Florida Senate - 2008 SB 1672
By Senator Jones
13-02900A-08 20081672__
1
A bill to be entitled
2
An act relating to beach management; amending s. 161.142,
3
F.S.; providing legislative intent and findings; providing
4
requirements concerning the quality and quantity of
5
dredged sand placed on certain beaches adjacent to inlets;
6
requiring an estimation of the requisite quantity of
7
beach-quality sand by the Department of Environmental
8
Protection and its consultants; requiring the protection
9
of shorebirds and marine turtles; applying requirements
10
concerning the placement of dredged sand on adjacent
11
beaches to the inlet management projects of certain ports;
12
providing an exemption from such requirements; providing
13
that the inlet projects of such ports are eligible for
14
funding; providing requirements and findings concerning
15
the placement of dredged sand from federal navigation
16
projects; providing for assignment of responsibility for
17
the erosion caused by inlets; specifying actions to be
18
taken by the department in disputes between local
19
governments and property owners concerning how much sand
20
should bypass an inlet; creating s. 161.143, F.S.;
21
requiring that inlet management studies, projects, and
22
activities be supported by certain plans; providing
23
criteria governing the department's ranking of inlet
24
management projects and activities; specifying conditions
25
that must be met; requiring that the department establish
26
funding priorities for projects and activities concerning
27
inlet management; providing for input from interested
28
governmental and private entities; providing criteria for
29
establishing priorities; authorizing funding levels for
30
inlet management projects under specified conditions;
31
requiring that the department annually provide an inlet
32
management project list to the Legislature; providing
33
requirements for the list; requiring that the department
34
make available certain moneys for projects on the list;
35
requiring that the department make available certain
36
moneys for projects on the list which are legislatively
37
approved; requiring that the Legislature designate certain
38
inlet projects as "Inlet of the Year"; requiring the
39
department to provide an annual report to the Legislature
40
concerning the success of projects so designated;
41
authorizing rulemaking by the department; providing an
42
effective date.
43
44
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
45
46
Section 1. Section 161.142, Florida Statutes, is amended to
47
read:
48
161.142 Declaration of public policy relating to improved
49
navigation inlets.--The Legislature hereby recognizes the need
50
for maintaining navigation inlets to promote commercial and
51
recreational uses of our coastal waters and their resources. The
52
Legislature further recognizes that inlets interrupt or alter the
53
natural drift of beach-quality sand resources, which often
54
results in these sand resources being deposited in nearshore
55
around shallow outer-bar areas or in the inlet channel, instead
56
of providing natural nourishment to the adjacent eroding
57
downdrift beaches. Accordingly, the Legislature finds it is in
58
the public interest to replicate the natural drift of sand which
59
is interrupted or altered by inlets to be replaced and for each
60
level of government to undertake all reasonable efforts to
61
maximize inlet sand bypassing to ensure that beach-quality sand
62
is placed on adjacent eroding beaches. Such activities cannot
63
make up for the historical sand deficits caused by inlets, but
64
shall be designed to reinstate longshore sand transport and
65
extend the life of proximate beach-restoration projects so that
66
periodic nourishment is needed less frequently. Therefore, in
67
furtherance of this declaration of public policy, and the
68
Legislature's intent to redirect and recommit the state's
69
comprehensive beach management efforts to address the beach
70
erosion caused by inlets, the department shall ensure that:
71
(1) All construction and maintenance dredgings of beach-
72
quality sand are should be placed on the adjacent eroding
73
downdrift beaches unless; or, if placed elsewhere, an equivalent
74
quality and quantity of sand from an alternate location is should
75
be placed on the adjacent eroding downdrift beaches.
76
(2) On an average annual basis, a quantity of beach-quality
77
sand is should be placed on the adjacent eroding downdrift
78
beaches which is equal to the natural net annual longshore
79
sediment transport. The department shall, with the assistance of
80
university-based or other contractual resources that it may
81
employ or call upon, maintain a current estimate of such
82
quantities of sand for purposes of prioritizing, planning, and
83
permitting.
84
(3) Construction waterward of the coastal construction
85
control line on downdrift coastal areas, on islands substantially
86
created by the deposit of spoil, located within 1 mile of the
87
centerline of navigation channels or inlets, providing access to
88
ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b), which suffers or has suffered
89
erosion caused by such navigation channel maintenance or
90
construction shall be exempt from the permitting requirements and
91
prohibitions of subsections (2), (5), and (6) of s. 161.053. The
92
timing and sequence of any construction activities associated
93
with inlet management projects in such coastal areas shall comply
94
with 44 C.F.R. part 60 and shall provide protection to nesting
95
sea turtles and their hatchlings and their habitats, to nesting
96
shorebirds, and to native salt-resistant vegetation and
97
endangered plant communities. Beach-quality sand placed on the
98
beach as part of an inlet management project must be suitable for
99
marine turtle nesting.
