HB 7253CS

CHAMBER ACTION




1The State Infrastructure Council recommends the following:
2
3     Council/Committee Substitute
4     Remove the entire bill and insert:
5
A bill to be entitled
6An act relating to growth management; amending s.
7163.3177, F.S.; deleting a requirement that the entire
8comprehensive plan be financially feasible; specifying
9limitations on challenges to certain changes in a 5-year
10schedule of capital improvements; authorizing local
11governments to continue adopting land use plan amendments
12during challenges to the plan; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.;
13providing for a waiver of transportation facilities
14concurrency requirements for certain urban infill,
15redevelopment, and downtown revitalization areas and
16certain built-out municipalities; requiring local
17governments and the Department of Transportation to
18establish a plan for maintaining certain level-of-service
19standards; providing requirements for the waiver for such
20built-out municipalities; exempting certain areas from
21certain transportation concurrency requirements; deleting
22recordkeeping and reporting requirements related to
23transportation de minimis impacts; providing that school
24capacity is not a basis for finding a comprehensive plan
25amendment not in compliance; deleting a requirement to
26incorporate the school concurrency service areas and
27criteria and standards for establishment of the service
28areas into the local government comprehensive plan;
29amending s. 163.3187, F.S.; authorizing approval of
30certain small scale amendments to a comprehensive plan for
31certain built-out municipalities; providing criteria,
32requirements, and procedures; providing for nonapplication
33under certain circumstances; amending s. 163.3247, F.S.;
34authorizing the Century Commission for a Sustainable
35Florida to appoint four additional members to the
36commission; providing for member terms; providing guidance
37as to the makeup of the commission; assigning the Century
38Commission for a Sustainable Florida to the Department of
39Community Affairs for administrative and fiscal
40accountability purposes; requiring the commission to
41develop a budget; providing budget requirements; amending
42s. 177.091, F.S.; revising requirements as to when
43permanent reference monuments must be set; amending s.
44339.2819, F.S.; revising criteria for matching funds for
45the Transportation Regional Incentive Program; amending s.
46380.06, F.S.; revising an exemption from development of
47regional impact review for certain developments within an
48urban service boundary; limiting development-of-regional-
49impact review of certain urban service boundaries, urban
50infill and redevelopment areas, and rural land stewardship
51areas to transportation impacts only under certain
52circumstances; providing legislative findings; requiring
53the Department of Transportation to conduct a study of
54per-trip fees on certain transportation facilities for
55certain purposes; providing study criteria; requiring a
56report to the Governor and Legislature; providing an
57appropriation; providing an effective date.
58
59Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
60
61     Section 1.  Subsection (2) and paragraph (b) of subsection
62(3) of section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
63     163.3177  Required and optional elements of comprehensive
64plan; studies and surveys.--
65     (2)  Coordination of the several elements of the local
66comprehensive plan shall be a major objective of the planning
67process. The several elements of the comprehensive plan shall be
68consistent, and the comprehensive plan shall be financially
69feasible. Financial Feasibility shall be determined using
70professionally accepted methodologies.
71     (3)
72     (b)1.  The capital improvements element shall be reviewed
73on an annual basis and modified as necessary in accordance with
74s. 163.3187 or s. 163.3189 in order to maintain a financially
75feasible 5-year schedule of capital improvements. Corrections
76and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or
77acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are
78consistent with the plan may be accomplished by ordinance and
79shall not be deemed to be amendments to the local comprehensive
80plan. A copy of the ordinance shall be transmitted to the state
81land planning agency. An amendment to the comprehensive plan is
82required to update the schedule on an annual basis or to
83eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for any facility
84listed in the 5-year schedule. An affected person may challenge
85the addition of a facility, or the elimination, deferral, or
86delay of a project, only when the facility is first added to the
875-year schedule of capital improvements or when the project is
88proposed to be eliminated, deferred, or delayed. All public
89facilities shall be consistent with the capital improvements
90element. Amendments to implement this section must be adopted
91and transmitted no later than December 1, 2007. Thereafter, a
92local government may not amend its future land use map, except
93for plan amendments to meet new requirements under this part and
94emergency amendments pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(a), after
95December 1, 2007, and every year thereafter, unless and until
96the local government has adopted the annual update and it has
97been transmitted to the state land planning agency. If an
98affected party challenges the 5-year schedule of capital
99improvements, a local government may continue to adopt plan
100amendments to the future land use map during the pendency of the
101challenge and any related litigation.
102     2.  Capital improvements element amendments adopted after
103the effective date of this act shall require only a single
104public hearing before the governing board which shall be an
105adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(7). Such amendments
106are not subject to the requirements of s. 163.3184(3)-(6).
107     Section 2.  Subsection (6), paragraph (a) of subsection
108(9), and paragraphs (d) and (g) of subsection (13) of section
109163.3180, Florida Statutes, are amended, and paragraphs (h),
110(i), and (j) are added to subsection (5) of that section, to
111read:
112     163.3180  Concurrency.--
113     (5)
114     (h)  It is a high state priority that urban infill and
115redevelopment be promoted and provided incentives. By promoting
116the revitalization of existing communities of this state, a more
117efficient maximization of space and facilities may be achieved
118and urban sprawl discouraged. If a local government creates a
119long-term vision for its community that includes adequate
120funding, services, and multimodal transportation options, the
121transportation facilities concurrency requirements of paragraph
122(2)(c) are waived:
123     1.a.  For urban infill and redevelopment areas designated
124in the comprehensive plan under s. 163.2517; or
125     b.  For areas designated in the comprehensive plan prior to
126January 1, 2006, as urban infill development, urban
127redevelopment, or downtown revitalization.
128
129The local government and the Department of Transportation shall
130cooperatively establish a plan for maintaining the adopted
131level-of-service standards established by the Department of
132Transportation for Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as
133defined in s. 339.64.
134     2.  For municipalities that are built-out. For purposes of
135this exemption:
136     a.  The term "built-out" means that 90 percent of the
137property within the municipality's boundaries, excluding lands
138that are designated as conservation, preservation, recreation,
139or public facilities categories, have been developed or are the
140subject of an approved development order that has received a
141building permit and the municipality has an average density of
142five units per acre for residential developments.
143     b.  The municipality must have adopted an ordinance that
144provides the methodology for determining its built-out
145percentage, declares that transportation concurrency
146requirements are waived within its municipal boundary or within
147a designated area of the municipality, and addresses multimodal
148options and strategies, including alternative modes of
149transportation within the municipality. Prior to the adoption of
150the ordinance, the local government shall consult with the
151Department of Transportation to assess the impact that the
152waiver of the transportation concurrency requirements is
153expected to have on the adopted level-of-service standards
154established for Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as
155defined in s. 339.64. Further, the local government shall
156cooperatively establish a plan for maintaining the adopted
157level-of-service standards established by the department for
158Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as described in s.
159339.64.
160     c.  If a municipality annexes any property, the
161municipality must recalculate its built-out percentage pursuant
162to the methodology set forth in its ordinance to verify whether
163the annexed property may be included within the exemption.
164     d.  If transportation concurrency requirements are waived
165under this subparagraph, the municipality must adopt a
166comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(c),
167which updates its transportation element to reflect the
168transportation concurrency requirements waiver, and must submit
169a copy of its ordinance, adopted in sub-subparagraph b., to the
170state land planning agency.
171     (i)  An areawide development of regional impact granted to
172a municipality under s. 380.06(25) is exempt from the
173requirements of transportation facilities concurrency if the
174development of regional impact's boundaries have not been
175increased after July 1, 2005, and a mitigation plan with
176identified funding has been submitted and approved by the
177Department of Transportation to address transportation
178deficiencies, if the approved development order did not address
179such deficiencies. New applications for development approval
180that are located outside of but are adjacent and contiguous to
181the specified exempt development-of-regional-impact boundaries
182shall not include the trips generated by such exempt development
183of regional impact as part of their transportation facilities
184concurrency calculations.
185     (j)  A development of regional impact granted to a downtown
186development authority under s. 380.06(22) is exempt from the
187requirements of transportation facilities concurrency if the
188development of regional impact's boundaries have not been
189increased after July 1, 2005, and a mitigation plan with
190identified funding has been submitted and approved by the
191Department of Transportation to address transportation
192deficiencies, if the approved development order did not address
193such deficiencies. New applications for development approval
194that are located outside of but are adjacent and contiguous to
195the specified exempt development-of-regional-impact boundaries
196shall not include the trips generated by such exempt development
197of regional impact as part of their transportation facilities
198concurrency calculations.
