| 1 | A bill to be entitled | 
| 2 | An act relating to alimony; amending s. 61.08, F.S.; | 
| 3 | permitting consideration of the existence of a supportive | 
| 4 | relationship meeting specified criteria as a factor in | 
| 5 | determining an award of alimony or maintenance; amending | 
| 6 | s. 61.14, F.S.; allowing the court to reduce or terminate | 
| 7 | an award of alimony upon certain findings; providing an | 
| 8 | effective date. | 
| 9 | 
 | 
| 10 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: | 
| 11 | 
 | 
| 12 | Section 1.  Paragraph (h) is added to subsection (2) of | 
| 13 | section 61.08, Florida Statutes, to read: | 
| 14 | 61.08  Alimony.-- | 
| 15 | (2)  In determining a proper award of alimony or | 
| 16 | maintenance, the court shall consider all relevant economic | 
| 17 | factors, including but not limited to: | 
| 18 | (h)  Whether a supportive relationship as set forth in s. | 
| 19 | 61.14(1)(b)2. does exist or has existed between the obligee and | 
| 20 | a person who is not related by consanguinity or affinity and | 
| 21 | with whom the obligee resides. | 
| 22 | 
 | 
| 23 | The court may consider any other factor necessary to do equity | 
| 24 | and justice between the parties. | 
| 25 | Section 2.  Paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section | 
| 26 | 61.14, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: | 
| 27 | 61.14  Enforcement and modification of support, | 
| 28 | maintenance, or alimony agreements or orders.-- | 
| 29 | (1) | 
| 30 | (b)1.  The court may reduce or terminate an award of | 
| 31 | alimony upon specific written findings by the court that since | 
| 32 | the granting of a divorce and the award of alimony a supportive | 
| 33 | relationship does exist or has existed between the obligee and a | 
| 34 | person with whom the obligee resides. On the issue of whether | 
| 35 | alimony should be reduced or terminated under this paragraph, | 
| 36 | the burden is on the obligor to prove by a preponderance of the | 
| 37 | evidence that a supportive relationship exists. | 
| 38 | 2.  In determining whether an existing award of alimony | 
| 39 | should be reduced or terminated because of an alleged supportive | 
| 40 | relationship between an obligee and a person who is not related | 
| 41 | by consanguinity or affinity and with whom the obligee resides, | 
| 42 | the court shall elicit the nature and extent of the relationship | 
| 43 | in question. The court shall give consideration, without | 
| 44 | limitation, to circumstances, including, but not limited to, the | 
| 45 | following, in determining the relationship of an obligee to | 
| 46 | another person: | 
| 47 | a.  The extent to which the obligee and the other person | 
| 48 | have held themselves out as a married couple by engaging in | 
| 49 | conduct such as using the same last name, using a common mailing | 
| 50 | address, referring to each other in terms such as "my husband" | 
| 51 | or "my wife," or otherwise conducting themselves in a manner | 
| 52 | that evidences a permanent supportive relationship. | 
| 53 | b.  The period of time that the obligee has resided with | 
| 54 | the other person in a permanent place of abode. | 
| 55 | c.  The extent to which the obligee and the other person | 
| 56 | have pooled their assets or income or otherwise exhibited | 
| 57 | financial interdependence. | 
| 58 | d.  The extent to which the obligee or the other person has | 
| 59 | supported the other, in whole or in part. | 
| 60 | e.  The extent to which the obligee or the other person has | 
| 61 | performed valuable services for the other. | 
| 62 | f.  The extent to which the obligee or the other person has | 
| 63 | performed valuable services for the other's company or employer. | 
| 64 | g.  Whether the obligee and the other person have worked | 
| 65 | together to create or enhance anything of value. | 
| 66 | h.  Whether the obligee and the other person have jointly | 
| 67 | contributed to the purchase of any real or personal property. | 
| 68 | i.  Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the | 
| 69 | other person have an express agreement regarding property | 
| 70 | sharing or support. | 
| 71 | j.  Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the | 
| 72 | other person have an implied agreement regarding property | 
| 73 | sharing or support. | 
| 74 | k.  Whether the obligee and the other person have provided | 
| 75 | support to the children of one another, regardless of any legal | 
| 76 | duty to do so. | 
| 77 | 3.  This paragraph does not abrogate the requirement that | 
| 78 | every marriage in this state be solemnized under a license, does | 
| 79 | not recognize a common law marriage as valid, and does not | 
| 80 | recognize a de facto marriage. This paragraph recognizes only | 
| 81 | that relationships do exist that provide economic support | 
| 82 | equivalent to a marriage and that alimony terminable on | 
| 83 | remarriage may be reduced or terminated upon the establishment | 
| 84 | of equivalent equitable circumstances as described in this | 
| 85 | paragraph. The existence of a conjugal relationship, though it | 
| 86 | may be relevant to the nature and extent of the relationship, is | 
| 87 | not necessary for the application of the provisions of this | 
| 88 | paragraph. | 
| 89 | Section 3.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2008. |