1 | The Growth Management Committee recommends the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Council/Committee Substitute |
4 | Remove the entire bill and insert: |
5 | A bill to be entitled |
6 | An act relating to growth management; amending s. |
7 | 163.3177, F.S.; encouraging local governments to adopt |
8 | boating facility siting plans; providing criteria and |
9 | exemptions for such plans; authorizing assistance for the |
10 | development of such plans; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; |
11 | conforming a cross-reference; amending s. 197.303, F.S.; |
12 | revising the criteria for ad valorem tax deferral for |
13 | working waterfront properties; including public lodging |
14 | establishments in the description of working waterfront |
15 | properties; amending s. 342.07, F.S.; adding recreational |
16 | activities as an important state interest; including |
17 | public lodging establishments within the definition of the |
18 | term "recreational and commercial working waterfront"; |
19 | creating s. 373.4132, F.S.; directing water management |
20 | district governing boards and the Department of |
21 | Environmental Protection to require permits for certain |
22 | activities relating to certain dry storage facilities; |
23 | providing criteria for application of such permits; |
24 | preserving regulatory authority for the department and |
25 | governing boards; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; providing for |
26 | the state land planning agency to determine the amount of |
27 | development that remains to be built in certain |
28 | circumstances; specifying certain requirements for a |
29 | development order; revising the circumstances in which a |
30 | local government may issue permits for development |
31 | subsequent to the buildout date; revising the definition |
32 | of an essentially built-out development; revising the |
33 | criteria under which a proposed change constitutes a |
34 | substantial deviation; clarifying the criteria under which |
35 | the extension of a buildout date is presumed to create a |
36 | substantial deviation; requiring that notice of any change |
37 | to certain set-aside areas be submitted to the local |
38 | government; requiring that notice of certain changes be |
39 | given to the state land planning agency, regional planning |
40 | agency, and local government; revising the statutory |
41 | exemptions from development-of-regional-impact review for |
42 | certain facilities; removing waterport and marina |
43 | developments from development-of-regional-impact review; |
44 | providing statutory exemptions and partial statutory |
45 | exemptions for the development of certain facilities; |
46 | providing that the impacts from an exempt use that will be |
47 | part of a larger project be included in the development- |
48 | of-regional-impact review of the larger project; amending |
49 | s. 380.0651, F.S.; revising the statewide guidelines and |
50 | standards for development-of-regional-impact review of |
51 | office developments; deleting such guidelines and |
52 | standards for port facilities; providing such guidelines |
53 | and standards for workforce housing; amending s. 380.07, |
54 | F.S.; revising the appellate procedures for development |
55 | orders within a development of regional impact to the |
56 | Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission; amending |
57 | s. 380.115, F.S.; providing that a change in a |
58 | development-of-regional-impact guideline and standard does |
59 | not abridge or modify any vested right or duty under a |
60 | development order; providing a process for the rescission |
61 | of a development order by the local government in certain |
62 | circumstances; providing an exemption for certain |
63 | applications for development approval and notices of |
64 | proposed changes; amending s. 403.813, F.S.; revising |
65 | permitting exceptions for the construction of private |
66 | docks in certain waterways; providing an effective date. |
67 |
|
68 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
69 |
|
70 | Section 1. Paragraph (g) of subsection (6) of section |
71 | 163.3177, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
72 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
73 | plan; studies and surveys.-- |
74 | (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5) |
75 | and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following |
76 | elements: |
77 | (g)1. For those units of local government identified in s. |
78 | 380.24, a coastal management element, appropriately related to |
79 | the particular requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) and |
80 | meeting the requirements of s. 163.3178(2) and (3). The coastal |
81 | management element shall set forth the policies that shall guide |
82 | the local government's decisions and program implementation with |
83 | respect to the following objectives: |
84 | a.1. Maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of the |
85 | overall quality of the coastal zone environment, including, but |
86 | not limited to, its amenities and aesthetic values. |
87 | b.2. Continued existence of viable populations of all |
88 | species of wildlife and marine life. |
89 | c.3. The orderly and balanced utilization and |
90 | preservation, consistent with sound conservation principles, of |
91 | all living and nonliving coastal zone resources. |
92 | d.4. Avoidance of irreversible and irretrievable loss of |
93 | coastal zone resources. |
94 | e.5. Ecological planning principles and assumptions to be |
95 | used in the determination of suitability and extent of permitted |
96 | development. |
97 | f.6. Proposed management and regulatory techniques. |
98 | g.7. Limitation of public expenditures that subsidize |
99 | development in high-hazard coastal areas. |
100 | h.8. Protection of human life against the effects of |
101 | natural disasters. |
102 | i.9. The orderly development, maintenance, and use of |
103 | ports identified in s. 403.021(9) to facilitate deepwater |
104 | commercial navigation and other related activities. |
105 | j.10. Preservation, including sensitive adaptive use of |
106 | historic and archaeological resources. |
107 | 2. As part of this element, affected local governments are |
108 | encouraged to adopt a boating facility siting plan or policy |
109 | that includes applicable criteria and considers such factors as |
110 | natural resources, manatee protection needs, and recreation and |
111 | economic demands as generally outlined in the Boat Facility |
112 | Siting Guide dated August 2000 and prepared by the Bureau of |
113 | Protected Species Management of the Fish and Wildlife |
114 | Conservation Commission. A comprehensive plan that adopts a |
115 | boating facility siting plan or policy is exempt from the |
116 | provisions of s. 163.3187(1). Local governments that wish to |
117 | adopt a boating facility siting plan or policy may be eligible |
118 | for assistance with the development of a plan or policy through |
119 | the Florida Coastal Management Program. |
120 | Section 2. Paragraph (a) of subsection (12) of section |
121 | 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
122 | 163.3180 Concurrency.-- |
123 | (12) When authorized by a local comprehensive plan, a |
124 | multiuse development of regional impact may satisfy the |
125 | transportation concurrency requirements of the local |
126 | comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency |
127 | management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate- |
128 | share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic |
129 | impacts, if: |
130 | (a) The development of regional impact meets or exceeds |
131 | the guidelines and standards of s. 380.0651(3)(h)(i) and rule |
132 | 28-24.032(2), Florida Administrative Code, and includes a |
133 | residential component that contains at least 100 residential |
134 | dwelling units or 15 percent of the applicable residential |
135 | guideline and standard, whichever is greater; |
136 |
|
137 | The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any |
138 | transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this |
139 | subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the |
140 | purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate- |
141 | share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative |
142 | number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach |
143 | roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a |
144 | stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak |
145 | hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from |
146 | construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted |
147 | level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the |
148 | time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to |
149 | maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this |
150 | subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of |
151 | the improvement. |
152 | Section 3. Subsection (3) of section 197.303, Florida |
153 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
154 | 197.303 Ad valorem tax deferral for recreational and |
155 | commercial working waterfront properties.-- |
156 | (3) The ordinance shall designate the percentage or amount |
157 | of the deferral and the type and location of working waterfront |
158 | property, including the type of public lodging establishments, |
159 | for which deferrals may be granted, which may include any |
160 | property meeting the provisions of s. 342.07(2), which property |
161 | may be further required to be located within a particular |
162 | geographic area or areas of the county or municipality. |
163 | Section 4. Section 342.07, Florida Statutes, is amended to |
164 | read: |
165 | 342.07 Recreational and commercial working waterfronts; |
166 | legislative findings; definitions.-- |
167 | (1) The Legislature recognizes that there is an important |
168 | state interest in facilitating boating and other recreational |
