Florida Senate - 2007                        SENATOR AMENDMENT
    Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng.
                        Barcode 113368
                            CHAMBER ACTION
              Senate                               House
                                   .                    
                                   .                    
 1                                 .         C          
                                   .         05/04/2007 14:17:19
 2                                 .                    
                                   .                    
 3         Floor: 1/AD/3R          .                    
       05/04/2007 11:31 AM         .                    
 4  ______________________________________________________________
 5  
 6  
 7  
 8  
 9  
10  ______________________________________________________________
11  Senator Garcia moved the following amendment:
12  
13         Senate Amendment (with title amendment) 
14         Delete everything after the enacting clause
15  
16  and insert:  
17         Section 1.  Subsections (26) and (32) of section
18  163.3164, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
19         163.3164  Local Government Comprehensive Planning and
20  Land Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this
21  act:
22         (26)  "Urban redevelopment" means demolition and
23  reconstruction or substantial renovation of existing buildings
24  or infrastructure within urban infill areas, or existing urban
25  service areas, or community redevelopment areas created
26  pursuant to part III.
27         (32)  "Financial feasibility" means that sufficient
28  revenues are currently available or will be available from
29  committed funding sources for the first 3 years, or will be
30  available from committed or planned funding sources for years
31  4 and 5, of a 5-year capital improvement schedule for
                                  1
    9:01 PM   04/30/07                           h720302e2d-40-t5b

Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 financing capital improvements, such as ad valorem taxes, 2 bonds, state and federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees, and 3 developer contributions, which are adequate to fund the 4 projected costs of the capital improvements identified in the 5 comprehensive plan necessary to ensure that adopted 6 level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained within 7 the period covered by the 5-year schedule of capital 8 improvements. A comprehensive plan shall be deemed financially 9 feasible for transportation and school facilities throughout 10 the planning period addressed by the capital improvements 11 schedule if it can be demonstrated that the level-of-service 12 standards will be achieved and maintained by the end of the 13 planning period even if in a particular year such improvements 14 are not concurrent as required by s. 163.3180. The requirement 15 that level-of-service standards be achieved and maintained 16 shall not apply if the proportionate-share process set forth 17 in s. 163.3180(12) and (16) is used. 18 Section 2. Subsections (2) and (3) of section 19 163.3177, Florida Statutes, are amended to read: 20 163.3177 Required and optional elements of 21 comprehensive plan; studies and surveys.-- 22 (2) Coordination of the several elements of the local 23 comprehensive plan shall be a major objective of the planning 24 process. The several elements of the comprehensive plan shall 25 be consistent, and the comprehensive plan shall be financially 26 feasible. Financial feasibility shall be determined using 27 professionally accepted methodologies and applies to the 28 5-year planning period, except in the case of a long-term 29 transportation or school concurrency management system, in 30 which case a 10-year or 15-year period applies. 31 (3)(a) The comprehensive plan shall contain a capital 2 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 improvements element designed to consider the need for and the 2 location of public facilities in order to encourage the 3 efficient use utilization of such facilities and set forth: 4 1. A component that which outlines principles for 5 construction, extension, or increase in capacity of public 6 facilities, as well as a component that which outlines 7 principles for correcting existing public facility 8 deficiencies, which are necessary to implement the 9 comprehensive plan. The components shall cover at least a 10 5-year period. 11 2. Estimated public facility costs, including a 12 delineation of when facilities will be needed, the general 13 location of the facilities, and projected revenue sources to 14 fund the facilities. 15 3. Standards to ensure the availability of public 16 facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including 17 acceptable levels of service. 18 4. Standards for the management of debt. 19 5. A schedule of capital improvements which includes 20 publicly funded projects, and which may include privately 21 funded projects for which the local government has no fiscal 22 responsibility, necessary to ensure that adopted 23 level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained. For 24 capital improvements that will be funded by the developer, 25 financial feasibility shall be demonstrated by being 26 guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement or 27 interlocal agreement pursuant to paragraph (10)(h), or other 28 enforceable agreement. These development agreements and 29 interlocal agreements shall be reflected in the schedule of 30 capital improvements if the capital improvement is necessary 31 to serve development within the 5-year schedule. If the local 3 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 government uses planned revenue sources that require referenda 2 or other actions to secure the revenue source, the plan must, 3 in the event the referenda are not passed or actions do not 4 secure the planned revenue source, identify other existing 5 revenue sources that will be used to fund the capital projects 6 or otherwise amend the plan to ensure financial feasibility. 