CS/HB 1135

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act for the relief of Sharon Jurgrau, wife of Mark
3Jurgrau, deceased, and Megan Jurgrau, minor child of Mark
4and Sharon Jurgrau, by the South Broward Hospital
5District; providing for an appropriation to compensate
6them for the death of Mark Jurgrau as a result of the
7negligence of the South Broward Hospital District;
8providing for attorney's fees, lobbyist's fees, and costs;
9providing an effective date.
10
11     WHEREAS, in the summer of 1999, Mark Jurgrau, an architect,
1238 years of age and a resident of Broward County, underwent
13medical tests after exhibiting weakness and shortness of breath
14while engaging in athletic activity, and
15     WHEREAS, the tests revealed that Mark Jurgrau had a problem
16with the aortic valve of the heart, and as a result of the
17diagnosis, he was advised to have surgery to replace the aortic
18valve, and
19     WHEREAS, Mark Jurgrau's doctors recommended a surgical
20procedure known as the "Ross procedure" in which the patient's
21own pulmonic valve is used to replace the aortic valve, and
22     WHEREAS, the procedure, commonly used in younger patients,
23was chosen due to the fact that it is effective for a very long
24period of time and does not require the patient to take
25medications subsequent to surgery, and
26     WHEREAS, the Ross procedure was performed on Mark Jurgrau
27on September 2, 1999, at Memorial Hospital, part of the South
28Broward Hospital District, and
29     WHEREAS, Mark Jurgrau tolerated the procedure well and
30appeared to be doing fine, and
31     WHEREAS, the decision to replace Mark Jurgrau's aortic
32valve was a good decision, the choice of the Ross procedure was
33a sound choice, and the operation was performed ably and
34correctly, and
35     WHEREAS, however, one of the risks of this procedure is the
36possible occurrence of internal bleeding at the location of the
37operation, and
38     WHEREAS, internal bleeding following this procedure does
39occur from time to time, is easily recognizable and readily
40treatable, and is not an indication of negligence per se, and
41     WHEREAS, one of the primary reasons patients are kept in
42the hospital following this type of surgery is so they can be
43observed for complications, and
44     WHEREAS, the negligence in this case occurred in the
45failure of the employees of Memorial Hospital to provide Mark
46Jurgrau with appropriate postoperative care, and
47     WHEREAS, following his operation, the management of Mark
48Jurgrau's care was entrusted to a nurse, Kathy Kater, ARNP, and
49     WHEREAS, the surgeon who operated on Mark Jurgrau never saw
50him again, and Kathy Kater and the other hospital nurses became
51Mark Jurgrau's health care team, and
52     WHEREAS, from the time of Mark Jurgrau's operation on
53September 2, 1999, to the time of his death on September 6,
541999, Mark Jurgrau exhibited signs and symptoms of internal
55bleeding, and
56     WHEREAS, in order to monitor for internal bleeding, blood
57is drawn from a patient daily, and
58     WHEREAS, when a person is losing blood, laboratory values
59drop as blood contents are used up, and
60     WHEREAS, Mark Jurgrau's hematocrit, hemoglobin, and
61platelets were all dropping, each day registering much lower
62than the day before, and
63     WHEREAS, in the 5 days he was in Memorial Hospital, Mark
64Jurgrau's blood values fell to less than 30 percent of normal,
65and
66     WHEREAS, also, in order to determine if blood is
67accumulating in a patient's chest, X-rays are taken daily and
68the patient's breathing is monitored daily, and
69     WHEREAS, Mark Jurgrau's X-rays showed his lungs filling
70with blood, more each day than the day before, and
71     WHEREAS, his breathing decreased each day as the portions
72of his lungs which were full of blood could no longer transfer
73oxygen, and
74     WHEREAS, as Mark Jurgrau's blood became depleted and his
75lungs filled with blood, he became deprived of oxygen, which
76made him weak, dizzy, and disoriented, as evidenced by the fact
77that his oxygen saturation fell precipitously, and
78     WHEREAS, despite the fact that all appropriate tests were
79administered and all the results of those tests indicated
80problems, no intervention was ordered based upon Mark Jurgrau's
81test results, and
82     WHEREAS, by September 5, 1999, Mark Jurgrau was dying,
83slowly bleeding to death and drowning in his own blood, and
84     WHEREAS, as he became disoriented from lack of oxygen, the
85hospital nurses called Nurse Kater, and
86     WHEREAS, without coming in to the hospital to observe Mark
87Jurgrau, Nurse Kater diagnosed him as having a panic attack and,
88over the telephone, ordered Xanax to be administered to Mr.
89Jurgrau, and
90     WHEREAS, on September 6, 1999, Mark Jurgrau's condition
91became critical, and
92     WHEREAS, Mark Jurgrau was gasping for air, turning pale and
93cold, and writhing in pain, and
94     WHEREAS, Nurse Kater was again contacted, and again, via
95telephone, Nurse Kater diagnosed Mark Jurgrau as having a panic
96attack, and
97     WHEREAS, Mark Jurgrau arrested and a code blue was called,
98but it was too late, and
99     WHEREAS, Mark Jurgrau died at the age of 38, leaving his
100wife of 8 years, Sharon Jurgrau, and a 4-year-old daughter,
101Megan Jurgrau, and
102     WHEREAS, upon performing an autopsy, the medical examiner
103confirmed that Mark Jurgrau died from undiagnosed internal
104bleeding, and
105     WHEREAS, the case was also reviewed by a recognized
106authority in cardiac surgery, Dr. Dudley Johnson, regarded as
107the father of cardiac surgery and, along with Dr. Michael
108DeBakey, the co-inventor of the modern coronary bypass
109operation, and
110     WHEREAS, Dr. Johnson confirmed that Mark Jurgrau's death
111was unnecessary and unreasonable, and
112     WHEREAS, at the time of his death, Mark Jurgrau was in the
113beginning stages of a very successful career as an architect,
114and
115     WHEREAS, based on his age and proven earning potential,
116economic damages alone were over $10 million, and
117     WHEREAS, Mark and Sharon Jurgrau's daughter, Megan Jurgrau,
118now 11 years of age, has experienced emotional distress as a
119result of the death of her father, and
120     WHEREAS, recognizing this as a case involving malpractice
121and catastrophic damages, the South Broward Hospital District
122settled the matter, tendering $200,000 pursuant to the limits of
123liability established pursuant to section 768.28, Florida
124Statutes, and agreeing to support a claim bill in the amount of
125$500,000, NOW, THEREFORE,
126
127Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
128
129     Section 1.  The facts stated in the preamble to this act
130are found and declared to be true.
131     Section 2.  The South Broward Hospital District is
132authorized and directed to appropriate from funds of the
133district not otherwise appropriated and to draw a warrant in the
134sum of $500,000 payable to Sharon Jurgrau, wife of Mark Jurgrau,
135deceased, as compensation for the death of Mark Jurgrau as a
136result of the negligence of the South Broward Hospital District.
137After payment of fees, costs, and authorized expenses, 75
138percent of the proceeds recovered through the passage of this
139act shall be apportioned to Sharon Jurgrau, wife of Mark
140Jurgrau, and 25 percent of the proceeds recovered through the
141passage of this act shall be deposited into the guardianship
142account of Megan Jurgrau, minor child of Mark and Sharon
143Jurgrau, for the exclusive use and benefit of Megan Jurgrau.
144     Section 3.  Payment for attorney's fees and costs incurred
145by the claimant's attorneys shall not exceed $77,781. Payment
146for the professional services and costs of lobbyists advocating
147for passage of this claim shall not exceed $5,000.
148     Section 4.  This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.