169 | access to the state's navigable waters. This access is vital to |
170 | tourists and recreational users and the marine industry in the |
171 | state, to maintaining or enhancing the $57 billion economic |
172 | impact of tourism and the $14 billion economic impact of boating |
173 | in the state annually, and to ensuring continued access to all |
174 | residents and visitors to the navigable waters of the state. The |
175 | Legislature recognizes that there is an important state interest |
176 | in maintaining viable water-dependent support facilities, such |
177 | as public lodging establishments and boat hauling and repairing |
178 | and commercial fishing facilities, and in maintaining the |
179 | availability of public access to the navigable waters of the |
180 | state. The Legislature further recognizes that the waterways of |
181 | the state are important for engaging in commerce and the |
182 | transportation of goods and people upon such waterways and that |
183 | such commerce and transportation is not feasible unless there is |
184 | access to and from the navigable waters of the state through |
185 | recreational and commercial working waterfronts. |
186 | (2) As used in this section, the term "recreational and |
187 | commercial working waterfront" means a parcel or parcels of real |
188 | property that provide access for water-dependent commercial and |
189 | recreational activities, including public lodging establishments |
190 | as defined in chapter 509, or provide access for the public to |
191 | the navigable waters of the state. Recreational and commercial |
192 | working waterfronts require direct access to or a location on, |
193 | over, or adjacent to a navigable body of water. The term |
194 | includes water-dependent facilities that are open to the public |
195 | and offer public access by vessels to the waters of the state or |
196 | that are support facilities for recreational, commercial, |
197 | research, or governmental vessels. These facilities include |
198 | docks, wharfs, lifts, wet and dry marinas, boat ramps, boat |
199 | hauling and repair facilities, commercial fishing facilities, |
200 | boat construction facilities, and other support structures over |
201 | the water. As used in this section, the term "vessel" has the |
202 | same meaning as in s. 327.02(37). Seaports are excluded from the |
203 | definition. |
204 | Section 5. Section 373.4132, Florida Statutes, is created |
205 | to read: |
206 | 373.4132 Dry storage facility permitting.--The governing |
207 | board or the department shall require a permit under this part, |
208 | including s. 373.4145, for the construction, alteration, |
209 | operation, maintenance, abandonment, or removal of a dry storage |
210 | facility for 10 or more vessels that is functionally associated |
211 | with a boat launching area. As part of an applicant's |
212 | demonstration that such a facility will not be harmful to the |
213 | water resources and will not be inconsistent with the overall |
214 | objectives of the district, the governing board or department |
215 | shall require the applicant to provide reasonable assurance that |
216 | the secondary impacts from the facility will not cause adverse |
217 | impacts to the functions of wetlands and surface waters, |
218 | including violations of state water quality standards applicable |
219 | to waters as defined in s. 403.031(13), and will meet the public |
220 | interest test of s. 373.414(1)(a), including the potential |
221 | adverse impacts to manatees. Nothing in this section shall |
222 | affect the authority of the governing board or the department to |
223 | regulate such secondary impacts under this part for other |
224 | regulated activities. |
225 | Section 6. Paragraph (d) of subsection (2), paragraphs (a) |
226 | and (i) of subsection (4) and subsections (15), (19), and (24) |
227 | of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended, and subsection |
228 | (28) is added to that section, to read: |
229 | 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- |
230 | (2) STATEWIDE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.-- |
231 | (d) The guidelines and standards shall be applied as |
232 | follows: |
233 | 1. Fixed thresholds.-- |
234 | a. A development that is below 100 percent of all |
235 | numerical thresholds in the guidelines and standards shall not |
236 | be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. |
237 | b. A development that is at or above 120 percent of any |
238 | numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development-of- |
239 | regional-impact review. |
240 | c. Projects certified under s. 403.973 which create at |
241 | least 100 jobs and meet the criteria of the Office of Tourism, |
242 | Trade, and Economic Development as to their impact on an area's |
243 | economy, employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels that |
244 | are at or below 100 percent of the numerical thresholds for |
245 | industrial plants, industrial parks, distribution, warehousing |
246 | or wholesaling facilities, office development or multiuse |
247 | projects other than residential, as described in s. |
248 | 380.0651(3)(c), (d), and (h)(i), are not required to undergo |
249 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
250 | 2. Rebuttable presumption.--It shall be presumed that a |
251 | development that is at 100 percent or between 100 and 120 |
252 | percent of a numerical threshold shall be required to undergo |
253 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
254 | (4) BINDING LETTER.-- |
255 | (a) If any developer is in doubt whether his or her |
256 | proposed development must undergo development-of-regional-impact |
257 | review under the guidelines and standards, whether his or her |
258 | rights have vested pursuant to subsection (20), or whether a |
259 | proposed substantial change to a development of regional impact |
260 | concerning which rights had previously vested pursuant to |
261 | subsection (20) would divest such rights, the developer may |
262 | request a determination from the state land planning agency. The |
263 | developer or the appropriate local government having |
264 | jurisdiction may request that the state land planning agency |
265 | determine whether the amount of development that remains to be |
266 | built in an approved development of regional impact meets the |
267 | criteria of subparagraph (15)(g)3. |
268 | (i) In response to an inquiry from a developer or the |
269 | appropriate local government having jurisdiction, the state land |
270 | planning agency may issue an informal determination in the form |
271 | of a clearance letter as to whether a development is required to |
272 | undergo development-of-regional-impact review or whether the |
273 | amount of development that remains to be built in an approved |
274 | development of regional impact meets the criteria of |
275 | subparagraph (15)(g)3. A clearance letter may be based solely on |
276 | the information provided by the developer, and the state land |
277 | planning agency is not required to conduct an investigation of |
278 | that information. If any material information provided by the |
279 | developer is incomplete or inaccurate, the clearance letter is |
280 | not binding upon the state land planning agency. A clearance |
281 | letter does not constitute final agency action. |
282 | (15) LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT ORDER.-- |
283 | (a) The appropriate local government shall render a |
284 | decision on the application within 30 days after the hearing |
285 | unless an extension is requested by the developer. |
286 | (b) When possible, local governments shall issue |
287 | development orders concurrently with any other local permits or |
288 | development approvals that may be applicable to the proposed |
289 | development. |
290 | (c) The development order shall include findings of fact |
291 | and conclusions of law consistent with subsections (13) and |
292 | (14). The development order: |
293 | 1. Shall specify the monitoring procedures and the local |
294 | official responsible for assuring compliance by the developer |
295 | with the development order. |
296 | 2. Shall establish compliance dates for the development |
297 | order, including a deadline for commencing physical development |
298 | and for compliance with conditions of approval or phasing |
299 | requirements, and shall include a buildout termination date that |
300 | reasonably reflects the time anticipated required to complete |
301 | the development. |
302 | 3. Shall establish a date until which the local government |
303 | agrees that the approved development of regional impact shall |
304 | not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or |
305 | intensity reduction, unless the local government can demonstrate |
306 | that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the |
307 | approval of the development order have occurred or the |
308 | development order was based on substantially inaccurate |
309 | information provided by the developer or that the change is |
310 | clearly established by local government to be essential to the |
311 | public health, safety, or welfare. The date established pursuant |
312 | to this subparagraph shall be no sooner than the buildout date |
313 | of the project. |
314 | 4. Shall specify the requirements for the biennial report |
315 | designated under subsection (18), including the date of |
316 | submission, parties to whom the report is submitted, and |
317 | contents of the report, based upon the rules adopted by the |
318 | state land planning agency. Such rules shall specify the scope |
319 | of any additional local requirements that may be necessary for |
320 | the report. |
321 | 5. May specify the types of changes to the development |
322 | which shall require submission for a substantial deviation |
323 | determination or a notice of proposed change under subsection |
324 | (19). |
325 | 6. Shall include a legal description of the property. |
326 | (d) Conditions of a development order that require a |
