Amendment
Bill No. 7167

Amendment No. 841619

CHAMBER ACTION
Senate		House
.
.
.

---

---

1	Representative(s) Johnson offered the following:
2
3	Amendment (with title amendment)
4	Remove everything after the enacting clause, and insert:
5	Section 1.  Subsection (32) of section 163.3164, Florida
6	Statutes, is amended to read:
7	163.3164  Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
8	Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act:
9	(32)  "Financial feasibility" means that sufficient
10	revenues are currently available or will be available from
11	committed funding sources for the first 3 years, or will be
12	available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4
13	and 5, of a 5-year capital improvement schedule for financing
14	capital improvements, such as ad valorem taxes, bonds, state and
15	federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees, and developer
16	contributions, which are adequate to fund the projected costs of
17	the capital improvements identified in the comprehensive plan
18	necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are
19	achieved and maintained within the period covered by the 5-year
20	schedule of capital improvements. The requirement that level-of-
21	service standards be achieved and maintained shall not apply if
22	the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate-share
23	process set forth in s. 163.3180(12) and (16) is used.
24	Section 2.  Subsection (2), paragraph (b) of subsection
25	(3), and paragraph (c) of subsection (13) of section 163.3177,
26	Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
27	163.3177  Required and optional elements of comprehensive
28	plan; studies and surveys.--
29	(2)  Coordination of the several elements of the local
30	comprehensive plan shall be a major objective of the planning
31	process. The several elements of the comprehensive plan shall be
32	consistent, and the comprehensive plan shall be financially
33	feasible. Financial Feasibility shall be determined using
34	professionally accepted methodologies.
35	(3)
36	(b)1.  The capital improvements element shall be reviewed
37	on an annual basis and modified as necessary in accordance with
38	s. 163.3187 or s. 163.3189 in order to maintain a financially
39	feasible 5-year schedule of capital improvements. Corrections
40	and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or
41	acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are
42	consistent with the plan may be accomplished by ordinance and
43	shall not be deemed to be amendments to the local comprehensive
44	plan. A copy of the ordinance shall be transmitted to the state
45	land planning agency. An amendment to the comprehensive plan is
46	required to update the schedule on an annual basis or to
47	eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for any facility
48	listed in the 5-year schedule. An affected person may challenge
49	the addition of a facility, or the elimination, deferral, or
50	delay of a project, only when the facility is first added to the
51	5-year schedule of capital improvements or when the project is
52	proposed to be eliminated, deferred, or delayed. All public
53	facilities shall be consistent with the capital improvements
54	element. Amendments to implement this section must be adopted
55	and transmitted no later than December 1, 2007. Thereafter, a
56	local government may not amend its future land use map, except
57	for plan amendments to meet new requirements under this part and
58	emergency amendments pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(a), after
59	December 1, 2007, and every year thereafter, unless and until
60	the local government has adopted the annual update and it has
61	been transmitted to the state land planning agency. If an
62	affected party challenges the 5-year schedule of capital
63	improvements, a local government may continue to adopt plan
64	amendments to the future land use map during the pendency of the
65	challenge and any related litigation.
66	2.  Capital improvements element amendments adopted after
67	the effective date of this act shall require only a single
68	public hearing before the governing board which shall be an
69	adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(7). Such amendments
70	are not subject to the requirements of s. 163.3184(3)-(6).
71	(13)  Local governments are encouraged to develop a
72	community vision that provides for sustainable growth,
73	recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural
74	resources. At the request of a local government, the applicable
75	regional planning council shall provide assistance in the
76	development of a community vision.
77	(c)  As part of the workshops and public meetings, the
78	local government must discuss strategies for addressing the
79	topics discussed under paragraph (b), including:
80	1.  Strategies to preserve open space and environmentally
81	sensitive lands, and to encourage a healthy agricultural
82	economy, including innovative planning and development
83	strategies, such as the transfer of development rights;
84	2.  Incentives for mixed-use development, including
85	increased height and intensity standards for buildings that
86	provide residential use in combination with office or commercial
87	space;
88	3.  Incentives for workforce housing;
89	4.  Designation of an urban service boundary pursuant to
90	subsection (14) (2); and
91	5.  Strategies to provide mobility within the community and
92	to protect the Strategic Intermodal System, including the
93	development of a transportation corridor management plan under
94	s. 337.273.
95	Section 3.  Paragraph (c) of subsection (2), subsections
96	(6) and (7), paragraph (a) of subsection (9), paragraphs (d),
97	(e), (f), and (g) of subsection (13), and paragraphs (a), (b),
98	(c), (e), and (f) of subsection (16) of section 163.3180,
99	Florida Statutes, are amended, and paragraph (f) of subsection
100	(5) of that section is amended and paragraphs (h), (i), and (j)
101	are added to that subsection, to read:
102	163.3180  Concurrency.--
103	(2)
104	(c)  Consistent with the public welfare, and except as
105	otherwise provided in this section, transportation facilities
106	needed to serve new development shall be in place or under
107	actual construction or programmed for construction to commence
108	in the Department of Transportation's work program or the local
109	government's schedule of capital improvements within 3 years
110	after the local government approves a building permit or its
111	functional equivalent that results in traffic generation.
112	(5)
113	(f)  Prior to the designation of a concurrency exception
114	area, the Department of Transportation shall be consulted by the
115	local government to assess the impact that the proposed
116	exception area is expected to have on the adopted level-of-
117	service standards established for Strategic Intermodal System
118	facilities, as defined in s. 339.64, and roadway facilities
119	funded in accordance with s. 339.2819. Further, the local
120	government shall, in cooperation with the Department of
121	Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any impacts to the
122	Strategic Intermodal System, including, if appropriate, the
123	development of a long-term concurrency management system
124	pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). The exceptions
125	may be available only within the specific geographic area of the
126	jurisdiction designated in the plan. Pursuant to s. 163.3184,
127	any affected person may challenge a plan amendment establishing
128	these guidelines and the areas within which an exception could
129	be granted. By October 1, 2006, the Department of
130	Transportation, after publicly noticed workshops, shall publish
131	and distribute to local governments a policy guideline
132	containing criteria and options to assist local governments in
133	planning to assess and mitigate the impacts of a proposed
134	concurrency exception area as described in this paragraph.
