1 | Representative(s) Johnson offered the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Amendment (with title amendment) |
4 | Remove everything after the enacting clause and insert: |
5 | Section 1. Subsection (32) of section 163.3164, Florida |
6 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
7 | 163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land |
8 | Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act: |
9 | (32) "Financial feasibility" means that sufficient |
10 | revenues are currently available or will be available from |
11 | committed funding sources for the first 3 years, or will be |
12 | available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 |
13 | and 5, of a 5-year capital improvement schedule for financing |
14 | capital improvements, such as ad valorem taxes, bonds, state and |
15 | federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees, and developer |
16 | contributions, which are adequate to fund the projected costs of |
17 | the capital improvements identified in the comprehensive plan |
18 | necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are |
19 | achieved and maintained within the period covered by the 5-year |
20 | schedule of capital improvements. The requirement that level-of- |
21 | service standards be achieved and maintained shall not apply if |
22 | the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate-share |
23 | process set forth in s. 163.3180(12) and (16) is used. |
24 | Section 2. Paragraph (c) of subsection (13) of section |
25 | 163.3177, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
26 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
27 | plan; studies and surveys.-- |
28 | (13) Local governments are encouraged to develop a |
29 | community vision that provides for sustainable growth, |
30 | recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural |
31 | resources. At the request of a local government, the applicable |
32 | regional planning council shall provide assistance in the |
33 | development of a community vision. |
34 | (c) As part of the workshops and public meetings, the |
35 | local government must discuss strategies for addressing the |
36 | topics discussed under paragraph (b), including: |
37 | 1. Strategies to preserve open space and environmentally |
38 | sensitive lands, and to encourage a healthy agricultural |
39 | economy, including innovative planning and development |
40 | strategies, such as the transfer of development rights; |
41 | 2. Incentives for mixed-use development, including |
42 | increased height and intensity standards for buildings that |
43 | provide residential use in combination with office or commercial |
44 | space; |
45 | 3. Incentives for workforce housing; |
46 | 4. Designation of an urban service boundary pursuant to |
47 | subsection (14) (2); and |
48 | 5. Strategies to provide mobility within the community and |
49 | to protect the Strategic Intermodal System, including the |
50 | development of a transportation corridor management plan under |
51 | s. 337.273. |
52 | Section 3. Paragraph (c) of subsection (2), paragraph (f) |
53 | of subsection (5), subsection (7), paragraphs (e) and (f) of |
54 | subsection (13), and paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (e), and (f) of |
55 | subsection (16) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are |
56 | amended to read: |
57 | 163.3180 Concurrency.-- |
58 | (2) |
59 | (c) Consistent with the public welfare, and except as |
60 | otherwise provided in this section, transportation facilities |
61 | needed to serve new development shall be in place or under |
62 | actual construction or programmed for construction to commence |
63 | in the Department of Transportation's work program or the local |
64 | government's schedule of capital improvements within 3 years |
65 | after the local government approves a building permit or its |
66 | functional equivalent that results in traffic generation. |
67 | (5) |
68 | (f) Prior to the designation of a concurrency exception |
69 | area, the Department of Transportation shall be consulted by the |
70 | local government to assess the impact that the proposed |
71 | exception area is expected to have on the adopted level-of- |
72 | service standards established for Strategic Intermodal System |
73 | facilities, as defined in s. 339.64, and roadway facilities |
74 | funded in accordance with s. 339.2819. Further, the local |
75 | government shall, in cooperation with the Department of |
76 | Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any impacts to the |
77 | Strategic Intermodal System, including, if appropriate, the |
78 | development of a long-term concurrency management system |
79 | pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). The exceptions |
80 | may be available only within the specific geographic area of the |
81 | jurisdiction designated in the plan. Pursuant to s. 163.3184, |
82 | any affected person may challenge a plan amendment establishing |
83 | these guidelines and the areas within which an exception could |
84 | be granted. By October 1, 2006, the Department of |
85 | Transportation, after publicly noticed workshops, shall publish |
86 | and distribute to local governments a policy guideline |
87 | containing criteria and options to assist local governments in |
88 | planning to assess and mitigate the impacts of a proposed |
89 | concurrency exception area as described in this paragraph. |
