(LATE FILED)Amendment
Bill No. 7167
Amendment No. 808053
CHAMBER ACTION
Senate House
.
.
.






1Representative(s) Johnson offered the following:
2
3     Amendment (with title amendment)
4     Remove everything after the enacting clause and insert:
5     Section 1.  Subsection (32) of section 163.3164, Florida
6Statutes, is amended to read:
7     163.3164  Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
8Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act:
9     (32)  "Financial feasibility" means that sufficient
10revenues are currently available or will be available from
11committed funding sources for the first 3 years, or will be
12available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4
13and 5, of a 5-year capital improvement schedule for financing
14capital improvements, such as ad valorem taxes, bonds, state and
15federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees, and developer
16contributions, which are adequate to fund the projected costs of
17the capital improvements identified in the comprehensive plan
18necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are
19achieved and maintained within the period covered by the 5-year
20schedule of capital improvements. The requirement that level-of-
21service standards be achieved and maintained shall not apply if
22the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate-share
23process set forth in s. 163.3180(12) and (16) is used.
24     Section 2.  Paragraph (c) of subsection (13) of section
25163.3177, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
26     163.3177  Required and optional elements of comprehensive
27plan; studies and surveys.--
28     (13)  Local governments are encouraged to develop a
29community vision that provides for sustainable growth,
30recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural
31resources. At the request of a local government, the applicable
32regional planning council shall provide assistance in the
33development of a community vision.
34     (c)  As part of the workshops and public meetings, the
35local government must discuss strategies for addressing the
36topics discussed under paragraph (b), including:
37     1.  Strategies to preserve open space and environmentally
38sensitive lands, and to encourage a healthy agricultural
39economy, including innovative planning and development
40strategies, such as the transfer of development rights;
41     2.  Incentives for mixed-use development, including
42increased height and intensity standards for buildings that
43provide residential use in combination with office or commercial
44space;
45     3.  Incentives for workforce housing;
46     4.  Designation of an urban service boundary pursuant to
47subsection (14) (2); and
48     5.  Strategies to provide mobility within the community and
49to protect the Strategic Intermodal System, including the
50development of a transportation corridor management plan under
51s. 337.273.
52     Section 3.  Paragraph (c) of subsection (2), paragraph (f)
53of subsection (5), subsection (7), paragraphs (e) and (f) of
54subsection (13), and paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (e), and (f) of
55subsection (16) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are
56amended to read:
57     163.3180  Concurrency.--
58     (2)
59     (c)  Consistent with the public welfare, and except as
60otherwise provided in this section, transportation facilities
61needed to serve new development shall be in place or under
62actual construction or programmed for construction to commence
63in the Department of Transportation's work program or the local
64government's schedule of capital improvements within 3 years
65after the local government approves a building permit or its
66functional equivalent that results in traffic generation.
67     (5)
68     (f)  Prior to the designation of a concurrency exception
69area, the Department of Transportation shall be consulted by the
70local government to assess the impact that the proposed
71exception area is expected to have on the adopted level-of-
72service standards established for Strategic Intermodal System
73facilities, as defined in s. 339.64, and roadway facilities
74funded in accordance with s. 339.2819. Further, the local
75government shall, in cooperation with the Department of
76Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any impacts to the
77Strategic Intermodal System, including, if appropriate, the
78development of a long-term concurrency management system
79pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). The exceptions
80may be available only within the specific geographic area of the
81jurisdiction designated in the plan. Pursuant to s. 163.3184,
82any affected person may challenge a plan amendment establishing
83these guidelines and the areas within which an exception could
84be granted. By October 1, 2006, the Department of
85Transportation, after publicly noticed workshops, shall publish
86and distribute to local governments a policy guideline
87containing criteria and options to assist local governments in
88planning to assess and mitigate the impacts of a proposed
89concurrency exception area as described in this paragraph.
90     (7)  In order to promote infill development and
91redevelopment, one or more transportation concurrency management
92areas may be designated in a local government comprehensive
93plan. A transportation concurrency management area must be a
94compact geographic area with an existing network of roads where
95multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes are available
96for common trips. A local government may establish an areawide
97level-of-service standard for such a transportation concurrency
98management area based upon an analysis that provides for a
99justification for the areawide level of service, how urban
100infill development or redevelopment will be promoted, and how
101mobility will be accomplished within the transportation
102concurrency management area. Prior to the designation of a
103concurrency management area, the Department of Transportation
104shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact
105that the proposed concurrency management area is expected to
106have on the adopted level-of-service standards established for
107Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined in s. 339.64,
108and roadway facilities funded in accordance with s. 339.2819.
