HB 7127

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act relating to growth management; amending s.
3163.3164, F.S.; revising the definition of the term
4"existing urban service area"; providing a definition for
5the term "dense urban land area" and providing
6requirements of the Office of Economic and Demographic
7Research and the state land planning agency with respect
8thereto; amending s. 163.3177, F.S.; revising requirements
9for adopting amendments to the capital improvements
10element of a local comprehensive plan; revising
11requirements for future land use plan elements and
12intergovernmental coordination elements of a local
13comprehensive plan; revising requirements for the public
14school facilities element implementing a school
15concurrency program; deleting a penalty for local
16governments that fail to adopt a public school facilities
17element and interlocal agreement; authorizing the
18Administration Commission to impose sanctions; amending s.
19163.3180, F.S.; revising concurrency requirements;
20providing legislative findings relating to transportation
21concurrency exception areas; providing for the
22applicability of transportation concurrency exception
23areas; deleting certain requirements for transportation
24concurrency exception areas; providing that the
25designation of a transportation concurrency exception area
26does not limit a local government's home rule power to
27adopt ordinances or impose fees and does not affect any
28contract or agreement entered into or development order
29rendered before such designation; requiring the Office of
30Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability to
31submit a report to the Legislature concerning the effects
32of the transportation concurrency exception areas;
33authorizing local governments to provide for a waiver of
34transportation concurrency requirements for certain
35projects under certain circumstances; revising school
36concurrency requirements; requiring charter schools to be
37considered as a mitigation option under certain
38circumstances; amending s. 163.31801, F.S.; revising
39requirements for adoption of impact fees; creating s.
40163.31802, F.S.; prohibiting establishment of local
41standards for security devices requiring businesses to
42expend funds to enhance local governmental services or
43functions under certain circumstances; amending s.
44163.3184, F.S.; authorizing local governments to use an
45alternative state review process for certain comprehensive
46plan amendments or amendment packages; providing
47requirements; amending s. 163.3187, F.S.; exempting
48certain additional comprehensive plan amendments from the
49twice-per-year limitation; amending s. 163.3245, F.S.;
50expanding the number of local governments eligible to
51adopt optional sector plans into their comprehensive
52plans; amending s. 163.3246, F.S.; specifying certain
53counties and municipalities as certified under the local
54government comprehensive planning certification program;
55providing duties and responsibilities of the Office of
56Economic and Demographic Research; providing certification
57requirements; requiring such local governments to submit
58monitoring reports; providing report requirements;
59deleting a reporting requirement for the Office of Program
60Policy Analysis and Government Accountability; amending s.
61163.32465, F.S.; providing for an alternative state review
62process for local comprehensive plan amendments; providing
63requirements, procedures, and limitations for exemptions
64from state review of comprehensive plans; making permanent
65and applying statewide an alternative state review
66process; revising the requirements, procedures, and
67limitations for the alternate state review process;
68requiring that agencies submit comments within a specified
69period after the state land planning agency notifies the
70local government that the plan amendment package is
71complete; requiring that the local government adopt a plan
72amendment within a specified period after comments are
73received; authorizing the state land planning agency to
74adopt rules and submit certain reports; deleting
75provisions relating to reporting requirements for the
76Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government
77Accountability; deleting pilot program provisions;
78amending s. 171.091, F.S.; requiring that a municipality
79submit a copy of any revision to the charter boundary
80article which results from an annexation or contraction to
81the Office of Economic and Demographic Research; amending
82s. 186.509, F.S.; revising provisions relating to a
83dispute resolution process to reconcile differences on
84planning and growth management issues between certain
85parties of interest; providing for mandatory mediation;
86amending s. 380.06, F.S.; providing exemptions for dense
87urban land areas from the development-of-regional-impact
88program; providing exceptions; providing legislative
89findings and determinations relating to replacing the
90transportation concurrency system with a mobility fee
91system; requiring the state land planning agency and the
92Department of Transportation to study and develop a
93methodology for a mobility fee system; specifying
94criteria; requiring joint reports to the Legislature;
95specifying report requirements; providing for extending
96certain permits, orders, or land use applications due to
97expire; prohibiting issuance of new permits, order, or
98land use applications under certain circumstances;
99providing for application of the extension to certain
100related activities; specifying nonapplication to certain
101permits or approvals by the Federal Government or certain
102permits in water-use caution areas; preserving the
103authority of counties and municipalities to impose certain
104security and sanitary requirements on property owners
105under certain circumstances; requiring permitholders to
106notify permitting agencies of intent to use the extension;
107providing a legislative declaration of important state
108interest; providing effective dates.
109
110Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
111
112     Section 1.  Subsection (29) of section 163.3164, Florida
113Statutes, is amended, and subsection (34) is added to that
114section, to read:
115     163.3164  Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
116Development Regulation Act; definitions.--As used in this act:
117     (29)  "Existing Urban service area" means built-up areas
118where public facilities and services, including, but not limited
119to, central water and sewer capacity such as sewage treatment
120systems, roads, schools, and recreation areas, are already in
121place. In addition, for counties that qualify as dense urban
122land areas under subsection (34), the nonrural area of a county
123which has adopted into the county charter a rural area
124designation or areas identified in the comprehensive plan as
125urban service areas or urban growth boundaries on or before July
1261, 2009, are also urban service areas under this definition.
127     (34)  "Dense urban land area" means:
128     (a)  A municipality that has an average of at least 1,000
129people per square mile of land area and a minimum total
130population of at least 5,000;
131     (b)  A county, including the municipalities located
132therein, which has an average of at least 1,000 people per
133square mile of land area; or
134     (c)  A county, including the municipalities located
135therein, which has a population of at least 1 million.
136
137The Office of Economic and Demographic Research within the
138Legislature shall annually calculate the population and density
139criteria needed to determine which jurisdictions qualify as
140dense urban land areas by using the most recent land area data
141from the decennial census conducted by the Bureau of the Census
142of the United States Department of Commerce and the latest
143available population estimates determined pursuant to s.
144186.901. If any local government has had an annexation,
145contraction, or new incorporation, the Office of Economic and
146Demographic Research shall determine the population density
147using the new jurisdictional boundaries as recorded in
148accordance with s. 171.091. The Office of Economic and
149Demographic Research shall submit to the state land planning
150agency a list of jurisdictions that meet the total population
151and density criteria necessary for designation as a dense urban
152land area by July 1, 2009, and every year thereafter. The state
153land planning agency shall publish the list of jurisdictions on
154its Internet website within 7 days after the list is received.
155The designation of jurisdictions that qualify or do not qualify
156as a dense urban land area is effective upon publication on the
157state land planning agency's Internet website.
158     Section 2.  Paragraphs (b) and (c) of subsection (3),
159paragraphs (a) and (h) of subsection (6), and paragraphs (a),
160(j), and (k) of subsection (12) of section 163.3177, Florida
161Statutes, are amended, and paragraph (f) is added to subsection
162(3) of that section, to read:
163     163.3177  Required and optional elements of comprehensive
164plan; studies and surveys.--
165     (3)
166     (b)1.  The capital improvements element must be reviewed on
167an annual basis and modified as necessary in accordance with s.
168163.3187 or s. 163.3189 in order to maintain a financially
169feasible 5-year schedule of capital improvements. Corrections
170and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or
171acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are
172consistent with the plan may be accomplished by ordinance and
173shall not be deemed to be amendments to the local comprehensive
174plan. A copy of the ordinance shall be transmitted to the state
175land planning agency. An amendment to the comprehensive plan is
176required to update the schedule on an annual basis or to
177eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for any facility
178listed in the 5-year schedule. All public facilities must be
179consistent with the capital improvements element. The annual
180update to the capital improvements element of the comprehensive
181plan need not comply with the financial feasibility requirement
182until December 1, 2011. Amendments to implement this section
183must be adopted and transmitted no later than December 1, 2008.
184Thereafter, a local government may not amend its future land use
185map, except for plan amendments to meet new requirements under
186this part and emergency amendments pursuant to s.
187163.3187(1)(a), after December 1, 2011 2008, and every year
188thereafter, unless and until the local government has adopted
189the annual update and it has been transmitted to the state land
190planning agency.
191     2.  Capital improvements element amendments adopted after
192the effective date of this act shall require only a single
193public hearing before the governing board which shall be an
194adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(7). Such amendments
195are not subject to the requirements of s. 163.3184(3)-(6).
196     (c)  If the local government does not adopt the required
197annual update to the schedule of capital improvements, the state
198land planning agency may issue a notice to the local government
199to show cause why sanctions should not be enforced for failure
200to submit the annual update and may must notify the
201Administration Commission. A local government that has a
202demonstrated lack of commitment to meeting its obligations
203identified in the capital improvements element may be subject to
204sanctions by the Administration Commission pursuant to s.
205163.3184(11).
206     (f)  A local government that has designated a
207transportation concurrency exception area in its comprehensive
208plan pursuant to s. 163.3180(5) shall be deemed to meet the
209requirement to achieve and maintain level-of-service standards
210if the capital improvements element and, as appropriate, the
211capital improvements schedule include any capital improvements
212planned within the scheduled timeframe based upon the strategies
213adopted in the plan to promote mobility.
214     (6)  In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5)
215and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following
216elements:
217     (a)  A future land use plan element designating proposed
218future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of
219land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry,
220agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public
221buildings and grounds, other public facilities, and other
222categories of the public and private uses of land. Counties are
223encouraged to designate rural land stewardship areas, pursuant
224to the provisions of paragraph (11)(d), as overlays on the
225future land use map. Each future land use category must be
226defined in terms of uses included, and must include standards to
227be followed in the control and distribution of population
228densities and building and structure intensities. The proposed
229distribution, location, and extent of the various categories of
230land use shall be shown on a land use map or map series which
231shall be supplemented by goals, policies, and measurable
232objectives. The future land use plan shall be based upon
233surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, including the
234amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth; the
235projected population of the area; the character of undeveloped
236land; the availability of water supplies, public facilities, and
237services; the need for redevelopment, including the renewal of
238blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which
239are inconsistent with the character of the community; the
240compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate
241to military installations; the discouragement of urban sprawl;
242energy-efficient land use patterns accounting for existing and
243future electric power generation and transmission systems;
244greenhouse gas reduction strategies; and, in rural communities,
245the need for job creation, capital investment, and economic
246development that will strengthen and diversify the community's
247economy. The future land use plan may designate areas for future
248planned development use involving combinations of types of uses
249for which special regulations may be necessary to ensure
250development in accord with the principles and standards of the
251comprehensive plan and this act. The future land use plan
252element shall include criteria to be used to achieve the
253compatibility of adjacent or closely proximate lands with
254military installations. In addition, for rural communities and
255counties designated as a rural area of critical economic concern
256pursuant to s. 288.0656, the amount of land designated for
257future planned industrial use shall be based upon surveys and
258studies that reflect the need for job creation, capital
259investment, and the necessity to strengthen and diversify the
260local economies, and shall not be limited solely by the
261projected population of the rural community. The future land use
262plan of a county may also designate areas for possible future
263municipal incorporation or new municipalities which shall not be
264limited by the projected population of the county. The land use
265maps or map series shall generally identify and depict historic
266district boundaries and shall designate historically significant
267properties meriting protection. For coastal counties, the future
268land use element must include, without limitation, regulatory
269incentives and criteria that encourage the preservation of
270recreational and commercial working waterfronts as defined in s.
271342.07. The future land use element must clearly identify the
272land use categories in which public schools are an allowable
273use. When delineating the land use categories in which public
274schools are an allowable use, a local government shall include
275in the categories sufficient land proximate to residential
276development to meet the projected needs for schools in
277coordination with public school boards and may establish
278differing criteria for schools of different type or size. Each
279local government shall include lands contiguous to existing
280school sites, to the maximum extent possible, within the land
281use categories in which public schools are an allowable use. The
282failure by a local government to comply with these school siting
283requirements will result in the prohibition of the local
284government's ability to amend the local comprehensive plan,
285except for plan amendments described in s. 163.3187(1)(b), until
286the school siting requirements are met. Amendments proposed by a
287local government for purposes of identifying the land use
288categories in which public schools are an allowable use are
289exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments
290contained in s. 163.3187. The future land use element shall
291include criteria that encourage the location of schools
292proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible and
293shall require that the local government seek to collocate public
294facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers,
295with schools to the extent possible and to encourage the use of
296elementary schools as focal points for neighborhoods. For
297schools serving predominantly rural counties, defined as a
298county with a population of 100,000 or fewer, an agricultural
299land use category shall be eligible for the location of public
300school facilities if the local comprehensive plan contains
301school siting criteria and the location is consistent with such
302criteria. Local governments required to update or amend their
303comprehensive plan to include criteria and address compatibility
304of adjacent or closely proximate lands with existing military
305installations in their future land use plan element shall
306transmit the update or amendment to the department by June 30,
3072006.
308     (h)1.  An intergovernmental coordination element showing
309relationships and stating principles and guidelines to be used
310in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted
311comprehensive plan with the plans of school boards, regional
312water supply authorities, and other units of local government
313providing services but not having regulatory authority over the
314use of land, with the comprehensive plans of adjacent
315municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region,
316with the state comprehensive plan and with the applicable
317regional water supply plan approved pursuant to s. 373.0361, as
318the case may require and as such adopted plans or plans in
319preparation may exist. This element of the local comprehensive
320plan shall demonstrate consideration of the particular effects
321of the local plan, when adopted, upon the development of
322adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the
323region, or upon the state comprehensive plan, as the case may
324require.
325     a.  The intergovernmental coordination element shall
326provide for procedures to identify and implement joint planning
327areas, especially for the purpose of annexation, municipal
328incorporation, and joint infrastructure service areas.
329     b.  The intergovernmental coordination element shall
330provide for recognition of campus master plans prepared pursuant
331to s. 1013.30.
332     c.  The intergovernmental coordination element shall may
333provide for a voluntary dispute resolution process as
334established pursuant to s. 186.509 for bringing to closure in a
335timely manner intergovernmental disputes. A local government may
336develop and use an alternative local dispute resolution process
337for this purpose.
338     2.  The intergovernmental coordination element shall
339further state principles and guidelines to be used in the
340accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan
341with the plans of school boards and other units of local
342government providing facilities and services but not having
343regulatory authority over the use of land. In addition, the
344intergovernmental coordination element shall describe joint
345processes for collaborative planning and decisionmaking on
346population projections and public school siting, the location
347and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency, and
348siting facilities with countywide significance, including
349locally unwanted land uses whose nature and identity are
350established in an agreement. Within 1 year of adopting their
351intergovernmental coordination elements, each county, all the
352municipalities within that county, the district school board,
353and any unit of local government service providers in that
354county shall establish by interlocal or other formal agreement
355executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described
356in this subparagraph consistent with their adopted
357intergovernmental coordination elements.
358     3.  To foster coordination between special districts and
359local general-purpose governments as local general-purpose
360governments implement local comprehensive plans, each
361independent special district must submit a public facilities
362report to the appropriate local government as required by s.
363189.415.
364     4.a.  Local governments must execute an interlocal
365agreement with the district school board, the county, and
366nonexempt municipalities pursuant to s. 163.31777. The local
367government shall amend the intergovernmental coordination
368element to provide that coordination between the local
369government and school board is pursuant to the agreement and
370shall state the obligations of the local government under the
371agreement.
372     b.  Plan amendments that comply with this subparagraph are
373exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1).
374     5.  The state land planning agency shall establish a
375schedule for phased completion and transmittal of plan
376amendments to implement subparagraphs 1., 2., and 3. from all
377jurisdictions so as to accomplish their adoption by December 31,
3781999. A local government may complete and transmit its plan
379amendments to carry out these provisions prior to the scheduled
380date established by the state land planning agency. The plan
381amendments are exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1).
382     6.  By January 1, 2004, any county having a population
383greater than 100,000, and the municipalities and special
384districts within that county, shall submit a report to the
385Department of Community Affairs which:
386     a.  Identifies all existing or proposed interlocal service
387delivery agreements regarding the following: education; sanitary
388sewer; public safety; solid waste; drainage; potable water;
389parks and recreation; and transportation facilities.
390     b.  Identifies any deficits or duplication in the provision
391of services within its jurisdiction, whether capital or
392operational. Upon request, the Department of Community Affairs
393shall provide technical assistance to the local governments in
394identifying deficits or duplication.
395     7.  Within 6 months after submission of the report, the
396Department of Community Affairs shall, through the appropriate
397regional planning council, coordinate a meeting of all local
398governments within the regional planning area to discuss the
399reports and potential strategies to remedy any identified
400deficiencies or duplications.
401     8.  Each local government shall update its
402intergovernmental coordination element based upon the findings
403in the report submitted pursuant to subparagraph 6. The report
404may be used as supporting data and analysis for the
405intergovernmental coordination element.
406     (12)  A public school facilities element adopted to
407implement a school concurrency program shall meet the
408requirements of this subsection. Each county and each
409municipality within the county, unless exempt or subject to a
410waiver, must adopt a public school facilities element that is
411consistent with those adopted by the other local governments
412within the county and enter the interlocal agreement pursuant to
413s. 163.31777.
414     (a)  The state land planning agency may provide a waiver to
415a county and to the municipalities within the county if the
416capacity rate for all schools within the school district is no
417greater than 100 percent and the projected 5-year capital outlay
418full-time equivalent student growth rate is less than 10
419percent. The state land planning agency may allow for a
420projected 5-year capital outlay full-time equivalent student
421growth rate to exceed 10 percent when the projected 10-year
422capital outlay full-time equivalent student enrollment is less
423than 2,000 students and the capacity rate for all schools within
424the school district in the tenth year will not exceed the 100-
425percent limitation. The state land planning agency may allow for
426a single school to exceed the 100-percent limitation if it can
427be demonstrated that the capacity rate for that single school is
428not greater than 105 percent. In making this determination, the
429state land planning agency shall consider the following
430criteria:
431     1.  Whether the exceedance is due to temporary
432circumstances;
433     2.  Whether the projected 5-year capital outlay full time
434equivalent student growth rate for the school district is
435approaching the 10-percent threshold;
436     3.  Whether one or more additional schools within the
437school district are at or approaching the 100-percent threshold;
438and
439     4.  The adequacy of the data and analysis submitted to
440support the waiver request.
441     (j)  If a local government fails Failure to adopt the
442public school facilities element, to enter into an approved
443interlocal agreement as required by subparagraph (6)(h)2. and s.
444163.31777, or to amend the comprehensive plan as necessary to
445implement school concurrency, according to the phased schedule,
446shall result in a local government being prohibited from
447adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan which increase
448residential density until the necessary amendments have been
449adopted and transmitted to the state land planning agency.
450     (k)  the state land planning agency may issue the school
451board a notice to the school board and the local government to
452show cause why sanctions should not be enforced for such failure
453to enter into an approved interlocal agreement as required by s.
454163.31777 or for failure to implement the provisions of this act
455relating to public school concurrency. The school board may be
456subject to sanctions imposed by the Administration Commission
457directing the Department of Education to withhold from the
458district school board an equivalent amount of funds for school
459construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.65, 1013.68,
4601013.70, and 1013.72. The local government may be subject to
461sanctions by the Administration Commission pursuant to s.
462163.3184(11).
463     Section 3.  Subsections (5) and (10), and paragraph (e) of
464subsection (13) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are
465amended to read:
466     163.3180  Concurrency.--
467     (5)(a)  The Legislature finds that under limited
468circumstances dealing with transportation facilities,
469countervailing planning and public policy goals may come into
470conflict with the requirement that adequate public
471transportation facilities and services be available concurrent
472with the impacts of such development. The Legislature further
473finds that often the unintended result of the concurrency
474requirement for transportation facilities is often the
475discouragement of urban infill development and redevelopment.
476Such unintended results directly conflict with the goals and
477policies of the state comprehensive plan and the intent of this
478part. The Legislature also finds that in urban centers
479transportation cannot be effectively managed and mobility cannot
480be improved solely through the expansion of roadway capacity,
481that the expansion of roadway capacity is not always physically
482or financially possible, and that a range of transportation
483alternatives are essential to satisfy mobility needs, reduce
484congestion, and achieve healthy, vibrant centers. Therefore,
485exceptions from the concurrency requirement for transportation
486facilities may be granted as provided by this subsection.
487     (b)1.  The following are transportation concurrency
488exception areas:
489     a.  A municipality that qualifies as a dense urban land
490area under s. 163.3164;
491     b.  An urban service area under s. 163.3164 that has been
492adopted into the local comprehensive plan and is located within
493a county that qualifies as a dense urban land area under s.
494163.3164, except a limited urban service area may not be
495included as an urban service area unless the parcel is defined
496as provided in s. 163.3164(33); and
497     c.  A county, including the municipalities located therein,
498which has a population of at least 900,000 and qualifies as a
499dense urban land area under s. 163.3164, but does not have an
500urban service area designated in the local comprehensive plan.
501     2.  A municipality that does not qualify as a dense urban
502land area pursuant to s. 163.3164 may designate in its local
503comprehensive plan the following areas as transportation
504concurrency exception areas:
505     a.  Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164;
506     b.  Community redevelopment areas as defined in s. 163.340;
507     c.  Downtown revitalization areas as defined in s.
508163.3164;
509     d.  Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or
510     e.  Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164 or areas
511within a designated urban service boundary under s.
512163.3177(14).
513     3.  A county that does not qualify as a dense urban land
514area pursuant to s. 163.3164 may designate in its local
515comprehensive plan the following areas as transportation
516concurrency exception areas:
517     a.  Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164;
518     b.  Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or
519     c.  Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164.
520     4.  A local government that has a transportation
521concurrency exception area designated pursuant to subparagraph
5221., subparagraph 2., or subparagraph 3. shall, within 2 years
523after the designated area becomes exempt, adopt into its local
524comprehensive plan land use and transportation strategies to
525support and fund mobility within the exception area, including
526alternative modes of transportation. Local governments are
527encouraged to adopt complementary land use and transportation
528strategies that reflect the region's shared vision for its
529future. If the state land planning agency finds insufficient
530cause for the failure to adopt into its comprehensive plan land
531use and transportation strategies to support and fund mobility
532within the designated exception area after 2 years, it shall
533submit the finding to the Administration Commission, which may
534impose any of the sanctions set forth in s. 163.3184(11)(a) and
535(b) against the local government.
536     5.  Transportation concurrency exception areas designated
537pursuant to subparagraph 1., subparagraph 2., or subparagraph 3.
538do not apply to designated transportation concurrency districts
539located within a county that has a population of at least 1.5
540million, has implemented and uses a transportation-related
541concurrency assessment to support alternative modes of
542transportation, including, but not limited to, mass transit, and
543does not levy transportation impact fees within the concurrency
544district.
545     6.  A local government that does not have a transportation
546concurrency exception area designated pursuant to subparagraph
5471., subparagraph 2., or subparagraph 3. may grant an exception
548from the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities
549if the proposed development is otherwise consistent with the
550adopted local government comprehensive plan and is a project
551that promotes public transportation or is located within an area
552designated in the comprehensive plan for:
553     a.1.  Urban infill development;
554     b.2.  Urban redevelopment;
555     c.3.  Downtown revitalization;
556     d.4.  Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or
557     e.5.  An urban service area specifically designated as a
558transportation concurrency exception area which includes lands
559appropriate for compact, contiguous urban development, which
560does not exceed the amount of land needed to accommodate the
561projected population growth at densities consistent with the
562adopted comprehensive plan within the 10-year planning period,
563and which is served or is planned to be served with public
564facilities and services as provided by the capital improvements
565element.
566     (c)  The Legislature also finds that developments located
567within urban infill, urban redevelopment, existing urban
568service, or downtown revitalization areas or areas designated as
569urban infill and redevelopment areas under s. 163.2517, which
570pose only special part-time demands on the transportation
571system, are exempt should be excepted from the concurrency
572requirement for transportation facilities. A special part-time
573demand is one that does not have more than 200 scheduled events
574during any calendar year and does not affect the 100 highest
575traffic volume hours.
576     (d)  Except for transportation concurrency exception areas
577designated pursuant to subparagraph (b)1., subparagraph (b)2.,
578or subparagraph (b)3., the following requirements apply: A local
579government shall establish guidelines in the comprehensive plan
580for granting the exceptions authorized in paragraphs (b) and (c)
581and subsections (7) and (15) which must be consistent with and
582support a comprehensive strategy adopted in the plan to promote
583the purpose of the exceptions.
584     1.(e)  The local government shall both adopt into the
585comprehensive plan and implement long-term strategies to support
586and fund mobility within the designated exception area,
587including alternative modes of transportation. The plan
588amendment must also demonstrate how strategies will support the
589purpose of the exception and how mobility within the designated
590exception area will be provided.
591     2.  In addition, The strategies must address urban design;
592appropriate land use mixes, including intensity and density; and
593network connectivity plans needed to promote urban infill,
594redevelopment, or downtown revitalization. The comprehensive
595plan amendment designating the concurrency exception area must
596be accompanied by data and analysis supporting the local
597government's determination of the boundaries of the
598transportation concurrency exception justifying the size of the
599area.
600     (e)(f)  Before designating Prior to the designation of a
601concurrency exception area pursuant to subparagraph (b)6., the
602state land planning agency and the Department of Transportation
603shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact
604that the proposed exception area is expected to have on the
605adopted level-of-service standards established for regional
606transportation facilities identified pursuant to s. 186.507,
607including the Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined
608in s. 339.64, and roadway facilities funded in accordance with
609s. 339.2819. Further, the local government shall provide a plan
610for the mitigation of, in consultation with the state land
611planning agency and the Department of Transportation, develop a
612plan to mitigate any impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System,
613including, if appropriate, access management, parallel reliever
614roads, transportation demand management, and other measures the
615development of a long-term concurrency management system
616pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). The exceptions
617may be available only within the specific geographic area of the
618jurisdiction designated in the plan. Pursuant to s. 163.3184,
619any affected person may challenge a plan amendment establishing
620these guidelines and the areas within which an exception could
621be granted.
622     (g)  Transportation concurrency exception areas existing
623prior to July 1, 2005, must, at a minimum, meet the provisions
624of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the time of the
625comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and
626appraisal report, whichever occurs last.
627     (f)  The designation of a transportation concurrency
628exception area does not limit a local government's home rule
629power to adopt ordinances or impose fees. This subsection does
630not affect any contract or agreement entered into or development
631order rendered before the creation of the transportation
632concurrency exception area except as provided in s.
633380.06(29)(e).
634     (g)  The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government
635Accountability shall submit to the President of the Senate and
636the Speaker of the House of Representatives by February 1, 2015,
637a report on transportation concurrency exception areas created
638pursuant to this subsection. At a minimum, the report shall
639address the methods that local governments have used to
640implement and fund transportation strategies to achieve the
641purposes of designated transportation concurrency exception
642areas, and the effects of the strategies on mobility,
643congestion, urban design, the density and intensity of land use
644mixes, and network connectivity plans used to promote urban
645infill, redevelopment, or downtown revitalization.
646     (10)  Except in transportation concurrency exception areas,
647with regard to roadway facilities on the Strategic Intermodal
648System designated in accordance with s. ss. 339.61, 339.62,
649339.63 , and 339.64, the Florida Intrastate Highway System as
650defined in s. 338.001, and roadway facilities funded in
651accordance with s. 339.2819, local governments shall adopt the
652level-of-service standard established by the Department of
653Transportation by rule. However, if the Office of Tourism,
654Trade, and Economic Development concurs in writing with the
655local government that the proposed development is for a
656qualified job creation project under s. 288.0656 or s. 403.973,
657the affected local government, after consulting with the
658Department of Transportation, may provide for a waiver of
659transportation concurrency for the project. For all other roads
660on the State Highway System, local governments shall establish
661an adequate level-of-service standard that need not be
662consistent with any level-of-service standard established by the
663Department of Transportation. In establishing adequate level-of-
664service standards for any arterial roads, or collector roads as
665appropriate, which traverse multiple jurisdictions, local
666governments shall consider compatibility with the roadway
667facility's adopted level-of-service standards in adjacent
668jurisdictions. Each local government within a county shall use a
669professionally accepted methodology for measuring impacts on
670transportation facilities for the purposes of implementing its
671concurrency management system. Counties are encouraged to
672coordinate with adjacent counties, and local governments within
673a county are encouraged to coordinate, for the purpose of using
674common methodologies for measuring impacts on transportation
675facilities for the purpose of implementing their concurrency
676management systems.
677     (13)  School concurrency shall be established on a
678districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the
679district and all portions of the district, whether located in a
680municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the
681public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12).
682The application of school concurrency to development shall be
683based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local
684governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph
685(f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency
686the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal
687agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163.3184(7)
688and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the
689following:
690     (e)  Availability standard.--Consistent with the public
691welfare, a local government may not deny an application for site
692plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent
693for a development or phase of a development authorizing
694residential development for failure to achieve and maintain the
695level-of-service standard for public school capacity in a local
696school concurrency management system where adequate school
697facilities will be in place or under actual construction within
6983 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan
699approval, or the functional equivalent. School concurrency is
700satisfied if the developer executes a legally binding commitment
701to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public
702school facilities to be created by actual development of the
703property, including, but not limited to, the options described
704in subparagraph 1. Options for proportionate-share mitigation of
705impacts on public school facilities must be established in the
706public school facilities element and the interlocal agreement
707pursuant to s. 163.31777.
708     1.  Appropriate mitigation options include the contribution
709of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land
710acquisition or construction of a public school facility; the
711construction of a charter school that complies with the
712requirements of s. 1002.33(18)(f); or the creation of mitigation
713banking based on the construction of a public school facility in
714exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Such options
715must include execution by the applicant and the local government
716of a development agreement that constitutes a legally binding
717commitment to pay proportionate-share mitigation for the
718additional residential units approved by the local government in
719a development order and actually developed on the property,
720taking into account residential density allowed on the property
721prior to the plan amendment that increased the overall
722residential density. The district school board must be a party
723to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into such a
724development agreement, the local government may require the
725landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement upon
726its expiration.
727     2.  If the education facilities plan and the public
728educational facilities element authorize a contribution of land;
729the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; or
730the construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a
731portion thereof; or the construction of a charter school that
732complies with the requirements of s. 1002.33(18)(f), as
733proportionate-share mitigation, the local government shall
734credit such a contribution, construction, expansion, or payment
735toward any other impact fee or exaction imposed by local
736ordinance for the same need, on a dollar-for-dollar basis at
737fair market value.
738     3.  Any proportionate-share mitigation must be directed by
739the school board toward a school capacity improvement identified
740in a financially feasible 5-year district work plan that
741satisfies the demands created by the development in accordance
742with a binding developer's agreement.
743     4.  If a development is precluded from commencing because
744there is inadequate classroom capacity to mitigate the impacts
745of the development, the development may nevertheless commence if
746there are accelerated facilities in an approved capital
747improvement element scheduled for construction in year four or
748later of such plan which, when built, will mitigate the proposed
749development, or if such accelerated facilities will be in the
750next annual update of the capital facilities element, the
751developer enters into a binding, financially guaranteed
752agreement with the school district to construct an accelerated
753facility within the first 3 years of an approved capital
754improvement plan, and the cost of the school facility is equal
755to or greater than the development's proportionate share. When
756the completed school facility is conveyed to the school
757district, the developer shall receive impact fee credits usable
758within the zone where the facility is constructed or any
759attendance zone contiguous with or adjacent to the zone where
760the facility is constructed.
761     5.  This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local
762government to deny a development permit or its functional
763equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except
764as provided in this part.
765     Section 4.  Paragraph (d) of subsection (3) of section
766163.31801, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
767     163.31801  Impact fees; short title; intent; definitions;
768ordinances levying impact fees.--
769     (3)  An impact fee adopted by ordinance of a county or
770municipality or by resolution of a special district must, at
771minimum:
772     (d)  Require that notice be provided no less than 90 days
773before the effective date of an ordinance or resolution imposing
774a new or increased amended impact fee. A county or municipality
775is not required to wait 90 days to decrease, suspend, or
776eliminate an impact fee.
777     Section 5.  Section 163.31802, Florida Statutes, is created
778to read:
779     163.31802  Prohibited standards for security devices.--A
780county, municipality, or other entity of local government may
781not adopt or maintain in effect an ordinance or rule that
782establishes standards for security devices that require a lawful
783business to expend funds to enhance the services or functions
784provided by local government unless specifically provided by
785general law.
786     Section 6.  Subsection (2) of section 163.3184, Florida
787Statutes, is amended, and paragraph (e) is added to subsection
788(3) of that section, to read:
789     163.3184  Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or
790plan amendment.--
791     (2)  COORDINATION.--Each comprehensive plan or plan
792amendment proposed to be adopted pursuant to this part shall be
793transmitted, adopted, and reviewed in the manner prescribed in
794this section. The state land planning agency shall have
795responsibility for plan review, coordination, and the
796preparation and transmission of comments, pursuant to this
797section, to the local governing body responsible for the
798comprehensive plan. The state land planning agency shall
799maintain a single file concerning any proposed or adopted plan
800amendment submitted by a local government for any review under
801this section. Copies of all correspondence, papers, notes,
802memoranda, and other documents received or generated by the
803state land planning agency must be placed in the appropriate
804file. Paper copies of all electronic mail correspondence must be
805placed in the file. The file and its contents must be available
806for public inspection and copying as provided in chapter 119. A
807local government may elect to use the alternative state review
808process in s. 163.32465 for any amendment or amendment package
809not expressly excluded by s. 163.32465(3). The local government
810must establish in its transmittal hearing required pursuant to
811this subsection that it elects to undergo the alternative state
812review process. If the local government has not specifically
813approved the alternative state review process for the amendment
814or amendment package, the amendment or amendment package shall
815be reviewed subject to the applicable process established in
816this section or s. 163.3187.
817     (3)  LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSED PLAN OR
818AMENDMENT.--
819     (e)  At the request of an applicant, a local government
820shall consider an application for zoning changes that would be
821required to properly enact the provisions of any proposed plan
822amendment transmitted pursuant to this subsection. Zoning
823changes approved by the local government are contingent upon the
824state land planning agency issuing a notice of intent to find
825that the comprehensive plan or plan amendment transmitted is in
826compliance with this act.
827     Section 7.  Paragraphs (b) and (f) of subsection (1) of
828section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, are amended, and paragraph
829(q) is added to that subsection, to read:
830     163.3187  Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.--
831     (1)  Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to
832this part may be made not more than two times during any
833calendar year, except:
834     (b)  Any local government comprehensive plan amendments
835directly related to a proposed development of regional impact,
836including changes which have been determined to be substantial
837deviations and including Florida Quality Developments pursuant
838to s. 380.061, may be initiated by a local planning agency and
839considered by the local governing body at the same time as the
840application for development approval using the procedures
841provided for local plan amendment in this section and applicable
842local ordinances, without regard to statutory or local ordinance
843limits on the frequency of consideration of amendments to the
844local comprehensive plan. Nothing in this subsection shall be
845deemed to require favorable consideration of a plan amendment
846solely because it is related to a development of regional
847impact.
848     (f)  Any comprehensive plan amendment that changes the
849schedule in The capital improvements element annual update
850required in s. 163.3177(3)(b)1., and any amendments directly
851related to the schedule, may be made once in a calendar year on
852a date different from the two times provided in this subsection
853when necessary to coincide with the adoption of the local
854government's budget and capital improvements program.
855     (q)  Any local government plan amendment to designate an
856urban service area, which exists in the local government's
857comprehensive plan as of July 1, 2009, as a transportation
858concurrency exception area under s. 163.3180(5)(b)2. or 3. and
859an area exempt from the development-of-regional-impact process
860under s. 380.06(29).
861     Section 8.  Subsection (1) of section 163.3245, Florida
862Statutes, is amended to read:
863     163.3245  Optional sector plans.--
864     (1)  In recognition of the benefits of conceptual long-
865range planning for the buildout of an area, and detailed
866planning for specific areas, as a demonstration project, the
867requirements of s. 380.06 may be addressed as identified by this
868section for up to 10 five local governments or combinations of
869local governments which adopt into the comprehensive plan an
870optional sector plan in accordance with this section. This
871section is intended to further the intent of s. 163.3177(11),
872which supports innovative and flexible planning and development
873strategies, and the purposes of this part, and part I of chapter
874380, and to avoid duplication of effort in terms of the level of
875data and analysis required for a development of regional impact,
876while ensuring the adequate mitigation of impacts to applicable
877regional resources and facilities, including those within the
878jurisdiction of other local governments, as would otherwise be
879provided. Optional sector plans are intended for substantial
880geographic areas including at least 5,000 acres of one or more
881local governmental jurisdictions and are to emphasize urban form
882and protection of regionally significant resources and
883facilities. The state land planning agency may approve optional
884sector plans of less than 5,000 acres based on local
885circumstances if it is determined that the plan would further
886the purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380. Preparation
887of an optional sector plan is authorized by agreement between
888the state land planning agency and the applicable local
889governments under s. 163.3171(4). An optional sector plan may be
890adopted through one or more comprehensive plan amendments under
891s. 163.3184. However, an optional sector plan may not be
892authorized in an area of critical state concern.
893     Section 9.  Subsections (12), (13), and (14) of section
894163.3246, Florida Statutes, are amended, and a new subsection
895(12) is added to that section, to read:
896     163.3246  Local government comprehensive planning
897certification program.--
898     (12)  Notwithstanding subsections (2), (4), (5), (6), and
899(7), any county that has a population greater than 1 million and
900an average of at least 1,000 residents per square mile and
901municipalities that have a population greater than 100,000 and
902an average of at least 1,000 residents per square mile shall be
903considered certified. The population and density needed to
904identify local governments that qualify for certification under
905this subsection shall be determined annually by the Office of
906Economic and Demographic Research using the most recent land
907area data from the decennial census conducted by the Bureau of
908the Census of the United States Department of Commerce and the
909latest available population estimates determined pursuant to s.
910186.901. The office shall annually submit to the state land
911planning agency a list of jurisdictions that meet the total
912population and density criteria necessary to qualify for
913certification. For each local government identified by the
914Office of Economic and Demographic Research as meeting the
915certification criteria in this subsection, the state land
916planning agency shall provide a written notice of certification
917to the local government, which shall be considered final agency
918action subject to challenge under s. 120.569. The notice of
919certification shall include a requirement that the local
920government submit a monitoring report at least every 2 years
921according to the schedule provided in the written notice. The
922monitoring report shall include the number of amendments to the
923comprehensive plan adopted by the local government, the number
924of plan amendments challenged by an affected person, and the
925disposition of those challenges.
926     (13)(12)  A local government's certification shall be
927reviewed by the local government and the department as part of
928the evaluation and appraisal process pursuant to s. 163.3191.
929Within 1 year after the deadline for the local government to
930update its comprehensive plan based on the evaluation and
931appraisal report, the department shall renew or revoke the
932certification. The local government's failure to adopt a timely
933evaluation and appraisal report, failure to adopt an evaluation
934and appraisal report found to be sufficient, or failure to
935timely adopt amendments based on an evaluation and appraisal
936report found to be in compliance by the department shall be
937cause for revoking the certification agreement. The department's
938decision to renew or revoke shall be considered agency action
939subject to challenge under s. 120.569.
940     (14)(13)  The department shall, by October July 1 of each
941odd-numbered year, submit to the Governor, the President of the
942Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives a report
943listing certified local governments, evaluating the
944effectiveness of the certification, and including any
945recommendations for legislative actions.
946     (14)  The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government
947Accountability shall prepare a report evaluating the
948certification program, which shall be submitted to the Governor,
949the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of
950Representatives by December 1, 2007.
951     Section 10.  Section 163.32465, Florida Statutes, is
952amended to read:
953     163.32465  Alternative state review process for of local
954comprehensive plan amendments plans in urban areas.--
955     (1)  LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.--
956     (a)  The Legislature finds that local governments in this
957state have a wide diversity of resources, conditions, abilities,
958and needs. The Legislature also finds that the needs and
959resources of urban areas are different from those of rural areas
960and that different planning and growth management approaches,
961strategies, and techniques are required in urban areas. The
962state role in overseeing growth management should reflect this
963diversity and should vary based on local government conditions,
964capabilities, and needs, and the extent and type of development.
965Therefore Thus, the Legislature recognizes and finds that
966reduced state oversight of local comprehensive planning is
967justified for some local governments and for certain types of
968development in urban areas.
969     (b)  The Legislature finds and declares that the diversity
970among local governments of this state state's urban areas
971require recognition that the a reduced level of state oversight
972should reflect the because of their high degree of urbanization
973and the planning capabilities and resources available to of many
974of their local governments. An alternative state review process
975that is adequate to protect issues of regional or statewide
976importance should be reflective of local governments' needs and
977capabilities created for appropriate local governments in these
978areas. Further, the Legislature finds that development,
979including urban infill and redevelopment, should be encouraged
980in these urban areas. The Legislature finds that an alternative
981process for amending local comprehensive plans in these areas
982should be established with an objective of streamlining the
983process and recognizing local responsibility and accountability.
984     (c)  The Legislature finds a pilot program will be
985beneficial in evaluating an alternative, expedited plan
986amendment adoption and review process. Pilot local governments
987shall represent highly developed counties and the municipalities
988within these counties and highly populated municipalities.
989     (2)  ALTERNATIVE STATE REVIEW PROCESS PILOT PROGRAM.--A
990local government may elect pursuant to s. 163.3184 to use the
991alternative state review process for any amendment or amendment
992package not expressly excluded by subsection (3). Pinellas and
993Broward Counties, and the municipalities within these counties,
994and Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa, and Hialeah shall follow an
995alternative state review process provided in this section.
996Municipalities within the pilot counties may elect, by super
997majority vote of the governing body, not to participate in the
998pilot program.
999     (3)  PROCESS FOR ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
1000UNDER THE PILOT PROGRAM.--
1001     (a)  Plan amendments adopted under this section by the
1002pilot program jurisdictions shall follow the alternate,
1003expedited process in subsections (4) and (5), except as set
1004forth in paragraphs (b)-(d) (b)-(e) of this subsection.
1005     (b)  An amendment to a comprehensive plan is not eligible
1006for the alternative state review process and shall be reviewed
1007subject to the applicable processes established in ss. 163.3184
1008and 163.3187 if the amendment:
1009     1.  Designates or implements a rural land stewardship area
1010pursuant to s. 163.3177(11)(d);
1011     2.  Designates or implements an optional sector plan;
1012     3.  Applies within an area of critical state concern or a
1013coastal high-hazard area;
1014     4.  Incorporates into a municipal comprehensive plan lands
1015that have been annexed;
1016     5.  Updates a comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and
1017appraisal report;
1018     6.  Implements new plans for newly incorporated
1019municipalities;
1020     7.  Implements statutory requirements that were not
1021previously incorporated into the comprehensive plan; or
1022     8.  Changes the boundary of a jurisdiction's urban service
1023area as defined in s. 163.3164. Amendments that qualify as
1024small-scale development amendments may continue to be adopted by
1025the pilot program jurisdictions pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(c)
1026and (3).
1027     (c)  Plan amendments adopted under this section that
1028propose a rural land stewardship area pursuant to s.
1029163.3177(11)(d); propose an optional sector plan; update a
1030comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and appraisal report;
1031implement new statutory requirements; or new plans for newly
1032incorporated municipalities are subject to state review as set
1033forth in s. 163.3184.
1034     (d)  Pilot program jurisdictions shall be subject to the
1035frequency and timing requirements for plan amendments set forth
1036in ss. 163.3187 and 163.3191, except where otherwise stated in
1037this section.
1038     (d)(e)  The mediation and expedited hearing provisions in
1039s. 163.3189(3) apply to all plan amendments adopted pursuant to
1040the alternative state review process by the pilot program
1041jurisdictions.
1042     (4)  INITIAL HEARING ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR
1043PILOT PROGRAM.--
1044     (a)  The local government shall hold its first public
1045hearing on a comprehensive plan amendment on a weekday at least
10467 days after the day the first advertisement is published
1047pursuant to the requirements of chapter 125 or chapter 166. Upon
1048an affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the members
1049of the governing body present at the hearing, the local
1050government shall immediately transmit the amendment or
1051amendments and appropriate supporting data and analyses to the
1052state land planning agency; the appropriate regional planning
1053council and water management district; the Department of
1054Environmental Protection; the Department of State; the
1055Department of Transportation; in the case of municipal plans, to
1056the appropriate county; the Fish and Wildlife Conservation
1057Commission; the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services;
1058and in the case of amendments that include or impact the public
1059school facilities element, the Office of Educational Facilities
1060of the Commissioner of Education. The local governing body shall
1061also transmit a copy of the amendments and supporting data and
1062analyses to any other local government or governmental agency
1063that has filed a written request with the governing body.
1064     (b)  The agencies and local governments specified in
1065paragraph (a) may provide comments regarding the amendment or
1066amendments to the local government. The regional planning
1067council review and comment shall be limited to effects on
1068regional resources or facilities identified in the strategic
1069regional policy plan and extrajurisdictional impacts that would
1070be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of the affected
1071local government. A regional planning council shall not review
1072and comment on a proposed comprehensive plan amendment prepared
1073by such council unless the plan amendment has been changed by
1074the local government subsequent to the preparation of the plan
1075amendment by the regional planning council. County comments on
1076municipal comprehensive plan amendments shall be primarily in
1077the context of the relationship and effect of the proposed plan
1078amendments on the county plan. Municipal comments on county plan
1079amendments shall be primarily in the context of the relationship
1080and effect of the amendments on the municipal plan. State agency
1081comments shall clearly identify as objections any issues that,
1082if not resolved, may result in an agency request that the state
1083land planning agency challenge the plan amendment and may
1084include technical guidance on issues of agency jurisdiction as
1085it relates to the requirements of this part. Such comments shall
1086clearly identify issues that, if not resolved, may result in an
1087agency challenge to the plan amendment. For the purposes of this
1088pilot program, Agencies shall are encouraged to focus potential
1089challenges on issues of regional or statewide importance.
1090Agencies and local governments must transmit their comments, if
1091issued, to the affected local government within 30 days after
1092the state land planning agency notifies the affected local
1093government that the plan amendment package is complete. The
1094state land planning agency shall notify the local government of
1095any deficiencies within 5 working days after receipt of an
1096amendment package. Any comments from the agencies and local
1097governments shall also be transmitted to the state land planning
1098agency such that they are received by the local government not
1099later than thirty days from the date on which the agency or
1100government received the amendment or amendments.
1101     (5)  ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PILOT
1102AREAS.--
1103     (a)  The local government shall hold its second public
1104hearing, which shall be a hearing on whether to adopt one or
1105more comprehensive plan amendments, on a weekday at least 5 days
1106after the day the second advertisement is published pursuant to
1107the requirements of chapter 125 or chapter 166. Adoption of
1108comprehensive plan amendments must be by ordinance and requires
1109an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the
1110governing body present at the second hearing. The hearing must
1111be conducted and the amendment must be adopted, adopted with
1112changes, or not adopted within 120 days after the agency
1113comments are received pursuant to paragraph (4)(b). If a local
1114government fails to adopt the plan amendment within the
1115timeframe set forth in this paragraph, the plan amendment is
1116deemed abandoned and the plan amendment may not be considered
1117until the next available amendment cycle pursuant to s.
1118163.3187. However, if the applicant or local government, prior
1119to the expiration of such timeframe, notifies the state land
1120planning agency that the applicant or local government is
1121proceeding in good faith to adopt the plan amendment, the state
1122land planning agency shall grant one or more extensions not to
1123exceed a total of 360 days after the issuance of the agency
1124report or comments. During the pendency of any such extension,
1125the applicant or local government shall provide to the state
1126land planning agency a status report every 90 days identifying
1127the items continuing to be addressed and the manner in which the
1128items are being addressed.
1129     (b)  All comprehensive plan amendments adopted by the
1130governing body along with the supporting data and analysis shall
1131be transmitted within 10 days of the second public hearing to
1132the state land planning agency and any other agency or local
1133government that provided timely comments under paragraph (4)(b).
1134     (6)  ADMINISTRATIVE CHALLENGES TO PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR PILOT
1135PROGRAM.--
1136     (a)  Any "affected person" as defined in s. 163.3184(1)(a)
1137may file a petition with the Division of Administrative Hearings
1138pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57, with a copy served on the
1139affected local government, to request a formal hearing to
1140challenge whether the amendments are "in compliance" as defined
1141in s. 163.3184(1)(b). This petition must be filed with the
1142Division within 30 days after the local government adopts the
1143amendment. The state land planning agency may intervene in a
1144proceeding instituted by an affected person.
1145     (b)  The state land planning agency may file a petition
1146with the Division of Administrative Hearings pursuant to ss.
1147120.569 and 120.57, with a copy served on the affected local
1148government, to request a formal hearing. This petition must be
1149filed with the Division within 30 days after the state land
1150planning agency notifies the local government that the plan
1151amendment package is complete. For purposes of this section, an
1152amendment shall be deemed complete if it contains a full,
1153executed copy of the adoption ordinance or ordinances; in the
1154case of a text amendment, a full copy of the amended language in
1155legislative format with new words inserted in the text
1156underlined, and words to be deleted lined through with hyphens;
1157in the case of a future land use map amendment, a copy of the
1158future land use map clearly depicting the parcel, its existing
1159future land use designation, and its adopted designation; and a
1160copy of any data and analyses the local government deems
1161appropriate. The state land planning agency shall notify the
1162local government of any deficiencies within 5 working days of
1163receipt of an amendment package.
1164     (c)  The state land planning agency's challenge shall be
1165limited to those objections issues raised in the comments
1166provided by the reviewing agencies pursuant to paragraph (4)(b).
1167The state land planning agency may challenge a plan amendment
1168that has substantially changed from the version on which the
1169agencies provided comments. For the purposes of the alternative
1170state review process this pilot program, the Legislature
1171strongly encourages the state land planning agency shall to
1172focus any challenge on issues of regional or statewide
1173importance.
1174     (d)  An administrative law judge shall hold a hearing in
1175the affected local jurisdiction. In a proceeding involving an
1176affected person as defined in s. 163.3184(1)(a), the local
1177government's determination of compliance is fairly debatable. In
1178a proceeding in which the state land planning agency challenges
1179the local government's determination that the amendment is "in
1180compliance," the local government's determination is presumed to
1181be correct and shall be sustained unless it is shown by a
1182preponderance of the evidence that the amendment is not "in
1183compliance."
1184     (e)  If the administrative law judge recommends that the
1185amendment be found not in compliance, the judge shall submit the
1186recommended order to the Administration Commission for final
1187agency action. The Administration Commission shall enter a final
1188order within 45 days after its receipt of the recommended order.
1189     (f)  If the administrative law judge recommends that the
1190amendment be found in compliance, the judge shall submit the
1191recommended order to the state land planning agency.
1192     1.  If the state land planning agency determines that the
1193plan amendment should be found not in compliance, the agency
1194shall refer, within 30 days of receipt of the recommended order,
1195the recommended order and its determination to the
1196Administration Commission for final agency action. If the
1197commission determines that the amendment is not in compliance,
1198it may sanction the local government as set forth in s.
1199163.3184(11).
1200     2.  If the state land planning agency determines that the
1201plan amendment should be found in compliance, the agency shall
1202enter its final order not later than 30 days from receipt of the
1203recommended order.
1204     (g)  An amendment adopted under the expedited provisions of
1205this section shall not become effective until the completion of
1206the time period available to the state land planning agency for
1207administrative challenge under paragraph (a) 31 days after
1208adoption. If timely challenged, an amendment shall not become
1209effective until the state land planning agency or the
1210Administration Commission enters a final order determining that
1211the adopted amendment is to be in compliance.
1212     (h)  Parties to a proceeding under this section may enter
1213into compliance agreements using the process in s. 163.3184(16).
1214Any remedial amendment adopted pursuant to a settlement
1215agreement shall be provided to the agencies and governments
1216listed in paragraph (4)(a).
1217     (7)  APPLICABILITY OF PILOT PROGRAM IN CERTAIN LOCAL
1218GOVERNMENTS.--Local governments and specific areas that have
1219been designated for alternate review process pursuant to ss.
1220163.3246 and 163.3184(17) and (18) are not subject to this
1221section.
1222     (7)(8)  RULEMAKING AUTHORITY FOR PILOT PROGRAM.--The state
1223land planning agency may adopt procedural Agencies shall not
1224promulgate rules to administer implement this section pilot
1225program.
1226     (8)(9)  REPORT.--The state land planning agency may, from
1227time to time, report to Office of Program Policy Analysis and
1228Government Accountability shall submit to the Governor, the
1229President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of
1230Representatives on the implementation of this section, including
1231any recommendations for legislative action by December 1, 2008,
1232a report and recommendations for implementing a statewide
1233program that addresses the legislative findings in subsection
1234(1) in areas that meet urban criteria. The Office of Program
1235Policy Analysis and Government Accountability in consultation
1236with the state land planning agency shall develop the report and
1237recommendations with input from other state and regional
1238agencies, local governments, and interest groups. Additionally,
1239the office shall review local and state actions and
1240correspondence relating to the pilot program to identify issues
1241of process and substance in recommending changes to the pilot
1242program. At a minimum, the report and recommendations shall
1243include the following:
1244     (a)  Identification of local governments beyond those
1245participating in the pilot program that should be subject to the
1246alternative expedited state review process. The report may
1247recommend that pilot program local governments may no longer be
1248appropriate for such alternative review process.
1249     (b)  Changes to the alternative expedited state review
1250process for local comprehensive plan amendments identified in
1251the pilot program.
1252     (c)  Criteria for determining issues of regional or
1253statewide importance that are to be protected in the alternative
1254state review process.
1255     (d)  In preparing the report and recommendations, the
1256Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability
1257shall consult with the state land planning agency, the
1258Department of Transportation, the Department of Environmental
1259Protection, and the regional planning agencies in identifying
1260highly developed local governments to participate in the
1261alternative expedited state review process. The Office of
1262Program Policy Analysis and Governmental Accountability shall
1263also solicit citizen input in the potentially affected areas and
1264consult with the affected local governments and stakeholder
1265groups.
1266     Section 11.  Section 171.091, Florida Statutes, is amended
1267to read:
1268     171.091  Recording.--Any change in the municipal boundaries
1269through annexation or contraction shall revise the charter
1270boundary article and shall be filed as a revision of the charter
1271with the Department of State within 30 days. A copy of such
1272revision must be submitted to the Office of Economic and
1273Demographic Research along with a statement specifying the
1274population census effect and the affected land area.
1275     Section 12.  Section 186.509, Florida Statutes, is amended
1276to read:
1277     186.509  Dispute resolution process.--Each regional
1278planning council shall establish by rule a dispute resolution
1279process to reconcile differences on planning and growth
1280management issues between local governments, regional agencies,
1281and private interests. The dispute resolution process shall,
1282within a reasonable set of timeframes, provide for: voluntary
1283meetings among the disputing parties; if those meetings fail to
1284resolve the dispute, initiation of mandatory voluntary mediation
1285or a similar process; if that process fails, initiation of
1286arbitration or administrative or judicial action, where
1287appropriate. The council shall not utilize the dispute
1288resolution process to address disputes involving environmental
1289permits or other regulatory matters unless requested to do so by
1290the parties. The resolution of any issue through the dispute
1291resolution process shall not alter any person's right to a
1292judicial determination of any issue if that person is entitled
1293to such a determination under statutory or common law.
1294     Section 13.  Subsection (29) is added to section 380.06,
1295Florida Statutes, to read:
1296     380.06  Developments of regional impact.--
1297     (29)  EXEMPTIONS FOR DENSE URBAN LAND AREAS.--
1298     (a)  The following are exempt from this section:
1299     1.  Any proposed development in a municipality that
1300qualifies as a dense urban land area as defined in s. 163.3164;
1301     2.  Any proposed development within a county that qualifies
1302as a dense urban land area as defined in s. 163.3164 and that is
1303located within an urban service area defined in s. 163.3164
1304which has been adopted into the comprehensive plan; or
1305     3.  Any proposed development within a county, including the
1306municipalities located therein, which has a population of at
1307least 900,000, which qualifies as a dense urban land area under
1308s. 163.3164, but which does not have an urban service area
1309designated in the comprehensive plan.
1310     (b)  If a municipality that does not qualify as a dense
1311urban land area pursuant to s. 163.3164 designates any of the
1312following areas in its comprehensive plan, any proposed
1313development within the designated area is exempt from the
1314development-of-regional-impact process:
1315     1.  Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164;
1316     2.  Community redevelopment areas as defined in s. 163.340;
1317     3.  Downtown revitalization areas as defined in s.
1318163.3164;
1319     4.  Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or
1320     5.  Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164 or areas
1321within a designated urban service boundary under s.
1322163.3177(14).
1323     (c)  If a county that does not qualify as a dense urban
1324land area pursuant to s. 163.3164 designates any of the
1325following areas in its comprehensive plan, any proposed
1326development within the designated area is exempt from the
1327development-of-regional-impact process:
1328     1.  Urban infill as defined in s. 163.3164;
1329     2.  Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517; or
1330     3.  Urban service areas as defined in s. 163.3164.
1331     (d)  A development that is located partially outside an
1332area that is exempt from the development-of-regional-impact
1333program must undergo development-of-regional-impact review
1334pursuant to this section.
1335     (e)  In an area that is exempt under paragraphs (a)-(c),
1336any previously approved development-of-regional-impact
1337development orders shall continue to be effective, but the
1338developer has the option to be governed by s. 380.115(1). A
1339pending application for development approval shall be governed
1340by s. 380.115(2). A development that has a pending application
1341for a comprehensive plan amendment and that elects not to
1342continue development-of-regional-impact review is exempt from
1343the limitation on plan amendments set forth in s. 163.3187(1)
1344for the year following the effective date of the exemption.
1345     (f)  Local governments must submit by mail a development
1346order to the state land planning agency for projects that would
1347be larger than 120 percent of any applicable development-of
1348regional-impact threshold and would require development-of-
1349regional-impact review but for the exemption from the program
1350under paragraph (a). For such development orders, the state land
1351planning agency may appeal the development order pursuant to s.
1352380.07 for inconsistency with the comprehensive plan adopted
1353under chapter 163.
1354     (g)  If a local government that qualifies as a dense urban
1355land area under this subsection is subsequently found to be
1356ineligible for designation as a dense urban land area, any
1357development located within that area which has a complete,
1358pending application for authorization to commence development
1359may maintain the exemption if the developer is continuing the
1360application process in good faith or the development is
1361approved.
1362     (h)  This subsection does not limit or modify the rights of
1363any person to complete any development that has been authorized
1364as a development of regional impact pursuant to this chapter.
1365     (i)  This subsection does not apply to areas:
1366     1.  Within the boundary of any area of critical state
1367concern designated pursuant to s. 380.05;
1368     2.  Within the boundary of the Wekiva Study Area as
1369described in s. 369.316; or
1370     3.  Within 2 miles of the boundary of the Everglades
1371Protection Area as described in s. 373.4592(2).
1372     Section 14.  (1)(a)  The Legislature finds that the
1373existing transportation concurrency system has not adequately
1374addressed the transportation needs of this state in an
1375effective, predictable, and equitable manner and is not
1376producing a sustainable transportation system for the state. The
1377Legislature finds that the current system is complex, lacks
1378uniformity among jurisdictions, is too focused on roadways to
1379the detriment of desired land use patterns and transportation
1380alternatives, and frequently prevents the attainment of
1381important growth management goals.
1382     (b)  The Legislature determines that the state shall
1383evaluate and, as deemed feasible, implement a different adequate
1384public facility requirement for transportation which uses a
1385mobility fee. The mobility fee shall be designed to provide for
1386mobility needs, ensure that development provides mitigation for
1387its impacts on the transportation system in approximate
1388proportionality to those impacts, fairly distribute financial
1389burdens, and promote compact, mixed-use, and energy-efficient
1390development.
1391     (2)  The Legislature directs the state land planning agency
1392and the Department of Transportation, both of which are
1393currently performing independent mobility fee studies, to
1394coordinate and use those studies in developing a methodology for
1395a mobility fee system as follows:
1396     (a)  The uniform mobility fee methodology for statewide
1397application is intended to replace existing transportation
1398concurrency management systems adopted and implemented by local
1399governments. The studies shall focus upon developing a
1400methodology that includes:
1401     1.  A determination of the amount, distribution, and timing
1402of vehicular and people-miles traveled by applying
1403professionally accepted standards and practices in the
1404disciplines of land use and transportation planning, including
1405requirements of constitutional and statutory law.
1406     2.  The development of an equitable mobility fee that
1407provides funding for future mobility needs whereby new
1408development mitigates in approximate proportionality its impacts
1409on the transportation system, yet is not delayed or held
1410accountable for system backlogs or failures that are not
1411directly attributable to the proposed development.
1412     3.  The replacement of transportation-related financial
1413feasibility obligations, proportionate-share contributions for
1414developments of regional impacts, proportionate fair-share
1415contributions, and locally adopted transportation impact fees
1416with the mobility fee, so that a single transportation fee may
1417be applied uniformly on a statewide basis by application of the
1418mobility fee formula developed by these studies.
1419     4.  Applicability of the mobility fee on a statewide or
1420more limited geographic basis, accounting for special
1421requirements arising from implementation for urban, suburban,
1422and rural areas, including recommendations for an equitable
1423implementation in these areas.
1424     5.  The feasibility of developer contributions of land for
1425right-of-way or developer-funded improvements to the
1426transportation network to be recognized as credits against the
1427mobility fee by entering into mutually acceptable agreements
1428reached with the impacted jurisdiction.
1429     6.  An equitable methodology for distribution of the
1430mobility fee proceeds among those jurisdictions responsible for
1431construction and maintenance of the impacted roadways, so that
1432the collected mobility fees are used for improvements to the
1433overall transportation network of the impacted jurisdiction.
1434     (b)  The state land planning agency and the Department of
1435Transportation shall develop and submit to the President of the
1436Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, no later
1437than July 15, 2009, an initial interim joint report on the
1438status of the mobility fee methodology study, no later than
1439October 1, 2009, a second interim joint report on the status of
1440the mobility fee methodology study, and no later than December
14411, 2009, a final joint report on the mobility fee methodology
1442study, complete with recommended legislation and a plan to
1443implement the mobility fee as a replacement for the existing
1444transportation concurrency management systems adopted and
1445implemented by local governments. The final joint report shall
1446also contain, but is not limited to, an economic analysis of
1447implementation of the mobility fee, activities necessary to
1448implement the fee, and potential costs and benefits at the state
1449and local levels and to the private sector.
1450     Section 15.  (1)  Any construction permit, development
1451order, building permit, or other land use application that has
1452been issued or rendered by a state or local governmental entity
1453pursuant to chapter 125, chapter 161, chapter 163, chapter 166,
1454chapter 253, part IV of chapter 373, chapter 378, chapter 379,
1455chapter 380, chapter 381, chapter 403, or chapter 553, Florida
1456Statutes, or pursuant to a local ordinance, and that has an
1457expiration date prior on or after the effective date of this act
1458through October 1, 2011, is extended and renewed for a period of
14592 years beyond the previously identified expiration date. Any
1460new construction permit, development order, building permit, or
1461other land use application rendered or issued after the
1462effective date of this act may not be extended or renewed except
1463as requested by the applicant and subject to a decision by the
1464state or local governmental entity issuing or rendering the
1465permit, development order, or land use decision.
1466     (2)  The 2-year extension also applies to the phase,
1467commencement, and build-out date for any development order or
1468local land use approval, including a certificate of concurrency
1469or developer agreement. The completion date for any required
1470mitigation associated with any phase of construction is
1471similarly extended so that such mitigation takes place within
1472the phase originally intended.
1473     (3)  Nothing in this act shall be deemed to extend or
1474purport to extend any permit or approval issued by the Federal
1475Government or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any
1476permit or approval by whatever authority issued of which the
1477duration of effect or the date or terms of its expiration are
1478specified or determined by or pursuant to law or regulation of
1479the Federal Government or any of its agencies or
1480instrumentalities. Nothing in this act shall be construed or
1481implemented in such a way as to modify any requirement of law
1482that is necessary to retain federal delegation to, or assumption
1483by, the state of the authority to implement a federal law or
1484program. Nothing in this act shall be deemed to extend or
1485purport to extend any permit or approval for the consumptive use
1486of water within Water-Use Caution Areas as permitted under
1487chapter 373 and chapter 403, Florida Statutes.
1488     (4)  Nothing in this act shall impair the authority of a
1489county or municipality to require the owner of a property, which
1490has received the benefit of an extension of time pursuant to
1491this act or pursuant to action of the municipality or county, to
1492maintain and secure the property in a safe and sanitary
1493condition in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances.
1494     (5)  The permitholder shall notify the permitting agencies
1495of the intent to use this extension.
1496     Section 16.  The Legislature finds that this act fulfills
1497an important state interest.
1498     Section 17.  This act shall take effect upon becoming a
1499law.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.