90 | (7) In order to promote infill development and |
91 | redevelopment, one or more transportation concurrency management |
92 | areas may be designated in a local government comprehensive |
93 | plan. A transportation concurrency management area must be a |
94 | compact geographic area with an existing network of roads where |
95 | multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes are available |
96 | for common trips. A local government may establish an areawide |
97 | level-of-service standard for such a transportation concurrency |
98 | management area based upon an analysis that provides for a |
99 | justification for the areawide level of service, how urban |
100 | infill development or redevelopment will be promoted, and how |
101 | mobility will be accomplished within the transportation |
102 | concurrency management area. Prior to the designation of a |
103 | concurrency management area, the Department of Transportation |
104 | shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact |
105 | that the proposed concurrency management area is expected to |
106 | have on the adopted level-of-service standards established for |
107 | Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined in s. 339.64, |
108 | and roadway facilities funded in accordance with s. 339.2819. |
109 | Further, the local government shall, in cooperation with the |
110 | Department of Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any |
111 | impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System, including, if |
112 | appropriate, the development of a long-term concurrency |
113 | management system pursuant to subsection (9) and s. |
114 | 163.3177(3)(d). Transportation concurrency management areas |
115 | existing prior to July 1, 2005, shall meet, at a minimum, the |
116 | provisions of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the time of |
117 | the comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and |
118 | appraisal report, whichever occurs last. The state land planning |
119 | agency shall amend chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, to |
120 | be consistent with this subsection. By October 1, 2006, the |
121 | Department of Transportation, after publicly noticed workshops, |
122 | shall publish and distribute to local governments a policy |
123 | guideline containing criteria and options to assist local |
124 | governments in planning to assess and mitigate the impacts of a |
125 | proposed concurrency management area as described in this |
126 | paragraph. |
127 | (13) School concurrency shall be established on a |
128 | districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the |
129 | district and all portions of the district, whether located in a |
130 | municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the |
131 | public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12). |
132 | The application of school concurrency to development shall be |
133 | based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local |
134 | governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph |
135 | (f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency |
136 | the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal |
137 | agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163.3184(7) |
138 | and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the |
139 | following: |
140 | (e) Availability standard.--Consistent with the public |
141 | welfare, a local government may not deny an application for site |
142 | plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent |
143 | for a development or phase of a development authorizing |
144 | residential development for failure to achieve and maintain the |
145 | level-of-service standard for public school capacity in a local |
146 | school concurrency management system where adequate school |
147 | facilities will be in place or under actual construction within |
148 | 3 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan |
149 | approval, or the functional equivalent. School concurrency shall |
150 | be satisfied if the developer executes a legally binding |
151 | commitment to provide proportionate fair-share mitigation |
152 | proportionate to the demand for public school facilities to be |
153 | created by actual development of the property, including, but |
154 | not limited to, the options described in subparagraph 1. Options |
155 | for proportionate fair-share proportionate-share mitigation of |
156 | impacts on public school facilities shall be established in the |
157 | public school facilities element and the interlocal agreement |
158 | pursuant to s. 163.31777. |
159 | 1. Appropriate proportionate fair-share mitigation options |
160 | include the contribution of land; the construction, expansion, |
161 | or payment for land acquisition or construction of a public |
162 | school facility; or the creation of mitigation banking based on |
163 | the construction of a public school facility in exchange for the |
164 | right to sell capacity credits. Such options must include |
165 | execution by the applicant and the local government of a binding |
166 | development agreement that constitutes a legally binding |
167 | commitment to pay proportionate fair-share proportionate-share |
168 | mitigation for the additional residential units approved by the |
169 | local government in a development order and actually developed |
170 | on the property, taking into account residential density allowed |
171 | on the property prior to the plan amendment that increased |
172 | overall residential density. The district school board shall be |
173 | a party to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into |
174 | such a development agreement, the local government may require |
175 | the landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement |
176 | upon its expiration. |
177 | 2. If the education facilities plan and the public |
178 | educational facilities element authorize a contribution of land; |
179 | the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; or |
180 | the construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a |
181 | portion thereof, as proportionate fair-share proportionate-share |
182 | mitigation, the local government shall credit such a |
183 | contribution, construction, expansion, or payment toward any |
184 | other impact fee or exaction imposed by local ordinance for the |
185 | same need, on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value. |
186 | 3. Any proportionate fair-share proportionate-share |
187 | mitigation must be directed by the school board toward a school |
188 | capacity improvement identified in a financially feasible 5-year |
189 | district work plan and which satisfies the demands created by |
190 | that development in accordance with a binding developer's |
191 | agreement. |
192 | 4. This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local |
193 | government to deny a development permit or its functional |
194 | equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except |
195 | as provided in this part. |
196 | (f) Intergovernmental coordination.-- |
197 | 1. When establishing concurrency requirements for public |
198 | schools, a local government shall satisfy the requirements for |
199 | intergovernmental coordination set forth in s. 163.3177(6)(h)1. |
200 | and 2., except that a municipality is not required to be a |
201 | signatory to the interlocal agreement required by ss. |
202 | 163.3177(6)(h)2. and 163.31777(6), as a prerequisite for |
203 | imposition of school concurrency, and as a nonsignatory, shall |
204 | not participate in the adopted local school concurrency system, |
205 | if the municipality meets all of the following criteria for |
206 | having no significant impact on school attendance: |
207 | a. The municipality has issued development orders for |
208 | fewer than 50 residential dwelling units during the preceding 5 |
209 | years, or the municipality has generated fewer than 25 |
210 | additional public school students during the preceding 5 years. |
211 | b. The municipality has not annexed new land during the |
212 | preceding 5 years in land use categories which permit |
213 | residential uses that will affect school attendance rates. |
214 | c. The municipality has no public schools located within |
215 | its boundaries. |
216 | d. At least 80 percent of the developable land within the |
217 | boundaries of the municipality has been built upon. |
218 | 2. A municipality which qualifies as having no significant |
219 | impact on school attendance pursuant to the criteria of |
220 | subparagraph 1. must review and determine at the time of its |
221 | evaluation and appraisal report pursuant to s. 163.3191 whether |
222 | it continues to meet the criteria pursuant to s. 163.31777(6). |
223 | If the municipality determines that it no longer meets the |
224 | criteria, it must adopt appropriate school concurrency goals, |
225 | objectives, and policies in its plan amendments based on the |
226 | evaluation and appraisal report, and enter into the existing |
227 | interlocal agreement required by ss. 163.3177(6)(h)2. and |
228 | 163.31777, in order to fully participate in the school |
229 | concurrency system. If such a municipality fails to do so, it |
230 | will be subject to the enforcement provisions of s. 163.3191. |
231 | (16) It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a |
232 | method by which the impacts of development on transportation |
233 | facilities can be mitigated by the cooperative efforts of the |
234 | public and private sectors. The methodology used to calculate |
235 | proportionate fair-share mitigation under this section shall be |
236 | as provided for in subsection (12). |
237 | (a) By December 1, 2006, each local government shall adopt |
238 | by ordinance a methodology for assessing proportionate fair- |
239 | share mitigation options. A local government that fails to adopt |
240 | a methodology for assessing proportionate fair-share mitigation |
241 | options by December 1, 2006, shall be subject to the sanctions |
242 | described in s. 163.3184(11)(a) imposed by the Administration |
243 | Commission. By December 1, 2005, the Department of |
244 | Transportation shall develop a model transportation concurrency |
245 | management ordinance with methodologies for assessing |
246 | proportionate fair-share mitigation options. |
247 | (b)1. In its transportation concurrency management system, |
248 | a local government shall, by December 1, 2006, include |
249 | methodologies that will be applied to calculate proportionate |
250 | fair-share mitigation. A local government that fails to include |
251 | such methodologies by December 1, 2006, shall be subject to the |
252 | sanctions described in s. 163.3184(11)(a) imposed by the |
253 | Administration Commission. A developer may choose to satisfy all |
