1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to developments of regional impact; |
3 | amending s. 380.06, F.S.; revising criteria for extending |
4 | application of certain deadline dates and approvals for |
5 | developments of regional impact; providing an additional |
6 | statutory exemption for certain developments in certain |
7 | counties; providing requirements and limitations; |
8 | providing an effective date. |
9 |
|
10 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
11 |
|
12 | Section 1. Paragraph (c) of subsection (19) and subsection |
13 | (24) of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended to read: |
14 | 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- |
15 | (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.-- |
16 | (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a development, |
17 | or any phase thereof, by more than 7 years is presumed to create |
18 | a substantial deviation subject to further development-of- |
19 | regional-impact review. An extension of the date of buildout, or |
20 | any phase thereof, of more than 5 years but not more than 7 |
21 | years is presumed not to create a substantial deviation. The |
22 | extension of the date of buildout of an areawide development of |
23 | regional impact by more than 5 years but less than 10 years is |
24 | presumed not to create a substantial deviation. These |
25 | presumptions may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at |
26 | the public hearing held by the local government. An extension of |
27 | 5 years or less is not a substantial deviation. For the purpose |
28 | of calculating when a buildout or phase date has been exceeded, |
29 | the time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative |
30 | or judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any |
31 | extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof |
32 | shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, |
33 | the termination date of the development order, the expiration |
34 | date of the development of regional impact, and the phases |
35 | thereof if applicable by a like period of time. In recognition |
36 | of the 2007 real estate market conditions, all development order |
37 | phase, buildout, commencement, and expiration dates and all |
38 | related local government approvals for projects that are |
39 | developments of regional impact or Florida Quality Developments |
40 | and under active construction on July 1, 2007, or for which a |
41 | development order was adopted between January 1, 2006, and July |
42 | 1, 2007, regardless of whether or not active construction has |
43 | commenced, are extended for 3 years regardless of any prior |
44 | extension. The 3-year extension is not a substantial deviation, |
45 | is not subject to further development-of-regional-impact review, |
46 | and may not be considered when determining whether a subsequent |
47 | extension is a substantial deviation under this subsection. This |
48 | extension also applies to all associated local government |
49 | approvals, including, but not limited to, agreements, |
50 | certificates, and permits related to the project. |
51 | (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
52 | (a) Any proposed hospital is exempt from the provisions of |
53 | this section. |
54 | (b) Any proposed electrical transmission line or |
55 | electrical power plant is exempt from the provisions of this |
56 | section. |
57 | (c) Any proposed addition to an existing sports facility |
58 | complex is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
59 | addition meets the following characteristics: |
60 | 1. It would not operate concurrently with the scheduled |
61 | hours of operation of the existing facility. |
62 | 2. Its seating capacity would be no more than 75 percent |
63 | of the capacity of the existing facility. |
64 | 3. The sports facility complex property is owned by a |
65 | public body prior to July 1, 1983. |
66 |
|
67 | This exemption does not apply to any pari-mutuel facility. |
68 | (d) Any proposed addition or cumulative additions |
69 | subsequent to July 1, 1988, to an existing sports facility |
70 | complex owned by a state university is exempt if the increased |
71 | seating capacity of the complex is no more than 30 percent of |
72 | the capacity of the existing facility. |
73 | (e) Any addition of permanent seats or parking spaces for |
74 | an existing sports facility located on property owned by a |
75 | public body prior to July 1, 1973, is exempt from the provisions |
76 | of this section if future additions do not expand existing |
77 | permanent seating or parking capacity more than 15 percent |
78 | annually in excess of the prior year's capacity. |
79 | (f) Any increase in the seating capacity of an existing |
80 | sports facility having a permanent seating capacity of at least |
81 | 50,000 spectators is exempt from the provisions of this section, |
82 | provided that such an increase does not increase permanent |
83 | seating capacity by more than 5 percent per year and not to |
84 | exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year period, and provided |
85 | that the sports facility notifies the appropriate local |
86 | government within which the facility is located of the increase |
87 | at least 6 months prior to the initial use of the increased |
88 | seating, in order to permit the appropriate local government to |
89 | develop a traffic management plan for the traffic generated by |
90 | the increase. Any traffic management plan shall be consistent |
91 | with the local comprehensive plan, the regional policy plan, and |
92 | the state comprehensive plan. |
93 | (g) Any expansion in the permanent seating capacity or |
94 | additional improved parking facilities of an existing sports |
95 | facility is exempt from the provisions of this section, if the |
96 | following conditions exist: |
97 | 1.a. The sports facility had a permanent seating capacity |
98 | on January 1, 1991, of at least 41,000 spectator seats; |
99 | b. The sum of such expansions in permanent seating |
100 | capacity does not exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year |
101 | period and does not exceed a cumulative total of 20 percent for |
102 | any such expansions; or |
103 | c. The increase in additional improved parking facilities |
104 | is a one-time addition and does not exceed 3,500 parking spaces |
105 | serving the sports facility; and |
106 | 2. The local government having jurisdiction of the sports |
107 | facility includes in the development order or development permit |
108 | approving such expansion under this paragraph a finding of fact |
109 | that the proposed expansion is consistent with the |
110 | transportation, water, sewer and stormwater drainage provisions |
111 | of the approved local comprehensive plan and local land |