135	(h)  It is a high state priority that urban infill and
136	redevelopment be promoted and provided incentives. By promoting
137	the revitalization of existing communities of this state, a more
138	efficient maximization of space and facilities may be achieved
139	and urban sprawl discouraged. If a local government creates a
140	long-term vision for its community that includes adequate
141	funding, services, and multimodal transportation options, the
142	transportation facilities concurrency requirements of paragraph
143	(2)(c) are waived:
144	1.a.  For urban infill and redevelopment areas designated
145	in the comprehensive plan under s. 163.2517; or
146	b.  For areas designated in the comprehensive plan prior to
147	January 1, 2006, as urban infill development, urban
148	redevelopment, or downtown revitalization.
149
150	The local government and the Department of Transportation shall
151	cooperatively establish a plan for maintaining the adopted
152	level-of-service standards established by the Department of
153	Transportation for Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as
154	defined in s. 339.64.
155	2.  For municipalities that are built-out. For purposes of
156	this exemption:
157	a.  The term "built-out" means that 90 percent of the
158	property within the municipality's boundaries, excluding lands
159	that are designated as conservation, preservation, recreation,
160	or public facilities categories, have been developed or are the
161	subject of an approved development order that has received a
162	building permit and the municipality has an average density of
163	five units per acre for residential developments.
164	b.  The municipality must have adopted an ordinance that
165	provides the methodology for determining its built-out
166	percentage, declares that transportation concurrency
167	requirements are waived within its municipal boundary or within
168	a designated area of the municipality, and addresses multimodal
169	options and strategies, including alternative modes of
170	transportation within the municipality. Prior to the adoption of
171	the ordinance, the local government shall consult with the
172	Department of Transportation to assess the impact that the
173	waiver of the transportation concurrency requirements is
174	expected to have on the adopted level-of-service standards
175	established for Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as
176	defined in s. 339.64. Further, the local government shall
177	cooperatively establish a plan for maintaining the adopted
178	level-of-service standards established by the department for
179	Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as described in s.
180	339.64.
181	c.  If a municipality annexes any property, the
182	municipality must recalculate its built-out percentage pursuant
183	to the methodology set forth in its ordinance to verify whether
184	the annexed property may be included within the exemption.
185	d.  If transportation concurrency requirements are waived
186	under this subparagraph, the municipality must adopt a
187	comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(c),
188	which updates its transportation element to reflect the
189	transportation concurrency requirements waiver, and must submit
190	a copy of its ordinance, adopted in sub-subparagraph b., to the
191	state land planning agency.
192	(i)  An areawide development of regional impact granted to
193	a municipality under s. 380.06(25) is exempt from the
194	requirements of transportation facilities concurrency if the
195	development of regional impact's boundaries have not been
196	increased after July 1, 2005, and a mitigation plan with
197	identified funding has been submitted and approved by the
198	Department of Transportation to address transportation
199	deficiencies, if the approved development order did not address
200	such deficiencies. New applications for development approval
201	that are located outside of but are adjacent and contiguous to
202	the specified exempt development-of-regional-impact boundaries
203	shall not include the trips generated by such exempt development
204	of regional impact as part of their transportation facilities
205	concurrency calculations.
206	(j)  A development of regional impact granted to a downtown
207	development authority under s. 380.06(22) is exempt from the
208	requirements of transportation facilities concurrency if the
209	development of regional impact's boundaries have not been
210	increased after July 1, 2005, and a mitigation plan with
211	identified funding has been submitted and approved by the
212	Department of Transportation to address transportation
213	deficiencies, if the approved development order did not address
214	such deficiencies. New applications for development approval
215	that are located outside of but are adjacent and contiguous to
216	the specified exempt development-of-regional-impact boundaries
217	shall not include the trips generated by such exempt development
218	of regional impact as part of their transportation facilities
219	concurrency calculations.
220	(6)  The Legislature finds that a de minimis impact is
221	consistent with this part. A de minimis impact is an impact that
222	would not affect more than 1 percent of the maximum volume at
223	the adopted level of service of the affected transportation
224	facility as determined by the local government. No impact will
225	be de minimis if the sum of existing roadway volumes and the
226	projected volumes from approved projects on a transportation
227	facility would exceed 110 percent of the maximum volume at the
228	adopted level of service of the affected transportation
229	facility; provided however, that an impact of a single family
230	home on an existing lot will constitute a de minimis impact on
231	all roadways regardless of the level of the deficiency of the
232	roadway. Further, no impact will be de minimis if it would
233	exceed the adopted level-of-service standard of any affected
234	designated hurricane evacuation routes. Each local government
235	shall maintain sufficient records to ensure that the 110-percent
236	criterion is not exceeded. Each local government shall submit
237	annually, with its updated capital improvements element, a
238	summary of the de minimis records. If the state land planning
239	agency determines that the 110-percent criterion has been
240	exceeded, the state land planning agency shall notify the local
241	government of the exceedance and that no further de minimis
242	exceptions for the applicable roadway may be granted until such
243	time as the volume is reduced below the 110 percent. The local
244	government shall provide proof of this reduction to the state
245	land planning agency before issuing further de minimis
246	exceptions.
247	(7)  In order to promote infill development and
248	redevelopment, one or more transportation concurrency management
249	areas may be designated in a local government comprehensive
250	plan. A transportation concurrency management area must be a
251	compact geographic area with an existing network of roads where
252	multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes are available
253	for common trips. A local government may establish an areawide
254	level-of-service standard for such a transportation concurrency
255	management area based upon an analysis that provides for a
256	justification for the areawide level of service, how urban
257	infill development or redevelopment will be promoted, and how
258	mobility will be accomplished within the transportation
259	concurrency management area. Prior to the designation of a
260	concurrency management area, the Department of Transportation
261	shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact
262	that the proposed concurrency management area is expected to
263	have on the adopted level-of-service standards established for
264	Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined in s. 339.64,
265	and roadway facilities funded in accordance with s. 339.2819.
266	Further, the local government shall, in cooperation with the
267	Department of Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any
268	impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System, including, if
269	appropriate, the development of a long-term concurrency
270	management system pursuant to subsection (9) and s.
271	163.3177(3)(d). Transportation concurrency management areas
272	existing prior to July 1, 2005, shall meet, at a minimum, the
273	provisions of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the time of
274	the comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and
275	appraisal report, whichever occurs last. The state land planning
276	agency shall amend chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, to
277	be consistent with this subsection. By October 1, 2006, the
278	Department of Transportation, after publicly noticed workshops,
279	shall publish and distribute to local governments a policy
280	guideline containing criteria and options to assist local
281	governments in planning to assess and mitigate the impacts of a
282	proposed concurrency management area as described in this
283	paragraph.
284	(9)(a)  Each local government may adopt as a part of its
285	plan, long-term transportation and school concurrency management
286	systems with a planning period of up to 10 years for specially
287	designated districts or areas where significant backlogs exist.
288	The plan may include interim level-of-service standards on
289	certain facilities and shall rely on the local government's
290	schedule of capital improvements for up to 10 years as a basis
291	for issuing development orders that authorize commencement of
292	construction in these designated districts or areas. The
293	concurrency management system must be designed to correct
294	existing deficiencies and set priorities for addressing
295	backlogged facilities. The concurrency management system must be
296	financially feasible and consistent with other portions of the
297	adopted local plan, including the future land use map. If a
298	long-term concurrency management system is adopted pursuant to
299	this paragraph for specially designated districts or areas where
300	significant backlog exists, then such plan shall be deemed
301	concurrent throughout the duration of the plan even if, in any
302	particular year, such transportation improvements are not
303	concurrent.
304	(13)  School concurrency shall be established on a
305	districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the
306	district and all portions of the district, whether located in a
307	municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the
308	public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12).
309	The application of school concurrency to development shall be
310	based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local
311	governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph
312	(f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency
313	the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal
314	agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163.3184(7)
315	and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the
316	following:
317	(d)  Financial feasibility.--The Legislature recognizes
318	that financial feasibility is an important issue because the
319	premise of concurrency is that the public facilities will be
320	provided in order to achieve and maintain the adopted level-of-
321	service standard. This part and chapter 9J-5, Florida
322	Administrative Code, contain specific standards to determine the
323	financial feasibility of capital programs. These standards were
324	adopted to make concurrency more predictable and local
325	governments more accountable.
326	1.  A comprehensive plan amendment seeking to impose school
327	concurrency shall contain appropriate amendments to the capital
328	improvements element of the comprehensive plan, consistent with
329	the requirements of s. 163.3177(3) and rule 9J-5.016, Florida
330	Administrative Code. The capital improvements element shall set
331	forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities
332	program, established in conjunction with the school board, that
333	demonstrates that the adopted level-of-service standards will be
334	achieved and maintained.
335	2.  Such amendments shall demonstrate that the public
336	school capital facilities program meets all of the financial
337	feasibility standards of this part and chapter 9J-5, Florida
338	Administrative Code, that apply to capital programs which
339	provide the basis for mandatory concurrency on other public
340	facilities and services.
341	3.  When the financial feasibility of a public school
342	capital facilities program is evaluated by the state land
343	planning agency for purposes of a compliance determination, the
344	evaluation shall be based upon the service areas selected by the
345	local governments and school board.
346	4.  School capacity shall not be the basis to find any
347	amendment to a local government comprehensive plan not in
348	compliance pursuant to s. 163.3184 until the date established
349	pursuant to s. 163.3177(12)(i), provided data and analysis are
350	submitted to the state land planning agency demonstrating
351	coordination between the school board and the local government
352	to plan on addressing capacity issues.
353	(e)  Availability standard.--Consistent with the public
354	welfare, a local government may not deny an application for site
355	plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent
356	for a development or phase of a development authorizing
357	residential development for failure to achieve and maintain the
358	level-of-service standard for public school capacity in a local
359	school concurrency management system where adequate school
360	facilities will be in place or under actual construction within
361	3 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan
362	approval, or the functional equivalent. School concurrency shall
363	be satisfied if the developer executes a legally binding
364	commitment to provide proportionate fair-share mitigation
365	proportionate to the demand for public school facilities to be
366	created by actual development of the property, including, but
367	not limited to, the options described in subparagraph 1. Options
368	for proportionate fair-share proportionate-share mitigation of
369	impacts on public school facilities shall be established in the
370	public school facilities element and the interlocal agreement
371	pursuant to s. 163.31777.
372	1.  Appropriate proportionate fair-share mitigation options
373	include the contribution of land; the construction, expansion,
374	or payment for land acquisition or construction of a public
375	school facility; or the creation of mitigation banking based on
376	the construction of a public school facility in exchange for the
377	right to sell capacity credits. Such options must include
378	execution by the applicant and the local government of a binding
379	development agreement that constitutes a legally binding
380	commitment to pay proportionate fair-share proportionate-share
381	mitigation for the additional residential units approved by the
382	local government in a development order and actually developed
383	on the property, taking into account residential density allowed
384	on the property prior to the plan amendment that increased
385	overall residential density. The district school board shall be
386	a party to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into
387	such a development agreement, the local government may require
388	the landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement
389	upon its expiration.
390	2.  If the education facilities plan and the public
391	educational facilities element authorize a contribution of land;
392	the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; or
393	the construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a
394	portion thereof, as proportionate fair-share proportionate-share
395	mitigation, the local government shall credit such a
396	contribution, construction, expansion, or payment toward any
397	other impact fee or exaction imposed by local ordinance for the
398	same need, on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.
399	3.  Any proportionate fair-share proportionate-share
400	mitigation must be directed by the school board toward a school
401	capacity improvement identified in a financially feasible 5-year
402	district work plan and which satisfies the demands created by
403	that development in accordance with a binding developer's
404	agreement.
405	4.  This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local
406	government to deny a development permit or its functional
407	equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except
408	as provided in this part.
409	(f)  Intergovernmental coordination.--
410	1.  When establishing concurrency requirements for public
411	schools, a local government shall satisfy the requirements for
412	intergovernmental coordination set forth in s. 163.3177(6)(h)1.
413	and 2., except that a municipality is not required to be a
414	signatory to the interlocal agreement required by ss.
415	163.3177(6)(h)2. and 163.31777(6), as a prerequisite for
416	imposition of school concurrency, and as a nonsignatory, shall
417	not participate in the adopted local school concurrency system,
418	if the municipality meets all of the following criteria for
419	having no significant impact on school attendance:
420	a.  The municipality has issued development orders for
421	fewer than 50 residential dwelling units during the preceding 5
422	years, or the municipality has generated fewer than 25
423	additional public school students during the preceding 5 years.
424	b.  The municipality has not annexed new land during the
425	preceding 5 years in land use categories which permit
426	residential uses that will affect school attendance rates.
427	c.  The municipality has no public schools located within
428	its boundaries.
429	d.  At least 80 percent of the developable land within the
430	boundaries of the municipality has been built upon.
431	2.  A municipality which qualifies as having no significant
432	impact on school attendance pursuant to the criteria of
433	subparagraph 1. must review and determine at the time of its
434	evaluation and appraisal report pursuant to s. 163.3191 whether
435	it continues to meet the criteria pursuant to s. 163.31777(6).
436	If the municipality determines that it no longer meets the
437	criteria, it must adopt appropriate school concurrency goals,
438	objectives, and policies in its plan amendments based on the
439	evaluation and appraisal report, and enter into the existing
440	interlocal agreement required by ss. 163.3177(6)(h)2. and
441	163.31777, in order to fully participate in the school
442	concurrency system. If such a municipality fails to do so, it
443	will be subject to the enforcement provisions of s. 163.3191.
444	(g)  Interlocal agreement for school concurrency.--When
445	establishing concurrency requirements for public schools, a
446	local government must enter into an interlocal agreement that
447	satisfies the requirements in ss. 163.3177(6)(h)1. and 2. and
448	163.31777 and the requirements of this subsection. The
449	interlocal agreement shall acknowledge both the school board's
450	constitutional and statutory obligations to provide a uniform
451	system of free public schools on a countywide basis, and the
452	land use authority of local governments, including their
453	authority to approve or deny comprehensive plan amendments and
454	development orders. The interlocal agreement shall be submitted
455	to the state land planning agency by the local government as a
456	part of the compliance review, along with the other necessary
457	amendments to the comprehensive plan required by this part. In
458	addition to the requirements of ss. 163.3177(6)(h) and
459	163.31777, the interlocal agreement shall meet the following
460	requirements:
461	1.  Establish the mechanisms for coordinating the
462	development, adoption, and amendment of each local government's
463	public school facilities element with each other and the plans
464	of the school board to ensure a uniform districtwide school
465	concurrency system.
466	2.  Establish a process for the development of siting
467	criteria which encourages the location of public schools
468	proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible and
469	seeks to collocate schools with other public facilities such as
470	parks, libraries, and community centers to the extent possible.
471	3.  Specify uniform, districtwide level-of-service
472	standards for public schools of the same type and the process
473	for modifying the adopted level-of-service standards.
474	4.  Establish a process for the preparation, amendment, and
475	joint approval by each local government and the school board of
476	a public school capital facilities program which is financially
477	feasible, and a process and schedule for incorporation of the
478	public school capital facilities program into the local
479	government comprehensive plans on an annual basis.
480	5.  Define the geographic application of school
481	concurrency. If school concurrency is to be applied on a less
482	than districtwide basis in the form of concurrency service
483	areas, the agreement shall establish criteria and standards for
484	the establishment and modification of school concurrency service
485	areas. The agreement shall also establish a process and schedule
486	for the mandatory incorporation of the school concurrency
487	service areas and the criteria and standards for establishment
488	of the service areas into the local government comprehensive
489	plans. The agreement shall ensure maximum utilization of school
490	capacity, taking into account transportation costs and court-
491	approved desegregation plans, as well as other factors. The
492	agreement shall also ensure the achievement and maintenance of
493	the adopted level-of-service standards for the geographic area
494	of application throughout the 5 years covered by the public
495	school capital facilities plan and thereafter by adding a new
496	fifth year during the annual update.
497	6.  Establish a uniform districtwide procedure for
498	implementing school concurrency which provides for:
499	a.  The evaluation of development applications for
500	compliance with school concurrency requirements, including
501	information provided by the school board on affected schools,
502	impact on levels of service, and programmed improvements for
503	affected schools and any options to provide sufficient capacity;
504	b.  An opportunity for the school board to review and
505	comment on the effect of comprehensive plan amendments and
506	rezonings on the public school facilities plan; and
507	c.  The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency
508	system.
509	7.  Include provisions relating to amendment of the
510	agreement.
511	8.  A process and uniform methodology for determining fair-
512	share proportionate-share mitigation pursuant to subparagraph
513	(e)1.
514	(16)  It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a
515	method by which the impacts of development on transportation
516	facilities can be mitigated by the cooperative efforts of the
517	public and private sectors. The methodology used to calculate
518	proportionate fair-share mitigation under this section shall be
519	as provided for in subsection (12).
520	(a)  By December 1, 2006, each local government shall adopt
521	by ordinance a methodology for assessing proportionate fair-
522	share mitigation options. A local government that fails to adopt
523	a methodology for assessing proportionate fair-share mitigation
524	options by December 1, 2006, shall be subject to the sanctions
525	described in s. 163.3184(11)(a) imposed by the Administration
526	Commission. By December 1, 2005, the Department of
527	Transportation shall develop a model transportation concurrency
528	management ordinance with methodologies for assessing
529	proportionate fair-share mitigation options.
530	(b)1.  In its transportation concurrency management system,
531	a local government shall, by December 1, 2006, include
532	methodologies that will be applied to calculate proportionate
533	fair-share mitigation. A local government that fails to include
534	such methodologies by December 1, 2006, shall be subject to the
535	sanctions described in s. 163.3184(11)(a) imposed by the
536	Administration Commission. A developer may choose to satisfy all
537	transportation concurrency requirements by contributing or
538	paying proportionate fair-share mitigation if transportation
539	facilities or facility segments identified as mitigation for
540	traffic impacts are specifically identified for funding in the
541	5-year schedule of capital improvements in the capital
542	improvements element of the local plan or the long-term
543	concurrency management system or if such contributions or
544	payments to such facilities or segments are reflected in the 5-
545	year schedule of capital improvements in the next regularly
546	scheduled update of the capital improvements element. Updates to
547	the 5-year capital improvements element which reflect
548	proportionate fair-share contributions may not be found not in
549	compliance based on ss. 163.3164(32) 163.164(32) and 163.3177(3)
550	if additional contributions, payments or funding sources are
551	reasonably anticipated during a period not to exceed 10 years to
552	fully mitigate impacts on the transportation facilities.
553	2.  Proportionate fair-share mitigation shall be applied as
554	a credit against impact fees to the extent that all or a portion
555	of the proportionate fair-share mitigation is used to address
556	the same capital infrastructure improvements contemplated by the
557	local government's impact fee ordinance.
558	(c)  Proportionate fair-share mitigation includes, without
559	limitation, separately or collectively, private funds,
560	contributions of land, and construction and contribution of
561	facilities and may include public funds as determined by the
562	local government. The fair market value of the proportionate
563	fair-share mitigation shall not differ based on the form of
564	mitigation. A local government may not require a development to
565	pay more than its proportionate fair-share mitigation
566	contribution regardless of the method of mitigation.
567	(e)  Mitigation for development impacts to facilities on
568	the Strategic Intermodal System made pursuant to this subsection
569	requires the concurrence of the Department of Transportation.
570	The department has 60 days from the date of submission by the
571	applicable local government to concur or withhold concurrence
572	with the mitigation of development impacts to facilities on the
573	Strategic Intermodal System. If the department does not respond
574	within the 60-day period, the department is deemed to have
575	concurred with the mitigation.
576	(f)  If In the event the funds in an adopted 5-year capital
577	improvements element are insufficient to fully fund construction
578	of a transportation improvement required by the local
579	government's concurrency management system, a local government
580	and a developer may still enter into a binding proportionate
581	fair-share mitigation proportionate-share agreement authorizing
582	the developer to construct that amount of development on which
583	the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate share is
584	calculated if the proportionate fair-share mitigation
585	proportionate-share amount in such agreement is sufficient to
586	pay for one or more improvements which will, in the opinion of
587	the governmental entity or entities maintaining the
588	transportation facilities, significantly benefit the impacted
589	transportation system. The improvement or improvements funded by
590	the proportionate fair-share mitigation proportionate-share
591	component must be adopted into the 5-year capital improvements
592	schedule of the comprehensive plan at the next annual capital
593	improvements element update.
594	Section 4.  Subsection (17) of section 163.3184, Florida
595	Statutes, is amended to read:
596	163.3184  Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or
597	plan amendment.--
598	(17)  A local government that has adopted a community
599	vision and urban service boundary under s. 163.3177(13)
600	163.31773(13) and (14) may adopt a plan amendment related to map
601	amendments solely to property within an urban service boundary
602	in the manner described in subsections (1), (2), (7), (14),
603	(15), and (16) and s. 163.3187(1)(c)1.d. and e., 2., and 3.,
604	such that state and regional agency review is eliminated. The
605	department may not issue an objections, recommendations, and
606	comments report on proposed plan amendments or a notice of
607	intent on adopted plan amendments; however, affected persons, as
608	defined by paragraph (1)(a), may file a petition for
609	administrative review pursuant to the requirements of s.
610	163.3187(3)(a) to challenge the compliance of an adopted plan
611	amendment. This subsection does not apply to any amendment
612	within an area of critical state concern, to any amendment that
613	increases residential densities allowable in high-hazard coastal
614	areas as defined in s. 163.3178(2)(h), or to a text change to
615	the goals, policies, or objectives of the local government's
616	comprehensive plan. Amendments submitted under this subsection
617	are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan
618	amendments in s. 163.3187.
619	Section 5.  Paragraph (p) is added to subsection (1) of
620	section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, to read:
621	163.3187  Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.--
622	(1)  Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to
623	this part may be made not more than two times during any
624	calendar year, except:
625	(p)1.  For municipalities that are more than 90 percent
626	built-out, any municipality's comprehensive plan amendments may
627	be approved without regard to limits imposed by law on the
628	frequency of consideration of amendments to the local
629	comprehensive plan only if the proposed amendment involves a use
630	of 100 acres or fewer and:
631	a.  The cumulative annual effect of the acreage for all
632	amendments adopted pursuant to this paragraph does not exceed
633	500 acres.
634	b.  The proposed amendment does not involve the same
635	property granted a change within the prior 12 months.
636	c.  The proposed amendment does not involve the same
637	owner's property within 200 feet of property granted a change
638	within the prior 12 months.
639	d.  The proposed amendment does not involve a text change
640	to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's
641	comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the
642	future land use map for a site-specific small scale development
643	activity.
644	e.  The property that is the subject of the proposed
645	amendment is not located within an area of critical state
646	concern.
647	2.  For purposes of this paragraph, the term "built-out"
648	means 90 percent of the property within the municipality's
649	boundaries, excluding lands that are designated as conservation,
650	preservation, recreation, or public facilities categories, have
651	been developed or are the subject of an approved development
652	order that has received a building permit and the municipality
653	has an average density of five units per acre for residential
654	development.
655	3.a.  A local government that proposes to consider a plan
656	amendment pursuant to this paragraph is not required to comply
657	with the procedures and public notice requirements of s.
658	163.3184(15)(c) for such plan amendments if the local government
659	complies with the provisions of s. 166.041(3)(c). If a request
660	for a plan amendment under this paragraph is initiated by other
661	than the local government, public notice of the amendment is
662	required.
663	b.  The local government shall send copies of the notice
664	and amendment to the state land planning agency, the regional
665	planning council, and any other person or entity requesting a
666	copy. This information shall also include a statement
667	identifying any property subject to the amendment that is
668	located within a coastal high hazard area as identified in the
669	local comprehensive plan.
