Florida Senate - 2009 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. SB 160 Barcode 183722 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House Comm: RCS . 02/18/2009 . . . . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— The Committee on Criminal Justice (Deutch) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment (with title amendment) 2 3 Delete lines 60 - 102 4 and insert: 5 (2) For purposes of this section, the “sanctioning 6 authority of an independent youth athletic team” includes the 7 independent organization with authority to sanction an 8 independent youth athletic team, any local office of that 9 organization, and any office or entity that is authorized by 10 that organization to perform any of its functions or represent 11 its interests. 12 (3)(a) Prior to a person in this state being hired as a 13 sports coach of an independent youth athletic team, the 14 sanctioning authority of the independent youth athletic team 15 must screen the person through the public website on sexual 16 offenders and sexual predators maintained by the Department of 17 Law Enforcement and the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public 18 Website maintained by the United States Department of Justice. 19 (b) The sanctioning authority shall disqualify an applicant 20 for sports coach from being a sports coach if the applicant 21 appears on either registry. 22 (c) The sanctioning authority must notify in writing each 23 applicant for sports coach of his or her right to obtain a copy 24 of the screening report. An applicant disqualified to be a 25 sports coach based on the screening may appeal to the 26 sanctioning authority the accuracy and completeness of any 27 information contained in the screening report. Unless otherwise 28 prohibited by state or federal law, an applicant appealing his 29 or her disqualification as a sports coach may be placed on 30 probationary status pending resolution of the appeal. 31 (4) Each sanctioning authority must sign an affidavit 32 annually, under penalty of perjury, stating that all persons who 33 have applied for a position as a sports coach of an independent 34 youth athletic team under its jurisdiction have been screened in 35 compliance with subsection (3). 36 (5) In any civil action brought against a sanctioning 37 authority in which it is alleged that the sanctioning authority 38 was negligent in the hiring of a sports coach because of sexual 39 misconduct committed by the sports coach, a rebuttable 40 presumption is created that the sanctioning authority was: 41 (a) Not negligent in the hiring of the sports coach if the 42 sanctioning authority conducted a screening of the sports coach 43 in compliance with subsection (3). 44 (b) Negligent in hiring of the sports coach if the 45 sanctioning authority did not conduct a screening of the sports 46 coach in compliance with subsection (3). 47 48 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 49 And the title is amended as follows: 50 Delete lines 3 - 30 51 and insert: 52 defining the terms “independent youth athletic team,” “minor,” 53 and “sports coach”; specifying what is included as a 54 “sanctioning authority of an independent youth athletic team”; 55 requiring the sanctioning authority of an independent youth 56 athletic team to an applicant for sports coach through 57 designated public websites maintained by the Department of Law 58 Enforcement and the United States Department of Justice; 59 requiring the sanctioning authority to disqualify any applicant 60 from being a sports coach if that applicant appears on either 61 registry; requiring the sanctioning authority to notify the 62 applicant of his or her right to obtain a copy of the screening 63 report; providing that an applicant disqualified from being a 64 sports coach based on the screening may appeal to the 65 sanctioning authority the accuracy and completeness of the 66 screening report; providing that the sanctioning authority may 67 place an applicant appealing his or her disqualification as a 68 sports coach on probationary status pending resolution of the 69 appeal; requiring each sanctioning authority to sign an 70 affidavit annually, under penalty of perjury, stating that all 71 persons who have applied for a position as a sports coach of an 72 independent youth athletic team under its jurisdiction have been 73 screened; creating rebuttable presumptions in a civil action 74 brought against a sanctioning authority in which it is alleged 75 that the sanctioning authority was negligent in the hiring of a 76 sports coach because of sexual misconduct committed by the 77 sports coach; providing legislative intent encouraging