254 | transportation concurrency requirements by contributing or |
255 | paying proportionate fair-share mitigation if transportation |
256 | facilities or facility segments identified as mitigation for |
257 | traffic impacts are specifically identified for funding in the |
258 | 5-year schedule of capital improvements in the capital |
259 | improvements element of the local plan or the long-term |
260 | concurrency management system or if such contributions or |
261 | payments to such facilities or segments are reflected in the 5- |
262 | year schedule of capital improvements in the next regularly |
263 | scheduled update of the capital improvements element. Updates to |
264 | the 5-year capital improvements element which reflect |
265 | proportionate fair-share contributions may not be found not in |
266 | compliance based on ss. 163.3164(32) 163.164(32) and 163.3177(3) |
267 | if additional contributions, payments or funding sources are |
268 | reasonably anticipated during a period not to exceed 10 years to |
269 | fully mitigate impacts on the transportation facilities. |
270 | 2. Proportionate fair-share mitigation shall be applied as |
271 | a credit against impact fees to the extent that all or a portion |
272 | of the proportionate fair-share mitigation is used to address |
273 | the same capital infrastructure improvements contemplated by the |
274 | local government's impact fee ordinance. |
275 | (c) Proportionate fair-share mitigation includes, without |
276 | limitation, separately or collectively, private funds, |
277 | contributions of land, and construction and contribution of |
278 | facilities and may include public funds as determined by the |
279 | local government. The fair market value of the proportionate |
280 | fair-share mitigation shall not differ based on the form of |
281 | mitigation. A local government may not require a development to |
282 | pay more than its proportionate fair-share mitigation |
283 | contribution regardless of the method of mitigation. |
284 | (e) Mitigation for development impacts to facilities on |
285 | the Strategic Intermodal System made pursuant to this subsection |
286 | requires the concurrence of the Department of Transportation. |
287 | The department has 60 days from the date of submission by the |
288 | applicable local government to concur or withhold concurrence |
289 | with the mitigation of development impacts to facilities on the |
290 | Strategic Intermodal System. If the department does not respond |
291 | within the 60-day period, the department is deemed to have |
292 | concurred with the mitigation. |
293 | (f) If In the event the funds in an adopted 5-year capital |
294 | improvements element are insufficient to fully fund construction |
295 | of a transportation improvement required by the local |
296 | government's concurrency management system, a local government |
297 | and a developer may still enter into a binding proportionate |
298 | fair-share mitigation proportionate-share agreement authorizing |
299 | the developer to construct that amount of development on which |
300 | the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate share is |
301 | calculated if the proportionate fair-share mitigation |
302 | proportionate-share amount in such agreement is sufficient to |
303 | pay for one or more improvements which will, in the opinion of |
304 | the governmental entity or entities maintaining the |
305 | transportation facilities, significantly benefit the impacted |
306 | transportation system. The improvement or improvements funded by |
307 | the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate-share |
308 | component must be adopted into the 5-year capital improvements |
309 | schedule of the comprehensive plan at the next annual capital |
310 | improvements element update. |
311 | Section 4. Subsection (17) of section 163.3184, Florida |
312 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
313 | 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or |
314 | plan amendment.-- |
315 | (17) A local government that has adopted a community |
316 | vision and urban service boundary under s. 163.3177(13) |
317 | 163.31773(13) and (14) may adopt a plan amendment related to map |
318 | amendments solely to property within an urban service boundary |
319 | in the manner described in subsections (1), (2), (7), (14), |
320 | (15), and (16) and s. 163.3187(1)(c)1.d. and e., 2., and 3., |
321 | such that state and regional agency review is eliminated. The |
322 | department may not issue an objections, recommendations, and |
323 | comments report on proposed plan amendments or a notice of |
324 | intent on adopted plan amendments; however, affected persons, as |
325 | defined by paragraph (1)(a), may file a petition for |
326 | administrative review pursuant to the requirements of s. |
327 | 163.3187(3)(a) to challenge the compliance of an adopted plan |
328 | amendment. This subsection does not apply to any amendment |
329 | within an area of critical state concern, to any amendment that |
330 | increases residential densities allowable in high-hazard coastal |
331 | areas as defined in s. 163.3178(2)(h), or to a text change to |
332 | the goals, policies, or objectives of the local government's |
333 | comprehensive plan. Amendments submitted under this subsection |
334 | are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan |
335 | amendments in s. 163.3187. |
336 | Section 5. Paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of section |
