscreen system or 10 of the devices for either system, |
174 | as applicable, whichever is greater. The test shall be conducted |
175 | by processing a group of ballots, causing the device to output |
176 | results for the ballots processed, and comparing the output of |
177 | results to the results expected for the ballots processed. The |
178 | group of ballots shall be produced so as to record a |
179 | predetermined number of valid votes for each candidate and on |
180 | each measure and to include for each office one or more ballots |
181 | which have activated voting positions in excess of the number |
182 | allowed by law in order to test the ability of the tabulating |
183 | device to reject such votes. |
184 | 2. If any tested tabulating device is found to have an |
185 | error in tabulation, it shall be deemed unsatisfactory. For each |
186 | device deemed unsatisfactory, the canvassing board shall take |
187 | steps to determine the cause of the error, shall attempt to |
188 | identify and test other devices that could reasonably be |
189 | expected to have the same error, and shall test a number of |
190 | additional devices sufficient to determine that all devices are |
191 | satisfactory. Upon deeming any device unsatisfactory, the |
192 | canvassing board may require all devices to be tested or may |
193 | declare that all devices are unsatisfactory. |
194 | 3. If the operation or output of any tested tabulation |
195 | device, such as spelling or the order of candidates on a report, |
196 | is in error, such problem shall be reported to the canvassing |
197 | board. The canvassing board shall then determine if the reported |
198 | problem warrants its deeming the device unsatisfactory. |
199 | Section 5. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this |
200 | act, this act shall take effect July 1, 2006. |