327 | developer to contribute land for a public facility or construct, |
328 | expand, or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion |
329 | of a public facility, or portion thereof, shall meet the |
330 | following criteria: |
331 | 1. The need to construct new facilities or add to the |
332 | present system of public facilities must be reasonably |
333 | attributable to the proposed development. |
334 | 2. Any contribution of funds, land, or public facilities |
335 | required from the developer shall be comparable to the amount of |
336 | funds, land, or public facilities that the state or the local |
337 | government would reasonably expect to expend or provide, based |
338 | on projected costs of comparable projects, to mitigate the |
339 | impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development. |
340 | 3. Any funds or lands contributed must be expressly |
341 | designated and used to mitigate impacts reasonably attributable |
342 | to the proposed development. |
343 | 4. Construction or expansion of a public facility by a |
344 | nongovernmental developer as a condition of a development order |
345 | to mitigate the impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
346 | development is not subject to competitive bidding or competitive |
347 | negotiation for selection of a contractor or design professional |
348 | for any part of the construction or design unless required by |
349 | the local government that issues the development order. |
350 | (e)1. Effective July 1, 1986, A local government shall not |
351 | include, as a development order condition for a development of |
352 | regional impact, any requirement that a developer contribute or |
353 | pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of public |
354 | facilities or portions thereof unless the local government has |
355 | enacted a local ordinance which requires other development not |
356 | subject to this section to contribute its proportionate share of |
357 | the funds, land, or public facilities necessary to accommodate |
358 | any impacts having a rational nexus to the proposed development, |
359 | and the need to construct new facilities or add to the present |
360 | system of public facilities must be reasonably attributable to |
361 | the proposed development. |
362 | 2. A local government shall not approve a development of |
363 | regional impact that does not make adequate provision for the |
364 | public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the |
365 | proposed development unless the local government includes in the |
366 | development order a commitment by the local government to |
367 | provide these facilities consistently with the development |
368 | schedule approved in the development order; however, a local |
369 | government's failure to meet the requirements of subparagraph 1. |
370 | and this subparagraph shall not preclude the issuance of a |
371 | development order where adequate provision is made by the |
372 | developer for the public facilities needed to accommodate the |
373 | impacts of the proposed development. Any funds or lands |
374 | contributed by a developer must be expressly designated and used |
375 | to accommodate impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
376 | development. |
377 | 3. The Department of Community Affairs and other state and |
378 | regional agencies involved in the administration and |
379 | implementation of this act shall cooperate and work with units |
380 | of local government in preparing and adopting local impact fee |
381 | and other contribution ordinances. |
382 | (f) Notice of the adoption of a development order or the |
383 | subsequent amendments to an adopted development order shall be |
384 | recorded by the developer, in accordance with s. 28.222, with |
385 | the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which the |
386 | development is located. The notice shall include a legal |
387 | description of the property covered by the order and shall state |
388 | which unit of local government adopted the development order, |
389 | the date of adoption, the date of adoption of any amendments to |
390 | the development order, the location where the adopted order with |
391 | any amendments may be examined, and that the development order |
392 | constitutes a land development regulation applicable to the |
393 | property. The recording of this notice shall not constitute a |
394 | lien, cloud, or encumbrance on real property, or actual or |
395 | constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance. |
396 | This paragraph applies only to developments initially approved |
397 | under this section after July 1, 1980. |
398 | (g) A local government shall not issue permits for |
399 | development subsequent to the buildout termination date or |
400 | expiration date contained in the development order unless: |
401 | 1. The proposed development has been evaluated |
402 | cumulatively with existing development under the substantial |
403 | deviation provisions of subsection (19) subsequent to the |
404 | termination or expiration date; |
405 | 2. The proposed development is consistent with an |
406 | abandonment of development order that has been issued in |
407 | accordance with the provisions of subsection (26); or |
408 | 3. The development of regional impact is essentially built |
409 | out, in that all the mitigation requirements in the development |
410 | order have been satisfied, all developers are in compliance with |
411 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
412 | except the buildout date, and the amount of proposed development |
413 | that remains to be built is less than 20 percent of any |
414 | applicable development-of-regional-impact threshold; or |
415 | 4.3. The project has been determined to be an essentially |
416 | built-out development of regional impact through an agreement |
417 | executed by the developer, the state land planning agency, and |
418 | the local government, in accordance with s. 380.032, which will |
419 | establish the terms and conditions under which the development |
420 | may be continued. If the project is determined to be essentially |
421 | built out built-out, development may proceed pursuant to the s. |
422 | 380.032 agreement after the termination or expiration date |
423 | contained in the development order without further development- |
424 | of-regional-impact review subject to the local government |
425 | comprehensive plan and land development regulations or subject |
426 | to a modified development-of-regional-impact analysis. As used |
427 | in this paragraph, an "essentially built-out" development of |
428 | regional impact means: |
429 | a. The developers are development is in compliance with |
430 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
431 | except the buildout built-out date; and |
432 | b.(I) The amount of development that remains to be built |
433 | is less than the substantial deviation threshold specified in |
434 | paragraph (19)(b) for each individual land use category, or, for |
435 | a multiuse development, the sum total of all unbuilt land uses |
436 | as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation |
437 | threshold is equal to or less than 100 percent; or |
438 | (II) The state land planning agency and the local |
439 | government have agreed in writing that the amount of development |
440 | to be built does not create the likelihood of any additional |
441 | regional impact not previously reviewed. |
442 | (h) The single-family residential portions of a |
443 | development may be considered "essentially built out" if all of |
444 | the infrastructure and horizontal development have been |
445 | completed, at least 50 percent of the dwelling units have been |
446 | completed, and more than 80 percent of the lots have been |
447 | conveyed to third-party individual lot owners or to individual |
448 | builders who own no more than 40 lots at the time of the |
449 | determination. |
450 | (i) The mobile home park portions of a development may be |
451 | considered "essentially built out" if all the infrastructure and |
452 | horizontal development has been completed, and at least 50 |
453 | percent of the lots are leased to individual mobile home owners. |
454 | (j) If the property is annexed by another local |
455 | jurisdiction, the annexing jurisdiction shall adopt a new |
456 | development order that incorporates all previous rights and |
457 | obligations specified in the prior development order. |
458 | (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.-- |
459 | (a) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
460 | development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional |
461 | regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the |
462 | change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency, |
463 | shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall cause the |
464 | proposed change development to be subject to further |
465 | development-of-regional-impact review. There are a variety of |
466 | reasons why a developer may wish to propose changes to an |
467 | approved development of regional impact, including changed |
468 | market conditions. The procedures set forth in this subsection |
469 | are for that purpose. |
470 | (b) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
471 | development of regional impact or development order condition |
472 | which, either individually or cumulatively with other changes, |
473 | exceeds any of the following criteria shall constitute a |
474 | substantial deviation and shall cause the development to be |
475 | subject to further development-of-regional-impact review without |
476 | the necessity for a finding of same by the local government: |
477 | 1. An increase in the number of parking spaces at an |
478 | attraction or recreational facility by 10 5 percent or 330 300 |
479 | spaces, whichever is greater, or an increase in the number of |
480 | spectators that may be accommodated at such a facility by 10 5 |
481 | percent or 1,100 1,000 spectators, whichever is greater. |
