1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to growth management; amending s. 163.01, |
3 | F.S.; revising provisions for filing certain interlocal |
4 | agreements and amendments; amending s. 163.3177, F.S.; |
5 | encouraging local governments to adopt recreational |
6 | surface water use policies; providing criteria and |
7 | exemptions for such policies; authorizing assistance for |
8 | the development of such policies; directing the Office of |
9 | Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability to |
10 | submit a report to the Legislature; revising a provision |
11 | relating to the amount of transferrable land use credits; |
12 | amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; conforming a cross-reference; |
13 | amending s. 197.303, F.S.; revising the criteria for ad |
14 | valorem tax deferral waterfront properties; amending s. |
15 | 342.07, F.S.; including hotels and motels within the |
16 | definition of the term "recreational and commercial |
17 | working waterfront"; creating s. 373.4132, F.S.; directing |
18 | water management district governing boards and the |
19 | Department of Environmental Protection to require permits |
20 | for certain activities relating to certain dry storage |
21 | facilities; providing criteria for application of such |
22 | permits; preserving regulatory authority for the |
23 | department and governing boards; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; |
24 | providing for the state land planning agency to determine |
25 | the amount of development that remains to be built in |
26 | certain circumstances; specifying certain requirements for |
27 | a development order; revising the circumstances in which a |
28 | local government may issue permits for development |
29 | subsequent to the buildout date; revising the definition |
30 | of an essentially built-out development; revising the |
31 | criteria under which a proposed change constitutes a |
32 | substantial deviation; providing criteria for calculating |
33 | certain deviations; clarifying the criteria under which |
34 | the extension of a buildout date is presumed to create a |
35 | substantial deviation; requiring that notice of any change |
36 | to certain set-aside areas be submitted to the local |
37 | government; requiring that notice of certain changes be |
38 | given to the state land planning agency, regional planning |
39 | agency, and local government; revising the statutory |
40 | exemptions from development-of-regional-impact review for |
41 | certain facilities; removing waterport and marina |
42 | developments from development-of-regional-impact review; |
43 | providing statutory exemptions and partial statutory |
44 | exemptions for the development of certain facilities; |
45 | providing that the impacts from an exempt use that will be |
46 | part of a larger project be included in the development- |
47 | of-regional-impact review of the larger project; providing |
48 | that vesting provisions relating to authorized |
49 | developments of regional impact are not applicable to |
50 | certain projects; revising provisions for the abandonment |
51 | of developments of regional impact; providing an exemption |
52 | from such provisions for certain developments of regional |
53 | impact; providing requirements for developments following |
54 | abandonment; amending s. 380.0651, F.S.; revising the |
55 | statewide guidelines and standards for development-of- |
56 | regional-impact review of office developments; deleting |
57 | such guidelines and standards for port facilities; |
58 | revising such guidelines and standards for residential |
59 | developments; providing such guidelines and standards for |
60 | workforce housing; amending s. 380.07, F.S.; revising the |
61 | appellate procedures for development orders within a |
62 | development of regional impact to the Florida Land and |
63 | Water Adjudicatory Commission; amending s. 380.115, F.S.; |
64 | providing that a change in a development-of-regional- |
65 | impact guideline and standard does not abridge or modify |
66 | any vested right or duty under a development order; |
67 | providing a process for the rescission of a development |
68 | order by the local government in certain circumstances; |
69 | providing an exemption for certain applications for |
70 | development approval and notices of proposed changes; |
71 | amending s. 403.813, F.S.; revising permitting exceptions |
72 | for the construction of private docks in certain |
73 | waterways; providing an effective date. |
74 |
|
75 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
76 |
|
77 | Section 1. Subsection (11) of section 163.01, Florida |
78 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
79 | 163.01 Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969.-- |
80 | (11) Prior to its effectiveness, an interlocal agreement |
81 | and subsequent amendments thereto shall be filed with the clerk |
82 | of the circuit court of each county where a party to the |
83 | agreement is located. However, if the parties to the agreement |
84 | are located in multiple counties and the agreement under |
85 | subsection (7) provides for a separate legal entity or |
86 | administrative entity to administer the agreement, the |
87 | interlocal agreement and any amendments thereto may be filed |
88 | with the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the |
89 | legal or administrative entity maintains its principal place of |
90 | business. |
91 | Section 2. Paragraph (g) of subsection (6) and paragraph |
92 | (d) of subsection (11) of section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, |
93 | are amended to read: |
94 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
95 | plan; studies and surveys.-- |
96 | (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5) |
97 | and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following |
98 | elements: |
99 | (g)1. For those units of local government identified in s. |
100 | 380.24, a coastal management element, appropriately related to |
101 | the particular requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) and |
102 | meeting the requirements of s. 163.3178(2) and (3). The coastal |
103 | management element shall set forth the policies that shall guide |
104 | the local government's decisions and program implementation with |
105 | respect to the following objectives: |
106 | a.1. Maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of the |
107 | overall quality of the coastal zone environment, including, but |
108 | not limited to, its amenities and aesthetic values. |
109 | b.2. Continued existence of viable populations of all |
110 | species of wildlife and marine life. |
111 | c.3. The orderly and balanced utilization and |
112 | preservation, consistent with sound conservation principles, of |
113 | all living and nonliving coastal zone resources. |
114 | d.4. Avoidance of irreversible and irretrievable loss of |
115 | coastal zone resources. |
116 | e.5. Ecological planning principles and assumptions to be |
117 | used in the determination of suitability and extent of permitted |
118 | development. |
119 | f.6. Proposed management and regulatory techniques. |
120 | g.7. Limitation of public expenditures that subsidize |
121 | development in high-hazard coastal areas. |
122 | h.8. Protection of human life against the effects of |
123 | natural disasters. |
124 | i.9. The orderly development, maintenance, and use of |
125 | ports identified in s. 403.021(9) to facilitate deepwater |
126 | commercial navigation and other related activities. |
127 | j.10. Preservation, including sensitive adaptive use of |
128 | historic and archaeological resources. |
129 | 2. As part of this element, a local government that has a |
130 | coastal management element in its comprehensive plan is |
131 | encouraged to adopt recreational surface water use policies that |
132 | include applicable criteria for and consider such factors as |
133 | natural resources, manatee protection needs, protection of |
134 | working waterfronts and public access to the water, and |
135 | recreation and economic demands. Criteria for manatee protection |
136 | in the recreational surface water use policies should reflect |
137 | applicable guidance outlined in the Boat Facility Siting Guide |
138 | prepared by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. If |
139 | the local government elects to adopt recreational surface water |
140 | use policies by comprehensive plan amendment, such comprehensive |
141 | plan amendment is exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). |
142 | Local governments that wish to adopt recreational surface water |
143 | use policies may be eligible for assistance with the development |
144 | of such policies through the Florida Coastal Management Program. |
145 | The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government |
146 | Accountability shall submit a report on the adoption of |
147 | recreational surface water use policies under this subparagraph |
148 | to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of |
149 | Representatives, and the majority and minority leaders of the |
150 | Senate and the House of Representatives no later than December |
151 | 1, 2010. |
152 | (11) |
153 | (d)1. The department, in cooperation with the Department |
154 | of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department of |
155 | Environmental Protection, water management districts, and |
156 | regional planning councils, shall provide assistance to local |
157 | governments in the implementation of this paragraph and rule 9J- |
158 | 5.006(5)(l), Florida Administrative Code. Implementation of |
159 | those provisions shall include a process by which the department |
160 | may authorize local governments to designate all or portions of |
161 | lands classified in the future land use element as predominantly |
162 | agricultural, rural, open, open-rural, or a substantively |
163 | equivalent land use, as a rural land stewardship area within |
164 | which planning and economic incentives are applied to encourage |
165 | the implementation of innovative and flexible planning and |
166 | development strategies and creative land use planning |
167 | techniques, including those contained herein and in rule 9J- |
168 | 5.006(5)(l), Florida Administrative Code. Assistance may |
169 | include, but is not limited to: |
170 | a. Assistance from the Department of Environmental |
171 | Protection and water management districts in creating the |
172 | geographic information systems land cover database and aerial |
173 | photogrammetry needed to prepare for a rural land stewardship |
174 | area; |
175 | b. Support for local government implementation of rural |
176 | land stewardship concepts by providing information and |
177 | assistance to local governments regarding land acquisition |
178 | programs that may be used by the local government or landowners |
179 | to leverage the protection of greater acreage and maximize the |
180 | effectiveness of rural land stewardship areas; and |
181 | c. Expansion of the role of the Department of Community |
182 | Affairs as a resource agency to facilitate establishment of |
183 | rural land stewardship areas in smaller rural counties that do |
184 | not have the staff or planning budgets to create a rural land |
185 | stewardship area. |
186 | 2. The department shall encourage participation by local |
187 | governments of different sizes and rural characteristics in |
188 | establishing and implementing rural land stewardship areas. It |
189 | is the intent of the Legislature that rural land stewardship |
190 | areas be used to further the following broad principles of rural |
191 | sustainability: restoration and maintenance of the economic |
192 | value of rural land; control of urban sprawl; identification and |
193 | protection of ecosystems, habitats, and natural resources; |
194 | promotion of rural economic activity; maintenance of the |
195 | viability of Florida's agricultural economy; and protection of |
196 | the character of rural areas of Florida. Rural land stewardship |
197 | areas may be multicounty in order to encourage coordinated |
198 | regional stewardship planning. |
199 | 3. A local government, in conjunction with a regional |
200 | planning council, a stakeholder organization of private land |
201 | owners, or another local government, shall notify the department |
202 | in writing of its intent to designate a rural land stewardship |
203 | area. The written notification shall describe the basis for the |
204 | designation, including the extent to which the rural land |
205 | stewardship area enhances rural land values, controls urban |
206 | sprawl, provides necessary open space for agriculture and |
207 | protection of the natural environment, promotes rural economic |
208 | activity, and maintains rural character and the economic |
209 | viability of agriculture. |
210 | 4. A rural land stewardship area shall be not less than |
211 | 10,000 acres and shall be located outside of municipalities and |
212 | established urban growth boundaries, and shall be designated by |
213 | plan amendment. The plan amendment designating a rural land |
214 | stewardship area shall be subject to review by the Department of |
215 | Community Affairs pursuant to s. 163.3184 and shall provide for |
216 | the following: |
217 | a. Criteria for the designation of receiving areas within |
