1 | Representative Precourt offered the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Amendment to Amendment (210765) (with directory and title |
4 | amendments) |
5 | Between lines 569-570, insert: |
6 | (12) A development of regional impact satisfies may |
7 | satisfy the transportation concurrency requirements of the local |
8 | comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency |
9 | management system, and s. 380.06 by paying payment of a |
10 | proportionate-share contribution for local and regionally |
11 | significant traffic impacts, if: |
12 | (a) The development of regional impact which, based on its |
13 | location or mix of land uses, is designed to encourage |
14 | pedestrian or other nonautomotive modes of transportation; |
15 | (b) The proportionate-share contribution for local and |
16 | regionally significant traffic impacts is sufficient to pay for |
17 | one or more required mobility improvements that will benefit the |
18 | network of a regionally significant transportation facilities |
19 | facility; |
20 | (c) The owner and developer of the development of regional |
21 | impact pays or assures payment of the proportionate-share |
22 | contribution to the local government having jurisdiction over |
23 | the development of regional impact; and |
24 | (d) If the regionally significant transportation facility |
25 | to be constructed or improved is under the maintenance authority |
26 | of a governmental entity, as defined by s. 334.03(12), other |
27 | than the local government with jurisdiction over the development |
28 | of regional impact, the local government having jurisdiction |
29 | over the development of regional impact must developer is |
30 | required to enter into a binding and legally enforceable |
31 | commitment to transfer funds to the governmental entity having |
32 | maintenance authority or to otherwise assure construction or |
33 | improvement of a the facility reasonably related to the mobility |
34 | demands created by the development. |
35 |
|
36 | The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any |
37 | transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this |
38 | subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the |
39 | purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate- |
40 | share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative |
41 | number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach |
42 | roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a |
43 | stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak |
44 | hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from |
45 | construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted |
46 | level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the |
47 | time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to |
48 | maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this |
49 | subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of |
50 | the improvement. Proportionate-share mitigation shall be limited |
51 | to ensure that a development of regional impact meeting the |
52 | requirements of this subsection mitigates its impact on the |
53 | transportation system but is not responsible for the additional |
54 | cost of reducing or eliminating backlogs. This subsection also |
55 | applies to Florida Quality Developments pursuant to s. 380.061 |
56 | and to detailed specific area plans implementing optional sector |
57 | plans pursuant to s. 163.3245. |
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 | ----------------------------------------------------- |
63 | D I R E C T O R Y A M E N D M E N T |
64 | Remove lines 356 and insert: |
65 | Section 3. Subsections (5), (10), and (12) and paragraphs |
66 | (b) |
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 | ----------------------------------------------------- |
70 | T I T L E A M E N D M E N T |
71 | Remove lines 1293 and insert: |
72 | circumstances; revising development of regional impact |
73 | concurrency requirements; revising school concurrency |
74 | requirements; |
75 |
|