670	4.  Amendments adopted pursuant to this paragraph require
671	only one public hearing before the governing board, which shall
672	be an adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(7), and are
673	not subject to the requirements of s. 163.3184(3)-(6) unless the
674	local government elects to have them subject to those
675	requirements.
676	5.  This paragraph shall not apply if a municipality
677	annexes unincorporated property that decreases the percentage of
678	build-out to an amount below 90 percent.
679	6.  A municipality shall notify the state land planning
680	agency in writing of the municipality's built-out percentage
681	prior to the submission of any comprehensive plan amendments
682	under this subsection.
683	Section 6.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of section
684	163.3247, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
685	163.3247  Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida.--
686	(3)  CENTURY COMMISSION FOR A SUSTAINABLE FLORIDA;
687	CREATION; ORGANIZATION.--The Century Commission for a
688	Sustainable Florida is created as a standing body to help the
689	citizens of this state envision and plan their collective future
690	with an eye towards both 25-year and 50-year horizons.
691	(a)  The commission shall consist of 15 members, 5
692	appointed by the Governor, 5 appointed by the President of the
693	Senate, and 5 appointed by the Speaker of the House of
694	Representatives. Appointments shall be made no later than
695	October 1, 2005. The membership must represent local
696	governments, school boards, developers and homebuilders, the
697	business community, the agriculture community, the environmental
698	community, and other appropriate stakeholders. The membership
699	shall reflect the demographic makeup of the state. One member
700	shall be designated by the Governor as chair of the commission.
701	Any vacancy that occurs on the commission must be filled in the
702	same manner as the original appointment and shall be for the
703	unexpired term of that commission seat. Members shall serve 4-
704	year terms, except that, initially, to provide for staggered
705	terms, the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the
706	Speaker of the House of Representatives shall each appoint one
707	member to serve a 2-year term, two members to serve 3-year
708	terms, and two members to serve 4-year terms. All subsequent
709	appointments shall be for 4-year terms. An appointee may not
710	serve more than 6 years.
711	Section 7.  Subsection (2) and paragraph (a) of subsection
712	(4) of section 339.2819, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
713	339.2819  Transportation Regional Incentive Program.--
714	(2)  The percentage of matching funds provided from the
715	Transportation Regional Incentive Program shall be 50 percent of
716	project costs, or up to 50 percent of the nonfederal share of
717	the eligible project cost for a public transportation facility
718	project.
719	(4)(a)  Projects to be funded with Transportation Regional
720	Incentive Program funds shall, at a minimum:
721	1.  Support those transportation facilities that serve
722	national, statewide, or regional functions and function as an
723	integrated regional transportation system.
724	2.  Be identified in the capital improvements element of a
725	comprehensive plan that has been determined to be in compliance
726	with part II of chapter 163, after July 1, 2005, or to implement
727	a long-term concurrency management system adopted by a local
728	government in accordance with s. 163.3180(9) 163.3177(9).
729	Further, the project shall be in compliance with local
730	government comprehensive plan policies relative to corridor
731	management.
732	3.  Be consistent with the Strategic Intermodal System Plan
733	developed under s. 339.64.
734	4.  Have a commitment for local, regional, or private
735	financial matching funds as a percentage of the overall project
736	cost.
737	Section 8.  Subsection (10) of section 339.55, Florida
738	Statutes, is amended to read:
739	339.55  State-funded infrastructure bank.--
740	(10)  Funds paid into the State Transportation Trust Fund
741	pursuant to s. 201.15(1)(d) for the purposes of the State
742	Infrastructure Bank are hereby annually appropriated for
743	expenditure to support that program.
744	Section 9.  Paragraphs (l), (m), and (n) of subsection (24)
745	of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended, and subsection
746	(28) is added to that section, to read:
747	380.06  Developments of regional impact.--
748	(24)  STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.--
749	(l)  Any proposed development within an urban service
750	boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the
751	provisions of this section if the local government having
752	jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has
753	adopted the urban service boundary, and has entered into a
754	binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions that would be
755	impacted and with the Department of Transportation regarding the
756	mitigation of impacts on state and regional transportation
757	facilities, and has adopted a proportionate fair-share
758	mitigation share methodology pursuant to s. 163.3180(16).
759	(m)  Any proposed development within a rural land
760	stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from
761	the provisions of this section if the local government that has
762	adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a
763	binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and
764	the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of
765	impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has
766	adopted a proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology
767	pursuant to s. 163.3180(16).
768	(n)  Any proposed development or redevelopment within an
769	area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under
770	s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the
771	local government has entered into a binding agreement with
772	jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of
773	Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and
774	regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a
775	proportionate fair-share mitigation share methodology pursuant
776	to s. 163.3180(16).
777	(28)  PARTIAL STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.--
778	(a)  If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph
779	(24)(l) for urban service boundaries is not entered into within
780	12 months after establishment of the urban service boundary, the
781	development-of-regional-impact review for projects within the
782	urban service boundary must address transportation impacts only.
783	(b)  If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph
784	(24)(n) for designated urban infill and redevelopment areas is
785	not entered into within 12 months after the designation of the
786	area or July 1, 2007, whichever occurs later, the development-
787	of-regional-impact review for projects within the urban infill
788	and redevelopment area must address transportation impacts only.
789	(c)  If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph
790	(24)(m) for rural land stewardship areas is not entered into
791	within 12 months after the designation of a rural land
792	stewardship area, the development-of-regional-impact review for
793	projects within the rural land stewardship area must address
794	transportation impacts only.
795	(d)  A local government that does not wish to enter into a
796	binding agreement or that is unable to agree on the terms of the
797	agreement referenced under paragraph (24)(l), paragraph (24)(m),
798	or paragraph (24)(n) shall provide written notification to the
799	state land planning agency of the desire not to enter into a
800	binding agreement or a failure to enter into a binding agreement
801	within the 12-month period referenced in paragraph (a),
802	paragraph (b), or paragraph (c). Following the notification of
803	the state land planning agency, the development-of-regional-
804	impact review for projects within the urban service boundary
805	under paragraph (24)(l), within a rural land stewardship area
806	under paragraph (24)(m), or for an urban infill and
807	redevelopment area under paragraph (24)(n) must address
808	transportation impacts only.