7 6. The schedule must include transportation 8 improvements included in the applicable metropolitan planning 9 organization's transportation improvement program adopted 10 pursuant to s. 339.175(7) to the extent that such improvements 11 are relied upon to ensure concurrency and financial 12 feasibility. The schedule must also be coordinated with the 13 applicable metropolitan planning organization's long-range 14 transportation plan adopted pursuant to s. 339.175(6). 15 (b)1. The capital improvements element must shall be 16 reviewed on an annual basis and modified as necessary in 17 accordance with s. 163.3187 or s. 163.3189 in order to 18 maintain a financially feasible 5-year schedule of capital 19 improvements. Corrections and modifications concerning costs; 20 revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to 21 dedications which are consistent with the plan may be 22 accomplished by ordinance and shall not be deemed to be 23 amendments to the local comprehensive plan. A copy of the 24 ordinance shall be transmitted to the state land planning 25 agency. An amendment to the comprehensive plan is required to 26 update the schedule on an annual basis or to eliminate, defer, 27 or delay the construction for any facility listed in the 28 5-year schedule. All public facilities must shall be 29 consistent with the capital improvements element. Amendments 30 to implement this section must be adopted and transmitted no 31 later than December 1, 2008 2007. Thereafter, a local 4 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 government may not amend its future land use map, except for 2 plan amendments to meet new requirements under this part and 3 emergency amendments pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(a), after 4 December 1, 2008 2007, and every year thereafter, unless and 5 until the local government has adopted the annual update and 6 it has been transmitted to the state land planning agency. 7 2. Capital improvements element amendments adopted 8 after the effective date of this act shall require only a 9 single public hearing before the governing board which shall 10 be an adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(7). Such 11 amendments are not subject to the requirements of s. 12 163.3184(3)-(6). 13 (c) If the local government does not adopt the 14 required annual update to the schedule of capital improvements 15 or the annual update is found not in compliance, the state 16 land planning agency must notify the Administration 17 Commission. A local government that has a demonstrated lack of 18 commitment to meeting its obligations identified in the 19 capital improvements element may be subject to sanctions by 20 the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 163.3184(11). 21 (d) If a local government adopts a long-term 22 concurrency management system pursuant to s. 163.3180(9), it 23 must also adopt a long-term capital improvements schedule 24 covering up to a 10-year or 15-year period, and must update 25 the long-term schedule annually. The long-term schedule of 26 capital improvements must be financially feasible. 27 (e) At the discretion of the local government and 28 notwithstanding the requirements of this subsection, a 29 comprehensive plan, as revised by an amendment to the plan's 30 future land use map, shall be deemed to be financially 31 feasible and to have achieved and maintained level-of-service 5 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 standards with respect to transportation facilities if the 2 amendment to the future land use map is supported by a: 3 1. Condition in a development order for a development 4 of regional impact or binding agreement that addresses 5 proportionate-share mitigation consistent with s. 6 163.3180(12); or 7 2. Binding agreement addressing proportionate 8 fair-share mitigation consistent with s. 163.3180(16)(f) and 9 the property subject to the amendment to the future land use 10 map is located within an area designated in a comprehensive 11 plan for urban infill, urban redevelopment, downtown 12 revitalization, urban infill and redevelopment, or an urban 13 service area. The binding agreement must be based on the 14 maximum amount of development identified by the future land 15 use map amendment. 16 Section 3. Subsections (5), (12), and (16) of section 17 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are amended to read: 18 163.3180 Concurrency.-- 19 (5)(a) The Legislature finds that under limited 20 circumstances dealing with transportation facilities, 21 countervailing planning and public policy goals may come into 22 conflict with the requirement that adequate public facilities 23 and services be available concurrent with the impacts of such 24 development. The Legislature further finds that often the 25 unintended result of the concurrency requirement for 26 transportation facilities is the discouragement of urban 27 infill development and redevelopment. Such unintended results 28 directly conflict with the goals and policies of the state 29 comprehensive plan and the intent of this part. Therefore, 30 exceptions from the concurrency requirement for transportation 31 facilities may be granted as provided by this subsection. 6 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 (b) A local government may grant an exception from the 2 concurrency requirement for transportation facilities if the 3 proposed development is otherwise consistent with the adopted 4 local government comprehensive plan and is a project that 5 promotes public transportation or is located within an area 6 designated in the comprehensive plan for: 7 1. Urban infill development;, 8 2. Urban redevelopment;, 9 3. Downtown revitalization;, or 10 4. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; 11 or. 12 5. An urban service area specifically designated as a 13 transportation-concurrency-exception area which includes lands 14 appropriate for compact, contiguous urban development, which 15 does not exceed the amount of land needed to accommodate the 16 projected population growth at densities consistent with the 17 adopted comprehensive plan within the 10-year planning period, 18 and which is served or is planned to be served with public 19 facilities and services as provided by the capital 20 improvements element. 21 (c) The Legislature also finds that developments 22 located within urban infill, urban redevelopment, existing 23 urban service, or downtown revitalization areas or areas 24 designated as urban infill and redevelopment areas under s. 25 163.2517 which pose only special part-time demands on the 26 transportation system should be excepted from the concurrency 27 requirement for transportation facilities. A special 28 part-time demand is one that does not have more than 200 29 scheduled events during any calendar year and does not affect 30 the 100 highest traffic volume hours. 31 (d) A local government shall establish guidelines in 7 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 the comprehensive plan for granting the exceptions authorized 2 in paragraphs (b) and (c) and subsections (7) and (15) which 3 must be consistent with and support a comprehensive strategy 4 adopted in the plan to promote the purpose of the exceptions. 5 (e) The local government shall adopt into the plan and 6 implement long-term strategies to support and fund mobility 7 within the designated exception area, including alternative 8 modes of transportation. The plan amendment must shall also 9 demonstrate how strategies will support the purpose of the 10 exception and how mobility within the designated exception 11 area will be provided. In addition, the strategies must 12 address urban design; appropriate land use mixes, including 13 intensity and density; and network connectivity plans needed 14 to promote urban infill, redevelopment, or downtown 15 revitalization. The comprehensive plan amendment designating 16 the concurrency exception area must shall be accompanied by 17 data and analysis justifying the size of the area. 18 (f) Prior to the designation of a concurrency 19 exception area, the state land planning agency and the 20 Department of Transportation shall be consulted by the local 21 government to assess the impact that the proposed exception 22 area is expected to have on the adopted level-of-service 23 standards established for Strategic Intermodal System 24 facilities, as defined in s. 339.64, and roadway facilities 25 funded in accordance with s. 339.2819. Further, the local 26 government shall, in consultation cooperation with the state 27 land planning agency and the Department of Transportation, 28 develop a plan to mitigate any impacts to the Strategic 29 Intermodal System, including, if appropriate, the development 30 of a long-term concurrency management system pursuant to 31 subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). The exceptions may be 8 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 available only within the specific geographic area of the 2 jurisdiction designated in the plan. Pursuant to s. 163.3184, 3 any affected person may challenge a plan amendment 4 establishing these guidelines and the areas within which an 5 exception could be granted. 6 (g) Transportation concurrency exception areas 7 existing prior to July 1, 2005, must shall meet, at a minimum, 8 meet the provisions of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the 9 time of the comprehensive plan update pursuant to the 10 evaluation and appraisal report, whichever occurs last. 11 (12) When authorized by a local comprehensive plan, A 12 multiuse development of regional impact may satisfy the 13 transportation concurrency requirements of the local 14 comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency 15 management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a 16 proportionate-share contribution for local and regionally 17 significant traffic impacts, if: 18 (a) The development of regional impact meets or 19 exceeds the guidelines and standards of s. 380.0651(3)(h) and 20 rule 28-24.032(2), Florida Administrative Code, and includes a 21 residential component that contains at least 100 residential 22 dwelling units or 15 percent of the applicable residential 23 guideline and standard, whichever is greater; 24 (a)(b) The development of regional impact which, based 25 on its location or mix of land uses, contains an integrated 26 mix of land uses and is designed to encourage pedestrian or 27 other nonautomotive modes of transportation; 28 (b)(c) The proportionate-share contribution for local 29 and regionally significant traffic impacts is sufficient to 30 pay for one or more required mobility improvements that will 31 benefit a regionally significant transportation facility; 9 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 (c)(d) The owner and developer of the development of 2 regional impact pays or assures payment of the 3 proportionate-share contribution; and 4 (d)(e) If the regionally significant transportation 5 facility to be constructed or improved is under the 6 maintenance authority of a governmental entity, as defined by 7 s. 334.03(12), other than the local government with 8 jurisdiction over the development of regional impact, the 9 developer is required to enter into a binding and legally 10 enforceable commitment to transfer funds to the governmental 11 entity having maintenance authority or to otherwise assure 12 construction or improvement of the facility. 