482 | 2. A new runway, a new terminal facility, a 25-percent |
483 | lengthening of an existing runway, or a 25-percent increase in |
484 | the number of gates of an existing terminal, but only if the |
485 | increase adds at least three additional gates. |
486 | 3. An increase in the number of hospital beds by 5 percent |
487 | or 60 beds, whichever is greater. |
488 | 3.4. An increase in industrial development area by 10 5 |
489 | percent or 35 32 acres, whichever is greater. |
490 | 4.5. An increase in the average annual acreage mined by 10 |
491 | 5 percent or 11 10 acres, whichever is greater, or an increase |
492 | in the average daily water consumption by a mining operation by |
493 | 10 5 percent or 330,000 300,000 gallons, whichever is greater. |
494 | An increase in the size of the mine by 10 5 percent or 825 750 |
495 | acres, whichever is less. An increase in the size of a heavy |
496 | mineral mine as defined in s. 378.403(7) will only constitute a |
497 | substantial deviation if the average annual acreage mined is |
498 | more than 550 500 acres and consumes more than 3.3 3 million |
499 | gallons of water per day. |
500 | 5.6. An increase in land area for office development by 10 |
501 | 5 percent or an increase of gross floor area of office |
502 | development by 10 5 percent or 66,000 60,000 gross square feet, |
503 | whichever is greater. |
504 | 7. An increase in the storage capacity for chemical or |
505 | petroleum storage facilities by 5 percent, 20,000 barrels, or 7 |
506 | million pounds, whichever is greater. |
507 | 8. An increase of development at a waterport of wet |
508 | storage for 20 watercraft, dry storage for 30 watercraft, or |
509 | wet/dry storage for 60 watercraft in an area identified in the |
510 | state marina siting plan as an appropriate site for additional |
511 | waterport development or a 5-percent increase in watercraft |
512 | storage capacity, whichever is greater. |
513 | 6.9. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 10 5 |
514 | percent or 55 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater. |
515 | 7. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 50 |
516 | percent or 200 units, whichever is greater, provided that 15 |
517 | percent of the increase in the number of dwelling units is |
518 | dedicated to the construction of workforce housing. For purposes |
519 | of this subparagraph, the term "workforce housing" means housing |
520 | that is affordable to a person who earns less than 150 percent |
521 | of the area median income. |
522 | 8.10. An increase in commercial development by 55,000 |
523 | 50,000 square feet of gross floor area or of parking spaces |
524 | provided for customers for 330 300 cars or a 10-percent 5- |
525 | percent increase of either of these, whichever is greater. |
526 | 9.11. An increase in hotel or motel rooms facility units |
527 | by 10 5 percent or 83 rooms 75 units, whichever is greater. |
528 | 10.12. An increase in a recreational vehicle park area by |
529 | 10 5 percent or 110 100 vehicle spaces, whichever is less. |
530 | 11.13. A decrease in the area set aside for open space of |
531 | 5 percent or 20 acres, whichever is less. |
532 | 12.14. A proposed increase to an approved multiuse |
533 | development of regional impact where the sum of the increases of |
534 | each land use as a percentage of the applicable substantial |
535 | deviation criteria is equal to or exceeds 110 100 percent. The |
536 | percentage of any decrease in the amount of open space shall be |
537 | treated as an increase for purposes of determining when 110 100 |
538 | percent has been reached or exceeded. |
539 | 13.15. A 15-percent increase in the number of external |
540 | vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was |
541 | projected during the original development-of-regional-impact |
542 | review. |
543 | 14.16. Any change which would result in development of any |
544 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
545 | development approval or in the development order for |
546 | preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened |
547 | plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened, or |
548 | species of special concern and their habitat, any species |
549 | protected by 16 U.S.C. s. 668a-668d, primary dunes, or |
550 | archaeological and historical sites designated as significant by |
551 | the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
552 | The further refinement of the boundaries and configuration of |
553 | such areas by survey shall be considered under sub-subparagraph |
554 | (e)2.j. (e)5.b. |
555 |
|
556 | The substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs |
557 | 3., 5., 8., 9., and 12. 4., 6., 10., 14., excluding residential |
558 | uses, and in subparagraph 13. 15., are increased by 100 percent |
559 | for a project certified under s. 403.973 which creates jobs and |
560 | meets criteria established by the Office of Tourism, Trade, and |
561 | Economic Development as to its impact on an area's economy, |
562 | employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels. The |
563 | substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs 3., |
564 | 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 12., and 13. 4., 6., 9., 10., 11., and 14. |
565 | are increased by 50 percent for a project located wholly within |
566 | an urban infill and redevelopment area designated on the |
567 | applicable adopted local comprehensive plan future land use map |
568 | and not located within the coastal high hazard area. |
569 | (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a development, |
570 | or any phase thereof, by more than 7 or more years shall be |
571 | presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further |
572 | development-of-regional-impact review. An extension of the date |
573 | of buildout, or any phase thereof, of more than 5 years or more |
574 | but less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a |
575 | substantial deviation. The extension of the date of buildout of |
576 | an areawide development of regional impact by more than 5 years |
577 | but less than 10 years is presumed not to create a substantial |
578 | deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and |
579 | convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
580 | government. An extension of 5 years or less than 5 years is not |
581 | a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a |
582 | buildout or, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the |
583 | time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or |
584 | judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any |
585 | extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof |
586 | shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, |
587 | the termination date of the development order, the expiration |
588 | date of the development of regional impact, and the phases |
589 | thereof if applicable by a like period of time. |
590 | (d) A change in the plan of development of an approved |
591 | development of regional impact resulting from requirements |
592 | imposed by the Department of Environmental Protection or any |
593 | water management district created by s. 373.069 or any of their |
594 | successor agencies or by any appropriate federal regulatory |
595 | agency shall be submitted to the local government pursuant to |
596 | this subsection. The change shall be presumed not to create a |
597 | substantial deviation subject to further development-of- |
598 | regional-impact review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear |
599 | and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
600 | government. |
601 | (e)1. Except for a development order rendered pursuant to |
602 | subsection (22) or subsection (25), a proposed change to a |
603 | development order that individually or cumulatively with any |
604 | previous change is less than any numerical criterion contained |
605 | in subparagraphs (b)1.-15. and does not exceed any other |
606 | criterion, or that involves an extension of the buildout date of |
607 | a development, or any phase thereof, of less than 5 years is not |
608 | subject to the public hearing requirements of subparagraph |
609 | (f)3., and is not subject to a determination pursuant to |
610 | subparagraph (f)5. Notice of the proposed change shall be made |
611 | to the regional planning council and the state land planning |
612 | agency. Such notice shall include a description of previous |
613 | individual changes made to the development, including changes |
614 | previously approved by the local government, and shall include |
615 | appropriate amendments to the development order. |
616 | 2. The following changes, individually or cumulatively |
617 | with any previous changes, are not substantial deviations: |
618 | a. Changes in the name of the project, developer, owner, |
619 | or monitoring official. |
620 | b. Changes to a setback that do not affect noise buffers, |
621 | environmental protection or mitigation areas, or archaeological |
622 | or historical resources. |
623 | c. Changes to minimum lot sizes. |
624 | d. Changes in the configuration of internal roads that do |
625 | not affect external access points. |
626 | e. Changes to the building design or orientation that stay |
627 | approximately within the approved area designated for such |
628 | building and parking lot, and which do not affect historical |
629 | buildings designated as significant by the Division of |
630 | Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
631 | f. Changes to increase the acreage in the development, |
632 | provided that no development is proposed on the acreage to be |
633 | added. |
634 | g. Changes to eliminate an approved land use, provided |
635 | that there are no additional regional impacts. |
636 | h. Changes required to conform to permits approved by any |
637 | federal, state, or regional permitting agency, provided that |
638 | these changes do not create additional regional impacts. |
639 | i. Any renovation or redevelopment of development within a |