100
(4) The provisions of subsections (1) and (2) shall not be
101
a requirement imposed upon ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b) are
102
subject to this section and may sponsor or cosponsor inlet
103
management projects that are fully eligible for state cost-
104
sharing. Such ports must demonstrate reasonable effort to place
105
beach-quality sand from construction and maintenance dredging and
106
port-development projects on adjacent eroding beaches; however,
107
if the department finds that the public interest would be served,
108
the department may permit such ports to place less than the
109
annualized equivalent volume of sand on adjacent eroding beaches
110
as otherwise required under subsection (2).
111
(5) The department shall ensure that any disposal of the
112
beach-quality sand from federal projects in this state which
113
involve dredging for the purpose of navigation is on, or in the
114
nearshore area of, adjacent eroding beaches. The department may
115
consider permitting offshore or upland disposal of such beach-
116
quality sand if emergency conditions exist. The state recognizes
117
that due to the growing demand for beach-quality sand resources
118
for beach restoration and nourishment projects, the limited
119
supply of such sand resources, and the cost of such projects,
120
beach or nearshore sand placement is the least-cost disposal
121
method.
122
(6) If federal investigations and reports or state-approved
123
inlet management plans do not specify the entity or entities
124
responsible for the extent of erosion caused by an inlet, the
125
department or local government, with the assistance of
126
university-based or other contractual resources that they may
127
employ or call upon, is encouraged to undertake assessments that
128
aid in specifying the responsible entity or entities and in more
129
accurately determining cost-sharing responsibilities for measures
130
to correct such erosion. The entity that is responsible for
131
maintenance dredging of an inlet may be deemed responsible for
132
the erosion caused by the inlet if another responsible party is
133
not specified in such an assessment, a shore-protection project
134
investigation or report, or a state-approved inlet management
135
plan.
136
(7) If the beneficiaries of the inlet, the local
137
governments having jurisdiction of lands adjacent to the inlet,
138
or the owners of property adjacent to the inlet, are involved in
139
a dispute concerning how much sand should be bypassed, the
140
department shall protect its monetary investment in beach
141
nourishment projects within the inlet's physical zone of
142
influence by taking all reasonable actions to reinstate the
143
natural longshore transport of sand, including implementation of
144
inlet sand bypassing and other inlet management projects.
145
Section 2. Section 161.143, Florida Statutes, is created to
146
read:
147
161.143 Inlet management; planning, prioritizing, funding,
148
approving, and implementing projects.--
149
(1) Studies, projects, and activities for the purpose of
150
mitigating the erosive effects of inlets and reinstating the
151
natural longshore flow of sand to adjacent eroding beaches must
152
be supported by separately approved inlet management plans or
153
inlet components of the statewide comprehensive beach management
154
plan. Such plans in support of individual inlet projects or
155
activities must, pursuant to s. 161.161(1)(b), evaluate each
156
inlet to determine the extent of the inlet's erosive effect on
157
adjacent beaches, and if significant, make recommendations to
158
mitigate such ongoing erosive effects and provide estimated costs
159
for such mitigation.
160
(2) The department shall establish annual funding
161
priorities for studies, activities, or other projects concerning
162
inlet management. Such inlet management projects include, but are
163
not limited to, inlet sand bypassing, modifications to channel
164
dredging, jetty redesign, jetty repair, disposal of spoil
165
material, and the development, revision, adoption, or
166
implementation of an inlet management plan. The funding
167
priorities established by the department must be consistent with
168
the requirements and legislative declaration in ss. 161.101(14),
170
under this subsection and before transmitting the annual inlet
171
project list to the Legislature under subsection (5), the
172
department shall seek formal input from local coastal
173
governments, beach and general government associations and other
174
coastal interest groups, and university experts concerning annual
175
funding priorities for inlet management projects. In order to
176
maximize the benefits of efforts to address the inlet-caused
177
beach erosion problems of this state, the ranking criteria used
178
by the department to establish funding priorities for studies,
179
activities, or other projects concerning inlet management must
180
include consideration of:
181
(a) An estimate of the annual quantity of beach-quality
182
sand reaching the updrift boundary of the improved jetty or inlet
183
channel.