109Further, the local government shall, in cooperation with the
110Department of Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any
111impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System, including, if
112appropriate, the development of a long-term concurrency
113management system pursuant to subsection (9) and s.
114163.3177(3)(d). Transportation concurrency management areas
115existing prior to July 1, 2005, shall meet, at a minimum, the
116provisions of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the time of
117the comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and
118appraisal report, whichever occurs last. The state land planning
119agency shall amend chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, to
120be consistent with this subsection. By October 1, 2006, the
121Department of Transportation, after publicly noticed workshops,
122shall publish and distribute to local governments a policy
123guideline containing criteria and options to assist local
124governments in planning to assess and mitigate the impacts of a
125proposed concurrency management area as described in this
126paragraph.
127     (13)  School concurrency shall be established on a
128districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the
129district and all portions of the district, whether located in a
130municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the
131public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12).
132The application of school concurrency to development shall be
133based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local
134governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph
135(f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency
136the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal
137agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163.3184(7)
138and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the
139following:
140     (e)  Availability standard.--Consistent with the public
141welfare, a local government may not deny an application for site
142plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent
143for a development or phase of a development authorizing
144residential development for failure to achieve and maintain the
145level-of-service standard for public school capacity in a local
146school concurrency management system where adequate school
147facilities will be in place or under actual construction within
1483 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan
149approval, or the functional equivalent. School concurrency shall
150be satisfied if the developer executes a legally binding
151commitment to provide proportionate fair-share mitigation
152proportionate to the demand for public school facilities to be
153created by actual development of the property, including, but
154not limited to, the options described in subparagraph 1. Options
155for proportionate fair-share proportionate-share mitigation of
156impacts on public school facilities shall be established in the
157public school facilities element and the interlocal agreement
158pursuant to s. 163.31777.
159     1.  Appropriate proportionate fair-share mitigation options
160include the contribution of land; the construction, expansion,
161or payment for land acquisition or construction of a public
162school facility; or the creation of mitigation banking based on
163the construction of a public school facility in exchange for the
164right to sell capacity credits. Such options must include
165execution by the applicant and the local government of a binding
166development agreement that constitutes a legally binding
167commitment to pay proportionate fair-share proportionate-share
168mitigation for the additional residential units approved by the
169local government in a development order and actually developed
170on the property, taking into account residential density allowed
171on the property prior to the plan amendment that increased
172overall residential density. The district school board shall be
173a party to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into
174such a development agreement, the local government may require
175the landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement
176upon its expiration.
177     2.  If the education facilities plan and the public
178educational facilities element authorize a contribution of land;
179the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; or
180the construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a
181portion thereof, as proportionate fair-share proportionate-share
182mitigation, the local government shall credit such a
183contribution, construction, expansion, or payment toward any
184other impact fee or exaction imposed by local ordinance for the
185same need, on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.
186     3.  Any proportionate fair-share proportionate-share
187mitigation must be directed by the school board toward a school
188capacity improvement identified in a financially feasible 5-year
189district work plan and which satisfies the demands created by
190that development in accordance with a binding developer's
191agreement.
192     4.  This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local
193government to deny a development permit or its functional
194equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except
195as provided in this part.
196     (f)  Intergovernmental coordination.--
197     1.  When establishing concurrency requirements for public
198schools, a local government shall satisfy the requirements for
199intergovernmental coordination set forth in s. 163.3177(6)(h)1.
200and 2., except that a municipality is not required to be a
201signatory to the interlocal agreement required by ss.
202163.3177(6)(h)2. and 163.31777(6), as a prerequisite for
203imposition of school concurrency, and as a nonsignatory, shall
204not participate in the adopted local school concurrency system,
205if the municipality meets all of the following criteria for
206having no significant impact on school attendance:
207     a.  The municipality has issued development orders for
208fewer than 50 residential dwelling units during the preceding 5
209years, or the municipality has generated fewer than 25
210additional public school students during the preceding 5 years.
211     b.  The municipality has not annexed new land during the
212preceding 5 years in land use categories which permit
213residential uses that will affect school attendance rates.