640 | previously approved development of regional impact which does |
641 | not change land use or increase density or intensity of use. |
642 | j. Changes that modify boundaries and configuration of |
643 | areas described in subparagraph (b)14. due to science-based |
644 | refinement of such areas by survey, by habitat evaluation, by |
645 | other recognized assessment methodology, or by an environmental |
646 | assessment. In order for changes to qualify under this sub- |
647 | subparagraph, the survey, habitat evaluation, or assessment must |
648 | occur prior to the time a conservation easement protecting such |
649 | lands is recorded and must not result in any net decrease in the |
650 | total acreage of the lands specifically set aside for permanent |
651 | preservation in the final development order. |
652 | k.j. Any other change which the state land planning agency |
653 | agrees in writing is similar in nature, impact, or character to |
654 | the changes enumerated in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. a.-i. and |
655 | which does not create the likelihood of any additional regional |
656 | impact. |
657 |
|
658 | This subsection does not require the filing of a notice of |
659 | proposed change but shall require an application to the local |
660 | government to amend the development order in accordance with the |
661 | local government's procedures for amendment of a development |
662 | order. In accordance with the local government's procedures, |
663 | including requirements for notice to the applicant and the |
664 | public, the local government shall either deny the application |
665 | for amendment or adopt an amendment to the development order |
666 | which approves the application with or without conditions. |
667 | Following adoption, the local government shall render to the |
668 | state land planning agency the amendment to the development |
669 | order. The state land planning agency may appeal, pursuant to s. |
670 | 380.07(3), the amendment to the development order if the |
671 | amendment involves sub-subparagraph g., sub-subparagraph h., |
672 | sub-subparagraph j., or sub-subparagraph k. and it believes the |
673 | change creates a reasonable likelihood of new or additional |
674 | regional impacts a development order amendment for any change |
675 | listed in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. unless such issue is addressed |
676 | either in the existing development order or in the application |
677 | for development approval, but, in the case of the application, |
678 | only if, and in the manner in which, the application is |
679 | incorporated in the development order. |
680 | 3. Except for the change authorized by sub-subparagraph |
681 | 2.f., any addition of land not previously reviewed or any change |
682 | not specified in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) shall be |
683 | presumed to create a substantial deviation. This presumption may |
684 | be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. |
685 | 4. Any submittal of a proposed change to a previously |
686 | approved development shall include a description of individual |
687 | changes previously made to the development, including changes |
688 | previously approved by the local government. The local |
689 | government shall consider the previous and current proposed |
690 | changes in deciding whether such changes cumulatively constitute |
691 | a substantial deviation requiring further development-of- |
692 | regional-impact review. |
693 | 5. The following changes to an approved development of |
694 | regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial |
695 | deviation. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and |
696 | convincing evidence. |
697 | a. A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the acreage |
698 | to a land use not previously approved in the development order. |
699 | Changes of less than 15 percent shall be presumed not to create |
700 | a substantial deviation. |
701 | b. Except for the types of uses listed in subparagraph |
702 | (b)16., any change which would result in the development of any |
703 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
704 | development approval or in the development order for |
705 | preservation, buffers, or special protection, including habitat |
706 | for plant and animal species, archaeological and historical |
707 | sites, dunes, and other special areas. |
708 | b.c. Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the |
709 | contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases |
710 | and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized |
711 | multiuse development of regional impact which was originally |
712 | approved with three or more uses specified in s. 380.0651(3)(c), |
713 | (d), (f), and (g) and residential use. |
714 | (f)1. The state land planning agency shall establish by |
715 | rule standard forms for submittal of proposed changes to a |
716 | previously approved development of regional impact which may |
717 | require further development-of-regional-impact review. At a |
718 | minimum, the standard form shall require the developer to |
719 | provide the precise language that the developer proposes to |
720 | delete or add as an amendment to the development order. |
721 | 2. The developer shall submit, simultaneously, to the |
722 | local government, the regional planning agency, and the state |
723 | land planning agency the request for approval of a proposed |
724 | change. |
725 | 3. No sooner than 30 days but no later than 45 days after |
726 | submittal by the developer to the local government, the state |
727 | land planning agency, and the appropriate regional planning |
728 | agency, the local government shall give 15 days' notice and |
729 | schedule a public hearing to consider the change that the |
730 | developer asserts does not create a substantial deviation. This |
731 | public hearing shall be held within 60 90 days after submittal |
732 | of the proposed changes, unless that time is extended by the |
733 | developer. |
734 | 4. The appropriate regional planning agency or the state |
735 | land planning agency shall review the proposed change and, no |
736 | later than 45 days after submittal by the developer of the |
737 | proposed change, unless that time is extended by the developer, |
738 | and prior to the public hearing at which the proposed change is |
739 | to be considered, shall advise the local government in writing |
740 | whether it objects to the proposed change, shall specify the |
741 | reasons for its objection, if any, and shall provide a copy to |
742 | the developer. |
743 | 5. At the public hearing, the local government shall |
744 | determine whether the proposed change requires further |
745 | development-of-regional-impact review. The provisions of |
746 | paragraphs (a) and (e), the thresholds set forth in paragraph |
747 | (b), and the presumptions set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) |
748 | and subparagraph (e)3. shall be applicable in determining |
749 | whether further development-of-regional-impact review is |
750 | required. |
751 | 6. If the local government determines that the proposed |
752 | change does not require further development-of-regional-impact |
753 | review and is otherwise approved, or if the proposed change is |
754 | not subject to a hearing and determination pursuant to |
755 | subparagraphs 3. and 5. and is otherwise approved, the local |
756 | government shall issue an amendment to the development order |
757 | incorporating the approved change and conditions of approval |
758 | relating to the change. The decision of the local government to |
759 | approve, with or without conditions, or to deny the proposed |
760 | change that the developer asserts does not require further |
761 | review shall be subject to the appeal provisions of s. 380.07. |
762 | However, the state land planning agency may not appeal the local |
763 | government decision if it did not comply with subparagraph 4. |
764 | The state land planning agency may not appeal a change to a |
765 | development order made pursuant to subparagraph (e)1. or |
766 | subparagraph (e)2. for developments of regional impact approved |
767 | after January 1, 1980, unless the change would result in a |
768 | significant impact to a regionally significant archaeological, |
769 | historical, or natural resource not previously identified in the |
770 | original development-of-regional-impact review. |
771 | (g) If a proposed change requires further development-of- |
772 | regional-impact review pursuant to this section, the review |
773 | shall be conducted subject to the following additional |
774 | conditions: |
775 | 1. The development-of-regional-impact review conducted by |
776 | the appropriate regional planning agency shall address only |
777 | those issues raised by the proposed change except as provided in |
778 | subparagraph 2. |
779 | 2. The regional planning agency shall consider, and the |
780 | local government shall determine whether to approve, approve |
781 | with conditions, or deny the proposed change as it relates to |
782 | the entire development. If the local government determines that |
783 | the proposed change, as it relates to the entire development, is |
784 | unacceptable, the local government shall deny the change. |
785 | 3. If the local government determines that the proposed |
786 | change, as it relates to the entire development, should be |
787 | approved, any new conditions in the amendment to the development |
788 | order issued by the local government shall address only those |
789 | issues raised by the proposed change and require mitigation only |
790 | for the individual and cumulative impacts of the proposed |
791 | change. |
792 | 4. Development within the previously approved development |
793 | of regional impact may continue, as approved, during the |
794 | development-of-regional-impact review in those portions of the |
795 | development which are not directly affected by the proposed |
796 | change. |
