Florida Senate - 2008 SB 2246

By Senator Baker

20-03268A-08 20082246__

1

A bill to be entitled

2

An act relating to land development regulation; amending

3

s. 163.3162, F.S.; providing for the use of certain lands

4

surrounding an agricultural enclave; creating a rebuttable

5

presumption for the imposition of certain development

6

conditions relating to agricultural enclaves; providing a

7

timeframe for submitting certain information relating to

8

proposed plan amendments; creating a rebuttable

9

presumption for denial of or failure to approve plan

10

amendments relating to agricultural enclaves; amending s.

11

163.3245, F.S.; revising provisions relating to optional

12

sector plans; providing applicability to certain pending

13

applications; providing an effective date.

14

15

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

16

17

     Section 1.  Subsection (5) of section 163.3162, Florida

18

Statutes, is amended to read:

19

     163.3162  Agricultural Lands and Practices Act.--

20

     (5)  AMENDMENT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.--The

21

owner of a parcel of land defined as an agricultural enclave

22

under s. 163.3164(33) may apply for an amendment to the local

23

government comprehensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3187. Such

24

amendment is presumed to be consistent with rule 9J-5.006(5),

25

Florida Administrative Code, and may include land uses and

26

intensities of use that are consistent with the uses and

27

intensities of use of the industrial, commercial, or residential

28

areas that surround the parcel. This presumption may be rebutted

29

by clear and convincing evidence. Each application for a

30

comprehensive plan amendment under this subsection for a parcel

31

larger than 640 acres must include appropriate new urbanism

32

concepts such as clustering, mixed-use development, the creation

33

of rural village and city centers, and the transfer of

34

development rights in order to discourage urban sprawl while

35

protecting landowner rights. Notwithstanding the provisions of a

36

comprehensive plan, the local government may not prohibit land

37

uses and intensities of use that are consistent with the uses and

38

intensities of use of the industrial, commercial, or residential

39

areas that surround the parcel to a distance equal to the longest

40

dimension of the parcel. Intensities of uses surrounding an

41

agricultural enclave shall, at minimum, be the average intensity

42

with the surrounding area as defined herein. If a local

43

government imposes development conditions that prevent the owner

44

from achieving consistent densities and intensities of use

45

pursuant to this subsection, the owner may apply to the circuit

46

court for appropriate relief pursuant to s. 70.001. The

47

imposition of such conditions is presumed to impose an inordinate

48

burden. This presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing

49

evidence.

50

     (a)  The local government and the owner of a parcel of land

51

that is the subject of an application for an amendment shall have

52

180 days following the date that the local government receives a

53

complete application to negotiate in good faith to reach

54

consensus on the land uses and intensities of use that are

55

consistent with the uses and intensities of use of the

56

industrial, commercial, or residential areas that surround the

57

parcel. Within 30 days after the local government's receipt of

58

such an application, the local government and owner must agree in

59

writing to a schedule for information submittal, public hearings,

60

negotiations, and final action on the amendment, which schedule

61

may thereafter be altered only with the written consent of the

62

local government and the owner. Compliance with the schedule in

63

the written agreement constitutes good faith negotiations for

64

purposes of paragraph (d) (c).

65

     (b)  Upon conclusion of good faith negotiations under

66

paragraph (a), regardless of whether the local government and

67

owner reach consensus on the land uses and intensities of use

68

that are consistent with the uses and intensities of use of the

69

industrial, commercial, or residential areas that surround the

70

parcel, the amendment must be transmitted to the state land

71

planning agency for review pursuant to s. 163.3184. If the local

72

government fails to transmit the amendment within 180 days after

73

receipt of a complete application, the amendment must be

74

immediately transferred to the state land planning agency for

75

such review at the first available transmittal cycle. A plan

76

amendment transmitted to the state land planning agency submitted

77

under this subsection is presumed to be consistent with rule 9J-

78

5.006(5), Florida Administrative Code. This presumption may be

79

rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.

80

     (c) Notwithstanding any provisions of a comprehensive plan

81

to the contrary, after review by the state land planning agency,

82

the owner shall respond to any objections, recommendations, or

83

comments issued by the agency pursuant to s. 163.3184(6). If the

84

department has issued no objections, recommendations, or

85

comments, or if the owner has responded to any objections,

86

recommendations, or comments and the local government denies or

87

fails to approve the amendment within the time period specified

88

in s. 163.3184(7), the owner may apply to the circuit court for

89

appropriate relief pursuant to s. 70.001 on the basis that the

90

denial or failure to approve the amendment constitutes an

91

inordinate burden. A plan amendment reviewed by the land planning

92

agency under this subsection is presumed to be consistent with

93

the provisions of rule 9J-5.006(5), Florida Administrative Code.

94

This presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing

95

evidence.

96

     (d)(c) If the owner fails to negotiate in good faith, a

97

plan amendment submitted under this subsection is not entitled to

98

the rebuttable presumption under this subsection in the

99

negotiation and amendment process.

100

     (e)(d) Nothing within this subsection relating to

101

agricultural enclaves shall preempt or replace any protection

102

currently existing for any property located within the boundaries

103

of the following areas:

104

     1.  The Wekiva Study Area, as described in s. 369.316; or

105

     2.  The Everglades Protection Area, as defined in s.

106

373.4592(2).

107

     Section 2.  Present subsections (6) and (7) of section

108

163.3245, Florida Statutes, are renumbered as subsections (7) and

109

(8), respectively, and a new subsection (6) is added to that

110

section, to read:

111

     163.3245  Optional sector plans.--

112

     (6) If an application for development approval or an

113

application for a comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to this

114

part has been filed and is pending prior to the effective date of

115

a sector plan, the application shall only be required to comply

116

with the provisions of a subsequently adopted sector plan upon

117

written consent of the applicant. This subsection applies to all

118

applications within a sector planning area pending before a local

119

government on or before December 31, 2007.

120

     Section 3.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2008.

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.