214     c.  The municipality has no public schools located within
215its boundaries.
216     d.  At least 80 percent of the developable land within the
217boundaries of the municipality has been built upon.
218     2.  A municipality which qualifies as having no significant
219impact on school attendance pursuant to the criteria of
220subparagraph 1. must review and determine at the time of its
221evaluation and appraisal report pursuant to s. 163.3191 whether
222it continues to meet the criteria pursuant to s. 163.31777(6).
223If the municipality determines that it no longer meets the
224criteria, it must adopt appropriate school concurrency goals,
225objectives, and policies in its plan amendments based on the
226evaluation and appraisal report, and enter into the existing
227interlocal agreement required by ss. 163.3177(6)(h)2. and
228163.31777, in order to fully participate in the school
229concurrency system. If such a municipality fails to do so, it
230will be subject to the enforcement provisions of s. 163.3191.
231     (16)  It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a
232method by which the impacts of development on transportation
233facilities can be mitigated by the cooperative efforts of the
234public and private sectors. The methodology used to calculate
235proportionate fair-share mitigation under this section shall be
236as provided for in subsection (12).
237     (a)  By December 1, 2006, each local government shall adopt
238by ordinance a methodology for assessing proportionate fair-
239share mitigation options. A local government that fails to adopt
240a methodology for assessing proportionate fair-share mitigation
241options by December 1, 2006, shall be subject to the sanctions
242described in s. 163.3184(11)(a) imposed by the Administration
243Commission. By December 1, 2005, the Department of
244Transportation shall develop a model transportation concurrency
245management ordinance with methodologies for assessing
246proportionate fair-share mitigation options.
247     (b)1.  In its transportation concurrency management system,
248a local government shall, by December 1, 2006, include
249methodologies that will be applied to calculate proportionate
250fair-share mitigation. A local government that fails to include
251such methodologies by December 1, 2006, shall be subject to the
252sanctions described in s. 163.3184(11)(a) imposed by the
253Administration Commission. A developer may choose to satisfy all
254transportation concurrency requirements by contributing or
255paying proportionate fair-share mitigation if transportation
256facilities or facility segments identified as mitigation for
257traffic impacts are specifically identified for funding in the
2585-year schedule of capital improvements in the capital
259improvements element of the local plan or the long-term
260concurrency management system or if such contributions or
261payments to such facilities or segments are reflected in the 5-
262year schedule of capital improvements in the next regularly
263scheduled update of the capital improvements element. Updates to
264the 5-year capital improvements element which reflect
265proportionate fair-share contributions may not be found not in
266compliance based on ss. 163.3164(32) 163.164(32) and 163.3177(3)
267if additional contributions, payments or funding sources are
268reasonably anticipated during a period not to exceed 10 years to
269fully mitigate impacts on the transportation facilities.
270     2.  Proportionate fair-share mitigation shall be applied as
271a credit against impact fees to the extent that all or a portion
272of the proportionate fair-share mitigation is used to address
273the same capital infrastructure improvements contemplated by the
274local government's impact fee ordinance.
275     (c)  Proportionate fair-share mitigation includes, without
276limitation, separately or collectively, private funds,
277contributions of land, and construction and contribution of
278facilities and may include public funds as determined by the
279local government. The fair market value of the proportionate
280fair-share mitigation shall not differ based on the form of
281mitigation. A local government may not require a development to
282pay more than its proportionate fair-share mitigation
283contribution regardless of the method of mitigation.
284     (e)  Mitigation for development impacts to facilities on
285the Strategic Intermodal System made pursuant to this subsection
286requires the concurrence of the Department of Transportation.
287The department has 60 days from the date of submission by the
288applicable local government to concur or withhold concurrence
289with the mitigation of development impacts to facilities on the
290Strategic Intermodal System. If the department does not respond
291within the 60-day period, the department is deemed to have
292concurred with the mitigation.
293     (f)  If In the event the funds in an adopted 5-year capital
294improvements element are insufficient to fully fund construction
295of a transportation improvement required by the local
296government's concurrency management system, a local government
297and a developer may still enter into a binding proportionate
298fair-share mitigation proportionate-share agreement authorizing
299the developer to construct that amount of development on which
300the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate share is
301calculated if the proportionate fair-share mitigation
302proportionate-share amount in such agreement is sufficient to
303pay for one or more improvements which will, in the opinion of
304the governmental entity or entities maintaining the
305transportation facilities, significantly benefit the impacted
306transportation system. The improvement or improvements funded by
307the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate-share
308component must be adopted into the 5-year capital improvements
309schedule of the comprehensive plan at the next annual capital
310improvements element update.
311     Section 4.  Subsection (17) of section 163.3184, Florida
312Statutes, is amended to read:
313     163.3184  Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or
314plan amendment.--
315     (17)  A local government that has adopted a community
316vision and urban service boundary under s. 163.3177(13)
317163.31773(13) and (14) may adopt a plan amendment related to map
318amendments solely to property within an urban service boundary
319in the manner described in subsections (1), (2), (7), (14),
320(15), and (16) and s. 163.3187(1)(c)1.d. and e., 2., and 3.,
321such that state and regional agency review is eliminated. The
322department may not issue an objections, recommendations, and
323comments report on proposed plan amendments or a notice of
324intent on adopted plan amendments; however, affected persons, as
325defined by paragraph (1)(a), may file a petition for
326administrative review pursuant to the requirements of s.
327163.3187(3)(a) to challenge the compliance of an adopted plan
328amendment. This subsection does not apply to any amendment
329within an area of critical state concern, to any amendment that
330increases residential densities allowable in high-hazard coastal
331areas as defined in s. 163.3178(2)(h), or to a text change to
332the goals, policies, or objectives of the local government's
333comprehensive plan. Amendments submitted under this subsection
334are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan
335amendments in s. 163.3187.
336     Section 5.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of section
337163.3247, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
338     163.3247  Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida.--
339     (3)  CENTURY COMMISSION FOR A SUSTAINABLE FLORIDA;
340CREATION; ORGANIZATION.--The Century Commission for a
341Sustainable Florida is created as a standing body to help the
342citizens of this state envision and plan their collective future
343with an eye towards both 25-year and 50-year horizons.
344     (a)  The commission shall consist of 15 members, 5
345appointed by the Governor, 5 appointed by the President of the
346Senate, and 5 appointed by the Speaker of the House of
347Representatives. Appointments shall be made no later than
348October 1, 2005. The membership must represent local
349governments, school boards, developers and homebuilders, the
350business community, the agriculture community, the environmental
351community, and other appropriate stakeholders. The membership
352shall reflect the demographic makeup of the state. One member
353shall be designated by the Governor as chair of the commission.
354Any vacancy that occurs on the commission must be filled in the
355same manner as the original appointment and shall be for the
356unexpired term of that commission seat. Members shall serve 4-
357year terms, except that, initially, to provide for staggered
358terms, the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the
359Speaker of the House of Representatives shall each appoint one
360member to serve a 2-year term, two members to serve 3-year
361terms, and two members to serve 4-year terms. All subsequent
362appointments shall be for 4-year terms. An appointee may not
363serve more than 6 years.
364     Section 6.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (4) of section
365339.2819, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
366     339.2819  Transportation Regional Incentive Program.--
367     (4)(a)  Projects to be funded with Transportation Regional
368Incentive Program funds shall, at a minimum:
369     1.  Support those transportation facilities that serve
370national, statewide, or regional functions and function as an
371integrated regional transportation system.
372     2.  Be identified in the capital improvements element of a
373comprehensive plan that has been determined to be in compliance
374with part II of chapter 163, after July 1, 2005, or to implement
375a long-term concurrency management system adopted by a local
376government in accordance with s. 163.3180(9) 163.3177(9).
377Further, the project shall be in compliance with local
378government comprehensive plan policies relative to corridor
379management.
380     3.  Be consistent with the Strategic Intermodal System Plan
381developed under s. 339.64.
382     4.  Have a commitment for local, regional, or private
383financial matching funds as a percentage of the overall project
384cost.
385     Section 7.  Subsection (10) of section 339.55, Florida
386Statutes, is amended to read:
387     339.55  State-funded infrastructure bank.--
388     (10)  Funds paid into the State Transportation Trust Fund
389pursuant to s. 201.15(1)(d) for the purposes of the State
390Infrastructure Bank are hereby annually appropriated for
391expenditure to support that program.
392     Section 8.  Paragraphs (l), (m), and (n) of subsection (24)
393of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
394     380.06  Developments of regional impact.--
395     (24)  STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.--
396     (l)  Any proposed development within an urban service
397boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the
398provisions of this section if the local government having
399jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has
400adopted the urban service boundary and has entered into a
401binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions and the Department
402of Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state
403and regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a
404proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology pursuant
405to s. 163.3180(16).
406     (m)  Any proposed development within a rural land
407stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from
408the provisions of this section if the local government that has
409adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a
410binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and
411the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of
412impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has
413adopted a proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology
414pursuant to s. 163.3180(16).
415     (n)  Any proposed development or redevelopment within an
416area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under
417s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the
418local government has entered into a binding agreement with
419jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of
420Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and
421regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a
422proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology pursuant
423to s. 163.3180(16).
424     Section 9.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of section
4251013.65, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
426     1013.65  Educational and ancillary plant construction
427funds; Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust
428Fund; allocation of funds.--
429     (2)(a)  The Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt
430Service Trust Fund shall be comprised of the following sources,
431which are hereby appropriated to the trust fund:
432     1.  Proceeds, premiums, and accrued interest from the sale
433of public education bonds and that portion of the revenues
434accruing from the gross receipts tax as provided by s. 9(a)(2),
435Art. XII of the State Constitution, as amended, interest on
436investments, and federal interest subsidies.
437     2.  General revenue funds appropriated to the fund for
438educational capital outlay purposes.
439     3.  All capital outlay funds previously appropriated and
440certified forward pursuant to s. 216.301.
441     4.a.  Funds paid pursuant to s. 201.15(1)(d).
442     b.  The sum of $41.75 million of such funds shall be
443appropriated annually for expenditure to fund the Classrooms for
444Kids Program created in s. 1013.735 and shall be distributed as
445provided by that section.
446     Section 10.  Subsections (2) and (3) of section 1013.738,
447Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
448     1013.738  High Growth District Capital Outlay Assistance
449Grant Program.--
450     (2)  In order to qualify for a grant, a school district
451must meet the following criteria:
452     (a)  The district must have levied the full 2 mills of
453nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage authorized in s.
4541011.71(2) for each of the past 3 4 fiscal years or currently
455receive an amount from the school capital outlay surtax
456authorized in s. 212.055(6) that, when added to the nonvoted
457discretionary capital outlay millage collected, equals the
458amount that would be generated if the full 2 mills of nonvoted
459discretionary capital outlay millage had been collected over the
460past 3 fiscal years.
461     (b)  The district must receive, in the current fiscal year,
462revenue from the collection of an impact fee specifically for
463schools and revenue from the collection of one of the following:
464     1.  A local government infrastructure sales surtax
465authorized in s. 212.055(2) in which a portion is dedicated for
466the construction of schools in the current fiscal year.
467     2.  A school capital outlay surtax authorized in s.
468212.055(6). If the school capital outlay surtax is used to meet
469the conditions of paragraph (a), the amount of the school
470capital outlay surtax collected must be in excess of the amount
471in paragraph (a).
472     3.  A local bond referendum as authorized in ss. 1010.40-
4731010.55. Fifty percent of the revenue derived from the 2-mill
474nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage for the past 4
475fiscal years, when divided by the district's growth in capital
476outlay FTE students over this period, produces a value that is
477less than the average cost per student station calculated
478pursuant to s. 1013.72(2), and weighted by statewide growth in
479capital outlay FTE students in elementary, middle, and high
480schools for the past 4 fiscal years.
481     (c)  The district must have equaled or exceeded three times
482twice the statewide average of growth in capital outlay FTE
483students over this same 3-year 4-year period.
484     (d)  The district must not have received an appropriation
485from the special facilities construction program in the current
486fiscal year. The Commissioner of Education must have released
487all funds allocated to the district from the Classrooms First
488Program authorized in s. 1013.68, and these funds were fully
489expended by the district as of February 1 of the current fiscal
490year.
491     (e)  The total capital outlay FTE students of the district
492is greater than 15,000 students.
493     (3)  The funds provided in the General Appropriations Act
494shall be allocated pursuant to the following methodology:
495     (a)  Each eligible district school board shall receive an
496amount from the Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service
497Trust Fund to be calculated by computing the capital outlay
498full-time equivalent membership as determined by the department.
499Such membership must include, but is not limited to:
500     1.  K-12 students, except hospital and homebound part-time
501students; and
502     2.  Students who are career education students and adult
503disabled students and who are enrolled in school district career
504centers. For each eligible district, the Department of Education
505shall calculate the value of 50 percent of the revenue derived
506from the 2-mill nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage
507for the past 4 fiscal years divided by the increase in capital
508outlay FTE students for the same period.