199     (6)  The Legislature finds that a de minimis impact is
200consistent with this part. A de minimis impact is an impact that
201would not affect more than 1 percent of the maximum volume at
202the adopted level of service of the affected transportation
203facility as determined by the local government. No impact will
204be de minimis if the sum of existing roadway volumes and the
205projected volumes from approved projects on a transportation
206facility would exceed 110 percent of the maximum volume at the
207adopted level of service of the affected transportation
208facility; provided however, that an impact of a single family
209home on an existing lot will constitute a de minimis impact on
210all roadways regardless of the level of the deficiency of the
211roadway. Further, no impact will be de minimis if it would
212exceed the adopted level-of-service standard of any affected
213designated hurricane evacuation routes. Each local government
214shall maintain sufficient records to ensure that the 110-percent
215criterion is not exceeded. Each local government shall submit
216annually, with its updated capital improvements element, a
217summary of the de minimis records. If the state land planning
218agency determines that the 110-percent criterion has been
219exceeded, the state land planning agency shall notify the local
220government of the exceedance and that no further de minimis
221exceptions for the applicable roadway may be granted until such
222time as the volume is reduced below the 110 percent. The local
223government shall provide proof of this reduction to the state
224land planning agency before issuing further de minimis
225exceptions.
226     (9)(a)  Each local government may adopt as a part of its
227plan, long-term transportation and school concurrency management
228systems with a planning period of up to 10 years for specially
229designated districts or areas where significant backlogs exist.
230The plan may include interim level-of-service standards on
231certain facilities and shall rely on the local government's
232schedule of capital improvements for up to 10 years as a basis
233for issuing development orders that authorize commencement of
234construction in these designated districts or areas. The
235concurrency management system must be designed to correct
236existing deficiencies and set priorities for addressing
237backlogged facilities. The concurrency management system must be
238financially feasible and consistent with other portions of the
239adopted local plan, including the future land use map. If a
240long-term concurrency management system is adopted pursuant to
241this paragraph for specially designated districts or areas where
242significant backlog exists, then such plan shall be deemed
243concurrent throughout the duration of the plan even if, in any
244particular year, such transportation improvements are not
245concurrent.
246     (13)  School concurrency shall be established on a
247districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the
248district and all portions of the district, whether located in a
249municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the
250public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12).
251The application of school concurrency to development shall be
252based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local
253governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph
254(f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency
255the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal
256agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163.3184(7)
257and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the
258following:
259     (d)  Financial feasibility.--The Legislature recognizes
260that financial feasibility is an important issue because the
261premise of concurrency is that the public facilities will be
262provided in order to achieve and maintain the adopted level-of-
263service standard. This part and chapter 9J-5, Florida
264Administrative Code, contain specific standards to determine the
265financial feasibility of capital programs. These standards were
266adopted to make concurrency more predictable and local
267governments more accountable.
268     1.  A comprehensive plan amendment seeking to impose school
269concurrency shall contain appropriate amendments to the capital
270improvements element of the comprehensive plan, consistent with
271the requirements of s. 163.3177(3) and rule 9J-5.016, Florida
272Administrative Code. The capital improvements element shall set
273forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities
274program, established in conjunction with the school board, that
275demonstrates that the adopted level-of-service standards will be
276achieved and maintained.
277     2.  Such amendments shall demonstrate that the public
278school capital facilities program meets all of the financial
279feasibility standards of this part and chapter 9J-5, Florida
280Administrative Code, that apply to capital programs which
281provide the basis for mandatory concurrency on other public
282facilities and services.
283     3.  When the financial feasibility of a public school
284capital facilities program is evaluated by the state land
285planning agency for purposes of a compliance determination, the
286evaluation shall be based upon the service areas selected by the
287local governments and school board.
288     4.  School capacity shall not be the basis to find any
289amendment to a local government comprehensive plan not in
290compliance pursuant to s. 163.3184 until the date established
291pursuant to s. 163.3177(12)(i), provided data and analysis are
292submitted to the state land planning agency demonstrating
293coordination between the school board and the local government
294to plan on addressing capacity issues.
