Florida Senate - 2008 SB 2634
By Senator Dean
3-03729-08 20082634__
1
A bill to be entitled
2
An act relating to agricultural industrial centers;
3
amending s. 163.3164, F.S.; defining the term
4
"agricultural industrial center"; amending s.
5
163.3177, F.S.; requiring that local governments, in
6
conjunction with certain state agencies, identify
7
existing agricultural industrial centers before a
8
specified deadline; requiring that local governments
9
amend the future land use element of their local
10
comprehensive plans for a certain purpose before a
11
specified deadline; providing that such amendment is
12
exempt from the twice-a-year limitation imposed by
13
state law; requiring that such planning districts meet
14
specified criteria; authorizing landowners within an
15
agricultural industrial center economic overlay
16
planning district to apply for an amendment to the
17
local government comprehensive plan for certain
18
purposes; limiting the effects of such proposed
19
amendments; providing an exception to certain
20
limitations; providing that such amendments are
21
presumed consistent with the Florida Administrative
22
Code, and may include land uses and intensities of use
23
consistent and compatible with the uses and
24
intensities of use of the corresponding agricultural
25
industrial center; providing that such assumption may
26
be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence;
27
requiring that a local government and the owner of a
28
parcel of land subject to such application negotiate
29
in good faith to reach consensus on the proposed
30
expansion and the land uses and intensities of use
31
within a specified period; requiring that a local
32
government and owner agree in writing to a schedule
33
for information submittal, public hearings,
34
negotiations, and final action on the amendment within
35
a specified period; providing that such schedule may
36
be altered only with the written consent of the local
37
government and the owner; providing that compliance
38
with such schedule constitutes good-faith
39
negotiations; requiring that the amendment be
40
transmitted to the state land planning agency for
41
review upon conclusion of good-faith negotiations,
42
regardless of the result of such negotiations;
43
providing that such submitted amendments are presumed
44
consistent with the Florida Administrative Code;
45
providing that such presumption may be rebutted by
46
clear and convincing evidence; providing that a plan
47
amendment is not entitled to such rebuttable
48
presumption under certain circumstances; providing an
49
effective date.
50
51
WHEREAS, the Legislature recognizes and finds that there are
52
a number of facilities throughout the state which process,
53
produce, or aid in the production or distribution of a variety of
54
agriculturally based products, such as fruits, vegetables,
55
timber, and other crops, as well as juices, paper, and building
56
materials. These agricultural industrial facilities often are
57
grouped in agricultural industrial centers, which have a
58
significant amount of developed infrastructure that is used for
59
the processing, production, or distribution of agricultural
60
products, and
61
WHEREAS, the Legislature further recognizes and finds that
62
such agricultural industrial centers often are located within or
63
near communities in which the economy is largely dependent upon
64
agriculture and agriculturally based products. These agricultural
65
industrial centers significantly enhance the economy of such
66
communities. However, such agriculturally based communities are
67
often socioeconomically challenged and many such communities have
68
been designated as rural areas of critical economic concern, and
69
WHEREAS, the Legislature recognizes and finds that if these
70
agricultural industrial centers are lost and not replaced with
71
other job-creating enterprises, these communities will lose a
72
substantial amount of their economies. The economies and
73
employment bases of such communities should be diversified in
74
order to protect against changes in national and international
75
agricultural markets, land use patterns, weather, pests or
76
diseases, or other events that could result in existing
77
agricultural industrial facilities being permanently closed or
78
temporarily shut down, ultimately resulting in an economic crisis
79
for these communities, and
80
WHEREAS, it is a compelling state interest to preserve the
81
viability of agriculture in Florida and to protect such
82
communities and the state from the economic upheaval that could
83
result from short-term or long-term adverse changes in the
84
agricultural economy. An essential part of protecting such
85
communities while protecting viable agriculture for the long term
86
is to encourage diversification of the employment base within
87
agricultural industrial centers for the purpose of providing jobs
88
that are not solely dependent upon agricultural operations, and
89
to encourage the creation and expansion of industries that use
90
agricultural products in innovative or new ways, NOW, THEREFORE,
91
92
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
93
94
Section 1. Subsection (34) is added to section 163.3164,
95
Florida Statutes, to read:
96
163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
97
Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act:
98
(34) "Agricultural industrial center" means a parcel or
99
parcels of land:
100
(a) On which there exists an operating facility or
101
facilities used for processing, producing, and preparing for
102
transport a farm product as defined in s. 163.3162 or any biomass
103
material that could be used, directly or indirectly, for the
104
production of fuel, renewable energy, bioenergy, or alternative
105
fuel as defined by state law;
106
(b) Including all contiguous lands at the site which are
107
not used for cultivation of crops, but still associated with the
108
operation of such a facility or facilities; and
109
(c) Located within rural areas of critical economic concern
110
or located in a county any portion of which has been designated
111
as an area of critical economic concern.
112
Section 2. Paragraph (a) of subsection (6) of section
113
163.3177, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
114
163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive
115
plan; studies and surveys.--
116
(6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5)
117
and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following
118
elements:
119
(a)1. A future land use plan element designating proposed
120
future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of
121
land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry,
122
agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public
123
buildings and grounds, other public facilities, and other
124
categories of the public and private uses of land. Counties are
125
encouraged to designate rural land stewardship areas, pursuant to
126
the provisions of paragraph (11)(d), as overlays on the future
127
land use map. Each future land use category must be defined in
128
terms of uses included, and must include standards to be followed
129
in the control and distribution of population densities and
130
building and structure intensities. The proposed distribution,
131
location, and extent of the various categories of land use shall
132
be shown on a land use map or map series which shall be
133
supplemented by goals, policies, and measurable objectives. The
134
future land use plan shall be based upon surveys, studies, and
135
data regarding the area, including the amount of land required to
136
accommodate anticipated growth; the projected population of the
137
area; the character of undeveloped land; the availability of
138
water supplies, public facilities, and services; the need for
139
redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the
140
elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the
141
character of the community; the compatibility of uses on lands
142
adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations; and,
143
in rural communities, the need for job creation, capital
144
investment, and economic development that will strengthen and
145
diversify the community's economy. The future land use plan may
146
designate areas for future planned development use involving
147
combinations of types of uses for which special regulations may
148
be necessary to ensure development in accord with the principles
149
and standards of the comprehensive plan and this act. The future
150
land use plan element shall include criteria to be used to
151
achieve the compatibility of adjacent or closely proximate lands
152
with military installations. In addition, for rural communities,
153
the amount of land designated for future planned industrial use
154
shall be based upon surveys and studies that reflect the need for
155
job creation, capital investment, and the necessity to strengthen
156
and diversify the local economies, and shall not be limited
157
solely by the projected population of the rural community. The
158
future land use plan of a county may also designate areas for
159
possible future municipal incorporation. The land use maps or map
160
series shall generally identify and depict historic district
161
boundaries and shall designate historically significant
162
properties meriting protection. For coastal counties, the future
163
land use element must include, without limitation, regulatory
164
incentives and criteria that encourage the preservation of
165
recreational and commercial working waterfronts as defined in s.
166
342.07. The future land use element must clearly identify the
167
land use categories in which public schools are an allowable use.
168
When delineating the land use categories in which public schools
169
are an allowable use, a local government shall include in the
170
categories sufficient land proximate to residential development
171
to meet the projected needs for schools in coordination with
172
public school boards and may establish differing criteria for
173
schools of different type or size. Each local government shall
174
include lands contiguous to existing school sites, to the maximum
175
extent possible, within the land use categories in which public
176
schools are an allowable use. The failure by a local government
177
to comply with these school siting requirements will result in
178
the prohibition of the local government's ability to amend the
179
local comprehensive plan, except for plan amendments described in
180
s. 163.3187(1)(b), until the school siting requirements are met.
181
Amendments proposed by a local government for purposes of
182
identifying the land use categories in which public schools are
183
an allowable use are exempt from the limitation on the frequency
184
of plan amendments contained in s. 163.3187. The future land use
185
element shall include criteria that encourage the location of
186
schools proximate to urban residential areas to the extent
187
possible and shall require that the local government seek to
188
collocate public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and
189
community centers, with schools to the extent possible and to
190
encourage the use of elementary schools as focal points for
191
neighborhoods. For schools serving predominantly rural counties,
192
defined as a county with a population of 100,000 or fewer, an
193
agricultural land use category shall be eligible for the location
194
of public school facilities if the local comprehensive plan
195
contains school siting criteria and the location is consistent
196
with such criteria. Local governments required to update or amend
197
their comprehensive plan to include criteria and address
198
compatibility of adjacent or closely proximate lands with
199
existing military installations in their future land use plan
200
element shall transmit the update or amendment to the department
201
by June 30, 2006.
