1 | The State Infrastructure Council recommends the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Council/Committee Substitute |
4 | Remove the entire bill and insert: |
5 | A bill to be entitled |
6 | An act relating to growth management; amending s. |
7 | 163.3177, F.S.; encouraging local governments to adopt |
8 | recreational surface water use policies; providing |
9 | criteria and exemptions for such policies; authorizing |
10 | assistance for the development of such policies; directing |
11 | the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government |
12 | Accountability to submit a report to the Legislature; |
13 | revising a provision relating to the amount of |
14 | transferrable land use credits; amending s. 163.3180, |
15 | F.S.; conforming a cross-reference; amending s. 197.303, |
16 | F.S.; revising the criteria for ad valorem tax deferral |
17 | for working waterfront properties; including public |
18 | lodging establishments in the description of working |
19 | waterfront properties; amending s. 342.07, F.S.; adding |
20 | recreational activities as an important state interest; |
21 | including public lodging establishments within the |
22 | definition of the term "recreational and commercial |
23 | working waterfront"; creating s. 373.4132, F.S.; directing |
24 | water management district governing boards and the |
25 | Department of Environmental Protection to require permits |
26 | for certain activities relating to certain dry storage |
27 | facilities; providing criteria for application of such |
28 | permits; preserving regulatory authority for the |
29 | department and governing boards; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; |
30 | providing for the state land planning agency to determine |
31 | the amount of development that remains to be built in |
32 | certain circumstances; specifying certain requirements for |
33 | a development order; revising the circumstances in which a |
34 | local government may issue permits for development |
35 | subsequent to the buildout date; revising the definition |
36 | of an essentially built-out development; revising the |
37 | criteria under which a proposed change constitutes a |
38 | substantial deviation; providing criteria for calculating |
39 | certain deviations; clarifying the criteria under which |
40 | the extension of a buildout date is presumed to create a |
41 | substantial deviation; requiring that notice of any change |
42 | to certain set-aside areas be submitted to the local |
43 | government; requiring that notice of certain changes be |
44 | given to the state land planning agency, regional planning |
45 | agency, and local government; revising the statutory |
46 | exemptions from development-of-regional-impact review for |
47 | certain facilities; removing waterport and marina |
48 | developments from development-of-regional-impact review; |
49 | providing statutory exemptions and partial statutory |
50 | exemptions for the development of certain facilities; |
51 | providing that the impacts from an exempt use that will be |
52 | part of a larger project be included in the development- |
53 | of-regional-impact review of the larger project; providing |
54 | that vesting provisions relating to authorized |
55 | developments of regional impact are not applicable to |
56 | certain projects; amending s. 380.0651, F.S.; revising the |
57 | statewide guidelines and standards for development-of- |
58 | regional-impact review of office developments; deleting |
59 | such guidelines and standards for port facilities; |
60 | revising such guidelines and standards for residential |
61 | developments; providing such guidelines and standards for |
62 | workforce housing; amending s. 380.07, F.S.; revising the |
63 | appellate procedures for development orders within a |
64 | development of regional impact to the Florida Land and |
65 | Water Adjudicatory Commission; amending s. 380.115, F.S.; |
66 | providing that a change in a development-of-regional- |
67 | impact guideline and standard does not abridge or modify |
68 | any vested right or duty under a development order; |
69 | providing a process for the rescission of a development |
70 | order by the local government in certain circumstances; |
71 | providing an exemption for certain applications for |
72 | development approval and notices of proposed changes; |
73 | amending s. 403.813, F.S.; revising permitting exceptions |
74 | for the construction of private docks in certain |
75 | waterways; providing an effective date. |
76 |
|
77 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
78 |
|
79 | Section 1. Paragraph (g) of subsection (6) and paragraph |
80 | (d) of subsection (11) of section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, |
81 | are amended to read: |
82 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
83 | plan; studies and surveys.-- |
84 | (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5) |
85 | and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following |
86 | elements: |
87 | (g)1. For those units of local government identified in s. |
88 | 380.24, a coastal management element, appropriately related to |
89 | the particular requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) and |
90 | meeting the requirements of s. 163.3178(2) and (3). The coastal |
91 | management element shall set forth the policies that shall guide |
92 | the local government's decisions and program implementation with |
93 | respect to the following objectives: |
94 | a.1. Maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of the |
95 | overall quality of the coastal zone environment, including, but |
96 | not limited to, its amenities and aesthetic values. |
97 | b.2. Continued existence of viable populations of all |
98 | species of wildlife and marine life. |
99 | c.3. The orderly and balanced utilization and |
100 | preservation, consistent with sound conservation principles, of |
101 | all living and nonliving coastal zone resources. |
102 | d.4. Avoidance of irreversible and irretrievable loss of |
103 | coastal zone resources. |
104 | e.5. Ecological planning principles and assumptions to be |
105 | used in the determination of suitability and extent of permitted |
106 | development. |
107 | f.6. Proposed management and regulatory techniques. |
108 | g.7. Limitation of public expenditures that subsidize |
109 | development in high-hazard coastal areas. |
110 | h.8. Protection of human life against the effects of |
111 | natural disasters. |
112 | i.9. The orderly development, maintenance, and use of |
113 | ports identified in s. 403.021(9) to facilitate deepwater |
114 | commercial navigation and other related activities. |
115 | j.10. Preservation, including sensitive adaptive use of |
116 | historic and archaeological resources. |
117 | 2. As part of this element, a local government that has a |
118 | coastal management element in its comprehensive plan is |
119 | encouraged to adopt recreational surface water use policies that |
120 | include applicable criteria for and consider such factors as |
121 | natural resources, manatee protection needs, protection of |
122 | working waterfronts and public access to the water, and |
123 | recreation and economic demands. Criteria for manatee protection |
124 | in the recreational surface water use policies should reflect |
125 | applicable guidance outlined in the Boat Facility Siting Guide |
126 | prepared by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. If |
127 | the local government elects to adopt recreational surface water |
128 | use policies by comprehensive plan amendment, such comprehensive |
129 | plan amendment is exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). |
130 | Local governments that wish to adopt recreational surface water |
131 | use policies may be eligible for assistance with the development |
132 | of such policies through the Florida Coastal Management Program. |
133 | The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government |
134 | Accountability shall submit a report on the adoption of |
135 | recreational surface water use policies under this subparagraph |
136 | to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of |
137 | Representatives, and the majority and minority leaders of the |
138 | Senate and the House of Representatives no later than December |
139 | 1, 2010. |
140 | (11) |
141 | (d)1. The department, in cooperation with the Department |
142 | of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department of |
143 | Environmental Protection, water management districts, and |
144 | regional planning councils, shall provide assistance to local |
145 | governments in the implementation of this paragraph and rule 9J- |
146 | 5.006(5)(l), Florida Administrative Code. Implementation of |
147 | those provisions shall include a process by which the department |
148 | may authorize local governments to designate all or portions of |
149 | lands classified in the future land use element as predominantly |
150 | agricultural, rural, open, open-rural, or a substantively |
151 | equivalent land use, as a rural land stewardship area within |
152 | which planning and economic incentives are applied to encourage |
153 | the implementation of innovative and flexible planning and |
154 | development strategies and creative land use planning |
155 | techniques, including those contained herein and in rule 9J- |
156 | 5.006(5)(l), Florida Administrative Code. Assistance may |
157 | include, but is not limited to: |
158 | a. Assistance from the Department of Environmental |
159 | Protection and water management districts in creating the |
160 | geographic information systems land cover database and aerial |
161 | photogrammetry needed to prepare for a rural land stewardship |
162 | area; |
163 | b. Support for local government implementation of rural |
164 | land stewardship concepts by providing information and |
165 | assistance to local governments regarding land acquisition |
166 | programs that may be used by the local government or landowners |
167 | to leverage the protection of greater acreage and maximize the |
168 | effectiveness of rural land stewardship areas; and |
169 | c. Expansion of the role of the Department of Community |
170 | Affairs as a resource agency to facilitate establishment of |
171 | rural land stewardship areas in smaller rural counties that do |
172 | not have the staff or planning budgets to create a rural land |
173 | stewardship area. |
174 | 2. The department shall encourage participation by local |
175 | governments of different sizes and rural characteristics in |
176 | establishing and implementing rural land stewardship areas. It |
177 | is the intent of the Legislature that rural land stewardship |
178 | areas be used to further the following broad principles of rural |
179 | sustainability: restoration and maintenance of the economic |
180 | value of rural land; control of urban sprawl; identification and |
181 | protection of ecosystems, habitats, and natural resources; |
182 | promotion of rural economic activity; maintenance of the |
183 | viability of Florida's agricultural economy; and protection of |
184 | the character of rural areas of Florida. Rural land stewardship |
185 | areas may be multicounty in order to encourage coordinated |
186 | regional stewardship planning. |
187 | 3. A local government, in conjunction with a regional |
188 | planning council, a stakeholder organization of private land |
189 | owners, or another local government, shall notify the department |
190 | in writing of its intent to designate a rural land stewardship |
191 | area. The written notification shall describe the basis for the |
192 | designation, including the extent to which the rural land |
193 | stewardship area enhances rural land values, controls urban |
194 | sprawl, provides necessary open space for agriculture and |
195 | protection of the natural environment, promotes rural economic |
196 | activity, and maintains rural character and the economic |
197 | viability of agriculture. |
198 | 4. A rural land stewardship area shall be not less than |
199 | 10,000 acres and shall be located outside of municipalities and |
200 | established urban growth boundaries, and shall be designated by |
201 | plan amendment. The plan amendment designating a rural land |
202 | stewardship area shall be subject to review by the Department of |
203 | Community Affairs pursuant to s. 163.3184 and shall provide for |
204 | the following: |