797 | (h) When further development-of-regional-impact review is |
798 | required because a substantial deviation has been determined or |
799 | admitted by the developer, the amendment to the development |
800 | order issued by the local government shall be consistent with |
801 | the requirements of subsection (15) and shall be subject to the |
802 | hearing and appeal provisions of s. 380.07. The state land |
803 | planning agency or the appropriate regional planning agency need |
804 | not participate at the local hearing in order to appeal a local |
805 | government development order issued pursuant to this paragraph. |
806 | (i) An increase in the number of residential dwelling |
807 | units shall not constitute a substantial deviation and shall not |
808 | be subject to development-of-regional-impact review for |
809 | additional impacts provided that all the residential dwelling |
810 | units are dedicated to workforce housing. For purposes of this |
811 | paragraph, the term "workforce housing" means housing that is |
812 | affordable to a person who earns less than 150 percent of the |
813 | area median income. |
814 | (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
815 | (a) Any proposed hospital which has a designed capacity of |
816 | not more than 100 beds is exempt from the provisions of this |
817 | section. |
818 | (b) Any proposed electrical transmission line or |
819 | electrical power plant is exempt from the provisions of this |
820 | section, except any steam or solar electrical generating |
821 | facility of less than 50 megawatts in capacity attached to a |
822 | development of regional impact. |
823 | (c) Any proposed addition to an existing sports facility |
824 | complex is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
825 | addition meets the following characteristics: |
826 | 1. It would not operate concurrently with the scheduled |
827 | hours of operation of the existing facility. |
828 | 2. Its seating capacity would be no more than 75 percent |
829 | of the capacity of the existing facility. |
830 | 3. The sports facility complex property is owned by a |
831 | public body prior to July 1, 1983. |
832 |
|
833 | This exemption does not apply to any pari-mutuel facility. |
834 | (d) Any proposed addition or cumulative additions |
835 | subsequent to July 1, 1988, to an existing sports facility |
836 | complex owned by a state university is exempt if the increased |
837 | seating capacity of the complex is no more than 30 percent of |
838 | the capacity of the existing facility. |
839 | (e) Any addition of permanent seats or parking spaces for |
840 | an existing sports facility located on property owned by a |
841 | public body prior to July 1, 1973, is exempt from the provisions |
842 | of this section if future additions do not expand existing |
843 | permanent seating or parking capacity more than 15 percent |
844 | annually in excess of the prior year's capacity. |
845 | (f) Any increase in the seating capacity of an existing |
846 | sports facility having a permanent seating capacity of at least |
847 | 50,000 spectators is exempt from the provisions of this section, |
848 | provided that such an increase does not increase permanent |
849 | seating capacity by more than 5 percent per year and not to |
850 | exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year period, and provided |
851 | that the sports facility notifies the appropriate local |
852 | government within which the facility is located of the increase |
853 | at least 6 months prior to the initial use of the increased |
854 | seating, in order to permit the appropriate local government to |
855 | develop a traffic management plan for the traffic generated by |
856 | the increase. Any traffic management plan shall be consistent |
857 | with the local comprehensive plan, the regional policy plan, and |
858 | the state comprehensive plan. |
859 | (g) Any expansion in the permanent seating capacity or |
860 | additional improved parking facilities of an existing sports |
861 | facility is exempt from the provisions of this section, if the |
862 | following conditions exist: |
863 | 1.a. The sports facility had a permanent seating capacity |
864 | on January 1, 1991, of at least 41,000 spectator seats; |
865 | b. The sum of such expansions in permanent seating |
866 | capacity does not exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year |
867 | period and does not exceed a cumulative total of 20 percent for |
868 | any such expansions; or |
869 | c. The increase in additional improved parking facilities |
870 | is a one-time addition and does not exceed 3,500 parking spaces |
871 | serving the sports facility; and |
872 | 2. The local government having jurisdiction of the sports |
873 | facility includes in the development order or development permit |
874 | approving such expansion under this paragraph a finding of fact |
875 | that the proposed expansion is consistent with the |
876 | transportation, water, sewer and stormwater drainage provisions |
877 | of the approved local comprehensive plan and local land |
878 | development regulations relating to those provisions. |
879 |
|
880 | Any owner or developer who intends to rely on this statutory |
881 | exemption shall provide to the department a copy of the local |
882 | government application for a development permit. Within 45 days |
883 | of receipt of the application, the department shall render to |
884 | the local government an advisory and nonbinding opinion, in |
885 | writing, stating whether, in the department's opinion, the |
886 | prescribed conditions exist for an exemption under this |
887 | paragraph. The local government shall render the development |
888 | order approving each such expansion to the department. The |
889 | owner, developer, or department may appeal the local government |
890 | development order pursuant to s. 380.07, within 45 days after |
891 | the order is rendered. The scope of review shall be limited to |
892 | the determination of whether the conditions prescribed in this |
893 | paragraph exist. If any sports facility expansion undergoes |
894 | development of regional impact review, all previous expansions |
895 | which were exempt under this paragraph shall be included in the |
896 | development of regional impact review. |
897 | (h) Expansion to port harbors, spoil disposal sites, |
898 | navigation channels, turning basins, harbor berths, and other |
899 | related inwater harbor facilities of ports listed in s. |
900 | 403.021(9)(b), port transportation facilities and projects |
901 | listed in s. 311.07(3)(b), and intermodal transportation |
902 | facilities identified pursuant to s. 311.09(3) are exempt from |
903 | the provisions of this section when such expansions, projects, |
904 | or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans |
905 | that are in compliance with the provisions of s. 163.3178. |
906 | (i) Any proposed facility for the storage of any petroleum |
907 | product or any expansion of an existing facility is exempt from |
908 | the provisions of this section, if the facility is consistent |
909 | with a local comprehensive plan that is in compliance with s. |
910 | 163.3177 or is consistent with a comprehensive port master plan |
911 | that is in compliance with s. 163.3178. |
912 | (j) Any renovation or redevelopment within the same land |
913 | parcel which does not change land use or increase density or |
914 | intensity of use. |
915 | (k)1. Waterport and marina development, including dry |
916 | storage facilities, are exempt from the provisions of this |
917 | section Any waterport or marina development is exempt from the |
918 | provisions of this section if the relevant county or |
919 | municipality has adopted a boating facility siting plan or |
920 | policy which includes applicable criteria, considering such |
921 | factors as natural resources, manatee protection needs and |
922 | recreation and economic demands as generally outlined in the |
923 | Bureau of Protected Species Management Boat Facility Siting |
924 | Guide, dated August 2000, into the coastal management or land |
925 | use element of its comprehensive plan. The adoption of boating |
926 | facility siting plans or policies into the comprehensive plan is |
927 | exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). Any waterport or |
928 | marina development within the municipalities or counties with |
929 | boating facility siting plans or policies that meet the above |
930 | criteria, adopted prior to April 1, 2002, are exempt from the |
931 | provisions of this section, when their boating facility siting |
932 | plan or policy is adopted as part of the relevant local |
933 | government's comprehensive plan. |
934 | 2. Within 6 months of the effective date of this law, The |
935 | Department of Community Affairs, in conjunction with the |
936 | Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Fish and |
937 | Wildlife Conservation Commission, shall provide technical |
938 | assistance and guidelines, including model plans, policies and |
939 | criteria to local governments for the development of their |
940 | siting plans. |
941 | (l) Any proposed development within an urban service |
942 | boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the |
943 | provisions of this section if the local government having |
944 | jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has |
945 | adopted the urban service boundary, and has entered into a |
946 | binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions that would be |
947 | impacted and with the Department of Transportation regarding the |
948 | mitigation of impacts on state and regional transportation |
949 | facilities, and has adopted a proportionate share methodology |
950 | pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
951 | (m) Any proposed development within a rural land |
952 | stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from |
953 | the provisions of this section if the local government that has |
954 | adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a |
