1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to land development regulation; amending |
3 | s. 163.3162, F.S.; providing for the use of certain lands |
4 | surrounding an agricultural enclave; creating a rebuttable |
5 | presumption for the imposition of certain development |
6 | conditions relating to agricultural enclaves; providing a |
7 | timeframe for submitting certain information relating to |
8 | proposed plan amendments; creating a rebuttable |
9 | presumption for denial of or failure to approve plan |
10 | amendments relating to agricultural enclaves; providing |
11 | concurrency for the treatment of agricultural enclaves in |
12 | relation to certain surrounding lands; amending s. |
13 | 163.3164, F.S.; revising the definition of "agricultural |
14 | enclave"; amending s. 163.3245, F.S.; revising provisions |
15 | relating to optional sector plans; providing applicability |
16 | to certain pending applications; providing an effective |
17 | date. |
18 |
|
19 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
20 |
|
21 | Section 1. Subsection (5) of section 163.3162, Florida |
22 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
23 | 163.3162 Agricultural Lands and Practices Act.-- |
24 | (5) AMENDMENT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.--The |
25 | owner of a parcel of land defined as an agricultural enclave |
26 | under s. 163.3164(33) may apply for an amendment to the local |
27 | government comprehensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3187. Such |
28 | amendment is presumed to be consistent with rule 9J-5.006(5), |
29 | Florida Administrative Code, and may include land uses, |
30 | densities, and intensities of use that are consistent with the |
31 | uses, densities, and intensities of use of the industrial, |
32 | commercial, or residential areas that surround the parcel. This |
33 | presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. |
34 | Each application for a comprehensive plan amendment under this |
35 | subsection for a parcel larger than 640 acres must include |
36 | appropriate new urbanism concepts such as clustering, mixed-use |
37 | development, the creation of rural village and city centers, and |
38 | the transfer of development rights in order to discourage urban |
39 | sprawl while protecting landowner rights. Notwithstanding the |
40 | provisions of a comprehensive plan, the local government may not |
41 | prohibit land uses, densities, and intensities of use that are |
42 | consistent with the uses, densities, and intensities of use of |
43 | the industrial, commercial, or residential areas that surround |
44 | the parcel. Densities and intensities of use for an agricultural |
45 | enclave shall, at minimum, be calculated as the average density |
46 | or intensity of uses within 3 miles of the perimeter of the |
47 | parcel. If a local government imposes development conditions |
48 | that prevent the owner from achieving consistent densities and |
49 | intensities of use pursuant to this subsection, the owner may |
50 | apply to the circuit court for appropriate relief pursuant to s. |
51 | 70.001. The imposition of such conditions is presumed to impose |
52 | an inordinate burden. This presumption may be rebutted by clear |
53 | and convincing evidence. |
54 | (a) The local government and the owner of a parcel of land |
55 | that is the subject of an application for an amendment shall |
56 | have 180 days following the date that the local government |
57 | receives a complete application to negotiate in good faith to |
58 | reach consensus on the land uses, densities, and intensities of |
59 | use that are consistent with the uses, densities, and |
60 | intensities of use of the industrial, commercial, or residential |
61 | areas that surround the parcel. Within 30 days after the local |
62 | government's receipt of such an application, the local |
63 | government and owner must agree in writing to a schedule for |
64 | information submittal, public hearings, negotiations, and final |
65 | action on the amendment, which schedule may thereafter be |
66 | altered only with the written consent of the local government |
67 | and the owner. Compliance with the schedule in the written |
68 | agreement constitutes good faith negotiations for purposes of |
69 | paragraph (d) (c). |
70 | (b) Upon conclusion of good faith negotiations under |
71 | paragraph (a), regardless of whether the local government and |
72 | owner reach consensus on the land uses, densities, and |
73 | intensities of use that are consistent with the uses, densities, |
74 | and intensities of use of the industrial, commercial, or |
75 | residential areas that surround the parcel, the amendment must |
76 | be transmitted to the state land planning agency for review |
77 | pursuant to s. 163.3184. If the local government fails to |
78 | transmit the amendment within 180 days after receipt of a |
79 | complete application, the amendment must be immediately |
80 | transferred to the state land planning agency for such review at |
81 | the first available transmittal cycle. A plan amendment |
82 | transmitted to the state land planning agency submitted under |
83 | this subsection is presumed to be consistent with rule 9J- |
84 | 5.006(5), Florida Administrative Code. This presumption may be |
85 | rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. |
86 | (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of a comprehensive |
87 | plan, after review by the state land planning agency, the owner |
88 | shall respond to any objections, recommendations, or comments |
89 | issued by the agency pursuant to s. 163.3184(6). If the |
90 | department has issued no objections, recommendations, or |
91 | comments, or if the owner has responded to any objections, |
92 | recommendations, or comments and the local government denies or |
93 | fails to approve the amendment within the time period specified |
94 | in s. 163.3184(7), such denial or failure to approve the |
95 | amendment is presumed to impose an inordinate burden, and the |
96 | owner may apply to the circuit court for appropriate relief |
97 | pursuant to s. 70.001. A plan amendment reviewed by the land |
98 | planning agency under this subsection is presumed to be |
99 | consistent with the provisions of rule 9J-5.006(5), Florida |
100 | Administrative Code. This presumption may be rebutted by clear |
101 | and convincing evidence. |
102 | (d)(c) If the owner fails to negotiate in good faith, a |
103 | plan amendment submitted under this subsection is not entitled |
104 | to the rebuttable presumption under this subsection in the |
105 | negotiation and amendment process. |
106 | (e)(d) Nothing within this subsection relating to |
107 | agricultural enclaves shall preempt or replace any protection |
108 | currently existing for any property located within the |
109 | boundaries of the following areas: |
110 | 1. The Wekiva Study Area, as described in s. 369.316; or |
111 | 2. The Everglades Protection Area, as defined in s. |
112 | 373.4592(2). |
113 | (f) For concurrency purposes, agricultural enclaves shall |
114 | be treated as any previously approved development surrounding |
115 | the agricultural enclave has been treated and calculated as the |
116 | average concurrency requirements within 3 miles of the perimeter |
117 | of the parcel. |
118 | Section 2. Paragraph (d) of subsection (33) of section |
119 | 163.3164, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
120 | 163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land |
121 | Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act: |
122 | (33) "Agricultural enclave" means an unincorporated, |
123 | undeveloped parcel that: |
124 | (d) Has public services, including water, wastewater, |
125 | transportation, schools, and recreation facilities, available or |
126 | such public services are scheduled in the capital improvement |
127 | element to be provided by the local government or can be |
128 | provided by an alternative provider of local government |
129 | infrastructure in order to ensure consistency with applicable |
130 | concurrency provisions of s. 163.3180; and |
131 | Section 3. Subsections (6) and (7) of section 163.3245, |
132 | Florida Statutes, are renumbered as subsections (7) and (8), |
133 | respectively, and a new subsection (6) is added to that section |
134 | to read: |
135 | 163.3245 Optional sector plans.-- |
136 | (6) If an application for development approval or an |
137 | application for a comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to this |
138 | part has been filed and is pending prior to the effective date |
139 | of a sector plan, the application shall only be required to |
140 | comply with the provisions of a subsequently adopted sector plan |
141 | upon written consent of the applicant. This subsection applies |
142 | to all applications within a sector planning area pending before |
143 | a local government on or before December 31, 2007. |
144 | Section 4. This act shall take effect July 1, 2008. |