205 | a. Criteria for the designation of receiving areas within |
206 | rural land stewardship areas in which innovative planning and |
207 | development strategies may be applied. Criteria shall at a |
208 | minimum provide for the following: adequacy of suitable land to |
209 | accommodate development so as to avoid conflict with |
210 | environmentally sensitive areas, resources, and habitats; |
211 | compatibility between and transition from higher density uses to |
212 | lower intensity rural uses; the establishment of receiving area |
213 | service boundaries which provide for a separation between |
214 | receiving areas and other land uses within the rural land |
215 | stewardship area through limitations on the extension of |
216 | services; and connection of receiving areas with the rest of the |
217 | rural land stewardship area using rural design and rural road |
218 | corridors. |
219 | b. Goals, objectives, and policies setting forth the |
220 | innovative planning and development strategies to be applied |
221 | within rural land stewardship areas pursuant to the provisions |
222 | of this section. |
223 | c. A process for the implementation of innovative planning |
224 | and development strategies within the rural land stewardship |
225 | area, including those described in this subsection and rule 9J- |
226 | 5.006(5)(l), Florida Administrative Code, which provide for a |
227 | functional mix of land uses, including adequate available |
228 | workforce housing, including low, very-low and moderate income |
229 | housing for the development anticipated in the receiving area |
230 | and which are applied through the adoption by the local |
231 | government of zoning and land development regulations applicable |
232 | to the rural land stewardship area. |
233 | d. A process which encourages visioning pursuant to s. |
234 | 163.3167(11) to ensure that innovative planning and development |
235 | strategies comply with the provisions of this section. |
236 | e. The control of sprawl through the use of innovative |
237 | strategies and creative land use techniques consistent with the |
238 | provisions of this subsection and rule 9J-5.006(5)(l), Florida |
239 | Administrative Code. |
240 | 5. A receiving area shall be designated by the adoption of |
241 | a land development regulation. Prior to the designation of a |
242 | receiving area, the local government shall provide the |
243 | Department of Community Affairs a period of 30 days in which to |
244 | review a proposed receiving area for consistency with the rural |
245 | land stewardship area plan amendment and to provide comments to |
246 | the local government. At the time of designation of a |
247 | stewardship receiving area, a listed species survey will be |
248 | performed. If listed species occur on the receiving area site, |
249 | the developer shall coordinate with each appropriate local, |
250 | state, or federal agency to determine if adequate provisions |
251 | have been made to protect those species in accordance with |
252 | applicable regulations. In determining the adequacy of |
253 | provisions for the protection of listed species and their |
254 | habitats, the rural land stewardship area shall be considered as |
255 | a whole, and the impacts to areas to be developed as receiving |
256 | areas shall be considered together with the environmental |
257 | benefits of areas protected as sending areas in fulfilling this |
258 | criteria. |
259 | 6. Upon the adoption of a plan amendment creating a rural |
260 | land stewardship area, the local government shall, by ordinance, |
261 | establish the methodology for the creation, conveyance, and use |
262 | of transferable rural land use credits, otherwise referred to as |
263 | stewardship credits, the application of which shall not |
264 | constitute a right to develop land, nor increase density of |
265 | land, except as provided by this section. The total amount of |
266 | transferable rural land use credits within the rural land |
267 | stewardship area must enable the realization of the long-term |
268 | vision and goals for the 25-year or greater projected population |
269 | of the rural land stewardship area, which may take into |
270 | consideration the anticipated effect of the proposed receiving |
271 | areas. Transferable rural land use credits are subject to the |
272 | following limitations: |
273 | a. Transferable rural land use credits may only exist |
274 | within a rural land stewardship area. |
275 | b. Transferable rural land use credits may only be used on |
276 | lands designated as receiving areas and then solely for the |
277 | purpose of implementing innovative planning and development |
278 | strategies and creative land use planning techniques adopted by |
279 | the local government pursuant to this section. |
280 | c. Transferable rural land use credits assigned to a |
281 | parcel of land within a rural land stewardship area shall cease |
282 | to exist if the parcel of land is removed from the rural land |
283 | stewardship area by plan amendment. |
284 | d. Neither the creation of the rural land stewardship area |
285 | by plan amendment nor the assignment of transferable rural land |
286 | use credits by the local government shall operate to displace |
287 | the underlying density of land uses assigned to a parcel of land |
288 | within the rural land stewardship area; however, if transferable |
289 | rural land use credits are transferred from a parcel for use |
290 | within a designated receiving area, the underlying density |
291 | assigned to the parcel of land shall cease to exist. |
292 | e. The underlying density on each parcel of land located |
293 | within a rural land stewardship area shall not be increased or |
294 | decreased by the local government, except as a result of the |
295 | conveyance or use of transferable rural land use credits, as |
296 | long as the parcel remains within the rural land stewardship |
297 | area. |
298 | f. Transferable rural land use credits shall cease to |
299 | exist on a parcel of land where the underlying density assigned |
300 | to the parcel of land is utilized. |
301 | g. An increase in the density of use on a parcel of land |
302 | located within a designated receiving area may occur only |
303 | through the assignment or use of transferable rural land use |
304 | credits and shall not require a plan amendment. |
305 | h. A change in the density of land use on parcels located |
306 | within receiving areas shall be specified in a development order |
307 | which reflects the total number of transferable rural land use |
308 | credits assigned to the parcel of land and the infrastructure |
309 | and support services necessary to provide for a functional mix |
310 | of land uses corresponding to the plan of development. |
311 | i. Land within a rural land stewardship area may be |
312 | removed from the rural land stewardship area through a plan |
313 | amendment. |
314 | j. Transferable rural land use credits may be assigned at |
315 | different ratios of credits per acre according to the natural |
316 | resource or other beneficial use characteristics of the land and |
317 | according to the land use remaining following the transfer of |
318 | credits, with the highest number of credits per acre assigned to |
319 | the most environmentally valuable land or, in locations where |
320 | the retention of open space and agricultural land is a priority, |
321 | to such lands. |
322 | k. The use or conveyance of transferable rural land use |
323 | credits must be recorded in the public records of the county in |
324 | which the property is located as a covenant or restrictive |
325 | easement running with the land in favor of the county and either |
326 | the Department of Environmental Protection, Department of |
327 | Agriculture and Consumer Services, a water management district, |
328 | or a recognized statewide land trust. |
329 | 7. Owners of land within rural land stewardship areas |
330 | should be provided incentives to enter into rural land |
331 | stewardship agreements, pursuant to existing law and rules |
332 | adopted thereto, with state agencies, water management |
333 | districts, and local governments to achieve mutually agreed upon |
334 | conservation objectives. Such incentives may include, but not be |
335 | limited to, the following: |
336 | a. Opportunity to accumulate transferable mitigation |
337 | credits. |
338 | b. Extended permit agreements. |
339 | c. Opportunities for recreational leases and ecotourism. |
340 | d. Payment for specified land management services on |
341 | publicly owned land, or property under covenant or restricted |
342 | easement in favor of a public entity. |
343 | e. Option agreements for sale to public entities or |
344 | private land conservation entities, in either fee or easement, |
345 | upon achievement of conservation objectives. |
346 | 8. The department shall report to the Legislature on an |
347 | annual basis on the results of implementation of rural land |
348 | stewardship areas authorized by the department, including |
349 | successes and failures in achieving the intent of the |
350 | Legislature as expressed in this paragraph. |
351 | Section 2. Paragraph (a) of subsection (12) of section |
352 | 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
353 | 163.3180 Concurrency.-- |
354 | (12) When authorized by a local comprehensive plan, a |
355 | multiuse development of regional impact may satisfy the |
356 | transportation concurrency requirements of the local |
357 | comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency |
358 | management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate- |
359 | share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic |
360 | impacts, if: |
361 | (a) The development of regional impact meets or exceeds |
362 | the guidelines and standards of s. 380.0651(3)(h)(i) and rule |
363 | 28-24.032(2), Florida Administrative Code, and includes a |
364 | residential component that contains at least 100 residential |
365 | dwelling units or 15 percent of the applicable residential |
366 | guideline and standard, whichever is greater; |
367 |
|
368 | The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any |
369 | transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this |
370 | subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the |
371 | purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate- |
372 | share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative |
373 | number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach |
374 | roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a |
375 | stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak |
376 | hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from |
377 | construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted |
378 | level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the |
379 | time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to |
380 | maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this |
381 | subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of |
382 | the improvement. |
383 | Section 3. Subsection (3) of section 197.303, Florida |
384 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
385 | 197.303 Ad valorem tax deferral for recreational and |
386 | commercial working waterfront properties.-- |
387 | (3) The ordinance shall designate the percentage or amount |
388 | of the deferral and the type and location of working waterfront |
389 | property, including the type of public lodging establishments, |
390 | for which deferrals may be granted, which may include any |
391 | property meeting the provisions of s. 342.07(2), which property |
392 | may be further required to be located within a particular |
393 | geographic area or areas of the county or municipality. |
394 | Section 4. Section 342.07, Florida Statutes, is amended to |
395 | read: |
396 | 342.07 Recreational and commercial working waterfronts; |
397 | legislative findings; definitions.-- |
398 | (1) The Legislature recognizes that there is an important |
399 | state interest in facilitating boating and other recreational |
400 | access to the state's navigable waters. This access is vital to |
401 | tourists and recreational users and the marine industry in the |
402 | state, to maintaining or enhancing the $57 billion economic |
403 | impact of tourism and the $14 billion economic impact of boating |
404 | in the state annually, and to ensuring continued access to all |
405 | residents and visitors to the navigable waters of the state. The |
406 | Legislature recognizes that there is an important state interest |
407 | in maintaining viable water-dependent support facilities, such |
408 | as public lodging establishments and boat hauling and repairing |
409 | and commercial fishing facilities, and in maintaining the |
410 | availability of public access to the navigable waters of the |
411 | state. The Legislature further recognizes that the waterways of |
412 | the state are important for engaging in commerce and the |
413 | transportation of goods and people upon such waterways and that |
414 | such commerce and transportation is not feasible unless there is |
415 | access to and from the navigable waters of the state through |
416 | recreational and commercial working waterfronts. |
417 | (2) As used in this section, the term "recreational and |
418 | commercial working waterfront" means a parcel or parcels of real |
419 | property that provide access for water-dependent commercial and |
420 | recreational activities, including public lodging establishments |
421 | as defined in chapter 509, or provide access for the public to |
422 | the navigable waters of the state. Recreational and commercial |
423 | working waterfronts require direct access to or a location on, |
424 | over, or adjacent to a navigable body of water. The term |
425 | includes water-dependent facilities that are open to the public |
426 | and offer public access by vessels to the waters of the state or |
427 | that are support facilities for recreational, commercial, |
428 | research, or governmental vessels. These facilities include |
429 | public lodging establishments, docks, wharfs, lifts, wet and dry |
430 | marinas, boat ramps, boat hauling and repair facilities, |
431 | commercial fishing facilities, boat construction facilities, and |
432 | other support structures over the water. As used in this |
433 | section, the term "vessel" has the same meaning as in s. |
434 | 327.02(37). Seaports are excluded from the definition. |
435 | Section 5. Section 373.4132, Florida Statutes, is created |
436 | to read: |
437 | 373.4132 Dry storage facility permitting.--The governing |
438 | board or the department shall require a permit under this part, |
439 | including s. 373.4145, for the construction, alteration, |
440 | operation, maintenance, abandonment, or removal of a dry storage |
441 | facility for 10 or more vessels that is functionally associated |
442 | with a boat launching area. As part of an applicant's |
443 | demonstration that such a facility will not be harmful to the |
444 | water resources and will not be inconsistent with the overall |
445 | objectives of the district, the governing board or department |
446 | shall require the applicant to provide reasonable assurance that |
447 | the secondary impacts from the facility will not cause adverse |
448 | impacts to the functions of wetlands and surface waters, |
449 | including violations of state water quality standards applicable |
450 | to waters as defined in s. 403.031(13), and will meet the public |
451 | interest test of s. 373.414(1)(a), including the potential |
452 | adverse impacts to manatees. Nothing in this section shall |
453 | affect the authority of the governing board or the department to |
454 | regulate such secondary impacts under this part for other |
455 | regulated activities. |
456 | Section 6. Paragraph (d) of subsection (2), paragraphs (a) |
457 | and (i) of subsection (4), and subsections (15), (19), and (24) |
458 | of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended, and subsection |
459 | (28) is added to that section, to read: |
460 | 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- |
461 | (2) STATEWIDE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.-- |
462 | (d) The guidelines and standards shall be applied as |
463 | follows: |
464 | 1. Fixed thresholds.-- |
465 | a. A development that is below 100 percent of all |
466 | numerical thresholds in the guidelines and standards shall not |
467 | be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. |
468 | b. A development that is at or above 120 percent of any |
469 | numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development-of- |
470 | regional-impact review. |
471 | c. Projects certified under s. 403.973 which create at |
472 | least 100 jobs and meet the criteria of the Office of Tourism, |
473 | Trade, and Economic Development as to their impact on an area's |
474 | economy, employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels that |
475 | are at or below 100 percent of the numerical thresholds for |
476 | industrial plants, industrial parks, distribution, warehousing |
477 | or wholesaling facilities, office development or multiuse |
478 | projects other than residential, as described in s. |
479 | 380.0651(3)(c), (d), and (h)(i), are not required to undergo |
480 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
481 | 2. Rebuttable presumption.--It shall be presumed that a |
482 | development that is at 100 percent or between 100 and 120 |
483 | percent of a numerical threshold shall be required to undergo |
484 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
485 | (4) BINDING LETTER.-- |
486 | (a) If any developer is in doubt whether his or her |
487 | proposed development must undergo development-of-regional-impact |
488 | review under the guidelines and standards, whether his or her |
489 | rights have vested pursuant to subsection (20), or whether a |
490 | proposed substantial change to a development of regional impact |
491 | concerning which rights had previously vested pursuant to |
492 | subsection (20) would divest such rights, the developer may |
493 | request a determination from the state land planning agency. The |
494 | developer or the appropriate local government having |
495 | jurisdiction may request that the state land planning agency |
496 | determine whether the amount of development that remains to be |
497 | built in an approved development of regional impact meets the |
498 | criteria of subparagraph (15)(g)3. |
499 | (i) In response to an inquiry from a developer or the |
500 | appropriate local government having jurisdiction, the state land |
501 | planning agency may issue an informal determination in the form |
502 | of a clearance letter as to whether a development is required to |
503 | undergo development-of-regional-impact review or whether the |
504 | amount of development that remains to be built in an approved |
505 | development of regional impact meets the criteria of |
506 | subparagraph (15)(g)3. A clearance letter may be based solely on |
507 | the information provided by the developer, and the state land |
508 | planning agency is not required to conduct an investigation of |
509 | that information. If any material information provided by the |
510 | developer is incomplete or inaccurate, the clearance letter is |
511 | not binding upon the state land planning agency. A clearance |
512 | letter does not constitute final agency action. |
513 | (15) LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT ORDER.-- |
514 | (a) The appropriate local government shall render a |
515 | decision on the application within 30 days after the hearing |
516 | unless an extension is requested by the developer. |
517 | (b) When possible, local governments shall issue |
518 | development orders concurrently with any other local permits or |
519 | development approvals that may be applicable to the proposed |
520 | development. |
521 | (c) The development order shall include findings of fact |
522 | and conclusions of law consistent with subsections (13) and |
523 | (14). The development order: |
524 | 1. Shall specify the monitoring procedures and the local |
525 | official responsible for assuring compliance by the developer |
526 | with the development order. |
527 | 2. Shall establish compliance dates for the development |
528 | order, including a deadline for commencing physical development |
529 | and for compliance with conditions of approval or phasing |
530 | requirements, and shall include a buildout termination date that |
531 | reasonably reflects the time anticipated required to complete |
532 | the development. |
533 | 3. Shall establish a date until which the local government |
534 | agrees that the approved development of regional impact shall |
535 | not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or |
536 | intensity reduction, unless the local government can demonstrate |
537 | that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the |
538 | approval of the development order have occurred or the |
539 | development order was based on substantially inaccurate |
540 | information provided by the developer or that the change is |
541 | clearly established by local government to be essential to the |
542 | public health, safety, or welfare. The date established pursuant |
543 | to this subparagraph shall be no sooner than the buildout date |
544 | of the project. |
545 | 4. Shall specify the requirements for the biennial report |
546 | designated under subsection (18), including the date of |
547 | submission, parties to whom the report is submitted, and |
548 | contents of the report, based upon the rules adopted by the |
549 | state land planning agency. Such rules shall specify the scope |
550 | of any additional local requirements that may be necessary for |
551 | the report. |
552 | 5. May specify the types of changes to the development |
553 | which shall require submission for a substantial deviation |
554 | determination or a notice of proposed change under subsection |
555 | (19). |
556 | 6. Shall include a legal description of the property. |
557 | (d) Conditions of a development order that require a |
558 | developer to contribute land for a public facility or construct, |
559 | expand, or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion |
560 | of a public facility, or portion thereof, shall meet the |
561 | following criteria: |
562 | 1. The need to construct new facilities or add to the |
563 | present system of public facilities must be reasonably |
564 | attributable to the proposed development. |
565 | 2. Any contribution of funds, land, or public facilities |
566 | required from the developer shall be comparable to the amount of |
567 | funds, land, or public facilities that the state or the local |
568 | government would reasonably expect to expend or provide, based |
569 | on projected costs of comparable projects, to mitigate the |
570 | impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development. |
571 | 3. Any funds or lands contributed must be expressly |
572 | designated and used to mitigate impacts reasonably attributable |
573 | to the proposed development. |
574 | 4. Construction or expansion of a public facility by a |
575 | nongovernmental developer as a condition of a development order |
576 | to mitigate the impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
577 | development is not subject to competitive bidding or competitive |
578 | negotiation for selection of a contractor or design professional |
579 | for any part of the construction or design unless required by |
580 | the local government that issues the development order. |
581 | (e)1. Effective July 1, 1986, A local government shall not |
582 | include, as a development order condition for a development of |
583 | regional impact, any requirement that a developer contribute or |
584 | pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of public |
585 | facilities or portions thereof unless the local government has |
586 | enacted a local ordinance which requires other development not |
587 | subject to this section to contribute its proportionate share of |
588 | the funds, land, or public facilities necessary to accommodate |
589 | any impacts having a rational nexus to the proposed development, |
590 | and the need to construct new facilities or add to the present |
591 | system of public facilities must be reasonably attributable to |
592 | the proposed development. |
593 | 2. A local government shall not approve a development of |
594 | regional impact that does not make adequate provision for the |
595 | public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the |
596 | proposed development unless the local government includes in the |
597 | development order a commitment by the local government to |
598 | provide these facilities consistently with the development |
599 | schedule approved in the development order; however, a local |
600 | government's failure to meet the requirements of subparagraph 1. |
601 | and this subparagraph shall not preclude the issuance of a |
602 | development order where adequate provision is made by the |
603 | developer for the public facilities needed to accommodate the |
604 | impacts of the proposed development. Any funds or lands |
605 | contributed by a developer must be expressly designated and used |
606 | to accommodate impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
607 | development. |
608 | 3. The Department of Community Affairs and other state and |
609 | regional agencies involved in the administration and |
610 | implementation of this act shall cooperate and work with units |
611 | of local government in preparing and adopting local impact fee |
612 | and other contribution ordinances. |
613 | (f) Notice of the adoption of a development order or the |
614 | subsequent amendments to an adopted development order shall be |
615 | recorded by the developer, in accordance with s. 28.222, with |
616 | the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which the |
617 | development is located. The notice shall include a legal |
618 | description of the property covered by the order and shall state |
619 | which unit of local government adopted the development order, |
620 | the date of adoption, the date of adoption of any amendments to |
621 | the development order, the location where the adopted order with |
622 | any amendments may be examined, and that the development order |
623 | constitutes a land development regulation applicable to the |
624 | property. The recording of this notice shall not constitute a |
625 | lien, cloud, or encumbrance on real property, or actual or |
626 | constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance. |
627 | This paragraph applies only to developments initially approved |
628 | under this section after July 1, 1980. |
629 | (g) A local government shall not issue permits for |
630 | development subsequent to the buildout termination date or |
631 | expiration date contained in the development order unless: |
632 | 1. The proposed development has been evaluated |
633 | cumulatively with existing development under the substantial |
634 | deviation provisions of subsection (19) subsequent to the |
635 | termination or expiration date; |
636 | 2. The proposed development is consistent with an |
637 | abandonment of development order that has been issued in |
638 | accordance with the provisions of subsection (26); or |
639 | 3. The development of regional impact is essentially built |
640 | out, in that all the mitigation requirements in the development |
641 | order have been satisfied, all developers are in compliance with |
642 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
643 | except the buildout date, and the amount of proposed development |
644 | that remains to be built is less than 20 percent of any |
645 | applicable development-of-regional-impact threshold; or |
646 | 4.3. The project has been determined to be an essentially |
647 | built-out development of regional impact through an agreement |
648 | executed by the developer, the state land planning agency, and |
649 | the local government, in accordance with s. 380.032, which will |
650 | establish the terms and conditions under which the development |
651 | may be continued. If the project is determined to be essentially |
652 | built out built-out, development may proceed pursuant to the s. |
653 | 380.032 agreement after the termination or expiration date |
654 | contained in the development order without further development- |
655 | of-regional-impact review subject to the local government |
656 | comprehensive plan and land development regulations or subject |
657 | to a modified development-of-regional-impact analysis. As used |
658 | in this paragraph, an "essentially built-out" development of |
659 | regional impact means: |
660 | a. The developers are development is in compliance with |
661 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
662 | except the buildout built-out date; and |
663 | b.(I) The amount of development that remains to be built |
664 | is less than the substantial deviation threshold specified in |
665 | paragraph (19)(b) for each individual land use category, or, for |
666 | a multiuse development, the sum total of all unbuilt land uses |
667 | as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation |
668 | threshold is equal to or less than 100 percent; or |
669 | (II) The state land planning agency and the local |
670 | government have agreed in writing that the amount of development |
671 | to be built does not create the likelihood of any additional |
672 | regional impact not previously reviewed. |
673 |
|
674 | The single-family residential portions of a development may be |
675 | considered "essentially built out" if all of the workforce |
676 | housing obligations and all of the infrastructure and horizontal |
677 | development have been completed, at least 50 percent of the |
678 | dwelling units have been completed, and more than 80 percent of |
679 | the lots have been conveyed to third-party individual lot owners |
680 | or to individual builders who own no more than 40 lots at the |
681 | time of the determination. The mobile home park portions of a |
682 | development may be considered "essentially built out" if all the |
683 | infrastructure and horizontal development has been completed, |
684 | and at least 50 percent of the lots are leased to individual |
685 | mobile home owners. |
686 | (h) If the property is annexed by another local |
687 | jurisdiction, the annexing jurisdiction shall adopt a new |
688 | development order that incorporates all previous rights and |
689 | obligations specified in the prior development order. |
690 | (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.-- |
691 | (a) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
692 | development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional |
693 | regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the |
694 | change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency, |
695 | shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall cause the |
696 | proposed change development to be subject to further |
697 | development-of-regional-impact review. There are a variety of |
698 | reasons why a developer may wish to propose changes to an |
699 | approved development of regional impact, including changed |
700 | market conditions. The procedures set forth in this subsection |
701 | are for that purpose. |
702 | (b) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
703 | development of regional impact or development order condition |
704 | which, either individually or cumulatively with other changes, |
705 | exceeds any of the following criteria shall constitute a |
706 | substantial deviation and shall cause the development to be |
707 | subject to further development-of-regional-impact review without |
708 | the necessity for a finding of same by the local government: |
709 | 1. An increase in the number of parking spaces at an |
710 | attraction or recreational facility by 10 5 percent or 330 300 |
711 | spaces, whichever is greater, or an increase in the number of |
712 | spectators that may be accommodated at such a facility by 10 5 |
713 | percent or 1,100 1,000 spectators, whichever is greater. |
714 | 2. A new runway, a new terminal facility, a 25-percent |
715 | lengthening of an existing runway, or a 25-percent increase in |
716 | the number of gates of an existing terminal, but only if the |
717 | increase adds at least three additional gates. |
718 | 3. An increase in the number of hospital beds by 5 percent |
719 | or 60 beds, whichever is greater. |
720 | 3.4. An increase in industrial development area by 10 5 |
721 | percent or 35 32 acres, whichever is greater. |
722 | 4.5. An increase in the average annual acreage mined by 10 |
723 | 5 percent or 11 10 acres, whichever is greater, or an increase |
724 | in the average daily water consumption by a mining operation by |
725 | 10 5 percent or 330,000 300,000 gallons, whichever is greater. A |
726 | net An increase in the size of the mine by 10 5 percent or 825 |
727 | 750 acres, whichever is less. For purposes of calculating any |
728 | net increases in size, only additions and deletions of lands |
729 | that have not been mined shall be considered. An increase in the |
730 | size of a heavy mineral mine as defined in s. 378.403(7) will |
731 | only constitute a substantial deviation if the average annual |
732 | acreage mined is more than 550 500 acres and consumes more than |
733 | 3.3 3 million gallons of water per day. |
734 | 5.6. An increase in land area for office development by 10 |
735 | 5 percent or an increase of gross floor area of office |
736 | development by 10 5 percent or 66,000 60,000 gross square feet, |
737 | whichever is greater. |
738 | 7. An increase in the storage capacity for chemical or |
739 | petroleum storage facilities by 5 percent, 20,000 barrels, or 7 |
740 | million pounds, whichever is greater. |
741 | 8. An increase of development at a waterport of wet |
742 | storage for 20 watercraft, dry storage for 30 watercraft, or |
743 | wet/dry storage for 60 watercraft in an area identified in the |
744 | state marina siting plan as an appropriate site for additional |
745 | waterport development or a 5-percent increase in watercraft |
746 | storage capacity, whichever is greater. |
747 | 6.9. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 10 5 |
748 | percent or 55 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater. |
749 | 7. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 50 |
750 | percent or 200 units, whichever is greater, provided that 15 |
751 | percent of the proposed additional dwelling units are dedicated |
752 | to affordable workforce housing, subject to a recorded land use |
753 | restriction that shall be for a period of not less than 20 years |
754 | and that includes resale provisions to ensure long-term |
755 | affordability for income-eligible homeowners and renters and |
756 | provisions for the workforce housing to be commenced prior to |
757 | the completion of 50 percent of the market rate dwelling. For |
758 | purposes of this subparagraph, the term "affordable workforce |
759 | housing" means housing that is affordable to a person who earns |
760 | less than 120 percent of the area median income, or less than |
761 | 140 percent of the area median income if located in a county in |
762 | which the median purchase price for a single-family existing |
763 | home exceeds the statewide median purchase price of a single- |
764 | family existing home. For purposes of this subparagraph, the |
765 | term "statewide median purchase price of a single-family |
766 | existing home" means the statewide purchase price as determined |
767 | in the Florida Sales Report, Single-Family Existing Homes, |
768 | released each January by the Florida Association of Realtors and |
769 | the University of Florida Real Estate Research Center. |
770 | 8.10. An increase in commercial development by 55,000 |
771 | 50,000 square feet of gross floor area or of parking spaces |
772 | provided for customers for 330 300 cars or a 10-percent 5- |
773 | percent increase of either of these, whichever is greater. |
774 | 9.11. An increase in hotel or motel rooms facility units |
775 | by 10 5 percent or 83 rooms 75 units, whichever is greater. |
776 | 10.12. An increase in a recreational vehicle park area by |
777 | 10 5 percent or 110 100 vehicle spaces, whichever is less. |
778 | 11.13. A decrease in the area set aside for open space of |
779 | 5 percent or 20 acres, whichever is less. |
780 | 12.14. A proposed increase to an approved multiuse |
781 | development of regional impact where the sum of the increases of |
782 | each land use as a percentage of the applicable substantial |
783 | deviation criteria is equal to or exceeds 110 100 percent. The |
784 | percentage of any decrease in the amount of open space shall be |
785 | treated as an increase for purposes of determining when 110 100 |
786 | percent has been reached or exceeded. |
787 | 13.15. A 15-percent increase in the number of external |
788 | vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was |
789 | projected during the original development-of-regional-impact |
790 | review. |
791 | 14.16. Any change which would result in development of any |
792 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
793 | development approval or in the development order for |
794 | preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened |
795 | plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened, or |
796 | species of special concern and their habitat, any species |
797 | protected by 16 U.S.C. s. 668a-668d, primary dunes, or |
798 | archaeological and historical sites designated as significant by |
799 | the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
800 | The further refinement of the boundaries and configuration of |
801 | such areas by survey shall be considered under sub-subparagraph |
802 | (e)2.j. (e)5.b. |
803 |
|
804 | The substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs |
805 | 3., 5., 8., 9., and 12. 4., 6., 10., 14., excluding residential |
806 | uses, and in subparagraph 13. 15., are increased by 100 percent |
807 | for a project certified under s. 403.973 which creates jobs and |
808 | meets criteria established by the Office of Tourism, Trade, and |
809 | Economic Development as to its impact on an area's economy, |
810 | employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels. The |
811 | substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs 3., |
812 | 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 12., and 13. 4., 6., 9., 10., 11., and 14. |
813 | are increased by 50 percent for a project located wholly within |
814 | an urban infill and redevelopment area designated on the |
815 | applicable adopted local comprehensive plan future land use map |
816 | and not located within the coastal high hazard area. |
817 | (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a development, |
818 | or any phase thereof, by more than 7 or more years shall be |
819 | presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further |
820 | development-of-regional-impact review. An extension of the date |
821 | of buildout, or any phase thereof, of more than 5 years or more |
822 | but not more less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a |
823 | substantial deviation. The extension of the date of buildout of |
824 | an areawide development of regional impact by more than 5 years |
825 | but less than 10 years is presumed not to create a substantial |
826 | deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and |
827 | convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
828 | government. An extension of 5 years or less than 5 years is not |
829 | a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a |
830 | buildout or, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the |
831 | time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or |
832 | judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any |
833 | extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof |
834 | shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, |
835 | the termination date of the development order, the expiration |
836 | date of the development of regional impact, and the phases |
837 | thereof if applicable by a like period of time. |
838 | (d) A change in the plan of development of an approved |
839 | development of regional impact resulting from requirements |
840 | imposed by the Department of Environmental Protection or any |
841 | water management district created by s. 373.069 or any of their |
842 | successor agencies or by any appropriate federal regulatory |
843 | agency shall be submitted to the local government pursuant to |
844 | this subsection. The change shall be presumed not to create a |
845 | substantial deviation subject to further development-of- |
846 | regional-impact review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear |
847 | and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
848 | government. |
849 | (e)1. Except for a development order rendered pursuant to |
850 | subsection (22) or subsection (25), a proposed change to a |
851 | development order that individually or cumulatively with any |
852 | previous change is less than any numerical criterion contained |
853 | in subparagraphs (b)1.-13. (b)1.-15. and does not exceed any |
854 | other criterion, or that involves an extension of the buildout |
855 | date of a development, or any phase thereof, of less than 5 |
856 | years is not subject to the public hearing requirements of |
857 | subparagraph (f)3., and is not subject to a determination |
858 | pursuant to subparagraph (f)5. Notice of the proposed change |
859 | shall be made to the regional planning council and the state |
860 | land planning agency. Such notice shall include a description of |
861 | previous individual changes made to the development, including |
862 | changes previously approved by the local government, and shall |
863 | include appropriate amendments to the development order. |
864 | 2. The following changes, individually or cumulatively |
865 | with any previous changes, are not substantial deviations: |
866 | a. Changes in the name of the project, developer, owner, |
867 | or monitoring official. |
868 | b. Changes to a setback that do not affect noise buffers, |
869 | environmental protection or mitigation areas, or archaeological |
870 | or historical resources. |
871 | c. Changes to minimum lot sizes. |
872 | d. Changes in the configuration of internal roads that do |
873 | not affect external access points. |
874 | e. Changes to the building design or orientation that stay |
875 | approximately within the approved area designated for such |
876 | building and parking lot, and which do not affect historical |
877 | buildings designated as significant by the Division of |
878 | Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
879 | f. Changes to increase the acreage in the development, |
880 | provided that no development is proposed on the acreage to be |
881 | added. |
882 | g. Changes to eliminate an approved land use, provided |
883 | that there are no additional regional impacts. |
884 | h. Changes required to conform to permits approved by any |
885 | federal, state, or regional permitting agency, provided that |
886 | these changes do not create additional regional impacts. |
887 | i. Any renovation or redevelopment of development within a |
888 | previously approved development of regional impact which does |
889 | not change land use or increase density or intensity of use. |
890 | j. Changes that modify boundaries and configuration of |
891 | areas described in subparagraph (b)14. due to science-based |
892 | refinement of such areas by survey, by habitat evaluation, by |
893 | other recognized assessment methodology, or by an environmental |
894 | assessment. In order for changes to qualify under this sub- |
895 | subparagraph, the survey, habitat evaluation, or assessment must |
896 | occur prior to the time a conservation easement protecting such |
897 | lands is recorded and must not result in any net decrease in the |
898 | total acreage of the lands specifically set aside for permanent |
899 | preservation in the final development order. |
900 | k.j. Any other change which the state land planning |
901 | agency, in consultation with the regional planning council, |
902 | agrees in writing is similar in nature, impact, or character to |
903 | the changes enumerated in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. a.-i. and |
904 | which does not create the likelihood of any additional regional |
905 | impact. |
906 |
|
907 | This subsection does not require the filing of a notice of |
908 | proposed change but shall require an application to the local |
909 | government to amend the development order in accordance with the |
910 | local government's procedures for amendment of a development |
911 | order. In accordance with the local government's procedures, |
912 | including requirements for notice to the applicant and the |
913 | public, the local government shall either deny the application |
914 | for amendment or adopt an amendment to the development order |
915 | which approves the application with or without conditions. |
916 | Following adoption, the local government shall render to the |
917 | state land planning agency the amendment to the development |
918 | order. The state land planning agency may appeal, pursuant to s. |
919 | 380.07(3), the amendment to the development order if the |
920 | amendment involves sub-subparagraph g., sub-subparagraph h., |
921 | sub-subparagraph j., or sub-subparagraph k. and it believes the |
922 | change creates a reasonable likelihood of new or additional |
923 | regional impacts a development order amendment for any change |
924 | listed in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. unless such issue is addressed |
925 | either in the existing development order or in the application |
926 | for development approval, but, in the case of the application, |
927 | only if, and in the manner in which, the application is |
928 | incorporated in the development order. |
929 | 3. Except for the change authorized by sub-subparagraph |
930 | 2.f., any addition of land not previously reviewed or any change |
931 | not specified in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) shall be |
932 | presumed to create a substantial deviation. This presumption may |
933 | be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. |
934 | 4. Any submittal of a proposed change to a previously |
935 | approved development shall include a description of individual |
936 | changes previously made to the development, including changes |
937 | previously approved by the local government. The local |
938 | government shall consider the previous and current proposed |
939 | changes in deciding whether such changes cumulatively constitute |
940 | a substantial deviation requiring further development-of- |
941 | regional-impact review. |
942 | 5. The following changes to an approved development of |
943 | regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial |
944 | deviation. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and |
945 | convincing evidence. |
946 | a. A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the acreage |
947 | to a land use not previously approved in the development order. |
948 | Changes of less than 15 percent shall be presumed not to create |
949 | a substantial deviation. |
950 | b. Except for the types of uses listed in subparagraph |
951 | (b)16., any change which would result in the development of any |
952 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
953 | development approval or in the development order for |
954 | preservation, buffers, or special protection, including habitat |
955 | for plant and animal species, archaeological and historical |
956 | sites, dunes, and other special areas. |
957 | b.c. Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the |
958 | contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases |
959 | and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized |
960 | multiuse development of regional impact which was originally |
961 | approved with three or more uses specified in s. 380.0651(3)(c), |
962 | (d), (e)(f), and (f)(g) and residential use. |
963 | (f)1. The state land planning agency shall establish by |
964 | rule standard forms for submittal of proposed changes to a |
965 | previously approved development of regional impact which may |
966 | require further development-of-regional-impact review. At a |
967 | minimum, the standard form shall require the developer to |
968 | provide the precise language that the developer proposes to |
969 | delete or add as an amendment to the development order. |
970 | 2. The developer shall submit, simultaneously, to the |
971 | local government, the regional planning agency, and the state |
972 | land planning agency the request for approval of a proposed |
973 | change. |
974 | 3. No sooner than 30 days but no later than 45 days after |
975 | submittal by the developer to the local government, the state |
976 | land planning agency, and the appropriate regional planning |
977 | agency, the local government shall give 15 days' notice and |
978 | schedule a public hearing to consider the change that the |
979 | developer asserts does not create a substantial deviation. This |
980 | public hearing shall be held within 60 90 days after submittal |
981 | of the proposed changes, unless that time is extended by the |
982 | developer. |
983 | 4. The appropriate regional planning agency or the state |
984 | land planning agency shall review the proposed change and, no |
985 | later than 45 days after submittal by the developer of the |
986 | proposed change, unless that time is extended by the developer, |
987 | and prior to the public hearing at which the proposed change is |
988 | to be considered, shall advise the local government in writing |
989 | whether it objects to the proposed change, shall specify the |
990 | reasons for its objection, if any, and shall provide a copy to |
991 | the developer. |
992 | 5. At the public hearing, the local government shall |
993 | determine whether the proposed change requires further |
994 | development-of-regional-impact review. The provisions of |
995 | paragraphs (a) and (e), the thresholds set forth in paragraph |
996 | (b), and the presumptions set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) |
997 | and subparagraph (e)3. shall be applicable in determining |
998 | whether further development-of-regional-impact review is |
999 | required. |
1000 | 6. If the local government determines that the proposed |
1001 | change does not require further development-of-regional-impact |
1002 | review and is otherwise approved, or if the proposed change is |
1003 | not subject to a hearing and determination pursuant to |
1004 | subparagraphs 3. and 5. and is otherwise approved, the local |
1005 | government shall issue an amendment to the development order |
1006 | incorporating the approved change and conditions of approval |
1007 | relating to the change. The requirement that a change be |
1008 | otherwise approved shall not be construed to require additional |
1009 | local review or approval if the change is allowed by applicable |
1010 | local ordinances without further local review or approval. The |
1011 | decision of the local government to approve, with or without |
1012 | conditions, or to deny the proposed change that the developer |
1013 | asserts does not require further review shall be subject to the |
1014 | appeal provisions of s. 380.07. However, the state land planning |
1015 | agency may not appeal the local government decision if it did |
1016 | not comply with subparagraph 4. The state land planning agency |
1017 | may not appeal a change to a development order made pursuant to |
1018 | subparagraph (e)1. or subparagraph (e)2. for developments of |
1019 | regional impact approved after January 1, 1980, unless the |
1020 | change would result in a significant impact to a regionally |
1021 | significant archaeological, historical, or natural resource not |
1022 | previously identified in the original development-of-regional- |
1023 | impact review. |
1024 | (g) If a proposed change requires further development-of- |
1025 | regional-impact review pursuant to this section, the review |
1026 | shall be conducted subject to the following additional |
1027 | conditions: |
1028 | 1. The development-of-regional-impact review conducted by |
1029 | the appropriate regional planning agency shall address only |
1030 | those issues raised by the proposed change except as provided in |
1031 | subparagraph 2. |
1032 | 2. The regional planning agency shall consider, and the |
1033 | local government shall determine whether to approve, approve |
1034 | with conditions, or deny the proposed change as it relates to |
1035 | the entire development. If the local government determines that |
1036 | the proposed change, as it relates to the entire development, is |
1037 | unacceptable, the local government shall deny the change. |
1038 | 3. If the local government determines that the proposed |
1039 | change, as it relates to the entire development, should be |
1040 | approved, any new conditions in the amendment to the development |
1041 | order issued by the local government shall address only those |
1042 | issues raised by the proposed change and require mitigation only |
1043 | for the individual and cumulative impacts of the proposed |
1044 | change. |
1045 | 4. Development within the previously approved development |
1046 | of regional impact may continue, as approved, during the |
1047 | development-of-regional-impact review in those portions of the |
1048 | development which are not directly affected by the proposed |
1049 | change. |
1050 | (h) When further development-of-regional-impact review is |
1051 | required because a substantial deviation has been determined or |
1052 | admitted by the developer, the amendment to the development |
1053 | order issued by the local government shall be consistent with |
1054 | the requirements of subsection (15) and shall be subject to the |
1055 | hearing and appeal provisions of s. 380.07. The state land |
1056 | planning agency or the appropriate regional planning agency need |
1057 | not participate at the local hearing in order to appeal a local |
1058 | government development order issued pursuant to this paragraph. |
1059 | (i) An increase in the number of residential dwelling |
1060 | units shall not constitute a substantial deviation and shall not |
1061 | be subject to development-of-regional-impact review for |
1062 | additional impacts provided that all the residential dwelling |
1063 | units are dedicated to affordable workforce housing, subject to |
1064 | a recorded land use restriction that shall be for a period of |
1065 | not less than 20 years and that includes resale provisions to |
1066 | ensure long-term affordability for income-eligible homeowners |
1067 | and renters. For purposes of this paragraph, the term |
1068 | "affordable workforce housing" means housing that is affordable |
1069 | to a person who earns less than 120 percent of the area median |
1070 | income, or less than 140 percent of the area median income if |
1071 | located in a county in which the median purchase price for a |
1072 | single-family existing home exceeds the statewide median |
1073 | purchase price of a single-family existing home. For purposes of |
1074 | this paragraph, the term "statewide median purchase price of a |
1075 | single-family existing home" means the statewide purchase price |
1076 | as determined in the Florida Sales Report, Single-Family |
1077 | Existing Homes, released each January by the Florida Association |
1078 | of Realtors and the University of Florida Real Estate Research |
1079 | Center. |
1080 | (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
1081 | (a) Any proposed hospital which has a designed capacity of |
1082 | not more than 100 beds is exempt from the provisions of this |
1083 | section. |
1084 | (b) Any proposed electrical transmission line or |
1085 | electrical power plant is exempt from the provisions of this |
1086 | section, except any steam or solar electrical generating |
1087 | facility of less than 50 megawatts in capacity attached to a |
1088 | development of regional impact. |
1089 | (c) Any proposed addition to an existing sports facility |
1090 | complex is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
1091 | addition meets the following characteristics: |
1092 | 1. It would not operate concurrently with the scheduled |
1093 | hours of operation of the existing facility. |
1094 | 2. Its seating capacity would be no more than 75 percent |
1095 | of the capacity of the existing facility. |
1096 | 3. The sports facility complex property is owned by a |
1097 | public body prior to July 1, 1983. |
1098 |
|
1099 | This exemption does not apply to any pari-mutuel facility. |
1100 | (d) Any proposed addition or cumulative additions |
1101 | subsequent to July 1, 1988, to an existing sports facility |
1102 | complex owned by a state university is exempt if the increased |
1103 | seating capacity of the complex is no more than 30 percent of |
1104 | the capacity of the existing facility. |
1105 | (e) Any addition of permanent seats or parking spaces for |
1106 | an existing sports facility located on property owned by a |
1107 | public body prior to July 1, 1973, is exempt from the provisions |
1108 | of this section if future additions do not expand existing |
1109 | permanent seating or parking capacity more than 15 percent |
1110 | annually in excess of the prior year's capacity. |
1111 | (f) Any increase in the seating capacity of an existing |
1112 | sports facility having a permanent seating capacity of at least |
1113 | 50,000 spectators is exempt from the provisions of this section, |
1114 | provided that such an increase does not increase permanent |
1115 | seating capacity by more than 5 percent per year and not to |
1116 | exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year period, and provided |
1117 | that the sports facility notifies the appropriate local |
1118 | government within which the facility is located of the increase |
1119 | at least 6 months prior to the initial use of the increased |
1120 | seating, in order to permit the appropriate local government to |
1121 | develop a traffic management plan for the traffic generated by |
1122 | the increase. Any traffic management plan shall be consistent |
1123 | with the local comprehensive plan, the regional policy plan, and |
1124 | the state comprehensive plan. |
1125 | (g) Any expansion in the permanent seating capacity or |
1126 | additional improved parking facilities of an existing sports |
1127 | facility is exempt from the provisions of this section, if the |
1128 | following conditions exist: |
1129 | 1.a. The sports facility had a permanent seating capacity |
1130 | on January 1, 1991, of at least 41,000 spectator seats; |
1131 | b. The sum of such expansions in permanent seating |
1132 | capacity does not exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year |
1133 | period and does not exceed a cumulative total of 20 percent for |
1134 | any such expansions; or |
1135 | c. The increase in additional improved parking facilities |
1136 | is a one-time addition and does not exceed 3,500 parking spaces |
1137 | serving the sports facility; and |
1138 | 2. The local government having jurisdiction of the sports |
1139 | facility includes in the development order or development permit |
1140 | approving such expansion under this paragraph a finding of fact |
1141 | that the proposed expansion is consistent with the |
1142 | transportation, water, sewer and stormwater drainage provisions |
1143 | of the approved local comprehensive plan and local land |
1144 | development regulations relating to those provisions. |
1145 |
|
1146 | Any owner or developer who intends to rely on this statutory |
1147 | exemption shall provide to the department a copy of the local |
1148 | government application for a development permit. Within 45 days |
1149 | of receipt of the application, the department shall render to |
1150 | the local government an advisory and nonbinding opinion, in |
1151 | writing, stating whether, in the department's opinion, the |
1152 | prescribed conditions exist for an exemption under this |
1153 | paragraph. The local government shall render the development |
1154 | order approving each such expansion to the department. The |
1155 | owner, developer, or department may appeal the local government |
1156 | development order pursuant to s. 380.07, within 45 days after |
1157 | the order is rendered. The scope of review shall be limited to |
1158 | the determination of whether the conditions prescribed in this |
1159 | paragraph exist. If any sports facility expansion undergoes |
1160 | development of regional impact review, all previous expansions |
1161 | which were exempt under this paragraph shall be included in the |
1162 | development of regional impact review. |
1163 | (h) Expansion to port harbors, spoil disposal sites, |
1164 | navigation channels, turning basins, harbor berths, and other |
1165 | related inwater harbor facilities of ports listed in s. |
1166 | 403.021(9)(b), port transportation facilities and projects |
1167 | listed in s. 311.07(3)(b), and intermodal transportation |
1168 | facilities identified pursuant to s. 311.09(3) are exempt from |
1169 | the provisions of this section when such expansions, projects, |
1170 | or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans |
1171 | that are in compliance with the provisions of s. 163.3178. |
1172 | (i) Any proposed facility for the storage of any petroleum |
1173 | product or any expansion of an existing facility is exempt from |
1174 | the provisions of this section, if the facility is consistent |
1175 | with a local comprehensive plan that is in compliance with s. |
1176 | 163.3177 or is consistent with a comprehensive port master plan |
1177 | that is in compliance with s. 163.3178. |
1178 | (j) Any renovation or redevelopment within the same land |
1179 | parcel which does not change land use or increase density or |
