Florida Senate - 2009 SB 1102
By Senator Storms
10-00193-09 20091102__
1 A bill to be entitled
2 An act relating to real property assessments; amending
3 s. 194.301, F.S.; revising the burden of proof in
4 challenges to the property appraiser's assessment of
5 just value; deleting the presumption of correctness
6 and placing the burden of proof on the appraiser;
7 providing an effective date.
8
9 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
10
11 Section 1. Section 194.301, Florida Statutes, is amended to
12 read:
13 194.301 Ad valorem tax assessment; burden of proof
14 presumption of correctness.—In an any administrative or judicial
15 action in which a taxpayer challenges an ad valorem tax
16 assessment of just value, the property appraiser has the burden
17 of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his or her
18 assessment complies with s. 193.011 and professionally accepted
19 appraisal practices appraiser's assessment shall be presumed
20 correct. This presumption of correctness is lost if the taxpayer
21 shows by a preponderance of the evidence that either the
22 property appraiser has failed to consider properly the criteria
23 in s. 193.011 or if the property appraiser's assessment is
24 arbitrarily based on appraisal practices which are different
25 from the appraisal practices generally applied by the property
26 appraiser to comparable property within the same class and
27 within the same county. If the presumption of correctness is
28 lost, the taxpayer shall have the burden of proving by a
29 preponderance of the evidence that the appraiser's assessment is
30 in excess of just value. If the presumption of correctness is
31 retained, the taxpayer shall have the burden of proving by clear
32 and convincing evidence that the appraiser's assessment is in
33 excess of just value. In no case shall the taxpayer have the
34 burden of proving that the property appraiser's assessment is
35 not supported by any reasonable hypothesis of a legal
36 assessment. If the property appraiser fails to meet the burden
37 of proof or the appraiser's assessment is determined to be
38 erroneous, the value adjustment board or the court may can
39 establish the assessment if there is exists competent,
40 substantial evidence in the record, which cumulatively meets the
41 requirements of s. 193.011. If the record lacks competent,
42 substantial evidence meeting the just value criteria of s.
43 193.011, the matter shall be remanded to the property appraiser
44 with appropriate directions from the value adjustment board or
45 the court.
46 Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2009.