218 | rural land stewardship areas in which innovative planning and |
219 | development strategies may be applied. Criteria shall at a |
220 | minimum provide for the following: adequacy of suitable land to |
221 | accommodate development so as to avoid conflict with |
222 | environmentally sensitive areas, resources, and habitats; |
223 | compatibility between and transition from higher density uses to |
224 | lower intensity rural uses; the establishment of receiving area |
225 | service boundaries which provide for a separation between |
226 | receiving areas and other land uses within the rural land |
227 | stewardship area through limitations on the extension of |
228 | services; and connection of receiving areas with the rest of the |
229 | rural land stewardship area using rural design and rural road |
230 | corridors. |
231 | b. Goals, objectives, and policies setting forth the |
232 | innovative planning and development strategies to be applied |
233 | within rural land stewardship areas pursuant to the provisions |
234 | of this section. |
235 | c. A process for the implementation of innovative planning |
236 | and development strategies within the rural land stewardship |
237 | area, including those described in this subsection and rule 9J- |
238 | 5.006(5)(l), Florida Administrative Code, which provide for a |
239 | functional mix of land uses, including adequate available |
240 | workforce housing, including low, very-low and moderate income |
241 | housing for the development anticipated in the receiving area |
242 | and which are applied through the adoption by the local |
243 | government of zoning and land development regulations applicable |
244 | to the rural land stewardship area. |
245 | d. A process which encourages visioning pursuant to s. |
246 | 163.3167(11) to ensure that innovative planning and development |
247 | strategies comply with the provisions of this section. |
248 | e. The control of sprawl through the use of innovative |
249 | strategies and creative land use techniques consistent with the |
250 | provisions of this subsection and rule 9J-5.006(5)(l), Florida |
251 | Administrative Code. |
252 | 5. A receiving area shall be designated by the adoption of |
253 | a land development regulation. Prior to the designation of a |
254 | receiving area, the local government shall provide the |
255 | Department of Community Affairs a period of 30 days in which to |
256 | review a proposed receiving area for consistency with the rural |
257 | land stewardship area plan amendment and to provide comments to |
258 | the local government. At the time of designation of a |
259 | stewardship receiving area, a listed species survey will be |
260 | performed. If listed species occur on the receiving area site, |
261 | the developer shall coordinate with each appropriate local, |
262 | state, or federal agency to determine if adequate provisions |
263 | have been made to protect those species in accordance with |
264 | applicable regulations. In determining the adequacy of |
265 | provisions for the protection of listed species and their |
266 | habitats, the rural land stewardship area shall be considered as |
267 | a whole, and the impacts to areas to be developed as receiving |
268 | areas shall be considered together with the environmental |
269 | benefits of areas protected as sending areas in fulfilling this |
270 | criteria. |
271 | 6. Upon the adoption of a plan amendment creating a rural |
272 | land stewardship area, the local government shall, by ordinance, |
273 | establish the methodology for the creation, conveyance, and use |
274 | of transferable rural land use credits, otherwise referred to as |
275 | stewardship credits, the application of which shall not |
276 | constitute a right to develop land, nor increase density of |
277 | land, except as provided by this section. The total amount of |
278 | transferable rural land use credits within the rural land |
279 | stewardship area must enable the realization of the long-term |
280 | vision and goals for the 25-year or greater projected population |
281 | of the rural land stewardship area, which may take into |
282 | consideration the anticipated effect of the proposed receiving |
283 | areas. Transferable rural land use credits are subject to the |
284 | following limitations: |
285 | a. Transferable rural land use credits may only exist |
286 | within a rural land stewardship area. |
287 | b. Transferable rural land use credits may only be used on |
288 | lands designated as receiving areas and then solely for the |
289 | purpose of implementing innovative planning and development |
290 | strategies and creative land use planning techniques adopted by |
291 | the local government pursuant to this section. |
292 | c. Transferable rural land use credits assigned to a |
293 | parcel of land within a rural land stewardship area shall cease |
294 | to exist if the parcel of land is removed from the rural land |
295 | stewardship area by plan amendment. |
296 | d. Neither the creation of the rural land stewardship area |
297 | by plan amendment nor the assignment of transferable rural land |
298 | use credits by the local government shall operate to displace |
299 | the underlying density of land uses assigned to a parcel of land |
300 | within the rural land stewardship area; however, if transferable |
301 | rural land use credits are transferred from a parcel for use |
302 | within a designated receiving area, the underlying density |
303 | assigned to the parcel of land shall cease to exist. |
304 | e. The underlying density on each parcel of land located |
305 | within a rural land stewardship area shall not be increased or |
306 | decreased by the local government, except as a result of the |
307 | conveyance or use of transferable rural land use credits, as |
308 | long as the parcel remains within the rural land stewardship |
309 | area. |
310 | f. Transferable rural land use credits shall cease to |
311 | exist on a parcel of land where the underlying density assigned |
312 | to the parcel of land is utilized. |
313 | g. An increase in the density of use on a parcel of land |
314 | located within a designated receiving area may occur only |
315 | through the assignment or use of transferable rural land use |
316 | credits and shall not require a plan amendment. |
317 | h. A change in the density of land use on parcels located |
318 | within receiving areas shall be specified in a development order |
319 | which reflects the total number of transferable rural land use |
320 | credits assigned to the parcel of land and the infrastructure |
321 | and support services necessary to provide for a functional mix |
322 | of land uses corresponding to the plan of development. |
323 | i. Land within a rural land stewardship area may be |
324 | removed from the rural land stewardship area through a plan |
325 | amendment. |
326 | j. Transferable rural land use credits may be assigned at |
327 | different ratios of credits per acre according to the natural |
328 | resource or other beneficial use characteristics of the land and |
329 | according to the land use remaining following the transfer of |
330 | credits, with the highest number of credits per acre assigned to |
331 | the most environmentally valuable land or, in locations where |
332 | the retention of open space and agricultural land is a priority, |
333 | to such lands. |
334 | k. The use or conveyance of transferable rural land use |
335 | credits must be recorded in the public records of the county in |
336 | which the property is located as a covenant or restrictive |
337 | easement running with the land in favor of the county and either |
338 | the Department of Environmental Protection, Department of |
339 | Agriculture and Consumer Services, a water management district, |
340 | or a recognized statewide land trust. |
341 | 7. Owners of land within rural land stewardship areas |
342 | should be provided incentives to enter into rural land |
343 | stewardship agreements, pursuant to existing law and rules |
344 | adopted thereto, with state agencies, water management |
345 | districts, and local governments to achieve mutually agreed upon |
346 | conservation objectives. Such incentives may include, but not be |
347 | limited to, the following: |
348 | a. Opportunity to accumulate transferable mitigation |
349 | credits. |
350 | b. Extended permit agreements. |
351 | c. Opportunities for recreational leases and ecotourism. |
352 | d. Payment for specified land management services on |
353 | publicly owned land, or property under covenant or restricted |
354 | easement in favor of a public entity. |
355 | e. Option agreements for sale to public entities or |
356 | private land conservation entities, in either fee or easement, |
357 | upon achievement of conservation objectives. |
358 | 8. The department shall report to the Legislature on an |
359 | annual basis on the results of implementation of rural land |
360 | stewardship areas authorized by the department, including |
361 | successes and failures in achieving the intent of the |
362 | Legislature as expressed in this paragraph. |
363 | Section 3. Paragraph (a) of subsection (12) of section |
364 | 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
365 | 163.3180 Concurrency.-- |
366 | (12) When authorized by a local comprehensive plan, a |
367 | multiuse development of regional impact may satisfy the |
368 | transportation concurrency requirements of the local |
369 | comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency |
370 | management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate- |
371 | share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic |
372 | impacts, if: |
373 | (a) The development of regional impact meets or exceeds |
374 | the guidelines and standards of s. 380.0651(3)(h)(i) and rule |
375 | 28-24.032(2), Florida Administrative Code, and includes a |
376 | residential component that contains at least 100 residential |
377 | dwelling units or 15 percent of the applicable residential |
378 | guideline and standard, whichever is greater; |
379 |
|
380 | The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any |
381 | transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this |
382 | subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the |
383 | purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate- |
384 | share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative |
385 | number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach |
386 | roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a |
387 | stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak |
388 | hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from |
389 | construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted |
390 | level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the |
391 | time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to |
392 | maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this |
393 | subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of |
394 | the improvement. |
395 | Section 4. Subsection (3) of section 197.303, Florida |
396 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
397 | 197.303 Ad valorem tax deferral for recreational and |
398 | commercial working waterfront properties.-- |
399 | (3) The ordinance shall designate the percentage or amount |
400 | of the deferral and the type and location of working waterfront |
401 | property, including the type of public lodging establishments, |
402 | for which deferrals may be granted, which may include any |
403 | property meeting the provisions of s. 342.07(2), which property |
404 | may be further required to be located within a particular |
405 | geographic area or areas of the county or municipality. |
406 | Section 5. Section 336.68, Florida Statutes, is created to |
407 | read: |
408 | 336.68 Special road and bridge district boundaries; |
409 | property owner rights and options.-- |
410 | (1) The owner of real property located within both the |
411 | boundaries of a community development district created under |
412 | chapter 190 and within the boundaries of a special road and |
413 | bridge district created by the alternative method of |
414 | establishing special road and bridge districts previously |
415 | authorized under ss. 336.61-336.67 shall have the option to |
416 | select the community development district to be the provider of |
417 | the road and drainage improvements to the property of the owner. |
418 | Having made the selection, the property owner shall further have |
419 | the right to withdraw the property from the boundaries of the |
420 | special road and bridge district under the procedures set forth |
421 | in this section. |
422 | (2) To be eligible for withdrawal, the subject property |
423 | shall not have received improvements or benefits from the |
424 | special road and bridge district; there shall be no outstanding |
425 | bonded indebtedness of the special road and bridge district for |
426 | which the property is subject to ad valorem tax levies; and the |
427 | withdrawal of the property shall not create an enclave bounded |
428 | on all sides by the other property within the boundaries of the |
429 | district when the property owner withdraws the property from the |
430 | boundaries of the district. |
431 | (3) The election by a property owner to withdraw property |
432 | from the boundaries of a district as described in this section |
