1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to growth management; amending s. |
3 | 163.3164, F.S.; revising the definition of the term |
4 | "existing urban service area"; providing a definition for |
5 | the term "dense urban land area" and providing |
6 | requirements of the Office of Economic and Demographic |
7 | Research and the state land planning agency with respect |
8 | thereto; amending s. 163.3177, F.S.; revising requirements |
9 | for adopting amendments to the capital improvements |
10 | element of a local comprehensive plan; revising |
11 | requirements for future land use plan elements and |
12 | intergovernmental coordination elements of a local |
13 | comprehensive plan; revising requirements for the public |
14 | school facilities element implementing a school |
15 | concurrency program; deleting a penalty for local |
16 | governments that fail to adopt a public school facilities |
17 | element and interlocal agreement; authorizing the |
18 | Administration Commission to impose sanctions; amending s. |
19 | 163.3180, F.S.; revising concurrency requirements; |
20 | providing legislative findings relating to transportation |
21 | concurrency exception areas; providing for the |
22 | applicability of transportation concurrency exception |
23 | areas; deleting certain requirements for transportation |
24 | concurrency exception areas; providing that the |
25 | designation of a transportation concurrency exception area |
26 | does not limit a local government's home rule power to |
27 | adopt ordinances or impose fees and does not affect any |
28 | contract or agreement entered into or development order |
29 | rendered before such designation; requiring the Office of |
30 | Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability to |
31 | submit a report to the Legislature concerning the effects |
32 | of the transportation concurrency exception areas; |
33 | authorizing local governments to provide for a waiver of |
34 | transportation concurrency requirements for certain |
35 | projects under certain circumstances; revising school |
36 | concurrency requirements; requiring charter schools to be |
37 | considered as a mitigation option under certain |
38 | circumstances; amending s. 163.31801, F.S.; revising |
39 | requirements for adoption of impact fees; creating s. |
40 | 163.31802, F.S.; prohibiting establishment of local |
41 | standards for security devices requiring businesses to |
42 | expend funds to enhance local governmental services or |
43 | functions under certain circumstances; amending s. |
44 | 163.3184, F.S.; authorizing local governments to use an |
45 | alternative state review process for certain comprehensive |
46 | plan amendments or amendment packages; providing |
47 | requirements; amending s. 163.3187, F.S.; exempting |
48 | certain additional comprehensive plan amendments from the |
49 | twice-per-year limitation; amending s. 163.3245, F.S.; |
50 | expanding the number of local governments eligible to |
51 | adopt optional sector plans into their comprehensive |
52 | plans; amending s. 163.3246, F.S.; specifying certain |
53 | counties and municipalities as certified under the local |
54 | government comprehensive planning certification program; |
55 | providing duties and responsibilities of the Office of |
56 | Economic and Demographic Research; providing certification |
57 | requirements; requiring such local governments to submit |
58 | monitoring reports; providing report requirements; |
59 | deleting a reporting requirement for the Office of Program |
60 | Policy Analysis and Government Accountability; amending s. |
61 | 163.32465, F.S.; providing for an alternative state review |
62 | process for local comprehensive plan amendments; providing |
63 | requirements, procedures, and limitations for exemptions |
64 | from state review of comprehensive plans; making permanent |
65 | and applying statewide an alternative state review |
66 | process; revising the requirements, procedures, and |
67 | limitations for the alternate state review process; |
68 | requiring that agencies submit comments within a specified |
69 | period after the state land planning agency notifies the |
70 | local government that the plan amendment package is |
71 | complete; requiring that the local government adopt a plan |
72 | amendment within a specified period after comments are |
73 | received; authorizing the state land planning agency to |
74 | adopt rules and submit certain reports; deleting |
75 | provisions relating to reporting requirements for the |
76 | Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government |
77 | Accountability; deleting pilot program provisions; |
78 | amending s. 171.091, F.S.; requiring that a municipality |
79 | submit a copy of any revision to the charter boundary |
80 | article which results from an annexation or contraction to |
81 | the Office of Economic and Demographic Research; amending |
82 | s. 186.509, F.S.; revising provisions relating to a |
83 | dispute resolution process to reconcile differences on |
84 | planning and growth management issues between certain |
85 | parties of interest; providing for mandatory mediation; |
86 | amending s. 380.06, F.S.; providing exemptions for dense |
87 | urban land areas from the development-of-regional-impact |
88 | program; providing exceptions; providing legislative |
89 | findings and determinations relating to replacing the |
90 | transportation concurrency system with a mobility fee |
91 | system; requiring the state land planning agency and the |
92 | Department of Transportation to study and develop a |
93 | methodology for a mobility fee system; specifying |
94 | criteria; requiring joint reports to the Legislature; |
95 | specifying report requirements; providing for extending |
96 | certain permits, orders, or land use applications due to |
97 | expire; prohibiting issuance of new permits, order, or |
98 | land use applications under certain circumstances; |
99 | providing for application of the extension to certain |
100 | related activities; specifying nonapplication to certain |
101 | permits or approvals by the Federal Government or certain |
102 | permits in water-use caution areas; preserving the |
103 | authority of counties and municipalities to impose certain |
104 | security and sanitary requirements on property owners |
105 | under certain circumstances; requiring permitholders to |
106 | notify permitting agencies of intent to use the extension; |
107 | providing a legislative declaration of important state |
108 | interest; providing effective dates. |
109 |
|
110 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
111 |
|
112 | Section 1. Subsection (29) of section 163.3164, Florida |
113 | Statutes, is amended, and subsection (34) is added to that |
114 | section, to read: |
115 | 163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land |
116 | Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act: |
117 | (29) "Existing Urban service area" means built-up areas |
118 | where public facilities and services, including, but not limited |
119 | to, central water and sewer capacity such as sewage treatment |
120 | systems, roads, schools, and recreation areas, are already in |
121 | place. In addition, for counties that qualify as dense urban |
122 | land areas under subsection (34), the nonrural area of a county |
123 | which has adopted into the county charter a rural area |
124 | designation or areas identified in the comprehensive plan as |
125 | urban service areas or urban growth boundaries on or before July |
126 | 1, 2009, are also urban service areas under this definition. |
127 | (34) "Dense urban land area" means: |
128 | (a) A municipality that has an average of at least 1,000 |
129 | people per square mile of land area and a minimum total |
130 | population of at least 5,000; |
131 | (b) A county, including the municipalities located |
132 | therein, which has an average of at least 1,000 people per |
133 | square mile of land area; or |
134 | (c) A county, including the municipalities located |
135 | therein, which has a population of at least 1 million. |
136 |
|
137 | The Office of Economic and Demographic Research within the |
138 | Legislature shall annually calculate the population and density |
139 | criteria needed to determine which jurisdictions qualify as |
140 | dense urban land areas by using the most recent land area data |
141 | from the decennial census conducted by the Bureau of the Census |
142 | of the United States Department of Commerce and the latest |
143 | available population estimates determined pursuant to s. |
144 | 186.901. If any local government has had an annexation, |
145 | contraction, or new incorporation, the Office of Economic and |
146 | Demographic Research shall determine the population density |
147 | using the new jurisdictional boundaries as recorded in |
148 | accordance with s. 171.091. The Office of Economic and |
149 | Demographic Research shall submit to the state land planning |
150 | agency a list of jurisdictions that meet the total population |
151 | and density criteria necessary for designation as a dense urban |
152 | land area by July 1, 2009, and every year thereafter. The state |
153 | land planning agency shall publish the list of jurisdictions on |
154 | its Internet website within 7 days after the list is received. |
155 | The designation of jurisdictions that qualify or do not qualify |
156 | as a dense urban land area is effective upon publication on the |
157 | state land planning agency's Internet website. |
158 | Section 2. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of subsection (3), |
159 | paragraphs (a) and (h) of subsection (6), and paragraphs (a), |
160 | (j), and (k) of subsection (12) of section 163.3177, Florida |
161 | Statutes, are amended, and paragraph (f) is added to subsection |
162 | (3) of that section, to read: |
163 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
164 | plan; studies and surveys.-- |
165 | (3) |
166 | (b)1. The capital improvements element must be reviewed on |
167 | an annual basis and modified as necessary in accordance with s. |
168 | 163.3187 or s. 163.3189 in order to maintain a financially |
169 | feasible 5-year schedule of capital improvements. Corrections |
170 | and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or |
171 | acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are |
172 | consistent with the plan may be accomplished by ordinance and |
173 | shall not be deemed to be amendments to the local comprehensive |
174 | plan. A copy of the ordinance shall be transmitted to the state |
175 | land planning agency. An amendment to the comprehensive plan is |
176 | required to update the schedule on an annual basis or to |
177 | eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for any facility |
178 | listed in the 5-year schedule. All public facilities must be |
179 | consistent with the capital improvements element. The annual |
180 | update to the capital improvements element of the comprehensive |
181 | plan need not comply with the financial feasibility requirement |
182 | until December 1, 2011. Amendments to implement this section |
183 | must be adopted and transmitted no later than December 1, 2008. |
184 | Thereafter, a local government may not amend its future land use |
185 | map, except for plan amendments to meet new requirements under |
186 | this part and emergency amendments pursuant to s. |
187 | 163.3187(1)(a), after December 1, 2011 2008, and every year |
188 | thereafter, unless and until the local government has adopted |
189 | the annual update and it has been transmitted to the state land |
190 | planning agency. |
191 | 2. Capital improvements element amendments adopted after |
192 | the effective date of this act shall require only a single |
193 | public hearing before the governing board which shall be an |
194 | adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(7). Such amendments |
195 | are not subject to the requirements of s. 163.3184(3)-(6). |
196 | (c) If the local government does not adopt the required |
197 | annual update to the schedule of capital improvements, the state |
198 | land planning agency may issue a notice to the local government |
199 | to show cause why sanctions should not be enforced for failure |
200 | to submit the annual update and may must notify the |
201 | Administration Commission. A local government that has a |
202 | demonstrated lack of commitment to meeting its obligations |
203 | identified in the capital improvements element may be subject to |
204 | sanctions by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. |
205 | 163.3184(11). |
206 | (f) A local government that has designated a |
207 | transportation concurrency exception area in its comprehensive |
208 | plan pursuant to s. 163.3180(5) shall be deemed to meet the |
209 | requirement to achieve and maintain level-of-service standards |
210 | if the capital improvements element and, as appropriate, the |
211 | capital improvements schedule include any capital improvements |
212 | planned within the scheduled timeframe based upon the strategies |
213 | adopted in the plan to promote mobility. |
214 | (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5) |
215 | and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following |
216 | elements: |
217 | (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed |
218 | future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of |
219 | land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, |
220 | agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public |
221 | buildings and grounds, other public facilities, and other |
222 | categories of the public and private uses of land. Counties are |
223 | encouraged to designate rural land stewardship areas, pursuant |
224 | to the provisions of paragraph (11)(d), as overlays on the |
225 | future land use map. Each future land use category must be |
226 | defined in terms of uses included, and must include standards to |
227 | be followed in the control and distribution of population |
228 | densities and building and structure intensities. The proposed |
229 | distribution, location, and extent of the various categories of |
230 | land use shall be shown on a land use map or map series which |
231 | shall be supplemented by goals, policies, and measurable |
232 | objectives. The future land use plan shall be based upon |
233 | surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, including the |
234 | amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth; the |
235 | projected population of the area; the character of undeveloped |
236 | land; the availability of water supplies, public facilities, and |
237 | services; the need for redevelopment, including the renewal of |
238 | blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which |
239 | are inconsistent with the character of the community; the |
240 | compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate |
241 | to military installations; the discouragement of urban sprawl; |
242 | energy-efficient land use patterns accounting for existing and |
243 | future electric power generation and transmission systems; |
244 | greenhouse gas reduction strategies; and, in rural communities, |
245 | the need for job creation, capital investment, and economic |
246 | development that will strengthen and diversify the community's |
247 | economy. The future land use plan may designate areas for future |
248 | planned development use involving combinations of types of uses |
249 | for which special regulations may be necessary to ensure |
250 | development in accord with the principles and standards of the |
251 | comprehensive plan and this act. The future land use plan |
252 | element shall include criteria to be used to achieve the |
253 | compatibility of adjacent or closely proximate lands with |
254 | military installations. In addition, for rural communities and |
255 | counties designated as a rural area of critical economic concern |
256 | pursuant to s. 288.0656, the amount of land designated for |
257 | future planned industrial use shall be based upon surveys and |
258 | studies that reflect the need for job creation, capital |
259 | investment, and the necessity to strengthen and diversify the |
260 | local economies, and shall not be limited solely by the |
261 | projected population of the rural community. The future land use |
262 | plan of a county may also designate areas for possible future |
263 | municipal incorporation or new municipalities which shall not be |
264 | limited by the projected population of the county. The land use |
265 | maps or map series shall generally identify and depict historic |
266 | district boundaries and shall designate historically significant |
267 | properties meriting protection. For coastal counties, the future |
268 | land use element must include, without limitation, regulatory |
269 | incentives and criteria that encourage the preservation of |
270 | recreational and commercial working waterfronts as defined in s. |
271 | 342.07. The future land use element must clearly identify the |
272 | land use categories in which public schools are an allowable |
273 | use. When delineating the land use categories in which public |
274 | schools are an allowable use, a local government shall include |
275 | in the categories sufficient land proximate to residential |
276 | development to meet the projected needs for schools in |
277 | coordination with public school boards and may establish |
278 | differing criteria for schools of different type or size. Each |
279 | local government shall include lands contiguous to existing |
280 | school sites, to the maximum extent possible, within the land |
281 | use categories in which public schools are an allowable use. The |
282 | failure by a local government to comply with these school siting |
283 | requirements will result in the prohibition of the local |
284 | government's ability to amend the local comprehensive plan, |
285 | except for plan amendments described in s. 163.3187(1)(b), until |
286 | the school siting requirements are met. Amendments proposed by a |
287 | local government for purposes of identifying the land use |
288 | categories in which public schools are an allowable use are |
289 | exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments |
290 | contained in s. 163.3187. The future land use element shall |
291 | include criteria that encourage the location of schools |
292 | proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible and |
293 | shall require that the local government seek to collocate public |
294 | facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, |
295 | with schools to the extent possible and to encourage the use of |
296 | elementary schools as focal points for neighborhoods. For |
297 | schools serving predominantly rural counties, defined as a |
298 | county with a population of 100,000 or fewer, an agricultural |
299 | land use category shall be eligible for the location of public |
300 | school facilities if the local comprehensive plan contains |
301 | school siting criteria and the location is consistent with such |
302 | criteria. Local governments required to update or amend their |
303 | comprehensive plan to include criteria and address compatibility |
304 | of adjacent or closely proximate lands with existing military |
305 | installations in their future land use plan element shall |
306 | transmit the update or amendment to the department by June 30, |
307 | 2006. |
308 | (h)1. An intergovernmental coordination element showing |
309 | relationships and stating principles and guidelines to be used |
310 | in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted |
311 | comprehensive plan with the plans of school boards, regional |
312 | water supply authorities, and other units of local government |
313 | providing services but not having regulatory authority over the |
314 | use of land, with the comprehensive plans of adjacent |
315 | municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region, |
316 | with the state comprehensive plan and with the applicable |
317 | regional water supply plan approved pursuant to s. 373.0361, as |
318 | the case may require and as such adopted plans or plans in |
319 | preparation may exist. This element of the local comprehensive |
320 | plan shall demonstrate consideration of the particular effects |
321 | of the local plan, when adopted, upon the development of |
322 | adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the |
323 | region, or upon the state comprehensive plan, as the case may |
324 | require. |
325 | a. The intergovernmental coordination element shall |
326 | provide for procedures to identify and implement joint planning |
327 | areas, especially for the purpose of annexation, municipal |
328 | incorporation, and joint infrastructure service areas. |
329 | b. The intergovernmental coordination element shall |
330 | provide for recognition of campus master plans prepared pursuant |
331 | to s. 1013.30. |
332 | c. The intergovernmental coordination element shall may |
333 | provide for a voluntary dispute resolution process as |
334 | established pursuant to s. 186.509 for bringing to closure in a |
335 | timely manner intergovernmental disputes. A local government may |
336 | develop and use an alternative local dispute resolution process |
337 | for this purpose. |
338 | 2. The intergovernmental coordination element shall |
339 | further state principles and guidelines to be used in the |
340 | accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan |
341 | with the plans of school boards and other units of local |
342 | government providing facilities and services but not having |
343 | regulatory authority over the use of land. In addition, the |
344 | intergovernmental coordination element shall describe joint |
345 | processes for collaborative planning and decisionmaking on |
346 | population projections and public school siting, the location |
347 | and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency, and |
348 | siting facilities with countywide significance, including |
349 | locally unwanted land uses whose nature and identity are |
350 | established in an agreement. Within 1 year of adopting their |
351 | intergovernmental coordination elements, each county, all the |
352 | municipalities within that county, the district school board, |
353 | and any unit of local government service providers in that |
354 | county shall establish by interlocal or other formal agreement |
355 | executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described |
356 | in this subparagraph consistent with their adopted |
357 | intergovernmental coordination elements. |
358 | 3. To foster coordination between special districts and |
359 | local general-purpose governments as local general-purpose |
360 | governments implement local comprehensive plans, each |
361 | independent special district must submit a public facilities |
362 | report to the appropriate local government as required by s. |
363 | 189.415. |
364 | 4.a. Local governments must execute an interlocal |
365 | agreement with the district school board, the county, and |
366 | nonexempt municipalities pursuant to s. 163.31777. The local |
367 | government shall amend the intergovernmental coordination |
368 | element to provide that coordination between the local |
369 | government and school board is pursuant to the agreement and |
370 | shall state the obligations of the local government under the |
371 | agreement. |
372 | b. Plan amendments that comply with this subparagraph are |
373 | exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). |
374 | 5. The state land planning agency shall establish a |
375 | schedule for phased completion and transmittal of plan |
376 | amendments to implement subparagraphs 1., 2., and 3. from all |
377 | jurisdictions so as to accomplish their adoption by December 31, |
378 | 1999. A local government may complete and transmit its plan |
379 | amendments to carry out these provisions prior to the scheduled |
380 | date established by the state land planning agency. The plan |
381 | amendments are exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). |
382 | 6. By January 1, 2004, any county having a population |
383 | greater than 100,000, and the municipalities and special |
384 | districts within that county, shall submit a report to the |
385 | Department of Community Affairs which: |
386 | a. Identifies all existing or proposed interlocal service |
387 | delivery agreements regarding the following: education; sanitary |
388 | sewer; public safety; solid waste; drainage; potable water; |
389 | parks and recreation; and transportation facilities. |
390 | b. Identifies any deficits or duplication in the provision |
391 | of services within its jurisdiction, whether capital or |
392 | operational. Upon request, the Department of Community Affairs |
393 | shall provide technical assistance to the local governments in |
394 | identifying deficits or duplication. |
395 | 7. Within 6 months after submission of the report, the |
396 | Department of Community Affairs shall, through the appropriate |
397 | regional planning council, coordinate a meeting of all local |
398 | governments within the regional planning area to discuss the |
399 | reports and potential strategies to remedy any identified |
400 | deficiencies or duplications. |
401 | 8. Each local government shall update its |
402 | intergovernmental coordination element based upon the findings |
403 | in the report submitted pursuant to subparagraph 6. The report |
404 | may be used as supporting data and analysis for the |
405 | intergovernmental coordination element. |
406 | (12) A public school facilities element adopted to |
407 | implement a school concurrency program shall meet the |
408 | requirements of this subsection. Each county and each |
409 | municipality within the county, unless exempt or subject to a |
410 | waiver, must adopt a public school facilities element that is |
411 | consistent with those adopted by the other local governments |
412 | within the county and enter the interlocal agreement pursuant to |
413 | s. 163.31777. |
414 | (a) The state land planning agency may provide a waiver to |
415 | a county and to the municipalities within the county if the |
416 | capacity rate for all schools within the school district is no |
417 | greater than 100 percent and the projected 5-year capital outlay |
418 | full-time equivalent student growth rate is less than 10 |
419 | percent. The state land planning agency may allow for a |
420 | projected 5-year capital outlay full-time equivalent student |
421 | growth rate to exceed 10 percent when the projected 10-year |
422 | capital outlay full-time equivalent student enrollment is less |
423 | than 2,000 students and the capacity rate for all schools within |
424 | the school district in the tenth year will not exceed the 100- |
425 | percent limitation. The state land planning agency may allow for |
426 | a single school to exceed the 100-percent limitation if it can |
427 | be demonstrated that the capacity rate for that single school is |
428 | not greater than 105 percent. In making this determination, the |
429 | state land planning agency shall consider the following |
430 | criteria: |
431 | 1. Whether the exceedance is due to temporary |
432 | circumstances; |
433 | 2. Whether the projected 5-year capital outlay full time |
434 | equivalent student growth rate for the school district is |
435 | approaching the 10-percent threshold; |
436 | 3. Whether one or more additional schools within the |
437 | school district are at or approaching the 100-percent threshold; |
438 | and |
439 | 4. The adequacy of the data and analysis submitted to |
440 | support the waiver request. |
441 | (j) If a local government fails Failure to adopt the |
442 | public school facilities element, to enter into an approved |
443 | interlocal agreement as required by subparagraph (6)(h)2. and s. |
444 | 163.31777, or to amend the comprehensive plan as necessary to |
445 | implement school concurrency, according to the phased schedule, |
446 | shall result in a local government being prohibited from |
447 | adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan which increase |
448 | residential density until the necessary amendments have been |
449 | adopted and transmitted to the state land planning agency. |
450 | (k) the state land planning agency may issue the school |
451 | board a notice to the school board and the local government to |
452 | show cause why sanctions should not be enforced for such failure |
453 | to enter into an approved interlocal agreement as required by s. |
454 | 163.31777 or for failure to implement the provisions of this act |
455 | relating to public school concurrency. The school board may be |
456 | subject to sanctions imposed by the Administration Commission |
457 | directing the Department of Education to withhold from the |
458 | district school board an equivalent amount of funds for school |
459 | construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.65, 1013.68, |
460 | 1013.70, and 1013.72. The local government may be subject to |
461 | sanctions by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. |
462 | 163.3184(11). |
463 | Section 3. Subsections (5) and (10), and paragraph (e) of |
464 | subsection (13) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are |
465 | amended to read: |
466 | 163.3180 Concurrency.-- |
467 | (5)(a) The Legislature finds that under limited |
468 | circumstances dealing with transportation facilities, |
469 | countervailing planning and public policy goals may come into |
470 | conflict with the requirement that adequate public |
471 | transportation facilities and services be available concurrent |
472 | with the impacts of such development. The Legislature further |
473 | finds that often the unintended result of the concurrency |
474 | requirement for transportation facilities is often the |
475 | discouragement of urban infill development and redevelopment. |
476 | Such unintended results directly conflict with the goals and |
477 | policies of the state comprehensive plan and the intent of this |
478 | part. The Legislature also finds that in urban centers |
479 | transportation cannot be effectively managed and mobility cannot |
480 | be improved solely through the expansion of roadway capacity, |
481 | that the expansion of roadway capacity is not always physically |
482 | or financially possible, and that a range of transportation |
483 | alternatives are essential to satisfy mobility needs, reduce |
484 | congestion, and achieve healthy, vibrant centers. Therefore, |
485 | exceptions from the concurrency requirement for transportation |
486 | facilities may be granted as provided by this subsection. |
487 | (b)1. The following are transportation concurrency |
488 | exception areas: |
489 | a. A municipality that qualifies as a dense urban land |
490 | area under s. 163.3164; |
491 | b. An urban service area under s. 163.3164 that has been |
492 | adopted into the local comprehensive plan and is located within |
493 | a county that qualifies as a dense urban land area under s. |
494 | 163.3164, except a limited urban service area may not be |
495 | included as an urban service area unless the parcel is defined |
496 | as provided in s. 163.3164(33); and |
497 | c. A county, including the municipalities located therein, |
498 | which has a population of at least 900,000 and qualifies as a |
499 | dense urban land area under s. 163.3164, but does not have an |
500 | urban service area designated in the local comprehensive plan. |
501 | 2. A municipality that does not qualify as a dense urban |
502 | land area pursuant to s. 163.3164 may designate in its local |
503 | comprehensive plan the following areas as transportation |
504 | concurrency exception areas: |
505 | a. Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164; |
506 | b. Community redevelopment areas as defined in s. 163.340; |
507 | c. Downtown revitalization areas as defined in s. |
508 | 163.3164; |
509 | d. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or |
510 | e. Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164 or areas |
511 | within a designated urban service boundary under s. |
512 | 163.3177(14). |
513 | 3. A county that does not qualify as a dense urban land |
514 | area pursuant to s. 163.3164 may designate in its local |
515 | comprehensive plan the following areas as transportation |
516 | concurrency exception areas: |
517 | a. Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164; |
518 | b. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or |
519 | c. Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164. |
520 | 4. A local government that has a transportation |
521 | concurrency exception area designated pursuant to subparagraph |
522 | 1., subparagraph 2., or subparagraph 3. shall, within 2 years |
523 | after the designated area becomes exempt, adopt into its local |
524 | comprehensive plan land use and transportation strategies to |
525 | support and fund mobility within the exception area, including |
526 | alternative modes of transportation. Local governments are |
527 | encouraged to adopt complementary land use and transportation |
528 | strategies that reflect the region's shared vision for its |
529 | future. If the state land planning agency finds insufficient |
530 | cause for the failure to adopt into its comprehensive plan land |
531 | use and transportation strategies to support and fund mobility |
532 | within the designated exception area after 2 years, it shall |
533 | submit the finding to the Administration Commission, which may |
534 | impose any of the sanctions set forth in s. 163.3184(11)(a) and |
535 | (b) against the local government. |
536 | 5. Transportation concurrency exception areas designated |
537 | pursuant to subparagraph 1., subparagraph 2., or subparagraph 3. |
538 | do not apply to designated transportation concurrency districts |
539 | located within a county that has a population of at least 1.5 |
540 | million, has implemented and uses a transportation-related |
541 | concurrency assessment to support alternative modes of |
542 | transportation, including, but not limited to, mass transit, and |
543 | does not levy transportation impact fees within the concurrency |
544 | district. |
545 | 6. A local government that does not have a transportation |
546 | concurrency exception area designated pursuant to subparagraph |
547 | 1., subparagraph 2., or subparagraph 3. may grant an exception |
548 | from the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities |
549 | if the proposed development is otherwise consistent with the |
550 | adopted local government comprehensive plan and is a project |
551 | that promotes public transportation or is located within an area |
552 | designated in the comprehensive plan for: |
553 | a.1. Urban infill development; |
554 | b.2. Urban redevelopment; |
555 | c.3. Downtown revitalization; |
556 | d.4. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or |
557 | e.5. An urban service area specifically designated as a |
558 | transportation concurrency exception area which includes lands |
559 | appropriate for compact, contiguous urban development, which |
560 | does not exceed the amount of land needed to accommodate the |
561 | projected population growth at densities consistent with the |
562 | adopted comprehensive plan within the 10-year planning period, |
563 | and which is served or is planned to be served with public |
564 | facilities and services as provided by the capital improvements |
565 | element. |
566 | (c) The Legislature also finds that developments located |
567 | within urban infill, urban redevelopment, existing urban |
568 | service, or downtown revitalization areas or areas designated as |
569 | urban infill and redevelopment areas under s. 163.2517, which |
570 | pose only special part-time demands on the transportation |
571 | system, are exempt should be excepted from the concurrency |
572 | requirement for transportation facilities. A special part-time |
573 | demand is one that does not have more than 200 scheduled events |
574 | during any calendar year and does not affect the 100 highest |
575 | traffic volume hours. |
576 | (d) Except for transportation concurrency exception areas |
577 | designated pursuant to subparagraph (b)1., subparagraph (b)2., |
578 | or subparagraph (b)3., the following requirements apply: A local |
579 | government shall establish guidelines in the comprehensive plan |
580 | for granting the exceptions authorized in paragraphs (b) and (c) |
581 | and subsections (7) and (15) which must be consistent with and |
582 | support a comprehensive strategy adopted in the plan to promote |
583 | the purpose of the exceptions. |
584 | 1.(e) The local government shall both adopt into the |
585 | comprehensive plan and implement long-term strategies to support |
586 | and fund mobility within the designated exception area, |
587 | including alternative modes of transportation. The plan |
588 | amendment must also demonstrate how strategies will support the |
589 | purpose of the exception and how mobility within the designated |
590 | exception area will be provided. |
591 | 2. In addition, The strategies must address urban design; |
592 | appropriate land use mixes, including intensity and density; and |
593 | network connectivity plans needed to promote urban infill, |
594 | redevelopment, or downtown revitalization. The comprehensive |
595 | plan amendment designating the concurrency exception area must |
596 | be accompanied by data and analysis supporting the local |
597 | government's determination of the boundaries of the |
598 | transportation concurrency exception justifying the size of the |
599 | area. |
600 | (e)(f) Before designating Prior to the designation of a |
601 | concurrency exception area pursuant to subparagraph (b)6., the |
602 | state land planning agency and the Department of Transportation |
603 | shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact |
604 | that the proposed exception area is expected to have on the |
605 | adopted level-of-service standards established for regional |
606 | transportation facilities identified pursuant to s. 186.507, |
607 | including the Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined |
608 | in s. 339.64, and roadway facilities funded in accordance with |
609 | s. 339.2819. Further, the local government shall provide a plan |
610 | for the mitigation of, in consultation with the state land |
611 | planning agency and the Department of Transportation, develop a |
612 | plan to mitigate any impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System, |
613 | including, if appropriate, access management, parallel reliever |
614 | roads, transportation demand management, and other measures the |
615 | development of a long-term concurrency management system |
616 | pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). The exceptions |
617 | may be available only within the specific geographic area of the |
618 | jurisdiction designated in the plan. Pursuant to s. 163.3184, |
619 | any affected person may challenge a plan amendment establishing |
620 | these guidelines and the areas within which an exception could |
621 | be granted. |
622 | (g) Transportation concurrency exception areas existing |
623 | prior to July 1, 2005, must, at a minimum, meet the provisions |
624 | of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the time of the |
625 | comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and |
626 | appraisal report, whichever occurs last. |
627 | (f) The designation of a transportation concurrency |
628 | exception area does not limit a local government's home rule |
629 | power to adopt ordinances or impose fees. This subsection does |
630 | not affect any contract or agreement entered into or development |
631 | order rendered before the creation of the transportation |
632 | concurrency exception area except as provided in s. |
633 | 380.06(29)(e). |
634 | (g) The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government |
635 | Accountability shall submit to the President of the Senate and |
636 | the Speaker of the House of Representatives by February 1, 2015, |
637 | a report on transportation concurrency exception areas created |
638 | pursuant to this subsection. At a minimum, the report shall |
639 | address the methods that local governments have used to |
640 | implement and fund transportation strategies to achieve the |
641 | purposes of designated transportation concurrency exception |
642 | areas, and the effects of the strategies on mobility, |
643 | congestion, urban design, the density and intensity of land use |
644 | mixes, and network connectivity plans used to promote urban |
645 | infill, redevelopment, or downtown revitalization. |
646 | (10) Except in transportation concurrency exception areas, |
647 | with regard to roadway facilities on the Strategic Intermodal |
648 | System designated in accordance with s. ss. 339.61, 339.62, |
649 | 339.63 , and 339.64, the Florida Intrastate Highway System as |
650 | defined in s. 338.001, and roadway facilities funded in |
651 | accordance with s. 339.2819, local governments shall adopt the |
652 | level-of-service standard established by the Department of |
653 | Transportation by rule. However, if the Office of Tourism, |
654 | Trade, and Economic Development concurs in writing with the |
655 | local government that the proposed development is for a |
656 | qualified job creation project under s. 288.0656 or s. 403.973, |
657 | the affected local government, after consulting with the |
658 | Department of Transportation, may provide for a waiver of |
659 | transportation concurrency for the project. For all other roads |
660 | on the State Highway System, local governments shall establish |
661 | an adequate level-of-service standard that need not be |
662 | consistent with any level-of-service standard established by the |
663 | Department of Transportation. In establishing adequate level-of- |
664 | service standards for any arterial roads, or collector roads as |
665 | appropriate, which traverse multiple jurisdictions, local |
666 | governments shall consider compatibility with the roadway |
667 | facility's adopted level-of-service standards in adjacent |
668 | jurisdictions. Each local government within a county shall use a |
669 | professionally accepted methodology for measuring impacts on |
670 | transportation facilities for the purposes of implementing its |
671 | concurrency management system. Counties are encouraged to |
672 | coordinate with adjacent counties, and local governments within |
673 | a county are encouraged to coordinate, for the purpose of using |
674 | common methodologies for measuring impacts on transportation |
675 | facilities for the purpose of implementing their concurrency |
676 | management systems. |
677 | (13) School concurrency shall be established on a |
678 | districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the |
679 | district and all portions of the district, whether located in a |
680 | municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the |
681 | public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12). |
682 | The application of school concurrency to development shall be |
683 | based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local |
684 | governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph |
685 | (f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency |
686 | the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal |
687 | agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163.3184(7) |
688 | and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the |
689 | following: |
690 | (e) Availability standard.--Consistent with the public |
691 | welfare, a local government may not deny an application for site |
692 | plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent |
693 | for a development or phase of a development authorizing |
694 | residential development for failure to achieve and maintain the |
695 | level-of-service standard for public school capacity in a local |
696 | school concurrency management system where adequate school |
697 | facilities will be in place or under actual construction within |
698 | 3 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan |
699 | approval, or the functional equivalent. School concurrency is |
700 | satisfied if the developer executes a legally binding commitment |
701 | to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public |
702 | school facilities to be created by actual development of the |
703 | property, including, but not limited to, the options described |
704 | in subparagraph 1. Options for proportionate-share mitigation of |
705 | impacts on public school facilities must be established in the |
706 | public school facilities element and the interlocal agreement |
707 | pursuant to s. 163.31777. |
708 | 1. Appropriate mitigation options include the contribution |
709 | of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land |
710 | acquisition or construction of a public school facility; the |
711 | construction of a charter school that complies with the |
712 | requirements of s. 1002.33(18)(f); or the creation of mitigation |
713 | banking based on the construction of a public school facility in |
714 | exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Such options |
715 | must include execution by the applicant and the local government |
716 | of a development agreement that constitutes a legally binding |
717 | commitment to pay proportionate-share mitigation for the |
718 | additional residential units approved by the local government in |
719 | a development order and actually developed on the property, |
720 | taking into account residential density allowed on the property |
721 | prior to the plan amendment that increased the overall |
722 | residential density. The district school board must be a party |
723 | to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into such a |
724 | development agreement, the local government may require the |
725 | landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement upon |
726 | its expiration. |
727 | 2. If the education facilities plan and the public |
728 | educational facilities element authorize a contribution of land; |
729 | the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; or |
730 | the construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a |
731 | portion thereof; or the construction of a charter school that |
732 | complies with the requirements of s. 1002.33(18)(f), as |
733 | proportionate-share mitigation, the local government shall |
734 | credit such a contribution, construction, expansion, or payment |
735 | toward any other impact fee or exaction imposed by local |
736 | ordinance for the same need, on a dollar-for-dollar basis at |
737 | fair market value. |
738 | 3. Any proportionate-share mitigation must be directed by |
739 | the school board toward a school capacity improvement identified |
740 | in a financially feasible 5-year district work plan that |
741 | satisfies the demands created by the development in accordance |
742 | with a binding developer's agreement. |
743 | 4. If a development is precluded from commencing because |
744 | there is inadequate classroom capacity to mitigate the impacts |
745 | of the development, the development may nevertheless commence if |
746 | there are accelerated facilities in an approved capital |
747 | improvement element scheduled for construction in year four or |
748 | later of such plan which, when built, will mitigate the proposed |
749 | development, or if such accelerated facilities will be in the |
750 | next annual update of the capital facilities element, the |
751 | developer enters into a binding, financially guaranteed |
752 | agreement with the school district to construct an accelerated |
753 | facility within the first 3 years of an approved capital |
754 | improvement plan, and the cost of the school facility is equal |
755 | to or greater than the development's proportionate share. When |
756 | the completed school facility is conveyed to the school |
757 | district, the developer shall receive impact fee credits usable |
758 | within the zone where the facility is constructed or any |
759 | attendance zone contiguous with or adjacent to the zone where |
760 | the facility is constructed. |
761 | 5. This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local |
762 | government to deny a development permit or its functional |
763 | equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except |
764 | as provided in this part. |
765 | Section 4. Paragraph (d) of subsection (3) of section |
766 | 163.31801, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
767 | 163.31801 Impact fees; short title; intent; definitions; |
768 | ordinances levying impact fees.-- |
769 | (3) An impact fee adopted by ordinance of a county or |
770 | municipality or by resolution of a special district must, at |
771 | minimum: |
772 | (d) Require that notice be provided no less than 90 days |
773 | before the effective date of an ordinance or resolution imposing |
774 | a new or increased amended impact fee. A county or municipality |
775 | is not required to wait 90 days to decrease, suspend, or |
776 | eliminate an impact fee. |
777 | Section 5. Section 163.31802, Florida Statutes, is created |
778 | to read: |
779 | 163.31802 Prohibited standards for security devices.--A |
780 | county, municipality, or other entity of local government may |
781 | not adopt or maintain in effect an ordinance or rule that |
782 | establishes standards for security devices that require a lawful |
783 | business to expend funds to enhance the services or functions |
784 | provided by local government unless specifically provided by |
785 | general law. |
786 | Section 6. Subsection (2) of section 163.3184, Florida |
787 | Statutes, is amended, and paragraph (e) is added to subsection |
788 | (3) of that section, to read: |
789 | 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or |
790 | plan amendment.-- |
791 | (2) COORDINATION.--Each comprehensive plan or plan |
792 | amendment proposed to be adopted pursuant to this part shall be |
793 | transmitted, adopted, and reviewed in the manner prescribed in |
794 | this section. The state land planning agency shall have |
795 | responsibility for plan review, coordination, and the |
796 | preparation and transmission of comments, pursuant to this |
797 | section, to the local governing body responsible for the |
798 | comprehensive plan. The state land planning agency shall |
799 | maintain a single file concerning any proposed or adopted plan |
800 | amendment submitted by a local government for any review under |
801 | this section. Copies of all correspondence, papers, notes, |
802 | memoranda, and other documents received or generated by the |
803 | state land planning agency must be placed in the appropriate |
804 | file. Paper copies of all electronic mail correspondence must be |
805 | placed in the file. The file and its contents must be available |
806 | for public inspection and copying as provided in chapter 119. A |
807 | local government may elect to use the alternative state review |
808 | process in s. 163.32465 for any amendment or amendment package |
809 | not expressly excluded by s. 163.32465(3). The local government |
810 | must establish in its transmittal hearing required pursuant to |
811 | this subsection that it elects to undergo the alternative state |
812 | review process. If the local government has not specifically |
813 | approved the alternative state review process for the amendment |
814 | or amendment package, the amendment or amendment package shall |
815 | be reviewed subject to the applicable process established in |
816 | this section or s. 163.3187. |
817 | (3) LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSED PLAN OR |
818 | AMENDMENT.-- |
819 | (e) At the request of an applicant, a local government |
820 | shall consider an application for zoning changes that would be |
821 | required to properly enact the provisions of any proposed plan |
822 | amendment transmitted pursuant to this subsection. Zoning |
823 | changes approved by the local government are contingent upon the |
824 | state land planning agency issuing a notice of intent to find |
825 | that the comprehensive plan or plan amendment transmitted is in |
826 | compliance with this act. |
827 | Section 7. Paragraphs (b) and (f) of subsection (1) of |
828 | section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, are amended, and paragraph |
829 | (q) is added to that subsection, to read: |
830 | 163.3187 Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.-- |
831 | (1) Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to |
832 | this part may be made not more than two times during any |
833 | calendar year, except: |
834 | (b) Any local government comprehensive plan amendments |
835 | directly related to a proposed development of regional impact, |
836 | including changes which have been determined to be substantial |
837 | deviations and including Florida Quality Developments pursuant |
838 | to s. 380.061, may be initiated by a local planning agency and |
839 | considered by the local governing body at the same time as the |
840 | application for development approval using the procedures |
841 | provided for local plan amendment in this section and applicable |
842 | local ordinances, without regard to statutory or local ordinance |
843 | limits on the frequency of consideration of amendments to the |
844 | local comprehensive plan. Nothing in this subsection shall be |
845 | deemed to require favorable consideration of a plan amendment |
846 | solely because it is related to a development of regional |
847 | impact. |
848 | (f) Any comprehensive plan amendment that changes the |
849 | schedule in The capital improvements element annual update |
850 | required in s. 163.3177(3)(b)1., and any amendments directly |
851 | related to the schedule, may be made once in a calendar year on |
852 | a date different from the two times provided in this subsection |
853 | when necessary to coincide with the adoption of the local |
854 | government's budget and capital improvements program. |
855 | (q) Any local government plan amendment to designate an |
856 | urban service area, which exists in the local government's |
857 | comprehensive plan as of July 1, 2009, as a transportation |
858 | concurrency exception area under s. 163.3180(5)(b)2. or 3. and |
859 | an area exempt from the development-of-regional-impact process |
860 | under s. 380.06(29). |
861 | Section 8. Subsection (1) of section 163.3245, Florida |
862 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
863 | 163.3245 Optional sector plans.-- |
864 | (1) In recognition of the benefits of conceptual long- |
865 | range planning for the buildout of an area, and detailed |
866 | planning for specific areas, as a demonstration project, the |
867 | requirements of s. 380.06 may be addressed as identified by this |
868 | section for up to 10 five local governments or combinations of |
869 | local governments which adopt into the comprehensive plan an |
870 | optional sector plan in accordance with this section. This |
871 | section is intended to further the intent of s. 163.3177(11), |
872 | which supports innovative and flexible planning and development |
873 | strategies, and the purposes of this part, and part I of chapter |
874 | 380, and to avoid duplication of effort in terms of the level of |
875 | data and analysis required for a development of regional impact, |
876 | while ensuring the adequate mitigation of impacts to applicable |
877 | regional resources and facilities, including those within the |
878 | jurisdiction of other local governments, as would otherwise be |
879 | provided. Optional sector plans are intended for substantial |
880 | geographic areas including at least 5,000 acres of one or more |
881 | local governmental jurisdictions and are to emphasize urban form |
882 | and protection of regionally significant resources and |
883 | facilities. The state land planning agency may approve optional |
884 | sector plans of less than 5,000 acres based on local |
885 | circumstances if it is determined that the plan would further |
886 | the purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380. Preparation |
887 | of an optional sector plan is authorized by agreement between |
888 | the state land planning agency and the applicable local |
889 | governments under s. 163.3171(4). An optional sector plan may be |
890 | adopted through one or more comprehensive plan amendments under |
891 | s. 163.3184. However, an optional sector plan may not be |
892 | authorized in an area of critical state concern. |
893 | Section 9. Subsections (12), (13), and (14) of section |
894 | 163.3246, Florida Statutes, are amended, and a new subsection |
895 | (12) is added to that section, to read: |
896 | 163.3246 Local government comprehensive planning |
897 | certification program.-- |
898 | (12) Notwithstanding subsections (2), (4), (5), (6), and |
899 | (7), any county that has a population greater than 1 million and |
900 | an average of at least 1,000 residents per square mile and |
901 | municipalities that have a population greater than 100,000 and |
902 | an average of at least 1,000 residents per square mile shall be |
903 | considered certified. The population and density needed to |
904 | identify local governments that qualify for certification under |
905 | this subsection shall be determined annually by the Office of |
906 | Economic and Demographic Research using the most recent land |
907 | area data from the decennial census conducted by the Bureau of |
908 | the Census of the United States Department of Commerce and the |
909 | latest available population estimates determined pursuant to s. |
910 | 186.901. The office shall annually submit to the state land |
911 | planning agency a list of jurisdictions that meet the total |
912 | population and density criteria necessary to qualify for |
913 | certification. For each local government identified by the |
914 | Office of Economic and Demographic Research as meeting the |
915 | certification criteria in this subsection, the state land |
916 | planning agency shall provide a written notice of certification |
917 | to the local government, which shall be considered final agency |
918 | action subject to challenge under s. 120.569. The notice of |
919 | certification shall include a requirement that the local |
920 | government submit a monitoring report at least every 2 years |
921 | according to the schedule provided in the written notice. The |
922 | monitoring report shall include the number of amendments to the |
923 | comprehensive plan adopted by the local government, the number |
924 | of plan amendments challenged by an affected person, and the |
925 | disposition of those challenges. |
926 | (13)(12) A local government's certification shall be |
927 | reviewed by the local government and the department as part of |
928 | the evaluation and appraisal process pursuant to s. 163.3191. |
929 | Within 1 year after the deadline for the local government to |
930 | update its comprehensive plan based on the evaluation and |
931 | appraisal report, the department shall renew or revoke the |
932 | certification. The local government's failure to adopt a timely |
933 | evaluation and appraisal report, failure to adopt an evaluation |
934 | and appraisal report found to be sufficient, or failure to |
935 | timely adopt amendments based on an evaluation and appraisal |
936 | report found to be in compliance by the department shall be |
937 | cause for revoking the certification agreement. The department's |
938 | decision to renew or revoke shall be considered agency action |
939 | subject to challenge under s. 120.569. |
940 | (14)(13) The department shall, by October July 1 of each |
941 | odd-numbered year, submit to the Governor, the President of the |
942 | Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives a report |
943 | listing certified local governments, evaluating the |
944 | effectiveness of the certification, and including any |
945 | recommendations for legislative actions. |
946 | (14) The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government |
947 | Accountability shall prepare a report evaluating the |
948 | certification program, which shall be submitted to the Governor, |
949 | the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of |
950 | Representatives by December 1, 2007. |
951 | Section 10. Section 163.32465, Florida Statutes, is |
952 | amended to read: |
953 | 163.32465 Alternative state review process for of local |
954 | comprehensive plan amendments plans in urban areas.-- |
955 | (1) LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.-- |
956 | (a) The Legislature finds that local governments in this |
957 | state have a wide diversity of resources, conditions, abilities, |
958 | and needs. The Legislature also finds that the needs and |
959 | resources of urban areas are different from those of rural areas |
960 | and that different planning and growth management approaches, |
961 | strategies, and techniques are required in urban areas. The |
962 | state role in overseeing growth management should reflect this |
963 | diversity and should vary based on local government conditions, |
964 | capabilities, and needs, and the extent and type of development. |
965 | Therefore Thus, the Legislature recognizes and finds that |
966 | reduced state oversight of local comprehensive planning is |
967 | justified for some local governments and for certain types of |
968 | development in urban areas. |
969 | (b) The Legislature finds and declares that the diversity |
970 | among local governments of this state state's urban areas |
971 | require recognition that the a reduced level of state oversight |
972 | should reflect the because of their high degree of urbanization |
973 | and the planning capabilities and resources available to of many |
974 | of their local governments. An alternative state review process |
975 | that is adequate to protect issues of regional or statewide |
976 | importance should be reflective of local governments' needs and |
977 | capabilities created for appropriate local governments in these |
978 | areas. Further, the Legislature finds that development, |
979 | including urban infill and redevelopment, should be encouraged |
980 | in these urban areas. The Legislature finds that an alternative |
981 | process for amending local comprehensive plans in these areas |
982 | should be established with an objective of streamlining the |
983 | process and recognizing local responsibility and accountability. |
984 | (c) The Legislature finds a pilot program will be |
985 | beneficial in evaluating an alternative, expedited plan |
986 | amendment adoption and review process. Pilot local governments |
987 | shall represent highly developed counties and the municipalities |
988 | within these counties and highly populated municipalities. |
989 | (2) ALTERNATIVE STATE REVIEW PROCESS PILOT PROGRAM.--A |
990 | local government may elect pursuant to s. 163.3184 to use the |
991 | alternative state review process for any amendment or amendment |
992 | package not expressly excluded by subsection (3). Pinellas and |
993 | Broward Counties, and the municipalities within these counties, |
994 | and Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa, and Hialeah shall follow an |
995 | alternative state review process provided in this section. |
996 | Municipalities within the pilot counties may elect, by super |
997 | majority vote of the governing body, not to participate in the |
998 | pilot program. |
999 | (3) PROCESS FOR ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS |
1000 | UNDER THE PILOT PROGRAM.-- |
1001 | (a) Plan amendments adopted under this section by the |
1002 | pilot program jurisdictions shall follow the alternate, |
1003 | expedited process in subsections (4) and (5), except as set |
1004 | forth in paragraphs (b)-(d) (b)-(e) of this subsection. |
1005 | (b) An amendment to a comprehensive plan is not eligible |
1006 | for the alternative state review process and shall be reviewed |
1007 | subject to the applicable processes established in ss. 163.3184 |
1008 | and 163.3187 if the amendment: |
1009 | 1. Designates or implements a rural land stewardship area |
1010 | pursuant to s. 163.3177(11)(d); |
1011 | 2. Designates or implements an optional sector plan; |
1012 | 3. Applies within an area of critical state concern or a |
1013 | coastal high-hazard area; |
1014 | 4. Incorporates into a municipal comprehensive plan lands |
1015 | that have been annexed; |
1016 | 5. Updates a comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and |
1017 | appraisal report; |
1018 | 6. Implements new plans for newly incorporated |
1019 | municipalities; |
1020 | 7. Implements statutory requirements that were not |
1021 | previously incorporated into the comprehensive plan; or |
1022 | 8. Changes the boundary of a jurisdiction's urban service |
1023 | area as defined in s. 163.3164. Amendments that qualify as |
1024 | small-scale development amendments may continue to be adopted by |
1025 | the pilot program jurisdictions pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(c) |
1026 | and (3). |
1027 | (c) Plan amendments adopted under this section that |
1028 | propose a rural land stewardship area pursuant to s. |
1029 | 163.3177(11)(d); propose an optional sector plan; update a |
1030 | comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and appraisal report; |
1031 | implement new statutory requirements; or new plans for newly |
1032 | incorporated municipalities are subject to state review as set |
1033 | forth in s. 163.3184. |
1034 | (d) Pilot program jurisdictions shall be subject to the |
1035 | frequency and timing requirements for plan amendments set forth |
1036 | in ss. 163.3187 and 163.3191, except where otherwise stated in |
1037 | this section. |
1038 | (d)(e) The mediation and expedited hearing provisions in |
1039 | s. 163.3189(3) apply to all plan amendments adopted pursuant to |
1040 | the alternative state review process by the pilot program |
1041 | jurisdictions. |
1042 | (4) INITIAL HEARING ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR |
1043 | PILOT PROGRAM.-- |
1044 | (a) The local government shall hold its first public |
1045 | hearing on a comprehensive plan amendment on a weekday at least |
1046 | 7 days after the day the first advertisement is published |
1047 | pursuant to the requirements of chapter 125 or chapter 166. Upon |
1048 | an affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the members |
1049 | of the governing body present at the hearing, the local |
1050 | government shall immediately transmit the amendment or |
1051 | amendments and appropriate supporting data and analyses to the |
1052 | state land planning agency; the appropriate regional planning |
1053 | council and water management district; the Department of |
1054 | Environmental Protection; the Department of State; the |
1055 | Department of Transportation; in the case of municipal plans, to |
1056 | the appropriate county; the Fish and Wildlife Conservation |
1057 | Commission; the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; |
1058 | and in the case of amendments that include or impact the public |
1059 | school facilities element, the Office of Educational Facilities |
1060 | of the Commissioner of Education. The local governing body shall |
1061 | also transmit a copy of the amendments and supporting data and |
1062 | analyses to any other local government or governmental agency |
1063 | that has filed a written request with the governing body. |
1064 | (b) The agencies and local governments specified in |
1065 | paragraph (a) may provide comments regarding the amendment or |
1066 | amendments to the local government. The regional planning |
1067 | council review and comment shall be limited to effects on |
1068 | regional resources or facilities identified in the strategic |
1069 | regional policy plan and extrajurisdictional impacts that would |
1070 | be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of the affected |
1071 | local government. A regional planning council shall not review |
1072 | and comment on a proposed comprehensive plan amendment prepared |
1073 | by such council unless the plan amendment has been changed by |
1074 | the local government subsequent to the preparation of the plan |
1075 | amendment by the regional planning council. County comments on |
1076 | municipal comprehensive plan amendments shall be primarily in |
1077 | the context of the relationship and effect of the proposed plan |
1078 | amendments on the county plan. Municipal comments on county plan |
1079 | amendments shall be primarily in the context of the relationship |
1080 | and effect of the amendments on the municipal plan. State agency |
1081 | comments shall clearly identify as objections any issues that, |
1082 | if not resolved, may result in an agency request that the state |
1083 | land planning agency challenge the plan amendment and may |
1084 | include technical guidance on issues of agency jurisdiction as |
1085 | it relates to the requirements of this part. Such comments shall |
1086 | clearly identify issues that, if not resolved, may result in an |
1087 | agency challenge to the plan amendment. For the purposes of this |
1088 | pilot program, Agencies shall are encouraged to focus potential |
1089 | challenges on issues of regional or statewide importance. |
1090 | Agencies and local governments must transmit their comments, if |
1091 | issued, to the affected local government within 30 days after |
1092 | the state land planning agency notifies the affected local |
1093 | government that the plan amendment package is complete. The |
1094 | state land planning agency shall notify the local government of |
1095 | any deficiencies within 5 working days after receipt of an |
1096 | amendment package. Any comments from the agencies and local |
1097 | governments shall also be transmitted to the state land planning |
1098 | agency such that they are received by the local government not |
1099 | later than thirty days from the date on which the agency or |
1100 | government received the amendment or amendments. |
1101 | (5) ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PILOT |
1102 | AREAS.-- |
1103 | (a) The local government shall hold its second public |
1104 | hearing, which shall be a hearing on whether to adopt one or |
1105 | more comprehensive plan amendments, on a weekday at least 5 days |
1106 | after the day the second advertisement is published pursuant to |
1107 | the requirements of chapter 125 or chapter 166. Adoption of |
1108 | comprehensive plan amendments must be by ordinance and requires |
1109 | an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the |
1110 | governing body present at the second hearing. The hearing must |
1111 | be conducted and the amendment must be adopted, adopted with |
1112 | changes, or not adopted within 120 days after the agency |
1113 | comments are received pursuant to paragraph (4)(b). If a local |
1114 | government fails to adopt the plan amendment within the |
1115 | timeframe set forth in this paragraph, the plan amendment is |
1116 | deemed abandoned and the plan amendment may not be considered |
1117 | until the next available amendment cycle pursuant to s. |
1118 | 163.3187. However, if the applicant or local government, prior |
1119 | to the expiration of such timeframe, notifies the state land |
1120 | planning agency that the applicant or local government is |
1121 | proceeding in good faith to adopt the plan amendment, the state |
1122 | land planning agency shall grant one or more extensions not to |
1123 | exceed a total of 360 days after the issuance of the agency |
1124 | report or comments. During the pendency of any such extension, |
1125 | the applicant or local government shall provide to the state |
1126 | land planning agency a status report every 90 days identifying |
1127 | the items continuing to be addressed and the manner in which the |
1128 | items are being addressed. |
1129 | (b) All comprehensive plan amendments adopted by the |
1130 | governing body along with the supporting data and analysis shall |
1131 | be transmitted within 10 days of the second public hearing to |
1132 | the state land planning agency and any other agency or local |
1133 | government that provided timely comments under paragraph (4)(b). |
1134 | (6) ADMINISTRATIVE CHALLENGES TO PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR PILOT |
1135 | PROGRAM.-- |
1136 | (a) Any "affected person" as defined in s. 163.3184(1)(a) |
1137 | may file a petition with the Division of Administrative Hearings |
1138 | pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57, with a copy served on the |
1139 | affected local government, to request a formal hearing to |
1140 | challenge whether the amendments are "in compliance" as defined |
1141 | in s. 163.3184(1)(b). This petition must be filed with the |
1142 | Division within 30 days after the local government adopts the |
1143 | amendment. The state land planning agency may intervene in a |
1144 | proceeding instituted by an affected person. |
1145 | (b) The state land planning agency may file a petition |
1146 | with the Division of Administrative Hearings pursuant to ss. |
1147 | 120.569 and 120.57, with a copy served on the affected local |
1148 | government, to request a formal hearing. This petition must be |
1149 | filed with the Division within 30 days after the state land |
1150 | planning agency notifies the local government that the plan |
1151 | amendment package is complete. For purposes of this section, an |
1152 | amendment shall be deemed complete if it contains a full, |
1153 | executed copy of the adoption ordinance or ordinances; in the |
1154 | case of a text amendment, a full copy of the amended language in |
1155 | legislative format with new words inserted in the text |
1156 | underlined, and words to be deleted lined through with hyphens; |
1157 | in the case of a future land use map amendment, a copy of the |
1158 | future land use map clearly depicting the parcel, its existing |
1159 | future land use designation, and its adopted designation; and a |
1160 | copy of any data and analyses the local government deems |
1161 | appropriate. The state land planning agency shall notify the |
1162 | local government of any deficiencies within 5 working days of |
1163 | receipt of an amendment package. |
1164 | (c) The state land planning agency's challenge shall be |
1165 | limited to those objections issues raised in the comments |
1166 | provided by the reviewing agencies pursuant to paragraph (4)(b). |
1167 | The state land planning agency may challenge a plan amendment |
1168 | that has substantially changed from the version on which the |
1169 | agencies provided comments. For the purposes of the alternative |
1170 | state review process this pilot program, the Legislature |
1171 | strongly encourages the state land planning agency shall to |
1172 | focus any challenge on issues of regional or statewide |
1173 | importance. |
1174 | (d) An administrative law judge shall hold a hearing in |
1175 | the affected local jurisdiction. In a proceeding involving an |
1176 | affected person as defined in s. 163.3184(1)(a), the local |
1177 | government's determination of compliance is fairly debatable. In |
1178 | a proceeding in which the state land planning agency challenges |
1179 | the local government's determination that the amendment is "in |
1180 | compliance," the local government's determination is presumed to |
1181 | be correct and shall be sustained unless it is shown by a |
1182 | preponderance of the evidence that the amendment is not "in |
1183 | compliance." |
1184 | (e) If the administrative law judge recommends that the |
1185 | amendment be found not in compliance, the judge shall submit the |
1186 | recommended order to the Administration Commission for final |
1187 | agency action. The Administration Commission shall enter a final |
1188 | order within 45 days after its receipt of the recommended order. |
1189 | (f) If the administrative law judge recommends that the |
1190 | amendment be found in compliance, the judge shall submit the |
1191 | recommended order to the state land planning agency. |
1192 | 1. If the state land planning agency determines that the |
1193 | plan amendment should be found not in compliance, the agency |
1194 | shall refer, within 30 days of receipt of the recommended order, |
1195 | the recommended order and its determination to the |
1196 | Administration Commission for final agency action. If the |
1197 | commission determines that the amendment is not in compliance, |
1198 | it may sanction the local government as set forth in s. |
1199 | 163.3184(11). |
1200 | 2. If the state land planning agency determines that the |
1201 | plan amendment should be found in compliance, the agency shall |
1202 | enter its final order not later than 30 days from receipt of the |
1203 | recommended order. |
1204 | (g) An amendment adopted under the expedited provisions of |
1205 | this section shall not become effective until the completion of |
1206 | the time period available to the state land planning agency for |
1207 | administrative challenge under paragraph (a) 31 days after |
1208 | adoption. If timely challenged, an amendment shall not become |
1209 | effective until the state land planning agency or the |
1210 | Administration Commission enters a final order determining that |
1211 | the adopted amendment is to be in compliance. |
1212 | (h) Parties to a proceeding under this section may enter |
1213 | into compliance agreements using the process in s. 163.3184(16). |
1214 | Any remedial amendment adopted pursuant to a settlement |
1215 | agreement shall be provided to the agencies and governments |
1216 | listed in paragraph (4)(a). |
1217 | (7) APPLICABILITY OF PILOT PROGRAM IN CERTAIN LOCAL |
1218 | GOVERNMENTS.--Local governments and specific areas that have |
1219 | been designated for alternate review process pursuant to ss. |
1220 | 163.3246 and 163.3184(17) and (18) are not subject to this |
1221 | section. |
1222 | (7)(8) RULEMAKING AUTHORITY FOR PILOT PROGRAM.--The state |
1223 | land planning agency may adopt procedural Agencies shall not |
1224 | promulgate rules to administer implement this section pilot |
1225 | program. |
1226 | (8)(9) REPORT.--The state land planning agency may, from |
1227 | time to time, report to Office of Program Policy Analysis and |
1228 | Government Accountability shall submit to the Governor, the |
1229 | President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of |
1230 | Representatives on the implementation of this section, including |
1231 | any recommendations for legislative action by December 1, 2008, |
1232 | a report and recommendations for implementing a statewide |
1233 | program that addresses the legislative findings in subsection |
1234 | (1) in areas that meet urban criteria. The Office of Program |
1235 | Policy Analysis and Government Accountability in consultation |
1236 | with the state land planning agency shall develop the report and |
1237 | recommendations with input from other state and regional |
1238 | agencies, local governments, and interest groups. Additionally, |
1239 | the office shall review local and state actions and |
1240 | correspondence relating to the pilot program to identify issues |
1241 | of process and substance in recommending changes to the pilot |
1242 | program. At a minimum, the report and recommendations shall |
1243 | include the following: |
1244 | (a) Identification of local governments beyond those |
1245 | participating in the pilot program that should be subject to the |
1246 | alternative expedited state review process. The report may |
1247 | recommend that pilot program local governments may no longer be |
1248 | appropriate for such alternative review process. |
1249 | (b) Changes to the alternative expedited state review |
1250 | process for local comprehensive plan amendments identified in |
1251 | the pilot program. |
1252 | (c) Criteria for determining issues of regional or |
1253 | statewide importance that are to be protected in the alternative |
1254 | state review process. |
1255 | (d) In preparing the report and recommendations, the |
1256 | Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability |
1257 | shall consult with the state land planning agency, the |
1258 | Department of Transportation, the Department of Environmental |
1259 | Protection, and the regional planning agencies in identifying |
1260 | highly developed local governments to participate in the |
1261 | alternative expedited state review process. The Office of |
1262 | Program Policy Analysis and Governmental Accountability shall |
1263 | also solicit citizen input in the potentially affected areas and |
1264 | consult with the affected local governments and stakeholder |
1265 | groups. |
1266 | Section 11. Section 171.091, Florida Statutes, is amended |
1267 | to read: |
1268 | 171.091 Recording.--Any change in the municipal boundaries |
1269 | through annexation or contraction shall revise the charter |
1270 | boundary article and shall be filed as a revision of the charter |
1271 | with the Department of State within 30 days. A copy of such |
1272 | revision must be submitted to the Office of Economic and |
1273 | Demographic Research along with a statement specifying the |
1274 | population census effect and the affected land area. |
1275 | Section 12. Section 186.509, Florida Statutes, is amended |
1276 | to read: |
1277 | 186.509 Dispute resolution process.--Each regional |
1278 | planning council shall establish by rule a dispute resolution |
1279 | process to reconcile differences on planning and growth |
1280 | management issues between local governments, regional agencies, |
1281 | and private interests. The dispute resolution process shall, |
1282 | within a reasonable set of timeframes, provide for: voluntary |
1283 | meetings among the disputing parties; if those meetings fail to |
1284 | resolve the dispute, initiation of mandatory voluntary mediation |
1285 | or a similar process; if that process fails, initiation of |
1286 | arbitration or administrative or judicial action, where |
1287 | appropriate. The council shall not utilize the dispute |
1288 | resolution process to address disputes involving environmental |
1289 | permits or other regulatory matters unless requested to do so by |
1290 | the parties. The resolution of any issue through the dispute |
1291 | resolution process shall not alter any person's right to a |
1292 | judicial determination of any issue if that person is entitled |
1293 | to such a determination under statutory or common law. |
1294 | Section 13. Subsection (29) is added to section 380.06, |
1295 | Florida Statutes, to read: |
1296 | 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- |
1297 | (29) EXEMPTIONS FOR DENSE URBAN LAND AREAS.-- |
1298 | (a) The following are exempt from this section: |
1299 | 1. Any proposed development in a municipality that |
1300 | qualifies as a dense urban land area as defined in s. 163.3164; |
1301 | 2. Any proposed development within a county that qualifies |
1302 | as a dense urban land area as defined in s. 163.3164 and that is |
1303 | located within an urban service area defined in s. 163.3164 |
1304 | which has been adopted into the comprehensive plan; or |
1305 | 3. Any proposed development within a county, including the |
1306 | municipalities located therein, which has a population of at |
1307 | least 900,000, which qualifies as a dense urban land area under |
1308 | s. 163.3164, but which does not have an urban service area |
1309 | designated in the comprehensive plan. |
1310 | (b) If a municipality that does not qualify as a dense |
1311 | urban land area pursuant to s. 163.3164 designates any of the |
1312 | following areas in its comprehensive plan, any proposed |
1313 | development within the designated area is exempt from the |
1314 | development-of-regional-impact process: |
1315 | 1. Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164; |
1316 | 2. Community redevelopment areas as defined in s. 163.340; |
1317 | 3. Downtown revitalization areas as defined in s. |
1318 | 163.3164; |
1319 | 4. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or |
1320 | 5. Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164 or areas |
1321 | within a designated urban service boundary under s. |
1322 | 163.3177(14). |
1323 | (c) If a county that does not qualify as a dense urban |
1324 | land area pursuant to s. 163.3164 designates any of the |
1325 | following areas in its comprehensive plan, any proposed |
1326 | development within the designated area is exempt from the |
1327 | development-of-regional-impact process: |
1328 | 1. Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164; |
1329 | 2. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or |
1330 | 3. Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164. |
1331 | (d) A development that is located partially outside an |
1332 | area that is exempt from the development-of-regional-impact |
1333 | program must undergo development-of-regional-impact review |
1334 | pursuant to this section. |
1335 | (e) In an area that is exempt under paragraphs (a)-(c), |
1336 | any previously approved development-of-regional-impact |
1337 | development orders shall continue to be effective, but the |
1338 | developer has the option to be governed by s. 380.115(1). A |
1339 | pending application for development approval shall be governed |
1340 | by s. 380.115(2). A development that has a pending application |
1341 | for a comprehensive plan amendment and that elects not to |
1342 | continue development-of-regional-impact review is exempt from |
1343 | the limitation on plan amendments set forth in s. 163.3187(1) |
1344 | for the year following the effective date of the exemption. |
1345 | (f) Local governments must submit by mail a development |
1346 | order to the state land planning agency for projects that would |
1347 | be larger than 120 percent of any applicable development-of |
1348 | regional-impact threshold and would require development-of- |
1349 | regional-impact review but for the exemption from the program |
1350 | under paragraph (a). For such development orders, the state land |
1351 | planning agency may appeal the development order pursuant to s. |
1352 | 380.07 for inconsistency with the comprehensive plan adopted |
1353 | under chapter 163. |
1354 | (g) If a local government that qualifies as a dense urban |
1355 | land area under this subsection is subsequently found to be |
1356 | ineligible for designation as a dense urban land area, any |
1357 | development located within that area which has a complete, |
1358 | pending application for authorization to commence development |
1359 | may maintain the exemption if the developer is continuing the |
1360 | application process in good faith or the development is |
1361 | approved. |
1362 | (h) This subsection does not limit or modify the rights of |
1363 | any person to complete any development that has been authorized |
1364 | as a development of regional impact pursuant to this chapter. |
1365 | (i) This subsection does not apply to areas: |
1366 | 1. Within the boundary of any area of critical state |
1367 | concern designated pursuant to s. 380.05; |
1368 | 2. Within the boundary of the Wekiva Study Area as |
1369 | described in s. 369.316; or |
1370 | 3. Within 2 miles of the boundary of the Everglades |
1371 | Protection Area as described in s. 373.4592(2). |
1372 | Section 14. (1)(a) The Legislature finds that the |
1373 | existing transportation concurrency system has not adequately |
1374 | addressed the transportation needs of this state in an |
1375 | effective, predictable, and equitable manner and is not |
1376 | producing a sustainable transportation system for the state. The |
1377 | Legislature finds that the current system is complex, lacks |
1378 | uniformity among jurisdictions, is too focused on roadways to |
1379 | the detriment of desired land use patterns and transportation |
1380 | alternatives, and frequently prevents the attainment of |
1381 | important growth management goals. |
1382 | (b) The Legislature determines that the state shall |
1383 | evaluate and, as deemed feasible, implement a different adequate |
1384 | public facility requirement for transportation which uses a |
1385 | mobility fee. The mobility fee shall be designed to provide for |
1386 | mobility needs, ensure that development provides mitigation for |
1387 | its impacts on the transportation system in approximate |
1388 | proportionality to those impacts, fairly distribute financial |
1389 | burdens, and promote compact, mixed-use, and energy-efficient |
1390 | development. |
1391 | (2) The Legislature directs the state land planning agency |
1392 | and the Department of Transportation, both of which are |
1393 | currently performing independent mobility fee studies, to |
1394 | coordinate and use those studies in developing a methodology for |
1395 | a mobility fee system as follows: |
1396 | (a) The uniform mobility fee methodology for statewide |
1397 | application is intended to replace existing transportation |
1398 | concurrency management systems adopted and implemented by local |
1399 | governments. The studies shall focus upon developing a |
1400 | methodology that includes: |
1401 | 1. A determination of the amount, distribution, and timing |
1402 | of vehicular and people-miles traveled by applying |
1403 | professionally accepted standards and practices in the |
1404 | disciplines of land use and transportation planning, including |
1405 | requirements of constitutional and statutory law. |
1406 | 2. The development of an equitable mobility fee that |
1407 | provides funding for future mobility needs whereby new |
1408 | development mitigates in approximate proportionality its impacts |
1409 | on the transportation system, yet is not delayed or held |
1410 | accountable for system backlogs or failures that are not |
1411 | directly attributable to the proposed development. |
1412 | 3. The replacement of transportation-related financial |
1413 | feasibility obligations, proportionate-share contributions for |
1414 | developments of regional impacts, proportionate fair-share |
1415 | contributions, and locally adopted transportation impact fees |
1416 | with the mobility fee, so that a single transportation fee may |
1417 | be applied uniformly on a statewide basis by application of the |
1418 | mobility fee formula developed by these studies. |
1419 | 4. Applicability of the mobility fee on a statewide or |
1420 | more limited geographic basis, accounting for special |
1421 | requirements arising from implementation for urban, suburban, |
1422 | and rural areas, including recommendations for an equitable |
1423 | implementation in these areas. |
1424 | 5. The feasibility of developer contributions of land for |
1425 | right-of-way or developer-funded improvements to the |
1426 | transportation network to be recognized as credits against the |
1427 | mobility fee by entering into mutually acceptable agreements |
1428 | reached with the impacted jurisdiction. |
1429 | 6. An equitable methodology for distribution of the |
1430 | mobility fee proceeds among those jurisdictions responsible for |
1431 | construction and maintenance of the impacted roadways, so that |
1432 | the collected mobility fees are used for improvements to the |
1433 | overall transportation network of the impacted jurisdiction. |
1434 | (b) The state land planning agency and the Department of |
1435 | Transportation shall develop and submit to the President of the |
1436 | Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, no later |
1437 | than July 15, 2009, an initial interim joint report on the |
1438 | status of the mobility fee methodology study, no later than |
1439 | October 1, 2009, a second interim joint report on the status of |
1440 | the mobility fee methodology study, and no later than December |
1441 | 1, 2009, a final joint report on the mobility fee methodology |
1442 | study, complete with recommended legislation and a plan to |
1443 | implement the mobility fee as a replacement for the existing |
1444 | transportation concurrency management systems adopted and |
1445 | implemented by local governments. The final joint report shall |
1446 | also contain, but is not limited to, an economic analysis of |
1447 | implementation of the mobility fee, activities necessary to |
1448 | implement the fee, and potential costs and benefits at the state |
1449 | and local levels and to the private sector. |
1450 | Section 15. (1) Any construction permit, development |
1451 | order, building permit, or other land use application that has |
1452 | been issued or rendered by a state or local governmental entity |
1453 | pursuant to chapter 125, chapter 161, chapter 163, chapter 166, |
1454 | chapter 253, part IV of chapter 373, chapter 378, chapter 379, |
1455 | chapter 380, chapter 381, chapter 403, or chapter 553, Florida |
1456 | Statutes, or pursuant to a local ordinance, and that has an |
1457 | expiration date prior on or after the effective date of this act |
1458 | through October 1, 2011, is extended and renewed for a period of |
1459 | 2 years beyond the previously identified expiration date. Any |
1460 | new construction permit, development order, building permit, or |
1461 | other land use application rendered or issued after the |
1462 | effective date of this act may not be extended or renewed except |
1463 | as requested by the applicant and subject to a decision by the |
1464 | state or local governmental entity issuing or rendering the |
1465 | permit, development order, or land use decision. |
1466 | (2) The 2-year extension also applies to the phase, |
1467 | commencement, and build-out date for any development order or |
1468 | local land use approval, including a certificate of concurrency |
1469 | or developer agreement. The completion date for any required |
1470 | mitigation associated with any phase of construction is |
1471 | similarly extended so that such mitigation takes place within |
1472 | the phase originally intended. |
1473 | (3) Nothing in this act shall be deemed to extend or |
1474 | purport to extend any permit or approval issued by the Federal |
1475 | Government or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any |
1476 | permit or approval by whatever authority issued of which the |
1477 | duration of effect or the date or terms of its expiration are |
1478 | specified or determined by or pursuant to law or regulation of |
1479 | the Federal Government or any of its agencies or |
1480 | instrumentalities. Nothing in this act shall be construed or |
1481 | implemented in such a way as to modify any requirement of law |
1482 | that is necessary to retain federal delegation to, or assumption |
1483 | by, the state of the authority to implement a federal law or |
1484 | program. Nothing in this act shall be deemed to extend or |
1485 | purport to extend any permit or approval for the consumptive use |
1486 | of water within Water-Use Caution Areas as permitted under |
1487 | chapter 373 and chapter 403, Florida Statutes. |
1488 | (4) Nothing in this act shall impair the authority of a |
1489 | county or municipality to require the owner of a property, which |
1490 | has received the benefit of an extension of time pursuant to |
1491 | this act or pursuant to action of the municipality or county, to |
1492 | maintain and secure the property in a safe and sanitary |
1493 | condition in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances. |
1494 | (5) The permitholder shall notify the permitting agencies |
1495 | of the intent to use this extension. |
1496 | Section 16. The Legislature finds that this act fulfills |
1497 | an important state interest. |
1498 | Section 17. This act shall take effect upon becoming a |
1499 | law. |