295     (g)  Interlocal agreement for school concurrency.--When
296establishing concurrency requirements for public schools, a
297local government must enter into an interlocal agreement that
298satisfies the requirements in ss. 163.3177(6)(h)1. and 2. and
299163.31777 and the requirements of this subsection. The
300interlocal agreement shall acknowledge both the school board's
301constitutional and statutory obligations to provide a uniform
302system of free public schools on a countywide basis, and the
303land use authority of local governments, including their
304authority to approve or deny comprehensive plan amendments and
305development orders. The interlocal agreement shall be submitted
306to the state land planning agency by the local government as a
307part of the compliance review, along with the other necessary
308amendments to the comprehensive plan required by this part. In
309addition to the requirements of ss. 163.3177(6)(h) and
310163.31777, the interlocal agreement shall meet the following
311requirements:
312     1.  Establish the mechanisms for coordinating the
313development, adoption, and amendment of each local government's
314public school facilities element with each other and the plans
315of the school board to ensure a uniform districtwide school
316concurrency system.
317     2.  Establish a process for the development of siting
318criteria which encourages the location of public schools
319proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible and
320seeks to collocate schools with other public facilities such as
321parks, libraries, and community centers to the extent possible.
322     3.  Specify uniform, districtwide level-of-service
323standards for public schools of the same type and the process
324for modifying the adopted level-of-service standards.
325     4.  Establish a process for the preparation, amendment, and
326joint approval by each local government and the school board of
327a public school capital facilities program which is financially
328feasible, and a process and schedule for incorporation of the
329public school capital facilities program into the local
330government comprehensive plans on an annual basis.
331     5.  Define the geographic application of school
332concurrency. If school concurrency is to be applied on a less
333than districtwide basis in the form of concurrency service
334areas, the agreement shall establish criteria and standards for
335the establishment and modification of school concurrency service
336areas. The agreement shall also establish a process and schedule
337for the mandatory incorporation of the school concurrency
338service areas and the criteria and standards for establishment
339of the service areas into the local government comprehensive
340plans. The agreement shall ensure maximum utilization of school
341capacity, taking into account transportation costs and court-
342approved desegregation plans, as well as other factors. The
343agreement shall also ensure the achievement and maintenance of
344the adopted level-of-service standards for the geographic area
345of application throughout the 5 years covered by the public
346school capital facilities plan and thereafter by adding a new
347fifth year during the annual update.
348     6.  Establish a uniform districtwide procedure for
349implementing school concurrency which provides for:
350     a.  The evaluation of development applications for
351compliance with school concurrency requirements, including
352information provided by the school board on affected schools,
353impact on levels of service, and programmed improvements for
354affected schools and any options to provide sufficient capacity;
355     b.  An opportunity for the school board to review and
356comment on the effect of comprehensive plan amendments and
357rezonings on the public school facilities plan; and
358     c.  The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency
359system.
360     7.  Include provisions relating to amendment of the
361agreement.
362     8.  A process and uniform methodology for determining
363proportionate-share mitigation pursuant to subparagraph (e)1.
364     Section 3.  Paragraph (p) is added to subsection (1) of
365section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, to read:
366     163.3187  Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.--
367     (1)  Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to
368this part may be made not more than two times during any
369calendar year, except:
370     (p)1.  For municipalities that are more than 90 percent
371built-out, any municipality's comprehensive plan amendments may
372be approved without regard to limits imposed by law on the
373frequency of consideration of amendments to the local
374comprehensive plan only if the proposed amendment involves a use
375of 100 acres or fewer and:
376     a.  The cumulative annual effect of the acreage for all
377amendments adopted pursuant to this paragraph does not exceed
378500 acres.
379     b.  The proposed amendment does not involve the same
380property granted a change within the prior 12 months.
381     c.  The proposed amendment does not involve the same
382owner's property within 200 feet of property granted a change
383within the prior 12 months.
384     d.  The proposed amendment does not involve a text change
385to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's
386comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the
387future land use map for a site-specific small scale development
388activity.
389     e.  The property that is the subject of the proposed
390amendment is not located within an area of critical state
391concern.
392     2.  For purposes of this paragraph, the term "built-out"
393means 90 percent of the property within the municipality's
394boundaries, excluding lands that are designated as conservation,
395preservation, recreation, or public facilities categories, have
396been developed or are the subject of an approved development
397order that has received a building permit and the municipality
398has an average density of five units per acre for residential
399development.
400     3.a.  A local government that proposes to consider a plan
401amendment pursuant to this paragraph is not required to comply
402with the procedures and public notice requirements of s.
403163.3184(15)(c) for such plan amendments if the local government
404complies with the provisions of s. 166.041(3)(c). If a request
405for a plan amendment under this paragraph is initiated by other
406than the local government, public notice of the amendment is
407required.
408     b.  The local government shall send copies of the notice
409and amendment to the state land planning agency, the regional
410planning council, and any other person or entity requesting a
411copy. This information shall also include a statement
412identifying any property subject to the amendment that is
413located within a coastal high hazard area as identified in the
414local comprehensive plan.
415     4.  Amendments adopted pursuant to this paragraph require
416only one public hearing before the governing board, which shall
417be an adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(7), and are
418not subject to the requirements of s. 163.3184(3)-(6) unless the
419local government elects to have them subject to those
420requirements.
421     5.  This paragraph shall not apply if a municipality
422annexes unincorporated property that decreases the percentage of
423build-out to an amount below 90 percent.
424     6.  A municipality shall notify the state land planning
425agency in writing of the municipality's built-out percentage
426prior to the submission of any comprehensive plan amendments
427under this subsection.
428     Section 4.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of section
429163.3247, Florida Statutes, is amended, and paragraphs (h) and
430(i) are added to subsection (4) of that section, to read:
431     163.3247  Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida.--
432     (3)  CENTURY COMMISSION FOR A SUSTAINABLE FLORIDA;
433CREATION; ORGANIZATION.--The Century Commission for a
434Sustainable Florida is created as a standing body to help the
435citizens of this state envision and plan their collective future
436with an eye towards both 25-year and 50-year horizons.
437     (a)  The commission shall consist of 19 15 members, 5
438appointed by the Governor, 5 appointed by the President of the
439Senate, and 5 appointed by the Speaker of the House of
440Representatives, and 4 appointed by the commission. The 4
441members appointed by the commission shall be initially appointed
442no later than October 1, 2006. Appointments shall be made no
443later than October 1, 2005. The membership must represent local
444governments, school boards, developers and homebuilders, the
445business community, the agriculture community, the environmental
446community, and other appropriate stakeholders. The membership
447shall reflect the demographic makeup of the state. One member
448shall be designated by the Governor as chair of the commission.
449Any vacancy that occurs on the commission must be filled in the
450same manner as the original appointment and shall be for the
451unexpired term of that commission seat. Members shall serve 4-
452year terms, except that, initially, to provide for staggered
453terms, the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the
454Speaker of the House of Representatives shall each appoint one
455member to serve a 2-year term, two members to serve 3-year
456terms, and two members to serve 4-year terms. In addition, the
457commission shall initially appoint 1 member for a 2-year term, 2
458members for a 3-year term, and 1 member for a 4-year term. All
459subsequent appointments shall be for 4-year terms. An appointee
460may not serve more than 6 years.
461     (4)  POWERS AND DUTIES.--The commission shall:
462     (h)  Be assigned to the Office of the Secretary of the
463Department of Community Affairs for administrative and fiscal
464accountability purposes but shall otherwise function
465independently of the control and direction of the department.
466     (i)  Develop a budget pursuant to chapter 216. The budget
467is not subject to change by the department but shall be
468submitted to the Governor together with the department's budget.
469     Section 5.  Subsection (7) of section 177.091, Florida
470Statutes, is amended to read:
471     177.091  Plats made for recording.--Every plat of a
472subdivision offered for recording shall conform to the
473following:
474     (7)  Permanent reference monuments must be placed at each
475corner or change in direction on the boundary of the lands being
476platted and may not be more than 1,400 feet apart. Where such
477corners are in an inaccessible place, "P.R.M.s" shall be set on
478a nearby offset within the boundary of the plat and such offset
479shall be so noted on the plat. Where corners are found to
480coincide with a previously set "P.R.M.," the Florida
481registration number of the professional surveyor and mapper in
482responsible charge or the certificate of authorization number of
483the legal entity on the previously set "P.R.M." shall be shown
484on the new plat or, if unnumbered, shall so state. Permanent
485reference monuments shall be set before the recording of the
486plat. The "P.R.M.s" shall be shown on the plat by an appropriate
487symbol or designation. In any county or municipality that does
488not require subdivision improvements and does not accept bonds
489or escrow accounts to construct improvements, "P.R.M.s" may be
490set prior to the recording of the plat and shall be set within 1
491year after the date the plat is recorded. In any county or
492municipality that requires subdivision improvements and has the
493means of insuring the construction of those improvements, such
494as bonding requirements, "P.R.M.s" shall be set prior to the
495expiration of the bond or other surety.