433 | shall be accomplished by filing a certificate in the official |
434 | records of the county in which the property is located. The |
435 | certificate shall identify the name and mailing address of the |
436 | owner, the legal description of the property, the name of the |
437 | district from which the property is being withdrawn, and the |
438 | general location of the property within district. The |
439 | certificate shall further state that the property has not |
440 | received benefits from the district from which the property is |
441 | to be withdrawn; that there is no bonded indebtedness owed by |
442 | the district; and that the property being withdrawn will not |
443 | become an enclave within the district boundaries. |
444 | (4) The property owner shall provide copies of the |
445 | recorded certificate to the governing body of the district from |
446 | which the property is being withdrawn within days 10 days after |
447 | the date that the certificate is recorded. If the district does |
448 | not record an objection to the withdrawal of the property in the |
449 | public records within 30 days after the recording of the |
450 | certificate identifying the criteria in this section that has |
451 | not been met, the withdrawal shall be final and the property |
452 | shall be permanently withdrawn from the boundaries of the |
453 | district. |
454 | Section 6. Section 342.07, Florida Statutes, is amended to |
455 | read: |
456 | 342.07 Recreational and commercial working waterfronts; |
457 | legislative findings; definitions.-- |
458 | (1) The Legislature recognizes that there is an important |
459 | state interest in facilitating boating and other recreational |
460 | access to the state's navigable waters. This access is vital to |
461 | tourists and recreational users and the marine industry in the |
462 | state, to maintaining or enhancing the $57 billion economic |
463 | impact of tourism and the $14 billion economic impact of boating |
464 | in the state annually, and to ensuring continued access to all |
465 | residents and visitors to the navigable waters of the state. The |
466 | Legislature recognizes that there is an important state interest |
467 | in maintaining viable water-dependent support facilities, such |
468 | as public lodging establishments and boat hauling and repairing |
469 | and commercial fishing facilities, and in maintaining the |
470 | availability of public access to the navigable waters of the |
471 | state. The Legislature further recognizes that the waterways of |
472 | the state are important for engaging in commerce and the |
473 | transportation of goods and people upon such waterways and that |
474 | such commerce and transportation is not feasible unless there is |
475 | access to and from the navigable waters of the state through |
476 | recreational and commercial working waterfronts. |
477 | (2) As used in this section, the term "recreational and |
478 | commercial working waterfront" means a parcel or parcels of real |
479 | property that provide access for water-dependent commercial |
480 | activities, including hotels and motels as defined in s. |
481 | 509.242(1), or provide access for the public to the navigable |
482 | waters of the state. Recreational and commercial working |
483 | waterfronts require direct access to or a location on, over, or |
484 | adjacent to a navigable body of water. The term includes water- |
485 | dependent facilities that are open to the public and offer |
486 | public access by vessels to the waters of the state or that are |
487 | support facilities for recreational, commercial, research, or |
488 | governmental vessels. These facilities include public lodging |
489 | establishments, docks, wharfs, lifts, wet and dry marinas, boat |
490 | ramps, boat hauling and repair facilities, commercial fishing |
491 | facilities, boat construction facilities, and other support |
492 | structures over the water. As used in this section, the term |
493 | "vessel" has the same meaning as in s. 327.02(37). Seaports are |
494 | excluded from the definition. |
495 | Section 7. Section 373.4132, Florida Statutes, is created |
496 | to read: |
497 | 373.4132 Dry storage facility permitting.--The governing |
498 | board or the department shall require a permit under this part, |
499 | including s. 373.4145, for the construction, alteration, |
500 | operation, maintenance, abandonment, or removal of a dry storage |
501 | facility for 10 or more vessels that is functionally associated |
502 | with a boat launching area. As part of an applicant's |
503 | demonstration that such a facility will not be harmful to the |
504 | water resources and will not be inconsistent with the overall |
505 | objectives of the district, the governing board or department |
506 | shall require the applicant to provide reasonable assurance that |
507 | the secondary impacts from the facility will not cause adverse |
508 | impacts to the functions of wetlands and surface waters, |
509 | including violations of state water quality standards applicable |
510 | to waters as defined in s. 403.031(13), and will meet the public |
511 | interest test of s. 373.414(1)(a), including the potential |
512 | adverse impacts to manatees. Nothing in this section shall |
513 | affect the authority of the governing board or the department to |
514 | regulate such secondary impacts under this part for other |
515 | regulated activities. |
516 | Section 8. Paragraph (d) of subsection (2), paragraphs (a) |
517 | and (i) of subsection (4), and subsections (15), (19), (24), and |
518 | (26) of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended, and |
519 | subsection (28) is added to that section, to read: |
520 | 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- |
521 | (2) STATEWIDE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.-- |
522 | (d) The guidelines and standards shall be applied as |
523 | follows: |
524 | 1. Fixed thresholds.-- |
525 | a. A development that is below 100 percent of all |
526 | numerical thresholds in the guidelines and standards shall not |
527 | be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. |
528 | b. A development that is at or above 120 percent of any |
529 | numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development-of- |
530 | regional-impact review. |
531 | c. Projects certified under s. 403.973 which create at |
532 | least 100 jobs and meet the criteria of the Office of Tourism, |
533 | Trade, and Economic Development as to their impact on an area's |
534 | economy, employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels that |
535 | are at or below 100 percent of the numerical thresholds for |
536 | industrial plants, industrial parks, distribution, warehousing |
537 | or wholesaling facilities, office development or multiuse |
538 | projects other than residential, as described in s. |
539 | 380.0651(3)(c), (d), and (h)(i), are not required to undergo |
540 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
541 | 2. Rebuttable presumption.--It shall be presumed that a |
542 | development that is at 100 percent or between 100 and 120 |
543 | percent of a numerical threshold shall be required to undergo |
544 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
545 | (4) BINDING LETTER.-- |
546 | (a) If any developer is in doubt whether his or her |
547 | proposed development must undergo development-of-regional-impact |
548 | review under the guidelines and standards, whether his or her |
549 | rights have vested pursuant to subsection (20), or whether a |
550 | proposed substantial change to a development of regional impact |
551 | concerning which rights had previously vested pursuant to |
552 | subsection (20) would divest such rights, the developer may |
553 | request a determination from the state land planning agency. The |
554 | developer or the appropriate local government having |
555 | jurisdiction may request that the state land planning agency |
556 | determine whether the amount of development that remains to be |
557 | built in an approved development of regional impact meets the |
558 | criteria of subparagraph (15)(g)3. |
559 | (i) In response to an inquiry from a developer or the |
560 | appropriate local government having jurisdiction, the state land |
561 | planning agency may issue an informal determination in the form |
562 | of a clearance letter as to whether a development is required to |
563 | undergo development-of-regional-impact review or whether the |
564 | amount of development that remains to be built in an approved |
565 | development of regional impact meets the criteria of |
566 | subparagraph (15)(g)3. A clearance letter may be based solely on |
567 | the information provided by the developer, and the state land |
568 | planning agency is not required to conduct an investigation of |
569 | that information. If any material information provided by the |
570 | developer is incomplete or inaccurate, the clearance letter is |
571 | not binding upon the state land planning agency. A clearance |
572 | letter does not constitute final agency action. |
573 | (15) LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT ORDER.-- |
574 | (a) The appropriate local government shall render a |
575 | decision on the application within 30 days after the hearing |
576 | unless an extension is requested by the developer. |
577 | (b) When possible, local governments shall issue |
578 | development orders concurrently with any other local permits or |
579 | development approvals that may be applicable to the proposed |
580 | development. |
581 | (c) The development order shall include findings of fact |
582 | and conclusions of law consistent with subsections (13) and |
583 | (14). The development order: |
584 | 1. Shall specify the monitoring procedures and the local |
585 | official responsible for assuring compliance by the developer |
586 | with the development order. |
587 | 2. Shall establish compliance dates for the development |
588 | order, including a deadline for commencing physical development |
589 | and for compliance with conditions of approval or phasing |
590 | requirements, and shall include a buildout termination date that |
591 | reasonably reflects the time anticipated required to complete |
592 | the development. |
593 | 3. Shall establish a date until which the local government |
594 | agrees that the approved development of regional impact shall |
595 | not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or |
596 | intensity reduction, unless the local government can demonstrate |
597 | that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the |
598 | approval of the development order have occurred or the |
599 | development order was based on substantially inaccurate |
600 | information provided by the developer or that the change is |
601 | clearly established by local government to be essential to the |
602 | public health, safety, or welfare. The date established pursuant |
603 | to this subparagraph shall be no sooner than the buildout date |
604 | of the project. |
605 | 4. Shall specify the requirements for the biennial report |
606 | designated under subsection (18), including the date of |
607 | submission, parties to whom the report is submitted, and |
608 | contents of the report, based upon the rules adopted by the |
609 | state land planning agency. Such rules shall specify the scope |
610 | of any additional local requirements that may be necessary for |
611 | the report. |
612 | 5. May specify the types of changes to the development |
613 | which shall require submission for a substantial deviation |
614 | determination or a notice of proposed change under subsection |
615 | (19). |
616 | 6. Shall include a legal description of the property. |
617 | (d) Conditions of a development order that require a |
618 | developer to contribute land for a public facility or construct, |
619 | expand, or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion |
620 | of a public facility, or portion thereof, shall meet the |
621 | following criteria: |
622 | 1. The need to construct new facilities or add to the |
623 | present system of public facilities must be reasonably |
624 | attributable to the proposed development. |
625 | 2. Any contribution of funds, land, or public facilities |
626 | required from the developer shall be comparable to the amount of |
627 | funds, land, or public facilities that the state or the local |
628 | government would reasonably expect to expend or provide, based |
629 | on projected costs of comparable projects, to mitigate the |
630 | impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development. |
631 | 3. Any funds or lands contributed must be expressly |
632 | designated and used to mitigate impacts reasonably attributable |
633 | to the proposed development. |
634 | 4. Construction or expansion of a public facility by a |
635 | nongovernmental developer as a condition of a development order |
636 | to mitigate the impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
637 | development is not subject to competitive bidding or competitive |
638 | negotiation for selection of a contractor or design professional |
639 | for any part of the construction or design unless required by |
640 | the local government that issues the development order. |
641 | (e)1. Effective July 1, 1986, A local government shall not |
642 | include, as a development order condition for a development of |
643 | regional impact, any requirement that a developer contribute or |