112 | development regulations relating to those provisions. |
113 |
|
114 | Any owner or developer who intends to rely on this statutory |
115 | exemption shall provide to the department a copy of the local |
116 | government application for a development permit. Within 45 days |
117 | of receipt of the application, the department shall render to |
118 | the local government an advisory and nonbinding opinion, in |
119 | writing, stating whether, in the department's opinion, the |
120 | prescribed conditions exist for an exemption under this |
121 | paragraph. The local government shall render the development |
122 | order approving each such expansion to the department. The |
123 | owner, developer, or department may appeal the local government |
124 | development order pursuant to s. 380.07, within 45 days after |
125 | the order is rendered. The scope of review shall be limited to |
126 | the determination of whether the conditions prescribed in this |
127 | paragraph exist. If any sports facility expansion undergoes |
128 | development-of-regional-impact review, all previous expansions |
129 | which were exempt under this paragraph shall be included in the |
130 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
131 | (h) Expansion to port harbors, spoil disposal sites, |
132 | navigation channels, turning basins, harbor berths, and other |
133 | related inwater harbor facilities of ports listed in s. |
134 | 403.021(9)(b), port transportation facilities and projects |
135 | listed in s. 311.07(3)(b), and intermodal transportation |
136 | facilities identified pursuant to s. 311.09(3) are exempt from |
137 | the provisions of this section when such expansions, projects, |
138 | or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans |
139 | that are in compliance with the provisions of s. 163.3178. |
140 | (i) Any proposed facility for the storage of any petroleum |
141 | product or any expansion of an existing facility is exempt from |
142 | the provisions of this section. |
143 | (j) Any renovation or redevelopment within the same land |
144 | parcel which does not change land use or increase density or |
145 | intensity of use. |
146 | (k) Waterport and marina development, including dry |
147 | storage facilities, are exempt from the provisions of this |
148 | section. |
149 | (l) Any proposed development within an urban service |
150 | boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the |
151 | provisions of this section if the local government having |
152 | jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has |
153 | adopted the urban service boundary, has entered into a binding |
154 | agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and with the |
155 | Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts |
156 | on state and regional transportation facilities, and has adopted |
157 | a proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
158 | (m) Any proposed development within a rural land |
159 | stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from |
160 | the provisions of this section if the local government that has |
161 | adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a |
162 | binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and |
163 | the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of |
164 | impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has |
165 | adopted a proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. |
166 | 163.3180(16). |
167 | (n) Any proposed development or redevelopment within an |
168 | area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under |
169 | s. 163.2517 is exempt from this section if the local government |
170 | has entered into a binding agreement with jurisdictions that |
171 | would be impacted and the Department of Transportation regarding |
172 | the mitigation of impacts on state and regional transportation |
173 | facilities, and has adopted a proportionate share methodology |
174 | pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
175 | (o) The establishment, relocation, or expansion of any |
176 | military installation as defined in s. 163.3175, is exempt from |
177 | this section. |
178 | (p) Any self-storage warehousing that does not allow |
179 | retail or other services is exempt from this section. |
180 | (q) Any proposed nursing home or assisted living facility |
181 | is exempt from this section. |
182 | (r) Any development identified in an airport master plan |
183 | and adopted into the comprehensive plan pursuant to s. |
184 | 163.3177(6)(k) is exempt from this section. |
185 | (s) Any development identified in a campus master plan and |
186 | adopted pursuant to s. 1013.30 is exempt from this section. |
187 | (t) Any development in a specific area plan which is |
188 | prepared pursuant to s. 163.3245 and adopted into the |
189 | comprehensive plan is exempt from this section. |
190 | (u) Any development within a county having a population |
191 | greater than 1.25 million which is proposed for at least two |
192 | uses, one of which is for use as an office or laboratory |
193 | appropriate for the research and development of medical |
194 | technology, biotechnology, or life science applications, is |
195 | exempt from this section if: |
196 | 1. The land is located in a designated urban infill area |
197 | or within 5 miles of a state-supported biotechnical research |
198 | facility or if a local government having jurisdiction |
199 | recognizes, by resolution, that the land is located in a |
200 | compact, high-intensity, and high-density multiuse area that is |
201 | appropriate for intensive growth. |
202 | 2. The land is located within three-fourths of 1 mile from |
203 | one or more bus or light rail transit stops. |
204 | 3. The development is registered with the United States |
205 | Green Building Council and there is an intent to apply for |
206 | certification of each building under the Leadership in Energy |
207 | and Environmental Design rating program, or the development is |
208 | registered by an alternate green building rating system that a |
209 | local government having jurisdiction finds appropriate, by |
210 | resolution. |
211 | (v)(u) Any development within a county with a research and |
212 | education authority created by special act and that is also |
213 | within a research and development park that is operated or |
214 | managed by a research and development authority pursuant to part |
215 | V of chapter 159 is exempt from this section. |
216 |
|
217 | If a use is exempt from review as a development of regional |
218 | impact under paragraphs (a)-(u) (a)-(t), but will be part of a |
219 | larger project that is subject to review as a development of |
220 | regional impact, the impact of the exempt use must be included |
221 | in the review of the larger project. |
222 | Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2008. |