1180 | intensity of use. |
1181 | (k)1. Waterport and marina development, including dry |
1182 | storage facilities, are exempt from the provisions of this |
1183 | section Any waterport or marina development is exempt from the |
1184 | provisions of this section if the relevant county or |
1185 | municipality has adopted a boating facility siting plan or |
1186 | policy which includes applicable criteria, considering such |
1187 | factors as natural resources, manatee protection needs and |
1188 | recreation and economic demands as generally outlined in the |
1189 | Bureau of Protected Species Management Boat Facility Siting |
1190 | Guide, dated August 2000, into the coastal management or land |
1191 | use element of its comprehensive plan. The adoption of boating |
1192 | facility siting plans or policies into the comprehensive plan is |
1193 | exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). Any waterport or |
1194 | marina development within the municipalities or counties with |
1195 | boating facility siting plans or policies that meet the above |
1196 | criteria, adopted prior to April 1, 2002, are exempt from the |
1197 | provisions of this section, when their boating facility siting |
1198 | plan or policy is adopted as part of the relevant local |
1199 | government's comprehensive plan. |
1200 | 2. Within 6 months of the effective date of this law, The |
1201 | Department of Community Affairs, in conjunction with the |
1202 | Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Fish and |
1203 | Wildlife Conservation Commission, shall provide technical |
1204 | assistance and guidelines, including model plans, policies and |
1205 | criteria to local governments for the development of their |
1206 | siting plans. |
1207 | (l) Any proposed development within an urban service |
1208 | boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the |
1209 | provisions of this section if the local government having |
1210 | jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has |
1211 | adopted the urban service boundary, and has entered into a |
1212 | binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions that would be |
1213 | impacted and with the Department of Transportation regarding the |
1214 | mitigation of impacts on state and regional transportation |
1215 | facilities, and has adopted a proportionate share methodology |
1216 | pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
1217 | (m) Any proposed development within a rural land |
1218 | stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from |
1219 | the provisions of this section if the local government that has |
1220 | adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a |
1221 | binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and |
1222 | the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of |
1223 | impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has |
1224 | adopted a proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. |
1225 | 163.3180(16). |
1226 | (n) Any proposed development or redevelopment within an |
1227 | area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under |
1228 | s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
1229 | local government has entered into a binding agreement with |
1230 | jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of |
1231 | Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and |
1232 | regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a |
1233 | proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
1234 | (o) The establishment, relocation, or expansion of any |
1235 | military installation as defined in s. 163.3175, is exempt from |
1236 | this section. |
1237 | (p) Any self-storage warehousing that does not allow |
1238 | retail or other services is exempt from this section. |
1239 | (q) Any proposed nursing home or assisted living facility |
1240 | is exempt from this section. |
1241 | (r) Any development identified in an airport master plan |
1242 | and adopted into the comprehensive plan pursuant to s. |
1243 | 163.3177(6)(k) is exempt from this section. |
1244 | (s) Any development identified in a campus master plan and |
1245 | adopted pursuant to s. 1013.30 is exempt from this section. |
1246 | (t) Any development in a specific area plan which is |
1247 | prepared pursuant to s. 163.3245 and adopted into the |
1248 | comprehensive plan is exempt from this section. |
1249 |
|
1250 | If a use is exempt from review as a development of regional |
1251 | impact under paragraphs (a)-(t) but will be part of a larger |
1252 | project that is subject to review as a development of regional |
1253 | impact, the impact of the exempt use must be included in the |
1254 | review of the larger project. |
1255 | (28) PARTIAL STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
1256 | (a) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
1257 | (24)(l) for urban service boundaries is not entered into within |
1258 | 12 months after establishment of the urban service boundary, the |
1259 | development-of-regional-impact review for projects within the |
1260 | urban service boundary must address transportation impacts only. |
1261 | (b) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
1262 | (24)(m) for rural land stewardship areas is not entered into |
1263 | within 12 months after the designation of a rural land |
1264 | stewardship area, the development-of-regional-impact review for |
1265 | projects within the rural land stewardship area must address |
1266 | transportation impacts only. |
1267 | (c) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
1268 | (24)(n) for designated urban infill and redevelopment areas is |
1269 | not entered into within 12 months after the designation of the |
1270 | area or July 1, 2007, whichever occurs later, the development- |
1271 | of-regional-impact review for projects within the urban infill |
1272 | and redevelopment area must address transportation impacts only. |
1273 | (d) A local government that does not wish to enter into a |
1274 | binding agreement or that is unable to agree on the terms of the |
1275 | agreement referenced under paragraph (24)(l), paragraph (24)(m), |
1276 | or paragraph (24)(n) shall provide written notification to the |
1277 | state land planning agency of the decision to not enter into a |
1278 | binding agreement or the failure to enter into a binding |
1279 | agreement within the 12-month period referenced in paragraphs |
1280 | (a), (b) and (c). Following the notification of the state land |
1281 | planning agency, development-of-regional-impact review for |
1282 | projects within an urban service boundary under paragraph |
1283 | (24)(l), a rural land stewardship area under paragraph (24)(m), |
1284 | or an urban infill and redevelopment area under paragraph |
1285 | (24)(n), must address transportation impacts only. |
1286 | (e) The vesting provision of s. 163.3167(8) relating to an |
1287 | authorized development of regional impact shall not apply to |
1288 | those projects partially exempt from the development-of- |
1289 | regional-impact review process under paragraphs (a)-(d). |
1290 | Section 7. Paragraphs (d) and (e) of subsection (3) of |
1291 | section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, are amended, paragraphs (f) |
1292 | through (i) are redesignated as paragraphs (e) through (h), |
1293 | respectively, paragraph (j) is redesignated as paragraph (i) and |
1294 | amended, and a new paragraph (j) is added to that subsection, to |
1295 | read: |
1296 | 380.0651 Statewide guidelines and standards.-- |
1297 | (3) The following statewide guidelines and standards shall |
1298 | be applied in the manner described in s. 380.06(2) to determine |
1299 | whether the following developments shall be required to undergo |
1300 | development-of-regional-impact review: |
1301 | (d) Office development.--Any proposed office building or |
1302 | park operated under common ownership, development plan, or |
1303 | management that: |
1304 | 1. Encompasses 300,000 or more square feet of gross floor |
1305 | area; or |
1306 | 2. Encompasses more than 600,000 square feet of gross |
1307 | floor area in a county with a population greater than 500,000 |
1308 | and only in a geographic area specifically designated as highly |
1309 | suitable for increased threshold intensity in the approved local |
1310 | comprehensive plan and in the strategic regional policy plan. |
1311 | (e) Port facilities.--The proposed construction of any |
1312 | waterport or marina is required to undergo |
1313 | development-of-regional-impact review, except one designed for: |
1314 | 1.a. The wet storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
1315 | watercraft used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial |
1316 | fishing, or |
1317 | b. The dry storage of fewer than 200 watercraft used |
1318 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing, or |
1319 | c. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
1320 | watercraft on or adjacent to an inland freshwater lake except |
1321 | Lake Okeechobee or any lake which has been designated an |
1322 | Outstanding Florida Water, or |
1323 | d. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 50 |
1324 | watercraft of 40 feet in length or less of any type or purpose. |
1325 | The exceptions to this paragraph's requirements for development- |
1326 | of-regional-impact review shall not apply to any waterport or |
1327 | marina facility located within or which serves physical |
1328 | development located within a coastal barrier resource unit on an |
1329 | unbridged barrier island designated pursuant to 16 U.S.C. s. |
1330 | 3501. |
1331 |
|
1332 | In addition to the foregoing, for projects for which no |
1333 | environmental resource permit or sovereign submerged land lease |
1334 | is required, the Department of Environmental Protection must |
1335 | determine in writing that a proposed marina in excess of 10 |
1336 | slips or storage spaces or a combination of the two is located |
1337 | so that it will not adversely impact Outstanding Florida Waters |
1338 | or Class II waters and will not contribute boat traffic in a |
1339 | manner that will have an adverse impact on an area known to be, |
1340 | or likely to be, frequented by manatees. If the Department of |
1341 | Environmental Protection fails to issue its determination within |
1342 | 45 days of receipt of a formal written request, it has waived |
1343 | its authority to make such determination. The Department of |
1344 | Environmental Protection determination shall constitute final |
1345 | agency action pursuant to chapter 120. |
1346 | 2. The dry storage of fewer than 300 watercraft used |
1347 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing at a |
1348 | marina constructed and in operation prior to July 1, 1985. |
1349 | 3. Any proposed marina development with both wet and dry |
1350 | mooring or storage used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or |
1351 | commercial fishing, where the sum of percentages of the |
1352 | applicable wet and dry mooring or storage thresholds equals 100 |
1353 | percent. This threshold is in addition to, and does not |
1354 | preclude, a development from being required to undergo |
1355 | development-of-regional-impact review under sub-subparagraphs |
1356 | 1.a. and b. and subparagraph 2. |
1357 | (i)(j) Residential development.--No rule may be adopted |
1358 | concerning residential developments which treats a residential |
1359 | development in one county as being located in a less populated |
1360 | adjacent county unless more than 25 percent of the development |
1361 | is located within 2 or less miles of the less populated adjacent |
1362 | county. The residential thresholds of adjacent counties with |
1363 | less population and a lower threshold shall not be controlling |
1364 | on any development wholly located within a municipality in a |
1365 | rural county of economic concern. |
1366 | (j) Workforce housing.--The applicable guidelines for |
1367 | residential development and the residential component for |
1368 | multiuse development shall be increased by 50 percent where the |
1369 | developer demonstrates that at least 15 percent of the total |
1370 | residential dwelling units authorized within the development of |
1371 | regional impact will be dedicated to affordable workforce |
1372 | housing, subject to a recorded land use restriction that shall |
1373 | be for a period of not less than 20 years and that includes |