337 | 163.3247, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
338 | 163.3247 Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida.-- |
339 | (3) CENTURY COMMISSION FOR A SUSTAINABLE FLORIDA; |
340 | CREATION; ORGANIZATION.--The Century Commission for a |
341 | Sustainable Florida is created as a standing body to help the |
342 | citizens of this state envision and plan their collective future |
343 | with an eye towards both 25-year and 50-year horizons. |
344 | (a) The commission shall consist of 15 members, 5 |
345 | appointed by the Governor, 5 appointed by the President of the |
346 | Senate, and 5 appointed by the Speaker of the House of |
347 | Representatives. Appointments shall be made no later than |
348 | October 1, 2005. The membership must represent local |
349 | governments, school boards, developers and homebuilders, the |
350 | business community, the agriculture community, the environmental |
351 | community, and other appropriate stakeholders. The membership |
352 | shall reflect the demographic makeup of the state. One member |
353 | shall be designated by the Governor as chair of the commission. |
354 | Any vacancy that occurs on the commission must be filled in the |
355 | same manner as the original appointment and shall be for the |
356 | unexpired term of that commission seat. Members shall serve 4- |
357 | year terms, except that, initially, to provide for staggered |
358 | terms, the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the |
359 | Speaker of the House of Representatives shall each appoint one |
360 | member to serve a 2-year term, two members to serve 3-year |
361 | terms, and two members to serve 4-year terms. All subsequent |
362 | appointments shall be for 4-year terms. An appointee may not |
363 | serve more than 6 years. |
364 | Section 6. Paragraph (a) of subsection (4) of section |
365 | 339.2819, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
366 | 339.2819 Transportation Regional Incentive Program.-- |
367 | (4)(a) Projects to be funded with Transportation Regional |
368 | Incentive Program funds shall, at a minimum: |
369 | 1. Support those transportation facilities that serve |
370 | national, statewide, or regional functions and function as an |
371 | integrated regional transportation system. |
372 | 2. Be identified in the capital improvements element of a |
373 | comprehensive plan that has been determined to be in compliance |
374 | with part II of chapter 163, after July 1, 2005, or to implement |
375 | a long-term concurrency management system adopted by a local |
376 | government in accordance with s. 163.3180(9) 163.3177(9). |
377 | Further, the project shall be in compliance with local |
378 | government comprehensive plan policies relative to corridor |
379 | management. |
380 | 3. Be consistent with the Strategic Intermodal System Plan |
381 | developed under s. 339.64. |
382 | 4. Have a commitment for local, regional, or private |
383 | financial matching funds as a percentage of the overall project |
384 | cost. |
385 | Section 7. Subsection (10) of section 339.55, Florida |
386 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
387 | 339.55 State-funded infrastructure bank.-- |
388 | (10) Funds paid into the State Transportation Trust Fund |
389 | pursuant to s. 201.15(1)(d) for the purposes of the State |
390 | Infrastructure Bank are hereby annually appropriated for |
391 | expenditure to support that program. |
392 | Section 8. Paragraphs (l), (m), and (n) of subsection (24) |
393 | of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended to read: |
394 | 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- |
395 | (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
396 | (l) Any proposed development within an urban service |
397 | boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the |
398 | provisions of this section if the local government having |
399 | jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has |
400 | adopted the urban service boundary and has entered into a |
401 | binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions and the Department |
402 | of Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state |
403 | and regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a |
404 | proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology pursuant |
405 | to s. 163.3180(16). |
406 | (m) Any proposed development within a rural land |
407 | stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from |
408 | the provisions of this section if the local government that has |
409 | adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a |
410 | binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and |
411 | the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of |
412 | impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has |
413 | adopted a proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology |
414 | pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
415 | (n) Any proposed development or redevelopment within an |
416 | area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under |
417 | s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
418 | local government has entered into a binding agreement with |
419 | jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of |
420 | Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and |
421 | regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a |