13 14 The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any 15 transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this 16 subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the 17 purposes of this subsection, the amount of the 18 proportionate-share contribution shall be calculated based 19 upon the cumulative number of trips from the proposed 20 development expected to reach roadways during the peak hour 21 from the complete buildout of a stage or phase being approved, 22 divided by the change in the peak hour maximum service volume 23 of roadways resulting from construction of an improvement 24 necessary to maintain the adopted level of service, multiplied 25 by the construction cost, at the time of developer payment, of 26 the improvement necessary to maintain the adopted level of 27 service. For purposes of this subsection, "construction cost" 28 includes all associated costs of the improvement. 29 Proportionate-share mitigation shall be limited to ensure that 30 a development of regional impact meeting the requirements of 31 this subsection mitigates its impact on the transportation 10 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 system but is not responsible for the additional cost of 2 reducing or eliminating backlogs. 3 (16) It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a 4 method by which the impacts of development on transportation 5 facilities can be mitigated by the cooperative efforts of the 6 public and private sectors. The methodology used to calculate 7 proportionate fair-share mitigation under this section shall 8 be as provided for in subsection (12). 9 (a) By December 1, 2006, each local government shall 10 adopt by ordinance a methodology for assessing proportionate 11 fair-share mitigation options. By December 1, 2005, the 12 Department of Transportation shall develop a model 13 transportation concurrency management ordinance with 14 methodologies for assessing proportionate fair-share 15 mitigation options. 16 (b)1. In its transportation concurrency management 17 system, a local government shall, by December 1, 2006, include 18 methodologies that will be applied to calculate proportionate 19 fair-share mitigation. A developer may choose to satisfy all 20 transportation concurrency requirements by contributing or 21 paying proportionate fair-share mitigation if transportation 22 facilities or facility segments identified as mitigation for 23 traffic impacts are specifically identified for funding in the 24 5-year schedule of capital improvements in the capital 25 improvements element of the local plan or the long-term 26 concurrency management system or if such contributions or 27 payments to such facilities or segments are reflected in the 28 5-year schedule of capital improvements in the next regularly 29 scheduled update of the capital improvements element. Updates 30 to the 5-year capital improvements element which reflect 31 proportionate fair-share contributions may not be found not in 11 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 compliance based on ss. 163.3164(32) and 163.3177(3) if 2 additional contributions, payments or funding sources are 3 reasonably anticipated during a period not to exceed 10 years 4 to fully mitigate impacts on the transportation facilities. 5 2. Proportionate fair-share mitigation shall be 6 applied as a credit against impact fees to the extent that all 7 or a portion of the proportionate fair-share mitigation is 8 used to address the same capital infrastructure improvements 9 contemplated by the local government's impact fee ordinance. 10 (c) Proportionate fair-share mitigation includes, 11 without limitation, separately or collectively, private funds, 12 contributions of land, and construction and contribution of 13 facilities and may include public funds as determined by the 14 local government. Proportionate fair-share mitigation may be 15 directed toward one or more specific transportation 16 improvements reasonably related to the mobility demands 17 created by the development and such improvements may address 18 one or more modes of travel. The fair market value of the 19 proportionate fair-share mitigation shall not differ based on 20 the form of mitigation. A local government may not require a 21 development to pay more than its proportionate fair-share 22 contribution regardless of the method of mitigation. 23 Proportionate fair-share mitigation shall be limited to ensure 24 that a development meeting the requirements of this section 25 mitigates its impact on the transportation system but is not 26 responsible for the additional cost of reducing or eliminating 27 backlogs. 28 (d) Nothing in This subsection does not shall require 29 a local government to approve a development that is not 30 otherwise qualified for approval pursuant to the applicable 31 local comprehensive plan and land development regulations. 12 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 (e) Mitigation for development impacts to facilities 2 on the Strategic Intermodal System made pursuant to this 3 subsection requires the concurrence of the Department of 4 Transportation. 5 (f) If In the event the funds in an adopted 5-year 6 capital improvements element are insufficient to fully fund 7 construction of a transportation improvement required by the 8 local government's concurrency management system, a local 9 government and a developer may still enter into a binding 10 proportionate-share agreement authorizing the developer to 11 construct that amount of development on which the 12 proportionate share is calculated if the proportionate-share 13 amount in such agreement is sufficient to pay for one or more 14 improvements which will, in the opinion of the governmental 15 entity or entities maintaining the transportation facilities, 16 significantly benefit the impacted transportation system. The 17 improvement or improvements funded by the proportionate-share 18 component must be adopted into the 5-year capital improvements 19 schedule of the comprehensive plan at the next annual capital 20 improvements element update. The funding of improvements that 21 significantly benefit the impacted transportation system must 22 satisfy concurrency as a mitigation of the development's 23 impact upon the overall transportation system. 