496     Section 6.  Subsection (2) of section 339.2819, Florida
497Statutes, is amended to read:
498     339.2819  Transportation Regional Incentive Program.--
499     (2)  The percentage of matching funds provided from the
500Transportation Regional Incentive Program shall be 50 percent of
501project costs, or up to 50 percent of the nonfederal share of
502the eligible project cost for a public transportation facility
503project.
504     Section 7.  Paragraphs (l) and (n) of subsection (24) of
505section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended, and subsection
506(28) is added to that section, to read:
507     380.06  Developments of regional impact.--
508     (24)  STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.--
509     (l)  Any proposed development within an urban service
510boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the
511provisions of this section if the local government having
512jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has
513adopted the urban service boundary, and has entered into a
514binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions that would be
515impacted and with the Department of Transportation regarding the
516mitigation of impacts on state and regional transportation
517facilities, and has adopted a proportionate share methodology
518pursuant to s. 163.3180(16).
519     (n)  Any proposed development or redevelopment within an
520area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under
521s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the
522local government has entered into a binding agreement with
523jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of
524Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and
525regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a
526proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. 163.3180(16).
527     (28)  PARTIAL STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.--
528     (a)  If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph
529(24)(l) for urban service boundaries is not entered into within
53012 months after establishment of the urban service boundary, the
531development-of-regional-impact review for projects within the
532urban service boundary must address transportation impacts only.
533     (b)  If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph
534(24)(n) for designated urban infill and redevelopment areas is
535not entered into within 12 months after the designation of the
536area or July 1, 2007, whichever occurs later, the development-
537of-regional-impact review for projects within the urban infill
538and redevelopment area must address transportation impacts only.
539     (c)  If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph
540(24)(m) for rural land stewardship areas is not entered into
541within 12 months after the designation of a rural land
542stewardship area, the development-of-regional-impact review for
543projects within the rural land stewardship area must address
544transportation impacts only.
545     (d)  A local government that does not wish to enter into a
546binding agreement or that is unable to agree on the terms of the
547agreement referenced under paragraph (24)(l), paragraph (24)(m),
548or paragraph (24)(n) shall provide written notification to the
549state land planning agency of the desire not to enter into a
550binding agreement or a failure to enter into a binding agreement
551within the 12-month period referenced in paragraph (a),
552paragraph (b), or paragraph (c). Following the notification of
553the state land planning agency, the development-of-regional-
554impact review for projects within the urban service boundary
555under paragraph (24)(l), within a rural land stewardship area
556under paragraph (24)(m), or for an urban infill and
557redevelopment area under paragraph (24)(n) must address
558transportation impacts only.
559     Section 8.  The Legislature finds that local governments
560should have the ability to require all new development to
561mitigate the development's impact on transportation facilities,
562regardless of the size or type of development, by payment of a
563per-trip fee as an alternative to the adoption by the local
564government of impact fees for transportation facilities or the
565implementation of proportionate fair-share mitigation.
566Therefore, the Legislature hereby directs that the Department of
567Transportation shall conduct a study to determine if a per-trip
568fee would provide local government with an effective method of
569ensuring that the cost of transportation facilities is equitable
570and equally distributed. Such fees would be imposed on roadways
571and paid at the time of the issuance of a building permit or its
572functional equivalent. The revenues derived from such fees would
573be used to fund new facilities or to fix existing deficiencies
574on transportation facilities. The department shall submit a
575report of its findings and recommendations to the Governor, the
576President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of
577Representatives by December 1, 2006.
578     Section 9.  The sum of $25 million is appropriated from the
579General Revenue Fund to the Conservation and Recreation Lands
580Program Trust Fund within the Department of Agriculture and
581Consumer Services for the purposes of s. 570.71, Florida
582Statutes.
583     Section 10.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2006.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.