422 | proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology pursuant |
423 | to s. 163.3180(16). |
424 | Section 9. Paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of section |
425 | 1013.65, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
426 | 1013.65 Educational and ancillary plant construction |
427 | funds; Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust |
428 | Fund; allocation of funds.-- |
429 | (2)(a) The Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt |
430 | Service Trust Fund shall be comprised of the following sources, |
431 | which are hereby appropriated to the trust fund: |
432 | 1. Proceeds, premiums, and accrued interest from the sale |
433 | of public education bonds and that portion of the revenues |
434 | accruing from the gross receipts tax as provided by s. 9(a)(2), |
435 | Art. XII of the State Constitution, as amended, interest on |
436 | investments, and federal interest subsidies. |
437 | 2. General revenue funds appropriated to the fund for |
438 | educational capital outlay purposes. |
439 | 3. All capital outlay funds previously appropriated and |
440 | certified forward pursuant to s. 216.301. |
441 | 4.a. Funds paid pursuant to s. 201.15(1)(d). |
442 | b. The sum of $41.75 million of such funds shall be |
443 | appropriated annually for expenditure to fund the Classrooms for |
444 | Kids Program created in s. 1013.735 and shall be distributed as |
445 | provided by that section. |
446 | Section 10. Subsections (2) and (3) of section 1013.738, |
447 | Florida Statutes, are amended to read: |
448 | 1013.738 High Growth District Capital Outlay Assistance |
449 | Grant Program.-- |
450 | (2) In order to qualify for a grant, a school district |
451 | must meet the following criteria: |
452 | (a) The district must have levied the full 2 mills of |
453 | nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage authorized in s. |
454 | 1011.71(2) for each of the past 3 4 fiscal years or currently |
455 | receive an amount from the school capital outlay surtax |
456 | authorized in s. 212.055(6) that, when added to the nonvoted |
457 | discretionary capital outlay millage collected, equals the |
458 | amount that would be generated if the full 2 mills of nonvoted |
459 | discretionary capital outlay millage had been collected over the |
460 | past 3 fiscal years. |
461 | (b) The district must receive, in the current fiscal year, |
462 | revenue from the collection of an impact fee specifically for |
463 | schools and revenue from the collection of one of the following: |
464 | 1. A local government infrastructure sales surtax |
465 | authorized in s. 212.055(2) in which a portion is dedicated for |
466 | the construction of schools in the current fiscal year. |
467 | 2. A school capital outlay surtax authorized in s. |
468 | 212.055(6). If the school capital outlay surtax is used to meet |
469 | the conditions of paragraph (a), the amount of the school |
470 | capital outlay surtax collected must be in excess of the amount |
471 | in paragraph (a). |
472 | 3. A local bond referendum as authorized in ss. 1010.40- |
473 | 1010.55. Fifty percent of the revenue derived from the 2-mill |
474 | nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage for the past 4 |
475 | fiscal years, when divided by the district's growth in capital |
476 | outlay FTE students over this period, produces a value that is |
477 | less than the average cost per student station calculated |
478 | pursuant to s. 1013.72(2), and weighted by statewide growth in |
479 | capital outlay FTE students in elementary, middle, and high |
480 | schools for the past 4 fiscal years. |
481 | (c) The district must have equaled or exceeded three times |
482 | twice the statewide average of growth in capital outlay FTE |
483 | students over this same 3-year 4-year period. |
484 | (d) The district must not have received an appropriation |
485 | from the special facilities construction program in the current |
486 | fiscal year. The Commissioner of Education must have released |
487 | all funds allocated to the district from the Classrooms First |
488 | Program authorized in s. 1013.68, and these funds were fully |
489 | expended by the district as of February 1 of the current fiscal |
490 | year. |
491 | (e) The total capital outlay FTE students of the district |
492 | is greater than 15,000 students. |
493 | (3) The funds provided in the General Appropriations Act |
494 | shall be allocated pursuant to the following methodology: |
495 | (a) Each eligible district school board shall receive an |
496 | amount from the Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service |
497 | Trust Fund to be calculated by computing the capital outlay |
498 | full-time equivalent membership as determined by the department. |
499 | Such membership must include, but is not limited to: |
500 | 1. K-12 students, except hospital and homebound part-time |
501 | students; and |
502 | 2. Students who are career education students and adult |
503 | disabled students and who are enrolled in school district career |
504 | centers. For each eligible district, the Department of Education |
505 | shall calculate the value of 50 percent of the revenue derived |
506 | from the 2-mill nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage |
507 | for the past 4 fiscal years divided by the increase in capital |
508 | outlay FTE students for the same period. |
509 | (b) The capital outlay full-time equivalent membership |
