1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to beach management; amending s. 161.142, |
3 | F.S.; providing legislative intent and findings; providing |
4 | requirements concerning the quality and quantity of |
5 | dredged sand placed on certain beaches adjacent to inlets; |
6 | requiring an estimation of the requisite quantity of |
7 | beach-quality sand by the Department of Environmental |
8 | Protection and its consultants; revising exemptions from |
9 | certain permitting requirements and prohibitions for |
10 | certain construction activities; requiring compliance with |
11 | the applicable Florida Building Code; requiring the |
12 | protection of nesting shorebirds and marine turtles; |
13 | specifying requirements of certain ports concerning the |
14 | placement of dredged sand on adjacent eroding beaches; |
15 | authorizing such ports to sponsor or cosponsor inlet |
16 | management projects that are fully eligible for state |
17 | cost-sharing; providing requirements and findings |
18 | concerning the placement of dredged sand from federal |
19 | navigation projects; providing for assignment of |
20 | responsibility for the erosion caused by inlets; |
21 | specifying actions to be taken by the department in |
22 | disputes between local governments and property owners |
23 | concerning how much sand should bypass an inlet; creating |
24 | s. 161.143, F.S.; requiring that inlet management studies, |
25 | projects, and activities be supported by certain plans; |
26 | providing criteria governing the department's ranking of |
27 | inlet management projects and activities; specifying |
28 | conditions that must be met; requiring that the department |
29 | establish funding priorities for projects and activities |
30 | concerning inlet management; providing for input from |
31 | interested governmental and private entities; providing |
32 | criteria for establishing priorities; authorizing funding |
33 | levels for inlet management projects under specified |
34 | conditions; requiring that the department annually provide |
35 | an inlet management project list to the Legislature; |
36 | providing requirements for the list; requiring that the |
37 | department make available certain moneys for projects on |
38 | the list; requiring that the department make available |
39 | certain moneys for projects on other legislatively |
40 | approved inlet management project lists; requiring that |
41 | the Legislature designate a certain inlet project as |
42 | "Inlet of the Year"; requiring the department to provide |
43 | an annual report to the Legislature concerning the success |
44 | of projects so designated; requiring rulemaking by the |
45 | department; providing an effective date. |
46 |
|
47 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
48 |
|
49 | Section 1. Section 161.142, Florida Statutes, is amended |
50 | to read: |
51 | 161.142 Declaration of public policy relating to improved |
52 | navigation inlets.--The Legislature hereby recognizes the need |
53 | for maintaining navigation inlets to promote commercial and |
54 | recreational uses of our coastal waters and their resources. The |
55 | Legislature further recognizes that inlets interrupt or alter |
56 | the natural drift of beach-quality sand resources, which often |
57 | results in these sand resources being deposited in nearshore |
58 | around shallow outer-bar areas or in the inlet channel instead |
59 | of providing natural nourishment to the adjacent eroding |
60 | downdrift beaches. Accordingly, the Legislature finds it is in |
61 | the public interest to replicate the natural drift of sand which |
62 | is interrupted or altered by inlets to be replaced and for each |
63 | level of government to undertake all reasonable efforts to |
64 | maximize inlet sand bypassing to ensure that beach-quality sand |
65 | is placed on adjacent eroding beaches. Such activities cannot |
66 | make up for the historical sand deficits caused by inlets but |
67 | shall be designed to balance the sediment budget of the inlet |
68 | and adjacent beaches and extend the life of proximate beach- |
69 | restoration projects so that periodic nourishment is needed less |
70 | frequently. Therefore, in furtherance of this declaration of |
71 | public policy and the Legislature's intent to redirect and |
72 | recommit the state's comprehensive beach management efforts to |
73 | address the beach erosion caused by inlets, the department shall |
74 | ensure that: |
75 | (1) All construction and maintenance dredgings of beach- |
76 | quality sand are should be placed on the adjacent eroding |
77 | downdrift beaches unless; or, if placed elsewhere, an equivalent |
78 | quality and quantity of sand from an alternate location is |
79 | should be placed on the adjacent eroding downdrift beaches. |
80 | (2) On an average annual basis, a quantity of beach- |
81 | quality sand is should be placed on the adjacent eroding |
82 | downdrift beaches which is equal to the natural net annual |
83 | longshore sediment transport. The department shall, with the |
84 | assistance of university-based or other contractual resources |
85 | that it may employ or call upon, maintain a current estimate of |
86 | such quantities of sand for purposes of prioritizing, planning, |
87 | and permitting. |
88 | (3) Construction waterward of the coastal construction |
89 | control line on downdrift coastal areas, on islands |
90 | substantially created by the deposit of spoil, located within 1 |
91 | mile of the centerline of navigation channels or inlets, |
92 | providing access to ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b), which |
93 | suffers or has suffered erosion caused by such navigation |
94 | channel maintenance or construction shall be exempt from the |
95 | permitting requirements and prohibitions of subsections (2), |
96 | (5), and (6) of s. 161.053(5) or (6); however, such construction |
97 | shall comply with the applicable Florida Building Code adopted |
98 | pursuant to s. 553.73. The timing and sequence of any |
99 | construction activities associated with inlet management |
100 | projects in such coastal areas shall comply with 44 C.F.R. part |
101 | 60 and shall provide protection to nesting sea turtles and their |
102 | hatchlings and their habitats, to nesting shorebirds, and to |
103 | native salt-resistant vegetation and endangered plant |
104 | communities. Beach-quality sand placed on the beach as part of |
105 | an inlet management project must be suitable for marine turtle |
106 | nesting. |
107 | (4) The provisions of subsections (1) and (2) shall not be |
108 | a requirement imposed upon ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b); |
109 | however, such ports must demonstrate reasonable effort to place |
110 | beach-quality sand from construction and maintenance dredging |
111 | and port-development projects on adjacent eroding beaches in |
112 | accordance with port master plans approved by the Department of |
113 | Community Affairs, and permits approved and issued by the |
114 | department, to ensure compliance with this section. Ports may |
115 | sponsor or cosponsor inlet management projects that are fully |
116 | eligible for state cost-sharing. |
117 | (5) The department shall ensure that any disposal of the |
118 | beach-quality sand from federal projects in this state which |
119 | involve dredging for the purpose of navigation is on, or in the |
120 | nearshore area of, adjacent eroding beaches. The department may |
121 | consider permitting nearshore or upland disposal of such beach- |
122 | quality sand if emergency conditions exist. The state recognizes |
123 | that due to the growing demand for beach-quality sand resources |
124 | for beach restoration and nourishment projects, the limited |
125 | supply of such sand resources, and the cost of such projects, |
126 | beach or nearshore sand placement is the least-cost disposal |
127 | method. |
128 | (6) If federal investigations and reports or state- |
129 | approved inlet management plans do not specify the entity or |
130 | entities responsible for the extent of erosion caused by an |
131 | inlet, the department or local government, with the assistance |
132 | of university-based or other contractual resources that they may |
133 | employ or call upon, is encouraged to undertake assessments that |
134 | aid in specifying the responsible entity or entities and in more |
135 | accurately determining cost-sharing responsibilities for |
136 | measures to correct such erosion. The entity that is responsible |
137 | for maintenance dredging of an inlet may be deemed responsible |
138 | for the erosion caused by the inlet if another responsible party |
139 | is not specified in such an assessment, a shore-protection |
140 | project investigation or report, or a state-approved inlet |
141 | management plan. |
142 | (7) If the beneficiaries of the inlet, the local |
143 | governments having jurisdiction of lands adjacent to the inlet, |
144 | or the owners of property adjacent to the inlet are involved in |
145 | a dispute concerning how much sand should be bypassed, the |
146 | department shall protect its monetary investment in beach |
147 | nourishment projects within the inlet's physical zone of |
148 | influence by taking all reasonable actions to balance the |
149 | sediment budget of the inlet and adjacent beaches, including |
150 | implementation of inlet sand bypassing and other inlet |
151 | management projects. |
152 | Section 2. Section 161.143, Florida Statutes, is created |
153 | to read: |
154 | 161.143 Inlet management; planning, prioritizing, funding, |
155 | approving, and implementing projects.-- |
156 | (1) Studies, projects, and activities for the purpose of |
157 | mitigating the erosive effects of inlets and balancing the |
158 | sediment budget of the inlet and adjacent beaches must be |
159 | supported by separately approved inlet management plans or inlet |
160 | components of the statewide comprehensive beach management plan. |
161 | Such plans in support of individual inlet projects or activities |
162 | must, pursuant to s. 161.161(1)(b), evaluate each inlet to |
163 | determine the extent of the inlet's erosive effect on adjacent |
164 | beaches and, if significant, make recommendations to mitigate |
165 | such ongoing erosive effects and provide estimated costs for |
166 | such mitigation. |
167 | (2) The department shall establish annual funding |
168 | priorities for studies, activities, or other projects concerning |
169 | inlet management. Such inlet management projects include, but |
170 | are not limited to, inlet sand bypassing, modifications to |
171 | channel dredging, jetty redesign, jetty repair, disposal of |
172 | spoil material, and the development, revision, adoption, or |
173 | implementation of an inlet management plan. The funding |
174 | priorities established by the department must be consistent with |
175 | the requirements and legislative declaration in ss. 161.101(14), |
176 | 161.142, and 161.161(1)(b). In establishing funding priorities |
177 | under this subsection and before transmitting the annual inlet |
178 | project list to the Legislature under subsection (5), the |
179 | department shall seek formal input from local coastal |
180 | governments, beach and general government associations and other |
181 | coastal interest groups, and university experts concerning |
182 | annual funding priorities for inlet management projects. In |
183 | order to maximize the benefits of efforts to address the inlet- |
184 | caused beach erosion problems of this state, the ranking |
185 | criteria used by the department to establish funding priorities |
186 | for studies, activities, or other projects concerning inlet |
187 | management must include consideration of: |
188 | (a) An estimate of the annual quantity of beach-quality |
189 | sand reaching the updrift boundary of the improved jetty or |
190 | inlet channel. |
191 | (b) The severity of the erosion to the adjacent beaches |
192 | caused by the inlet and the extent to which the proposed project |
193 | mitigates the erosive effects of the inlet. |
194 | (c) The overall significance and anticipated success of |
195 | the proposed project in balancing the sediment budget of the |
196 | inlet and adjacent beaches and addressing the sand deficit along |
197 | the inlet-affected shorelines. |
198 | (d) The extent to which existing bypassing activities at |
199 | an inlet would benefit from modest, cost-effective improvements |
200 | when considering the volumetric increases from the proposed |
201 | project, the availability of beach-quality sand currently not |
202 | being bypassed to adjacent eroding beaches, and the ease with |
203 | which such beach-quality sand may be obtained. |
204 | (e) The interest and commitment of local governments as |
205 | demonstrated by their willingness to coordinate the planning, |
206 | design, construction, and maintenance of an inlet management |
207 | project and their financial plan for funding the local cost- |
208 | share for initial construction, ongoing sand bypassing, channel |
209 | dredging, and maintenance. |
210 | (f) The previous completion or approval of a state- |
211 | sponsored inlet management plan or local-government-sponsored |
212 | inlet study concerning the inlet addressed by the proposed |
213 | project, the ease of updating and revising any such plan or |
214 | study, and the adequacy and specificity of the plan's or study's |
215 | recommendations concerning the mitigation of an inlet's erosive |
216 | effects on adjacent beaches. |
217 | (g) The degree to which the proposed project will enhance |
218 | the performance and longevity of proximate beach nourishment |
219 | projects, thereby reducing the frequency of such periodic |
220 | nourishment projects. |
221 | (h) The project-ranking criteria in s. 161.101(14) to the |
222 | extent such criteria are applicable to inlet management studies, |
223 | projects, and activities. |
224 | (3) The department may, pursuant to s. 161.101 and |
225 | notwithstanding s. 161.101(15), pay from legislative |
226 | appropriations provided for these purposes 75 percent of the |
227 | total costs, or, if applicable, the nonfederal costs, of a |
228 | study, activity, or other project concerning the management of |
229 | an inlet. The balance must be paid by the local governments or |
230 | special districts having jurisdiction over the property where |
231 | the inlet is located. |
232 | (4) Using the legislative appropriation to the statewide |
233 | beach-management-support category of the department's fixed |
234 | capital outlay funding request, the department may employ |
235 | university-based or other contractual sources and pay 100 |
236 | percent of the costs of studies that are consistent with the |
237 | legislative declaration in s. 161.142 and that: |
238 | (a) Determine, calculate, refine, and achieve general |
239 | consensus regarding net annual sediment transport volumes to be |
240 | used for the purpose of planning and prioritizing inlet |
241 | management projects; and |
242 | (b) Appropriate, assign, and apportion responsibilities |
243 | between inlet beneficiaries for the erosion caused by a |
244 | particular inlet on adjacent beaches. |
245 | (5) The department shall annually provide an inlet |
246 | management project list, in priority order, to the Legislature |
247 | as part of the department's budget request. The list must |
248 | include studies, projects, or other activities that address the |
249 | management of at least 10 separate inlets and that are ranked |
250 | according to the criteria established under subsection (2). |
251 | (a) The department shall make available at least 10 |
252 | percent of the total amount that the Legislature appropriates in |
253 | each fiscal year for statewide beach management for the three |
254 | highest-ranked projects on the current year's inlet management |
255 | project list. |
256 | (b) The department shall make available at least 50 |
257 | percent of the funds appropriated for the feasibility and design |
258 | category in the department's fixed capital outlay funding |
259 | request for projects on the current year's inlet management |
260 | project list which involve the study for, or design or |
261 | development of, an inlet management project. |
262 | (c) The department shall make available all statewide |
263 | beach management funds that remain unencumbered or are allocated |
264 | to non-project-specific activities for projects on legislatively |
265 | approved inlet management project lists. Funding for local- |
266 | government-specific projects on annual project lists approved by |
267 | the Legislature must remain available for such purposes for a |
268 | period of 18 months pursuant to s. 216.301(2)(a). Based on an |
269 | assessment and the department's determination that a project |
270 | will not be ready to proceed during this 18-month period, such |
271 | funds shall be used for inlet management projects on |
272 | legislatively approved lists. |
273 | (d) The Legislature shall designate one of the three |
274 | highest projects on the inlet management project list in any |
275 | year as the Inlet of the Year. The department shall annually |
276 | report to the Legislature concerning the extent to which each |
277 | inlet project designated by the Legislature as Inlet of the Year |
278 | has succeeded in balancing the sediment budget of the inlet and |
279 | adjacent beaches, mitigating the inlet's erosive effects on |
280 | adjacent beaches, and transferring or otherwise placing beach- |
281 | quality sand on adjacent eroding beaches. |
282 | (6) The department shall adopt rules under ss. 120.536(1) |
283 | and 120.54 to administer this section. |
284 | Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2008. |