809	Section 10.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of section
810	1013.65, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
811	1013.65  Educational and ancillary plant construction
812	funds; Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust
813	Fund; allocation of funds.--
814	(2)(a)  The Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt
815	Service Trust Fund shall be comprised of the following sources,
816	which are hereby appropriated to the trust fund:
817	1.  Proceeds, premiums, and accrued interest from the sale
818	of public education bonds and that portion of the revenues
819	accruing from the gross receipts tax as provided by s. 9(a)(2),
820	Art. XII of the State Constitution, as amended, interest on
821	investments, and federal interest subsidies.
822	2.  General revenue funds appropriated to the fund for
823	educational capital outlay purposes.
824	3.  All capital outlay funds previously appropriated and
825	certified forward pursuant to s. 216.301.
826	4.a.  Funds paid pursuant to s. 201.15(1)(d).
827	b.  The sum of $75 $41.75 million of such funds shall be
828	appropriated annually for expenditure to fund the Classrooms for
829	Kids Program created in s. 1013.735 and shall be distributed as
830	provided by that section.
831	c.  The sum of $30 million of such funds shall be
832	appropriated each year for expenditure to fund the High Growth
833	District Capital Outlay Assistance Grant Program created in s.
834	1013.738 and shall be distributed as provided in that section.
835	Section 11.  Subsections (2) and (3) of section 1013.738,
836	Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
837	1013.738  High Growth District Capital Outlay Assistance
838	Grant Program.--
839	(2)  In order to qualify for a grant, a school district
840	must meet the following criteria:
841	(a)  The district must have levied the full 2 mills of
842	nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage authorized in s.
843	1011.71(2) for each of the past 3 4 fiscal years or currently
844	receive an amount from the school capital outlay surtax
845	authorized in s. 212.055(6) that, when added to the nonvoted
846	discretionary capital outlay millage collected, equals the
847	amount that would be generated if the full 2 mills of nonvoted
848	discretionary capital outlay millage had been collected over the
849	past 3 fiscal years.
850	(b)  The district must receive, in the current fiscal year,
851	revenue from the collection of an impact fee specifically for
852	schools and revenue from the collection of one of the following:
853	1.  A local government infrastructure sales surtax
854	authorized in s. 212.055(2) in which a portion is dedicated for
855	the construction of schools in the current fiscal year.
856	2.  A school capital outlay surtax authorized in s.
857	212.055(6). If the school capital outlay surtax is used to meet
858	the conditions of paragraph (a), the amount of the school
859	capital outlay surtax collected must be in excess of the amount
860	in paragraph (a).
861	3.  A local bond referendum as authorized in ss. 1010.40-
862	1010.55. Fifty percent of the revenue derived from the 2-mill
863	nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage for the past 4
864	fiscal years, when divided by the district's growth in capital
865	outlay FTE students over this period, produces a value that is
866	less than the average cost per student station calculated
867	pursuant to s. 1013.72(2), and weighted by statewide growth in
868	capital outlay FTE students in elementary, middle, and high
869	schools for the past 4 fiscal years.
870	(c)  The district must have equaled or exceeded three times
871	twice the statewide average of growth in capital outlay FTE
872	students over this same 3-year 4-year period.
873	(d)  The district must not have received an appropriation
874	from the special facilities construction program in the current
875	fiscal year. The Commissioner of Education must have released
876	all funds allocated to the district from the Classrooms First
877	Program authorized in s. 1013.68, and these funds were fully
878	expended by the district as of February 1 of the current fiscal
879	year.
880	(e)  The total capital outlay FTE students of the district
881	is greater than 15,000 students.
882	(3)  The funds provided in the General Appropriations Act
883	shall be allocated pursuant to the following methodology:
884	(a)  Each eligible district school board shall receive an
885	amount from the Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service
886	Trust Fund to be calculated by computing the capital outlay
887	full-time equivalent membership as determined by the department.
888	Such membership must include, but is not limited to:
889	1.  K-12 students, except hospital and homebound part-time
890	students; and
891	2.  Students who are career education students and adult
892	disabled students and who are enrolled in school district career
893	centers. For each eligible district, the Department of Education
894	shall calculate the value of 50 percent of the revenue derived
895	from the 2-mill nonvoted discretionary capital outlay millage
896	for the past 4 fiscal years divided by the increase in capital
897	outlay FTE students for the same period.
898	(b)  The capital outlay full-time equivalent membership
899	shall be determined for kindergarten through grade 12 and for
900	career centers by averaging the unweighted full-time equivalent
901	membership for the second and third surveys and comparing the
902	results on a school-by-school basis with the Florida Inventory
903	for School Houses. The capital outlay full-time equivalent
904	membership by grade-level organization shall be used in making
905	the following calculation: the capital outlay full-time
906	equivalent membership by grade-level organization for the prior
907	year must be used to compute the growth over the highest of the
908	3 years preceding the prior year. The Department of Education
909	shall determine, for each eligible district, the amount that
910	must be added to the value calculated pursuant to paragraph (a)
911	to produce the weighted average value per student station
912	calculated pursuant to paragraph (2)(b).
913	(c)  The total amount appropriated by the Legislature
914	pursuant to this subsection shall be allocated among the growth
915	capital outlay full-time equivalent membership. The allocation
916	shall be prorated to the districts based upon each district's
917	percentage of growth capital outlay full-time equivalent
918	membership. The most recent 4-year capital outlay full-time
919	equivalent membership data shall be used in each subsequent
920	year's calculation for the allocation of funds pursuant to this
921	subsection. If a change, correction, or recomputation of data
922	during any year results in a reduction or increase of the
923	calculated amount previously allocated to a district, the
924	allocation to that district shall be adjusted correspondingly.
925	If such recomputation results in an increase or decrease of the
926	calculated amount, such additional or reduced amounts shall be
927	added to or reduced from the district's future appropriations.
928	However, no change, correction, or recomputation of data shall
929	be made subsequent to 2 years following the initial annual
930	allocation. The value calculated for each eligible district
931	pursuant to paragraph (b) shall be multiplied by the average
932	increase in capital outlay FTE students for the past 4 fiscal
933	years to determine the maximum amount of a grant that may be
934	awarded to a district pursuant to this section.
