1 | Representative Precourt offered the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Amendment to Amendment (210765) (with directory and title |
4 | amendments) |
5 | Between lines 538-539, insert: |
6 | (12) A development of regional impact may satisfy the |
7 | transportation concurrency requirements of the local |
8 | comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency |
9 | management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate- |
10 | share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic |
11 | impacts, if: |
12 | (a) The development of regional impact which, based on its |
13 | location or mix of land uses, is designed to encourage |
14 | pedestrian or other nonautomotive modes of transportation; |
15 | (b) The proportionate-share contribution for local and |
16 | regionally significant traffic impacts is sufficient to pay for |
17 | one or more required mobility improvements that will benefit a |
18 | regionally significant transportation facility; |
19 | (c) The owner and developer of the development of regional |
20 | impact pays or assures payment of the proportionate-share |
21 | contribution; and |
22 | (d) If the regionally significant transportation facility |
23 | to be constructed or improved is under the maintenance authority |
24 | of a governmental entity, as defined by s. 334.03(12), other |
25 | than the local government with jurisdiction over the development |
26 | of regional impact, the developer is required to enter into a |
27 | binding and legally enforceable commitment to transfer funds to |
28 | the governmental entity having maintenance authority or to |
29 | otherwise assure construction or improvement of the facility. |
30 |
|
31 | The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any |
32 | transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this |
33 | subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the |
34 | purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate- |
35 | share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative |
36 | number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach |
37 | roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a |
38 | stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak |
39 | hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from |
40 | construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted |
41 | level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the |
42 | time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to |
43 | maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this |
44 | subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of |
45 | the improvement. The cost of any improvements to a regionally |
46 | significant transportation facility constructed by the owner or |
47 | developer of the development of regional impact, including the |
48 | costs associated with accommodating a transit facility within |
49 | the development of regional impact which is in a county's or the |
50 | Department of Transportation's long range plan, shall be |
51 | credited against a development of regional impact's |
52 | proportionate-share contribution. Proportionate-share mitigation |
53 | shall be limited to ensure that a development of regional impact |
54 | meeting the requirements of this subsection mitigates its impact |
55 | on the transportation system but is not responsible for the |
56 | additional cost of reducing or eliminating backlogs. This |
57 | subsection also applies to Florida Quality Developments pursuant |
58 | to s. 380.061 and to detailed specific area plans implementing |
59 | optional sector plans pursuant to s. 163.3245. |
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 | ----------------------------------------------------- |
65 | D I R E C T O R Y A M E N D M E N T |
66 | Remove lines 356 and insert: |
67 | Section 3. Subsections (5), (10), and (12), and paragraphs |
68 | (b) |
69 |
|
70 |
|
71 | ----------------------------------------------------- |
72 | T I T L E A M E N D M E N T |
73 | Remove lines 1293 and insert: |
74 | circumstances; providing for crediting the costs of |
75 | improvements to certain regionally significant transportation |
76 | facilities against a development of regional impact's |
77 | proportionate-share contribution; revising school concurrency |
78 | requirements; |
79 |
|