Florida Senate - 2008 SB 2226
By Senator Aronberg
27-03477-08 20082226__
1
A bill to be entitled
2
An act relating to water restrictions; amending s.
3
373.246, F.S.; authorizing the governing board of a water
4
management district or the Department of Environmental
5
Protection to issue an order establishing liability,
6
requiring corrective action, or imposing an administrative
7
penalty against a person who violates a declaration of
8
water shortage; providing that a court may enter a
9
judgment based on such order; requiring the governing
10
board or the department to issue a notice of noncompliance
11
before taking action against a violator, except if such
12
violator has a history of noncompliance; requiring the
13
governing board or the department to send a written notice
14
of violation to the violator by certified mail; requiring
15
that such notice contain certain information; providing
16
that an order is not effective until the violator has been
17
served notice and an administrative hearing is held;
18
requiring the violator to file a petition in response to
19
the order and request a hearing within a specified time or
20
waive the right to such hearing; providing that such
21
violator is the respondent for hearing purposes; requiring
22
the governing board or the department to refer a timely
23
filed petition to the Division of Administrative Hearings;
24
requiring the hearing to be held in the same county in
25
which the violation occurred; providing that the governing
26
board or the department has the burden of proving by a
27
preponderance of the evidence that the respondent is
28
responsible for the violation; requiring the
29
administrative law judge to conduct the hearing using the
30
summary hearing process; requiring the administrative law
31
judge to issue a final order; providing for the prevailing
32
party to recover all costs, including attorney's fees;
33
providing that the governing board or the department may
34
pursue injunctive relief in addition to any other
35
administrative action; providing a schedule of
36
administrative penalties; requiring the administrative law
37
judge to add the direct economic benefit that the violator
38
gained to the penalty; providing that evidence of
39
mitigating circumstances may reduce a penalty; providing
40
an effective date.
41
42
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
43
44
Section 1. Subsections (9) and (10) are added to section
45
373.246, Florida Statutes, to read:
46
373.246 Declaration of water shortage or emergency.--
47
(9)(a) The governing board or the department may issue an
48
order that establishes liability, requires corrective action, or
49
imposes an administrative penalty against any person who violates
50
the restrictions established by a declaration of water shortage.
51
Any court having jurisdiction may enter a judgment based on the
52
governing board's or the department's order and such judgment has
53
the same force and effect as any other judgment.
54
(b) The governing board or the department shall issue a
55
notice of noncompliance as set forth in s. 120.695 before taking
56
administrative action against an alleged violator. However, if
57
the person has a history of noncompliance as described in
58
paragraph (10)(f), such notice is not required before taking
59
administrative action.
60
(c) The governing board or the department shall send a
61
written notice of violation to the alleged violator by certified
62
mail. If the governing board or the department is unable to serve
63
the notice of violation by certified mail, the notice may be hand
64
delivered or personally served in accordance with chapter 48.
65
Such notice must specify the provision of the law, rule, or order
66
which has allegedly been violated and the facts constituting the
67
alleged violation. The notice may include any corrective action
68
required to address the violation, including payment of an
69
administrative penalty and any other corrective action ordered by
70
the governing board or the department. An order is not effective
71
until after the alleged violator has been served and an
72
administrative hearing is held.
73
(d) The alleged violator must file a petition in response
74
to the order and request an administrative hearing within 14 days
75
after the notice is served. Failure to request an administrative
76
hearing within 14 days after service constitutes a waiver of the
77
right to such hearing. If an alleged violator timely files a
78
petition, such violator shall subsequently be referred to as the
79
respondent. The governing board or the department shall refer the
80
petition to the Division of Administrative Hearings. The hearing
81
must be held in the county in which the violation allegedly
82
occurred. Such hearings should be addressed in an expeditious and
83
effective manner and scheduled accordingly. The governing board
84
or the department must prove by a preponderance of the evidence
85
that the respondent is responsible for the violation. A hearing
86
shall proceed in accordance with the summary hearing process as
87
set forth in s. 120.574(2). The administrative law judge shall
88
issue a final order on all matters and impose an administrative
89
penalty.
90
(e) The prevailing party shall recover all costs, including
91
investigative costs and reasonable attorney's fees in an
92
administrative proceeding brought under this section. The
93
administrative law judge shall include such costs and fees in the
94
final order. The respondent is the prevailing party if an
95
administrative law judge enters an order finding that the notice
96
of violation did not have a reasonable basis in law and fact at
97
the time the proceeding was initiated.
98
(f) The governing board or the department is not prohibited
99
from taking any other legal or administrative action in
100
accordance with law. This subsection does not limit the governing
101
board's or the department's authority to judicially pursue
102
injunctive relief. The governing board and the department may
103
judicially pursue penalties in excess of the administrative
104
penalty schedule set forth in subsection (10). The governing
105
board or the department may enter into a settlement, before or
106
after initiating a notice of violation, and the settlement may
107
include a penalty amount different from the administrative
108
penalty schedule set forth in subsection (10).
109
(10)(a) For a violation involving the use of water on 10
110
acres or less or the use of less than 100,000 gallons of water
111
per day, the penalty is $500 per offense, per day, and $2,000 per
112
offense, per day, for a violator that has a history of
113
noncompliance.
114
(b) For a violation involving the use of water on 10 to 100
115
acres or the use of 100,000 to 500,000 gallons of water per day,
116
the penalty is $1,000 per offense, per day, and $5,000 per
117
offense, per day, for a violator that has a history of
118
noncompliance.
119
(c) For a violation involving the use of water on more than
120
100 acres or the use of more than 500,000 gallons of water per
121
day, the penalty is $3,000 per offense, per day, and $10,000 per
122
offense, per day, for a violator that has a history of
123
noncompliance.
124
(d) For a golf course that fails to submit timely reports,
125
the penalty is $300 per offense and $1,000 per offense for a
126
violator that has a history of noncompliance.
127
(e) For a golf course that fails to meet monthly targeted
128
reductions, the penalty is $500 per offense for meeting 75
129
percent to 90 percent of the monthly targeted reduction; $1,500
130
per offense for meeting 25 percent to 75 percent of monthly
131
targeted reduction; and $3,500 per offense for meeting 0 percent
132
to 25 percent of monthly targeted reduction. The penalty is
133
doubled for a violator that has a history of noncompliance.
134
(f) A violator that has a history of noncompliance is any
135
person who has been found by final order to have violated a
136
declaration of water shortage within 2 years after the most
137
recent violation.
138
(g) An administrative law judge shall add the direct
139
economic benefit gained by a violator from a violation to the
140
scheduled administrative penalty.
141
(h) An administrative law judge may receive evidence in
142
mitigation and may reduce the penalties identified in this
143
subsection up to 50 percent for mitigating circumstances,
144
including good faith efforts to comply before or after discovery
145
of the violation. The administrative law judge may reduce the
146
penalty further upon an affirmative finding that the violation
147
was caused by circumstances beyond the control of the respondent
148
and could not have been prevented by the respondent's due
149
diligence.
150
Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2008.
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.