644 | pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of public |
645 | facilities or portions thereof unless the local government has |
646 | enacted a local ordinance which requires other development not |
647 | subject to this section to contribute its proportionate share of |
648 | the funds, land, or public facilities necessary to accommodate |
649 | any impacts having a rational nexus to the proposed development, |
650 | and the need to construct new facilities or add to the present |
651 | system of public facilities must be reasonably attributable to |
652 | the proposed development. |
653 | 2. A local government shall not approve a development of |
654 | regional impact that does not make adequate provision for the |
655 | public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the |
656 | proposed development unless the local government includes in the |
657 | development order a commitment by the local government to |
658 | provide these facilities consistently with the development |
659 | schedule approved in the development order; however, a local |
660 | government's failure to meet the requirements of subparagraph 1. |
661 | and this subparagraph shall not preclude the issuance of a |
662 | development order where adequate provision is made by the |
663 | developer for the public facilities needed to accommodate the |
664 | impacts of the proposed development. Any funds or lands |
665 | contributed by a developer must be expressly designated and used |
666 | to accommodate impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
667 | development. |
668 | 3. The Department of Community Affairs and other state and |
669 | regional agencies involved in the administration and |
670 | implementation of this act shall cooperate and work with units |
671 | of local government in preparing and adopting local impact fee |
672 | and other contribution ordinances. |
673 | (f) Notice of the adoption of a development order or the |
674 | subsequent amendments to an adopted development order shall be |
675 | recorded by the developer, in accordance with s. 28.222, with |
676 | the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which the |
677 | development is located. The notice shall include a legal |
678 | description of the property covered by the order and shall state |
679 | which unit of local government adopted the development order, |
680 | the date of adoption, the date of adoption of any amendments to |
681 | the development order, the location where the adopted order with |
682 | any amendments may be examined, and that the development order |
683 | constitutes a land development regulation applicable to the |
684 | property. The recording of this notice shall not constitute a |
685 | lien, cloud, or encumbrance on real property, or actual or |
686 | constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance. |
687 | This paragraph applies only to developments initially approved |
688 | under this section after July 1, 1980. |
689 | (g) A local government shall not issue permits for |
690 | development subsequent to the buildout termination date or |
691 | expiration date contained in the development order unless: |
692 | 1. The proposed development has been evaluated |
693 | cumulatively with existing development under the substantial |
694 | deviation provisions of subsection (19) subsequent to the |
695 | termination or expiration date; |
696 | 2. The proposed development is consistent with an |
697 | abandonment of development order that has been issued in |
698 | accordance with the provisions of subsection (26); or |
699 | 3. The development of regional impact is essentially built |
700 | out, in that all the mitigation requirements in the development |
701 | order have been satisfied, all developers are in compliance with |
702 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
703 | except the buildout date, and the amount of proposed development |
704 | that remains to be built is less than 20 percent of any |
705 | applicable development-of-regional-impact threshold; or |
706 | 4.3. The project has been determined to be an essentially |
707 | built-out development of regional impact through an agreement |
708 | executed by the developer, the state land planning agency, and |
709 | the local government, in accordance with s. 380.032, which will |
710 | establish the terms and conditions under which the development |
711 | may be continued. If the project is determined to be essentially |
712 | built out built-out, development may proceed pursuant to the s. |
713 | 380.032 agreement after the termination or expiration date |
714 | contained in the development order without further development- |
715 | of-regional-impact review subject to the local government |
716 | comprehensive plan and land development regulations or subject |
717 | to a modified development-of-regional-impact analysis. As used |
718 | in this paragraph, an "essentially built-out" development of |
719 | regional impact means: |
720 | a. The developers are development is in compliance with |
721 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
722 | except the buildout built-out date; and |
723 | b.(I) The amount of development that remains to be built |
724 | is less than the substantial deviation threshold specified in |
725 | paragraph (19)(b) for each individual land use category, or, for |
726 | a multiuse development, the sum total of all unbuilt land uses |
727 | as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation |
728 | threshold is equal to or less than 100 percent; or |
729 | (II) The state land planning agency and the local |
730 | government have agreed in writing that the amount of development |
731 | to be built does not create the likelihood of any additional |
732 | regional impact not previously reviewed. |
733 |
|
734 | The single-family residential portions of a development may be |
735 | considered "essentially built out" if all of the workforce |
736 | housing obligations and all of the infrastructure and horizontal |
737 | development have been completed, at least 50 percent of the |
738 | dwelling units have been completed, and more than 80 percent of |
739 | the lots have been conveyed to third-party individual lot owners |
740 | or to individual builders who own no more than 40 lots at the |
741 | time of the determination. The mobile home park portions of a |
742 | development may be considered "essentially built out" if all the |
743 | infrastructure and horizontal development has been completed, |
744 | and at least 50 percent of the lots are leased to individual |
745 | mobile home owners. |
746 | (h) If the property is annexed by another local |
747 | jurisdiction, the annexing jurisdiction shall adopt a new |
748 | development order that incorporates all previous rights and |
749 | obligations specified in the prior development order. |
750 | (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.-- |
751 | (a) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
752 | development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional |
753 | regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the |
754 | change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency, |
755 | shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall cause the |
756 | proposed change development to be subject to further |
757 | development-of-regional-impact review. There are a variety of |
758 | reasons why a developer may wish to propose changes to an |
759 | approved development of regional impact, including changed |
760 | market conditions. The procedures set forth in this subsection |
761 | are for that purpose. |
762 | (b) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
763 | development of regional impact or development order condition |
764 | which, either individually or cumulatively with other changes, |
765 | exceeds any of the following criteria shall constitute a |
766 | substantial deviation and shall cause the development to be |
767 | subject to further development-of-regional-impact review without |
768 | the necessity for a finding of same by the local government: |
769 | 1. An increase in the number of parking spaces at an |
770 | attraction or recreational facility by 10 5 percent or 330 300 |
771 | spaces, whichever is greater, or an increase in the number of |
772 | spectators that may be accommodated at such a facility by 10 5 |
773 | percent or 1,100 1,000 spectators, whichever is greater. |
774 | 2. A new runway, a new terminal facility, a 25-percent |
775 | lengthening of an existing runway, or a 25-percent increase in |
776 | the number of gates of an existing terminal, but only if the |
777 | increase adds at least three additional gates. |
778 | 3. An increase in the number of hospital beds by 5 percent |
779 | or 60 beds, whichever is greater. |
780 | 3.4. An increase in industrial development area by 10 5 |
781 | percent or 35 32 acres, whichever is greater. |
782 | 4.5. An increase in the average annual acreage mined by 10 |
783 | 5 percent or 11 10 acres, whichever is greater, or an increase |
784 | in the average daily water consumption by a mining operation by |
785 | 10 5 percent or 330,000 300,000 gallons, whichever is greater. A |
786 | net An increase in the size of the mine by 10 5 percent or 825 |
787 | 750 acres, whichever is less. For purposes of calculating any |
788 | net increases in size, only additions and deletions of lands |
789 | that have not been mined shall be considered. An increase in the |
790 | size of a heavy mineral mine as defined in s. 378.403(7) will |
791 | only constitute a substantial deviation if the average annual |
792 | acreage mined is more than 550 500 acres and consumes more than |
793 | 3.3 3 million gallons of water per day. |
794 | 5.6. An increase in land area for office development by 10 |
795 | 5 percent or an increase of gross floor area of office |
796 | development by 10 5 percent or 66,000 60,000 gross square feet, |
797 | whichever is greater. |
798 | 7. An increase in the storage capacity for chemical or |
799 | petroleum storage facilities by 5 percent, 20,000 barrels, or 7 |
800 | million pounds, whichever is greater. |
801 | 8. An increase of development at a waterport of wet |
802 | storage for 20 watercraft, dry storage for 30 watercraft, or |
803 | wet/dry storage for 60 watercraft in an area identified in the |
804 | state marina siting plan as an appropriate site for additional |
805 | waterport development or a 5-percent increase in watercraft |
806 | storage capacity, whichever is greater. |
807 | 6.9. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 10 5 |
808 | percent or 55 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater. |
809 | 7. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 50 |
810 | percent or 200 units, whichever is greater, provided that 15 |
811 | percent of the proposed additional dwelling units are dedicated |
812 | to affordable workforce housing, subject to a recorded land use |
813 | restriction that shall be for a period of not less than 20 years |
814 | and that includes resale provisions to ensure long-term |
815 | affordability for income-eligible homeowners and renters and |
816 | provisions for the workforce housing to be commenced prior to |
817 | the completion of 50 percent of the market rate dwelling. For |
818 | purposes of this subparagraph, the term "affordable workforce |
819 | housing" means housing that is affordable to a person who earns |
820 | less than 120 percent of the area median income, or less than |
821 | 140 percent of the area median income if located in a county in |
822 | which the median purchase price for a single-family existing |
823 | home exceeds the statewide median purchase price of a single- |
824 | family existing home. For purposes of this subparagraph, the |
825 | term "statewide median purchase price of a single-family |
826 | existing home" means the statewide purchase price as determined |
827 | in the Florida Sales Report, Single-Family Existing Homes, |
828 | released each January by the Florida Association of Realtors and |
829 | the University of Florida Real Estate Research Center. |
830 | 8.10. An increase in commercial development by 55,000 |
831 | 50,000 square feet of gross floor area or of parking spaces |
832 | provided for customers for 330 300 cars or a 10-percent 5- |
833 | percent increase of either of these, whichever is greater. |
834 | 9.11. An increase in hotel or motel rooms facility units |
835 | by 10 5 percent or 83 rooms 75 units, whichever is greater. |
836 | 10.12. An increase in a recreational vehicle park area by |
837 | 10 5 percent or 110 100 vehicle spaces, whichever is less. |
838 | 11.13. A decrease in the area set aside for open space of |
839 | 5 percent or 20 acres, whichever is less. |
840 | 12.14. A proposed increase to an approved multiuse |
841 | development of regional impact where the sum of the increases of |
842 | each land use as a percentage of the applicable substantial |
843 | deviation criteria is equal to or exceeds 110 100 percent. The |
844 | percentage of any decrease in the amount of open space shall be |
845 | treated as an increase for purposes of determining when 110 100 |
846 | percent has been reached or exceeded. |
847 | 13.15. A 15-percent increase in the number of external |
848 | vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was |
849 | projected during the original development-of-regional-impact |
850 | review. |
