1 | The Water & Natural Resources Committee recommends the |
2 | following: |
3 |
|
4 | Council/Committee Substitute |
5 | Remove the entire bill and insert: |
6 | A bill to be entitled |
7 | An act relating to the exploration, production, and |
8 | storage of petroleum and natural gas; directing the |
9 | Department of Environmental Protection to contract for a |
10 | study of exposure risks and potential adverse effects of |
11 | hurricane wind and storm surge on field-erected |
12 | aboveground storage tank systems at bulk product |
13 | facilities; providing requirements for the scope of the |
14 | study; providing an appropriation from the Inland |
15 | Protection Trust Fund for the cost of the study; directing |
16 | the department to compile and review existing data and |
17 | information relating to environmental risks associated |
18 | with oil and natural gas exploration and production in the |
19 | eastern Gulf of Mexico; providing requirements and |
20 | criteria for the evaluation of such risks; requiring the |
21 | department to submit a report to the Governor and the |
22 | Legislature; providing an effective date. |
23 |
|
24 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
25 |
|
26 | Section 1. Study of exposure risks and potential adverse |
27 | effects of hurricane wind and storm surge on field-erected |
28 | aboveground storage tank systems at bulk product facilities.-- |
29 | (1) The Department of Environmental Protection shall |
30 | contract for a study to evaluate the exposure risks and |
31 | potential adverse effects of hurricane wind and storm surge on |
32 | field-erected aboveground storage tank systems, including tanks, |
33 | piping, pumps, and related components, at bulk product |
34 | facilities as defined in s. 376.031(3), Florida Statutes. The |
35 | study's scope shall include, but need not be limited to: |
36 | (a) Evaluating the frequency, strength, and probability |
37 | estimates for hurricane winds and storm surge on the coastal |
38 | areas of the state where existing bulk product facilities are |
39 | located and where new bulk product facilities are likely to be |
40 | constructed. |
41 | (b) Evaluating the need and timing for requirements for |
42 | the establishment of minimum ballast levels for field-erected |
43 | aboveground storage tanks at bulk product facilities based on |
44 | the frequency, strength, and probability estimates for hurricane |
45 | winds and storm surge, and based on levels calculated by a |
46 | professional engineer specific to each individual field-erected |
47 | aboveground storage tank, taking into account the type of tank, |
48 | the type of product stored, tank diameter, tank height, and |
49 | other relevant factors. |
50 | (c) Evaluating the need and feasibility for requirements |
51 | for: |
52 | 1. Professionally engineered permanent anchoring systems |
53 | for field-erected aboveground storage tanks in high-risk surge |
54 | zones. |
55 | 2. Professionally engineered temporary cable tie-down |
56 | systems, which could be preconstructed or prefabricated and |
57 | retained in storage until needed, that would not interfere with |
58 | normal daily operations and that could be set up in advance of |
59 | an approaching storm. |
60 | (d) Evaluating the need for potential siting |
61 | considerations or engineering mitigation that would prevent or |
62 | limit the installation of new field-erected aboveground storage |
63 | tank systems at bulk product facilities in areas that are |
64 | potentially high-risk areas for hurricane winds and storm surge |
65 | unless the systems are designed and engineered to withstand |
66 | hurricane winds and storm surge. |
67 | (e) Identifying all current and proposed industry |
68 | standards for professionally engineered dike fields surrounding |
69 | field-erected aboveground storage tanks at bulk product |
70 | facilities, including standards for materials and designs that |
71 | will withstand hurricane winds and storm surges yet allow access |
72 | for emergency firefighting vehicles in accordance with industry |
73 | reference standards contained in National Fire Protection |
74 | Association publication NFPA No. 30. |
75 | (2) The study shall include recommendations for changes, |
76 | if needed, to aboveground storage tank system laws and agency |
77 | rules in order to decrease damage from hurricanes and improve |
78 | recovery of field-erected aboveground storage tank systems after |
79 | storm damage. All recommendations shall be accompanied by a |
80 | cost-benefit analysis, which shall include an analysis of: |
81 | (a) The costs for modifying existing field-erected |
82 | aboveground storage tank systems and dike fields, and the costs |
83 | associated with new construction of field-erected aboveground |
84 | storage tank systems and dike fields, to meet any proposed new |
85 | requirements. |
86 | (b) The potential adverse effect on petroleum inventory |
87 | capacity in the state resulting from any proposed new |
88 | requirements. All industry segments with field-erected |
89 | aboveground storage tanks, including, but not limited to, those |
90 | used for petroleum and electric utility, shall be included in |
91 | the petroleum inventory capacity analysis. |
92 | (3) The department shall report the findings and |
93 | recommendations of the study to the Governor, the President of |
94 | the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by |
95 | March 1, 2008. |
96 | (4) The Department of Environmental Protection is |
97 | authorized to use up to $250,000 from the Inland Protection |
98 | Trust Fund for the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 fiscal years for the |
99 | cost of the study set forth in this section. |
100 | Section 2. Compilation and review of existing data and |
101 | information relating to environmental risks associated with oil |
102 | and natural gas exploration and production in the eastern Gulf |
103 | of Mexico.-- |
104 | (1) The Department of Environmental Protection shall |
105 | compile and review existing data and information to evaluate the |
106 | environmental risks from all activities associated with the |
107 | possible future exploration for and production of oil and |
108 | natural gas in the eastern Gulf of Mexico currently subject to |
109 | federal moratoria. The department shall immediately request from |
110 | the appropriate state agencies and private research institutes |
111 | all available data and information necessary to complete this |
112 | task. The appropriate state agencies must submit the data and |
113 | information to the department at the earliest possible date, and |
114 | private research institutes are encouraged to submit relevant |
115 | data and information to the maximum extent practicable. The |
116 | department's effort shall include data and information available |
117 | through appropriate federal executive branch agencies. To the |
118 | maximum extent practicable, the department's efforts shall take |
119 | into consideration current technologies for controlling |
120 | discharges from oil and gas exploration rigs and production |
121 | platforms and shall include, but need not be limited to: |
122 | (a) Evaluating the probability of a discharge from oil and |
123 | gas exploration rigs and production platforms. |
124 | (b) Evaluating the magnitude of any probable discharge |
125 | from oil and gas exploration rigs and production platforms. |
126 | (c) Evaluating the Gulf of Mexico currents and circulation |
127 | patterns and the likelihood of any probable discharge's reaching |
128 | the coastal waters and shorelines of the state. |
129 | (d) Evaluating the environmental impacts of any probable |
130 | discharge on the fish and wildlife resources in the coastal |
131 | waters of the state. |
132 | (2) The department shall report the findings of the |
133 | evaluation to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the |
134 | Speaker of the House of Representatives within 120 days after |
135 | the effective date of this act. |
136 | Section 3. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |