Florida Senate - 2008 SENATOR AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for CS for SB 1544
146394
Senate
Floor: 1/AD/2R
4/16/2008 3:00 PM
.
.
.
.
.
House
1
Senator Saunders moved the following amendment:
2
3
Senate Amendment (with directory and title amendments)
4
Delete line(s) 3324-3385
5
and insert:
6
403.44 Florida Climate Protection Act.--
7
(1) The Legislature finds it is in the best interest of this
8
state to document, to the greatest extent practicable, greenhouse
9
gas (GHG) emissions and to pursue a market-based emissions
10
abatement program, such as cap-and-trade, to address GHG
11
emissions reductions.
12
(2) As used in this section, the term:
13
(a) "Allowance" means a credit issued by the department through
14
allotments or auction which represents an authorization to emit
15
specific amounts of greenhouse gases, as further defined in
16
department rule.
17
(b) "Cap-and-trade" or "emissions trading" means an
18
administrative approach used to control pollution by providing a
19
limit on total allowable emissions, providing for allowances to
20
emit pollutants, and providing for the transfer of the allowances
21
among pollutant sources as a means of compliance with emission
22
limits.
23
(c) "Greenhouse gas" means carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous
24
oxide, and fluorinated gases such as hydrofluorocarbons,
25
perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride.
26
(d) "Leakage" means the offset of emission abatement that is
27
achieved in one location subject to emission control regulation
28
by increased emissions in unregulated locations.
29
(e) "Major emitter" means an electric utility regulated under
30
this chapter.
31
(3) A major emitter must use The Climate Registry for purposes of
32
emission registration and reporting.
33
(4) The Department of Environmental Protection shall establish
34
the methodologies, reporting periods, and reporting systems that
35
must be used when major emitters report to The Climate Registry.
36
The department may require the use of quality assured data from
37
continuous emissions-monitoring systems.
38
(5) The department may adopt rules for a cap-and-trade regulatory
39
program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from major emitters.
40
When developing the rules, the department shall consult with the
41
Florida Energy and Climate Commission and the Public Service
42
Commission, and may consult with the Governor's Action Team for
43
Energy and Climate Change. The department shall not adopt rules
44
until after January 1, 2010. The rules shall not become effective
45
until ratified by the Legislature.
46
6) The rules of the cap-and-trade regulatory program shall
47
include, but are not limited to:
48
(a) A statewide limit or cap on the amount of GHG emissions
49
emitted by major emitters.
50
(b) Methods, requirements, and conditions for allocating the cap
51
among major emitters.
52
(c) Methods, requirements, and conditions for emissions
53
allowances and the process for issuing emissions allowances.
54
(d) The relationship between allowances and the specific amounts
55
of greenhouse gases they represent.
56
(e) The length of allowance periods and the time over which
57
entities must account for emissions and surrender allowances
58
equal to emissions.
59
(f) The time path of allowances from the initiation of the
60
program through to 2050.
61
(g) A process for the trade of allowances between major emitters,
62
including a registry, tracking, or accounting system for such
63
trades.
64
(h) Cost containment mechanisms to reduce price and cost risks
65
associated with the electric generation market in this state.
66
Cost containment mechanisms to be considered for inclusion in the
67
rule include, but are not limited to:
68
1. Allowing major emitters to borrow allowances from
69
future time periods to meet their emission limit.
70
2. Allowing major emitters to bank emission reductions in the
71
current year to be used to meet emission limits in future years.
72
3. Allowing major emitters to purchase emissions offsets from
73
other entities who produce verifiable reductions in unregulated
74
greenhouse gas emissions or who produce verifiable reductions in
75
greenhouse gases through voluntary practices that capture and
76
store greenhouse gases that otherwise would be released into the
77
atmosphere. In considering this cost containment mechanism, the
78
department shall identify sectors and activities outside of the
79
capped sectors, including other state or international
80
activities, and the conditions under which reductions there can
81
be credited against emissions of capped entities in place of
82
allowances issued by the department. The department shall also
83
consider potential methods, and their effectiveness, to avoid
84
double-incentivizing such activities.
85
4. Providing a safety valve mechanism to ensure that the market
86
prices for allowances or offsets do not surpass a predetermined
87
level compatible with the affordability of electric utility rates
88
and the well being of the state's economy. In considering this
89
cost containment mechanism, the department shall evaluate
90
different price levels for the safety valve and methods to change
91
the price level over time to reflect changing state, federal and
92
international markets, regulatory environments, and technological
93
advancements.
94
In considering cost containment mechanisms for inclusion in the
95
rule, the department shall evaluate the anticipated overall
96
effect of each mechanism on the abatement of greenhouse gas
97
emissions, electricity rate payers, and the benefits and costs of
98
each to the state's economy, and shall also consider the
99
interrelationships between the mechanisms under consideration.
100
(i) A process to allow the department to exercise its authority
101
to discourage leakage of GHG emissions to neighboring states
102
attributable to the implementation of this program.
103
(j) Provisions for a trial period on the trading of allowances
104
before full implementation of a trading system.
105
(7) In recommending and evaluating proposed features of the cap
106
and trade system, the following factors shall be considered:
107
(a) The overall cost-effectiveness of the cap and trade system in
108
combination with other policies and measures in meeting statewide
109
targets.
110
(b) Minimizing the administrative burden to the state of
111
implementing, monitoring and enforcing the program.
112
(c) Minimizing the administrative burden on entities covered
113
under the cap.
114
(d) The impacts on electricity prices for consumers.
115
(e) The specific benefits to Florida's economy for early adoption
116
of a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases in the context of
117
a federal climate change legislation and the development of
118
international compacts.
119
(f) The specific benefits to Florida's economy associated with
120
the creation and sale of emissions offsets from economic sectors
121
outside of the emissions cap.
122
(g) The potential effects of leakage if economic activity
123
relocates out of the state.
124
(h) The effectiveness of the combination of measures in meeting
125
identified targets.
126
(i) The implications for near-term periods of long run targets
127
specified in the overall policy.
128
(j) The overall costs and benefits of a cap-and-trade system to
129
the economy of this state.
130
(k) How to moderate impacts on low income consumers that result
131
from energy price increases.
132
(l) Consistency of the program with other state and possible
133
Federal efforts.
134
(m) The feasibility and const-effectiveness of extending the
135
program scope as broadly as possible among emitting activities
136
and sinks in Florida.
137
(n) Evaluation of the conditions under which Florida should
138
consider linking its trading system to other states' or other
139
countries' systems, and how that might be affected by the
140
potential inclusion in the rule of safety valve.
141
(8) Recognizing that the international, national, neighboring
142
state policies and the science of climate change will evolve,
143
prior to submitting the proposed rules to the Legislature for its
144
consideration, the department shall submit the proposed rules to
145
the Florida Energy and Climate Commission, which shall review the
146
proposed rule and submit a report to the Governor, the President
147
of the Florida Senate, the Speaker of the Florida House of
148
Representatives, and the department. The report shall address:
149
(a) The overall cost-effectiveness of the proposed cap and trade
150
system in combination with other policies and measures in meeting
151
statewide targets.
152
(b) The administrative burden to the state of implementing,
153
monitoring and enforcing the program.
154
(c) The administrative burden on entities covered under the cap.
155
(d) The impacts on electricity prices for consumers.
156
(e) The specific benefits to Florida's economy for early adoption
157
of a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases in the context of
158
federal climate change legislation and development of new
159
international compacts.
160
(f) The specific benefits to Florida's economy associated with
161
the creation and sale of emissions offsets from economic sectors
162
outside the emissions cap.
163
(g) The potential effects on leakage if economic activity
164
relocates out of the state.
165
(h) The effectiveness of the combination of measures in meeting
166
identified targets.
167
(i) The economic implications for near-term periods of short-term
168
and long-term targets specified in the overall policy.
169
(j) The overall costs and benefits of a cap-and-trade system to
170
the economy of this state.
171
(k) The impacts on low income consumers that result from energy
172
price increases.
173
(l) The consistency of the program with other states and possible
174
Federal efforts.
175
(m) The evaluation of the conditions under which Florida should
176
consider linking its trading system to other states' or other
177
countries' systems, and how that might be affected by the
178
potential inclusion in the rule of a safety valve.
179
(n) The timing and changes in the external environment, such as
180
proposals by other states or implementation of a Federal program
181
that would spur reevaluation of the Florida program.
182
(o) The conditions and options for eliminating the Florida
183
program if a Federal program were to supplant it.
184
(p) The need for a regular re-evaluation of the progress of other
185
emitting regions of the country and of the world, and whether
186
other regions are abating emissions in a commensurate manner.
187
(o) The desirability of and possibilities of broadening the scope
188
of Florida's cap and trade system at a later date to include more
189
emitting activities as well as sinks in Florida, and the
190
conditions that would need to be met to do so, as well as how the
191
program would encourage these conditions to be met such as
192
developing monitoring and measuring techniques for land use
193
emissions and sinks, regulating sources up stream, and other
194
considerations.
195
4/15/2008 8:16:00 PM EP.37.07746
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.