851 | 14.16. Any change which would result in development of any |
852 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
853 | development approval or in the development order for |
854 | preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened |
855 | plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened, or |
856 | species of special concern and their habitat, any species |
857 | protected by 16 U.S.C. s. 668a-668d, primary dunes, or |
858 | archaeological and historical sites designated as significant by |
859 | the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
860 | The further refinement of the boundaries and configuration of |
861 | such areas by survey shall be considered under sub-subparagraph |
862 | (e)2.j. (e)5.b. |
863 |
|
864 | The substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs |
865 | 3., 5., 8., 9., and 12. 4., 6., 10., 14., excluding residential |
866 | uses, and in subparagraph 13. 15., are increased by 100 percent |
867 | for a project certified under s. 403.973 which creates jobs and |
868 | meets criteria established by the Office of Tourism, Trade, and |
869 | Economic Development as to its impact on an area's economy, |
870 | employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels. The |
871 | substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs 3., |
872 | 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 12., and 13. 4., 6., 9., 10., 11., and 14. |
873 | are increased by 50 percent for a project located wholly within |
874 | an urban infill and redevelopment area designated on the |
875 | applicable adopted local comprehensive plan future land use map |
876 | and not located within the coastal high hazard area. |
877 | (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a development, |
878 | or any phase thereof, by more than 7 or more years shall be |
879 | presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further |
880 | development-of-regional-impact review. An extension of the date |
881 | of buildout, or any phase thereof, of more than 5 years or more |
882 | but not more less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a |
883 | substantial deviation. The extension of the date of buildout of |
884 | an areawide development of regional impact by more than 5 years |
885 | but less than 10 years is presumed not to create a substantial |
886 | deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and |
887 | convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
888 | government. An extension of 5 years or less than 5 years is not |
889 | a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a |
890 | buildout or, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the |
891 | time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or |
892 | judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any |
893 | extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof |
894 | shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, |
895 | the termination date of the development order, the expiration |
896 | date of the development of regional impact, and the phases |
897 | thereof if applicable by a like period of time. |
898 | (d) A change in the plan of development of an approved |
899 | development of regional impact resulting from requirements |
900 | imposed by the Department of Environmental Protection or any |
901 | water management district created by s. 373.069 or any of their |
902 | successor agencies or by any appropriate federal regulatory |
903 | agency shall be submitted to the local government pursuant to |
904 | this subsection. The change shall be presumed not to create a |
905 | substantial deviation subject to further development-of- |
906 | regional-impact review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear |
907 | and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
908 | government. |
909 | (e)1. Except for a development order rendered pursuant to |
910 | subsection (22) or subsection (25), a proposed change to a |
911 | development order that individually or cumulatively with any |
912 | previous change is less than any numerical criterion contained |
913 | in subparagraphs (b)1.-13. (b)1.-15. and does not exceed any |
914 | other criterion, or that involves an extension of the buildout |
915 | date of a development, or any phase thereof, of less than 5 |
916 | years is not subject to the public hearing requirements of |
917 | subparagraph (f)3., and is not subject to a determination |
918 | pursuant to subparagraph (f)5. Notice of the proposed change |
919 | shall be made to the regional planning council and the state |
920 | land planning agency. Such notice shall include a description of |
921 | previous individual changes made to the development, including |
922 | changes previously approved by the local government, and shall |
923 | include appropriate amendments to the development order. |
924 | 2. The following changes, individually or cumulatively |
925 | with any previous changes, are not substantial deviations: |
926 | a. Changes in the name of the project, developer, owner, |
927 | or monitoring official. |
928 | b. Changes to a setback that do not affect noise buffers, |
929 | environmental protection or mitigation areas, or archaeological |
930 | or historical resources. |
931 | c. Changes to minimum lot sizes. |
932 | d. Changes in the configuration of internal roads that do |
933 | not affect external access points. |
934 | e. Changes to the building design or orientation that stay |
935 | approximately within the approved area designated for such |
936 | building and parking lot, and which do not affect historical |
937 | buildings designated as significant by the Division of |
938 | Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
939 | f. Changes to increase the acreage in the development, |
940 | provided that no development is proposed on the acreage to be |
941 | added. |
942 | g. Changes to eliminate an approved land use, provided |
943 | that there are no additional regional impacts. |
944 | h. Changes required to conform to permits approved by any |
945 | federal, state, or regional permitting agency, provided that |
946 | these changes do not create additional regional impacts. |
947 | i. Any renovation or redevelopment of development within a |
948 | previously approved development of regional impact which does |
949 | not change land use or increase density or intensity of use. |
950 | j. Changes that modify boundaries and configuration of |
951 | areas described in subparagraph (b)14. due to science-based |
952 | refinement of such areas by survey, by habitat evaluation, by |
953 | other recognized assessment methodology, or by an environmental |
954 | assessment. In order for changes to qualify under this sub- |
955 | subparagraph, the survey, habitat evaluation, or assessment must |
956 | occur prior to the time a conservation easement protecting such |
957 | lands is recorded and must not result in any net decrease in the |
958 | total acreage of the lands specifically set aside for permanent |
959 | preservation in the final development order. |
960 | k.j. Any other change which the state land planning |
961 | agency, in consultation with the regional planning council, |
962 | agrees in writing is similar in nature, impact, or character to |
963 | the changes enumerated in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. a.-i. and |
964 | which does not create the likelihood of any additional regional |
965 | impact. |
966 |
|
967 | This subsection does not require the filing of a notice of |
968 | proposed change but shall require an application to the local |
969 | government to amend the development order in accordance with the |
970 | local government's procedures for amendment of a development |
971 | order. In accordance with the local government's procedures, |
972 | including requirements for notice to the applicant and the |
973 | public, the local government shall either deny the application |
974 | for amendment or adopt an amendment to the development order |
975 | which approves the application with or without conditions. |
976 | Following adoption, the local government shall render to the |
977 | state land planning agency the amendment to the development |
978 | order. The state land planning agency may appeal, pursuant to s. |
979 | 380.07(3), the amendment to the development order if the |
980 | amendment involves sub-subparagraph g., sub-subparagraph h., |
981 | sub-subparagraph j., or sub-subparagraph k. and it believes the |
982 | change creates a reasonable likelihood of new or additional |
983 | regional impacts a development order amendment for any change |
984 | listed in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. unless such issue is addressed |
985 | either in the existing development order or in the application |
986 | for development approval, but, in the case of the application, |
987 | only if, and in the manner in which, the application is |
988 | incorporated in the development order. |
989 | 3. Except for the change authorized by sub-subparagraph |
990 | 2.f., any addition of land not previously reviewed or any change |
991 | not specified in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) shall be |
992 | presumed to create a substantial deviation. This presumption may |
993 | be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. |
994 | 4. Any submittal of a proposed change to a previously |
995 | approved development shall include a description of individual |
996 | changes previously made to the development, including changes |
997 | previously approved by the local government. The local |
998 | government shall consider the previous and current proposed |
999 | changes in deciding whether such changes cumulatively constitute |
1000 | a substantial deviation requiring further development-of- |
1001 | regional-impact review. |
1002 | 5. The following changes to an approved development of |
1003 | regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial |
1004 | deviation. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and |
1005 | convincing evidence. |
1006 | a. A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the acreage |
1007 | to a land use not previously approved in the development order. |
1008 | Changes of less than 15 percent shall be presumed not to create |
1009 | a substantial deviation. |
1010 | b. Except for the types of uses listed in subparagraph |
1011 | (b)16., any change which would result in the development of any |
1012 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
1013 | development approval or in the development order for |
1014 | preservation, buffers, or special protection, including habitat |
1015 | for plant and animal species, archaeological and historical |
1016 | sites, dunes, and other special areas. |
1017 | b.c. Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the |
1018 | contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases |
1019 | and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized |
1020 | multiuse development of regional impact which was originally |
1021 | approved with three or more uses specified in s. 380.0651(3)(c), |
1022 | (d), (e)(f), and (f)(g) and residential use. |
1023 | (f)1. The state land planning agency shall establish by |
1024 | rule standard forms for submittal of proposed changes to a |
1025 | previously approved development of regional impact which may |
1026 | require further development-of-regional-impact review. At a |
1027 | minimum, the standard form shall require the developer to |
1028 | provide the precise language that the developer proposes to |
1029 | delete or add as an amendment to the development order. |
1030 | 2. The developer shall submit, simultaneously, to the |
1031 | local government, the regional planning agency, and the state |
1032 | land planning agency the request for approval of a proposed |
1033 | change. |
1034 | 3. No sooner than 30 days but no later than 45 days after |
1035 | submittal by the developer to the local government, the state |
1036 | land planning agency, and the appropriate regional planning |
1037 | agency, the local government shall give 15 days' notice and |
1038 | schedule a public hearing to consider the change that the |
1039 | developer asserts does not create a substantial deviation. This |
1040 | public hearing shall be held within 60 90 days after submittal |
1041 | of the proposed changes, unless that time is extended by the |
1042 | developer. |
1043 | 4. The appropriate regional planning agency or the state |
1044 | land planning agency shall review the proposed change and, no |
1045 | later than 45 days after submittal by the developer of the |
1046 | proposed change, unless that time is extended by the developer, |
1047 | and prior to the public hearing at which the proposed change is |
1048 | to be considered, shall advise the local government in writing |
1049 | whether it objects to the proposed change, shall specify the |
1050 | reasons for its objection, if any, and shall provide a copy to |
1051 | the developer. |
1052 | 5. At the public hearing, the local government shall |
1053 | determine whether the proposed change requires further |
1054 | development-of-regional-impact review. The provisions of |
1055 | paragraphs (a) and (e), the thresholds set forth in paragraph |
1056 | (b), and the presumptions set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) |
1057 | and subparagraph (e)3. shall be applicable in determining |
