1 | Representative(s) Galvano offered the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Amendment (with title amendment) |
4 | Between lines 392 and 393, insert: |
5 | Section 6. Paragraph (c) is added to subsection (1) of |
6 | section 393.0661, Florida Statutes, to read: |
7 | 393.0661 Home and community-based services delivery |
8 | system; comprehensive redesign.--The Legislature finds that the |
9 | home and community-based services delivery system for persons |
10 | with developmental disabilities and the availability of |
11 | appropriated funds are two of the critical elements in making |
12 | services available. Therefore, it is the intent of the |
13 | Legislature that the Agency for Persons with Disabilities shall |
14 | develop and implement a comprehensive redesign of the system. |
15 | (1) The redesign of the home and community-based services |
16 | system shall include, at a minimum, all actions necessary to |
17 | achieve an appropriate rate structure, client choice within a |
18 | specified service package, appropriate assessment strategies, an |
19 | efficient billing process that contains reconciliation and |
20 | monitoring components, a redefined role for support coordinators |
21 | that avoids potential conflicts of interest, and ensures that |
22 | family/client budgets are linked to levels of need. |
23 | (c) By December 1, 2007, the Agency for Persons with |
24 | Disabilities, in consultation with the Agency for Health Care |
25 | Administration, shall create a model service delivery system |
26 | pilot project for persons with developmental disabilities who |
27 | receive services under the developmental disabilities waiver |
28 | program administered by the Agency for Persons with |
29 | Disabilities. Persons with developmental disabilities who |
30 | receive services under the family and supported living waiver |
31 | program or the consumer-directed care plus waiver program |
32 | administered by the Agency for Persons with Disabilities may |
33 | also be included in the system if the agency determines that |
34 | such inclusion is feasible and will improve coordination of care |
35 | and management of costs. The system must transfer and combine |
36 | all services funded by Medicaid waiver programs and services |
37 | funded only by the state, including room and board and supported |
38 | living payments, for individuals who participate in the system. |
39 | The pilot project shall document increased client outcomes that |
40 | are known to be associated with a valid needs assessment of the |
41 | level of need of the client, rate setting based on the level of |
42 | need, and encouragement of the use of community-centered |
43 | services and supports. The pilot project shall implement strong |
44 | utilization control, such as capped rates, in order to ensure |
45 | predictable and controlled annual costs. Medicaid service |
46 | delivery, including, but not limited to, service authorization, |
47 | care management, and monitoring shall be managed locally through |
48 | the area office of the Agency for Persons with Disabilities in |
49 | order to encourage provider development. Support coordination |
50 | services shall be available to individuals participating in the |
51 | pilot program. |
52 | 1. The Legislature intends that the service delivery |
53 | system provide recipients in Medicaid waiver programs with a |
54 | coordinated system of services, increased cost predictability, |
55 | and a stabilized rate of increase in Medicaid expenditures while |
56 | ensuring: |
57 | a. Consumer choice. |
58 | b. Opportunities for consumer-directed services. |
59 | c. Access to medically necessary services. |
60 | d. Coordination of community-based services. |
61 | e. Reductions in the unnecessary use of services. |
62 | 2. The Agency for Persons with Disabilities shall |
63 | implement the system on a pilot basis in Area 1 and may conduct |
64 | a similar pilot in an urban area of the Agency for Persons with |
65 | Disabilities, in consultation with the Agency for Health Care |
66 | Administration. After completion of the development phase of the |
67 | system, attainment of necessary federal approval, selection of |
68 | qualified providers, and rate setting, the Agency for Persons |
69 | with Disabilities shall delegate administration of the system to |
70 | the administrator of the agency's local area office. The Agency |
71 | for Persons with Disabilities shall set standards for qualified |
72 | providers and provide quality assurance, monitoring oversight, |
73 | and other duties necessary for the system. The enrollment of |
74 | Medicaid waiver recipients into the system in pilot areas shall |
75 | be mandatory. |
76 | 3. The local area office shall administer the pilot |
77 | program and shall be responsible for ensuring that the costs of |
78 | the program do not exceed the amount of funds allocated for the |
79 | program. The agency area administrator shall also: |
80 | a. Identify the needs of the recipients using a |
81 | standardized assessment process approved by the agency. |
82 | b. Allow a recipient to select any provider that has been |
83 | qualified by the agency, provided that the service offered by |
84 | the provider is appropriate to meet the needs of the recipient. |
85 | c. Make a good faith effort to select qualified providers |
86 | currently providing Medicaid waiver services for the agency in |
87 | the pilot area. |
88 | d. Develop and use a service provider qualification system |
89 | approved by the agency that describes the quality of care |
90 | standards that providers of service to persons with |
91 | developmental disabilities must meet in order to provide |
92 | services within the pilot area. |
93 | e. Exclude, when feasible, chronically poor-performing |
94 | providers and facilities as determined by the agency. |