202
2.a. Local governments shall, in consultation with the
203
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department
204
of Community Affairs, the Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic
205
Development, the appropriate regional planning council, property
206
owners, and interested parties, identify existing agricultural
207
industrial centers as defined by s. 163.3164(34) within their
208
jurisdiction on or before July 1, 2009.
209
b. Local governments shall amend the future land use
210
element of their local comprehensive plans on or before July 1,
211
2010, for the purpose of establishing agricultural industrial
212
center economic overlay planning districts. Such amendment is
213
exempt from the twice-a-year limitation of s. 163.3187(1). Such
214
planning districts shall:
215
(I) Incorporate existing agricultural industrial centers;
216
(II) Be developed in consultation with affected landowners;
217
(III) Encourage the expansion of industrial uses or
218
facilities;
219
(IV) Take into account the need to reduce the economic
220
vulnerability of communities that are largely reliant on
221
agriculture for income or employment; and
222
(V) Be designed and implemented so that a district does not
223
interpret its local comprehensive plans so as to permanently
224
restrict the conversion of agricultural lands within the district
225
to other uses consistent with this act.
226
c. Landowners within an agricultural industrial center
227
economic overlay planning district may apply for an amendment to
228
the local government comprehensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3187
229
for the purpose of expanding the industrial uses or facilities
230
associated with the agricultural industrial centers or expanding
231
the agricultural industrial centers to include industrial uses or
232
facilities that are not dependent upon agriculture. Each
233
application for a comprehensive plan amendment under this
234
subparagraph may not increase the physical footprint of the
235
agricultural industrial center by more than 50 percent of the
236
existing footprint unless the applicant can demonstrate that
237
infrastructure capacity exists or can be provided to support the
238
improvements as required by the applicable sections of this
239
chapter. Any single application may not increase the physical
240
footprint of the existing agricultural industrial center by more
241
than 200 percent or 640 acres, whichever is less. Such amendment
242
is presumed to be consistent with rule 9J-5.006(5), Florida
243
Administrative Code, and may include land uses and intensities of
244
use consistent and compatible with the uses and intensities of
245
use of the agricultural industrial center. Such presumption may
246
be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.
247
d. The local government and the owner of a parcel of land
248
that is the subject of an application for an amendment must,
249
within 180 days after the date on which the local government
250
receives a complete application, negotiate in good faith to reach
251
a consensus on the proposed expansion, land uses, and intensities
252
of use that are consistent with the uses and intensities of use
253
of the agricultural industrial center.
254
e. Within 30 days after the date of a local government's
255
receipt of such an application, the local government and owner
256
must agree in writing to a schedule for information submittal,
257
public hearings, negotiations, and final action on the amendment.
258
Such schedule may be subsequently altered only with the written
259
consent of the local government and the owner. Compliance with
260
such schedule constitutes good-faith negotiations.
261
f. The amendment must be transmitted to the state land
262
planning agency for review pursuant to s. 163.3184 immediately
263
upon the conclusion of good-faith negotiations, regardless of
264
whether the local government and owner reach a consensus on the
265
proposed expansion, land uses, or intensities of use that are
266
consistent with the uses and intensities of use of the
267
agricultural industrial center. If the local government fails to
268
transmit the amendment within 180 days after the date of receipt
269
of a complete application, the amendment must be immediately
270
transferred to the state land planning agency for such review at
271
the first available transmittal cycle. An amendment transmitted
272
to the state land planning agency pursuant to this subparagraph
273
is presumed to be consistent with rule 9J-5.006(5), Florida
274
Administrative Code. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear
275
and convincing evidence.
276
g. If the owner fails to negotiate in good faith, an
277
amendment submitted under this subparagraph is not entitled to
278
the rebuttable presumption under this subparagraph during the
279
negotiation or amendment process.
280
Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2008.
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.