955 | binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and |
956 | the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of |
957 | impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has |
958 | adopted a proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. |
959 | 163.3180(16). |
960 | (n) Any proposed development or redevelopment within an |
961 | area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under |
962 | s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
963 | local government has entered into a binding agreement with |
964 | jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of |
965 | Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and |
966 | regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a |
967 | proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
968 | (o) The establishment, relocation, or expansion of any |
969 | military installation as defined in s. 163.3175, is exempt from |
970 | this section. |
971 | (p) Any self-storage warehousing that does not allow |
972 | retail or other services is exempt from this section. |
973 | (q) Any proposed nursing home or assisted living facility |
974 | is exempt from this section. |
975 | (r) Any development identified in an airport master plan |
976 | and adopted into the comprehensive plan pursuant to s. |
977 | 163.3177(6)(k) is exempt from this section. |
978 | (s) Any development identified in a campus master plan and |
979 | adopted pursuant to s. 1013.30 is exempt from this section. |
980 | (t) Any development in a specific area plan which is |
981 | prepared pursuant to s. 163.3245 and adopted into the |
982 | comprehensive plan is exempt from this section. |
983 |
|
984 | If a use is exempt from review as a development of regional |
985 | impact under paragraphs (a)-(t) but will be part of a larger |
986 | project that is subject to review as a development of regional |
987 | impact, the impact of the exempt use must be included in the |
988 | review of the larger project. |
989 | (28) PARTIAL STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
990 | (a) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
991 | (24)(l) for urban service boundaries is not entered into within |
992 | 12 months after establishment of the urban service boundary, the |
993 | development-of-regional-impact review for projects within the |
994 | urban service boundary must address transportation impacts only. |
995 | (b) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
996 | (24)(m) for rural land stewardship areas is not entered into |
997 | within 12 months after the designation of a rural land |
998 | stewardship area, the development-of-regional-impact review for |
999 | projects within the rural land stewardship area must address |
1000 | transportation impacts only. |
1001 | (c) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
1002 | (24)(n) for designated urban infill and redevelopment areas is |
1003 | not entered into within 12 months after the designation of the |
1004 | area or July 1, 2007, whichever occurs later, the development- |
1005 | of-regional-impact review for projects within the urban infill |
1006 | and redevelopment area must address transportation impacts only. |
1007 | (d) A local government that does not wish to enter into a |
1008 | binding agreement or that is unable to agree on the terms of the |
1009 | agreement referenced under paragraph (24)(l), paragraph (24)(m), |
1010 | or paragraph (24)(n) shall provide written notification to the |
1011 | state land planning agency of the decision to not enter into a |
1012 | binding agreement or the failure to enter into a binding |
1013 | agreement within the 12-month period referenced in paragraphs |
1014 | (a), (b) and (c). Following the notification of the state land |
1015 | planning agency, development-of-regional-impact review for |
1016 | projects within an urban service boundary under paragraph |
1017 | (24)(l), a rural land stewardship area under paragraph (24)(m), |
1018 | or an urban infill and redevelopment area under paragraph |
1019 | (24)(n), must address transportation impacts only. |
1020 | Section 7. Paragraphs (d) and (e) of subsection (3) of |
1021 | section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, are amended, paragraphs (f) |
1022 | through (j) are redesignated as (e) through (i), respectively, |
1023 | and a new paragraph (j) is added to that subsection, to read: |
1024 | 380.0651 Statewide guidelines and standards.-- |
1025 | (3) The following statewide guidelines and standards shall |
1026 | be applied in the manner described in s. 380.06(2) to determine |
1027 | whether the following developments shall be required to undergo |
1028 | development-of-regional-impact review: |
1029 | (d) Office development.--Any proposed office building or |
1030 | park operated under common ownership, development plan, or |
1031 | management that: |
1032 | 1. Encompasses 300,000 or more square feet of gross floor |
1033 | area; or |
1034 | 2. Encompasses more than 600,000 square feet of gross |
1035 | floor area in a county with a population greater than 500,000 |
1036 | and only in a geographic area specifically designated as highly |
1037 | suitable for increased threshold intensity in the approved local |
1038 | comprehensive plan and in the strategic regional policy plan. |
1039 | (e) Port facilities.--The proposed construction of any |
1040 | waterport or marina is required to undergo |
1041 | development-of-regional-impact review, except one designed for: |
1042 | 1.a. The wet storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
1043 | watercraft used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial |
1044 | fishing, or |
1045 | b. The dry storage of fewer than 200 watercraft used |
1046 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing, or |
1047 | c. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
1048 | watercraft on or adjacent to an inland freshwater lake except |
1049 | Lake Okeechobee or any lake which has been designated an |
1050 | Outstanding Florida Water, or |
1051 | d. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 50 |
1052 | watercraft of 40 feet in length or less of any type or purpose. |
1053 | The exceptions to this paragraph's requirements for development- |
1054 | of-regional-impact review shall not apply to any waterport or |
1055 | marina facility located within or which serves physical |
1056 | development located within a coastal barrier resource unit on an |
1057 | unbridged barrier island designated pursuant to 16 U.S.C. s. |
1058 | 3501. |
1059 |
|
1060 | In addition to the foregoing, for projects for which no |
1061 | environmental resource permit or sovereign submerged land lease |
1062 | is required, the Department of Environmental Protection must |
1063 | determine in writing that a proposed marina in excess of 10 |
1064 | slips or storage spaces or a combination of the two is located |
1065 | so that it will not adversely impact Outstanding Florida Waters |
1066 | or Class II waters and will not contribute boat traffic in a |
1067 | manner that will have an adverse impact on an area known to be, |
1068 | or likely to be, frequented by manatees. If the Department of |
1069 | Environmental Protection fails to issue its determination within |
1070 | 45 days of receipt of a formal written request, it has waived |
1071 | its authority to make such determination. The Department of |
1072 | Environmental Protection determination shall constitute final |
1073 | agency action pursuant to chapter 120. |
1074 | 2. The dry storage of fewer than 300 watercraft used |
1075 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing at a |
1076 | marina constructed and in operation prior to July 1, 1985. |
1077 | 3. Any proposed marina development with both wet and dry |
1078 | mooring or storage used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or |
1079 | commercial fishing, where the sum of percentages of the |
1080 | applicable wet and dry mooring or storage thresholds equals 100 |
1081 | percent. This threshold is in addition to, and does not |
1082 | preclude, a development from being required to undergo |
1083 | development-of-regional-impact review under sub-subparagraphs |
1084 | 1.a. and b. and subparagraph 2. |
1085 | (j) Workforce housing.--The applicable guidelines for |
1086 | residential development and the residential component for |
1087 | multiuse development shall be increased by 50 percent where the |
1088 | developer demonstrates that at least 15 percent of the |
1089 | residential dwelling units will be dedicated to workforce |
1090 | housing. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "workforce |
1091 | housing" means housing that is affordable to a person who earns |
1092 | less than 150 percent of the area median income. |
1093 | Section 8. Section 380.07, Florida Statutes, is amended to |
1094 | read: |
1095 | 380.07 Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission.-- |
1096 | (1) There is hereby created the Florida Land and Water |
1097 | Adjudicatory Commission, which shall consist of the |
1098 | Administration Commission. The commission may adopt rules |
1099 | necessary to ensure compliance with the area of critical state |
1100 | concern program and the requirements for developments of |
1101 | regional impact as set forth in this chapter. |
1102 | (2) Whenever any local government issues any development |
1103 | order in any area of critical state concern, or in regard to any |
1104 | development of regional impact, copies of such orders as |
1105 | prescribed by rule by the state land planning agency shall be |
1106 | transmitted to the state land planning agency, the regional |
1107 | planning agency, and the owner or developer of the property |
1108 | affected by such order. The state land planning agency shall |
1109 | adopt rules describing development order rendition and |
1110 | effectiveness in designated areas of critical state concern. |
1111 | Within 45 days after the order is rendered, the owner, the |
1112 | developer, or the state land planning agency may appeal the |