1374 | resale provisions to ensure long-term affordability for income- |
1375 | eligible homeowners and renters and provisions for the workforce |
1376 | housing to be commenced prior to the completion of 50 percent of |
1377 | the market rate dwelling. For purposes of this paragraph, the |
1378 | term "affordable workforce housing" means housing that is |
1379 | affordable to a person who earns less than 120 percent of the |
1380 | area median income, or less than 140 percent of the area median |
1381 | income if located in a county in which the median purchase price |
1382 | for a single-family existing home exceeds the statewide median |
1383 | purchase price of a single-family existing home. For the |
1384 | purposes of this paragraph, the term "statewide median purchase |
1385 | price of a single-family existing home" means the statewide |
1386 | purchase price as determined in the Florida Sales Report, |
1387 | Single-Family Existing Homes, released each January by the |
1388 | Florida Association of Realtors and the University of Florida |
1389 | Real Estate Research Center. |
1390 | Section 8. Section 380.07, Florida Statutes, is amended to |
1391 | read: |
1392 | 380.07 Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission.-- |
1393 | (1) There is hereby created the Florida Land and Water |
1394 | Adjudicatory Commission, which shall consist of the |
1395 | Administration Commission. The commission may adopt rules |
1396 | necessary to ensure compliance with the area of critical state |
1397 | concern program and the requirements for developments of |
1398 | regional impact as set forth in this chapter. |
1399 | (2) Whenever any local government issues any development |
1400 | order in any area of critical state concern, or in regard to any |
1401 | development of regional impact, copies of such orders as |
1402 | prescribed by rule by the state land planning agency shall be |
1403 | transmitted to the state land planning agency, the regional |
1404 | planning agency, and the owner or developer of the property |
1405 | affected by such order. The state land planning agency shall |
1406 | adopt rules describing development order rendition and |
1407 | effectiveness in designated areas of critical state concern. |
1408 | Within 45 days after the order is rendered, the owner, the |
1409 | developer, or the state land planning agency may appeal the |
1410 | order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission by |
1411 | filing a petition alleging that the development order is not |
1412 | consistent with the provisions of this part notice of appeal |
1413 | with the commission. The appropriate regional planning agency by |
1414 | vote at a regularly scheduled meeting may recommend that the |
1415 | state land planning agency undertake an appeal of a development- |
1416 | of-regional-impact development order. Upon the request of an |
1417 | appropriate regional planning council, affected local |
1418 | government, or any citizen, the state land planning agency shall |
1419 | consider whether to appeal the order and shall respond to the |
1420 | request within the 45-day appeal period. Any appeal taken by a |
1421 | regional planning agency between March 1, 1993, and the |
1422 | effective date of this section may only be continued if the |
1423 | state land planning agency has also filed an appeal. Any appeal |
1424 | initiated by a regional planning agency on or before March 1, |
1425 | 1993, shall continue until completion of the appeal process and |
1426 | any subsequent appellate review, as if the regional planning |
1427 | agency were authorized to initiate the appeal. |
1428 | (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an appeal |
1429 | of a development order by the state land planning agency under |
1430 | this section may include consistency of the development order |
1431 | with the local comprehensive plan. However, if a development |
1432 | order relating to a development of regional impact has been |
1433 | challenged in a proceeding under s. 163.3215 and a party to the |
1434 | proceeding serves notice to the state land planning agency of |
1435 | the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215, the state land |
1436 | planning agency shall: |
1437 | (a) Raise its consistency issues by intervening as a full |
1438 | party in the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215 within 30 days |
1439 | after service of the notice; and |
1440 | (b) Dismiss the consistency issues from the development |
1441 | order appeal. |
1442 | (4) The appellant shall furnish a copy of the petition to |
1443 | the opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local |
1444 | government that issued the order. The filing of the petition |
1445 | stays the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
1446 | of the appeal process. |
1447 | (5)(3) The 45-day appeal period for a development of |
1448 | regional impact within the jurisdiction of more than one local |
1449 | government shall not commence until after all the local |
1450 | governments having jurisdiction over the proposed development of |
1451 | regional impact have rendered their development orders. The |
1452 | appellant shall furnish a copy of the notice of appeal to the |
1453 | opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local government |
1454 | which issued the order. The filing of the notice of appeal shall |
1455 | stay the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
1456 | of the appeal process. |
1457 | (6)(4) Prior to issuing an order, the Florida Land and |
1458 | Water Adjudicatory Commission shall hold a hearing pursuant to |
1459 | the provisions of chapter 120. The commission shall encourage |
1460 | the submission of appeals on the record made below in cases in |
1461 | which the development order was issued after a full and complete |
1462 | hearing before the local government or an agency thereof. |
1463 | (7)(5) The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission |
1464 | shall issue a decision granting or denying permission to develop |
1465 | pursuant to the standards of this chapter and may attach |
1466 | conditions and restrictions to its decisions. |
1467 | (8)(6) If an appeal is filed with respect to any issues |
1468 | within the scope of a permitting program authorized by chapter |
1469 | 161, chapter 373, or chapter 403 and for which a permit or |
1470 | conceptual review approval has been obtained prior to the |
1471 | issuance of a development order, any such issue shall be |
1472 | specifically identified in the notice of appeal which is filed |
1473 | pursuant to this section, together with other issues which |
1474 | constitute grounds for the appeal. The appeal may proceed with |
1475 | respect to issues within the scope of permitting programs for |
1476 | which a permit or conceptual review approval has been obtained |
1477 | prior to the issuance of a development order only after the |
1478 | commission determines by majority vote at a regularly scheduled |
1479 | commission meeting that statewide or regional interests may be |
1480 | adversely affected by the development. In making this |
1481 | determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that |
1482 | statewide and regional interests relating to issues within the |
1483 | scope of the permitting programs for which a permit or |
1484 | conceptual approval has been obtained are not adversely |
1485 | affected. |
1486 | Section 9. Section 380.115, Florida Statutes, is amended |
1487 | to read: |
1488 | 380.115 Vested rights and duties; effect of size |
1489 | reduction, changes in guidelines and standards chs. 2002-20 and |
1490 | 2002-296.-- |
1491 | (1) A change in a development-of-regional-impact guideline |
1492 | and standard does not abridge Nothing contained in this act |
1493 | abridges or modify modifies any vested or other right or any |
1494 | duty or obligation pursuant to any development order or |
1495 | agreement that is applicable to a development of regional impact |
1496 | on the effective date of this act. A development that has |
1497 | received a development-of-regional-impact development order |
1498 | pursuant to s. 380.06, but is no longer required to undergo |
1499 | development-of-regional-impact review by operation of a change |
1500 | in the guidelines and standards or has reduced its size below |
1501 | the thresholds in s. 380.0651 of this act, shall be governed by |
1502 | the following procedures: |
1503 | (a) The development shall continue to be governed by the |
1504 | development-of-regional-impact development order and may be |
1505 | completed in reliance upon and pursuant to the development order |
1506 | unless the developer or landowner has followed the procedures |
1507 | for rescission in paragraph (b). Any proposed changes to those |
1508 | developments which continue to be governed by a development |
1509 | order shall be approved pursuant to s. 380.06(19) as it existed |
1510 | prior to a change in the development-of-regional-impact |
1511 | guidelines and standards, except that all percentage criteria |
1512 | shall be doubled and all other criteria shall be increased by 10 |
1513 | percent. The development-of-regional-impact development order |
1514 | may be enforced by the local government as provided by ss. |
1515 | 380.06(17) and 380.11. |
1516 | (b) If requested by the developer or landowner, the |
1517 | development-of-regional-impact development order shall may be |
1518 | rescinded by the local government having jurisdiction upon a |
1519 | showing that all required mitigation related to the amount of |
1520 | development that existed on the date of rescission has been |
1521 | completed abandoned pursuant to the process in s. 380.06(26). |
1522 | (2) A development with an application for development |
1523 | approval pending, and determined sufficient pursuant to s. |
1524 | 380.06 s. 380.06(10), on the effective date of a change to the |
1525 | guidelines and standards this act, or a notification of proposed |
1526 | change pending on the effective date of a change to the |
1527 | guidelines and standards this act, may elect to continue such |
1528 | review pursuant to s. 380.06. At the conclusion of the pending |
1529 | review, including any appeals pursuant to s. 380.07, the |
1530 | resulting development order shall be governed by the provisions |
1531 | of subsection (1). |
1532 | (3) A landowner that has filed an application for a |
1533 | development-of-regional-impact review prior to the adoption of |
1534 | an optional sector plan pursuant to s. 163.3245 may elect to |
1535 | have the application reviewed pursuant to s. 380.06, |
1536 | comprehensive plan provisions in force prior to adoption of the |
1537 | sector plan, and any requested comprehensive plan amendments |
1538 | that accompany the application. |
1539 | Section 10. Paragraph (i) of subsection (2) of section |
1540 | 403.813, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
1541 | 403.813 Permits issued at district centers; exceptions.-- |
1542 | (2) A permit is not required under this chapter, chapter |
1543 | 373, chapter 61-691, Laws of Florida, or chapter 25214 or |
1544 | chapter 25270, 1949, Laws of Florida, for activities associated |
1545 | with the following types of projects; however, except as |
1546 | otherwise provided in this subsection, nothing in this |
1547 | subsection relieves an applicant from any requirement to obtain |
1548 | permission to use or occupy lands owned by the Board of Trustees |
1549 | of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund or any water management |
1550 | district in its governmental or proprietary capacity or from |
1551 | complying with applicable local pollution control programs |
1552 | authorized under this chapter or other requirements of county |
1553 | and municipal governments: |
1554 | (i) The construction of private docks of 1,000 square feet |
1555 | or less of over-water surface area and seawalls in artificially |
1556 | created waterways where such construction will not violate |
1557 | existing water quality standards, impede navigation, or affect |
1558 | flood control. This exemption does not apply to the construction |
1559 | of vertical seawalls in estuaries or lagoons unless the proposed |
1560 | construction is within an existing manmade canal where the |
1561 | shoreline is currently occupied in whole or part by vertical |
1562 | seawalls. |
1563 | Section 11. This act shall take effect July 1, 2006. |