24 (g) Except as provided in subparagraph (b)1., nothing 25 in this section may not shall prohibit the Department of 26 Community Affairs from finding other portions of the capital 27 improvements element amendments not in compliance as provided 28 in this chapter. 29 (h) The provisions of this subsection do not apply to 30 a multiuse development of regional impact satisfying the 31 requirements of subsection (12). 13 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 Section 4. Subsection (14) is added to section 2 163.3191, Florida Statutes, to read: 3 163.3191 Evaluation and appraisal of comprehensive 4 plan.-- 5 (14) The prohibition on plan amendments in subsection 6 (10) does not apply to a proposed plan amendment adopted by a 7 local government in order to integrate a port master plan with 8 the coastal management plan element of the local comprehensive 9 plan required under s. 163.3178(2)(k), if the port master plan 10 or the proposed plan amendment do not cause or contribute to 11 the local government's failure to comply with the requirements 12 of the evaluation and appraisal report. 13 Section 5. Paragraph (c) of subsection (19) of section 14 380.06, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 15 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- 16 (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.-- 17 (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a 18 development, or any phase thereof, by more than 7 years is 19 shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to 20 further development-of-regional-impact review. An extension of 21 the date of buildout, or any phase thereof, of more than 5 22 years but not more than 7 years is shall be presumed not to 23 create a substantial deviation. The extension of the date of 24 buildout of an areawide development of regional impact by more 25 than 5 years but less than 10 years is presumed not to create 26 a substantial deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by 27 clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by 28 the local government. An extension of 5 years or less is not a 29 substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a 30 buildout or phase date has been exceeded, the time shall be 31 tolled during the pendency of administrative or judicial 14 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 proceedings relating to development permits. Any extension of 2 the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof shall 3 automatically extend the commencement date of the project, the 4 termination date of the development order, the expiration date 5 of the development of regional impact, and the phases thereof 6 if applicable by a like period of time. In recognition of the 7 2007 real estate market conditions, all phase, buildout, and 8 expiration dates for projects that are developments of 9 regional impact and under active construction on July 1, 2007, 10 are extended for 3 years regardless of any prior extension. 11 The 3-year extension is not a substantial deviation, is not 12 subject to further development-of-regional-impact review, and 13 may not be considered when determining whether a subsequent 14 extension is a substantial deviation under this subsection. 15 Section 6. This act shall take effect July 1, 2007. 16 17 18 ================ T I T L E A M E N D M E N T =============== 19 And the title is amended as follows: 20 Delete everything before the enacting clause 21 22 and insert: 23 A bill to be entitled 24 An act relating to comprehensive planning; 25 amending s. 163.3164, F.S.; redefining the 26 terms "urban redevelopment" and "financial 27 feasibility" for purposes of the Local 28 Government Comprehensive Planning and Land 29 Development Regulation Act; amending s. 30 163.3177, F.S.; providing for application of 31 requirements for financial feasibility with 15 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b
Florida Senate - 2007 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 7203, 2nd Eng. Barcode 113368 1 respect to the elements of a comprehensive 2 plan; delaying the deadline for amendments 3 conforming public facilities with the capital 4 improvements element; specifying circumstances 5 under which transportation and school 6 facilities shall be deemed to be financially 7 feasible and to have achieved level-of-service 8 standards; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; 9 providing an additional exemption from 10 concurrency requirements for an urban service 11 area under specified circumstances; requiring 12 that a local government consult with the state 13 land planning agency regarding the designation 14 of a concurrency exception area; revising 15 provisions providing an exception from 16 transportation concurrency requirements for a 17 multiuse development of regional impact; 18 providing requirements for proportionate-share 19 mitigation and proportionate fair-share 20 mitigation with respect to transportation 21 improvements; amending s. 163.3191, F.S.; 22 exempting from a prohibition on plan amendments 23 certain amendments to local comprehensive plans 24 concerning the integration of port master 25 plans; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; extending the 26 buildout and expiration dates for certain 27 projects that are developments of regional 28 impact; providing an effective date. 29 30 31 16 9:01 PM 04/30/07 h720302e2d-40-t5b