1058 | whether further development-of-regional-impact review is |
1059 | required. |
1060 | 6. If the local government determines that the proposed |
1061 | change does not require further development-of-regional-impact |
1062 | review and is otherwise approved, or if the proposed change is |
1063 | not subject to a hearing and determination pursuant to |
1064 | subparagraphs 3. and 5. and is otherwise approved, the local |
1065 | government shall issue an amendment to the development order |
1066 | incorporating the approved change and conditions of approval |
1067 | relating to the change. The requirement that a change be |
1068 | otherwise approved shall not be construed to require additional |
1069 | local review or approval if the change is allowed by applicable |
1070 | local ordinances without further local review or approval. The |
1071 | decision of the local government to approve, with or without |
1072 | conditions, or to deny the proposed change that the developer |
1073 | asserts does not require further review shall be subject to the |
1074 | appeal provisions of s. 380.07. However, the state land planning |
1075 | agency may not appeal the local government decision if it did |
1076 | not comply with subparagraph 4. The state land planning agency |
1077 | may not appeal a change to a development order made pursuant to |
1078 | subparagraph (e)1. or subparagraph (e)2. for developments of |
1079 | regional impact approved after January 1, 1980, unless the |
1080 | change would result in a significant impact to a regionally |
1081 | significant archaeological, historical, or natural resource not |
1082 | previously identified in the original development-of-regional- |
1083 | impact review. |
1084 | (g) If a proposed change requires further development-of- |
1085 | regional-impact review pursuant to this section, the review |
1086 | shall be conducted subject to the following additional |
1087 | conditions: |
1088 | 1. The development-of-regional-impact review conducted by |
1089 | the appropriate regional planning agency shall address only |
1090 | those issues raised by the proposed change except as provided in |
1091 | subparagraph 2. |
1092 | 2. The regional planning agency shall consider, and the |
1093 | local government shall determine whether to approve, approve |
1094 | with conditions, or deny the proposed change as it relates to |
1095 | the entire development. If the local government determines that |
1096 | the proposed change, as it relates to the entire development, is |
1097 | unacceptable, the local government shall deny the change. |
1098 | 3. If the local government determines that the proposed |
1099 | change, as it relates to the entire development, should be |
1100 | approved, any new conditions in the amendment to the development |
1101 | order issued by the local government shall address only those |
1102 | issues raised by the proposed change and require mitigation only |
1103 | for the individual and cumulative impacts of the proposed |
1104 | change. |
1105 | 4. Development within the previously approved development |
1106 | of regional impact may continue, as approved, during the |
1107 | development-of-regional-impact review in those portions of the |
1108 | development which are not directly affected by the proposed |
1109 | change. |
1110 | (h) When further development-of-regional-impact review is |
1111 | required because a substantial deviation has been determined or |
1112 | admitted by the developer, the amendment to the development |
1113 | order issued by the local government shall be consistent with |
1114 | the requirements of subsection (15) and shall be subject to the |
1115 | hearing and appeal provisions of s. 380.07. The state land |
1116 | planning agency or the appropriate regional planning agency need |
1117 | not participate at the local hearing in order to appeal a local |
1118 | government development order issued pursuant to this paragraph. |
1119 | (i) An increase in the number of residential dwelling |
1120 | units shall not constitute a substantial deviation and shall not |
1121 | be subject to development-of-regional-impact review for |
1122 | additional impacts provided that all the residential dwelling |
1123 | units are dedicated to affordable workforce housing and the |
1124 | total number of new residential units does not exceed 200 |
1125 | percent of the substantial deviation threshold. The affordable |
1126 | workforce housing shall be subject to a recorded land use |
1127 | restriction that shall be for a period of not less than 20 years |
1128 | and that includes resale provisions to ensure long-term |
1129 | affordability for income-eligible homeowners and renters. For |
1130 | purposes of this paragraph, the term "affordable workforce |
1131 | housing" means housing that is affordable to a person who earns |
1132 | less than 120 percent of the area median income, or less than |
1133 | 140 percent of the area median income if located in a county in |
1134 | which the median purchase price for a single-family existing |
1135 | home exceeds the statewide median purchase price of a single- |
1136 | family existing home. For purposes of this paragraph, the term |
1137 | "statewide median purchase price of a single-family existing |
1138 | home" means the statewide purchase price as determined in the |
1139 | Florida Sales Report, Single-Family Existing Homes, released |
1140 | each January by the Florida Association of Realtors and the |
1141 | University of Florida Real Estate Research Center. |
1142 | (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
1143 | (a) Any proposed hospital which has a designed capacity of |
1144 | not more than 100 beds is exempt from the provisions of this |
1145 | section. |
1146 | (b) Any proposed electrical transmission line or |
1147 | electrical power plant is exempt from the provisions of this |
1148 | section, except any steam or solar electrical generating |
1149 | facility of less than 50 megawatts in capacity attached to a |
1150 | development of regional impact. |
1151 | (c) Any proposed addition to an existing sports facility |
1152 | complex is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
1153 | addition meets the following characteristics: |
1154 | 1. It would not operate concurrently with the scheduled |
1155 | hours of operation of the existing facility. |
1156 | 2. Its seating capacity would be no more than 75 percent |
1157 | of the capacity of the existing facility. |
1158 | 3. The sports facility complex property is owned by a |
1159 | public body prior to July 1, 1983. |
1160 |
|
1161 | This exemption does not apply to any pari-mutuel facility. |
1162 | (d) Any proposed addition or cumulative additions |
1163 | subsequent to July 1, 1988, to an existing sports facility |
1164 | complex owned by a state university is exempt if the increased |
1165 | seating capacity of the complex is no more than 30 percent of |
1166 | the capacity of the existing facility. |
1167 | (e) Any addition of permanent seats or parking spaces for |
1168 | an existing sports facility located on property owned by a |
1169 | public body prior to July 1, 1973, is exempt from the provisions |
1170 | of this section if future additions do not expand existing |
1171 | permanent seating or parking capacity more than 15 percent |
1172 | annually in excess of the prior year's capacity. |
1173 | (f) Any increase in the seating capacity of an existing |
1174 | sports facility having a permanent seating capacity of at least |
1175 | 50,000 spectators is exempt from the provisions of this section, |
1176 | provided that such an increase does not increase permanent |
1177 | seating capacity by more than 5 percent per year and not to |
1178 | exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year period, and provided |
1179 | that the sports facility notifies the appropriate local |
1180 | government within which the facility is located of the increase |
1181 | at least 6 months prior to the initial use of the increased |
1182 | seating, in order to permit the appropriate local government to |
1183 | develop a traffic management plan for the traffic generated by |
1184 | the increase. Any traffic management plan shall be consistent |
1185 | with the local comprehensive plan, the regional policy plan, and |
1186 | the state comprehensive plan. |
1187 | (g) Any expansion in the permanent seating capacity or |
1188 | additional improved parking facilities of an existing sports |
1189 | facility is exempt from the provisions of this section, if the |
1190 | following conditions exist: |
1191 | 1.a. The sports facility had a permanent seating capacity |
1192 | on January 1, 1991, of at least 41,000 spectator seats; |
1193 | b. The sum of such expansions in permanent seating |
1194 | capacity does not exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year |
1195 | period and does not exceed a cumulative total of 20 percent for |
1196 | any such expansions; or |
1197 | c. The increase in additional improved parking facilities |
1198 | is a one-time addition and does not exceed 3,500 parking spaces |
1199 | serving the sports facility; and |
1200 | 2. The local government having jurisdiction of the sports |
1201 | facility includes in the development order or development permit |
1202 | approving such expansion under this paragraph a finding of fact |
1203 | that the proposed expansion is consistent with the |
1204 | transportation, water, sewer and stormwater drainage provisions |
1205 | of the approved local comprehensive plan and local land |
1206 | development regulations relating to those provisions. |
1207 |
|
1208 | Any owner or developer who intends to rely on this statutory |
1209 | exemption shall provide to the department a copy of the local |
1210 | government application for a development permit. Within 45 days |
1211 | of receipt of the application, the department shall render to |
1212 | the local government an advisory and nonbinding opinion, in |
1213 | writing, stating whether, in the department's opinion, the |
1214 | prescribed conditions exist for an exemption under this |
1215 | paragraph. The local government shall render the development |
1216 | order approving each such expansion to the department. The |
1217 | owner, developer, or department may appeal the local government |
1218 | development order pursuant to s. 380.07, within 45 days after |
1219 | the order is rendered. The scope of review shall be limited to |
1220 | the determination of whether the conditions prescribed in this |
1221 | paragraph exist. If any sports facility expansion undergoes |
1222 | development of regional impact review, all previous expansions |
1223 | which were exempt under this paragraph shall be included in the |
1224 | development of regional impact review. |
1225 | (h) Expansion to port harbors, spoil disposal sites, |
1226 | navigation channels, turning basins, harbor berths, and other |
1227 | related inwater harbor facilities of ports listed in s. |
1228 | 403.021(9)(b), port transportation facilities and projects |
1229 | listed in s. 311.07(3)(b), and intermodal transportation |
1230 | facilities identified pursuant to s. 311.09(3) are exempt from |
1231 | the provisions of this section when such expansions, projects, |
1232 | or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans |
1233 | that are in compliance with the provisions of s. 163.3178. |
1234 | (i) Any proposed facility for the storage of any petroleum |
1235 | product or any expansion of an existing facility is exempt from |
1236 | the provisions of this section, if the facility is consistent |
1237 | with a local comprehensive plan that is in compliance with s. |
1238 | 163.3177 or is consistent with a comprehensive port master plan |
1239 | that is in compliance with s. 163.3178. |
1240 | (j) Any renovation or redevelopment within the same land |
1241 | parcel which does not change land use or increase density or |
1242 | intensity of use. |
1243 | (k)1. Waterport and marina development, including dry |
1244 | storage facilities, are exempt from the provisions of this |
1245 | section Any waterport or marina development is exempt from the |
1246 | provisions of this section if the relevant county or |
1247 | municipality has adopted a boating facility siting plan or |
1248 | policy which includes applicable criteria, considering such |
1249 | factors as natural resources, manatee protection needs and |
1250 | recreation and economic demands as generally outlined in the |
1251 | Bureau of Protected Species Management Boat Facility Siting |
1252 | Guide, dated August 2000, into the coastal management or land |
1253 | use element of its comprehensive plan. The adoption of boating |
1254 | facility siting plans or policies into the comprehensive plan is |
1255 | exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). Any waterport or |
1256 | marina development within the municipalities or counties with |
1257 | boating facility siting plans or policies that meet the above |
1258 | criteria, adopted prior to April 1, 2002, are exempt from the |
1259 | provisions of this section, when their boating facility siting |
1260 | plan or policy is adopted as part of the relevant local |
1261 | government's comprehensive plan. |
1262 | 2. Within 6 months of the effective date of this law, The |
1263 | Department of Community Affairs, in conjunction with the |
1264 | Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Fish and |