935	(d)  In the event the funds provided in the General
936	Appropriations Act are insufficient to fully fund the maximum
937	grants calculated pursuant to paragraph (c), the Department of
938	Education shall allocate the funds based on each district's
939	prorated share of the total maximum award amount calculated for
940	all eligible districts.
941	Section 12.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of section 27
942	of chapter 2005-290, Laws of Florida, is amended to read:
943	Section 27.
944	(2)  The following appropriations are made for the 2005-
945	2006 fiscal year only on a nonrecurring basis:
946	(a)  From the State Transportation Trust Fund in the
947	Department of Transportation:
948	1.  One hundred seventy-five Two hundred million dollars
949	for the purposes specified in sections 339.61, 339.62, 339.63,
950	and 339.64, Florida Statutes.
951	2.  Two hundred seventy-five million dollars for the
952	purposes specified in section 339.2819, Florida Statutes.
953	3.  One hundred million dollars for the purposes specified
954	in section 339.55, Florida Statutes.
955	4.  Twenty-five million for the purposes specified in
956	section 339.2817, Florida Statutes.
957	Section 13.  The Legislature finds that local governments
958	should have the ability to require all new development to
959	mitigate the development's impact on transportation facilities,
960	regardless of the size or type of development, by payment of a
961	per-trip fee as an alternative to the adoption by the local
962	government of impact fees for transportation facilities or the
963	implementation of proportionate fair-share mitigation.
964	Therefore, the Legislature hereby directs that the Department of
965	Transportation shall conduct a study to determine if a per-trip
966	fee would provide local government with an effective method of
967	ensuring that the cost of transportation facilities is equitable
968	and equally distributed. Such fees would be imposed on roadways
969	and paid at the time of the issuance of a building permit or its
970	functional equivalent. The revenues derived from such fees would
971	be used to fund new facilities or to fix existing deficiencies
972	on transportation facilities. The department shall submit a
973	report of its findings and recommendations to the Governor, the
974	President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of
975	Representatives by December 1, 2006.
976	Section 14.  Effective upon this act becoming a law, the
977	$30 million appropriated in s. 1013.65(2)(a)4.c., Florida
978	Statutes, as provided by section 25 of chapter 2005-290, Laws of
979	Florida, which was vetoed for the 2005-2006 fiscal year, which
980	sum is in the Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service
981	Trust Fund in the Department of Education, is appropriated for
982	the 2005-2006 fiscal year on a nonrecurring basis to the High
983	Growth District Capital Outlay Assistance Grant Program created
984	in s. 1013.738, Florida Statutes.
985	Section 15.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2006.
986
987	================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T =================
988	Remove the entire title, and insert:
989	An act relating to growth management; amending s.
990	163.3164, F.S.; revising a definition; amending s.
991	163.3177, F.S.; deleting a requirement that the entire
992	comprehensive plan be financially feasible; specifying
993	limitations on challenges to certain changes in a 5-year
994	schedule of capital improvements; authorizing local
995	governments to continue adopting land use plan amendments
996	during challenges to the plan; correcting a cross-
997	reference; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; revising
998	concurrency requirements and procedures; providing
999	sanctions; providing for a waiver of transportation
1000	facilities concurrency requirements for certain urban
1001	infill, redevelopment, and downtown revitalization areas
1002	and certain built-out municipalities; requiring local
1003	governments and the Department of Transportation to
1004	establish a plan for maintaining certain level-of-service
1005	standards; providing requirements for the waiver for such
1006	built-out municipalities; exempting certain areas from
1007	certain transportation concurrency requirements; deleting
1008	recordkeeping and reporting requirements related to
1009	transportation de minimis impacts; providing that school
1010	capacity is not a basis for finding a comprehensive plan
1011	amendment not in compliance; deleting a requirement to
1012	incorporate the school concurrency service areas and
1013	criteria and standards for establishment of the service
1014	areas into the local government comprehensive plan;
1015	amending s. 163.3184, F.S.; correcting a cross-reference;
1016	amending s. 163.3187, F.S.; authorizing approval of
1017	certain small scale amendments to a comprehensive plan for
1018	certain built-out municipalities; providing criteria,
1019	requirements, and procedures; providing for nonapplication
1020	under certain circumstances; amending s. 163.3247, F.S.;
1021	providing a requirement on the makeup of the Century
1022	Commission for a Sustainable Florida; amending s.
1023	339.2819, F.S.; revising criteria for matching funds for
1024	the Transportation Regional Incentive Program; correcting
1025	a cross-reference; amending s. 339.55, F.S.; deleting an
1026	annual appropriation from the State Transportation Trust
1027	Fund for State Infrastructure Bank purposes; amending s.
1028	380.06, F.S.; revising certain statutory exemption
1029	provisions for developments of regional impact; revising
1030	an exemption from development of regional impact review
1031	for certain developments within an urban service boundary;
1032	limiting development-of-regional-impact review of certain
1033	urban service boundaries, urban infill and redevelopment
1034	areas, and rural land stewardship areas to transportation
1035	impacts only under certain circumstances; amending s.
1036	1013.65, F.S.; revising the sum appropriated for the
1037	Classrooms for Kids Program; providing a continuing
1038	appropriation for the High Growth District Capital Outlay
1039	Assistance Grant Program; amending s. 1013.738, F.S.;
1040	revising the eligibility criteria for the High Growth
1041	District Capital Outlay Assistance Grant Program; revising
1042	provisions for allocation of funds; providing
1043	calculations; amending s. 27, ch. 2005-290, Laws of
1044	Florida; revising an appropriation from the State
1045	Transportation Trust Fund for Florida Strategic Intermodal
1046	System purposes; providing legislative findings; requiring
1047	the Department of Transportation to conduct a study of
1048	per-trip fees on certain transportation facilities for
1049	certain purposes; providing study criteria; requiring a
1050	report to the Governor and Legislature; providing an
1051	appropriation from the Public Education Capital Outlay and
1052	Debt Service Trust Fund to the High Growth District
1053	Capital Outlay Assistance Grant Program; providing an
1054	effective date.

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.