510 | shall be determined for kindergarten through grade 12 and for |
511 | career centers by averaging the unweighted full-time equivalent |
512 | membership for the second and third surveys and comparing the |
513 | results on a school-by-school basis with the Florida Inventory |
514 | for School Houses. The capital outlay full-time equivalent |
515 | membership by grade-level organization shall be used in making |
516 | the following calculation: the capital outlay full-time |
517 | equivalent membership by grade-level organization for the prior |
518 | year must be used to compute the growth over the highest of the |
519 | 3 years preceding the prior year. The Department of Education |
520 | shall determine, for each eligible district, the amount that |
521 | must be added to the value calculated pursuant to paragraph (a) |
522 | to produce the weighted average value per student station |
523 | calculated pursuant to paragraph (2)(b). |
524 | (c) The total amount appropriated by the Legislature |
525 | pursuant to this subsection shall be allocated among the growth |
526 | capital outlay full-time equivalent membership. The allocation |
527 | shall be prorated to the districts based upon each district's |
528 | percentage of growth capital outlay full-time equivalent |
529 | membership. The most recent 4-year capital outlay full-time |
530 | equivalent membership data shall be used in each subsequent |
531 | year's calculation for the allocation of funds pursuant to this |
532 | subsection. If a change, correction, or recomputation of data |
533 | during any year results in a reduction or increase of the |
534 | calculated amount previously allocated to a district, the |
535 | allocation to that district shall be adjusted correspondingly. |
536 | If such recomputation results in an increase or decrease of the |
537 | calculated amount, such additional or reduced amounts shall be |
538 | added to or reduced from the district's future appropriations. |
539 | However, no change, correction, or recomputation of data shall |
540 | be made subsequent to 2 years following the initial annual |
541 | allocation. The value calculated for each eligible district |
542 | pursuant to paragraph (b) shall be multiplied by the average |
543 | increase in capital outlay FTE students for the past 4 fiscal |
544 | years to determine the maximum amount of a grant that may be |
545 | awarded to a district pursuant to this section. |
546 | (d) In the event the funds provided in the General |
547 | Appropriations Act are insufficient to fully fund the maximum |
548 | grants calculated pursuant to paragraph (c), the Department of |
549 | Education shall allocate the funds based on each district's |
550 | prorated share of the total maximum award amount calculated for |
551 | all eligible districts. |
552 | Section 11. Paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of section 27 |
553 | of chapter 2005-290, Laws of Florida, is amended to read: |
554 | Section 27. |
555 | (2) The following appropriations are made for the 2005- |
556 | 2006 fiscal year only on a nonrecurring basis: |
557 | (a) From the State Transportation Trust Fund in the |
558 | Department of Transportation: |
559 | 1. One hundred seventy-five Two hundred million dollars |
560 | for the purposes specified in sections 339.61, 339.62, 339.63, |
561 | and 339.64, Florida Statutes. |
562 | 2. Two hundred seventy-five million dollars for the |
563 | purposes specified in section 339.2819, Florida Statutes. |
564 | 3. One hundred million dollars for the purposes specified |
565 | in section 339.55, Florida Statutes. |
566 | 4. Twenty-five million for the purposes specified in |
567 | section 339.2817, Florida Statutes. |
568 | Section 12. This act shall take effect July 1, 2006. |
569 |
|
570 |
|
571 | ======= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ========== |
572 | Remove the entire title and insert: |
573 | A bill to be entitled |
574 | An act relating to growth management; amending s. |
575 | 163.3164, F.S.; revising a definition; amending s. |
576 | 163.3177, F.S.; correcting a cross-reference; amending s. |
577 | 163.3180, F.S.; revising concurrency requirements and |
578 | procedures; providing sanctions; amending ss. 163.3184 and |
579 | 339.2819, F.S.; correcting cross-references; amending s. |
580 | 163.3247, F.S.; providing a requirement on the makeup of |
581 | the Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida; amending |
582 | s. 339.55, F.S.; deleting an annual appropriation from the |
583 | State Transportation Trust Fund for State Infrastructure |
584 | Bank purposes; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; revising certain |
585 | statutory exemption provisions for developments of |
586 | regional impact; amending s. 1013.65, F.S.; revising |
587 | provisions relating to sources of appropriations to the |
588 | Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust |
589 | Fund to delete an annual appropriation to the Classroom |
590 | for Kids Program; amending s. 1013.738, F.S.; revising the |
591 | eligibility criteria for the High Growth District Capital |
592 | Outlay Assistance Grant Program; revising provisions for |
593 | allocation of funds; providing calculations; amending s. |
594 | 27, ch. 2005-290, Laws of Florida; revising an |
595 | appropriation from the State Transportation Trust Fund for |
596 | Florida Strategic Intermodal System purposes; providing an |
597 | effective date. |