1113 | order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission by |
1114 | filing a petition alleging that the development order is not |
1115 | consistent with the provisions of this part notice of appeal |
1116 | with the commission. The appropriate regional planning agency by |
1117 | vote at a regularly scheduled meeting may recommend that the |
1118 | state land planning agency undertake an appeal of a development- |
1119 | of-regional-impact development order. Upon the request of an |
1120 | appropriate regional planning council, affected local |
1121 | government, or any citizen, the state land planning agency shall |
1122 | consider whether to appeal the order and shall respond to the |
1123 | request within the 45-day appeal period. Any appeal taken by a |
1124 | regional planning agency between March 1, 1993, and the |
1125 | effective date of this section may only be continued if the |
1126 | state land planning agency has also filed an appeal. Any appeal |
1127 | initiated by a regional planning agency on or before March 1, |
1128 | 1993, shall continue until completion of the appeal process and |
1129 | any subsequent appellate review, as if the regional planning |
1130 | agency were authorized to initiate the appeal. |
1131 | (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an appeal |
1132 | of a development order by the state land planning agency under |
1133 | this section may include consistency of the development order |
1134 | with the local comprehensive plan. However, if a development |
1135 | order relating to a development of regional impact has been |
1136 | challenged in a proceeding under s. 163.3215 and a party to the |
1137 | proceeding serves notice to the state land planning agency of |
1138 | the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215, the state land |
1139 | planning agency shall: |
1140 | (a) Raise its consistency issues by intervening as a full |
1141 | party in the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215 within 30 days |
1142 | after service of the notice; and |
1143 | (b) Dismiss the consistency issues from the development |
1144 | order appeal. |
1145 | (4) The appellant shall furnish a copy of the petition to |
1146 | the opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local |
1147 | government that issued the order. The filing of the petition |
1148 | stays the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
1149 | of the appeal process. |
1150 | (5)(3) The 45-day appeal period for a development of |
1151 | regional impact within the jurisdiction of more than one local |
1152 | government shall not commence until after all the local |
1153 | governments having jurisdiction over the proposed development of |
1154 | regional impact have rendered their development orders. The |
1155 | appellant shall furnish a copy of the notice of appeal to the |
1156 | opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local government |
1157 | which issued the order. The filing of the notice of appeal shall |
1158 | stay the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
1159 | of the appeal process. |
1160 | (6)(4) Prior to issuing an order, the Florida Land and |
1161 | Water Adjudicatory Commission shall hold a hearing pursuant to |
1162 | the provisions of chapter 120. The commission shall encourage |
1163 | the submission of appeals on the record made below in cases in |
1164 | which the development order was issued after a full and complete |
1165 | hearing before the local government or an agency thereof. |
1166 | (7)(5) The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission |
1167 | shall issue a decision granting or denying permission to develop |
1168 | pursuant to the standards of this chapter and may attach |
1169 | conditions and restrictions to its decisions. |
1170 | (6) If an appeal is filed with respect to any issues |
1171 | within the scope of a permitting program authorized by chapter |
1172 | 161, chapter 373, or chapter 403 and for which a permit or |
1173 | conceptual review approval has been obtained prior to the |
1174 | issuance of a development order, any such issue shall be |
1175 | specifically identified in the notice of appeal which is filed |
1176 | pursuant to this section, together with other issues which |
1177 | constitute grounds for the appeal. The appeal may proceed with |
1178 | respect to issues within the scope of permitting programs for |
1179 | which a permit or conceptual review approval has been obtained |
1180 | prior to the issuance of a development order only after the |
1181 | commission determines by majority vote at a regularly scheduled |
1182 | commission meeting that statewide or regional interests may be |
1183 | adversely affected by the development. In making this |
1184 | determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that |
1185 | statewide and regional interests relating to issues within the |
1186 | scope of the permitting programs for which a permit or |
1187 | conceptual approval has been obtained are not adversely |
1188 | affected. |
1189 | Section 9. Section 380.115, Florida Statutes, is amended |
1190 | to read: |
1191 | 380.115 Vested rights and duties; effect of size |
1192 | reduction, changes in guidelines and standards chs. 2002-20 and |
1193 | 2002-296.-- |
1194 | (1) A change in a development-of-regional-impact guideline |
1195 | and standard does not abridge Nothing contained in this act |
1196 | abridges or modify modifies any vested or other right or any |
1197 | duty or obligation pursuant to any development order or |
1198 | agreement that is applicable to a development of regional impact |
1199 | on the effective date of this act. A development that has |
1200 | received a development-of-regional-impact development order |
1201 | pursuant to s. 380.06, but is no longer required to undergo |
1202 | development-of-regional-impact review by operation of a change |
1203 | in the guidelines and standards or has reduced its size below |
1204 | the thresholds in s. 380.0651 of this act, shall be governed by |
1205 | the following procedures: |
1206 | (a) The development shall continue to be governed by the |
1207 | development-of-regional-impact development order and may be |
1208 | completed in reliance upon and pursuant to the development order |
1209 | unless the developer or landowner has followed the procedures |
1210 | for rescission in paragraph (b). Any proposed changes to those |
1211 | developments which continue to be governed by a development |
1212 | order shall be approved pursuant to s. 380.06(19) as it existed |
1213 | prior to a change in the development-of-regional-impact |
1214 | guidelines and standards except that all percentage criteria |
1215 | shall be doubled and all other criteria shall be increased by 10 |
1216 | percent. The development-of-regional-impact development order |
1217 | may be enforced by the local government as provided by ss. |
1218 | 380.06(17) and 380.11. |
1219 | (b) If requested by the developer or landowner, the |
1220 | development-of-regional-impact development order shall may be |
1221 | rescinded by the local government having jurisdiction upon a |
1222 | showing that all required mitigation related to the amount of |
1223 | development that existed on the date of rescission has been |
1224 | completed abandoned pursuant to the process in s. 380.06(26). |
1225 | (2) A development with an application for development |
1226 | approval pending, and determined sufficient pursuant to s. |
1227 | 380.06 s. 380.06(10), on the effective date of a change to the |
1228 | guidelines and standards this act, or a notification of proposed |
1229 | change pending on the effective date of a change to the |
1230 | guidelines and standards this act, may elect to continue such |
1231 | review pursuant to s. 380.06. At the conclusion of the pending |
1232 | review, including any appeals pursuant to s. 380.07, the |
1233 | resulting development order shall be governed by the provisions |
1234 | of subsection (1). |
1235 | (3) A landowner that has filed an application for a |
1236 | development-of-regional-impact review prior to the adoption of |
1237 | an optional sector plan pursuant to s. 163.3245 may elect to |
1238 | have the application reviewed pursuant to s. 380.06, |
1239 | comprehensive plan provisions in force prior to adoption of the |
1240 | sector plan, and any requested comprehensive plan amendments |
1241 | that accompany the application. |
1242 | Section 10. Paragraph (i) of subsection (2) of section |
1243 | 403.813, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
1244 | 403.813 Permits issued at district centers; exceptions.-- |
1245 | (2) A permit is not required under this chapter, chapter |
1246 | 373, chapter 61-691, Laws of Florida, or chapter 25214 or |
1247 | chapter 25270, 1949, Laws of Florida, for activities associated |
1248 | with the following types of projects; however, except as |
1249 | otherwise provided in this subsection, nothing in this |
1250 | subsection relieves an applicant from any requirement to obtain |
1251 | permission to use or occupy lands owned by the Board of Trustees |
1252 | of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund or any water management |
1253 | district in its governmental or proprietary capacity or from |
1254 | complying with applicable local pollution control programs |
1255 | authorized under this chapter or other requirements of county |
1256 | and municipal governments: |
1257 | (i) The construction of private docks of 1,000 square feet |
1258 | or less of over-water surface area and seawalls in artificially |
1259 | created waterways where such construction will not violate |
1260 | existing water quality standards, impede navigation, or affect |
1261 | flood control. This exemption does not apply to the construction |
1262 | of vertical seawalls in estuaries or lagoons unless the proposed |
1263 | construction is within an existing manmade canal where the |
1264 | shoreline is currently occupied in whole or part by vertical |
1265 | seawalls. |
1266 | Section 11. This act shall take effect July 1, 2006. |