1265 | Wildlife Conservation Commission, shall provide technical |
1266 | assistance and guidelines, including model plans, policies and |
1267 | criteria to local governments for the development of their |
1268 | siting plans. |
1269 | (l) Any proposed development within an urban service |
1270 | boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the |
1271 | provisions of this section if the local government having |
1272 | jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has |
1273 | adopted the urban service boundary, and has entered into a |
1274 | binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions that would be |
1275 | impacted and with the Department of Transportation regarding the |
1276 | mitigation of impacts on state and regional transportation |
1277 | facilities, and has adopted a proportionate share methodology |
1278 | pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
1279 | (m) Any proposed development within a rural land |
1280 | stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from |
1281 | the provisions of this section if the local government that has |
1282 | adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a |
1283 | binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and |
1284 | the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of |
1285 | impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has |
1286 | adopted a proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. |
1287 | 163.3180(16). |
1288 | (n) Any proposed development or redevelopment within an |
1289 | area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under |
1290 | s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
1291 | local government has entered into a binding agreement with |
1292 | jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of |
1293 | Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and |
1294 | regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a |
1295 | proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
1296 | (o) The establishment, relocation, or expansion of any |
1297 | military installation as defined in s. 163.3175, is exempt from |
1298 | this section. |
1299 | (p) Any self-storage warehousing that does not allow |
1300 | retail or other services is exempt from this section. |
1301 | (q) Any proposed nursing home or assisted living facility |
1302 | is exempt from this section. |
1303 | (r) Any development identified in an airport master plan |
1304 | and adopted into the comprehensive plan pursuant to s. |
1305 | 163.3177(6)(k) is exempt from this section. |
1306 | (s) Any development identified in a campus master plan and |
1307 | adopted pursuant to s. 1013.30 is exempt from this section. |
1308 | (t) Any development in a specific area plan which is |
1309 | prepared pursuant to s. 163.3245 and adopted into the |
1310 | comprehensive plan is exempt from this section. |
1311 |
|
1312 | If a use is exempt from review as a development of regional |
1313 | impact under paragraphs (a)-(t) but will be part of a larger |
1314 | project that is subject to review as a development of regional |
1315 | impact, the impact of the exempt use must be included in the |
1316 | review of the larger project. |
1317 | (26) ABANDONMENT OF DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT.-- |
1318 | (a) There is hereby established a process to abandon a |
1319 | development of regional impact and its associated development |
1320 | orders. A development of regional impact and its associated |
1321 | development orders may be proposed to be abandoned by the owner |
1322 | or developer. The local government in which the development of |
1323 | regional impact is located also may propose to abandon the |
1324 | development of regional impact, provided that the local |
1325 | government gives individual written notice to each development- |
1326 | of-regional-impact owner and developer of record, and provided |
1327 | that no such owner or developer objects in writing to the local |
1328 | government prior to or at the public hearing pertaining to |
1329 | abandonment of the development of regional impact. The state |
1330 | land planning agency is authorized to promulgate rules that |
1331 | shall include, but not be limited to, criteria for determining |
1332 | whether to grant, grant with conditions, or deny a proposal to |
1333 | abandon, and provisions to ensure that the developer satisfies |
1334 | all applicable conditions of the development order and |
1335 | adequately mitigates for the impacts of the development. If |
1336 | there is no existing development within the development of |
1337 | regional impact at the time of abandonment and no development |
1338 | within the development of regional impact is proposed by the |
1339 | owner or developer after such abandonment, an abandonment order |
1340 | shall not require the owner or developer to contribute any land, |
1341 | funds, or public facilities as a condition of such abandonment |
1342 | order. The rules shall also provide a procedure for filing |
1343 | notice of the abandonment pursuant to s. 28.222 with the clerk |
1344 | of the circuit court for each county in which the development of |
1345 | regional impact is located. Any decision by a local government |
1346 | concerning the abandonment of a development of regional impact |
1347 | shall be subject to an appeal pursuant to s. 380.07. The issues |
1348 | in any such appeal shall be confined to whether the provisions |
1349 | of this subsection or any rules promulgated thereunder have been |
1350 | satisfied. |
1351 | (b) Upon receipt of written confirmation from the state |
1352 | land planning agency that any required mitigation applicable to |
1353 | completed development has occurred, an industrial development of |
1354 | regional impact located within the coastal high-hazard area of a |
1355 | rural county of economic concern which was approved prior to the |
1356 | adoption of the local government's comprehensive plan required |
1357 | under s. 163.3167 and which plan's future land use map and |
1358 | zoning designates the land use for the development of regional |
1359 | impact as commercial may be unilaterally abandoned without the |
1360 | need to proceed through the process described in paragraph (a) |
1361 | if the developer or owner provides a notice of abandonment to |
1362 | the local government and records such notice with the applicable |
1363 | clerk of court. Abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred |
1364 | upon the recording of the notice. All development following |
1365 | abandonment shall be fully consistent with the current |
1366 | comprehensive plan and applicable zoning. |
1367 | (28) PARTIAL STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
1368 | (a) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
1369 | (24)(l) for urban service boundaries is not entered into within |
1370 | 12 months after establishment of the urban service boundary, the |
1371 | development-of-regional-impact review for projects within the |
1372 | urban service boundary must address transportation impacts only. |
1373 | (b) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
1374 | (24)(m) for rural land stewardship areas is not entered into |
1375 | within 12 months after the designation of a rural land |
1376 | stewardship area, the development-of-regional-impact review for |
1377 | projects within the rural land stewardship area must address |
1378 | transportation impacts only. |
1379 | (c) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
1380 | (24)(n) for designated urban infill and redevelopment areas is |
1381 | not entered into within 12 months after the designation of the |
1382 | area or July 1, 2007, whichever occurs later, the development- |
1383 | of-regional-impact review for projects within the urban infill |
1384 | and redevelopment area must address transportation impacts only. |
1385 | (d) A local government that does not wish to enter into a |
1386 | binding agreement or that is unable to agree on the terms of the |
1387 | agreement referenced under paragraph (24)(l), paragraph (24)(m), |
1388 | or paragraph (24)(n) shall provide written notification to the |
1389 | state land planning agency of the decision to not enter into a |
1390 | binding agreement or the failure to enter into a binding |
1391 | agreement within the 12-month period referenced in paragraphs |
1392 | (a), (b) and (c). Following the notification of the state land |
1393 | planning agency, development-of-regional-impact review for |
1394 | projects within an urban service boundary under paragraph |
1395 | (24)(l), a rural land stewardship area under paragraph (24)(m), |
1396 | or an urban infill and redevelopment area under paragraph |
1397 | (24)(n), must address transportation impacts only. |
1398 | (e) The vesting provision of s. 163.3167(8) relating to an |
1399 | authorized development of regional impact shall not apply to |
1400 | those projects partially exempt from the development-of- |
1401 | regional-impact review process under paragraphs (a)-(d). |
1402 | Section 9. Paragraphs (d) and (e) of subsection (3) of |
1403 | section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, are amended, paragraphs (f) |
1404 | through (i) are redesignated as paragraphs (e) through (h), |
1405 | respectively, paragraph (j) is redesignated as paragraph (i) and |
1406 | amended, and a new paragraph (j) is added to that subsection, to |
1407 | read: |
1408 | 380.0651 Statewide guidelines and standards.-- |
1409 | (3) The following statewide guidelines and standards shall |
1410 | be applied in the manner described in s. 380.06(2) to determine |
1411 | whether the following developments shall be required to undergo |
1412 | development-of-regional-impact review: |
1413 | (d) Office development.--Any proposed office building or |
1414 | park operated under common ownership, development plan, or |
1415 | management that: |
1416 | 1. Encompasses 300,000 or more square feet of gross floor |
1417 | area; or |
1418 | 2. Encompasses more than 600,000 square feet of gross |
1419 | floor area in a county with a population greater than 500,000 |
1420 | and only in a geographic area specifically designated as highly |
1421 | suitable for increased threshold intensity in the approved local |
1422 | comprehensive plan and in the strategic regional policy plan. |
1423 | (e) Port facilities.--The proposed construction of any |
1424 | waterport or marina is required to undergo |
1425 | development-of-regional-impact review, except one designed for: |
1426 | 1.a. The wet storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
1427 | watercraft used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial |
1428 | fishing, or |
1429 | b. The dry storage of fewer than 200 watercraft used |
1430 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing, or |
1431 | c. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
1432 | watercraft on or adjacent to an inland freshwater lake except |
1433 | Lake Okeechobee or any lake which has been designated an |
1434 | Outstanding Florida Water, or |
1435 | d. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 50 |
1436 | watercraft of 40 feet in length or less of any type or purpose. |
1437 | The exceptions to this paragraph's requirements for development- |
1438 | of-regional-impact review shall not apply to any waterport or |
1439 | marina facility located within or which serves physical |
1440 | development located within a coastal barrier resource unit on an |
1441 | unbridged barrier island designated pursuant to 16 U.S.C. s. |
1442 | 3501. |
1443 |
|
1444 | In addition to the foregoing, for projects for which no |
1445 | environmental resource permit or sovereign submerged land lease |
1446 | is required, the Department of Environmental Protection must |
1447 | determine in writing that a proposed marina in excess of 10 |
1448 | slips or storage spaces or a combination of the two is located |
1449 | so that it will not adversely impact Outstanding Florida Waters |
1450 | or Class II waters and will not contribute boat traffic in a |
1451 | manner that will have an adverse impact on an area known to be, |
1452 | or likely to be, frequented by manatees. If the Department of |
1453 | Environmental Protection fails to issue its determination within |
1454 | 45 days of receipt of a formal written request, it has waived |
1455 | its authority to make such determination. The Department of |
1456 | Environmental Protection determination shall constitute final |
1457 | agency action pursuant to chapter 120. |
1458 | 2. The dry storage of fewer than 300 watercraft used |
1459 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing at a |
1460 | marina constructed and in operation prior to July 1, 1985. |
1461 | 3. Any proposed marina development with both wet and dry |
1462 | mooring or storage used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or |
1463 | commercial fishing, where the sum of percentages of the |
1464 | applicable wet and dry mooring or storage thresholds equals 100 |
1465 | percent. This threshold is in addition to, and does not |
1466 | preclude, a development from being required to undergo |
1467 | development-of-regional-impact review under sub-subparagraphs |
1468 | 1.a. and b. and subparagraph 2. |
1469 | (i)(j) Residential development.--No rule may be adopted |
1470 | concerning residential developments which treats a residential |
1471 | development in one county as being located in a less populated |