184
(b) The severity of the erosion to the adjacent beaches
185
caused by the inlet, and the extent to which the proposed project
186
mitigates the erosive effects of the inlet.
187
(c) The overall significance and anticipated success of the
188
proposed project in reinstating the natural longshore transport
189
of sand and addressing the sand deficit along the inlet-affected
190
shorelines.
191
(d) The extent to which existing bypassing activities at an
192
inlet would benefit from modest, cost-effective improvements when
193
considering the volumetric increases from the proposed project,
194
the availability of beach-quality sand currently not being
195
bypassed to adjacent eroding beaches, and the ease with which
196
such beach-quality sand may be obtained.
197
(e) The interest and commitment of local governments as
198
demonstrated by their willingness to coordinate the planning,
199
design, construction, and maintenance of an inlet management
200
project and their financial plan for funding the local cost-share
201
for initial construction, ongoing sand bypassing, channel
202
dredging, and maintenance.
203
(f) The previous completion or approval of a state-
204
sponsored inlet management plan or local-government-sponsored
205
inlet study concerning the inlet addressed by the proposed
206
project, the ease of updating and revising any such plan or
207
study, and the adequacy and specificity of the plan's or study's
208
recommendations concerning the mitigation of an inlet's erosive
209
effects on adjacent beaches.
210
(g) The degree to which the proposed project will enhance
211
the performance and longevity of proximate beach nourishment
212
projects, thereby reducing the frequency of such periodic
213
nourishment projects.
214
(h) The project-ranking criteria in s. 161.101(14) to the
215
extent such criteria are applicable to inlet management studies,
216
projects, and activities.
217
(3) The department may, pursuant to s. 161.101 and
218
notwithstanding s. 161.101(15), pay from legislative
219
appropriations provided for these purposes 75 percent of the
220
total costs or, if applicable, the nonfederal costs, of a study,
221
activity, or other project concerning the management of an inlet.
222
The balance must be paid by the local governments or special
223
districts having jurisdiction over the property where the inlet
224
is located.
225
(4) Using the legislative appropriation to the statewide
226
beach-management-support category of the department's fixed
227
capital outlay funding request, the department may employ
228
university-based or other contractual sources and pay 100 percent
229
of the costs of studies that are consistent with the legislative
230
declaration in s. 161.142 and that:
231
(a) Determine, calculate, refine, and achieve general
232
consensus regarding net annual sediment transport volumes to be
233
used for the purpose of planning and prioritizing inlet
234
management projects; and
235
(b) Appropriate, assign, and apportion responsibilities
236
between inlet beneficiaries for the erosion caused by a
237
particular inlet on adjacent beaches.
238
(5) The department shall annually provide an inlet
239
management project list, in priority order, to the Legislature as
240
part of the department's budget request. The list must include
241
studies, projects, or other activities that address the
242
management of at least 10 separate inlets and that are ranked
243
according to the criteria established under subsection (2).
244
(a) The department shall make available at least 10 percent
245
of the total amount that the Legislature appropriates in each
246
fiscal year for statewide beach management for the three highest-
247
ranked projects on the current year's inlet management project
248
list.
249
(b) The department shall make available at least 50 percent
250
of the funds appropriated for the feasibility and design category
251
in the department's fixed capital outlay funding request for
252
projects on the current year's inlet management project list
253
which involve the study for, or design or development of, an
254
inlet management project.
255
(c) The department shall make available all statewide beach
256
management funds that remain unencumbered or are allocated to
257
non-project-specific activities for projects on legislatively
258
approved inlet management project lists. Funding for local-
259
government-specific projects on annual project lists approved by
260
the Legislature must remain available for such purposes for a
261
period of 18 months, pursuant to s. 216.301(2)(a). Based on an
262
assessment and the department's determination that a project will
263
not be ready to proceed during this 18-month period, such funds
264
shall be used for inlet management projects on legislatively
265
approved lists.
266
(d) The Legislature shall designate one of the three
267
highest projects on the inlet management project list in any year
268
as the Inlet of the Year. The department shall annually report to
269
the Legislature concerning the extent to which each inlet project
270
designated by the Legislature as Inlet of the Year has succeeded
271
in reinstating the natural longshore transport of sand around
272
inlets, mitigating the inlet's erosive effects on adjacent
273
beaches, and transferring or otherwise placing beach-quality sand
274
on adjacent eroding beaches.
275
(6) The department shall adopt rules under ss. 120.536(1)
276
and 120.54 to administer this section.
277
Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2008.
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.