509     (b)  The capital outlay full-time equivalent membership
510shall be determined for kindergarten through grade 12 and for
511career centers by averaging the unweighted full-time equivalent
512membership for the second and third surveys and comparing the
513results on a school-by-school basis with the Florida Inventory
514for School Houses. The capital outlay full-time equivalent
515membership by grade-level organization shall be used in making
516the following calculation: the capital outlay full-time
517equivalent membership by grade-level organization for the prior
518year must be used to compute the growth over the highest of the
5193 years preceding the prior year. The Department of Education
520shall determine, for each eligible district, the amount that
521must be added to the value calculated pursuant to paragraph (a)
522to produce the weighted average value per student station
523calculated pursuant to paragraph (2)(b).
524     (c)  The total amount appropriated by the Legislature
525pursuant to this subsection shall be allocated among the growth
526capital outlay full-time equivalent membership. The allocation
527shall be prorated to the districts based upon each district's
528percentage of growth capital outlay full-time equivalent
529membership. The most recent 4-year capital outlay full-time
530equivalent membership data shall be used in each subsequent
531year's calculation for the allocation of funds pursuant to this
532subsection. If a change, correction, or recomputation of data
533during any year results in a reduction or increase of the
534calculated amount previously allocated to a district, the
535allocation to that district shall be adjusted correspondingly.
536If such recomputation results in an increase or decrease of the
537calculated amount, such additional or reduced amounts shall be
538added to or reduced from the district's future appropriations.
539However, no change, correction, or recomputation of data shall
540be made subsequent to 2 years following the initial annual
541allocation. The value calculated for each eligible district
542pursuant to paragraph (b) shall be multiplied by the average
543increase in capital outlay FTE students for the past 4 fiscal
544years to determine the maximum amount of a grant that may be
545awarded to a district pursuant to this section.
546     (d)  In the event the funds provided in the General
547Appropriations Act are insufficient to fully fund the maximum
548grants calculated pursuant to paragraph (c), the Department of
549Education shall allocate the funds based on each district's
550prorated share of the total maximum award amount calculated for
551all eligible districts.
552     Section 11.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of section 27
553of chapter 2005-290, Laws of Florida, is amended to read:
554     Section 27.
555     (2)  The following appropriations are made for the 2005-
5562006 fiscal year only on a nonrecurring basis:
557     (a)  From the State Transportation Trust Fund in the
558Department of Transportation:
559     1.  One hundred seventy-five Two hundred million dollars
560for the purposes specified in sections 339.61, 339.62, 339.63,
561and 339.64, Florida Statutes.
562     2.  Two hundred seventy-five million dollars for the
563purposes specified in section 339.2819, Florida Statutes.
564     3.  One hundred million dollars for the purposes specified
565in section 339.55, Florida Statutes.
566     4.  Twenty-five million for the purposes specified in
567section 339.2817, Florida Statutes.
568     Section 12.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2006.
569
570
571======= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ==========
572     Remove the entire title and insert:
573
A bill to be entitled
574An act relating to growth management; amending s.
575163.3164, F.S.; revising a definition; amending s.
576163.3177, F.S.; correcting a cross-reference; amending s.
577163.3180, F.S.; revising concurrency requirements and
578procedures; providing sanctions; amending ss. 163.3184 and
579339.2819, F.S.; correcting cross-references; amending s.
580163.3247, F.S.; providing a requirement on the makeup of
581the Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida; amending
582s. 339.55, F.S.; deleting an annual appropriation from the
583State Transportation Trust Fund for State Infrastructure
584Bank purposes; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; revising certain
585statutory exemption provisions for developments of
586regional impact; amending s. 1013.65, F.S.; revising
587provisions relating to sources of appropriations to the
588Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust
589Fund to delete an annual appropriation to the Classroom
590for Kids Program; amending s. 1013.738, F.S.; revising the
591eligibility criteria for the High Growth District Capital
592Outlay Assistance Grant Program; revising provisions for
593allocation of funds; providing calculations; amending s.
59427, ch. 2005-290, Laws of Florida; revising an
595appropriation from the State Transportation Trust Fund for
596Florida Strategic Intermodal System purposes; providing an
597effective date.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.