95 | f. Demonstrate a quality assurance system and a |
96 | performance improvement system that are satisfactory to the |
97 | agency. |
98 | 4. The agency must ensure that the rate-setting |
99 | methodology for the system reflects the intent to provide |
100 | quality care in the least restrictive setting appropriate for |
101 | the recipient and provide for choice by the recipient. The |
102 | agency may choose to limit financial risk for the pilot area |
103 | operating the system to cover high-cost recipients or to address |
104 | the catastrophic care needs of recipients enrolled in the |
105 | system. |
106 | 5. Within 24 months after implementation, the agency shall |
107 | contract for a comprehensive evaluation of the system. The |
108 | evaluation must include assessments of cost savings, cost- |
109 | effectiveness, recipient outcomes, consumer choice, access to |
110 | services, coordination of care, and quality of care. The |
111 | evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, an assessment |
112 | of the following aspects: |
113 | a. A study of the funding patterns of the cost-prediction |
114 | methodology before and after implementation of the pilot |
115 | program; |
116 | b. A study of the service utilization patterns of the |
117 | cost-prediction methodology before and after implementation of |
118 | the pilot program; |
119 | c. The accuracy of the cost-prediction methodology in |
120 | explaining and predicting funding levels for individuals |
121 | receiving each of the three waivers in the pilot areas; |
122 | d. The accuracy of the cost-prediction methodology and a |
123 | plan for dealing with cases involving individuals with the |
124 | highest and lowest support needs and funding levels; |
125 | e. A survey of consumer satisfaction regarding consumer |
126 | choice, scope of services, and proposed funding levels generated |
127 | by the cost-prediction methodology in the pilot areas; |
128 | f. The applicability of the cost-prediction methodology |
129 | to explain and predict funding levels for all individuals |
130 | receiving the waivers; |
131 | g. The robustness of the cost-prediction methodology to |
132 | withstand appeals and grievances; and |
133 | h. A systematic comparison of the outcomes in both pilot |
134 | areas and the different models that are demonstrated. |
135 | 6. Each pilot area shall form an advisory committee that |
136 | includes representatives from the stakeholder community, |
137 | including persons with disabilities, family members of persons |
138 | with disabilities, members of disability advocacy groups, and |
139 | representatives of program service providers to provide feedback |
140 | and monitor the implementation of the pilot program on at least |
141 | a quarterly basis. |
142 | 7. The Agency for Persons with Disabilities shall form an |
143 | advisory committee that includes representatives from the |
144 | stakeholder community, including persons with disabilities, |
145 | family members of persons with disabilities, members of |
146 | disability advocacy groups, and representatives of program |
147 | service providers to provide feedback and monitor the |
148 | implementation of the pilot program from a statewide |
149 | perspective. |
150 | 8. The advisory committees shall submit reports evaluating |
151 | the progress of the pilot programs to the President of the |
152 | Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives on a |
153 | quarterly basis. |
154 | 9. The agency shall submit a report that describes the |
155 | administrative or legal barriers to the implementation and |
156 | operation of the system, including recommendations regarding |
157 | statewide expansion of the system and a recommendation for the |
158 | model service delivery system to be implemented statewide, to |
159 | the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of |
160 | the House of Representatives no later than December 31, 2008. |
161 | 10. The agency, in coordination with the Agency for Health |
162 | Care Administration, may seek federal waivers or Medicaid state |
163 | plan amendments and adopt rules as necessary to administer the |
164 | system on a pilot basis. The agency must receive specific |
165 | authorization from the Legislature prior to expanding beyond the |
166 | pilot areas designated for the implementation of this system. |
167 | Further expansion of this pilot project requires approval by the |
168 | Legislature. |
169 |
|
170 | ======= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ======= |
171 | Remove line(s) 16 and insert: |
172 | anesthesiologist assistant; amending s. 393.0661, F.S.; |
173 | requiring the Agency for Persons with Disabilities, in |
174 | consultation with the Agency for Health Care Administration, to |
175 | implement federal waivers to create a model service delivery |
176 | system pilot project for Medicaid recipients with developmental |
177 | disabilities; providing legislative intent; providing for |
178 | implementation of the system on a pilot basis in certain areas |
179 | of the state; providing for administration of the system by the |
180 | Agency for Persons with Disabilities; providing requirements for |
181 | selection of service providers to operate the system; providing |
182 | for mandatory enrollment in pilot areas; requiring an evaluation |
183 | of the system; providing for the formation of local and |
184 | statewide advisory committees; requiring the committees to |
185 | submit quarterly reports to the Legislature; requiring the |
186 | agency to submit a report to the Governor and Legislature; |
187 | authorizing the agency to seek federal waivers or Medicaid state |
188 | plan amendments and adopt rules; requiring the agency to receive |
189 | specific authorization from the Legislature before expanding the |
190 | system; providing an effective date. |