Florida Senate - 2009 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT
Bill No. SB 160
Barcode 183722
LEGISLATIVE ACTION
Senate . House
Comm: RCS .
02/18/2009 .
.
.
.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
The Committee on Criminal Justice (Deutch) recommended the
following:
1 Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
2
3 Delete lines 60 - 102
4 and insert:
5 (2) For purposes of this section, the “sanctioning
6 authority of an independent youth athletic team” includes the
7 independent organization with authority to sanction an
8 independent youth athletic team, any local office of that
9 organization, and any office or entity that is authorized by
10 that organization to perform any of its functions or represent
11 its interests.
12 (3)(a) Prior to a person in this state being hired as a
13 sports coach of an independent youth athletic team, the
14 sanctioning authority of the independent youth athletic team
15 must screen the person through the public website on sexual
16 offenders and sexual predators maintained by the Department of
17 Law Enforcement and the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public
18 Website maintained by the United States Department of Justice.
19 (b) The sanctioning authority shall disqualify an applicant
20 for sports coach from being a sports coach if the applicant
21 appears on either registry.
22 (c) The sanctioning authority must notify in writing each
23 applicant for sports coach of his or her right to obtain a copy
24 of the screening report. An applicant disqualified to be a
25 sports coach based on the screening may appeal to the
26 sanctioning authority the accuracy and completeness of any
27 information contained in the screening report. Unless otherwise
28 prohibited by state or federal law, an applicant appealing his
29 or her disqualification as a sports coach may be placed on
30 probationary status pending resolution of the appeal.
31 (4) Each sanctioning authority must sign an affidavit
32 annually, under penalty of perjury, stating that all persons who
33 have applied for a position as a sports coach of an independent
34 youth athletic team under its jurisdiction have been screened in
35 compliance with subsection (3).
36 (5) In any civil action brought against a sanctioning
37 authority in which it is alleged that the sanctioning authority
38 was negligent in the hiring of a sports coach because of sexual
39 misconduct committed by the sports coach, a rebuttable
40 presumption is created that the sanctioning authority was:
41 (a) Not negligent in the hiring of the sports coach if the
42 sanctioning authority conducted a screening of the sports coach
43 in compliance with subsection (3).
44 (b) Negligent in hiring of the sports coach if the
45 sanctioning authority did not conduct a screening of the sports
46 coach in compliance with subsection (3).
47
48 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================
49 And the title is amended as follows:
50 Delete lines 3 - 30
51 and insert:
52 defining the terms “independent youth athletic team,” “minor,”
53 and “sports coach”; specifying what is included as a
54 “sanctioning authority of an independent youth athletic team”;
55 requiring the sanctioning authority of an independent youth
56 athletic team to an applicant for sports coach through
57 designated public websites maintained by the Department of Law
58 Enforcement and the United States Department of Justice;
59 requiring the sanctioning authority to disqualify any applicant
60 from being a sports coach if that applicant appears on either
61 registry; requiring the sanctioning authority to notify the
62 applicant of his or her right to obtain a copy of the screening
63 report; providing that an applicant disqualified from being a
64 sports coach based on the screening may appeal to the
65 sanctioning authority the accuracy and completeness of the
66 screening report; providing that the sanctioning authority may
67 place an applicant appealing his or her disqualification as a
68 sports coach on probationary status pending resolution of the
69 appeal; requiring each sanctioning authority to sign an
70 affidavit annually, under penalty of perjury, stating that all
71 persons who have applied for a position as a sports coach of an
72 independent youth athletic team under its jurisdiction have been
73 screened; creating rebuttable presumptions in a civil action
74 brought against a sanctioning authority in which it is alleged
75 that the sanctioning authority was negligent in the hiring of a
76 sports coach because of sexual misconduct committed by the
77 sports coach; providing legislative intent encouraging