1472 | adjacent county unless more than 25 percent of the development |
1473 | is located within 2 or less miles of the less populated adjacent |
1474 | county. The residential thresholds of adjacent counties with |
1475 | less population and a lower threshold shall not be controlling |
1476 | on any development wholly located within areas designated as |
1477 | rural areas of critical economic concern. |
1478 | (j) Workforce housing.--The applicable guidelines for |
1479 | residential development and the residential component for |
1480 | multiuse development shall be increased by 50 percent where the |
1481 | developer demonstrates that at least 15 percent of the total |
1482 | residential dwelling units authorized within the development of |
1483 | regional impact will be dedicated to affordable workforce |
1484 | housing, subject to a recorded land use restriction that shall |
1485 | be for a period of not less than 20 years and that includes |
1486 | resale provisions to ensure long-term affordability for income- |
1487 | eligible homeowners and renters and provisions for the workforce |
1488 | housing to be commenced prior to the completion of 50 percent of |
1489 | the market rate dwelling. For purposes of this paragraph, the |
1490 | term "affordable workforce housing" means housing that is |
1491 | affordable to a person who earns less than 120 percent of the |
1492 | area median income, or less than 140 percent of the area median |
1493 | income if located in a county in which the median purchase price |
1494 | for a single-family existing home exceeds the statewide median |
1495 | purchase price of a single-family existing home. For the |
1496 | purposes of this paragraph, the term "statewide median purchase |
1497 | price of a single-family existing home" means the statewide |
1498 | purchase price as determined in the Florida Sales Report, |
1499 | Single-Family Existing Homes, released each January by the |
1500 | Florida Association of Realtors and the University of Florida |
1501 | Real Estate Research Center. |
1502 | Section 10. Section 380.07, Florida Statutes, is amended |
1503 | to read: |
1504 | 380.07 Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission.-- |
1505 | (1) There is hereby created the Florida Land and Water |
1506 | Adjudicatory Commission, which shall consist of the |
1507 | Administration Commission. The commission may adopt rules |
1508 | necessary to ensure compliance with the area of critical state |
1509 | concern program and the requirements for developments of |
1510 | regional impact as set forth in this chapter. |
1511 | (2) Whenever any local government issues any development |
1512 | order in any area of critical state concern, or in regard to any |
1513 | development of regional impact, copies of such orders as |
1514 | prescribed by rule by the state land planning agency shall be |
1515 | transmitted to the state land planning agency, the regional |
1516 | planning agency, and the owner or developer of the property |
1517 | affected by such order. The state land planning agency shall |
1518 | adopt rules describing development order rendition and |
1519 | effectiveness in designated areas of critical state concern. |
1520 | Within 45 days after the order is rendered, the owner, the |
1521 | developer, or the state land planning agency may appeal the |
1522 | order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission by |
1523 | filing a petition alleging that the development order is not |
1524 | consistent with the provisions of this part notice of appeal |
1525 | with the commission. The appropriate regional planning agency by |
1526 | vote at a regularly scheduled meeting may recommend that the |
1527 | state land planning agency undertake an appeal of a development- |
1528 | of-regional-impact development order. Upon the request of an |
1529 | appropriate regional planning council, affected local |
1530 | government, or any citizen, the state land planning agency shall |
1531 | consider whether to appeal the order and shall respond to the |
1532 | request within the 45-day appeal period. Any appeal taken by a |
1533 | regional planning agency between March 1, 1993, and the |
1534 | effective date of this section may only be continued if the |
1535 | state land planning agency has also filed an appeal. Any appeal |
1536 | initiated by a regional planning agency on or before March 1, |
1537 | 1993, shall continue until completion of the appeal process and |
1538 | any subsequent appellate review, as if the regional planning |
1539 | agency were authorized to initiate the appeal. |
1540 | (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an appeal |
1541 | of a development order by the state land planning agency under |
1542 | this section may include consistency of the development order |
1543 | with the local comprehensive plan. However, if a development |
1544 | order relating to a development of regional impact has been |
1545 | challenged in a proceeding under s. 163.3215 and a party to the |
1546 | proceeding serves notice to the state land planning agency of |
1547 | the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215, the state land |
1548 | planning agency shall: |
1549 | (a) Raise its consistency issues by intervening as a full |
1550 | party in the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215 within 30 days |
1551 | after service of the notice; and |
1552 | (b) Dismiss the consistency issues from the development |
1553 | order appeal. |
1554 | (4) The appellant shall furnish a copy of the petition to |
1555 | the opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local |
1556 | government that issued the order. The filing of the petition |
1557 | stays the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
1558 | of the appeal process. |
1559 | (5)(3) The 45-day appeal period for a development of |
1560 | regional impact within the jurisdiction of more than one local |
1561 | government shall not commence until after all the local |
1562 | governments having jurisdiction over the proposed development of |
1563 | regional impact have rendered their development orders. The |
1564 | appellant shall furnish a copy of the notice of appeal to the |
1565 | opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local government |
1566 | which issued the order. The filing of the notice of appeal shall |
1567 | stay the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
1568 | of the appeal process. |
1569 | (6)(4) Prior to issuing an order, the Florida Land and |
1570 | Water Adjudicatory Commission shall hold a hearing pursuant to |
1571 | the provisions of chapter 120. The commission shall encourage |
1572 | the submission of appeals on the record made below in cases in |
1573 | which the development order was issued after a full and complete |
1574 | hearing before the local government or an agency thereof. |
1575 | (7)(5) The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission |
1576 | shall issue a decision granting or denying permission to develop |
1577 | pursuant to the standards of this chapter and may attach |
1578 | conditions and restrictions to its decisions. |
1579 | (8)(6) If an appeal is filed with respect to any issues |
1580 | within the scope of a permitting program authorized by chapter |
1581 | 161, chapter 373, or chapter 403 and for which a permit or |
1582 | conceptual review approval has been obtained prior to the |
1583 | issuance of a development order, any such issue shall be |
1584 | specifically identified in the notice of appeal which is filed |
1585 | pursuant to this section, together with other issues which |
1586 | constitute grounds for the appeal. The appeal may proceed with |
1587 | respect to issues within the scope of permitting programs for |
1588 | which a permit or conceptual review approval has been obtained |
1589 | prior to the issuance of a development order only after the |
1590 | commission determines by majority vote at a regularly scheduled |
1591 | commission meeting that statewide or regional interests may be |
1592 | adversely affected by the development. In making this |
1593 | determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that |
1594 | statewide and regional interests relating to issues within the |
1595 | scope of the permitting programs for which a permit or |
1596 | conceptual approval has been obtained are not adversely |
1597 | affected. |
1598 | Section 11. Section 380.115, Florida Statutes, is amended |
1599 | to read: |
1600 | 380.115 Vested rights and duties; effect of size |
1601 | reduction, changes in guidelines and standards chs. 2002-20 and |
1602 | 2002-296.-- |
1603 | (1) A change in a development-of-regional-impact guideline |
1604 | and standard does not abridge Nothing contained in this act |
1605 | abridges or modify modifies any vested or other right or any |
1606 | duty or obligation pursuant to any development order or |
1607 | agreement that is applicable to a development of regional impact |
1608 | on the effective date of this act. A development that has |
1609 | received a development-of-regional-impact development order |
1610 | pursuant to s. 380.06, but is no longer required to undergo |
1611 | development-of-regional-impact review by operation of a change |
1612 | in the guidelines and standards or has reduced its size below |
1613 | the thresholds in s. 380.0651 of this act, shall be governed by |
1614 | the following procedures: |
1615 | (a) The development shall continue to be governed by the |
1616 | development-of-regional-impact development order and may be |
1617 | completed in reliance upon and pursuant to the development order |
1618 | unless the developer or landowner has followed the procedures |
1619 | for rescission in paragraph (b). Any proposed changes to those |
1620 | developments which continue to be governed by a development |
1621 | order shall be approved pursuant to s. 380.06(19) as it existed |
1622 | prior to a change in the development-of-regional-impact |
1623 | guidelines and standards, except that all percentage criteria |
1624 | shall be doubled and all other criteria shall be increased by 10 |
1625 | percent. The development-of-regional-impact development order |
1626 | may be enforced by the local government as provided by ss. |
1627 | 380.06(17) and 380.11. |
1628 | (b) If requested by the developer or landowner, the |
1629 | development-of-regional-impact development order shall may be |
1630 | rescinded by the local government having jurisdiction upon a |
1631 | showing that all required mitigation related to the amount of |
1632 | development that existed on the date of rescission has been |
1633 | completed abandoned pursuant to the process in s. 380.06(26). |
1634 | (2) A development with an application for development |
1635 | approval pending, and determined sufficient pursuant to s. |
1636 | 380.06 s. 380.06(10), on the effective date of a change to the |
1637 | guidelines and standards this act, or a notification of proposed |
1638 | change pending on the effective date of a change to the |
1639 | guidelines and standards this act, may elect to continue such |
1640 | review pursuant to s. 380.06. At the conclusion of the pending |
1641 | review, including any appeals pursuant to s. 380.07, the |
1642 | resulting development order shall be governed by the provisions |
1643 | of subsection (1). |
1644 | (3) A landowner that has filed an application for a |
1645 | development-of-regional-impact review prior to the adoption of |
1646 | an optional sector plan pursuant to s. 163.3245 may elect to |
1647 | have the application reviewed pursuant to s. 380.06, |
1648 | comprehensive plan provisions in force prior to adoption of the |
1649 | sector plan, and any requested comprehensive plan amendments |
1650 | that accompany the application. |
1651 | Section 12. Paragraph (i) of subsection (2) of section |
1652 | 403.813, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
1653 | 403.813 Permits issued at district centers; exceptions.-- |
1654 | (2) A permit is not required under this chapter, chapter |
1655 | 373, chapter 61-691, Laws of Florida, or chapter 25214 or |
1656 | chapter 25270, 1949, Laws of Florida, for activities associated |
1657 | with the following types of projects; however, except as |
1658 | otherwise provided in this subsection, nothing in this |
1659 | subsection relieves an applicant from any requirement to obtain |
1660 | permission to use or occupy lands owned by the Board of Trustees |
1661 | of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund or any water management |
1662 | district in its governmental or proprietary capacity or from |
1663 | complying with applicable local pollution control programs |
1664 | authorized under this chapter or other requirements of county |
1665 | and municipal governments: |
1666 | (i) The construction of private docks of 1,000 square feet |
1667 | or less of over-water surface area and seawalls in artificially |
1668 | created waterways where such construction will not violate |
1669 | existing water quality standards, impede navigation, or affect |
1670 | flood control. This exemption does not apply to the construction |
1671 | of vertical seawalls in estuaries or lagoons unless the proposed |
1672 | construction is within an existing manmade canal where the |
1673 | shoreline is currently occupied in whole or part by vertical |
1674 | seawalls. |
1675 | Section 13. This act shall take effect July 1, 2006. |