1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act for the relief of Angela Isham by the City of Ft. |
3 | Lauderdale; providing for an appropriation to compensate |
4 | Angela Isham, individually, and as co-personal |
5 | representative of the Estate of David Isham, deceased, for |
6 | the death of Mr. Isham which was due to the negligence of |
7 | employees of the City of Ft. Lauderdale; providing for |
8 | attorney's fees and costs; providing a limitation on the |
9 | payment of fees and costs; providing an effective date. |
10 |
|
11 | WHEREAS, on November 15, 2001, David Isham, the owner of a |
12 | landscaping business and a pest control business, was driving |
13 | along N.W. 13th Street in Ft. Lauderdale, and |
14 | WHEREAS, in an unmarked police vehicle, police officers |
15 | from the Ft. Lauderdale Police Department were engaged in an |
16 | undercover narcotics surveillance and were in pursuit of a |
17 | suspect who was driving a 1994 BMW, and |
18 | WHEREAS, while being chased by the police officers, the |
19 | suspect collided with Mr. Isham's vehicle and caused Mr. Isham's |
20 | vehicle to flip upside down, catch on fire, and trap Mr. Isham |
21 | inside, and |
22 | WHEREAS, as a result of the collision, Mr. Isham died and |
23 | left behind his grieving widow, Angela Isham, and |
24 | WHEREAS, Mrs. Isham filed a lawsuit against the City of Ft. |
25 | Lauderdale, and a week-long jury trial ensued in which the jury |
26 | found that the police officers, acting in an official capacity |
27 | as employees of the City of Ft. Lauderdale, were negligent with |
28 | regard to the vehicle chase that ultimately resulted in the |
29 | death of Mr. Isham and that their actions were the legal cause |
30 | of injury and death to Mr. Isham, and |
31 | WHEREAS, the jury returned a verdict on February 1, 2008, |
32 | in favor of Mrs. Isham, and final judgment was entered in the |
33 | amount of $1,435,219.25, plus postjudgment interest at the |
34 | statutory rate of 11 percent per annum, and |
35 | WHEREAS, the City of Ft. Lauderdale has paid only $200,000 |
36 | of the judgment and has not negotiated any settlement of the |
37 | remaining judgment, and |
38 | WHEREAS, the City of Ft. Lauderdale has approximately |
39 | $2,023,594.52 in its Risk Management Fund which is available to |
40 | pay claims or judgments such as the one presented by Mrs. Isham, |
41 | but it has not done so to date, and |
42 | WHEREAS, the balance of the net jury verdict in the amount |
43 | of $1,235,219.25 is sought through the submission of a claim |
44 | bill to the Legislature, NOW, THEREFORE, |
45 |
|
46 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
47 |
|
48 | Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act |
49 | are found and declared to be true. |
50 | Section 2. The City of Ft. Lauderdale is authorized and |
51 | directed to appropriate from funds of the city not otherwise |
52 | appropriated and to draw a warrant in the amount of |
53 | $1,235,219.25, plus postjudgment interest at the statutory rate |
54 | of 11 percent per annum, payable to Angela Isham, individually, |
55 | and as co-personal representative of the Estate of David Isham, |
56 | deceased. |
57 | Section 3. The amount paid by the City of Ft. Lauderdale |
58 | pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the amount awarded |
59 | under this act are intended to provide the sole compensation for |
60 | all present and future claims arising out of the factual |
61 | situation described in this act which resulted in the death of |
62 | David Isham. The total amount paid for attorney's fees, lobbying |
63 | fees, costs, and other similar expenses relating to this claim |
64 | may not exceed 25 percent of the amount awarded under this act. |
65 | Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |